The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-09-04 Joint Meeting AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4 , 1984 AT 7 : 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET e�'�* � I. CALL TO ORDER II. INVOCATION: Council Member Larry Oliver III. PRESENTATION Plaque of appreciation to be presented to Chief J. C. "Jake" Greener. IV. JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-21 submitted by River Valley Investments. B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-24 submitted by Mr. Phil R. Parker. C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-25 submitted by Mr. Robert Bambrick and Mr. Curtis �* Hodgson. � D. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-26 submitted by Wright Construction Company. E. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-29 submitted by Mr. Barney Giles and Mr. Gerald Thompson. V. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS , A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to consider further published agenda items. B. City Council to recess briefly and reconvene in the Council Chambers to consider additional business items. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S, AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- �"^ SION, THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 31TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1984 AT 1:30 P.M. � LtJ ��l.t�t./ City Secretary AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4 , 1984 AT 7: 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET VI. CITIZENS REQUESTS AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS „�. VII. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meetings of May 8 , August 20 , and August 21 , 1984 � VIII. OLD BUSINESS City Council to consider awarding the bid relative to the sale of surplus real property. IX. PUBLIC HEARING City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to the proposed 1984-85 budget. X. NEW BUSINESS A. City Council to consider an ordinance adopting the City of Grapevine revised budget for fiscal year 1983-84. B. City Council to consider an ordinance adopting the City of Grapevine proposed budget for fiscal year 1984-85. C. City Council to consider a resolution naming a park in The Woods Addition. �� D. City Council to consider awarding the bid relative to the relocation of a 20-inch water line along Highway 121 South. E. City Council to consider rejecting the bids relative to the sale of the southwest sewer plant. F. City Council to consider an ordinance relative to traffic control. G. City Council to consider a resolution accepting the improvements made to Fairway Drive. XI . PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z84-21 (River Valley) and a subsequent ordinance , if applicable. B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z84-24 (Parker) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. � C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli- „r,�, cation Z84-25 (Bambrick) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z84-26 (Wright) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z84-29 (Giles) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of the College Creek Addition. G. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of the Stilts Addition. H. City Council to consider the recommendation of the ,�., Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- nary plat of Mustang Addition. � XII. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C. S, AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 1984 AT 1: 30 P.M. �� City Secretary � � �* �rr.+ AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS SPECIAL PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4 , 1984 AT 7: 30 P.M. CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN STREET � VI. NEW BUSINESS �"` A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- cation Z84-21 (River Valley) and make a recommendation to the City Council. B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- cation Z84-24 (Parker) and make a recommendation to the City Council. C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- cation Z84-25 (Bambrick) and make a recommendation to the City Council. D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- cation Z84-26 (Wright) and make a recommendation to the City Council. E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- cation Z84-29 (Giles) and make a recommendation to the City Council. F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat *�`� of the College Creek Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. `""� G. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of the Stilts Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. H. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- nary plat of the Mustang Addition and make a recom- mendation to the City Council. VII. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION VIII. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C. S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE SPECIAL PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 1984 AT 1 : 30 P.M. � �, �� a� City Secretary STATE OF TEXAS COUN'].'Y OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Special Session on this the 4th day of September, 1984 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 413 Main Street, with the follawing members present to-wit: William D. Tate Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem Marion Brekken Council MeqnY�er �, Ron Dyer Council Member Tam Pawers Council Member constituting a quorum, with Council M�r Larry Oliver and Council Me.mber Jim Glynn absent, with the follawing members of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager Karen Spann City Secretary with City Attorney John F. Boyle, Jr. absent. CAIZ TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Tate. PUBLIC HEARZNG, INl�r TO INCRF�ASE TAX RATE The purpose for holding the special meeting was for the City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to a statement of intent to increase the tax rate calculated pursuant to Section 26.04(d) of the Praperty Tax Code. � ` The public hearing was opened by Ma.yor Tate, who called on Assistant City Manager Bill Eisen to review the proposed tax rate increase. �..:,� Mr. Eisen advised that the Property Tax Code required the calculation of an effective