Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 03, 27, 28, 29, 30 - Z18-01, CU18-02, PD18-01 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONOE- SCOTT FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2018 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION Z18-01, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU18-02, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD18-01, THE PRESERVE it Ii 1-7 t% - APPLICANT: Greystar GP II, LLC Grapevine Lake dove \ PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: I.H.1635 Northwest The subject property is addressed as 101 East Glade ods P�� Road and is proposed to be platted Lot 1, Block A, ;4011,,. Glade/360 Addition. The subject property comprises )1 low 20.4 acres and has approximately 367 feet of frontage along Glade Road and 1 ,240 feet of S DFW I Hall-Johnson ti�so Airport a frontage along the northbound State Highway 360 ° _ service road. Glade Rd. - I H c REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE, CONDITIONAL USE, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a zone change to rezone 14.34 acres from "LI" Light Industrial District and 6.07 acres from "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District to "R-MF" Multi-Family District for the development of a 399 unit multi-family project. The applicant is also seeking a conditional use permit to exceed the height regulations, vary from the parking requirements, and allow for a reduction in the front yard setback relative to the flexible design standards in the "R-MF" Multi-Family District. A planned development overlay is also being requested to deviate from but not be limited to the building separation requirements in the "R-MF" Multi-Family district. It is the applicant's intent to develop a 399 unit, gated, multi-family complex on approximately 20 acres beginning at the southwest corner of Glade Road and State O:/ZCU/Z18-01.4;CU18-02.4;PD18-01.4 1 February 14,2018(2:47PM) Highway 360 and continuing northward approximately 1 ,200 feet along the State Highway 360 service road. This project, consisting of 399 units (19.6 dwelling units/acre)will have two primary points of access—one at the easternmost edge of the property along Glade Road and a second point of access near the northernmost boundary of the site along the northbound State Highway 360 service road. This development will consist of 256, one bedroom units ranging from 705-1,020 net square feet in size; 102, two bedroom units ranging from 1 ,092-1,268 net square feet in size; and 20, three bedroom units 1 ,393 net square feet in size. Also as part of this project the applicant intends to develop 21 brownstone-style apartments that are three-stories in height and resemble a product similar to an attached townhome with attached garages and guest parking; these brownstone apartments will range from 1 ,310-1,747 square feet in size. The flexible design standards within the conditional use section of the "R-MF" Multi-Family District, allow through the conditional use process, consideration of height in excess of the two-story, 35 feet maximum as stated in the district, as well as a reduction in the required parking and reduction of the front yard setback. All of the structures in this project other than the clubhouse will be three stories and 39 feet in height. Total required parking for this project is 798 spaces; the applicant has conducted a parking study which recommends a ratio of 1.60 spaces/unit (639 total units). The applicant is providing 685 spaces in the form of 347 surface spaces, 100 carport spaces, 140 garages spaces, and 90 tandem spaces (behind garages). An additional eight spaces have been provided for people who wish to walk the on-site trail that do not live on the property. Relative to the reduced front yard setback, although the buildings are set back well beyond the minimum 40 foot requirement, the applicant has added driveway access and public parking along this portion of the frontage along East Glade Road. The "R-MF" Multi-Family District regulations require a minimum building separation of 50 feet for structures that are arranged face-to-face or back-to-back. The applicant is seeking a planned development overlay to slightly reduce this separation to 39 feet between buildings 4 and 8 and a separation of 46 feet between buildings 3 and 9 in order to provide a more efficient arrangement of the structures on the site relative to the existing topography. Two monument signs are proposed, one located near the Glade/State Highway 360 intersection and the other near the entrance to the property from State Highway 360. Both signs are 6' in height, 60 square feet in size. Usable recreational open space provided by the applicant in the form of hiking trails, nature preserve areas, a dog park, and pool area in in excess of 200,000 square feet - 99,750 square feet is required. Contained in your packet, along with the site specific exhibits, is an affidavit of compliance signed and sealed by the project architect stating the project is in compliance with the recently adopted Design Standards Manual for Multi-Family and Vertical Mixed Use Development. Specifically, this project is located within District 1 , State Highway O:/ZCU/Z18-01.4;CU18-02.4;PD18-01.4 2 February 15,2018(8:46AM) 360/Airport District. This district has ten, district specific standards which the affidavit and accompanying checklist demonstrate compliance along with the general standards required of all districts. Along with the affidavit and checklist is a set of exhibits that graphically demonstrate compliance with specific elements of the design standards. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District and "LI" Light Industrial District and is undeveloped. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject property was zoned "1-2" Heavy Industrial District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The property to the north was zoned "R-1" Single Family District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. At a February 3, 1997 meeting the Council approved a zone change (Z97-20) and a conditional use permit (CU97-73) on the subject site rezoning approximately 14.34 acres from "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District to "LI"for outside storage in conjunction with an office/warehouse development that never materialized. At the September 15, 2015 meeting the Council considered and denied a zoning change and a conditional use permit to rezone approximately 68 acres from "LI" Light Industrial District and "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District to "R-MF" Multi-Family District for a two-phase multi-family project on the subject site comprised of 714 total units. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District and D/FW International Airport—vacant undeveloped property and vacant undeveloped airport property SOUTH: City of Euless and D/FW International Airport EAST: D/FW International Airport—vacant undeveloped airport property WEST: State Highway 360 right-of-way AIRPORT IMPACT: A portion of the subject tract is not located within any of the noise zones as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map and an approximate equal portion of the tract is located within "Zone A" Zone of Minimal Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" Map. Few activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in "Zone A" except for sound sensitive activities such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. 0:/ZCU/Z18-01.4;CU18-02.4;PD18-01.4 3 February 15,2018(8.46AM) MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Commercial/Mixed Use land use. The applicant's proposal is not in compliance with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: The Thoroughfare Plan does not designate this portion of Glade Road east of State Highway as a thoroughfare. /rs O:/ZCU/Z18-01.4;CU18-02.4;PD18-01.4 4 February 15,2018(8:46AM) ♦, ♦* • • • 1,1 14 z.. Ta a 160 16. a m .O.eC • • 1 ■ • y• E • • f! oNGE,jyNE • 0 09-0 • Ta x,.] 0 •1C r. ,'�F* • 1 ,• Tax,.: •• 7]1 s, 3r 0•• ,� •♦ p `� •1 • -3-y-1"°`a • r `D '"• „ �. • • �� .v ,.e x 22 • OpK5' x m • e • v '.• wx. oIN 26 0 ;-,)a. .I 4 e- ,/ . • '\ ■ ■ m: 19_7: _ 3 .'■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ ■ 4 a • • • *♦ \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i■ - " u ;i ; ` •,1a.,..,r, , ,. 'ice L• 581 061,0.41 1.41 1 261ir1A1 14■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ;----- 66. > le .p ag3' . DTR a G9e . w, • a x. c ' m . ,. . n ao : ] mE'”' 42 F4 aEa 2 3' . a 2 ` 2 a z 12 a s, v . B 9 ' J ., n as s A ] C C 20 10 e 0 se e Z Z +� a m +' a e ] 2 o 6 7 2 9 10 11 12 11 14 1515 16 12 e as 97 „ 2 Op,K ' , . D -O' g B s e ] e . .e .. ,a 3Q a - 055 je : ,3 aa 32 0XSa a , „ a„ ' 0GN0 0 , Ze ,a petA ' G�RH �5y OgLIAM-1 h C.P. xVn-9p1B ' . a • Feet 0 250 500 750 1,000E• Z18-01 , C U 18-02, P D 18-01 T E ;" ` The Preserve w�E This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department Various official and unofficial sources were Date Prepared: 2/7/2018 used to gather this information.Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data,howeverno guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said date Kimley>>) Horn MEMORANDUM .�P�E 9F rF ��l To: Andrew Ord ••• ••• Greystar f�C• •••��• •9;s' 11� e * : * /\ From: Scot Johnson P.E., PTOE j.* * �� Jake Halter, EIT SCOT A. JOHNSON 0 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. / : Registered Firm F-928 I, ' 9 2 61 :=• ' ,�f• � I . CEN t:?. Date: February 12, 2018 `;�ON' E�4 ( �i8 Subject: The Preserve �, l Parking Demands in Comparable Multifamily Developments Introduction Greystar Residential is proposing to build The Preserve, a high-end multifamily development on the east side of State Highway 360 in Grapevine, Texas. This memorandum documents the two lines of inquiry which were investigated to support the proposed 1.60 spaces per unit parking rate: national research and local observations of parking occupancy at comparable sites. Careful sizing of parking areas to specific uses will prevent the waste of space and building materials that is caused by providing parking that is rarely if ever used. Excessive parking also has negative impacts on often-hidden issues like walkable design, storm water runoff, and urban heat island effects. Parking Research ITE publishes Parking Generation, a compendium of parking demand research at sites across the country. ITE provides more information on each base parking demand rate than do most other sources, although the number of observations is still limited. The ITE data do not contain any significant amount of mixed-use or TOD-influenced observations, but do track suburban and urban differences. Table 1 shows the average rates for some multifamily uses which are similar to the proposed site. Table 1 — ITE Parking Generation Observed Demand Use—ITE Classification Unit Average Parking Demand Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Suburban, Weekday Unit 1.23 Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Urban, Weekday Unit 1.20 Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Urban, Saturday Unit 1.03 kimley-horn.com 13455 Noel Road, Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75240 972 770 1300 Kimley>>> Horn Page 2 Local Observations To make empirical observations of actual parking usage, comparable multifamily sites were found in the City of Grapevine. Observations were accomplished at eight sites, as some potential sites could not be accessed for observations. The average occupancy of the sites was 95%, or typical for the market average. Parking occupancy observations were made overnight, at 10 PM or later. The exact number of occupied parking spaces and enclosed garages were counted during the observations. It should