Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-01-20 Joint Meeting CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 20 , 1981 AT 7 :30 P.M. � COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � I. CALL TO ORDER II. INVOCATION: Commission Member Sharron Spencer III. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z81-5, submitted by Great Texas Companies, Inc. B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z81-6 , submitted by Scott A. Keeshin. IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Conference Room to deliberate the merits of �,,, the Zoning Cases and to consider other published ; agenda items. � B. City Council to remain in session in the Council Chambers to consider further published agenda items. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSYON THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16th DAY OF JANUARY, 1981 AT 10 : 00 A.M. /�� � City Sec tary � i i i�rrr CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 20 , 1981 AT 8 :00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET V. CITIZENS REQUEST and/or MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS � VI . CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES City Council to consider the Minutes of December 16 , 1980 & January 6 , 1981. VII. OLD BUSINESS City Council to consider an Ordinance relating to a cable television franchise, second reading. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. City Council to consider an ordinance relative to the annexation of certain property, first reading. B. City Council to consider awarding the contract for the City ' s employee insurance plan. C. City Council to consider a resolution declaring surplus property and authorizing its sale. �� '� D. City Council to consider authorizing the City � Staff to enter into a contract with Rene ' Bates Auctioneers, Inc. E. City Council to consider a resolution declaring the City' s estimated population. F. City Council to consider setting a date for a public hearing relative to an application to relocate a house. IX. ZONING CASES AND PLATS A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission concerning Zoning Application Z80-50 , (Good Luck Oil Company) . B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission concerning Zoning Application Z80-51, (Mary Wilson) . C. City Council to consider the recommendation of �""" the Planning & Zoning Commission concerning Zoning Application Z81-5 , (Great Texas i, Companies, Inc. ) . ;Wlrww D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z81-6 , (Scott Keeshin) . E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of Lot 4 and half of Lot 5 , Block 3 , Ridgecrest Addition. ���� F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative � to the final plat of Twelve Eighty Main Addition. G. City Council to consider the recommendation of } the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of High Country. X. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16th DAY OF JANUARY, 1981 AT 10 : 00 A.M. � � �' �' City S ret ry � . � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS EMERGENCY AGENDA ITEM REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 20 , 1981 AT 8 : 00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � �rrrr VI. OLD BU5INESS City Council to consider appointments of persons to Citizens Advisory Committee. The above emergency agenda item was placed on the City Council Meeting Agenda because immediate action is necessary to insure the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas. � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE CITY COUNCIL wrrr MEETING EMERGENCY AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16th DAY OF JANDARI�, 1981 AT 2 :00 P.M. City Sec tary Shirley Armstrong � � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 20 , 1981 AT 8 : 00 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOM - 413 MAIN STREET � V. NEW BUSINESS � A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z81-5 (Great Texas Companies, Inc. ) and make a recommendation to the City Council. B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z81-6 (Scott Keeshin) and make a recommendation to the City Council. C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat of Lot 4 , and half of Lot 5 , Block 3 , Ridgecrest Addition. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z80-50 (Good Luck Oil Company) and make a recommendation to the City Council. B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider � Zoning Application Z80-51 (Mary Wilson) and make a recommendation to the City � Council. C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of Twelve Eighty Main Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of High Country and make a recommendation to the City Council. E. Planning & Zoning Commission to hold a discussion with developers concerning land use and street pattern on the west side of Park Boulevard. F. Discussion of Master Plan VII . MINUTES Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the Minutes of November 20 , 1980 and December 16 , 1980 . +�+ VIII. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS and/or DISCUSSIONS IX. ADJOURNMENT � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S . , AS AMEND BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 615T LEGIS- LATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16th DAY OF JANUARY, 1981 AT 10 : 00 A.M. � �wr � �rnr City ec etary �. � � �w.r STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Joint Session on this the 20th day of January, 1981 with the following persons present to-wit: �r William D. Tate Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro-Tem C.�. "Larry" Oliver Council Member ;�, Charles Dunn Council Member William Shafer Council Member Aulton D. Mullendore Council Member Marion Brekken Council Member constituting a quorum with the following members of the Planning & Zoning Commission: Duane Rogers Chairman Sharron Spencer Vice-Chairman Harlen Joyce Commissioner Ron Cook Commissioner Robert Sands Commissioner Gerald Norman Commissioner Harold Anderson Commissioner constituting a quorum with the following members of the City Staf f : James L. Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager Rayford Price City Attorney Representative Shirley Armstrong City Secretary � �,, CALL TO ORDER Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Commissioner Sharron Spencer. INTRODUCTIONS AND PROCEDURE Mayor Tate welcomed those in attendance and introduced members of the Planning & Zoning Commission. He then explained the procedure to be followed during the public hearings . ZONING APPLICATION Z81-5, GREAT TEXAS COMPANIES , INC. The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z81-5, submitted by Great Texas Companies , Inc. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon �""'"" the City Secretary to explain the requested zoning. Mrs. Armstrong advised that the applicants were requesting a ir,,.r 1. 005 acre tract of land on the southwest corner of Tanglewood and Mustang Drive be rezoned from "R-3•• Multi-Family Dwelling District to "C-2" Community Business District Zoning. Ol/20/81 Mr. Blaine East then made a brief presentation explaining that a commercial development was planned for the property and further advised that prospective tenants included two doctors and a dentist who were interested in a medical plaza on the site. Mr. East then advised the Council and Planning & Zoning Commission of a petition that had been submitted to the City Secretary, captioned as follows : ZONING CHANGE PETITION '"�"" AN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL TO REZONE � .� "R-3" MULTI FAMILY TO "C-2" COMMERCIAL. IF YOU HAVE NO OBJECTIONS OF A ZONING CHANGE ON SUBJECT PROPERTY, YOUR SIGNATURE WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. The petition contained one-hundred forty-five signatures. Mayor Tate then advised that questions were in order from the Planning & Zoning Commission. Mr. East was asked if he would be opposed to a Specific Use Zoning for a professional building only. The applicant answered no, indicating that he would not be opposed to a Specific Use Zoning. Further discussion followed from members of the Planning & Zoning Commission and Council relative to the size of the proposed facility, construction plans , drainage related problems, and proposed traffic congestion in the area. Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests present to speak � for or against the application. � J Mr. J. Bert Dycus, 2917 Southridge, addressed the Council _ and read the following letter into the record: ---------------------------------------- Oakcreek Homeowner' s Association Grapevine, Tx. City of Grapevine Members of the Grapevine City Council & Planning & Zoning Commission Grapevine, Texas Dear Representatives : On behalf of the Oakcreek Homeowner' s Associa- tion, I would like to present the enclosed petitions, which contain over 110 names of concerned Grapevine citizens . These si na- g tures are evidence of our mutual opposition to the actions to "commercially� rezone and issue specific use permits for the sale of � alcoholic beverages on property located at the intersection of Tanglewood and Mustang Drives. w�� Although these petitions may contain only 110+ names, it is very significant to note that this support was obtained during only one days solicitation. . . . The residents of Oakcreek, while slow to react in the O1/20/81 current situation because of late word of tonights public hearing, have without ques- tion given a resounding indication of their preference in the matters at hand. We neither ask for, nor expect that any sympathy be granted due to our delayed start in obtaining the signatures to support our cause. We sug- gest only that one take note of the sizeable �"'"" response which was mustered in one weekday' s time, and project what the volume of our listing could have been had we assembled it over the �rr period of a weekend, or an extra week. Together, as private citizens , we stand united in support of ••controlled" growth within the Grapevine community. We are wholly in favor of a "reasonable" mix of single-family, multi- family and commercial property zoning which will serve to enhance and improve the entire neighborhood, rather than to simply enrich the special interests of a few. As our representa- tives, and having the overall perspective to evaluate the needs of the City along with the concerns of its