tax rate, which was the rate figure that would generate the san�e amount of ad valorem tax revenue as in the previous year after certain adjust�nts. The effective tax rate for the 1984-85 year was 30G per $100 of valuation. He noted the praposed tax rate used in budget calculations was 40�/$100 valuation, representing a tax rate increase of 33 percent, which was slightly deceptive. This figure did not take into account a 40� hamestead exem�tion offered to property c�mers, or new personal property at DFW Regional Airport. Preliuninaiy calculations indicated the qreat majority of hameawners in Grapevine would experience a reduction in their property taxes. Mayor Tate then invited those persons wh�o wished to speak relative to the proposed tax rate to do so. Inquiries were made by (1) Mr. Rc�nald Eakins, 840 E. Wall Street; (2) Mrs. M. T. Wallin, 3715 Lakeview Drive; and (3) N�s. Julie Fisher, 1642 Sonnet Drive. , Follawing brief com�ients fran the City Council, Council Megnber Marion Brekken made a motion to close the public hearing. The nx�tion was seconded by Council Nl�mber Rr�n Dyer and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers ""�' Nays . None Absexit: Oliver & Glynn � ADJOURi�'�NT There being rno further business to came before the City Council, a motion to adjourn the meeting was offered by Council Member Dyer and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware. The nx�tion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver & Glynn 09/04/84 PASSID AND APPRaVID BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF C-�RAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 18 th day of y��t PmhP r� 1984. APPRaVED: �� S� (��. _=� Mayor Pro Tem � A'ITEST: �� C�� City Secretas.y �� . �� (2) STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRAN'I' CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council and Planning & Zoning Cammission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Special Joint Session on this the 4th day of Septe�iber, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 413 Main Street, with the follawing n�mbers of the City Council present to-,wit: � William D. Tate Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem � Larry Oliver Council Member Marion Brekken Council Member Ron Dyer Council Member Tan Pawers Council Member constituting a quonml, with Council Member Jim Glynn absent, with the follawing men�rs of the Planning & Zoning Co�mission: Sharron Spencer Chairnnan Harlen Joyce Member Gerald Norman Member Shane Wilbanks Me�nber Peggy Engholm Member constituting a quonun, with Vice Chairman Ron Cook and MPaYiUer Rick Atkins absent, with the follawing members of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Karen Spann City Secretuy ,�`' CALI� TO ORDER ,�, The meeting was called to order by Mayor Tate. INVOCATION Council Member Tcan Pawers delivered the Invocation. PLP�QUE PRESIIVTATICR�T TO CHIEE' J. C. "JAKE" GREQ�IE,R A plaque of appreciation was then presented to retiring Fire Chief J. C. "Jake" Greener, who had served in the Grapevine Fire Depai�nent for 40 years. PUBLIC HEARING, ZONITTG APPLICATION Z84-21, RIVER VALI�'Y INVES'IMENTS The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Canmission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-21 submitted by River Valley Investrrents. Mayor Tate declared open the public hearing and called on Public Works Director Jim Baddaker to explain the request of the applicant. Those present were advised this request involved approximately 8.5 acres of land located on the sauthwest corner of Dove Road an� Dave Loop Road. The '"�"'° current zoning on the property was "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line Zoning District, with the requested zoning being "CN" Neighborhood Cvn�rcial. � Mr. Harold Mutter, representing River Valley Invest�nents, explained their pro- posal to develc7p a neighborhood center on this tract. The plan was for con- struction of six buildings, each being 9,000 to 10,000 square feet, with the northern portion of the praperty to be retail c�rcial and the sauthern portion to be professional offices. He also noted a traffic study which ha.d been made. A lengthy period of questions and cc�m�ents frcan the Council and Cammission Me,�ibers ensued. The applicant's concept plan for devela�,xnent was presented, and sam� of the t:opics discussed were the height of the praposed builclings, th�e traffic study and the effect of the developirent on the surrounding area. 09/04/84 Mayor Tate then asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak relative to the zoning request, and the follawing persons spoke in opposition: 1. Mr. Bob Barnett, 1108 H�aningbird, representing the Russwood Hameawners' Association; 2. Mr. Rick Ebel, 1618 Choteau Circle, representing the Marina Del Rey Hcmeowners' Association; 3. Mr. Randy Kurth, 1907 Redwood Trail, representing the Park Place ,r� Hcxnecxnmers' Association; 4. Mrs. Becky Stewart, 1858 Cimarron Trail; and „�� 5. Mr. Jesse Woods, 2746 Manchester, neighboring property awner. The City Secretary then acknawledged receipt of the follawing petitions and letters: 1. A petition in opposition to the requested zoning with 85 signatures of dawntawn business persons; 2. A petition with 129 signatures of Park Place h�owners in opposition; 3. A petition in opposition with 91 signatures representing the Laguria Vista. area hameawners, the LaPalana Addition, and the Marina Del Rey Apartments; 4. One hundred forty-four letters fram the Russwr�od hcxneawners opposing the proposed zoning; 5. A letter frcen Mr. Don T�mitz, adjoining property awner to the �st, requesting the c�rcial buildings be limited to one story. �'"� The follawing letter was then read into the record: �� ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ August 8, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council and Planning & Zoning Cca�mission City of Grapevine, Texas Dear Sirs & Madams, Since I will be out of t�own on August 21st and will not be able to appear personally and protest certain proposed zoning cases, I take this means of co�nicating my objections. The cases I am concerned with, as an adjoining property awner, are Z84-21 and Z84-29, (the NW and the SW corners of the Dave Road and Dove Loop intersection.) I have been the awner of buildings occupied by a convenience food store and a marine supply shop on