Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 03 - Z20-03, CU20-21, PD20-031 The Elan TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER RON STOMBAUGH, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 20, 2020 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z20-03, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU20-21, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD20-03, ELAN GRAPEVINE, THE PRESERVE PHASE II APPLICANT: CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine, LP PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: The subject property is addressed at 4501 State Highway 360, and is platted as Lot 2, Block A, Glade/360 Addition. The subject property is comprised of 47.35 acres and has approximately 3,750 feet of frontage along the northbound State Highway 360 service road and 527 feet along Euless- Grapevine Road. REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE, CONDITIONAL USE, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a zone change to Family District for the development of a 324-unit multi-family project. The applicant is also seeking a conditional use permit to exceed the height regulations, vary from the parking requirements, and allow for a reduction in the front yard setback relative to the flexible design Multi-Family District. A planned development overlay is also being requested to deviate from the building separation requirement October 15, 2020 (8:45AM) O:/ZCU/Z20-03.4; CU20-21.4; PD208-03.4 1 At the February 20, 2018 meeting the applicant received approval for a zoning change, conditional use request, and planned development overlay on the subject property immediately adjacent to the s Commerce Development District were the development of a 399-unit multi-family project. The conditional use permit allowed for increased height, reduced parking and a reduction in the front yard setback relative to the flexible design Multi-Family District and the planned development overlay was used to deviate from the building separation requirements in With this request, it is the second phase of the previously approved project from 2018, specifically, a 324 unit, gated, multi-family complex on approximately 47.35 acres beginning at the northern terminus of The Preserve and continuing northward approximately 3,750 feet along the S.H. 360 service road to Euless- Grapevine Road. This project, consisting of 324-units (6.84 dwelling units/acre) will have two controlled points of access along the northbound State Highway 360 service road and an additional point of joint access from the existing multi-family complex immediately adjacent to the south. This development will consist of 220, one bedroom units ranging from 705-1,117 square feet in size; 92, two bedroom units ranging from 1,100-1,332 s.f. in size; and four, three bedroom units 1,354 s.f. in size. Also as part of this project the applicant intends to develop eight, single story cottage-style apartments with accompanying garages; contained within two buildings of four units each, these three bedroom units will be 1,693 s.f. in size. The flexible design standards within the conditi District allows through the conditional use process consideration of height in excess of the two-story, 35 feet maximum as stated in the district as well as a reduction in the required parking and reduction of the front yard setback. All of the structures in this project other than the clubhouse and the cottages will be three stories and no greater than 40-feet in height. Total required parking for this project is 648 spaces; the applicant has conducted a parking study which recommends a ratio of 1.60 spaces/unit (519 total spaces). The applicant is providing 533 spaces in the form of 313 surface spaces, 73 carport spaces, 100 garages spaces, and 49 tandem spaces (behind garages). Relative to the reduced front yard setback, buildings 1, 10, 14, 15 and garage 4 have slight encroachments into the 40-foot front yard setback ranging from a maximum of approximately 10 feet to a minimum of less than two feet for very small portions of these referenced structures. Given that the site is compromised by a large portion of it being contained within unbuildable floodplain and further inhibited by a TRA Regional Sanitary Sewer Easement 50 feet in width, the resulting narrowness of the site and the need to comply with the district specific design standards creates the need for the encroachments. require a minimum building separation of 50 feet for structures that are arranged face-to-face or back-to-back and a minimum separation of 20 feet or the height of the structure for buildings arranged end-to-end. October 15, 2020 (8:45AM) O:/ZCU/Z20-03.4; CU20-21.4; PD208-03.4 2 Relative to the face-to-face separation requirement, the applicant is seeking a planned development overlay to slightly reduce this separation to 44.5 feet between buildings 5 and 6 and a separation of 35.5 feet between buildings 6 and 7. Regarding the end-to-end separation, a number of structures throughout the development are separated less than the 40 feet required; however, no apartment structure in the app less than 25 feet. This reduced separation is necessary in order to provide a more efficient arrangement of the structures on the site relative to the existing topography and narrowness of the site. Usable recreational open space provided by the applicant in the form of hiking trails, nature preserve areas, a dog park, and pool area is in excess of square feet is required. The hiking/biking trail that was approved with the first phase of this project in early 2018 and accessible to the public along with parking for trail visitors contained within the phase 1 property will be continued along the eastern edge of the property to Euless-Grapevine Road. The applicant is intending to enter into an agreement Recreation Department to dedicate the trail and a portion of land to the City to be used as public open space. Contained in your packet along with the site specific exhibits is an affidavit of compliance signed and sealed by the project architect stating the project is in compliance with the recently adopted Design Standards Manual for Multi-Family and Vertical Mixed Use Development. Specifically, this project is located within District 1, State Highway 360/Airport District. This district has ten, district specific standards which the affidavit and accompanying checklist demonstrate compliance along with the general standards required of all districts. Along with the affidavit and checklist is a set of exhibits that graphically demonstrate compliance with specific elements of the design standards. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: anned Commerce Development District and is undeveloped. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: Industrial District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The property to the north was z 1984 City Rezoning. At a February 3, 1997 meeting the Council approved a zone change (Z97-20) and a conditional use permit (CU97-73) on the subject site rezoning approximately storage in conjunction with an office/warehouse development that never materialized. At the September 15, 2015 meeting the Council considered and denied a zoning change and a conditional use permit to rezone approximately ght Industrial District October 15, 2020 (8:45AM) O:/ZCU/Z20-03.4; CU20-21.4; PD208-03.4 3 two-phase multi-family project on the subject site comprised of 714 total units. At the February 20, 2018 meeting, the Council approved a zoning change (Z18-0), conditional use permit (CU18-02), and a planned development overlay (PD18-01) on the property immediately adjacent to the south. The zone change rezoned 14.34 acres from he development of a 399-unit multi-family project. The conditional use permit allowed for increased height, reduced parking and a reduction in the front yard setback relative to the flexible design standards in t District. The planned development overlay was used to deviate from the building separation requirements in the SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: vacant undeveloped airport property multifamily project EAST: D/FW International Airport WEST: State Highway 360 right-of-way AIRPORT IMPACT: A portion of the subject tract is not located within any of the noise zones as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map and an approximate equal portion of the tract is locat Map. Few activities will be affected by ai sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Commercial/Mixed Use land use. compliance with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: Although no access will be taken from Euless-Grapevine Road, it is designed a Type D, Minor Arterial, with a minimum 75 feet of right-of-way developed as four lanes. October 15, 2020 (8:45AM) O:/ZCU/Z20-03.4; CU20-21.4; PD208-03.4 4 za06,03 CITY OFGRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICA - Applicant Name: CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner, L.P. c/o Andrew Ord Applicant Address: 600 E Las Colinas Blvd City/State/Zip Irving, Texas 75039 Phone No. 972444-2197 Fax No. Email Address Mobile Phone K58-8648521 Applicant's interest in subject property I Purchaser PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property 14501 STATE HWY Legal Description: Lot f 27 Block Addition GLADE 360 ADDITION _ — Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres+/�i square footage+/- 2,047,320 Present zoning classification PCD Planned Commerce Developr Requested zoning district R-MF-2 Multifamily District Present use of property Vacant/Undevelopmed Proposed use of property IMultifamily Development The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that R-MF Multifamily District would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning 2 Acres. See 221.2. PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner (Multiple owners, see attached) Prop Owner Address City/State/Zip ` Phone No. I Fax No 110 Zao.o3 PART 1. APPLK Applicant Name: Applicant Address: CITY OFGRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION City/State/Zip Phone No. Fax No. Email Address Mobile Phone Applicant's interest in subject property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property Legal Description: Lot F Block F Addition Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres square footage Present zoning classification F Requested zoning district Present use of property Proposed use of property The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is f Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner Gardner 360 WLC Partnership West c/o Paul A. Gardner Prop Owner Address 17480 Dallas Parkway, Suite 127 City/State/Zip Dallas, TX 75289 Phone No. 972-669-9955 Fax No. 972-669-9977 Z,ap.a3 =yIYJL Yl ]l n w Y JLl,Y i. w, of +r.T X s i �a PART 1. APPLICANT Applicant Name: Applicant Address: City/State/Zip CITY OFGRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Phone No. Fax No. Email Address Mobile Phone Applicant's interest in subject property 1 PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property Legal Description: Lot F Block F— Addition Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres square footage Present zoning classification Present use of property Proposed use of property Requested zoning district The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner (Grapevine Holdings LTD c/o Paul A. Gardner Prop Owner Address 117480 Dallas Parkway, Suite 127 City/State/Zip Dallas, TX 75289 Phone No. 972-669-9955 Fax No. 972-669-9977 7ai)605 ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the descretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings maybe continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUES AND P ACE A ZQN E CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner, L.P. c/o Andrew Ord Print Applicant's Name App i atu The State of I "�� Ka--5 County of aaa—'s Before me (notary) tJ�'` �on this day personally appeared (applicant) Af1Lt-'� +� known to me imm fed to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing a •cknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. •,• �!'/'/�/ (Se a"":11�ndnd seal of office this day ofj Se b2 , A.D. t I!'eoFJOY Print Property Owner's Name The State of County of Notary In and For State of -e— yC�� Property Owner's Signature Before me (notary) , on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of, Notary In and For State of , A.D. ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the descretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ l have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name The State of County of Applicant's Signature Before me (notary) on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this ` day off Gardner 360 WLC Partnership West c/o Paul A. Gardner Print Property Owner's Name The State of County of f y,� S -L)fft-UA-C, Notary In and For State of , A.D. Property Owner's Signature Before me (notary) I "MG U, rA+WQI k4 on this day personally appeared (applicant) IPaul A. Gardner known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office thisf day of &CMM'9eV_ , A.D. I g-2 010 �O'lYP, 'r. LYNELL R. MANNING °;' fin= Notary Public, State of Texas ( i -• .*• Comm. Expires 07-14-2024 j ,,,, Notary ID 124988264 Notary In and For State of� Z 20 e08 ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the descretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name The State of County of Before me (notary) Applicant's Signature on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day (Grapevine Holdings LTD c/o Paul A. Gardner Print Property Owner's Name The State of lwqs County of TAU A-s Notary In and For State of , A.D. �i Property Owner's Signature Before me (notary) t.,� I.l���i� is�1(� ! on this day personally appeared (applicant) Paul A. Gardner known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this I'T day of S'erj-]GiMR0p,__ , A.D. ;L-C)a- �����YP��� LYNELL R. MANNING Notary Public. State of Texas i ,V-. lr Comm. Expires 07-14-2024 111;011,;;.`� Notary ID 124988264 Notary In and For State of LCS' ZZ04S. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date I CI 1 -24 2.6" Signature of Property Owner Date SEP 8 NZO Z,ao.os ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ! have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date Signature of Property Owner Date aC2 `� Z';�o •03 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date Signature of Property Owner I Zfi i t, Date I. /. aQAv GuZo•al V ,GRIAA � IJ E A % CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent/company/contact CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner, L.P_ c/o Andrew Ord Street address of applicant / agent. 600 E Las Colinas Blvd City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent. Irving, Texas 75039 Telephone number of applicant / agent. Fax number of applicant/agent 972-444-2197 Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent 858-864-8521 PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property 4501 STATE HWY Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11'sheet) Lot 2 Block_ A Addition GLADE 360 ADDITION Size of subject property +/-47 Acres +/- 2,047,320 Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property. PCD R-MF Multifamily District Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum / maximum district size for conditional use request- 2 Acres. See 22.F.2. Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: Sec. 22.1.1 (3 stories and 44 feet); Sec. 22.J (1.60 per unit); Sec. 22.G.1 (encroach on front setback) PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner. (Multiple Owners, see attached) Street address of property owner: City / State /Zip Code of property owner. - Telephone number of property owner: Fax number of property owner.• 'T E % 1 S� CITY OF GRAPEVINE . CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent:/company/contact Street address of applicant / agent. City / State /Zip Code of applicant/ agent: Telephone number of applicant / agent: Fax number of applicant/agent Email address of applicanbagent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11 "sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres S:;uare foota:_,_e Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum / maximum district size for conditional use request. Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: Grapevine Holdings LTD c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner: 17480 Dallas Parkway, Suite 127 City / State /Zip Code of property owner. - Dallas, TX 75289 Telephone number of property owner: Fax number of property owner. 972-669-9955 972-669-9977 ,k ,V E "T L X A 5 CITY OF GRAPEVINE r� SITE PLAN APPLICATION Form "B" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent:/company/contact Street address of applicant / agent. City / State /Zip Code of applicant / agent: Telephone number of applicant / agent: Fax number of applicant / agent: Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent Applicant's interest in subject property: PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x i 1 " sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property. Give a general description of the proposed use or uses for the proposed development: Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner. Grapevine Holdings LTD �c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner. 17480 Dallas Parkway, Suite 127 City / State /Zip Code of property owner - Dallas, TX 75289 Telephone number of property owner: Fax number of property owner. 972-669-9955 972-669-9977 CUWWQ1 ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations (example: buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood ❑ Application of site plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form B7. ❑ The site .roan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at OK ti f submittal... PART 4. REQUEST SIGN ON T EATURE TO RSUBJEC IZE TPROPERTY ITIONAL EEQUES1 AND' A CONDITIONAL USE CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner L.P. c/o Andrew Ord V Print Applicant's Name: Appl Signs The State of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared PM&X-C,, , ' l � ok'd ....... ( tary) (applicant) me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and executed the same for the puloses and consslideration therein expressed. End seal of office this _ tk _ day of U �� A.D. C�0 02-0 Print Property Owners Name: The State Of County Of Before Me (notary) LCLL�L-, in And For State Of as Property Owner's Signature: on this day personally appeared (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this . day of _ _, A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas C'U ea I ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations (example: buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Application of site plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form `B'). ❑ The site Ulan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledUe that all requirements of this a:,,plication have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas Gra evine Holdings LTD do Paul A. Gardner / Print Property Owners Name: Property Owners Signature: I't. The State Of KAS County Of t- r, ► � c r. AA Before Me _ U' IRA Ci ��- _ on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner _ (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this . I "' day of .�%"'P r'',. LYNELL R. MANNING t ei6= Notary Public, State of Texas 'A= Comm. Expires 07-14-2024 #o;l�` Notary ID 124988264 )t/Y 1 'WVC. A.D. rLVO K-- Notaryl nd For State Of Texas C LA 4;10 -, P k ❑ Attach a final plat or replat, of the approved subdivision by city council showing property boundary lines, dimensions, easements, roadways, rail lines, and public rights -of way crossing and adjacent to the tract ( 1 blueline copy) ❑ If a master development plan is required, attach a statement showing the proposed use substantially conforms to the master development plan. ❑ Submit a site plan showing all information required by Section 47.E., Site Plan review requirements (see attached requirements). ❑ Provide all required information demonstrating compliance with all conditions imposed on any conditional use, site plan zoning, or conditional use zoning. ❑ All site plans must conform to the approved concept plan. Any changes to a site plan, approved with a conditional use or a conditional use, can only be approved by city council through the ;>ublic hearing rrocess. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF A FINAL SITE PLAN Print Applicant's Name: The State Of County Of Applicant's Signature: Before Me on this day personally appeared _ (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas Grapevine Holdings LTD do Paul A. Gardner Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature The State Of T x4ts County Of -D+ 1 t/,ZFAAGi+3 ' ` - Before Me (7( Nt LAI �, f� V ` W N I W'� on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and conssiideerratio�nr therein expressed. �q 1 (Seal) Given um , L LL 12. M ay of Uiil'tiI C�{J� A.D.%U o �J1P;:Y;;Ub�ii 'fiS Notary Public, State of Texas Comm. Expires 07-14-2024 ��� ✓����� 'a„°,;,���` Notary ID 124988264 Notary 1(i ;id For State Of Texas ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Conditional Use and Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have beenmtat-tie time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: 11/3/ZC,,' Signature of Owner Date: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Conditional Use and Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: Signature of Owner Date: , / - CU a04,01( ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Conditional Use and Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: Signature of Owner Date: 201'al VI T E X A S CITY OF GRAPEVINE V'r SITE PLAN APPLICATION Form "B" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent:/company/contact CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner, L.P. c/o Andrew Ord Street address of applicant / agent: 600 E Las Colinas Blvd City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent. Irving, Texas 75039 Telephone number of applicant / agent. Fax number of applicant / agent: 972-444-2197 Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent 858-864-8521 Applicant's interest in subject property. Purchaser PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property 4501 STATE HWY Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11 "sheet) Lot 2 Block A Addition GLADE 360 ADDITION Size of subject property +/-47 Acres +/- 2,047,320 Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: PCD R-MF Multifamily District Give a general description of the proposed use or uses for the proposed development: Multifamily Development Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: Sec. 22.1.1 (3 stories and 44 feet); Sec. 22.J (1.60 per unit); Sec. 22.G.1 (encroach on front setback) PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: (Multiple Owners, see attached) _ Street address of property owner: City / State / Zp Code of property owner., Telephone number of property owner: Fax number of property owner: CIA20eatf VINE T E % A 9 CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/ agent:/company/contact Street address of applicant / agent. City / State / Zip Code of applicant/ agent. Telephone number of applicant/ agent: Fax number of applicant/agent Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11 "sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property. Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum / maximum district size for conditional use request: Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner. Gardner 360 WLC Partnership West c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner. 17480 Dallas Parkway, Suite 127 City/ State /Zip Code of property owner. - Dallas, TX 75289 Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property owner. 972-669-9955 972-669-9977 cuao•a � VINE VINE :T E AS CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLAN APPLICATION Form "B" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/ agentYcompany/contact Street address of applicant / agent: City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent. Telephone number of applicant/ agent: Fax number of applicant / agent: Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent Applicants interest in subject property: PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11 "sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square tootage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: Give a general description of the proposed use or uses for the proposed development. Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner. Gardner 360 WLC Partnership West c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner: 17480 Dallas Parkway, Suite 127 City / State / Zip Code of property owner. Dallas, TX 75289 Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property owner. 972-669-9955 972-669-9977 Cuaoea% ❑ Attach a final plat, or replat of the approved subdivision by city council showing property boundary lines, dimensions, easements, roadways, rail lines, and public rights -of way crossing and adjacent to the tract (1 blueline copy) ❑ If a master development plan is required, attach a statement showing the proposed use substantially conforms to the master development plan. ❑ Submit a site plan showing all information required by Section 47. E., Site Plan review requirements (see attached requirements). ❑ Provide all required information demonstrating compliance with all conditions imposed on any conditional use, site plan zoning, or conditional use zoning. ❑ All site plans must conform to the approved concept plan. Any changes to a site plan, approved with a conditional use or a conditional use, can only be yeroved by city council through the public hearing p2cgiL, PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF A FINAL SVE PLA CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner, L.P. Go Andrew Ord Print Applicant's Name: Appli nature:N The State Of County Of DatL a-S Before Me L IL� on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) gag'f known j@1�1e���ij�on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and ackn dgaypi%uted the same for the pu oses and consideration therein expressed. (Se Gi+$n�� er ha •td s�I of office this day of UL r , A. D. d� •••. 114110�9 •• ���� OF Notary In And For State Off xas '641 N1 N0 Print Property Owners Name: Property Owners Signature The State Of County Of Before Me _ _ _ on this day personally appeared _ (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of _ A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas Cuao'021 ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ in the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations (example: buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Application of site plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form B'). ❑ The site Man submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this avplication have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: The State of County Of. _ Before Me (notary) Applicant's Signature: on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas Gardner 360 WLC Partnership West do Paul A. Gardner Print Property Owners Name: roperty Owner's Signature: The State Of County Of e4LA-" T 13S t �ij Before Me -E ' iw T2, (notary) on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. ♦,%�UHIJ'Z LYNELL R. MANNING Notary Public, State of Texas( Comm. Expires 07-14-2024 Notary I A d For State Of Texas '4q��� Notary ID 124968264 y . Cl Attach a final plat, or replat, of the approved subdivision by city council showing property boundary lines, dimensions, easements, roadways, rail lines, and public rights -of way crossing and adjacent to the tract ( I blueline copy) ❑ if a master development plan is required, attach a statement showing the proposed use substantially conforms to the master development plan. ❑ Submit a site plan showing all information required by Section 4ZE., Site Plan review requirements (see attached requirements). ❑ Provide all required information demonstrating compliance with all conditions imposed on any conditional use, site plan zoning, or conditional use zoning. ❑ All site plans must conform to the approved concept plan. Any changes to a site plan, approved with a conditional use or a conditional use, can onl • be approved by cit council throu�,lh the public hearing; process. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF A FINAL SITE PLAN Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this . day of _ _ _ A.D. _ Notary In And For State Of Texas Gardner 360 WLC Partnership West do Paul A. Gardner Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature - The State Of 1y)(1bt9 County Of. MW43 A p ' 1 Before Me WJ� ti L L, �G'y. `AQ N I W on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this _. day of C�'(, M WprV2— A. D. . '001111'.. LYNELL R. MANNING ��Notary Public, State of Texas i�. 'PAnd For State Of Texas ; Comm. Expires 07-14-2024 Notary %i;o;„` Notary ID 124988264 p 60,-) 4) - 0 3 a:VM_ 7 E' " ` CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/company/contact CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner, L.P. c/o Andrew Ord Street address of applicant/agent.• 600 E Las Colinas Blvd City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent., Irving, Texas 75039 Telephone number of applicant / agent. Fax number of applicant / agent: 972-444-2197 Email address of applicant / agent Mobile phone number of applicant / agent 058-864-8521 Applicant's interest in subject property: Purchaser PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property 4501 STATE HWY Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot 2 Block A Addition GLADE 360 ADDITION Size of subject property +/- 47 Acres +/- 2,047,320 Square toowe Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: PCD 7 R-MF Multifamily District Minimum /maximum district size for request: 2 Acres. See 22. F.2 Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: Sec. 22.M.6(Building separations) PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner (Multiple owners see attached Street address of property owner. City / State / Zip Code of property owner. Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property owner. O:VCU11 Formslapp.pd.doc S�P 2/14/2017 ✓ ,?o CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/company/contact Street address of applicant / agent: City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent. Telephone number of applicant / agent: Fax number of applicant / agent: Email address of applicant / agent Mobile phone number of applicant /agent Applicant's interest in subject property: PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 12" x 11" sheet) Lot _ Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Sivare footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property. Minimum /maximum district size for request: Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner Gardner 360 WLC Partnership West c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner. 17480 Dallas Parkway, Suite 127 City/State/Zip Code of property owner Dallas, TX 75289 Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property owner.- 972-669-9955 972-669-9977 O:\ZCU\l Forms\app.pd.doc 2/14/2017 r-- � f i �,. "., VINE GT 9 X a ` CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent:/company/contact Street address of applicant / agent: City /State /Zip Code of applicant / agent: Telephone number of applicant / agent: Fax number of applicant / agent: Email address of applicant /agent Mobile phone number of applicant /agent Applicants interest in subject property: PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11 " sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: Minimum /maximum district size for request: Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner.- Grapevine Holdings LTD do Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner. 17480 Dallas Parkway, Suite 127 City/State /Zip Code of property owner. Dallas, TX 75289 Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property owner.- 972-669-9955 972-669-9977 O:1ZCU11 Formslapp.pd.doc 2/14/2017 pt>;J0.005 ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. ❑ Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. ❑ Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ l have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this aw ication have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPME VERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON TH UBJ CT PRQPFERTY CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner, L.P. do Andrew Ord Print Applicant's Name: The State Of A' - County Of ,� /�� Before Me �' ""f �`-�r on this day personally appeared '-^" 0lC--�`� .:�tllllilfl��„. (notary) (applicant) VFto 7%*Omp a on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and owe p (rj�i • e �ecuted the same for the pu►p ses and consideration therein expressed. i v !� i Sere. bt'K Give i�rp anCseal of office this day of -A.D. .114110N; N- Notary !n And For Stat -of Texas '•....••r. _119 Print Property Owners Name: The State Of County Of Before Me Property Owner's Signature: on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of caul or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of 0:1ZCU11 Fonnslapp.pd.doc 2/14/2017 A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas �e10.OB ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. ❑ Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. ❑ Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application maybe scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: The State Of County Of Before Me Applicant's Signature: on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. Notary /n And For State Of Texas Gardner 360 WLC Partnership West c/o Paul A. Gardner Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of I V X-n CountyOf (✓ S Before Me �� ��L Iv �T{ w tJl �G on this day personally appeared (notary) Paul A. Gardner (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. � ,1 (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day ofy�r I � Ak'91Yc-- . A.D. O-O 2 l LYNELL R. MANNING 11 {,� M Notary Public, State of Texas i K- 8 Comm. Expires 07-14-2024 Nota / And For State Of Texas Notary ID 124988264 0:1ZCU11 Formslapp.pd.doc 2/14/2017 Ppae.oz ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. ❑ Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. ❑ Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site )Ian submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: The State Of County Of Before Me Applicant's Signature: on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this ._ _ day of A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas Grapevine Holdings LTD c/o Paul A. Gardner Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of T k. X r}.P County Of Before Me L l �i�i, N N+ _ _ on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. 1 (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of CF M I14'0&r1 A.D. �LO,�- 0 a�r4 LYNELL R. MANNING g v f �sNotary Public, State of Texas + , 1� � t..•• • � �+�: Comm. Expires 07-14-2024 Notarynd For State Of Texas ,fill � Notary ID 124988264 0:1ZCU11 Formslapp.pd.doc 2/14/2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowle--d a that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: 913I Z.o Signature of Owner Date: 0:VCU11 Formslapp.pd.doc 4 2/14/2017 Pb Doo 03 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: Signature of Owner Date; �?O a c2 0:2=1 Formslapp.pd.doc 4 2/14/2017 a I 011b J i, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required riling fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date; Signature of Owner Date: I " — 12d of d 0:1ZCU11 Formslapp.pd.doc 4 2/14/2017 Pp610003 PLATTING VERIFICATION This verification statement must be signed prior To the submittal of this planned development overlay application It has been determined that the property described below does require platting or replatting and the applicant has been instructed on this procedure. X It has been determined that the property described below is currently platted or does not require platting or replatting at this time. Address of subject property 4501 STATE HWY Legal description of subject property GLADE 360 ADDITION, Block A, Lot 2 Publ' . Works Department 09/03/2020 Date This form must be signed by the public works department and submitted along with a completed application to the planning and zoning department 0:1ZCU11 Form slapp.pd. doe 2/14/2017 HHI� PHV d I iII 1 1 0 N4. d 15, I s III IT T — IC2J Z-F ul nil 1 I FM I 6 � �� plug � i 8 ppZ)0003 ILLUMINATION PLAN An illumination plan to include a site photometric (including illuminated signs) and all fixture details shall be submitted as part of the site plan review process. Applications will not be accepted without this requirement. I hereby acknowledge that an illumination plan has been included as a part of this submittal. Applicant Signature Date: -nlj-51U Property Owner Signature Date: 0:1ZCU11 Formslapp.pd.doc 2/14/2017 F5Nao •03 ILLUMINATION PLAN An illumination plan to include a site photometric (including illuminated signs) and all fixture details shall be submitted as part of the site plan review process. Applications will not be accepted without this requirement. I hereby acknowledge that an illumination plan has been included as a part of this submittal. Applicant Signature Date: Property Owner Signature ,zz Date: % - / " 02 0 -�- e V0,11 a 0 V 6 5 ILLUMINATION PLAN An illumination plan to include a site photometric (including illuminated signs) and all fixture details shall be submitted as part of the site plan review process. Applications will not be accepted without this requirement. I hereby acknowledge that an illumination plan has been included as a part of this submittal. Applicant Signature Date: Property Owner Signature Date: O oZ v -z2,,0D�; "ZONING DESCRIPTION" LOT 2, BLOCK A — GLADE 360 ADDITION BEING a tract of land situated in the Elijah C. Clary Survey, Abstract No. 323 and the Green West Minter Survey, Abstract No. 1083, City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas and being all of Lot 2, Block A of Glade 360 Addition, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Texas, according to the plat thereof recorded in Instrument No. D219025558, Official Public Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwest corner of said Lot 2, Block A, same being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block A of said Glade 360 Addition, and being in the northeast right-of-way line of State Highway 360 (A variable width right-of-way); THENCE with said northeast right-of-way line, the following courses and distances: North 25010'36" West, a distance of 1,508.52 feet; North 25°09'27" West, a distance of 1,325.10 feet to the beginning of a non -tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 16"41'47", a radius of 1,939.85 feet, a chord bearing and distance of North 33031'42" West, 563.29 feet; In a northwesterly direction, with said curve to the left, an arc distance of 565.29 feet; North 41052'35" West, a distance of 50.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 41 °47'08", a radius of 320.00 feet, a chord bearing and distance of North 20059'09" West, 228.24 feet; In a northwesterly direction, with said curve to the right, an arc distance of 233.37 feet; North 0005'35" West, a distance of 68.58 feet; North 89017'09" West, a distance of 21.89 feet to the intersection of said northeast right- of-way line with the east right-of-way line of Euless -Grapevine Road (a variable width right- of-way); THENCE with said east right-of-way line, the following courses and distances: North 14016'31" West, a distance of 126.04 feet; North 0032'19" West, a distance of 286.88 feet; North 6059'09" East, a distance of 62.50 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 2, Block A; North 0008'35" East, a distance of 51.65 feet in the approximate centerline of Bear Creek; THENCE along said approximate centerline of Bear Creek, the following courses and distances: K:\DAL—Survey\067771670-Greystar Grapevine Phase Murvey\Legal DescriptionsTRESERVE PH 2 ZD.Docx 1 of 3 South 65°26'08" East, a distance of 325.18 feet; South 5°58'30" East, a distance of 155.70 feet; South 24002'30" East, a distance of 163.50 feet; South 45°26'30" East, a distance of 49.50 feet; South 65°14'30" East, a distance of 93.90 feet; South 12058'30" East, a distance of 138.30 feet; South 5053'30" West, a distance of 135.80 feet; South 44039'30" East, a distance of 258.10 feet; South 33024'30" East, a distance of 220.50 feet; South 50°22'30" East, a distance of 287.50 feet; North 71 °31'30" East, a distance of 268.20 feet; South 11 040'30" East, a distance of 154.00 feet; South 17°59'30" West, a distance of 63.80 feet; South 9°58'30" East, a distance of 145.00 feet; South 38011'30" East, a distance of 129.00 feet; South 40°53'30" East, a distance of 115.60 feet; South 8°02'30" West, a distance of 67.70 feet; South 49°56'30" West, a distance of 271.30 feet; South 20044'30" West, a distance of 85.80 feet; South 49026'30" East, a distance of 263.70 feet; South 73°47'30" East, a distance of 101.20 feet; South 42036'12" East, a distance of 146.00 feet; South 29026'25" West, a distance of 100.00 feet; South 20023'40" West, a distance of 54.55 feet; K:1DAL_Survey1067771870-Greystar Grapevine Phase 21Survey\Legal DescriptionsTRESERVE PH 2_2D.Docx 2 of 3 South 40058'41" East, a distance of 130.10 feet; South 14034'30" East, a distance of 99.40 feet; South 21 °54'48" East, a distance of 222.15 feet; South 44"08'29" East, a distance of 375.19 feet; South 39037'45" East, a distance of 95.97 feet; South 65°07'45" East, a distance of 176.46 feet; South 2004345" East, a distance of 212.81 feet; South 48050'35" East, a distance of 105.62 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 2, Block A and being in the north line of said Lot 1, Block A; THENCE with the common line of said Lots 1 and 2, Block A, the following courses and distances: North 89031'47" West, a distance of 449.09 feet; South 18"59'34" West, a distance of 5.93 feet; South 25010'36" East, a distance of 99.74 feet; South 64049'24" West, a distance of 346.30 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing a computed area of 47.35 acres of land, more or less. Bearing system based on the Texas Coordinate System of 1983, North Central Zone (4202), North American Datum of 1983. This document was prepared under 22 TAC §663.21, does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey, and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivision for which it was prepared. 1 5 OF T GJQ`G 1 S 7' � A 603= l,�� :�ss►o .. ® SURV K NDAL_Survey1067771670-Greystar Grapevine Phase 21SurveylLegal DescriptionslPRESERVE PH 2_ZD.Docx 3of3 Kimley>»Horn MEMORANDUM To: Andrew Ord Greystar From: Scot Johnson P.E., PTOE Jake Halter, EIT Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Registered Firm F-928 Date: February 12, 2018 SEP � 2Q�3 .40 ," y.' •.'sip, t P.i......................::.. SCOT A JOHNSON e ................................