HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-09-18 Joint Meeting AGENDA
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL
&
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18 , 1984 AT 7 :30 P.M.
�"°` COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET
�
I . CALL TO ORDER
II . INVOCATION: Council Member Larry Oliver
III . PRESENTATION
Mr. Don Spitzer, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. ,
to make a presentation to the City Council.
IV. JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to
conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning
Application Z84-30 submitted by Seahunt' s
Sporting Goods.
B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to
conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning
Application Z84-31 , city-instigated rezoning of
.�,.-�
225 N. Lucas.
C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to
�, conduct a public hearing relative to proposed
amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No.
82-73 , as amended.
V. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the
Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to consider
further published agenda items.
B. City Council to recess briefly and reconvene in
the Council Chambers to consider additional
business items .
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S, AS AMENDED
BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES-
SION, THE REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS
THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 AT 1:30 P.M.
�
�r■.
Cit Secretar
�
AGENDA
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18 , 1984 AT 7 : 30 P .M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET
�
VI . CITIZENS REQUESTS AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS
�, VII. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
Meetings of September 4, 1984
VIII . OLD BUSINESS
City Council to consider awarding the bid relative to
the sale of surplus real property.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. City Council to consider a resolution adopting the 1984
tax roll.
B. City Council to consider an ordinance setting the ad
valorem tax rate for fiscal year 1984-85.
C. City Council to consider an ordinance setting the
general homestead tax exemption amount at 40 percent.
D. City Council to consider an ordinance amending the golf
course rate schedule.
.�.a.
E. City Council to consider an ordinance relative to
;,�,,, vehicle impoundment fees and related items.
F. City Council to consider authorizing the execution of
an agreement with the City of Colleyville and the
Grapevine-Colleyville I . S . D. relative to the
utilization of a School Resource Officer.
G. City Council to consider making a Council appointment
to the Grapevine-Colleyville I . S. D. Citizens Advisory
Committee.
H. City Council to consider authorizing funding for the
Northeast Sector of the Tarrant Council on Alcoholism
and Drug Abuse.
I . City Council to consider setting a public hearing date
relative to the proposed Cable TV rate increase request
and the proposed amendment to the Cable TV franchise
agreement.
J. City Council to consider awarding the bid relative to
the purchase of insurance services.
� �
K. City Council to consider awarding the bid relative to
the reconstruction of Dove Road (from Park Boulevard to
� Kimball Road) .
L. City Council to consider Change Order No. 3 relative to
the Timberline Drive reconstruction project.
M. City Council to consider an ordinance abandoning a
utility easement.
N. City Council to consider an ordinance amending the City
Code Appendix E relative to construction standards.
X. EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. City Council to recess to the Conference Room to
discuss personnel pursuant to Article 6252-17,
V.A.T.C.S. , Subsection (g) .
B. City Council to reconvene in the Council Chambers and
take any necessary action relative to personnel.
� XI . PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
� Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli-
cation Z84-30 (Seahunt' s) and a subsequent ordinance,
if applicable.
B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli-
cation Z84-31 (225 N. Lucas) and a subsequent ordi-
nance, if applicable.
C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to proposed
amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73
and a subsequent ordinance.
D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat
of the Grapevine Office Addition.
E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the corrected
final plat of the Harwell Addition, Phase II .
'"�"` F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
'� Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat
,�, of the Education Center Addition.
G. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi-
nary plat of the Southwest Grapevine Commercial Park.
H. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi-
nary plat of the DFW Air Freight Addition.
I . City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi-
nary plat of the Western Oaks Addition.
J. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi-
nary plat of the Grapevine_ Municipal Complex Addition.
XII . ADJOURNMENT
"'�"" IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S, AS AMENDED
BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES-
SION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED
i�w AND POSTED ON THIS THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 AT 1 : 30
P.M.
Cit Secretary
AGENDA
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18 , 1984 AT 7 : 30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER — 311 MAIN STREET
VI . NEW BUSINESS
e�
A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli-
cation Z84-30 (Seahunt' s) and make a recommendation to
„�„ the City Council.
B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli-
cation Z84-31 (225 N. Lucas) and make a recommendation
to the City Council.
C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider proposed
amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73 ,
as amended, and make a recommendation to the City
Council.
D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat
of the Grapevine Office Addition and make a recommenda-
tion to the City Council.
E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the corrected
final plat of the Harwell Addition, Phase II , and make
a recommendation to the City Council.
F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat
of the Education Center Addition and make a recommenda-
�
tion to the City Council.
G. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi-
,,,�, nary plat of the Southwest Grapevine Commercial Park
and make a recommendation to the City Council.
H. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi-
nary plat of the DFW Air Freight Addition and make a
recommendation to the City Council.
I. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi-
nary plat of the Western Oaks Addition and make a
recommendation to the City Council.
J. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi-
nary plat of the Grapevine Municipal Complex Addition
make a recommendation to the City Council.
VII . CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
Meetings of August 14 & 21 and September 4 , 1984
VIII . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION
�-�
IX. ADJOURNMENT
�. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S, AS AMENDED
BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES-
SION, THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 14TH DAY OF
SEPTEMBER, 1984 AT 1 :30 P.M.
Cit Secretar
STATE OF TEXAS
COUN'I'Y OF TARRANT
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
The City Council and Planning & Zoning Cc�nenission of the City of Grapevine,
Texas �t in Regular Joint Session on this the 18th day of Septe.mber, 1984 at
7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 413 Main Street, with the following members
of the City Council present to�wit:
�
Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem
Larry Oliver Council M+e�nber
� Marion Brekken Council Me.mber
Jim Glynn Council Me��ber
Tom Po�aers Council Nlember
constituting a quonun, with Mayor William D. Tate and Council Member Ron Dyer
absent, with the following me.mbers of the Planning & Zoning Comnission:
Sharron Spencer Chairnnari
Ron Cook Vice Chairman
Harlen Joyce Nl�mber
Shane Wilbanks Member
Rick Atkins Me�tber
Peggy Engholm Member
constituting a quonam, with Cammissioner Gerald Norn�n absent, with the
follawing members of the City Staff:
James L. Hancock City Manager
John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney
Karen Spann City Secretary
CALL TO ORDER
�
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Ware.
