The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1976-07-06 Joint Meeting � � s � � � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 4 SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 6, 1976 AT 7: 30 P.M. �' ; COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET ? � � � � � � � � I . CALL TO ORDER � � ; � II. INVOCATION: Councilman Gideon � � III. PUBLIC HEARING � € The City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to � hold a Public Hearing for the purpose of considering ' the rezoning of Tract 1, Block 4, Ridgecrest Addition � ; from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District to "R-3" � Multiple Family Dwelling District. Applicants are � Drs. Minnie Lee and Edgar L. Lancaster. Zoning � � Application Z76-13. � � IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING � � � G A. City Council to remain in session to consider } further agenda items . § � � B. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the � Conference Room to consider further business. _ � � � � � � � � � � � ;: r; ' IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED � � BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR g SESSION, THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & � � ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS � THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 1976 AT 1: 30 P.M. _ E � i � i � • � — ; � CIT SECRE RY � � fi E � � � Rp j i 7 { � � � � i 7 � � E � i' F k}� 4f $ Y � � � � � E � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 6, 1976 AT 8:00 P.M. ; COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � V. CITIZENS REQUEST &/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS & DISCUSSIONS i VI. PRESENTATION ; � r City Council to present a plaque of appreciation to � retired employee, Izola ,Tordan. _ � VII. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES (June 22, 1976) � � VIII. OLD BUSINESS ` A. City Council to discuss construction of the E golf course. � ! B. City Council to discuss a cleanup campaign. ; Kenneth Pritt to make a presentation. C. City Council to ratify the salary of the g Assistant City Judge. � E IX. NEW BUSINESS ; � A. City Council to consider a resolution relative to criteria to be used in the study of the expansion of the Trinity River Authority' s ? � Tarrant County water supply project. Mr. � Dick Knowlton to make a presentation. e 7 `r i ' B. City Council to consider the Tourist & Conven- � _ tion Bureau' s recommendation that additional � funds be approved for the reconstruction �of � � the Tanner Log Cabin. Mr. Aulton Mullendore, ' Chairman, to be present for discussion. y. i ! C. City Council to consider the recommendation .df ' � � the Planning & Zoning Commission i� regard to Zoning Application Z76-13. City Council to also r consider an ordinance if zoning is approved. `4 � � � D. City Council to recess to the Conference Room to � discuss personnel and the purchase of real estate ; persuant to Article 6252-17, Section 2, (f) and f (g) , Texas Civil Statutes. € � ; E. City Council to return to the Council Chambers; � Council may or may not take action on the above ; items. � � X. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY ; CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, a THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 1976 At 3:00 P.M. � f City Secr� ary �- � � � � E � � � i � � i CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS � SPECIAL PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 6, 1976 AT 8:00 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOM - 413 MAIN V. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES (June 22, 1976) ; � VI. OLD BUSINESS �: f VII. NEW BUSINESS � � The Planning & Zoning Commission to consider $ Zoning Application Z76-13 (Drs . Lancaster) 4 and make a recommendation to the Council. � VIII. ADJOURNMENT k F � � I f S � � { { 5f F � 7 £ IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED � BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LLGISLATURE, REGULAR � SESSION, THE SPECIAL PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING } ; AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 1976 AT 1:30 P.M. _ � � � - � � CITY SE TA Y � f � $. � �' � G' S } $ � G � � 4 Y � 6 � � a i t F- � � � � # � � � 8 � d �q i STATE OF TEXAS � COUNTY OF TARR,ANT � CITY