Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-09-18 Joint Meeting AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18 , 1984 AT 7 :30 P.M. �"°` COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � I . CALL TO ORDER II . INVOCATION: Council Member Larry Oliver III . PRESENTATION Mr. Don Spitzer, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. , to make a presentation to the City Council. IV. JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-30 submitted by Seahunt' s Sporting Goods. B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-31 , city-instigated rezoning of .�,.-� 225 N. Lucas. C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to �, conduct a public hearing relative to proposed amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73 , as amended. V. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to consider further published agenda items. B. City Council to recess briefly and reconvene in the Council Chambers to consider additional business items . IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S, AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 AT 1:30 P.M. � �r■. Cit Secretar � AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18 , 1984 AT 7 : 30 P .M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � VI . CITIZENS REQUESTS AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS �, VII. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meetings of September 4, 1984 VIII . OLD BUSINESS City Council to consider awarding the bid relative to the sale of surplus real property. IX. NEW BUSINESS A. City Council to consider a resolution adopting the 1984 tax roll. B. City Council to consider an ordinance setting the ad valorem tax rate for fiscal year 1984-85. C. City Council to consider an ordinance setting the general homestead tax exemption amount at 40 percent. D. City Council to consider an ordinance amending the golf course rate schedule. .�.a. E. City Council to consider an ordinance relative to ;,�,,, vehicle impoundment fees and related items. F. City Council to consider authorizing the execution of an agreement with the City of Colleyville and the Grapevine-Colleyville I . S . D. relative to the utilization of a School Resource Officer. G. City Council to consider making a Council appointment to the Grapevine-Colleyville I . S. D. Citizens Advisory Committee. H. City Council to consider authorizing funding for the Northeast Sector of the Tarrant Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse. I . City Council to consider setting a public hearing date relative to the proposed Cable TV rate increase request and the proposed amendment to the Cable TV franchise agreement. J. City Council to consider awarding the bid relative to the purchase of insurance services. � � K. City Council to consider awarding the bid relative to the reconstruction of Dove Road (from Park Boulevard to � Kimball Road) . L. City Council to consider Change Order No. 3 relative to the Timberline Drive reconstruction project. M. City Council to consider an ordinance abandoning a utility easement. N. City Council to consider an ordinance amending the City Code Appendix E relative to construction standards. X. EXECUTIVE SESSION A. City Council to recess to the Conference Room to discuss personnel pursuant to Article 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , Subsection (g) . B. City Council to reconvene in the Council Chambers and take any necessary action relative to personnel. � XI . PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the � Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z84-30 (Seahunt' s) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z84-31 (225 N. Lucas) and a subsequent ordi- nance, if applicable. C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to proposed amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73 and a subsequent ordinance. D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of the Grapevine Office Addition. E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the corrected final plat of the Harwell Addition, Phase II . '"�"` F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the '� Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat ,�, of the Education Center Addition. G. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of the Southwest Grapevine Commercial Park. H. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of the DFW Air Freight Addition. I . City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of the Western Oaks Addition. J. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of the Grapevine_ Municipal Complex Addition. XII . ADJOURNMENT "'�"" IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S, AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED i�w AND POSTED ON THIS THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 AT 1 : 30 P.M. Cit Secretary AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18 , 1984 AT 7 : 30 P.M. CIVIC CENTER — 311 MAIN STREET VI . NEW BUSINESS e� A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- cation Z84-30 (Seahunt' s) and make a recommendation to „�„ the City Council. B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- cation Z84-31 (225 N. Lucas) and make a recommendation to the City Council. C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider proposed amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73 , as amended, and make a recommendation to the City Council. D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of the Grapevine Office Addition and make a recommenda- tion to the City Council. E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the corrected final plat of the Harwell Addition, Phase II , and make a recommendation to the City Council. F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of the Education Center Addition and make a recommenda- � tion to the City Council. G. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- ,,,�, nary plat of the Southwest Grapevine Commercial Park and make a recommendation to the City Council. H. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- nary plat of the DFW Air Freight Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. I. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- nary plat of the Western Oaks Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. J. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- nary plat of the Grapevine Municipal Complex Addition make a recommendation to the City Council. VII . CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meetings of August 14 & 21 and September 4 , 1984 VIII . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION �-� IX. ADJOURNMENT �. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S, AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 AT 1 :30 P.M. Cit Secretar STATE OF TEXAS COUN'I'Y OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council and Planning & Zoning Cc�nenission of the City of Grapevine, Texas �t in Regular Joint Session on this the 18th day of Septe.mber, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 413 Main Street, with the following members of the City Council present to�wit: � Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem Larry Oliver Council M+e�nber � Marion Brekken Council Me.mber Jim Glynn Council Me��ber Tom Po�aers Council Nlember constituting a quonun, with Mayor William D. Tate and Council Member Ron Dyer absent, with the following me.mbers of the Planning & Zoning Comnission: Sharron Spencer Chairnnari Ron Cook Vice Chairman Harlen Joyce Nl�mber Shane Wilbanks Member Rick Atkins Me�tber Peggy Engholm Member constituting a quonam, with Cammissioner Gerald Norn�n absent, with the follawing members of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Karen Spann City Secretary CALL TO ORDER � The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Ware. � INVOCATION Council Member Larry Oliver delivered the Invocation. PRESENTATION, MR. DON SPITZER, PEAT, MA1�lIQZ, MITCHE.LL & CO. The first item was for Mr. Don Spitzer, representing the accounting firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. , to present a Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting to the City of Grapevine. He noted that the City's financial sta.t�nents had been submitted to the Government Finance Officers Association and, upon meeting their reporting standards, the City ha.d been awarded a Certificate of Conformance recognizing excellence in financial management and statez�ent preparation. Mr. Spitzer presented a plaque to Mayor Pro Tem Ware on behalf of the City, and a certificate was presented to City Manager Jim Hancock on behalf of the staff m�nbers who were instnunental in achieving this award. Aclmawledging remarks were then offered. by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and City Manager Jim Hancock. PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-30, SEAflUNT'S SPORTING GOODS � The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Canr mission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-30 sub- i,",,, mitted by Seahunt's Sporting Goods. The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Pro Te.�n Ware, who then called upon Public Works Director Jim Baddaker to explain the request of the applicant. Mr. Baddaker advised that the property in question was located at 216 North Dove Road, just north of Northwest Highway. Being currently zoned "HC" Highway C�rcial and used as a bait and ta.ckle shop also serving soft drinks and chips, the property awner had requested. approval �or the storage, posses- sion, retail sale, and off-prelnise cons�ption of beer. 09/18/8� Mr. Mike Blanco, applicant, explained. that he had purchased the property in March of 1984 and put in the Seahunt's bait and tackle shop. He felt the sale of beer for off-premise constunption wnuld offer a m�re complete service to his customers. A period of questions and camnents follaw�ed, which included a discussion of the parking situation. NOTE: Commissioner Ron Cook arrived during this discussion. �� Mayor Pro Tem Ware asked if there w�ere any guests present who wished to ccataY�nt relative to the proposed zoning. Mr. George Tiller.y, 301 North Dove Road, spoke in oppc>sition to the beer sales at this location. It was reported �� by the City Secretary that no correspondence had been received relative to this zoning request. There being no further discussion, a n�ation to close their portion of the public hearing was offered by Ccmmissioner Shane Wilbanks and seconded by Commission Men�ber Rick Atkins. The mr�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Wilbanks, Atkins & Engholm Nays . None Abstain: Joyce Absent : Nornian A motion to close the public hearing was also offered by Council Member Tam Pawers and seconded by Council M,e�nber Marion Brekken. The mr�tion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-31, CITY INSTIGATID, 211 N. LUCAS �� The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Ccx�r mission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-31, „�;,,�, city-instigated rezoning of 211 N. Lucas. Mayor Pro Tem Ware declared open the public hearing. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised this parcel was a part of the city- i.nstigated rezoning case, having been inadvertently anitted. The tract had originally been advertised for the "G1�" Neighborhood Cc�tiercial Zoning District, and the City Council had authorized readvertisement for the "CC" Ccmmunity Camiercial and the "HC" Highway C�rcial zoning designations. Being located at 211 N. Lucas Drive, the property was currently zoned "R-2" 'Itac�-Family Dwoelling District under Ccxnprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 70-10. The cx�mer of the property was not present to cc�nrent on the matter; however, Mr. Harlen Joyce, a neighboring property o�wner, stated that he had spoken with the awner of the tract in question, who supported the "CC" Canmunity C�rcial zoning category. Mayor Pro Tem Ware asked if there were guests present who wished to speak reiative to this zoning request. There w�ere none. City Secretary Karen Sparin also reported that no correspondence had been received concerning this application. �� A nx�tion to close the public hearing was then made by Canmission Me.mber Engholm. Cc�nmissioner Ron Cook offered a second to the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: .�� Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Wilbanks, Atkins, & Engholm Nays . None Abstai.n: Joyce Absent : Nornn�an Council Memt�er Glynn also made a nx�tion to close the Council's portion of the public hearing. A second was made by Council Member Pawers, and the nx�tion prevailed by the follawing vote: (2) 09/1$/84 Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer PUBLIC HEARING, PR(JPOSID ANIENDN�ITS TO CONI�'RII�tSIVE ZONING ORDIN�INCE NO. 84-73 The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Co�r mission to conduct a public hearing relative to proposed amendments to Cornpre- ,w.. hensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended. The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Pro Tem Ware. � Planning & Zoning Cc�mission Chainnan Sharron Spencer highlighted the proposed changes to the Camprehensive Zoning Ordinance, beginning with Section 56, Off- Street Parking Requirement. This proposal concerned parking requirements for general office uses, requiring 5 parking spaces, plus 1 for each 300 square feet of floor area. Proposed changes to Section 58, Parking and Loading Area Develog�nt Standards, were also noted, which included a require�nent that all parking areas in all zoning districts be paved. Mrs. Spencer outlined revisions to Section 45, Concept Plan, and noted that they basically set out standards of fornn for submitta.l of a concept plan. Ntunerous proposed anyendments to the "R-20", "R-12.5", and "R-7.5" Single- Family Dwelli.ng Districts were presented. These included changes in the perm.itted uses, accessozy uses, conditional uses, and liunitations of uses. Density requirements were set, and. building height requirements �,�rere extended frcan 25 feet to 35 feet not to exceed two stories. The off-street parki.ng regulations were amended to prohibit the parking of recreational vehicles in the required front yard. A cam�ion open space requir�ent of 200 square feet per dwelling unit in developments of 100 or more units was addressed at length. The landscaping/tree preservation requiranents were also presented. Questions and ccm�rents frcan the Planning & Zoning Ccmmi.ssion an,d City Council +�* were addressed during this presentation, and a lengthy discussion ensued relative to the tree preservation and ca�snon open space requirements. �`"' Parks & Recreation Director Kevin Conklin addressed the c�n open space regulations and maintenance thereof. Due to the late hour and the remaining agenda items, consideration was given to continuing the public hearing at a later date or possibly scheduling a public wr�rkshop. Ha�ever, the general ooncensus of those present was to continue the public hearing at this time. Mayor Pro Tem Ware invited those who wished to speak relative to these pro- posed amenc7ments to do so. (1) Mr. Darrell VanDyke, 2005 Shadow Court, addressed the limitation that no more than five persons unrelated by blood or marriage may occupy residences in the R-20, R-12.5, or R-7.5 Single-Family Districts. (2) Mr. Joe Wright, 601 W. Wall, made a lengthy presentation pre- dominantly addressing the ccx�non open space and tree preservation require�nents. A recess was called during the presentation of Mr. Wright and upon reconvening, all Council M�nbers were present with the exception of Mayor Tate and Council Member Dyer, and all Plaxu�ing & Zoning Coitmission Members were present with the exception of Cc�missioner Nornian. �^* Mr. Wright concluded his remarks, and (3) Mr. Chris Lott, 929 Kings Canyon Drive, c�nted relative to the height requir�ent in the single-family districts. (4) Mr. Jay Mossman, 1601 Box Canyon Court, also addressed the ,�,,,,. single-family height requirements, and (5) Mr. Roy Stewart, 309 Drexel Drive, cc�mlented relative to the tree preservation regulations. (6) Mr. Jesse Woods, 2746 Manchester Lane, inquired about the uses permitted in the R-7.5 Single- Family District, and (7) Mr. Jim Swann, 1018 Riverside Drive, offered possible solutions to difficulties presented with the c�n open space and the tree preservation require�ents. Questions fram the Council concerning the buffer requirerents were briefly addressed, and the following letter was read by the City Secretary. (3) 09/18/84 September 18, 1984 Nlembers of the City Council and Planning & Zoning C�mission: When I first moved to Grapevine six years ago, the property behind me was heavily wooded with dozens of live and post oaks, native pecan trees, and an assortinent of colorful birds. I no longer wake ,��, up in the morning to birds singing, but the tune of bulldozers turning the forest and pasturelands into a dustlx7wl of develog�ent. Trees that had previously withstood icestorms and the ferocity of �" tornado-like winds have fallen prey to progress. The mighty oak and pecan trees have been carted off in the shovels of bulldozers to their funeral pyre of bonfires that I see burning in the darkness fresn by bedrocxn window. I find it ironic that twr� of the largest oak trees in the fields have not yet met their demise because the developers park theix bulldozers underneath them and use the shade of their large branches to escape frcxn the heat and eat their lunches. But once they are no longer needed, these trees will also end up in the bonfires. Haw sad to think that my children and their descendants will never see the wild quail and pheasants, nor tease the caws that once roam�ed my backyard. They will never be able to appreciate the country-Iike atmosphere that Grapevine was once knawn for. They will graw up thinking all tawns are nothing but flat, treeless I.and full of houses and apartments. They will grow up thinking that there is no difference between Grapevine, Texas and Plano unless s�ething is done to prevent developers fran taking the na.tural beauty of the land away from it. Let's not let the Dallas developers (I say Dallas because mQst of ��+ our local developers who live in tawn do make an effort to save trees and keep their heavily wooded lots as attractive as possible) nzin what Grapevine has cane to stand for. Let's not have strangers �'� to Grapevine w�nder why our City was even natr�ed Grapevine in the first place. The land in our tawn has been zoned, ncyw let's ensure that the develognents to caire are not an eyesore, but enhance the reputation of our City. The proposed "beautification" amendment will rwt bring back the trees that have been mawed dawn behind me, nor will it bring back the wildlife who are now hameless, but maybe it will keep future residents fran suffering the sam�e fate as those of us in my neighborhood have suffered. Grawth should not be synonymous with ugli.ness. Keep the "grapevines in Grapevine" and ensure quality and beauty for generations to came. Sincerely, Jeanne Riecss 2027 Tangle�u�od Following additional discussion relative to continuance of the public hearing, �� a nx�tion was offered by Ccarmi.ssioner Engholm to close the public hearing relative to the height requireanents in Sections 13, 14, & 15, the Single- Family Dwelling Districts, and in Sections 17 & 18, the R-3.5 �-Family �� Dwelling District and the R-3.75 Three- and Four-Family Dwelling District. Also to close the public hearing relative to Section 45, Concept Plans, Sec- tion 56, Off-Street Parking Require�nents, an�d Section 58, Parking and Loading Area, Develog�eent Standards. The m�tion was secon,ded by Vice Chairman Ron Cook and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Wilbanks, Atkins, & Engholm Nays . None Absent: NornnaYz (4) 09/18/84 A motion was then made by Cammission Member Pec�gy Engholm and seconded by Cam- missioner Shane Wilbanks to continue the public hearing on the remainder of the proposed Ccx�rehensive Zoning Ordinance aniendments until October 16, 1984. The nx�tion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Wilbanks, Atkins, & Engholm Nays . None Absent: Nornian ,,,.