�
INVOCATION
Council Member Larry Oliver delivered the Invocation.
PRESENTATION, MR. DON SPITZER, PEAT, MA1�lIQZ, MITCHE.LL & CO.
The first item was for Mr. Don Spitzer, representing the accounting firm of
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. , to present a Certificate of Conformance in
Financial Reporting to the City of Grapevine. He noted that the City's
financial sta.t�nents had been submitted to the Government Finance Officers
Association and, upon meeting their reporting standards, the City ha.d been
awarded a Certificate of Conformance recognizing excellence in financial
management and statez�ent preparation. Mr. Spitzer presented a plaque to Mayor
Pro Tem Ware on behalf of the City, and a certificate was presented to City
Manager Jim Hancock on behalf of the staff m�nbers who were instnunental in
achieving this award.
Aclmawledging remarks were then offered. by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and City Manager
Jim Hancock.
PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-30, SEAflUNT'S SPORTING GOODS
�
The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Canr
mission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-30 sub-
i,",,, mitted by Seahunt's Sporting Goods.
The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Pro Te.�n Ware, who then called
upon Public Works Director Jim Baddaker to explain the request of the
applicant.
Mr. Baddaker advised that the property in question was located at 216 North
Dove Road, just north of Northwest Highway. Being currently zoned "HC"
Highway C�rcial and used as a bait and ta.ckle shop also serving soft drinks
and chips, the property awner had requested. approval �or the storage, posses-
sion, retail sale, and off-prelnise cons�ption of beer.
09/18/8�
Mr. Mike Blanco, applicant, explained. that he had purchased the property in
March of 1984 and put in the Seahunt's bait and tackle shop. He felt the sale
of beer for off-premise constunption wnuld offer a m�re complete service to his
customers.
A period of questions and camnents follaw�ed, which included a discussion of
the parking situation.
NOTE: Commissioner Ron Cook arrived during this discussion.
��
Mayor Pro Tem Ware asked if there w�ere any guests present who wished to
ccataY�nt relative to the proposed zoning. Mr. George Tiller.y, 301 North Dove
Road, spoke in oppc>sition to the beer sales at this location. It was reported ��
by the City Secretary that no correspondence had been received relative to this
zoning request.
There being no further discussion, a n�ation to close their portion of the
public hearing was offered by Ccmmissioner Shane Wilbanks and seconded by
Commission Men�ber Rick Atkins. The mr�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote:
Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Wilbanks, Atkins & Engholm
Nays . None
Abstain: Joyce
Absent : Nornian
A motion to close the public hearing was also offered by Council Member Tam
Pawers and seconded by Council M,e�nber Marion Brekken. The mr�tion prevailed by
the follawing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-31, CITY INSTIGATID, 211 N. LUCAS
��
The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Ccx�r
mission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-31, „�;,,�,
city-instigated rezoning of 211 N. Lucas.
Mayor Pro Tem Ware declared open the public hearing.
Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised this parcel was a part of the city-
i.nstigated rezoning case, having been inadvertently anitted. The tract had
originally been advertised for the "G1�" Neighborhood Cc�tiercial Zoning
District, and the City Council had authorized readvertisement for the "CC"
Ccmmunity Camiercial and the "HC" Highway C�rcial zoning designations.
Being located at 211 N. Lucas Drive, the property was currently zoned "R-2"
'Itac�-Family Dwoelling District under Ccxnprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 70-10.
The cx�mer of the property was not present to cc�nrent on the matter; however,
Mr. Harlen Joyce, a neighboring property o�wner, stated that he had spoken with
the awner of the tract in question, who supported the "CC" Canmunity
C�rcial zoning category.
Mayor Pro Tem Ware asked if there were guests present who wished to speak
reiative to this zoning request. There w�ere none. City Secretary Karen Sparin
also reported that no correspondence had been received concerning this
application.
��
A nx�tion to close the public hearing was then made by Canmission Me.mber
Engholm. Cc�nmissioner Ron Cook offered a second to the motion, which
prevailed by the ensuing vote: .��
Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Wilbanks, Atkins, & Engholm
Nays . None
Abstai.n: Joyce
Absent : Nornn�an
Council Memt�er Glynn also made a nx�tion to close the Council's portion of the
public hearing. A second was made by Council Member Pawers, and the nx�tion
prevailed by the follawing vote:
(2)
09/1$/84
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
PUBLIC HEARING, PR(JPOSID ANIENDN�ITS TO
CONI�'RII�tSIVE ZONING ORDIN�INCE NO. 84-73
The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Co�r
mission to conduct a public hearing relative to proposed amendments to Cornpre-
,w.. hensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended.
The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Pro Tem Ware.
� Planning & Zoning Cc�mission Chainnan Sharron Spencer highlighted the proposed
changes to the Camprehensive Zoning Ordinance, beginning with Section 56, Off-
Street Parking Requirement. This proposal concerned parking requirements for
general office uses, requiring 5 parking spaces, plus 1 for each 300 square
feet of floor area. Proposed changes to Section 58, Parking and Loading Area
Develog�nt Standards, were also noted, which included a require�nent that all
parking areas in all zoning districts be paved. Mrs. Spencer outlined
revisions to Section 45, Concept Plan, and noted that they basically set out
standards of fornn for submitta.l of a concept plan.
Ntunerous proposed anyendments to the "R-20", "R-12.5", and "R-7.5" Single-
Family Dwelli.ng Districts were presented. These included changes in the
perm.itted uses, accessozy uses, conditional uses, and liunitations of uses.
Density requirements were set, and. building height requirements �,�rere extended
frcan 25 feet to 35 feet not to exceed two stories. The off-street parki.ng
regulations were amended to prohibit the parking of recreational vehicles in
the required front yard. A cam�ion open space requir�ent of 200 square feet
per dwelling unit in developments of 100 or more units was addressed at
length. The landscaping/tree preservation requiranents were also presented.
