The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985-06-18 Joint Meeting AGENDA � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION NEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 18 , 1985 AT 7 : 30 P.M. , COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � I . CALL TO ORDER � � �� II. INVOCATION: Commissioner Gerald Norman � ; III . INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS � i � s = A. City Council to consider a resolution approving an � � issue by the Grapevine Industrial Development ;' Corporation of an issue of Grapevine Industrial � Development Corporation Industrial Development Revenue � Bonds (Ampad Corporation Project) Series 1985; and � approving the resolution of the issuer authorizing the � bonds, the issuance of the bonds authorized thereby, � the plan of financing approved thereby, and the bond � documents . t � �V. JOINT PU�L,IC HEARINGS �: � � A. Cit� Cct�.r_cil and P��_r:nir_c, � Zcr�inc� Comm_i�•;.i.cr. tc cci;-- � duct a public hearing relative to Zoning Applicatior. � Z85-21 submitted by Mr. Terry Williams . � � � B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- � duct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application � Z85-22 submitted by the City of Grapevine (City Parcel � No. 164 - north end of Lucas Drive) . �: S � C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- �' duct a public hearing relative to the replat of Block 5 � of the Brookside Addition. : � f V. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS � t A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Civic � Center, 311 Main Street, to consider other published agenda items. � � � B. City Council to recess briefly before considering � further business. �' k i i IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S . , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMTfI,�',SION I�lEEZ'ING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 14`I`H Dr1i U�' �:tP�,L, l.9$5 A�!' s : l.�C� �' .D:. � E: � ��L.==_�.�� '��.��.�.��. �� City SecrEtar �- � € � �. �` i :� �7 ;3 � � AGENDA ,� CiTY OF GRRFEVINE, TEX�S REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEE;TING � TUESDAY, JUNE 18, 19$5 AT 7: 3C� F,h:. � COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET ;i i ,;� � VI . CITIZENS REQtTESTS < .I � VZI, PliBL�C HEARING � � � City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to a proposed street improveaments on Park Boulevard and take j � any necessary action, � � VIIT . OLD BUSINESS � � � �A. City Council to discuss the Park Place drainage praject and take any necessary action. � �,€ B, City Council to hear a presentation �'rom Freese & � Nichols relative to right-of-way alternatives for the ' proposed Ba11 Street improvements and take any � nece�sary action. � � � IX, NEW BUSINESS � A. City Council to consider the minutes of the meetings of May 21 & June 4 , 1985 . �: B. City Council to consider an Application For Solid Waste Disposal Permit submitted by J. P. Waste Management of � Lewisville. � �, C. City Council to consider the bid award for the 1984-85 Community Develapment Block Grant Program £or construc-- _ tivn of water Iin�s in certain areas o� the Ci.fi�y. 4 D . City Councii to consi�er a resclution vacatinc- an� � a�andcning a drair�ure easement in �hE N�ulberry S�uare Addition. X. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. City Ccuncil to consider the recammendation of �.he Planning & Zoning Commission relative �a Zoning Appli- � cation Z85-21 (Williams) and a subsequent ardinance, if � applicable. � � B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Cammission relative �o Zoning Appli- catian Z85-22 (Parcel No. 164) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. C. City Gounci2 to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zaning Application Z85-11 (Transwestern) and a subs�guent f ordinance, if applicable. F D. City Cauncil to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative ta Zoning x Application Z85-20 {Devon} and a subsequent ordinance, # if applicable. E. CS.ty Council to consider the recommendation of the F'l�nning & Zoning Cr�mmi�sion relative to the replat o£ Block 5 of the Brookside Addition. F. City Cauncil to consider the recamirendation of the Planning & Zening Cammission relative �o the replat of Lots 38 & 39 , Block 7 af the Creekwood West Addition, Phase III . ;,, ; Y � � �.. �' � g � G. City Council to consider the recommendation of the ti' Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final pla�. � of the Timberpoint Addition. � � H. City Council to consider the recommendation af the �lannzng & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of Shadow Glen, Phase I. T . City Council to consider the recommendation of the ' Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat af the Grapevine xigh Schoal Addition. � J. City Council to consider the recommendation of the � Planning & Zoning Cammission relative �o the final. plat 3 af the Dove Creek Addition, Phase ITI. � ! � � K. City Council to consider �he recommendation of �he � Planning & Zaning Commi�sian rel.ative to the final piat ; of the Fax Addition. � L. City Council to consider �.he recommendation of the � Planning & Zonixig Commission relative ta the prelimi- j nary �lat of Black 2 of the I,ew�s a . B�ker 1-�c�.�,�.f_icn . � � M . City Council tG COTl.f'.alGEY` d re.cluticr instructir;c the � City 5taff ta take a11 necessary actian fcr cansi�.era- I tic�n af proposed amendmen�s ta Con�preher�sive Zoning ' �, Ordinanc� Na. 82-73 . i XI . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS � XII , ADJOURNMENT � IN ACCORDANGE WITH ARTICLE 625G-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227, ACT� QF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE REGULAR CTTY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND PQSTED ON THZS THE 14TH DAY QF JUNE, 19$5 AT 3;40 P.M. (,�.Lt�tti.. City ecretary : ;� � � � � � , � AGENDA ' � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS � REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING `� TUESDAY, JUNE 18 , 1985 AT 7 : 30 P.M. ' 3 � CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN STREET � � � i VI . OLD BUSINESS ' � A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zonin A li- :� g PP ; . cation Z85-11 (Transwestern) and make a recommendation i ; to the City Council. � I � B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- a cation Z85-20 (Devon) and make a recommendation to the �� City Council. ; ; � � i � VII . NEW BUSINESS � I A; I A. Planning & Zoning Commission tc cansider Zcning Appli- � cation Z85-21 (Williams) and make a recommendation to � e the City Ceuncil. 