the east side of that intersection for several years. I also awn a snall residence with I tzy to keep "'"""" leased on the corner of Dave Loop and Shannon St. (just north of the food store.) My second family in less than a year has notified me of their intention to break their one year lease and move out of ��r this rental house. (By the ti.me you hold this public hearing I expect they will have moved.) This will be a total of 10 months occupancy by the two families. The point is that both families have ccxnplained about the noise, traffic hazzard, and a general apprehen- sion about the "rough" crowd that hangs out around the lake on w�ek-ends. The rent is very reasonable and the property is other- wise very desirable, but they just can't stand the conjestion and traffic as it is at present. With regard to the possibility of a "nice convenient neighborhood (2) 09/04/84 shopping center" as was talked about in the recent zoning case initiated by the city, I would add my voice to the hundred or n�re ho�ne c�mers whcen I have heard about, and many of whcsn I have talked to, who object on the basis that caniron sense tells us that it will a]imst certainly never happen. What we look forward to for certainty hawever, is another bigger self-service gas station and convenience food store. All the big food store chains have m�re sense than t�o invest in a boxed-in location where only a small regular trade camrnanity is possible. This is especially true when � there are already four large supermarkets and two more planned or possible within two miles of the location. A food store or other retail stores on these corners--if built--°wnuld attract some traffic � fran all of Park Boulevard, Kimball Rr�ad, Dove Road, and even fran Northwest Highway. At the present, no one other than the people who live in the neighborhood or those enroute to or fran the lake pass the intersection. A major shopping center or supernnarket, if built there against all market indicators, would draw additional traffic initially by advertising, loss-leaders, and other gimmicks such as parking lot carnivals. But they would eventually fail, in my opinion, and wr�uld stand half e�ty until, in desparation, they began to pressure you for zoning to permit the�n to rent to recreation halls, game machine parlors, and beer joints. I strongly rec�nd that you disapprove these two proposed zoning changes. Sincerely, Jesse Woods There being no further discussion, Canmissioner Harlen Joyce made a mr�tion to close their portion of the public hearing. The nx�tion was seconded by ''�"�" Coimussion Meznber Shane Wilbanks and prevailed by the follawing vote: �, Ayes . Spencer, Joyce, Normari, Wilbanks, & Ehgholm Nays . None Absent: Cook & Atkins A motion to close the public hearing was also offered by Council Member Ron Dyer and seconded by Council Me�nber Marion Brekken. The nx�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver & Glynn PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-24, COLL�7GE CREEK ADDITION (PARi�R) The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Cc�mission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-24 submitted by Mr. Phil R. Parker. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker reported the praperty in question included approx�mately 30 acres located on West College Street ��diately south of eA"�° Cannon Elementary School. The current zoning was for "R-7.5" Single-Family Dwelling District and "R-3.5" 'Itao-Family Dwelling District. A prelimiriary plat for this tract, the College Creek Addition, had recently been approved. �,,, The zoning requested at this time would not change the land use, but would adjust the zoning district boundaries to confornn with the plat. Mr. Phil Parker, applicant, briefly addressed the Council and Canmission, pointing out the minor adjustinent in the zoning district boundaries of the single-family and two-family districts to reflect the platted property. During the ensuing discussion, the emergency vehicle access was noted. Mr. Parker advised that a 15-foot drainage and e�rgency access easement had been provided between Lots 15 and 16 of Block A (this was in addition to the underground storm sewer facilities) . (3) 09/04/84 Mayor Tate invited those guests present to speak either for or against the requested zoning, though no one wished to c�nt. It was also reported that no correspondence had been received relative to this case. A m�tion to close the public hearing was then made by Camnissioner Norman and seconded by Commissioner Joyce. The motion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Spencer, Joyce, Norn�i, Wilbanks, & Engholm Nays . None Absent: Cook & Atkins � Council Member Tcxn Pac�rs also offered a motion to close the public hearing. A secand was made by Ma.yor Pro Tem Ware, arbd the motion prevailed by the ,�,,� follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver & Glynn PUBLIC HEAR'1'NG, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-25, THE STILTS ADDITION (BF,NIBRICK) The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Cammission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-25 submitted by Mr. Robert Bambrick and Mr. Curtis Hodgson. The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Tate. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised this tract was located on fihe west� side of Dove Loop Road by Grapevine Lake and contained 1.797 acres. Being currently zoned "CN" Neighborhood Cca�anercial, the requested zoning was for "SP" Site Plan Zoning District for the storage, possession, retail sale, and on-pre�nise constmtption of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant. The applicant, Mr. Robert Bambrick, briefly addressed the Council and "'�''� Cc�anission and offered to answer any questions they might have. A lengthy discussion ensued, during which they discussed the required sewer e�tension ��; and lift station installation, the proposed site plan, the use of alcoholic beverages, and the outdoor pool area. Those present in the audience were then invited to speak relative to this zoning request. The following persons offered their c�nts; hawever, most of the can�srents were not either for or against the zoning application, but w�ere questions about the proposed project. 