The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-06-19 Joint Meeting AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL �,, & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 19 , 1984 AT 7 : 30 P.M. � COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET I. CALL TO ORDER II. INVOCATION: Council Member Larry Oliver III. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-14 submitted by Mr. Fred Branan. B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-15 submitted by Mr. Mark Tutun representing the Willard Baker Company. C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to the �� replat of Lots 18 & 19 , Block 2 , Tiffany Forest Addition. �"` IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to consider the other published agenda items. B. City Council to recess briefly and reconvene in the Council Chambers to consider further business. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984 AT 1 : 00 P.M. � Cit Secretary � AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 19 , 1984 AT 7: 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET V. CITIZENS REQUESTS AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS VI. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meetings of April 23, 24 , 25 , & 26 and May 1 & 2 , 1984 VII. NEW BUSINESS A. City Council to consider authorizing the execution of a contract with the State Highway Department relative to an extension of Highway 121 N frontage road (in con- junction with Connell Development Company) . B. City Council to consider an ordinance amending the City Code relative to service rates for solid waste collec- tion and disposal. VIII. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z84-14 (Branan) and subsequent ordinance, if applicable. B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli- ��-�� cation Z84-15 (Tutun) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of Lots 18 & 19 , Block 2, Tiffany Forest Addition. D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of the Pecan Gap Addition. E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of 114 Place. F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of the Wildwood Park Addition. G. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of the Simmons tract. H. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of College Creek Addition. �„ I. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of Dove Landing. J. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to pending City- instigated rezoning cases, if available, and take any necessary action relative thereto. IX. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S, AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984 AT 1 : 00 P.M. � �, �L/�l�i City Secretary � � � � AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 19, 1984 AT 7: 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET V. NEW BUSINESS � A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- cation Z84-14 (Branan) and make a recommendation to the +r�. City Council. B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- cation Z84-15 (Tutun) and make a recommendation to the City Council. C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat of Lots 18 & 19 , Block 2, Tiffany Forest Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the ��I o� ..�.a the Pecan Gap Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of 114 Place and make a recommendation to the City Council. F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- nary plat of the Wildwood Park Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. G. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- nary plat of the Simmons tract and make a recommenda- � tion to the City Council. H. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the �relimi- nary plat of the College Creek Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. I. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- nary plat of Dove Landing and make a recommendation to the City Council. VI. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meetings of February 16 , April 30 , May 1 , and May 15 , 1984 VII. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION VIII. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S, AS AMENDED � BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 15TH DAY OF p� JUNE, 1984 AT 1 : 00 P.M. ' City Secretary STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF C�ZAPEVINE The City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas �t in R,egular Joint Session on this the 19th day of June, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 413 Main Street, with the following members of the City Council present to-,wit: � William D. Tate Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem � Larry Oliver Council Member Marion Brekken Council Member Ron Dyer Council M�ember Jim Glynn Council Member Tan Pawers Council MP.mber constituting a quon�n, with the following members of the Planning & Zoning Commission: Sharron Spencer Chairn�an Ron Cook Vice Chainnan Harlen Joyce Member Gerald Normari Member Shane Wilbanks Member Rick Atkins Men�er Peggy Engholm Member constituting a quon�►, with the following members of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager A�rienne Leonard City Attorney Representative �"^ Karen Spann City Secretary � CAT� TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Tate. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered. by Council Member Oliver. PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-14, FRID BRANAN The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Cca�anission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-14 sulx�►itted by Fred Branan. