Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-09-07 Regular Meeting 1 CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1976 AT 7:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN ST. � I . CALL TO ORDER II . INVOGATION - Councilman Dunn �� III . CITIZEN�S REQUEST AND�OR MISCELLANLOUS REPORTS & DISCUSSIONS A. Mrs. Norma Henderson to appear before the City Council in reference to the "no parking" signs on the fifty foot right-of-way on Dove Road. B. Mr. Bill Shirley to appear before the City Council in reference to city administration and personnel policies . � IV. OLD BUSINESS A. City Council to discuss the Senior Citizens facility. V. NE6V BUS INESS A. City Council to consider an ordinance calling a bond election and providing and fixing details thereto. B. City Council to set a date for the public hearing on the 1976-77 Sudget and also a date for a workshop on i� same. The City Staff recommends September 21, 1976 � for the date for the Public Hearing. C. City Council to consider bicls and award the contract for construction of a maintenance building. D. City Council to discuss a water line alongfGlade Road, Hughes Road, ancl Arlington-Grapevine Road. E. City Council to consider an amendment to the budget and adjusting certain cash accounts . F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission on a preliminary plat for Shoreview Estates . G. City Council to appoint an auditor to audit the 1975- 76 books . H. City Council to consider a. resolution calling for a removal of tolls f rom the Fort Worth-Dallas Turnpike . ;� IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF TH� 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 6JAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTED'IBER, 1976, AT 3:30 P.M. G�/ . � 1 �G CITY SLCRETARY�`�1cr �v CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COD'II�IISSION MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1976 AT 7:30 P.M. CONF'ERENCE ROOM - 413 MAIN STREET I . CALT TO ORDER :� II . INVOCATION - Ted Ware III . OLD- BUSINESS A. � IV. NEW BUSINESS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider a preliminary plat for Shoreview Estates and make a recommendation to the City Council for same . IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATUP,E, REGULAR SESSION, THE PL,ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA G'�AS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEN�ER, 1976, AT 3:30 P.M. C CITY S CRETARY �ACTiN� i i STATE OF TEXAS � '' COUNTY OF TARRANT � CITY OR GRAPEVINE � The City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas convened in regular session at 7:35 P.M. on this the 7th day of September, 1976 with the following members present to-wit: William D. Tate Mayor Doil Dalton Mayor Pro-tem Charles Gideon ) David Florence ) Larry Oliver ) Councilmen Charles Dunn ) constituting a quorum with Councilman Willis Pirkle absent, with Floy T. Ezell City Manager James L. Hancock Assistant City Manager Shirley Armstrong City Secretary John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney , Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. The Invocation was given by Councilman Dunn. The first order of business was for Mr. Charles Henderson, citizen, to appear before the City Council in reference to the "No parking" signs on the fifty foot right-of-way on Dove