Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-10-21 Joint Meeting CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1980 AT 7 : 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � � I. CALL TO ORDER II. INVOCATION: Robert Sands III . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z80-41, submitted by Schepps Food Stores. B. City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z80-43 , submitted by Suzanne Sapienza. C. City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application A80-44 , submitted by Cinco Banditos. D. City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning �"`'' Application Z80-45 , submitted by Dennis Roberts . �rt IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING A. City Council to remain in Session to consider further published agenda items . B. Planning and Zoning Commission to recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to consider their published agenda. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETIN� AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1980 AT 12 : 00 P.M. �����2`,p�l' Shirley A mstrong ,�� �— City Secretary `'`J,�� �1ww a CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1980 AT 8 : 00 P .M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET �»„ V. CITIZENS REQUESTS �I VI . NEW BUSINESS � A. City Council to consider a resolution approving the issuance of City of Grapevine Industrial Development Corporation Borids, Series 1980 (Standard Motor Products, Inc. ) $3 Million and any and all other related and necessary legal matters. B. City Council to consider authorizing the City Staff to accept bids for the Middle School tennis court fence. C. City Council to consider amending the City Code, Chapter 7 , Section 140 by adopting the 1979 edition of the Uni- form Housing Code. D. City Council to consider authorizing payment to Trinity River Authority for the Little Bear Creek Sewer. E. City Council to consider traffic control ordinance rela- tive to stop signs in certain designated areas. F. City Council to consider a traffic control ordinance relative to speed limits on certain city streets. �:� � G. City Council to discuss amending the City Code relative �� to relocating portable structures. H. City Council to consider the hearing required by the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 . VII . OLD BUSINESS City Council to consider the first reading of an ordinance annexing certain property. VIII . ZONING CASES AND PLATS A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, relative to Zoning Application Z80-41 (Schepps) and a subsequent ordinance. B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, relative to Zoning Application Z80-43 (Sapienza) and a subsequent ordi- nance. C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the �^" Planning and Zoning Commission, relative to Zoriing ; Application Z80-44 (Cinco Banditos) and a subsequent � ordinance. � D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, relative to Zoning Application Z80-45 (Roberts) and a subsequent ordi- nance. E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission relative to the Metroplace Preliminary Plat. IX. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS and/or DISCUSSIONS Mayor to consider appointing committee to determine �°" the most desireable place for Municipal Complex. � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C .S . , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1980 AT 2 : 00 P.M. Shirley Ar strong �-j��, City Secretary —0 � ,�.,., �.,,� � �r CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1980 AT 7 : 00 P.M. CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN STREET �""�, � City Council to host a reception for applicants of the Citizen' s Advisory Committee. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S . , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1980 AT 10 : 00 A.M. � Shirley rmstrong J�. +� - City Secretary �..� � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1980 AT 8 : 00 P.M. CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN STREET !�" V. PUBLIC HEARING t � A. Planning and Zoning Commission to consider +r�r Zoning Application Z80-41 (Schepps) and make a recommendation to the City Council. B. Planning and Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z80-43 (Sapienza) and make a recommendation to the City Council C. Planning and Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z80-44 (Cinco Banditos) and make a recommenda�ion to the City Council . D. Planning and Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z80-45 (Roberts) and make a recommendation to the City Council. VI . PLATS Planning and Zoning Commission to consider the preliminary plat of Metroplace, and make a recommendation to the City Council. �, VII . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS and/or DISCUSSIONS � VIII . ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S . , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1980 AT 3 : 00 P.M. � � �-�- l ��C it-���'t�' irley Ar strongA.