�., Council Member Marion Brekken also offered a similar mption to close the public hearing relative to the height requirements in the Single-Family Dis- tricts, Sections 13, 14, & 15, the R-3.5 Two-Family District, Section 17, and � the R-3.75 Three- and Four-Family District, Section 18, also relative to Sec- tion 45, Concept Plans, Section 56, Off-Street Parking R�g�ire�nents, and Section 58, Parking and Loading Area Develognent Standards. In addition, she moved to continue the public hearing on the rest of the proposed amenclments until October 16, 1984. Council Member Jim Glynn seconded the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer RECESS & RECONVENE Mayor Pro Tem Ware then announced that the Planning & Zoning C�ssion vx�uld recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to consider further published agenda ite[ns. The City Council was to recess briefly before considering additional business. Upon reconvening in the Council Chambers, all meznbers of the City Council were present with the exception of Mayor Tate and Council M�snber Dyer. CODTSIDERATIOI�T OF Tf� MINUTES � The next ite�n before the City Council was to consider the mi.nutes of their two � nueetings on Septeqnber 4, 1984. There being no additions or corrections, Council Nlember Brekken made a mr�tion that the minutes be approved as published. The motion was seconded by Council Member Pawers and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer BID AW�2D, SAI�E OF SURPLUS PROPERTY, ACCFSS TO CITY COMPLEX SITE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider awarding the bid relative to the sale of surplus real property. The taking of bids had been authorized relative to the sale of a tract of land approximately 70' x 406' at the access point to the City Cc�mplex site on South Main Street. Only one bid had been received, that being fran Hall Construc- tion Campany, offering two options for the purchase of the property. The award of the bid had been tabled by the City Council on August 21 and September 4, 1984 to allow the Municipal Facilities Canmittee to meet with the bidder and formulate a reccam�ndation. � Council Nlember Larry Oliver, Chairntian of the Municipal Facilities Conmittee, reported that a discrepancy had been discovered in the advertisement, making ,�,,,, the award of the bid impossible without readvertising correctly. The City Council then discussed whether to readvertise or retain the property in question. Follawing this deliberation, it was generally concurred that the City should retain this property and not readvertise for the sale thereof. Council M�ember Oliver offered a nx�tion to reject the bid received. The motion was seconded by Council N1�nber Glynn and prevailed by the follo�aing vote: (5) 09/18/84. Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pavers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer RFSOI�JTION, ADOPT 1984 TAX ROLL The next order of busi.ness was for the City Council to consider a resolution adopting the 1984 tax roll. Acting Finance Director Jim Cook advised that the Chief P,ppraiser of the ,�.h Tarrant Appraisal District had su�anitted totals of appraised property values within the City of Grapevine at a net taxable value of $948,920,453. He noted that the majority of the increase aver last year's figure was due to a �,� reappraisal; how�ever, $33.5 million w�ere new additions to the tax roll. The captian of the proposed resolution was presented by the City Secretary. There being little discussion, Council Member T�n Paaers made a motion that the resolution be adopted. The nx�tion, seconded by Council Member Oliver, prevailed by ensuing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer RE.SOLUTION NO. 84-43 A RESOLUTION OF Tf� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, APPFt�VING THE TAX ROLL FOR 1984 ON PROPEf�t'Y WITHIN Tf� CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFEC.'TIVE DATE 012DINANCE, SETTING AD VAI�ORII�i TAX RATE FOR 1984-85 The next itezn before the City Council was to consider an ordinance setting the �°� ad valorem tax rate for fiscal year 1984-85. Acting Finance Director Jim Cook advised that a tax rate of 40G per $100 `�" valua.tion had been used in developing the 1984-85 bt�lget figures. This pro- posed an increase over the effective tax rate of 30.045�, and all legal requisements of the Truth-In-Taxation laws had been met. With the h�nestead exe�nptions being offered, it was determi.ned that the majority of homeawners w�uld actually ex�erience a decrease in their property tax�es. City Secretary Karen Spann then read the caption of the proposed ordinance. A motion was made by Council N1+e�t�ber Glynn and seconded by Council Mesnber Paw�rs that the ordinance be adopted. The nr�tion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pov�rers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer ORDINANCE NO. 84-67 AN O�INANCE SEITING TI� ANNLIAL TAX RATE FOR 1984; LE,'VYING TAXES FOR Tf� YF,AR 1984 TO BE ASSFSSID ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY �► WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, T�A.S; PRCATIDING PEDIALTIES AND INTEREST FOR DELINQUENT TAXES; PROVIDING �,� FOR THE INTRA- AND INTER-DF�AR�'MENT FUND TRANSFEFtS; PROVIDING FOR THE INVESZMENT OF IDLE F'[R�IDS; AND DDCI,ARING AN II�EI�TCY 012DINANCE, SETTING 40$ GEL�TERAL HONIESTF�AD TAX EXEMPTION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance setting the general homestead tax exemption amount at 40 percent. (6) o9/1s/s4 Mr. Cook once again advised that a 40$ general h�estead tax exe�nption for all awners that occupy single-family residences had been used in preparation of the 1984-85 budget and in setting the tax rate. The proposed exemption was naw before the City Council for forma.l adoption by ordinance. The caption of the proposed ordinance was read by the City Secretary. Council Nle�nber Glynn then made a m�tion that the ordinance approving the 40� hca�estead tax exemption be adopted. The motion was seconded by Council Me,mber ,,,�, Oliver and prevailed by the folla�ing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers � Nays : None Absent: Tate & Dyer ORDIN�INCE NO. 84-68 AN ORDINANCE OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TF�1�.S, PROVIDING FOR RESIDEDtCE HOMESTEAD E�P'TION FROM AD VALORFM TAXATION; AND PFtO�IIDING AN EF'FECTIVE DATE ORDINANC.