Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 05 - HL06-03 315 East Wall StreetHistoric Landmark Subdistrict HL06-03 Lannie Jackson 315 East Wall Street driveways, parking, exterior finishes and other architectural embellishments were established by the Historic Preservation Commission to preserve the historic integrity of the property. See the attached preservation criteria. 1WV_:M01 The property is currently zoned "HC" Highway Commercial District. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject property and the surrounding properties to the north, south, east, and west were zoned "R-1" Single Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: SOUTH: EAST: WEST: AIRPORT IMPACT: "HC" Highway Commercial District— commercial business Single Family Residential District—First Baptist Church property "HC" Highway Commercial District – mini warehouse storage "HC" Highway Commercial District – non -conforming single family residence The subject tract is located within "Zone A" Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" Map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in "Zone A" except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Residential Low Density land use. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan. MA 0AZCU\HL06-03.4.doc 2 December 7, 2006 (10:42AM) 2 li '2—��t 1���� T ._.__.. 2 _. { I. - 222 K _-_.. __--._ 0 R 201 CN,Aot'l� 130 1A Lz- 4w 204 �S�216 o �evJJZ204 16 15 X10 O�c�ll`�G o M ! 2 �'R Q1NG CW : 120 : O` _.__.... ... V , 210Q 2.111 c n I! 2�- 3 los J 2oe N 1z1 VU ! 2 120 1o��GL` "1G� TR 2882 120 4 - — HC 301 2 1R1 �j W 110 r7J(�® 5 1R Z 5 6 7_ _18 23 327 ! 301 L — — 1 1 ���+ 3004'5- �Q 315 401 J 4 St 1 2�Q 311 ' w� 203 B ` 2 z,3 ¢\� c�}� 1 2 G�` ��� 3Q3 1 TR 36A 1 R 201 f D, I G c] C� 121 11 R 48 ( �j i`' 30� i T\" P HC 5 7 1I8 I r� �yAA _. _. -"! 6_-I 23 �.._ f0�--aO�`--- 1R1 E NORTHWEST HWY L J STRAIT _40.603 +" TR 0249 49� 49H �1'R �eI 18C pp(26 R 1 4 Bim- - 1-- , TR 48 P�3A 506 I- - 1 TRTRTt TR 4 3 TR !TR ( TR 49 X216 310 1 9E 410 24498 424 - �Oo 2oz C TR 49F H2 3� 322 �.�ox���1 r� .. _. Y — 5 -TR 37A - TR i © 101 , 105 TR 37A1 _.r 39TR TR 40A TR TR TR TR 3 RO P�D I 40 ; &40A1 41 42 44A 43 � 0�� 1 1R1 �O� 1R 125 : 223 301 305 311 401 Q 1 416 2 1 i 1 TR TR 137 , �, a 501 511 38A36 GRAF?EVINE ,) ", (���Np 105 1 125 _ `.' �Omsk blummok 0r e� s� � iw waoo�iwns r� � awwr 3o�e rw aim��r o� �a iee aam�rotoa�a�m� ep o � �+"� r� E WALL ST TR 49A i 200 6R 1 2 215 49 ,301 416 205 509 10 16 4R 51 TR 50 _ 095�S S 3 0 , G' 2 ESTILL ST 301 1 1AI / ! 1R..- _.. — TR 52 221 3 4 1 A�a�J 512 TR 2R. 102 1 TR 52 1329 58 A 225 azo CBD 13 1��� - 1R T 104 R-7.5 229 E TEMST 60 235 2A TR 28 _ TR TR TR TR 61 TR 63A��0 C TR TR ' 60 59 oe t 128 128 304 6oA1 6oB 63 j B j aze (� E TEXAS ST t j 106 2, 212 --- -__... 0 406 A f - _ _ 41s �I __ TR TR61A S 336 C/)1 414 308 18 3 3 TR ... % 60A1A 60C 306 -__. _.q B 325 j 325 1 U) 1 ��jj {� J g w NPT 1 J 56 NPT 0 40s '� i�� A 311 LA-� 12i 125 203 .J 125W T T �T20 1� E HG 308 319 1.- _. __ 325 3 P4 �� 413 - . 503 1 `7 115 2 2 3 13 �30 2 35134 rtl 1 inch equals 200 feet 315 East Wall Streel CITY OF GRAPEVINE HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION t, A tjA716- 1 APPLICANT/AGENT NAME -6eni Jackson COMPANY NAME ADDRESS 315 East Wall Street CITY/STATE/ZIP Grapevine, Texas WORK PHONE 972 841-1770 FAX NUMBER—q'7 2- - 2. APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN SUBJECT PROPERTY Owner 3. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME Same L ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP -74OS-) WORK PHONE Y -lb. 3180 FAX NUMBER q loa8* i/2 --l- 4. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 315 East Wall Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A 946 Tr 44C ADDITION Arch. Leonard Survey o Vf 7), SIZE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY ACRES ' SQUARE FEET 5. PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION Highway Commercial 6. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Residence 0AZCUT0RMS\APPHlST www.ci.grapevine.tx.us 1/06 SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACING A HISTORICAL LANDMARK SUBDISTRICT REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. �. �. �. la low, . .�. APPLICANT (PRINT) I-ayk-0,16", r OWNER (PRINT) Jackson •� d O:\ZCU\FURMSWPPHIST www.ci.grapevine.tx.us 1/06 The State of Z / -— County of Before me on this day personally appeared known to me (or proved to me on the oath of or through (description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office thisof day of A.D PA, Vd. X—A Notary Signature The State of uounty of Before me on this day personally appeared known to me (or proved to me on the oath of or through (description of identity card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of A.D. ti Notary Signature 0:\ZCU\FORMS\APPHIST 1/06 www.d.grapevine.tx.us GRAPEVINE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 1. Name Historic Lois Stewart House And/or common 2. Location i Address 315 East Wall Street land survey Archibald F. Leonard Survey Location/neighborhood Lot 1, Block 1, Morrison Addition 3. Current zoning Highway Commercial 4. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district X occupied _museum X building(s) _public X private _unoccupied _agriculture commercial _park _work in progress _education X residence _structure X site Accessible _entertainment _religious ,yes: restricted _government _scientific _yes: unrestr. _industrial _transportation _no _military _other (vacant) 5. Ownership Current owner: Lannie Jackson phone: 972-841-1770 Address: 702 S. Denton Tap Rd. city: Coppell state: Texas zip: 75019 6. Form Preparation Name & title David Klempin, HP Officer organization: Grapevine Twnsp Revitalization Project Contact: David Klempin phone: 817/410-3197 7. Representation on Existing Surve! _Tarrant County Historic Resources other National Register of Historic Places —_Recorded Texas Historic Landmark _Texas Archaeological Landmark for Office use only 8. Date Rec'd: Survey Verified: Yes ! No 9. Field Chk date: By: 10. Nomination _ Archaeological _ Structure _ District Site Structure & Site 11. Historic Ownership incl owner Lois Stewart significant later owr 12. Construction Dates original 1937 (according to tax records) alterations/additions 13. Architect inal construction unknown alterations/additions 14. Site Features natural urban design Condition Check One: Check One: excellent deteriorated unaltered X Original site X good ruins X altered Moved (date:_) X fair unexposed Describe present and original (if known) physical appearance; include style(s) of architecture, current condition and relationship to surrounding fabric (structures, objects, etc.). Elaborate on pertinent materials used and style(s) of architectural detailing, embellishments and site details. Lois Stewart House 315 East Wall Street This small house with matching detached garage exemplifies the type of housing built in Grapevine prior to World War II, at the end of the 1930's. There are a number of similar houses of this type that are scattered throughout the Historic Grapevine Township. An especially good example is located at 517 East Worth Street that has been completely restored. The Stewart house is placed near to the Street on a very deep 50 foot by 208 foot lot. A 1 -car garage sets to the rear of the house just to the east, Underneath grey vinyl siding is the original wood siding. This siding can be seen on the garage. The original wood front porch has been replaced with concrete. Original four by four wood porch posts have also been replaced with wrought -aluminum columns. Original wood windows have been replaced with aluminum windows that were popular in the 1950's. The interior of the house contains a living room, dining room, kitchen, bathroom and two bedrooms. The house is in good condition and could easily be restored to its original appearance. 76. Historical Significance Statement of historical and cultural significance. Include: cultural influences, special events and important personages, influences on neighborhood, on the city, etc. The house was built in November 1937 by Mr. Lois Stewart. According to long-time resident Maxine Eidson, Mr. Stewart was a young family man, new to Grapevine, who entered the butane business working for Mr. Dave Whiteside. Mr. Whiteside was Maxine Edison's father-in-law. Mr. Lois Stewart was not related to any of the other Stewart families residing in Grapevine at that time. He was a very friendly, outgoing man. Through the butane business he took care of customers who were "out in the country'— primarily where Southlake and Roanoke are today. Whiteside Butain was located at 428 S. Main Street in Grapevine. In 1965, Mr. Whiteside became in ill health and sold the business to Mr. Stewart. The 300 block of East Wall Street was the site for residential and commercial business. Thelma Conine, Grapevine's first city councilwoman, operated a beauty shop at the southeast corner of Wall and Jenkins Streets adjacent to her home. An Appliance Service Company shop owned by the Tommy and Eula Thomas family was located at on E. Wall Street adjacent to their home. There is an interesting mix in the sizes of residences on East Wall ranging from the small cottages on the north side of the street to the larger Queen Anne style home owned by the Lipscomb family. This neighborhood is adjacent to the First Baptist Church which faces Texas Street and is a major presence. In 1947 Mr. Stewart sold his house to Mr. Alvin P. Powers for $500. The 1958 Grapevine telephone directory lists Mr. Stewart as living at 321 E. Wali Street — next door to the house he built a decade earlier. 17. Bibliography McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995. Tarrant County, Texas. Offices of the County Clerk and Tax Assessor. Deed and tax records. Young, Charles H. Grapevine Area History. Dallas, Texas, Taylor Publishing Co., 1979. 18. Attachments District or Site map Additional descriptive material Site Plan Footnotes X Photos ( current) X Other (deed and tax records) E Designation Merit X A. Character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City of Grapevine, State of Texas of the United States. B. Location as the site of a significant historical event. C. Identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the city. D. Exemplification of the cultural, economic, social or historical heritage of the city. E. Portrayal of the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style. ____F. Embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type or specimen. G. Identification as the work of an architect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the city. H. Embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation. X I. Relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites or areas which are eligible for preservation according to a plan based on historic, cultural or architectural