Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWS Item 01 - Comprehensive Master PlanMEMBERSMEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND OF i ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR fy" s MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2016 SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN/FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND POSSIBLE AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO THE APPLICATION PROCESS RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council consider the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Master Plan and Future Land Use Map and possible amendments to the zoning ordinance relative to the application process and take any action necessary. Comprehensive Master Plan/Future Land Use Map amendments: Staff has been asked to provide suggestions for amendments to the Future Land Use Map category designations, to accommodate mixed use projects. Therefore, City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to add a "C/MU" (Commercial/Mixed Use) category to the Future Land Use Map, along with a brief description of the types of uses that would be appropriate. A suggested amendment to the Comprehensive Master Plan is attached. The Future Land Use Map itself contains draft amendments of areas that might be considered for the "C/MU" designation, as suggested in Scott Polikov's study. The proposed boundaries of the Commuter Rail District are tentatively shown as "C/MU", although it is understood that this area will most likely require much additional study before any changes to the Future Land Use Map are made. Zoning Ordinance amendment(s) relative to multiple applications: At the September 20 and October 18 meetings, the Commission and Council considered multiple applications on a 52 acre tract of land with discussion centering on a multi -faceted development consisting of an expansion to an existing hotel, the construction of a new hotel, and the development of a 359 unit multi -family complex. These three development proposals required seven different applications (one zoning change application, three conditional use applications, and three planned development overlay applications) for OICU:2016:AM16-03.4 property that was intended to be developed as one project. Although the property owner/developer intended to construct this project as one "development," each portion of the project required individual advertising, property owner notification, and discussion during the public hearing which may have inhibited the developer's ability to present the case as one large, multifaceted development. In the future, for development requests of a similar nature whereby a sizeable tract of land is proposed to be developed with multiple components that would require several or more applications, the Commission and Council may want to consider several options such as: Amending sections of the zoning ordinance that allow the planned commercial center concept to include specific "uses" along with language that gives clear direction on submittal requirements relative to the multiple components of a request. For example, amending the planned commercial center language in the "CC" Community Commercial District to include multi -family uses would have allowed consideration of the project previously mentioned under one application which would allow both specific discussion where necessary but also allow consideration of the entire project/property as a whole. This could add clarity to future proposals of