Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ Item 08 - MinutesITEM 0 P & Z BRIEFING SESSION MAY 16, 2000 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Special Briefing Session on this the 16th day of May, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. in the Planning and Zoning Conference Room, 200 South Main Street, 2nd Floor, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present -to -wit: Larry Oliver Chairman Kevin Busbee Member Cathy Martin Member Danette Murray 1 st Alternate B J Nicholson 2nd Alternate constituting a quorum, with Herb Fry, Kathy Martinez, and Chris Coy absent and the following City Staff: H.T. (Tommy) Hardy Ron Stombaugh Scott Dyer Cristin Turner Pam Huntress CALL TO ORDER Director of Development Services Planner Sr. Civil Engineer Jr. Civil Engineer Planning Secretary Chairman Oliver called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. ITEM 1. BRIEFING SESSION Chairman Oliver announced the Planning and Zoning Commission would conduct a briefing session relative to the following cases: C000-22 First United Methodist Church S000-04 First United Methodist Church Z00-07 Walker Estates C000-18 Pinnacle Decorating Z00-06 Terra Land & Cattle HL00-03 Gerell & Fran McCann C000-01 Burger Street BS051600 1 P & Z BRIEFING SESSION MAY 16, 2000 to discuss development issues. ADJOURNMENT After a brief discussion, Chairman Oliver adjourned the meeting at 7:26 p.m. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2000. APPROVED: CHAIRMAN ATTEST: SECRETARY NOTE: Planning and Zoning Commission continued with the Joint Public Hearing BS051600 2 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING MAY 16, 2000 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Joint Public Hearing with the City Council, on this the 16th day of May, 2000, in the City Council Chambers, 200 South Main Street, 2nd Floor, Grapevine, Texas with the following members present -to -wit: Larry Oliver Chairman Cathy Martin Member Kevin Busbee Member Danette Murray 1 st Alternate B J Nicholson 2nd Alternate constituting a quorum, with Chris Coy, Herb Fry, and Kathy Martinez absent, and the following City Staff present: H. T. (Tommy) Hardy Ron Stombaugh Scott Dyer Cristin Turner Pamela Huntress CALL TO ORDER Director of Development Services Planner Sr. Civil Engineer Jr. Civil Engineer Planning Secretary Mayor William D. Tate called the joint meeting to order at 7:40 p.m., and Chairman Larry Oliver called the Planning and Zoning Commission deliberation session to order at 9:12 p.m. INVOCATION Commissioner Larry Oliver delivered the Invocation. PUBLIC HEARING C000-22 — FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH First for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was Conditional Use Request C000-22 submitted by Jones C. McConnell, Jr. for property located at 422 Church Street and platted as Lot 1, Block 3, First United Methodist Church Addition. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to allow for off-site parking 051600 1 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING MAY 16, 2000 within 300 feet of the primary use in accordance with Section 20.C.5 of the City of Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Jones C. McConnell, Jr., of HH Architects was present to answer questions regarding the request. Mayor Tate discussed concerns relating to the new placement of the sanctuary as well as traffic considerations. The applicants addressed these matters and referred to solutions within long term concept plans. With no further questions, guests to speak, 1 letter of support, 1 letter of concern, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session Cathy Martin moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to table Conditional Use Request C000-22 until the June 6, Public Hearing, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None S000-04 — FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to City Council was Special Use Request S000-04 submitted by First United Methodist Church for property located at 422 Church Street and platted as Lot 1 R, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 3, First United Methodist Church. The applicant was requesting a special use permit to allow a church to exceed the maximum height regulation established for the "R-TH" Townhouse District in accordance with Section 49.13.14, specifically to allow a maximum height to exceed the established maximum height of 35 feet by 115 feet to allow a maximum building height of 150 feet. With no further questions, guests to speak, 2 letters of support, 1 letter of concern, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session Cathy Martin moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to table Special Use Request S000-04 until the June 6, Public Hearing, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None FINAL PLAT LOT 1R, BLOCK 1, AND LOT 1, BLOCK 3, FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 051600 2 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING MAY 16, 2000 Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat application of Lot 1 R, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 3, First United Methodist Church. The applicant was final platting 9.4704 acres for the proposed expansion of the existing church facility. In the Commission's deliberation session Cathy Martin moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to table the Statement of Findings and Final Plat application of Lot 1 R, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 3, First United Methodist Church until the June 6, Public Hearing, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Martin, Busbee, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None ZONE CHANGE REQUEST Z00-07 — WALKER ESTATES Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to City Council was Zone Change Request Z00-07 submitted by Robert Schneeberg for property located at 3830 Parr Road and proposed to be platted as Lots 1-22, Block 1, and Lots 1-10, Block 2, Walker Estates. The applicant was requesting to rezone 9.8462 acres from "R-20" Single Family District to "R-12.5" Single Family District for single family residential development. The developer also submitted deed restrictions as well as a revised preliminary plat, final plat, and concept plan in an effort to address the concerns of the surrounding area property owners. The developer was proposing within the deed restrictions to maintain a minimum 20,000 square foot lot size for all lots common with Crystal Butte Estates to the north; a minimum 17,500 square foot lot size for all lots common with Green Briar Estates to the west; a minimum 15,500 square foot lot size for all lots common with the Birdsong Addition to the south; and a minimum of 12,500 square foot lot sizes for all remaining lots within the proposed subdivision. The developer also was proposing a minimum 3,000 square feet of total air-conditioned living area on all lots within the subdivision. Robert Schneeberg of Schneeberg & Gonzales and Shawn Goff of Graham Hart Home Builders were present to discuss the deed restrictions as well as answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. The nine citizens who addressed Council were as follows: Terry Walker - approved Peggy Maxwell - opposed Greg Maxwell - opposed Gregory Roach - opposed John Myrich - concerned Donald Horton - opposed Robert Parsi - concerned 051600 3 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING MAY 16, 2000 Pat Rizos - opposed Jerry Grant - opposed Of the total notification area, 38.01 percent of the surrounding property owners protested the zone change request and thus required a three-quarters vote of Council to approve the request. With no further questions, guests to speak, no letters of support, 25 letters of opposition, and one petition with 41 names, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session Kevin Busbee moved, with a second by Cathy Martin, to approve Zone Change Request Z00-07, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST C000-18 — PINNACLE DECORATING Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to City Council was Conditional Use Request C000-18 submitted by Jim Miller of Pinnacle Decorating Company for property located at 205 North Lucas and platted as Lot 4, Block 8, W.C. Lucas Addition. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to allow for an office/warehouse dedicated to the rental of materials such as drapes, tables, carpet and exhibit booths for conventions, tradeshows, and corporate meetings. The owner, Jim Miller, was present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. Ken Kensel, a citizen, spoke in favor of the request. With no further questions, guests to speak, letters, or petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session Danette Murray moved, with a second by Kevin Busbee, to approve Conditional Use Request C000-18, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None ZONE CHANGE REQUEST Z00-06 -TERRA LAND & CATTLE Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to City Council was Zone Change Request Z00-07 submitted by Paul Spain for property located at 2412 Los Robles drive. The applicant was requesting to rezone 9.134 acres from "R-20" Single Family District 051600 4 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING MAY 16, 2000 to "R-7.5" Single Family District for future development of single family homes. The applicant requested the case be tabled to address Public Works issues that were brought up after the case was advertised and to submit a new site plan that will reflect those issues. The total percent of property opposed to the request, located within 200 feet of the subject property was 28.25%, therefore a 3/4 vote was required by City Council to approve the request. With no further questions, guests to speak, 1 letter of support, 22 letters of opposition, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session Kevin Busbee moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to table Zone Change Request Z00-06 until the City Council meeting of July 18, 2000, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None HL00-03 — GERELL & FRAN