Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 09 - Jones Branch/Austin Oaks StreamMEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROGER NELSON, CITY MANAGERR/ MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 2004 SUBJECT: ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT — JONES BRANCH / AUSTIN OAKS STREAM RESTORATION ECOMMENDATION: City Council consider awarding an Engineering Services Contract to Turner, Collie & Braden Inc., for the design of the Jones Branch / Austin Oaks Stream Restoration in an amount not to exceed $ 151,601.00, authorize staff to execute said contract, and take any necessary action. FUNDING SOURCE: Funds are available as follows: Funding Source Account Amount Award Percent SDUS 116-48941-535-1-000007 $925,000.00 $151,601.00 100.0% TOTAL 100% Budget Amount Award Percent Engineering $151,601.00 $151,601.00 16.4% Testing $20,000.00 2.2% Construction $636,350.00 68.8% Contingency $117,049.00 12.6% TOTAL $925,000.00 $151,601.00 100% BACKGROUND: This project addresses two issues. • the erosion along Jones Branch within the Austin Oaks Addition and associated encroachment onto private property, and • the acquisition of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to remove homes from the FEMA mapped 100 -year floodplain along Jones Branch in the Winding Creek Addition, immediately downstream of the Austin Oaks Addition. November 10, 2004 (2:44PM) This work will include additional surveyed cross-sections along the stream from SH 114 to Dove Road and new hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the stream to establish the base flood elevation and its effective floodplain boundaries for the LOMR submittal. Two City Council Workshops have been conducted (June 15, 2004 and September 7, 2004) to brief the Council on this project. On July 16, 2002, the City hired Turner, Collie and Braden, Inc. to study the channel and develop possible courses of action to address the erosion problems being experienced. The result of the study suggests the need to provide erosion protection and reduce the velocities in the channel. The proposed erosion protection consists of lining the existing channel with gabions over a length of approximately 1,180 lineal feet, extending from just upstream of Austin Oaks Park to about 110 feet upstream of the Bonham Trail crossing. To address the need to reduce velocities, three drop -structures, ranging in height from 1.1 to 4.1 feet are proposed. The addition of the drop structures provides for needed vertical fall in the channel bottom in predetermined areas which results in flatter slopes in the channel bottom between the drop -structures. The flatter slopes will slow the velocity of the flow in the channel and overbank and will reduce the potential for erosion. The channel cross section will consist of a gabion mattress between 12 to 18 feet in width and gabion baskets on the sides ranging in heights from 3 to 8 feet. This cross section will generally follow the existing channel location and provide a pilot channel to further reduce erosion potential and to also provide support to the failing channel banks and resident's yards. Staff recommends approval. JSL/jdr \\CHDNWOL.1\DATA\PWORKS\AGENDA\2004\11-16-04\Engr Contract - TC&B for Jones Branch.doc November 10, 2004 (2:44PM) j t ( TTTU t-7 _m. {/.'LS_,1�....., } Sts -et -v' qp i. qq 0 LL LJ kj co E � ^. j'`��j- �.._.__ .1 L1 k..E . i __. , �� ) k i t .- 11 71 -I � . �-� � �� � ��-. �_ I � � � Q O Y { }z 01 j` IC `j�f ,�} tom_ i���„�Lu,t..� ,_ I i LLL .F , rll Ta , ezol IJ L t � M t ice” p + � 7 I VLP4 LL T. IT' fi ZIFII^ �-'—i TT '4 Tn lid LU CI o X 4 J�. ra - ,W EXHIBIT "A" JONES BRANCH/AUSTIN OAKS STREAM RESTORATION SCOPE OF SERVICES 0.0 GENERAL 0.1 Project Description This project consists of the design of approximately 1,200 linear feet of gabion lined channel, including upstream and downstream riprap, landscaping, and related improvements, from 150 feet upstream of Bonham Trail to 1,050 feet downstream of Bonham Trail along Jones Branch in the Austin Oaks subdivision. The project will include the following features. • Approximately 1,200 if of gabion lined channel including three gabion drop structures and 501f of graded limestone riprap at the upstream and downstream limits of the gabion lined channel. • Landscaping plans. 