similar size and complexity and allow an applicant/developer the ability to present a project with multiple aspects as a "whole" project rather than a compilation of individual parts. • Creating an entirely new zoning district within the ordinance that would allow consideration of multiple uses within a given tract of land with its own separate guidelines relative to density, height, bulk, open space, setbacks, etc., as required for any other zoning district established within the zoning ordinance. O:ZCU:2016:AM 16-03.4 COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN LAND USE CATEGORIES O:ZCU/2016/AM16 03/Residential Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density “R-20” Single Family “R-5.0” Zero-Lot-Line “R-12.5” Single Family “R-3.5” Two Family District “R-7.5” Single Family “R-3.75” Three & Four Family “R-MH” Mobile Home “R-TH” Townhouse “R-MODH” Modular Home “PRD-6” Planned Residential Low Density “PRD-12” Planned Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Governmental Use “R-MF-1” Multifamily “GU” Governmental Use “R-MF-2” Multifamily “RA” Recreation/Amusement Central Business District Flood Plain “CBD” Central Business District Any District Low Intensity Commercial Commercial “LB” Limited Business “CC” Community Commercial “GV” Grapevine Vintage “HC” Highway Commercial “CN” Neighborhood Commercial “HCO” Hotel/Corporate Office “PO” Professional Office “PCD” Planned Commerce Development “BP” Business Park “RA” Recreation/Amusement Industrial Industrial/Commercial “LI” Light Industrial All the zoning districts listed under Industrial and Commercial Land Uses “PID” Planned Industrial Development “BP” Business Park Mixed Use One or more of the following: “R-5.0” Zero-Lot-Line “R-3.5” Two Family District “R-3.75” Three & Four Family “R-TH” Townhouse “CC” Community Commercial “GV” Grapevine Vintage “CN” Neighborhood Commercial “PO” Professional Office “HC” Highway Commercial “HCO” Hotel/Corporate Office “PCD” Planned Commerce Development “BP” Business Park “RA” Recreation/Amusement PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN LAND USE CATEGORY Commercial/Mixed Use One or more of the following: Two or more of the following: (residential uses are only appropriate when they are a component of a non- residential development) “CC” Community Commercial “R-5.0” Zero-Lot-Line “GV” Grapevine Vintage “R-3.5” Two Family District “CN” Neighborhood Commercial “R-3.75” Three & Four Family “PO” Professional Office “R-TH” Townhouse “HC” Highway Commercial “R-MF” Multifamily “HCO” Hotel/Corporate Office “CC” Community Commercial “PCD” Planned Commerce Development “GV” Grapevine Vintage “BP” Business Park “CN” Neighborhood Commercial “RA” Recreation/Amusement “PO” Professional Office “HC” Highway Commercial “HCO” Hotel/Corporate Office “PCD” Planned Commerce Development “BP” Business Park “RA” Recreation/Amusement et LL a) CO O - CL A O L d V! N Q. 0 W 0 Ln d t Vi 3cN N M N O C NO c �O0+NM� 0cV No -. A r 2 N N N ca) Eo wc Ooa) =O N'0 Q c C E X C�'U� � O is U_ o = rn� Lu E°� € � ECw rnE m-0 oC-3rD N c - > an�E Ow o O :ON 0NW Q N N U cc -0 . UJ fl 0 0 � > O Z a 0 c •y E c U v v aE m O 0 EE aEm � �yN Eo tF= F a - U EH o ao � rn � = °� a0 _, 2 . a y O E > o�� � m EM a 0 V) UOw � (_ O cx A= ° = E - w (O `Uo0.2 o3 a) 1 0. u CD U c ccN4+ 0 20 0 ,v .°i o. a N 0 -0 -0 co m 3 ._ m LL E- �_- c v) imp U '� .a N LL ? m O Q 2 o 0 om axi c c� °c c cM o o w z U m �� i`' E o C C7 -� U U U C7 U? J CC Q Q o f tea) o m m >, m - N �' 0- w LL= _ �� as _ aN U E �� c z"E 75 75 O c _ 2m 1 y cEu m ))o�� ���°' 3 Z3U �o Noon a �E wy = Y ° `16 1 o > 3� a�= rn > o� h pU w rs.N An �p Ou 6� a� J LLMA O a°_ To c c 0 N= y N c as Z cO C7 y Ori NU z? E p� �_ c�oa� Em 0 0)> m 0 o ( �cm (Dv0 QOM z� CL Z�'�� o _ cn o Q z v a) c o a) E z a.