The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 03 - Silver Lake Crossings Renaissance HotelTO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENTS �VIICESDIRECTOR MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU16-22 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD16-07 SILVER LAKE CROSSINGS/RENAISSANCE HOTEL II r ---I I I t r I ~ -- Grapevine doc? APPLICANT: Mehul Patel I I ve Lake I I I I � I I v � I. H. 1635 PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: rl'�Hall-Johnson The subject property is located at 2225 Bass Pro Court and is proposed to be platted as Lot 2, Block 1, DFWSilver Lake Crossings. The property contains GAirport approximately 21.6 acres and has 475 feet of °frontage along an internal access easement within � I B Glade Rd. m I - the planned commercial center. REQUESTED CONDITIONAL USE, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to establish a 300 room hotel (Renaissance Hotel) with the possession storage retail sales, and on -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine and mixed beverages) in conjunction with a restaurant outdoor patio seating outdoor speakers and an increase in height. The applicant is also seeking a planned development overlay to deviate from but not be limited to reduction in the amount of parking provided below what is required by ordinance. With this request the applicant intends to develop a nine story, 300 room Renaissance Hotel on the subject tract that is part of the planned commercial center established with the Towneplace Suites/Marriott Courtyard/Hilton Garden Inn hotel complex located immediately adjacent to the south. This hotel with have its access and frontage along a 0:1ZCU\CU16-22.4 1 September 15, 2016 (9:19AM) shared common access easement through the planned commercial center. All guestrooms will meet or exceed the minimum 380 s.f. room size requirement. The applicant will also be providing 19,687 s.f. of conference space and a restaurant in excess of 4,000 s.f. with seating for 150 patrons. A 2,934 s.f. swimming pool is also proposed therefore meeting all ordinance requirements for new hotel development within the city. As part of the conditional use process, the applicant proposes to establish an outdoor patio area with outdoor speakers that will be on a lower level from the main lobby looking towards the lake to the northeast. Also through the conditional use process, the applicant is seeking to exceed the height maximum of 50 feet for the district to allow for the nine story (114 feet) to be developed on the site. Relative to the planned development overlay request, the applicant proposes a reduction in the amount of parking provided from a required 500 spaces to 280 spaces. A parking study (see attached) recommends a reduction in the parking provided given the high number of guests that will arrive at the hotel through shuttle service from D/FW Airport or in situations where demand exceeds the available spaces, guests will be shuttled from other auxiliary parking areas. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "CC" Community Commercial District and undeveloped. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject and surrounding property was zoned "SP" Specific Use Permit Zoning and 1-1" Light Industrial District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. Portions of the subject property were once part of the Austin Ranch which received approval from Council (Z77-18 and Z81-44) for on -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages. At Council's September 21, 1999 meeting the subject and surrounding property (52.8 acres) was rezoned from "PID" Planned Industrial Development District to "CC" Community Commercial District (Z99-13) for a mixture of uses to include retail, hotel, and restaurant development. At the May 15, 2001 meeting Council approved a conditional use permit (CU01-22) for a restaurant with on -premise alcohol beverages sales and consumption and outside dining however the restaurant was never developed. At Council's August 1, 2009 meeting, a zone change (Z09-04) rezoning 21.2 acres of the subject and surrounding properties from "CC" Community Commercial District to "MXU" Mixed Use District along with three conditional use requests (CU09-21, CU09-22, and CU09-23) to allow for three hotels, a multifamily complex and a stand-alone parking garage was considered and later withdrawn by the applicant. The following month at the September 15, 2009 meeting, Council approved a conditional use request (CU09-32) to allow for a 300 room hotel with increased height and on -premise alcohol beverage sales in conjunction with a restaurant and a pole sign; the hotel was never developed. At the January 17, 2012 meeting, a conditional use request was approved (CU11-34) for a six story, 300 room hotel (Marriott Courtyard and TownePlace Suites) on the subject site. At a December 17, 2013 meeting the Council O: ZCU\CU16-22.4 2 September 15, 2016 (9:19AM) approved a conditional use permit on the subject property to establish a planned commercial center on the subject site and allow for a 20 foot pylon sign for the TownePlace Suites/Marriott Courtyard hotel complex at the southeast corner of Bass Pro Court and State Highway 26. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "CC" Community Commercial District, "HCO" Hotel and Corporate Office District—undeveloped vacant property, D/FW Hilton Hotel SOUTH: "GU" Governmental Use District—D/FW International Airport EAST: "CC" Community Commercial District—undeveloped vacant property WEST: "GU" Governmental Use District—Corps of Engineers/Grapevine Lake, Cowboy's golf course AIRPORT IMPACT: The subject tract is located within "Zone C" Zone of Greatest Effect, as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. In "Zone C," industrial and commercial uses that can tolerate a high level of sound exposure are acceptable. With appropriate sound attenuation for the project, the applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in these noise zones. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Commercial Land Use. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan. /rs 0:\ZCU\CU16-22.4 3 September 15, 2016 (9:19AM) MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMEBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR (✓ u�� rS�� MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU16-22 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD16-07 SILVER LAKE CROSSINGS/RENAISSANCE HOTEL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission consider the following additional information relative to conditional use application CU16-22 and planned development overlay request PD16-07 and take any necessary action. BACKGROUND: Planned development overlay request PD1 6-07 was originally proposed as a reduction in the amount of parking provided for the Renaissance Hotel from a required 500 spaces to 280 spaces based on a ratio of 0.8 parking spaces per room rather than the 1.5 spaces per room required by the ordinance. A parking study commissioned by the applicant recommended a reduction in the parking provided given the high number of guests that will arrive at the hotel through shuttle service from D/FW Airport and the hotel's own shuttle service. After further consideration of the overall parking scenario relative to both hotels, the applicant proposed increasing the number of spaces provided from 0.8 spaces per room to 1.0 spaces per room or 300 spaces relative to the Renaissance Hotel. These additional spaces as well as those associated with the adjacent hotel will be contained within a parking structure that will be constructed within the basic confines of the main parking area for the Renaissance Hotel. This decision was made after the final exhibits for the request were prepared. If the request is approved, the applicant will revise the overall site plan submittal to reflect the addition of the parking structure and submit it for review through whatever process is deemed appropriate. See the attached letter from the applicant. 0AZCU\2016\CU16-22\CU16-22.41.doc 9/15/2016 2:06:17 PM aX� LIVE. PLAY, SHOP, WORK, Grapevine, Texas September 14, 2016 Mr. Scott Williams City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Dear Mr. Williams: The Hotel properties presented within the attached zoning packages, reflect a parking reduction based on a recommendation from a licensed traffic engineer. This study looked specifically at the existing Hotel, the use of airport shuttles and new travel and transportation habits of travelers today. The study recommends a reduction from the code required 1.5 parking space per Hotel room to 0.8 parking spaces per Hotel room, which is currently reflected in the site plans presented. This reduction assumes the ability to share parking between the sites in the event there is a significant event at either Hotel. We would like to increase the parking requirements to 1 parking space per Hotel room in lieu of the 0.8 parking spaces per Hotel room, and maintain the shared parking agreement noted above. In order to achieve this parking increase, while maintaining the natural terrain and tree canopy, we would respectfully request the ability to place a parking structure on the project. The appearance and placement of the garage would follow the City of Grapevine zoning ordinance, and would be placed in the same location(s) as parking lot(s) currently shown on the site plan. Your consideration with this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, Mehul Patel 700 State Highway 121 Byp., Suite 175 Tel: 214.774.4650 Lewisville, TX 75067 Fax: 214.618.5328 TR 3 9814 AC TR 5D1 j 11 43 AC 1� I.. ...... ........ i i ++I (1 I GU U N6 3 4.036 AC i r� f TR 6A1 16 95 AC TRe G .. ... ... ....... ... ... ...... 