Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 11 - HL01-08 Cottonbelt Railroad Historic Subdistrictc, ITEM 11,411 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: ROGER NELSON, CITY MANAGER H.T. HARDY, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 2002 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF COTTONBELT RAILROAD HISTORIC SUBDISTRICT APPLICATION HL01-08 I r ---I I I I I I -- _ ------------- Grapevine 5?% APPLICANT: Grapevine Historic Preservation I Lake t I Dove I \-'- Ra. Commission I F LH.1635 PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: �ogd, KAI The subject properties are located along the south side of Hudgins Street from Ira E. Woods Avenue to Sy DFW ; I Dooley Street. The southern boundary of those Hall-JohnsonSso Airport a properties located to the east of Main Street is along 0 the railroad tracks and they are not platted. The Glade Rd. — `m —I _� southern boundary of the properties located on the west side of Main Street is along Dallas Road and they have been platted as either the B & D Mills Addition or the Lipscomb -Daniel Addition. REQUESTED COTTONBELT RAILROAD HISTORIC SUBDISTRICT AND COMMENTS: The Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission recommends the subject properties as shown on the attached map be designated as the Cottonbelt Railroad Historic Overlay District and the Cottonbelt Historic District Design Guidelines be adopted as part of the ordinance. The Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission has been considering the area for Historic Overlay designation because of the importance of both the railroad and the surrounding buildings to the City of Grapevine's transportation and agricultural development. Several members of the Commission have met personally with some of the property owners to discuss the advantages and guidelines associated with the proposed Overlay District. The Commission held a community meeting with all the property owners 0:/zcu/HL01-08.4 1 January 8, 2002 (1:29PM) at the Visitor's Information Center on August 29, 2001. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The subject properties are located within several zoning districts: the "CBD", Central Business District, the "GU", Governmental Use District and the "LI", Light Industrial District. The two sites zoned "CBD", Central Business District are the former B & D Mills and the other, located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Main Street and Dallas Road was once referred to as "Jess's Place". The sites zoned "GU", Governmental Use District are the locations of the Railroad Depot, the Section House, the Visitor's Information Center, the Historical Museum and the Heritage Gardens. The sites zoned "LI", Light Industrial District are the locations of the Master Made Feed Store, and the Tarantula Roundhouse, as well as several other industrial uses. The majority of the subject properties as well as the properties to the south and northeast of the site were zoned "L-1" Limited Industrial District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The western portions of the subject site were zoned 1-2" Heavy Industrial District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. That part of the subject site located on the eastern side of Main Street of the property was rezoned in 1991 to "GU" Governmental Use District (Z91-10, Ord. No. 91-80) and 1992 (Z92-05, Ord. No. 92-61). It is now the location of the Heritage �w Center and Visitors Information Center. The site located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Dallas Road and Main Street was rezoned from "LI" Light Industrial District to "CBD" Central Business District in 1998 (Z98-24, Ord. No. 98-136). At that same time, CU98-58 was approved for the site providing for the location of a sculpture studio at the site. CU99-19 was approved in April 1999 for a winery with on -and off -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages (wine only). C000-42, amended CU99-19, allowing outside dining in conjunction with the winery. Case No. Z99-12, approved in September 1999, changed the zoning of the B & D Mills site from "LI", Light Industrial District to "CBD" Central Business District. CU99-45 was approved at the same time, allowing for the on -premise consumption of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with a restaurant that is planned for the site. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "LI", Light Industrial District; "GU", Governmental Use District; "CBD", Central Business District; "CC", Community Commercial District and "GV", Grapevine Vintage District — Arpco, Town and Country Cleaners, Prairie House Restaurant, Northstar Automotive Supply, Storage House Self Storage, Panda Embroidery, two occupied single family homes, La Buena Vida 0:/zcu/HL01-08.4 2 December 27, 2001 (2:59PM) Vineyards, and a vacant single family residence. SOUTH: "Ll", Light Industrial District; "PO", Professional Office District; "CC", Community Commercial District and "GU", Governmental Use District — Frost Bank ATM and Night Deposit, Autotech, an automotive repair facility, City Of Grapevine Police Department and Courthouse, a church, a single family residence and Hughes Shipping and Supply, Security Manufacturing, Nations Rent, a mobile home park and a vacant lot. EAST: "Ll", Light Industrial District — Wheat Lumber Supply WEST: "Ll", Light Industrial District and "CC", Community Commercial District- Mr. Electric, warehouses, vacant land and Breadhaus. The part of the site located to the west of Main Street is not located within any of the noise zones as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. That part of the site located to the east of Main Street is located within "Zone A" Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" Map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in "Zone A" except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as Industrial. The Cottonbelt Railroad Historic Overlay District will not affect the existing planned land uses nor the zoning. The Subdistrict acts as an overlay to add extra protection to the existing structures and insure that future buildings will be a cohesive addition to the neighborhood. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: The Thoroughfare Plan designates Main Street as a Type D, Minor Arterial with a minimum 75 foot right-of-way developed as 4 lanes and Dallas Road as a Type C, Minor Arterial with a minimum 80 foot right-of-way developed as 4 lanes with a turn lane. Hudgins Street and that portion of Ira E. Woods Avenue are not designated on the Thoroughfare Plan. ci 0Jzcu/HL01-08.4 3 December 27, 2001 (2:59PM) 77 MCI r� o awr as —I= to EMMMMIUM iaV. wr. TMs_.. _. to M_.. ... �.� t f $1600 e r s _ _ u �J� CNi3„�ey�E m. , �/ �� i 6' iEmu r""7i R 7.5'TM.� �1 — - 210 12 to. A" imomomAWRa t F' ..• k Ac x y K AC: M-----' ai s r i tN WI W ml/s S•'.� ._.. +tr4 R: It p -._ R i R rt •r �n8 --_ __._. _. U i i M ai -"n��'/ � /3�r..—J�/ t� _... r)q(�_.. c 1 3 //i c'lrte t � R R R R R R -- _ . - «n• .... � 8 '.' e+ ro m n Pr n yr �- vWr R r -• i i 112 e r s •� � r• u..... �s� a .. - a a {n eb F is i i• i s t 4 a /� ,«, ••- •'• 'e'lR�ioa-at • �,az{ ..... . ; . ,~ � .. � K M ,NW,_ a �- -- --. . •. _ .. A.77 c �' '286'06„ •, A r ' • ,2�1i8-2S '��• -7. -r s' .. ...so L 1v�,+ ... 3 s .TMw,k NO E. rNmNt TMa .. . 1 a . - - • L, P {a Ll- rK TMwm De• � mar+ _ s•a r S• z9s-aptC[396-09 _. � TM,.� coma se CLIWIg EMLW RD ne m �2 W .. .. .. au •.. -''.t_ ,�•� .RL.• - a p GUdb6f w w GU$ ,w ! r tl LI 2 CIC - -,�y� t'>EfB4-03 p ax w e Mro k \\ a t9 , ..■ Mi)94 3E a • �e �" N arae : e -s ,) � � r 1 i 1 e �• � u r a w'c 17 24 r F R { + k t LS e r ... •... nes a.a ,� „y Z97-12 V ii 5 � a5 °2 Yti°"3ti{C3 A ���� ��y+'W1711 r p' _. a M"� � * r�fNp�t rr!a�ii .._, srPO Ou Ip Iblu 27"S-0lm a a s mtrs 11 aQ Z97-20 CU"-34 + _.� -_a. ia• 7r.7 -�� -'----. ' ... _.. .._-�a \l. HL01-08 Cottonbelt Railroad. goo' istoricH District 1. Name Historic Cotton Belt Railroad Historic District And/or common 2. Location Address N/A land survey William Dooley Survey, A-422 Location/neighborhood City of Grapevine block/lot N/A tract size N/A 3. Current zoning GU - Government Use District & LI - Light Industrial District 4. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use X District X public X occupied X Agriculture X Museum Building(s) X private unoccupied X Commercial _ Park _ Structure work in progress Education _ Residence _ Site Accessible _ Entertainment Religious _ X yes: restricted _ X government _ Scientific X yes: unrestr. X industrial X Transportation no military Other 5. Ownership Current owner: Various Owners (See Attached List) phone: Address: city: state: zip: 6. Form Preparation Name & title: Sherry Hendrix, Hist. Pres. Asst. organization: Grapevine Historic Preservation Office Contact: Hugo Gardea phone: 817/410-3197 7. Representation on Existing Surveys X Tarrant County Historic Resources X National Register of Historic Places Recorded Texas Historic Landmark X other Multiple Property Nomination Form Texas Archaeological Landmark for office use only 8. Date Rec'd: (� it, DI Survey Verified: X Yes No 9. Field Chk date: (( ilo _O1 By: ALkjp 10. Nomination — Archaeological _ Structure X District Site Structure & Site Page l of 9 11. Historic Ownership original owner Various Owners significant later owner(s): 12. Construction Dates original: Circa 1888 alterations/additions: Through 1956 13. Architect original construction: unknown alterations/additions: 14. Site Features natural: Industrial property set within an urban and historic commercial neighborhood urban desien: Condition Check One: Check One: X Excellent X deteriorated _ Unaltered X Original site X good Ruins X altered X Moved (Depot 1993) (Section House 1993) X fair _ unexposed _ _ poor _ E Desoibe presort and original (if known) plrysical appearmau ; include styles) of ardiwaure, cu»mt mndnzon and relationship to surrrnmding fabric (structavvs, objets, etc.). Elaborate on pertinat materials used and styles) of arrhitc-etural ddailin& ortbel- lishnoz and site details. The Cotton Belt Historic District is comprised of buildings that are directly associated with the city's transportation and agricultural development. The district is located to the south of the Grapevine Commercial Historic District and flanking the east and west sides of Main Street along the historic right-of-way of the St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas (SLA&T) Railroad, later renamed the St. Louis Southwestern (SSW) Railroad and its "Cotton Belt Route." The district includes the original Cotton Belt track way, a bridge structure (1928), the Section House (1888), railroad depot (1901) the Farmers & Merchants Milling Company/B&D Mill Complex and other various industrial buildings. These utilitarian buildings feature simple materials such as corrugated steel siding, factory sash windows and reinforced concrete structural components. Additional resources directly associated with the rail line operations include a late 19th century section house, as well as a frame depot and a plate girder bridge dating to the early 20th century. The district retains a high level of its historic character, with 9 of these 13 properties retaining sufficient integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association to be recognizable to the period of sig- nificance. Flanking the east and west sides of Main Street along the historic right-of-way of the St. Louis, Arkansas & Southwestern (SLA&S) rail line, the district encompasses a gently rolling landscape dominated by industrial constructions. Renamed the St. Louis