HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 05 - SU02-01 Cingular WirelessTO
FROM
MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT
r ---i
— —'
�—
Grapevine \
'0Lake
� °ye /
11
>I ��
cc nom. 5. /q
P i Z_ _7�t 7
HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ROGER NELSON, CITY MANAGER -;6/ r
H.T. HARDY, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' �A
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF SPECIAL
USE APPLICATION SU02-01
APPLICANT:
Peter Kavanaugh of Zone Systems, Inc.
PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE:
The subject property is located at 525 Industrial
Boulevard and is platted as Lot 3, Grapevine
Industrial Park. The addition contains 1.45 acres
and has approximately 243 feet of frontage along
Industrial Boulevard.
REQUESTED SPECIAL USE AND COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting a special use permit to allow for the installation of a 75 foot
high monopole communications tower with a 11'6" x 20' equipment shelter building
measuring 10'6" in height.
The proposed 75 foot high monopole is located on a 600 square foot lease area situated
on Lot 3, Grapevine Industrial Park Addition. There are three existing office/warehouse
buildings situated on the 1.45 -acre lot. No existing parking spaces will be removed to
accommodate the monopole construction, although one existing space has been
designated for specific use by vehicles that will service the lease site from time to time. The
proposed equipment shelter is a prefabricated building comprised of glass fiber reinforced
concrete. An eight -foot high chain link fence is proposed around the entire 600 square
foot lease site for screening and security.
0'\ZCU\SU02-01.4.doc 1 February 4, 2002 (2:11 PM)
In December, 2001, City Council denied without prejudice a proposal for this same 75 -foot
Cingular Wireless monopole, stating that more information and analysis regarding
alternative sites in the proposed service area would be required. The applicant has
provided coverage maps for five alternative sites along with a written statement on why
each of these five sites is considered less desirable than the proposed Industrial Boulevard
site.
PRESENT ZONING AND USE:
The property is currently zoned "Ll" Light Industrial District and developed with three
buildings, two of which are occupied by industrial and warehouse users. The building
located at the northwest corner of the site is currently vacant.
The subject property and immediate area is zoned "Ll" Light Industrial District. Buildings
"A" and "B," located on the northern half of the subject tract, were developed before 1984
under the previous Zoning Ordinance and are considered non -conforming. Building "C,"
a 12,000 square foot office/warehouse development on the southern portion, was
approved via case SP95-29 in April 1996.
Three Special Use Permit requests for the property have been considered by the Planning
and Zoning Commission and City Council in the past. A 100 foot high monopole proposed
by Nextel was approved in this location in June 1995, via case SU95-02 (Ord. 95-46).
However, the Special Use Permit expired one year later as development of the tower had
not commenced. In February 1997, the City Council denied case SU96-12 for the same
Nextel 100 foot high monopole, recommending collocation on facilities at Baylor Medical
Center. In December, 2001, City Council denied without prejudice a proposal for this same
75 -foot Cingular Wireless monopole via case SU01-08, stating that more information and
analysis regarding alternative sites in the proposed service area would be required.
SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
EAST:
WEST:
0AZCU\SU02-01.4.doc
"Ll," Light Industrial District — Dunbar Armored Trucks, GT Products
warehouses
"LI," Light Industrial District -existing warehouse development
"Ll," Light Industrial District — Craigs Collision Specialists; Storage
USA Mini Warehouses
"LI," Light Industrial District —Four Seasons
K
February 5, 2002 (3:58PM)
The subject tract is located within "Zone B" Middle. Zone of Effect as defined on the
"Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. In Zone B,
the following uses may be considered only if sound treatment is included in building design:
multi family apartments, motels, office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, personal and
business services. Single family residential and sound sensitive uses such as schools and
churches should avoid this zone. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this
noise zone.
MASTER PLAN APPLICATION:
The Master Plan designates the subject property as Industrial land use. The applicant's
proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION:
Industrial Boulevard is not designated on the City of Grapevine Thoroughfare Plan.
