The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985-08-20 Joint Meeting AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL & �* PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING � TUESDAY, AUGUST 20 , 1985 AT 7 : 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � I . CALL TO ORDER II. INVOCATION: Council Member Marion Brekken III . PRESENTATION Planning & Zoning Commission to make plaque presentation to Council Member Shane Wilbanks (former P&Z Commissioner) . IV. JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z85-22 submitted by the City of Grapevine (City Parcel No. 164 - north end of Lucas Drive) . B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission �``'� to conduct a public hearing relative to proposed amendments to Comprehensive Zoning �� Ordinance No. 82-73 , as amended. (Highway Commercial, Professional Office, Open Space, and Zero Lot Line regulations . ) V. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to consider other published agenda items. B. City Council to recess briefly before con- sidering further business. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1985 AT 3 :00 P.M. � � City S�cretary AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, AUGUST 20 , 1985 AT 7 : 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET ,� VI . CITIZENS REQUESTS VII . CONSENT AGENDA �r Consent items are deemed to need little Council delibera- tion and will be acted upon as one business item. Any member of the City Council or member of the audience may request that an item be withdrawn from the consent agenda and placed before the Council for full discussion. Approval of the consent agenda authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to implement each item in accordance with Staff recommendations. A. Consideration of the minutes of July 16 , July 30 , and August 6 , 1985 . City Secretary recommends approval as published. B. Consider awarding the bid for the purchase of 60, 000 city map/visitors guides . Convention & Visitors Bureau Director recommends award to the low bidder in the amount of $12, 819 . 00 . C. Consider authorizing the execution of an agreement with the City of Colleyville and the Grapevine-Colleyville I. S. D. relative to a School Resource Officer for �"` " 1985-86 . Chief of Police recommends approval with a commitment of City funds in the amount of $35 ,000 . 00 . �..� D. Consideration of an ordinance repealing Sections 25-50 through 25-54 of the City Code relative to water and sewer main extensions , as these regulations are no longer applicable. Public Works Director recommends approval . E. Consider authorizing the City Staff to enter an agree- ment with LDS (Long Distance Service, Inc. ) for telephone long distance service. Assistant Finance Director recommends approval. VIII . PUBLIC HEARING City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to the proposed annexation of the Meadowmere Park area. IX. OLD BUSINESS Hatfield/Halcomb architects to make a presentation relative to bids previously taken for the proposed civic center/auditorium facility. � X. NEW BUSINESS ,,,�, A. City Council to consider a resolution authorizing the City Attorney to draft an ordinance relative to the annexation of the Meadowmere Park area. B. City Council to consider an ordinance amending Chapter 14 of the City Code relative to Billiard Halls and Coin-Operated Machine Establishments. C. City Council to consider an appointment to the Library Board. D. City Council to discuss policy relative to claims resulting from discolored water and take any necessary action. E. City Council to discuss sales tax revenues from DFW Airport parking facilities and take any necessary action. XI . EXECUTIVE SESSION � A. City Council to recess to the Conference Room to discuss personnel pursuant to Article 6252-17, � V.A.T.C.S. , Subsection (g) . B. City Council to reconvene in the Council Chambers and take any neccessary action relative to personnel. XII . PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planninq & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z85-22 (Parcel No. 164) and a subsequent ordi- nance, if applicable. B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of the Dove Crossing Addition, Phase I . C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of the Dove Crossing Addition, Phase II . D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of �' � Lots 17 through 30 , Block 5 of the Creekwood West Addition, Phase III . �,� E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of the Western Oaks Addition. F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of Tract 3 of the DFW Air Freight Centre Addition. G. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of Lots 11 , 20, & 21 , Block 2, of the Creekwood Estates Addition. H. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of the J. L. Whitman Addition. I . City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of Shadow Glen, Phase 2A. "`�"�'' J. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of Shadow Glen, Phase 2B. � K. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of Lot 1 , Block 3 , of the Kelley Addition. L. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of the Creek Crossing Addition. M. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of the Lewis T. Baker Addition. N. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of the Sugar Creek Apartments. O. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of the Grapevine Service Center Addition. �, P. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to proposed amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended, (HC, PO, Open Space, & R-5 .0) and a sub- sequent ordinance, if applicable. Q. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to proposed amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended, (HCO, Sign Standards, Supplementary Regu- lations) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. XIII . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION XIV. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1985 AT 3 : 00 ""' " P.M. �� City Secretary � � AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, AUGUST 20 , 1985 AT 7 : 30 P.M. CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN STREET VI . NEW BUSINESS � A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- cation Z85-22 (Parcel No. 164) and make a recom- ,� mendation to the City Council. B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat plat of the Dove Crossing Addition, Phase I, and make a recommendation to the City Council. C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat plat of the Dove Crossing Addition, Phase II , and make a recommendation to the City Council. D . Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat of Lots 17 through 30 , Block 5 of the Creekwood West Addition, Phase III , and make a recommendation to the City Council. E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat of the Western Oaks Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat of Tract 3 of the DFW Air Freight Centre Addition and make ,„�.,� a recommendation to the City Council. G. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat of ,�� Lots 11, 20 , & 21, Block 2, of the Creekwood Estates Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. H. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of the J. L. Whitman Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. I . Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of Shadow Glen, Phase 2A, and make a recommendation to the City Council. J. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of Shadow Glen, Phase 2B, and make a recommendation to the City Council. K. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of Lot l , Block 3 , of the Kelley Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. L. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- nary plat of the Creek Crossing Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. � M. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- nary plat of the Lewis T. Baker Addition and make a w� recommendation to the City Council. N . Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- nary plat of the Sugar Creek Apartments and make a recommendation to the City Council. O. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- plat of the Grapevine Service Center Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. P. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider proposed amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73 , as amended, and make a recommendation to the City Council (HC, PO, Open Space, & R-5.0) . VII . OLD BUSINESS Planning & Zoning Commission to consider proposed amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, � as amended, and make a recommendation to the City Council (HCO, Sign Standards , Supplementary Regu- lations) . � VIII . CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meetings of March 19 , April 10 , April 16 , May 14 , May 21 , and June 11, 1985 IX. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION X. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1985 AT 3 :00 P.M. "�� City Secretary �� STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TAR�NT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council and Planning & Zoning Cca�mission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Regular Joint Session on this the 20th day of August, 1985 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council ChatY�bers, 413 Main Street, with the following members ef the City Council present to�ait: � Tan Powers Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem � Marion Brekken Council Mgnber Ron Dyer Council Me�mber Jim Glynn Council Member Sharron Spencer Council Member C. Shane Wilbanks Council Memher constituting a quorum, with the following members of the Planning & Zoning Coim�ission: Richard L. Atkins, Jr. Chairman Ron Cook Vice Chairm,an Gerald Norntian Member Peggy Engholm blember Donalc� A. Florence M,ember Catherine Martir� M�riber constituting a quonAn, with Comnission Member Harlen Joyce absent, with the following mezr�bers of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager Kelvi.n Knauf Assistant City Manager John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney °�"�' Karen Spann City Secretary �.�, CAL�L TO ORDER The meeting was`called to order by Mayor Pawers. INVOCATION Council Member Brekken delivered the Invocation. �'LAQUE PRESENTATICN Flanning & Zoning Commission Chairman Rick Atkins presented a plaque of appre- ciation to Mr. Shane Wilbanks for his cor�tributions while serving on the Plan- ning & Zoning Ccx�mission prior to election to the City Council. PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z85-22, PARCEL NO. 164, JOE WRIC�iT The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning C�rsssion to conduct a puXilic hearing relative to Zoning Application Z85-22 su�mitted by the City of Grapevine (City Parcel No. 164 - north end of Lucas Drive) . The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Pawers. � � Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised the property in questior� was located on the far north er.d of Lucas Drive and contained approximately 35 '� acres. The tract, being currently zoned "R-3" Multi-Family, had been under moratoritmn since September, 1983. This public hearing had been postponed from June 18, 1985, and the tract was advertised for consideration of all residential districts. Mr. Joe Wright, awner of the tract, briefly addressed the Council and noted two issues concerning this property: (1) access to and traffic generated by this develognent and (2) the tract is adjacent to a sir�gle-family neighbor- hood. 08/20/85 Mr. Mark Thanpson, representing DeShazo, Starek, & Tang, then presented a traffic study relative to the proposed develo�anent. His study assumed multi- fami.ly zoning with a maximtun of 400 units and the Dove Road arterial extended through the property. Questions and ca��ents pertaining to traffic/access followed. Mr. Pete