motif. J. Unique location of singular physical characteristics representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, community or the city. K. Archaeological value in that it has produced or can be expected to produce data affecting theories of historic or prehistoric value. L. Value as an aspect of community sentiment or public pride. Recommendation The Grapevine Township Revitalization Program requests the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission to deem this nominated landmark meritorious of designation as outlined in Chapter 39, City of Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Further, the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission endorses the Design Guidelines, policy recommendations and landmark boundary as presented by the City of Grapevine Development Services Department. Burl Gilliam, Chair Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission Scott Williams, Acting Director Development Services/Building Department David Klempin Historic Preservation Officer I The Lois Stewart Housz 315 E. Wall Street Grapevine, Texas Grapevine Township Revitalization Project, Inc. City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Grapevine, Texas 76051 June 21, 2006 PREFACE I. SITE ■ Setbacks ■ Driveways, Parking Lots ■ Service and Mechanical Areas ■ Fences ■ Preservation ■ Exterior Finishes ■ Windows Ill. EMBELLISHMENTS ■ Awnings -Canopies ■ Exterior Lighting IV. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION • Infill • Additions to Historic Buildings Page 2 of 8 The house was built in November 1937 by Mr. Lois Stewart. According to long-time resident Maxine Eidson, Mr. Stewart was a young family man, new to Grapevine, who entered the butane business working for Mr. Dave Whiteside. Mr. Whiteside was Maxine Edison's father-in-law. Mr. Lois Stewart was not related to any of the other Stewart families residing in Grapevine at that time. He was a very friendly, outgoing man. Through the butane business he took care of customers who were "out in the country' — primarily where Southlake and Roanoke are today. Whiteside Butain was located at 428 S. Main Street in Grapevine. In 1965, Mr. Whiteside became in ill health and sold the business to Mr. Stewart. The 300 block of East Wall Street was the site for residential and commercial business. Thelma Conine, Grapevine's first city councilwoman, operated a beauty shop at the southeast corner of Wall and Jenkins Streets adjacent to her home. An Appliance Service Company shop owned by the Tommy and Eula Thomas family was located at on E. Wall Street adjacent to their home. There is an interesting mix in the sizes of residences on East Wall ranging from the small cottages on the north side of the street to the larger Queen Anne style home owned by the Lipscomb family. This neighborhood is adjacent to the First Baptist Church which faces Texas Street and is a major presence. In 1947 Mr. Stewart sold his house to Mr. Alvin P. Powers for $500. The 1958 Grapevine telephone directory lists Mr. Stewart as living at 321 E. Wall Street — next door to the house he built a decade earlier. Lois Stewart House 315 East Wall Street Page 3 of 8 This small house with matching detached garage exemplifies the type of housing built in Grapevine prior to World War ll, at the end of the 1930's. There are a number of similar houses of this type that are scattered throughout the Historic Grapevine Township. An especially good example is located at 517 East Worth Street that has been completely restored. The Stewart house is placed near to the Street on a very deep 50 foot by 208 foot lot. A 1 -car garage sets to the rear of the house just to the east. Underneath grey vinyl siding is the original wood siding. This siding can be seen on the garage. The original wood front porch has been replaced with concrete. Original four by four wood porch posts have also been replaced with wrought -aluminum columns. Original wood windows have been replaced with aluminum windows that were popular in the 1950's. The interior of the house contains a living room, dining room, kitchen, bathroom and two bedrooms. The house is in good condition and could easily be restored to its original appearance. Retain the historic relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features such as walks, drives and fences that help define the residence's historic value. i.I7Mm Building setbacks should be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the style of the building. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive streetscape. Buildings should be set back to a line that is consistent with their neighbors and land use. For example, a residential setback should retain the setback of adjacent and nearby structures, with landscaping along the street right-of-way. Residential buildings with a commercial use in residential areas should be set back in a manner consistent with setbacks of neighboring or similar residential structures. Maintain building orientation pattern, with the front facade facing the street. Maintain spacing patterns between buildings. Driveways should be located perpendicular to the street; no circular drives shall be allowed (unless proven with historic documentation) in front or corner side yard, so that the character of the landscaped yard can be reinforced. New parking lots for commercial uses should not be located adjacent to sidewalks in the district. Off-street parking lots should not be allowed to