Road. Mr. Henderson stated that he was a property owner on Dove Road and that it was a great inconvenience not to be able to park in front of his home. � Traffic Safety Engineer, Eddie Cheatham acknowledged that a traffic study had been made by a Houston firm and that they had ; recommended that no parking be allowed on any thoroughfare. He added that if parking was allowed, the use of two traffic lanes would be lost. Mr. Cheatham further commented that the ' City made an attempt to acquire enough right-of-way to allow street parking, but were unable to obtain the additional property needed. Councilman Dalton asked the City Manager when Dove Road was initially designated as a thoroughfare. Mr. Ezell answered that it was in 1964 when the first thoroughfare study was made by Henderson, Durham & Richardson. Mayor Tate asked if the Houston firm gave any consideration to the possibility of allow- �: ing street parking during certain hours. Mr. Cheatham answered that it was not mentioned but continued to say that to allow � parking part of the time and not allow it at others would create ;: confusion. He added that cars parked in traffic lanes would be ;' a hazard. Mr. Frank Pilney, citizen and propery owner on Dove Road stated j that sufficient right-of-way was obtained to allow parking in fzont of his home, but because of inadequate parking facilities for a nearby apartment complex, a large number of cars were parking along his property. He asked that the City consider placing "No Parking" signs in front of his home. � Mayor Tate expressed appreciation to both Mr. Henderson and Mr. � Pilney for their concern and stated that another inquiry would a � be made into both problems. ' The next order of business was for Mr. Bill Shirley to appear � before the City Council in reference to city administration and personnel policies . Mr. Shirley began by stating that he felt city employees need either Civil Service protection or an appeals � board. He added that the City Council, to be most effective as � a governmental entity, must be fair and honorable and must be understood by the people. Mr. Shirley stated that the right to � an appeals board was removed from the city personnel ordinance in ; ; { � � j � I � � � � � � � � � � April, 1976. He commented that at present, an employee can � � only appeal to the City Manager. He asked that the City � Council give due consideration to his request. � y The next order of business was for the city council to discuss � k the Senior Citizens Facility. The City Manager gave a brief � history stating that the City had been allocated a grant in � the amount of $70,511 through the Community Development program � for use in providing a community center for senior citizens. � Mr. Ezell then asked for suggestions f rom the Council in regard � Ty to using the funds available. Mayor Tate suggested that efforts � " be concentrated on the purchase of an existing building near the � downtown area with the remainder of the funds used for any � � necessary renovation. There was little discussion. No action � = was taken. � � � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider ; an ordinance calling a bond election and providing and fixing � details thereto. The City Manager stated that Mr. Frank � Medanich, financial advisor had been working with the City Attor- � ney in preparation of