Southwestern (SSW) Railroad and colloquially known as the "Cotton Belt Route," the rail company built a section house and depot on a tract north of the right-of-way and east of Main Street. To the west of Main Street lies the feed manufacturing complex associated with the Farmers & Merchants Milling Company, later re - Page 2 of 9 named B&D Mills. As the rail line exits the district on the west, a historic railroad bridge marks a joint effort by the rail line and Tarrant County to provide a grade separation for Highway 26. An assortment of vernacular industrial buildings occupies tracts to the south of the right-of-way. The Cotton Belt line built the section house in 1888 and the depot in 1901. Both buildings feature frame construction on wood pier foundations, finished with weatherboard siding, wood shingle roofs and the yellow and brown color scheme indicative of Cotton Belt buildings. The 2-story sec- tion house features an L-plan vernacular form measuring 32 feet by 41 feet. Dual porches front towards the tracks and Hudgins Street. The first floor consisted of a living room, kitchen, dining room, one bedroom and an L shaped stair, with two bedrooms on the second floor. Heating was provided by a wood-burning stove, often using old cross ties as fuel. Running water was only available in the kitchen, although a well provided additional water and a dry toilet provided sani- tary facilities. The rectangular plan of the depot measured 20 feet in width by 114 feet in length. Positioned 20 feet from the centerline of the tracks, it included two freight rooms, two offices, a storage room and two waiting rooms separated by a 7-foot high partition wall. The scale, detailing and composition of these buildings represent the vernacular traditions of their type and period of construction. The standard plan types were developed in corporate offices for use throughout the Cotton Belt system. Constructed by company crews along local and branch lines throughout the service area, these buildings facilitated the expansion of rail service during the late 19th and early 20th centuries in Texas. To ensure their preservation, the Grapevine Heritage Foundation recently relocated these buildings to their current sites, maintaining their spatial relationship to the tracks and undertaking their restoration. The railroad bridge dates to 1928. The through plate girder structure carries a single track over a single span viaduct con- structed of riveted steel plates with vertical stiffeners and steel X-bracing underneath. Reinforced concrete piers support the structure to provide an underpass for vehicular traffic. The eastern pier is embossed with the date of construction, while the western pier remains unmarked. The bridge's distinctive angled design prompted speculation as to its stability by many Grapevine residents at the time of its construction. It has proven durable, however, with the original alignment and gradi- ent maintained despite replacement of ties and rails through regular maintenance. The Farmers & Merchants Milling Company or B&D Mills property consists of a feed manufactur- ing complex constructed and gradually expanded to its present multiple story form during the first half of the 20th century. The principal visual landmark in the community, the complex occupies a tract that still retains an original spur track that formerly was connected to the main rail line. It en- compasses one riveted steel bulk warehouse, four bolted steel bulk warehouses, a series of con- crete bulk warehouses, a feed manufacturing tower built on a vertical, gravity flow design, railroad shed, office and feed retail outlet, and several utilitarian buildings sheathed in corrugated metal. Despite a fire in 1995, the complex retains its historical integrity and much of its original building forms, materials and details as a 20th century industrial facility. An assortment of small warehouses and machine shops occupies the portion of the district south of the rail line. Erected shortly after World War Il, most were in place by 1948. These simple ver- nacular buildings typically rise one to one and a half stories in height, with sheathing of standing seam or corrugated metal. They feature gabled roofs and steel casement fenestration. The intact collection of utilitarian buildings still bespeaks Grapevine's postwar growth. The district's contrib- uting properties all retain their historic character, scale, materials and setting. While the depot and the section house lost their integrity of location after the period of significance, recent restoration efforts returned them to a location adjacent to the rail line in close proximity to their original site. This sensitive move was necessitated by efforts to ensure their preservation despite the loss of the original site to a realignment of Main Street. Other additions to the property include a Black- smith Shop and a relocated tenant farmers house. The Grapevine Garden Club maintains a pass-a-long garden in the area. The Heritage Center is the location of the City of Grapevine's Main Street Days and GrapeFest festivals held each year to raise funds for historic preservation projects in Grapevine. Page 3 of 9 16. Historical Significance Statement of historical and a duffel siguf=rxe Indz& cultural inVlroxas, special ezvz and i *oYt mt personages, influences on neigh&a� on the city, etc. The Cotton Belt Railroad Industrial Historic District encompasses a cohesive collection of late 19th and 20th century buildings occupying the historic transportation focus of Grapevine. They represent the community's evolution as a transportation hub for an agrarian economy based on the development of agricultural processing industries. With dates ranging from the inauguration of rail service through the development of modern agri-businesses in the post war era, these prop- erties reflect the growing prosperity of the community that access to the rail line facilitated. Evalu- ated within the context of Township Expansion, Commercial and Suburban Development of Grapevine, Texas, this district reflects the broad historic and architectural trends that shaped de- velopment patterns in the community. The Cotton Belt line's antecedents included the 1871 charter for the Tyler Tap connecting that east Texas community with the Texas & Pacific rail line at Big Sandy in 1877. Taken over by the Texas & St. Louis, the line was extended through Texarkana and on to Waco by 1882. Reorgan- ized under the name of the St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas (SLA&T) in 1886, the system eventually reached Grapevine on its way to Fort Worth. In 1887 the SLA&T built its Cotton Belt Route through Grapevine, inaugurating service the following year. The line connected Fort Worth with Greenville and Texarkana via Grapevine. Reorganized in 1891 as the St. Louis Southwestern (SSW) Railroad, the carrier was later purchased and operated as a subsidiary of Southern Pacific (SP) from 1932 until 1972. The rail carrier supplied consumer goods to the township's residents and its farmers and provided local growers and speculators with "unprecedented profits from the sale of their raw goods". As such, the railroad was ultimately responsible for solidifying Grapevine's position as a regional � trade center. With the arrival of the SLA&T and continued service from SSW, the township be- came the shipping point for the crops and produce from hundreds of surrounding farms and a number of small rural communities in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The phenomenal impact of rail service on the township and the development of a cash crop economy ended the town's relative isolation. Since its establishment in the 1850s, town residents had been forced to rely on northern Tarrant County's inadequate transportation network. Grape- vine's merchants and farmers attempted to acquire a railhead for more than 30 years, lamenting as early as 1858 that "oxcarts are as yet our only means of transportation, though we are looking for the Houston Railroad to reach us before long." With the inauguration of rail service in 1888, the community finally realized these aspirations. The SLA&T constructed the line along a 300 -foot right-of-way apportioned from the William Dooley Survey. A section house erected for the foreman of a maintenance crew and his family facilitated the upkeep of between eight and ten miles of track east and west of the township. Although no records were located to document this initial period of activity, the company also presumably erected a small depot, a siding or house track and loading platform (ail now demolished) for cot- ton to facilitate rail service in the community. Registers from 1890 note that "Grape Vine, Texas" boasted a "money order office, an express office and a telegraph office" located adjacent to the tracks. This entry suggests a depot predated the present building. Although cotton cultivation in the area dates to the 1870s, the construction of the rail line dramati- cally increased production of the crop in the region. To process the crop for shipment three gins arose on the west side of Main Street in proximity to the depot, but beyond the district bounda- ries. The North Texas Gin Company occupied the corner of College and Boynton Streets, the Farmers Gin Company was at the intersection of Wall and Scribner Streets and the Fort Worth Cotton Oil Mill Company opened in the 200 block of Church Street (Sanborn Map Com - Page 4 of 9 pany 1935: n.p.). These facilities contributed to Tarrant County's annual production of 11,580 bales of cotton by 1900, although all have since been demolished. A variety of businesses sprang up in Grapevine to support those involved in shipping agricultural commodities out of town on the rail line. Local speculators such as W.D. Turnipseed set up en- terprises to purchase crops such as corn, wheat and oats, for example, in addition to buying and selling cotton futures. In 1891 John Wallis constructed a hotel (now demolished) diagonally across Main Street from the depot (just outside the historic district) to accommodate the traffic generated by this commodities trade. Despite efforts to establish another rail line through the community, the Cotton Belt remained Grapevine's principal link to external markets. Profits from the traffic generated by this trade fueled the Cotton Belt's prosperity for many of the ensuing dec- ades. Perhaps in response to these profits, in 1901 the Cotton Belt line constructed a new depot 20 feet from the centerline of the tracks in Grapevine. One of three standard plans utilized by the carrier, the building provided both passenger and freight services to Grapevine's citizens. In addition to office space and freight facilities, the plan incorporated racially segregated waiting rooms, as re- quired by Texas' Jim Crow laws. In 1902 the Farmers & Merchants Milling Company built a flourmill on the north side of the right- of-way in close proximity to the Cotton Belt depot. They soon added a spur line to facilitate transfers to and from the main line. The company's founders included six prominent Grapevine businessmen, including Wingate Lucas, Zeb Jenkins, Dr. Thomas Benton Dorris, Benjamin R. Wall, Charles Estill and George E. Bushong. Estill was a lumberman/builder, Dorris was a physi- cian and Wall published the Grapevine Sun, while the remaining investors were downtown mer- chants and farmers with significant land holdings. Capitalizing on the interdependence of agricul- ture and retail commerce in the community, the partnership remained in effect until its purchase in 1936 by J. Kirby Buckner and W.D. Deacon. During