�, AMENDING GOLF COURSE RATE SCI�DULE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance amending the golf course rate schedule. City Manager Jim Hancock advised that increases in certain golf course rates had been used in calculating budget figures and. naw needed to be adopted by ordinance. He reviewed the increases, which included w�ekend green fees and golf cart rental for 18 holes. The caption of the proposed ordinance was read by the City Secretary. �^ Follawing discussion of this item, Council Member Powers made a motion that the ordinance be adopted. The motion was seconded by Council M�ember Brekken � and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer ORDIN�INCE NO. 84-69 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE GRAPEVINE CITY CODE S�CTI�T 16-32 (A) RII�ATIVE TO GRAPEUINE MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FEFS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CI�AUSE; PRpVIDING A PII�IALTY NOT TO EXCEID THE SUM OF 'IWO HLTNDRID DOT�2S ($200.00) AND A SEPARATE OF�'EDTSE SHALL BE DEF�IFD COMMI'I`!'EID UPON EACH DAY DURING ON WFiICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND DECLARING AN II�9ERGENCY ORDINANCE, WREC�ER SER�IICE ADID VEHICLE Ir�OiJNDMENI' FEES The next item was for the City Council to consider an ordinance relative to �°* vehicle i��pounc�m�ent fees and related items. City Manager Jim Hancock reported that a vehicle impoundtn�nt area had been r�,,,,, authorized in the 1984-85 budget for the Police Departrrnnt. The ordinance setting wrecker operation regulations and fees had been proposed for consideration at this time; however, it had been discovered that the ordinance was incanplete and the City Staff recon�nded this item be tabled. A �tion was then offered by Council M�nber Powers and seconded by Council Member Oliver that the ordinance relative to impound fees and related it�ns be tabled pending further study by the City Staff. The motion prevailed by the follawing vote: (7) 09/18/84 Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer CONTRAGT, SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER The next order of l�usiness was for the City Council to consider authorizing the execution of an agree��nt with the City of Colleyville and the Grapevine- Colleyville I. S. D. relative to the utilization of a School Resource Officer. ��� Police Chief H. A. Deggans advised that the City Council had recently approved a School Resource Officer Progr�n to provide police services at the Grapevi.ne- Colleyville schools. In order t�o coordinate this program, a cooperation �� agree��nt needed to the authorized between the City of Grapevine, the City of Colleyville, and the Grapevine-Colleyville School District, and h,e solicited Council authorization to execute this agre�eent. There being little discussion, Council Me�nber Tan Pawers offered a m�tion to authorize the City Staff to execute the cooperation agreenient relative to the School Resource Officer Program. The motion was seconded by Council Member Glynn and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer COUNCIL APPOIl�IT, GRAPEVINE-COLI�EYVILLE I. S. D. CITIZIIVS ADVISORY COMMITI�E The next item was for the City Council to consider maki.ng a Council appoint- ment to the Grapevine-Colleyville I. S. D. Citizens Advisory Cc�mittee. City Secretary Karen Spann advised that a m�mber of the Grapevine City Council was to serve on the School District Citizens Advisory Catmittee. The term of office was two years, and Council Member Marion Brekken had been serving in '"""* this capacity for the pa.st ternn. ,�...r Follawing brief deliberation, a motion was made by Council Member Glynn and seconded by Council Me�nber Powers that Mrs. Brekken be reappointed as the Council representative serving on the School District Citizens Advisory Ccnr mittee. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Abstain: Brekken Absent : Tate & Dyer FUNDING, TARRANT COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE, NORZ'HFJAST SE(,'TOR The next order of business was for the City Council to consider authorizing funding for the Northeast Sector of the Tarrant Council on Alcoholism and Dnxg Abuse. City Secretary Karen Spann reported that a request for funding had been received fresn th�e Tarrant Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse, Northeast Sector. She noted that a portion of their approx�mately $48,000 budget was funded by the United Way, but that the majority of finances w�re raised fram the ccmmunities served. It was the recamYtiendation of the City Staff that $1,500 be authorized for this cause. It was also noted that, if approved, '"""'* this aimunt w�uld autr�natically be inclu,ded in subsequent budgets unless instructed otherwise. �.� Council Member Marion Brekken then made a motion authorizing funding for the Northeast Sector of the Tarrant Council on Alcoholism aryd Drug Abuse in the amount of $1,500. The m�tion was seconded Council M�ember Oliver and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pvwers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer �8� 09/18/84 SET P'UBLIC HEARING DATE, GROUP W CABLE TV The next order of business was for the City Council to consider setting a public hearing relative to the proposed Cable TV rate increase request and the proposed amendment to the Cable TV franchise agreement. City Secretazy Karen Spann reviewed the proposals sulxnitted on August 21, 1984 by Mr. Robin Troop of Group W Cable TV relative to a request for amenc7ment of the franchise agreement eliminating the annua.l outside audit require�nt and a ,,r�., request for a rate increase on basic cable service. The only Council action necessary at this time was to set a date for a public hearing on both of these proposals, for which the Cable TV Canmittee recan�nded October 2, 1984. � There being little discussion, Council M�ember Brekken made a motion that the public hearing relative to these Cable TV matters be set for October 2, 1984. The mr�tion, seconded by Council Member Glynn, prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Paaers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer BID AWARD, PURCHASE OF INSURANCE SERVICFS The next item before the City Council for consideration was to award the bid relative to the purchase of insurance services. City Manager Jim Hancock advised that only one bid had been received relative to insurance services, that being fram Diversified Insurance Services, Inc. He e_xplained the bid procedure and noted