the proposed bond election. The City � Attorney explained that the ordinance, drafted for Council g consideration, called for the bond election to be held on ' Saturday, September 25, 1976. He further explained that the � ordinance proposed general obligationtnnds on the following � items: � � � (1) $1,000,000 Water Works System � (2) 300,000 Sanitary Sewer System � (3) 750,000 Golf Course � (4) 100,000 Police Facility � �,150,000 TOTAL � a � The City Attorney further explained that if the election was � called for September 25th, in order to properly advertise and � ' �F meet the statutory requirements, notice af the election would need to be published in the Star Telegram as a paper of general � circulation. The City Secretary then read the caption to the proposed ordinance. There was little discussion. Councilman Dunn made a motion to adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Councilman Gideon and prevailed by the following � vote: 3 Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton & Dunn � Nays: None ; Absent: Councilman Pirkle � �� Rrances Goad was appointed Election Judge and Martha Cluck was appointed Alternate Election Judge. � k � i ! ORDINANCE NO. 76-25 ; AN ORDINANCE CALLING BOND ELECTION ; AND PROVIDING AND FIXING DETAILS RELATING THERETO The next order of business was for the City Council to set a date for the public hearing on the 1976-77 Budget and also a = date for a workshop on same. The City Manager stated that � ' g the City Staff recommended September 21, 1976 for the date of the Public Hearing and September 14, 1976 for a budget workshop. There was no discussion. Councilman Dalton made a motion to accept the recommendation of the city staff and hold the 1976- 77 Budget Public Hearing on Tuesday, September 21, 1976 and a workshop session on Tuesday, September 14, 1976. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the follow- ing vote: Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton & Dunn Nays: None Absent: Councilman Pirkle x : � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider bids and award the contract for construction of a maintenance building. The City Manager explained the bid tabulation. (See E�chibit "A�� attached hereto and made a part hereof) . The City Manager then stated that the City Staff recommended the contract be awarded to Hall Construction for their base bid with authoriza- tion to issue minor change orders. Councilman Dalton made a '� motion to accept the recommendation of the City Staff and accept the bid from Ha11 Construction Co. , Inc. for Base Bid # 1 in ' the amount of $62,000, Base Bid #2, $8,000 and Base Bid #3, $18,000. subject to work order changes. The motion was seconded by Councilman Florence and prevailed by the following vate: Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton & Dunn `{ Nays: None ' Absent: Councilman Pirkle The next order of business was for the City Council to discuss a water line along Glade Road, Hughes Road, and Arlington-Grapevine Road. The City Manager explained that the City of Euless has recently extended a water line along the South side of Glade Road. He added that arrangements have been made to buy some water f rom Euless to serve our citizens in the South section of the city. He further stated that the City Staff was proposing an 8" line along Glade Road, a 12" water line