�, City Secretary +d � � �r STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in joint session on this the 21st day of October, 1980 with the following persons present to-wit: William D. Tate Mayor �' Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro-Tem Charles Dunn Council Member C.L. Oliver Council Member r�r�w William Shafer Council Member Aulton D. Mullendore Council Member Marion Brekken Council Member constituting a quorum with the following members of the Planning and Zoning Commission: Duane Rogers Chairman Harold Anderson Member Ron Cook Member Robert Sands Member Harlen Joyce Member Gerald Norman Member constituting a quorum with Vice-Chairman Sharron Spencer absent, with the following members of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Iwith City Secretary Shirley Armstrong absent. ,�: k CALL TO ORDER � Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Planning and Zoning Commission Member, Robert Sands. ' INTRODUCTIONS & PROCEDURE Mayor Tate introduced members of the Planning and Zoning Commission and explained the procedure to be followed during the public hearings. PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z80-41, SCHEPPS FOOD STORES The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing rela- tive to Zoning Application Z80-41, submitted by Schepps Food Stores. � Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon Assistant City Manager, Bill Eisen to explain the request of the applicant. �""' Mr. Eisen reported that the applicant, Schepps Food Stores was requesting that the property located on the southeast corner of Mustang and Tanglewood be rezoned from "C-2" Community Business District to "SP" Specific Use Permit for the storage, retail sale, and off premise consumption of alcoholic beverages, (beer only) incidental to the operation of a convenience store and gasoline service station and other uses as permitted in the "C-2" 10/21/80 Community Business District. Attorney Scott Keeshin made a presentation on behalf of the applicants including the history of Schepps past attempts to obtain a Specific Use Permit in the area in question. Mr. Keeshin added that at this point in time he felt Schepps had the support of the citizens. Mr. Keeshin further indicated that Schepps might decline to locate in Grapevine in the event the zoning is not approved. A lengthy Council and Planning and Zoning Commission dis- „�„ cussion was then held relative to store competition, proximity to an elementary school, and high school, other retail businesses within the shopping complex, and concern from the Council that Schepps had applied a third time for zoning in the same area. �`�` Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests to speak for or against the application. The following persons spoke in opposition to the requested zoning indicating that they were opposed to the sale of beer in their area: Mrs. Ann Glenn Mr. Gaylord Weinrider The Vineyard 2916 Ridgewood Grapevine, Texas Grapevine, Texas Mr. R.J. Shahan 2910 Ridgewood Drive Grapevine, Texas Mr. Scott Tarwater, 2829 Southridge spoke in favor of the re- quested zoning. Mayor Tate then asked if there were any letters or petitions � in regard to the applications. Mr. Eisen answered yes, and � read the following into the record: ------------------------------------------- � September 16 , 1980 Miss Shirley Armstrong City Secretary City of Grapevine P.O. Drawer 1547 Grapevine, Texas 76051 Dear Miss Armstrong: Republic-Loewi Realty Corporation is the owner of 23. 8 acres directly north of a proposed con- venience store to be located on Mustang Drive. We have no objections to this facility being granted permission to sell beer and wine. Very truly yours, Roland D. Freeman � cc: Mr. Pete Schenkel, Pres. Schepps Food Stores, Inc. �.� P.O. Box 11095 Dallas, Texas 75223 ------------------------------------------- 10/21/80 ------------------------------------------------ October 15, 1980 City Council Planning & Zoning Commission City of Grapevine Post Office Drawer 1547 Grapevine, Texas 76051 �.. Re: Zoning Application Z80-41 Members of the Council and the Commission: � I appreciate the notification on the above referenced application on the part of Schepps Food Stores. As owner of the adjoining duplex zoned property, south of the subject site, I would like to go on record as being in favor of granting "SP" Specific Use Permit for the storage, retail sale, and off premise consumption of alcoholic beve- rages (beer only) , incidental to the operation of a convenience store. I feel a well managed establishment such as Schepps Food Stores plus the added convenience of being able to purchase beer for off premises consumption would be an asset to the surrounding community. If you have any further questions or thoughts on this matter, please do not hesitate to call upon me. � Yours truly, � John R. McDearman � JRMcD/lp ------------------------------------------------ October 20, 1980 TO: The Mayor, City Council, & Planning and Zoning Commission, City of Grapevine SUBJECT: Zoning Application Z80-41, submitted by Schepps Food Stores I would like to express my opposition to granting Schepps Food Stores permission to sell beer at their convenience store to be located at the intersection of Mustang and Tanglewood as requested by this zon- ing application. Please consider the following items. l. Beer is already available at two locations on Highway 26 within a reasonable distance from Oak Creek Estates , Creekwood Estates , *'�' and the Vineyard. 2. This location is in close proximity to two r�,,,,,, s choo 1 s. 3. It is not necessary for every convenience store to sell beer, especially if it is down within our neighborhoods , and not on a major 10/21/80 thoroughfare. Schepps was content to build on this location, even though beer zoning was turned down before construction. 