/mh
0AZCU1SU02-01A.doc 3 February 4, 2002 (2:11 PM)
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant! agent:
Zone Systems, Inc. by_
Street address of applicant/ agent:
/ State /
214-941-4440
"s interest in subject property:
PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATH
Street address of subject property
525 Industrial B lvd.
Legal description of subject property (metes
Part of lot 3 of Graf
Size of subject property
Present
Scab a -C 1
RECEIVE®
JAN 0 4 2007
.PLANNNII�NGI
CITY F GRAPEVINE
V I E
SPECIAL USE APPLICATION
Form "A"
=ax number of applicant /agent:
214-941-5259
must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet)
Industrial Park
• Proposed use of the property:
Trx-�tP c-.pl 1 ul ar r
size for specla(use request:
reauirina a special use:
7 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
of current property owner:
Lancaster Family -Tr st II
foota
>treet address of property owner:
1001 W Northwest Ha.cthway . Sw to A
;itylSfate lZip Code of property owner.
Grapevine, TX 76051 Fax number of property owner.
Telephone number of property owner.
817-487-1217
817-424-3884
❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed special use and note the request on the site plan document
❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and special requirements or conditions Imposed upon the particular special use by applicable
district regulations (example: bufferyards, distance between users)
E3 In the same tetter, describe whether the proposed special use will, or will
not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other
property In the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed special use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the
neighborhood.
❑ Application ofsite plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form 'B").
0 The site Plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. 2
REE
U n, onditional use and special use applications are assumed to be complete when riled and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing-Ifte
tion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date.
AA
public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continue oQhe�n�tic
hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. •�l
0 Any changes to a sKe plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use orspecial use permit can only be' AA*n y�ty
councK through the public hearing process. ,� iY to
D I have read and understand alt the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all
!e traments of this aodication have been mel at the time of submittal.
- -
PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE SPECIAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A SPECIAL
REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 1 -4
npripplican('s Name:
Kd
The State Of /-e )4a5'
,�
County Of -1A ►�_
Before Me on this day personally appeared
(notary) (applicant)
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged to m@j+V` the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
(Seat) Given uqo yhs,t��t• A,ffi�
.• QR @� %V.
Cid
„. • a>� of t
•. EXPIFti•.•s� ;.
this day of , A.D.
--fftfaryIn And For
Print Property OftjeMbhif5g'L” %%' . • -V— • .,.._-_. _.
-
f %-,
l.owi2aS4/z
The State Of TAY C t
f
Courtly Of d VI"4K
Before Me 2Y" �(notary)
on this day personally appeared ! �k Lot W ca.01W'
(property owner}
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged tome that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
(Sean Given under my hand and seat of office this Y�= day of0AA_.- , A.D.Ci� Q �-
�,uua .
PETER OVANAGH
tic -,,VY PUBLIC
C;- S1•f m of TEXAS
4' mp,, comm. Exp. 08-24-2003
ZONE SYSTEMS, INC. DECEIVED
.iA N 0 .1 :1002
PLANNING
January 4, 2002
Mr. Michael Hampton
Development Services
City of Grapevine
200 South Main Street
Grapevine, Texas 76099
Re: Cingular Wireless
525 Industrial Drive
Dear Mr. Hampton:
Cingular Wireless proposes to locate a cellular telephone cell site at 525 Industrial Drive.
The site will contain an antenna facility that will provide cellular coverage to the
immediate area. Attached is propagation information and a list of alternate sites that have
been considered. The list is in response to the concern of the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council that more sites should be considered prior to approving
this site.
If you need any more information beyond what we are providing please call me. Thank
you for your help in processing our request.
Sincerely,
Kavanagh
1620 HANDLEY DRIVE, SUITE A " DALLAS, TEXAS 7520$ " (214) 941-4440 ° FAX (214) 941-5259
rilli
Design Summary for Hwy 114 / FM 1709 area JAN 3 1 2002
-P LA l",1 JN11 �!