OF GRAPEVINE � The City Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission met in joint and special session at 7:45 P.M. on this the 6th ,� day of July 1976 with the following members present to-wit: William D. Tate Mayor Charles Gideon Councilman David Florence Councilman Larry Oliver Councilman Doil Dalton Councilman Willis Pirkle Councilman Charles Dunn Councilman constituting a quorum with Ted Ware Chairman Joe Kennedy Member Cato Jones Member with Harlen Joyce, Mike Davis & Bill Crabtree absent, with Floy T. Ezell City Manager Jim Hancock Ass � t. City Manager Shirley Rrrnstrong City Secretary John Boyle City Attorney Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. The invocation was given by Councilman Gideon. The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to hold a Public Hearing for the purpose of considering the rezoning of Tract 1, Block 4, Ridgecrest Addition from "R-1" Single Ramily Dwelling District to "R-3" Multiple Family Dwelling District. Applicants are Drs. Minnie Lee and Edgar L. Lancaster. Zoning Application Z76-13. � ' Mayor Tate explained the procedure of a Public Hearing and then introduced the applicant, Dr. Minnie Lee Lancaster. Dr. Lancaster stated that her application was for the extension of Ridgecrest Addition. She added that at the present time, Ridgecrest Addition stops on the East side of Crestview. Dr. Lancaster commented that lots one thru nine on the west � side of Crestview are now zoned "R-1" Single Family Dwelling and that there are numerous restrictions to insure that those homes built will enhance the beauty of Grapevine. She further stated that now, application was being made to change the type of aduition within the middle of the block instead of facing houses. She added, that in other words, the homeowners on the east and west side of Crestview, would have the same zoning. However, the property owners on the west side of Crestview would back up to the property that is being considered for "R-3" Multiple Family Dwelling District zoning. (East side of Dogwood) Dr. Lancaster furthe r acknowledged that the property on the west side of Dogwood has already been zoned Multiple Family. She stated that plans are to construct a masonry fence completely through the middle of the block. (Block Four) Mayor Tate stated that questions were in order f rom the Planning & Zoning Commission. Member Cato Jones asked what type apartments are being planned for the area in the event the zoning is granted. Dr. Lancaster stated that at present she had no plans, but that she did not see apartments there at all, but rather duplexes. She commented that she could better make a decision if she knew what the owner of the west side of Dogwood had in mind. Member Joe Kennedy asked if Dr. Lancaster was requesting a blanket "R-3" zoning without any other provisions made as to � the plans for the pr�perty. Dr. Lancaster answered yes. Mayor Tate stated that questions were in order from the Council. Councilman Rlorence asked who owned the property to the west of Dogwood. Dr. Lancaster answered that she was not sure, but that she thought it was Mr. Hobratsch. Councilman Dalton asked of Dr. Lancaster since she has no specific plans, what prompted her to make the request for zoning. Dr. Lancaster answered that she preferred zoning to be different on a back to back situation rather than front to front. Councilman Dunn asked if Dr. Lancaster planned to build the fence along the center of the block or if that would be a restriction that was imposed upon the property owners. Dr. Lancaster answered that she planned to build the fence in hopes that it would be uniform and more attractive. Dr. Lancaster commented that the property in question is near the hospital and that anyone that is aware of the Ridgecrest Addition must know that they would want whatever is built to be attractive and a credit to the town. Mayor Tate asked Assistant City Manager, Jim Hancock, if the property in question was under the Planned Development that was approved. Mr. Hancock answered that it was in the Planned Development request, when the hospital was remodeled, but that it was decided at that time not to go north of College Street with any additional zoning. There were no further questions from the Council and Mayor Tate recognized Mrs . Linda Orr, 516 Dogwood, Grapevine. Mrs. Orr : stated