31.8 AC .. ... ... ....... ... ... ... ... ... w' K I M TR 51) 3.01 AC v TRACTAR qjy 1.334 7 I 6 zR 1 2.4010 j 2.697 � I 1.321 HCO of. �vp.Ik IPA . :: ....... .... x:::::::. c ......:::....... a 2Rt .............................................. TR 3 17 088 AC Feet 0 200 400 600 800 vm T E x A s W E 5 Date Prepared: 9/12/2016 TRI j TR 4 00 089 AC (99.109 AG) C U 16-22 & P D 16-07 Renaissance Hotel I IA 7.901 0 This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unoffwial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. (NE Pp�v N P� G 2899 1 ^ ^ lA ■ _ Hato r� ::: ::: \��0�// ..................... . :: ....... .... x:::::::. c ......:::....... a 2Rt .............................................. TR 3 17 088 AC Feet 0 200 400 600 800 vm T E x A s W E 5 Date Prepared: 9/12/2016 TRI j TR 4 00 089 AC (99.109 AG) C U 16-22 & P D 16-07 Renaissance Hotel I IA 7.901 0 This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unoffwial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. G a VIDE T E X A S CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/ agent:/company/contact Newcrest Image Street address of applicant/ agent: 700 State Hwy 121 Byp, Suite 175 City / State / Zip Code of applicant /agent: Lewisville, TX 75067 Telephone number of applicant / agent: Fax number of applicant/agent 214.744.4650 214.988.9006 Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property DC-) a s S S S P� o Co L'L(- A- Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 112"x 11 "sheet) Lot 1 Block 1 Addition Size of subject property 9.385 Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: CC New Hotel Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum / maximum district size for conditional use request.- equest.minimum minimum5 acres Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: Section 25: Conditional Uses PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION D L Name of current property owner.- wner.Supreme SupremeBright Grapevine lll, LLC Street address of property owner. LJU 700 State Hwy 121 Byp, Suite 175 City /State /Zip Code of property owner. — --- Lewisville, TX 75067 Telephone number of property owner: Fax number of property owner. 214.988.9006 CUtLo-aa ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations (example: buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Application of site plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form 'B'). ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY rAlk, I l A� t,k rso � Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State of tt X'Ie"i County O1 ^)-k #4 Before Me wj:` "1 ii'0 ( on this day personally appeared I `xl {i�t POJ (n ry) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 2-;F day of Tk A.D. KELSEY ° p Notary Public,, State Siate off Texas My Commission Expires Notary In And For SMte Of Texas May 13, 2019 AA.L 1 t?. Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of County Of��V/��_t Before Me 1�-� 1 �' on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 2 0 "poday of T� "♦ A.D. KELSEY POLLARD r - Notary Public, State of Texas Notary In And FdjState Of My Commission Expires May 13, 2019 11 Cush—aQ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Conditional Use and Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: 941/1 b Signature of Owner Date: ?/7'.X L�CpC�Cl�7�l� I 0:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc D 7/17/2014 i i. 'i 1 4y lr �RAMIN E, �'TE % A S CITY OF GRAPEVINE V�rPLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/ agent:/company/contact Newcrest Image Street address of applicant / agent 700 Hwy 121 Byp, Suite 175 City / State /Zip Code of applicant / agent: Lewisville, TX 75067 Telephone number of applicant / agent: Fax number of applicant / agent: 214.744.4650 214.988.9006 Email address of applicant/ agent Mobile phone number of applicant/ agent Applicant's interest in subject property: Developer PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property o�o� aS P, ^ 1 -% S Pro Co LA_ r- 4 - Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11 " sheet) Lot 1 Block 1 Addition Size of subject property 9.385 Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: CC New Hotel Minimum / maximum district size for request: minimum 5 acres Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: off-street parking reduction PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: Supreme Bright Grapevine III, LLC Street address of property owner.- wner.700 700Hwy 121 Byp, Suite 175 City / State /Zip Code of property owner: Lewisville, TX 75067 Telephone number of property owner: Fax number of property owner. 214.744.4650 214.988.9006 I 0:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc D 7/17/2014 i i. 'i 1 4y lr pbtb -Dff ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. ❑ Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. ❑ Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of T-ey—c i County Of 0cl,�Iy Before Me Lei " r 0 (LOC �� on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 2 day of S t �% A.D. ••`r=;�e •, KELSEY POLLARD Notary Public, State of Texas 1�--C.