• 01'• IICEN t1l\os �oN • 'Er1,la Subject: The Preserve Parking Demands in Comparable Multifamily Developments Introduction Greystar Residential is proposing to build The Preserve, a high -end multifamily development on the east side of State Highway 360 in Grapevine, Texas. This memorandum documents the two lines of inquiry which were investigated to support the proposed 1.60 spaces per unit parking rate: national research and local observations of parking occupancy at comparable sites. Careful sizing of parking areas to specific uses will prevent the waste of space and building materials that is caused by providing parking that is rarely if ever used. Excessive parking also has negative impacts on often -hidden issues like walkable design, storm water runoff, and urban heat island effects. Parking Research ITE publishes Parking Generation, a compendium of parking demand research at sites across the country. ITE provides more information on each base parking demand rate than do most other sources, although the number of observations is still limited. The ITE data do not contain any significant amount of mixed -use or TOD-influenced observations, but do track suburban and urban differences. Table 1 shows the average rates for some multifamily uses which are similar to the proposed site. i aoie -i — i i r- varKing veneration unserved uemand Use —ITE Classification Unit Average parking Demand Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Unit 1.23 Suburban, Weekday Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Unit 1.20 Urban, Weekday Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Unit 1.03 Urban, Saturday 13455 Noel Road, Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75240 Kimley»>Horn Local Observations Page 2 To make empirical observations of actual parking usage, comparable multifamily sites were found in the City of Grapevine. Observations were accomplished at eight sites, as some potential sites could not be accessed for observations. The average occupancy of the sites was 95%, or typical for the market average. Parking occupancy observations were made overnight, at 10 PM or later. The exact number of occupied parking spaces and enclosed garages were counted during the observations. It should be noted that each enclosed garage is treated as an occupied parking space for the purposes of the occupancy study. Since some of the garage spaces are empty or used as storage., this means that the observed parking demand is artificially high. Many of the sites also had some trailers, boats, and other vehicle -related objects located in parking spaces, and these were counted as occupied spaces as well. Since all of the sites had ample unused parking spaces, these objects did not impede the normal parking operation of the sites. Attached to the end of this report is a parking data table listing the results of the data collection. The following tables show the details of each site and the observations: Table 2 - Weekday Parking Demand at 6 Local Sites (7 Observations) Observed Parking Demand Observed Observed Study Site Dwelling Bedrooms (Including Enclosed Garages) Demand Demand Units Overnight Per Unit Per Bedroom Royal St. Moritz 336 528 467 1.39 0.88 Terrawood 291 401 400 1.37 1.00 Twenty-Four99 348 486 452 1.30 0.93 Marquis at Silver Oaks 480 732 703 1.46 0.96 Montelena (Tuesday 1/23) 256 400 323 1.26 0.81 Montelena (Wednesday 1/24) 256 400 330 1.29 0.83 Wildwood Creek 344 524 344 1.00 1 0.66 Weekday 6-Site Totals: 2311 3471 3019 1.31 0.87 Weekday 6-Site Averages:. 330 496 431 Table 3 - Saturday Parking Demand at 7 Local Sites Dwelling Observed Parking Demand Observed Observed Study Site Units Bedrooms (Ind udingEnclosed Garages) Demand Demand Overnight Per Unit Per Bedroom Royal St. Moritz 336 528 448 1.33 0.85 Cross Creek 392 544 444 1.13 0.82 Terrawood 291 401 397 1.36 0.99 Twe nty- Fo u r 99 348 486 443 1.27 0.91 Marquis at Silver Oaks 480 732 735 1.53 1.00 Montelena 256 400 1 290 1.13 0.73 Wildwood Creek 344 524 331 0.96 0.63 Saturday 7-Site Totals: 4447 1 3615 3088 1.26 0.85 Saturday 7-Site Averages:1 350 1 516 1 441 13455 Noel Road, Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75240 Kimley>>> Horn Page 3 The weekday observed parking demand including garages across the six sites averaged 1.31 vehicles per unit with a range of 1.00 to 1.46 spaces per unit. The average number of vehicles per bedroom was calculated to be 0.87, ranging from 0.66 to 1.00. The Saturday observed parking demand including garages across the six sites averaged 1.26 vehicles per unit with a low observation of 0.96 and a high of 1.36. The Saturday average demand was observed to be 0.85 vehicles per bedroom, varying from 0.63 to 1.00. Four of the study sites included garages on the property. Residents often park in the "driveway" of their garages, which leads to double counting since the garage is counted as occupied, and the vehicle is counted again as being on the site. Since the "driveways" do not count as parking spaces, this results in an artificially high ratio of parked vehicle to units or bedrooms. Even with this assumption that enclosed garages skew the occupancy of the sites to be higher than reality, the highest observed parking rate was 1.53 vehicles per unit and 1.00 vehicles per bedroom, both of which are below the 1.60 spaces per unit and 1.13 spaces per bedroom that are proposed for the Preserve. Summary Observations of comparable local and suburban sites show that the effective parking demand of 1.31 occupied spaces per unit is slightly higher than ITE averages. This observed number is known to be somewhat high due to the assumption of garage spaces being occupied. A comparison of the national ITE rates, observed parking rates, and provided parking supply can be found in the summary table below: Table 4 — Summary Table ITE Average Observed Preserve Suburban, Urban, Urban, Weekday Saturday Proposed Weekday Weekday Weekend Parking Demand per Unit 1.23 - 1.20 - 1.03 - 1.31 0.87 1.26 0.85 1.60 1.13 Parking Demand per Bedroom The proposed supply of 1.60 spaces per unit for the Preserve will provide the right balance of available parking while preserving the nature oriented design of the site. Attached: Parking Count Data Summary Table 13455 Noel Road, Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75240 T Observed Observed Tuesday Wednesday Saturday Apartment Complex No. of Dwelling Units Parking Demand Parking Demand 1/23/2018 1/24/2018 1/2712018 Vehicles+ Vehicles+ Vehicles+ per Dwelling Unit per Bedroom Garages Counted Garages Counted Garages Counted 58 Efficiency 208 One Bedroom Colonial Village 117 Two Bedroom 251 286 253 67 Three Bedroom a 64 0.41 450 Total D.U. Outlier- Count not Outlier- Count not Outlier- Count not 701 Total Bedrooms 2300 Grayson Drive included included included N/A Efficiency N/A One Bedroom Grayson Square N/A Two Bedroom 332 326 N/A Three Bedroom N/A N/A N/A Total D.U. No Room Data - Data No Room Data - Data No Room Data - Data N/A Total Bedrooms 2100 Grayson Drive not included not included not included 0 Efficiency 152 One Bedroom Royal St. Moritz 176 Two Bedroom N/A 8 Three Bedroom 1.39 0.88 467 448 336 Total D.U. Unable to enter 528 Total Bedrooms 2050 Grayson Drive complex Gate 0 Efficiency 240 One Bedroom Cross Creek 152 Two Bedroom N/A N/A 0 Three Bedroom 1 13 0.82 444 392 Total D.U. Could not count North Could not count North 544 Total Bedrooms 2701 Grapevine Mills Blvd N half of property -Gated half of property -Gated 0 Efficiency 193 One Bedroom Terrawood 86 Two Bedroom N/A 12 Three Bedroom 1.37 1.00 400 397 291 Total D.U. Unable to enter 401 Total Bedrooms 3225 Grapevine Mills Blvd N complex Gate 0 Efficiency 222 One Bedroom Twenty -Four 99 114 Two Bedroom N/A 12 Three Bedroom 1.30 0.93 452 443 348 Total D.U. Unable to enter 486 Total Bedrooms 3601 Grapevine Mills Parkway complex Gate 0 Efficiency 264 One Bedroom Marquis at Silver Oaks 180 Two Bedroom N/A 36 Three Bedroom 1.53 1.00 703 735 480 Total D.U. Unable to enter 732 Total Bedrooms 3701 Grapevine Mills Parkway complex Gate 0 Efficiency 128 One Bedroom Montelena 112 Two Bedroom 16 Three Bedroom 1.29 0.83 323 330 290 256 Total D.U. 501 Turner Road 400 Total Bedrooms 0 Efficiency 188 One Bedroom Wildwood Creek 132 Two Bedroom N/A 24 Three Bedroom 0.81 0.53 277 259 344 Total D.U. Unable to enter 524 Total Bedrooms 820 E Dove Loop Road 1 complex Gate 1'1rat A / VI VV October 14, 2020 Mr. Ron Stombaugh Assistant Director, Planning and Zoning Department City of Grapevine 200 S. Main St. Grapevine, TX 76051 Re: Proposed Additional Townhome Project Northwest Corner of Euless Grapevine Road and Hwy 360 Dear Mr. Stombaugh, Dallas Fort Worth International Airport would like to comment on the proposal by Greystar to build "Elan Grapevine," an additional property located at the northwest corridor of Euless/Grapevine Rd and Highway 360. The proposed project is located adjacent to the previously approved apartment project called "The Preserve", to which on February 19, 2018, we had previously commented to the proposal. This proposed project is also located immediately adjacent to DFW International Airport property and thus we would like to inform you of what residents can expect, should the City approve the proposed project: • The property is proximate to but located just outside the 65 dB Day-Night Level (DNL) noise contour, which was promulgated by the North Central Texas Council of Governments to the cities surrounding DFW Airport and adopted by the City of Grapevine in Ordinance 78-2. • The property is adjacent to DFW's west diagonal runway, Runway 13R/31 L being approximately 0.60 mile from the runway centerline and would be subject to aircraft arrival and departure noise from this runway: o The runway is currently used for arrivals by all type aircraft in south winds (South Flow), which occurs 70%of the year on average. The runway currently receives 75-100 daily aircraft arrivals at present but can accommodate approximately 150 arrivals per day. o The runway is also used for an average of 10 daily turboprop departures in north winds (north flow)which occurs 30% of the year on average. During the current Runway 18R/36L Rehabil- itation project, the runway is currently seeing approximately 100-250 daily jet departures. • The property is also in close proximity to DFW's main north/south runways on the west side being approximately one mile from the runway centerlines. In south winds, aircraft departures may be heard from the proposed development as well as an average of 10 daily turboprop departures that turn west upon departures, some of which may fly over or near the proposed development. Dallas Fort Worth International Airport P.O.Box 619428 DFW Airport,TX 75261-9428 mrolA / VI YV • The property would also be subject to ground-related airport effects from thrust reverse from jet arrivals as well as noise from proximate DFW facilities, including aircraft maintenance operations and DFW Department of Public Safety testing and training facilities. • While operations are currently reduced due to the impacts of COVID-19, DFW is expected to recover in time and forecast to continue to grow its air operations benefitting Grapevine and the local DFW Region, which could bring additional air traffic in the future. DFW Airport urges the City to consider these facts in its decision to approve the proposed expansion on this property and recommends: 1. Design and construction of the buildings sufficient to achieve a noise reduction of at least 25 dB out- door to indoor in order to reduce interior noise levels. It should be noted that the level of noise reduc- tion recommended may not be adequate to negate the vibration associated with the low-frequency rumble of jet departures. 2. Dedication of an avigation easement to the City of Grapevine, the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board, and the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth. 3. Full disclosure of the proximate industrial activities to all first time and subsequent potential residents. 4. Implementation of sustainable stormwater drainage design by complying with iSWM to maintain ex- isting discharge quantity and velocities into Big Bear Creek. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 972-973-5573. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Sandy J. Lancaster Sandy Lancaster, C.M. Environmental Program Manager DFW International Airport 972-973-5573 slancasterdfwairport.com cc: R. Horton, VP DFW Environmental Affairs P. Tomme, DFW Legal Counsel S. Tan, DFW Environmental Affairs A. Ord, Greystar Dallas Fort Worth International Airport P.O.Box 619428 DFW Airport,TX 75261-9428 City of Grapevine: The Preserve and Elan ,,1�� "'%fir,. . is ^y j,,gc -i �'E" 11 ( _ �` laIt r II i . I 1 -01;,, ii -1T,) ., . .. ‘, •,,, Tr.' ' *I* ‘ ,th, I ill • . ,,, fir. 47 16:' ''''I ill II 1,4 el 4 Ki'l4 41 II \ virk "• ,, ` r_. � -.::: It :i e., R 6 4 . ' •_. • .." • ,1 . itql• 4,, hi it., a ' imp• •�► r.,�. t y i ri , A.. tf- \8i I i - ,: Googe &' . ORDINANCE NO. 2020-053 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Grapevine AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING ZONING CHANGE Z20-03 ON A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE S. CLARY SURVEY, ABSTRACT 323 AND THE G. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1083 being Lot 2, Block A, Glade/360 Addition (4501 State Highway 360), DESCRIBED AS BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM “PCD” PLANNED COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO "R-MF” MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of Grapevine, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these requested changes should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning change, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: 2 Ordinance No. 2020-053 Section 1. That the City of Grapevine Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended and changed by Zoning Application Z20-03 to rezone the following described property to-wit: being a 47.35 acre tract of land out of the S. Clary Survey, Abstract 323 and the G. Minter Survey, Abstract 1083, Tarrant County, Texas (Lot 2, Block A, Glade/360 Addition (4501 State Highway 360), more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which was previously zoned “PCD” Planned Commerce Development District Regulations, respectively, is hereby changed to “R-MF” Multi-Family District Regulations, all in accordance with Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the herein change in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. 3 Ordinance No. 2020-053 Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of October, 2020. APPROVED: ___________________________ William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ City Attorney 4 Ordinance No. 2020-053 ORDINANCE NO. 2020-054 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ISSUING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU20- 21, TO EXCEED THE HEIGHT REGULATIONS, VARY FROM PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND ALLOW FOR A REDUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK IN A DISTRICT ZONED “R-MF” MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT FOR LOT 2, BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION (4501 STATE HIGHWAY 360), ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a conditional use permit by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this conditional use permit, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the conditional use permit lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this conditional use permit and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this conditional use permit for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Ordinance No. 2020-054 2 Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by granting Conditional Use Permit No. CU20-21 to exceed the height regulations, vary from the parking requirements, and allow for a reduction in the front yard setback, in a district zoned “R-MF” Multi-Family District Regulations within the following described property: Lot 2, Block A, Glade/360 Addition (4501 State Highway 360) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not Ordinance No. 2020-054 3 to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of October, 2020. APPROVED: ___________________________ William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ City Attorney Ordinance No. 2020-054 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2020-055 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ISSUING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD20-03 TO DEVIATE FROM, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE BUILDING SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE TO THE “R-MF” MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT FOR LOT 2, BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION (4501 STATE HIGHWAY 360) ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a planned development overlay by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this planned development overlay, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the planned development overlay lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this planned development overlay and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this planned development overlay for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. Ordinance No. 2020-055 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a planned development overlay in accordance with Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by granting Planned Development Overlay PD20-03 to deviate from, but not be limited to, the building separation requirements relative to the “R-MF” Multifamily District within the following described property: Lot 2, Block A, Glade/360 Addition (4501 State Highway 360) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein planned development overlay. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Ordinance No. 2020-055 3 Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20thday of October, 2020. APPROVED: ___________________________ William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ City Attorney Ordinance No. 2020-055 4 Affidavit of Compliance Multi -family Design Standards E L A N GRAPEVINE Zoning Case Z20-03, CU20-21, PD20-03 Table of Contents Affidavit of Compliance 1. Affidavit of Compliance a. Architect's Affidavit b. Architects Approval Letter c. Design Guidelines 2. Design Guideline Exhibits CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner, L.P. Attention: Andrew Ord 600 E Las Colinas Blvd, Suite 2100 Irving, Texas 75039 Via Electronic Mail Rons ra evinetexas.gov Mr. Ron Stombaugh 200 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 RE: Zoning Change Application for Property at 4501 State HWY 360 Rd., Applicant: CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner, L.P. Dear Ron; Thank you for your assistance with our zoning application referenced above. Pursuant to your previous conversations with Greystar, we are forwarding this letter to confirm the status Of the proposed development's compliance with the City's Design Standards. Accompanying this letter is our completed District -Specific Design Standards checklist. As you will see from reviewing the accompanying checklist, we are pleased to confine that we are either in virtually total compliance with the Design Standards, in almost all cases to the letter, or, in a few instances, in compliance with the spirit of the Design Standards_ Of course, we are at the beginning of the zoning and entitlement phase, and as is normal during any development process, allowances must be trade for reasonable modifications as the design is further developed in detail_ In any such event, it is our intention to retnain in compliance with the spirit and intent of the Design Standards at all times. Thank you very much for your consideration of the accompanying checklist. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with City Staff as we go through this process. ` Sind 3' yoursj Donald eeks, AIA Meeks + Partners, CC: Andrew Ord Architect for Greystar Archircxas October 7, 2020 Mr. Ron Stombaugh Grapevine Development Services 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, Texas 78051 Dear Mr. Stombaugh, This letter is to inform you that Greystar's submittal for The Preserve, Phase 2 is the product of extensive review by, and collaboration with, Robin McCaffrey and me. This process started with an early review of the site and continued through development of the site plan as well as architectural design. The Site Plan Review process was guided by 3 primary objectives of Grapevine's Mufti -Family Ordinance, namely: 1. Creation of Community 2. Connection to the social fabric of Grapevine 3. Integration with the natural fabric of the site and its setting Robin and I feel that the final site plan achieves these important objectives and complies with the MF Standards regarding site plan design. Upon agreement regarding the site plan, Rabin and I worked extensively with Greystar on architectural design. The architectural Design Review Process was guided by 5 primary objectives of Grapevine's Multi -Family Ordinance, namely: 1. Craftsmanship 2. Integrity of elevation composition and building farm 3. Connection to the ground plane 4. Addressment of the street 5. Material change execution Again, Robin and I feel that the final building design achieves these important objectives and complies with the MF Standards Building design. Therefore, Robin and I affirm that The Preserve Phase 2 complies with the standards of the Multi - Family Ordinance. Sincerely, Craig Melde, Sr. Principal Dallas I Austin I San Antonia 1907 Manila St. W WW. architexas.eom Second Floor Dallas. Texas 75201 29005. C©ngress Ave. Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78704 417 81" Street San Antonio, Texas 79215 p 214.748.4561 p 512.444.4220 p 210,998,2422 District- Specifilc Design Standards 1. Architectural Accommodations of Grade Change Complies, Does the plan retain grade to support the building plate including terraces, pati- Yes No Fn Spirit os, decks and any accessory buildings adjoined to the primary structure? _ Comments: Will Comply. We've identified a number of opportunities to accomplish this, In specific, there are 3 prominent locations where we have designed turn -down footings. These are high impact locations that will be enjoyed esthetically and functionally by residents and their visitors. Additionally, many of the building will have 2' to 4' breaks (step-downs) in the foundations that allow the buildings to step down with the declining grade which minimizes retaining walls and maximizes the retainage of grade in order to support the building plate. It is worth noting that we are constrained by FEMA requirements on some accounts where we need walls for flood modeling considerations. Mesa Planning and Architexas are very aware and their will be some benefits to this as well Z. Pedestrian Connection Beyond The Project And District Complies: Does the plan provide pedestrian connections from units within the project to Yes No In Spirit existing trails, sidewalks or other public and private walkways. 7 7 7 Does the plan provide pedestrian connections to places within the development that abut pedestrian walkways that the City's approved plans identify for the future? Comments: We Comply. Elan Grapevine ("EG" - subject community) will connect to the neighboring Preserve community ("Phase 1 ") via the shared trail system which will then extend another —1 /2 mile from EG up to Euless Grapevine Rd. The "trail" design will be a 1 Q' wide concrete hikelbike trail with benches, lighting, dog park and fitness structure to compliment the existing Phase 1 design standard. Sidewalks will also be connected to facilitate pedestrian connections between communities. As an additional note, EG will also tie into the existing round -a -bout with a vehicular connection. Please refer to Exhibit 2 showing trail build -out to date. 3. Preserve and/or Restore The Natural Characteristic Of The District Complies: Does the plan include landscape development that continues the natural charac- Yes No In Spirit teristics of the projects surroundings? Comments: Will Comply. Our landscape plan includes natural drifts and groupings/groves of trees that will be restorative to the site and will extend the natural mosaic open space (34 acres of "on property" open space) into the site. Tree species used will be natural to the site and from the City's approved plant material list. As per Mesa Planning and Architexas guidance, tree groves will provide heavy screening along the 360 Frontage Rd., to reknit the the natural landscape, as shown on plan. Please refer to corresponding Exhibit 3. 