01/25/02 (amended)
The primary purpose of the proposed site in the above captioned area is to cover below
grade areas of Hwy 114, with additional coverage to surrounding areas as a secondary
objective. Recorded Traffic in this area on Hwy 114, Hwy 26, FM 1709 and Bus. 114
exceeds 150,000 vehicles per day I mandating the need for clear strong service levels if
for nothing other than 911 service. In addition you will note in the attached signal level
plots that several cells "surround" the proposed location, but a couple of weak signal
areas remain that must be resolved 2. Numerous antenna and power changes were
accomplished on the existing cells in attempt to resolve the weak signal areas prior to the
origination of this new site package. Also note that this specific section of Hwy is an
average of 15-20' below grade, and there is direct relationship between the distance of a
site from the Hwy and its ability to serve on it (the further away a site is, the less signal
that will be "seen" in the hole)! Therefore, the candidate consideration was based on
location, availability and ability to serve the desired area. The following is a summary of
the findings for those sites.
1) Baylor Medical Center — Hwy114 / College [EXHIBIT 2]
PRO's
There are 3 — 4 Carriers already present on the rooftop of the five story building
located on the eastern edge of this Campus so ability to lease is established.
Location would be very good, for right now (see below).
CON's
A new five story building is planned that will be located between the existing one
and Hwy 114. The new building would be located on a line from the existing one
and the intersection of Hwy 114 and Wall St / Southlake Blvd (FM1709). The
location of this building would reduce signal's toward this area by an average of
25 to 30 dBm, which is typical loss for structures of this type (concrete & Steel)
located in the near field to transmitting antenna's. As a result once the new
building is completed signal would not be much better (if any) than that present
today.
Follow-up
A lease was investigated, but the Medical Center would not give permission to
re -locate the proposed site to the new building when it was completed.
Result
Site rejected due to planned future blockage of signal and resulting loss of signal
to desired area.
1 1999 Tx D.O.T. Traffic map; Fort Worth District
2 Exhibit 1: Note that the actual "coverage" of a phone varies between Class III (handheld, non -pocket
size) & Class IV(pocketsize) mobiles as well as between phones in the same class. The signal classification
on the following plots is based on an average Class III mobile meaning that some Class III mobiles as well
as Class IV mobiles will "generally" perform a little worse than shown.
Page 1 of 3 Cingular Wireless — Confidential Hwy 114 /Industrial
2) Shopping Center - SW Corner Hwy 114 & Southlake Blvd [EXHIBIT 3]
PROs
Existing signage, large area to work with and close to the desired location.
CONs
Zoning (?), Proximity of new Residential buildings and continued building in
immediate area (willingness of landowners to lease???). Assuming 65'CL would
still leave a weak area in south.
Result
Not pursued.
3) Hwy 114 / Industrial - Industrial Blvd [EXHIBIT 4]
PROs
Existing Warehouses and buildings with correct Zoning classification, excellent
location with respect to coverage area.
CONS
None noticied.
Result
Desired, Awaiting decision at City of Grapevine
4) Dragon Stadium - Nolen / Silicon Rd. (1085 S. Kimball) [EXHIBIT 5]
PROs
Tall light structures (- 100' CL) which have successfully been replaced in the
past (i.e. Frisco), close to northern edge of desired coverage area.
CONS
Zoning (?), proximity of residential area, but most importantly the service from
this site would provide only slight improvement in Southern area where improved
service is desired and still result in the need for a separate site to resolve this
location?
Result
Rejected due to lack of coverage in Southern area.
5) Mustang / Panther Stadium - Ira E Woods Ave. (Hwy 26) [EXHIBIT 6]
PROs
Tall light structures (- 100' CL) which have successfully been replaced in the
past (i.e. Frisco)
CONs
Stadium is located approximately 1/4 mile from existing Cingular site on
Grapevine (?) WT at Hwy 26 / Mustang. Does not resolve coverage for either
area.
Result
Rejected due to proximity of existing site..