9 e ; �B. Plannir�g & Zoning Com,mission to consider Zoning Appli- , cation Z85-22 (Parcel No. 164) and make a recom- i mendation to the City Council. � � C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat of � Block 5 of the Brookside Addition and make a � recommendation to the City Council . [ D. Planning & Zoning Ccmmission to consider the replat of Lots 38 & 39 , Block 7 of the Creekwood West Addition, � Phase III and make a recommendation to the City Council. � � E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat � of the Timberpoint Addition and make a recommendation � to the City Council. # F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat � of Shadow Glen, Phase I and make a recommendation to � the City Council. � � G. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat � of the Grapevine High School Addition and make a � recommendation to the City Council. � � � H. Flanning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat � c,f the Dove Creek Addition, Phase III arG make a reccm- F mendation to the City Ccuncil. � z & I . Planninc� & Zcning Commission tc ccnsicier t.he fi.i:ai plat � of the Fox Addition and make a recommendation tc the ; City Council. � � i J. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- � nary plat of Block 2 of the Lewis T. Baker Addition and �. make a recommendation to the City Council. ;' � K. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider proposed $ amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73 � and make a recommendation to the City Council relative � to a date for public hearing. € VIII . CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES � a � Meeting of January 24, 1985 � fr E j �' � i � g ';� � � � IX. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION � � i � X. ADJOURNMENT i ;� � 1 � � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED � � BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- � j SION, THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ; � AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 14TH DAY OF � � � JUNE, 1985 AT 3 :00 P .N. � � � � � � ; � � � i � � Cit Secretary i � � � � i � � � � i � � � � � � t `t E � ; � � v � � � � � � � � � s: � a a; q t t � i € i s 1 € k f: t': � I 4 C � i �. A `t F � � � STATE OF TEXAS COLIN'I.'Y OF TAR�2ANT CITY OF C'�RAPE'VINE The City Council and Plann.ing & Zoning Ccmmissian of the City of Grapevine, � Texas met in Regtzlar Joint Ses�ion on this the 18th day of June, 1985 at 7:30 � p.m. in the Council Chambers, 413 Main 5treet, with the following m�rs af the City Council present to wit: Tcan Powers Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayar Pra Tem Marion Brekken Cauncil M�nbex Jim Glynn Council Me�ib�r Sharran Speneer Council M�nber � C. Shane Wilbanks Council N1�nber � E constitu�ing a quorum, with Council M�aer R�an Dyer absent, with the following � � m�nk,7ers of the Planning & Zoning Camtission: � Rick A�,kins Chairman ' Ron Cook Vice Chairman � Harlen Joyce M�ember Gerald Nornlan M�nber � P�95Y Enghalm N�e.mber � Danald A. Florence Memb�r � constituting a quonun, with Me�nber Gatherine Martin absent, wi�h the following � m�rs af the Ci�y Staff: � � { James L. Hancock City Mar�.ger z � Kelvin Knau� Assistan� City Manager ` Jahn F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney t :� Kenneth Dippel City Attorney Representative � Karen 5pann City Secretary ; l � CAI� TO (7RDER � Mayor Pc�nrers called the meeting to arder» INVOCATION jThe Invacation was delivered by Ccx�m.issianer Gerald Nazn�an. a I RES{)LLTI'T4N, INDUSTRIAL' DEV��.�O�?[T:�3`.E' Bt�IDS, �'AI} PR:Q�C:T � I � The first order of business wa� for the City Cauncil to consider a resolution i approving an issue by the Grapevine Industrial Develo�ent Carporation of an ' issue of Grapevine Industrial Develogr�nt Corporation Industrial Develognent iRevenue Bonds fAmpad Corpora�tion Project) Series 1985; and approving the � resalutir�n o� the issuer authorizing the }�nds, the is�uance of the bonds authorized thereby, t.he plan of financing approved thereby, and the bond ' doctmnen�.s. � :I� Assistant Ci�.y Manager ICelvin Knauf advised a $1 million issue was proposed � for Ameriean Pad and Paper C'c�spany locat� on South Main 5txeet in Grapevine. i The funds would be used �.o purchase equigrrent far manufactura.ng paper based i products, ar�d the project w�uld provide 14 additional jobs. � The caption af the proposed re�olution was presented by the Ci�.y Secretaxy. There being little discussion, a motion was made by Council M�r Brekken � that the resolution be adopted. 'I`he mc�tian was seconded by Council Mfember , Glynn and prevailed by the follawing vote: ; Ayes . Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wil.banks � Nays . None � Absent: Dyer i '� � i i 3 06/18/85 RESOLUTION NO. 85-31 j A RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUAN(:E BY � GRAPEVINE INDUSTRII�L DEVIIAPN�IT CORPORATION OF AN ISSUE OF GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL DEVEI�OPMENT CORPORATION IlWUSTRIAL DE'�IETAPNIEIVT REVENUE BONDS � ',' (AA4PAD CORPORATION PROJFiGT) SERIFS 1985; � � APPIZOVING THE B(�IDS, T� ISSUANCE OF THE ' BONDS AUTHORIZID Tf�REBY AND Tf� PLAN OF � FINANCING APPFiOVID Tf�REBY AND � BOND � � ; DOCUMENTS i PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z85-21, MR. TERRY WILLIAMS The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Conmission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z85-21 su�mitted by Mr. Terry Williams. � The lic hearin was declared o � p� g pen by Mayor Pcxaers. � r Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised the property in question was I` located on the east side of Pool Road adjacent to the Wirx�mill Estates � subdivision ar�d contained approximately 1.3 acres. The current zoning was � "R-20" Single-Family Dwelling District and the requested zoning was "R-7.5" � Single-Family Dwelling District. � Mr. James Wicker, land planner, 1601 E. Lamar in Arlington, spoke on behalf of � the applicant. He noted the property was located at Pool Road and High Meadaw � Drive and briefly reviewed the history of