Fritz of Proctor Bowers & Associates planning consultants then presented a diagram and addressed proposed building height and buffering, which included utilization of a benn, fencing, and landscaping. , Following this presentation, Mr. Wright addressecz tY�.e Council and Carmission at length regarding the project: (1) its relation to the Master Plan, (2) possible pravision of park land, (3) flood plain and net buildable acres, and g � (4) proposed deed restrictions concerning the thoroughfare and develo�anent of the project. The ensuing discussion centered around the construction of and location of the arterial road, buildable area, and buffering. Mayor Pawers then invited those guests present to offer co�ments relative to the requested zoning. The following persons spoke in opposition to the pro- posed multi-fami.ly develognent: 1. Mr�. Kathy Martinez, 915 I.ucas Drive, representing the Brookhollow H�eawners Association 2. Mr. Lavid Royall 1028 Nleada�brook The receipt of one petition containing the r�s of 34 persons opposed to multi-family zoning was acknowledged by the City Secretary. Also noted were letters fran Mrs. Kathy Martinez and Lonny & Sandy Landry, 1040 Meadawbrook, in support of single-family develo�anent. A motion to close their portior. of the public hearing was then offered by �'� Cca�missioner Nornnar. and seconded by Comnission M�ember Martin. The mption prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Atkins, Cook, Norman, Engholm, Florence, & Martin Nays . None Absent: Joyce Council Member Spencer also made a motion to close the public hearing. The m�:tion was seconded by Council Member Dyer and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None PUBLIC HEARING, AMII�1DNlENTS TO COMPREE�ISIVE ZONING ORDINANCE N0. 82-73 The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Co�n.ission to conduct a public hearing relative to groposed amendments to Conr prehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended (Highway Commercial, Pro- fessional Office, Open Space, and Zero Lot Line regulations) . Mayor Paaers declared the public hearing open and called. on Mr. Baddaker to review the proposed amendments. Those present were advised of minor changes to the Highway C�rcial, Professional Office, and Opexi Space sections of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. It was also not-.ed repeal of the R-5.0 Zero ""'�""' Lat Line Zoning District was to be considered. Planning & Zoning Commission Chairman Rick Atkins noted some additional �--�_ changes to the HC District: (1) that It�n A6, "Public or private storage garages, yards or lots", be removed fran Permitted Uses and placed as Item C9 under Conditional Uses, and (2) that Item D2 be amended to provide that all access must be fram an arterial highway and not through residential areas. A period of questions and ccamlents frcgn the City Council and Comnission followed, after which Mayor Pcywers invited m�.mbers of the audience to speak. Mr. Tim Lancaster, 1025 Oakhurst, ccsranente-� concerning the limitation of access to an arterial highway. (2) 08/20/85 There being no further comnents, a motion to close the public hearing was made by Cc�mission Member Florence. Carm.issioner No�z seconded the nlotion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes : Atkins, Cook, Norn�an, Engholm, Florence, & Martin Nays . None Absent: Joyce Council M�ember Wilbanks also made a mption to close the public hearing. The � motion was seconded by Niayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, �rekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None RECESS & RECONVE[�E It wa.s ther. announced that the Planning & Zoning Cammission would recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to consider other published agenda items. The City Council was to recess briefly before continuing their deliberations. Upon reconvening mar�r_tarily in the Council Chambers, all members of the City Council were present. CONSENT AGENDA The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the consent items, which were deemed to need little deliberation and were acted upon as one business item. Mayor Powers asked if there was any me,mber of the audience or the City Council who wished to remove ar. item frc�n the consent agenda for full discussion. There were none. Consideration of the Minutes City Secretary reccgrur�ende�i approval of the minutes of the meetings of July 16, '"" ' July 30, and August 6, 1985 as published. ;� � Motion by Council Member Spencer and seconded by Council Member Wilbanks to approve as recca�u��ended prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None Bid Award, City Maps and Visitors Guides Convention & Visitors Bureau Director recc�mended award of the bid for the purchase of 60,OOG city map/visitors guides to A. I. D. Associates, Inc. for t-heir law bid amount of $12,819.00 M.c�tion by Council Member Spencer and seconded by Council Nle.mber Wilbanks to approve as rec�nded prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Powers, 4vare, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbariks Nays: None Authorize Agreement with Colleyville and �CISD For School Resource Officer Police Chief recc�riended authorizing the execution of an agreement with the City of Colleyville and the Grapevine-Colleyville I. S. D. relative to a '"`�` School Resource Officer for 1985-86. Total cost of the program would be $7C,000 with 50 percent participation by the City of Grapevine in the amount of $35,000. � Motion by Council Nlember Spencer and seconded by Council N',ember Wilbanks to approve as rec�nded pr�vailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None (3) 08/20/85 Ordinance, Repeal Code Sections 25-50 Through 25-54, Water & Sewer Main Extensions Public Works Director rec�nded approval of an ordinance repealing Sections 25-50 through 25-54 of the Ci.ty Code relative to water and sewer main extensions, as these provisions were no longer applicable. The caption of the proposed ordinance was presented by the City Secretary. Motian