4. Perpetuate Residentially Derived Styling And Forms Does the plan use the following architectural components? Pitched roof (gable or hip) • Organized roof massing where a dominant roof has subordinate roofs that extend form it. 12 inch roof overhang • Roofed porches and balconies • No more than 45 horizontal feet of continuous wall without a horizon- tal onset of at least 4 feet . Dormers that break the cornice • Windows that align both horizontally and vertically • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form 'three stories maximum. These three stories may be over a parking podium. Openings are treated with a jamb and/or head surround The Void -to -Solid relationship for window -in -wall elements is less than 50% Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 7 C C r, 5. Provide Buffer Adjacent To Residentially Adverse Conditions Complies: Does the plan provide a buffer between residential land use and adjacent envi- Yes No III Spirit ronmental conditions (e.g. loud sound) that would negatively impact the livabili- ty of the residential land? Comments: To the West, our development will be set away from Hwy 360 by a generously landscaped ("borrowed landscape") public and private street scape. Additionally, the community will be buffered by a generous tree canopy along 360, providing an attractive "tree -soaped" frontage for the public realm. Lastly, the buildings will be equipped with acoustically rated and engineered windows specifically designed to perform within the required indoor/outdoor noise level transmissions recommended by our acoustical engineer and as required by DFW Airport on Phase To the North and East, our development is buffered by... almost a mile of open space, 34 acres on our legal plat alone, the trail, Sear Creek, and towering trees that provide privacy and seclusion. 180 degree unobstructed private views into the natural opens space, trail and creek are also included for over half of all the residences. Our development will effectively "re -knit" the natural landscape and tree canopy that once existed but were removed during the reconstruction of the TRA sanitary -sewer line. See Exhibit 5 6. Provide A Land Use And Scale Transition Between Multifamily/Vertical Mixed -Use Development And Abutting Single Family Development. If the plan abuts an area of single-family residential land use, does it provide a "residential transition"? A residential transition must include two cornponents: Height 'Transition: For any element with a height above 35ft, this ele- ment can't exceed one foot above 35ft in height for every lft of setback beyond 15ft. For example, you may have 36f# at 16frt setback. Sift at 17ft and so on. . Scale Transition: Any element located within 20ft of a property line abutting a single-family land use must not have an elevation face area more than 1200 sq. ft. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. Complies: Yes No In Spirit l E E 7. Provide Deve] opment Zliat Maximizes Uses Appropriate To The Value OfIhe Complies: Setting And/Or Characteristic Of The ConteNt. Yes No In Spirit If the surrounding street -level use is NOT predurninately residential, does the F 7 plan provide —or is the structure such that it could be leased to provide —first - floor or street -level land uses that are consistent with the context? If the plan has a distinct locational opportunity (such as being close to logistic, movement or transit huhs), does it provide —or is the structure such that is could be leased to provide —first -floor or street -level land uses that are consistent with this context? If the answer to either question is YES, does the plan provide —or could be rent- ed to provide —these ]and uses for at least 70% of the street -fronting first -floor space? Comments: We perceive the value of the setting, characteristic of the context, and the distinct locational opportunity to be Nature (34 acres of open space) and how we are leveraging our relationship within that context. Our development maximizes this setting by "re -knitting" the 34 acres of natural landscape into our site design, constructing the 3rd 1 f2 mile phase of a public hike/bike trail and trail -head so people (both our residents and the Grapevine community) can enjoy this environment, and delivering the resort style architecture to compliment and flow with the natural setting. We're also including a dog park, informational nature placards and a fitness station along the trail to auament and compliment the natural setting. See Exhibit 7 p 8. Perpetuate Commercially Derived Styling And Fornts Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms that include the following elements: A predominately flat roof concealed by a raised parapet of at least 1 2in in height . All openings are vertically and horizontally aligned Balconies are projected • Steel construction is exposed The first floor plate is at least 15ft high at the street level Void -to -solid relationships are 50% or greater void Comments: Not applicable to 3601Airport District. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 17 F_ F 9. Preserve And Extend Thematic Streetscapes Complies: Does the plan continue the established streetscape of its surrounding District? Yes No In Spirit This includes: 71 fir-; F7 Matching light fixtures and spacing of light fixtures [~ * Matching tree species, scale, placement and spacing * Matching paving material and paving pattern Continuation of defined inset areas for on -street parking Comments; Not applicable to 3+60/Airport District. 10, Maintain Compatibility With District Thematic Sign Features. Does the plan Complies: provide signage that is compatible with signage in the surrounding District? This Yes No In Spirit includes: 0 D * Maintaining the relationship of signage to street -fronting building planes * Marinating the general appearance of the District's signage * Maintaining sign illumination consistent with the District and its nightscape Use of sign types consistent with the District and the context. This in- cludes commercial tenant signs, premise signs and project signs. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 5 11. provide responsive Interface To Open Space And Open Space Amenities. Does the plan address open space in ways that extend the open space into the project? This includes: • Elimination of parking aprons in the foreground between the structure and the open space . Extension of landscape species and patterns characteristic of the open space into the project Orientation of buildings to that building placement breaks free from the normal orthogonal relation to street and hears relationship to features of the larger landscape Extension of trails into the project Use of fence design that does not visually disrupt the continuous ground plane Comments: Not applicable to 360lAirport District. Complies: Ares No III Spirit 12. Resort/Lodge/Prairie Styling And Forms. Does the plan use architectural Complies: styles derived from resort/lodge/prairie architectural precedents? These include, Yes No * Flat pitched gable or hipped rooves with Iong and un-interrupted ridges XJ and cornices * Large roof overhangs with structural bracing such as brackets, angled braces, canted braced and exposed rafters • Tapered columns that are full masonry or have masonry bases * Use of flat roofs to accent pitched roofs * Variable plate heights * 1f'ertical and Horizontal alignment of openings * Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form * Use of decks and terraces ■ Architecturally enclosed balconies * Projected window jambs and/or headers * Structural details derived from timber construction detailing * Use of siding and masonry • Upper story insets within, or projections over, a lower story base Comments: C We Comply. A few examples of features that (but not limited to) we designed to in order to characterize the style are... " Large Roof [overhangs with exposed rafters . Vertical and horizontal alignment of openings. . Structural Bracing * Timber Frame Accents * Tapered Stone Columns * Architecturally Enclosed Balconies y Metal Awnings . 80%+ Stone In Spirit E All these architectural features, and more, help the community to meld into the natural setting, compliment neighboring architectural theming for continuity, and make it feel a part of the environment that is its' home. Please refer to Exhibit 12. 13. Curvilinear Organization Of The Development Plan Dues the plan have a curvilinear organization? 'This includes: Complies: .Fes No • Gracefully meandering streets and drives with bends in the street and =J drive alignment that is responsive to grade Merging street intersections where operations permit • Organically -shaped parking areas • Building orientations that are not tied to uniform street frontage • Drifted groupings of trees in lieu of straight rows with uniform spacing Comments: E In Spirit 11 We comply, We conform to all 5 bulleted points above. The site plan is non -orthogonal in nature, is not regimental in design and is curvilinear in its' appeal. Our site meanders in an artful non -orthogonal arrangement providing aesthetically pleasing visual interest for both the community and our residents while optimizing view corridors towards the open space. See Exhibit 13. 14. Conceal Visibility Of Service And Parking Functions Complies: Does the plan place service and parking functions so that such functions are Yes No In Spirit NOT in the foreground yard space between any arterial or primary street and the buildings that are facing that street? Comments: Yes. We comply. The public realm is buffered by a large "borrowed landscape" setback of dense tree groves (Average of 46.3' across the entire frontage), retaining walls that face away from the ROW and a meandering sidewalk. Parking and trash functions, while balancing other important guidelines, are strategically situated away and screened from public by means of berms, tree groves, buildings and retaining walls. 15. Perpetuate Historic/Indigenous Derived Architectural Styling And Forms. Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms derived from the historic or indigenous character of the District? Such aspects include: . Commercially -scaled first floor with a 15ft plate For building of three boors or greater, a tripartite architecture • Decorative and embellished front parapet Street canopy • Portrait orientation of openings and subversion of openings • Continuous vertical corners often expressed as pilasters • Occasional use of roof forms as accent elements on the front elevation Void -to -Solid ratio with greater void at the street level and greater solid at other levels Treatment of openings with jamb and/or header surrounds • Use of belt courses to establish horizontal reference for placement of openings . Use of decorative brick bands and details Comments: Not applicable to 360JAirport District. Complies-. Yes No In Spirit F F 7 9 I6. Use Of Thematic Exterior Material, If Such Material Is Characteristic Of Dis- Complies: trict And Complies With The General Material Standards. Yes No In Spirit If there is a surrounding District context, does the plan continue with the use of the dominant and characteristic material of the surrounding District? If so, is the use of that material in compliance with the General Material Stan- dards of the Building Manual? Dominant use of material means material that comprises at least 70% of the building exterior excluding openings. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Air-port District. 17. Orthogonal/Block Orientation Of The Development Flan. Does the plan have Complies: a block/orthogonal organization? This includes; Yes No In Spirit o Straight streets with right angle intersections 0 E Sj • Continuous street wall defined by alignment of buildings • Uniform spacing of street trees and street fixtures • Continue the urban blocks which are adjacent to the project Have decorative cross walks or other intersection enhancements Comments: Not applicable to 360IAirport District. 18. Pedestrian/Residential Activity Connection Between The Public Street And Complies: Living Units Fronting The Street. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan present the public street with an external expression of the resi- dential activity? This means that the street level of the residential development is not commercially used or made capable for commercial use. This includes parches, stoops, terraces, patios, fenced front yards and steps up from an ap- proach grade. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 19. Maintain Height And Scale Compatibility With The Height And Scale Char- Complies: acteristic Of District. Yes No In Spirit When height and scale are important attributes of the surrounding District's identity; is the plan compatible with this height and scale? Such compatibility can be achieved through one or both of the following: • Upper -story setbacks that create a building mass at the street consistent with context • HorizontaI offsets at the street level which reduce the lower floor pre- sentation of mass when the characteristic block size is exceeded. This creates the image of a Block that is further subdivided through built rec- ognition of individual properties as described in the "Bay Modulation" section of the Building Manual. Comments: Not applicable to 360IAirport District. 11 20. Use Of Bay Modulation Patterns That Are Compatible With Bay Modulation Complies; Of The District. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a street frontage that continues the bay modulation of the block:? Bay modulation refers to the architectural expression of individual build- ings within the block face. 'this is important to emulate the traditional black face of a downtown where buildings are normally built lot -line to lot -line in direct juxtaposition. In such downtowns, there is a complex street wall referred to as the `Bay" and the rhyth- mic and varied offset and appearance of that bay is referred to as `Bay Modula- tion" Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 12 1. Provide An Urbanized Streetscape. Does the plan provide an urbanized streetscape along the primary street frontage that is consistent with the char- acteristic urban street fabric within the District? Key features of an urbanized streetscape include: • The architectural plane fronting the primary street must create a con- tinuous street wall along the primary street frontage, Buildings must establish a "built -to" zone which extends from the primary street front property line and extends into the property a distance of aft and at least 75% of the primary street frontage much Iie within this zone. NOTE: the location and depth of this zone may be modified upon City approval when the modification results in lateral expansion of a sidewalk space for a sidewalk restaurant or sidewalk retail or in the creating of an arcade along the street. . Street trees used in the streetscape should continue the use of an exist- ing tree species when the larger urban setting contains a thematic tree. If the surrounding urban setting does not have a thematic tree, the plan roust choose frorn a list of approved plants, Street lights roust continue the uniform spacing and placement charac- teristic of the surrounding primary street. When a larger urban setting contains a thematic light or light standard, the plan must use that light standard. When no thematic light exists, the plan must choose a light or light standard appropriate for urban streetscape use. Decorative paving should continue the characteristic paving material and pattern of the urban context when that context includes a thematic sidewalk treatment_ When no thematic treatment exists, the project must use a sidewalk paving material and pattern appropriate for urban streets - cape use. Comments: Not applicable to 360lAirport District. Complies: Ye No In Spirit 17 11 13 2. Provide A "Borrowed Landscape" For The Primary Street Frontage Dees the plan provide a "borrowed landscape' along the primary street frontage that preserved the general character of the (District? This includes; • Elimination of parking aprons or walls between the building and street unless the landscape space abutting the street is greater than 20ft • Creation of an expanded parkway that is varied in dimension with the minimum parkway expansion being 15ft from the street right of way and with variations in width occurring at least every 200ft. Creation of pads for horizontal mixed use qualifies as varied Borrowed Landscape space • Use of a pedestrian trail in lieu of a pedestrian sidewalk. Sidewalks within the borrowed landscape space must be meandering pedestrian ways at least Sft wide. Comments: Complies; Yes No In Spit -it F_ We Comply. Our "borrowed landscape"/ "expanded parkway" includes a variable width open space along the street frontage to the ROW (ranging from 31.4' (one specific corner location) to 67.6' for an average of 46.3"} with private pedestrian sidewalks along the frontage providing access to residences. The public pedestrian connectivity routes through the more serene —1 mile of hike/bike trail all the way up to Euless Grapevine Rd. northward. Our security fencing is set back from the street to the building level so the frontage area does not give the appearance of a "compound". The dense tree drifts along the frontage and "borrowed landscape" area extend the natural mosaic of the adjacent areas into the site. See Exhibit 22. 14 23. Promote Horizontal Mixed Use Complies: Yes No In Spirit Does the project create opportunities for stand-alone retail/restaurant pads with- in the street frontage of the primj�ary street? In no case should the provision of a =� I' 17-11 retail pad consume more than 50% of the multifamily frontage. Where the multifamily frontage is 300ft or less, a retail pad leave -out is not required. This retail pad requirement may be waived upon City Approval but a requirement for variable street definition (#24) still applies Comments: Retail is infeasible for this location for the following reasons... • Access constraints: Access is poor due to right -in right -out limited access off of 360 frontage. South bound traffic would have to exit Glade Rd. and double back to the south, only to do those same gymnastics to get back on 360 if they wanted to head south. This is too much effort for what is already a bad commercial/retail location in our opinion. The land -use has to be a "destination" designation. • Demand constraints: There is inadequate consumer density demand ("rooftops to support retail") as the airport land dominates most of the retail trade area circle of influence. Additionally, due to COVID19 and other very impactful macro trends in the retail industry, forcing retail in this area would not be recommended. • Operator constraints: Retail operators have overwhelmingly selected 121 and Glade Road to the west and Highway 114 to the north as viable locations. The site has been zoned commercial for over two decades with no interest along this stretch of what has become more of a residential corridor of 360 due to the constraints outlined above, 24. Provide Variable Street Definition Within The Block Face Along Primary Complies: Streets Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a variable street definition through the variable setback of "` multifamily structures fronting the primary street? No more than 50% of the project frontage may adhere to a uniform setback dimension. Horizontal offsets in the development plan set back line must be no less than 10 ft. Comments: We comply and far exceed both the 50% and the 10ft. rule above. In accordance with the natural and organic theme of the design, the building's fronting both the public trail and the 360 Frontage Rd. are canted in differing angles that create a varied presentation of the architecture to the public realm (both from Hwy 360 and the public Hike/Bike Trail from behind) in a way that is non -regimental and non -uniform. Our closest building to the property line/ROW along the frontage roads is 31.4' vs. the 10' minimum above. Max setback is 67.6'. 171 District Specific Stan- 360/Airport Grapevine Grapevine GaylordlSH Central Tran- dards (A = Applicable) District Mille South Mills North 26 District sit District District District 1 Architectural accommo- A A dation of ,grade change 2 Pedestrian connection A A A A A beyond project and district 3 Preserve/restore charac- A A teristic natural mosaic 4 Residentially derived A A.* styling and forms/ pitched roof 5 Buffer adjacent environ- A mental encroachments 6 Land use/scale transition A A from MFISF 7 Maximize value capture A A opportunities 8 Commercially derived A A' ` A styling and forms 9 Preserve/perpetuate A thematic streetsca e 10 Compatible with district? thematic signage features 11 Responsive interface A ,A 1 with open space and amenities 12 Resort/lodge derived A Z styling and forms 13 Curvilinear organization A .A of development plan 14 Conceal visibility of ser- A ; � ,A vice/parking functions from arterials/primary roads 15 Historic/indigenous A derived styling/forms 16 Use of thematic exterior A material if characteristic of district and complies with standards A* = When closer to topography and golf course A** = When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 16 17 Orthogonal, block orga- A nization of development plan 18 Pedestrian/residential A activity connection between street and living unit fronting street 19 Height and scale com- A patibility with height and scale characteristic of district 20 Bay modulation pattern A compatibility with the- matic bay modulation of district 21 Urbanized streetsca e A 22 Provide "Borrowed" A landscape for street en- hancement 23 Promote horizontal A A A mixed -use 24 Variable street definition A to create a more complex street scape A* = When closer to topography and golf course A** = When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 17 General Standards for Multifamily Development Part A: Site and Desi a. Contextual Relationships 1. Community Structure: Each plan for a project larger than 100 units must Complies: provide: Yes No In Spirit i. Benches: at least one every 700ft or one per black, whichever is less E, • 7_ j ii. Bike Racks: a capacity for 4 bikes at each residential building and 14 at the central pedestrian facility iii. Trash Disposal Units: one trash receptacle at each bench iv. Pedestrian Lighting: one light standard at least every 100ff Continued from below (Due to lack of space) Bike racks will be located at each building as required. In addition we will provide a bike rack at the proposed trail head into the creek trail. Pedestrian lighting of open spaces and trail amenities will be designed to Comments: comply. Will Comply. We have strategically placed benches and trash receptacles at locations to both comply with the requirements and to work in the open space areas we have created. See above... 