along Grapevine- Euless Road, and an 8" line to the east along Hughes Road. The City Manager further explained that installation of the lines had been discussed with a contractor who is willing to �, lease his equipment to the City and be paid by the hour for labor. He stated that the estimated cost of the project would be between $90,000 and $100,000. The City Manager acknowledged that funds for the project are being proposed in the upcoming bond election. He added that in the event the bond issue failed, there was a possibility of using Revenue Sharing Funds to finance the project. He added that no action was necessary from the Council at this time, but that he wanted the Council to be � informed of the city staff�s proposed actions. 1 � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an amendment to the budget and adjusting certain cash accounts. Finance Director, Kenneth Pritt explained that the City of Grapevine is making an attempt to be accredited by the Municipal i Finance Officers Association in their accoun�ing procedures He added that one advantage of being recognized by this associa- tion is an ability to get a better rating on bond issues. Mr. Pritt continued to say that auditors have advised that several funds be consolidated and that a capital projects fund be established. He added that the current Reserve for Replacement Fund needed to be eliminated from the Utility and General Funds. � He stated that the names of these funds need to be changed to Capital Projects, General and Reserve for Construction, Utility. Mr. Pritt then explained the transactions and proposed budget ' amendment. For detailed analysis see Exhibit "B" (Summary of Transactions) and Exhibit "C" (Budget Amendment #4) , attached = hereto and made a part hereof. Councilman Dunn made a motion � to accept the recommendation of the City Staff and amend the ; budget as proposed. The motion was seconded by Councilman F'lorence and prevailed by the following vote: � i ? Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton & Dunn � �� Nays: None � Absent: Councilman Pirkle ; The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission on a preliminary plat for Shoreview Estates. The Assistant City � Manager, Jim Hancock stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat for Shoreview � Estates with the provision that the City Council ask the deve- � • loper to give consideration to reduce the number of lots in i � 1 , � ; � ; t Block One from eight to seven. Mr. Walter Elliott of Elliott & Hughes, Consulting Engineers made a presentation in regard to the preliminary plat. He stated that consideration would be given to the reduction of the number of lots in block one before the final plat was brought before the council for approval. There was lit�le discussion. Councilman Florence made a motion to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and approve the preliminary plat with the provision that the number of lots in block one be reduced f rom eight to seven. The motion was seconded by Councilman � Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: �; � Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton & Dunn � Nays: None Absent: Councilman Pirkle � � The next order of business was for the City Council to appoint an auditor to audit the 1975-76 books. There was little dis- cussion. Mayor Tate