the williams tract. Three single- family h�s caere proposed for this site on lots averaging about 17,000 square feet. ' � Questions and comnents fran the Commission and Council ensued, during which � the proposed develognent in general was addressed at length. „ � Mayor Pawers then invited those present to speak either for or against the � requested zoning. Mr. Terry Williams, 3217 Pool Road, was the awner of the k subject tract and offered conments concerning the develognent and reasons for � a zoning change request. The following persons then spoke in opposition to = the application: � € _ 1. Mr. Burl Gilliam 6. Mrs. Flo Gibson � 3311 Marsh Lane 3444 Blueberry Lane � � ;: 2. Mr. Rr�n Banks 7. Mrs. Joan Rice � 3402 Marsh Lane 2900 Pool Road Colleyville, Texas i 3. Mr. Justin Joseph � 3501 Rolling Hills Lane 8. Mr. Jerry Brc�m = 3433 Wintergreen 4. Mrs. Dorothy Dougherty 3452 Blueberry Lane 9. Mr. Robert L. Sands, Jr. � 3341 Marsh Lane 5. Mr. Tun Becker � 3421 Barberry Road 10. Mr. Ken Woodson � 3332 Marsh Lane k: Mr. Randy Hodnett of Fort Worth supported the project arLd cam�nted relative to � the type of construction of the proposed houses. Mr. David Spalding, 2706 p: 7.tain Creek Cove, co-developer of Winc�iill Estates, ca�anented relative to the � existing develo�anent and dealings with Mr. Williams concerning the subject � tsact. �' e City Secretary Karen Spann acknawledged receipt of a petition containing 114 � � signatures of persons opposed to the "R-7.5" zoning request. The follawing F letter was then read into the record: � � � � t € 7 1' � E � ��/ � F � 06118185 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ . June 15, 1985 , Dear Sirs: As tax paying residents of the Grapevine Colleyville I. S. D. w� are � vitally interested in the developm�nt of land in southwes� � Grapevine. � ,,, We have watched the accelerated pace of develog��t in this area over the last several years, and are cancerned about the increasing burden af higher density housing on city plans and services as well as its irnpact on the people currently living in this area. 4 � We wduld Iike to recard our objections to dawn zoning of this land, ' indeed �a any extension of high density housing here. � , � a Sincerely, � � � Herbert E. & Joan F. Losey � 27Q4 Poal Road ; � � -------------____--------------------------------------------------------------__ ' There being no further carr�nts, a rrr�tion to close their portion of the public � hearing was offered by Comn.issicaner Joyce. The rru�tian was secanded by � � Ccnmission Nlember Engholm and prevailed by the follaw5.ng vote: � 7 Ayes : Atkins, Cook, Joyce, Norma�cY, Engholm, & Florence � Nays . None � Absent: Mar�.in i { Mayor Pro Tem Ware also of�ered a motion to close the public hearing. Cauncil � � �r Brekken seconded the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: ' , x � � Ayes . Powers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wil.k�anks ' 3 Nays : None i Absent: Dyer � PUBLIC HEARING, Z(�NING APPLICATION Z85-22, MR, JOE WRTQ�T PARCEL NO. 164 1 The ne� order af business was for the City Council and Planning & Zonirig j Ccx�rtlission t:o conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z85-22 � subrnitted by the City of Grapevine {City Parcel Na. 16� - nar�h end of Lucas Drive) . i � Mayor Pc�wers decl.ared open the public hearing and called an Public Works '' Director Jim Bacldaker to review the application. ; Mr. Baddaker advised Z85-22 involved a 35± acre tract of land identified ', ; during the City-instigated rezoning as Parcel No. 164. This �ract is located a on the far north end of Lucas Drive and is currently under a voluntary ; moratoritiun to e�ire June 30. �isting zoning is "R-3" Multi-Fami.ly with advertisement for consideration of all residential uses. � Mr. Joe Wright, c�nmer of subject property, then requested a postponement af � the hearing until August pendi.ng receipt of additional �.nformation. He also agreed to an e�ctension of the maratoriwn. � Mrs. Sandy Landry, 1040 I�+l�adc7wbrook, representing the Meadawbroak Homec�mer's � Association, respectfially requested the case be heard and a decision made. � The City Council and Planna.ng & Zoning Canmissian then deliberated the meri�s � af the request for postpon�ment, after which C�missioner Joyce made a motian to postpone Zoning Application Z85-22 until August 20, 19$5. The mr�tian was � secanded by Cc�mi�sioner Cook and prevailed by the fallowing vate: i � Aye� : Atkins, Cook, Joyce, Nonnari, & Florence Nays . Enqholm j Absent: r9artin i ; {3} � � $ 06/18/85 a Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made mc�tion to accept the reco�ndatit�n of the � '� PLanning & Zoning Cca�missian and postpone the hearing until the n�eting af � August 20. Cauncil �r Brekken seconded the motion, which prevailed by the ; ensuing vote: Ayes . Pawersf Ware, Brekken, & Wilbariks G Nays : Glynn & 5pencer x Absent: Dyer � � PUBLIC �ARING, R�PLAT, BROOKSIDE ADT?ITIQN, BLUCK 5 The next order of business was far the City Council and Planning & Zoning C�mtission to conduct a public �aring relative ta the replat of Block 5 of the Brookside Addition. The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Powers. Mr. Baddaker advised the proposed rep�at is located on the east side of Park � Boulevard directly north of the �.xistang office park at the corner af North�est Highway. The replat w�uld divlde one lat inta four Iot� for "PC}" Pro�essional Office develo�an�acat. No one was present on behalf af the applican�.. Follawing brief ca�nents frc�n the Cc�mis�ion and Council M�sr�bers, Mayor Pawers asked if there were guests present who wished ta speak. Mr. Ed Yatsko, 2025 Willow Caurt, requested clarificatian about the proposed developnen�.. � A motion to close the Gcnmission's portion of the public hearing was then made by Ca�.issioner Nonnari ar�l secc�nded by Cc��nissioner Florence. `I'he mation prevailed by the ensuing vr�te: Ayes . Atkins, Cook, Joyce, Norma�l, Engholm, & Florence � Nays . None � Absent: Mar�in � Council Mfemb�:.r Wilbanks a2so offered a mation to close the pubZic hearing, The nx>tion was seconded by Mayar Pro Team Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilkk�nks �, Nays . None � Absent: Dyer � REC�SS & REOONVIIVE It was then announced by Mayor Pawers �.hat a recess of the City Council and 4: Planning & Zoning Ccs�t�ission w�uld be taken. Additional business