2. Cognitive Structure: Development site plants should avoid a "maze -like" Complies: arrangement of streets and drives and should provide a clear demarcation of Yes No In Spirit sub -areas arranged with reference to an internal destination. F F_ F7 Comments: There are various sub -areas (Pavilion area, Courtyards, Dog Park, Trail -head & Clubhouse etc.) integrated throughout the site that will drive community interaction through Cognitive Structure. 3. Edge Definition: Planting of the edge must provide visual concealment of Complies: at least 70% of the perimeter fence using evergreen plants. Moreover, at least Yes No In Spirit 70% of these plants must have foliage from ground to top capable of providing a screen. Edge screening must be planted in natural drifts that appear as native plant clusters. Comments: The landscaping along our ornamental fencing will further screen the material to soften the edge of our community. 4. Traffic Calming: Any multifamily plan must illustrate traffic calming ynea- Complies: cures using traffic tables, intersections, traffic circles, chokers, roadway neck Yes No In Spirit downs at intersections, center island narrowing or rumble strips. Speed bumps n are prohibited. El Continued from below reduce internal speeds. They will also provide Comments: safe pedestrian access and connectivity between the open space areas. We Comply. In multiple locations where the street runs are longer we've employed raised cross -walk tables to slow traffic speeds internal to the project. Curvilinear nature of roads will also 18 b. Connections Beyond The Project 1. Relationship With And Connections To The City Fabric; The site plan for any multifamily development must portray the extent to which the following elements of the City Fabric are continued or otherwise responded to: i. Curb Cuts and Driveways: Development plans much seep to continue flow between projects by coordinating points of ingress and egress so that efficient maneuvers to and from serving public streets are possible. Coordination of routing traffic volumes anticipated by individual project TIANs is a required consideration of a development plan being considered by the City. ii. Thoroughfares And Roadways: A development plan that lays within the path of a thoroughfare as planned or committed to by adjacent devel- opment or of a thoroughfare that has been adjusted by the Council must make provision for the extension of the right of way of such thoroughfare when traffic projected densities necessitate extension. iii, Trails: A proposed multifamily development plan must consider appropriate trail routing through the proposed development so that a cohesive trail network can evolve over time. iv, ©pen Space: The proposed development plan must consider exten- sion of the open space or expansion of the open space, or consider how development portrayed by the development plan can relate to and define the open space. v. Contextual Characteristics: Any multifamily development plan must illustrate how various aspects of the context will also be manifest in the development design. Key aspects of the context include streetscape themes, continuity of water or water bodies, extension of indigenous play drifts, continuity of road sections, treatment of parking, protection of and continuity with adjacent land uses, continuation of tree canopies and canopy species, continuity of natural features, extension of surface water management strategies, and continuity of edge treatments. Complies: Yes No In Spirit F 17 r 6ontinueul from below: iv. We Comply. Open space will be shared and extended between future land -uses and tracts of land. Y. We Comply. We are re -knitting the natural fabric as a part of our built environment in an aesthetically pleasing meandering arrangement as a backdrop to the enhanced ecology. Comments: i. We Comply. We are connecting to the existing trail head/public parking round -a -about to the south so that our residents will also be able to access the main trailhead. ii. 'NIA iii. We Comply. At full build -out, a 4-phase (4 different landowners) —2-mile extension of a I O' wide hike and bike trail has been coordinated all the way to Bear Creek Park as a part of this development proposal, thus fully connecting the existing Grapevine hike and bike trail system with the southern gateway of the City. Phase 2's (—.5 MI.) will be constructed as a part of this development_ See Exhibit c. Lot Occupancy 1. In a development plan that's required to be curvilinear as outlined by the Dis- Complies: trict Specific Standards, such a plan must establish a building relationship to the Yes No In Spirit street such that: F C F i. At least 60% of the interior street and drive -fronting buildings within the development plan design and 75% of buildings facing public streets serving the project must be sited so that the front building plane (the plane facing the street) is not parallel to the street right of way. ii. A minimum of 30% of the yard space along interior streets and drives, and 50% of the yard space fronting public streets serving the project, must be covered by a landscape approach defined by organic plant mass- ing and rratural drifts. Comments: i. 5 out of the 7 (71.4%) interior buildings are not parallel to the interior street right-of-ways they front on. 7 out of the 8 buildings (87.5%) that front public streets are not parallel to the street right of way they front on. The curvilinear nature of the street pattern inherently keeps the buildings from being parallel to the street. 10 out of the 16 buildings have unobstructed views of the creek, trail and open space. ii. We will comply. The defined parameters above will feature the themed organic plant massing and naturalistic drifts. See Exhibit, 2. Building Relation to the Street and Orthogonal Plan Layouts: Plan designs Complies: that are required to be orthogonal, as outlined by the District Specific Standards, Yes No I Spirit trust establish a building relationship to the street such that: 17 7 r7; i. The development plan must establish a "build -to" line for the interior streets and drives of the project that will vary from the required aft build - to line along the plats exterior public streets as specified in the District Specific Standards. This build -to line roust be at least aft form the street or drive back of curb. ii. The presence of repetitive stoops, terraces or porches which project into the yard space created by the build -to line cannot be closer than 5ft to the street or drive back of curb and trust project at least Oft from the primary building mass. These projections must be architecturally contained such that they are part of the overall facade composition. The offset space created between the projected stoop, porch or terrace and the primary building mass must be a landscape space, leaving a 5ft minimum pedestrian space at the street edge. Comments: Not applicable to 3601Airport District. 20 d. Parking: Placement and Configuration 1. Parking Facility Type: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Structured Parking: Parking within the Transit Center Character Zone must he structured when the project exceeds 20 units per acre. Projects exceeding 40 units per acre in any other Character Zone must provide structured parking. ii. Surface Parking Areas: Projects with a unit density between 28 and 39 units per acre that provide aggregated surface parking must comply with the following: 1. Aggregated parking areas with more than 70 parking spaces (not including street or drive head -in parking) must be located in a place that is not visible to the primary street serving the project or located so that the parking area may be screened. Parking garages located such that they front a public street must have architectural eleva- tions that complement the design style of the multifamily structures. "Complement" in this context means that they must share similar horizontal offsets, organization of openings, and use of materials. 2. Aggregated parking areas in non -orthogonal development plan designs must also have a curvilinear configuration. 3. Aggregated parking areas must be landscaped Comments: Not applicable because our proposed development's density is 20 units/acre- However, all our aggregated parking does have a curvilinear configuration and is landscaped. 2, Head -in parking along streets: Before the parking demand for aggregated Complies: parking areas is determined, head -in street and drive parking must he provided Yes No In Spirit to the extent permitted by the streetscape design. 1• • 71 � 7] Comments: We Comply. Head -in street and drive -parking is maxed out throughout the site and zonally spaced out to accommodate maximum convenience to the resident. 21 e. Site Open Space Requirement 1. Open space as a percent of total development area: At least 20% of the site Complies: area identified in any multifamily plan must be set aside as open space. Site areas Yes No that qualify as open space set asides include: E 7 i, Areas protecting existing natural features and/or plant communities li. Areas used for the surface management of storm water that are not structures iii. Any retained water iv. Project amenity areas that are visually accessible from streets and/or drives v. Playgrounds vi. Pedestrian trails vii. Borrowed street landscape areas viii. Pedestrian accessible areas between structures open to access by the project population Comments: We comply and well exceed this standard, offering all of the above elements in our proposed community in a quantity greater than the 20% standard. Aside from borrowed street landscape, pedestrian accessible areas and trails, project amenities* and all other internal open space that meets the above definitions, we have set aside approximately 33 acres of natural open space (not including what we have internal to the project) that will protect existing natural features and plant communities. Additionally, we will be providing a —.5 mile 1 O' wide public hike/bike trail. 2, Form giving influence: Open space provided within any development plan Complies: must serve as a frontage for at least 25%, of the structures within the project, Yes No In Spirit where buildings can define the edge of open space, except for the Transit Center i� District where street frontage is prioritized, Comments: We exceed this standard, which is a standard that renders the outdoor environment as a primary Local feature of the community. Very conservatively, 9 out of 16 buildings front directly onto the hike/bike trail - more than double the requirement. 22 f. Preservation of Natural Drainage 1, Natural Drainageways: Any development plan for multifamily developanent Complies: in Grapevine must illustrate the extent to which natural drainage within the lot, Yes No In Spirit parcel or tract exists and is preserved through design initiatives that preserve, restore or replicate natural drainage patterns. Any disruption of natural drainage patterns must be approved by the City of Grapevine. Comments: We Comply, We have employed a dry riverbed design in certain areas of the site to help replicate the natural environment, catch and direct surface drainage off the site with the added benefit being that this design will provide an enhanced pedestrian experience for our residents and guests. 23 g. Storm Weather Management Facilities 1. Storm weather management structures: Any development plan for mul- tifamily development in the City of Grapevine, where structured storm water management solutions are requires must adhere to the fallowing: i. Minimize structured means of water management: Plans must min- imize the use of cross drainage structures, armored channels, concrete flow ways, and other structured solutions to storm water management, unless such structures are for the purpose of creating a pedestrian or urban activity at a water edge. ii. Maintain natural shapes and farm in the creation of detention/re- tention facilities and created drainageways (a.k.a. flow management facilities): Water collection points and/or pools created by nature have shapes that are clearly organic. Therefore, plans should avoid straight lines, hard angles, and regular geometric shapes in the creation of flow management facilities. iii. Landscape with natural elements: Where storm water management design creates conditions that support indigenous plants, measures must be taken to landscape such facilities in ways that allow such plants. iv. Respect natural sub -systems. Proper design of flow management fa- cilities should, where appropriate, include diverse ecological settings such as deep water (lininetic zones) in combination with shallow water (lit- toral zones), wetlands, ephemeral flows, and greater states of hydration which can support plant communities associated with these zones. Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit I F We Comply. We have employed a dry riverbed design in various locations to help catch and direct surface drainage off the site while ensuring safety and quality of life for our residents. 24 h. Grading 1 Grading for multifamily development in the City of Grapevine must adhere to Complies: the fallowing: Yes No In Spirit i, Avoid steep grades: Grades equal to or greater than 20% are consid- ered steep and shall not be graded to create building lots. However, indi- vidual buildings which snake grade transition within the building, porch or terrace expansions are permitted and therefore the limited disturbance of grade needed to accomplish this is permitted also. ii. Conform to standards for tree protection: Any tree over three inches in caliper remaining on a lot, parcel or tract (that is, trees not approved for removal) and exposed to the building activity or within 30ft of the building activity (hereinafter regulated trees) shall be protected as fol- lows: a. Tree fencing: Regulated tree trunks shall be protected within a visible "tree fence" at least 36 inches tall and protecting the tree and ground around the tree to a minimum distance from the trunk equal to the distance of the tree drip line or 10 feet, whichever is less. b. Tree marking: All regulated trees shall be marked with a green surveyor tape which indicates "Protected Tree" status. c. Ground compaction avoidance: Measures shall be taken to min- imize ground compaction within the dripline of a Regulated Tree. Grading within the ground protected by a tree fence is prohibited. d. Maintenance of normal hydration: Measures shall be taken to maintain normal hydration of a Regulated Tree. Comments: Will Comply. We have no grades on site that exceed 20%. We will comply and will use the best arborilogical practices to snake sure preserved trees are protected so they will thrive post construction. Part B: Building Design Standards a.Street Interface 1. Semi-public space adjacent to streets: Complies: Yes No i. Canopies and store fronts are limited to urban setting such as primary street frontage in the Transit Center Character Zone. L'X ii. In any single building block, there must he at least one expression of first -floor, semi-public space within the street -facing elevation. If a cano- py of storefront is used to meet this standard, it must occupy at least 50% of the length of the elevation. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open space, each building block must have at least one first -floor pedestrian space that is Bart of the architectural design. i. Store fronts must he set within a minimum first -floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un-supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: We Comply. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open Complies: space, each building block must have at least one first -floor pedestrian space that Yes No is part of the architectural design. i. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first -floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un-supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: E. We Comply. All of our buildings have multiple first -floor "pedestrian space" in the form of the architectural featured access breezeway, In Spirit 17 In Spirit F OU b. Elevation Composition 1. The exterior design of any multifamily structure must comprise an overall Complies: pattern. This pattern includes: Yes No In Spirit i. Regulating lines that organize its elements nj F- El ii. Proportioning iii. Hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements Comments: We Comply. Our compositional intent complies as it enacts the use of "proportioning" and "hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements". We also employ "Regulating lines that organize its elements". CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 27 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 2. Openings and features of any building must have a common justification_ Complies: Yes No i. When a pitched roof design is used, all windows —except dormer win- F7 dows—must be below the cornice detail. ii. When a flat roof design is used, all windows must be at least zft below the parapet, iii. When both a ;bitched roof and flat roof design are used in the same elevation, the window heads must align horizontally. iv. Windows may abut the cornice detail if the window heavier modulates the handing or detailing of the cornice. v. Openings within an elevation must Have a common reference line that engages the sill or head. vi. Windows within an elevation must have a common vertical reference line from the first to the top floor, vii. Windows must align with the features that define the architectural form. For example, windows in a gable cannot be arbitrarily distributed within the face of the gable unless specifically approved by the City. viii. Excepting first floor store front or vertical mixed -use structure, all openings must be square or portrait in orientation. ix. Windows, doors and other openings must be articulated within a pro- jected surround or header unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: El In Spirit El We Comply. Please refer and compare to Architectural elevations. One nice item of note is that we are using cast -stone sills and headers as our window projected surrounds. These standards above elevate the role of windows from mere utilitarian openings to architecturally striking features unto themselves. See Exhibit. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 28 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 3. All elevations of a structure must receive equal treatment of style on all el- Complies: evations of a structure so as to avoid the common pitfall whereby only the Yes No In Spirit street -facing facade is adequately styled and structured. Comments; We Comply. Each and every building face presents the same high standard in this guideline. Please see building elevations for confirmation. See {Mans. 4. Forms created within the elevation, such as towers, bays and plate changes, must be derived from functions within the plan- Design approaches which seek to decorate a "space plan" derived independent of the elevation design are pro- hibited. Comments: We Comply. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 29 b. Street wall complexity and exterior offsets 1. Building offsets; Complies: Yes No i. Residential building blacks may not have more than 50 linear feet of wall without a wall offset. EX ii. Horizontal wall offsets must be at least Oft. This may include balconies if contained within the confines of the offset. Any balconies projected from the face must have an architectural enclosure. iii. Architectural forms such as enclosed porches, stair towers, projected bays or stacked balconies maybe projected from the building block or recessed within it and must be accompanied by a roof in the roof massing that corresponds to the architectural form. Comments; We Comply. E In Spirit L 30 d. Void to Solid Ratio 1, For the first floor of a vertical mixed -use plan wherein the first floor has a Complies: commercial use, the void -to -solid ratio must be greater than or equal to 1.5:1 Yes No In Spirit (the amount of void being greater than the amount of solid), The solid portions of the first floor facade must extend vertically to the floors above and parapet detail. Comments: Not Applicable. We are not a vertical mixed -use project. (Please excuse the check in the box. I can't get it to un-check.) 2. For floors above the first floor in a vertical mixed -use plan (or for all floors in a residential plan), the void -to -solid ratio must be less than or equal to 0.5: ] (the amount of void being less than the amount of solid). Comments: We Comply. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 1777 31 e. Architectural Enclosures 1. All projected stair towers, elevator shafts, and cantilevered building projec- tions (other than balconies) must be architecturally enclosed. This means that they must be enclosed in an architectural skin and must be expressed as a roof farm. Comments: We Comply. Complies: Yes No In Spirit E 32 f. Roof form: Rooves and the roof lines they create are essential design elements for higher -value structures. Visible roof design must: 1. Be legible, There must be a clear organization of a dominant roof mass from Complies: which subordinate roof masses extend. Yes No In Spirit Comments: We Comply. 