be noted that each enclosed garage is treated as an occupied parking space for the purposes of the occupancy study. Since some of the garage spaces are empty or used as storage, this means that the observed parking demand is artificially high. Many of the sites also had some trailers, boats, and other vehicle-related objects located in parking spaces, and these were counted as occupied spaces as well. Since all of the sites had ample unused parking spaces, these objects did not impede the normal parking operation of the sites. Attached to the end of this report is a parking data table listing the results of the data collection. The following tables show the details of each site and the observations: Table 2-Weekday Parking Demand at 6 Local Sites (7 Observations) Dwelling Observed Parking Demand Observed Observed Study Site Bedrooms (Including Enclosed Garages) Demand Demand Units Overnight Per Unit Per Bedroom Royal St.Moritz 336 528 467 1.39 0.88 Terrawood 291 401 400 1.37 1.00 Twenty-Four99 348 486 452 1.30 0.93 Marquis at Silver Oaks 480 732 703 1.46 0.96 Montelena(Tuesday 1/23) 256 400 323 1.26 0.81 Montelena(Wednesday 1/24) 256 400 330 1.29 0.83 Wildwood Creek 344 524 344 1.00 0.66 Weekday 6-Site Totals: 2311 3471 3019 1.31 0.87 Weekday 6-Site Averages: 330 496 431 Table 3 -Saturday Parking Demand at 7 Local Sites Dwelling Observed Parking Demand Observed Observed Study Site Bedrooms (Including Endosed Garages) Demand Demand Units Overnight Per Unit Per Bedroom Royal St. Moritz 336 528 448 1.33 0.85 Cross Creek 392 544 444 1.13 0.82 Terrawood 291 401 397 1.36 0.99 Twenty-Four99 348 486 443 1.27 0.91 Marquis at Silver Oaks 480 732 735 1.53 1.00 Montelena 256 400 290 1.13 0.73 Wildwood Creek 344 524 331 0.96 0.63 Saturday 7-Site Totals: 2447 3615 3088 Saturday 7-Site Averages: 350 516 441 1.26 0.85 kimley-horn.com 13455 Noel Road, Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75240 972 770 1300 Kimley>>> Horn Page 3 The weekday observed parking demand including garages across the six sites averaged 1.31 vehicles per unit with a range of 1.00 to 1.46 spaces per unit. The average number of vehicles per bedroom was calculated to be 0.87, ranging from 0.66 to 1.00. The Saturday observed parking demand including garages across the six sites averaged 1.26 vehicles per unit with a low observation of 0.96 and a high of 1.36. The Saturday average demand was observed to be 0.85 vehicles per bedroom, varying from 0.63 to 1.00. Four of the study sites included garages on the property. Residents often park in the "driveway" of their garages, which leads to double counting since the garage is counted as occupied, and the vehicle is counted again as being on the site. Since the "driveways" do not count as parking spaces, this results in an artificially high ratio of parked vehicle to units or bedrooms. Even with this assumption that enclosed garages skew the occupancy of the sites to be higher than reality, the highest observed parking rate was 1.53 vehicles per unit and 1.00 vehicles per bedroom, both of which are below the 1.60 spaces per unit and 1.13 spaces per bedroom that are proposed for the Preserve. Summary Observations of comparable local and suburban sites show that the effective parking demand of 1.31 occupied spaces per unit is slightly higher than ITE averages. This observed number is known to be somewhat high due to the assumption of garage spaces being occupied. A comparison of the national ITE rates, observed parking rates, and provided parking supply can be found in the summary table below: Table 4— Summary Table ITE Average Observed Preserve Suburban, Urban, Urban, Weekday Saturday Proposed Weekday Weekday Weekend Parking Demand per Unit 1.23 1.20 1.03 1.31 1.26 1.60 Parking Demand per Bedroom - - - 0.87 0.85 1.13 The proposed supply of 1.60 spaces per unit for the Preserve will provide the right balance of available parking while preserving the nature oriented design of the site. END Attached: Parking Count Data Summary Table kimley-horn.com 13455 Noel Road, Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75240 972 770 1300 Observed Observed Tuesday Wednesday Saturday Apartment Complex No.of Dwelling Units Parking Demand Parking Demand 1/23/2018 1/24/2018 1/27/2018 per Dwelling Unit per Bedroom Vehicles+ Vehicles+ Vehicles+ Garages Counted Garages Counted Garages Counted 58 Efficiency 208 One Bedroom Colonial Village 117 Two Bedroom 251 286 253 67 Three Bedroom 0.64 0.41 450 Total D.U. Outlier-Count not Outlier-Count not Outlier-Count not 2300 Grayson Drive 701 Total Bedrooms included included included N/A Efficiency N/A One Bedroom Grayson Square N/A Two Bedroom 332 361 326 N/A Three Bedroom N/A N/A N/A Total D.U. No Room Data-Data No Room Data-Data No Room Data-Data 2100 Grayson Drive N/A Total Bedrooms not included not included not included 0 Efficiency 152 One Bedroom Royal St. Moritz 176 Two Bedroom N/A 8 Three Bedroom 1.39 0.88 467 448 336 Total D.U. Unable to enter 2050 Grayson Drive 528 Total Bedrooms complex Gate 0 Efficiency 240 One Bedroom Cross Creek 152 Two Bedroom N/A N/A 0 Three Bedroom 113 0.82 444 392 Total D.U. Could not count North Could not count North 2701 Grapevine Mills Blvd N 544 Total Bedrooms half of property-Gated half of property-Gated 0 Efficiency 193 One Bedroom Terrawood 86 Two Bedroom N/A 12 Three Bedroom 1.37 1.00 400 397 291 Total D.U. Unable to enter 3225 Grapevine Mills Blvd N 401 Total Bedrooms complex Gate 0 Efficiency 222 One Bedroom Twenty-Four 99 114 Two Bedroom N/A 12 Three Bedroom 1 30 0.93 452 443 348 Total D.U. Unable to enter 3601 Grapevine Mills Parkway 486 Total Bedrooms complex Gate 0 Efficiency 264 One Bedroom Marquis at Silver Oaks 180 Two Bedroom N/A 36 Three Bedroom 1.53 1.00 703 735 480 Total D.U. Unable to enter 3701 Grapevine Mills Parkway 732 Total Bedrooms complex Gate 0 Efficiency 128 One Bedroom Montelena 112 Two Bedroom 16 Three Bedroom 1.29 0.83 323 330 290 256 Total D.U. 501 Turner Road 400 Total Bedrooms 0 Efficiency 188 One Bedroom Wildwood Creek 132 Two Bedroom N/A 24 Three Bedroom 0.81 0.53 277 259 344 Total D.U. Unable to enter 820 E Dove Loop Road 524 Total Bedrooms complex Gate • SILVER TREE PARTNERS January 2, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Mayor, Members of City Council, and P&Z Commissioners, Silver Tree Partners and Greystar respectfully request your approval of 20 acres to be rezoned for The Preserve, a MF Class A Development comprising of Brownstones, Resort Flats, and Lodge Flats. The current zoning of Industrial and PCD are impractical because of size, shape and topography. Yet, these features work extremely well with our proposed development. The Preserve meets Grapevine's new MF Design Guidelines and mirrors a Lodge Style Development with its exterior facades, curvature streets and plentiful landscaping. Amenities include a mile walking trail, 24-hour fitness center, large dog park facility, business center with computers, conference room with audio/visual capability, and resort style pool with cabanas. There is no site better suited for this type of development within the City of Grapevine. By incorporating the natural topography of the property, this development avoids any resemblance to cookie-cutter developments of the past. Buffered by SH360 to the west and over 350 acres of DFW Airport land east and south, it truly is surrounded by a preserve. We have worked with your Planning and Parks Departments, ArchiTexas and many other engineers and consultants for over three years to ensure the Preserve fulfills the needs of the residents while still protecting Grapevine's high quality standards. We believe with your approval the Preserve will be a community the City of Grapevine uses as a template for future multifamily housing. Sincerely, lialf%111411- I 10 • Paul Gardner, • ew Ord, D 1 1 g Silver Tree Partners Greystar n JAN 02 29:3 By 17101 Preston Road Suite Ioo Dallas, Texas 75248 tel (972) 669-9955 fax(972) 669-9977 www.silvertreepartners.corn fNo 1 GREYSTAR® January 9, 2018 Development Services—Planning Division 200 S. Main St Grapevine,Texas 76051 RE: "The Preserve"Planned Development Overlay Application Letter. To whom it may concern: "The Preserve" is a 399 unit 3-story apartment community, comprised of resort and lodge-style architecturally themed buildings. Most of the buildings have "tuck-under" internal garages and the remainder are surfaced parked with carports. The Preserve mirrors a lodge-style development with its exterior facades, curvilinear designed streets and plentiful landscaping which have all been designed to adhere to the newly approved "Design Standards Manual for Multifamily and Vertical Mixed-use Development"(The Guidelines). Exterior amenities that complement the natural landscape include an extensive hike and bike trail/sidewalk with fitness stations intermixed, outdoor kitchen/BBQ pavilions, dog park and dog wash facility and resort style pool, to name a few. Interior amenities include, but are not limited to, 24-hour fitness facility, 24 hr. digital package concierge, business center with computers and conferencing and spacious club and gaming room. As a part of the requested Planned Development Overlay Application process, we are requesting that the"face to face"distance between 3 sets of buildings be less than 50'. As mentioned above,our site plan is required to have a "non-orthogonal" design which caters to a more curvilinear site plan design of winding roads and asymmetric building orientation. For this reason, it has forced our buildings into diagonal configurations that satisfy this requirement but unfortunately makes it extremely difficult to comply with the 50' rule. There are essentially 3 places where the buildings are less than 50' —one is 46.7' (Bldgs. 3 & 9), the 2"d is 32.5' (Bldg. 2 and single-story Clubhouse) and the 3rd instance shows a min. separation of 39' (Bldgs. 4 & 8) but an average of closer to 44'. We feel that the "non-orthogonal" relationship of the building layout is an important design principle that adds value to the enjoyment of the development and is more important than the buildings proximity to one another in these minor cases. Thank you, GREYS 'AR ' H,LLC a Dela are limi -d li �; company By: /;lit , II Name: IMP ANID2E1A1 O( - Title: Vtce- pae-stpt--tt- JAN 31 2-filF3 1 19487790v.2 _ ......._____,7,- _,N......_ z Ia.° 1 _GRAPE l [NE. :,,,t;- '' CITY OFGR.APEVINE ° ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION PART 1.APPUCAP T INFORMATION - — — Applicant Name: Greystar GP II,LLC do Andrew Ord Applicant Address: 1600 E Las Colinas Blvd City/State/Zip Irving,Texas 75039 -`-.------------------- Phone No. X469 51:MO vi la . U L • atq l Fax No. 843.302.0214 Email Address 1 ' Mobile Phone 858.846.8521 i Applicant's interest in subject property(Purchaser PART 2.PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property (n/a --- Legal Description: LotF---- Block I"' Addition[Glade/360 Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet Size of subject property: acres(r/-20.32 square footage 14-./.-885,357 _ -- r Present zoning classification ILI Light Industrial District Requested zoning district 1R-MF-2 Multifamily District Present use of property l\-/-acant Proposed use of property Multifamily Development The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that `R ;or Multifamily District would allow the proposed use is ` Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning 12 acres. Sec.22.F.0 PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner [(multiple owners,see attached) - Prop Owner Address I.__.