4 . It is my understanding that a strip shopping center will be built at the intersection of Timberline and Highway 121, just east of the apartments currently being constructed in an area already zoned commercial. This strip shopping center will no doubt have a convenience store and will also want to sell beer (perhaps at a more logical site, as it is next to High- '"""'" way 121. ) 5. It was brought to my attention that Schepps �:-#� has been quietly seeking support from some residents in Oak Creek Estates. Since time did not permit for much public response since the notice of this public hearing was issued, I 'm sure there are residents of this area who are opposed who have been unable to voice their displeasure. 6 . Lastly, the fact that this zoning case is again before the City Council, though defeated only a short time age, leads me to repeat an appeal I have made to the City Council before: The City Zoning Ordinances should be amended such that once a zoning case is heard, there should be a reasonable time period to pass be- fore the zoning case can again be placed before the City Council--- � be it 120 days, 180 days , or what- ever. It is unrealistic to expect � that your citizens should have to continually and repeatedly come voice their opinions as many times � as some developer has the $90 to give the City for the zoning applica- tion filing fee. Sooner or later, the citizens tire and no one shows up in opposition representing the citizens, and the developer gets what he wanted in the first place. You owe your citize�s more than that. Thank you for your time. Ron Dyer 2845 West Creekwood Court Grapevine, Texas 76051 ------------------------------------------------------------ Members of the Planning & Zoning Members of the City Council Please place my name in opposition to the zoning case � for Schepps Food Stores for a Specific Use Permit for the sale of beer for off premise consumption. I feel that by awarding this zoning case it will bring the sale of beer closer to our public schools. I am against '��` the request and speak only as a single school board mem- ber in asking for you to deny this request. Mike Davis 10205 Main Grapevine, Texas ----------------------------------------------------------- 10/21/80 Mr. Eisen also reported that a petition had been submitted with fifteen signatures in support of the application. Mr. Keeshin then made reference to Article 109 . 32 of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Control Statute which addresses the power of cities to distribute and control beer. There being no further discussion, Planning and Zoning Commission Member Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their � portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Gerald Norman and prevailed by the following vote: � Ayes . Rogers, Anderson, Cook, Sands , Joyce, & Norman Nays . None Absent : Sharron Spencer Councilman Shafer then made a motion to close the Council ' s portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z80-43, SAPIENZA The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z80-43 , submitted by Suzanne Sapienza. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. Mr. Eisen explained that the property in question, 920 and 5 916 South Main Street, was currently zoned "C-2" Community � Business District with the requested zoning being for a "SP" Specific Use Permit for the storage, resale, and on premise consumption of alcoholic beverages , incidental to the operation �""` of a restaurant and other uses permitted in the "C-2" Community Business District. Mr. Tom Sapienza gave a brief presentation advising that the Italian restaurant would be family operated by his wife who had a business background, and by one partner with ex- perience in the restaurant field. In answer to questions , Mr. Sapienza indicated that beer and wine only would be served and only in conjunction with the meal. . A short discussion was then held relative to the amount of remodeling intended on the existing building and the hours and days of operation. There being no further discussion, Mayor Tate asked if there were any letters or petitions in regard to the application. Mr. Eisen then read the following letter into the record. ------------------------------------- October 15, 1980 � Ms . Shirley Armstrong City Secretary �„ City of Grapevine P.O. Box 1547 Grapevine, Tx. 76051 Re: Zoning Application Z80-43 Dear Ms. Armstrong: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter 10/21/80 dated October 10 , 1980 notifying me of a public hearing for the above captioned zoning application. The purpose of this letter is to advise you that I own the property contiguous to the property covered by the zoning application. The legal description of the property that I own is Tract 21 and 21B, William Dooley Survey, A-422 , Grape- vine, Tarrant County, Texas. � In my opinion, the above captioned zoning appli- cation should be approved, because there is a need for a good restaurant in this area. �,,,� Yours very truly, B.R. Flories BRF/jm ------------------------------------------------- Mayor Tate then gave those interested persons in the audience an opportunity to speak in regard to the application. There was no response. There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Commission Member Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the Public Hearing seconded by Member Gerald Norman and pre- vailed by the following vote: Ayes . Rogers , Joyce, Cook, Anderson, Norman, and S�nds Nays . None �a Absent : Sharron Spencer � Councilman Mullendore then made a motion to close the Council • s portion of the public hearing. The motion was .,��„ seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ted Ware and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z80-44, CINCO BANDITOS The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z80-44 , submitted by Cinco Banditos. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. Mr. Eisen ex- plained that the property in question was on the east side of Dooley Street, just north of East Northwest Highway. He further noted that the present zoning was "C-2" Community Business District with the requested zoning being for a "SP" Specific Use Permit for the construction and operation of mini-storage warehouse units, in accordance with a site plan, and other uses as permitted in the "C-2" Community Business District Zoning Category. � There was no one in attendance to represent the applicant. Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or �'' against the application. There were none. Mr. Eisen indicated that one letter had been received and read it into the record as follows : 10/21/80 ----------------------------------------------- City Staff: I am in favor of the zoning change on Application Z80-44 , Thank you, C.C. Hall, Jr. � ------------------------------------------------ � There being no further discussion, Planning and Zoning Commission Member Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Gerald Norman and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Rogers, Joyce, Cook, Anderson, Norman, and Sands Nays . None Absent : Sharron Spencer Councilman Oliver then made a motion to close the Council ' s portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Member Marion Brekken and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z80-45, DENNIS ROBERTS The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning � and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to � Zoning Application Z80-45 , submitted by Mr. Dennis Roberts . Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon � the Assistant City Manager to explain the application. Mr. Eisen reported that the property in question was 118 West Dallas Road. He noted that the current zoning was "L-1" Limited Industrial Zoning with the requested zoning being for "I-1" Industrial District Zoning. Mr. Dennis Roberts made a brief presentation explaining that the purpose of the requested change was to allow him to take advantage of the smaller setback requirements in the "I-1" zoning category. He noted that the existing building would be torn down and a new one constructed for the purpose of operating Dennis Electric Company. There being little discussion from members of the Planning & Zoning Commission, and Council, Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak in relation to the requested zoning. There were none. Mr. Eisen reported that he was not in receipt of any letters or petitions. Planning and Zoning Commissioner Ron Cook made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was �,,,, seconded by Commissioner Robert Sands and prevailed by the following vote: � Ayes . Rogers, Cook, Joyce, Norman, Anderson, and Sands Nays . None Absent : Sharron Spencer Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to close the Council ' s portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote : 10/21/80 Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Tat� �dvised that the Planning & Zoning Commission would reconvene in the Civic Center, 311 Main Street to deliberate the merits of the zoning applications and to consider other agenda items . He added that the Council �* would reconvene in the Council Chambers following a recess. RECONVENE .. ,� Mayor Pro-Tem Ware called the Council back to order with all members present with the exception of Mayor Tate. RESOLUTION, GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution approving the issuance of City of Grapevine Industrial Development Corporation Bonds , Series 1980 (Standard Motor Products , Inc. ) $3 Million and any and all other related and necessary legal matters . City Attorney John Boyle explained that the paperwork was not yet complete and asked that the item be tabled with the schedule to include the Grapevine Development Corporation meeting at noon on Tuesday, October 28 , and the Council meeting in Special Ses- sion at 5 : 00 P.M. on that same date for consideration of this item. Councilman Dunn then made a motion to table the item and to � call a special meeting of the City Council for 5 : 00 P.M, on October 28 , 1980 for the purpose of considering the bond pur- �" chasing agreement. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: ,�� Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None Absent : Tate BIDS, MIDDLE SCHOOL TENNIS COURT FENCE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider authorizing the City Staff to accept bids for the Middle School Tennis Court Fence. Upon the request of the City Manager, (for the purpose of re- viewing alternatives) , Councilman Mullendore made a motion that the item be tabled. The motion was seconded by Council- man Dunn and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None Absent : Tate ORDINANCE, ADOPTING 1979 UNIFORM HOUSING CODE � The next order of business was for the City Council to con- sider amending the City Code, Chapter 7 , Section 140 by adopt- ing the 1979 edition of the Uniform Housing Code. � City Engineer, Jim Baddaker explained that recently the Council adopted the 1979 Building and Fire codes. He further commented that those two codes inter-related with the Housing Code and asked that the Council adopt the 1979 Uniform Housing Code in an effort to become uniform. 