2. Be balanced. A single roof pitch must be used within the total composition, Complies: Different roof pitches are permitted for tower forms which are not engaged with Yes No In Spirit the general roof form. Permitted roof forms include gables, hips, barrels if used a secondary forms, sheds if used as secondary fortes, and Flat. ' 1 Comments: We Comply. 33 g. Style Integrity 1. The use of architectural detailing associated with a style must use the charac- Complies: teristic detailing of that style. Yes No In Spirit X E F Comments: We Comply. A few examples of features that we designed to in order to characterize the style are.,. " Large Roof Overhangs * Structural Bracing h Timber Frame Accents Tapered Stone Columns * Architecturally Enclosed Balconies * Metal Awnings * 80% Stone and Brick 2. The use of systems or materials that replicate the work of a trade or artisan are prohibited. Construction details which are traditionally derived from the work of an artisan (such as a metal smith, carpenter or stonemason) must use a mate- rial in which the characteristic craftsperson can work. Comments: We Comply. Complies: Yes No In Spirit F E E 34 h. Chimneys 1. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the chimney nest he ter- Complies: zninated with a chimney cap that conceals the metal spark arrester and visually Yes No In Spirit reads as a traditional tile flue system, unless otherwise approved by the City. F- C 0 Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 2. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the chimney shaft roust be Complies: enclosed with unit masonry, stone or 3-coat stucco with a minimum dimension Yes No In Spirit of 4.5ft x A, unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 3. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the rise of the chimney shaft Complies: roust be detailed so that the chimney has complexity in plan as well as elevation. Yes No In Spirit Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 35 Part C: Building Construction Standards a -Materials and Application of Materials 1. Primary Material. At least 70% of the exterior facade of a 4-story structure or Complies: 80% of the exterior fad ade of a 3-stony structure or 100% of the exterior Parade of Yes No In Spirit a structure less than 3 stories must be one of the following; 17 � 7 i. Brick. Clay brick, modular size, hard -fired and meeting severe weath- er standards. Embossed or molded brick is generally prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. All brick shall be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all building corners —both inside and outside —must he executed in a toothed masonry fashion, Weeping or slumped joints are prohibited, ii. Stone. Stone must be laid in a typical load -bearing pattern. Character- istics of such pattern include: 1. Tight mortar joints with no in ore than 34%n of joints larger than 3f8 inches. 2. Coursed patterns such as Ashlar, Coursed Chopped Stone and Coursed Rubbed Stone. Mosaic and un-coursed rubble stone -work are prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. 3. Cultured stone or other faux stone products are prohibited. 4. All stone must be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all cor- ners —both inside and outside --must be executed in a toothed ma- sonry fashion. iii. Other Stone. Cut stonelsrnoothed-face stone or Cut stone/smoothed- face stone that is mechanically attached with a stone veneer system may be used provided that the system uses a true stone. Comments - We will Comply. Stone will be real coursed stone to fit the (iii.) definition above. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 36 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 2. Secondary Material. No more than 30% of the buiidi jig facade may be a sec- ondary material. This includes: Complies: Yes No i. Stucco. 3-coat stucco on lath over a structural frame with expansion V joints concealed by filling the joint with expandable filler that is troweled flat with the stucco, is the same color as the stucco and that matches the stucco surface texture is permitted. Dryvit/FFS type systems are prohibit- ed. Stucco is not permitted in the Central Transit District. ii. Metal. Architectural metal wall systems are permitted. iii. Siding. Wood or Cementacious siding is permitted in these Character Zones where pitched roof styles are permitted. Comments: F In Spirit 11 We Comply. We will be using a cementitious hoard and batten siding (along with 80% stone and brick) to compliment the architectural design. This product also maintains itself over time and doesn't cup, buckle or warp like real wood tends to in the sometimes extreme Texas weather fluctuations. See plan elevations. Note we have zero stucco in our proposed development. 3. Roof Material. Acceptable materials include; Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Flat Roof. Flat rooves maybe either a built-up bituminous roof or a F 77 membrane roof provided that it is installed in accordance with the man- ufacturer's specifications and issued a 30-year warranty. All flat rooves must be hidden from ground level view, behind a 12-inch parapet. ii. Pitched Roof. These may be either a standing -seam metal roof with standing folded and soldered seams, a commercial metal roof if approved by the City, slate, clay tile, or 40-year high profile composition single. All composition shingle rooves must have closed valleys. Concrete single products with a relief greater than '/z inch are prohibited. iii. Parapet Cap. These must be either clay brick, cut stone, cast stone, tile, or terra cotta. Pressed metal maybe used if is it specifically created to decoratively cap a parapet and if specifically approved by the City. Comments: We will Comply. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 37 a.Materials and Application of Materials {(continued) 4, Material Change. Material changes in any elevation may occur only under the Complies: following conditions: Yes No i. Change occurs at an inside corner. ii. Change that occurs at an outside corner must wrap the corner and change at a location at least 12) inches from that corner and be designed as the termination of an architectural detail. iii. Change that occurs wherein the different material is contained within a distinct architectural form that projects from the primary architectural mass. iv. Change that reflects an offset between a lower and an upper floor where the offset is at least 6 inches. Material changes within the same architectural plane are prohibited. Comments: We Comply. In Spirit 11 CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE. 38 a,Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 5. Relief. The City seeks to promote relief and dimension in architectural surfac- Complies: es, details, and motifs with the following requirements: Yes No In Spirit i. The fallowing materials are prohibited: Fiberglass, Styrofoam or stuc- F co-over-styrofoam, plastic, aluminum. Stucco applied to look like pro- jected stone, Stucco applied to look like cast stone, Stucco applied to look like terra cotta, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a corner, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a mitre or decorative shape, Masonite or Masonite products, com- position wood products used as an exterior material, trimcratt used as a soffit board, or other smooth finished soffit board. ii. Relief in the treatment of cornices, overhangs, gable projections, bay windows, dormers, water tables, belt coursers, sills, surrounds, timber components and other expressions must be executed in ways that pro- duce depth, shadow and texture, iii. In coursed rubble stonework, stones must be laid into the wall as the stone would lay on the ground. No more than 20% of the stones in any elevation may be "flipped" sideways. iv. The minimum projection in any built-up profiles and decorative assembly must be 3/4 inch per element of the assembly. A cornice detail comprised of three stepped bricks must have a total projection of 2 and inches. Comments: As corroborated by City consultants, cementitious trim - provided it is dimensionally acceptable - will require less maintenance, have stronger architectural appeal, and exhibit superior durability in our climate than conventional wood. It will not cup, buckle or warp which starts to look rundown over time. We will be using real Cedar for the larger beams where (similar to Phase 1) cementitious trim is not dimensionally large enough to achieve the design intent. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 39 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) G. Carpentered Exterior Trim, i. All carpentered exterior trim must be high -quality finished grade wood stock. ii. If a trim installation is to be joined along any continuous run of mate- rial, the required joint joust be a "spline joint." iii. All outside corners most he mitered and blocked with sufficient clo- sure that the joint is not visible from the street. iv. Corners must be closed by a carpentered joint. Trim clips are prohib- i ted. v. Facia and gable rake must be steppes{ at the drip mold unless hidden by a gutter. vi. Carpentered trim that forms the veneer packet must have a complex- ity achieved in trim mold, built-up step molding, or other traditional detail such as a dentil mold. Comments: Complies: Yes No C In Spirit As corroborated by City consultants, cementitious trim - provided it is dimensionally acceptable - will requires less maintenance, stronger architectural appeal, and superior durability in our climate than conventional wood. It will not cup, buckle or warp which starts to look rundown over time. We will be using real Cedar for the larger beams where (similar to Phase 1) cementitious trim is not dimensionally large enough to achieve the design intent. At carpentered wood outside corner conditions, we will be using a rabbetted joint (not mitered) as this proved on Phase 1 to be the most successful solution to provide a clean and consistent looking outside corner. This method was also corroborated by the City architectural consultant. 4D b. Wall Construction I. Wall Section. All wood -framed exterior walls must be constructed as follows: Complies. - Ye s No III Spirit i. When shim- or flange -mounted windows are used in masonry ve- neered walls, framing may be conventional 2x4 framing. LN_ ii. When shirr -mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or oth- er perrTLitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, exterior- walls must be framed with 2x6 members in order to achieve a 3.5-inch minimum offset within the opening. iii. When flange -mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or ether permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, a double 2x4 framing assembly is required that allows the flange to be mounted oil the inner 2A section with the second 2x4 section providing the required offset from the window sash or door at the opening. Comments: We will Comply. 2. Parapets. Where there is a flat roof, a parapet must extend at least 12 inches Complies: above the roof surface and conceal the roof material from ground -level view. Yes No In Spirit Comments: N/A CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 41 b. Wall Construction (continued) 3. Cornice Detail. All wall terminations at the roof must have a cornice detail comprised of at least 2 projected elements. Parapets must have a cap detail com- prised of at least 2 projected elements. Comments: We will Comply. 4, Window Surrounds, Belt Courses and Lase Courses, i, All openings in the exterior skin must have an architecturally appro- priate header and sill with an optional jamb. The required header and sill must project at least 3I inches beyond the wall veneer. Window headers or sills may be either stone, cast stone, terra cotta, heavy timber (where appropriate for the style), or wood (where appropriate for the style). ii. tither architectural details like belt courses and base courses must be executed, in the above materials and have a minimum projection of 3/4 inch per element of detail, Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit 7] 77 Complies: Yes No In Spirit El We will Comply. As mentioned above, our windows will have a cast -stone header and sill that will adhere to this requirement. 42 c. Roof screening and appurtenances I. Roof Projections, No plumbing stacks, venting stacks, skylights, or attic Complies: ventilators may penetrate the roof surfaces facing the street/drive, If there are Yes No In Spirit multiple street/drive facing exposures, no roof projection may penetrate the roof C r� slope that slopes to the `'fronting" street or drive, All such penetrations must be mounted straight and perpendicular to the ground (except for skylights and attic ventilators) and painted to blend with the roof color. Turbine vents are prohibit- ed. All vent stacks must have lead jacks. Comments: All our appliances for the residences are electric se there won't be an excessive amount of gas derived penetrations. The majority of roof penetrations will be limited to plumbing stacks and painted to match. We will have ridge vents and no turbines. 2. Roof Mechanical, Roof mechanical must be screened behind a parapet wall or Complies: platform that is recessed into a pitched roof so that the incline of the roof slope Yes No creates a parapet wall,{ 7 Comments: We will Comply, 3. Gutters, Downspouts, Scuppers and Collection Boxes. These must be copper or an enduring prefinished metal with a minimum 20-gauge thickness. Gutters must be a minimum of inches, half -round profile and attached with gutter straps. Downspouts must be a minimum of 4 inches and round. Elbows and bends must be a minimum of inches, plain and round. Fascia mounted gutter systems are prohibited unless custom designed and integral to the architecture, Comments: We will Comply_ In Spirit Complies: Yes No In Spirit '.X1 17 1 E 43 d. Windows and Glazing 1. Glazing and Glazing Systems, Reflective glass is prohibited. Tinted glass and Complies: dark adhesive films where the transmission coefficient exceeds 27% is prohibited. Yes No In Spirit Stained glass is allowed provided that the glass is crafted in accordance with Sol- dered camping or " H" camping. No acrylic or pourable techniques are allowed. Glazing systems may be used in certain accent areas of specifically approved by the City. Cosnnients: We will Compty. 44 Part D: Landscaping, Fencing and Screening a. Site Landscaping 1 Leaf Mass Between Buildings. All multifamily development must provide Complies; trees between buildings. At least 60% of the planted area must be comprised of Yes No aver -Story (canopy). Comments: We Comply. We have provided a significant amount of trees between each building and will exceed the requirement as the trees take root and mature. In Spirit F 2. Layered Landscaping at Building Entries. Landscaping must be provided at Complies: building entries and must be "layered:' The building entry landscaping area must Yes No In Spirit be comprised of at least 3 layers: one upper layer of mechum evergreen shrub ` approximately 30-36 inches high and 2 layers of shorter shrubs or one shrub and an ornamental grass. These must be planted in beds having a minimum width of 72 inches. Upper layer shrubs must be 5-gallon container plants planted 30 inches on center with triangular spacing. Lower layer shrubs may be 3-gallon container plants planted 24 inches on center with triangular spacing. Comments: We will Comply. The planting areas defined on our landscape plan will allow for the layered look of ground covers and shorter up to large upper layer shrubs. All of our planting beds are at least 72" wide and we will comply with the size and spacing requirements of this section. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE W a. Site Landscaping (continued) 3. All landscape heels must be associated with walkways, roadways, amenity Complies: feature, buildings or screens. bloating, ornamental or non -associated landscape Yes No In Spirit beds are prohibited. X F_ .71 Comments: We will Comply. All of the proposed landscape planting beds on the site are associated with or adjacent to pedestrian walkways and the buildings. All of our pedestrian walks meander through landscaped open spaces with the beds immediately adjacent to the walkways. The planting areas will be informal and will contain a mix of native and culturally appropriate landscape materials. 4. Plant Sizing. Shrubs that serve a screening function must be sized at the time Complies; of planting such that they can serve as an effective screen within 2 years of the Yes No In Spirit planting date. 3-gallon plants must be planted 30 inches on center with triangu- lar spacing and 2-gallon plants must be planted 24 inches on center with trian- '' F 17 gular spacing. Smaller container and bedding plants must he planted at least 11 inches on center with triangular spacing.. Comments: We will Comply. Shrubs used for screening such as along our security fencing and plant material within the planting beds and building entrance areas will comply with the plant sizing requirements, 46 h. Fejices and Screening Wads 1, Fence Materials, Visible perimeter fences that are compliant with the General Complies: Standards may be made of unit masonry, wrought iron with unit masonry corner Yes No In Spirit columns, or masonry. If masonry, corner column and masonry interim column spacing is not to exceed 15ft and must have a masonry knee wall supporting wood or wrought iron infill. Comments: We will Comply. Our fencing has been designed to comply with these requirements. ?. Gate Materials. Gates in fences constructed in accordance with Db 1 above may be made from wrought iron with a wrought iron frame (complying with General Standards) or wood with frame members measuring a minimum of 1 and �/2 inches thick by 3 and '/z inches wide and planks measuring at least 1 and '/2 inches thick. Gates must be comprised of the same material as the fence. Comments: We will Comply Complies: Yes No In Spirit E 11 CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 47 b. Fences and Screening Walls (continued) 3. Corner Expression of Support Structure. All property corners of a property line fence much be supported by a masonry column that is at least 10 square inches. Comments: We will Comply. 4. Thin wall construction, cast or embossed concrete walls, picket materials not in compliance with the General Standards, iron fences with mechanical connec- tion assemblies, pre -fabricated decorative elements designed to slip over stock or tubular steel shapes, and plastic or vinyl fence component systems are prohibit- ed. Comments - We will Comply. Complies: Yes No In Spirit F u Complies: Yes No In Spirit IF EI EI H4 c. Street Visible Wrought Iron 1.Frames and other structural support members may not be less than 1 and 3/4 Complies: inches in either width measurement or 1 and 3/ inches in diameter if round. Yes No In Spirit FEl Comments: We will Comply. 2. Pickets that are 5ft in length or height or less must have a minimum width of Complies: i inches in either width dimension or diameter. When pickets are longer or tall- Yes No In Spirit er than 5ft, the minimum with dimension is increased to 1 inch in the dimension � I! that faces the street or 1 inch in diameter. L Comments: We will Comply 3. Panels must be made of metal plate material with a minimum thickness of Complies; 3/ 16 inches. Yes No In Spirit z D Comments: We will Comply. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 49 c. Street Visible Wrought Iron (continued) 4, The wall thickness of any tubular steel must not he Iess than 3/32 inches Comments: We will Comply. 5. Decorative elements such as finials and rings must be made of solid stock material and welded to the pickets or to the frame made from the pickets if the pickets are solid stock material. Attachments to the pickets or frame and all other components of the wrought iron construction must he welded. Mechanical con- nections are prohibited. Comments: We will comply if applicable_ Complies: Yes No In Spirit F 7 Complies: Yes No In Spirit 1 l� 50 District Specific Standards • Buildings "Step" where possible in concert with Site's vertical fall towards creek to ' minimize ,re aining-walls in highly visible areas _ Maximize bu'Idin architecture with its ability to accommodate grade cha e v a turr -. . _. AR /�► 4ow outings OWN- • Architecture.wili sup ort Site's unique topographic characteristics and constraints. 4!. 32' Foot Vertical Fall �: 25' Foot Vertical Fall Turn -down Footing � ;t Turn -down Footi AMER.t � ,. !t t T-'L _ _ t - -"w l • Elan Grapevine will complete Section B (11,eft), I� g Section C and D as the only sections left plete. • Trail is a 10' wide concrete hike/bike trail With benches, lighting, dog park and fitness structure to compliment the Phase 1 design standard. k 1 Mile of 4 Trail Connections (2 �, ' - beyond the project) 'A B ear Creek pen Spac , 33 acres Hike/Bike Tr ail -1 m -Elan Grapevine (Ph. 2) 11 Standard #3 — Preserve and Restore Natural Mosaic, Page 1 "Re -knitting" - Elan Grapevine will tie in the existing natural characteristics (Vegetation) of the project's surroundings as shown in the landscape plan below. • Enhanced Screening— Dense tree groves will buffer Hwy. 360 frontage road. On the trail side, we will also restore the 60' of TRA tree clear -cutting that was recently needed to build the regional pipeline (see orange graphic below). Restorative Tree Groves ­ tea; ,... -'Im . 101' -A - T _;_4 to ... .`,•;' ,,r� %•` _`��� •Fig - •�.-. F� �.I Eastern Buffer • Densely wooded floodplain • .S Mile to DFW Airport Avg. rear -yard setback 270' 4 k • -50' Vertical rise to airport from center of site - - • Noise reducing windows 67 Front -yard Setback Western Buffer f • 31' to 67' Private densely landscaped buffer along _ frontage road / Avg. 46.3' front -yard setback. Site retaining walls Y µ. ��"�• i�e,Redu 'ng Windows 'El ,. `i e B ear Creek pen Spacv n ! Avg. 33 acres _ Elan Grary Trail xI m Hike/Bike _ -.- -- v^_tee - y ,4�:.e•i .',. a • • i 11 Standard #7 — Maximizes Uses Appropriate to the Value of the Setting and/or Characteristics..., Page 4 Value of the Setting: • 10/16 Bldgs. have panoramic nature views • Architecture compliments the natural setting Public Hike / Bike Trail — Phase 2 of 4 is % mile long 33 Acres of private creek -side open -space r - 1Lifto, IN + d - — - `^+++•'i it - +„ _+ ....