� -_ ---------------- - -- - --- - - llffOffil -- - N- C — City/State/Zip II - ------------ - JAN p2 2C13 Phone No. Fax Fax No. I - --- By -GRAPFNIN ,1 CITY OFGRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION PART 1.APPLICAM INEORMATIOht --_---------- Applicant Name Applicant Address: l City/State/Zip Phone No r j Fax No Email Address Mobile Phone 1- Applicants interest in subject property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property Legal Description: Lot Block I Addition Legal description of subject property (metes& bounds must be described on 8 1/2" x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres' square footage Present zoning classification) Requested zoning district Present use of property Proposed use of property The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner 'The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West c/o Paui A.Gardner E Earl Prop Owner Address 17101 Preston Road,Suite 100 JAN 0 2 2ai City/State/Zip (Dallas,TX 75248 Phone No 972.669.9955 Fax No 1972.669.9977 ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the descretion of the staff Based on the size of the agenda,your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry Public hearings may be continued t hekLp/c hearing Public hearings will not be tabled O Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ t have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature The State of County of Before me (notary) ! on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me(or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of[ , A.D Notary In and For State of The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West c/o Paul A.Gardner 1-32;14,/a// Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature The State of Texas County of kAAts Before me (notary) L40a-c- 0/l kii t,' on this day personally appeared (applicant)[Paul A.Gardner known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this[ 15-1-k day ofIj�Q� a�'� , A.D. 2418 a or-1 ••0` LYNELL R.MANNING My Notary ID#124988264 I ,��+" Expires July 14,2020 — T Notary In and For State of 'Texas 1MMMM JAN 0 L 2.013 By ACKNOWLEDGEMENT \%-O All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West c/o Paul A. Gardner Signature of Property OwnerF57--- emla /_ Date /Z _15-_ ,20/7 5rmm 'om\] 1 JAN O 2 2 3 By ______,----r-, __---. ___ Z. li?• 0 I GRAPFVINF �� I S ' CITY OFGRAPEVINE 1:72i,--A,,= ��i ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION PART 1.APPLICA{ I1NFQRMATION Applicant Name: Applicant Address: ---- City/State/Zip Phone No. Fax No. Email Address ' Mobile Phone 1 Applicant's interest in subject property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property I Legal Description: Lot Block Addition Legal description of subject property (metes& bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11" sheet Size of subject property: acres[ — square footage I Present zoning classification' Requested zoning district Present use of property Proposed use of property The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning f PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION M E p E Property Owner [KFF,Limited Partnership do Kathy C.Blackstone,Treasurer fl JAN 0 2 2013 Prop Owner Address 1366 Dublin Road By City/State/Zip 'Columbus,Ohio 43215 Phone No. 1614.351.6227 Fax No 614.274.6794 ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when fled and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the tion o e st Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continu o the hearing Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process ❑ /have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature The State of County of Before me (notary) on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office thisr, day of , A D.47- Notary In and For State of fKFF.Limited Partnership do Kathy C.Blackstone,Treasurer J Print Property Owner's Name Property per's Signature The State of oo271i C� County of i >2y 4Lj N (notary)Before me nota hige ,yb/,�X�� D on this day personally appeared (applicant) ne) •Gl 34k 1-�J known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office thisf W day of.ji'ff/y/yQr , A.D. 1213-1-8-a d i s *ereAy(---J4' ki, J OF 9A — Rebecca Hendrix Blackstone Notary In and For State of 10M *t -----:,,. *i Notary Public,State of Ohio . : My Commission Expires 11-13.2020 2 M M [1 " 0\1, T °F4" hju JAN 0 2 2)13 By ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ''"Z‘% 1•0 ( All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant DateI - - -- ---- ----- --------- -- ------- KFF, Limited Partnership do Kathy C. Blackstone, Treasurer Signature of Property Owner /1J Date f f a/dk//2 [JdTITIMUI JAN 0 2 2013 By ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at t - .: cre' of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda,your application may be scheduled to a later date. O All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be contin . r hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4.SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUE • ' PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IGreystar GP II,LLC do Andrew Ord1�P 4. Print Applicant's Name • :nill' 'Signature The State of (Texas County of I --0:0\JUl-Ott Before me(notary)I W on this day personally appeared (applicant) (Andrew Ord known to me (or proved to me on t e oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 14 day of per .i r , A.D. 12014 WENDY COKER W‘°LjA-Lt a()16LAL °' Notary Public,State of Texas My Commission Expires January 27, 2019 Notary In and For State of (Texas ((multiple owners,see attached) Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature The State of County of I Before me (notary) on this day personally appeared (applicant)I known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office thisl day oft , A.D. Notary In and For State of EIMIEITT till JAN 042013 By ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 'g'O t All Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Gr: star G" II, 11./o Andrew Ord Signature of Applicant / Date k2/ 146P Signature of Property Owner (multiple owners,see attached) Date ))1 (2109`if; JAN 0 2 2 By :.___, ,..,-----) .--\___, --, z riktil CRi\PITV `w I' 1., ,,,:!.,A, r CITY OFGRAPEVINE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION PART 1.APPLICANT INFORMATION- — ,— Applicant Name: Applicant Address. I City/State/Zip —-- — — _ — - Phone No I Fax No. F Email Address r Mobile Phone I Applicant's interest in subject property PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street Address of subject property f Legal Description: Lot Block 1 Addition i W Legal description of subject property (metes& bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet Size of subject property: acres[ square footage f Present zoning classification; Requested zoning district E Present use of property — Proposed use of property I — The applicant understands the master plan designation and the most restrictive zone that would allow the proposed use is Minimum/Maximum District size for requested zoning PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner !Grapevine Holdings,L.P.do Paul A.Gardner D IEM IE MER Prop Owner Address 117101 Preston Road,Suite 100 11 ------A, u City/State/Zip (Dallas,Texas 75248 By Phone No. 1972.669.9955 Fax No. 1972.669.9977 ❑ All Zone Chage Requests are assumed to be completed when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the descretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date • All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry Public hearings may be contin to • : hearing Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND PLACE A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicants Name Applicants Signature ---._-.--------- The State of [ County of Before me (notary)( ry) on this day personally appeared (applicant) known to me(or proved to me on the oath of card or other document)to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this[ day of , A D [_ Notary In and For State of Grapevine Holdings, L.P.do Paul A.Gardner FY244.,&//td-W*-fillanagefe-7 Print Property Owner's Name Property Owner's Signature The State of 'Texas County of ; Vri w49-S Before me(notary) [ Ly0C-- 11A4114,11-1, on this day personally appeared (applicant) Paul A.Gardner known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 1 5 day of[ OCCCM.1W-- , A.D. 12018 d 01-7 •••;-171%"(!-. LYNELL R.MANNING — — — — 1•: -1� i* My Notary ID#124988264 ;'' 1(k_444/1RA;'-(-3 Expires July 14,2020 ' Notary In and For State of Texas --11p (2T JAN 0 2 2Q13 By ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Z a.0( Al! Zone Change Request are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a concept plan approved with a zone change request can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for zone change request and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date Grapevine Holdings, L.P. clo Paul A. Gardner Signature of Property OwneC7;44/WAr4iliktA Date 12—/,51 /Z0/ 7 qt1 JAN 02 l 3 By PRAiVIN• . • T 1 ttZ A S CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/contact Greystar GP II, LLC c/o Andrew Ord Street address of applicant/agent 600 E. Las Colinas Blvd City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: Irving, Texas 75039 Telephone number of applicant/agent: Fax number of applicant/agent 972.444.2197 843.302.0214 Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent 858.864.8521 PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property n/a Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on B 112"x 11"sheet) Lot 1 Block A Addition Glade/360 Size of subject property +/- 20.325 Acres +1- 885,357 square footage Present zoning classification: j Proposed use of the property: T._ L1 /PCD Multifamily Development Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum/maximum district size for conditional use request 2 acres. Sec. 22.F.2 Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: Sec. 22.1.1 (CUP to allow maximum 3 stories not to exceed 44 feet in height). Sec. 56.1 (Parking Reiv►row PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Recrii Lt rzt-}fit Name of current property owner: o (multiple owners, see attached) Street address of property owner City/State/Zip Code of property owner.- — Telephone number of property owner Fax number of property owner: a � JAN 0 2 '10lg By cutS-o a CRAP VINE +'T .E; T A S"6' CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent -- -..------------------------ City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent Telephone number of applicant/agent Fax number of applicant/agent Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property.- Circle roperty.Circle yes or no,if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum/maximum district size for conditional use request- - -------- ---- ----------- --- Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West c/o Paul A. Gardner Street address of property owner.- 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 City/State/Zip Code of property owner: Dallas, TX 75248 Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property ow nil re 11 xi 972.669.9955 972.669.99 111 JAN 0 2 20\3 By cuLO .GRAPEVF . T E tr A Cw, CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent: City-/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: Telephone number of applicant/agent' Fax number of applicant/agent Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: ; Proposed use of the property: — ---------------------- ---Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum/maximum district size for conditional use request: Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: Grapevine Holdings, L.P. do Paul A. Gardner ------------ --- ____--- ------_-_..-------- Street address of property owner: 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 City/State/Zip Code of property owner. Dallas, Texas 75248 Telephone number of property owner: Fax number of property owner. M El 972.669.9955 972.669.9977lulu] u JAN 0 2 Z013 By ,GAPVINE. 