Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-05-03 Emergency Meeting EMERGENCY AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY, MAY 3 , 1984 AT 6: 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET I. CALL TO ORDER '�'"s II. INVOCATION: Council Member Tom Powers III. CITIZENS REQUESTS AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS IV. NEW BUSINESS City Council to consider a resolution imposing a moratorium on the issuance of building permits in certain delineated areas by mutual consent and agreement of the property owner and the City. V. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS City Council to consider the recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the adoption of a new zoning district map for the entire City and a subsequent ordinance. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. City Council to consider the second reading of Ordinance No. 84-20 passed on first reading on `�: ` May 1 , 19 8 4. B. City Council to consider the second reading of Ordinance No. 84-21 passed on first reading on May 2 , 1984. C. City Council to consider a resolution amending Resolution No. 83-34 relative to extending the moratorium. VII . ADJOURNMENT THIS EMERGENCY AGENDA WAS PREPARED BECAUSE IMMEDIATE ACTION IS NECESSARY TO INSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF GRAPE- VINE, TEXAS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS ^�- „ AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING EMERGENCY AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 3RD �� DAY OF MAY, 1984 AT 12 :00 NOON. Cit Secretary STATE OF TEXAS COUN'i'Y OF TARR�INT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Special Session on this the 3rd day of May, 1984 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council (.'h��mbers, 413 Main Street, with the follawing members present to-wit: ,,,�, William D. Tate Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem Marion Brekken Council Member � Ron Dyer Council Member Jim Glynn Council Member Tom Powers Council Member constituting a quor�n, with Council Member Larry Oliver absent, with the follawing members of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Karen Spann City Secretary CAIS� TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Tate. INVOCATION Council Member Tam Pawers delivered the Invocation. RESOLUTION, INIPOSING VOLUNTARY 45-DAY BUILDING NIORATORIUM � The first order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution in�osing a mr�ratorium on the issuance of building permits in certain � delineated areas by mutual consent and agreement of the property cx�mer and the City. City Attorney John Boyle explained. that a resolution had been prepared for Council consideration which would i.mpose a 45-da.y voluntary nx�ratori�n on certain properties. He continued that the avners of the properties involved had agreed in writing to this moratoritun, which was not an extension of the existing moratoriiun, but a new, voluntary moratoritun on building permits only. 'I'he City Secretary then presented the caption of the proposed resolution. During brief discussion on this matter, it was agreed to postpone action on this resolution until after deliberation of the re�nainder of the Planning & Zoning Comnission recoimiendations. PI1�I�Il�TING & ZOI�TING CON�IISSION RECONA�LVDATIONS, CITY-INSTIGATED REZONING CASE The final rec�ndations to ccane fran the Planning & Zoning Ccmmission relative to the City-instigated rezoning ca.se were then presented by Public Works Director Jim Baddaker. Each parcel was identified, along with current and proposed zoning categories. +�'"° Follaaing this lengthy review of the Comni.ssion's rec�ndations, a brief recess was taken by the City Council. Al1 Council Nlembers, with the exception of Council �er Oliver, were present when the meeting reconvened mcxrentarily �,,, in the Council Chambers. Consideration was then given to the parcels and their respective zoning classifications. Special concern was expressed for outdoor storage areas, which are currently allawed only under the "HC" Highway Commercial Zoning District. Of particular interest were the Wa7mart shopping center on William D. Tate Avenue and the Fox Equi�anent Rental on West Dallas Road. It was the general concensus of the City Council to consider amending the "CC" C�nrnanity Ccarn�ercial zoning district regulations, at a later date, to allc�w autdoor storage as a conditional use. 05/03/84 The property loca.ted north of the new post office facility on William D. Tate Avenue (Parcel No. 88) was also discussed. This parcel was currently zoned "C-2" Cammunity Busi.ness Zoning District and was rec�nded to be rezoned to "CN" Neighborhood Cca�n�ercial Zoning District. For straw vote purposes, Council Member Glynn offered a motion that the rec�ndation be accepted and the "CN" zoning be designated on this tract. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pauers Nays . None ,.F�, Absent: Oliver Parcel No. 31, located on both sides of Dove Road on the north side of North- west Highway, was given special attention. The praperty was advertised for "� the "HC" Highway Cam�ercial classification; hawever, the Planning & Zoning Ccemtii.ssion had rec�.nded a "CC" Carmunity C�rcial designation for this tract. Council Member Dyer then made a motion for straw vote purposes that this parcel be rezoned to the "HC" Highway C�rcial Zoning District. The motion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Following discussion on several other tracts of land, it was noted that letters frcan property awners agreeing to a voluntary 45-day mr�ratoritun had bee.n received relative to certain parcels. The City Council then gave consideration to reqnoving these items fran these zoning deliberations and readvertis�ng them for additional consideration and public testimr�ny. Property awner agreement letters had been received from 1) Dallas-�rapevine Associates and 2) Trinity Industries relative to their property as portions of Parcels No. 132, 77, & 78. These tracts were located generally east of South Main Street to Spur 382 and south of East Dallas Road to Highway 114. A m�tion was offered for straw vote purposes by Mayor Pro Tem Ware that the ��• properties awned by Dallas-Grapevine Associates and Trinity Industries (as portions of Parcels No. 132, 77, & 78) be withdrawn fran these deliberations and readvertised for additional consideration. The m�tion prevailed Y.�y the `"�`� ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pc�wers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Mr. James Mason, the awner of Parcel No. 94, the southeast corner of William D. Tate Avenue and Highway 114, had also agreed to the voluntazy moratori�n on his property. For straw vote purposes, Council Me�er Jim Glynn made a irotion that this praperty awned by Mr. Mason be witYydrawn fran these deliberations and readvertised for additional consideration. The motion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays : None Absent: Oliver Parcel No. 95 included property under two c�merships 1) the I�etter Estate, represented by Mr. Neil Nelles, and 2) Tanlin Properties, represented by Mr. David Denison, both of whan had subanitted agreeme.nt letters. The property is located on the south side of Highway 114 and extends fram William D. Tate �� Avenue to Highway 26, north of the Airport property. A straw vote irotion was made by Council Member Brekken to rezrove this parcel fran oonsideration at this time and that it be readvertised for additional deliberation. The mQtion �,, � prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver A property aaner letter had been received frcan Mr. James Mason relative to ' property identified as Parcel No. 22, located generally on the northwest corner of Dove Road and Dave Lc�ap Road. A m�tion was offered for straw vote (2) 05/03/84 purposes by Council member Jim Glynn that Parcel No. 22 be withdrawn from these deli.berations and readvertised for additional consideration. The mr�tion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Mr. BarYy Knight, attorney representing Cecil Properties, Inc. , had sulx�iitted ,�+. a letter agreeing to the voluntary moratoritiun on their property referred to as Parcel No. 24A and located on the west side of Park Boulevard inm�ediately south of the existing Woodlake Apartments. For straw vote purposes, Council � Member Ron Dyer offered a m�tion that this property be removed froan these deliberations and readvertised for additional consideration. The m�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Parcel No. 30 was located generally on both sides of Lucas Drive south of Worthington Street. Letters agreeing to the volunta.ry 45-day moratorium had been received frcan Dr. Don Gerschick and Mr. Harlen Joyce, both of whom awned property as portions of Parcel No. 30. A straw vote motion was made by Council Me�er Glynn to remove the portions of this parcel owned by Dr. Gerschick and Mr. Joyce fran consideration at this time, and that they be readvertised for additional deliberation. The mption prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Mr. Carroll Ravk�otham, oumer of the Storage House mini warehouses on North �"' Scribner Street, ha.d also submitted a letter agreeing to the voluntary moratoritnn on his praperty, a portion of Parcel No. 34. A mr�tion was then �, offered by Council M��ber Po�,aers for straw vote purposes that the portion of Parcel No. 34 awned by Mr. Rc�wl�otham be withdrawn fran these deliberations and readvertised for additional consideration. The m�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Oliver A property awner agreement letter had been received frcan Mr. Joe L. Wright relative to his property located on the north end of Lucas Drive and currently zoned for multi-family development (Parcel No. 164) . A motion was offered by Council Me,mUer Brekken for straw vote purposes that Parcel No. 164 be with- drawn from consideration at this time and readvertised for additional deliberation. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Mr. Ted E,hloe, representing the awners of the property identified as Parcel No. 45, had also submitted a letter agreeing to the voluntary 45-day �"* moratoritun. This property is located generally across frcen the Harris Corporation on the northwest side of State Highway 121 North and backing up to Corps of IIzgineers property at Lake Grapevine. A straw vote mr�tion was made �r.r by Mayor Pro Tem Ware to remove this parcel fran these deliberations and readvertise the property for additional consideration. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Property awner agreement letters had been received frc�n 1) Frederick Brodsky and 2) Rosewood Properties relative to their property as portions of Parcels 46, 47 and 49. In addition, it was noted that Ms. Chris Larson had testified (3) 05/03/84 during the public hearing that her client, Ctiirt Carter, aaned property included in Parcels 46, 47, and 49. It was his wish to have tY�e tract reconsidered for a different zoning classification, and an extension of the moratoriLun wr�uld be agreeable. The property in question is located in the northeast portion of the City and wraps around the Hilton Hotel and the Austin Ranch, extending north. A m�tion was made for straw vote purposes by Council Member Dyer that the properties awned by Mr. Brodsky, Mr. Carter, and Rosewood Properties be withdrawn fran consideration at this time and readvertised for add.itional deliberation. The motion prevailed by the follawing vote: �� Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver ��-� Parcel No. 106 was then considered for remr�val fran these deliberations. It was noted that this parcel, located on the southwest corner of Tanglewood Drive and N�ustang Drive, had been advertised for the "R-3.5" duplex zoning designation. Mr. James Lee, representing the property cx�,mer, had spoken at the public Y�earing requesting an "R-MF-1" Multi-Family classification, and Mayor Pro Tem Ware offered a straw vote motion that this parcel be withdrawn and readvertised for additional consideration. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pavers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Consideration was then given to Parcel No. 149, located generally on the south side of State Highway 26 fresn Grapevine High School to Big Bear Creek. The property, under several awnerships, had been advertised for the "CN" Neighborhood ConaY�ercial Zoning District; hawever, the Planning & Zoning Cca�mission felt this was inappropriate zoning for this tract and recc��ended the parcel be reconsidered for "HC" Highway C�xcial Zoning. Council Member RQn Dyer made a mc�tion for straw vote purposes that Parcel No. 149 be withdrawn fr�► these deliberations and readvertised for additional ��e consideration. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers "�� Nays . None Absent: Oliver Mr. Joe Wright, awner of Parcel No. 148, had also su}�iitted a letter agreeing to the voluntary mr�ratoritun on his property located north of the Creekw�od West Subdivision, fronting on Pool Road and extending east to Grapevine High School. For straw vote purposes, Council Member Jim Glynn made a motion that this tract be removed frcan consideration at this time and readvertised for additional deliberation. Th�e mr�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Paaers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Parcel No. 139B, located at the r�rtheast corner of Hall-Johnson Road and the proposed Cheeksparger extension, had been advertised for consideration as "CC" ComYaznity C�rcial Zoning District. The Planning & Zoning Cammission, hawever, had recam►ended that this property be reconsidered for the "R-N�'-2" Multi Fami.ly designation. A m�tion was offered for straw vote purposes by Mayor Pro Tem Ware that Parcel No. 139B be withdrawn fran these deliberations and reconsidered. The motion prevailed by the follvwing vote: •�� Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None �� Absent: Oliver Mr. Larry Lightner, awner of Parcel No. 121, and Mr. Jim Sawell, who had contracted for purchase of a portion of Parcel No. 121, had both submitted property cx�mer agreement letters. This tract is lc�a�ed on the south side of I T�mberline Drive fran appr�imately 300 feet �as.