� 1�::-'�_ • - Standard #12 — Resort Lodge Styling Forms, Page 7 Structural/Accent Large Roof Timber Frame Accents __._ _ Overhanes 80 % IV w/ PI Architecturally Enclosed Balconies -ed Stone lumns d Metal Awnings Standard #13 — Curvilinear Organization of the Development Plan, Page 8 4* • a+ Jli•.��« f�� �: �.� �;�A�1a- .;� ��w c�,{��:y �f� ��' .t' �y�t• r •.` �L , :.�� ;�' ♦ ♦'- `, /F• - �� �. �y+ y. `,.{ • { Ma"ySr 1 �r .M:�l� :.� V, �,� In {:' `•"�,�. ,a `� '1{t � . i_ I► .rAt+y..,, 4-It Nit +ilkn. ter. .. �'F�l � f.i`...L' ':4✓-l. � . 1 jmmr�� Standard #14 — Conceal Visibility of Service And Parking Function, Page 8 IDWA let 4A bjA Vt - Owk W-c & low N Parking Concealed Behind Buildings, Landscape Buffer, W Jr. dlk� n w k 6, Abr- k Standard #14 "Borrowed Landscape" (Parkway & Trailway) Front Yard: 31'- 67' Wide Parkway Average Setback = 46' .� Rear Yard: '121-395' Wide Parkway Average Set Back = 270' *Complies with the Borrowed Landscape or "Re -knitting" of natural landscape concept. w lot n. General Design Standards Part A: Site and Design, a.4., Page 18 —Traffic Calming -�IA awl • I Mile of 4 Trail Connections (2 beyond the pp#) 0 Expansion and relatability to the 33 $tres of Open Space — 16x the open space requirement. • Vehicular connection wilt be made to "The Preserve" (Ph. 1). Seamlessly ties with the surrounding natural environment both in form (esthetically) and function (Public "Trail Trail Access Points I -- Spac 33 acres -EIan,G;,qUjWq Bike Trail -1 (Ph. 2) 11 r. p4gear Creek Part A: Site and Design, c.1.,i-ii, Page 18 — Building Relationships to the Street Elan Grapevine exceeds the required recreational opeffOpc. 6.3X • Total Site Area 2,062,567 SF - • Total Recreational Open Space Required 81,000 SF • Total Recreational Open Space Provided 512,471 SF (24.5%) Total Additional Open Space Provided 1,406,614 SF (48.8%) �. o , . OpEfn Space Provided 73.60 B' ear Greek r pen Spa. 33 acres Hike/Bike Trail N-i mi - Part B: Building Design Standards, a. - g., Page 26-29 Proportioning Hierarchy of Dominant and Subordinate elements —1, 2, 3... Regulating Lines 2 First -floor pedestrian spaces Projected Window Surrounds Vert. & Horiz. Alignment of Openings All windows below cornice detail Part B: Building Design Standards, a.- g., Page 30-31 Required >4' building offset every 50 linear ft. 50' Part B: Building Design Standards, a. - g., Page 32-33 Sarre Roof Dominate and Subordinate Pitrhac Roof Masses All Stair Towers Enclosed in Architectural Skin & Expressed as a Roof Form Solid Jo ance — See Arch. Drawings Part B: Building Design Standards, a. - g., Page 34 Timber Frame Accents 80% Masonry w/ Precast Trim Structural/Accent Rr7rin" Architecturally Enclosed Balconies Large Roof Overhangs Tapered Stone Columns Enhanced Metal Awnings Part C: Building Construction Standards, a.—d., Page 36-44 Precast Header and Footers 6-Inch off -set at 40-year (life -time) High Profile Composition Shingle Brick Masonry Natural Stone Masonry Transition 80% Masonry — Ashlar Pattern E L A N GRAPEVINE Site Plan Submittal 10/20/20 1 Proposed "360/Airport Subdistrict" Multifamily Community GREYSTAR Zoning Case Z20-03, CU20-2_1 PD20-03 Table of Contents Site Plan Submittal 1. Introduction a. Executive Narrative/Intro b. Architexas Approval Letter c. Conditional Use and Planned Development Overlay Request Letter d. Open Space Dedication, Compliance with DFW Airport Requests, and FAA Approval of Building Height Letter e. Location / Site Overview (Phase 1 and Phase 2) 2. Renderings 3. Project Plans a. Civit Plans i. Sheet 1— Overall Site Plan J. Sheet 2 — Contextual Site Plan Exhibit iii. Sheet 3 — Detailed Site Plan 1 of 2 iv. Sheet 4 — Detailed Site Plan 2 of 2 v. Sheet EX-1: Building Separation Exhibit b. Architecture Plans i. Sheet 5 — Unit Mix ii. Sheets 6-16 — Unit Floarplan Drawings iii. Sheets 17-34 — Building Plans & Elevations iv. Sheet 35-36 — Clubhouse Floor Plan & Elevations v. Sheets 37-39 — Garage Building Plan & Elevations c.. Photometric Plan i. Sheets E1.02 — EI.028 d. Landscape Plans i. Sheet LC-1 -- Overall Site Plan ii. Sheets LP-1— LP-5 — ❑etailed Landscape Plans iii. Sheets 1-2 — Open Space Exhibit 4. Design Guideline Exhibits 5. Representative Photos of High Quality Living & Key Benefits to City Arc:hzrexas .1. October 7, 2020 Mr. Ron Stombaugh Grapevine Development Services 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, Texas 75051 Dear Mr. Stombaugh, This letter is to inform you that Greystar's submittal for The Preserve, Phase 2 is the product of extensive review by, and collaboration with, Rabin McCaffrey and me. This process started with an early review of the site and continued through development of the site plan as well as architectural design. The Site Plan Review process was guided by 3 primary objectives of Grapevine's Multi -Family Ordinance, namely: 1, Creation of Community 2, Connection to the social fabric of Grapevine 3, Integration with the natural fabric of the site and its setting Robin and I feel that the final site plan achieves these important objectives and complies with the MF Standards regarding site plan design. Upon agreement regarding the site plan, Robin and I worked extensively with Greystar on architectural design. The architectural Design Review Process was guided by 5 primary objectives of Grapevine's Multi -Family Ordinance, namely: 1. Craftsmanship 2. Integrity of elevation composition and building form 3. Connection to the ground plane 4. Add ressment of the street 5. Material change execution Again, Robin and I feel that the final building design achieves these important objectives and complies with the MF Standards Building design. Therefore, Robin and I affirm that The Preserve Phase 2 complies with the standards of the Multi - Family Ordinance. Sincerely, Craig Melde, Sr. Principal Dallas I Austin I San Antonio 1907 Manila St www.archkiexas.com Second Floor r7MW, Texas 75201 29OU S. Congress Ave Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78704 417 81" Street San An(pnlo, Texas 78215 9 214,748,4561 p 511,444.4220 0 Z117.998.2412 I Proposal: 324 luxury MF residences, amenities and continuation of public hike/bike trail ❑ Description: Creekside & "Trailside" resort -lodge derived architecture set in 33 acres of surrounding open space, enriched with 5-star amenities ❑ Goal: Further a distinctive sense of community by responding to subdistrict guidelines and site conditions thereby designing a project that "gives more than it takes". ❑ Appearance: 1 and 3 stories, attached and detached garages, high -quality Grapevine design ❑ The Preserve (Phase 1): Enhanced connection to the existing and highly successful Phase 1 and the extension of additional public amenities. GuYsTAR-" October 9, 2020 Ron Stombaugh Assistant Director, Planning, and Zoning 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, Texas 75051 Re: Elan Grapevine ("Tlre Preserve. Phase Il') Conelilionerl Use raid Planned Development Overlrrt- Request Leiter Dear Ron: Elan Grapevine is a 3244111it multifamily community consisting of single and 3-story buildings, comprised of resort and lodge -style architecturally themed buildings per the "3601Airport District" requirements. Most of the buildings have tuck -under internal garages and manv have detached garages and carports. Phase I1 compliments the Phase i development which encompasses a lodge -style development with its exterior facades, curvilinear designed drives. and plentiful landscaping, All of the designs adhere to the "Design Standards Manual for Multifamily and Vertical Mixed -Use Guidelines": full detail of compliance of which is provided in the submittal materials. Exterior amenities that complement the natural landscape include an extensive hike and bike trail/sidewalk with fitness stations intermixed (This —i/2 stretch will complete the 3'a section of the 4 sections needed to reach Bear Creek Park to the north), outdoor kitchen and BBQ pavilions, dog park and dog wash facility, bike storage and fix./it facility and a resort style pool just to name a few. interior amenities include a 24-hour fitness facility, 24-hour digital package concierge. business center with computers and conferencing and spacious club and gaming rooms. The community will also boast 180-degree private views fronting the hike/bike trail. Bear Creek and the —33 acres of "on property" open space that will be dedicated to the City. As part of the our Conditional Use Request ("CU20-21"), we are requesting a few modifications to the flexible design standards in the "R-MF" Multi -Family District, as follows. First" ►,,e request an increase in maximum height. Similar to Phase 1, this development xN ill consist of 3-story buildings with a maximum height of —40 feet (to the midpoint of the roof height). Second, we request a modification to required parking. Per our Parking Study provided with this application, we propose a parking ratio of 1.6 spaces per unit. And finally, we request a reduction in the front yard setback relative to the flexible design standards. While our average setback on all buildings is 46.3 feet, there are a few minor encroachments —the largest (bv far) of which is 9.6 feet at Building 15 on the northern corner. As you are aware, this is an extremely narrow site as our property is sandwiched between TxDOT Right of Way, flood plain, and TRA Regional Sanitary Sewer Easement which necessitates the minor encroachments. The other reason for these encroachments is due to the required canting and slight rotating of the buildings shown on the site plan to comply with the variable width "borrowed landscape" District -Specific Design Standard 422. As an example. while the largest encroachment is 9.6 feet for building 15, building 8 is set back on one corner 67.6' off the public ROW. Mesa Planning and Architexas felt that these encroachments were a fair tradeoff in an effort to best comply with the District -Specific Design Standards. greystar.cvm GREYSTAR: THE GLOBAL LEADER IN RENTAL HOUStNGTM GREYsTAR r" These three conditional use permits will enable this project viability and provide for a high -quality development fit for ibis ulaique area and site location. Each of these Conditional Uses were approved for Phase l and just as they did then and continue to do now that the development is complete —will add to the enjoyment of the development and enhance to value to its future residents and the greater community of Grapevine. Our Planned Development Overlay request ("PD20-03") is for a variance to the minimum distance required between unattached building structures. Given the unique qualities of this site and the narrowness of the lot.. it is extremely difficult to reach a building configuration that can meet this standard of twenty feet orthe height of the building while also complying with the design standards required for multifamily setbacks from primary streets and achieve a curvilinear organization. This site is non -orthogonal in nature, and is not regimental in design. In order to optimize the view corridors towards the open space and away from Highway 360, this particular building layout is an important design principle that adds value to the enjoyment of the development. We feel that it is more important than the proximity to one another in these few cases. Similar building separations were also approved for Phase 1. Thank you for your assistance with processing these applications and please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding this project. na cc: gill Dahlstrom. Jackson Walker LLP Jo. greystar.c©m GREYsTAR" October 9. 2020 Ran Stontbaugh Assistant Director. Planning and Zoning 200 S. Main Street Grapevine. Texas 75051 Ile. Open Spare Dedication, Compliance with DFW requests, FAA Approval of'Budding Height Dear Ron: Thank you for your time regarding the exciting. Elan Preserve Phase 11. Pursuant to our previous conversations, we are forwarding this letter to (I ) express the our commitment to dedicate open space, (2) confirm compliance with Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (-DFW-) requests, and (3) summarize the Federal Aviation Administration's ("FAA") approval of building height for this development. First, we commit to dedicate approximately 33 acres for publicly accessible open space. For the purposes of this zoning request (Z20-03), conditional use request (CU20-21), and planned development overlay request (PD20-03), the land to be dedicated shall be included in the development's calculation for opens space requirement with the City of Grapevine. Further, in order to complete detailed design with site development and engineering, we propose to dedicate the property prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for development on the Property. Second, during the zoning process for Preserve Phase I in 2018. DFW had three requirements for out zoning case: (1) dedicate an AvigationlAviation Easement, (2) achieve a Noise Reduction of at least 25 decibels outdoor to indoor. and (3) disclose to residents the Property's proximity to DFW Airport. After consultation with DFW's Environmental Program Manager of Environmental Affairs, these three items are also required for Phase 1I. This letter serves as confirmation that we commit to the necessary easement. commitment to achieve the appropriate Noise Reduction (we have engaged SLR International Corporation), and disclose the location of DFW Airport to future residents. Finally, we received multiple "Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation" notices from the FAA for the proposed buildings based on aeronautical studies which concluded that each "structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation." This docurnentation was issued on September 17, 2020 and includes approximately 90 pages. We are happy to provide copies of these Determinations at your request. Please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions regarding this letter or any other items relative to this zoning request. Thank you very much. lo. greystar.com Location / Site Overview n Glass 6aclus K EN,gn,L-dss .Dove Rd Galy!lord'Texa.Resort ? } c B Convention Center a 100Dad uWake E Souddake e+yy � 114 d m o d Grapevine Y. A I 1- 1 114 Avd 75 } 114 Eoocang Dr p'c 171 n eia � BarbeM1kqd q y S � son Rd F g �--_ Hughes Rd z1 id W Glape Rd1 'a Cheek-Sparger Rd n m` IF M,d 04� � �a c Bear Cr Golf Club > Sa'rMld Dr Public Trail ilk a�. "Jib } � r 25 VOL Y lift r `y f "Trailside" Living rue=_��.� _• ' �l+' -.. i � v Y ' P1. �1 1 11• '♦� - !�-�fl:,. Ida Ilk as I 1 aa II``�� IIiil��!!lli� II N'I I19III��I�ll��l��I�� ri11�411 ..1......1j1 M. �aIau444iaoil ������rF��F Jill I�..t,Y lEll�rl:, ,� oil ONES mdom mm"r. F5 Lm w -a-- -.B- W 10 -4 .46 14, a i `� / GAP.Mit SC4E iN eEE� � z y ' \ — UWE l,n M \ R g SSIP \ ®3 ELAN GRAPEVINE s Z LU \ � CL lN,q y3s0 a4 W(ryo� THE PRESERVE z AT GRAPEVINE Q r LU LEGEND Z � Q tl F —fuWi�—sEEnfrr . J uj J ,,xwP mow. O 7-7 n..E wE ��0� � �•.a..,+•o SHEET.1 OF 45 "—^J wsso,un srvEE*rvvMBEq Ao- >J cu SUBJECT PROJECT EELANGRAPEVINE PHASE 2 47.36 ACRES ul � AT GRAPEVINE 20.3E ACRES LLI Z H IL LU < a_ U, F55 t < x X F- LU ui z 0 L) SHEET 2 OF 46 eEa 2 y ' LOCATION MAP 'w GRtP pt SCAiE IN iEEi '� ../ � a ITE q , 1 x nW� r,Ut== COD UJI -- ------ ----a- --1----- u� s - z - - - ----- - _---- --_ W i _ 4 - Q W r } �I T U o— — STATE HIGHWAY 360 - o.=•=* � Z O s- ---- -- - - W OEEiMTpryB •.cE osaweu LEGFNp srt,Mor.,ewesuo�uen xirs.<waL�mo-.matat � m ,M - �,� A<e iM0.iE BlNI➢..NG ME GLASS rwE e „ n �. u .s .� ILpMG IYPE ME[GIR raunw e.._.oxrrt,au. •� �� 'wo eomuEs,e LU SHEET3 OF 45 sr. e LcCAlIRN MAP �q CRWHit i4siL iN fEF� cvnRfuEPSRiv.wEST (PMiaF CXg 9x�.41@ --STATE HIGHWAY-380 -- pores 9EEiwnaNs - ••�°� .ate. - FCEHo � pnvgpvvMTE Bf4.491Ng HEiF'rT3 ccvmrw,v.mr+aEn BFR we TvvE RE,pNT er.e urmcvx, - - umm ,o ure.m..r ao, SHEET4 OF 45 N LL O Z Q J CL LLI CO 4 ---------- - ------ -- --- -- -- _ - --- - - _ - -- --- ------ --- —-- • � —� _ - _� � _--_—_ _—_ _ - _ _ _ — __ __ - _ _ OGRA ZOIC SCli YN FEET� __ -- — _ _ / r ___________ ` _ _ ______ ----I — I � ` �� ems..._ _•---__—__—__ '_ - "` STATE HIGHWAY 360 In vArtwaiE vn�iN NI;wE#mAn � — — - ----- -- - ----- - -- - — — Y p, 1 • _ -- _—_---- _ _ _ __ r 1 ^ a LU I TTawl Z .._.�._.._ piles CD - - W rr I I n I I J r — _ " ___--___-_. (n2 __ --------- -- r- -------------------__—'-_ r----------------------- x ��----------------i,_-1----.-----------__—__------- Zw r - ... -- J --_ — _ - Ei STATE-HIGHWAY560— — — — — — -- — — — — ' _ EX-taE UNITUSCRIPTION �o©©o©m©ommmmmmm �roo•o00000000000000 ©® ©m000000©©ool��caol�rn■�i�o�o� �lofo■000000©©oo©00000�>� mom®000000000000aooar�� � os.�®oAll�sodo©o 0000 - 000 o, ��®o■o•000000000000000® ��®o•®00000000000lr0000��� o•���lo•o�0000000000000oo�o�r o_�®ot®oo©00000000©©©o��� ��oto•®��Idr00000000©©©oo�� ��mo•00000©©000©0000�a�o,o� , ���mo■a0000©©©00000000���� ���e�mdo4ll�n■oo©000000000a�� o_�mo•®000000000000000�r ��om®000�pr00000000000� r ota®000©000000om000d �■ o_�mo®000©oor�IRal00000000�® �■r�otm®000000000000000� = ® ����®00000r�000ll�00000®� c����m0000000000000000 ��ot®a000000000roroor000Am ����m0000000000■r.�lo■�ol�o�� ��Ilo���00000000�000000a Im>�®000000000000000E�� 1 ®>a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E# R!l o da1 oE ® a I�000000000oO©00MENEI 0m ����a®®00000©©000000����oo ®da0000m©omommoo®®® SITE PLAN - REr-MR CIVIL DRALJINGS SHEET- 5 OF 4 5 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DATA - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS B00PARTNERS GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR aaias.%se°"" KITCHEN ENTRY vo.I.C. BATH LIVING 1 DINING BEDROOM (� 1UNIT -� 1 �-- 7- KITCHEN KITCHEN ENTRY WIC BATH WIRY 177,NL:L BATH LIVING/DINING I BEDROOM Lf7o (*' �170"77 UNIT PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE 11 GRAPEVINE, TX— GREYSTAR LIVING! DINING BEDROOM BALCIPAFIO MEEKS PARTNERSI.., ENTRY KITCHEN r iL r-BATH r � BE!n(SM 11 LIVINGICINING 3 UNIT Ala y i UNIT A2G UNIT A 2 4 SHEETS 7 OF 45 UNIT PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS PARTNERS 7 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTART. , �,a GAR. ACCESS - - u - -, KITCHEN t + e ENTRY ��` I 1° W.I.C. I — BATH LIVINGv! DINING R BEDROPM KITCHEN r ENTRY BATH r LIVIN G I DINING x BEDROOM r`BALCIPATIO � UNIT A3C 3 UNITcA3B � 2 .UNIT A3A � UNIT A3 SHEETS 8 [IF 45 t A= =Ioa UNIT PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS "° PARTNERS 8 GRAPEVINE. TX - GREYSTAR seusaa+'n ea. em% � UNIT ALB 71 KITCHEN W.I.C. ENT BATH - LIVING I DINING BEDROOM !zs.wa •- BALGPATIO UNIT A*4A 2 1 /4 =1 —G su csr i KITCHEN W.I.C. I IvJ� I_ BATH ENTRY LIVING I DINING ,Ira BEDROOM BALCIPATIO SHEET, 9 [IF as UNIT PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE 11 MEEKS "= PARTNERS 9 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR ,ror w.l.e. KITCHEN ENTRY BATH J LIVING I DINING _ WE w.I.c. - BEDROOM — BALCIPi UNIT A5G 3 UNIT A56y 2 UNITc145A M J , o KITCHEN ENTRY i LLI BATH - LIVING I DINING ll l �IIIJIp w.l.c. BEDROOM BALCIPATIO �WPS 0.wr,xo�N'oaxiwcoiae'mnx I re SHEETS 10 OF f 45 I I UNIT PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS PARTNERS 10 GRAPEVINE, TX-GREYSTAR nO KITCHEN ENTRY O BATH 1 ; ; I�. Lam_ �e�J II �' DININ G UTILITY n�I ' u LI�INM BEDROOM BEDROOM ! BALCIPATIO BALCPATIO u Z UIV�T 46A I Uitp�7 A6v SHEET, 11 [IF 45 UNIT PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS PARTNERS 11 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR „oo LJ u l • ` j L � � w.l.c. I UTILITY STUDY I I ENTRY - _- 71 KITCHEN BATH ENTRY I P w.LG STUDY - UTILITY KITCHEN DINING Wu re .,rr _ BATH PDR.`. PER. LNING -o L BEDROOM BEDROOM W.LC.. W. BALCfPATlO BALCIPATIO r � U�l�t A'14 liN�i 41 SHEET, 12 Z 1 �jr1 ❑F 45 UNIT PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE 11 MEEKS"PARTNERS �12 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAIR „ore W.I.C. ENTRY M-BEDROOM M. BATH r KITCHEN LIVING a L-._.� ill J BEDROOM 2 DINING WIC BALCIPATIO u u 4 3 urvir eza W-L(J. ENTRY_ M. BEDROOM M. BATH ,..� I N x %D KITCHEN LIVING BEDROOM2 DINING nu . va W.I.C. BALCIPATIO u 2 uNlr e2 ENTRY O LIVING/DINING - L_ KITCHEN- i m —'M BATH BEDROOM2 w.l.c. ` -- M. BEDROOM � u>vIT sip ENTRY O a JJ LIVING I DINING 'JHENiT M. BATH BEDROOM W-I-C- W.I.C. M. BEDROOM 0UNIT BI '5 UNIT PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE it GRAPEVINE,. TX - GREYSTAR c � I I SHEETS 13 OF 45 MEEKS PARTNERS .�. UNIT B3A 2 ,�; -, PAR. LIVING � OININO W V H Y UNIT PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II GRAPEVINE, TX- GREYSTAR L UTILITY ENTRY Jnx6o 1 � ® 111 M. BEDROOM BEDROOM2I ., �+.nvso.cvM°m�"9°a rmx - _-Y gwxmcnx: zoxixc cournssmx HEE OF FT115 14 o� MEEKS z PARTNERS 14 ENTRY KITCHEN I BEDROOM W.LC. ff V = —_ Eull� n LIVING DINING yam M. BEgD TM W LcI Ell I BEDROOM3 BALClPA_. ,� I � 1 i ' UNIt GI sNEEn is OF <s UNIT PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS'' PARTNERS 15 GRAPEVINE, TX- GREYSTAR — zews�; .. W.LC. BEDROOM #3 - t _ BATH 2 — L--___ GaRaGE i UTILITY BEDROOM#2 e _ W.I.C. DINING ENTRY r ��� �•; y U �— �! -` L - --- PWDR. -� LIVING M. BEDROOM Qo `c J 11 a KITCHEN - 1 COTTACsE 3 rj� - h SHEET- 16 �)r� ❑F 45 UNIT PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS PARTNERS 16 GRAPEVINE, TX- GREYSTAR nas _..� BUILDING PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR � BUILDINCs I - 2ND FLDOR I i (,GILDINCi I - 15t FLDOic RI PI —(1" �asc� SHEET 11 OF 45 MEEKS PARTNERS 1.7;, M, � BUILDING I -ROOF I BUILDING 1 - 3RD FLOOR £rc 9c SHEETS IB ❑F 45 E9f en BUILDING PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS ­ PARTNERSI . GRAPEVINE,TX - GREYSTAR w°uB.:gO... — n 0 El Cl ❑ El ❑ ul ❑ ❑oo❑o 00 0 0 0 0 o[D OMmIm meld Cad I BUILDING rypr f - REAP, ELEV. o aao CD MASOIVfR Y � AL ULATIONS — 87 ,I VUID:S000 CALCULATIf7HS — 0,19:1 0 KEXN07F 1 MENR xW 1 ]pa .'❑e ]B 0 a� � � 1�7 © L� � .fin �D e -- - -- pp -._ o O ai O Y. s zo I] ❑ 0 C. III I r2� m O MAS010I CALCULATIONS — SHEET, 14 as BUILDINGS HYPE I - F9zONT ELEv. VOID: SOLID CALCULATIOfJS BUILDING ELEVATIONS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS sPARTNERS 19 GRAPEVINE, TX-GREYSTAR'� „D,s 01 I n ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 BUILDING tYf�E I - kIGNt ELEy. M 0 MASONRY CALCULATIONS US VOIC. SOLID CALCULATIONS — 011 I e.h mo Na1Nm`.su.m a ❑ KEYNOTE IFCFNfF run.ry� Ll t _ LA eln]tnnue��gf�a�a x MAypNRti CALCULATI CPf���86.5 .Aa.r T .,E w 1 SHEET, 20 BUILDINC- LEfT ELEY. s TYPE OF 45 ' VOIC', SCLVD CALCULATIONS — Q-11.1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS PARTNERS woaa N.