that she lived in a rent house directly across the street from the property in question and that she was very concerned that apartments might be built adjacent to her home. She stated that she believed that duplexes would be in keeping with community planning, but that she would be opposed to apartments because of the additional traffic and possible vandalism. She concluded that apartments would be undesirable for the neighborhood in question. Mrs. Orr then thanked the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Council for allowing her to speak. Mayor Tate then recognized Mr. Jerry Jordan, 509 Bluebonnet, Grapevine. Mr. Jordan stated that he was opposed to "R-3" Zoning that was being requested. He commented that more than enough property to accomodate the residents of Grapevine has already been zoned for apartments . Mr. R. V. Trammel, engineer for Dr. Lancaster stated that he would like to make a rebuttle in regard to the statements made by Mrs. Orr and Mr. Jordan. He stated that Mrs. Orr was not a landowner and is presently living on property that is al- ready zoned "R-3" . He also commented that Mr. Jordan was not within 200 feet of the property in question and that the applica- tion was not requesting apartments, but rather "R-3" zoning. k $ t Mayor Tate asked Dr. Lancaster if there was any particular reason for asking for "R-3" rather than "R-2" if duplexes were being planned for the property. Dr. Lancaster answered �: that she was concerned that the existing zoning of "R-3" across the street would effect the marketability of the ` E lots on the east side of Dogwood as Single Ramily. Mr. Trammel stated that they felt it would be easier to have "R•3"Zoning and build "R-2" than it would be to have "R-2" and be forced to build "R-3" . � Chairman Ted Ware asked Dr. Lancaster if she would consider the possibility of single story complexes rather than two story so as to avoid tenants of the apartments looking down into the back yards of the single family dwellings. Dr. Lancaster stated that Mr. Ware�s observation could be taken into consideration. ' t i� Member Ted Kennedy made a motion to close the Planning & Zoning portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Cato Jones and prevailed by the following vote: w � � Ayes: Ware, Kennedy & Jones k Nays: None � Absent: Joyce, Davis and Crabtree Councilman Florence then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: `� ; x Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn ; Nays: None The next order of business was for the City Council to present a plaque of appreciation to retired employee, Izola Jordan. Mayor Tate stated that Mrs. Jordan had served in various � capacities on behalf of the City government for many, many � years. He commented that on June 20, 1976 Mrs. Jordan ; completed twenty years of service to the city. He further � stated that hers was a name that had been synonymous with city hall for many years and one that would be missed for many yedrs to come. Mayor Tate then presented Mrs . Jordan with the plaque. Mrs. Jordan thdnked the Mayor and C;ouncil and expressed appreciation for an opportunity to serve her city. The next order of business was consideration of the minutes of the meeting of June 22, 1976. � Councilman Oliver made a motion to apYrove the minutes as � published. The motion was seconded by Councilman Gideon and � prevailed by the following vote: ' i Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Rlorence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn Nays: None The next order of business was for the City Council to discuss construction of the golf course. ` The City Manager explained that Mr. Leon Howard had presented an updated estimate on the construction of the golf course. See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof of the minutes of the city council meeting of July 6, 1976. The City Manager then explained several items within the budget. He then further commented that previously the council and the city staff had talked about relocating the pro shop and the maintenance building over onto corps property north of the dam, rather than on Anderson Gibson Road. He stated � � ; � E s i F � [Y k E I �{ P that this location has been reviewed and should work out as an ideal site for the pro shop and maintenance building. The City Manager stated that