McCANN Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to City Council was Historical Landmark Request HL00-03 submitted by Gerell and Fran McCann for property located at 221 East Worth Street and platted as Lot 5A, Block 35, Original Township. The applicant was requesting the W. H. Lucas House be designated as a Historic Landmark Subdistrict. With no further questions, guests to speak, 2 letters of support, no letters of opposition, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session Cathy Martin moved, with a second by B. J. Nicholson, to approve Historical Landmark Request HL00-03, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None C000-01 — BURGER STREET Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to City Council was Zone Change Request C000-01 submitted by Steve C. Meier for property located at 1135 William D. Tate Avenue and platted as Lot 2, Block 1, Tate Street Plaza Revised. The applicant was requesting a conditional use permit to amend the approved site plan of CU97-28 (Ord.97- 70) for a planned commercial center with the possession, storage, retail sale and on - premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, and mixed drinks) in conjunction with a restaurant, specifically to allow for a drive through restaurant. 051600 5 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING MAY 16, 2000 With no further questions, guests to speak, 1 letter of support, no letters of opposition, and no petitions, the public hearing was closed. Steve Meier, and Earl Martino, representing the owner were present to answer questions and request favorable consideration of the request. In the Commission's deliberation session Danette Murray moved, with a second by B. J. Nicholson, to approve Conditional Use Request CU00-01, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None FINAL PLAT OF LOT 5R, STARNES ADDITION Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat application of Lot 5R, Starnes Addition submitted by Mr. Steve Bonesco of Bronze Star, Inc. and located at the northeast corner of Northwest Highway and Starnes Drive. The applicant was final platting 0.93 acres for a proposed redevelopment of the property. With no further questions, guests to speak, letters, or petitions, the public hearing was closed. In the Commission's deliberation session Danette Murray moved, with a second by B. J. Nichoson, to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat application of Lot 5R, Starnes Addition, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None FINAL PLAT LOTS 1R, 2R, AND 3, BLOCK 1, AND LOT 1R AND TRACT A, BLOCK 5, GRAPEVINE VINEYARD Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat application of Lots 1 R, 2R, and 3, Block 1, and Lot 1 R and Tract A, Block 5, Grapevine Vineyard for property located at the Southeast corner of Grapevine Mills Parkway and Grapevine Mills Boulevard North. The applicant is final platting 12.348 acres for a proposed retail development. With no further questions, guests to speak, letters or petitions, the public hearing was closed. 051600 6 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING MAY 16, 2000 In the Commission's deliberation session Kevin Busbee moved, with a second by Danette Murray, to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat application of Lots 1 R, 2R, and 3, Block 1, and Lot 1 R and Track A, Block 5, Grapevine Vineyard, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None END OF PUBLIC HEARING PRELIMINARY PLAT LOTS 1-22, BLOCK 1, AND LOTS 1-10 BLOCK 2 WALKER ESTATES Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Preliminary Plat application of Lots 1-22, Block 1, and Lots 1- 10, Block 2, Walker Estates submitted by Robert Schneeberg. The applicant was preliminary platting 12.7796 acres for a proposed single-family residential development. In the Commission's deliberation session Danette Murray moved, with a second by B. J. Nicholson, to table the Statement of Findings and Preliminary Plat application of Lots 1-22, Block 1, and Lots1-10, Block 2, Walker Estates until the June 6 meeting, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None FINAL PLAT LOTS 1-22, BLOCK 1, AND LOTS 1-10 BLOCK 2 WALKER ESTATES Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat application of Lots 1-22, Block 1, and Lots 1-10, Block 2, Walker Estates submitted by Robert Schneeberg. The applicant was final platting 12.7796 acres for a proposed single-family residential development. In the Commission's deliberation session Danette Murray moved, with a second by B. J. Nicholson, to table the Statement of Findings and Final Plat application of Lots 1-22, Block 1, and Lots1-10, Block 2, Walker Estates until the City Council meeting of June 6, 2000, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None 051600 7 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING MAY 16, 2000 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, THE BLUFFS AT GRAPEVINE Next for the Commission to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council was the Statement of Findings and Final Plat application of Lot 1, Block 1, The Bluffs at Grapevine located at the northwest corner of Bass Pro Drive and State Highway 26. The applicant was requesting a final plat for 19.992 acres for a proposed development of a retail complex. In the Commissioner's deliberation session, B. J. Nicholson moved, with a second by Cathy Martin, to approve the Statement of Findings and Final Plat application of Lot 1, Block 1, the Bluffs at Grapevine, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF MARCH 28. 