� of Highway 121 South extending west to Ztain Creek Cove. Council M�nber Ron Dyer offered a m�tion for straw vote purposes that this property be ren►aved fran consideration at this time and readvertised for additional deliberation. The motion prevailed ' by th� ensuing vote: (4) 05/03/84 Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Parcel No. 121A was also owned by Mr. Larry Lightner, a portion of which had been contracted for sale to Mr. Jim Saaell, and was located on the north side of Timberline Drive and east of the proposed Cheeksparger extension to the existing Pearltree Apartrnents. Both Mr. Lightner and Mr. Sawell had submitted letters agreeing to the voluntary 45-day moratoritun on this tract. For straw ,�. vote purposes, a motion was offered by Mayor Pro Tem Ware that this parcel be withdrawn at this ti.tre and readvertised for additional consideration. The motion prevailed by the following vote: �w Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver A letter agreeing to the voluntaty nx�ratoriwn had also been received fram Mr. Tarry Lightner relative to his property located on the north side of Timberli.ne Drive and west of the proposed Cheeksparger extension to Oak Creek Estates (Parcel No. 104A) . A m�tion was offered for straw vote purposes by Council Member Dyer that this parcel be withdrawn fran these deliberations and reconsidered. The m�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Parcel No. 104, com�nly ]mcx�m as the fornier Box property, was currently zoned "R-1" Single-Family Dwelling District and had been advertised for consideration as "R-MF-2" Multi-Family Dwelling District. The recotm�endation fran the Planning & Zoning Cannission, hawever, was that this tract be removed from consideration at this time and readvertised for all residential uses. A straw vote m�tion supporting the Planning & Zoning Camzussion rec�ndation was made by Council Member Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: �, Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Mr. Larry Lightner had also sul�nitted a praperty awner agreement letter relative to his property located south of Grapevine High School and �st of Timb�rline Drive (Parcel No. 116) . The property is lmdwn as Aspen Oaks and is currently zoned for "R-3" Multi-Family development. For straw vote purposes, a motion was offered by Mayor Pro Tem Ware to withdraw Parcel No. 116 fram these deliberations and readvertise the property for additional consideration. The nx�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Paaers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Parcel No. 117, approximately 4 acres located on the north side of Timberline Drive adjacent to the Memorial Baptist Church, was advertised for consideration of the "R-MF-1" N�ulti-Family Dwelling District. The reco�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Carmission was to rezone the property "R-3.5" 'Ita�-Family Dwelling District. The City Council discussed the possibility of removing this tract for readvertisement and further �^ consideration. A straw vote motion offered by Mayor Pro Tem Ware to consider zoning this property "R-MF-1" as advertised failed for lack of a majority vote in favor. � � Discussion of this item continued, and it was the general concensus of the Council that Parcel No. 117 be included for "R-3.5" Twn-Family Dwelling District zoning in the ordinance to be passed later in the meeting. It was also requested that this tract be included with those parcels to be readvertised so that additional consideration could be given. During a discussion of Parcel No. 101, loca.ted at the northwest corner of Ponderosa and Mustang Drive, it was noted that Mr. Hubert Gill had represented the property awner during the public hearing and had requested additional consideration for n�ulti-family developn�nt. At that ti.me, Mr. Gill had also (5) 05/03/84 noted that they wnuld be agreeable to an extension of the m�ratoritun on this tract. Mayor Pro 'Ipm Ware made a motion for straw vote purposes that Parcel No. 101 be withdrawn and readvertised for further deliberation. The m�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Parcel No. 108A included the Cote office building located on HigYnaay 26 ��,� adjacent to Mustang Stadiiun. This tract had inadvertently been included with the stadilun for advertiserrn�it as "GU" Governmental Use, and the Planning & Zoning Ccamission recam�.nded it be rea.dvertised for the "PO" Professional Office Zoning District. For straw vote purposes, Mayor Pro Tem Ware offered a �" motion to remove Parcel