0.2 Design Standards Design and preparation of construction drawings and technical specifications required for the project will be in accordance with the following standards. a. City of Grapevine Design Standards b. EPA and FEMA Regulations (environmental and drainage) 1.0 Basic Services Phase 1— Channel Restoration Plans 1.1 Data Collection a. Existing Utilities and Underground Facilities (1) Provide a list to the City of as -built street, water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer plans needed for design (City to provide hard copy of plans and available digital electronic files). (2) Obtain plans for existing power, telephone, cable television, long distance communications, and natural gas. b. Obtain GPS coordinate data from the City. C. Meet with City personnel to assess other planned improvements. Jones Branch/Austin Oaks Stream Restoration 11/2/2004 Scope of Services 1.2 Channel Plans a. Typical Sections Typical sections will be developed for various locations along the channel to reflect proposed gabion section, base, filter thickness, materials, cross -slopes, and embankment slopes. b. Channel Plan & Profile Plan and Profile sheets will be provided at a 1" = 20' horizontal and 1"= 4 vertical scales. Channel plan & profile sheets will contain the following information: (1) Channel bottom and top of gabion profiles. (2) Proposed drop structure locations, elevations and details. (3) Control (horizontal and vertical). (4) Proposed channel geometry. (5) Limits of grading. (6) Existing structures, utility crossings, and trees of 3" and above diameter. (7) Limits and elevations of upstream and downstream riprap. (8) Limits of access and floodplain easement. (9) Lot lines, street addresses, property ownership and easements. c. Cross Sections Cross-sections will be developed at intervals not -to -exceed 100 feet along the project length and will extend a minimum of 10 feet past the easement line or floodplain limit on both sides of the channel, whichever is further from the channel. Additional cross- sections at important features including drop structures utilities, and graded riprap, will also be provided. Cut and fill volumes will be calculated using the average end area method. 1.3 Cost Estimates Update estimate of projected construction costs at 30%, 60% and final plans. 1.4 Plan Reviews a. Meet with City of Grapevine staff to review 30%, 60% and 95% complete plans. One meeting anticipated for each. b. Address final City review comments. 1.5 Contract Documents a. Prepare bid documents and contract documents. b. Develop any special specifications required for project not covered by standard specifications. Jones Branch/Austin Oaks Stream Restoration 11/2/2004 Scope of Services Page 2 �4 1 ,.: 2.0 Basic Services Phase 2 - Bidding and Construction 2.1 Bidding a. Provide copies of the contract documents for bidding. The cost of printing the documents will be recovered through charging for copies. The City of Grapevine will advertise the project. b. Distribute contract documents to contractors and plan rooms; maintain a plan holders list; and issue addenda, if required. c. Attend the pre-bid meeting and the bid opening. d. Tabulate bids received. e. Check bidder references and issue a Recommendation of Award. f. Prepare executed contract documents and conformed documents. 2.2 Construction Phase Services a. Attend the Pre -construction Meeting to respond to questions. b. Make a maximum of 18 site visits (3 visits per month for 6 months) during construction to observe construction progress. c. Review and make recommendations on shop drawing submittals. d. Respond to requests for information as needed. e. Prepare change orders if necessary. f. Recommend final acceptance of the project at the completion of construction. g. Prepare record drawings based on marked up plans supplied by the City. 3.0 Special Services 3.1 Topographic Survey a. Survey the area within the Jones Branch Access and Drainage Easement (Easement) as shown on the