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. Director of Cammunity Develognent H. T. Hardy advised the 3.132 acres inclu,cled in this zoning request was located west of Park Boulevard and north of State Highway 114. The current zoning on the tract was "R-3.5" Two-Family Dwelling District, with the requested zoning being "CC" Car¢nunity Ca�ercial Zoning District. He noted that the awner of this tract also owned an adjacent tract in the City limits of Southlake, and frontage to the Grapevine property would �"""'" be fran Highway 114 in Southlake. Dr. Fred Branan, applicant, then addressed the City Council and Commission and i� advised. that his property within the City of Southlake had comnercial zoning. He continued that prior to the City-instigated rezoning, the portion of his property within the City of Grapevine also had a coir¢nercial zoning designation. Mr. Charles Starnes then presented. the preliminary plans for development of the property. Questions and can�anents frcan the Council Members and Commissioners followed, after which Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present who wished to speak relative to this zoning application. There were none. It was reported that no correspondence had been received concerning this request. 06/19/84 Conanission Nl�mber Joyce then offered a mc�tion to close the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Ccmmi.ssioner Gerald Norman and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Norman, Wilbanks, Atkins, & Engholm Nays: None A motion to close the public hearing was also made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council Memb�r Pawers. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays: None PUl3LIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-15, MARK TUI'UN � The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Conmission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-15 submitted by Mr. Mark Tutun representing the Willard Baker Canpany. Mayor Tate declared open the public hearing. Mr. Hardy, Director of Canmunity Develognent, reported. this was a "clean up" zoning effort by the Willard Baker Company relative to their proposed Western Oaks development, which is Iocated on the west side of State Highway 121 South, north of Parker Cemetery and south of Big Bear Creek. Mr. Mark Tutun, applicant, then reviewed the recent zoning history on this tract, which included the City-instigated zoning case and Zoning Application Z84-09 considered on April 17 and May 15, 1984. Three small tracts vaere to be considered in Z84-15 in order to coordinate zoning district lines. The pro- posed rezoning of Tract lA was fran "R-MF-2" Multi-Family Dwelling District to "CC" C�nity Co�mercial Zoning District; Tract 3A fran "R-MF-2" Multi-Family Dw�lling District to "CC" Commznity Cc��ercial Zoning District; and Tract 8 frcan "R-MF-2" Multi-Family Dw�elling District and "R-20" & "R-12.5" Single- Family Districts to "R-7.5" Single-Family District (see attached Exhibit "A") . � Questions and c�nts frcgn the Cca�mission and Council followed, after which Mayor Tate invited those guests present who wished to speak for or against the proposed zoning to do so. No one wished to cc�mrent. It was also reported �""� that no correspondence or petitions had been received. A mption to close the Cammission's portion of the public hearing was offered. by Commission Member Shane Wilbanks. Commissioner Gerald Nornian seconded the motion, which prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Norman, Wilba.nks, Atkins, & Engholm Nays: None Council Member Oliver also made a motion to close the public hearing on Zoning Application Z84-15. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays: None PUBLIC HEAR�Q�1G, REPLAT, I�OTS 18 & 19, BLOCK 2, TIFFANY FOREST ADDITION The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Can- mission to conduct a public hearing relative to the replat of Lots 18 & 19, Block 2, Tiffany Forest Addition. w�ar Mr. Doug Eberhart, Public iNorks Engineer, noted that the proposed replat of Lots 18 & 19, Block 2, of the Tiffany Forest Addition was a settlanent between ,,,� property awners over the location of a conmon property line. It was later learned that this type of a replat did not require a public hearing, but since notification of the hearing had already been published in the newspaper, it wr�uld continue. No one representing the applicant was present to speak. In addition, there were no persons present who wished to ccnanent relative to the proposed replat, and no correspondence had been received. (2) 06/19/84 A nlotion to close the public hearing was made by Conmissioner Norn�an and seconded. by Ccmnission Member Joyce. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Norman, Wilbanks, Atkins, & Engholm Nays: None A motion to close the Council's portion of the public hearing was made by Council Member Brekken and seconded by Council M�mber Pow�rs. The motion pre- ,t� vailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers �,�,�,,,, Nays: None RECESS, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Mayor Tate then announced that the Planning & Zoning Comni.ssion would recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to consider other published agenda items. The City Council was to remain in session to consider further business. MISCII�LANEOUS REPORTS City Manager Jim Hancock then reported the City had employed a new Main Street Project Director, and he introduced Mary Ellen Tamasy who had recently ass�d this position. CC7NTRACT WITH STATE HIGHf�Y DEPARZT�]T, EXTENSION OF HIGHV�.Y 121 FRONTAC� ROAD The next item considered by the City Council was authorizing the execution of a contract with the State Highway Departnuent relative to an extension of High- way 121 N frontage road (in conjunction with Connell Develo�.anent C�npany) . ""�""' City Manager Jim Hancock reviewed the procedure for extension of this portion of frontage road at the expense of Connell Development Canpany. This would %,,,,�, require two contracts: (1) One between the City and Connell Develo�anent Company stipulating that they will provide funding and engineering for the project; and (2) A contract between the City and the State Highway Department stipulating that the City will advertise for bids and award and administer the contract. The first contract with Connell Develognent Company had been approved on April 17, 1984, and the City Staff was naa recammending that the contract with the State Highway Department be approved. There being little discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Ware offered a motion that the agreement with the State Highway Departrnent be approved. The motion, seconded by Council Member Glynn, prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Paaers Nays: None ORDINANCES, GARBAGE RATES The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance amending the City Code relative to service rates for solid waste collection and disposal. The caption of the proposed ordinance was read by the City Secretary. � Assistant City Manager Bill Eisen reviewed the rates proposed by SCA Services of Fort Worth in their new 5-year contract for refuse collection and disposal. �.r Most of the rates were proposed to be reduced, with twice-a-week service to residential, single-family honues decreasing fram $4.50/month to $3.94/month. It was rec�uended the effective date of the ordinance be May 21, 1984. A motion was then made by Council Member Pawers and seconded by Council Me.mber Glynn that the ordinance be adopted. The mption prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays: None (3) 06/19/84 ORDIN�NCE NO. 84-43 AN ORDINANCE ANIEi�IDING CHAPTER 25, SECTION 97 OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS FSTABLISHING GARBAGE RATES; PROVIDING AN EF��CTIVE DATE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY; AND DF7CCLARING AN II�RGIIQCY CONSIDERATION OF THE MINU'i�S � The next item before the City Council was to consider the minutes of the meetings of April 23, 24, 25, & 26 and May 1, 2, 1984. � There being no additions or corrections, Council Member Glynn made a motion that the minutes be approved as published. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays: None PLANNING & ZONING CON7NiISSION RECONA�IDATIONS, CITY-INSTIGATED REZONING CASE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reconr mendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to pending City- instigated rezoni.ng cases, if available, and take any necessary action relative thereto. These recaninendations were carried over fran the City Council and Planning & Zoning deliberations of June 6-18, 1984. Item No. 28, Parcel No. 101 - This tract is located on the northwest corner of Mustang Drive and Ponderosa and is awned by SunWest Properties. The current zoning on the property is "R-3" Multi-Family Dw�lling District. Planning & Zoning C�anission Chairman Sharron Spencer reported the Ccattnission had, on June 14, 1984, made a rec�ndation on this tract for "R-MF-2" Multi- Family Dw�elling District with deed restrictions limiting the density to 16 '"'� units per acre. At that time, the City Council had requested that the item be sent back to the Ccmunission for reconsideration. Following additional �i deliberation, Mrs. Spencer advised the Planning & Zoning Cce�nission was still in agreearent to recommend that this parcel be zoned for multi-family develognent with a 16-unit-per-acre maximum density being imposed by deed restrictions. Their vote was 6 to 0. The caption of the proposed ordinance was presented by the City Secretary. Council discussion followed, during which it was noted that the Master Plan designation for this tract was meditun density residential, and Mr. Wiles, consulting planner, had reco�nended "PRD-12" Plaruzed Residential District. Density and drainage problems in the area were discussed, as well as the Cc�ani.ssion's concern for camnercial develo�xnent which wr�uld be allawed under the "PRD-12" district. Mayor Pro Tem Ware then offered a motion to accept the recongrtendation of the Planning & Zoning Conmission and adopt the ordinance. Council Meznber Brekken ' seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, & Glynn Nays: Dyer & Pawers ORDINAI�TCE NO. 84-44 � AN ORDINANCE AI�NDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10, Tf� COMPREEiII�1SIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF Tf� � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TExA.S, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPIIVDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANI'ING A ZONING C.'fiANGE ON A TRAC'I' OF LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A I�OT, TRACI', OR PARCII� OF LAIVD LYING AND BEING SIT[JP,TED Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, MORE F'ULLY AND CONlPI�,TELY DESCRIBID IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "R-3" MULTI-FAMILY (4) 06/19/84 DWELLING DISTRICT UNDER ORDINANC� N0. 70-10 TO "R-MF-2" MULTI-FANiILY DWE:Lr- LING DISTRICT UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND PROVIDING FOR ACCEPTANCE BY 'I'HE CITY OF PROFFERID VOLUNTARY DEID RESTRICTIONS; CORRFx'rING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRE- SERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF Tf� ZONING ORDINANCE; PRC7VIDING A CLAUSE REI,ATING TO SEVERABILITY; DEI`ERMIl�IING THAT THE PUBLIC e!� INTERESTS, I�RAIS AND GII�IERAL WEI�'ARE DIIKAr1D A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT Tf-�REIN MADE; PFZOVIDING A PEDIALTY NOT TO ;�, EXCEID THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOT,T,ARS ($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OF�'E[�tSE S T,T BE DEEN�D CONIl�IITI�D UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND DF�I�ARING AN ET'IERC�tCY NOr!'E: The owner of Parcel 101 had initially submitted a letter opposing any change in the zoning of this tract, which would require a three-quarter vote of the City Council to approve. Mr. Hubert Gill, representing SunWest Praperties, withdrew their objection and confirmed their acceptance of the zoning. Item No. 31, Parcel No. 139B - Parcel No. 139B is currently awned by Lincoln Properties and is located on the northeast corner of the proposed Cheek- Sparger extension and Hall-Johnson Road. The property is zoned "R-1" for single-family develognent, and Mrs. Spencer reported the Planning & Zoning Conanission recca�anendation for "R-MF-2" Multi-Family Dwelling District on the entire tract. She noted the Ccamnission preferred the "CN" Neighborhood Coimlercial District; hawever, this choice was not available under the current advertisement. City Secretary Karen Spann then read the caption of the proposed ordinance. � Following brief Council discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a mr�tion that this ;,�„ item be tabled and to authorize the City Staff to institute a new zoning case for consideration of the Neighborhood C�ercial District. The mr�tion was seconded by Council Mem}�er Dyer and prevailed by the followinq vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays: None Item No. 32, Parcel No. 22A - Parcel No. 22A is located