Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-03-01 Joint Meeting � � � � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH l, 1977 AT 7: 30 P.M. � � � I. CALL TO ORDER � II. INVOCATION: COUNCILMAN DUNN � � �: III. PUBLIC HEARINGS � r � , A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission � �, to hold a public hearing for the purpose of � � considering the rezoning of Lot A, Starnes � i Addition, Grapevine, Texas from "R-2" Two- � � Family Dwelling District to "C-2" Community � Business District. The applicant is Mr. � Robert H. Rockenbaugh. (Application No. Z77-3) � � # r B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission � � to hold a public hearing for the purpose of con- � sidering the rezoning of Lot 1 and 10 of Block One, � � and Lot 22 of Block 'It�o, Laguna Vista Addition along � � with a tract of land in the William Y. Al1en Survey, t Grapevine, Texas, from "i��l" Single Family Dwelling � District to "R-2" Two Family Dwelling District. � The application was filed by Mrs . J.T. Davis on � behalf of Dascon, Inc. (Application No. Z77-5) � E C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to � hold a public hearing far the purpose of consider- � ing the rezoning of 52.31 acres of land out of the � G.F. Martin, A.F. Leonard, and Samuel Freeman Surveys, ; Grapevine, Texas from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling ¢ District to "SP" Specific Use Permit District, in- � cidental to the operation of a health care center � and uses as permitted under "C-1" Neighborhood Busi- � ness District. The applicant is Mr. Parker C. Folse � on behalf of Mr. & Mrs. Van Ellis. (Application No. � Z77-6) � � � � IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING � � A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the § Conference Room to consider further business. � � � ; ( B. City Council to remain in session to consider = � other published agenda items. � � � €; � , �. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED � { BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, �; � THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING � WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1977 � t AT 1:30 P.M. � 8 . � � CIT SEC T RY � � ' � � � � r � � ' CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS � ? AGENDA + REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING � TUESDAY, MARCH l, 1977 AT 8:00 P.M. � � COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � � � i ; � V. PUBLIC HEARING City Council to hold a public hearing for the � purpose of considering the rate increase requested � by Texas Power and Light Company. � VI. CITIZENS REQUEST AND/OR MISC. REPORTS & DISCUSSIONS � � � � VII. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES (February 22, 1977) � i � $ VIII. NEW BUSINESS � City Council to consider the franchise application � of Metroplex Cab Company as submitted by Mr. Hugh � M. Waite. � � � �; IX. OLD BUSINESS a+ 1 s � A. City Council to consider the recommendation of � the Planning & Zoning Commission regarding Zoning � Application Z77-3. (Rockenbaugh) City Council to � also consider an ordinance if zoning is approved. � � � B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the � Planning & Zoning Commission regarding Zoning Applica- �: tion Z77-5. (Davis) City Council to also consider an � ordinance if zoning is approved. � � � C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the � Planning & Zoning Commission regarding Zoning Appli- � cation Z77-6. (Folse) City Council to also con- sider an ordinance if zoning is approved. D. City Council to consider a revision to the final plat � of Oak Creek Estates, Fourth Filing. � � E. City Council to consider the final plat of Oak Grove � � Estates. � � X. ADJOURNMENT � � � �� IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED � BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED � ON THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBURARY, 1977 AT 1: 30 P.M. � i � s' � � 3 � CITY SE TARY � � � � 6 � � � � � � 1 � t t € ¢ � z � F `,s F. $ # � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS � � � A GENDA � SPECIAL PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING � TUESDAY, MARCH l, 1977 AT 8:00 P.M. � CONFERENCE ROOM - 413 MAIN � I �I � V. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES (February 22, 1977) � � , VI. NEW BUSINESS � � A. Planning & Zoning- Comtnission to con�ider zonir�g t Application Z77-3 (Rockenbaugh) and make a � recommendation to the Council. � � B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning � Application Z77-5 (Davis) and make a recommendation g to the Council. � � C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning � Application Z77-6 (Folse) and make a recommenda- � tion to the Council. ` 3' �. d � E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider a revision � ; to the final plat of Oak Cree}� Estates, Fourth Filing, �' and make a recommendation to the Council. � � � F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final � 3 plat of Oak Grove Estates and make a recommendation � to the Council. � r r � VII. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND DISCUSSIONS � 3 { VIII. ADJOURNMENT ; � Y IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 3' 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE � � SPECIAI� PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS � PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1977 � € AT 1:30 P.M. ; $ � r. � � � � CITY SE ETARY �� � � F t � � � 3 i � , ; � Y � a � g qg € � , !r: 1 � � �y L € � � 3 � 6. � § i � STATE OF TEXAS X COUNTY OF TARRANT X � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE X 1 � � The City Council and the Planning & Zoning Commiss�on met � in joint session at 7: 30 P.M. on this the lst day of March, 1977 with the following members present to-wit: William D. Tate Mayor Doil Dalton Mayor Pro tem Charles Gideon Councilman Larry Oliver Councilman David A. Florence Councilman Charles Dunn Councilman constituting a quorum with Councilman Willis Pirkle absent, with Ted Ware Chairman Harlen Joyce Member � Joe Kennedy Member � Cato Jones Member i Mike Davis Member constituting a quorum with Member Bill Crabtree absent, with Floy T. Ezell City Manager "� James L. Hancock Assistant City Manager John Boyle City Attorney Shirley Armstrong City Secret�sry Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. The Invocation was delivered by Councilman Charles Dunn. Mayor Tate explained the procedure of a public hearing and introduced members of the Planning & Zoning Commission. The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to hold a public hearing to consider the rezoning of Lot A, Starnes Addition, Grapevine, Texas from "R-2" Two Family Dwelling District, to "C-2" Community Business District. Mayor Tate introduced the applicant, Mr. Robert H. Rockenbaugh and declared the public hearing open. , Mr. Rockenbaugh explained that he was the owner of Grapevine Lockers and that he had bought the lot adjacent to (North) of his present location for the purpos� of expansion. The City Manager used the overhead projector to describe the location of the property in question. There was little discussion from the Council and Planning & Zoning Commission. Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present who wished to speak for or .against the application. There were none. � � � a � � t Commission member Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their � portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by = Commission member ,Toe Kennedy and prevailed by the following � vote: € € � Ayes . Ware, Joyce, Davis, Jones, & Kennedy � ; � Nays . None � Absent : Bill Crabtree � � ff � Councilman Florence made a motion to close the Council' s £ portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by � Councilman Dalton and prevailed by the following vote: � � , Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn � r � Nays . None � Absent : Councilman Pirkle � a. �, � The next order of business was for the City Council and ;: Planning & Zoning Commission to hold a public hearing to � consider the rezoning of Lot 1 and 10 of Block One, and Lot ' 22 of Block Two, Laguna Vista Addition, along with a tract k , of land in the William Y. Allen Survey, Grapevine, Texas, from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District to "R-2" Two � Family Dwelling District. Mayor Tate introduced the � applicant, Mr. J. T. Davis and declared the public hearing open. � i Mr. Davis explained that Dascon, Inc. was requesting the "R-2" ; zoning as a buffer between the Corbin Mob ile Home Park and e Laguna Vista Addition. Mr. Davis then supplied the Council � r and Planning & Zoning Commission members with a set of •plans � similar in design to the proposed duplexes. � � The City Manager then used the overhead projector to clarify � d the location of the property in question. ; � � Mayor Tate commented that questions were in arder from the ;' Planning & Zoning Cammission. Commission member Joe Kennedy ' s asked if there would be only one street leading into the � area. Mr. Davis answered yes, and explained that the only F ' other possible way to enter the area would be through Mr. � Corbin' s property or through Corps of Engineer property. � � ; There was little other discussion from the Planning & Zoning : Commission. � s Mayor Tate stated that questions were in order from the Council. � There was little discussion. r � � �. Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present who wished to ° speak for or against the application. There were none. The � City Secretary advised that she had not received any petitions � for or against the application. r There being no further discussion, Commission member Mike Davis } made a motion to close the Planning & Zoning portion of the � public hearing. The motion was seconded by Commission member � Cato Jones and prevailed by the following vote: � � Ayes . Ware, Kennedy, Joyce, Davis, & Jones � Nays . None � Absent : Bill Crabtree z � � � � s � � i: � Councilman Oliver made a motion to close the Council' s portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Gideon and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Flarence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn Nays . None � Absent : Councilman Pirkle ' The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning � and Zoning Commission to hold a public hearing to consider the rezoning of 52.31 acres of land out o� the G.F. Martin, A.F. Leanard, and Samuel Freemar� Surveys, Grapevine, Texas, from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District to "SP" Specific Use Permit District, incidental to the operation of a health care center and uses as permitted under "C-1" Neighborhood Business District. Mayor Tate then introduced Mr. Parker C. Folse, applicant on behalf of the property owners, Mr. & Mrs. Van E1lis. Mr. Folse explained that it was the intent of his clients to build an exclusive health resort on the f irst ten acres of the 52.31 acre tract. He commented that it would be a luxurious facility ' which would accommodate approximately twenty-four guests at one time. He added that the remainder of the tract would eventually be developed into hotels, restaurants, or businesses