final plat of the Austin Oaks Addition. The limits will be from 100 -feet south of the southerly line of said Addition northerly along the Easement approximately 1,500 linear feet to the southerly limit of the park site. b. All improvements within the easement area will be located using conventional ground surveying techniques along with sufficient spot elevations and grade breaks to generate Jones Branch/Austin Oaks Stream Restoration 11/2/2004 Scope of Services Page 3 one -foot contours. Also locate all trees with trunk diameters 3 inches and larger with trunk size and type noted. c. Use City of Grapevine GPS monuments to establish horizontal and vertical control for the project. d. Determine horizontal and vertical locations at manholes, valve boxes, and other surface evidence of underground utilities. e. Obtain field ties to property corners to compute the existing access and floodplain easement. f. Prepare map of the existing access and floodplain easement along the alignment, showing the underlying ownership. g. Provide horizontal and vertical control for construction. Stake proposed centerline at 100 foot intervals and at PI's, PC's and PT's. h. Stake centerline of intersecting utility lines. 3.2 Public Meeting Attend one public meeting which the City of Grapevine will hold to make the public aware of the project and to solicit public comments. Provide graphics for the meeting based on the construction plans for the project, and attend the meeting. The City will arrange for and conduct the meeting. 3.3 Geotechnical Investigation a. Provide geotechnical services required to evaluate subsurface conditions in the areas of the proposed improvements. b. Four borings are planned to evaluate subsurface soil conditions for the walls and earth slopes. The borings will be drilled and sampled to a depth of 25 feet or 2 feet into bedrock, whichever is shallower. The borings will be continuously sampled to a depth of 10 feet in soil and at 5 -foot intervals thereafter using thin-walled sampling tubes. The consistency of bedrock, if encountered, will be evaluated with TxDOT Cone Penetrometer tests. c. Water level readings will be obtained during and at completion of drilling at each boring. The boreholes will be backfilled with auger cuttings after the water level readings are obtained. d. The drilling operations will proceed in a manner that will reduce the potential of damage to underground utilities. Coordinate underground utility line clearance with the Texas Excavation Safety System. e. Test sampled soil in the laboratory to evaluate the pertinent engineering properties. Liquid and plastic limits, moisture content, dry unit weight tests, and unconfined Jones Branch/Austin Oaks Stream Restoration 11/2/2004 Scope of Services Page 4 compression tests will be performed to evaluate the strength characteristics of the soils. f. Prepare an engineering report to present the results of the field and laboratory investigations. The report will present the results of the slope stability analysis and provide recommendations for design. Two copies of the report will be submitted. The report will include the following: (1) Boring logs, laboratory test results, water level observations and a boring site plan. (2) The results of the slope stability analysis to evaluate the overall stability of the gabion wall design will be presented. These analyses will include groundwater seepage and long-term strength parameters. The long-term strength parameters will be based on correlations with the PI of the clay soils. (3) Should the slope stability analysis indicate an insufficient factor of safety with respect to deep seated shearing movements, recommendations for design change will be provided. (4) Recommendations for riprap gradation. (5) Recommendations for filter blanket and/or geotextile under gabions and backfill requirements behind gabion walls. 3.4 Design Phase Hydraulics a. Revise existing conditions hydraulic model prepared for MDP Update to incorporate field surveys performed for this project. Use flows developed for MDP as the basis of design. b. Prepare proposed conditions hydraulic model using revised existing conditions hydraulic model and recommended improvement plan from MDP update (not including additional culvert at Bonham Trail). c. Review findings with City Staff and respond to comments. 