'T F: `41 ,1 S �. 4'' CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent: City]State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: Telephone number of applicant/agent: Fax number of applicant/agent Email address of applicant/agent i Mobile phone number of applicant/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11'sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: l Proposed use of the property: Circle yes or no,if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum/maximum district size for conditional use request Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: KFF, Limited Partnership do Kathy C. Blackstone, Treasurer Street address of property owner 1366 Dublin Road City/State/Zip Code of property owner Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone number of property owner: Fax number of property owner. 614.351.6227 614.274.6794 D 1 JAN 022013 By Cu ?-ala ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations(example:buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood ❑ Application of site plan approval(Section 47, see attached Form "B"). ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major)approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL US Q 0 ST AN II • ACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Greystar GP II, LLC c/o Andrew Ord . I Print Applicant's Name: Ap. ' t' .• ture: The State of(`�T,e�xas� County Of DOL110 Before Me 1��Je dai 0_, on this day personally appeared Andrew Ord (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and considerationrathereinreinexpressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 14 day of I���XA T th►V'." , A.D. 201$1 WENDY COKER OD/IQ/IL Notary Public,State of Texas • My Commission Expires .k*s$ January 27, 2019 Notary In And For State Texas (multiple owners. see attached) Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of ,A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas REMEIV 1 T1 JAN 0 2 2013 By aULgo 'ID ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations(example:buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ in the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Application of site plan approval(Section 47, see attached Form 13") ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. U All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled ❑ Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major)approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process O /have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this_ day of , A.D Notary In And For State Of Texas The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West c/o Paul A. Gardner &f hr14,ek4 -4414,44•ae Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of Texas County Of P Before Me LV NaL- i. (IAA-NT-11Q on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner (notary) (property owner) known to me(or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office th•is I day of D-C-6-014713Q4.- A.D. • cic. `4 : LYNELL R.MANNING /V vi jN My Notary ID#124988264 Not n And For State Of Texas';f, ;•E'"/ Expires July 14,2020 1 'E [ [ n rip 11 p u Wf JAN 0 2 201r� By C1LtO a ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document O In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations(example:buffer yards, distance between users) ❑ In the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Application of site plan approval(Section 47, see attached Form "B"), J The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47. Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing Public hearings will not be tabled ❑ Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major)approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature; The State of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this day of , A.D. Notary in And For State Of Texas Grapevine Holdings, L.P. do Paul A. Gardner ' 41'1, f/ --M4'1(4444 Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: ' ` The State Of Texas County Of (itr1� Before Me i-)li- KA-01-11.I-6 _on this day personally appeared Paul A. Gardner (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this 15 day of Y (iOBE rz-- ,A.D. 2018 d-0r ..o; " LYNELL R.MANNING 1_. ►v�^�My Notary ID#124988264 Notary I rid For State Of Texas 'T /\*" Expires July 14,2020 {' JAN 0 2 1013 U By C tit t?..0 a ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ❑ In the same letter,describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations(example:buffer yards distance between users) ❑ In the same letter,describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood ❑ Application of site plan approval(Section 47, see attached Form"B") O The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. _ ❑ All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. U All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major)approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ /have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this day of ,A.D Notary In And For State Of Texas 1 KFF, Limited Partnership do Kathy C. Blackstone j'r/ C__- Print Property Owners Name: Property ner's Signature: The State Of div / County Of 1✓:,/_nL ,✓,, Before Me/4247t-e->)a . 2)6r l 13)1%641AL on this day personally appeared Y1:25(/{/) (. /i�- (notary) / (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. 7(Sea! Given under myhand and seal of office this'�(�(r N'1 dayo / `2.17) , A.D. ite'� IALMp'1 --- �Fi� / / • iO4 i / �// � $F�Sy, 4 ry In And Fo - ate Of Tex-as' i? 9�_ /D Rebecca Hendrix$.ck.s�orse Irl U * "" - �►�•� *: Notary Pubic,Stale d Ohio I _ i`,. :'; = My Commission Expires 11-13-2020 i`E� JAN 0 l 3 �u tP.`: • -,t`:• •OS 1 B �► . ,+ +, `-.onO F N•N•• Y I IS I -0 VINE, r EWA S CITY OF GRAPEVINE / PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent:/company/contact res'kc r GP I1 , o Andreq Orel Street addres3'of applicant/agent (no E Los Cotik4s SIVA. City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: I rVik k ( Te)vis 15036'1 Telephone nurraier of applicant/agent Fax number of applicant/agent: ci12 . 444 . 2491 X13. 3 Dz .c z 14 Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent 335 . SIo4 . 8S2 t � V Applicant's interest in subject property: Wrckl5er PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property 014 Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot I Block A Addition la4e ( 31#D Size of subject property +/- 2.0.32. Acres / &>) 353Square footage Present zoning classification. Proposed use of the pry (opert (� L I L l tN4u tiDI G t t4 fti TQ WI �I Lt1�VG IDt,✓InG , � Minim urn/maximum district size for request: 2- acre eZ 2 F_ C Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: 13v\14 rev'rc w(e v,} o f SO' Li ce -fb Fe.cr' Sac k b Stic k) PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: M ULT1 PLE oWN EQS SSE 1\0111tIe Street address of property owner: City/State/Zip Code of property owner Telephone number of property owner Fax number of property owner 0:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc MI/ VI " 2 2/14/2017 JAN 31 2018 By r Pieply- 6 . , 1 CITY OF GRAPEVINE \ j PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent: City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: Telephone number of applicant/agent Fax number of applicant/agent Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent Applicant's interest in subject property. PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11'sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: Minimum/maximum district size for request: Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner The Ciardne r 30O PAeTkte12-&fiiP- '4est c,/ Paul A. Gard ne r Street address of property owner 11 WI Preston R-oaci Su e lo City/State/Zip Code of property owner Balks TX 1SZ.�o Telephone number of property owner: Fax number of property owner: 1?2. 1061 . 619 55 912 L9179.9911 MIMIHdC� 0:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc JAN 31 zois 2 2/14/2017 BY p(Ste...0 ' INE I A S`4' CITY OF GRAPEVINE • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: Telephone number of applicant/agent: Fax number of applicant/agent: Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent Applicant's interest in subject property. PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: Minimum/maximum district size for request: Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: eirCipevihe f-1)14i10As 1 L-• P. c/o Pau( A . C,arc(her- Street address of property owner: 11101 Frestvvi 1206 Sui4e loo City/State/Zip Code of property owner pgllas TX —15240 Telephone number of property owner. Fax number of property owner: �i1 Z.la le`j . 1955 172. La lay) . 9911 O:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc r2 2/14/2017 AN 31 ?i'ig By ?I. 0 I nT ' 4 5 CITY OF GRAPEVINE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY APPLICATION PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/agent/company/contact Street address of applicant/agent: City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent: Telephone number of applicant/agent: Fax number of applicant/agent: Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent Applicant's interest in subject property: PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property Legal description of subject property(metes&bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot Block Addition Size of subject property Acres Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: Minimum/maximum district size for request. Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from: PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner: ILfF Pq'+viersiAi'r c/..) ILa i314c1.s-1-vve Tre6S1 rc.r. Street address of property owner 131�to Dubh& Qoc► City/State/Zip Code of property owner Cplu1,1461 S OLD 4 3 215 Telephone number of property owner Fax number of property owner: 6214 . 351 . to221- la l 4 . 214 . 094 r1 " . M\ O:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc 2 2/14/2017 igNc ,.:\93 By I • Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. • Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. • Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ❑ Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE S JEC PRO• ' Y Gr s+Gr CSP tt ,uc c/o Aictrets Orci (III Print App'ant's Name: Applica ' S',.•to •. 91110 The State Of Tels.a r9 County Of 1,110114-$ Before MeUAL\W kvf, on this day personally appeared ANL(a") Ia (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the pu oses and cons ration therein expressed. �►y�r��f (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this t V day of . A.D. / "1 WENpY G@KIR ---- °` `,-,? Notary Pubfic:,519I_A(ie►g§ r� My Comm ti n i.pif@A +�,•• January 2�, g919 Notary In And For State xas Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal)Given under my hand and seal of office this day of .A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas gMtIVE O:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc D 3 2/14/2017 JAN 31 ZOIS ISL ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. • Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. ❑ Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. • Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. O The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. U Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ /have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of . A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas GrQpevivle hold s L•P. o Pau( A• G;creirer Print Property Owners Namel? Property Owner's Signature: The State Of ^\G-�CS County Of G1Iks Before Me Ly New e-. rvvivwfw, on this day personally appeared PR v l A- �aro N e►- (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. c2 (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 181' day of J'V ELA A9-07 ,A.D. I o • ..y P.,•' 1 LYNELL R.MANNING c Ilk j� .