Questions and ccm�rents frcan the Planning & Zoning Ccmmi.ssion an,d City Council
+�* were addressed during this presentation, and a lengthy discussion ensued
relative to the tree preservation and ca�snon open space requirements.
�`"' Parks & Recreation Director Kevin Conklin addressed the c�n open space
regulations and maintenance thereof.
Due to the late hour and the remaining agenda items, consideration was given
to continuing the public hearing at a later date or possibly scheduling a
public wr�rkshop. Ha�ever, the general ooncensus of those present was to
continue the public hearing at this time.
Mayor Pro Tem Ware invited those who wished to speak relative to these pro-
posed amenc7ments to do so. (1) Mr. Darrell VanDyke, 2005 Shadow Court,
addressed the limitation that no more than five persons unrelated by blood or
marriage may occupy residences in the R-20, R-12.5, or R-7.5 Single-Family
Districts. (2) Mr. Joe Wright, 601 W. Wall, made a lengthy presentation pre-
dominantly addressing the ccx�non open space and tree preservation
require�nents.
A recess was called during the presentation of Mr. Wright and upon
reconvening, all Council M�nbers were present with the exception of Mayor Tate
and Council Member Dyer, and all Plaxu�ing & Zoning Coitmission Members were
present with the exception of Cc�missioner Nornian.
�^* Mr. Wright concluded his remarks, and (3) Mr. Chris Lott, 929 Kings Canyon
Drive, c�nted relative to the height requir�ent in the single-family
districts. (4) Mr. Jay Mossman, 1601 Box Canyon Court, also addressed the
,�,,,,. single-family height requirements, and (5) Mr. Roy Stewart, 309 Drexel Drive,
cc�mlented relative to the tree preservation regulations. (6) Mr. Jesse Woods,
2746 Manchester Lane, inquired about the uses permitted in the R-7.5 Single-
Family District, and (7) Mr. Jim Swann, 1018 Riverside Drive, offered possible
solutions to difficulties presented with the c�n open space and the tree
preservation require�ents.
Questions fram the Council concerning the buffer requirerents were briefly
addressed, and the following letter was read by the City Secretary.
(3)
09/18/84
September 18, 1984
Nlembers of the City Council and
Planning & Zoning C�mission:
When I first moved to Grapevine six years ago, the property behind
me was heavily wooded with dozens of live and post oaks, native
pecan trees, and an assortinent of colorful birds. I no longer wake ,��,
up in the morning to birds singing, but the tune of bulldozers
turning the forest and pasturelands into a dustlx7wl of develog�ent.
Trees that had previously withstood icestorms and the ferocity of �"
tornado-like winds have fallen prey to progress. The mighty oak and
pecan trees have been carted off in the shovels of bulldozers to
their funeral pyre of bonfires that I see burning in the darkness
fresn by bedrocxn window. I find it ironic that twr� of the largest
oak trees in the fields have not yet met their demise because the
developers park theix bulldozers underneath them and use the shade
of their large branches to escape frcxn the heat and eat their
lunches. But once they are no longer needed, these trees will also
end up in the bonfires.
Haw sad to think that my children and their descendants will never
see the wild quail and pheasants, nor tease the caws that once
roam�ed my backyard. They will never be able to appreciate the
country-Iike atmosphere that Grapevine was once knawn for. They
will graw up thinking all tawns are nothing but flat, treeless I.and
full of houses and apartments. They will grow up thinking that
there is no difference between Grapevine, Texas and Plano unless
s�ething is done to prevent developers fran taking the na.tural
beauty of the land away from it.
Let's not let the Dallas developers (I say Dallas because mQst of ��+
our local developers who live in tawn do make an effort to save
trees and keep their heavily wooded lots as attractive as possible)
nzin what Grapevine has cane to stand for. Let's not have strangers �'�
to Grapevine w�nder why our City was even natr�ed Grapevine in the
first place. The land in our tawn has been zoned, ncyw let's ensure
that the develognents to caire are not an eyesore, but enhance the
reputation of our City.
The proposed "beautification" amendment will rwt bring back the
trees that have been mawed dawn behind me, nor will it bring back
the wildlife who are now hameless, but maybe it will keep future
residents fran suffering the sam�e fate as those of us in my
neighborhood have suffered. Grawth should not be synonymous with
ugli.ness. Keep the "grapevines in Grapevine" and ensure quality and
beauty for generations to came.
Sincerely,
Jeanne Riecss
2027 Tangle�u�od
Following additional discussion relative to continuance of the public hearing, ��
a nx�tion was offered by Ccarmi.ssioner Engholm to close the public hearing
relative to the height requireanents in Sections 13, 14, & 15, the Single-
Family Dwelling Districts, and in Sections 17 & 18, the R-3.5 �-Family ��
Dwelling District and the R-3.75 Three- and Four-Family Dwelling District.
Also to close the public hearing relative to Section 45, Concept Plans, Sec-
tion 56, Off-Street Parking Require�nents, an�d Section 58, Parking and Loading
Area, Develog�eent Standards. The m�tion was secon,ded by Vice Chairman Ron
Cook and prevailed by the ensuing vote:
Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Wilbanks, Atkins, & Engholm
Nays . None
Absent: NornnaYz
(4)
09/18/84
A motion was then made by Cammission Member Pec�gy Engholm and seconded by Cam-
missioner Shane Wilbanks to continue the public hearing on the remainder of
the proposed Ccx�rehensive Zoning Ordinance aniendments until October 16, 1984.
The nx�tion prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Wilbanks, Atkins, & Engholm
Nays . None
Absent: Nornian
,,,.�., Council Member Marion Brekken also offered a similar mption to close the
public hearing relative to the height requirements in the Single-Family Dis-
tricts, Sections 13, 14, & 15, the R-3.5 Two-Family District, Section 17, and
� the R-3.75 Three- and Four-Family District, Section 18, also relative to Sec-
tion 45, Concept Plans, Section 56, Off-Street Parking R�g�ire�nents, and
Section 58, Parking and Loading Area Develognent Standards. In addition, she
moved to continue the public hearing on the rest of the proposed amenclments
until October 16, 1984. Council Member Jim Glynn seconded the motion, which
prevailed by the ensuing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Powers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
RECESS & RECONVENE
Mayor Pro Tem Ware then announced that the Planning & Zoning C�ssion vx�uld
recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to consider further published
agenda ite[ns. The City Council was to recess briefly before considering
additional business.