3.5 Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) Request a. Update hydrologic analysis from MDP update to incorporate existing watershed conditions in the portion of the drainage in the area upstream of SH 114. Calculate 10, 50, 100 and 500 -year flows through the reach from Dove Road to the City limits just upstream of Bonham Trail (study reach). b. Use the updated existing conditions hydraulic model developed in Task 3.4 to calculate water surface profiles of Jones Branch through the study reach for the 10, 50, 100 and 500 -year storm. Delineate 100 -year and 500 -year floodplains and floodway on available topographic map. c. Prepare a request for LOMR to FEMA using typically required narrative, forms, exhibits and backup computations. d. Coordinate with the City of Grapevine, City of Southlake and FEMA in their review process. Any Permit fees payable to cities or FEMA are to be paid by City of Grapevine. Jones Branch/Austin Oaks Stream Restoration 11/2/2004 Scope of Services Page 5 3.6 Landscape Design Services (In support of section 404 coordination) a. Project Initiation & Data Gathering (1) Review existing information including topographic, boundary, tree survey, utilities, floodplain conditions, adjacent properties, and other digital base maps necessary for plan preparation. (2) Obtain USACE/FEMA tree mitigation requirements and digital base map files AutoCAD 2002+) for creek corridor project limit area and adjacent park property. b. Site Analysis (1) Review preliminary creek improvement plans, tree inventory and survey, and USACE tree mitigation requirements. (2) Provide field investigation and assessment related to establishing grass and required tree mitigation within project limits (and adjacent park property for tree planting only). c. Preliminary Design (1) Prepare Preliminary Planting Design Plan for grassing and tree mitigation. (2) Prepare preliminary plan updates and landscape cost estimate based on City comments. d. Construction Documentation & Bidding (1) Review creek protection plans and details. (2) Prepare Construction Documents for planting plans and details, with notation and limit shown for temporary irrigation for grass establishment. (3) Prepare Technical Specifications for Top soiling, Landscaping, and Grassing, (4) Provide Bidding services: addendums, bid conferences, and bid tab analysis in recommending contract award. e. Graphics and Public Meeting Support (1) Prepare one Color Illustrative of planting and tree mitigation in the corridor. (2) Participate in Public Meeting. (3) Prepare landscape and architectural support documents for USACE submittal. 3.7 Environmental Permitting a. Data Collection and Evaluation Collect and review various information specific to Jones Branch to help determine the existing conditions of the project area. Information to be collected will include, but may not be limited to the following: Jones Branch/Austin Oaks Stream Restoration 11/2/2004 Scope of Services Page 6 (1) Proposed project plans. (2) Prior studies and reports. (3) Pertinent U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle map(s). (4) National Wetland Inventory map(s). (5) Tarrant County soil survey and hydric soil list. (6) Readily available aerial photography. b. Site Investigation Perform a site investigation of the Jones Branch project area to identify, characterize, and document the existing conditions relative to Section 404 jurisdictional areas in accordance with USACE requirements, as well as immediate adjacent areas (i.e. riparian habitat) that would be affected by the project. c. Data Analysis Compile and evaluate all data collected from the previous tasks for use in preparing the Preconstruction Notification (PCN) document and Conceptual Mitigation Plan Report. This effort may include the preparation of representative Wetland Determination Data Forms, if the conditions warrant, for documentation to the USACE identifying the representative conditions within the project