on the northwest corner of Dove Road and Dove Loop RQad and is currently zoned as "PUD" Planned Unit Develognent. The Planning & Zoning Camnission reconmendation as reported by Mrs. Spencer was for the "CN" Neighborhood Camnercial Zoning District by a vote of 4 to 2. The caption of the proposed ordinance was presented by the City Secretary. During the e�nsuing discussion, concern was expressed for c�rcial develoFanent on the entire 11± acre tract and that the awner did not have a develo�ent plan proposed. Possible am�enciments to the "CN" Neighborhood Co��rcial District were also noted, such as limiting the square footage of buildings and leased spaces. Follawi.ng lengthy deliberation, Mayor Pro Tem Ware offered a motion to accept '�"'°"' the recatu�eendation of the Plaruiing & Zoning Cca�mission and adopt the ordinance zoning Parcel No. 22A "CN" Neighborhood Cammercial. The motion was seconded by Council Member Oliver and failed by the ensuing vote: � Ayes: Tate, Ware, & Oliver Nays: Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Council Member Glynn then made a mr�tion, which was seconded by Council Member Powers that Parcel No. 22A be zoned "R-TH" Tawnhouse Zoning District. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays: Tate, Ware, & Oliver (5) 06/19/84 I ORDINANCE NO. 84-45 AN ORDINANCE AN�NDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE �RII�SIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF TI� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPIIVDIX "A" OF � CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A LOT, TRAC.'T, OR PARCEZ OF L�11�ID LYING AND BEING SITUATID IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, e�� BEING A PART OF � JOEL HAIZUM SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 722, IN 'PHE CITY OF GRAPE- VINE, TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND C:OMPLEI'ELY „� DFSCRIBID IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN TI� USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "PUD" PLANNID UNIT DEVEI�OP- MENT UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 70-10 TO "R-TH" TOWNHOUSE ZONING DISTRICT UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 82-73; CORREC.TING TI� OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL 0'rHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CI�AUSE RELI�TING TO SEVF�BILITY; DEI`ERMINING THAT ' THE PUBLIC INTERFSTS, MORALS AND GENERAL ' WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CEIANGE AND AMII�]D- MENT Z�IEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PII�LTY NOT TO EXCEID Tf� SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOT,T.AR� (sl,000.00) Arm A s��z� o�sE sNAT,T. BE DEF�lED COMMI'I'1'� UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICfi A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND DDCLARING AN II�IERGENCY Item No. 33, Parcel No. 117 - The Dallas North Properties tract, Parcel No. 117, is located on the north side of Timberline Drive, south and east of the M�emorial Baptist Church and contains approximately 4 acres. The property is currently zoned "R-3.5" Two-Family Dwelling District, and Chairnu�n Spencer '""�" advised that the Planning & Zoning Ccmmission recannended that it remain as "R-3.5". Their vote was 5 to l. �� No ordinance caption was presented, as it was determined that acceptance of the Planning & Zoning Ccnmission recamYbendation wnuld not constitute a rezoning of the tract. This tract had been advertised for consideration of all residential districts, and it was the general concensus of the City Council that the property awner be allaw�ed to sulxnit some type of develognent plan for Council consideration. A brief recess was then taken by the City Council. Upon reconveni.ng mcmentarily in the Council Chambers, all Council Members and the Mayor were present. Follawing additional deliberation on Parcel No. 117, Council Member Brekken made a motion to table the ma.tter for further consideration and to allow the owner to prepare a develognent plan. Council Member Oliver offered a second to the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays: None Iteqn No. 35, Parcel No. 104 - Parcel No. 104 is com�nly known as the forn�er "'"� Box tract, is currently awned by The Chasewuod Ccanpany, and is zoned "R-1" for Si.ngle-Family develop�ent. The property is located on the west side of State Highway 121 South and south of Mustang Drive. ��r Planning & Zoning Coim�ission Chairnian Sharron Spencer reported the Cc�mission's recc�m�endation as follaws: (1) "CC" Ca�nunity C�rcial District on approximately 15 acres fronting on Highway 121; (2) "R-MF-2" Multi-Family Dwelling District on the remainder of the tract lying east of the creek which runs north and south through the property; and (6) 06/19/84 (3) "R-7.5" Single-Family Dwelling District on the remainder of the tract which is located on the west side of the creek, backing up to the pro- posed Cheek-Sparger arterial. City Secretary Karen Spann read the caption of the proposed ordinance. A lengthy Council discussion followed. Possible use of the creek and/or the proposed arterial as buffers was addressed, as c�ll as whether the creek would be an adequate buffer. Master Plan proposed densities for this tract were �* discussed, and the location of the comnercial designation was deliberated. Council Member Glynn then offered a mption to accept the rec�tiendation of the � Planning & Zoning Co�nission and adopt the ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Ware seconded the motion, which failed by the following vote: Ayes: Ware & Glynn Nays: Tate, Oliver, Bre7cken, Dyer, & Pawers Council Member Tcgn Powers then made a motion to table consideration of this matter for 45 days in order to work with the developer for an acceptable plan. The motion was seconded by Council Member Oliver. Following additional discussion, Council Meznbers Powers and Oliver agreed to amend their motion to table the matter until 'Thursday, June 21, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. The amended motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays: None Item No. 36, Parcel No. 121A & 104A - This tract is located on the north side of Timberline Drive between Oak Creek Estates and the existing Pearltree Apartments and is a�med by Mr. Larry Lightner. The property is currently zoned "R-3" Multi-Family Dwelling District. Chairnnan Spencer advised the Planning & Zoning Commission made the following '��' recammendation by a vote of 4 to 2: �,,, (1) "R-7.5" Single-Family Dwelling District on the west side of the proposed arterial (approximately 3.2 acres) ; and (2) "R-TH" Townhouse Zoning District on the east side of the proposed arterial (approximately 4.8 acres) . The caption of the proposed ordinance was presented by the City Secretary. Use of the proposed arterial as a buffer between land uses was discussed briefly. It was also noted that Mr. Lightner, the awner of the tract, was in opposition to any change in the existing multi-family use and had sukmiitted a letter so stating. As a result, a three-quarter vote of the City Council was necessary to approve. Mayor Pro Te.