that most insurance canpaizies had been reluctant to quote municipalities at this ti� due to high risk. Mr. Earl Stevens, Senior Vice President of Diversified Insurance Services, then introduced Mr. Dan Frazier, Undezwriting Supervisor, who reviewed the deviations fran specifications. � Follawing questions and ccx�nents frcen the City Council, Council Member Brekken � made a motion to award the bid for insurance services as presented by Diversified Insurance Services, Inc. , and that Diversified be appointed as Agent of Record for the three year period beginning October 1, 1984. The mr�tion was seconded by Council Me.anber Glynn and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer BID AWARD, RECONSTRUCTION OF DOVE RfJAD The next order of business was for the City Council to consider awarding the bid relative to the reconstruction of Dove Road (fran Park Boulevard to Kimball Road) . Public Works Director Jim Baddaker reported that the follawing bids had been received relative to the reconstruction of Dove Road west frcm Park Boulevard. BIDDER ANIOUNT Austin Road Ccxnpany $1,576,516.90 A^* Marriott Brothers, Inc. 1,711,043.17 APAC-Texas, Inc. 1,714,951.19 � SRO Asphalt, Inc. 2,011,744.43 It was the recc�iendation of the City Sta.ff that the contract be awarded to the low bidder, Austin RQad Cc�npany, in the amount of $1,576,516.90, which was within the $1.6 million budget for the project. He added that canpletion t�me was scheduled for 330 calendar days, with construction to begin about October 1, 1984. Council deliberation followed, with the possibility of a temporary road being discussed. (9) 09/18/84 A mption was then offered by Council Member Oliver to accept the recce�anenda- tion of the City Staff and award the contract to Austin Road Cca�rpany in their lav bid a�unt of $1,576,516.90. The motion was seconded by Council M�ember Brekken and prevailed by the follaaing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer TTMR�zT,Tt�: RECONSTRLTCTIOrT PRQ7ECT, CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 w�� The next item before the City Cauncil was to consider Change Order No. 3 relative to the Timberli.ne Drive reconstruction project. �� Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised that a problgn had been encountered on the reconstruction of Timberline Drive in the area of the creek running between the Pearltree Apartrrents Phases 1 and 2. Erosion in the vicinity of the eastern culvert headwall had caused concern for the stability of the cross-tie retaining wall arour�d the apartm�ent project. He elaborated on the probleqn, and advised the City Staff reccxmiended solving it by placing a gabion reta.ini.ng wall 15 feet long and eight feet tall along the eastern slope. This w�uld add $18,017.71 to the amount of the TimUerline reconstruction contract. A lengthy discussion, during which the drainage and existing and proposed. develognent i.n the area vaere addressed. It was determined that the probable cause of the probl�n was improper construction of the apar�trrients; hawever, this solution vx�uld elimina.te any possible City liability for the shifting of the building due to excavation. A motion to table consideration of this change order pending further investi- gation by the City Staff was then made by Council Member Larry Oliver. The motion was seconded by Council Member Pawers and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers "'"'� Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer .�r ORDINANCE, UTILITY EASENIEN'T ABANDOI�]MIIVT, WEST NOR'I'�iWEST HIC�IWAY The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance abandoning a utility easement. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised that tw+o ease�nt instnunents Yiad been prepared for a sewer line extension located on the south side of Northwest Highway just east of the General Telephone Company equignent facility. The incorrect doctuttient had been filed inadvertently with Tarrant County and was now to be abandoned, as the sew�r line ha.d been installed at a different location. The caption of the proposed ordinance was presented by the City Secretary. There being little discussion, Council Member Oliver offered a motion that the ordinance be adopted. The nx�tion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer �^�► ORDIN�INCE N0. 84-70 �� AN O�INANCE ABANDONING AI�ID VACATING A SANITARY SEWER EASII�NT L(X'ATID IN THE T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 1050 AND THE A. FOS'I'ER SURVEY, P.BSTRAC.'T N0. 518 IN 'I'f� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, T�.S, AS HEREI:I�TAFTER DFSCRIBID; PRdVIDING A SEUER�IBILITY C�,AUSE; AND D�CLARING AN II�EDTCY (10) 09/18i$� O�INANCE, AMEND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, DESICITI REVIEW AND INSPECTION FEES The next item considered by the City Council was an ordinance amending the City Code Appendix E relative to construction standards. Mr. Baddaker reported the City Staff rec�carended charging developers a three percent Design Revi�w and Inspection Fee in order to offset sc7me of the administrative & equi�ent costs of reviewing plans and inspecting utilities, stornn drains, and streets in new developmPazts. He also noted it was recom- ,r�, mended that this ordinance become effective on all subdivision plats approved after October 16, 1984. ,� City Secretary Karen Spann then read the caption of the proposed ordinance. A motion was offered by Council N1+�nber Pc7wers and seconded by Council Me�nber Glynn that the ordinance be adopted. The m�tion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes : Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers NayS . None Absent: Tate & Dyer O�INANCE NO. 84-71 AN ORDINANCE AMEL�IDING APPII�IDIX E, COrT- STItUCTION STANDARDS-ARTICLE 1, ITEM I BY PRdVIDING FOR SDCTION 1.5.1; PFiOVIDING FOR FEES FOR SANITARY SEWER LINE TELEVISION INSPECTION; P�VIDING FOR �CUTID CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT COPIES TO BE FILID WITH 'I'HE DIREC.,TOR OF PUBLIC WORKS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; P%JVIDING AN EE"F�C,'TIVE DATE �^' E�ECC]TIVE SESSION, PE�LiONNEL � Mayor Pro Tem Ware then announced that the City Council v�uld recess to the Conference Rocan to discuss personnel pursuant to Article 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S., Subsection (g) . The City Council reconvened n�ntarily in the Chambers and, with the exceptian of Mayor Tate and Council M�nber Dyer, all members of the governing body were present. City Manager Jim Hancock noted that a replace�nt for retixing Fire Chief J. C. "Jake" Greener had not been officially named. The City Charter requixed that such an appointment be made by the City Council, and the City Staff rec�nded that Fire Marshal Bill Powers be prcanoted to fill the position. Council Member Oliver made a motion to accept the reca��ndation of the City Staff and appoint Mr. Bill Pow�ers as Fire Chief. The nx�tion was seconded by Council Me.