1. Mr. Skip Owens 5. Mrs. Vicki Barnett 1108 HwYuciingbird 2. Mrs. Julie Fisher 6. Mr. Steve Fisher 1642 Sonnet Drive 1642 Sonnet Drive 3. Mr. Bob Barnett 7. Mrs. Betty Farrar 1108 Htmuningbird 4. Mrs. Barbara Nunn 2013 Redwuod Trail City Secretary Karen Spann reported that no correspondence had been received concerning this Site Plan zoning request. �'"" There being no further discussion, Cammission Member Shane Wilbanks made a nbtion to close the public hearing. The motion, seconded by Ccmmissioner �� Engholm, prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Spencer, Joyce, Norman, Wilbanks, & Engholm Nays . None Absent: Cook & Atkins A mption to close the Council's portion of fhe public hearing was then made by Council M�nber Tan Pawers and seconded by Council M,e��r Brelcken. The motion prevailed by the following vote: (4) 09/04/84 Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Oliver & Glynn PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-26, WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Canmission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-26 submitted by Wright Construction Ccx�any. ,� Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called on Public Works Director Jim Baddaker to present the application. � Nir. Baddaker advised Zoning Application Z84-26 involved approximately 15 acres of land fronting on Hall-Johnson Road between Cheek-Sparger Road and Roberts Rc�ad. The requested zoning was for "R-7.5" Single-Family Dwelling District with the existing zoning being "R-20" Single-Family Dwelling District. Mr. Joe Wright addressed the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission and reported his intention to develap a single-family residential subdivision. He noted that this piece of land was m�stly flat with few trees and did not lend itself to the minim�n 20,000 square foot lots required in the "R-20" district. Follawing this presentation, Mayor Tate asked if there were any guests present who wished to speak. There were none. No correspondence had been received relative to this case. There being little discussian Canmissioner Joyce made a irotion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by C�m►ission Meqnber Norn�azz and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Spencer, Joyce, Nornian, Wilbanks, & Engho]m Nays . None �..�, Absent: Cook & Atkins Mayor Pro Tem Ware also offered a motion to close the public hearing. A ,�, second was offered by Council Member Dyer, and the nx�tion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Oliver & Glynn PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-29, GILFS & THOMPSON The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Cammission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z84-29 submitted by N�. Barney Giles and Mr. Gerald Thcenpson. The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Tate. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker reported this application was for approximately 11 acres located on the rwrthwest corner of Dove Road and Dove I,00p Road, being currently zoned "R-�I'H" Tvwnhouse Zoning District. The r�uested zoning was "CN" Neighborhood Comr�ercial. I�. Gerald Thompson addressed those present and advised that in an effort to consider son� of the concerns of the Council and the neighboring homeowners, "'�' they had reduced their c�rercial zoning application t�o appr�imately eight acres and requested a postponement of the public hearing in order to obtain a n�w legal description of the property to be zoned. In addition, they wisY�ed � to be able to infonn son�e hameowners of their proposal for a ccx�rercial c:enter. A lengthy discussion ensued, during which tiure the Planning & Zoning Commission ar�d City Council deliberated the merits of the request for post- ponement. A motion was then offered by Canmissioner Joyce and seconded by Camnissioner Wilbanks to grant the request and postpone the public hearing on Zoning Appli- cation Z84-29 until Tuesday, October 16, 1984. The mc�tion prevailed by the follawing vote: (5) 09/04/84 I' Ayes . Spencer, Joyce, Nonnari, & Wilbanks Nays . Engho7m Absent: Cook & Atkins Council Me�nUer Pawers also made a motion to grant the request for postpone�uent and to hear the case on Zoning P,pplication Z84-29 on Tuesday, October 16, 1984. The nx�tion was seconded by Council Member Dyer and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Powers ,��q Nays . None Absent: Oliver & Glynn �� RECFSS & RECONVII�IE It was then announced by Mayor Tate that the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council would recess briefiy before considering further published agenda items. The Ccmmission would reconvene mr�mentarily in the Civic Center, 311 Main Street. Council Member Oliver arrived during the recess and, with the exception of Council Meqnber Glynn, all members of the City Council were present upon reconvening in the Council Chambers. CONSIDERATION OF Tf� N[INUTES The next item before the City Council was to consider the minutes of their meetings of Ma.y 8, August 20, and August 21, 1984. There being no additions or corrections, Council Member Marion Brekken made a motion that the minutes be approved as published. The nx�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None �'""� Absent: Glynn ' �.�r� ' BID AV�2D, SALE OF SURPLUS PROPEFt'I'Y, ACC�SS TO CITY COMPLEX SITE ', The next order of business was for the City Council to consider awarding the ', bid relative to the sale of surplus real property. ' One bid had been received relative to the sale of a tract of land approximately 70' x 406' at the access point to the City Ccxnplex site on South Main Street. The bid, received frc�n Hall Construction Ccxnpany, had two ,, options for the purchase of the property, and this item had been tabled on ' August 21, 1984 to allaw the Municipal Facilities Cantnittee to meet with bidder and make a recamnendation to the City Council. Council Member Oliver, Chairman of the Municipal Facilities Cc�nittee, reported they had been unable to meet with the bidder. The reco�nendation was that this ite�n again be tabled until September 18, 1984, and he did so move. A second to the rrotian was offered by Council Member Pawers, and the trotion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Glynn �� PUBLIC HEAI2ING, PROPOSID 1984-85 BUDGET The ne� order of business was for the City Council to conduct a public .,,�:r hearing relative to the proposed 1984-85 budget. Assistant City Manager Bill Eisen