its operations, the flourmill provided a signifi- cant source of income for Grapevine farmers, as well as the merchants and professionals who provided services to their families. During the first two decades of the 20th century, the Cotton Belt line experienced a steady in- crease in both its freight and passenger traffic. The company advertised its service as "the Best, Shortest and Quickest Line to the Old States". As early as 1901 it implemented significant up- grades in service to promote ridership by the general public. Advertisements for that year indicate that the line offered "both day and night trains equipped with comfortable Coaches and Reclining Chair Cars, [as well as] Parlor Cafe Cars by day and Pullman Sleepers at night". The carrier pro- vided discounted fares for groups such as the Confederate Veterans so that they could travel at "Low Rates To Memphis for the Confederate Veteran Reunion". Despite its monopoly on local service, however, the Cotton Belt was not without its share of competition. The Texas & Pacific (T&P) also advertised in the local newspaper, offering "two Fast Trains Daily For St. Louis, Chi- cago and the East [as well as] a Direct Line to Arizona, New Mexico and California" to those Grapevine passengers willing to change trains and carriers in Dallas. The coincident growth of the local truck farming industry continued to steadily increase in re- sponse to the availability of rail shipping. Known in other parts of the country as market gardening or market farming, the term was used by Grapevine's farmers and merchants to describe produc- tion of commodity crops such as sweet potatoes and peanuts. In 1927 the Cotton Belt line an- nounced its plans to establish a "shipping and packing shed for the truck growers" participating in the region's burgeoning industry. Conducting a survey of non -cotton crop production earlier in that year, the rail line documented in excess of 500 acres of sweet potatoes and 1500 acres of peanuts planted on local farms. Even low yields would result in an estimated 50 to 60 carloads of sweet potatoes and 70 carloads of peanuts (valued at $60,000) each year, in addition to other vegetable crops produced in the area. The Cotton Belt line publicly offered the assistance of its horticultural agent to link growers with buyers, provide crating and culling service for pro - Page 5 of 9 duce "at the cheapest price possible" and other attempts to spur growth in this market. These in- centives greatly enhanced the developing industry so that it became a firmly established compo- nent of the local economy by the end of the decade. This expansion of Grapevine's truck farming industry increased vehicular traffic in the vicinity of the depot. In response, the Cotton Belt line sought the cooperation of Tarrant County to install a grade separation between the rail line and the highway into town. In 1928 they undertook con- struction of an underpass to "eliminate a bad grade crossing on the Grapevine Road about 400 yards west of the depot". Described in the local newspaper as the "Cotton Belt Underpass" or the "Grapevine Pass," it was one of six bridge projects in the county constructed by the rail company that year. Estimated project costs of $24,000 were to be borne equally by the rail company and the county, although the contract specified that the county would bear any cost overruns. This project proved the last rail improvement in the community. Within two years the effects of the Great Depression, coupled with increased competition from automobiles and trucks, precipitated a dramatic decline in passenger and freight traffic. Unfortunately, conditions continued to deteriorate and the decline in ridership prompted the Cot- ton Belt line to gradually withdraw from the Grapevine market. In 1930 the line discontinued regular passenger service to Fort Worth, running only one mixed (passenger and freight) train in either direction each day. In 1932 it sold the line to the Southern Pacific system, although it con- tinued to operate under the name of the Cotton Belt Route as a subsidiary of the larger carrier. Southern Pacific responded to declining revenues by proposing to reconfigure the depot in Grapevine. This decision coincided with the community's plans to realign the congested intersec- tion of Main Street, the highway and the tracks. As a result, the rail line reassembled the depot 125 feet east of Main Street, eliminating the middle 42 feet of the original facility. The reconfig- ured facility continued to provide limited services to the community through the next two decades. The section house remained in operation during this period, although the oral tradition of the de- scendants of foremen who occupied the section house portrays a bleak picture of life at the south end of Main Street. Typically between four and six section hands worked under the direction of the foreman for the Grapevine section. The rail company provided accommodations in the section house for foremen and their families, often including as many as ten children. Along with their crews, these foremen moved around the system frequently. One informant noted that his father served as a section hand in the east Texas towns of Commerce, Mount Pleasant and Tyler be- fore his promotion to foreman at Redwater, Cookville, Pritchett, Bailey, Renner, Addison and fi- nally Grapevine. Although the rail company typically provided housing for section foremen and their families, the same was not always true for the crews. More often than not, section hands rented dwellings in the towns in which they were based. Some of Grapevine's section hands ap- parently lived in small houses in the neighborhood just north of the mill complex and within easy walking distance of the section house. While working on a rail section in the vicinity of nearby Addison, G.C. Miller was photographed in 1932 during the period (1919-45) that he worked for the Cotton Belt line. He reportedly was the last foreman to reside in the section house at Grape- vine. Under Southern Pacific's management in the 1940s, section hands were alternatively housed in company trailers, allowing greater mobility that facilitated the maintenance of vaster sections of track. This trend resulted in the sale of the section house, which was moved to a rural location south of town. Heeding calls for agricultural diversification, local farmers created a well-developed poultry indus- try by 1930. Advertisements in the Grapevine Sun indicate that poultry production began at least a decade earlier. Main Street businesses such as Wood & Simmons advertised poultry feeds for sale in the mid 1920s. In 1927 Wall Feed Store began distributing Purina Poultry Products, while W.D. Deacon was marketing his own brand by 1929. Deacon's small-scale poultry operation just south of town led to his development of hand feed mixes for chicks hatched from eggs warmed by Buckeye incubators. By 1929 he was advertising his line of "Milk Fed Fryers" from the Deacon Chick Hatchery in the Grapevine Sun. Throughout the early 1930s his ads combined sales Page 6 of 9 pitches with optimism in the face of the Great Depression. He suggested a way to "Beat Hard Times With Deacon Farm English Leghorns" while offering "Pullets for Sale. Egg prices are going up every day! The chicken business is the only one of the big five that is below a five-year aver- age. Now is the time to get in and reap the profits that are sure to come." Deacon profited from a successful Main Street storefront as a retail outlet for his hatchery business over a four-year pe- riod. The local poultry industry continued to expand during the post war period, exceeding 125 poultry farms in operation within a 50 -mile radius of the mill within five years. To meet the growing de- mand for its products, Deacon undertook a series of expansions that facilitated delivery of agri- cultural feeds in bulk quantities. Beginning with four steel bulk warehouses added to the complex in 1946, this innovative effort culminated in conversion to an electronic weighing process in 1956 that received national publicity. This campaign added a manufacturing tower and an office build- ing adjacent to the east warehouse. The feed store was expanded to service the retail trade in 1956. The last major additions to the facility were made between 1968-69 when 12 soft stock in- gredient bins and bulk load out bins for rail distribution were installed. These changes coincided with the transition by Grapevine area farmers from cotton to grain production. The mill served as the principal consumer of local grain production to manufacture its line of feeds during this period, becoming a state leader in the field. Innovative approaches in the weighing and transferring of feed ingredients along with the bulk distribution of poultry feeds led the mill to become the first feed manufacturer in Texas to utilize electronic batching and to pioneer bulk delivery systems to local poultry accounts. At the height of its production during the decade, the manufacturing facil- ity processed a minimum of 20 tons of feed every hour. Its feed sales territory ranged from Na- cogdoches on the east and Wichita Falls on the west, to Falfurrias on the south and Shawnee, Oklahoma on the north. In addition, the company expanded into the production of turkeys during this period, becoming one of Texas' largest contract turkey producers. It typically produced be- tween 500,000 and 900,000 birds annually for the Fort Worth Poultry and Egg Company, a sub- sidiary of the Armour meatpacking conglomerate. Also during this period, the company initiated experimental research in feed formulations for the production of eggs, broilers and turkeys. Par- ticipating in a variety of contract research programs for companies such as Phizer, Monsanto and A.E. Staley, it successfully conducted studies on turkey breeder antibiotic levels, synthetic levels of the amino acid Methionine, and the effect of caloric content on Fatty Liver Syndrome. The mill served as Grapevine's largest employer throughout the postwar period, providing a vital base for the local economy and became the city's largest rail user, making up as much as 75% of the shipments processed through the depot. The urbanization of the Grapevine area and rede- velopment of agricultural lands prompted by the construction of the Dallas -Fort Worth Interna- tional Airport ultimately prompted the sale and closure of the feed mill in 1973. Further reflecting the impact of these changes, Southern Pacific's divestment strategy acceler- ated after the close of the historic district's period of significance. As previously noted, the sale of the section house in the mid 1950s removed the building from its historic location along the right- of-way. Its subsequent use as a rural single-family dwelling led to a series of additions and altera- tions at its new setting. This same period witnessed the sale and transfer of portions of the right-of-way by the rail com- pany. Changes to the depot accelerated in the 1960s, as sections housing the packing sheds, waiting rooms and offices were demolished, leaving only a freight room and telegrapher's office. The company officially abandoned the facility in 1974, transferring ownership to the City of Grapevine. The surviving segment was moved to a new site in a nearby community park. In 1992 the Grape- vine Heritage Foundation led the move to reinvigorate this area by returning the depot to its 1937 location along the tracks. The foundation acquired the entire original tract from the Southern Pa- cific system, conducting archaeological and documentary research to determine an appropriate location for the depot. At the same time, the section house was also acquired and returned to its Page 7 of 9 original site. Following intensive interior and exterior restorations of the depot in 1995 and the section house in 1996, the foundation turned the facilities into a museum complex focused on the area's history. In addition, the depot once again serves its historic function as a terminal for daily steam -powered rail service, this time for passenger excursions from nearby communities. This heritage tourism experience recently prompted the owners of the B&D mill to undertake sensitive restoration of their facility through the Investment Tax Credit program. These positive changes are returning the vitality to the community's historic transportation focus. The district embraces the architecturally and historically significant buildings most closely associ- ated with transportation's role in the development of Grapevine's vibrant agrarian economy. As they once again reflect the character established during the period of significance through such sensitive restoration as the historic depot and section house projects, the district complies with the guidelines established for local landmark designation. The exceptional significance of the development of modern agri-businesses in the district during the post war period also contributes to the districts nomination as a local historic landmark. This cohesive collection of vernacular commercial, industrial and rail related buildings and structures is an important historic landmark for the City of Grapevine. 