Upon reconvening in the Council Chambers, all meznbers of the City Council were
present with the exception of Mayor Tate and Council M�snber Dyer.
CODTSIDERATIOI�T OF Tf� MINUTES
�
The next ite�n before the City Council was to consider the mi.nutes of their two
� nueetings on Septeqnber 4, 1984.
There being no additions or corrections, Council Nlember Brekken made a mr�tion
that the minutes be approved as published. The motion was seconded by Council
Member Pawers and prevailed by the ensuing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Powers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
BID AW�2D, SAI�E OF SURPLUS PROPERTY, ACCFSS TO CITY COMPLEX SITE
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider awarding the
bid relative to the sale of surplus real property.
The taking of bids had been authorized relative to the sale of a tract of land
approximately 70' x 406' at the access point to the City Cc�mplex site on South
Main Street. Only one bid had been received, that being fran Hall Construc-
tion Campany, offering two options for the purchase of the property. The
award of the bid had been tabled by the City Council on August 21 and
September 4, 1984 to allow the Municipal Facilities Canmittee to meet with the
bidder and formulate a reccam�ndation.
�
Council Nlember Larry Oliver, Chairntian of the Municipal Facilities Conmittee,
reported that a discrepancy had been discovered in the advertisement, making
,�,,,, the award of the bid impossible without readvertising correctly. The City
Council then discussed whether to readvertise or retain the property in
question.
Follawing this deliberation, it was generally concurred that the City should
retain this property and not readvertise for the sale thereof. Council M�ember
Oliver offered a nx�tion to reject the bid received. The motion was seconded
by Council N1�nber Glynn and prevailed by the follo�aing vote:
(5)
09/18/84.
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pavers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
RFSOI�JTION, ADOPT 1984 TAX ROLL
The next order of busi.ness was for the City Council to consider a resolution
adopting the 1984 tax roll.
Acting Finance Director Jim Cook advised that the Chief P,ppraiser of the ,�.h
Tarrant Appraisal District had su�anitted totals of appraised property values
within the City of Grapevine at a net taxable value of $948,920,453. He noted
that the majority of the increase aver last year's figure was due to a
�,�
reappraisal; how�ever, $33.5 million w�ere new additions to the tax roll.
The captian of the proposed resolution was presented by the City Secretary.
There being little discussion, Council Member T�n Paaers made a motion that
the resolution be adopted. The nx�tion, seconded by Council Member Oliver,
prevailed by ensuing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
RE.SOLUTION NO. 84-43
A RESOLUTION OF Tf� CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, APPFt�VING THE
TAX ROLL FOR 1984 ON PROPEf�t'Y WITHIN Tf�
CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFEC.'TIVE DATE
012DINANCE, SETTING AD VAI�ORII�i TAX RATE FOR 1984-85
The next itezn before the City Council was to consider an ordinance setting the �°�
ad valorem tax rate for fiscal year 1984-85.
Acting Finance Director Jim Cook advised that a tax rate of 40G per $100 `�"
valua.tion had been used in developing the 1984-85 bt�lget figures. This pro-
posed an increase over the effective tax rate of 30.045�, and all legal
requisements of the Truth-In-Taxation laws had been met. With the h�nestead
exe�nptions being offered, it was determi.ned that the majority of homeawners
w�uld actually ex�erience a decrease in their property tax�es.
City Secretary Karen Spann then read the caption of the proposed ordinance.
A motion was made by Council N1+e�t�ber Glynn and seconded by Council Mesnber
Paw�rs that the ordinance be adopted. The nr�tion prevailed by the following
vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pov�rers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
ORDINANCE NO. 84-67
AN O�INANCE SEITING TI� ANNLIAL TAX RATE
FOR 1984; LE,'VYING TAXES FOR Tf� YF,AR 1984
TO BE ASSFSSID ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY �►
WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, T�A.S; PRCATIDING PEDIALTIES AND
INTEREST FOR DELINQUENT TAXES; PROVIDING �,�
FOR THE INTRA- AND INTER-DF�AR�'MENT FUND
TRANSFEFtS; PROVIDING FOR THE INVESZMENT OF
IDLE F'[R�IDS; AND DDCI,ARING AN II�EI�TCY
012DINANCE, SETTING 40$ GEL�TERAL HONIESTF�AD TAX EXEMPTION
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance
setting the general homestead tax exemption amount at 40 percent.
(6)
o9/1s/s4
Mr. Cook once again advised that a 40$ general h�estead tax exe�nption for all
awners that occupy single-family residences had been used in preparation of
the 1984-85 budget and in setting the tax rate. The proposed exemption was
naw before the City Council for forma.l adoption by ordinance.
The caption of the proposed ordinance was read by the City Secretary.
Council Nle�nber Glynn then made a m�tion that the ordinance approving the 40�
hca�estead tax exemption be adopted. The motion was seconded by Council Me,mber
,,,�, Oliver and prevailed by the folla�ing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
� Nays : None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
ORDIN�INCE NO. 84-68
AN ORDINANCE OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE,
TF�1�.S, PROVIDING FOR RESIDEDtCE HOMESTEAD
E�P'TION FROM AD VALORFM TAXATION; AND
PFtO�IIDING AN EF'FECTIVE DATE
ORDINANC.�, AMENDING GOLF COURSE RATE SCI�DULE
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance
amending the golf course rate schedule.
City Manager Jim Hancock advised that increases in certain golf course rates
had been used in calculating budget figures and. naw needed to be adopted by
ordinance. He reviewed the increases, which included w�ekend green fees and
golf cart rental for 18 holes.
The caption of the proposed ordinance was read by the City Secretary.