suggested that Members of the Council and City Staff contact auditing firms, discuss the audit, and then present that information to the Council for consideration. Councilman Dunn made a motion to postpone the appointment of an auditor until the next council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dalton and prevailed by the following � vote: � Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton & Dunn Nays: None � Absent: Councilman Pirkle � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution calling for a removal of tolls from the Fort Worth� Dallas Turnpike. The City Secretary read the caption of the � proposed resolution and explained that the Mayor�s Council of � Tarrant County had suggested that the resolution be considered. There was little discussion. Councilman Oliver made a motion � to adopt the proposed resolution. The motion was seconded by Councilman Gideon and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton & Dunn Nays: None Absent: Councilman Pirkle RESOLUTION 76-19 A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE�S OPPOSITION TO THE TEXAS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY ZN REGARD TO THE CONTINUATION OF THE TOLL ON THE DALLAS%FORT WORTH TURNPIKE. There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilman Florence made a motion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and a�.l present w ted aye. PASSED AND APPROVED this the Q2L da of , 1976. .., ,` � � G`�'� B n � Mayor `� ��-��_- � ATTEST: City Secre r � EXHIBIT "A" � CITY OF GRAPEVI�JE, '�1AI'1TE!�,'�iJCE FACILITY BID TAEiULATIQ'� ' Sikes Construction C�, Hall Constructian Co. Inc. Sarn Qini�n & Asso. Base Qid 1 �102,020.00 `�62 ,00�.00* $63,500.00** Base Sid 2 � 3,850.00 5 8,OOO.QO i10 6id Base Qid 2A 'ao aid $24,000.00* $ 8,900.00 Base Bid 3 � 25,77�J.00 �18,OOQ.00* �11 ,9�0.00** Bi d Lond '�0 5% 5� *Gidder proposes Naydite Black as alternative to concrete tilt wall or orecast concrete. **Gidder oroposes pre-fa�ricated metal '�uilding as alternative ta concrete tiZt ���all or orecast concrete. EXHIBIT "B" St1M�dARY OF TRA�dSACTIOVS General Fund Existing cash - Reserve far Rep]acement Fund $ 53,184 Transfer from Genera] Fund �apita] Outlay 86,310 Contributions from General Fund CASH � 170,000 sub-total 30�,�94 LESS: 2j3 cost of maintenance building b0,0pp reserve far golf caurse 10q,000 balance cast of street (Dove) 50,QOQ ]ighting of tennis courts 25,000 balance 74,494 � Utili� Fund Existing Eash - Reserve for Replacement Fund 9,957 Transfer from Utility �und Capital Qutlay 20,00� Contributians fram General Fund CAS�i 30,Q40 sub-tota3 59,957 �.ESS: sewer line LaPaloma 30,000 lj3 cast of maintenance building 34,000 baiance (43) � . 1 t EXHIBIT "C" AMENDMENT NUMBER 4 Amendment as herein made was passed and approved by all members of the City Council present on September .u� 7, 1976 . SiJT'it•if�i;Y OF G}�Ni�.R�'�L, UTIL.ITY, .�1ND TAX FtTNDS � ,� I NCOr1E EXP}:N D I TU RES General Fund $ 700,600.00 Ger,eral F�ind 1 ,351 ,765.00 1974 Tax� s-Estimated 8h9,014.00 D�bt Service 75,991.00 Delinqunet Tax� s 18,500.00 Contrihiiti.ons to Penalty and Interest 6,500.00 Utility Fund fo.r Collection De'�t Servi�e 75,991.00 Contr.i_butions �o � Cap�_tal Yrojects �und-Gcneral 86,310.00 Contir.�er_cies �?-,55?.00 $1 ,594,614.00 fi1 ,5�4,614.00 T_TTILITY FUND INCOME i;Y.F'F_?