17. Bibliography Solamillo, Stan. "Cotton Belt Railroad Industrial Historic District National Register Nomination," 1996. Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, Grapevine, Texas 1921 & 1935. 18. Attachments X District or Site map _Additional descriptive material X Site Plan (Tarrant Co. Tax Record) Footnotes X Photos (historic & current) X Other (NR Surve Mal)1921 & 1935 Sanborn Fire Map) Page 8 of 9 19. Designation Merit A. Character, interest or value as part of X the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City of Grape- vine, State of Texas of the United States. B. Location as the site of a significant historical event. C. Identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the city. D. Exemplification of the cultural, eco- nomic, social or historical heritage of the city E. Portrayal of the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive archi- tectural style. G Identification as the work of an archi- tect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the city. H Embodiment of elements of architec- tural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a sig- nificant architectural innovation. I Relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites or areas which are eli- gible for preservation according to a plan based on historic, cultural or ar- chitectural motif. X J Unique location of singular physical characteristics representing an estab- lished and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, community or the city. K Archaeological value in that it has produced or can be expected to pro- duce data affecting theories of historic or prehistoric value. F. Embodiment of distinguishing char- X L Value as an aspect of community sen- X acteristics of an architectural type or timent or public pride. specimen. 20. Recommendation Staff requests the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission to deem this nominated landmark merito- rious of designation as outlined in Chapter 39, City- of Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Further, the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commis- sion endorses the Design Guidelines, policy recom- mendations and landmark boundary as presented by the City of Grapevine Development Services Depart- ment. Grapevin Historic Preservation Commission Hugo A. ardea, hitec Historic Pre, ion ff` er Tommy Hardy,'PJirector i Development Services Department Page 9 of 9 Wimnm I =F -A N I acl:j a4l 0 Applicant: Cotton Belt Railroad Historic District Address: Legal: Page I of Pages LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT / TRACT BLOCK ASST. TAX ROLL NAME/ ADDRESS B & D Mills Market Center Lt 1 1 Grain Mill Ltd. 213A W. Hudgins St., GV City of Grapevine Lts. 1-9 27 Grapevine Historic Pre—servation 520 S. Main St., GV it 28 Abst. 422 Tr. 65, pt of Tr. 65 Dallas Area Rapid Transit 601 Pacific Ave. Dallas, TX -75202 it Tr. 65C, 65D Grapevine Heritage Foundation 1 Liberty Park Plaza, GV It Tr. 65E Grain Mill Ltd. 213A W. Hudgins St., GV Lipscomb & Daniel Subd. 2 Revis J & Jay Ann Massey P.O. Box 223 Boyd, TX 76023-0223 3R, 3R1, 3 R2, 4A, 4A1, 481, 4C1 City of Grapevine 4B Judith Ann Ferris 123 Windriver Ct. Weatherford, TX 76088-3836 4C Russell Anderson 814 Lake Forest Ct., GV 4D Jess M. Sr. & Judith M. Daniel 1137 S. Pine St., GV )Updated 10-01-01 Whp6cottonbelt-31 pro powners M Proposed Design Guidelines Cotton Belt Historic District Grapevine, Texas City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Grapevine, Texas November 16, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE [ INTRODUCTION � What are Design Guidelines ? = Why dOvv8need Design Guidelines? m Basic Preservation Theory and Integrity ° Period OfSignificance � Purpose {JfDesign Guidelines |\. TREATMENT OFHISTORIC BUILDINGS Ui SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES • Building Setbacks = Site Lighting m Landscape and Features m Fences and Walls ~ Parking Lots • Service and Mechanical Areas N. BUILDING MATERIALS DESIGN GUIDELINES m Wood • Metal • Concrete = Masonry (Brick &Concrete) ° Paint V. ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS DESIGN GUIDELINES • Windows and Doors " Exterior siding • ROOf, Gutters &Downspouts • Awnings &Canopies " Building Lighting " Building & Ground Signs V}. NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DESIGN GUIDELINES • New Construction Infill w Additions to Historic Buildings ° New Building FOrm, Mass and Scale " New Building K48t8h8|S Ni APPENDIX Page 2 of 22 0 Preface The Cotton Belt Historic District is comprised of buildings that are directly associated with the city's transportation and agricultural development. The district is located to the south of the Grapevine Commercial Historic District and flanking the east and west sides of Main Street along the historic right-of-way of the St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas (SLA&T) Railroad, later renamed the St. Louis Southwestern (SSW) Railroad and its "Cotton Belt Route." The district includes the original Cotton Belt trackway, a bridge structure (1928), the Section House (1888), railroad depot (1901), the Farmers & Merchants Milling Company/B&D Mill Complex and other various industrial buildings. In 1887 the SLA&T Railroad built what it named and advertised as the "Cotton Belt Route" through Grapevine and began service one year later. The road connected Grapevine and Texarkana to the northeast as well as Fort Worth to the southwest. The railroad reorganized in 1891 as the SSW, the carrier supplied consumer goods to the township's residents and its farmers and provided local growers and speculators with profits from their raw goods. As such, the railroad was ultimately responsible for solidifying Grapevine's position as a regional trade center. With this railroad service, the township became the shipping point for the crops and produce from hundreds of surrounding farms and a number of small rural communities. In 1888, the small Section Foreman's House was constructed in the (then popular) 2 story `I -House" design that was prevalent in and around the Grapevine community. The style, one room deep, two stories tall, two rooms wide (with a central hallway) and a one story "EI" addition (typically to the rear), were common amongst the communities of Kentucky pioneers who brought the style with them from their homeland. In 1901 the SSW constructed a railroad depot in the popular Craftsman Style, including deep overhanging and exposed eaves, bracketed supports and No. 121 yellow pine siding. It was one of the three standard plans utilized by the carrier and measured 20 feet in width and 114 feet in length and was located approximately 20 feet from the centerline of the track. It included two freight rooms, two offices, a storage room and two waiting rooms — as required by Texas' Jim Crow laws. In 1937, the city announced plans to realign the 700 block of South Main Street and extend it southward around the depot. After several citizens complained that this would negatively impact the city, the depot was reassembled 125 feet east of Main Street (with a smaller footprint) to accommodate the extension of Main Street to the south. In 1972, the facility was officially closed and moved to Heritage Park by the City of Grapevine after the Grapevine Garden Club successfully petitioned for the saving of the building. From this movement, arose the beginnings of the Grapevine Historical Society. The Farmers & Merchants Milling Company established a flourmill on the north side of the SSW tracks in 1902. It is presumed the spur into the flour mill complex was constructed during the early years of its operation. The company's founders included six prominent businessmen, including Wingate Lucas, Zeb Jenkins, Dr. Thomas Benton Dorris, Benjamin Wall, Charles Estill and George Bushong. Their intent was to create another local business that would benefit from the interdependence of agriculture and retail commerce. The partnership was sold in 1936 to J. Kirby Buckner and W.D. Deacon. During their ownership, the B&D Mills grew and expanded, providing local poultry farms with feed and Page 3 of 22 Heeding calls for agricultural diversification, local farmers produced 8 poultry industry that was fairly well developed iDGrapevine bv193O. VV.O.Deacon began marketing his own brand by 1825. De8C0O had h8gUO a SOl8l| SC8|e poultry Ope[aUOD OD a farm that was located 2.5miles south Ofthe city. He produced hand feed mixes for chicks hatched from eggs warmed byincubators. The success ofhis hand -mixed feeds from his barn eventually led to the establishment of feed store on K48iD Street (where the CU[[eOt Gazebo is located) and then the purchase Ofthe flour mill iD1Q30. The Cotton Belt Railroad was not without its negative impacts. Frank and Charlie ESUi|'S lumber and construction business suffered when VVi||ia[D C8rnenDO & Company, Inc., located 8lumber yard and retail store iOGrapevine iD1917. During its period iDGrapevine, the CO[np8Dy also maintained 3 housing business that eventually built several hoDl8S in Grapevine, The company had along history Ofbeing associated with railroads. The authenticity of Grapevine's Cotton Belt Historic District and its buildings set this area apart from neighboring coOl[OUOidCS. Grapevine's unique quality Oflife and neighborhood character will be protected with thoughtful rehabilitation and PeStO[adoO of these historic resources and carefully designed and placed compatible new construction. A}|0vviOg this district to GU\h8OtiCa||y tell its OvYD story of its period and time, while reinforcing the historical Period OfSignificance (1888-1958)with necessary preservation, rehabilitation and restoration, are the goals Of this historic district. The preservation of original 8nChiteCtUng| fe3tUrBS, especially windows, doors, porch and siding, is preferred, rather than "modernization" or "updating" Of older features, or imposing 8 false "historical look" OO newer buildings. The repair of original Dl8te[i8|S, rather than their [8p|8C8OOeOt can best preserve the historic