�^ Follawing discussion of this item, Council Member Powers made a motion that
the ordinance be adopted. The motion was seconded by Council M�ember Brekken
� and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Powers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
ORDIN�INCE NO. 84-69
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE,
TEXAS, AMENDING THE GRAPEVINE CITY CODE
S�CTI�T 16-32 (A) RII�ATIVE TO GRAPEUINE
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FEFS; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CI�AUSE; PRpVIDING A PII�IALTY
NOT TO EXCEID THE SUM OF 'IWO HLTNDRID
DOT�2S ($200.00) AND A SEPARATE OF�'EDTSE
SHALL BE DEF�IFD COMMI'I`!'EID UPON EACH DAY
DURING ON WFiICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND
DECLARING AN II�9ERGENCY
ORDINANCE, WREC�ER SER�IICE ADID VEHICLE Ir�OiJNDMENI' FEES
The next item was for the City Council to consider an ordinance relative to
�°* vehicle i��pounc�m�ent fees and related items.
City Manager Jim Hancock reported that a vehicle impoundtn�nt area had been
r�,,,,, authorized in the 1984-85 budget for the Police Departrrnnt. The ordinance
setting wrecker operation regulations and fees had been proposed for
consideration at this time; however, it had been discovered that the ordinance
was incanplete and the City Staff recon�nded this item be tabled.
A �tion was then offered by Council M�nber Powers and seconded by Council
Member Oliver that the ordinance relative to impound fees and related it�ns be
tabled pending further study by the City Staff. The motion prevailed by the
follawing vote:
(7)
09/18/84
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
CONTRAGT, SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER
The next order of l�usiness was for the City Council to consider authorizing
the execution of an agree��nt with the City of Colleyville and the Grapevine-
Colleyville I. S. D. relative to the utilization of a School Resource Officer.
���
Police Chief H. A. Deggans advised that the City Council had recently approved
a School Resource Officer Progr�n to provide police services at the Grapevi.ne-
Colleyville schools. In order t�o coordinate this program, a cooperation ��
agree��nt needed to the authorized between the City of Grapevine, the City of
Colleyville, and the Grapevine-Colleyville School District, and h,e solicited
Council authorization to execute this agre�eent.
There being little discussion, Council Me�nber Tan Pawers offered a m�tion to
authorize the City Staff to execute the cooperation agreenient relative to the
School Resource Officer Program. The motion was seconded by Council Member
Glynn and prevailed by the ensuing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
COUNCIL APPOIl�IT, GRAPEVINE-COLI�EYVILLE I. S. D.
CITIZIIVS ADVISORY COMMITI�E
The next item was for the City Council to consider maki.ng a Council appoint-
ment to the Grapevine-Colleyville I. S. D. Citizens Advisory Cc�mittee.
City Secretary Karen Spann advised that a m�mber of the Grapevine City Council
was to serve on the School District Citizens Advisory Catmittee. The term of
office was two years, and Council Member Marion Brekken had been serving in '"""*
this capacity for the pa.st ternn.
,�...r
Follawing brief deliberation, a motion was made by Council Member Glynn and
seconded by Council Me�nber Powers that Mrs. Brekken be reappointed as the
Council representative serving on the School District Citizens Advisory Ccnr
mittee. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Abstain: Brekken
Absent : Tate & Dyer
FUNDING, TARRANT COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE, NORZ'HFJAST SE(,'TOR
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider authorizing
funding for the Northeast Sector of the Tarrant Council on Alcoholism and Dnxg
Abuse.
City Secretary Karen Spann reported that a request for funding had been
received fresn th�e Tarrant Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse, Northeast
Sector. She noted that a portion of their approx�mately $48,000 budget was
funded by the United Way, but that the majority of finances w�re raised fram
the ccmmunities served. It was the recamYtiendation of the City Staff that
$1,500 be authorized for this cause. It was also noted that, if approved, '"""'*
this aimunt w�uld autr�natically be inclu,ded in subsequent budgets unless
instructed otherwise.
�.�
Council Member Marion Brekken then made a motion authorizing funding for the
Northeast Sector of the Tarrant Council on Alcoholism aryd Drug Abuse in the
amount of $1,500. The m�tion was seconded Council M�ember Oliver and prevailed
by the follawing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pvwers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
�8�
09/18/84
SET P'UBLIC HEARING DATE, GROUP W CABLE TV
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider setting a
public hearing relative to the proposed Cable TV rate increase request and the
proposed amendment to the Cable TV franchise agreement.
City Secretazy Karen Spann reviewed the proposals sulxnitted on August 21, 1984
by Mr. Robin Troop of Group W Cable TV relative to a request for amenc7ment of
the franchise agreement eliminating the annua.l outside audit require�nt and a
,,r�., request for a rate increase on basic cable service. The only Council action
necessary at this time was to set a date for a public hearing on both of these
proposals, for which the Cable TV Canmittee recan�nded October 2, 1984.
� There being little discussion, Council M�ember Brekken made a motion that the
public hearing relative to these Cable TV matters be set for October 2, 1984.
The mr�tion, seconded by Council Member Glynn, prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Paaers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
BID AWARD, PURCHASE OF INSURANCE SERVICFS
The next item before the City Council for consideration was to award the bid
relative to the purchase of insurance services.
City Manager Jim Hancock advised that only one bid had been received relative
to insurance services, that being fram Diversified Insurance Services, Inc.
He e_xplained the bid procedure and noted that most insurance canpaizies had
been reluctant to quote municipalities at this ti� due to high risk.
Mr. Earl Stevens, Senior Vice President of Diversified Insurance Services,
then introduced Mr. Dan Frazier, Undezwriting Supervisor, who reviewed the
deviations fran specifications.
�
Follawing questions and ccx�nents frcen the City Council, Council Member Brekken
� made a motion to award the bid for insurance services as presented by
Diversified Insurance Services, Inc. , and that Diversified be appointed as Agent
of Record for the three year period beginning October 1, 1984. The mr�tion was
seconded by Council Me.anber Glynn and prevailed by the ensuing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
BID AWARD, RECONSTRUCTION OF DOVE RfJAD
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider awarding the
bid relative to the reconstruction of Dove Road (fran Park Boulevard to
Kimball Road) .