Page 2 of 3 Cingular Wireless — Confidential Hwy 114 /Industrial
! 4,
Comments:
The proposed Hwy 114 / Industrial site is easily the best location for this
candidate package. If the Baylor Medical Center Lease could have been worked to allow
for moving to the new building at its completion, then it would have been comparable to
this choice, however that is not the case, so the proposed site stands alone. One other
limiting factor in the site selection, is the amount of undeveloped land in and around this
area. The owners of the undeveloped land generally do not want to commit to leases
when they are waiting for the right time to develop or sell the land.
Respectfully,
1�0
Larry Co ello
Cingular Wireless
Manager of RF Engineering & Design, North Texas Region
Page 3 of 3 Cingular Wireless — Confidential Hwy 114 / Industrial
O
N N
� o
O
O
O O
M p
O O
Lr)
N O
tt7
O
O 1 O
O M N O
M O O
O N
O N
V
0
0
CD v
{
{
{
{
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
M
r
00
Lo
Q
—
O
o
v
o
M
LO
r
O
n
zO
Lr)
_oo
�co
vZ
0
a
F-
M
�
o
o
�<<
F
~<1 M
Z —
LO
�
Vie`>,
to
Ln
N
a
LnF-
o
a
oso$
Ln—
O
O
U
'
tQ
hW- O
F-
J
8
W
g
O
inx
O
O
0
2
0 -LS
,.
O
W
V)
cr
O
QOi
(�_
W
N
�
Q
N
O
O
D
O S w
O 0 1
� �
M
p
o
-
p
O
O
O
O
m
M
N
N
O
N N
� o
O
O
O O
M p
O O
Lr)
N O
tt7
O
O 1 O
O M N O
M O O
O N
O N
V
0
0
CD v
{
{
{
{
a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ISSUING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 49 OF ORDINANCE
NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS SAME BEING ALSO
KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE BY
GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT SU02-01 IN A DISTRICT
ZONED "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WITH A SPECIAL
USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A 75
FOOT HIGH MONOPOLE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER AND
AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER UNDER CITY OF GRAPEVINE
ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE
PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF
ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS,
RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING
ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY;
UC I CKIVIININU 1 1-1/A 1 I r1C t'UbLIU IN I CKCS I �, MUKAL�
AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF
THIS SPECIAL USE PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT
TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS
($2,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE
DEEMED COMMITTED UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON
WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a special use permit
by making applications for same with the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of
Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of
Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been
complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine,
Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been
complied with; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing
called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as
to whether this requested special use permit should be granted or denied: safety of the
motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding
the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent
property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the
vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the
neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control
and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected
to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking
facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces,
and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on
the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the
overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the
transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing
called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors
in making a determination as to whether this requested special use permit should be
granted or denied;
- effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and
other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the
promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on
the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on
the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 49 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been
satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character
of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view
to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout
this city; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is
a public necessity for the granting of this special use permit, that the public demands it,
that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not
unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference
to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that the
special use permit lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,
panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration
of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks and other public requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that
there is a necessity and need for this special use permit and has also found and
determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and
in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally
classified; and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this special use permit for the particular
ORD. NO. 2
piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large,
„ws the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety,
and welfare of this community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a special use permit in accordance
with Section 49 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by
granting Special Use Permit SU02-01 to allow for the installation of a 75 foot high
monopole communications tower (Zone Systems, Inc./Cingular) with a 11'6" x 20'
equipment shelter building in a district zoned "LI" Light Industrial District within the following
described property: Lot 3, Grapevine Industrial Park Addition (525 Industrial Boulevard),
all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73,
attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions,
restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including, but not limited to, the following:
None.
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map
of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the herein special use permit.
Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein
above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of
Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City
of Grapevine, Texas.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have
been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting
health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been
designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated
to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from
fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent
overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate
provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial
needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable
consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability
for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and
encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City
of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said
ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct
conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
ORD. NO. 3
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of
land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity
of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein.
Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not
to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed
committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues.
Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of
Grapevine, Texas are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace
and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an
emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety
and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective
from and after the date of its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained.
PASSED AND APPPOVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE on this the 19th day of February, 2002.