*E My Notary ID#124988264 Caryl nd For State Of Texas�L�^J�2 %II?. r Expires July 14,2020 O:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.docD IE I T 3 2/14/2017 IJAMN By 1 , t _O I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant . 41d/i / i/ Date: 1 ' / — R°/,e �rafevitie tivtAiiisi L.f). dIo Paul A. C-�cccli^- r Signature of Owner Date: 1Mf O ] CE JAN v 1 ZO iS o\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd doc 4 2/14/2017 By i *d' 0 I ❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. ❑ Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. ❑ Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ❑ The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. ❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. • All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. i Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major)approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. ❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of . A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas eihe Gaccirtelr 3171) tAiLc Par erski - tr,fcst c/o Pay) A• C-xre{v►er / Print Property Owners Name: Property Owner's Signature: The State Of;�n'TY r ' ,� County Of IJ/,1"15-1w'r 1 S A l I ` ' p Before Me L)I U (,�2-• I APSIJ 1I\A on this day personally appeared Pq A (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposesur � and considerationr ' therein expressed. �1 'l �j (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this 1 U " ` day of cJ1tJu1`t"I> . A D v"v I a ,PY'''�,* LYNELL R.MANNING• / _• 4—*. My Notary ID#124988264 Ita I And For State Of Texa %rF;F ,`' Expires July 14,2020 �,r � O:\ZCU\1 Forms\app pd doc `Zi;�� 3 2/14/2017 ,\PM v ev ICS 4"0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant 41 . I- Date: It I I IS Signature of Owner CkU\kh'fil-4- ouv'er s ( �cl-c ci ) Date: p1MI qFT\ O:\ZCU11 Forms\app.pd.doc JAN c Lrc;` 4 2/14/2017 J By 0 I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant do/nid, Date: / --/d 114e C,Gccitne'r 319D 4LC NrivIersiAir - West c to PGvi A • (rclvi€r Signature of Owner Date: 0\ZCU\1 Forms\a d.doc j��� ��,9 PpP 4 2/14/2017 By i: IN F.... 0 1 J Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document. J Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations. D Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. J Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. J The site plan submission shall meet the requirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements. J All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. • Any changes to a site plan(no matter how minor or major)approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. • I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Print Applicant's Name: Applicant's Signature: The State Of County Of Before Me on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of . A.D. Notary In And For State Of Texas vfc L:)froi}tcj Par-hier9k;� c(0 1l-G'% C . '('2CVS-kovie 'Trecsurer K/ , ' ►� c (� Print Property Owners Name: Property owner's Signature: �}, 'N.• The State Of Ott ,� / County Of_4206 //1/ Before Mee ejIJt//�i/LPV (L 0.A. 2 on this day personally appeared ,eaj 1 e_474,210 (notary) j (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration� therein expressed. _ n (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this C�(/it day of l�j TSL,f i$?"(1 , A.D.�{//i 1-' Not ry In And For State Of�exas Rebecca Hendrix Blackstone Oily d _ - V = My Conunission Expires 11-132020 ? / E 1 U t s AN ; \ii By pci ?- o ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: V--FF i L-i kcl Partr%er ( v ThL C . 1/kcI1st° Irccsurz r. Signature of Owner �t � Date: 7/a Y-1/ 8 Gt V O:\ZCU\1 Forms\app.pd.doc , 4 2/14/2017 By Pco 1 PLATTING VERIFICATION This verification statement must be signed prior To the submittal of this planned development overlay application It has been determined that the property described below does require platting or replatting and the applicant has been instructed on this procedure. It has been determined that the property described below is currently platted or does not require platting or replatting at this time. Address of subject property Legal description of subject property Public Works Department Date This form must be signed by the public works department and submitted along with a completed application to the planning and zoning department to !I JAN 0:2M1 Forms\app.pd.doc a ` I a,$ 6 2/14/2017 a • • 3A 1. SILVER TREE PARTNERS January 31, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Mayor, Members of City Council, and P&Z Commissioners, The Exhibit attached to this letter outlines our proposal as to the Extension, Construction, and Regional Connectivity of the Grapevine Trail System. Trail Portion A - Will be installed simultaneously with The Preserve development, which will commence approximately 90 days after Council approval. Trail Portion B - Will be installed upon Council approval and development on that tract of land. Trail Portion C - Will be installed upon Council approval of development, which request is coming before the City within the next 2-3 months. Trail Portion D — This Bear Creek Park Trail extension has full support of the Grapevine Parks and Recreation Department. The landowners of Tracts A and B agree to provide $200,000 and the landowner of Tract C agrees to provide $50,000 to the City of Grapevine for construction of this portion of the Trail. Hope the details above help explain the Exhibit attached to this letter. As always, we are happy to answer any questions you may have concerning this proposal. Sincerely, Paul A. Gardner Terry Castleberry nn Landowner Tracts A and B Landowner Tract C T U B Y M JAN 31 2018 By 17101 Preston Road Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75248 tel (972) 669-9955 fax(972) 669-9977 www.silvertreepartners.com Proposed Grapevine Trail Extension Exhibit 04 lit , A 4,.- -t N :tet L C • a� ' Public Trail Addition 11 ÷. • ar Crook 411 • > Trail . B === - 360 TEXAS i R.. 9 • 4 Hug a /id � * , A 5 V - 1 4s W.Glade Rd. -` _' NIMMT5T JAN 31 2018 By \ ZtOt c utt.° a LEGAL DESCRIPTION (ZONING TRACT) Being a parcel of land located in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas a part of the Green W. Minter Survey, Abstract Number 1083, and being all of that called 14.324 acre tract of land described in deed to KFF Limited Partnership, an Ohio limited partnership as recorded in Volume 14006, Page 43, Tarrant County Deed Records, and also being a part of that called 23.918 tract of land described in deed to The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership-West as recorded in Volume 15348, Page 75, Tarrant County Deed Records, and being further described as follows: BEGINNING at a highway monument with an aluminum disc found at southwest corner of said 14.324 acre tract, said point also being at the intersection of the north right-of-way of Glade Road(a variable width right-of-way) with the east right-of-way of State Highway 360 (a variable width right-of-way); THENCE along the east right-of-way line of State Highway 360 as follows: North 29 degrees 23 minutes 17 seconds West, 193.24 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 27 degrees 58 minutes 48 seconds West, 195.10 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 31 degrees 03 minutes 10 seconds West, 99.30 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 41 degrees 19 minutes 29 seconds West, 104.66 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; Northwesterly, 399.12 feet along a curve to the right having a central angle of 06 degrees 02 minutes 03 seconds, a radius of 3789.72 feet, a tangent of 199.74 feet, and whose chord bears North 28 degrees 10 minutes 40 seconds West, 398.93 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 25 degrees 24 minutes 31 seconds West, 26.27 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 02 degrees 57 minutes 29 seconds East, 52.70 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 24 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds West, 21.60 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner, said point being the northwest corner of said 14.324 acre tract, said point also being the southwest corner of that said 23.918 acre tract; North 25 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds West, 40.30 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; North 81 degrees 25 minutes 40 seconds West, 30.15 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for corner; [i-iilEMT0591 --' JAN 0 2 2018 1 By Z12-01 CCtlit-OQ North 25 degrees 10 minutes 36 seconds West, 77.41 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner; THENCE North 64 degrees 49 minutes 24 seconds East, 346.30 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner; THENCE North 25 degrees 10 minutes 36 seconds West, 99.74 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "JBI" set for corner; THENCE North 18 degrees 59 minutes 34 seconds East, 5.93 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 31 minutes 47 seconds East, 449.09 feet to a point for corner in the east line of said 23.918 acre tract, said point being the west line of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, said point also being in the centerline of Bear Creek; THENCE along the center line of Bear Creek and the east line of said 23.918 acre tract and the west line of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport as follows: South 48 degrees 50 minutes 35 seconds East, 38.58 feet to a point for corner; South 79 degrees 25 minutes 45 seconds East, 205.58 feet to a point for corner; THENCE continuing along the east line of said 23.918 acre tract and the west line of Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport as follows: South 01 degrees 20 minutes 13 second West, 30.64 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner; South 01 degrees 06 minutes 45 seconds East, 239.36 feet to a five-eighths inch iron rod found at the southeast corner of said 23.918 acre tract, said point also being the northeast corner of said 14.324 acre tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 00 minutes 54 seconds East, 993.83 feet along the west line of the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport to a monument with brass disc found for corner, said point being the southeast corner of said 14.324 acre tract, said point also being in the north right- of-way line of Glade Road; THENCE along the north right-of-way line of Glade Road as follows: West, 234.43 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped"JBI" set for corner; North 79 degrees 23 minutes 48 seconds West, 132.59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 888,946 square feet or 20.407 acres of land. n„ O JAN 0 2n13 ay Z k $4.0 CLAt?-0 2 "This document was prepared under 22 TAC 663.23, does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey,and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivision for which it was prepared." pIE [E0 JAN 0 2 2013 ._ 21, By C Via Electronic Mail Rons@grapevinetexas.gov Mr.Ron Stombaugh 200 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 RE: Zoning Change Application for Property at the northeast corner of Glade Road and SH 121,Applicant: Greystar GP II, LLC Dear Ron; Thank you for your assistance with our zoning application referenced above. Pursuant to your previous conversations with Greystar, we are forwarding this letter to confirm the status of the proposed development's compliance with the City's Design Standards. Accompanying this letter is our completed District-Specific Design Standards checklist. CAs you will see from reviewing the accompanying checklist,we are pleased to confirm that we are either in virtually total compliance with the Design Standards, in almost all cases to the letter, or, in a few instances, in compliance with the spirit of the Design Standards. Of course, we are at the beginning of the zoning and entitlement phase, and as is normal during any development process, allowances must be made for reasonable modifications as the design is further developed in detail. In any such event, it is our intention to remain in compliance with the spirit and intent of the Design Standards at all times. Thank you very much for your consideration of the accompanying checklist. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with City Staff as we go through this process. ,,; -14‘ p Since•- y yours3 - 5 % '',',I't. 1 ' „ , n',\ s aJ f. "- �. .- c';'-'f4:-ft . r-F ... s �� Donald eeks, AIA ''''1: 7, s-r Meeks + Partners, Architect for Greystar ‘ CC: Andrew Ord 19846382v.2 District-Specific Design Standards 1. Architectural Accommodations of Grade Change Complies: kar Does the plan retain grade to support the building plate including terraces,pati- Yes No In Spirit os,decks and any accessory buildings adjoined to the primary structure? Comments: Will Comply. We've identified a number of opportunities to accomplish this. In specific, there are 5 prominent locations where we have designed in turn-down footings. These are high impact locations that will be enjoyed esthetically and functionally by residents and their visitors. Additionally, in the same spirit above, it is currently proposed (pending final engineering allowances) that most of the buildings will have 2' to 4' breaks (step-downs) in the foundations that allow the buildings to step-down with the declining grade which minimizes retaining wall usage and maximizes the architecture and its' ability to accommodate grade change. 2. Pedestrian Connection Beyond The Project And District Complies: Does the plan provide pedestrian connections from units within the project to Yes No In Spirit existing trails, sidewalks or other public and private walkways. Does the plan provide pedestrian connections to places within the development that abut pedestrian walkways that the City's approved plans identify for the future? (kir. Comments: We Comply. Accommodations have been made to provide for future connection points (both trail, sidewalks and streets) to the adjacent property to the north. Specifically, we have established an 8' wide "boardwalk" that runs along the western frontage of the project defined as the "borrowed landscape" (Parkway) that will tie into future developments to the north. Additionally, we will be providing a 10' wide public hike/bike trail that will extend northward and tie into future proposed developments to the north. Lastly, our plan shows an easement off the roundabout feature that will accommodate future vehicular tie-ins/connections to the adjacent property as well. a 3. Preserve and/or Restore The Natural Characteristic Of The District Complies: Does the plan include landscape development that continues the natural charac- Yes No In Spirit teristics of the projects surroundings? Comments: I I Will Comply. Our landscape plan includes natural drifts and groupings/groves of trees that will be restorative to the site and will extend the natural mosaic of the adjacent undeveloped and open space areas into the site. Tree species used will be natural to the site, ones that accentuate the resort/lodge theme (e.g. Columnar Pines) and from the City's approved plant material list. 4. Perpetuate Residentially Derived Styling And Forms Complies: Yes No In Spirit Does the plan use the following architectural components? 1 • Pitched roof(gable or hip) I • Organized roof massing where a dominant roof has subordinate roofs that extend form it. • 12 inch roof overhang • Roofed porches and balconies • No more than 45 horizontal feet of continuous wall without a horizon- tal offset of at least 4 feet • Dormers that break the cornice • Windows that align both horizontally and vertically • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form • Three stories maximum. These three stories may be over a parking ibr podium. • Openings are treated with a jamb and/or head surround • The Void-to-Solid relationship for window-in-wall elements is less than 50% Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. • 2 5. Provide Buffer Adjacent To Residentially Adverse Conditions Complies: Does the plan provide a buffer between residential land use and adjacent envi- Yes No In Spirit ronmental conditions (e.g. loud sound) that would negatively impact the livabili- p r ty of the residential land? !-. Comments: To the West, our development will be set away from Hwy 360 by a generously landscaped ("borrowed landscape") public and private street scape - roughly 25' to 60' in width off property line. Additionally, the development will also slope down and away from the 360 frontage rd. towards Bear Creek - a fall of 30 - 60' (avg. 46') depending on the cross section you take. Lastly, the buildings will be equipped with acoustically rated and engineered windows to dampen any ambient sounds, within acceptable levels recommended by our acoustical engineer, from hwy 360 or the Airport. [To the East, our development is buffered from the airport by almost a mile of open space, 1/2 mile of flood plan (included in the open space), a creek, and towering trees that seclude it from sight as the development is nestled down closer towards Bear Creek (a vertical drop of 76' from the airport to Bear Creek). [Our development will effectively "re-knit" the natural landscape and tree canopy that once existed on the site. The site itself is currently devoid of lots of trees compared to the surrounding parcels so we will be restoring or "re-knitting" that natural landscape into our development. 6. Provide A Land Use And Scale Transition Between Multifamily/Vertical Complies: Mixed-Use Development And Abutting Single Family Development. Yes No In Spirit If the plan abuts an area of single-family residential land use,does it provide a "residential transition"?A residential transition must include two components: L� • Height Transition: For any element with a height above 35ft, this ele- ment can't exceed one foot above 35ft in height for every lft of setback beyond 15ft. For example,you may have 36ft at 16ft setback, 37ft at 17ft and so on. • Scale Transition: Any element located within 20ft of a property line abutting a single-family land use must not have an elevation face area more than 1200 sq. ft. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 3 7. Provide Development That Maximizes Uses Appropriate To The Value Of The Complies: Setting And/Or Characteristic Of The Context. Yes No In Spirit If the surrounding street-level use is NOT predominately residential, does the n plan provide—or is the structure such that it could be leased to provide—first- floor I I or street-level land uses that are consistent with the context? If the plan has a distinct locational opportunity(such as being close to logistic, movement or transit hubs), does it provide—or is the structure such that is could be leased to provide—first-floor or street-level land uses that are consistent with this context? If the answer to either question is YES, does the plan provide—or could be rent- ed to provide—these land uses for at least 70% of the street-fronting first-floor space? Comments: We perceive the value of the setting, characteristic of the context, and the distinct locational opportunity to be Nature and how we are leveraging our relationship with that context. Our development maximizes this setting by "re-knitting" the natural landscape into our site design, introducing the first phase of a public hike/bike trail and trail-head so people - both our residents and the Grapevine community at large - can enjoy the environment, and delivering the resort/lodge derived style architecture to compliment and flow with the natural setting. a , 8. Perpetuate Commercially Derived Styling And Forms Complies: Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms that include the following Yes No In Spirit elements: • A predominately flat roof concealed by a raised parapet of at least 12in in height • All openings are vertically and horizontally aligned • Balconies are projected • Steel construction is exposed • The first floor plate is at least 15ft high at the street level • Void-to-solid relationships are 50% or greater void Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. L 4 9. Preserve And Extend Thematic Streetscapes Complies: Does the plan continue the established streetscape of its surrounding District? Yes No In Spirit This includes: I I n n • Matching light fixtures and spacing of light fixtures • Matching tree species, scale, placement and spacing • Matching paving material and paving pattern • Continuation of defined inset areas for on-street parking Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. kir 10. Maintain Compatibility With District Thematic Sign Features. Does the plan Complies: provide signage that is compatible with signage in the surrounding District? This Yes No In Spirit includes: ❑ • Maintaining the relationship of signage to street-fronting building planes • Marinating the general appearance of the District's signage • Maintaining sign illumination consistent with the District and its nightscape • Use of sign types consistent with the District and the context. This in- cludes commercial tenant signs, premise signs and project signs. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 5 11. Provide Responsive Interface To Open Space And Open Space Amenities. Complies: Does the plan address open space in ways that extend the open space into the Yes No In Spirit project?This includes: I I I I • Elimination of parking aprons in the foreground between the structure and the open space • Extension of landscape species and patterns characteristic of the open space into the project • Orientation of buildings to that building placement breaks free from the normal orthogonal relation to street and bears relationship to features of the larger landscape • Extension of trails into the project • Use of fence design that does not visually disrupt the continuous ground plane Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. • 6 12. Resort/Lodge/Prairie Styling And Forms. Does the plan use architectural Complies: styles derived from resort/lodge/prairie architectural precedents? These include: Yes No In Spirit • Flat pitched gable or hipped rooves with long and un-interrupted ridges X and cornices • Large roof overhangs with structural bracing such as brackets, angled braces, canted braced and exposed rafters • Tapered columns that are full masonry or have masonry bases • Use of flat roofs to accent pitched roofs • Variable plate heights • Vertical and Horizontal alignment of openings • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form • Use of decks and terraces • Architecturally enclosed balconies • Projected window jambs and/or headers • Structural details derived from timber construction detailing • Use of siding and masonry • Upper story insets within,or projections over,a lower story base Comments: We Comply. A few examples of the highlighted features that we designed to in order to characterize the style are... * Large Roof Overhangs with exposed rafters * Structural Bracing * Timber Frame Accents * Tapered Stone Columns * Architecturally Enclosed Balconies * Metal Awnings * 80% Stone All these architectural features help the community to meld into the natural setting and make it feel a part of the environment that is its' home. 13. Curvilinear Organization Of The Development Plan Complies: Does the plan have a curvilinear organization? This includes: Yes No In Spirit • Gracefully meandering streets and drives with bends in the street and drive alignment that is responsive to grade • Merging street intersections where operations permit • Organically-shaped parking areas • Building orientations that are not tied to uniform street frontage • Drifted groupings of trees in lieu of straight rows with uniform spacing Comments: We comply. We conform to all 5 bulleted points above. The site plan is non-orthogonal in nature, is not regimental in design and is curvilinear in its' appeal. Our site streets and parking meander in a non-orthogonal arrangement providing aesthetically pleasing visual interest for both the community and our residents. 