Public Works Director Jim Baddaker reported that the follawing bids had been
received relative to the reconstruction of Dove Road west frcm Park Boulevard.
BIDDER ANIOUNT
Austin Road Ccxnpany $1,576,516.90
A^* Marriott Brothers, Inc. 1,711,043.17
APAC-Texas, Inc. 1,714,951.19
�
SRO Asphalt, Inc. 2,011,744.43
It was the recc�iendation of the City Sta.ff that the contract be awarded to
the low bidder, Austin RQad Cc�npany, in the amount of $1,576,516.90, which was
within the $1.6 million budget for the project. He added that canpletion t�me
was scheduled for 330 calendar days, with construction to begin about
October 1, 1984.
Council deliberation followed, with the possibility of a temporary road being
discussed.
(9)
09/18/84
A mption was then offered by Council Member Oliver to accept the recce�anenda-
tion of the City Staff and award the contract to Austin Road Cca�rpany in their
lav bid a�unt of $1,576,516.90. The motion was seconded by Council M�ember
Brekken and prevailed by the follaaing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
TTMR�zT,Tt�: RECONSTRLTCTIOrT PRQ7ECT, CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 w��
The next item before the City Cauncil was to consider Change Order No. 3
relative to the Timberli.ne Drive reconstruction project. ��
Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised that a problgn had been encountered
on the reconstruction of Timberline Drive in the area of the creek running
between the Pearltree Apartrrents Phases 1 and 2. Erosion in the vicinity of
the eastern culvert headwall had caused concern for the stability of the
cross-tie retaining wall arour�d the apartm�ent project. He elaborated on the
probleqn, and advised the City Staff reccxmiended solving it by placing a gabion
reta.ini.ng wall 15 feet long and eight feet tall along the eastern slope. This
w�uld add $18,017.71 to the amount of the TimUerline reconstruction contract.
A lengthy discussion, during which the drainage and existing and proposed.
develognent i.n the area vaere addressed. It was determined that the probable
cause of the probl�n was improper construction of the apar�trrients; hawever,
this solution vx�uld elimina.te any possible City liability for the shifting of
the building due to excavation.
A motion to table consideration of this change order pending further investi-
gation by the City Staff was then made by Council Member Larry Oliver. The
motion was seconded by Council Member Pawers and prevailed by the follawing
vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers "'"'�
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
.�r
ORDINANCE, UTILITY EASENIEN'T ABANDOI�]MIIVT, WEST NOR'I'�iWEST HIC�IWAY
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance
abandoning a utility easement.
Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised that tw+o ease�nt instnunents Yiad
been prepared for a sewer line extension located on the south side of
Northwest Highway just east of the General Telephone Company equignent
facility. The incorrect doctuttient had been filed inadvertently with Tarrant
County and was now to be abandoned, as the sew�r line ha.d been installed at a
different location.
The caption of the proposed ordinance was presented by the City Secretary.
There being little discussion, Council Member Oliver offered a motion that the
ordinance be adopted. The nx�tion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and
prevailed by the ensuing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer �^�►
ORDIN�INCE N0. 84-70
��
AN O�INANCE ABANDONING AI�ID VACATING A
SANITARY SEWER EASII�NT L(X'ATID IN THE T.
MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 1050 AND THE A.
FOS'I'ER SURVEY, P.BSTRAC.'T N0. 518 IN 'I'f�
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, T�.S, AS HEREI:I�TAFTER
DFSCRIBID; PRdVIDING A SEUER�IBILITY
C�,AUSE; AND D�CLARING AN II�EDTCY
(10)
09/18i$�
O�INANCE, AMEND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, DESICITI REVIEW AND INSPECTION FEES
The next item considered by the City Council was an ordinance amending the
City Code Appendix E relative to construction standards.
Mr. Baddaker reported the City Staff rec�carended charging developers a three
percent Design Revi�w and Inspection Fee in order to offset sc7me of the
administrative & equi�ent costs of reviewing plans and inspecting utilities,
stornn drains, and streets in new developmPazts. He also noted it was recom-
,r�, mended that this ordinance become effective on all subdivision plats approved
after October 16, 1984.
,� City Secretary Karen Spann then read the caption of the proposed ordinance.
A motion was offered by Council N1+�nber Pc7wers and seconded by Council Me�nber
Glynn that the ordinance be adopted. The m�tion prevailed by the follawing
vote:
Ayes : Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
NayS . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
O�INANCE NO. 84-71
AN ORDINANCE AMEL�IDING APPII�IDIX E, COrT-
STItUCTION STANDARDS-ARTICLE 1, ITEM I BY
PRdVIDING FOR SDCTION 1.5.1; PFiOVIDING FOR
FEES FOR SANITARY SEWER LINE TELEVISION
INSPECTION; P�VIDING FOR �CUTID
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT COPIES TO BE FILID
WITH 'I'HE DIREC.,TOR OF PUBLIC WORKS;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; P%JVIDING
AN EE"F�C,'TIVE DATE
�^' E�ECC]TIVE SESSION, PE�LiONNEL
� Mayor Pro Tem Ware then announced that the City Council v�uld recess to the
Conference Rocan to discuss personnel pursuant to Article 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S.,
Subsection (g) .
The City Council reconvened n�ntarily in the Chambers and, with the
exceptian of Mayor Tate and Council M�nber Dyer, all members of the governing
body were present.
City Manager Jim Hancock noted that a replace�nt for retixing Fire Chief
J. C. "Jake" Greener had not been officially named. The City Charter requixed
that such an appointment be made by the City Council, and the City Staff
rec�nded that Fire Marshal Bill Powers be prcanoted to fill the position.
Council Member Oliver made a motion to accept the reca��ndation of the City
Staff and appoint Mr. Bill Pow�ers as Fire Chief. The nx�tion was seconded by
Council Me.�nber Glynn and prevailed by the ensuing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pcywers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl�IDATION
!�"""` ZCJNING APPLICATION Z84-30, SEAHUNT'S SPORTING C-,OODS
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reccsn-
r�,,,,,. mendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccz�mission relative to Zoning Application
Z84-30 (Seahunt's) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable.