2000 Next for the Commission to consider were the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Joint Public Hearing of March 28, 2000. In the Commission's deliberation session, Kevin Busbee moved with a second by Danette Murray to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of March 28, 2000, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None Abstain: Martin CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF APRIL 18, 2000 Next for the Commission to consider were the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Joint Public Hearing of April 18, 2000. In the Commissioner's deliberation session, Danette Murray moved with a second by Cathy Martin, to approve the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of April 18, 2000, with the correction on page 2 to replace "Nicholson" in the ayes with "Murray", which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Martin, Murray Nays: None Abstain: Busbee and Nicholson 051600 8 P & Z JOINT PUBLIC HEARING MAY 16, 2000 ADJOURNMENT With nothing further to discuss, Cathy Martin moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:33 p.m. and Kevin Busbee seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Oliver, Busbee, Martin, Murray, and Nicholson Nays: None PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 6th DAY OF JUNE, 2000. APPROVED: CHAIRMAN ATTEST: SECRETARY 051600 DRAFT COPY 05/24/00 The percentage of minimum open space may be reduced to a minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the total lot area, if the lot width at the platted front property line is a minimum of one hundred fifty (150) feet wide and the depth of the entire front yard setback required in Section 32.G.3. is increased to thirty five (35) feet. 4. MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE: The combined area occupied by all buildings and structures shall not exceed sixty (60) percent of the total lot area. 5. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: The combined area occupied by all buildings and structures, parking, storage, loading and other paved areas shall not exceed eighty (80) percent of the total lot area. The percentage of maximum impervious surface may be increased to a maximum of eighty-five (85) percent of the total lot area if the requirements of Section 325.3. are met. G. AREA REGULATIONS: The following minimum standards shall be required: 1. LOT WIDTH: Every lot shall have a minimum width of not less than one hundred fifty (150) feet. 2. LOT DEPTH: Every lot shall have a minimum depth of not less than two hundred (200) feet. 3. FRONT YARD: Every lot shall have a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet which shall be utilized as a landscaped setback area. Front yards shall not be used for any building, structure, fence, wall or storage area, except that signs may be permitted in this area. Front yards shall be landscaped with grass, shrubbery, vines, or trees and no part shall be paved or surfaced except for minimum access, driveways and sidewalks in accordance with Section 53 of this ordinance. 4. SIDE YARD: Every lot shall have two (2) side yards, each of which shall be not less than fifteen (15) feet in width. Planned Business Parks permitted as a conditional use shall meet the requirements of Section 32.N.1. 5. REAR YARD: Every lot shall have a rear yard of not less than twenty five (25) feet in depth. Planned Business Parks permitted as a 041800 5 Section 32 DRAFT COPY 05/24/00 conditional use shall meet the requirements of Section 32.N.1. 6. DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS: None Required. H. BUFFER AREA REGULATIONS: Whenever a BP Business Park District abuts a Residential District, an appropriate buffer screen shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of Section 53 and Section 32.M.5. of this Ordinance. In addition, no building or structure shall be located nearer to any residentially zoned property than a distance of one hundred (100) feet. Any use other than open space or off-street parking proposed to be located within the one hundred (100) foot buffer shall be permitted as a conditional use meeting the requirements of Section 48. HEIGHT: 1. No building or structure shall be erected or altered to a height exceeding fifty (50) feet; except buildings located adjacent to an R- 20, R-12.5, or R-7.5 District shall not exceed one (1) floor level or twenty (20) feet in height. 2. For buildings or structures exceeding fifty (50) feet, a Conditional Use Permit must be obtained. In addition, the building height granted under a conditional use permit shall not exceed one-half (1/2) the shortest distance between the structure and the nearest adjacent residentially zoned district. J. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: Landscaping shall be required in accordance with Section 53 of this Ordinance. K. OFF-STREET PARKING: Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of Section 56 and 58 and shall be landscaped in accordance with Section 53 of this Ordinance. In addition, the following shall be required: 1. No off-street parking area shall be located closer than twenty five (25) feet to any residentially zoned property nor ten (10) feet to any adjacent property line. 2. Off-street Parking for passenger vehicles wherever practical shall be separated from truck loading and maneuvering areas. L. OFF-STREET LOADING: Off-street loading shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of Section 57 and 58 of this Ordinance. 041800 6 Section 32 DRAFT COPY 05/24/00 M. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS: The following design requirements shall apply to all permitted, accessory and conditional uses. 1. No outdoor storage, except for refuse and garbage storage, shall be permitted. Refuse and garbage storage areas shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Section 50.8.3. 2. Heating, ventilating, air conditioning and electrical equipment, shall be designed, installed and operated to minimize noise impact on surrounding property. All such equipment shall be screened from public right-of-way. 3. Lighting facilities, if provided, shall be so arranged as to be reflected away from residentially zoned or used property. Lighting provided within parking facilities shall meet the requirements of Section 58.E. 4. MASONRY REQUIREMENT: Due to the development nature of the BP Business Park District, it is recognized that all uses in this district shall have exterior fire resistant construction having one hundred (100) percent of the total exterior walls, excluding doors and windows constructed of brick, stone or other masonry, or material of equal characteristics in accordance with the City Building Code and Fire Prevention Code which may not allow for some business park type developments. 5. ADDITIONAL BUFFERING, SCREENING, FENCING, & LANDSCAPING. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend and the City Council may require additional buffering, screening, fencing and landscaping requirements on any zoning change, conditional use or special use case or concept plan in addition to or in lieu of buffering, screening, fencing, or landscaping requirements set out specifically in each use district when the nature and character of surrounding or adjacent property dictate a need to require such protection for the general health, welfare and morals of the community in general. 6. Hotel/motel facilities are required to meet the following standards: (a) Each guest room shall have a minimum area of 380 sq. ft. (b) A full service restaurant with full kitchen facilities and which provides service to the general public shall be required. 041800 7 Section 32 DRAFT COPY 05/24/00 (c) On-site staff is required 24 -hours a day, seven days a week. (d) The following amenities shall be provided: 1. A minimum of 1,000 sq. ft. of meeting or conference room or a ratio of 3 sq. ft of conference room per guest room, whichever is greater; and 2. A swimming pool with a minimum area of 1,000 sq. ft. N. PLANNED BUSINESS PARK PROVISIONS: Each lot or parcel of land created within a Planned Business Park shall comply with the following requirements: 1. MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENT OF PLANNED BUSINESS PARK PROVISIONS: The front yard requirements contained in Section 32.G.3. shall be applicable to each lot or parcel of land within a Planned Business Park. A minimum fifteen (15) foot side yard and a minimum twenty five (25) foot rear yard shall be required around the outside perimeter of a Planned Business Park. Minimum side and rear yard requirements of interior lots may be required if deemed necessary by City Council in order to meet the provisions of Section 48. 2. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF PLANNED BUSINESS PARKS: The minimum landscaping requirements of Section 53.H.2.b. shall be applicable around the outside perimeter of a Planned Business Park. For interior lots the minimum landscaping requirements of Section 53.H.2.b. may be required if deemed necessary by City Council in order to meet the provisions of Section 48. 3. MINIMUM OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS OF PLANNED BUSINESS PARKS: At least twenty (20) percent of the total site area of the Planned Business Park shall be devoted to nonvehicular open space. (Nonvehicular open space is any area not devoted to buildings, parking, loading, storage, or vehicular uses.) The percentage of minimum open space may be reduced to fifteen percent of the total lot area when the thirty five (35) foot front yard requirement is met in Section 32.F.3. 041800 8 Section 32 DRAFT COPY 4. 05/24/00 BUILDING ELEVATIONS OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE SITE PLAN REQUIRED BY SECTION 48.D.7. 041800 9 Section 32