14. Conceal Visibility Of Service And Parking Functions Complies: Does the plan place service and parking functions so that such functions are Yes No In Spirit NOT in the foreground yard space between any arterial or primary street and the buildings that are facing that street? Comments: Yes. We comply. The public realm is buffered by a large "borrowed landscape" (Parkway) setback (25'-60') of tree groves, meandering 8' wide sidewalk, resort/lodge styled buildings and a thoughtful dog park. Parking and trash functions are strategically situated away and screened from public view by buildings and landscaping. The only parking areas that are visible from the public realm is the public parking area for the hike/bike trail-head and the public leasing parking in front of the club/leasing center - both of which are nicely and sufficiently landscaped. 8 15. Perpetuate Historic/Indigenous Derived Architectural Styling And Forms. Complies: Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms derived from the historic or Yes No In Spirit indigenous character of the District? Such aspects include: C � � • Commercially-scaled first floor with a 15ft plate • For building of three floors or greater, a tripartite architecture • Decorative and embellished front parapet • Street canopy • Portrait orientation of openings and subversion of openings • Continuous vertical corners often expressed as pilasters • Occasional use of roof forms as accent elements on the front elevation • Void-to-Solid ratio with greater void at the street level and greater solid at other levels • Treatment of openings with jamb and/or header surrounds • Use of belt courses to establish horizontal reference for placement of openings • Use of decorative brick bands and details Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. L 9 16. Use Of Thematic Exterior Material, If Such Material Is Characteristic Of Dis- Complies: trict And Complies With The General Material Standards. Yes No In Spirit If there is a surrounding District context,does the plan continue with the use of 1-1 E the dominant and characteristic material of the surrounding District? If so, is the use of that material in compliance with the General Material Stan- dards of the Building Manual? Dominant use of material means material that comprises at least 70% of the building exterior excluding openings. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 17. Orthogonal/Block Orientation Of The Development Plan. Does the plan have Complies: a block/orthogonal organization?This includes: Yes No In Spirit • Straight streets with right angle intersections E E • Continuous street wall defined by alignment of buildings • Uniform spacing of street trees and street fixtures • Continue the urban blocks which are adjacent to the project • Have decorative cross walks or other intersection enhancements Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. • 10 18. Pedestrian/Residential Activity Connection Between The Public Street And Complies: Living Units Fronting The Street. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan present the public street with an external expression of the resi- L E dential activity? This means that the street level of the residential development is not commercially used or made capable for commercial use. This includes porches, stoops, terraces, patios, fenced front yards and steps up from an ap- proach grade. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 19. Maintain Height And Scale Compatibility With The Height And Scale Char- Complies: acteristic Of District. Yes No In Spirit When height and scale are important attributes of the surrounding District's I I r identity, is the plan compatible with this height and scale? Such compatibility can be achieved through one or both of the following: • Upper-story setbacks that create a building mass at the street consistent with context • Horizontal offsets at the street level which reduce the lower floor pre- sentation of mass when the characteristic block size is exceeded. This creates the image of a block that is further subdivided through built rec- ognition of individual properties as described in the"Bay Modulation" section of the Building Manual. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. • 11 20. Use Of Bay Modulation Patterns That Are Compatible With Bay Modulation Complies: Of The District. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a street frontage that continues the bay modulation of the block? Bay modulation refers to the architectural expression of individual build- ings within the block face. This is important to emulate the traditional block face of a downtown where buildings are normally built lot-line to lot-line in direct juxtaposition. In such downtowns,there is a complex street wall referred to as the"Bay" and the rhyth- mic and varied offset and appearance of that bay is referred to as"Bay Modula- tion." Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. L • 12 21. Provide An Urbanized Streetscape. Does the plan provide an urbanized Complies: streetscape along the primary street frontage that is consistent with the char- Yes No In Spirit acteristic urban street fabric within the District? Key features of an urbanized streetscape include: • The architectural plane fronting the primary street must create a con- tinuous street wall along the primary street frontage. Buildings must establish a"built-to" zone which extends from the primary street front property line and extends into the property a distance of 3ft and at least 75% of the primary street frontage much lie within this zone. NOTE: the location and depth of this zone may be modified upon City approval when the modification results in lateral expansion of a sidewalk space for a sidewalk restaurant or sidewalk retail or in the creation of an arcade along the street. • Street trees used in the streetscape should continue the use of an exist- ing tree species when the larger urban setting contains a thematic tree. If the surrounding urban setting does not have a thematic tree, the plan must choose from a list of approved plants. • Street lights must continue the uniform spacing and placement charac- teristic of the surrounding primary street. When a larger urban setting contains a thematic light or light standard,the plan must use that light standard.When no thematic light exists,the plan must choose a light or light standard appropriate for urban streetscape use. • Decorative paving should continue the characteristic paving material and pattern of the urban context when that context includes a thematic sidewalk treatment. When no thematic treatment exists, the project must use a sidewalk paving material and pattern appropriate for urban streets- cape use. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 13 22. Provide A"Borrowed Landscape" For The Primary Street Frontage Complies: Does the plan provide a"borrowed landscape" along the primary street frontage Yes No In Spirit that preserved the general character of the District?This includes: IX • Elimination of parking aprons or walls between the building and street unless the landscape space abutting the street is greater than 20ft • Creation of an expanded parkway that is varied in dimension with the minimum parkway expansion being 15ft from the street right of way and with variations in width occurring at least every 200ft. Creation of pads for horizontal mixed use qualifies as varied Borrowed Landscape space • Use of a pedestrian trail in lieu of a pedestrian sidewalk. Sidewalks within the borrowed landscape space must be meandering pedestrian ways at least 8ft wide. Comments: We Comply. Our "borrowed landscape" (Parkway) includes a variable width (-25'-60' from property line - not including public ROW add! width) open space along the street frontage, with pedestrian access, that moves in and out of the frontage area providing pedestrian connectivity from the site to adjacent trails and future connection points. Our security fencing is set back from the street, linking the buildings, at the building level so the frontage area does not give the appearance of a "compound". Around the perimeter and where the opportunities arise, we use the buildings themselves as a security barrier with the security fence connecting each building. This puts our lodge-style building architecture thoughtfully in the foreground while pushing the fence to the background where it belongs. The tree drifts and groves in the frontage area extend the natural mosaic of the adjacent areas into the site along the "borrowed landscape" parkway. 14 23. Promote Horizontal Mixed Use Complies: Yes No In Spirit Does the project create opportunities for stand-alone retail/restaurant pads with- n I (— in the street frontage of the primary street? In no case should the provision of a retail pad consume more than 50% of the multifamily frontage. Where the multifamily frontage is 300ft or less, a retail pad leave-out is not required. This retail pad requirement may be waived upon City Approval but a requirement for variable street definition (#24) still applies Comments: Retail is infeasible for this location for the following reasons... • Site constraints: Due to site topo (the site falls between 30' and 60' towards Bear Creek), visibility is poor. The large areas needed for big-box retail or bulk distribution warehouse (the site's current zoning) would require a cost-prohibitive level of earthwork to clear sufficiently flat pads for the building, parking areas and loading areas. • Access constraints: Access is poor due to limited Glade frontage and "right-in right-out" (one-way) limited access off of 360 frontage. • Demand constraints: There is inadequate residential density as the airport land dominates most of the retail trade area. • Operator constraints: Retail operators have overwhelmingly selected 121 and Glade Road to the west and Highway 114 to the north as viable locations. The site has been zoned industrial for over two decades, but industrial operators have selected other locations around the airport with level topography. 