F-IMI'MMOM"
ATTEST:
ORD. NO. 4
3 12002
AN
Design Summary for Hwy 114 / FM 1709 area)
01/25/02 (amended)
The primary purpose of the proposed site in the above captioned area is to cover below
grade areas of Hwy 114, with additional coverage to surrounding areas as a secondary
objective. Recorded Traffic in this area on Hwy 114, Hwy 26, FM 1709 and Bus. 114
exceeds 150,000 vehicles per day r mandating the need for clear strong service levels if
for nothing other than 911 service. In addition you will note in the attached signal level
plots that several cells "surround" the proposed location, but a couple of weak signal
areas remain that must be resolved 2. Numerous antenna and power changes were
accomplished on the existing cells in attempt to resolve the weak signal areas prior to the
origination of this new site package. Also note that this specific section of Hwy is an
average of 15-20' below grade, and there is direct relationship between the distance of a
site from the Hwy and its ability to serve on it (the further away a site is, the less signal
that will be "seen" in the hole)! Therefore, the candidate consideration was based on
location, availability and ability to serve the desired area. The following is a summary of
the findings for those sites.
1) Baylor Medical Center — Hwy114 / College [EXHIBIT 2]
PRO's
There are 3 — 4 Carriers already present on the rooftop of the five story building
located on the eastern edge of this Campus so ability to lease is established.
Location would be very good, for right now (see below).
CON'S
A new five story building is planned that will be located between the existing one
and Hwy 114. The new building would be located on a line from the existing one
and the intersection of Hwy 114 and Wall St / Southlake Blvd (FM1709). The
location of this building would reduce signal's toward this area by an average of
25 to 30 dBm, which is typical loss for structures of this type (concrete & Steel)
located in the near field to transmitting antenna's. As a result once the new
building is completed signal would not be much better (if any) than that present
today.
Follow-up
A lease was investigated, but the Medical Center would not give permission to
re -locate the proposed site to the new building when it was completed.
Result
Site rejected due to planned future blockage of signal and resulting loss of signal
to desired area.
' 1999 Tx D.O.T. Traffic map; Fort Worth District
2 Exhibit 1: Note that the actual "coverage" of a phone varies between Class III (handheld, non -pocket
size) & Class IV(pocketsize) mobiles as well as between phones in the same class. The signal classification
on the following plots is based on an average Class III mobile meaning that some Class III mobiles as well
as Class IV mobiles will "generally" perform a little worse than shown.
Page 1 of 3 Cingular Wireless — Confidential Hwy 114 /Industrial
2) Shopping Center — SW Corner Hwy 114 & Southlake Blvd [EXHIBIT 3]
PROs
Existing signage, large area to work with and close to the desired location.
CONs
Zoning (?), Proximity of new Residential buildings and continued building in
immediate area (willingness of landowners to lease???). Assuming 65'CL would
still leave a weak area in south.
Result
Not pursued.
3) Hwy 114 ! Industrial — Industrial Blvd [EXHIBIT 4]
PROs
Existing Warehouses and buildings with correct Zoning -classification, excellent
location with respect to coverage area.
CONs
None noticied.
Result
Desired, Awaiting decision at City of Grapevine
4) Dragon Stadium — Nolen / Silicon Rd. (1085 S. Kimball) [EXHIBIT 5]
PROs
Tall light structures (— 100' CL) which have successfully been replaced in the
past (i.e. Frisco), close to northern edge of desired coverage area.
CONs
Zoning (?), proximity of residential area, but most importantly the service from
this site would provide only slight improvement in Southern area where improved
service is desired and still result in the need for a separate site to resolve this
location!
Result
Rejected due to lack of coverage in Southern area.
5) Mustang / Panther Stadium — Ira E Woods Ave. (Hwy 26) [EXHIBIT 6]
PROs
Tall light structures (— 100' CL) which have successfully been replaced in the
past (i.e. Frisco)
CONs
Stadium is located approximately 1/4 mile from existing Cingular site on
Grapevine (?) WT at Hwy 26 / Mustang. Does not resolve coverage for either
area.