10/21/80 Mr. Eisen then read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Councilman Mullendore made a motion to adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None Absent : Tate ORDINANCE NO. 80-58 � AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE, CHAP- TER 7 , SECTION 140 BY ADOPTING THE 1979 +�,rr EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE AND ITS SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY PAYMENT, LITTLE BEAR CREEK SEWER, TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY The next order of business was for the City Council to consider authorizing payment to Trinity River Authority for the Little Bear Creek Sewer. City Engineer, Jim Baddaker gave a brief history of the past agreement with Trinity River Authority. He further stated that there were two fees that TRA was requesting to be paid as follows : (1) $30,173 for the City' s share of the capacity in the Little Bear interceptor. (2) (Half of the total estimated construction fee) of the line from the Little Bear interceptor to the proposed -�-� south city limit line. � Mr. Baddaker added that once construction was completed, the exact balance of the construction fee would be payable by the W�w+ City. He concluded that the time schedule included letting of the bid in January, award of the contract in February, with completion in late 1981. There being little discussion, Councilman Dunn made a motion to authorize payment to Trinity River Authority in the amount of $42 , 262 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None Absent : Tate ORDITJANCES-SFEED LIMITS & STOP SIGNS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider traffic control ordinances relative to stop signs and speed limits in certain designated areas. City Engineer, Jim Baddaker explained in detail the areas in question relative to stop signs; the Turner, Washington, Dooley, �,,,,,,, & Jones Streets area, and the Trail Lake Addition. Mr. Baddaker then outlined the speed limit proposal for the Trail Lake Addition. �"""" The caption of the stop sign ordinance was then read by Mr. Eisen. Councilman Oliver made a motion to accept the recommendation of the City Staff and adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mullendore and prevailed by the following vote: 10/21/80 Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None Abstain : Mayor Tate ORDINANCE NO. 80-59 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 23, SECTION 30 OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF GRAPE- VINE, TEXAS, BY ADDING STOP SIGNS AT CER- TAIN LOCATIONS DESCRIBED HEREIN; AUTHORIZING THE ERECTION OF TRAFFIC REGULATION SIGNS; RE- ,,,�, PEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY �. :,� Mr. Eisen then read the caption of the ordinance relative to the previously discussed speed limits. Councilman Dunn made a motion to adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Council Member Marion Brekken and pre- vailed by the following vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None Abstain : Mayor Tate ORDINANCE NO. 80-60 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, REGULATING THE SPEED OF VEHICLES WITHIN THE CITY; SPECIFYING THE REASON— ABLE AND PRUDENT SPEED FOR PUBLIC STREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN THE CITY AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS; AUTHORIZING THE ERECTION OF TRAFFIC REGULATIONS SIGNS ; REPEALING CON— �b FLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A PEN— � ALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED ($200. 00) DOLLARS FOR EACH OFFENSE; PRO— VIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING "� AN EMERGENCY Note: Mayor Tate returned to the meeting during the dis- cussion of the above two ordinances . DISCUSSION, PORTABLE BUILDING REGULATIONS The next order of business was for the City Council to dis- cuss amending the City Code relative to relocating portable structures. The City Attorney explained that in the ordinance pertaining to the relocation of portable structures, the current defini- tions and terms covered "any" structure, including small portable storage buildings in residential rear yards. He added that in the past the thrust of the ordinance was to include larger type structures, or structures used for commer- cial purposes. The City Attorney further commented if the Council desired, the Ordinance could be amended to exclude those structures that are not used for human occupancy, not used for commercial purposes, and of a certain size. +�► It was the general concensus of the Council that such an Ordinance be drafted for future consideration. �,,,,�� Councilman Dunn therefore made a motion to instruct the City Attor:ney to draft the necessary ordinance. The motion was secon�3ed by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: 10/21/80 Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATORY POLICIES ACT, 1978, HEARING DISCUSSION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the hearing required by the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. Assistant City Manager, Bill Eisen advised that the Public �, Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 was enacted by Con- gress in an effort to reduce the likelihood of future electricity and natural gas shortages. He added that one of the requirements of the law was that all jurisdictions having regulatory authority �' over gas and electric supplies hold a series of public hearings. Mr. Eisen continued to explain that the hearing required must cover eleven proposed standards including peak-load pricing, advertising as a part of the rate base, and fuel adjustment charges. The Council was then advised of three possible courses of action: (1) The City could relinquish its