presented an overview of the proposed 1984-85 City budget. The expenditures and revenues for all funds were briefly reviewed. It was noted that the budget inclu�ded a tax rate of 40�/$100 valuation and a 40$ hca�estead exen�tion. In addition, he advised of sane revisions made since the Council workshop, which resulted in a budget decrease of approximately $10,000. (6) 09/04/84 Follawing a brief period of questions and conments fr�n the Council Members, Mayor Tate invited those guests present to speak relative to the proposed budget. No one wished to make a oomrent. A mr�tion to close the public hearing was offered by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council Member Brekken. The m�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None r� Absent: Glynn ORDIN�NCE, ADOPTING REVISID 1983-84 BUDGET � The next item before the City Council was to consider an ordinance adapting the City of Grapevine revised budget for fiscal year 1983-84. The caption of the proposed ordinarice was presented by the City Secretary. Assistant City Manager Bill Eisen revieiaed the revised budget figures for fiscal year 1983-84. He noted that revenues were higher than anticipated due to (1) payment of ad valorem taxes by the previously insolvent Braniff Inter- national, (2) increased water consvmption, and (3) increased rounds of golf played at the Grapevine Municipal Golf Course. E�penditures also had increased fran the original 1983-84 budget proposal due pr�marily to the c�nprehensive rezoning effort. There being little discussion, Council Member Brekken then offered a mc�tion that the ordinance adopting the revised budget for fiscal year 1983-84 be adopted. The motion was seconded by Council Member Pawers and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers - Nays . None Absent: Glynn �u� 012DIl�,NCE NO. 84-62 � AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE AN�IDID BUDGET FOR � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, FOR THE FISCAL YEP,R B�GI1VrTING OCI'OBER 1, 1983 AND ENDING SEP'i�ER 30, 1984; AND DECL�ARING AN II�FNCY ORDINANCE, ADOPTING PROPOSID 1984-85 BUDG�I' The next ite�n to be considered by the City Council was an ordinanoe adopting the City of Grapevine proposed budget for fiscal year 1984-85. City Secretary Karen Spann then read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Mr. Eisen advised that the budget, as praposed during the public hearing earlier in the evening, was rec�rended by the City Staff to be adapted. He noted that praposed water and sewer availability charges had been delayed pending further study by the City Staff and would be considered separately at a later date. In addition, Federal Revenue Sharing funds in the aQmunt of $197,000, together with an anticipated year erld balance of $13,836 and $4,000 incame fran investrrents, will be transferred to the General Ftiixxl solely for street repair and maintenance. Council adaption of the buc7get would set the """� Revenue Sharing use for this purpose. ' Council Member Oliver offered a mr�tion that the ordinance adapting the '� proposed 1984-85 budget be appraved. The mc�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawi.ng vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Glynn ORDINANCE NO. 84-63 AN O�INANC.E ADOPTING Tf� BUDGET FOR � CITY OF GRAPEUINE, TEXAS, FOR THE FISCI�L YF�t BEGIl�TING OC'i'OBER 1, 1984 AI�ID E[�1IDING (7) 09/04/84 SEPTII�'1BER 30, 1985; PRWIDING FOR IlVTI2A- AND IlV'I'ER-D�AR�7TAL FCTND TRANSFERS; P1�lIDING FOR INVES'I�]T OF CERTAIN FUNDS; AND DECLARING AN II�EDICY RFSOLUTION, NAMING A PARK IN Tf� WOODS ADDITION, C. J. HU'I'CHINS PARK The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution naming a park in The Woods Addition. � Paxks & Recreation Director Kevin Conklin advised that developer Re,x Scott had donated tw�o lots within The Woods Addition for park puYposes and had expressed his wish that the park be named after Mr. C. J. Hutchins, a longtime Grapevine ,�;� resident who is now deceased. The Parks & Recreation Board concurred with this wish, and the City Staff also rec�nded that the park be named the C. J. Hutchins Park. The caption of the proposed resolution was presented by the City Secretary. A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council Member Brekken that the resolution be approved and the park be named C. J. Hutchins Park. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Powers Nays . None Absent: Glynn RESOLUTION NO. 84-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, DFSCRIBING THE IiOCATION OF UNN�INIED CITY PARK PROPERTY AND DETERMINING A NAME FOR SAID PARK BID AV�2D, REI�OCATION OF �TER LINE ATANG HIGHWAY 121 SOUTH ��! The next item before the City Council was to consider awarding the bid ,�� relative to the relocation of a 20-inch water line along HigYiway 121 South. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker reported that it was necessary to relocate approximately 1,100 feet of water line between Hughes Rr�ad and. Hall-Johnson Road due to the freeway construction of Highway 121 South by the State Highway Departr�nt. Bids for this relocation had been received as follaws: CONTRAC'I'OR AMOUNT BID Jay-Mar Corporation $ 74,500.00 Mackey B. Allen, Inc. $ 83,391.25 Circle "C" Construction Ccxnpany $106,385.00 Mr. Baddaker also reviewed a proposal to salvage the oId pipe for use in conjunction with the Bear Run developin�e.nt. It was the rec�ndation of the City Staff that the bid for the relocation of this 20-inch line be awarded to Jay-Mar Corporation in their low bid amr�unt of $74,500.00. Followi.ng brief Council deliberation, Council Member T�n Pawers made a nx�tion to accept the rec�ndation of the City Staff and award the bid for this ""'�� water line relocation to Jay-Mar Corporation in the amount of $74,500. The ; m�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: I� �� Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Glynn REJFX.'T BIDS, SALE OF BIG BEAR CREF� SEWER PI�ANT The next order of business was for the City Council to consider rejecting the bids relative to the sale of the southwest se�rer plant. (8) 09/04/84 Public Works Director Jim Baddaker reported that three bids had been received relative to the sale of the Big Bear Creek Sewer Plant as surplus property. Al1 three bids would require the City to pay the contractor for removal of the facility, with the lowest bid being received frcan Tenbusch E�cavating, Inc. in the amount of $15,400. The recamnendation of the City Staff was that it wr�uld be more cost effective to utilize City personnel to disass�nble the sewer plant and salvage the materials for sale as scrap metal. Council Member Oliver made a mption to accept the recamnendation of the City �� Staff, rejecting all bids received relative to the sale of the Big Bear Creek Sewer Plant and authorizing disassembly of the plant by City personnel for sale as scrap metal. The m�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and pre- ,� , vailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Glynn ORDINANCE, TRAF�'IC CONTROL The next item before the City Council was to consider an ordinance relative to traffic control. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker identified several areas of concern where additional traffic control was needed. The first item was a request fram the school district to establish a 20 mile per hour school zone on Pool Road in the vicinity of the new high school entrance south of State Highway 26. The Staff recommendation was that the school zone extend fran Big Bear Creek north to State Highway 26. During Council deli.beration, however, concern was expressed for the length of this proposed school zone. The ite�n was discussed for some time, and the potential pedestrian traffic on Pool Road was also addressed. It was the general �� concensus that the area covered by the school zone should be reduced. Mr. Baddaker then advised that he wished to erect flashing yellaw warning � lights on Dove Road near pove Elementary, on College Street near Cannon Elementary, on TimY�erline Drive near Timberline Elementary and on Pool Road near the entry to Grapevine High School. He est�mated it would take approx.imately six to eight weeks for installation at a total cost of approximately $5,000. During the ensuing discussion, the City Council concurred with this expenditure and also requested that a flashing light be erected on Pebblebrook Drive near Cannon Elementary School. Vehicles making U-turns on Mustang Drive in the vicinity of the Wheel Estates Mobile Home Park was also to be discussed. Mr. Baddaker reported that the back up of high school traffic at Mustang Drive during peak periods had encouraged right turns to Wheel Estates and then turning around westbound to the stoplight at Highway 26. This was creating a traffic hazard, and the Staff recanarended prohibiting U-turns on Mustang Drive near the entzy to this mobile hame park. The final traffic control item to be discussed was the parking problem on the south side of Dallas Road near the Police/Library Building. Mr. Baddaker reviewed the situation, noting that view obstruction was a major problem at the Dallas Road intersections with Pine Street and Church Street. His recoim�endation was that a No Parking zone be established on the south side of �� Dallas Road fram Bellaire Drive to Church Street. The caption of the proposed traffic control ordinance was then read by the City Secretary. It was noted that the flashing school zone lights did not require Council action by ordinance and were not included. Mayor Pro Tem Ware offered a n�tion, seconded by Council Me.�nber Pawers, that the ordinance be adopted. The mc�tion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Glynn (9) 09/04/84 ' ORDINANCE NO. 84-64 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ANl�'NDING CHAPTER 23, SECTION 27 OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, 'I'EXAS BY SPECIFYING THE RF,ASONABLE AND PRUDENT SPEID FOR A CERTAIN ARF� TO BE DESIC�TATID AS A SCHOOL ZONE; AMEDTDING CHAP'I'ER 23 BY ' ADDING A NEW SEC,TION 35 PROHIBITING VEEIICI� U-7.'URNS AT CERTAIN I+OCATIONS �+� DESCRIBID HEREIN; AND ANID.VDING CFiAPTER 23, SECTION 63 PROHIBITING PARKING AT CERTAIN I,CX'ATIONS DESCRIBID HEREIN; �� AUTHORIZING THE �rION OF TRAFFIC REGiJI�F,TION SIC�TS; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A PE�IALTY NOT TO EXCEID TI� SUM OF TWO HUNDRID DOLI�ARS ($200,oo) Arm A s�� or�vsE sxAT T, BE DEEN�D CONIMITTID UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; PROVIDING A SEVII�IBILITY; AND DECLARING AN II�RGII�ICY NOTE: The school zone on Pool Rc�ad designated as part of this ordinance begins 117 feet south of State Highway 26 and continues south for 1000 ', feet. ' RESOLUTION, ACCEP'I'ING CORPS OF IIQGINEERS Il�IPROVII�NTS MP,DE TO FAIFS�IAY DRIVE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution accepting the improvements to Fairway Drive. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised that the Corps of Engineers had recently ccxnpleted a project to relocate Fairway Drive across the Grapevine Lake spillway apron. He had inspected the roadway construction and found it '"""� ' to be in accordance with our contract agreement, which also abandoned the old ' Fairway Drive right-of-way. The resolution proposed for Council action ,�,,�; accepted the improvements made and dedicated an easement for the new roadway. , The caption of the proposed resolution was read by City Secretary. I There being little discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion that the '�, resolution be adopted. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Paw�rs and ��, prevailed by the following vote: ', Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Glynn RESOLUTION N0. 84-42 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING TI� IMPRWIIKEI�I'S CONSTRUCTID BY THE DEPAR'IlKENT OF THE ARMY, , FORT WORTH DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ' WITHIN THE GRAPEVINE LAKE ARE',A AND THE DIDICATION OF AN EASEMEN'r 'I'HAT RIIACATES FAI�V'AY DRIVE PLANNING & ZONING CONY�iISSION RECON�IDATION ""�"� ZONING APPLICATION Z84-21, RIVER VALLEY INVESTMEN`I'S The next it�n before the City Council was to consider the reccamtiendation of �� the Planning & Zoning Coimiission relative to Zoning Application Z84-21 (River Valley) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. Planning & Zoning Cammission Chairman Sharron Spencer reported the Cammis- ' sion's reccx�mendation of denial for this "CN" Neighborhood Cammercial zoning on the southwest corner ot Dove Road at Dove Loop Road. Their vote was 4 to 1. She noted that increased traffic was of pr�mary concern to the Cammission ' Me,mbers, as well as the fact that they felt the highest and best use