Planning & Zoni.ng C�mission Chairman Sharron Spencer reported the Cc�mission
had tabled consideration of this Site Plan zoning request for off-pre.�nise
cons�tion of beer only pending additional deli.beration.
No fornnal action was taken by the City Council.
(11)
09/18/84
PLANNING & ZONING CONIl�LISSION RECO�DATION
ZONING APPLICATION Z84-31, CITY-INSTIGATID REZONING 211 N. LUCAS DRIVE
The next. order of business was for the City Council to consider the recam-
m�endation of the Planning & Zoning Ca�mission relative to Zoning Application
Z84-31 (211 N. Lucas) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable.
This tract of land, being unintentionally an.itted frcan the City-instigated
rezoning case, was recamt�nded for the "CC" Community CoiYmercial zoning
designation, as reported by Cccrmission Chairman Spencer. The vote was 5 to 0, ,,.,�,
with Cam�nissioner Harlen Joyce abstaining because he was a neighboring
property awner within 200 feet.
The caption of the proposed zoning ordinance was then presented by the City �"�
Secretary.
A motion was made by Council Memb�r Glynn to accept the recongnendation of the
Planning & Zoning Cc�nnission and adopt the ordinance. A second was offered by
Council M�aiber Pawers, and the mc�tion prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Powers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
ORDINAI�TCE NO. 84-72
AN ORD]NAIVCE AN1II�]DING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10,
THE COMP�tSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF Tf�
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TExAS, SAME BEING ALSO
KN04V1V AS APPIIVDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF
C�RAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRAN'I'ING A ZONING CHANGE
ON A TRACT OF L�ND DESCRIBID AS BEING A
IpT, TRP�T, OR PARCEL OF LAl�ID LYING AND
BEING SITUATID IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS,
BEING A PART OF THE W. C. LUCAS ADDITION "�"�
IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE
F[JI,LY AI�ID QOP�LEI�'LY DESCRIB� IN THE BODY
OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A C�ii�1NGE IN ��
THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY F%k�I "R-2" ZWO-
FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT UNDER ORDINANCE
N0. 70-10 TO "CC" CONIl�1LlNITY COrM'IERCIAL
ZONING DISTRICT UNDER ORDINANCE N0. 82-73;
CORR�CTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRE-
SEKVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE; PR()VIDING A CI�AUSE RELATING TO
SEVERABILITY; DEI'ERNiINING THAT 'I'HE PUBLIC
Il�1'.PERFSTS, MORALS AND GIIVII2AL WES�ARE
DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMED1DMr3�]T
Tf�REIN MADE; PRC)VIDING A PF�IAI,TY NOr!' TO
EXCEm THE SUM OF OI�]E THOUSAND DOT,TJaRS
($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OF'FE�TSE SxP.TT,
BE DEII�lID CON�IITTID UPON EACH DAY DURING
OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND
D�CLARING AN ENIERGENCY
PLANNING & ZONING COrM2ZSSION R�M�IDATION
PROPOSID ANIENDMENTS TO COMPREFI�TTSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73
The next item before the City Council was to consider the rec�ndation of ��+
the Planning & Zoning Ccmmission relative to proposed amendments to
Ccxnprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73 an�d a subsequent ordinance.
��
Chairman Spencer reported the Planning & Zoning Cammission recamrended
approval of Section 45, Concept Plans, as presented; Section 56, Off-Street
Parking Requirements, as presented; and the height limitations in the single-
family districts, Sections 13, 14, & 15, the two-family district, R-3.5, and
the three- and four-family district, R-3.75, as presented. She also noted a
few minor changes in the Parking and Loading Area Develo�ent Standards,
Section 58, and the Ccmmission's recamrendation for approval.
The caption of the proposed ordinance was read by the City Secretary.
(12)
09/18/84
Council Nlember Pawers then made a motion to accept the recanmendation of the
Planning & Zoning Cc�anission and adopt the ordinance. The motion, seconded by
Council Member Brekken, prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes : Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
ORDINANCE NO. 84-73
��*+
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE,
TEX�1S ANIENDING APPENDIX "D" OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE,
�"`" Z�B, � COMPREI�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE,
BY PROVIDING FOR AMII�IDMENTS AND CHANGES TO
ARTICLE III - DISTRICT REGUI,ATIONS - BY
PROVIDING FOR AMENDMIIV�i'S AND CHANGES IN
THE R-20, R-12.5, R-7.5, AND R-3.5 RESI-
DENTIAL DISTRICI'S, BY PROVIDING FOR HEIC�iT
LIMITATIONS; BY PROVIDING FOR CHANGES IN
OFF-STRE�r PARKING REQUIRII�]TS; BY PFt(J-
VIDING FOR C�iANGES IN CONCEPT PLANS; BY
PROVIDING FOR PARKING AND IAADING ARF.A
DE�7E'L�OPMENT STANDARDS; P120VIDING A PEDIALTY
UPON CONVICI'ION OF NO�I' LESS 'I'HAN OI�IE
DOLLAR ($1.0 0) NOR NYJRE Tf�iAN ONE THOUSAND
DOLL�ARS ($1,000) AND A SEPARATE OFFEDISE
SHA�L BE D�D CONIl�IITI'ID UPON EACfi DAY
DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CI�AUSE; AND
DECr�RING AN II�TCY
PI�INNING & ZONING OOMMISSION RECON�IDATION
FINAL PLAT, SOUTH SIDE OF S. H. 26 AND WEST OF S. H. 114
�►
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recom-
mendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccc�[n.ission relative to the final plat of
� the Grapevine Office Addition.
This particular plat included approximately 2.5 acres of land located on the
south side of State Highway 26 and just west of State Highway 114, northwest
of airport property. The name given the subdivision was not descriptive of
the "LI" Light Industrial zoning for the proposed use of the property as ware-
housing, and the Planning & Zoning Commission reccx�aciended the plat be
approved, provided that a new name be selected prior to obtaining signatures
on the plat.