�n Ware then of fered a nx�tion to accept the reco��endation of the Planning & Zoning Ca�nission and adopt the ordinance. Council Member Powers seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Glynn, & Pow�rs Nays: Dyer ORDINANCE NO. 84-46 � AN ORDINANCE ANIENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10 THE C:OMPREHII�ISIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE �rrw CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TE�.S, SAME BEING ALSO KNO�NIN AS APPENDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRAN.PING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRISID AS BEING A IiOT, TRACT, OR PARCII, OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATID IN TARRANT COUN`I'Y, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE W. D. SHEPHERD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1393, IN Tf� CITY OF GRAPE- VINE, TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND COMPI�I'ELY DESCRIBID IN 'I�iE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID (7) 06/19/84 PROPERTY FROM "R-3" MULTI-FAMILY DWEI�ING DISTRICT UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 70-10 TO "R-7.5" SINGLE-FAMILY DWEL�ING DISTRICT AND "R-TH" 'I'CJWNHOUSE DISTRICI' UNDER ORDI- NANCE NO. 82-73; CORREGTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF Tf� ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE REL�ATING TO SEVERABILITY; DEZ�R- MINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERE'STS, M�RALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DIIKAl�ID A ZONING CHANGE � AND AMEDiDME�r Z�IE�tEIN MADE; PROVIDING A PETtALTY NOT TO ExCEID THE SUM OF ONE Txoos�rm Dor.�.zs (Sl,000.00) �rm A s�A ,� RATE OFFEDISE SHP,LI� BE DEII�IED COPM�lITI�D UPON EACH DAY DURING OR 01�1 WHICH A VIo- LATION OCCURS; AND D�CI�ARING AN II�RGEL�ICY Item No. 37, Parcel No. 121 - Mr. Lightner was also the owner of this approxi- mately 78-acre tract located on the south side of Timberline Drive, wrapping around the Creekwood P,ddition and extending east to approximately 300 feet west of State Highway 121. The existing zoning on the tract is "R-3" Multi- Family Dwelling District and "C-2" Camm�nity Business District, and it had been advertised for consideration of all residential districts. The Planning & Zoning Conanission recca�anendation as reported by Mrs. Spencer was for the "PRD-6" Planned Residential District on the entire tract, subject to a flood reclamation plan being approved by the City prior to development. The vote was5tol. The caption of the proposed ordinance was then read into the record. The City Council deliberated this matter at length. Concern was expressed for dividing the land uses by the proposed Cheek-Sparger arterial, leaving approximately 21 acres to be located east of the arterial directly across fran the existing multi-family apartments. Whether or not the develo�anent require- ments of the "PRD-6" district could be met due to the flood plain and build- '""�" able area was also addressed. It was noted that the Master Plan recammended ccaranercial develo�anent on the eastern portion of this tract. ,,,�� Council Member Glynn then offered a mr�tion, which was seconded by Council Nlember Paaers, to adopt an ordinance zoning the tract as follows: (1) "R-7.5" Single-Family Dwelling District on approx�mately 55± acres located west of the arterial, subject to a flood reclamation plan to be approved by the City Staff, the Planning & Zoning Canmission, and the City Council, or a consulting engineer chosen by the City; and (2) "R-3.5" 'I�-Family Dwelling District on approx�mately 21± acres located on the east side of the proposed arterial. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays: .None ORDINANCE NO. 84-47 AN ORDINANCE �1DING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE COMPRII-�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEX��.S, SANlE BEING ALSO �"""�' KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF Tf� CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A v�� IiOT, TRACr, OR PARCEL OF I�ND LYING AND BEING SITUATID IN TARRANI' COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE J. S. BYIZD SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 207 AND THE W. D. SHEPHERD SUl�'Y, ABSTRACT N0. 1393, IN 'I�iE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, NYJRE FULLY AND COM- PLE�'TELY DESCRIBID IN TI� BODY OF THIS ORDINP�ICE; ORDII�ING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "R-3" MULTI-FAMILY DWEZLING DISTRICT AND "C-2" CANIl�lUNITY �8) 06/19/84 BUSINFSS DISTKICT UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 70-10 TO "R-7.5" SINGLE-FAI�IILY DWEZ- LING DISTRICT AND "R-3.5" 'I'WO-FAMILY �,T,ING DISTRICT UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, AS DELINEATID IN EXHIBIT "A", AND PROVIDING CERTAIl�1 STIPULATIONS; COR- RE(.,Z'ING THE OFFICIAL ZONING NIAP; PRESERV- ING ALL O'I'HIIt PORTIONS OF Tf� ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A Q�AUSE RELATING TO �"^ SEVII�ABILITY; DETERMINING THAT Tf� PUBLIC INrERESTS, MORAIS AND GEI�IERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND ANIENDME�VT ,�, THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PEDIALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAl�ID DOT T,ARS ($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFEDISE SHAL�L BE DEENN�D CONil�'LZT`.PID UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHIC�i