�.uom. 20 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREMSTAR xewsceiai'� ���UILDINC, II - 2ND FLaOR u ° SUILDlNCs II - 1StL00 I4, .Uj u ET I ^ o. SHEET 21 - OF 45 BUILDING PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS PARTNERS 21 GRAPEVINE, TX — GREYSTAR ...,�„ ��UILDfNCs If - ROpF ®.--A7A —J A7A I-_� ,F a, eH, • --: PJ, "may- - --- - �,�UILaIN�s !I - 3iZD FLOOR STk #_rP (2 11T- I if - secvsowuna ; r�. L�EE D ® AM ''.7i,- A A-k � ® ® �_. n A3E ®. •l w.ww.ro .. SHEET, 22 I wn OF 45 qr ,AL] � _- l ' _ 4F }�. t. rrmwu sore rnrumiwaa.wraxw BUILDING PLANS — ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS `° PARTNERS 22 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR — Jp MN07F I MEW 4C CC'C CO C C C ❑C❑ CG CI C 0 C ❑CGl CCC G ,G O ❑❑ 0El C ❑❑ C _ vi�TM _ Cl Ll Y w� LLJ - -,� o LE o ❑o o o El 0 0 MASC,NP7 CALCULATIONS — 952% BUILDING TYPE II - RE,4Q ELEV. VOUSCILID (ALcuLATlcaNs' c,12:1 7 II + -t - -T Lu MASQNPt CALCULATIONS — 893T ON ��' '"c'a SHEET, 23 of .s BUILDING TYPE II - FRONT ELEV_ � VOID SDLIp CALLCC ULATIONS — D9: DJ9, 1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKs:aPARTNERs 23 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR O Cl El E] ED O 0 0 0 %LSULATIONS — 50-2%, �„ BUILDIN's TYE-E iI - RIGHT ELEV. ULID CALCULATIONS 017'1 0 E71 E:l o 0 2 0 0 0 0,-- s MASGNP. r CALCLLAT10N5 90,77 � � SHEET, 24 } 53UILDINCy TYPE II - LEFT ELEV- CALCULATIONS �t of ay 4GIG�SULIG CALCULATIONS 0121 nyF EQ 1 � �yuv_E_ 9 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS w: PARTNERS 24 GRAPEVINE,TX- GREYSTAR � BUILDfNG III - 2NL7 FLOOR f I �EL _ =1 a � _ _ Jl j-_ p; BU ILaING III - IST FLOQR _ r ® � _ t_ 1 __ ___ t— -- =T E wxwwrao mxiwcaweori SHEET 25 OF 45 BUILDING PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS PARTNERS GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR now 25 BUILD1NCz III - icOOF ®® AA A iC..I �.. AS ,. A7 - _ I A`-'E '.� - q nawrAeawmwx imx A^A 12A - - SHEET, — 45. BUILDING PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS PARTNERS 26 GRAPEVINE, TX- GREYSTAR ra,. ci ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ i 17 El ❑ ❑o ❑ -I i 1 ❑ ❑ ❑n oo❑e ❑ ❑ 000 0 00 TONS — 54 7' F BUILi�ING TYPE Ili - RE4R ELEVe nIp SOun CALCULATIONS �Ro1s ❑ KEYNOTE IFCFUC rt 7'77t.t - ❑71 Lt R �� ' 10W6�—8F04ekW— __ BOb 09600 R ❑❑❑❑ ❑ 19 ❑ ❑ ❑-17 - BUILDING TYPE III - FRONT ELEv- MASON1Rr CALCULATION5 - 91,12% rONS G° �" ��I SHEET, 27 OF 45 VOID -50LIU CALCULATIONS 2 e. <nxn — 0.16:1 - Mnuc�„ v zoo BUILDING ELEVATIONS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS H PARTNERS 27 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR n�a 0r :xe o00 0 Elo. ED o L — a { I F o o b o o ?= -L--ULATIOPIS - 96.'3% i,BUILDINC; TYPE III - RISHT ELEV. c.- - :zLCULATIT Ll Li o 0 0 © 1C o o:L Ell �i� RCh4 i 0 MA OIJP, CA-CULATIGHS 9� 18:o t SHEET, gg j BUILDING; TYPE III LEFT ELEV. Ma VOID. SOLID CALCULATION - 0-13.1 - eaca�ss �aWoso =s sac � rz 1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS PARTNERS • 28 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR"�00 a,.ss..I., - - CI' r7 kj =H C' 4 nBUILDINCs IY - 2ND FLOOR - - - - �1l3UfLDING IV - 1St FLOOi4 i - STR N3 - - i ®. e 6 �j•L s of 745 9 BUILDING PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE If MEEKS - PARTNERS 29 ,. GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR „°„ BUILDING PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR (-,-�BulLtmo IV -ROOF /8"-1' o �BUILD11�1G IV - '�RD FLOOR SHEET, 30 r fir. ❑F 45 MEEKS"PARTNERS 0 00❑ Q ao Ll 0 0 000 ❑000 ❑ ❑ ❑❑o❑ ODE o ❑ ? BUILnmw TYPE Iv - REAM ELEV. f a-i ❑ KEYNOTE LEMM �-- MAKNP I - - .,4.,m WUID, ® ® 5 LOT � n T © EE IMP FTT - 1 J T , I i , v -L T .PE 1- NIASQIJ.r CALCAAMNS - 89547 r$ SHEET 31. BUILDINCs TYi�E Iy - FRONT ELEv. ��,E.'o«�a.�r of as I 401D: 9LIG C'ALCULATIUNS - 0.15: 1. BUILDING ELEVATIONS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS PARTNERS 31 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR rrno TIONS - 88 .9% w01D-,L _ fA_CLILATIONS - 0.19.1 ❑rl _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑ r. 0 ('., `MU[LnING TYPE IV - RIGS 4T 6L6V. E T 7 Q o � KEYNOTE LEGEND 4--=, zzll.. I I� _ _ —4Pi. L n,awousa�vomow zm - — t -_ --1 n._L r rui�oxc.•_zeww mYuetgx MASONF CALCULATIONS 90e �m `� SHEET, 32 OF 45 ' 5UILDING TYPE IV - LEFT ELEV. QD:Mua caLcuLAnoNs 0101 jjp BUILDING ELEVATIONS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS PARTNERS 32 GRAPEVINE, TX-GREYSTAR .. - I I I� I I I I I � sul�aiN� v - oorTAC�E Roo;= F -- 1 7\j SHEET, 33 OF 45 BUILDINCs Y - COTTAGE E 1 o BUILDING PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS ` PARTNERS 33 GRAPEVINE, TX-GREYSTAR zm.a Ei ❑ ❑ C ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ j T J L J F L, �. Id ASnlyki GALCCILA11l1q° - 1au`:; BUILDING: TYPE V - LEFT ELEV. 43`, 1 m MASGNRi CALCULATIGN� - 14a4 BUILDING: TYPE V - t MAM ELEV, v414:sOuo cALaOLATIUNs eR41O a Q KEYNKEYNO�TE IFTFNC L7 E ❑ ❑ L ❑ ❑ u [, i k n C❑E: ❑❑noo Q❑ob MASIINRY i-ALLILATI4N5 111. — 11. jl'�BUILDINGs TYPE V -RIGHT ELEV. oIo:Qua cau.uLATlora= - a_ 1 re MASQNRY CALCULAT14NS - 96.7% r—,---�SUILDINp TYPE V - II ELEV, VOIa,_OLID C LCULATIONS �4.401 SHEET- OF 45 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS ` PARTNERS 34 GRAPEVINE, T%-GREYSTAR MAIL FITNESS ll _ .. ... PATIO .. _ .. DINING / LOUNGE 36..1`a ltd' I I I I CLUB ROOM I � - 1 � GAME ROOM L .- KIT- - NECH ` MICRO CONF. rr.v BUSINESS CENTER LEASMG2BBY _ MICRO I I CONF. OFFICE NANO NANO NANO CONP. CONF. CONF. ENTRY , 4­r WORK w ROOM I CLUB PLAN CLUB! PLAN - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II GRAPEVINE, TX- GREYSTAR �4 SHEET 35 es MEEKSPARTNERS 35 FM o © Fl- El Ell a0 E, tll� b oo a o0o Ll El - _:,,LULAT101'•f5 — 83.?"! tuUr W f I F fG fpc p oLeq %41GLUB - FRONT ELEVATION -17ALCULATICAIS - Cali 1 MASCNRY CALCULATIONS — 88.7% �CLUB - REAR ELEVATIONyCIC: SOLID CALCULATIONS �^ 0 46 1 Baa.�wUttL as saw ru E: rt A_ -__'I_, -°Li ULATKlNS — R0,7 CLUB - LEFT ELEVATION ..f , _ _ILI SALL<ULATICNS — C 17. 1 O O I1' f MASONRY CALCULATION` — 83.45% CLUB - RIG -IT ELEVATION VOID SOLID caLruLanans oi m , ea[aFs uuupy .s�sam � Fk�4oymai, r®m �^.�148✓——SEPkRulf— YF��pFl1 SNEET. 36 OF 45 v9p2p iE � ri wiwwrss BUILDING ELEVATIONS ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS"'PARTNERS 36 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR f '.',v°T.,.,,,o o 2 GARAGE ROOF PLAN G,4R,4*S PLAN GARAGE PLANS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II GRAPEVNE, TX - GREYSTAR SHEET: 37 QF 45 MEEKS 9 PARTP 3E16G0.0i5i Tmie MASGNk i SALCUL. TIO 5 - `.'."„ �1TYPIGAL CsARGCsE REAR ELEvAtION `uio_soun uAl c ATIVNS - 003I MASONRY LALCULA TION� 8`3_t a �•w �w s.c o w a n�.rz TYPICAL q,4RA rm rmcNT ELEvAt10,,� o.scu� cALcuLAnm`�s SHEET, 38 OF 45 a+E OF SE+' vmx GARAGE ELEVATIONS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE II MEEKS2B PARTNERSI J` 38 GRAPEVINE, TX-GREYSTAR KEYNOT€ L€GEND� 'r � ' Ital[ nEa[U :GlFr L� rvFta CFwEI� n!P4. l=P 11VNi, ($MWM frn:i:: rvE[P t�EYly IGwf (ErKOM ira�7x � — Gttt. t[zrnfc aFa[Fi a. Mi cu nuMPsnuYLLE H� _-- u[ uG <xvawc x+M Sium iulgvlF 5£cu v[IaL ppgG 5 ( aEln'nl! 'r�t(y lJ 9 � A CARPORT ELEV4tfON d SECTION C-11- ELEV'_LE[t _ �� — - am�oumvcort:cx O MASOHRY €ALCULATI GI!'� — 3.871 Ex Frw« SHEET 39 5 SGLICI CALCULAT10N5 —G't r T 45 ,TYPICAL GARAGE SIDE ELV EATION • ` of t�- CARPORT & GARAGE ELEVATIONS - ELAN PRESERVE PHASE ll �AEEKS PARTNERS39 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR ,Im. m � xo ram„ (—,-� OVERALL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN v—, I .,„Q BOB Jordan & Skala Engineers Z� Q � LU > U z w � w a!� V) CL >- Lu Lu ce _ {7 - _ DAFE DESCRIPiIC rFaecr r�umeer:rm D—, B,.,R checked s.W — OVERALL PHOTOMURIC PLAN SHEFf W.BER E 1.02 r�or �ssueD roF co*isrRuc r' L r 4� r • T r (1 PARTIAL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN G_ -w M@ Jordan & Skala Engineers Q ~ J Z LU < x r La 0 W > U Z w a w I— W (/) Cr w LU H PRIM RECORD Dnr€ issueD Eoz REv�510N$ .AT- DE SC RIPfION Projeci r,iomcerrso Orewn By:dR Checked By:MJ $HEEI DAE OVERALL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN sNee ri �neHx - E 1.02A �\ PARTIAL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E 7,e r -_ Big Jordan & Skala Engineers eu ""I Z w ZD Z y Q X Lu O w U Z w w F W N CL >- LU 2 o r-- PPoM RECORD WE IssIJED FOR REVISIONS DbIE DESCRIPTION P,ae<I ry,mee=TaD Dmwn BY�JP Checked By^� SHEETME PARTIAL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET NLrt.!4E4 E 1.02B p..uou uuu. ..r........... u■■■■�i a r�. u.• ru t i�Yi r...... fry • il' ■ ( ! ■ LAN38CAPE PLAAk BHEfT LP,4 ■ LAN68CAPE PLAN: BHiT LRt ■ L.A1�6CAPE PLAN:. MEET LIP-4 • LANJBCAPE —AL—- -..rw j �LAIiDBCeAPB FIAN:1D3 ■ _ _ .......... II ■• T ■ `#. .y:..w■uiuuu.rru. u..o. u...u.uu.. �'. u.i o.................1 Y / • ■ ` _ /_ e Ir % %r T07AL SITE OPEN SPACE .nx.fa 11oNwi 9e,epD g SDYK xEcrnngxx eP[x sv�¢ 5: (N.Sx) 4 {.e Bxl LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS (LOT 2, BLOC( A) °f 19el�1rnE5 tt,Tk D[kLapnBii uov.. 1�� wfs) xuuafa GF u/6fnc sr Avc nxfn lY1 /iwx oaP s se.xxz or v uw I �u�m u lwlOP9 e.16) M;^�ercn nxf/ 0 9v Gf pEy- NfGIIXt uxPEt+�E .® Bl � tAEE hR vwlffn rsuxo um IERMWs rt6 rt ryiY 7 +IOF Vi�wnMc .0 re¢11/lo wx —T) 11 1 mfc/5e is a aeaWfTw nrcs mE[LeeN 5; Y M I I.A � WSET /]W� S �F Np1 ei YRE[/.az Y 6 NCN-wcAllw 6EN T.fE - srnw �f'1 e,ems S.Z.seY s/mxTse. aa..,. a 2Vo 0 POe xp0 MnERNd{iw nLWCkM 2 SITE LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) x e.�n�rmlmf 1dPi 'R —aP01 -- vTf 9V.YiMr.Iioza.+rGw.swex w.x SHEET: 40 OF 45 s PFPPP4%MMTE PIITUNP �� Ez{5nY1G TPEF��s � ll// ;��I�„D�I;g; PPHtRETEE,aEwa_R a �PaR4.� LBGR. su4iE¢ FEacE To xurcx- �rl�el`e, kUug o,a «.,,Ilr ,+ wr'.141,arw vn€ mint Damn olg ou lo+a[e �n ��rqum ImMwo MW . maoauN memin0.�M9lnry rv•mg, MIdl�0.q� �elaML+q�TM �++a29. ma Ml�r wd�. o[tlHla€ [anvnan to M of Ima[[cP�n�x IyM1e lw�G[m.1 A 4.1 mei[rlel p ®Lem[eN amen n e HGTE uxvwarw.rewimu.EE FFOU TIE PPHroVEociY PLWfusr ryµj �� E[TECTE6PYMEFE�PC651 �' kMt4u2=1CPIs CvxEMIHTOTNE wlaly ma � mt en[pllen w � '� u� Neuwn wkty[w+ C 1 I O I 1 x—�Pr Y I I I wXET+{ 4 aHPwU 9x EKP FIRET GIUPHIG SCOLE e'�3a' as o- ao so wnLLn.srrow.r xoRm MpopPTDWIµ r¢ireliliaesE¢r€I�x�:o LOCATION ASAP - I iMAttM 4RG.IELY FEucE (NOT TO SCALE) - I, n LEGEND . a• PPER EHnDE! xPPHwEocm Pl}Ti UST UNE�EEL14T x� I EXISTING I PHASE to tEl°uwas�u enlL cP cHwEsi elsTatHE : halo I r � R my TaFx � .Pnar+asEoecaev€Rslxoeiza:E P o0PP4�DC�HpyEMM1REE4 FA iVwlVi LbY lµ j PFIux61+i4 TgEE LST- ❑ PP HiPP9E�0 UHa6CAPEPwVi1HG fuD41AwHOVED CRv ❑ NiDPL5E0 UCNCHE[E 91aEWALY. 43VI4411 at N �� —•— TsuuRsrE¢FEwcE �� YH[oFos€c PET rums fHCP64€e LI6Hi9PLlM1[ PRPPosEo cuRroRrs _'-_ � 6 NePan�u� �' n e.wrmonnunon .zm z. ,� zet coLunlH � 7 ...,..... D.R —� ,...Ia,e.PP=a.D[w.l�, � STATE HIGHWAY 360 FRONTAGE ROAD SHEET: 41 OF 4E w ' ♦ I ! .. ........... ►,�� wrA LupO.! oue.aE..a L.E i .� u i:.zti +cnis�` MTK p£V6dPM&C uan n,i5a Ei (,., ze �wEsl emss rexwxe swurc rao..a . o.io1 wra aF K� sr R[E/.0a Sf ❑ rtfp0 MnERIOa lFHES[LPE N <f pvFs � ¢Pert P..N,pP la:oro .Np IEz.n�E .Es P•tw�x6 xw - wEnrn'rE«rman , mez/m �r a PTfec�Ea=rtrt .wE. ,cs ate+-vEac�,rrs �vaa APE/�SS�rtE NON-WUWCN MFNESP.cE 8f 11.EfnOPc s Q= xpN-'M1�nWVR WEN cE FLcngi F W) ai.p'tl SF sr/ ucw � Ihlex Of PETAININE WALL. — TPnsP PECEPrnuE rtvP. � NEOWiETEELFENt.GWOP STATE HIGHWAY 360�„,,, UNpa�PE.MONT FRONTAGE ROAD GWNNIC SCII.E I'�ap' 0 0 b Ep oeEEns�oPe woP�P LOCATION MAP (NoT Tc SCALE) LMENO 0 AaeP9YE0 trtY PU—T oL"EEsT Ep ��ELw� EP CH HE9F P3TncT£ o • a NO W s E0 a' G4.IPER SH1p E I REE PP��r E ID n TR- PN ePwv,.p AWPavEn crtr I C )� � aROvasF.p CpHCRETE PIpPw/q,t ,� � s r t >t PPOPOE�PETUPNNwAu - n1 Meaa�pweti oJPo��s are.�PNT . MOWS®LY�M[BOLLMO " F 8 >u n.Nn.a.lns..nm..mm � —ems g 2 SHEET; 42 OF 45 s �• .�:�aXA,�R�ro�„�`: oxW�E ` e•1iYPIR�,�l,.1 a Fmw�mssa�ms 1 0 r+uEE srEEE raPW.W y 3O .•nreE Si.EFi PicA•FTs i! P oc xqx qO STUaE SIEFF �ni u O ©5 RPPROVEagiuWtMii %Gtg.'I.IWw n za I ll a'tr+P. O a 6' TLIGIM.AR $TEH PERIMETER FENCE -- - sxarwecRE rrYP 1 � 6RARXIC SfAE - ]P L ]0 60 4�e nWrFwORru SITE T N % mnmT � 9 LOCATI�]N MAP = I (NOT TO SCALE) - LEGEND RROPosF4% I _____-___ • APPRD1EmCMPuull usiE __ - _____ -- �-- •m Ro ' � snwF rnEE j- 0• rxwriisW BLDG, 12 1 •co / •tm� _ BLDG. 13 EmRRox oeo ar •Ro - _. cnxssEvsracHE Fi� FIrnESm ARFA PH44E2 �E xIDULW siEFE FFteCE lm eRRUpCs[od [wPEPSX4DF TREE Ul / MaTCR PnaWCT n-T+CE I NW I W mMtlwPsiEA IN PACu PneR�€o r a mFFs 1N e�° aamRmH / I y1y O R aux mi ... L -D EH tE J° z1z RecEvrAc�Fnma •eP _ _ w iR��e vAw�ox�s, F' � PR 9HCwx_F FmsiJ� 5'iF9imEwAYX . 1 PPUPos Eo i.WosCm£PLVttINO IaFa �J RFWR�54PR0 �Fm BY j � I 4F£AS PR li uATtH PQ r ro •cm s 1 f�--: " _ =12 ❑ MNf xSi yEo crrc 1 wHs E •� � _ _ _ wn— — __. n ns�R�_ `R _ ♦ �I_ _ _ i' F 1° F F L PRaPo-•tnrmruwxo vn k •---`_---- f I neWm�OOENmH. PRmPosEOE,�EREPUR = ------------- BLDG. 15 - _ mrW SHnaE srRucroRE i vamvs*raRos ^ BLDG. 19 11 vRavaseo uoln Raugo — q 1' — Ala--t • - •c� GARAGE I I V r 1 uwe SiFEI %ENPNU MAM 6GRE�mSGPE IWFRONi srmxF COLUMIISATLGRNEREhP.I �' STATE HIGHWAY 360 FRONTAGE ROAD FACH anFgxc RTP.1 3 A4wiMawMm+ Fmx. � nawwwoipw.a pyRWaUx E � SHEEP: 43 OF 45 GwANwI� =�LE ._30 6F E%ISIING PRE �IAh6S- /' I II / f MTER SPPpNn4'�lX nIRRpRT 1 I I g n �IXG I I I I � APRHILWTF tnR11nE OFfYIGnugTVE ��. -------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOT 2, BLOCK A ,s �slwaRE FeFr 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I � s I I I I I LOCATION MAP E I (NOT TO SCALE) - tE ExiSn'xp TREE I.w55 I TrvlcrE ' I _ _ _ __ -- ---- ' LEGEND _ _ _ ___-_____ _y___--___--- -_-_ _ _ _ _ ___ __-- — ____-______ _I __ I ---- vRaroEEo +v aggqEEOGW➢ErLWOw TcFreunTNe crreov>ro u ___ Aai - __--___-_-__ I- 'fir G Ew I v Y - _. I I to pnwWMln oul 111 -- _ _ _ _ � - - - - __ - -- ---------- gig co- GIINf6f FL6TACNE � aRGEGEEGGRN6�ENT6LTREE6 ---_---__-_ _1.` F �IW FNnNARL.�,�ntnral,NTL�T GRNV.,ENTnL TREE L w w Re R�ofiuG ��d% TYN rnR E�rMIFONEUT: Zlx PR6�SE�G LANOGfwPE PlwNiw� NACNRO6 NrTTH 9£ Ncn I I-aY,�tN$EG TWJL IJ ❑ ¢LANE LIST II III i I tVLVEAt C=1�Va aRav�sev cou[rreTE SIGEwwT I Y <ia a II ,s I a I � ilJ.�.E � i. aROPo6mRETAIwNGwAu i 6^�'�^ E"'"r pv,MAOE ����� �TwvL urart snovm ls�caxc� u. I Iwaaasm r.roor lsEcwr ESM, uF cpnSTRucnplN� I TUGVIM STEEL i£NLE _ `\\ I IV I I 1 ' I a gipppsm LIGHT SOWFo OF F%ISNNG TREE MaSBE I ` 1 __-`____ Rr+avasso cARooRTs c 1 S I I I I I I I I ✓ 1 1 �-_______.I Y STATE HIGHWAY 360 FRONTAGE ROAD II --------------- rwnwenwo- aaerarwv®ox SHEET: 44 OF 45 3 LUTEoxT,�E - owNNSEa�wE or E�sni�GmE �ti �- oEExvrnxG h�� FPPnorJWYE � �F Ensnrc cassx 'A 1 r 6✓/ , � � y 1 1 1 f I 1 _J w \r ., I I NOSE THE demur Sx� SCONOEPN44 IN ME EIEL-TTiNE OR OONESNucYNxl F�fAGS ?'oAD OR 1c SCSLE 1'=]O' 3O O ]c 40 IN � nuPiLTmREx SITE LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) LEGEND 0 LO�EInE OEx� ROVE➢ cv cxmesawsracxE muu m�aRRO o�vEo Efl'rRANfIffi! [P�p nM1t _„__ LEniu iPe[Lsr Eo1wNr�AT� UVE Grv� n�c�EEo�N�E,EE��T,NLx 11E311LM.STEEL FENLE � AAtpoSEO PETrNRfa PNoroaEo uGNr BouAFO ± "_ � Pxmd9Eo ulixaNS6 F E s 8 SHMT; 45 Of 45 4 4 Tom. LANDSCAPE CALCVLATONS (LOT Z BLOCK A) wti„A Y (IRSB wGhS) Pivss RIAXwG uaAWE uiix`rrx" n wm%Iw: g sv.a Maw ss. / , �iw � x.vx rr an u � � vl ewe souuc rao].v[ v a�i o1 � � I m[C/�.vVurtn[We-'wrtvltR��[➢[ we�K3 x��tt5 Ru/.w' uR -.1) ,TS 45 I lN[E/w If Cf PFmrE]E4 wAu KS ll ,4ITA— cP[]1 , m¢/aow u a w�wl-wliauR awu, mwce gcnw mini e,.� g - - - - - - STATE HIGHWAY 360 - --- FRONTAGE ROAD ffiAL,111E OPEN SPACawTaru�w[aM]wwa aw/�wi m.aaa s T. S Rae q o. Ipro el�lsr( eq cawM¢ srxt I_co' w o so laa LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) OTOTAL USABLE RECREATION OPEN SPACE TOTAL AOOITIONAL OPEN SPACE SITE OPEN SPACE (GROSSARFA) $MEET: t OF R NI I �I I I I WI 1 ZI f\ v=jr I �J I I i 6AUA5/PGR! „6RM MRTMATWu. I SITE i LOCATION MAP sur", rt_NAa rscwu ----y (NOT TO SCALE) o°o�TM '----- t LEGEND unecerv+E•wne _---- =TOTAL USABLE RECREATION _-_ _-- .o�Rcleeuaw O¢R?- i OPEN SPACE BLOG13 _PTALADD ONAL OPEN _L____- _______ SPACE _ t F--7(GR OPENSPACE -- - - I (GROSS AREA) FRONTAGE ROAD c JBI,EM a R�Pd 20 eye... 7soo. PARTNERS I TWLSNaFIoa/b0ao OPEN SPACE EXHIBITGIRS LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 002 THE PRESERVE — PHASE 2 �M Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas 2 District Specific Standards • Buildings Step where possible in concert with Sites vertical fall towards creek to minimize retaining walls in highly visible areas. '" • Maximize buildin architecture with its ability to accommodate grade change v' turn � down footings., —�, s w.��U _ • .Architecture will support Site's unique topographic characteristics and constraints. 3 Foot 1 rtical Fall 25' Foot'Vertical Fall Turn -down Footing _, .I-GIL Turn -down, Footi - �, ,,y. - -. tea• - • ;Elan Grapevine will complete Section B (I -o-, I� g Section C and D as the only sections left,' -- plete. • Trail is a 10' wide concrete hike/bike trail with benches, lighting, dog park and fitness structure to compliment the Phase 1 design standard. 1 Mile of 4 Trail Connections (2 beyond the project) pen Spac 33 acres Hike/Bike Trail �1 m if Elan Grapevine (Ph. RSTi,t i ear Creek Standard #3 — Preserve and Restore Natural Mosaic, Page 1 • "Re -knitting" - Elan Grapevine will tie in the existing natural Ii characteristics (Vegetation) of the project's surroundings as shown in the landscape plan below. • Enhanced Screening— Dense tree groves will buffer Hwy. 360 frontage road. On the trail side, we will also restore the 60' of TRA tree clear -cutting that was recently needed to build the regional pipeline (see orange graphic below). =,1. `.. Eastern Buffer • Densely wooded floodplain • .S Mile to DFW Airport / Avg. rear -yard setback 270' • —50' Vertical rise to airport from center of site • Noise reducing windows 67' Front -yard Setback Western Buffer • 31' to 67' Private densely landscaped buffer along frontage road / Avg. 46.3' front -yard setback. Site retaining walls ;,-Nwe,Redu4,ing Windows I l r Ao • x B ear.Creek. �--' pen Spac A. 33 acres -Elan r r e (Ph. 2) Trail rn - H i ke fBike � � .,� 0 _ �� �� o • o d @ mil_ Standard #7 — Maximizes Uses Appropriate to the Value of the Setting and/or Characteristics..., Page 4 "0 Value of the Setting: • 10/16 Bldgs. have panoramic nature views - • Architecture compliments the natural setting • Public Hike / Bike Trail — Phase 2 of 4 is % mile long 0121 • 33 Acres of private creek-sideA. open -space FF. ��,(� ' `� � `�a�_ ��' ♦ fir. i Standard #12 — Resort Lodge Styling Forms, Page 7 Timber Frame Accents 80% IV w/ Pi Tr or Structural/Accent Architecturally Enclosed Balconies Large Roof Clvprhanas red Stone ►lumns d Metal Awnings Standard #13 — Curvilinear Organization of the Development Plan, Page 8 * •-C�F.ti*" :Y•a .�• tr+.` ''� }.r�Tj,_'1(' iy°1f#il� .A� v;- �• �- t .i. i+2•. ,.....y �..�''.�+ti-'1 F. 1}.�.a,hlA �T1f VrirY','�:' -a!.� ate- �:a• ��.4 r T _ _.a- �• t �'fa,/ryLjy�� �• ' �', i�c '%•� � �1.'�•x!�� ...',i�'+'':; :'Z�� c'r.. �,` ��'Z� �r`�'�: ` ' +�. cs. ti'�`j - - cu 14 Tree Layout lie 1,0 v 1 . l �i rT I RU- Standard #14 — Conceal Visibility of Service And Parking Function, Page 8 s1i �, � �` 3 .� ;�� j.•'. `��.� �f`. -�; ,� �. `Si fir+ v:��� . _ .t�. Z .i• .. , �•_ �. • l a' am �w1"'•�'.. !•x'alV�, ..t i. f. '�' �T►,fAk •�' �,'� , .. ..k, .yjr _i' ��t�al • � �.V�+� •. ,,,, .. � � � r+'fr +. •ti � ,4, !j'.",;+��;.,I�t'�•}r ` �.,. `t� �- t��. •.r f'j ,�, �_ { k.• . \ "lid.! `4M�?R'� r.r It ""�. .,�rT 4}lr w�'a �a.,4.r•p. f6. 4` �y'L, low L. Ak - A , _-; �- �,;. - - -- -Now Standard #14 — "Borrowed Landscape" (Parkway & Trailway) Front Yard: 31'- 67' Wide Parkway Average Qatkni-L- = Ag" Rear Yard: '121-395' Wide Parkway Average Set Back = 270` *Complies with the Borrowed Landscape or "Re -knitting" of natural landscape concept. MCA--- Lu i�v 40 �w General Design Standards Part A: Site and Design, a.4., Page 18 — Traffic Calming '.1 i w • ;1 Mike of 4 Trail Connections (2 beyon #hip o' ) Expansion and relatability to the 33 res of Open Space — 16x the open space requirement. • Vehicular connection will be made to"The Preserve" (Ph. 1). 4 Seamlessly ties with the surrounding natural environment both in form (esthetically) and function (Public "Trail JI Trail Access Points en SpaCE 33 acres 1. ice/Bike Trail �1 m ` BBear Creek _E�ie�erve Elan Qr aevine,. (Ph. 2) v r. Part A: Site and Design, c.1.,i-ii, Page 18 — Building Relationships to the Street 1" T `' Elan Grapevine exceeds the required recreational �op6ff -plc.^ 6.3x • Total Site Area 2 062 567 SF • Total Recreational Open Space Required 81,000 SF . • Total Recreational Open Space Provided 512,471 SF (24.5%) • Total Additional Open Space: Provided 1,006,614 5F (48.8%) a � Opd`h Space Provided 73.6o k. r , f � B' ear Creek pen Spac 33 acres Bike Trail �1 mi V Part B: Building Design Standards, a. - g., Page 26-29 Proportioning Regulating Lines Projected Window Surrounds Hierarchy of Dominant and Subordinate elements —1, 21 3... Is Vert. & Horiz. Alignment of Openings All windows below cornice detail Part B: Building Design Standards, a.- g., Page 30-31 Required >4' building Offset everv5Olinear ft. 50' Part B: Building Design Standards, a. - g., Page 32-33 Same Roof Dominate and Subordinate Pitrhpq Roof Masses All Stair Towers Enclosed in Architectural Skin & Expressed as a Roof Form i Solid :io ance — See Arch. Drawings Part B: Building Design Standards, a. - g., Page 34 Timber Frame Accents 80 /o IVY w/ Pi Structural/Accent r,--- - - - Architecturally Enclosed Balconies La rge Roof r)vPrha nac °ed Stone ilumns d Metal Awnings Part C: Building Construction Standards, a.—d., Page 36-44 Precast Header and Footers 6-Inch off -set at 40-year (life -time) High Profile Composition Shingle Brick Masonry Natural Stone Masonry Transition 80% Masonry — Ashlar Pattern High Quality Living (Phase 1 Actual Photos) E L A N GRAPEVINE Lhh.- it 13MEM.-L I I Ll F- I III a ; It INN ll 0 Great Room I 2 If 11 I �M -".Iolmdmmmcmp- Kitchen m Club Room •j - _ �y 1 F`yrl j-, :{7441,�'i1 �, FlFl1lYT.^3`� 41 ,![mac. �. �� ,y;f •,arc ,,,. _ �. - . !J Golf Simulator and Theatre j 77 AW Key Benefits To City Developer Funded Connection to the Big Bear Creek Park Public Trail —$700K+ Permit Fees 166x Increase in Property Tax Revenue A High -Quality Residential Community that gives more to the community than it takes 33 Acres of dedicated open -space E L A N GRAPEVINE