individuals , we are confident that your decision will be rendered in favor of the community' s best interest. Bert Dycus January 20 , 1981 --------------------------------------------- � Mr. Dycus then presented the subsequent petition containing �, 131 signatures, captioned as follows : �ilrr+ We the undersigned are opposed to the rezoning of the corner at Tanglewood and Mustang Drive, Grapevine, Texas to commercial zoning. Guest, Charlene Berry advised that she resented the implication that the petition was submitted on behalf of the Oak Creek Homeowners Association since she was a member, and no meeting had been held in regard to the matter at hand. Mrs. Gloria Lorio, 2904 Southridge, Vice-President of the Oak Creek Homeowners Association stated that in the past, the Association had taken the position of opposing commercial and alcoholic beverage zoning in the area. Mr. Jim McIntire, 2009 Tanglewood and Charlene Berry advised the Council that they would not oppose a medical facility on the proposed site. � The following persons spoke in opposition to the requested zoning: Fran Gerten, Tanglewood Drive resident; Mr. Ron Dyer, 2845 West Court, Creekwood Addition; and Peggy Pointer, 2805 Ridgewood Drive. Concerns expressed were traffic, future '� master plan suggested uses, and the devaluation of residential property in the area. There being no other guests to speak, Mayor Tate asked the City Secretary if there was correspondence to be read into the record. The following letter was then introduced: oi/2o/si --------------------------------------------- January 20 , 1981 Jerry Forbus 4 Whispering Vine Grapevine, Texas Members of City Council & Planning and Zoning Committee: � This letter is written to voice opposition to any proposed rezoning of properties located in the southwest corner of Mustang and Tangle- wood Drive. The City of Grapevine is currently �` "� undergoing an extensive/expensive study to update and/or revise zoning in this area. It would therefore be in the City' s best interest to delay any zoning of this area until a new master plan has been accepted, thus placing the City in a more knowledgeable position to make an acceptable judgment in this case. Sincerely, Jerry Forbus There being no further testimony, Planning & Zoning Commission Member Gerald Norman made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Harlen Joyce and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Rogers, Spencer, Joyce, Cook, Sands , Norman, & Anderson � Nays : None ,�, .� Mayor Pro-Tem Ware then made a motion to close the Council 's �+ portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by • Councilman William Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z81-6 , SCOTT KEESHIN The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z81-6, submitted by Scott A. Keeshin. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. The City Secretary explained that the property in question was . 8148 acres on the southeast corner f o Tan lewood an g d Mustang Drive. She further advised that the present zoning was "C-2" Community Business District with the requested zoning being "SP" Specific Use Permit District for the storage, retail sale, and off-premise consumption ,,�, of alcoholic beverages , (beer only, with sales limited to individuals twenty-one (21) years of age or older) , incidental to the operation of a convenience stor e and gasoline service station, and permitting other uses as '��""" allow " �� ed in the C-2 Community Business District Zoning Category. Attorney, Scott Keeshin then made a brief presentation representing C.D.E. Investments , Inc. and offered to answer questions from the Council and Planning & Zoning Commission. Ol/20/81 There was then a lenghty discussion relative to the financial position of the investors and their difficulty in locating an anchor tenant for the shopping facility without the ability to sell beer. In response to a question from the Council, regarding the wording of the requested zoning, City Attorney Rayford Price advised that the applicant had the ability to refuse ,,,�, the sale of beer to persons under the age of twenty-one, but whether or not the City could enforce the issue as a result of the wording of the ordinance was ambiguous. �"` Mr. Keeshin then advised the Council of a petition sub- mitted containing 370 signatures with the following caption: RETAIL BUSINESS SURVEY SEVERAL MAJOR CONVENIENCE STORE COMPANIES HAVE EXPRESSED A DESIRE TO LOCATE AN OUTLET IN YOUR IMMEDIATE AREA. MOST ALL CONVENIENCE STORES SUPPLY THOSE ITEMS SUCH AS BREAD, MILK, ICE, BEER, GASOLINE, AND OTHER PRODUCTS WHICH THE AVERAGE FAMILY REQUIRES ON A DAY-TO-DAY BASIS. THE SOLE REASON WHY YOU HAVE NOT SEEN A CON- VENIENCE STORE IN YOUR AREA IS DUE TO ACTION TAKEN BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF GRAPEVINE. RE- CENTLY THE COUNCIL HAS DENIED EACH APPLICANT A LICENSE TO SELL BEER, ALTHOUGH THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER CONVENIENCE STORES IN GRAPEVINE WHO DO SELL BEER. � IF YOU HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC / � BEVERAGES (EXCLUDING HARD LIQUOR) AT S�ORES OF i�w THIS TYPE, PLEASE SIGN BELOW. YOUR COOPERATION WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the