by Council Member Spencer and seconded by Council Member Wilbanks to �+ approve as reca�unended prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 85-35 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI� CITY OF GE2APEVINE, TEXAS REPEALING SEC- TIONS 25-50 THFtOUGH 25-54 OF THE GRAPEVINE CITY CODE RII�F,TIVE TO WATER AND SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECI,ARING AN IlKERGENCY Authorize Agreement for Long Distance Service Assistant Finance Director recomnended authorizing the execution of an agree- ment with LDS (Long Distance Service, Inc.) for telephone long distance service for the municipal offices. Motion by Council Member Spencer and seconded by Council M�ember Wilbanks to approve as recommended prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & wilbanks Nays: None '"""`" PUBLIC HEARING, ME�AD04�RE PARK ANNEXATION ,�, The next it�n before the City Council was to conduct a public hearing relative to the proposed annexation of the Meadowmere Park area. The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Fc�aers. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised this was the second public hearing scheduled pursuant to the Municipal Annexation Act for the consideration of annexation of the Meadowmere Park area. He reviewed the location of the subject tract northwest of the City and the plan proposed to provide services to this area. Mayor Powers asked if there v�ere guests present who desired to speak relative to this matter; hawever, no one wished to comment. There being little Council discussion, a motion to close the public hearing was made by Council Me.mber Brekken and seconded by Council Member Glynn. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None �: HATFIELD/HAL�COMB ARCHITECTS PRFSIIVTATION, CIVIC CIIVTER BIDS The next order of business was for the City's architects, Hatfield/Halccgnb, to � �� make a presentation relative to bids previously taken for the proposed civic center/auditori�n facility. Mr. Jones McConnell, representing Hatfield/Halccgnb, addressed the City Council and presented a ccenparison of the cost of estimate prepared by his finn and the contractor's cost breakdown as bid for the civic center/auditoriLur. facility. He advised there was no apparent explanaticn for the difference ir� the two figures, which exceeded $720,000, and noted their desire to continue serving the City of Grapevine. ' (4) 08/20/85 Co�nts from the City Council Me_mbers ensued; however, no forn�al action was taken. RESOLUTION, AUTHORIZE CITY ATI'ORNEY TO DRAFT ANNEXATION ORDINANCE The ne�t item before the City Cour.cil was to consider a resolution authorizir.g the City Attorney to draft an ordinarice relative to the annexation of the Nleadowmere Park area. � City Secretary Karen Spann noted that both public hearings relative to the annexation of the Meadawmere Purk area had been held on August 13 and August 20, 1985. The next step was for the City Council to consider a ;� resolution authorizing the drafting of an annexation ordinance by the City Attorney. The caption of the resolution was presented for the record. Following brief cc�anents, Council N�mber Spencer made a motion that the reso- lution be adopted. The motion, seconded by Council Member Brekken, prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Poc�aers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None RESOLIITION N0. 85-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AU'1�iORIZING THE DRAETING OF AN ORDINANCE REL�ATING TO THE ANNEXATION OF Tf� MEAD04�RE PARK AREA AS DESCRIBID HEREIN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE ORDINANCE, BILLIARD F-�ALLS AND COIN-0PERATID AMUSII�'NT MACHINES ,�. , - The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance � ,, amending Chapter 14 of the City Code relative to Billiard Halls and Coin- Operated Machine EstablisYur�ents. A review of the proposed ordinance was presented by the City Secretary, who noted most of the amendments were to properly reflect current procedures. An increase in fees was proposed as follows: Billiard Hall Operator: Occupation tax per table - current - $2.50 proposed - $7.50 License fee - current - $10.00 per table proposed - $100.00 for 1 to 50 tables $200.00 for over 50 tables Coin-Operated N�achine Establishm�a��t: Occupation tax per machine - current - $5.00 proposed - $7.50 �� Licen�e fee - current - $35.OG for 1 to 7 machines $100.00 for 8 or n�re machines proposed - $100.00 for 1 to 50 machines $200.00 for over 50 machines � Appropriation of the fees was a topic of concern during the ensuing discus- sion, after which the caption of the proposed ordinance was presented for the record. A motion was then made by Council Member Glynn and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware tY�iat the ordinance be adopted. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None (5) 08/20/85 ORDINANCE NO. 85-36 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, AME�TDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF GRAPEVINE, CHAPTER 14 OCCUPATIONAL LIC�ISE, TAXES, AND RF.GULATIONS; AMENDING SECTION 14-20 DEFINITIONS; AMII�]DING SECTION 14-21 F�NIPTIONS; AMII�iDING SECPION 14-36 APPLICATION, LICEDTSE, FORM, E�C[JTION, �� ISSUANCE, POSTING; ANIENDING SECTION 14-37 RII�P,TING TO ANN[JAL OCCUPATION TAXES AND LICF�ISE FEES CHARGID AGAINST BILLIARD HAT� OPERATORS AI�3D SKILL OR COIN—OPERATID MAC�3INE FSTP,BLISI�IIIVTS; AMII�IDING SDCTION 14-38 CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE; AN�'NDING SF�C.`I'IOlv 14-40 DII�TIAL, APPEAL; ANIENDING SECTION 14-42 REFUND OF FEE; ANIENDING SE7CTION 14-43 TERMINATION, RIIVEfn7�I�; PRO— VIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCF�ED THE SUM OF TVu� HLl1�IDRID DOLI�ARS ($200.00) FOR EACH GFF'�TvSE AND A SEPARATE OFFEL�ISE SHALL BE DF�E�D CON�7I2� UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; PROVI.L�ING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING AN II�IERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE APPOIN`IT�IIV'r 'PO LIBRARY BOARD The next item before the City Council was to consider an appointment to the Library Board. It was reported that a vacancy existed on the Library Board due to the resignation of Dr. Thomas Kelly. �a Council Member Brekken made a motion that Dr. Jim Able be appointed to fill this vacancy. A second to the motion was offered by Council Me.mber Glynn, and ; the motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None CLAIN'.