c�uld be considered separately by each bady, with the City Council to reconvene in the � Council Chambers, and the Plaruzing & Zoning Corrmission �.o reconvene at the � Civic Center, 311 Main Street. �' k Upon reconveni.ng m�entarily, aIl s��e�rbers af the City Council were present ` with the exception of Council Mc�nber Dyer. �' � F PUBLIC HEARING, PROPOSED I�EFT T[JRN CUTS ON PARK BOUI�IRD � � � The next order af business was for the City Council ta conduct a public � hearing relative to proposeci stree�. improvements on Park Boulevard and take � any necessary actian. �: � Mayar Pawers declared the publ.ic heari.ng open and called on Public Warks � Director Jun Baddaker �.o review the proposed street improvements. Those present vuere advised that the nc>rthbcaund side of Park Boulevard was � propased to be resurfaced fran Northwest Highway ta Dove Road. This also � included construction of a center median. Mr. Baddaker review�ed the design requir�nents for constxuction of left turn lanes as well as the praposed median cuts and changes in left turn access. A brief period of questic�ns and c�nts from the City Council ensued, after which Mayor Pawer� invited �iers of �he audience to offer c,ronm�nts. The �ollawing persons then addressed the Council: � � �' � t�y � � 06118185 � � ' 1. Mr. Joel Barks, representing the First Presbyy�eerian Church 4�-iites Chapel RQad ' Roanoke, Texa� ' 2. Mr. A. L. McAlister, representing the Church of Christ 1555 Count�y Forest Court 3, Mrs. Terry Davis 1831 Big Bend �, Mr. Rick Eakins, Jr. 832 Kings Canyon 5. Mrs. Beth E�iba.nks 814 Glacier Lane 6. Mr. Paul Sanders 101Q Kings Canyon Court N�st of the c�nts �pressed �re of concern for only �ro autlets praposed fran the Park Place subdivision (a�. Big Bend and Redwood Trail) . The closing of access at Shenandaah was addressed, and representatives fr�n bc��h churches requested theis left turn access be re�a.ined. Mr. M�Alister fran the Church ' of Christ also offered an alternative, which wnuld allow left turn access �o both McPherson Drive and the church property isee attached EXhibit "A") . Couut�rrcil discussion ensued, during which they addressed the e�isting design af Park Boulevard and its original construction. The site problem at Shenandoah and passihle installa�ion of a traf�ic light wer� also nated, , A mation to close the public hearing was then offered by Council M�nber Glynn and secanded by Council Memher Brekken. The motion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays . None Absent: Dyer It was noted that all public testimony had not been received, and Council N3�rk�er Glynn made a mation to reopen the public hearing. Cauncil M�nb�r Spencer secon�.ed the mcatian, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Pa�rs, Ware, Brek}cen, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks ; Nays . None , Absent: Dyer ' The follt�wing letter was then read inta the record: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- June 15, 19$5 Dep�nt of Public Works City af Grapevine P.O. Box 729 Grapeviner Te.xas 76051 I will be unable to attend the public hearing on June 18 regardir�g fihe praposed left turn lanes on Park Boul�vard. I request that my suggestians be made a matter of record for cansideration by the decision-making body. Z recannend that all e�i.sting breaks in the Park Boulevard rnedian strip be retained except the one just north of Big Bend whi�h goes ; nawhere« Anattrer break is needed at the narth ent.ry �o ' Woradlake--the residents have �ut theis awn as othei�wa.se those living on the north side of the apari�nent� must drive through the center of the ccmplex to get to theas parking. R�moving the break at Shenandaah will seriously inconvenience nearby ' residents. While this is a blind spot, I believe that a left turn wc�uld be preferred �o U turns on Park and additional traf�ic an residential streets. (5} � _ o6118I85 t The breaks should be widened ta allcxa for the fact that streets do ` nat crass Park Boulevard at the same paint--less than goad plar7ning by someane. ? Where practical, I suggest that all breaks in the median be de�igned with left turn lanes. This may not be passible ta the fact that � Park Boulevard's two lanes are nat on the sat� level--again s� �; poor planning in the past. � While breaks in the median are expensive and left turn lanes even �re so, I feel that th� e.xpense is justified in view of the � anticipated greater traffic on Park Boulevard bcaaund to resul� fram additional residential construction axid the new s�pping center at Northwest Highway. } Sincerely, f Robert G. Maxfield 2027 Heatherbrook Drive ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- � Council M�r Glynn offered a motion to close the public hearing. The � motion, seconded by Council Mesr�ber 5gencer, prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer� & Wilbanks Nays . None Absent: Dyer Brief Council deli.beration ensued, which mainly addressed the pc�ssibility and cos� of future signalization at Park Baulevard and Shenandoah. A mation was then ma.de by Council M�nber Glynn instructing the City Staff �.o ' proceed with the proposed improve�rFen�.s ta Park Boulevard including the following revisions: (1) to accept the Church of Christ alternative for le£t turn access; {2) �o leave a median cut �or access at the Presbyterian Church, but no left �urn lane; and (3) leave the intersection at Shen�idoah open and plan far a future traffic signal at that locatian. The motion was secanded by Mayar Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Pcnaers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays . None Absent: Dyer DISCCtTSSION, PARK PI.�ACE DRAINAGE PRQ3F.�C'I' The ne�. iteqn before the City Council was to discuss the Park Place drainage project and take any necessary actian. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker revi� the drainage problem in the Park Place subdivision and the groposed solution, which involvec� rew�rking several intersections, canstructing additianal inlets and piping, and enlarging the flume between Lot� 3 & 4 af Block 4 on Redwc�od Trail. 4ther streets to be incl�led in the project area are Yellc�wstone Drive, Shex�andoah Avenue, and Glacier Lane. Council discussion ensued, during which they addressed the drainage area, grade lc�ring of certain streets, and the cost of the praject which was estimated to be $1I7,000. Follcxaing this del.iberation, Council Me�iber Spencer offered a matian that a public hearing relative to this mat�.er be se� for Tuesday, July 2, 1985. The mat�.on was seconded by Council N�.