�' m a> Z (D Ce) y �m Vm o zm o o Nm� oU U a) am' x s cn w aE >.ui w 4 0 (� O w J — — p c 3 O O(D a) (� » z J O 0 m a) Q m Cl N N c`0 a) m N' 00 aTa h va E E h o �n °Am > o fl oma= h as ,LU as h Qp a w Q m as Q L Z .� O n' Q. O 0 Q .`� = E Q) Z ` L v+ E L W E ��.. O E N 0 y E o Q o c m o �m� Q rn t1 0 o=r- woo O o 0 o'c a) c o m� p v0_ c _j -le N a) 0 U to 0 a) � s� 0 wst dt c wtin�in asa�s U. h C= a, 0-Y rn0 to O mw N'o w N w•- as d 0) �' 3 O•f Q♦ C 7 3 O� c O O IL 75 m2smv)-� w a0ca �o �00Mc Doo woo Mo'0o'o wo'er0m cs Oz Econ wQ �' E� E o� m m m� rn¢ cncon°in Uzco azcn Uz Ew S az ocnz o ��„_ N 1 o M ` low41 VAA __.� i F AWL J . w a • �- E ALbe CL all rt i � f ` w. r 1. =ter `� ; # . ✓ I a3 e -•:tar <..._,i .' � ��. r Rr �i,�':.• rA �w �a��' ;, �<. � 1 0 V ■ 1 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ f _ ♦ ♦Itoo �s 59 0-5 D. 0' <. //jllJ/j •.I,' V - ry • ■ l ■ ■ lJ.'� C1nui.u+v�. ✓C7"-' ""'=i t a ei • _ aE ♦ I ' i• r� V ♦ ihAll �. + `� �°r. q L X16 � `� � t -"E �i�� r t � s 5�;.. .J `� S .� •, '� � .{� j'� N �t � .lei ,.. � - � }�� 1■ 1. ..�•�; � +«�, r t+ ' � .. ''!. W- '�l i�Voll no .•. ♦ f'..*++r.- yxIN•�' +� ....140© *ply lr r• • 0 MCI 011,Il. � ���■ �"'�` • � •'.t. "� •.ff�• .� 1 etc f f .�.ias�yay �j ,� a ! •'►i� , ':� L• A o�,.�' �Y r ♦ - i� � al •a1 i�S � � I '� • ji P� Al i • T , ' +t. !{ -0, .. r co 10 MIN LU Tv ,. _ • � -s � .� s.'1%t,�' ! .�•'• , r p+' .. � * , _ .� .S7 1` . ,. " � r it s ^'�,�'� ��.� ;'� t ♦ � � ....�_g p � �� � . >� .����.�►�i� ��� Wit• a ■T�1 .♦�" • r'`r=�- �� ` + �� �- ` i i�� �'� iC r f0 0 rr Rail Corridor Study - Proposed Future Land Use RL v RL k' -' - t F 2 • ' RL ;.r R Ak- r ., l. - AA GNU ti Y , � - ri � s >� . Ir•+ ,�. '!e`er .:..-•, : � 4 r * r ii r Legend • 7 ! �, ► GU Rail Corridor Boundary IN - Industrial' Future Land Use LC -Commerical Low Intensity; C/MU - Commercial/Mixed Use RA - Recreational/Amusement CB - Central Business RH - Residential High Intensity Co - Commerical RL - Residential Low Intensity Total Acreage: 113.GU - Governmental Use RM - Residential Medium Intensity y= • !fir � . I/C - Industrial/Commerical . -; �. C+ • *� - • fJ 0 250 500 1,000 Feet Date: 11/9/16 *Acreage is approximate. RI . itNUDGINS ST 1 ON *L p i 7 _: .. - . _ - E O• ALLAS RD . ,• r � _ r YV OALLAS RD +ri:' y .� ti j f i •K - , I• - - Legend Acreages approximate. Date: 812016 =z� 9es ere �° DFWAirport Boundary _ - : _ ,, �.,..,., . ,.: � ; .�`• • � ; , � _ ;,»�;, � Development Study Area #2 S 1� ' 'Aim - 4 r r Future Land Use f ;.. � 1 � � a CBUL -Central Business �• ���'-"` a 7..: _ � .. � z w, ��. .,'1 � �,• , � CO -Commerical # Y1`` ; ; : s.► GU - Governmental Use I/C - Industrial/Commerical c +� IN - Industrial Tata I Acreage ■ 1 0 9 r 4� �` LC - Commensal Low Intensity A Its, y RL - Residential Low Intensity ` vNES�Ti.;- RM - Residential Medium Intensity I� it r.•- vI co LL U) 0 CL 0 L— cu 4-0 U) E W) CL 0 0 (D LL 0 cli c a) 0 Z>l 0 cc (1) o M2 C o (D M 0 C: ' N a a) E E (D r_ iF= E o C: 0 0 (D E -0 M � - C� Fm -zg w a (D 0 ia C LY - a) 0 'o 0 w E 0 - 0 0 a) o 0 —a > D w Lo 0 a) 0 0 cm c m — 0 NCO 0 .52 -a 0-- 0) 3: 0 r M Lo r o m - 4) �.r 5 00), 0 M — go a) 4) -0 c CO 0 x CL m m (D 'a E 4) "a 0 C) 0 mw -j U') > 0 4) 0 E (,D C: 0 0 0 4) (n C14 -0 4)L) r 0. 0 m m CL E-5 -m o U) Lo 3: 0E (b 0 0 o CL N D 1. 