�S POLICY REI�ATIVE TO DISCOLORID 4�1TER The next order of business was for the City Council to discuss policy relative to claims resulting fran discolored water and take any necessary action. Assistant City Manager Kelvin Knauf reviewed the different types of citizens' requests for compexisation resulting fran the recent water discoloration due to manganese. These included requests for re�mbursement for stained clothing and purchase of bottled water, as well as requests for reduced water billing. He solicited guidance fran the City Council relative to a policy for handling such claims. The difficulty in determining valid requests and administrating them was noted during the ensuing discussion. Other topics of concern were voiced, and Mrs. Carolyn Vance, 1520 Tiffany Forest Lane, and Mrs. Mary Ftiilop, 1525 Tiffany Forest Lane, also offered camlents. Although no formal action was taken by a vote, the City Council generally expressed regret about the probleqn and advised that re�mbursement w�uld not be possible. �, DF�1 AIRPORT PARKING SALES TAX REVIIVUES The next order of business was for the City Council to discuss sales tax revenues fr�n DFW Airport parking facilities and take any necessary action. City Manager Jun Hancock reportecl the DFW Airport Board had expressed a desire to retain a portion of the sales tax revenues generated by the parking facilities at the airport. One percent of said funds are currently (6) 08/20/85 appropriated to the City of Grapevi.ne. Mr. Hancock recomnended the appointment cf a Council caYml.ittee to woork with City Staff and airport officials in resolving the issue. Additional co�nts were offered by Mayor Pawers, who then appointed a co�mittee consisting of Mayor Pro Tem Ware, Council Me.mber Wilbanks, and hunself to review the n�atter. No fornr►al action was taken by trie City Council. � EXEC[JTIVE SESSIGN, PERSONNEL �, N[aycr Powers then advisea' the City Council w�uld recess to the Conference kocan to discuss personnel pursuant to Article 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S., Subsection (g) . All members of the City Council were present upon recor.vening mr�mentarily in the Council Chambers. City Manager Jim Hancock advised that no formal Council action was necessary relative to personnel. PLANNING & ZONING CCMNiISSI0IV RECON�]II�7DATION, Z85-22, PARCEL NO. 164,_WRIGHT The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the rece�n:- mendation of the Planning & Zoning Camnission relative to Zoning Application Z85-22 (Parcel No. 164) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. Subject tract, located on the far north end of Lucas Drive, had been advertiseci for consideration of all residential districts, and Chairman Rick Atkins reported the Planning & Zoning Cca�m.ission recom�er�ded "R-7.5" Single- Family Dwelling District on this 35 acres. Their vote was 4 to 2. The caption of the proposed ordinar�ce was presented by the City Secretary. `�"' During the ensuing discussion, Mr. Atkins advised the Cc�mission had felt that the zoning could be reconsidered once the arterial roadway was in place. �,,;:� The City Council generally concurred, and a motion was offered by Council Member Glynn to accept the recomnendation of the Planning & Zoning Cam�ission and adopt the ordinance designating single-family zoning. The mption was secandeu by Council Member Sper.cer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Paaers, Ware, Brekken, I'iyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 85-37 AN ORDINANCE �NIII�]DING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE COI�7PREHINSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, 'I�.S, SAME BEING AISO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF 'I'HE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEX1�S, GRANTING A ZONING CF.ANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRSBID AS BEI1�:G A I�OT, TRACT, Ok PARCII� OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITLJP,TID IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE B. B. JOHNSON SUR'�T�'Y, ABSTRACT NO. 869, IN 'PHE CITY OF GRAPE- VIl�tE, Z`EXAS, MORE FUI�LY AND C�MMFLEI'ELY `'"�` DFSCRIBID IN Tf-IE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CFiANGE IN Tf� USE OF SAID PROPER'I'Y FRGNI "R-3" NiULTI-FAMILY DWF.LLING DISTRICT UNDER ORDIN�TCE NO. 70-10 TO "R-7.5" SINGI�E-FAMILY DVv�ZING DISTRICT UNDER ORDINANC� N0. 82-73; CORREC,'TING � OFFICIAL ZGNING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF TN.E ZONING ORDINANCE; PRU- VIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEF<ESTS, MORALS AND GENEERAL WELF'ARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AN1ET]DN�r Tf�REIN MADE; PROVID- ING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCF�D THE SUM OF ONE ��) i, 08/20/85 I THOUSAND DOLI�RS ($1 000.00) AIdD A SEPA- RATE OFFEL�TSE SHALL BE DEII�D CODM4ITI�D UI�ON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIO- LATION OCCURS; AND DEICLARTNG AN II�RGEDTCY PL�ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECON��[v'DATION REPLATS, DOVE CROSSING PHASFS I & II The next two items, (1) replat of Dove Crossing Phase I, and (2) replat of Dove Crossing Phase II, were considered jointly by the City Council. *�� The Dove Crossing subdivision is located on the west side of Dove Loop Road north of the Marina Del Rey Apartments and is a single-family subdivision. �,�,, Mr. Atkins advised the Planning & Zoning C�mission had recca�nended denial of the replats of Dove Crossing Phases I & II. The vote was unanimous. A lengthy discussion followed, during which the applicant's proposed