character Ofthe property. New construction (additions orrehabilitation) tOthis industrial district should reflect the character Of the district during its period Of significance. Constructed for industrial and [Bi|rOGd use, its [D8SSiOg, roof shapes, configurations and rn8te[i8|3 that reflect the architectural character Of the district during its historic period should bepreserved. The design Ofany new architectural features shall have key elements 0f8 primary historic style already existing in the district and shall be C|eGdy cDODp8bb|e with and COrDp|iDl8nfa[y to its adjacent features. Page 4of22 0 1. INTRODUCTION What are Design Guidelines? Design guidelines are written documents that help ascertain the cultural and architectural importance of a Historic District or Landmark within the City of Grapevine. They provide for a common ground for making educated decisions for proposed alterations to property (including new construction) and ensuring those modifications will be compatible with the architectural character of the historic district for which they apply. Design guidelines are also intended to be recommendations and not rigid or direct interpretation of work to be executed on a property. Although appropriate, they do not require that buildings be restored to a historical period or style. They are intended to be flexible and used to promote communication about how appropriate design alterations can blend into and enhance the architectural character of the historic district or landmark. Why do we need Design Guidelines? These design guidelines are needed to preserve the architectural and cultural integrity of a historic district and are intended for the property owner(s), their architects or designers and the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission to use as a base reference for proposed exterior modifications to property within the historic district. They will serve as a basis for decisions about appropriate treatments and compatible new construction. The Historic Preservation Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Grapevine City Council have approved these design guidelines for this historic district. The Historic Preservation Commission, through the Certificate of Appropriateness review process, will use these guidelines for making informed, consistent decisions about design alterations. The Commission, however, realizes that there is more than one solution to a historic preservation design objective, and as such, will use these guidelines for a base reference only. Basic Preservation Theory and Integrity What makes a property historically significant? On a national level, and locally, properties must generally be at least 50 years old before they may be considered or evaluated for historic significance. However, exceptions do exist for properties less than 50 years old when the property is clearly significant. Historic properties must meet certain criteria that demonstrate their significance. This criteria is different from the national level to a local level. Generally speaking, a property must meet at least one of the following criteria to be considered historically significant: ■ Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history; or ■ Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or Page 5 of 22 • They embody the distinctive characteristics Of8type, period D[method Of construction, o[that represent the work Of8master, O[that possess high artistic value, Orthat represent asignificant and distinguishable entity whose components may |3Ck individual distinction; or • They have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. |naddition to meeting one of the criteria above, @property must also possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and/or association. Integrity is the ability of property to convey its significance and to retain historic integrity, 8 property will have tDpossess several and usually most Ofthe seven aspects ofintegrity. Adistrict Or \aOdOO@[k`S integrity will come from the district O[landmark having 3 substantial number Ofsignificant St[UCtUreS (that retain integrity) within it boundaries and for when they were significant, O[their Period ofSignificance. Period ofSignificance Each historic district D[landmark iS significant during 8 period in its history, which it represents Or is associated with, thus @ Period of Significance. The period uGU@||y begins when the district was first constructed to when it reached it peak activity in CDOSt[UC\i0D. Buildings and S\[UCturRS that date within the Period of Significance are considered , "historic" and contribute 1OvV8[dS the Ch8r3C1eF of the district. Buildings and structures built outside of the Period of Significance are geO8[8||y CoDSid8[9d ''OoO-hi3tOriC" and not contributing to the character of the diSL[iC1. however, there may be buildings VVh|Ch will have gained significance and considered historic. The Period of Significance for the Cotton Belt Historic District is between 1888-1950. Purpose of Design Guidelines Grapevine's CU|tUr8| heritage is uniquely preserved in its Main Street, industrial and adjacent residential neighborhoods. The historic core OfGrapevine has served 8Sthe center of the community for more than 100 years and retains many buildings that reflect its early oh3r8CtS[. The City's history [8Ol8iOS alive in its preserved buildings and neighborhoods. Historic preservation and economic development are partners in the success of downtowns throughout the country. Grapevine iSDOdifferent. The historic districts within Grapevine have strengthened the economic stability Ofour local Main Street commercial area and stabilized and improved the values of property in the residential Oeighbo[hUOd. The City OfGrapevine also recognizes that the character Ofthe historic districts is of community interest. Design guidelines are written to @SSuFe that preservation efforts and property investments are protected by providing direction for future development. The City of Grapevine, in 1991, adopted the Historic Preservation Ordinance, Appendix � } G, Code of Ordinances, thus creating the Historic Preservation Commission and a ~ Page 6 of 22 historic overlay zoning ability in an effort to protect the city's rich, cultural and architectural heritage. The Commission, through the ordinance, was given the power to recommend specific Historic Districts and Landmarks within the city. Any exterior alterations to buildings and properties within Grapevine's Historic Districts or to a designated Historic Landmark require a Certificate of Appropriateness (CA) prior to commencing work. Many modifications are simple and routine, and can be approved by city Staff within a few days after the CA application is made. More significant projects may require the review and approval by the Historic Preservation Commission, which meets monthly. 11. TREATMENT OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS The Preservation, Restoration, Rehabilitation and Reconstruction philosophy adopted by these design guidelines and incorporated herein by reference are the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (see appendix). The following treatment philosophy should be considered for improvements or alterations to this industrial district. 1. If a new use is required for a historic building, consider uses that are compatible with the original use of the building and that would require minimal change to the defining characteristics of the property. Converting the former lumberyard into the Visitor's Information Center would be considered a compatible new use. 2. Each historic building within this district is a product of its time (when constructed). The original design of each building should be respected for what it is and not altered to something it was not or giving it an "older" period look. Preserve, stabilize, and restore the original building form, ornament and materials. However, when rehabilitating, removal of non -historic or unsympathetic additions is encouraged. 3. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance on their own right shall be preserved. Older structures or additions may have, at some time, been renovated with such care and skill that the renovation itself is worthy of preservation. Reconstruction of building elements should reflect the size, scale, material and level of detail of the original design. Where replication of original elements is not possible, a new design consistent with the original style of the building may be used. 4. Preserve and maintain original character defining features and architectural styles of historic buildings and structures. Key architectural features of a building or structure are those that help convey the integrity and significance of the property to the Period of Significance. They may included, but are not limited to, doors, windows, siding, roofs, structural systems and decorative ornamentation. 5. Original character defining features and elements should be repaired where needed and replaced only when repair of original materials is not possible because they are deteriorated beyond repair. Repair elements and features using the gentlest means Page 7 of 22 possible. Any missing or severely deteriorated elements may be replaced with replicas of the original. The new feature or element should match the old in design, color, texture and other visual qualities and where possible, materials. Ill. SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES This section of the design guidelines concentrates on the development of site planning and site features and their relationship to the property and the entire historic district. The goal of this section is to encourage continued preservation of the industrial district, while yet still allowing preservation, development and continued adaptive use of properties. This district presents a unique situation in its industrial nature composed of primarily 2 different industries, the railroad and the feed mill. When the following site specific issues are addressed, they should be done so with the reminder that each served a different industrial function. BUILDING SETBACKS The distance a building sets back from the front property line relays the visual continuity or presence of buildings and structures within a district, especially in a commercial or residential area. This industrial district is not necessarily different. Whereas buildings within a commercial area were sited to focus on a potential buyer of merchandise and buildings within a residential area were sited to provide front yards, the buildings in the industrial area were sited to facilitate industrial machines and mechanisms to operate that business (i.e. feed mill warehouses and railroad loading docks). The relationships between buildings, landscaping features and open space should be preserved. Avoid rearranging the site by moving or removing buildings and site features, such as walks, drives and fences, that help define the historic district. Building setbacks may be consistent with adjacent buildings or with the overriding setbacks commonly used in this industrial area. Setbacks are an important ingredient in creating an attractive streetscape to create a comfortable presence for pedestrian activity while still facilitating the automobile. Spacing patterns between buildings should also be consistent with that of other industrial buildings within the district. SITE LIGHTING Lighting is an important element in commercial, retail and tourism areas that necessitate sufficient lighting for pedestrian circulation, aesthetics and safety. Historically, lighting in this industrial district was