�nber Glynn and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pcywers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl�IDATION !�"""` ZCJNING APPLICATION Z84-30, SEAHUNT'S SPORTING C-,OODS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reccsn- r�,,,,,. mendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccz�mission relative to Zoning Application Z84-30 (Seahunt's) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. Planning & Zoni.ng C�mission Chairman Sharron Spencer reported the Cc�mission had tabled consideration of this Site Plan zoning request for off-pre.�nise cons�tion of beer only pending additional deli.beration. No fornnal action was taken by the City Council. (11) 09/18/84 PLANNING & ZONING CONIl�LISSION RECO�DATION ZONING APPLICATION Z84-31, CITY-INSTIGATID REZONING 211 N. LUCAS DRIVE The next. order of business was for the City Council to consider the recam- m�endation of the Planning & Zoning Ca�mission relative to Zoning Application Z84-31 (211 N. Lucas) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. This tract of land, being unintentionally an.itted frcan the City-instigated rezoning case, was recamt�nded for the "CC" Community CoiYmercial zoning designation, as reported by Cccrmission Chairman Spencer. The vote was 5 to 0, ,,.,�, with Cam�nissioner Harlen Joyce abstaining because he was a neighboring property awner within 200 feet. The caption of the proposed zoning ordinance was then presented by the City �"� Secretary. A motion was made by Council Memb�r Glynn to accept the recongnendation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�nnission and adopt the ordinance. A second was offered by Council M�aiber Pawers, and the mc�tion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer ORDINAI�TCE NO. 84-72 AN ORD]NAIVCE AN1II�]DING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE COMP�tSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TExAS, SAME BEING ALSO KN04V1V AS APPIIVDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF C�RAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRAN'I'ING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF L�ND DESCRIBID AS BEING A IpT, TRP�T, OR PARCEL OF LAl�ID LYING AND BEING SITUATID IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE W. C. LUCAS ADDITION "�"� IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE F[JI,LY AI�ID QOP�LEI�'LY DESCRIB� IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A C�ii�1NGE IN �� THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY F%k�I "R-2" ZWO- FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT UNDER ORDINANCE N0. 70-10 TO "CC" CONIl�1LlNITY COrM'IERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT UNDER ORDINANCE N0. 82-73; CORR�CTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRE- SEKVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PR()VIDING A CI�AUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DEI'ERNiINING THAT 'I'HE PUBLIC Il�1'.PERFSTS, MORALS AND GIIVII2AL WES�ARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMED1DMr3�]T Tf�REIN MADE; PRC)VIDING A PF�IAI,TY NOr!' TO EXCEm THE SUM OF OI�]E THOUSAND DOT,TJaRS ($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OF'FE�TSE SxP.TT, BE DEII�lID CON�IITTID UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND D�CLARING AN ENIERGENCY PLANNING & ZONING COrM2ZSSION R�M�IDATION PROPOSID ANIENDMENTS TO COMPREFI�TTSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 The next item before the City Council was to consider the rec�ndation of ��+ the Planning & Zoning Ccmmission relative to proposed amendments to Ccxnprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73 an�d a subsequent ordinance. �� Chairman Spencer reported the Planning & Zoning Cammission recamrended approval of Section 45, Concept Plans, as presented; Section 56, Off-Street Parking Requirements, as presented; and the height limitations in the single- family districts, Sections 13, 14, & 15, the two-family district, R-3.5, and the three- and four-family district, R-3.75, as presented. She also noted a few minor changes in the Parking and Loading Area Develo�ent Standards, Section 58, and the Ccmmission's recamrendation for approval. The caption of the proposed ordinance was read by the City Secretary. (12) 09/18/84 Council Nlember Pawers then made a motion to accept the recanmendation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�anission and adopt the ordinance. The motion, seconded by Council Member Brekken, prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes : Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer ORDINANCE NO. 84-73 ��*+ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEX�1S ANIENDING APPENDIX "D" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, �"`" Z�B, � COMPREI�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY PROVIDING FOR AMII�IDMENTS AND CHANGES TO ARTICLE III - DISTRICT REGUI,ATIONS - BY PROVIDING FOR AMENDMIIV�i'S AND CHANGES IN THE R-20, R-12.5, R-7.5, AND R-3.5 RESI- DENTIAL DISTRICI'S, BY PROVIDING FOR HEIC�iT LIMITATIONS; BY PROVIDING FOR CHANGES IN OFF-STRE�r PARKING REQUIRII�]TS; BY PFt(J- VIDING FOR C�iANGES IN CONCEPT PLANS; BY PROVIDING FOR PARKING AND IAADING ARF.A DE�7E'L�OPMENT STANDARDS; P120VIDING A PEDIALTY UPON CONVICI'ION OF NO�I' LESS 'I'HAN OI�IE DOLLAR ($1.0 0) NOR NYJRE Tf�iAN ONE THOUSAND DOLL�ARS ($1,000) AND A SEPARATE OFFEDISE SHA�L BE D�D CONIl�IITI'ID UPON EACfi DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CI�AUSE; AND DECr�RING AN II�TCY PI�INNING & ZONING OOMMISSION RECON�IDATION FINAL PLAT, SOUTH SIDE OF S. H. 26 AND WEST OF S. H. 114 �► The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recom- mendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccc�[n.ission relative to the final plat of � the Grapevine Office Addition. This particular plat included approximately 2.5 acres of land located on the south side of State Highway 26 and just west of State Highway 114, northwest of airport property. The name given the subdivision was not descriptive of the "LI" Light Industrial zoning for the proposed use of the property as ware- housing, and the Planning & Zoning Commission reccx�aciended the plat be approved, provided that a new name be selected prior to obtaining signatures on the