The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-02-28 Special Meeting ,,:.,,�. �,: .� AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28 , 1984 AT 7 : 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET I. CALL TO ORDER II. INVOCATION: Mayor Pro Tem Ted Ware III. OLD BUSINESS City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map and take any necessary action relative thereto. IV. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION V. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V,A.T.C. S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1984 AT 11 : 00 A.M. City Secretar ,��.-;, �w� STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in S�ecial Session on this the 28th day of February, 1984 at 7:30 p.m, in the Council Chambers, 413 Main Street, with the following members present to�ait: �� William D. Tate Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem rarry Oliver Council Member �� Charles Dunn Council M�mber Marion Brekken Council M�nber Ron Dyer Council Member Jim Glynn Council Member constituting a quorum, with the follawing members of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Karen Spann City Secretary CALL TO ORDER Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Mayor Pro Tem Ware. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION F;ECONIl`�VDATION PROPOSID AMENDMENTS TO COMPREEIETISIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ZONING MAP The purpose of the meeting was for the City Council to consider the recan- menda.tion of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to the proposed amend- Y ments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the zoning map and take any necessary action relative thereto. Planning & Zoning Commission Chairman Sharron S`pencer then presented the Com- mission's reco�ndation relative to the proposed textual amenchnents to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. NOZ'E: Council �r Dunn and Council Nlember Dyer arrived at the meeting. Mrs. Spencer reported the PRD-6 Planned Residential District was rec�nded to be included. She briefly reviewed this proposed district, noting that it would allaw a mixture of residential uses on a tract of land, utilizing buffers, open space, and landscaping requirements. The minirmnn tract size w�uld be 25 contiguous acres, and each land use would be developed in accor- dance with the regulations for that particular district. It was noted that the mi.ninnun distance between rnultiple family buildings shall be not less than twenty (20) feet and that all structures, except single-family homes on 7,500 square foot lots or larger, shall have exterior construction of at least 800 masonry. During the ensuing discussion, additional points were reviewed and clarified, '�' '' including the heights of the buildings within a planned development. The PRD-12 Planned Residential District was then reviewed. This district ;„� closely resembles the PRD-6 District. The permitted uses include a m�ture of residential districts plus co�nercial uses permitted in the C�1 Neighborhood C�rcial District. The maximLun rnmiber of dwelling units within the multiple family area in a PRD-12 District shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre, with a maximtnn overall density not to exceed 12 dwelling units per acre. 'I'he minim�nn tract size to be considered for PRD-12 zoning shall be 15 contiguous acres. The Planned Comnercial District {PCD) was also discussed. This proposed district would allaw a planned retail office/c�rcial park on a minimum tract size of 25 contiguous acres. Any of the uses pernu.tted in the CN �� 02/28/84 Neighborhood Coim�rcial District, the CC C�nznity Co�riercial District, the HCO Hotel Corporate Office District, or the PO Professional Office District i, and some of the uses allowed under the LI Light Industrial District would be ' allowed. Additional requirements such as height, screening, buffering, and �� parking and loading areas were also revieF,ved witYi the City Council. I�I Mrs. Spencer also reviewed the proposed PID Planned Industrial District, which I closely resembles the PC� District. In addition to the uses pezmitted in the �i PCC� District, the Planned Industrial District also allaws all uses in the I Light Industrial District and some warehousing and wholesale distribution ,�� I facilities. The additional requirements of this zoning district were briefly �� reviewed, and it was noted that a minimtun of 20 contiguous acres would be '�� necessary for consideration under this zoning category. I, GU Governmental Use District was also presented for Council consideration. �I This district was established to apply to those lands where national, state, 'I or local goverrunental activities are conducted and where governments hold ' title to such lands. In addition to the pezmitted uses as parks and recrea- tion areas, public facilities, hospitals, schools, and government buildings, conditional uses such as jails and sanitary landfills would also be allawed I upon City Council approval. The buffer area regulations for this district I were also addressed. Chairman Spencer then briefly presented the AN Airport Noise Overlay District, which was established to provide additional regulations for property in the vicinity of the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport, mainly dealing with noise impact areas. i The regulations for the Master Development Plan were then reviewed. The Master Develo�nt Plan would be submitted as a part of the zoning application on all planned development districts. There would be a time limit set for Master Development Plan approval or denial--the Planning & Zoning Comnission would have 15 days follawing the public hearing to act on the Plan, and the City Council would have 15 days follawing receipt of the Planning & Zoning Comnission recatzar�endation. It was noted that if the City Council has denied a . ''""'� 1Master Development Plan, neither the said application nor a request for rezoning to allaw the uses, may be refiled until at least twelve mpnths have „�,, , elapsed since the action of the Council in denying said Plan. If after a max�m�un of 4 years, construction has not begun in accordance with an approved I Plan, said Plan shall expire. Additional Master Development Plan requirements I were then discussed with the City Council. Mrs. Spencer also presented the Site Plan requireirents. It was noted that the Site Plan is not a part of the zoning application, but must be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. A Site Plan is a very detailed plan of the proposed developm�nt, and, on tracts which do not exceed 1/2 acre in size and have no mpre than 4 dwelling units proposed, may be reviewed by the Director of Public Works only. All other Site Plans must be �� considered by the Planning & Zoning Cammission and the City Council. The �� procedure for processing site plans was also discussed, and it was noted that � modifications subject to approval or reasons for denial of a site plan must � be clearly stated to the applicant. Site Plan approval will be considered �� invalid if, after a period of one year, construction on said project has not ,� begt.ln- I Mrs. Spencer noted that this was only a partial reco�ndation from the '� Planning & Zoning Conmission relative to the proposed am�nchnents. The final draft on four of the proposed districts, CBD Central Business District, HCO Hotel Corporate Office District, LI Light Industrial, and HC Highway Com- """'� mercial District, was being was being prepared and submitted by Mr. Marlin Smith, consulting attorney. The rec�mendation of the Comnission relative to these districts would be presented to the City Council on Tuesday, March 6, � 1984. It was also reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission rec�nded the follawing districts not be included in the praposed amenc�nents: LB Limited Business, GI General Industrial, and FP Flood Plain Overlay. AA70URI�TT There being no further discussion, a mc�tion to adjourn the meeting was offered by Council Member Oliver. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: (2) 02/28/84 Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, Dyer, & Glynn Nays: None PASSID AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this 6th day of March , 1984. APPROVID: � � � -�7�.��'.� ��. � Mayor A'1'I'EST: �' t� t. .t� City Se etary �;. .. �� (3)