of the land was for residential development. (10) 09/04/84 The caption of the proposed ordinance was presented by the City Secretary. Follawing brief Council deliberation, Council ManUer Tcm Pawers made a motion to accept the reca�►endation of the Planning & Zoning Canmission and deny the zoning requested in Application Z84-21. The mr�tion was seconded by Council Member Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . Ware � Abstain: Oliver Absent : Glynn ;�,,, PI�ANNING & ZONING CONIl�IISSION RECON�IDATION ZONING APPLICATION Z84-24, COLLE'�GE CREIIZ The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recan- nuendation of the Planning & Zoning Conmission relative to Zoning Application Z84-24 (Parker) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. N�s. Spencer advised the Planning & Zoning Cce�mission had unan�mously reccan- mended approval of this adjustz�uent in the zoning district boundaries between the Single-Family and �-Family Dwelling Districts of the College Creek Addition. City Secretary Karen Spann read the caption of the proposed ordinance. . ion to acce t the Cc�mission's Council Member Ron er then offered a mr�t p DY ! recamnendation and approve the requested zoning. The mQtion was seconded by Council M�ember Tc�n Pawers and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Abstain: Oliver �� Absent : Glynn � ORDINANCE NO. 84-65 � AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPRII�iII�1SIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEX�1S, 5AME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPIIVDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, 'I�S, GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACI' OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A IlJT, TRACT, OR PARCII� OF I�TD LYING ArID BEING SIT[JATED IN TARRP,NT COUN`I'Y, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF TI� A. FOSTgt SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 518, IN THE CITY OF GRAPE- VIl�TE, TEXA.S, MORE FULLY AND COMPLEI'ELY DESCRIBID IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; 012DERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPER7.'Y FROM "R-7.5" SINGI�-FAMILY DWEL- LING DISTRICT AND "R-3.5" 'I'WO-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "R-7.5" SINGLE-FAMILY TxVELLING DISTRICT AND "R-3.5" 'IWO-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRIGT, PROVIDING FOR AN ADJiJS'I�N'I' IN THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES; CORRECI'ING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OZ�iER PORTIONS OF Tf� ''�' ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A C��AUSE REI�ATING TO SEVEF�BILITY; DE'.I'ERMIlVING THAT TE� PUBLIC INTERF'�STS, M(JRAIS AND C�NERAL ��,,, WELFARE DIIKAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMEND- N�1T THE'12EIN N1ADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEID THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOLI�RS ($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OF'FENSE SHALS� BE DEII"� CON]MITTID UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND DECI�RING AN II�1CY (11) 09/04/84 PLANI�tING & ZONING CANIl�IISSION RECONIl�7DATION ', ZONING APPLICATION Z84-25, STILTS ADDITION The ne� order of business was for the City Council to c�nsider the recom- n�ndation of the Planning & Zoning C�mnission relative to Zoning Application Z84-25 (Bambrick) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. Ccmtnission Chairman Sharron Spencer reported the reccamtiendation of the Plan- ning & Zoning Ca�nission was for approval by a vote of 4 to 1. In addition, they reccngnended that any specific requiretrents not set out by the site plan � should be in accordance with the "CN" Neighborhood Camnercial regulations. The caption of the proposed ordinance was then presented by the City „�,,,� SecretaYy. Council deliberation follawed, after which a motion was made by Council Member Paaers and sec�onded by Council Me.�nber Brekken to accept the recam�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Camnission and approve the proposed zoning allawing on-premise cons�tion of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with a restaurant. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Ware, Brekken, & Powers Nays : Tate & Dyer Abstain: Oliver Absent : Glynn � ORDINANCE NO. 8 4-7 4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREf]II�ISIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF 'I'HE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S, SAN1E BEING ALSO KNOV�IN AS APPENDIX "D" OF 'I23E CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, 'I�.S, GRAN'I'ING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF I�AND DESCRIBID AS BEING A IDT, TRACT, OR PARCII, OF LAND LYING AND '�"� ' BEING SI'I'[JATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE JOEL L. HAI�,UM SUR�IEY, ,,,�� ABSTRACT NO. 722, IN Z�-IE CITY OF GRAPE- , �TII�1E, Z'EXAS, MURE FCTi�,Y �1ND COMPLEI'ELY , DESCRIBID TN Tf� BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ', ORDERING A C'��l�TGE IN THE USE OF SAID �� PROPERTY FROM ��CN�� NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCTAT, '� ZONING DISTRICT TO "SP" SITE PLAN ZONING , DISTRICT FOR Z'f� STORAGE, POSSESSION, i, RETAIL SALE, AND ON-PREMISE CONSLAyPri'ION OF '� ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH ', Tf� OPERATION OF A RESTAURANT, ALL IN ACCARDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN, ATTACHID HERETO AND MADE A PART HEf2EOF; CORRELTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING AT,T, OTHER PORTIONS OF TI� ZONING ORDINANCE; ', PROVIDING A CI�AUSE RELATING TO SEVER- �I ABILITY; DETERNIINING THAT THE PUBLIC i INTERFSTS, MORAI�S AND GENERAL V�E.LFARE ' DII"IAND A ZONING CHANGE AND ANIENDMEI�F!' THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEID THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOT,T,ARS ($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHAIZ BE DE�IED CODM�IITTID UPON EACH DAY DURING '""� OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND DECLARTNG AN �ENCY �� NOTE: Following the vote on this ordinance, City Attorney John Boyle advised that, in accordance with Section 3.11 of the City Charter, since it was being considered on an emergency ba.sis and did not receive a favorable vote of three-fourths of the Council Members present, pas- sage of this ordinance would