No. 108A frcm these deliberations and that it be readvertised for additional consideration. The nx�tion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Wayne's Drive-In and shopping center located on the southeast corner of Tanglewood Drive and Mustang Drive was noted as Parcel No. 105. This property had mistakenly been included in the advertisement with an adjacent tract for consideration as "R-N�'-1" Multi-Family Lkaelling District. Upon discavering this in their deliberations, the Planning & Zoning Commission reco�nrended Parcel No. 105 be readvertised for the "CN" Neighborhood Cce�a�iercial Zoning District. Being in agreement with the findings of the Planning & Zoning Carmission, Council Member Marion Brekken offered a straw vote motion that Parcel No. 105 be withdrawn frcHn consideration at this time and readvertised for further deliberation. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Paaers - Nays . None �""�! Absent: Oliver A property owner letter agreeing t�o the voluntary 45-day moratoriLun had bee,n "�"` received fran Mr. B. R. Flories, awner of the Mattie Al1en tract, a portion of Parcel No. 130, located east of Highway 121 South between Hughes Road and Glade Rc�ad. For straw vote puzposes, Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion that Mr. Flories' property as a portion of Parcel No. 130 be removed froan consideration at this time and readvertised for additional deliberation. 'I'he motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver Praperty owner agreement letters had been received fran (1) Jim Lucas of Lucas Funeral Ho�nes and (2) Tim Lancaster of Dellwood DeveloFxrent Campany relative to their property as portions of Parcel 53, 54. These tracts being located generally east of Highway 114 at College Street. A motion was offered for straw vote purposes by Council Member Dyer that the properties awned by Mr. Jim Lucas and Mr. Tim Lancaster (as portions of Parcel 53, 54) be withdrawn frcan these deliberations and readvertised for additional consideration. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers �� Nays . None Absent: Oliver �� The caption of the ordinance incorporating the final recamnendations of the Planning & Zoning Carmission was then read by the City Secretary. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware that the ordinance be adopted, excluding those parcels, or portions of parcels, which had been withdrawn by the City Council for additional consideration. The motion was seconded by Council Member Glynn and prevailed by the follawing vote: (6) 05/03/84 Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Oliver - ORDINANCE NO. 84-22 AN ORDINANCE ANIENDING ORDIIQANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPRII�ISIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVIlVE, TEX�1S, SAN� BEING AI�SO �. KNqV�1N AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, T.F�S, AI�ID AMEDIDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, SAN1E BEING ALSO KNC7WN AS APPEL�IDIX "A" OF 'I�iE CITY CODE OF TI� CITY �"° OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRAN'I'ING VARIOUS ZONING CHANGFS ON PARCELS OF LADID, DESCRIBID BY MEZ�S AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE, SI'ILTATED IN Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUN'I'Y, '1�XAS; ORDERING CHANGES 1N THE USES OF SAID PROPII�TIES 'PO VARIOUS USES AUI'fiORIZID AI�ID pFRMTTTF� UNDER 00MPREHII�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANC� N0. 82-73; CORRE(,�I'ING THE �'FICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESER�IING ALL 0►I'HII2 PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVID- ING A CZ�AUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DEPEFZM-�IING THAT THE PUBLIC IlVTERESTS, MpRALS AND GENEf�L WF�FARE DIIK�ND A ZONING Q-1ANGE AND AN�DMEDI`I' THEftEIN NIADE; PRO- VIDING A PEDTALTY NO►I' Z�0 �CEID THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFE[�TTSE SHAI� BE DEII�'!ED C�A'IITTED UPON EAQi DAY DURING OR ON WfiICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND DDCI,ARING AN E��CY � ORDINANCE NO. 84-20, SECOI�ID READING The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the second reading of Ordinance No. 84-20 passed on first rea.ding on May 1, 1984. The caption of the ordinance was presented by the City Secretary. It was noted that Parcel No. 14, located on the north side of West Northwest Highway across fran the Northwest Plaza Shopping Center, had been included. in the first reading of Ordinance No. 84-20 and was proposed to be rezoned to the "PO" Professional Office Zoning District. Mr. Claude Miller, awner of the property in question, had submitted a letter agreeing to the voluntary 45-day moratori�n on this tract and requested that it be readvertised for additional consideration. Following brief Council discussion, a straw vote motion was made by Council bsember Brekken that Parcel No. 14 be remr�ved frcgn consideration at this time and be readvertised for further deliberation. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pc7wers Nays . None Absent: Oliver � It was also noted that Parcel No. 32, located on the north side of Northwest Highway frcan just east of Lucas Drive extending east to North Main Street, was �,,,,,,, included in this second reading of Ordinance No. 84-20 (as instructed during the City Council meeting of May 2, 1984) . The Planning & Zoning Commission rec�ndation for this tract was "CC" Comrnxnity Cam�ercial Zoning District; hawever, the City Attorney had advised that an "HC" Highway Cam��rcial classification was a consideration under the current advertisement. Parcel No. 32 was included in this reading of the ordinance for "HC" Highway Cam�rcial zoning. Council Member Brekken then made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 84-20 on second reading, ea�cluding Parcel No. 14. Council Member Glynn seconded the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: (7) 05/03/84 Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pcxaers Nays . None Absent: Oliver ORDINANCE NO. 84-20 AN ORDINANCE AN�IDING ORDINANC.,E NO. 82-73, THE CONIPRII-III�TSIVE ZONIlQG ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S, SANIE BEING ALSO HI�7WN AS APPEL�IDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF ,,,�„� GRAPEVINE� `I�.S� AND �1NIENDING ORDINArTCE NO. 70-10, SAN1E BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPII�IDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING VARIOUS `�"� ZONING C�IANGFS ON PARCELS OF LAND, DE.SC.RISED MY ME'I�'S AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE, SIZUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARF2ANT COUN'I'Y, TE}�S; ORDERING CHANGFS IN THE USFS OF SAID PRUPERTIES TO VARZOUS USES AUTHORIZID AND PERMITTID UNDER CON�REE�TSIVE ZONING ORDIlVANCE N0. 82-73; CORRECTING 'I�iE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESFR�IING ALL �!'��t PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANC�; PFtOVIDING A CIAUSE REI,ATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETER- MINING THAT THE PUBLIC Il�TERESTS, MORAI� AI�ID GIIVERAL WELFARE DE2�IAI�ID A ZONING CHANGE P.DID AMENDN�IT TFIE�ZZEIN Nl��DE; PROVIDING A PII�iAI,TY NOrI' TO F�C�ID Tf� SUM OF (7NE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE D�IED CONINLTTTID UPON EAC�i DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATIC7IV OCCURS ORDIlQANCE NO. 84-21, SECOND RF�DING � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the second reading of Ordinance No. 84-21 passed on first reading on May 2, 1984. �� City Secretary Karen Spann read the caption of the ordinance. Council discussion ensued, during which the Council Nle�nbers were advised. that property awner letters agreeing to the voluntary 45-day mpratoritun had been received. frcgn (1) John & L�nda Hughes of 205 E. College, (2) Mr. Larry Brown of 224 E. College, and (3) Dr. J. H. Miles of 213 E. College, each of these tracts being a portion of Parcel No. 68, which was to be considered for "R-7.5" Single-Family Zoning. Mayor Pro Tem Ware then offered a straw vote nr�tion that the properties awned by Mr. & Mrs. Hugh,es, Mr. Brawn, and Dr. Miles be remr�ved frcan consideration pending readvertis�nent for additional deliberation. The mr�tion prevailed by th,e follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver A irotion approving Ordinance No. 84-21 on second reading, excluding the above- mentioned portions of Parcel No. 68, was made by Council Member Glynn. Council Member Paaers seconded the m�tion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: ��R Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekke.n, Dyer, Glynn, & Pvwers Nays . None Absent: Oliver „„�,g ORDINANCE NO. 84-21 AN O�INANCE ANIENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, Tf� C'ONIPR�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANC,E OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SANIE BEING AISO KiV(7WN AS APPF�IDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPE,VINE, '!'EXAS� AI�ID AMENDING ORDIl�TP�iVC,E NO. 70-10, S�N1E BEING ALSO KNOHII�T AS I APPEDIDIX "A" OF � CITY CODE OF � CITY �8) O5/03/84 OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING VARZOUS ZONING CHANGFS ON PAE�ELS OF LAND, DESCRIBID BY METFS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE, SITUATID IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUN'I'Y, TExAS; ORDERING CHANGES IN THE USES OF SAID PROPEI�I'IES TO VARIOUS