interrupt the continuity of landscaped front or corner side yards. This is important to both the preservation of historic character, and to the strengthening of the residential district. Screen existing parking lots from streets and pedestrian areas in the Historic District. Existing parking lots located adjacent to streets and sidewalks may be screened to the height of car hoods. This will provide a certain level of continuity of the building facade line; it will screen unsightly views; and it will provide a level of security by allowing views to and from the sidewalk. Page 4 of 8 441krow, Historically, fences around historic houses defined yards and the boundary around property and gardens. Wood picket fences, wood rail fences and barbed wire or decorative wire fences were the common fence types in Grapevine. Traditionally, picket fences surrounded the front of the house while rail and wire fences surrounded the agricultural portions of the property. Maintain historic fences. New fences. Simple wood picket fences, wood and wire and wrought iron fences are appropriate. Avoid chain-link fences, privacy fences and concrete block fences for the street sides of property. Wood privacy fences may be allowed when installed in the rear yard and behind the front facade of a property. Utilitarian/privacy fences should not be installed in front of a historic building or beyond the line of the front facade of a historic building. Replacing fences. If replacement is required due to deterioration, remove only those portions of historic fences that are damaged beyond repair and replace in-kind, matching the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is necessary for non -historic fences, or new fences are proposed, locate and design the fence in such a way that will compliment the historic boundary of the property without concealing the historic character of the property. SERVICE AND MECHANICAL AREAS Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the street and other pedestrian areas. All garbage and equipment storage areas should be screened from the street. Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, shall not be located in front or corner side yards or should be set back from the edges of roofs, and screened so that they are not visible to pedestrians and do not detract from the historic character of buildings. 1:111119119MM"eil PRESERVATION Preserve, stabilize, and restore original building form, ornament and materials. Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the original. Ensure that roof, window, porch and cornice treatments are preserved, or when preservation is not possible duplicate the original building element. When rehabilitating, remove non -historic alterations. Often, "modern" renovations conceal the original facade details. If not, the original style may be recreated through the use of historic photographs. Where replication of original elements is not possible, a new design consistent with the original style of the building may be used. Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level of detail of the original design. Preserve older renovations that have achieved historic significance. Older structures or additions may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and skill that the renovation itself is worthy of preservation. Usually, such renovations may date from before 1940. Page 5 of 8 s - Original wood finishes should be maintained and painted or, when necessary, replaced in kind. Modern synthetic siding materials such as vinyl or metal bear little resemblance to historic siding materials. The application of such modern synthetic materials often involves the removal of original decorative elements such as cornice, corner boards, brackets, window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding shall not be installed; removal of existing such materials is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original asbestos siding should be maintained and painted, or when necessary, replaced with synthetic siding to match the existing asbestos siding. The removal of asbestos siding over existing wood siding is not required, but strongly encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Original masonry surfaces should be maintained and not be painted, unless severe deterioration of the brick or stone can be shown to require painting. If the color or texture of replacement brick or stone cannot be matched with existing, painting may be an appropriate treatment. Paint colors should be complimentary to each other and the overall character of the house. When possible, research the original paint color and finishes of the building's historic period; the right colors respect the historic building. The Historic Preservation Commission shall adopt, as necessary, a paint palette(s) appropriate to the district's character, which may be proposed and approved through the Minor Exterior Alteration application process. Any colors proposed outside the adopted palette may be reviewed by the Commission in the regular Certificate of Appropriateness process. WINDOWS Original window framing and lites (panes of glass) configurations should be preserved and maintained or replaced in kind. When replacement is necessary, do so within existing historic opening. Replacement of non -original windows should consider the use of historically appropriate wood windows. Use same sash size to avoid filling in or enlarging the original opening. Clear or very slightly tinted window glass may be used. No reflective or heavily tinted glass shall be used. Should the owner wish to install security bars, they should be installed on the interior of windows and doors. Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged. Storm windows are available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to preserve the exterior historic character of the building. Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic windows, storm windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes (i.e. one over one sashes) are recommended. If metal storm windows are installed, paint to blend with surrounding elements. EMBELLISHMENTS AWNINGS -CANOPIES New awnings and canopies should not be installed above windows or doors. Page 6 of 8 EXTERIOR LIGHTING Lighting is an important element in residential areas. Fixtures should be consistent with the historic character of the house. Appropriate incandescent light fixtures to the style of the district should be used. Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless part of a historic fixture. TIT, rdM_ The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts encourage similarity of form and materials, but not actual replication. New construction proposals and the rehabilitation of non -historic buildings will be reviewed based on these Criteria. Judgment will be based on the compatibility of the design within the context of the properties adjacent and nearby historic buildings. The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic period of significance including massing, scale, fenestration and materials. Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions, and appear as clearly contemporary. Only when a previously demolished historic Grapevine building can be accurately replicated may a reproduction be considered. Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form, cornice line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new building to the heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over existing ones. Horizontal wood siding (either novelty, tongue and groove, shiplap or equivalent) and brick are appropriate exterior building finishes for the historic house. Fake brick or stone or gravel aggregate materials shall never be used. Additions to historic buildings should replicate the style of the main building if possible; otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details. As a minimum, new additions should reflect the massing, roof shape, bay spacing, cornice lines and building materials of the primary structure. All new wood or metal materials should have a painted finish except on some 20th century buildings where the use of unpainted aluminum or steel was part of the original design and should be maintained. A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic building. If this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side if it is recessed at least 18 inches from the historic building facade or a connection is used to separate old from new. New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to be readily apparent from the facing street. Page 7 of 8 When reproducing elements that were originally part of a historic building they should be replicated when evidence of the actual detail has been documented by photographs, drawings, or remaining physical evidence. If no evidence exists, elements typical of the architectural style may be used. Historic photographs can provide information on the original elements of the building. t[•1:7 MFWAI112 IN: a WHEREAS, an application was made by the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission requesting a historic landmark subdistrict designation by making application for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested historic landmark subdistrict designation should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this Ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 39 of Appendix "D" of the Code of Ordinances have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered, among other things, the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this historic landmark subdistrict, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the historic landmark subdistrict designation lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this historic landmark subdistrict designation and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that historic landmark subdistrict designation for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby designate a historic landmark subdistrict (HL06-03) in accordance with Section 39 of Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, in a district zoned "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations within the following described property: 315 East Wall Street and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Morrison Addition, and in addition thereto, the adoption of the Lois Stewart House Historic District Design Guidelines as conditions, regulations and safeguards in connection with the said historic landmark subdistrict, a copy of said criteria being attached hereto and labeled Exhibit "A". ORD. NO. 2 Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the "H" zoning designation. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. OR®. NO. 3 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 19th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2006. FWAIIIIIIIII APPROVED AS TO FORM: ORD. NO. 4