�D I TURES ��.'ater Sales 275,000.00 Fxpenses $ 574,400.00 Setitier Sales 98,000.00 Reconr.ect & Transfers 400.00 Contributior.s to �•;ater Tap Cl:�arges 3,a00.00 Capital Projects Sewer Cor,nections 9,600.00 Fund-Utility 20,000.00 ,,;� Interest Income 18,000.00 N�iscellaneous 200.00 Pro-Rata Crarges 22 ,000.00 Contributions Rev�nue Sharing 97,340.00 Contributions Fram r7unicipality Tax 75,991 .00 Contin�encies 5,531.00 $ 599,931 .00 $ 599,931.00 TOTAL OF THE OPFF;,4TING I�iT�?DS IItiTCOT",E E.�'LN D I TUR ES General & T�,x Fund $1 ,594, 614.00 Expenses & Debt Pequirements $1 ,`�94,614.00 Utility Fund 599,931.00 Utility rxj�ense 599,931.00 $2, 194,545.00 $2, 194,545.00 G(;NiAL FIJi\D EXPF_NDITUIZBS '` SUTiT�-'1P,Y 1975-76 _�lctual T�uclqet Estima±ed l�?73-74 1974-75 for 1975-76 Department 1 . administration $11�?, 55F�.80 $123, 100.00 $123,650.00 2. Police 27�?,2?_2.56 ?Oa,823.00 404,350.00 3. Fire 140,671.27 176,80R.00 195,010.00 �. Street 168 ,058.78 208,244.00 228,770.00 5. Sanitation 31 , 1g4.38 22,078.00 21 ,G95.00 h. Civic Center 2,096.37 5,650.00 8,000.00 7. Library 18,636.30 27, 107.00 32,935.00 8. Le�al and Professional 37, 177.58 37,200.00 42,200.00 9. Dept. of Revenue 27,852.66 45,4�2.00 42,250.00 10. City Secretary 13,456.98 17,915.00 17,7,�30.00 11. ;�11zn ic ipal Cot�rt 6, 173. 19 15,200.00 38,775.00 12. Planning and 7oning 674.81 2,300.00 2, 100.00 13. Parks 64,866.26 106,40a.00 69,750.00 14. Recreation 4, 155.20 -0- 49,050.00 15. Finance Department -O- 16,625.00 30,950.00 16. Inspection Department 28,305.32 a4,515.00 44, 500.00 $9�0,58�3 .46 $1,253,391.00 fi1,351,765.00 /1D;�IINISTPATIC�N ACCOUNT NO. 1 Actual F�uctget }?stimated 1973-74 1974-75 for 1�75-76 Per_sonnel Services $62 , ?_3?_ .03 $78,025.00 $71 , ?_00.00 Office Supplies & Printing 3, 861 . 11 3, 250.00 4, 500.00 T4aps 16 .84 500.00 500.00 I�9ayor & Council 1 ,046 .30 5,000.00 5,000.00 Telephone 3, 238 .91 2,40U.00 ?_ ,SOO.00 Utilities 901 . 10 1 , 500.00 1 ,800.00 Travel , School, Dues , Subscription 1 ,726.?_O 2,000.00 2 , 500.00 Car Expense 503.71 750.00 750.00 Elections 231 .67 350.00 400.00 -�.-� Insurance-Bonds 2, 599. 26 750.00 600.00 Equipment , R & M 1 ,459.04 750.(�O 850.00 Building Maintenance 1 , 564.84 2,40U.OU 3, 500.00 Aiaster Plan, TTatching Grants 5,978 .00 2, SOO.vO 15,000.00 . Others 1 , 734.46 1 , 200.00 2, 500.00 Bicentennial -O- -O- 3,OOO.uO CAP I T.�L OUTT AY Purchased Bldg. -O- $ 3,7L5.00 $ �3,550.OU Office Fquipment $ 4, 560.81 3,000.00 3,000.00 Bldg. Addition-City Hall 26 ,902.52 15,000.00 -0- Purchase Auto -O- -0- 2, 500.00 $118 , 556.80 $123, 100.00 Y123,650.00 20 � y" POI,ICF � ACCOUI�T Nd. 2 Actual 33udc�et Estimated 1973-74 1974--75 for 1975-16 Peraonr�el Serv.���s $2I6, 645. I1 $3�7,414.00 $331 ,700.00 Offa_ce Supplies & Printirag ?_, 100 . �34 1 ,7.50.00 ?_, 500.00 Insurance b,967. 2b 2, 250.00 2, 500.00 Uti�iti�s Z ,085.41 940.C?Q 900.00 T�lephane . 3, 384.74 3,5(�d.00 3, .Sd0.00 Travel , Schools , Dues 505,QQ 1,50Q.00? 1 ,t.�pQ.(}p Jail 875. 58 750.OQ I ,QOO.QO Animal Control 472, 79 600.Of7 600.00 Traffic Control 13.79 150.00 150.00 �'� Auto Repaiac & Operatian 17, �34. 13 14,000.00 19,000.00 Communicat�ons R & M 1 ,075 . 90 2,000.00 2, 500.00 Suilc�ing Maantr-_�nance 1 ,851 . 28 3,000.00 3,000.00 Reserve for Replac�ment 6,t�00.�0 6,000.0� 6,000.00 Qthers �378 .88 4,�{Jd.00 2,000.00 GAPITAL OUTLAY Equipment 18 ,431 .