of a retail nature. He explained that Mr. & Mrs. Ellis engaged in numerous philenthropic activities and added that their presence in the Grapevine area would be an asset to the commun ity. � Mayor Tate advised that questions were in order from the Planning & Zoning Commission. There were_ none. Questions were then in order from members af the Council. Councilman Dunn asked Mr. Folse if Mr. & Mrs. Ellis owned the land at the present ti.me. Mr. Folse answered yes. There � was little other discussion. � Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests present who wished � to speak for or against the application. There were none. , Commission member .Harlen Joyce made a motion to close the Planning & Zoning Commission' s portion of the public hearing. The motian was seconded by Member Mike Davis and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Ware, Kennedy, Joyce, Davis, & Jones Nays None - Absent : Bill Crabtree Couincilman Gideon made a motion to close. the .Council' s portion _of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Florence and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn Nays . None � Absent : Pirkle � - The Planning & Zoning Commission then recessed to the Con- ' ference Room to consider further business. The Council re- mained in session to consider other published agenda items. � f The first order of business for the City Council was to hold a public hearing for the purpose of considering the rate in- � crease requested by Texas Power and Light Company. Mayor Tate then introduced Mr. Ervil Quinn, Mr. John Whitmire, and � Mr. Bob Daniels of Texas Power and Light Company. The presen- tation was made by Mr. Daniels. ; Mr. Daniels began by stating that it was the intent of Texas � Power and Light to provide dependable, electrical power at � the lowest possible price to the citizens of Grapevine. He explained that in order to accomplish their goal, TP&L must change to a more abundant, cheaper lignite source. Mr. Daniels then mad�e a slide presentation showing the increased 3: costs of fuel, construction expenditures, air pollution control = � costs and other expenditures incurred by Texas Power and Light. j' Upon conclusion of the slide presentation, Mr. Daniels stated that TP&L must either increase rates or stop constructi on. Nt� Daniels commented that according to current economic trends, the increase should last through mid 1979. ; The City Attorney then explained that the purpose of the � public hearing was to allow Texas Power and Light to make ; their initial presentation, to allow guests to submit their � views, and to allow the Council ta satisfy any questions � , that they might have. He continued to say that a large ; number of municipalities had hired (at the expense of ` Texas Power and Light) Touche-Ross & Company, a CPA firm in Dallas, to make a systemwide analysis of the requested � increase. The City Attorney advised that the report from Touche-Ross should be forthcoming within a week to ten days. Councilman Dalton asked what percentage increase was being requested. Mr. Daniels answered that the overall increase � requested was 34 percent. Councilman Florence asked how the 34 percent systemwide in- �° crease would effect the local rates. Mr. Dan iels answered � as follows: � Residential 38.8 percent � Municipal 37.8 percent t Schools 40.2 percent ' Commercial 25. 9 percent Industri:al 30.0 percent 3 £ Mayor Tate asked why the greater burden had been placed Q on the residential customer. Mr. Daniels answered that under � the rules af the commission, each class customer was charged : according to the relation in cost of service. ; Councilman Dunn asked what rate of return would TP&L have ` if the requested increase was granted. Mr. Daniels answered # that based on the adjusted value of the invested capital, � it would amount to a ten percent rate of return. _ < � Mr. Daniels commented that because of the conversion ta lignite � � coal, TP&L customers had saved approximately $80 million. Mayor � � Tate asked haw that figure compared to the additional investm�nt that the customer had to pay to convert the system to lignite � coal. Mayor Tate added that TP&L had requested an increase of nearly 45 percent in only a year and a half. � � � �. f Mr. Daniels answered that in order to supply the needs of customers in future years, another source of energy had to be obtained. He added that in the long run, the net saving to the customer would be greater. Councilman Florence asked if TP&L was a subsidiary of Texas Utilities, and if they owned their own fuel company. Mr. Daniels answered that TP&L was a s�bsidiary of -Texas ' Utilities and that Texas Utilities Fuel Company was a three operated company from w�ich Dallas Power and Light, Texas Power and Light, and Texas Electric Service obtained fuel. Mr. Daniels added that the construction of the lignite plants was a jaint venture of the three companies . Councilman Oliver asked since TP&L usually had a monopoly on the cities served, why did they spend so much mon�y on - advertisements. Mr. Daniels answerea that the commercial� were geared to informing the customers of conservation methods and also to advise customers of actions being taken by TP&L in an attempt ta: save- them money. There was little other discussion from the Council. - Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present who wished to speak for or against the requested increase. Mr. Jerry Spencer, 105 Manor way, Grapevine, Texas asked what would happen if the city refuaed the requested rate increase. Mr. Daniels answered that it would be appealed before the Commission. Mr. Hugh Waite, a Grapevine tax payer, t�ien asked several questions relative to advertisements, construction, and investors of TP&L. _ Mr. Wayne Dunn, Grapevine eitizen, stated tl�at Mr. Daniels had expresse.d the need to attract and prote�t the interest of the stockholders and the.