- s'•,% My Commission Expires Notary In And For State Of Texas May 13, 2019 LV poJe, ( Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of l t- G:P v County Of DZ fltk. r"�s,� �o Before Me `�'l t"' 1 rot(,�-k on this day personally appeared ftfotary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 24 N�u day of TV ` A.D. KELSEY POLLARD r — _ �: _ Notory Public, State of Texas „Jif My Commission Expires Notary In And Fors e Of Texas �'�`•""'iO May 13, 2019 O:\ZCLI\l Forms\app.pd.doc 3 7/17/2014-� ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: �IZ 9/1 � Signature of Owner Date: Ad, 0AZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc 7/17/2014 P'n I 1 01 BY-- -- JULY 19, 2016 RENAISSANCE SILVER LAKE PARKING ..w .... .......... ..%at, ROXANNA MARIE RIVERA L 101 • �ooeee ; * 49ENS" �* 11,191 F7 STUDY GRAPEVINE, TEXAS I i � III -1-A LI Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-761 500 W. 7th Street, Suite 300 Mail Unit 23 Fort Worth, TX 76102-4728 Phone: (817) 335-3000 Fax: (817) 335-1025 Silver lake Parking Study Grapevine, TX Introduction HHHT ZHLLAKS The objective of this study is to determine if the required parking space rate requirements for the proposed Renaissance Silver Lake Hotel in Grapevine, Texas may be reduced from 1.5 parking spaces per guest room. Currently, the City of Grapevine's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance requires that hotels with restaurants, clubs, or conference facilities between 25,001 and less than 100,000 square feet (SF) of conference area require 1.5 parking spaces for each room plus one parking space per 100 square feet of conference area. This technical memorandum aims to determine if a lower parking space per room rate is feasible without adverse effects to hotel operations. Methodology The first step in conducting this parking study was to determine an existing hotel of similar size, usage, and location where parking lot usage data may be collected. By collecting data at a similar hotel, an estimate of the proposed hotel's parking lot usage may be obtained. After consideration of the qualifying factors, it was determine that the Courtyard Dallas DFW Airport North/Grapevine and Towneplace Suites at 2200 Bass Pro Court, Grapevine, Texas were best suited as Study Hotels. The proposed hotel's location along with the location of the Study Hotels is shown in Exhibit 1. A detail of the proposed and Study Hotels is shown in Exhibit 2. Exhibit 1— Proposed Hotel and Study Hotels Location ;f CO Proposed Renaissance Hotel HURT-ZAARS Silverlake Traffic Impact Analysis Exhibit 5822 Cro no Drive 1 2 Suite ° xas-M12 Proposed Hotel and Study Hotels Detail 915.50339 Firm No. F-761 www.hultt - z o I rs. com Silver Lake Parking Study Grapevine, TX HL IITT-0OLLARS The Courtyard Marriot and Towneplace Suites are physically connected hotels that share the same parking lot. Combined, the Study Hotels have 300 guest rooms and 26,018 SF of meeting space. A guest room, meeting space, and available parking space comparison for the proposed Renaissance and Courtyard/Towneplace hotels is shown in Table 1. Table 1— Study and Proposed Hotel Comparison Hotel # of Guestrooms Meeting Space (SF) Available Parking Spaces Existing Cou rtya rd/Towne place 300 26018 498 Proposed Renaissance 300 26127 TBD Table 1 shows that the proposed Renaissance hotel has the same amount of guestrooms and only 109 SF of meeting space more than the Study Hotels. Following the City of Grapevine's Ordinance for required parking spaces and considering the number of guestrooms, meeting space square footage, and available parking spaces for the Study Hotels, the parking space to guest room rate is 0.79. The calculations for this rate is shown below. Available Parkin Spaces — (Meeting Space SFl Parking Space _ g p \ 100 SF J Guestroom Number of Guestrooms Parking Space \ 498 — (26018 SF) 100 SF J _ = 0.79 Guestroom 300 Based on information provided in Parking Generation, 4th Edition from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, parking lot usage at hotels is typically at its highest during the late evening to early morning hours. Taking this into account, it was determined that the ideal time to conduct the parking lot data collection was from 4:00 AM to 4:30 AM. Also, it is expected that hotel occupancy during the summer months (the time of year which this study was conducted) would be at its highest leading up to and during the weekend. Thus, the parking lot data collection was scheduled from Thursday, June 30th to Saturday, July 2"d between 4:00 and 4:30 AM. Data collection results are shown in Table 2. 