accomplished with simple exterior incandescent light fixtures, typically mounted on the buildings. Consider lighting to accent architectural features of the district, to light freestanding signs, to illuminate pedestrian walkways and parking lots. Provide low scale lighting for pedestrian walkways and appropriate scale lighting for parking areas. Avoid tall parking lot lights and exposed lighting of any kind, unless it is a part of a period light fixture. Page 8 of 22 The design of the lights (globes) and posts (standards) should be simple and not take away from the architectural character of this industrial district. This industrial district was historically constructed in a very utilitarian design, such that overly decorative site lighting may disrupt the architectural character of the district. The use of decorative lights similar to the Main Street Historic District may be allowed in pedestrian areas. When providing site lighting that is located adjacent to residential areas, the use of shielded lights to prevent glare onto adjacent property is required by city ordinance. LANDSCAPE AND FEATURES This industrial district historically contained large amounts of open space that are now conducive to use of landscape planting and landscape features. Traditionally, industrial areas had very little historic landscaping (exception: possible trees and gardens for homes). Where historic landscape features do remain, they should be preserved. Landscape features can be fences, sidewalks, walls, trees, plants, gardens and any decorative or utilitarian ground feature important to the nature of this industrial district (i.e. gravel earth berms at railroad tracks). For new landscape design, use materials that are compatible with the context of this industrial district. Landscape plans that are simple in design, using native trees and plants and secondary in nature to the architectural character of the industrial district are encouraged. Also consider landscape plans with a low scale that relate to pedestrian activity at walkways. FENCES AND WALLS Historically, fences and walls were typically not utilized around this industrial district (exception: Section Foreman's House) as it would tend to hamper operations within a property. Where fences were typically used, they would have provided an enclosure or security for materials storage. These were materials pertinent to industrial operations. These fences were typically open metal or chain link fences. Contrasting industrial fences were those fences in the residential area that typically defined yards and the boundary around property and gardens. Wood picket fences, wood rail fences (Section Foreman's House) and barbed wire or decorative wire fences were the common residential fence types in Grapevine. Traditionally, picket fences surrounded the front of the house while rail and wire fences surrounded the agricultural portions of the property. New fences and walls. Simple rolled metal fences (chain link or otherwise), wood and wire and modest wrought iron fences are appropriate for this industrial district. A wood fence is appropriate for the residential buildings in this district. Avoid privacy fences and privacy concrete block walls. Low concrete or masonry walls may also be appropriate to this district. Replacing fences and walls. If replacement is required due to deterioration, remove only those portions of historic fences and walls that are damaged beyond repair and replace in- kind, matching the original in material, design and placement. If replacement is necessary Page 9 of 22 for non -historic fences or walls, or new fences or walls are proposed, locate and design in such a way that will compliment and not conceal the historic character of the property. PARKING LOTS Parking lots were not present during the early years of Grapevine's history, as much Of early travel was via cart and horse. Therefore the early layout and planning [fthis industrial district did not COOSide[ the eventual coming (and parking) Of the @UtO[DObi|8. As the automobile became used iOtown, this industrial district (and especially B&DMills) adapted tOthe needs Ofautomobile transportation. The ViSU8\ irDpneSSiOO Of @ parking |0t has the pOteDU8| to impact @ historic district. However, the functional planning and layout of this industrial district required open spaces between and around buildings and structures, which may facilitate development of parking lots. Parking lots should belocated such that they are considered secondary b}other features and in [h0S8 Sp8CeS that were CUStODl8ri|y OpBD sp8C8S between and anDUDd iOdU5t[i8| buildings. Their visual impact of parking lot may be RliOirniZ8d through various methods, which may include landscape islands interspersed throughout the lot, asoftening Of the ground surface (in lieu of asphalt or concrete) and breaking up of parking into different areas between and around buildings. VVheF8 new Orexisting parking 8bUhS 8 public sidewalk, consider screening the parking from streets and pedestrian 8F88S. Existing parking located adjacent to streets and sid8VV8ikS may be screened to the height Dfcar hoods. This may be @CCO[np|iShed through 8 landscaped planter Orbuffer containing trees and shrubs. SERVICE AND MECHANICAL AREAS Service and mechanical areas and equipment should be screened from the viewshed of the street and other pedestrian areas. This includes garbage and equipment storage 3n83S. Mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, shall not be located iOfront Orcorner side yards or should be set back from the edges of buildings or roofs, and screened so that they are not visible to pedestrians and d0 not detract from the historic character Ofbuildings. IV. BUILDING MATERIALS DESIGN GUIDELINES This section of the design guidelines concentrates on recommendations for the preservation Of original building materials within this industrial district. The goal of this section is to encourage continued pneS8n/8tiOD Of the building n13teha|S in this area, while yet still allowing necessary repair/replacement and continued adaptive use of properties. The use Ofinappropriate treatments iOrepair and restoration work can seriously damage Page 1Oof22 historic structures. These guidelines present general directions for actions. The building materials for this district again presents a unique situation in its industrial nature composed of primarily 2 different industries, the railroad and the feed mill, thus the use of 2 different building materials, wood and steel. METAL Metal as an exterior building material or an internal structural material was traditionally used on the feed mill activities of this industrial district. The metal of choice was either natural (unfinished) steel or steel with a galvanized protective coating. Steel structural framing was used sparingly on the railroad buildings and structures, except railroad tracks. Preserve and maintain all original architectural metal that contributes to the character of the buildings and structures or this industrial district. Protect metal from corrosion by maintaining protective coatings and provide proper drainage of water to discourage accumulation, which will lead to rust and corrosion. Repair historic metal by patching or splicing where necessary. This will allow the greater overall character of buildings and structures to remain. Also use the gentlest means possible when cleaning historic metal or when removing rust (in preparation of a new coating). Wood as an exterior building material was traditionally used on the railroad activities of this industrial district. Wood trim was used sparingly on the feed mill and other steel industrial buildings. Original wood features and elements should be properly maintained and cyclically painted when required. Provide proper water and site drainage to minimize wood deterioration and rot. Also maintain wood's protective coatings (paint, stain, sealer, etc.) to prevent its deterioration. When necessitated by deterioration, in-kind replacement of original wood elements is acceptable. If minor deterioration exists, consider wood consolidation and epoxy fillers to restore wood. CONCRETE Concrete as a building material was not used very much in this industrial district. The primary use of this material is the vertical concrete warehouses at the feed mill and as a structural foundation for various buildings. Original concrete buildings should be property maintained. When necessitated by deterioration, in-kind replacement of concrete is acceptable. Any new concrete should match the color and texture of existing original concrete. MASONRY (BRICK & CONCRETE) Page 11 of 22 Brick and COOC[8t8 masonry as 8 building nlateh@| also was not used V8[y [DUCh in this industrial district. The primary use Ofmasonry iS8Saveneer finish for the offices 3tthe feed mill, as a structural foundation for the original 1904 mill and as exterior structural walls for some buildings throughout the district. (]hQiO8\ masonry should be preserved and maintained. Preserve the original mortar joints and masonry sizes, tooling and bonding patterns. Repointing Ofmortar joints where there is evidence of deterioration is encouraged. New repointing GhOU|d match the existing in 08teri@|8' CO|o[, size, and hardness. Clean historic brick walls CanBfU||y. OO not use 8b[8SiV8 cleaning methods for historic brick rD8SOOry, such as sand blasting and high-pressure wash as they can remove the hard protective SUrf3C8 of old SOft brick. Additionally, some ChgFOiC@| de8OerS. which are designed to remove paint from brick surfaces, may be used if caution is exercised. Avoid painting brick or concrete [O8SOOry, Vn|HSS it was @ historic treatment or has previously been painted. PAINT T[8ditiOD8||y. paint was used to protect an underlying building materials (typically wood) from deterioration. Paint was also used for decorative pU[pOS8S OO VVOOd and [O8tB| in this industrial area, and brick nl3SOOry in the Main Street Historic District. P|8D /[8\p8inUOg carefully. Good pFHp8[3ƒiOD is 8|VV8yS the key to SUCC8S3fU| painting Of historic buildings. The substrate ShOU|d 8|VV8yS be cleaned from dirt and residue and washed dOvvO using the simplest nle8OS possible, OO power washing on SOft substrates. The substrate, especially ifwood, should be given plenty Oftime tOdry out. Paint CO|OrS GhOU|d be C0[np|irD8Dt8ry to each other and the OYer8\| character Of this iDdUSt[|@| district. When possible, F8SeaFCh original paint 0O|OnS and finishes of the building's historic period; the right colors respect the historic building. The Historic Preservation CODl[DiSSi8D has adopted four historic paint palettes appropriate tOthis district's character, which may be p[Op0Snd and approved through the Minor Exterior Alteration application process. Any colors proposed outside the adopted palettes should be reviewed by the Commission in the regular Certificate of Appropriateness process. V. ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS DESIGN GUIDELINES This section Ofthe design gUidB\iReSCOOC8OtrateSOnr8COrnOleDd8bODGfo[the preservation of original architectural B|8FO8D1S within this industrial district. The goal of this S8CtiOD is to encourage continued preservation and rehabilitation of a building or structure's character defining features and distinctive architectural elements in this industrial area, while yet still allowing necessary rep8ir/rep|aCern8nt. Page 12of23 0 WINDOWS AND DOORS Windows and doors are arguably the most important character defining feature of buildings. This industrial district contained many different windows and doors relevant to the successful operation of the area. Historic windows and doors contribute to the architectural character of buildings and should be preserved and maintained. Windows varied from the wood, double hung windows found at the Section Foreman's House to the steel frame and sash windows at the feed mill. Doors were also just as varied and consisted of wood stile and rail doors with vision panels (glass) to large overhead and/or rolling steel doors. Original window and door (including framing and lights or panes of glass) configurations, orientation, and proportions should be preserved and maintained. Any new windows and doors should be designed, located and sized to compliment existing historic windows and doors. If needing replacement (or new where previous originals removed), replace in kind. When replacement is necessary, do so within the existing historic opening size and matching the original design. Use same sash size to avoid filling in or enlarging the original opening. Where existing windows and doors were constructed of wood, replacements should also be wood, likewise with steel windows and doors. Clear or very slightly tinted glass may be used. No reflective or heavily tinted glass shall be used. Storm windows. The use of interior storm windows is encouraged where needed. Storm windows are available which can be installed on the interior of windows. This helps to preserve the exterior historic character of the building. Should storm windows need to be installed on the exterior of the historic wood windows, storm windows constructed of wood and configured to match the historic sashes (i.e. one over one sashes) are recommended. This industrial district also contains many different types of historic siding that vary in age from the Period of Significance. Some of the earliest siding is wood board and battens found on the Section Foreman's house, to beveled clapboards and tongue and groove wood siding on the railroad depot and steel corrugated siding on the feed mill and industrial buildings. Existing historic siding should be preserved and maintained. Where the original siding had (or has) a protective coating, maintain and cyclically reapply the coating as needed. Where replacement of the siding is warranted due to the severity of deterioration of original siding material, replace the siding material in kind. The new should match the original in size, configuration, profile and material. If a replacement does not match the original, a replacement that matches the spirit of the original should be considered. Modern synthetic siding materials, such as vinyl or composite hardboards bear little Page 13 of 22 [eSe[Db|3OD8 to historic siding n7@\8[iadS. The 8ppUC8tOD Of such nlOdeOl synthetic nl8teda|S often involves the F8rD0V8| of original decorative elements such as CODliC8, cOrO8[ boards, brackets, window and door trim, etc. New synthetic siding shall not beinstalled. F<8[0Ov8| of existing synthetic Siding is not required, but Stn}Dg|y encouraged, to restore historic patina, finish and appearance. Newer contemporary synthetic materials, such 8Sfiber cement, may considered for new COOSbU[tiOn and in 8 location where they appear similar iO character, 02xt4nS and profile to traditional building [D8teFi8\S. ROOF, GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS Roofs, gutters and dOVVOSpDUts are critical in the protection of the building from the elements and to protect from the 8CCunlU|aUOD of water, VV@te[ is a building or structure's worst enemy. This industrial district contains many different roof forms and varies from the steeply pitched wood roof of the section house and depot to a galvanized corrugated metal roof on the feed mill and blacksmith shop, to8flat roof found ODseveral feed mill buildings. Preserve and maintain the original roof form and materials, where possible. Avoid 8it8[iOg the angle or pitch of historic roof. VVhe[8 @ new [0Of is necessary, match the pitch, Co|OF, material and pattern of the historic roof as closely as possible. New roofs. VVheF8 possible, iOSt8|| new roofing materials that match the original roofing in color, texture, profile and material. New contemporary Ortechnologically advanced roofing nn8tgri8|s Or coatings may be COnS)den8d for this district where evidence ShOvvS they are superior to historic roofing [O8te[i3|S. Flat or UnS88n roofs may also be considered for newer contemporary [OODng materials. Where original gutters and downspouts exist, they should be preserved. T[@dihOn@|\y, gutters and downspouts consisted of half -round or square gutters attached to fascias and leading to K]UOd dUvVOSpoUtS. Where the roof is flat, the [8r0OV8| of water consisted Of gathering the water through @ scupper (or leader) along the lower edge Ofthe flat roof (and SO[D8tirneS through an exterior parapet wall) to 8 downspout attached to the building. These types 0fgutters, downspouts, scuppers/leaders are still commercially available and should b8considered for installation where appropriate. Avoid installing new gutters, |88de[S/SCupp8[3 & dOvVOSpOUtS nO8d8 from synthetic nO8teri8|5. such as vinyl Or p|BStiC, as these materials are not compatible with 8 historic building. |OSta||8tiOD of seamless 8|unliOUrO gutters and dOvvOSpOUts is also di8COU[Gg8d, but may be a!|OvVed vvhen9 the profile of p[0pOS8d gutter & downspout matches the 0[igiD8\ in design Or matches the design of the historic building, AWNINGS &CAy4OPiES Awnings and canopies traditionally were very important to the use of buildings and structures throughout this industrial district. Climate COntpO| ayStgrnS did not exist when � these buildings were constructed and one method used to control the sun and rain were awnings and canopies. Page 14 of 22 Existing historic awnings or canopies should be preserved and maintained. Repair existing where necessary. When replacement is required, do so within the existing opening size and matching the original design. Where existing awnings and canopies were constructed of wood, replacements should also be wood, likewise with steel. New awnings and canopies. Rolled or flat metal canopies, similar to styles formerly seen on historic buildings on Main Street may be used. They may be attached either above window and door transoms or between the transoms and display windows, where existing. Awnings made from canvas or other fabric materials are allowed and should be a "drop - front" style. Plastic or modern bubble design awnings should be avoided. Back -lighting or internal illumination of awnings should not be used. Coordinate the color of awnings with the color of the building(s) and color palettes approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Awnings and canopies should not be continuous across a fagade, but rather relate to each window or a building's architectural bays. This rhythm is typical of historic commercial buildings and provides an interest to pedestrians. As per the building code, all awnings or canopies shall provide at least 8 feet of clearance above grade. BUILDING LIGHTING Exterior building lighting, just as site lighting, is an important element in the success of this industrial district. Building lighting is important in commercial, retail and tourist areas that require sufficient lighting for aesthetics, advertisement, safety and in some cases, merchandise display. As such, design and install light fixtures that are consistent with the historic character of this industrial area. Consider lighting to accent architectural features of the buildings within this district, to light building signs, and to illuminate pedestrian walkways adjacent to the buildings. Provide low scale lighting for pedestrian walkways. The design of the exterior lights should be simple and not take away from the architectural character of this industrial district. This industrial district was historically constructed in a very utilitarian design, such that overly decorative building lighting may disrupt the architectural character of the district. Exterior gooseneck lights, recessed lights or other incandescent light fixtures appropriate to the style and period of the building or district are appropriate. Avoid exposed lighting of any kind unless part of a historic or period light fixture. BUILDING & GROUND SIGNS Signs are also critical to the success of this industrial district. They provide pertinent retain merchant information for a potential shopper or critical tourist information for visitors to Grapevine. Traditionally, signs were painted onto buildings themselves or on windows, as is evident on the feed mill and feed store. Where existing historic signs Page 15 of 22 remain, they should hepreserved and restored. |Dcommercial O[retail areas, the building itself may b8considered part Ofthe sign 8nd painted tOappropriately. The use Ofwall and projecting SigDSa[8eDCOU[8g8d. LOC8t8 signs SO that they nei8t8 to and compliment 8[Chit8CtUrG| f88tUn3S of the building. For businesses located inbuildings, which have a generous setback, appropriately scaled monument signs are encouraged. |Dgeneral, building signs should besmall (in relation to the size of the building) and limited to one per business on buildings with rnu|Up|e tSO@DtS. Off premise signs, flashing signs and plastic backlit signs are should not be allowed. Roof top signs should be avoided as they can detract from the architectural character of @ historic roof O[ profile of building. Signs may be CODSt[U[ted of painted vV0Od or metal, or on the building itself. Lighting Of signs should be done externally with incandescent bulbs or gooseneck lighting using appropriate fixtures to the StV|8 of the building. N8OD signs can enhance 8 DO[n[O8rCi3), retail 0[restaurant area bycreating asense Offun and festivity, however, excessive use can also detract from the industrial district, N8OD should be used inside windows only and occupy alimited amount ofspace within the window. Sandwich board Signs are typical ofhistoric commercial and retail area and are encouraged for pedestrian traffic iO this industrial district, They should be OlBiOt8iD8d and removed after business hours. Chalkboards are encouraged for daily changing DleSS8geS. Sandwich board signs, which are directed towards pedestrians should be limited to 24 inches wide by 36 inches high and no more than one per tenant. Sign lettering ShOU|d be consistent with the 8[Chit8CtU[8| Stv|8 of the building it's mounted on. Gene[@||y, serif styles may be Used for CO0nOerci8| and n3t@i| u3oS within !