�er Wilbanks and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Pa�ers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbar�ks Nays . None Absent: Dyer ' (6) 0611818� DISCIJSSIQN, RIGHT-0E-WAY ALTEI2rT1�TNES, BALL STREE'T IlKPROVF�!LENTS The next order of bu�iness wa� for the City Council to hear a presentation frcam Freese & Nichals relative to rightrof�aay alternatives far the groposed Ball Street impravem�Yts and take any necessary action. � Mr. John Jones and Mr. David Gillespie, representing the City's consulting engineers, presented a review of the altern.atives for obtaini.ng right-of-way for the widening of Ball Street frcan College Street to Wall S�.reet. The original proposal, presented in public hearing on Ma.y 7, 1985, centered the roadway between the fronts of �he �is�ang residences. The twa alternatives proposed. the w�est curb line along the existing west edge of paving, thus taki.ng more right-of-way frcan the east side af the street, with Alternative No. 2 requiring the acquisition of twc� houses along the east side of Ba11 Stz�eet. ' A lengthy Council discussion ensued. Tapics of concern included the efiect of the alternatives on the existing park area, trees to be r�aved, and the existing residences an bo�h sides af the street. The possibility of staking ' the alternatives for an-sit.e Gauncil revi�w was also nated. The City Council did then recess brie�ly. Upan reconven.ing in tl�.e Council Q�ambers, Ci�.y At�orney John &ayle had joined the meeting. All �rs of the City Council w�re present, with the exception af Council M�nber Dyer. Following additianal deliberation af the matter, Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to approve the ariginal propasal ohtaining right-of-way frcen both sides of the roadway. Council Mgnb�r Glynn affered a second �o the mo�.ion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Powers, Ware, Brekken, G�ynn, & Wil.t�s Nays . Sp�ncer Absent: Dyer PT�,NNING & Zf�NING CONY�iISSIQN RECONY�IF.�7DATION, Z85-21, WILLIAMS The next ite,�n cansidered by the City Council was the recam�nda�,ion of the Planning & Zaning Ccxrcnission relative to Zaning Application Z85-21 (Williams} and a subsequent ardin.ance, if applicable. ' Planning & Zoning Ccsrmission Chairman Rick Atkins reparted the Cann�.ssian reec.�nended denial of this zoning request frcxn "R-20" to "R-7.5" on Pool Road. The vote was to 6 to 0. It was noted that aver 20� af the surrounding property was represented by owners in opposi�ion to the zoning reques�., thus requiring a three-c�uarter vat.e af the City Council to averride t.he recc�mendatioz� af the Cc�nmissian. The cap�ion of the proposed ordinance was presented by the City Secretary. There being little discussion, a motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council �r 5pencer �.ca accept the recc�rendation of the Planning & Zaning Camnission and deny Zoning Application Z85-21. The mation prevailed by the follcnving vote: Ayes . Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays . None Absent: Dyer PI�NNING & ZONING CON�LISSSON RE,CyONll`�'.,[QDATION, $5-11, TF2�i1�TSWESTERN "' The next order of business was far the Ci�.y Council ta consider the recc�mendation of the Planning & Zaning Commission relative to Zoning Applicatian Z85-11 {Transw�stern.} aru�, a. subseguent ordinance, if applicable. The tract in question is locat+ed north of Bethel Road be�een State Highways 26 and 121 North and is currently zoned "PID" Planned Industrial Develogn�it District. The zoning requester�, "HGO" Hotel/Corporate Office, was considered in public hearing on March 19, 1985 and had been t�bled pending receipt of additional inforntiatian. C.cxtm.ission Chairman Atkins reported the Planning & Zoning Comn:ission unanimously reccmnended denial of the applicationr with the apglicant t,a be ' allcx�aed to resuY.Ynit a similar case without waiting the required 12 mpnths. i7) � o�11s/s5 E i ; � ` Council discussion followed, during which it was noted that the applicant had requested further postpan�nt af the matter pending receipt and review of the � City's water and sewer study update. # . � � A mr�tion was then made by Council Nl�mb�r Spencer to fi.able Zoning Applicatian ' Z85-11 until the utility study update was available. The matter was ta go � back into joint public hearing with the Planning & Zaning Camnission a� that time. Mayor Fro Tem Ware seconded the z�tionr which prevailed by the erisuing � vote: ` t Ayes . Pcx,vers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wil.x,�nks � �� Nays . None >- Absent; Dyer � PLANNING & ZC7NING COMMISSION RE�C�,�lDATION, Z$5-2Q, DEITQN T?EU�[APMEN`I` C�NIPANY � £ The nex� order of business was for the City Council to consider the E; recar�menz�ation af the Planning & Zaning Commissian relative to 2oning � Application Z85-20 (Devon) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. s t At �,heir mee�.ing of May 21, 1985, the City Council and Planning & Zoning { Ccarmission had canduc�ed a public hearing relative to Z85-20, a request for = rezaning fram "R-20" 5ingle-Family �o "R 7.5" Single-Family. The property in question is approximately 25 acres located on the north side of Hall�ohnsan � Road and west of Farr Road. The Planning & Zoning Cc�nmissian had approved withdrawal o� the applica�ion, after which the City Council rejected that � recc�crosnK�ation and su�.rnitted the ma�ter back to �,he Cc�missic�n for additional delikaeration. Conmissian Chairm�z Rick Atkins now reported their unan�srious rec�ndation far denial of the reguested zoning, A three-c�uarter vate of the City Council w�u1d be necessary to ovexride the � Flanning & Zaning Contrti.ssian due to the requirernent af the 20 percent rule, City Secretary Itaren Spann then read the caption af the proposed ordinance. There being little discussion, a mQtion was affered by Council M�r Wilbanks and seconded by Council M�er Spencer to accept the rec�xidation of the Planning & Zoning Ccxrmissian and deny Zoning Application Z85-20. The motian prevailed by the follawing vate: Ayes . Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays . None Absent: Dyer PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REC�DATION, REPLAT, I�OT 5 BROOKSIDE ADDITION The next item before the Gity Council was ta consider the reccx�ndation af the Flanning & Zoning Cc�mission relative ta the replat af 81ock 5 af the Brookside Addition. Planning & Zoning CcxTmission Chairman Rick Atkins reported the �cmmission unaxlimously rec�nded approval of this replat considered in public hearing earlier in the meeting, ' A motian was made by Cauncil Member Glynn and seconded by Council Me�r Wiibanks to accep� the recc�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Catmission and apprave the replat of Block 5 af the Brooksid� Addition. The motion prevailed by the erisuing vote: Ayes . Pc�saers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, & Wilbanks� Nays . None �bstain: Spencer Absent : Dyer PLANNING & ZONING C�N�tISSION RECONY�IDATION REPLAT, I�U'I'S 3$ & 39, BI�C.K� 7, CREII�n1U0D WEST PHASE III The nex� order of business was for the City Cauncil ta consider the ; recc�rn�dation of the P3anninc3 & Zoning Ccx�missian relative to the replat af Lots 38 & 39, Block 7, of the Creekw�raod West Addi�.i.on, Phase IIT. i8) � asf�$Iss ; '' The Creekwood. West Addition, Phase III, is a single-family subdivision located ; sou�h of Grapevine High School be�ween Pool Rr�ad and Creekwr7c�d Drive. The purpose of the replat was �o make a slight change in a lot line. The Pl.anning & Zoning Ccant��issa.on recc�m�.ndation, as reparted by Chain�an Atkin�, was far appraval by a vote of 6 to 0. Council I�mber Glynn offered a mr�tian, seconded by Council Nie�r Wilbanks, to accept the Cc�cmission's reccxYC��endation and approve the replat of Lats 38 & 39, Block 7, Creekw�o� West Phase III. The mr�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Powers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & WilbariIcs Nays . None Absent: Dyer PLANNING & Z�1ING CC�IZSSION RECO1+g2Et�DATION, FINAL PLAT, TIMBERPOINT ADDITION The next� order of business wa� for the City Council to consider the recan- mendation of the Planning & Zoning Camti.ssion relative ta the firial plat ot the Ti.mk�rpoint Addition. This particular plat ancluded approximately 3 acres of land loca�ed on the narthwest carner of Ti�mberline Drive and State Highway 121 Sou�h and was proposed for c�rercial develognent. Mr. Atkins reported the Planning & Zoning Ccnmission unanimausly recant�en.d�d approval. Council Memb�r Glynn offered a motion, which was seconded by Council I�r Wilk�anks, to accept the reccem�ndation af the Planning & Zaning Ccmnission and approve the �inal plat of the Tin�rpoint Additian. The m�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Glyrinj Spencerj & Wilbanks Nays . None Absent: Dyer PLANNING & ZONING CONA�IISSION RFC�iDATION, FINAL PI�AT, SHP,DOW GLF�T PHA..SE I The nex� item before �.he City Cauncil for consideratian wa� the reccsmtien�ation af the Planning & Zoning Cc�mission relative ta the final plat of Shadow Glen, Phase I. This praposed single-�amily subdivision is located on the north side of Hughes Rc�ad and wes� of Grapevine-�iless Road. Planning & Zaning C�nnissian Chairman ' Rick Atk�.ns advised the Commission recc�mnexLded approval of this �inal pla�., i with operi space requirements to be met within Shadow Glen, Phase II. The vote was 5 to l. Cauncil deliberation rela�.ive to the praposed open space dedicatian ensued. A rnotion was then offered by Council Menc�r Spencer t.o table consideration of the final plat of Shadaw Glen, Phase I until the preliminary plat af Phase II could also be cansidered. The motion, seconded by Council Member Wilbanks, prevaileci by the follc�ving vote: Ayes : Powc:rs, Ware, BreJ�.ken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wi].k�anks Nays . None F,bsent: Dyer PLANNING & ZONING CO1�M�SISSION R�C."'ON�IE�IDATION FINAL PLAT, GF2APEVTNE HTGH SCHOOL ADDITION , The ne�t order of business was for the City Council to cansider the reca�miendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccmmission relative to -the final plat � of the Grapevine High School A�dditibn. Grapevine High School is located at �,he intersection of ,Mustang Drive and State Kighway 26. The Schaol District was platti.ng the high school can�aus as , a matter of record. Mr. Atkins reported the Planning & Zoning Cc�nrnission reccnmended appravaT by a vote of 3 to 0 with 3 abstentions. ' Council Niemb�r G1ynn offered a motion, �econded by Council Member Wilban.ks, �.o accept the recea�cn�ndation of the Planni.ng & Zoning CcxmLission and a�rove the ' final plat of the Grapevine High School Adcli.tion. The mo�ion prevailed by the ensuinq vote: ��} , ;� 06128I85 � Ayes . Powers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wi].Y.7anks Nays . None Absent: Dyer s PL�NNING & ZONING CONA'IISSI(�I RE'�C:ONIl�IF,.TIDATION, FINAL PLAT, DOVE C�K PHASE III The nex� order of business was for the City Cauncil tra consider the recc�mendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccmmission relative to the final plat of the Dave Creek Addition, Phase ISI. This tract o� land is zoned "R-?.5" Single-Family and is located an the n,arth side of Aut�nn Drive west of Dove Rpad. Mr. A�.kins advised the Planning & Zoning Cca�mission unanimou�ly recam�,nded approval of the final plat. A mt�tion was made by Council M�tiber Glynn to accept the rec��ndation of the Planning & Zoning Cce��enission and apprave the final plat of the Dove Creek .Addition, Phase III. The motion was secanded by Council �r Wilbanks and prevailed hy the ensuing vote: Ayes . Po�ers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays . None Abs�t: Dyer � PLANNING & ZC7NING GC)N�IISSION �RF�C:t�NY�iCNDATIt�1, FZNAL PLAT, FOX ADDITI4N The next it�n be£ore the City Council for consideration was the Planning & Zoni.ng Canmission rec�ndation relative to �he final plat a� the Fox Addition, The Fox Addition con�.ains approximately 2 acres lacated on the nor�hwest carner af Dove Road arul Northwest Highway. 'I�e tract is zoned "HC" Highway Camr�ercial and is proposed for an equi��ent rent.al facility. TYie Planning & Zoning Cc�mission recammended approval of the plat by a vote of 4 ta 2. z A mation was made by Council Mc�tt7ber Glynn to accept the recam�ndation af the Planning & Zoning Cc�tnissi.on and approve the final plat of the Fox Addition. Council Meqnb�r Wilk�anks secon�ded the mr�tion, which prevailed by the follc7wing vote: Ayes . Pc�wersJ Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilk�anks Nays . None Absent: Dyer PLANNING & ZC�NING CONIMISSION RECON�DATION PRELZMINARY PLAT, Z�'sWIS T. BP.