original jurisdiction in regulatory matters and turn it over to the Public Utility Commission; (2) Council could table consideration of the PURPA standards until after the Public Utility Commission and Railroad Commission held their hearings; (3) The Council could elect to conduct hearings on the proposed standards . It was the recommendation of the City Staff and City Attorney �� that the second recommended course of action be taken. � Following a short discussion, Councilman Mullendore made a motion that consideration of the various utility rate making, � and other standards specified in the Public Utility Regula- tory Policies Act of 1978 be tabled until after both the Public Utility Commission and the Railroad Commission of Texas consider same, at which time this municipal regulatory authority will schedule a hearing to consider those standards in light of the determinations made by these state regulatory bodies . The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None ANNEXATION ORDINANCE, FIRST READING The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the first reading of an ordinance annexing certain property. The Assistant City Manager read the caption of the proposed ordinance. A brief history relative to the annexation involved in the Grapevine/Colleyville boundary change was given by City Manager �* Jim Hancock. There being nc discussion from the Council, Mayor Pro Tem ;�, Ware made a motion that the ordinance be adopted on first reading. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None 10/21/80 ORDINANCE NO. 80-54 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS FINDING THAT ALL NECESSARY AND REQUIRED LEGAL CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED, PROVIDING THAT SUCH AREA SHALL BECOME A PART OF THE CITY AND THAT THE OWNERS AND INHABITANTS THEREOF SHALL BE ENTITLED TO THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES OF OTHER CITIZENS AND BE BOUND BY THE ACTS AND ORDINANCES NOW IN EFFECT AND TO BE HEREAFTER ADOPTED, AND FURTHER PROVIDING FOR AMENDING � AND CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY AS HERETOFORE ADOPTED AND PROVIDING FOR THE ORDINANCE TO GO INTO EFFECT UPON PASSAGE „,, :� OF THE ORDINANCE ON SECOND READING REQUIRED BY THE CITY CHARTER AND PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. ZONIN'G APPLICATION, Z80-41, SCHEPPS, ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION The n.ext order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission, relative to Zc�ning Application Z80-41, (Schepps) and a subsequent ordi- nance.. Assistant City Manager, Bill Eisen reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission had voted a tie, with three in favor of the application, and three in opposition. He then read the caption of the proposed ordinance. A lengthy discussion then followed during which members of the Council revealed mixed opinions pertaining to the application. Council Member Brekken then made a motion to table any action �o� on the matter until November 4, 1980. The motion was seconded �, by Mayor Pro Tem Ted Ware and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken �'-'�' Nays : None ZONING APPLICATION Z80-43, SAPIENZA, ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z80-43, and a subsequent ordinance. Chair:man Duane Rogers reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval of the application by a vote ��f f ive to one. Assistant City Manager Bill Eisen then read the proposed ordin��nce caption. Counc.ilman Shafer made a motion to accept the recommendation of th�� Planning & Zoning Commission and adopt the ordinance. The m��tion was seconded b Councilman Mullendo Y re and re- P vailec3 by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken �+ Nays : None ORDINANCE N0. 80-57 x ;�� AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A LOT, 10/21/80 TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE WILLIAM DOOLEY SURVEY, AB- STRACT NO. 422, IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT TO "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DISTRICT FOR THE STOR- AGE, RESALE, AND ON PREMISE CONSUMPTION OF �"'""" ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, BEER & WINE ONLY, INCI- DENTAL TO THE OPERATION OF A RESTAURANT & OTHER U5ES AS PERMITTED IN THE "C-2" COM- �rr MUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT, ALL IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH THE ATTACHED SITE PLAN; CORRECT- ING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS, AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY ZONING APPLICATION, Z80-44 , CINCO BANDITOS, ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z80-44 , and a subsequent ordinance. Chairman Rogers advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission had recommended approval by a vote of six to zero. Mr. Eisen read the caption of the proposed ordinance. �� Mayor Pro-Tem Ware made a motion that the ordinance be ''� adopted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mullendore and prevailed by the following vote: �rrr Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None ORDINANCE NO. 80-56 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE A.F. LEONARD SURVEY, IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROP- ERTY FROM "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DIS- TRICT TO "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DISTRICT ZONING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF MINI-WAREHOUSE STORAGE UNITS , IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH A SITE PLAN AND OTHER USES AS