A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND DECLARING AN II`�FtGINCY CITIZEDIS REQUESTS The following letter was then read into the record as a Citizens Request: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- June 18, 1984 City of Grapevine Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am the owner of approxi.mately 27 acres that surrounds Grapevine °"�'�` Medical Center. I have recently had an engineering consultant review the PCD zoning designation you have applied to my property. ,� He has made me aware of a requiretn�ent under that category that concerns me grea.tly: that is, the requirement of a buffer zone of 60 to 100 feet betvueen the PCD and adjacent zoning. A land benn and a greenbelt buffer only are allowed. and therefore, all this huge amount of land cannot have parking or construction of buildings on it. If this interpretation is correct, this is definitely punitive and damaging to my property. I intend to sul�lit a plat for said tract within this year. I also intend to deed restrict my subdivision strictly to enforce a quality business park. I finally intend to build my awn professional office building in said subdivision along with a not-for-profit Wellness Center designed for use by the entire community. The problem that I have is the width of the land required by your ordinance, not the land benn and screening fence requirements. I need to retain the use of that property for parking. Your ordinance as I have interpreted it restricts all use within these boundaries because of the neighboring single family districts. My land is currently sized in a way that I have only one practical develo�xnent plan, and that is for the new street into my property to split evenly and approx�m�ately 470 feet frontage on College street having '"""`" lots fronting on said new street. This solution is good because it does not allow a straight through intersection with the new street and Azalea Drive. It does give me lots with depths of 200 feet �► which are ideal for professional office construction. However when I install the minumun 60 feet with benn requirement then I must move the street west to retain a typical usable lot depth and this causes an intersection that is undersirable by the City engineering standards. Therefore in conclusion, I must request that you consider requiring the preluninary plat applicant tonight (the purchaser of the Williamson land) to share the 60 feet requirement with me by imple- menting a 30 feet rear yard building line on all lots adjacent to my property. Also to share the cost of installing a berm with a (9) 06/19/84 screening fence on our boundary at the time of construction of his streets. I will also dedicate 30 feet along our boundary as greenbelt buffer and require by deed restriction that all users in the business park professionally landscape and maintain said 30 feet greenbelt area. I think this solution is a good co�nprcanise because your zoning ordi- nance also suggests that the greenbelt area bec�s the responsi- bility of the land not previously zoned, be it the residential or the Business Developer. Since my zoning was in place first the � entire 60 feet could be the responsibility of the land awner to the east. It also insures an orderly thoroughfare plan and appealing greenbelt Business Park design. I intend to request the sat�ue �,,,� voluntary greenbelt "sharing" fran Baylor Medical Center on my western boundary. Thank you for your time. Sincerely yours, E. L. Lancaster, M.D. 305 Azalea Drive ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RE7CESS & RECONVIIVE Mayor Tate then announced that the City Council would recess briefly pending receipt of the reccarmendations of the Planning & Zoning Cc�nnission. Upon reconvening momentarily, all members of the City Council were present in the Council ChamY�ers. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMNID.VDATION, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-14, BRANAN � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning ,�„� Application Z84-14 (Branan) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. This tract of land is located west of Park Boulevard and north of State Highway 114. The Cca�mission's recomYbendation, as reported by Chairn�n Spencer, was for approval of the "CC" Co�snunity Ccam�ercial District. Their vote was unani.mr�us. , The caption of the proposed ordinance was then read by the City Secretary. ' There being little Council discussion, Council M�ember Glynn made a motion to accept the recaim�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Ca�anission and adopt the ordinance. The mption was seconded by Council Member Dyer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays: None OE2DINANCE NO. 84-48 AN ORDINANCE ANIENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREEiII�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S, SAN� BEING AL.SO "'�' KNOWN AS APPIIVDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GFi�NTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A ��+ IfJT, TRAC.'T, OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATID IN TARRANT COUN'i'Y, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE THQMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRAC'I' NO. 458, IN THE CITY OF GRAPE- VIl�TE, TEXA.S, N1�JRE F[TLZY AND CON�LETELY DESCRIBID IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPEF�I'Y FROM "R-3.5" 'I'V�TO-FANiILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "CC" CONIMUNITY CONIlKERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT; CORRE�I'ING THE OFFICIAL (10) 06/19/84 ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL O'I'HER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PRC7VIDING A CLAUSE RII�ATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETER- MINING THAT THE PUBLIC IN`i'ERESTS, MORALS AND �RAL WELFARE DENIAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMII�IDMII�iT THEREIN MADE; PR0�7IDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEm THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOLLAR.S ($1,000.00) AND A SEPA- RATE OFFENSE SHAI� BE DEENIFD CONID'LZZTED �""""* UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHIC�i A VIO- ; LATION OCCURS; AND DECLARING AN II�9ERGENCY �,,,,,,, PL�TNING & ZONING COPM'IISSION RECONIMELVDATION, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-15, `1'[JTUN The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recanm�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z84-15 (Tutun) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. Planning & Zoning C�mission Chairman Sharron Spencer advised the Conmission recca�nended approval of the requested "clean-up" zoning for the Western Oaks Subdivision as follows: "CC" Canmunity Ca�nercial District on Tract lA; "CC" Comnunity Co�nercial District on Tract 3A; and "R-7.5" Single-Family Dw�lling District on Tract 8. The vote was 7 to 0. City Secretary Karen Spann trien presented the caption of the proposed ordinance. Following brief Council deliberation, a motion was made by Council Member Oliver and seconded by Council Member Glynn to accept the reconanendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and adopt the ordinance. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays: None � �,, ORDINANCE NO. 84-49 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREI�NSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S, SANIE BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANI'ING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A I1JT, TRA�T, OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATID IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF TI� G. G. STARR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1466 AND THE E. COX SURVEY, ABSTRAGT NO. 352, IN TF� CITY OF GRAPE- VINE, TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND COMPI�TELY DESCRIBID IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A C��ANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FR01�1 "R-20" AND "R-12.5" SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICTS AND "R-MF-2" MULTI-FANIILY DWELZING DISTRICT TO "CC" - CONIMUNITY CONIl�9ERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT ON TRACTS lA AND 3A AND "R-7.5" SINGLE—FAMILY ;�In1}{��7�I1`dC� D152�'.ICT ON 'I'RACT 8; CORRE�rING �' Tf� OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING AL�L OTfiER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINAI�TCE; PROVIDING A Q�P,USE RELATING TO SEVER- Wr�r ABILITY; DETERNIINING THAT THE; PUBLIC INI'ERESTS, MORALS AND GIIQERAL WEL�'ARE DFNtAD1D A ZONING CHANGE AND AMII�IDN�]T �RFIN MADE; PRO�IIDING A PENAI,TY NOT TO EXCEm THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOT,T,ARS (sl,000.00) �rm A s�� or�INSE sx�, BE DEII�'�D COMMI'�i'ED UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOIT�TION OCCURS; AND DECLARING AN IIKERGEL�TCY (11) 06/19/84 I PI�INNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECON�IDATION REPLAT TIFFANY FOREST . � The next item of business before the City Council was to consider the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Camnission relative to the replat of Lots 18 & 19, Block 2, Tiffany Forest Addition. Mrs. Spencer noted the Planning & Zoning Cca�enission unanimously recan�tended approval of the proposed replat to resolve a property line dispute. Council Member Glynn then offered a mr�tion, which was seconded by Council �4 Nlember Powers, to accept the rec�ndation of the Cammission and approve the replat of Lots 18 & 19, Block 2, Tiffany Forest Addition. The �tion prevailed by the following vote: �r Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays: None PII�NNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOrM'IENDATION, FINAL PLAT, PECAN GAP ADDITION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recan- men�dation of the Planni.ng & Zoning Ca�an.ission relative to the final plat of the Pecan Gap Ad.dition. The Pecan Gap Addition is located north of Dove Road and on the east side of Kimball Road (north of the Harwell Addition) . Chairman Spencer advised the Planning & Zoning Co�nission rec�nded approval of this final plat for sinqle-family hcares. The vote was 7 to 0. Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to accept the reconmendation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�mission and approve the final plat of the Pecan Gap Addition. The motion, seconded by Council Member Brekken, prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays: None � PLANNING & ZONING CON��IISSION RECONIlKENDATION, FINAL PLAT, 114 PLACE � The ne� item considered by the City Council was the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Com�mission relative to the final plat of 114 Place. 114 Place is located on the southeast corner of Dove Road and West Northwest Highway and is proposed for can��rcial/retail develo�ent. Plann;ng & Zoning ' Cc�tnission Chairman Sharron Spencer reported the Cca�mission's recc�anendation , for approval of the proposed final plat. A motion was then made by Council Member Oliver and seconded by Council M�nber ' Glynn to accept the Camnission's reca�iendation and approve the final plat of 114 Place. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays: None PLANNING & ZONING CONIl�IISSION RECONY�]DATION PR�LIMINARY PLAT, WILDW�OD PARK ADDITION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recatanendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to the prelinunary plat of the Wildwood Park Addition. � Wildw�od Park is located. on the north side of Wildw�ood i�ane, east of Boyd Drive, and. proposes sixteen single-family lots. The Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously rec�nded approval of the preluninary plat, with the ��' rec�ndations of the Public Works Director relative to drainage and utility easements to be incorporated into the final plat. Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to accept the rec�ndation of the Co�nission and approve the prel�minary plat of the Wildwood Park Addition. The motion seconded by Council Member Glynn, prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays: None (12) 06/19/84 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl�IDATION, PRELIMINARY PLAT, SINA�ONS TRACT The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recca�enendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to the preliminary plat of the Sina�nons tract. The property in this preliminary plat (known as the Sinnx>ns tract) is located on the southwest corner of Dove Road and Park Boulevard and is zoned for single-family develo�nt. Mrs. Spencer reported the Planning & Zoning �* CcxYmission rec�ndation for approval of the preluninary plat, with the provision that no streets be extended through to the property to the south which is zoned for duplexes. Their vote was 7 to 0. � Council Member Oliver offered a motion, which was seconded by Council Member Glynn, to accept the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�ission and approve the preliuninar.y plat of the Simnons tract. The mr�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays: None PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl"�TIDATION PRELIMINARY PLAT, COLLEGE CRE�.