plat. Council Meanber Brekken then made a motion to accept the rec�ndation of the C��i.ssion and approve this final plat, but that the doc�ent not be signed until a new r� had been approved by the City Staff. Council Member Glynn seconded the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONfl�IDATION CORRECTID FINAL PLAT, HAFd�IEL,L ADDITION, PHASE II �* The next ite�n before the City Council was to consider the recona�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Canmission relative to the corrected final plat of the �,,,,�, Hazwell Addition, Phase II. The property included in this plat is located on the north side of Dove Rpad just west of the Canterbuzy Village Addition. During preliminary construction of this subd.ivision, some minor discrepancies were discovered concerning dimensions on several of the lots. To correct these errors, a revised final plat was to be considered. ConEni.ssion Chairman Sharron Spencer reported their unanimous approval of the corrected final plat. There being little discussion, Council M�mber Tom Powers made a motion to accept the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Caimission and approve the (13) 09/18/84 corrected final plat of the Harwell Addition, Phase II. The motion was seconded by Council M�nber Jim Glynn and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pc�wers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer PI�ANNING & ZC7rtING CONIl�iISSIODT P;ECONS��IDATION FINAL PLAT, IDLICATION CENTIIt ADDITION wr�w The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reca►r mendation of the Planning & Zoning Cca�mission relative to the final plat of the Education Center P,ddition. +�,r This plat, filed by the Grapevine-Colleyville Schools, included the existing administration building, football staditun, and adjacent property. A platting of the tract was necessary in order to make improvements. Council Member Oliver, being e�nployed by the school district, advised that he wduld abstain frc�n consideration of this item. Mrs. Spencer advised the Planning & Zoning Commission had unanimously approved the final plat of the Education Center Addition. A motion was then offered by Council Member Glynn and seconded by Council Member Brekken to accept the recc�mendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccmmis- sion and approve the final plat. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pow�ers Nays . None Abstain: Oliver Absent : Tate & Dyer PI�I�TNING & ZONING CON7MISSION RECONIl�IDATION PRELIMINARY PLAT, SOUPHWEST GRAPEVINE �IAL PARK �� The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recam- mendation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�tnission relative to the preliminary plat of the Southwest Grapevine C�rcial Park. �`� The Sauthwest Grapevine Cam�rcial Park is proposed to be located on the south side of Mustang Drive adjacent to the airport property (a portion of the forn�er Box property) . The tract is currently zoned Planned Industrial and Camrnuiity Ccxr[rercial. Planning & Zoning Cammission Chairnian Sharron Spencer reported that they had tabled consideration of this preliminary plat pending further deliberation. No formal action was taken by the City Council. PI�NNING & ZO�G CONIl�IISSION RECONIlKENDATION PFtELIMINARY PLAT, DFW AIR FREIGHr ADDITION The next ite�n to be considered by the City Council was the Planning & Zoning Cammission rec�ndation relative to the preliminasy plat of the DFW Air Freight Addition. The property included in this particular plat is located on the south side of East Dallas Road and east of Minters Chapel Road, and is proposed as Phase II of the DFW Air Freight Centre. The Planning & Zoning Ccc�mission had tabled this preliminary plat, as reported by Chairnnan Spencer. �^* No formal action was taken by the City Council. �� PLANNING & ZONING COrM�iIS5I0N R�ANA�LVDATION PRF�IMINARY PLAT, WESTERDT OAKS ADDITION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recc�r mendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccx�mission relative to the prel�mi.riary plat of the Western Oaks Addition. This preliminary plat covers the single-family portion of the Willard Baker development, fornierly knawn as the Hawn tract, located west of State Highway 121 south and north of Hall-Johnson Road, adjacent to the Woodland Hills and (14) 09/18/84 O'Dell Subdivisions. Planning & Zoning Canmission Chairniari Sharron Spencer advised of the Cc�nmission's unaniunpus recotmtiendation for the approval of this preliminary plat. A motion was then offered by Council Nie.mber Oliver and seconded by Council Nlember Powers to accept the recoimiendation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�mission and approve the preliminary plat of the Western Oaks Addition. The m�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: ,.•�• Ayes : Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer � PLANNING & Z(7DTING COMMISSION RECONIl�IDATION PRELIMINARY PLAT, GRAPEVINE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX ADDITION The final order of business was for the City Council to consider the recan- mendation of the Planning & Zoning Canmission relative to the preliminary plat of the Grapevine Municipal Ccxnplex Addition. This approx�m�ately 13 acres is the site of the proposed City Municipal Camplex located off of South Main Street near the American Bank of Comnerce. Platting the property was necessary in order to issue a building permit for the first phase of the comple�, the new municipal library. The Planning & Zoning Commission rec�ndation, as reported by Chairman Spencer, was for approval. The vote was 6 to 0. It was noted that the City Council had, earlier at this meeting, elected to retain approximately 70 feet of access frontage on Main Street previously advertised for sale. There being little discussion, Council Me.anber Oliver made a motion to accept the reccrnm+endation of the Planning & Zoni.ng Cammission and approve the preliminary plat of the Grapevine Municipal Cam�lex Addition. The mr�tion was �""" seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the followi.ng vote: �, Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer AATOURNMENT The deliberations of the City Council having been concluded, a motion to adjourn the meeting was offered by Council M�mber Oliver and seconded by Council M�r Brekken. The nwtion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pcxaers Nays . None Absent: Tate & Dyer PASSID AND APPROVID BY Tf� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 2nd day of October , 1984. APPRC3VED: � �^f ^�-�c-� f� lj ��' Mayor � ATI'EST: � � � City ecretary (15)