Result
Rejected due to proximity of existing site..
Page 2 of 3 Cingular Wireless — Confidential Hwy 114 /Industrial
Comments:
The proposed Hwy 114 / Industrial site is easily the best location for this
candidate package. If the Baylor Medical Center Lease could have been worked to allow
for moving to the new building at its completion, then it would have been comparable to
this choice, however that is not the case, so the proposed site stands alone. One other
limiting factor in the site selection, is the amount of undeveloped land in and around this
area. The owners of the undeveloped land generally do not want to commit to leases
when they are waiting for the right time to develop or sell the land.
Respectfully,
j4Ae
Lary
Cingular Wireless
Manager of RF Engineering & Design, North Texas Region
Page 3 of 3 Cingular Wireless — Confidential Hwy 114 /Industrial
IN,
C)
P
0
0
coco
— ------------
CD
C,O
O
CD
ti
O
Z
rnc
in
O
n
C, Ol
CL
cl
co
LrI
U')
U�
�
� Wiz
o
�� t o�
—
�,�
�—
� o
Q �
J
z
Lr)
0
'Z
cl�
0
0 0
LLJ
V) 0
LOM
0
C-)
<
cr
< 0-
0
cr
<
M
LO
0)a_
m
0
0
Lrl
LL
rn rn
o
L
0
0
o
0
Q
00
0)Nto
C)
P
0
coco
RI
D
a �
1
F--
t-
v
r-
,� � � �}�� � � � � Imo,• --��-. _
rr t
I'�y j�rff` 3
L i -L
r--
a
AREA MAP
DISTANCE FROM TOWER
TO EXISTING E
0
w
m
00
VICINITY MAP
NOTES:
1. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED "U" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT,
2. THE CURRENT LAND USE DESIGNATION AS CONTAINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE
MASTER PLAN IS INDUSTRIAL. ALL REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 31, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT SHALL BE MET.
3, DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRAPEVINE
SOIL EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE SHALL BE MET.
4. ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND.
DISTANCE FROM TOWER CENTER
TO EXISTING BUILDINGS
015TANCE FROM TOWER CENTER
TO EAST PROPERTY LINE
S 00 ,11,00" E 3.00 - �Ex15'-0" PROPERTY LINE
•- "^^� -^^• � - 249'-0" x 260'-0" AREA
II I
PROPOSED "I5' -O° MONOPOLE
b' W/ CONCRETE FOUNDATION
B ;2? PROPOSED UTILITY RACK
I
PROPOSED FRENCH DRAIN
I - (TYP OF 2)
n
/`. PROPOSED GRAVEL TO
l`_F+ FILL LEASE AREA
/ PROPOSED il'-6" x 20'-O" GLASS
EXISTING - (5'1 FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE
B /ILDING / RCPREFABRIGATED EQUIPMENT
SHELTER
EXISTING CURB
O
PROPOSED LEASE LINE
4 O
PROPOSED 15'x 40'
LEASE AREA
7 PROPOSED CHAIN-LINK
ENTRY GATE
}— { X -- PROPOSED 6'-0" CHAIN
LINK FENCE
PAESPACE SPECIFIC
RKIING
— N 0��'053_ �00\�
INDUSTRIAL TVD
1-4—EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
ACCESS INGRE5511=6RE55
IN COMMON i -V LE55OR
z OVERALL SITE PLAN
SCALE, 1° a 40'-0°
TOWER ELEVATION
SCALE, 1" = 10'-0"
LEASE AREA NOTES
BEING ALL OF A CALLED 600.00 SQUARE FEET TRACT AND
BEING ALL THAT CERTAIN LOT, TRACT OR PAFCEL OF -&,ND
SITUATED IN THE T. EASTER SURVEY, .u.BSTR,a:CT N0. 474,
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF LOT 3, OF
THE GRAPE",-1NE INDUSTRIAL PARK ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 388-140, PAGE 84,
TARRANT COUNTY DEED RECORDS, AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING FROM A POINT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID LOT 3:
THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST
,ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 A DISTANCE OF
110.93 FEET AND SOUTH 87 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 57
SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 30.14 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH
IRON ROD SET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS
600.00 SQUARE FOOT LEASE AREA;
THENCE SOUTH 02DEGREES 36 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST
A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET TO A 60D NAIL SET FOR A
CORNER;
THENCE SOUTH 87DEGREES 23 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST
A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A "X" CUTIN CONCRETE
FOR A CORNER;
THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 44 SECONDS
WEST A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD
SET FOR A CORNER;
THENCE NORTH 87DEGREES 23 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST
A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
AND CONTAINING 600.00 SQUARE FEET OF LAND.