replats (which delineated variances in front yard requirem�ents of certain lots) were ccmpared with the provisions of the ordinance zoning subject tract (Ordi- nance No. 83-80) . It was requested that the applicant, Mr. Ron Haynes, be present at the next meeting to address the City Council relative to this matter. Following this deliberation, Council Member Spencer made a mption that the replats of Dove Crossing Phase I and Phase II be tabled for further consideration. Council Member Wilbanks seconded the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None PI�ANNING & ZONING CONIl�IISSION RECONIl�'IELVDATION REPLAT, CR,EEKWOOD WEST PHASE III, I�OTS 17 'I'fiiROUGH 30, BI+OCK 5 The next item before the City Council for consideration was the Planninq & ""'�"' Zoning Canmission recarnY�endation relative to the replat of Lots 17 through 30, Block 5 of the Creekwood West Addition, Phase III. „�;, This particular tract is located in the Creekwood West Addition south of Grapevine High School between Pool Road and Creekw�od Drive. The purpose of the replat was to move a drainage easement line on these single-family lots. The Planning & Zoning Cammission recca�mlendation, as reported by Mr. Atkins, was for approval by a vote of 6 to 0. A motion was then made by Council NJember Wilbanks and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware to accept the Cca�mission's rec�ranendation and approve the replat of Lots 17 through 30, Block 5 of the Creekwood West Addition, Phase III. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None PI.ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONY�]DATION, REPLAT, WFSTERN OAKS ADDITION The next order of busiriess was for the City Council to consider the reca� mendation of the Planning & Zoning C�ission relative to the replat of the Western Oaks Addition. This replat proposes to relocate utility easement lines in the Western Oaks ""�"'' Addition, a single-family subdivision located north of Hall-Johnson Road between Pool Fcoad and State Highway 121 South. Planning & Zon:ing Ca�mission Chairman Rick Atkins reported the unanimous rec�nendation of the Conmission g- # for approval. Council N',Q_mber Wilbanks made a mr�tion to accept the recca�a�iendation of the Planning & Zoning Cammission and approve the replat of the Western Oaks Addition. The mr�tion was seconded by Mayor Pawer Tem Ware and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None �g) 08/20/85 P�ING & ZONI�G COMMISSION RECOMMD.`�DATION REPLAT, TRACT 3, DFW AIR FREIGHT CENTRE ADDITION The ne� order of business was for the City Council to consider the recom- mendation of the Planning & Zoning Cca�mission relative to the replat of Tract 3 of the DFi�V Air Freight Ce.ntre Addition. This tract of land is located on the south side of Dallas Road between Minters Chapel Road and Highway 114 Btzsiness and is zoned "LI" Light Industrial. The Planning & Zoning Cca�nission unaniurously rec�nded approval of the proposed replat. Council Member Wilbanks made a motion to accept the reccxraYbendation of the Planning & Zoning Conznission and approve the replat of Tract 3 of the DFW Air Freight Centre Addition. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None PLANNING & ZONING COMN�ISSION RECON�IDATION REPLAT, LOTS 11, 20, & 21, BLOC�Z 2, CREEKWOOD ESTATES ADDITION The ne�t item befere the City Council was to consider the reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to the replat of Lots 11, 20, & 21, Block 2 of thE Creekwood Estates Addition. This replat proposed te change certain lot lines in order to allaw one pro- perty owner to build a swi�ning pool. Chairnian Atkins advised the Planning & Zoning Commission recc�mended approval of the replat. The vote was 6 to 0. A motion was then made by Council N1�ember Wilbanks and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware to accept the recomnendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission and approve the replat of Iats 11, 20, & 21, Block 2, of the Creekwood Estates "` ' Addition. The motion prevailed hy the following vote: � � Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None PLANNING & ZONING COMNlISSION RECONIl`�Lv'DATION FINAL PLAT, J. L. WHIZMAN ADDITICKv The next order of business was tor the City Council to consider the recom- mendation of the Planning & Zoning C�nnission relative to the final plat of the J. L. Whitman Addition. The J. L. Whitman Addition is located on the north side of Kimball Road near its ir.tersection with Kimberly Drive and creates three lots for "R-7.5" single-family develo�nt. The Planning & Zoning Conmission unanimously recammended approval of the final plat. Council Member Wilbanks made a motion to accept the reco�nendation of the C�n- mission and approve the final plat of the J. L. Whitman Addition. The motion, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware, prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None �� PL�NNING & ZONII�?G COMMISSION RECONI�7II�IDATION, FINAL PLAT, SHADOW GLEN PHASE 2A The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reccgn- mendation of the Planni.ng & Zoning Cc�anission relative to the final plat of Shadow Glen, Phase 2A. The Shadow Glen subdivision Phase 2 is located south of Hughes Road between the Mulberry Square develo�xnent and the propased Baze Road. Phase 2A is the southern portion of this single-family tract. Mr. Atkins reported the Planning & Zoning Cc�mission unanimously rec�nded approval of the final plat. The developer will be required to cor.struct the west side of Baze Road. (9) 08/20/85 A motion was then made by Couricil Member Wilbanks to accept the recomnendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccmmission and approve the final plat of Shadow Glen, Phase 2A. The m�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None PI,ANNING & ZONING CON�IISSION RECON�IDATION, FINAL PLAT, SHADOW GI�'[�I PHASE 2B �, The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recan- mendation of the Planning & Zoning Conmission relative to the final plat of Shadow