@1e 1 9t and early 20m Century buildings. San serif Stv|eS may be used for 3Ornrn8rCia| and retail uses within buildings dating from the 183O-5OS. Avoid garish colors O[patterns and avoid 8clutter Ofsigns On the building O[windows and limit the number and size Ofsigns. VI' NEW BUILDING This section Ofthe design gUid8|ineSCOOQentrat8sODF8coOlmSnd8tiOOGfO[thSCOOStOJCU0O of new buildings within this industrial district. New buildings are considered additions to historic buildings and new stand alone construction. The gO3| of this section is to encourage appropriate and compatible new construction for this industrial district, while still retaining the historic architectural Ch8[8Cte[ of the historic district. NEW CONSTRUCTION INFILL The Secretary of the Interior's guidelines for new buildings in historic districts BnC0Un3ge similarity of form and [n8teri8\S. but not 8CtU8| FSp|iC8tiOO. F{eVi8vv Of proposed designs Page 1Gof22 will be based on the compatibility of the design within the context of the property's adjacent and nearby historic buildings. The design of new buildings should have key elements of the building's historic period, including massing, scale, fenestration and materials. Infill buildings should not be absolute reproductions, and appear as clearly contemporary. Only when a previously demolished historic building can be accurately replicated may a reproduction be considered. Infill buildings between historic buildings should be similar in setback, roof form, cornice line and materials, to one of the adjacent buildings. Relate height of new building to the heights of adjacent structures. Avoid new buildings that tower over existing ones. ADDITIONS TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS Additions to historic buildings should compliment the style of the main building if possible; otherwise they should adhere to the general style with simplified details. New additions should be designed in a manner that makes clear what is historic and what is new and done in such a manner that the least amount of historic materials or character defining features are not obscured, damaged or destroyed. A new addition should, if at all possible, be located at the rear of the historic building. If this is not possible, the addition may be added to the side if it is recessed at least 18 inches from the historic building facade or a connection is used to separate old from new. New vertical additions should be set back from primary facades so as not to be readily apparent from the facing street. NEW BUILDING FORM, MASS AND SCALE Traditionally, mass and scale are building patterns, particularly on Main Street, that defined an edge and height for a historic district. This industrial district is different in that the mass and scale of buildings did not necessarily define its edge, except for the railroad tracks. However, mass type and scale do represent landmarks of various kinds for the community. Again, the mass and scale of these buildings and structures were representative of their utilitarian nature and uses. New construction forms, massing and scale should incorporate or compliment the existing mass and scale found within this industrial district. The new work should be differentiated from the old, while yet clearly contemporary buildings. At a minimum, new construction should reflect the forms, massing, roof shapes, cornice lines and building materials of the primary structures within the district. NEW BUILDING MATERIALS New building materials should materials for this industrial district wood and steel. be visually compatible with the predominate building This district was primarily built with 2 building materials, Page 17 of 22 New building construction should, as best as possible, be representative of these 2 primary materials. Secondary materials Onnew construction could bRthose used inother buildings within this district. Modern synthetic siding rO8teho|S. Such BS vinyl Or COnlpOSite hardboards bear little resemblance to historic [OBtSha|S in this district and ShOU|d thus be avoided. Newer contemporary synthetic Dl8tBha|S, such as fiber C8[neOt, may COOSid8Fed for new COOStnUCtiOD and in 8 |OCaUOO where they appear similar in character, texture and profile to traditional building nO8t8[i@|S. Page 1Oof22 0 VIL APPENDIX The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, 1995. PRESERVATION IS DEFINED as the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain the existing form, integrity and materials of an historic property. Work, including preliminary measures to protect and stabilize the property, generally focuses upon the ongoing maintenance and repair of historic materials and features rather than extensive replacement and new construction. New exterior additions are not within the scope of this treatment; however, the limited and sensitive upgrading of mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems ad other code - required work to make the properties functional is appropriate within a preservation project. 1. A property will be used as it was historically, or be given a new use that maximizes the retention of distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships. Where a treatment and use have not been identified, a property will be protected and, if necessary, stabilized until additional work may be undertaken. 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The replacement of intact or repairable historic materials or alteration of features, spaces and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Work needed to stabilize, consolidate and conserve existing historic materials and features will be physically and visually compatible, identifiable upon close inspection, and properly documented for future research. 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. 6. The existing condition of historic features will be evaluated to determine the appropriate level of intervention needed. Where the severity of deterioration requires repair or limited replacement of a distinctive feature, the new material will match the old in composition, design, color and texture. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. Page 19 of 22 RESTORATION IS DEFINED as the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features and character of a property as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of features from other periods in its history and reconstruction of missing features from the restoration period. The limited and sensitive upgrading of mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems and other code required work to make properties functional is appropriate within a restoration project. 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use which reflects the property's restoration period. 2. Materials and features from the restoration period will be retained and preserved. The removal of materials or alteration of features, spaces and spatial relationships that characterize the period will not be undertaken. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Work needed to stabilize, consolidate and conserve materials and features from the restoration period will be physically and visually compatible, identifiable upon close inspection, and properly documented for future research. 4. Materials, features, spaces and finishes that characterize other historical periods will be documented prior to their alteration or removal. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize the restoration period will be preserved. 6. Deteriorated features from the restoration period will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture and where possible, materials. 7. Replacement of missing features from the restoration period will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. A false sense of history will not be created by adding conjectural features, features from other properties, or by combining features that never existed together historically. 8. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 9. Archeological resources affected by a project will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 10. Designs that were never executed historically will not be constructed. REHABILITATION IS DEFINED as the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural or architectural values. 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships. 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture and where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in a such manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Page 21 of 22 RECONSTRUCTION IS DEFINED as the act orprocess of depicting, by means of new construction, the form, features and detailing of a non -surviving site, landscape, building, structure, or object for the purpose of replicating its appearance at a specific period of time and in its historic location. Reconstruction will be used to depict vanished or non -surviving portions of a property when documentary and physical evidence is available to permit accurate reconstruction with minimal conjecture and such reconstruction is essential to the public understanding of the property. 2. Reconstruction of a landscape, building, structure, or an object in its historic location will be preceded by a thorough archeological investigation to identify and evaluate those features and artifacts which are essential to an accurate reconstruction. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. 3. Reconstruction will include measures to preserve any remaining historic materials, features and spatial relationships. 4. Reconstruction will be based on the accurate duplication of historic features and elements substantiated by documentary or physical evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different features from other historic properties. A reconstructed property will re- create the appearance of the non -surviving historic property in materials, design, color and texture. 5. A reconstruction will be clearly identified as a contemporary re-creation. 6. Designs that were never executed historically will not be constructed. Page 22 of 22 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS DESIGNATING A HISTORIC LANDMARK SUBDISTICT HL01-08 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 (APPENDIX "D" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES), DESIGNATING THE SOUTH SIDE OF HUDGINS STREET BETWEEN IRA E. WOODS AVENUE AND DOOLEY STREET AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN A DISTRICT ZONED "CBD" CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, "GU" GOVERNMENTAL USE DISTRICT, AND "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRICAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE COTTONBELT RAILROAD HISTORIC DISTRICT PRESERVATION CRITERIA; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made by the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission requesting a historic landmark subdistrict designation by making application for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested historic landmark subdistrict designation should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 39 of Appendix "D" of the Code of Ordinances have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing-, and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered, among other things, the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this historic landmark subdistrict, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the historic landmark subdistrict designation lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this historic landmark subdistrict designation and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that historic landmark subdistrict designation for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1, That the City does hereby designate a historic landmark subdistrict (HL01-08) to be known as the Cottonbelt Railroad Historic District in accordance with Section 39 of Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of ORD. NO. 2 Grapevine, Texas, in a district zoned "CBD" Central Business District, "GU" Governmental Use District, and "Ll" Light Industrial within the following described property: The south side of Hudgins Street, between Ira E. Woods Avenue and Dooley Street, more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of hereof; and, in addition thereto, the adoption of the Cottonbelt Historic District Design Guidelines as conditions, regulations and safeguards in connection with the said historic landmark subdistrict, a copy of said criteria being attached hereto and labeled Exhibit "B". Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the "H" zoning designation. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. ORD. NO. 3 Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 15th day of January, 2002. =••C• 10!7 ATTEST: ORD. NO. 4