0 0 — - m -a 0 o ;6 w Q 0- 2-0 taiC: 0) 2 a) 0 M (D E c Q- a r- fn m 41 a 0 0 0 (D 0 -J c .5; " �o C14 CL W 0 L) 3 ® ' i ro- 0 tm w 0 c r_ m �o >1 c w cm 0 0 E 0 -0 'Do -rg 0 CL a 0 CL Ia. 0 'm E c (a 0-0 0) C: m r_ i E L 02 -(OD 43 E o m m 4) r_ > X— M 0 0 -0 LL 0 'o 0 r > D 0 W worn r- 0 z LL U) 7E 2 0 0 2 0 CD 0 X E 0 0 - m E 3: LM < d) 0 z m E -0 0 0 0: U) 0 �2 vi 0 CL 0 r- 0 m o co 0 a) 4) m W a ca M > v 'n :3 W m r- 0- 0 CL (D a- 0 2 ma u) 2 �2 0 a — !p 0 (o a) 1 M E E E 0 0 00 W F- lz W z z z 0 (D r CL r- 0 Z M E 0 co) 7j) r- r m 0 o o "Fu 0) 0 4) C) E E > W r- o r- E cL c z E z X >' z W :3 CL W x 2 o Off' L�- N 0 T -0 (mo U) CL X 2 -Lo w 0 0 M m - - _j B 0— N C _j (D (D M a c CL 4) 0-9 _3 (1) 0 U) 0 CL 2 0 x V- 4) " > W (D 4) 0 a) 0 0 -Z 0 E E C: CL m o o o E z U) cu < Z E E =.O W 0 W 000 O 0 0 0 0 a) w a. wcoLC: W 0 (n 4) 0 c CO W 0 CO D r-. 0 0) a) 0- 4) > fn to Q) -a x 'a c M (D c J-- X I- M C6 M 1- 0 0 Ix 0 D C) o tm (D 0 --a m WO 3:(o (D -C c 2 a t= 5 T cn 0(.) 0 Z ui i �a F 04 rA. CL (u (n0 L) ILI Z CL Z < U• . .9 cc r rr�i�� ,IF t ■ s _ V� IL ••i --,V.$Ir `"L.?I' * � _�yl �y � , +dw� �.r � ' �i 3j�'� �'' � s'xF_ ^ V17 i1( I lMi �t4lY+i�is P FH■s f H ft/t[Mwit+ .•� i (; • t t �� 11 LO I Ln I S � rn its ! lf< ! I! !� r4 �� / l !1• ! � C L _ o Q y m d U 1S h31) 3� tL CD N C J O U c E a U c7 v of a n 1J ;11 fry �a Y N \1 / E S F.: Al Development Study Area #4 - Proposed Future Land Use C1 U �► r r - a =��• tib*' `� �+ � • � � •ala 1 ,.iNA, Vo ktiF zRawtt�, 1 Legend Grapevine City Limits Future Land Use Development Study Area #4 C/MU - Commercial/Mixed Use DFW Airport Boundary CB - Central Business STUDY AREA 4 OPTIMUM LAND USE (In order of preference) Hospitality, restaurant, residential as an integral part of a fully connected mixed use development, with physical links between public amenities (hike and bike trail) and all elements of private development, including lake, as well as site design that treats lake frontage as emphasized amenity. EXPLANATION Mixed use with residential component reinforces sustainable vibrant context for core retail/entertainment north up State Highway 26. DESCRIPTION Large 49.92 acre site within entertainment/attraction corridor. Existing 300 room co -branded Courtyard/Towneplace Suites Hotel. SITE ADVANTAGES Proximity to entertainment/attraction, hospitality venues, access to airport and major highways. Beautiful site amenities including trees, topography, spring fed lake, city hike and bike trail. SITE CHALLENGES Current vegetation limits visibility, impacting effectiveness for destination retail. CURRENT DESIGNATION ON FUTURE LAND USE MAP CO Commercial PROPOSED CHANGES TO FUTURE LAND USE MAP Redesignated the future land uses to reflect mixed uses CURRENT ZONING CC Community Commercial PROPOSED ZONING Redesignated the appropriate areas to multi -family to accomodate mixed use Total Acreage: 49.92 CO - Commerical IN - Industrial GU - Governmental Use LC - Commerical Low Intensity I/C - Industrial/Commerical RA- Recreational/Amusement 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet RH - Residential High Intensity RL - Residential Low Intensity RM - Residential Medium Intensity Date: 11/9/16 1 *Acreage is approximate. LV t J'o -�; Ac - � n M Sz `OI �iIt Total Acreage: 49.92 c'S s 17.33 p 4cres NLegend Acreages are approximate, Date: 62016 DFW Airport Boundary Future Land Use 3.26 ®Development Study Area #4 CO -Commerical - s GU - Governmental Use • BASS PRO DR ATEWAYPLA\NIN x Developement Study Area #5 - Proposed Future Land Use STUDY AREA 5 OPTIMUM LAND USE tin order