3 Silver Lake Parking Study Grapevine, TX HUITTZOLLARS Table 2 — Courtyard Marriot/Towneplace Suites Parking Lot Study Data From Table 2, it is observed that the Study Hotels' parking lot did not exceeded 44% of capacity and averaged 41% over the three observation days. The rate of occupied spaces versus guest rooms averaged 0.67. In addition to data collection, the staff at the Study Hotels were consulted concerning hotel occupancy and parking lot usage. The Dual General Manager at the Marriot Courtyard and Towneplace Suites, Michelle Strong, was contacted for this information. Per the General Manager, the normal occupancy for both hotels is between 80% and 84% with peak periods of the year experiencing over 90% occupancy. During these normal and peak periods, the amount of parking spaces the two hotels share is more than adequate to handle all parking demands. Only during special events held at the hotel, such as weddings or large conferences, has parking demand exceeded capacity. During these special events, guests were directed to park at a spill over lot nearby and subsequently shuttled over to the hotel. This typically only happens three to four times a year and is not a usual occurrence. She also noted that due to their proximity to DFW Airport, many of their guests arrive from the Airport and utilize the hotel shuttle. The Study Hotels operate three shuttles to and from the Airport 24 -hours a day, seven days a week, and circulate every half hour. Another factor analyzed as part of the parking study was the use of transportation network companies (TNCs) at DFW Airport and their acceptance as a transportation alternative to taxies or other car -for -hire services. TNCs include app -based companies such as Uber and Lyft. Based on data from the Airport, TNCs have become a significant part of ground transportation at DFW. Since December of 2015, TNCs have exceeded taxies as the car -for -hire most often used at the Airport. Ground transportation ride data from June 2015 to January 2016 is shown in Figure 1. All Occupied Date Handicap Other Totalaces Percent Parking Spaces Spaces Spaces Capacity /Guest Rooms Available 9 489 498 - - Spaces Thursday, Occupied 6/30/2016 1 216 217 44% 0.72 Friday, 7/1/16 2 183 185 37% 0.62 Spaces Saturday, 7/2/16 5 196 201 1 40% 0.67 From Table 2, it is observed that the Study Hotels' parking lot did not exceeded 44% of capacity and averaged 41% over the three observation days. The rate of occupied spaces versus guest rooms averaged 0.67. In addition to data collection, the staff at the Study Hotels were consulted concerning hotel occupancy and parking lot usage. The Dual General Manager at the Marriot Courtyard and Towneplace Suites, Michelle Strong, was contacted for this information. Per the General Manager, the normal occupancy for both hotels is between 80% and 84% with peak periods of the year experiencing over 90% occupancy. During these normal and peak periods, the amount of parking spaces the two hotels share is more than adequate to handle all parking demands. Only during special events held at the hotel, such as weddings or large conferences, has parking demand exceeded capacity. During these special events, guests were directed to park at a spill over lot nearby and subsequently shuttled over to the hotel. This typically only happens three to four times a year and is not a usual occurrence. She also noted that due to their proximity to DFW Airport, many of their guests arrive from the Airport and utilize the hotel shuttle. The Study Hotels operate three shuttles to and from the Airport 24 -hours a day, seven days a week, and circulate every half hour. Another factor analyzed as part of the parking study was the use of transportation network companies (TNCs) at DFW Airport and their acceptance as a transportation alternative to taxies or other car -for -hire services. TNCs include app -based companies such as Uber and Lyft. Based on data from the Airport, TNCs have become a significant part of ground transportation at DFW. Since December of 2015, TNCs have exceeded taxies as the car -for -hire most often used at the Airport. Ground transportation ride data from June 2015 to January 2016 is shown in Figure 1. Silver Lake Parking Study Grapevine, TX 250,000 200,000 183,330 163,56970,415 150,000 152,255 in v it 100,000 50,000 HUITTZOLLARS 234,570 216,644 193,006 187,743 —9—Taxicab t Limousine —*—TNC's --*—Shared Ride --*—Total Rides ti� ti� ti� 1h ti� ti� 1� ti� �0 O� ,ac Figure 1— Ground Transportation Rides at DFW Airport From Figure 1, it is observed that due to the increasing usage of TNCs at DFW Airport, the total amount monthly ground transportations rides since August 2015 to January 2016 has increased by over 60,000. Documented rides from TNCs at the Airport began in August 2015. Analysis Results From the data collection performed at the Study Hotels, it is observed that its parking lot was under capacity during the study period. To further enforce this observation, the General Manager provided that under normal and even peak hotel occupancy, the parking lot is able to accommodate guest's vehicles adequately. In addition, the 24-hour airport shuttle from the Study Hotels provides guests with transportation to and from the Airport; therefore, reducing the amount of parking spaces required at the hotel. Based on data from DFW Airport, it is observed that transportation network companies are not only becoming an accepted alternative to other car -for -hire services like taxies, but are also increasing the amount of travelers using car -for -hire services as a whole. The utilization of these services provides less of a parking demand for hotels in the surrounding DFW Airport vicinity like the Study Hotels and proposed Renaissance Hotel. 