because of the condition of the soil, it would be �heaper to construct the north portion of the course before the south portion. He further acknowledged that the City Staff had talked with Mr. Byron Nelson in regard to construction of the course. Mr. Nelson had indicated that he was obligated to work with Mr. Joe Fingers, architect and engineer. The City Manager then stated that Mr. Leon Howard � had been hired to do the preliminary work and that his contract had expired. He then acknowledged that it would need to be determined if the city wanted to hire Mr. Byron Nelson and Mr. Joe Fingers or Mr. Leon Howard as architects and engineers of the golf course. Mayor Tate asked if Mr. Nelson recommended the club house be at the north end of the dam rather than on the property that we would have to acquire. The City Manager answer ed yes, that Mr. Nelson thought this would be a much better location because of the steep cliff at the other proposed site. Councilman Dunn asked how accessible would this location be to the South course when it is constructed. The City Manager stated that he and Mr. Nelson had discussed this and Mr. Nelson had indicated that it would be very simple to redesign several holes to accomodate for this variation. Councilman Dunn then asked if there was any possibility of the corps closing the road across the dam. The City Manager answered that to his knowledge this would not happen, and that one way to prevent this would be for the city to take over the maintenance of the road. Councilman Dunn then asked if there would be any possibility of bringing the road off of Anderson Gibson Road through the corps property up to the club- house. The City Manager stated that that would be a possibility. He continued to say that some private property would have to be purchased if that was the case. Mayor Tate commented that possibly the county would participate with the city in purchasing some of that property. There was little other discussion. No action was taken. The next order of business was for the City Council to discu�s - a cl�anup campaign. Kenneth Pritt to make .a preseatation. _ Mr. Pritt stated that the objective of the proposed campaign was to improve the generalappearance of the City of Grapevine by utilizing the available manpower from the local citizenry, civic organizations, churches, and city employees to clean the roadsides of trash, debris, abandoned cars, old buildings, and unkept vacant lots. Mr. Pritt continued by stating that it was proposed that a concentrated effort be made on each of four successive Saturdays starting on July 24 through August 14, 1976 to clean the right of ways and adjoining property of all debris and trash. He further proposed that all organiza- tions participating be urged to make a pledge of the total amount of trash that they will collect during this four week period, and that the individual and the organization that collects the most trash during this time be recognized by the City Council. Mr. Pritt further suggested that certain designated streets have prize debris planted on them which will be clearly marked and make the collector eligible for a prize when produced with one bag of trash. Mr. Pritt suggested that the City be responsible for providing the bulk of the manpower and equipment. He then proposed that financing for the project come from the city�s general fund. He also recommended that financing for bumper stickers and plaques be solicited through the Tour3st and Convention Bureau and the f ranchises within the city. There was no discussion. No action was taken. � � ; � The next order of business was for the City Council to ; ratify the salary of the Assistant City Judge. The City Manager explained that this item was discussed � during the previous meeting but that it was not advertised i on the agenda so that action could be taken in regard to salary. He reported that the assistant city judge was working at this time and that it had been proposed that he be paid $10.00 per trip up to $200.00 per month. Councilman Dalton made a motion to accept the recommenda- "` tion of the City Staff and ratify the setting of the assistant city judge's salary at $10.00 per trip to a maximum of $200.00 per month. The motion was seconded by Councilman Gideon and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence , Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn � Nays: None Mayor Tate stated that the Council would recess for approxi- mately ten minutes. The Council reconvened at 9:20 P.M. with all members present. � � The next order of business was for the City Council to � consider a resolution relative to criteria to be used in the � study of the expansion of the Trinity River Authority�s ` Tarrant County water supply project. Mr. Dick Knowlton to ° make a presentation. Mr. Knowlton explained that the proposed resolution was three-fold. He stated that the population projections and > corresponding water demand requirements established by the Grapevine Comprehensive Master Plan, dated February, 1975 would be used in the study in the Trinity River Authority ' Water study. Secondly, he stated that the resolution pro- poses that the Trinity River Authority water supply would ' be treated, potable water delivered at the City of Grapevine�s � design water system pressure. Thirdly, he commented that � the proposed resolution stated that the Trinity River k Authority water supply would be delivered to the Grapevine city limits near the intersection of State Highway 157 and ; Cheek Sparger Road. There was some discussion and it was decided and re�ommended that the water supply be delivered to the intersection of State Highway 157 and Glade Road. � Councilman Pirkle made a motion to adopt the proposed � resolution with the stipulation that the water supply be Y delivered to the Grapevine City limits near the intersection of State Highway 157 and Glade Road rather than 157 and �: Cheek Sparger Road. Councilman Gideon seconded the motion and it prevailed by the following vote: � � Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn �: Nays: None i � RESOLUTION 76-18 � RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF GRAPEVINE, ` TEXAS, ADOPTING CRITERIA RELATIVE TO WATER SUPPLY � � �� STUDIES. � � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � the Tourist & Convention Bureau's recommendation that addi- tional funds be approved for the reconstruction of the Tanner Log Cabin. Mr. Aulton Mullendore, Chairman, was present for � discussion. � � � � � � : Mr. Mullendore stated that an additional $3,868.22 was needed over the $5,000 that was budgeted for reconstruction of the log cabin. Mr. Mullendore then commended the Grapevine Historical Society for their efforts in having the cabin re- stored. He further commented that Mr. Hall of Hall 's Construc- tion Company had stated that the additional money requested should complete the construction, and if it did not, his firm would assume the balance of the debt. Mr. Mullendore then read a letter f rom the Historical Society requesting the '� Tourist & Convention Bureau to assist them in paying the additional $3,878.22. Councilman Dunn asked if the work in regard to the $3,878.22 had already been done. Mr. Mullendore answered yes. Councilman Dunn made a motion to approve the request and grant funds in the amount of $3,868.22 to pay Hall Construction Company the balance due on construction of the log cabin. The motion was seconded by Councilman Pirkle and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn Nays: None The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the �ecommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission in regard to Zoning Application Z76-13. City Council to also consider an ordinance if zoning is approved. The Assistant City Manager, Jim Hancock read the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commisg on in regard to 2oning applica- tion Z76-13. He stated that the Planning &Zoning Commission recommended that the "R-3" zoning be granted with the restric- tion of single story structures and a six foot screening fence through block four behind lots one thru nine. Mayor Tate then asked the City Secretary to read the proposed ordinance in regard to zoning application Z76-13. Mayor Tate pointed out that the proposed ordinance did not take into consideration the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and asked the City Attorney what provisions would have to be made. The City Attorney answered that the Planning & Zoning Commission under the ordinance would have the ability to recommend screening devices that could be added as an addi- tional stipulation to the"R-3" category. He continued by stating that the "R-3" category does have a specific provision relative to heights , two and a half stories or thirty five feet. Only through a specific use permit district, site plan type thing, do they have ability to vary the specified height restrictions contained in the ordinance. He further acknowledged, that that left the Council with the prerogative of officially overriding the Planning & Zoning Commission or simply grant the "R-3" zoning which would require a three-quarter override vote, which in turn would eliminate the one story restriction. The City Attorney then commented that the Council could send the application back to the Planning & Zoning Commission for further review. The City Attorney stated that the application could be re- advertised to read, "R-3" or any district higher and more restrictive by use and by specifications. He stated that if this were the case, the council would have the authority to zone it "R-2" or Specific Use Permit District� with the re- striction that the multiple family structure be of single story construction. � r � Councilman Dunn made a motion that the application be re- advertised and referred back to the Planning & Zoning Commission for further discussion on the first Tuesday in � August, (August 3, 1976) . The motion was seconded by �' Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: � � Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence, Dalton, Oliver, Pirkle & Dunn Nays: None The next order of business was for the City Council to recess � to the Conference Room to discuss personnel and the purchase of real estate persuant to Article 6252-17, Section 2, (f) � and (g) , Texas Civil Statutes. The council reconvened in the Council Chambers at 11:55 P.M. # F , j: There being no further business to come before the council, Councilman Pirkle made a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and all present voted aye. k � �: PASSED AND APPROVED this the �D_ day of '; .'1976. e 1r--� f� �`" : �._��;`�'`� . � Mayor � € ATTEST: � � � City Sec ta y ' � � � � � S � F 2 C Y � � � f' i � 4 ¢ � f j f t � � � 3 � � t & �Y � . __ ___ ..__ _ _ _- � _ i .. � . .._ . _.. _..___ _.._ _. ..�.. ,.._1 • � EXHIBIT "A" 1 • / � .G'.`'AGE t�//✓F_ - ��_%L E.Q .�O,qO) �'►�ALL STR� o o `GO'E• �-E T ( 6�-- R.O.��) ti.7a 30 - - r'_� 3 -- �S.a�° f0�00"E. 2r,3. �2' - 1•'�2 - �zs�� __ - JS` �< � � __G_�9�--- ;I--- Il& A$' ( -r-- �z� � I - - i � � 15�8.L. -' � 1� � '�� ' � _ � IV � � . , . � �� a, 50 :' - ' m . � ' � � +� ' � I 1` ( i � ,: � � - � � 4 � � ' � , - - I100� I � , i � - - 1 , •� i ::.:: I � ' I � �' - � o - I � i ;� 2 , � I ► i � ; � � � � � � .�� 2�.�� • --- --- �_ I 1 . . � � -�-- � I i1 � ; t� � ! � , i -^L ;, � p 3 �o r � � � , I � ;� 5 i �` v � iO iG= U.E. `� O �� f , i �2oQ -� - � , � � ''� � _-_- - - — 1- � - -- - -- -�— a � � , C�C O � � � O � ' o i ��:� , _ ; i - t� � j - , R _ ; b o � O � ; �, � 4 �� " � � � i` � �;�� or . m uJ : v -�� I �2� � � � � -- --- -�- p � I W - I ; m� p � � f j '� oI p � 0 � __/�___ �DO '_— i �c � � _- — i � 5 � � ! ? C] o <. t- n I �_----�20.0' , ?" S � � � N : Q Q ; ! _ � _ � Lt� I � � , C> o � � � � � O � i O o � � J: ,� 6 I o �� -- O � . . ,� `,� � CErZT1FY THAT THIS PLAT VdAS � � � J . � , t i20.0 i �� : m . � , � � � FRGM �:N ,aCTUAL SuRVEY ON _ � o - ---- - -- � _ IND AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT 1 p � �� , _ U I � �_S T O F t��Y K ti 0'N L E D G E A N D i � � ; ;0 7 , ° i � ' '�' � � � . �� , �- ; . � ' �20 0' � � , , � , i I �' ' 1 - -- --- -- � , ---- - ---------- --- -- --- i � . ,p I - � ;� 8 I o ( j _ , � . m � i � i 5'� . ! � i2o.0 � I ! --- — _— i— ' I ! , �- � : � i ) I � I ') . I � �. . i� 9 0 � � � 1 � I o 50 . ! � , -,-, :- � - I , : � � o ° i � �— � , , , ' , � ;_ _ � .} ; :i-,2 2 �3��__- -- _- ' _-- - - I . a„ � r � � /�5 6�`�-, :- ,� -�p � -s l � 17 s , � a �:-.- -' 1—� � .66 '; ; � J , �oo��*1 R-6�-� _ ( 6 0° R.0.�y.) t G� S� 1�� --_�___ ' _ _ _ � _ � S �g � ��-- � � : GO�- / I :;: i � . __ _ ��ES`C,._ " �1 - ' / / . _ � :v r �. _ ___. .. . ... . .. - � .- . .. _ . . . r �.. .. . . � . . - " � ' • . . ... .. .. . � �1 ' ' ,' . • 1 :�, f ��,� c.'� -I-' ,�; I ri ci) <'� �f � - ! j -I-' (-], i�, . �—! - .��I - �;i il) �� t:�� •r' . �ll '�. �J f�� j; �" i._, C, _ � . O ; C7 C� O O O O O O c::� C� <_� C) �� C_� CJ C� <_)�� CJ C� �.i�C � r7!i:�:: • ri.i �l` .�7 �`.