PER- � MITTED IN THE "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DIS- TRICT ZONING CATEGORY CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF '�✓ THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RE- LATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY 10/21/80 ZONING APPLICATION Z80-45, DENNIS ROBERTS, ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission rela- tive to Zoning Application Z80-45 , and a subsequent ordinance. Chairman Rogers reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission had recommended approval of the application by a vote of six to zero. Mr. Eisen read the caption of the proposed ordinance. � Councilman Dunn made a motion to accept the recommendation ; of the Planning & Zoning Commission and adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and pre- " � vailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None ORDINANCE NO. 80-55 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10 , THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A LOT, TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE WILLIAM DOOLEY AND E. MOORE AND A. FOSTER SURVEYS , IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF T�iIS ORDINANCE; // ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROP- IT ERTY "L-1" LIMITED INDUSTRIAL TO "I-1" � LIGHT INDUSTRIAL; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONTNG ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE �`""� RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND APdEND- MENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AIt�I�.. DECLARING AN EMERGENCY PRELIMINARY PLAT, METROPLACE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission rela- tive to the Metroplace Preliminary Plat. Chairman Rogers reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat. City Engineer, Jim Baddaker presented the plat and noted that the development would invo�ve Dallas/Fort Worth Air- port. He added that the plat showed a street connection to the west across airport property to a bridge that would be built under the present State Highway Department contract for W.D. Tate Avenue, (Highway 121) . Mr. Baddaker advised +�► that in discussions with Mr. Bob Heath, Manager of Planning and Engineering at the airport, it was indicated that the street connection would hinder airport plans for a parking ,�;�,,, area in this vicinity. Mr. Heath had suggested a north- south connection to 14th Street, south and east of the proposal by Metroplace. Mr. Baddaker then recommended approval of the preliminary plat with the understanding that the access to the Highway Department bridge be resolved by mutual agreement bet- ween the City, D/FW Airport and the Developer. 10/21/80 Following a lengthy discussion, Councilman Mullendore made a motion that the preliminary plat be approved. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro-Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None COMMITTEE, MUNICIPAL COMPLEX °�"' The next order of business was for Mayor Tate to consider appointing a committee to determine the most desirable place for a Municipal Complex. il�rr City Manager, Jim Hancock gave a brief history including several ' suggestions to a future city hall complex. Mayor Tate commented that because of the importance of the project, he preferred that the committee consist of not only members of the council, but possibly some citizens and some professional assistance. Mr. Hancock stated that he would ask that the situation be included into the Master Plan Update. Mayor Tate asked the Council to be considering ideas relative to a solution to be discussed at a later date. No formal action was taken. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS House Numbering Ordinance ��/ City Manager, Jim Hancock advised the Council that emergency � entities were having difficulty in locating homes when calls for help were received. He advised that an ordinance existed �r relative to requiring street numbers to be placed on houses , etc. He further commented that he wanted the Council to be aware that the Police Department had been asked to enact strict enforcement of the existing ordinance. Zoning Hearings Mr. Hancock advised the Council that the City Attorney and the City Staff had , on several occassions , discussed the possibility of having zoning hearings on one night and receive the recommenda- tion from the Planning & Zoning Commission at a subsequent meeting rather than considering the hearing, application, and ordinance all in one night. It was the general concensus of the Council that no ordinance amendments be made, but that the current practice be continued with the understanding that the Planning & Zoning Commission did not have to return a recommendation to the Council on the same night of the hearing. "' Councilman Dunn requested that an item be placed on the agenda � limiting the time for re-submission of zoning cases . Letters, Timberline Elementary �""'" Mayor Tate advised that he and the City Staff had been in receipt of letters from students at Timberline Elementary thanking them for the playground equipment. He suggested that a letter acknow- ledging receipt of their gratitude be written on behalf of the Mayor and City Council. 10/21/80 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilman Shafer made a motion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro-Tem Ted Ware and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None PASSED AND APPROVED on this the u� day of ��fn�, , 19 8 0. '"'"� ; APPROV . ��,�r . %��'-'�.�.j �� Mayor ATTEST: City ec ��v � � � � . � ��