INGRESS/EGRESS IN COMMON W/LESSOR
IN
b"
b"
REQUEST
SU01-08IS A REQUEST FOR APPR AL OF A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A 75 FOOT
HIGH MONOPOLE COMMUNICATIONS 10AER WITH AN
EQUIPMENT BUILDING, LOCATED ON A 600 SQUARE
FOOT TRACT OF LAND SITUATED ON LRT 3,
GR,APEANE INDUSTRIAL PARK,
CASE NAME: CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE
CASE NUMBER: ;1-001-08
LOCATION: LOT 3, GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK,
525 INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
MAYOR SECRETARY
DATE:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN
DATE:
SHEET: 1 OF 1
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN
CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
EXISTING PARKING SPACE
PROPOSED UTILITY RACK
W! PPG AND TELCO
PANELS
PROPOSED -15'-0" MONOPOLE
W/ GONGRETE FOUNDATION
PROPOSED 4'-0" WIDE
CHAIN LINK GATE
PROPOSED FRENCH DRAINS
(TTP OF 2)
PROPOSED II' -b" x 20'-0"
CINGULAR AIREll 5LA55
FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE
(&FRG) PREFABRICATED
EQUIPMENT SHELTER
PROPOSED 15'-0" x 40'-O"
CINGULAR AIRELE55
LEASE AREA (LEASE LINE
AND FENCE LINE AREA SAME)
PROPOSED 8'-0"
CHAIN LINK FENCE
PROF05FO 5'-0" x 5'-0"
CONCRETE STOOP ENTRY
PROPOSED 4'-0" WIDE
CHAIN LINK 6ATE
PROPOSED CRUSHED STONE
SURFACE WITHIN LEASE AREA
PROPOSED GIN6ULAR AIRELE55
5PECIFIG PARKING SPACE
z�-C3A!%
�d0
I(oevinjoL. hlallace Architects, Inc.
2775 Villa C-1, #150 Dullo.t., TX
❑ EI F11— (,."; 2) 484-F,855
DRAWN BY: E:.B.S.
CHECKED BY: K.L.W.
PROJECT k :01025
ISSUE DATE: 10/0S' 1 p
PRINTED DATE:
REVISIONS
rtV
'A y ,4 R. TM's. sa _
Al
7
J.
PROJECT ADDRESS
525 Industrial Drive
Grapevine, TX 76051
LESSOR:
Tim Lancaster, Real Estate Manager
1001 Nothwest Hwy. Suite A
Grapevine, TX 76051
(817) 487-1217
LESSEE:
CINGULAR WIRELESS
1801 Valley View Lane
Farmers Branch, Texas 75234
Phone: 972-277-5804
AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE
CINGULAR WIRELESS
PROJECT COORDINATOR
Craig Hayes
Phone: 214-277-5804
Fax: 972-706-6389
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
J.D. Jones
1801 Volley View Lane
Farmers Branch, Texas 75234
Phone: 972-277-5803
Fax: 972-706-6389
cingular-
�ELESS
GRAPEVINE AREA
HWY 114 / INDUSTRIAL
CELL SITE
CENTER* 4226
CASE NUMBER: SU02-01
CASE NAME: CINGULAR WIRELESS MONOPOLE
CASE ADDRESS: 525 INDUSTRIAL BLVD., LOT 3
GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK
SHEET
1 OF 1