proposed zoning. The following persons spoke in opposition to the requested zoning: Dennis McGrath Mr. Ron Dyer 2905 Cresthaven Drive 2845 West Court Mr. Jim McIntire Sherry Blackshear 2009 Tanglewood 1324 Tipperary Mr. Gary Fickes Fran Gerten 2847 Harvest Hill Tanglewood Drive Mrs. Darla Allcorn Charlotte Dycus 2934 Southridge 2907 Southridge � Ann Glynn #2 Whispering Vine Mr. Burt Dycus , 2917 Southridge submitted a petition con- "`�"" taining 122 signatures with the following caption: We the undersigned are opposed to the sale of alcoholic beverages on the corner of Tanglewood and Mustang Drive, Grape- vine, Texas or any properties adjacent thereof. ol�ao/al The general concensus of those opposing the requested zoning was concern for traffic related problems, litter associated with the sale of beer, devaluation of neigh- boring property, and the right to preserve the neighbor- hood areas. The following persons spoke in favor of the requested zoning: Charlene Berry ,,,�,,, 2805 Canyon Elaine East C.D.E. Investment associate ��'� Clark East C.D.E. Investment associate Mr. Huey Thomas, 3725 Parr Road objected to the wording of the requested zoning which would limit the sale of beer to those twenty-one years of age or older. Mr. Ron Berry, 2805 Canyon questioned the Council relative to the applicant obtaining a building permit and the Council and Planning & Zoning Commission's criteria for approving or denying requests for the sale of alcoholic beverages . Mayor Tate responded to Mr. Berry' s questions. Attorney, Scott Keeshin closed by stating that it was the intent of the applicants to provide a first class operation as a service to the residents of the area in question. There being no further discussion, Planning and Zoning Commission Member Robert Sands made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Ron � Cook and prevailed by the following vote: �;�; Ayes : Rogers, Spencer, Cook, Sands , Joyce, Norman, "�"" & Anderson Nays : None Councilman Oliver then made a motion to close the Council ' s portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Tate announced that the Planning and Zoning Commission would recess to the Conference Room to deliberate the merits of the Zoning cases and to consider other published agenda items. The Mayor further advised that the Council would take a short recess afterwhich they would reconvene to consider other published agenda items. RECONVENE e� Mayor Tate called the Council back to order with all members present. � � MINUTES The next order of business was consideration of the Minutes of December 16, 1980 and January 6, 1981. oi�ao�al Council Member Brekken advised that the first paragraph under the title of Public Hearing, Annexation, page six of the Minutes of January 6 , 1981 should be amended to read as follows : "The next order of business was for the City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to the annexation of certain property. " � There being no further corrections, Council Member Brekken made a motion to waive the reading of the Minutes and � approve them as amended. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None ORDINANCE, SECOND READING, CABLE TV FRANCHISE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance relating to a cable television franchise, second reading. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Councilman Dunn made a motion that the ordinance be adopted on second reading. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro-Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None Abstain . Councilman Shafer !'�°` ORDINANCE NO. 80-72 r? ' ° � AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO TELEPROMPTER COMMUNITY CABLEVISION A FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM WITHIN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS; SETTING FORTH THE TERRITORIAL AREA INVOLVED AND THE TIME OF CONSTRUC- TION; ESTABLISHING LIABILITY AND INDEM- NIFICATION; ESTABLISHING OPERATIONAL STANDARDS AND STANDARDS OF SERVICE; ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS ON STREET OC- CUPANCY; ESTABLISHING PAYMENT TO THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR PERIODIC REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS; AND PRESCRIBING THE TERMS , CONDITIONS, OBLIGATIONS, AND LIMITATIONS UNDER WHICH SUCH FRANCHISE SHALL BE EXERCISED; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE ORDINANCE, ANNEXATION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider �'" an ordinance relative to the annexation of certain property, first reading. � City Manager, Jim Hancock explained that an error had been discovered in the legal notice publication relative to the public hearing on the annexation of the property in question, (in the northwest section of the City) . He further noted that it was the recommendation of the City Attorney that the public hearing be readvertised and held again prior to consideration of the ordinance. oi�ao�si Mayor Pro-Tem Ware then made a motion that a public hearing be scheduled for February 3, 1981 pertaining to the annexation of the subject property in the north- west section of the City. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mullendore and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore & Brekken Nays : None „� CONTRACT AWARD, CITY EMPLOYEE INSURANCE PLAN The next order of business was for the City Council to consider �'� awarding the contract for the City' s employee insurance plan. Assistant City Manager, Bill Eisen advised the Council of the following bids received from Blue Cross/Blue Shield and Continental Assurance Company: Health Insurance Blue Cross Continental Employee/Per Month $ 47 . 50 $28. 48 Employee and Dependents (per mo. ) $122 . 75 $89. 51 Life Insurance and AD&D Cost per $1, 000 Coverage/per month $ . 36 $ . 41 Short Term Disability Cost per $10 Benefit/per month $ . 40 $ . 58 Dental � Employee/Per month $ 4 . 80 $ 6 .71 R� Employee and Dependents (per month) $ 10 . 83 $13. 52 `'� � Mr. Eisen then explained in detail the effects of the insurance rates as they pertained to both the City and employees. He then recommended that the contract be awarded to Continental Assurance Company to become effective on March l, 1981. Councilman Oliver then made a motion to accept the recommendation of the City Staff and award the contract for the City' s employee insurance plan to Continental Assurance Company. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None RESOLUTION, SURPLUS PROPERTY SALE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution declaring surplus property and authorizing its sale. � Assistant City Manager, Bill Eisen explained that because a schedule of the property in question was not yet available ��� the staff was recommending that the item be tabled. Councilman Mullendore made a motion to accept the recommenda- tion of the City Staff and table the item. The motion was se- conded by Mayor Pro-Tem Ware and prevailed b the followin Y g vote: oi/2o/al Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None CONTRACT, AUCTIONEERS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider authorizing the City Staff to enter into a contract with Rene ' Bates Auctioneers, Inc. � Mr. Eisen advised the Council that the selection of an auc- tioneer was relative to the sale of the property to be declared �, surplus. He further noted that it was the recommendation that the contract be signed with Rene ' Bates Auctioneers , McKinney, Texas for a fee of l00 of gross sales. Mr. Eisen then outlined the services offered by the auctioneering company. Councilman Mullendore then made a motion to accept the recommenda- tion of the City Staff and authorize the execution of a contract with Rene' Bates Auctioneers, Inc. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None POPULATION, 1981 The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution declaring the City' s estimated population. City Manager, Jim Hancock advised that it was the recommendation of the City Staff that a population figure of 14 , 610 , estimated �� by City Engineers, Freese & Nichols, be accepted as the City' s ��, 1981 population. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed resolution. Following a short discussion, Council Member Marion Brekken made a motion that the resolution be adopted. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro-Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None RESOLUTION NO. 81-2 A RESOLUTION MAKING OFFICIAL THE FINDING AND DETERMINATION AS TO THE POPULATION AND NUMBER OF INHABI- TANTS OF AND WITHIN THE CITY OF GRAPE- VINE, TEXAS, AS OF JANUARY 1, 1981 PUBLIC HEARING DATE, HOUSE MOVING APPLICATION � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � setting a date for a public hearing relative to an application to relocate a house. The City Secretary advised that an application had been sub- mitted by Mr. Ronnie Smith requesting permission to relocate a house from its present location on Dove Road to Texas Street. She recommended that the public hearing be scheduled for February 3, 1981. Ol/20/81 Council Member Marion Brekken made a motion to accept the recommendation of the City Staff and schedule the public hearing relative to the house moving application for February 3 , 1981. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro- Tem Ware. and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, APPOINTMENTS DISTRICT SEVEN "'�"" The next order of business was for the City Council to con- sider appointments to the Citizens Advisory Committee. w.�� Mr. Eisen reported that the Citizens Advisory Committee had met on January 15th and agreed to recommend to the Council that Mr. Tom Powers and Mr. Ted Willhoite both be appointed to the Citizens Advisory Committee to represent district seven. There being little discussion, Mayor Pro-Tem Ware made a motion to accept the recommendation and appoint Mr. Tom Powers and Mr. Ted Willhoite to serve as representatives of District Seven of the Citizens Advisory Committee. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None RECESS Mayor Tate announced that the City Council would recess pending the recommendations from the Planning & Zoning Commission. � RECONVENE � Following the recess, the Council reconvened with all members present. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Tate called the meeting back to order. PLANNING & ZONING RECOMMENDATION, GOOD LUCK OIL COMPANY, APPLICATION Z80-50 The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission concern- ing Zoning Application Z80-50 , (Good Luck Oil Company) . City Secretary, Shirley Armstrong gave a brief history of the application explaining that a decision on the case had been tabled on two separate occasions pending the submission of a service station application. She further noted that the service station application had still not been received and that the City Staff had been advised by telephone that the intent was to withdraw the application. Mrs. Armstrong advised however, � that a letter to that affect had not yet been received. It was then reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission had recommended to deny the application by a unanimous vote. "� Mayor Pro-Tem Ware then made a motion to accept the rer.om-- mendation of the Planning and Zoning Comanission and deny the ol�ao/si application. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None • PLANNING & ZONING RECOMMENDATION, MARY WILSON, APPLICATION Z80-51 �.,,, The next order of business was for the City Council to consider , the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission con- cerning Zoning Application Z80-51, (Mary Wilson) . � It was reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission recom- mended denial by a vote of four to three. Councilman Mullendore made a motion to accept the recommenda- tion of the Planning & Zoning Commission and deny the applica- tion. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : Ware PLANNING & ZONING RECOMMENDATION, GREAT TEXAS , ZONING APPLICATION Z81-5 The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning Zoning Application Z80-5, (Great Texas Companies, Inc. ) . The City Council was advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission had recommended that the application be denied by �°" a vote o f f ive to two. �� � � Councilman Dunn made a motion that the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission be accepted and the applica- tion be denied. The motion was seconded by Council Member Marion Brekken and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None PLANNING & ZONING RECOMMENDATION, SCOTT KEESHIN, ZONING APPLICATION Z81-6 The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z81-6 , (Scott Keeshin) . The City Council was advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission had recommended denial by a vote of four to three. Council Member Brekken made a motion to accept the recommenda- "'� tion of the Planning & Zoning Commission and deny the applica- tion. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the following vote: � Ayes : Tate, Dunn, Oliver, & Brekken Nays : Ware, Mullendore, & Shafer O1/20/81 PLANNING & ZONING RECOMMENDATION, FINAL PLAT TWELVE- EIGHTY MAIN ADDITION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of Twelve Eighty Main Addition. The Council was advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval by a unanimous vote. � Following a review of the plat, Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to accept the recommendation and approve the final � plat of Twelve Eighty Main Addition. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None PLANNING & ZONING RECOMMENDATION, FINAL PLAT, HIGH COUNTRY The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission rela- tive to the final plat of High Country. The Council was advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval by a unanimous vote of seven to zero. Cit En ineer Jim Baddaker revi we e d the lat with the Y g . p Council, advising that sewer is not yet available, and that no building permits would be issued until the sewer line extension was within ninet da s of com letion. Y Y P There being little discussion, Councilman Dunn made a motion "'� to accept the recommendation of the City Staff and Planning � and Zoning Commission and approve the final plat of High Country. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays : None MAYOR, DISQUALIFICATION Mayor Tate advised the Council that the next item pertained to him personally. He then disqualified himself from pre- siding or taking part in the discussion and exited from the Council Chamber. Mayor Pro-Tem Ware presided over the re- mainder of the meetin . g PLANNING & ZONING RECOMMEND ATION REPLAT RI , DGECREST ADDITION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of Lot Four and half of Lot Five, Block Three, Ridgecrest Addition. � The Council was advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission had unanimously recommended approval of the replat. �� Upon review of the plat and presentation by the City Engineer, Councilman Dunn made a motion to accept the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approve the replat of Lot Four and half of Lot Five, Block Three, Ridgecrest Addition. O1/20/81 The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None Absent . Mayor Tate �,,, ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council, � Councilman Oliver made a motion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the fol- lowing vote: Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None Absent . Mayor Tate " PASSED AND APPROVED on this the .���day of �-�i`2C�CLh.¢ , 1981. APPROVED: � _�� Mayor ATTEST: � :�% • . Ci y Secr a � �