Glen, Phase 2B. M „ The Shadow Glen subdivision Phase 2 is located south of Hughes Road between the Mulberry Square developnent and the proposed Baze Road. Phase 2B is the northern portion of this single-family tract. Planning & Zoning Conmission Chairman Rick Atkins advised the CcxYmission rec�nded approval of this final plat by a vote of 6 to 0. Constructior. of the w�est side of Baze Road will be the responsibility of the developer. Council M+ember Wilbanks made a motion to accept the Comnission's recom- mendation and approve the fir�al plat of Shadow Glen, Phase 2B. Mayor Pro Tem Ware seconded the motion, which prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None PLANNING & ZONING CONfl�IISSION RECONY�TDATION, FINAL PLAT, Fi,TFv ADDITION The next item before the City Council for consideration was the Planning & Zoning Cca�anission reccarut�ndation relative to the final plat of the Kelley Addition. This particular plat contains approx�mately 2.6 acres of land and is located �' on the north side of Wildwood Lane, west of Boyd Drive. The tract is zoned "R-7.5" Single-Family Dwelling District and is proposed to be the site of a , church facility. Mr. Atkins reported the Planning & Zoning Conmission unanimpusly rec�nded approval of the final plat. A motion was offered by Council Member Wilbanks and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware to accept the Conmission's rec�ndation and approve the final plat of the Kelley Addition. The m�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None PLANNING & ZONING COMNIISSION RECODM'III�IDATIGN PRELIMINARY PLAT, CREEK CROSSING ADDITION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recan- mendation of the Planning & Zoning C�mission relative to the preliminary plat of the Creek Crossing Addition. This plat contains slightly more than 36 acres of land zoned for sir�gle-family development and is located between Mustang Drive and Timberline Drive directly east of the proposed north-south arterial (east of Oak Creek Estates) . Plan- ning & Zoning CcaYmission Chairnian Rick Atkins advised the Ccxrmission reccarmended approval of the plat. The vote was 6 to 0. ` Council Member Wilbanks then made a m�tion to accept the reca�iendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission and approve the preliminary plat of the Creek Crossing Addition. Mayor Pro Tem Ware seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None (10) 08/20/85 PI�NNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl��]DATION PRELIMINARY PLAT, LEWIS T. BAKER ADDITION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recom- mendation of the Planning & Zoning Cca�missior. relative to the prel�mi.nary plat of the Lewis T. Baker Addition. The Lewis T. Baker Addition includes s� lots zoned for "R-12.5" sir�gle-family develo��nt. The tract is located in northwest Grapevine on the north side of �* Lakeridge Drive and backs up to Corps of Engineers property. The recan- mendation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�mission was for approval by a vote of 6 to 0. � A motion was offered by Council Member Wilbanks and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware to accept the Comnission's recc�mendation and approve the preliminary plat of the Lewis T. Baker Additior�. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanlcs Nays: None PI�ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl�TDATION PRELIMINARY PLAT, SUGAR CREEK APAR'IT�Lv'TS The r�ext item before the City Council was to consider the recomnendation of the Planning & Zoning Commissior_ relative to the preliminary plat of the Sugar Creek Apartments. The Sugar Creek Apartrnents are proposed. for the northwest corner of Mustang Drive an� Ponderosa Drive with a maximum density of 16 units per acre. This item had been tabled by the Planning & Zoning Ccnmission for further consideration. No formal action was taken by the City Council. �`` ' PLANNING & ZONING CONA�tISSION RECONIlKENDATIOr? PRELIMI1vARY PLAT, GRA�EVINE SERVICE C�NTER ADDITION �,.;..� The next order of busir.ess was for the City Cour.cil to consider the recce�r mexidation of the Planning & Zoning C�nnission relative to the preliminary plat of the Grapevine Service Center Addition. This 37-acre tract of land is owned by the City of Grapevine and is located east and north of the �isting shop facility on Shadybrook Drive. Zoned for Governmental Use, the property will be used for expansion of the sew�er treat- ment plant and other municipal services. Chairman Atkins advised the Planning & Zoning Cenmission unaninwusly reco�nended approval of the preliminasy plat. Council Meniber Wilbanks then made a motion to accept the Comriission's recan- mendation and approve the preliminary plat of the Grapevine Service Center Addition. Mayor Pro Tem Ware seconded the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Paaers, 4v'are, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None PI.ANNING & ZONIlVG CON�iISSION RECONll�ENDATIGN COMPREEIE[�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AN�IDNID.�ITS, hC, PO, OPEDT SPACE & P.-5.0 �""' The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recan- mendation of the Planning & Zonir�g Cca�mission relative tc� the proposed amend- ments to Comprehensive Zoninq Ordin�:ce No. 82-73, as amended (HC, PO, Open '� Space, and R-5.0) and a subsEa,uent ordinance, if applicable. Chairm�l Atkins advised the Planning & Zoning Cc�nmission approved the follow- ing amendments to the Cc�►prehensive Zoning Ordinance. Their vote was 6 to 0. 1. "HC" Highway C�rcial District approved as presented during the public hearing, with the access to be frcgn arterial highways only except in the case of corner lots, when side street access will be allowed. 2. "PO" Professional Office District approved as presented, with drive-in and drive-through restaurants being deleted fran the Conditional Uses. (11) ' 08/20/85 3. Open Space regulations approved as proposed. 