5 Silver Lake Parking Study Grapevine, TX Recommendations and Conclusions R 111T-ZOLL ARS From the analysis performed in this study, the following recommendations are suggested to address the reduction of the parking rate at the proposed Renaissance Hotel. Recommendations are as follows: 1. The proposed hotel is expected to receive a high number of guests arriving DFW Airport. The implementation of a 24-hour shuttle system, similar to that used at the Courtyard Marriot/Towneplace Suites, would serve a large number of guests and aide to minimize parking demand. 2. During special events at the proposed Renaissance Hotel, where parking demand may exceed available spaces, a nearby parking lot may be used as a spill over lot to accommodate guest vehicles. Shuttles may be utilized to bring guests to and from this auxiliary parking lot. This system is currently in use at the Courtyard/Towneplace Hotels. In conclusion, the proposed Renaissance hotel may utilize a parking space to guest room rate of 0.8 without adversely affecting hotel operations. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ISSUING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 48 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE, BY GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU16-22 TO ESTABLISH A 300 -ROOM HOTEL TO ALLOW FOR THE POSSESSION, STORAGE, RETAIL SALE, AND ON - PREMISE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (BEER, WINE, AND MIXED BEVERAGES) IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT; OUTDOOR PATIO SEATING; OUTDOOR SPEAKERS; AND AN INCREASE IN HEIGHT IN A DISTRICT ZONED "CC" COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a conditional use permit by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this conditional use permit, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the conditional use permit lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this conditional use permit and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this conditional use permit for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. Ordinance No. 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by granting Conditional Use Permit No. CU16-22 to establish a 300 -room hotel (Renaissance Hotel) to allow for the possession, storage, retail sale, and on -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, and mixed beverages) in conjunction with a restaurant; outdoor patio seating; outdoor speakers; and an increase in height in a district zoned "CC" Community Commercial District within the following described property: Lot 2, Block 1, Silver Lake Crossings Addition (2225 Bass Pro Court) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of Ordinance No. 3 land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of September, 2016. APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Ordinance No. 4 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ISSUING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 41 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE, BY GRANTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD16-07 TO DEVIATE FROM, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO REDUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF PARKING PROVIDED BELOW THAT REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a planned development overlay by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this planned development overlay, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the planned development overlay lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this planned development overlay and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this planned development overlay for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Ordinance No. 2 Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a planned development overlay in accordance with Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by granting Planned Development Overlay PD1 6-07 to deviate from, but not be limited to, reduction in the amount of parking provided below that required by ordinance within the following described property: Lot 2, Block 1, Silver Lake Crossings (2225 Bass Pro Court) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein planned development overlay. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to Ordinance No. 3 exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of September, 2016. APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Ordinance No. 4