£i5 ?_2,000.00 28,000.00 Suil.ding Additions --0- 15,000.00 -�_ $278 , 222. 56 $404,814.C)tJ $4d4,350.00 25 . � ;: �� �� �t IR� � AC�<�i,UNT NC�. 3 r /#ctu<�l I�uc�c�et rsti}nated 1973 -74 1974-'75 for 1975-76 Persannel Services $ "7�,80.3.89 $�_08, 683.00 $146, 690.C)O Relief & Reti�e�nent 2 , Ib5 .00 2, 1?_5.003 3, I25.00 O�fice Slzp�li�s & Px�.r�ting 28. 32 20p.00 IOO.�t3 Utilities 848 . 22 90Q.00! I,O�Q.00 Telephane 340.94 `75Q.00 SQO.00? Insurance 3, 572. 68 1 , 725.00 1 ,750.00 Trave2, Schools & Dues 479.47 850.00 850.00 Small. Toals 5.87 100.00 20d.OQ � Truck M & Q 1 , 363.�7 1fOQC?.OQ 1 , 50Q.00 Equipment R & M 1 , 551 . 65 1 ,000.C?O ?_,000.00 Building R & M ?_67. 56 22,p00.00 500.00 Reserve for Repl�cement 5,OQ0.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 ih'a.ter Allos�aarace 3, 3�5. IO 4, 2Op.p0 3,480.00 Q the rs 5'72.69 5dC}.QO 1 ,ODO.00 F_mergency l�snbulance -Q- -O- 6, 5C70.00 CI-�,1'I TAL OUTLAY Equipment 13,795. I1 5,000.00 5,000.00 Truck� Purchased 34,b`76.00 25,000.00 17,915..00 _ Suilding Addita.ons -Q- -O- -�- $142,836,27 $1'78,933.00 $ 195,�].D.00? ; ; _ � , �Tl��FT ACCOUNT NO. 4 Actual. F3ud��et Estamat�d 1973-74 197�-"l5 for 1975-76 ;. Personnel Serv�.ces '�5 954.86 � $." , $12�3,519.04 �121 ,870.00 k ,, Small Tools 502.26 SOO.00 SOO.l�O Tel�phone -0- -O- 300.00 Rep��.irs 13,782 . 68 ?_Q,000.00 45,000.00 4`` Lighting 7,004.65 7,000.00 8 ,000.00 � Insurance 3, 330.96 1 , 125.00 2, 500.00 �' Travel , School� & Dues 20.00 200.00 300.00 �` � Fqu�.pment lZent�;Z 2,OpO.UU -O- 250.00 r: , Fquipm�nt R & M 8, 52b.4S 4, 5(�4.0{�3 13, SOO.C}O Radio R & M 1C7�.4C} 4C�O.00} 350.OQ , Reserve for Replacer�ent 3,b75.QC} 4,OC?C}.00 S,OgQ.t�O Ot���rs 869.81 500,Q0 �50.04 CAPITI�L, OUTI.,AY ' Equipment 37,C137.�8 20,OOO.flC) 9�,0OO.OQ Street-Alley Smprc�vements 34,435.97 20,OC?4.QC} 2d,Od0.4Q Signs & Post 813.'76 1 , 50Q.4Q 1 ,75Q.00 �168 ,058.78 �2C�8 , 244.00 $22$ ,770.00 34 � 7 SANITATION ACCOUNT NO. S Actual Pudget Estimated 1973-74 1975-76 for 1976-77 Personnel Services $18 , 901 .70 $16, 353.00 $16,470.00 Offi_ce Supplies & Printing -O- 25 .00 25.00 Insurance 689. 52 ?_00.00 200.00 Dump Ground Lnase 420.00 900.00 500.00 Trash Bags -O- -O- 600.00 Truck M & O -0- -O- 1 , 500.00 Tractor R & M 137.80 1 ,000.00 1 ,000.00 Dump Ground Maintenance -O- 50.00 50.00 ��,�eed & ?�7osquito 239.98 400.00 1,000.00 Reserve for Replacement 6 , 900.00 1 ,000.00 -O- Others 45.38 650.00 350.00 GAPITAL OUTLAY Equipment 3,850.00 -O- -0-.:� $31 , 184.38 $20, 578 .00 $21�695.00 38 - X; r•�u?�T 1 c 1}�ar_ cou RT /1CCOUNT NO. 11 Actual 1?udget Estimated 1973-74 1974-75 for 1975-76 Personnel Services $6 ,000.00 $14 ,400.00 $33,300.00 Office Supplies & Priilting 1`73. 19 800.00 2,�00.00 Telephoi�e -O- -O- 300.00 M & O Car -O- -O- 900.00 Others -O- -O- 200.00 CAPITAL OUTLAY Fquipment -O- -O- 400.00 Purchase Auto -O- -O- 1,275.00 °� -- --- -- ------- $6 , 173. 19 $15, 200.00 $38,775.00 56 • v' .,:* Yl�RKS ACCOUNT NO. 13 /�ctual I3uc�get Fstimated 1973-74 197�-75 for 1975-76 Personnel Services $36, 910.85 $60, 279.00 $46, 700.00 Insurance 2 ,4 .?_2.85 575 .00 l ,?_50.00 Travel , School , Dues -O- 300.00 200.00 - Utilities 1 , 5£36. 64 3,000.00 600.00 Chemicals 1 , 212 . 10 1 ,000.00 1 ,000.00 Parks M & O 2, 208 .07 5,000.00 4,000.00 Truck M & O 1 , 365.47 1 , 250.00 1 , 500.00 � Tractor R & M -O- -O- 3,000.00 S.