4. "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line District repealed as proposed. The major topic of the ensuing discussion concerned access to the Highway Ccan- mercial uses, specifically in the area of Northv�est Highway and Wall Street. Whether or not to delete the "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line District was also deliberated. City Secretary Karen Spann then read the caption of the proposed ordinance. *�� A motion was offered by Council Member Glynn te accept the recca�m�endation of the Flanning & Zoning Cammission and approve the ordinance adopting amended „ .._ provisions for the "HC" Highway Camiercial District, "PO" Professional Office District, and Open Space regulati�ns. The motion was seconded by Council M�r Spencer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None ORI�iIN�1NCE NO. 85-38 AN ORDINANC� AN�NDING ORDINANCE NO. $2-73, THE COMPREHII�iSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SANIE BEING ALSO KNCJ4VN AS APPIIVDIX "D" OF TfiE CODE OF ORDI- NANCFS OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, BY PROVIDIlvG F'OR AMII�]DMIIQTS AND CHAlvGES TO DISTRICT REGUI,ATIONS BY AN,ENDING SECTIOlv 26 RELATING TO "HC" HIGHWAY COrM9ERCTAT, DISTRICI' REGULATIONS, BY AN�7DING SF�C,'I'ION 27 REI,ATING TO "PO" PROFESSIONAL GFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS, AND BY AMII�IDING SECTION 51 RELATING TO REQUIREN�ITS FOR OPET; SPACE AND RECREATIONAL AREAS; PRfJVID- ''"�' ING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEID THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOLL�AFLS ($1,000.00) FOR EA�H �, OFFENSE AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHAIZ BE DF�IED COPM'LZTTID UPON EA�H DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CI,AUSE; DECLARING AN II�lERC�ICY AND FkOVIDING AN EFFECI'IVE �A'1� rlayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to deny the reccatanendation of the Planning & Zoning Camr�ission relative to "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line District, that it should reqnain in the Canprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Council Member Glynn seconded the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vcte: Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Glynn Nays: Spencer & Wilbanks PI�NNING & ZONING COMMISSION RDCONA�INDATION COMPREI�'JQSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AMIIVDMII�ITS, HCO, SIC�l STANDARDS & SUPPT.F�FNi'ARY REGUI,ATIONS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recom- mendation of the Planning & Zoning CaYmLission relative to proposed amendments to Canprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended (HCO, Sign Standards, Supplementary Regulations) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. '�"�`" Planning & Zoning Canmission Chairntian Rick Atkins reported the following � recarn�ndations were made unanimously: µ 1. "HCO" Hotel/Corporate Office District approved as proposed by Mr. Tony Wiles, planning consultant to the City. 2. Sign Standards approved as proposed with certain editorial changes being noted. 3. Supplementary District Regulations as proposed, with It�n A5 providing that the City Manager can approve certain temporary uses for a length af time not to exceed seven days. (12) 08/20/85 The caption of the proposed ordinance was presented for the record. Following deliberation of these items, Council Member Wilbanks made a motion to accept the Conmission's rec�ndation unct approve the ordinance adopting amended provisior�s for the Supplementary District Regulations ar.d the Sign Standards only. The "HCO" Hotel/Corporate Office District regulations were tabled for further consideratior�. Council Member Spencer offered a second to the mption, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: �» Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None ,�, ORDINANCE NO. 85-39 AN ORDINANCE AMII�IDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, TI-� COMPREEIE[VSIVE ZUNING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TExAS, SAN1E BEING AISO KNOTn�IV AS APPIIVDIX "D" OF � CODE OF ORDI- NANCFS OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, BY PFQJVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS AND CHANGES TO DISTRICI' REGUI�ATIONS BY AMII�IDING SECTION 42 RELATING TO SUPPLEMII�ITARY DISTRICT REGUI,ATIONS, Al`� BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 60 REI�TING TO SIQ�T STANDARDS; PROVIDING A PENALZ'Y NOT TO EXCEID THE SUM OF ONE Txous�rm Do��s (�i,000.00) FOR �cx OFFENSE AND A SF;PARATE OFFE�ISE SHAIZ BE Dffi��D CGN�1I'ITED UPON EACH DAY DliRING Uk ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DF�CLARING AN II�IERC;�,'[�TCY AND PROVIDING AN EFF�CTIVE DATE M,ISCFT T.Atv�US REPORTS � ' Public Works Director Jim Baddaker requested clarificatior. fran the City Council relative to �roposed changes in storm drainage design standards. He ,� , questioned whether they intended drainage to be contained (1) within the right-of-way or (2) fran top-cf-curb to top-of-curb. The general concensus of the City Council was that drainage be cantained. within the right-of-way. No formal action was taken. Mayor Powers announced a special meeting of the City Council would be held on Thursday, August 22, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. fcr the purpose of conducting an executive session on real est�te. Finance Director Bill White briefly explained property Tax Code require�nents and the differences between t� rate increase percentage and tax revenue increase percentage. AATOLTRI�'.��`.'I' The deliberations of the City Council having been concluded, a motion to adjourn the meeting was offered by Council Member Wilbanks. Council Member Brekken seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: P�aers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wi]�araks Nays: None �� PASSID AND APPROVED BY TN�E CITY COUDTCIL OF 'PHE CITY OF GR�IPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 3rd day of _�pt�r , 1985. � APPROVID: e�F-� ,V � Maycr ' (13) 08/20/85 ATl'F�T: � City Secretary �6 �^'++�R'1 � �' $�..� (14)