of preference) These three large parcels would be ideally viewed as a singular development, with integration of uses, and connectivity elements between sites. Ideal uses would include hospitality, additional corporate office, destination restaurant, entertainment/attraction, specialty retail, and residential component, only if part of a mixed use development with connectivity between all elements. Vertical gateway elements and strong pedestrian design along the perimeter of the sites will be critical to create that connectivity in terms of visual and function, EXPLANATION This location offers opportunity to cement Grapevine as a new corporate destination center in context of emerging national live -work -play worker and consumer preference. That mixed use potential will reinforce sustainable vibrant context for core retail/entertainment anchored by Grapevine Mills Mall. DESCRIPTION Three separate parcels of 20, 30 and 185 acres, located in northeast Grapevine. 30 acre site owned by Saddle Barnett Resources LLC and located adjacent to Grapevine Mills Mall with frontage on Grapevine Mills Parkway and North Grapevine Mills Boulevard. 20 acre site owned by Crow Billingsley with frontage on State Highway 121. 185 acres site principally owned by City of Grapevine, with current development of Kubota North America Headquarters, JLB Residential (454 units of multifamily), TST Impresso (office/manufacturing) and Mercedes Benz Regional Training and Distribution facility. Approximately 50 acres remain to be developed. SITE ADVANTAGES All sites have high visibility, are located within entertainment/attraction corridor. Have excellent access to airport and major highways. SITE CHALLENGES Large, deep sites most likely require internal access. Some access challenges from highway frontage. Creating a sense of cohesion and connection across Grapevine Mills Parkway and Grapevine Mills Boulevard will be challenging from site to site. CURRENT DESIGNATION ON FUTURE LAND USE MAP 20 & 30 acres - CO Commercial 185 acres - CO Commercial, IN Industrial PROPOSED CHANGES TO FUTURE LAND USE MAP None CURRENT ZONING 30 acres — HCO Hotel/Corporate Office 20 acres - CC Community Commercial 185 acres — CC Community Commercial, LI Light Industrial, R -MF Multifamily PROPOSED ZONING None i 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Legend Grapevine City Limits QDevelopment Study Area #5 K .V Future Land Use C/MU C/MU - Commercial/Mixed Use CB - Central Business CO - Commerical y ;1 rf I/C - Industrial/Commerical ' IN - Industrial R. LC - Commerical Low Intensity RA- Recreational/Amusement RH - Residential High Intensity RL - Residential Low Intensity RM - Residential Medium Intensity i 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Total Acreage: 186.14 Date: 11/9/16 1 *Acreage is approximate. Legend Grapevine City Limits QDevelopment Study Area #5 Future Land Use C/MU C/MU - Commercial/Mixed Use CB - Central Business CO - Commerical GU - Governmental Use rf I/C - Industrial/Commerical ' IN - Industrial r i LC - Commerical Low Intensity RA- Recreational/Amusement RH - Residential High Intensity RL - Residential Low Intensity RM - Residential Medium Intensity Total Acreage: 186.14 Date: 11/9/16 1 *Acreage is approximate. GU Ask A A K tt A' 30.54 M`jt AA Acres �� 4LLI V, Total Acreage: 186.14 fA Legend Acreages are approx"e. Date: $12018 Grapevine City Limits r Development Study Area #5 L., A Future Land Use Mco - commerical GU - Governmental Use IN - Industrial RH - Residential High Intensity gn 11111 EWAYPLANNING