� . � i��{ �-� C_' � —� CJ �� O O C� �:� �—� �._ ._. .. . _ r; r�� i-� - - - �� •rl ,t_; . , _.i i . �� _� C� �_� . . . , . .. .._, �.i , i_ . i ._ , ._ ii n1 � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . � , !�i- (� l! �� i�� — — - I. . �- . �... LJ l..J L/ � �� J ( � i.,i ,., ,�.�.i i �, ( � _1 1 C? � l� 1 � � '� • '_' �- 11 (U , , � . __ . .� .. .._ ... _. -� i . Q -:-� �'�; r '. r'i �- -, �'- r� - ;- � �i �-� � � � ) , , i�� - , , - �� I l�t-� �) �r� ., C i , � c.7 � �. ..� � �. . �, i � � . _ _ . �_� _ ._. . . ,�' ... , .. {-' . ' _ - � . - . `, _ __ � _ �•. � , � , � ., �.� I �_: L� i. � i(� �.__ ��., �-�, . . i . . . �� . � „ . . -' _� __ . . _ , , � . ,n i�i �.r. . _ , �� ci 1�-i� _. � , i � .; , , .-.' ,,, ., .. .. .. . ., ., ., . ., , n .. ' ' � 0) � : ;� �� ;_� .. .. .. .. _ . . - �_, . .� .� .. ..� ' � � � ,f '� LlJ C..) I.(�l L"- L(.i lTl ll-i I') �.A: f�-� i�'. ( ; . . .. 1 �. I_ I . ' ' � . _ I f..i L.i ( (-, l7') CU �� li� �.�J, l , . , . L. 1 !�..� �-. . . �_ -, . '. �_.! N �l� Cv <•: �� i� �,.�� rL� i.i i.;i �.�r, ,.i ,,�', ^ _ i'. _, i'1 i ' '- ,:. � �' ,i-. � ' r-I �—. . _ � . , ; r i� . , .., � �i�� . .i r-, i--'. ,. ' �T� r '� �/1 :I , - - _ ��_, � �U?- :(�t .. � . , _l . . '.�� ii� ,..i �i) t( I � �'� (�� i; - . , �'� _ . � r I �,� _ ^ � II II It II It II II II II II II II II 11 II II II II II II II ' ' � �'� , . C�� ! . , � � (_ ;� �� , � . � ... � ��_ • . �_i _ � . , � � � � �{��I . � . ��.1 <<� . �� . , . . r . .. �- � � � . .. . �I- . _ _ r� r`J ` . _ �.� . i � � ; t� �- , (_� ._ • , � 'i i' 41 . � -, (�� i� ... � �_�i) ,y � � � ' �� , `-�� I; ��i ., �,i,�� t!� i!! , 'r�t pf :-, �1 UI . ' q) -I� .� I i') :�� ,�'�i �'� � . t�i � {,)� � ,�.� '_x�'I �. �.� , '. : � � • j�: , � U (_� , � � �i (�., _ L,I 'Ll .0 'l.' UJ U t.� r-I , � > 'tJ - � <� ,�, r;� �n �t� r-I (.� �_; ill . '� � i, C� �-� � ' . � .i .,� . in - -F.� J) �_ . • ,rl �1! C.J ;.i • (l� I.J �U ,�_; U � � F-{ �` � ' '" .-. . c, "' . � i l., �, t:,ll C� .,,�, �� -4� ��1 S": �--I (-.' �; � :� , (, Ui . .. ..:. ... , � ,� . r� ;'� , , � F-; C) U1 r__ _ � ��U .i F-i G C�� 4�i � ':-i i- (.i� � , .' � � �. < i i�: - n Q) . . .�; �i "� �1, � � C� n ��, ' �.r, E ' � -i i �� .;-� W , ��i ., , _ .�� C"_� ��, ��> ` ' ^ �.�' hi) iL I�! �I�1 -{-� �? ) �ii ,� �.� _� �1�� r � � ��f , -- .i t.) .�� " �.1� 1/] _ i � I � ��n .� i��_ �� i . � � �-I Ul l') .i+l . . Cf� . . r . I�I ��I I Ui (I) .;}� i � -i . _ �Jl i�i �� ' . � O ... _ ('1 . _a c: �� _, , ,1� � , C_; , . ��''. . ;'.; i _ "� �i �? i) � �n b0 � _ CIl rL' ,,I �� _ � .i . . (�i � �� Q) �l) i'1 r�i � i i �� _� I� i. , i I I ' i 'r. ' � \ �, ,^.�; v i;� �i> ` i i� r C) n�'r � . � � �i U , I i _ �-� � i �!1 r.l i a � : i) �'� il�, r i :0 i i i� _ �- �' �i � tif� . . � �_J tU � � ! ' i - I� r . i , � � � . ` S. L� U� - (1) (.1 .. �' �i11 �I.; �i-� C; C/)��.i ��I' I1� � , , �I,1 iU !�� • . ., -, � n•r! i7 �:� ,:.�; � .._ . . . i , .. . � � U ' ' "- 1 (Il i 1 (11 I_i • , • I � a, ,,� � ._.. Y tr� < I� � �� I U) � (�; i ' u) �t 1��, i) ( , �it r'I ) ,l , �-: � � , � �ll �. il 1 �, � � - '. i ( --_ � ! _ ..; �� -, � � �-� ��..� . � <.. l ) �i` ( � i ) v � � !-1 I I i u) i . � ��' 1�� -1 F'-I t ' tl ., ' l. � �tl ( � � � l..i U) . � I (I,) l� ii,j � � �� i � I) ; A . . . , . , �i. �) � -1 � , � .I ! C� � �.�.� . .l F C,� � ; bO ,'• i'i � � � �, . . '(! - .., . � �� , � _ ; .. .. i�� -! .I� � � �� I .) � r �� : . , ,_, �_ � � 4� [J) .ii i�< vl r �rl �) r (U (U �.; i 1 . . . , � ti �.J ��. . ( , i11 � �� t i-� - - l l�.l i-� � �L' 0) � -, � � _' �'� .i.' i, . :� � . ., .� _ Ll r-I y r�; f7 l) �! n� �.� U.l i ��1-� � } ri ��-� �?-� ll ul � .�l ��) f �) ;!� , . Q! r . . r, ' ` . , , � t�_I ( _ r_! r � G� �� 3; - (� � �_ �_ .l -I ,. - . l.) ; �� . ., ' . . '1 , l� . � I .1 � l� �. �li �.�.) .� I, . r �. ( ,1 i. .. � �� + U 4-� { .�'� !l (! •rl . � _� i 1 i �� i t ill 1� U C� ��) l, r! r N ._ � I��' �� I-�. (l� ' . I i-� , . � i , r lI� ( ('� (], I i �i; � , I•� C I�� ( �?) �. I�� i . , ��J (�a �1 >l _�_� r� . _ � �71 �. 1 (�, � � .. � • -.� ., ,T) QI tl� Ul n� . . . ' .I '.t' . :i ..: •� ''-i �;� �; r ' � 1 I,� . . . . � . • Ui G C'��.� (�� i�� I t�-I �-1 l�l '�� !�� i � ( ; � ` `' . • 1 \ __ .�; ;. • �� : i� �.�i i . .. . � � r - � �� ,�l i i . , . t, , ' c. !� r � ("1 f � ;?, „ •� r—i cv c�> _t �n cD �- cr, � � � � � � ` ' � v � � �• � `. . �. � � �� ,�) ,�1 ��11 ' � � � �