area. d. Resource Agency Coordination Consistent with USACE recommendations, letters will be prepared and transmitted to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Texas Historical Commission (THC) notifying the agencies of the proposed project. Comments will be requested from the USFWS regarding threatened and endangered species and coordination with the THC will occur to determine the likelihood of encountering known cultural resources (pre -historic and historic) within the project area. e. Draft Preconstruction Notification Using information developed from the previous tasks and project specific information, prepare the Draft PCN document and associated exhibits including a vicinity map and typical plan and section views for the proposed project. An alternatives analysis is required for incorporation into the PCN. Previously prepared information addressing alternatives that were considered as part of the project's feasibility study will be used for this purpose. Address consideration of other practicable alternatives, including the no -action alternative. Provide two (2) copies of the Draft PCN document to the City of Grapevine for review and comment. f. Draft Conceptual Mitigation Plan Report Concurrent with Task e above, prepare a Draft Conceptual Mitigation Plan Report to address compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts to the aquatic environment and adjacent riparian habitat that would occur as a result of the proposed project. It is assumed that on-site mitigation can be performed at the location where the stream and riparian habitat impacts will occur. The USACE will require assurance from the City of Grapevine that the mitigation area(s) will be protected in perpetuity. This may be Jones Branch/Austin Oaks Stream Restoration 11/2/2004 Scope of Services Page 7 performed by providing a letter to the USACE indicating protection of the mitigation area(s); through the use of a conservation easement; or, by deed restricting the mitigation area(s). The Conceptual Mitigation Plan Report will address the USACE mitigation sequencing process that was applied to the project in considering the avoidance, minimization, and compensation of impacts to Jones Branch and adjacent riparian habitat. g. Final Preconstruction Notification Prepare the Final PCN document subsequent to receipt of review comments and transmit the document to the USACE for evaluation and processing. Two (2) copies of the Final PCN document will be provided to the City of Grapevine. h. Final Conceptual Mitigation Plan Report f_ Prepare the Final Conceptual Mitigation Plan Report subsequent to receipt of review comments and transmit the report to the USACE with the Final PCN document. Provide two copies of the Final Conceptual Mitigation Plan Report to the City. i. On -Going Coordination Perform on-going coordination with the USACE and the City of Grapevine during the USACE's evaluation of the PCN and Conceptual Mitigation Plan Report. Accompany the USACE Project Manager if the USACE wants to conduct a site visit to review the conditions within the project area. Public Involvement Attend one public involvement meeting and assist with addressing issues, questions, and comments relative to the project area's environmental features and the USACE Section 404 permitting requirements. k. Permit Review and Coordination Review the USACE permit upon receipt to determine the required terms and conditions. Provide two (2) copies of the permit to the City of Grapevine. Coordinate with the City of Grapevine regarding the permit terms and conditions. 1. Environmental investigations do not include threatened and endangered species investigations, boundary delineation or survey of waters of the US, including wetlands, cultural resources surveys, preparation and coordination of a Section 404 Individual Permit, construction observation related to mitigation and mitigation monitoring and compliance reporting. 4.0 Information To Be Provided By The City 1. City's plat, easement and plan files. 2. Available previous studies for the project. Jones Branch/Austin Oaks Stream Restoration 11/2/2004 Scope of Services Page 8 3. Notify residents, establish time and location, and make arrangements for public meetings. 