require a second reading. (12) 09/04/84 PLANNING & ZONING CONIl�IISSION RECONIMENDATION, ZONING APPLICATION Z84-26, WRIGHT The ne�t order of business was for the City Council to consider the reccan- merulation of the Planning & Zoning Cca�n.ission relative to Zoning Application Z84-25 (Wright) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. Planning & Zoning CcaYm.ission Chairman Sharron Spencer advised the Camnission had unanimously rec�nded to approve the "R-7.5" Single-Family zoning as requested on this tract located off of Hall-Johnson Road. � City Secretary Karen Sp�arin presented the caption of the proposed ordinance. ,�„ There being little discussion, Council Member Marion Brekken offered a nx�tion to accept the recca►i�endation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�nmission and approve Zoning Application Z84-26. The irotion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absta.in: Oliver Absent : Glynn 012DINANCE NO. 84-66 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPRE��ISIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXP,S, SANIE BEING ALSO KNOV�IN AS APPIIVDIX "D" OF Z�IE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, G�AN'rING A ZONING CHANGE ON A 'I'RACT OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A IAT, TRP,�T, OR PARCII� OF I�ND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF Tf� G. W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 1034, IN THE CITY OF GRAPE- �TIl�1E, TF�.S, MORE FUId,Y AND COMPI�i'ELY DESCRIBID IN 'I'f� BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; �„ ORDERING A CHANGE IN TI� USE OF SAID PR(J- PERTY FROM "R-20" SINGI,E-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "R-7.5" SINGL�-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHII� PORTIONS OF TF� ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE REL�ATING TO SEUII�IBILITY; DEI'ERMINING THAT Tf� PUBLIC IN'I�REBTS, MORAI�S AND C�NERAL WELFARE DFS'IAND A ZONING CHANGE AND ANNlEND- N�N'P 'I'f�REIN MADE; PROVIDING A PEDIALTY NOT TO EXCEID TI� SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOT T,ARS ($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFF�NSE SHATT, BE DEII�lED COMMI�i'ID UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND DDCL�RING AN II�RGE[�CY PLANNING & ZONING CONI�'lISSION RECONIl�IDATION FINAL PLAT, COLLFGE CREIIZ ADDITION The next item before the City Council was to consider the recca�iendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccmmission relative to the final plat of the College Creek Addition. � The College Creek Addition is located on West College Street i�tediately south , of Cannon Elementary School. Zoning Application Z84-24 had been approved �r earlier aligning the single-family and two-family land uses as indicated on this final plat. The access easement had been properly shown between Lots 15 & 16 of Block A. Mrs. Spencer reported the Conmission's unanumus rec�menda- tion for approval. A motion to accept the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and approve the final plat of the College Creek Addition was then made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council Me�iber Brekken. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: (13) 09/04/84 , Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pavers ', Nays . None Absent: Glynn PLANNING & ZONING CONA�iISSION RECONgKENDATION, FINAL PLAT, STILTS ADDITION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recan- mendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccxcmission relative to the final plat of the Stilts Addition. � The Stilts Addition is located on the very north end of Dove Loop Road. An ordinance zoning this same property for use as a restaurant with sales of alcoholic beverages for on-premise constunption had been approved on first �,� reading earlier in the evening (Z84-25) . The rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission, as reported by Chairman Spencer, was for approval of this final plat. The vote was 5 to 0. ' There being little Council deliberation, Council Member Pawers made a mQtion that the reca�aner�dation of the Planning & Zoning Cammission be accepted and the final plat of the Stilts Addition be approved. The motion, seconded by Council M��ber Oliver, prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None Absent: Glynn ' PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl�IDATION PRELIMINARY PLAT, MUSTANG ADDITION The final business ite�n before the City Council was to consider the rec�n- mendation of the Planni.ng & Zoning Cc�mission relative to the preliminary plat of the Mustang P,ddition. ', Council Men�r Oliver advised that he w�uld abstain fran consideration of this ' iteqn because the plat had been su�anitted by his e�nployer, the Grapevine- '"'� Colleyville Independent School District. A Conflict of Interest Affidavit had been filed with the City Secretary. ,,,�,� This particular plat includes the school administration building, the bus barn, the football stadiiun, and surrounding school property located between West Highway 26 and Mustang Drive. Improvements w�re to be made on this tract, and a plat was required in order for a building permit to be issued. Planning & Zoning Camnission Chairnnan Sharron Spencer reported Conmission's unaniumus approval of this preliminary plat. During the ensuing Council discussion, it was noted. that another name wr�uld I�, have to be chosen prior to final platting, as a Mustang Addition already ' exists. ', Mayor Pro Tem Ware then of fered a mption to accept the recan�tiendation of the �� Planning & Zoning Canmission and approve this preliminary plat. The motion ' was seconded by Council N�e.anber Brekken and prevailed by the following vote: ' Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers ', Nays . None ' Abstain: Oliver ' Absent : Glynn P,DJOURI�IT ,""�"' The deliberations of the City Council having been concluded, a motion to ' adjourn the meeting was offered by Council Me�nber Oliver and seconded by w�,�w ' Council Member Brekken. The motion prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dyer, & Pawers Nays . None , Absent: Glynn I PASSID AND APPRC7VID BY 'PI� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on ', this the 18�h day of Se�tember, 1984. (14) 09/04/84 APPR(NED: � �� Mayor Pro A'1'I'EST: � �rr �,��t,�l.� `�- ' G�/�'L/l/�� City ecretary � � � (15)