USFS AUTf-iORIZID AND PERMITTID UNDER COMPREEIINSIVE ZONING ORDIlQANCE NO. 82-73; CORRECTING THE �„ OF'FICIAL ZONING MAP; PRFSEFZ�IING ALL OTF�R PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINAl�K�; PROVID- ING A (�,AUSE RII�ATII� 'I�0 SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC Il�]TERESTS, � MpRAT� AND GII�TERAL WEL�F'ARE DII�IArID A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENr!' THEREIN NJADE; PRO- VIDING A PII�tALTY NOT TO �CEID THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOLLI�RS ($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFII�ISE SHAI� BE DEII� CONY�IITI�D UPON EACfi DAY DURING OR ON WfiICH A VIOLATION OCCURS It was also noted that Parcel No. 24B, located on the west side of Park Boulevard near its intersection with Northwest Highway, and portions of Parcel No. 58 c�med by (1) Susan Massey, located on the southeast corner of Pebblebrook and Wall Street, and (2) Mr. William Ratcliff, just south of the Massey tract at Pebblebrook and Heather, ha.d been withdrawn prior to the first reading of this ordinance pending readvertisement. RESOLUTION, VOI�iJNTARY 45-DAY NYJRATORIUM Al1 of those parcels which had been withdrawn fro�n consideration pending readvertisement were then reviewed. A motion was made by Council Me.mber Pawers and seconded by Council Me�er � Glynn that the follawing parcels of land be readvertised for additional consideration, but that they not be included in the voluntary 45-day moratorium (property awner agreement letters had not been received on these ""� tracts, and a mr�ratoritun was unnecessary due to the existing zoning or land use) : l. Portions of Parcel No. 58 awned by (a) Susan Massey, currently zoned "R-3" Multi-Family and (b) William Ratcliff, currently zoned Specific Use for an athletic facility. 2. Parcel No. 149, ]mawn as the Tiller Praperty, and currently zoned "R-1" Single-Family, "C-1" Neighborhood Bt.isiness, "C-2" Ccenrnxnity Business, "I-1" Light Industrial, and Specific Use. 3. Parcel No. 139B, awned by Lincoln Praperties, currently zoned "R-1" Single-Family. 4. Parcel No. 104, the fornter Box property, currently c�med by the Chase�od Ccmg�any and currently zoned "R-1" Single-Family. 5. Parcel No. 117, which is owned by Dallas North Prc�pert:ies and currently zoned "R-3.5" 'Itao Family. 6. Wayne's Drive-In and Shopping Center, Parcel No. 105, located at �* Mustang Drive and Tanglewood Drive. 7. Parcel No. 108A, the Cote office building on Highway 26. �wr 8. A portion of Parcel No. 1 owned by Mr. Jesse Woods and currently zoned "R-1" Si.ngle-Family. 9. A portion of Parcel No. 133 located east of Field-Doss Road and north of Glade Road, which had been rezoned "R-7.5" Single-Family, was to be given additional consideration at the request of the awner, C. R. Woolridge. The m�tion prevailed by the follawing vote: (9) 05/03/84 Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Oliver A resolution inq�osing a voluntary 45--day moratoritun on building permits, the caption of which had been presented by the City Secretary at the beginning of this meeting, was then considered. Those tracts for which a letter agreeing to the mpratoritun had been received fran the property owner and which had been withdra�m fran consideration by the City Council were then briefly review�ed. �� Council Member Glynn made a motion that the resolution imposing the moratoriiun on these certain properties be adopted, and that they be readvertised for additional consic3�xation. Mayor Pro Tem Ware offered a second to the motion, �� which prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Paaers Nays . None Absent: Oliver RFSOLUI'ION NO. 84-25 A RESOLUTIOI�T Il��OSING A FORTY-FIVE (45) DAY NIfJRATORIUM �1 THE ISSU�N(.',E OF BUILDING PERMITS IN CERTAIN DF�INID ARF�AS BY MU'lqJAL AGREII�IT BE'iWEII�T THE CITY AND THE CJWNERS OF THE PROPERTY MISCELIAI�IDOUS DISC[JSSION It was noted that a resolution relative to extending the original m�ratorium in�osed on SeptemUer 6, 1983, which had been included on the agenda, was not needed. The original moratoritun would expire at midnight on May 3, 1984. Mayor Tate then appointed Mayor Pro Tem Ware and Council Member Glynn to review and inventory the non-conforniing uses in the City. Upon receiving wr� their report, special consideration will be given to these tracts. AA70URl�.'NT ""�`� The deliberations of the City Council having been concl�ded, a motion to adjourn the meeting was offered by Council Ntember Dyer. Council M�t�ber Brekken seconded the motion, which prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver PASSID AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the � day of __, 1984. APP . _��'��~' � Mayor �� ATI'EST: �� Cit Secretary (10)