-'K ADDITION The next item before the City Council for consideration was the reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccmgnission relative to the preliminazy plat of the College Creek Addition. The College Creek Addition is located on the south side of West College Street across fran Cannon Elementary School. The tract is zoned "R-7.5" Single- Family, with the southern portion being zoned for duplexes. Planning & Zoning C�mission Chairman Sharron Spencer advised the Cca�anission rec�nded approval of the preliminary plat with the following provisions: (1) That the easterrunost north-south street alignment with Drexel Drive be addressed on the '�' '� final plat; and (2) That a letter be received fran the developers, Mr. Tamnitz � and Mr. Parker, agreeing to postpone develo�ent of the duplexes until an ;,�, east-w�est through street is constnicted to Ball Street or to Highway 114. During the ensuing discussion, Mr. Mike Starek of DeShazo, Starek, & Tang, was called upon to address the traffic study. Concern was expressed for only one point of ingress/egress, increased traffic as it relates to the school, and Council Me.mbers favored an access point for �ergency vehicle use. A motion was then made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council M��ber Oliver to accept the recommendation of the Pl�nn;nq & Zoning Camnission for approval of the preliminary plat of the College Creek Addition, with the above stipulations to be addressed at the time of final platting. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Paaers Nays: None PLANNING & ZONING CONIl�RISSION RECONIl�lE[�IDATION, PRELIMINARY PLAT, DOVE LANDING The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recaimlendation of the Planning & Zoning Cce�anission relative to the preliminary plat of Dove I�anding. `'"�"" This particular tract is presently zoned "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line and is located on the south side of Dove Road iimiediately east of the Park Place Addition. Mrs. Spencer reported the Planning & Zoning Cc�mission reco�nendation for +�r approval of the preliminary plat by a vote of 7 to 0. Council Member Oliver then made a motion to accept the reco�rendation of the Conmission and approve the preliminazy plat of the Dove Landing Subdivision. The nx�tion was seconded by Council Members Pawers and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Pawers Nays: None (13) 06/19/84 ' ADJOURi�'NT The deliberations of the City Council having been concluded, a motion to adjourn the meeting was offered by Council M�nber Oliver and seconded by Council Nbe.znber Brekken. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Powers Nays: None � PASSID AND APPROVID BY TFiE CITY C;OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 5th day of March , 1985. � APPRWID: .t--�G�� Mayor ATI'EST: Cit Secretary � rrr;� � ti��l� (14) EXHIBIT "A" TO THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL NiINU'I'ES OF 6/19/84 t i � E � i Propo�ed Thorouphhro ...�_� _1.-- �"�'i•Y _ . . - � -----�-._ � I �y t= -}\ ---J—�� I�\.ti �'..�, .� \ ,•, - - -- -- � c__ \\ � �� - ' ��- �\, , . •� - � � �n \ � �, �R-2Q- _ -� � '�,�p '�..5 \\ � + � 1 '�� - �—�� - � -- «-,° �� -��! � ,'�� , ��U �� — �� ' ' /� '� --'" ccaslt� � � � ---- �_ — � „�-��`� ' � I � � ��. s �J '��// � ; �- �•�s - �� __ � / Q ��, �� r _ �-� � l \�� ".E \ � • `. � , � �. � Ct �� ,�� A �'"�`� - t�u�� J �� ,.o�, - � i - \ �\ � � — �.�. ,I1 ��I �,1 .�,e ,.., \. � f� �• � ,.01 ��l � ��. - - _ -� �� I,1�`�.1��,� � TRACT �l/ ,,, f: ' � �j �G: ,:� i ( � t � /R—/P.6 ��V�\; ,�y , " „ . , � ,�/'" - �. � TRACT g'�\ l �`� �_.,) � °`'�i,;° � , -i i,� _ �J I � i. � � t <<.. i--� ► �_ `�� R�� 5 ,y�� , --�"�" �� /� � �,,/// \u o ` � { , � F;� - �� ; � / ;�I ; a \ � ,;. � ) � /�,,5ij/�� p IFif.6 X \1 II /, '1/ y' � / -' / �—�� \) � � I � I � j�� ' `I�� '�/ / `�' ��:�j/%/�.M /I I � / �'/. I � ��R�1�. � � _�� ` e;�__-� � � ��. �6�° � ,' i �I, t > ,� "TRACT� �`�� I i � '� , t_ , -_ , � , � �_N � =�` �,�'' .� � . � � �� " , � � 'F'r`r�I.c� ��OB '��'' �% � � � ' � ` '� ! --� �� .i � �,f � IRi v�� - , � � �; /�� t ._..__�-�L •wd.� � �h�,�� I a° � � � � ��' � %��'...�%,�.�� esee � � -- � � � iTRACT 7� � � ��,� � ,� > / � � � , � I � _.�_ _-- �,�' ' a-MF-P�� / ,� � �TRAC7 3_ 'z - � � �� ,�<<_;:�1 j ,� �/ � � y�. ----�, ��' � _1�-�i �' ' �l� �` � � _ � � � � "/�� f��"J � — n � � �� `�, ' � � � � i�,��' �., �� ' �r�� ,�° / � �� ' � � � . � � � � ,- _ '�k'°�. �� °-��% a �"../� ��rRA�r z �, , m r � \� �` � � P'_ �� \. � � �eP� �`�' N , � � �-A��_, ��, �� `��_�L _�� o�� I m � � � •� � y (�//_�\� 1 0 � ��, �-�.a �� .:TRACT 9�, \��, � �"� V�� % ;s��`� _��j✓�� - � � � � �� R-�s � '�� --TRACT 6 , � � i , ,.�� s � �� _ � � � V�� `� , •�� R�MF.t � , 7RACT 5 sa° � <o.� �j � �� `,� 1V �'�,'�. '\ � l ( � ( , f�� R-�F-t _ - � �.�#, � � �, �� ,i � , `, i , ��---� y � --� � � ' � � � , � � � _ �� \ ,\\ , ' i ,� ` , � .;/ ! � 1 ; ,- l 1� �II I�I ,I'I i�II I II i . 1 ; / �t� i �`�'0 .� �` '. 59��1 'I.� j � �I � � ��/� � ' 1 i � � i � � -, ' �� TRAC7` / ` �' � — � '�� ' � i �, �i� � � �1 � �� , I E � , � �'� �� I �� `' , ' , '� �, ,"� � �1� ,cc ; � � � � � li � i � I i � ' j � r . \ ,I.� j,.�..�. ,.�s:�_ � , , $ � �! ; � ` ( I ' ' ` � � � r ;� ' � , �-:o , .�t�, i �I ; i �, � Proposed Zoning for ' ' ' . _., � � I � ` \�-T,` �� i �, �� _�.: , ,_ � � � � Western Oaks , � � � -� ��T� G,p..��..T.... � '�--�-- °`�.— � �-to � c«..i.rr � i � � � � 1 � ; � ...........,�......�.,.�. i � .o+.� e .e �oe .e� .ee � ' I � _f 1 j EOI.ARCHITECTS:INC. , �+ 1 i - �� _ � � , � uion� HeFJoMem RQ ' -. ' 4 � -- ---. _ __--_ _-__ ___:_- - . ��--- _--- __ - . � � -;� � { � �� E �