�all Tools -O- -O- 250.00 Reserve for Replacement -O- 2 ,000.00 3,000.00 Others - 2 , 150.79 500.00 250.00 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1�luseum 215.75 SOO.00 1 ,000.00 Trucks , Tractors Purchased 3, 550.00 7,000.00 2,000.00 Equipment, Playground, Bldg . 13, 243.74 17,000.00 5,000.00 $64,866. 26 $98 ,404.00 $69,750.00 62 t �. CITY S}:CRETARY ACCOUI�T NO. 10 Actual I3udget Esti�nated 1973-74 1974-75 for 1975-76 Persoiznel Services $11 , 105 .81 $15, 565.00 $.14,480.00 Office Supplies & Printing 1 , 357 . 17 800.00 l , ?_00.00 Telephone -O- -O- ?_50.00 Travel , Schools , Dues ?_27.85 200.00 200.00 Codification , Advertising & Publishing Ordinances 766. 15 950.00 1 ,000.00 Others -O- -O- 100.00 CAPITAL _OUTI�Y Equipment -O- 400.00 550.00 $13,456.98 $17,915.00 $ 17,780.00 `' 53 � FINI�NCF DF�PARTA;FNT ACCOUNT N(}, 15 r 1�ctua.l Budcfet Estimated 1973-74 197�-75 for 19"75-76 Pezsonnel Services -Q- $1.6,225.Q0 $24 ,Q25.00 Office SuppZies & Printzs�g -Q- 150.�0 15Q.�0 F_quipnent R & M -Q- 15Q.00 475.QQ R�serve fox Replacement -O- --0- 5,000.00 OtherS -O- 100.00 300.00 CAPZTAL OUTLAY Fuxnit�re & Equiprnent -Q- -O- 1,000.�0 -O- $16 ,625.OU $30,950.00 69 � ' EXPFNDITURFS UTILITY FUND ACCUUNT NO. 50 t Actual Budget Estimat,ed 19�3--'74 1974-75 for 19'75-76 PFR�ONN}�L �ERVICES $118 ,340.55 $212 �045 .00 $1t38 ,2C10.00 OFF�ICE EXYENSE 3, 300. 17 5,000.00 3,000.00 riAltvTENANCE SHOP 693.'7$ 1 ,400.00 750.0(7 CHEM ICAL F(JR W�TEF2 Th�.ATN�F_tvT 5,��5.59 4,000.00 8 , 5Q0.Q4 CHE.M I CALS SEWER PI.,.t-�NT 1 ,�32,OQ 1,250.t?O 4, SQd.0{� S�'[ALL TOOLS & �UP�'LZ ES 832,21 1�250.�O 1 ,O{7Q.dt) CONNECTZON i�'L4TERZf�.I_.S 5,083.43 S,OQC7.fl0 2,SOO.C}C} OTHERS 1,923.59 2,Qfl0.00 5p0.00 �aATER LINE REPAIR & MAItvTENANCE 4,625.33 4,00(�.00 4,C}Ot}.C'10 SEl•TE.R LZNE R&I�f 2,55a.61 2,500,OU 2,SQd.Ot� TRUCK MAINTEN�I�ICE 5,759.29 6 s SQO.C}{} 4,OOC},QO . TRACTflR REPAI R & NIAINTFNANCE 3C78.71 � ,OOQ.d0 1,QOO.4C? 1�3ATER TREATAIENT PI.ANT MAINT�,NANCE 2, 149.0$ 8 ,000.00 S,QOO.00 SEt�JER PLANT R�PAIR & MAINTENANCE 4,482 . 17 2�50C1.00 5,5C10.00 LIFT STATIONS R&M (Se�ver) 316. 35 l , 50cJ.00 5,0(JO.00 POI�lER 22 � 507.39 24y500.00 28 �000.00 HEAT & GAS 521 .09 750.00 750.00 TELEP}�ONE 1 ,304. 11 1. , 200.�ta 1 ,250.C?O INSURANCE 4,S4b.43 1 ,70C�.00) 1 ,800.04 REN2 QN LAND-ir3aTER TREATMENT PLAIVT ' 350.C70 3S(7.00 350.00 , RADIO T1..AINTEN.4NCE 231 .60 300.00 300.00 � 76 � Actual Budget Estirnated � 1973-74 197�-75 for .t975-76 FFtE TGHT 1 .75 SO,t�Q 1(70.0(J TRAVEL, SCHOt�LS & DUES 52.49 300.00 300.00 L.�SC}RATt�RY FEES 887.21 1 ,000.00 2,(}OU.OU TR�ATET.� WATER PURCIiASED 19. 34 -O- 4,40G.40 RESERVE FOR REYLAC�MENT 1Ct,00C3.00 S,OOC?.00 -C?- DEl3T Th�r1NSFER �BO�tD PA1'i�IFNTS) 121 ,004.00 '70,625.O(� 71 ,70Q.00 INTERFST ON BC�I�iDS 131 ,692.27 126,9�7,00 123, S(�0.00 OTHER INTFREST (I�1cKEE� 1,440.00 -O- � 9bU.0� SA.D L7EBTS 9,464.8'7 3, StJt�.00 4,OOt�.00 �JATER STORAGE GI�.PEVINE T_f�{E 79.55 -t?- lOU.00 JAh?ITORIAL SUPPLIE.S -K�- -O- 1 , 250.OU 5N1ALL EQU I PI�tENT -C?-- -O- 750.00 CAP I TAL OUTL.AY C".,AFITAL IS�IYROVEI�SENT I�7ATER $ 376,843.89 � �O,000.00 $ 87, 34E�.C?Cl C_4PITAL IMPRClVEl�IENT SEt�JER 445,732. 56 32,34b.U0 1t�,000.C1C? EQU IP?�1ENT 2, .1.6b.9� 5,OQO.00 -O- MAINT�N�NCE BLDG. -O- 25,000.00 �� �O- - TOTAL UTILITY EXPFNSE $� �286, 168. �3 $577�493.00 $ 574 >400.d0 , � �7 7