� asked -what was the rate of return, i, (dividends) presently being paid on the common stock. Mr. � Da�iels answered that it was approximately 72 percent. � � ; Mayor Tate asked the City Attorney if th� Cauncil wanted to request separate data relative to Grapevine Customers, what point in time would that action be necessary. The City Attorney adwised that .rates eould be suspended for up to 120 days, then the Council �aould ha�e the ability to sttspend rates., upon just cause, for another 30 days. � - He commented, however, that :after a 90 day period . (Apr�:�7. 26) if no deeision had been made, the compa�y could put the reqtzested rates into effeet by the place- ment of a bond: The Cit�r Attorney then: recon3mended that the request for additional data be considered within a reasonable length-of time a�ter receipt of� the Touch-Ross � study. There being no further discussion, Councilman Dunn made a motion to close the public hearing, and to continue suspension of the application of the rates pending receipt of the Touch- Ross study and further analization of the reqt�ested increase. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dalton and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn Nays . None Absent : Councilman Pirkle � � � After a short recess, Mayor Tate called the meeting to order with all members present with the exception of Councilman �s Pirkle. � ; The next order of business was for the City Council to consider �� the franchise application of Metroplex Cab Company as submitted � r by Mr. Hugh M. Waite. Mr. Waite commented that he had sub- ; mitted an application for transfer of franchise in accordance f with Ordinance 74-40. He explained that he was in the process � of purchasing Metraplex Cab Company from its present owner, Mr. Hammonds. z � The City Attorney advised the Council that the franchise, : originally granted to Metroplex Cab Company expired on April � 15, 1976. He added that the franchisee had been operating on � a continual basis and that the City had essentially acquiesced i and agreed, by non action, to allaw the firm to continue to operate. He added that the Council could consent to a day to r day assignment pending a public hearing for consideration of 4 the granting of the franchise. The City Attorney added that ` he felt it was important that Mr. Waite understand that a �' franchise could not be granted at this time, but that the only � � ac�ion the Council could take at the present would be to ; grant an assignment and to set a date for a public hearing. Mr. Waite stated that he understood the situat�on. � Mayor Tate asked the City Attorney if the Council could grant multiple taxi franchises. The City Attorney answered that ` the Council could not grant an exclusive franchise, but that P multiple franchises were considered a matter of public con- q venience and necessity. i There being no further discussion, Councilman Dunn made a motion to grant the request for a transfer and set the date ; for a public hearing to consider the franchise on March 15, 1977. Councilman Florence seconded the motion and it � prevailed by the following vote: � � � Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn �' Nays . None Absent : Councilman Pirkle � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission regard- ing Zoning Application Z77-3, applicant, Mr. Rockenbaugh. The � Assistant City Manager, Jim Hancock reported that the Planning E & Zoning Cammission unanimously recommended approval of the requested zoning. ,�'he City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Councilman Gideon made a motion to x grant the requested zaning and adopt the ordinance. The i motion was seconded by Councilman Florence and prevailed by � the following vote: � d. Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn r ,_ Nays . None � Absent : Councilman Pirkle ` � £ ORDINANCE NO. 77-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE COM- PREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, € Y � � TEXAS; SAA'iE ��ING �,LSO K�TOWN'- AS TI�LE 10 OF THE �ITY CODE OF- GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CHAN�E ON A T�2ACT- OF �AND DESCRI#3ED AS BEING A -LOT, LYING AND- BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT � COUNTY, - TEXAS, BEING LOT "A" OF J.J. HALL' S- REVISION 0F LOTS 11 TO 22, STARNES ADDITION ' TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS � ,� ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "R-2" TWO FAMILY DWELLING � DISTRICT TO "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINE5S DISTRICT, CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZO�I�TG MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND • GENERAI� WELFARE DEMAND A ZONIN� CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendat�ion� of the Planning & Zaning Commission regarding Zo�ing Application Z77-5, applicant J. T. Davis. Mr. Hancock reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the requested zoning. ThE City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Councilman Oliver made a motion to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and approve the ordinance. The motion was seeonded by Councilman Dalto� and prevailed by the following votee _ Ayes . Tate, Gideon, �'lorence, Oliver, Daiton,- & Dunn Nays . None � Absent s Pirk�le - ORDINANCE NO. 77-11 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE- OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEiNG �1LS0 KNOWN AS ' TITLE 10 OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRP,NTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF . LAND DESCRIBED A� BEING A LOT, TRACT OR-PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, T�X1aS, BEING A PORTION OF ,BLOCK l AND BLOCK 2, LAGUNA VISTA ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, AND ALSO BEING A TRACT OF LAND IN THE WILLIAM Y. ALLEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 34, TARRANT ' COUNTY TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DES- -- CRIBED IN �'FiE �ODY OF THIS ORDINANCE f ORDER- ING �-CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FRONI "R-1" S ING�E-•-FAMI�Y DWFLI,IN� DI�TR�CT TO "R-2" TWO FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT, CORRECTING THE � OFF�CIA� ZOATING MAP; PRFsSERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; P�20VIDING A CLAUSE RE- LATING TO SEVERABIL�TY; D�TERMINING '�HAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DE- MAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A FENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The next order of business was �o� the .City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission regard- ing Zoning Application Z77-�6. Mr. Hancock reported that the � � ; § Planning & Zoning Cammission unanimously recommended approval of the requested zoning. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Councilman Dalton made a motion � to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commis- _ sion and adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by � � Councilman Gideon and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn � Nays . None � ; Absent : Councilman Pirkle ORDINANCE NO. 77-12 f AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ` GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO K1�TOWS AS TITLE ; TEN OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEViNE, TEXAS, GRANT- � ING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED ` AS BEING A 52. 31 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING i A PORTION OF THE G.F. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1003, SAMUEL FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. � 526, AND THE A.F. LEONARD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 946, TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS MORE FULLY ; AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID � PROPERTY FROM "R-1" SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT, � � INCIDENTAL TO THE OPERATION OF A HEALTH CARE CENTER ; AND USES AS PERMITTED UNDER "C-1" NEIGHBOR�IOOD € BUSINESS DISTRICT; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERA- ' BILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS, k AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMEND- ` MENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING ; AN EMERGENCY. ; � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � a revision to the final plat of Oak Creek Estates, Fourth Filing. � Mr. Hancock reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Engineers recommended approval of the plat revision. Mr. Joe Wright, developer, then made a presentation. Mr. Wright advised the Council that the major change was that ; approximately 18 acres had been added to the addition. Mayor Tate asked if the City Engineers had approved the plat � in relation to drainage. Mr. Hancock answered no, and ex- plained that at this point, the anly approval was in regard to the subdivision of the land. He further explained that the � drainage would be considered when the city staff and city ` engineers considered the construction plans. Councilman Oliver made a motion to accept and approve the final � plat of Oak Creek Estates, Fourth Filing. The motion was 4 seconded by Councilman Dalton and prevailed by the following t vote: � �. s Ayes . Tate, Dalton, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, & Dunn Nays . None � Absent : Councilman Pirkle � The next order of business was for the City Council to con- �: sider the final plat of Oak Grove Estates. Mr. Hancock ex- ; plained that the final plat consisted af only a portion of the z preliminary plat which was approved several weeks ago contingent = � � upon approval by City Engineers. He added that the remainder of the land was being reevaluated and would not be included as a part of the final plat. Mr. Leon Levitt, Engineer made the presentation. After a lengthy discussion, Mayor Tate suggested that the item be tabled pending dedication of a 25 foot right-of- way by a separate instrument, change in the name of the addition because of si.milarity to existing subdivisions, change in the names of several streets because of similar existing street names, and submission of the plat in final form. Councilman Dunn made a motion that the item be tabled until March 15, 1977. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn Nays . None Absent : Councilman Pir�le The next order of business was consideration of the minutes of February 22, 1977. Councilman Oliver made a motion to approve the minutes as published. The motion was seconded by Councilman Florence and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Gidean, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn Nays . None Absent : Councilman Pirkle There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilman Florence made a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dalton and all present voted aye. PASSED AND APPROVED on this the � day f J��Lr�� 1977. _�� ��- ��� MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SEC TARY �