Council Meanber Brekken then made a motion to accept the rec�ndation of the
C��i.ssion and approve this final plat, but that the doc�ent not be signed
until a new r� had been approved by the City Staff. Council Member Glynn
seconded the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONfl�IDATION
CORRECTID FINAL PLAT, HAFd�IEL,L ADDITION, PHASE II
�*
The next ite�n before the City Council was to consider the recona�ndation of
the Planning & Zoning Canmission relative to the corrected final plat of the
�,,,,�, Hazwell Addition, Phase II.
The property included in this plat is located on the north side of Dove Rpad
just west of the Canterbuzy Village Addition. During preliminary
construction of this subd.ivision, some minor discrepancies were discovered
concerning dimensions on several of the lots. To correct these errors, a
revised final plat was to be considered. ConEni.ssion Chairman Sharron Spencer
reported their unanimous approval of the corrected final plat.
There being little discussion, Council M�mber Tom Powers made a motion to
accept the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Caimission and approve the
(13)
09/18/84
corrected final plat of the Harwell Addition, Phase II. The motion was
seconded by Council M�nber Jim Glynn and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pc�wers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
PI�ANNING & ZC7rtING CONIl�iISSIODT P;ECONS��IDATION
FINAL PLAT, IDLICATION CENTIIt ADDITION
wr�w
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reca►r
mendation of the Planning & Zoning Cca�mission relative to the final plat of
the Education Center P,ddition.
+�,r
This plat, filed by the Grapevine-Colleyville Schools, included the existing
administration building, football staditun, and adjacent property. A platting
of the tract was necessary in order to make improvements. Council Member
Oliver, being e�nployed by the school district, advised that he wduld abstain
frc�n consideration of this item.
Mrs. Spencer advised the Planning & Zoning Commission had unanimously approved
the final plat of the Education Center Addition.
A motion was then offered by Council Member Glynn and seconded by Council
Member Brekken to accept the recc�mendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccmmis-
sion and approve the final plat. The motion prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes : Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pow�ers
Nays . None
Abstain: Oliver
Absent : Tate & Dyer
PI�I�TNING & ZONING CON7MISSION RECONIl�IDATION
PRELIMINARY PLAT, SOUPHWEST GRAPEVINE �IAL PARK
��
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recam-
mendation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�tnission relative to the preliminary plat
of the Southwest Grapevine C�rcial Park. �`�
The Sauthwest Grapevine Cam�rcial Park is proposed to be located on the south
side of Mustang Drive adjacent to the airport property (a portion of the
forn�er Box property) . The tract is currently zoned Planned Industrial and
Camrnuiity Ccxr[rercial. Planning & Zoning Cammission Chairnian Sharron Spencer
reported that they had tabled consideration of this preliminary plat pending
further deliberation.
No formal action was taken by the City Council.
PI�NNING & ZO�G CONIl�IISSION RECONIlKENDATION
PFtELIMINARY PLAT, DFW AIR FREIGHr ADDITION
The next ite�n to be considered by the City Council was the Planning & Zoning
Cammission rec�ndation relative to the preliminasy plat of the DFW Air
Freight Addition.
The property included in this particular plat is located on the south side of
East Dallas Road and east of Minters Chapel Road, and is proposed as Phase II
of the DFW Air Freight Centre. The Planning & Zoning Ccc�mission had tabled
this preliminary plat, as reported by Chairnnan Spencer. �^*
No formal action was taken by the City Council.
��
PLANNING & ZONING COrM�iIS5I0N R�ANA�LVDATION
PRF�IMINARY PLAT, WESTERDT OAKS ADDITION
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recc�r
mendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccx�mission relative to the prel�mi.riary plat
of the Western Oaks Addition.
This preliminary plat covers the single-family portion of the Willard Baker
development, fornierly knawn as the Hawn tract, located west of State Highway
121 south and north of Hall-Johnson Road, adjacent to the Woodland Hills and
(14)
09/18/84
O'Dell Subdivisions. Planning & Zoning Canmission Chairniari Sharron Spencer
advised of the Cc�nmission's unaniunpus recotmtiendation for the approval of this
preliminary plat.
A motion was then offered by Council Nie.mber Oliver and seconded by Council
Nlember Powers to accept the recoimiendation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�mission
and approve the preliminary plat of the Western Oaks Addition. The m�tion
prevailed by the ensuing vote:
,.•�• Ayes : Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
� PLANNING & Z(7DTING COMMISSION RECONIl�IDATION
PRELIMINARY PLAT, GRAPEVINE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX ADDITION
The final order of business was for the City Council to consider the recan-
mendation of the Planning & Zoning Canmission relative to the preliminary plat
of the Grapevine Municipal Ccxnplex Addition.
This approx�m�ately 13 acres is the site of the proposed City Municipal Camplex
located off of South Main Street near the American Bank of Comnerce. Platting
the property was necessary in order to issue a building permit for the first
phase of the comple�, the new municipal library. The Planning & Zoning
Commission rec�ndation, as reported by Chairman Spencer, was for approval.
The vote was 6 to 0.
It was noted that the City Council had, earlier at this meeting, elected to
retain approximately 70 feet of access frontage on Main Street previously
advertised for sale.
There being little discussion, Council Me.anber Oliver made a motion to accept
the reccrnm+endation of the Planning & Zoni.ng Cammission and approve the
preliminary plat of the Grapevine Municipal Cam�lex Addition. The mr�tion was
�""" seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the followi.ng vote:
�, Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Powers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
AATOURNMENT
The deliberations of the City Council having been concluded, a motion to
adjourn the meeting was offered by Council M�mber Oliver and seconded by
Council M�r Brekken. The nwtion prevailed by the ensuing vote:
Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pcxaers
Nays . None
Absent: Tate & Dyer
PASSID AND APPROVID BY Tf� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on
this the 2nd day of October , 1984.
APPRC3VED:
�
�^f ^�-�c-� f� lj
��'
Mayor
�
ATI'EST:
�
� �
City ecretary
(15)