4. Right -of -entry and access along the right-of-way and existing easements. Notify residents in the area of the pending survey work. Provide access to private properties adjacent to the proposed alignment as required to obtain the required topographic survey, geotechnical investigations, and environmental assessment. 5. Water, sanitary sewer, paving and drainage plans. Jones Branch/Austin Oaks Stream Restoration 11/2/2004 Scope of Services Page 9 A 0 z N O O C M N d O � U > E r O d Z .y o a 0 O 3 o; g c c E d x c O u') :3 oa O. U U O dC V 0 N a co O ` S y V d O H cs G o tea, 0 0 v a o 0 N r S U a h � N C) n N N M V to t0 h '. m! N N d _ C3 Q p M M (p, r M O' O LL cN N N tp; d � N r r � O N r O z. O O p O O O O O O O .c N M iA N N N O M r N h N N c0 N M r Lo O LL F N O u) O u) O to O Lo O to O to O { r N N (O r CO rW N Q N O) N h N .r- L LL LL T T 0 N N N >1 N >1 0 N "v x 3 3 3 3 o a 3 0 N d m CL N C d > E Z .y o C 0 O 3 g c c E d x c O (D F rL O. U U O dC V co a Z a O ` S y V d O H m aa- o tea, 0 0 v a o 0 m r z Y r S U a Q m C) U N M V to t0 h '. m! d m CL EXHIBIT C City of Grapevine, Texas Jones Branch Restoration @ Austin Oaks SUMMARY 11/02/04 TASK LISTING Project Director ProjectSenior Manager EnStaff ineer Technician Technician Clerical TOTAL $600 $672 $122 $236 $225 Deliveries $300 $300 $336 $366 $125 Postage TC&B Labor $100 Mileage $300 $1,800 $4,536 $1,104 $236 $260 3.5 LOMR Request $300 $2,400 $6,048 $828 $2,440 $472 $12,488 Administrative 10.0o7% $129 11NON-LABOR TOTAL Final Design $3,000 $13,098 $21,420 $4,140 $15,006 $56,664 $1,500 1 $9,300 1 $15,456 1 $10,902 1 $5,246 $1,888 $44,292 90 none $990 Newman, Jackson , Bieberstein Bidding & Construction Phase Services $150 $4,800 $6,384 $4,392 $2,950 $18,676 111-ABOR EXPENSE TOTALS $3,150 $17,898 1 4 ,1 TC&B NON -LABOR ESTIMATE Plotting Project Project Staff Senior i �� Mana er Engineer En ineer Technician Technician Clerical $420 Reproduction (Plans) .......--- Subtler Contracts $158 Reproduction (Specifications) _ _ _ $600 $672 $122 $236 $225 Deliveries $300 $300 $336 $366 $125 Postage $1,200 $336 $122 $236 $100 Mileage $300 $1,800 $4,536 $1,104 $236 $260 3.5 LOMR Request $300 $2,400 $6,048 $828 $2,440 $472 $12,488 Administrative 10.0o7% $129 11NON-LABOR TOTAL :1 1 TOTAL BASIC SERVICES $76,756 RECOMMENDED SPECIAL SERVICES TASK LISTING Project Project Staff Senior i �� Mana er Engineer En ineer Technician Technician Clerical TOTAL Reproduction (Bluelines)_...._..........._......._ Subtler Contracts $100 3.1 Topographic Survey Coordination $600 $672 $122 $236 $1,630 3.2 Public Meetings 1 $300 $300 $336 $366 $1,302 3.3 Geotechnical Investigation Coordination $1,200 $336 $122 $236 $1,894 3.4 Design Phase Hydraulics $300 $1,800 $4,536 $1,104 $236 $7,976 3.5 LOMR Request $300 $2,400 $6,048 $828 $2,440 $472 $12,488 Administrative 10.00% $180 3.7 Environmental Permitting $600 $3,000 $3,528 $8,970 $2,196 $708 $19,002 NON -LABOR TOTAL none $1,980 LABOR EXPENSE TOTALS $1,500 1 $9,300 1 $15,456 1 $10,902 1 $5,246 $1,888 $44,292 TC&B NON -LABOR ESTIMATE Plottin _... Task $100 Reproduction (Bluelines)_...._..........._......._ Subtler Contracts $100 Reproduction (Specifications) _ $100 Deliveries $200 Postage 3.1 Topographic Surveys $500 Mileage none $800- 800Com uter Use Computer 3.3 Geotechnical Investigations 7,000 Administrative 10.00% $180 Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein 3.6 a -e Landscaping Desi n for Sect 404 9,725 NON -LABOR TOTAL none $1,980 SUBCONTRACTOR SERVICES AND ADMINISTRATION Subcontractor Task Labor & Ex Admin. Q 10.00% Subtler Contracts Subcontract Ex ense Survcon, Inc. 3.1 Topographic Surveys 7,500 750 none 8,250 Terra -Mar, Inc. 3.3 Geotechnical Investigations 7,000 700 none 7,700 Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein 3.6 a -e Landscaping Desi n for Sect 404 9,725 973 none 10,698 Newman, Jackson , Bieberstein 3.6f. Environmental Permitting Public Meeting 900 90 none $990 Newman, Jackson , Bieberstein 3.6f Environmental Permitting 850 85 $935 11TOTAL SPECIAL ERVI 74,845 11TOTAL BASIC PE I L I 151,601 Page 1 of 4