�TiER ADDI'TION The next. order of business was for the City Council to consider the recc,�endatian of the Plar�ning & Zonang C'.acmission relative to �.he preliminary pla� af Block 2 0� the Lewis T. Baker Addition. 'I'his proposec� single-fami.ly subdivision is located on the north side of Lakeridge Drive near Grapevine Lake. The Planning & Zaning Co�nission recarmendatian, as reported by Chairman Atkins, was for denial. The vote was 6 to 0. Council M�mber Glynn affered a mc�tia�, s�conded by Couneil M�r Wilbanks, to accept the Cc�mission's recc��,enda�ion and deny the preliminary plat of the Lewis T. Baker Additian. The mc�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: �,.. Ayes . Paw�rs, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays . Nane Absent: Dyer PI�INNING & ZUNING CONIl�IISSICiN REG`ON�g�1DATI0N, PUBLIC �RING DATE PROPOSID AMF�IDNS��TS TQ C�NIPRE��tSIVE ZC7NING flRDINANC� N0. 82-73 The next order of business was for the City Gouncil ta cansider a resolution instructing the City �taff ta take alI necessary action for consideration af proposed �¢nendments ta Cca�rehensive Zoni.ng Ordin�tnce No. $2-73. Planning & Zoning Cc�mission Chaa.r�man Rick Atki.ns advi�ed the Cannissian reccamzended a public hearing date be set for Ju3.y 16, 2985 far oansideration t10) ; ObJ18185 � i i � of proposed amendnients to Cc�rehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73 as follows: , Amenc�nent o� existing Sectian �0 relative to "DFW" Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport District Regulatians and existing Section 42 relating to � Supplementary District Regulations; the addition of new Sectian 48 relating to ' Conditianal Uses, new Section 60 relating to Sign Standards, and new Section ; 61 rela�.ing ta Aclministration and F�force�ne.nt; ar�d the repeal af e,xisting Section 49, "S-P" Site Plan District Regulations and the creation of a new j Section 49 relating ta Special Use Permi.ts, � , The caption af the proposed resolution was then read into the record. � � There being 1.ittle discussion, Mayar Pro Tem Ware made a rr�tion ta adopt the � resalution and set the �blic hearang date for July 16, 1985. The m�tion was : � seconded by Council Member Glynn and pr�vailed by the follcawing vote: s , � Ayes . Paw�rs, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spericer, & Wilbanks K Nays : None k � Absent: Dyer � �,sa�rr�oN rTO. ss-�2 � � A F,ESOI�TI'I�I ZNSTIT[3TING A I�fEW Z{%TING CA�E OR CASES IN ORDER TO CONSIDER AMII�TDING AND CEiANGING TFiE CITY'S COMPREF�NSIVE Z�lING ' ORDINANCE, ORDIN;ANCE NO. 82-73, AS AN�IDID, SANlE ALSO BEING KNOWN AS AL�'PIIVDIX � "D" {�F THE CODE OF ORDINANCFS OF `PH.E CI�'Y " � OF GRAPEVINE, T�; BY AN�TDING SECI'IQN � 40 �TING TO "DFW" DAL;.L1�S-FC}RT G�RTH � INTET2NATIONAL AIRPC7RT DISTRIGT R�GULATIONS � ARID SECTION 42 RELATIl�TG 20 SUPPLII+'[�.�ITARY � DISTRICT REGfJI�ATIOI�iS; BY ADDING NEW � SECTIQNS, SE�CTION 48 RB.,ATING TO CON- i DITIC�TAL IISES, SE�'i`ION 60 RELATING T(J SIGN j STANDARI7S, AND SFCI'ION 61 T�iE�ATING TO � ADMINISTRATION AND E�3FOFt�k�`F; AND BY REPEALING EXISTING SF�C.."I'ION 49, "S-F" SITE ? PLAN DISTRIGT REG,CZLrATIC7I�7S, AND C'REATING A ! NE,W S�CI'ION 49 REI�ATING "PO SPECIAL U�E PERMITS; ALl�it)RIZII� THE AllZTERTISE�NI' �"OR I PUBLIC H:E�ARINGS PURSUANT TO TEX. REV. CIV. ' j STAT. ANN. ART, J.Qlla-1011e; AND PR�JVIDTNG AN EFFEGSIVE DATE � C{7�TSIDERATION OF THE M:tNt.Pl'�S The next ite�n before the City Council was ta c�nsider the minutes of the meetings of May 21 and June 4, 1985. ; ; Council M�r Brekken noted ane correctian on Page 15 of the minutes of May 21, 1985 concerning the vote of the City Council relative to Zoning Apglication Z85-20, Devon Develo�nt Cc�mpany. Mrs. Brekken was incorrectly ' shc�wn as an "Aye" vote, when in fact she voted again�t the motion. The ; minutes taere carrected to reflect Mrs. Brekken as a "Nay" vat�. � There being no further additions or corrections, Cauncil M�nber Willbanics made a mr�tion to accept the mi.nut,es as carrected. The mr�tion wa.s seconded by j Council M�rEber Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: � Ayes . Paw�ers, Ware, Br�kken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays . None Absent: Dyer i SOLID V�STE DISPC�SAL PERMIT APPLICATION{ J. P. 4�STE MANA(�L�NT I � The next order of business was for �.he City Council ta consider an Application i For Solid Waste Disposal Perniit sukmitted. by J. P. Waste Management af � I�ewisville. � Ci�.y Seeretary Karen Spann advised that J. P. Waste Manag�nent had su�C�itted an application far a permi.t ta remove and dispa�e o£ solid waste within the ' City limits of Grapevine. Approval of the Cit�r Council was nec�ssary since ;I ; (11) � � i i 06/18/85 'i � I ` they woere not the City's duly authorized agent for solid waste disposal. An i ' investigation of the application was impossible due to a lack of information � = in the application, and the City Staff recam�nded denial. k There being little discussion, Council �er Wilbanks made a mr�tion to deny the application suhnitted by J. P. Waste Management. The m�tion, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware, prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays . None Absent: Dyer BID Ain1�RD, 1984-85 CONYK[JNITY DEVELpPN�LV`!' BLUCK GRANT PROGRAM The next itan before the City Council for consideration was the bid award for the 1984-85 Community Develognexit Block Grant Program for construction of water lines in certain areas of the City. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker reported the Block Grant Program was for � water line improvements in a target area bounded by Wall Street on the north and the railroad tracks on the south, between Main Street and Austin Street. He noted the law bid was su�imitted by Skyhawk Constzuction Ccxnpany in the � amc�unt of $139,710. Mr. Baddaker reccamtended approval of the low bidder, with � allocation of funds as follcxas: Tarrant County $88,500 and the City of � Grapevine, $55,401 (which included a 3$ contingency fee) . � �Following brief Council discussion, a motion was offered by Council M��l�er � Spencer to accept the Staff recatunendation and award the bid to Skyhawk �' Construction Ccmpany in the amr�unt of $139,710, with approval of City funds � for the project in the amount of $55,401. The motion was seconded by Council � Member Brekken and prevailed by the ensuing vote: � Ayes . Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays . None � Absent: Dyer . � � � VACATE DRAINAGE EASII�NT, MUI�ERRY SQUARE � The final iten of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution � vacating and abandoning a drainage easement in the Mulberry Square Addition. } � Mr. Baddaker advised the City was acting as a pass-through agent between the � State Highway Department and the developer of the Mulberry Square Addition, � located on the east side of State Highway 121 South between Glade Road and � Hughes Rr�ad. As part of the develognent a new drainage system had been ��! designed, ar�d the existing drainage easement was no longer needed. £ � The City Secretary then read the caption of the proposed. resolution vacating � the existing drainage easement and autYiorizing the Mayor to execute a contract � with the State Highway Departat�nt. ' �: Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion that the resolution be adopted. A second was �: offered by Council Me��r Glynn, and the motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: _ � Ayes . Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays : None � Absent: Dyer � RESOLUTION NO. 85-33 �` 4' � A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING Tf� CITY OF � GRAPEVINE, TEXAS TO II�iTER IN'I'O A � C:C�ITRAGT WITH Tf� STATE OF TEXAS WHEItEBY � TI� CITY WILL ASSLIl� RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DRAINAGE AT RT. OF STA. 448+14.20 ON � STATE HIC�IWAY 121 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S; AND FURTF�RMORE, THAT �. THE STATE'S DRAI1�iAGE EASEL�NT RIGHTS AS RDCORDID IN VOLUME 5618, PAGE 322 OF THE �', DEED RECORDS� TARRAIVT COUN'!'Y� TEX1�.S� ARE t: NO IANGER NEID� FOR TI� USE OF CITIZEDIS � AND HAVE BEIIV REPLACID BY A COMPATIBLE � � � � � �12) � � � � o611sJs5 � EASE�]T BY '1� CITY ANU THAT THE CITY RECt7�M'IEN17S THAT 'I'HE STATE'S EASENt�NT BE ; QUITCZAIMED TO THE CJWNER OF Tf� FEE IN � THE I,AND; AND I}ECI��tTNG AN EE'F.�CTIVE � DATE � ADJOURNMF�V'T' � There beang no furthex business to c� before the City Council, a mc�tian �.o .� adjourn the meeting was made by Council Member Brekken and seconded by Mayor � Pro T�n Ware. The mr�tion prevailed by the fallawing vote: Ayes : Po�ers, Ware, Brekken, Glynnr Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays . None Absent: Dyer 4 � i � i � PASSED AND AFPRC}VED BY THE CITY C4t71�TCIL OF TF� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on F this the 16� day o£ July ► 1985. � ; � AP'PFt{}V.ID: I ; ; � ��,� � ~``�.�.� I Li��'!�� n.'— _, � Mayar '� ATTEST: � - / E G �. �-t�..t�,.. ` 1 =% City Secretazy , , i � ; � , , ; i ' � i ; l I i � i 'I ; � , i � I ; i � a i � � i 1.3) i 3 i � i 'i � PARK BLUD. ExEiIBIT "A" 'IC} � '� �rZD Pc�S �� ..£ �! 1 v#R n) ��,nl� c�'i'Y covNC=z M�rrcrrES � oF 611�Is5 � � � � � I � � � 1M � ��' PN6RSOt�.1 � � � � � w n � � � _ � � tI � � v��V� � � + � k�� i -�-'--"---\ � I J � 4 # 1 ( I 1 � � � � LEF't' Tu,r�i1 �or►� � � � I �RoaKS�o� ¢ lvok7'!1 �NT/ZAnIG�' 0 F N'� �, 1 � � ��t11iE � C�4�C �� I � j�N� CNU.QGb�I OF 1.N1�1s'r �F � � � ' � An�O ,BQo c��S�D� �Q�� C'�Rt j �� -}- � � � � k t S ,Cd s-r- w�TN � ' .� � � �� I �unR��r �oPosA,�. �a � � I � � s�►,� � ��' ' I � 1 N��RBa�� 1 � aQtt,r E �: 1 � � � � � �; p� �v�. �N �c�t G C E s-I"=L1" �. �F`�" 1 u�2rJ �./9 nl� i � 1 � I � � � 1 1 rh�PN�sa� � I � I ? � _ _ _ .� _ _ �... _ _ i z a a.t�� I ! 1 ' '�1 � � � � � � � 1.�'FT �P?/V �D An10 � � I a/R»oekT�AE ' f � o,�,�� F F oin J�Io�¢-ru �"�rrx�v� ,�N I � 1 E u �� I aF Ti�� '�ru,�cN a� C,�� `� � j ; �C�J � � i �'NR�sr ��V4 $�oksr0�' �� ! ''�'��I�U E i S Irl�i tt�1T+4�N Ea. ��'�!s'7- � � � f � � � « � � Ju2,v �or��i�,�z + � � j , t5 �Lem1�t�4T�D. 5°�'� � � � � H6ATNER��a� E�' � � � � �R�U� � � � 1 � � , � � � ; � . , MINUTES AND CERTIFICATION _ � STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TARRANT § On the 18th day of June, 1985, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, convened in Regular Meeting at the regular meeting place thereof in the City Hall, the meeting being open to the public and notice of such meeting, giving the date, hour, place and subject thereof, having been posted as prescribed by Article 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S., and the roll of the duly constituted officers and members of the City Council was called, which officers and members are as follows, to-wit: Tom Powers, Mayor Marion Brekken ) Karen Spann, City Secretary Ron Dyer ) Ted Ware, Mayor Pro Tem Jim Glynn ) Councilmembers Sharron Spencer ) C. Shane Wilbanks ) and all of such persons were present, except the following absentees: Dyer , thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon, a.mong other business, the following was transaeted, to-wit: a written Resolution bearing the following caption was introduced: : 7: A Resolution approving issuance by Grapevine Industrial Development Corporation of an issue of Grapevine Industrial Development Corporation Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Ampad Corporation Project) Series 1985; and approving the Resolution of the Issuer authorizing the Bonds, the issuanee of the Bonds authorized thereby and the plan of financing approved thereby and the Bond Documents The Resolution, a full, true and correct copy of which is attaehed hereto was ; read and reviewed by the City Council. Upon motion duly made and seeonded, the Resolution was finally passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: p�rs, Ware, Brekken, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks NOES: None The Presiding Officer then declared the Resolution passed and signed and approved the same in the presence of the City Council. MINUTES APPROVED AND CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT and to reflect aecurately the duly constituted officers and members of the City Council of such City, and the attached and following eopy of such Resolution is hereby oizaX � as1�.81a� ; certified to be a true and correct copy of an official cppy thereof on file among the official recards of the City, ali on this Jur�e 1$, 1985. z ,; ` Mayac, City of Grapevine, Texas "� ATTEST: 1 � l�,t,t,, � Cit Seeretary, C ty of Grapevine, Texas :; [SEAL] ; f i � � � ; i �� I s i `s � € s t s' a t 7 • _' R Y 4 � i-. i £ € e i'+ �. 0128x 4 . _2_ � � r 1