24. Provide Variable Street Definition Within The Block Face Along Primary Complies: Streets Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a variable street definition through the variable setback of multifamily structures fronting the primary street? No more than 50% of the project frontage may adhere to a uniform setback dimension. Horizontal offsets in the development plan set back line must be no less than 10 ft. Comments: We comply and far exceed both the 50% and the 10ft. rule above. In accordance with the natural and organic theme of the design, the building's fronting both Glade Rd. and the 360 Frontage Rd. are canted at differing angles that create a varied presentation of the architecture to the public realm in a way that is non-regimental and non-uniform. Our closest building to the property line along the frontage roads is 25' vs. the 10' minimum above. Our furthest building is roughly 60' from the property line. 15 District Specific Stan- 360/Airport Grapevine Grapevine Gaylord/SH Central Tran- dards (A = Applicable) District Mille South Mills North 26 District sit District District District 1 Architectural accommo- A A dation of grade change 2 Pedestrian connection A A A A A beyond project and district 3 Preserve/restore charac- A A teristic natural mosaic 4 Residentially derived A A* styling and forms/ pitched roof 5 Buffer adjacent environ- A mental encroachments 6 Land use/scale transition A A from MF/SF 7 Maximize value capture A A opportunities 8 Commercially derived A A** A styling and forms 9 Preserve/perpetuate A thematic streetscape Lor 10 Compatible with district, A A A thematic signage features 11 Responsive interface A A A with open space and amenities 12 Resort/lodge derived A A styling and forms 13 Curvilinear organization A A A A of development plan 14 Conceal visibility of ser- A A A vice/parking functions from arterials/primary roads 15 Historic/indigenous A derived styling/forms 16 Use of thematic exterior A material if characteristic of district and complies with standards tor A* =When closer to topography and golf course A** =When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 16 17 Orthogonal,block orga- A nization of development plan \Iv 18 Pedestrian/residential A activity connection between street and living unit fronting street 19 Height and scale corn- A patibility with height and scale characteristic of district 20 Bay modulation pattern A compatibility with the- matic bay modulation of district 21 Urbanized streetscape A 22 Provide"Borrowed" A landscape for street en- hancement 23 Promote horizontal A A A mixed-use _ 24 Variable street definition A to create a more complex street scape A* =When closer to topography and golf course A** =When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 17 General Standards for Multifamily Development Part A: Site and Design %► a. Contextual Relationships 1. Community Structure: Each plan for a project larger than 100 units must Complies: provide: Yes No In Spirit i. Benches: at least one every 700ft or one per block,whichever is less ii. Bike Racks: a capacity for 4 bikes at each residential building and 14 at the central pedestrian facility iii. Trash Disposal Units: one trash receptacle at each bench iv. Pedestrian Lighting: one light standard at least every 100ft Continued from below (Due to lack of space): Bike racks will be located at each building as required. In addition we will provide a bike rack at the proposed trail head into the creek trail. Pedestrian lighting of open spaces and trail amenities will be designed to Comments: comply. Will Comply. We have strategically placed benches and trash receptacles at locations to both comply with the requirements and to work in the open space areas we have created. See above... 2. Cognitive Structure: Development site plans should avoid a"maze-like" Complies: arrangement of streets and drives and should provide a clear demarcation of Yes No In Spirit sub-areas arranged with reference to an internal destination. -' Cr X n Comments: There are various sub-areas (Pavilion area, Courtyards, Dog Park, Trail-head & Clubhouse etc.) integrated throughout the site that will drive community interaction through Cognitive Structure. o 3.Edge Definition: Planting of the edge must provide visual concealment of Complies: at least 70%of the perimeter fence using evergreen plants. Moreover, at least Yes No In Spirit 70% of these plants must have foliage from ground to top capable of providing �x a screen. Edge screening must be planted in natural drifts that appear as native plant clusters. Continued from below (Due to lack of space): The landscaping along our ornamental fencing will further screen the material to soften the edge of our community. Comments: Our perimeter fence is not continuous —in many cases we use the buildings themselves as entry barriers which reduces the amount of fencing needed and also provides less of a "compound" feel. 4.Traffic Calming: Any multifamily plan must illustrate traffic calming mea- Complies: sures using traffic tables, intersections,traffic circles,chokers, roadway neck Yes No In Spirit downs at intersections,center island narrowing or rumble strips. Speed bumps �Xf are prohibited. Continued from below: Not only will these help to slowdown traffic but they will also Comments: provide safe pedestrian access and connectivity between the open space areas. We Comply. In 2 locations where the street runs are longer we've employed raised cross-walks to slow traffic speeds internal to the project, which essentially mimic the raised traffic table concept. 18 b. Connections Beyond The Project 1. Relationship With And Connections To The City Fabric: The site plan for Complies: any multifamily development must portray the extent to which the following Yes No In Spirit ‘1„„ elements of the City Fabric are continued or otherwise responded to: X i. Curb Cuts and Driveways: Development plans much seek to continue flow between projects by coordinating points of ingress and egress so that efficient maneuvers to and from serving public streets are possible. Coordination of routing traffic volumes anticipated by individual project TIA's is a required consideration of a development plan being considered by the City. ii. Thoroughfares And Roadways: A development plan that lays within the path of a thoroughfare as planned or committed to by adjacent devel- opment or of a thoroughfare that has been adjusted by the Council must make provision for the extension of the right of way of such thoroughfare when traffic projected densities necessitate extension. iii. Trails:A proposed multifamily development plan must consider appropriate trail routing through the proposed development so that a cohesive trail network can evolve over time. iv. Open Space: The proposed development plan must consider exten- sion of the open space or expansion of the open space, or consider how development portrayed by the development plan can relate to and define the open space. v. Contextual Characteristics: Any multifamily development plan must illustrate how various aspects of the context will also be manifest in the development design. Key aspects of the context include streetscape themes, continuity of water or water bodies, extension of indigenous plan drifts, continuity of road sections,treatment of parking,protection of and continuity with adjacent land uses,continuation of tree canopies and canopy species, continuity of natural features, extension of surface water management strategies, and continuity of edge treatments. Continued from below: iv.We Comply. Open space will be shared and extended between future land-uses and tracts of land. v.We Comply.We are re-knitting the natural fabric as a part of our built environment in an aesthetically pleasing meandering arrangement as a backdrop to the enhanced ecology. Comments: i. We Comply. We have easements in place that will allow for an adjacent land-use to the north to connect into our public/private roundabout trailhead entry feature. ii. N/A iii. We Comply. At full build-out, a 4-phase (3 different landowners) —2-mile extension of a 10' wide hike and bike trail has been coordinated all the way to Bear Creek Park as a part of this development proposal, thus fully connecting the existing Grapevine hike and bike trail system with the southern gateway of the City. Phase 1(—.25 MI.) will be constructed as a part of this development. 19 c. Lot Occupancy 1. In a development plan that's required to be curvilinear as outlined by the Dis- Complies: trict Specific Standards, such a plan must establish a building relationship to the Yes No In Spirit street such that: 57 i. At least 60% of the interior street and drive-fronting buildings within the development plan design and 75% of buildings facing public streets serving the project must be sited so that the front building plane (the plane facing the street) is not parallel to the street right of way. ii. A minimum of 30% of the yard space along interior streets and drives, and 50% of the yard space fronting public streets serving the project, must be covered by a landscape approach defined by organic plant mass- ing and natural drifts. Comments: i. 7 out of the 11 (63.6%) interior buildings are not parallel to the interior street right-of-ways they front on. 6 out of the 7 buildings (85.7%) that front public streets are not parallel to the street right of way they front on. The curvilinear nature of the street pattern inherently keeps the buildings from being parallel to the street. ii. We will comply. The defined parameters above will feature the themed organic plant massing and naturalistic drifts. 0 2. Building Relation to the Street and Orthogonal Plan Layouts: Plan designs Complies: L. that are required to be orthogonal, as outlined by the District Specific Standards, Yes No In Spirit must establish a building relationship to the street such that: El i. The development plan must establish a"build-to" line for the interior ( I I streets and drives of the project that will vary from the required 3ft build- to line along the plan's exterior public streets as specified in the District Specific Standards. This build-to line must be at least 9ft form the street or drive back of curb. ii. The presence of repetitive stoops, terraces or porches which project into the yard space created by the build-to line cannot be closer than 5ft to the street or drive back of curb and must project at least 4ft from the primary building mass. These projections must be architecturally contained such that they are part of the overall facade composition. The offset space created between the projected stoop, porch or terrace and the primary building mass must be a landscape space,leaving a 5ft minimum pedestrian space at the street edge. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. `r. 20 d. Parking: Placement and Configuration 1. Parking Facility Type: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Structured urCenterCharacterProjects Zone must be structured when the project exceeds 20 units per acre. ! 1 exceeding 40 units per acre in any other Character Zone must provide structured parking. ii. Surface Parking Areas: Projects with a unit density between 28 and 39 units per acre that provide aggregated surface parking must comply with the following: 1. Aggregated parking areas with more than 70 parking spaces (not including street or drive head-in parking) must be located in a place that is not visible to the primary street serving the project or located so that the parking area may be screened. Parking garages located such that they front a public street must have architectural eleva- tions that complement the design style of the multifamily structures. "Complement" in this context means that they must share similar horizontal offsets, organization of openings, and use of materials. 2. Aggregated parking areas in non-orthogonal development plan designs must also have a curvilinear configuration. ft„ 3.Aggregated parking areas must be landscaped Comments: Not applicable because our proposed development's density is 20 units/acre. However, all our aggregated parking does have a curvilinear configuration and is landscaped. 2. Head-in parking along streets: Before the parking demand for aggregated Complies: parking areas is determined,head-in street and drive parking must be provided Yes No In Spirit to the extent permitted by the streetscape design. Comments: We Comply. Head-in street and drive-parking is maxed out throughout the site and zonally spaced out to accommodate maximum convenience to the resident. 21 e. Site Open Space Requirement 1. Open space as a percent of total development area: At least 20% of the site Complies: area identified in any multifamily plan must be set aside as open space. Site areas Yes No In Spirit that qualify as open space set asides include: E l l Xj i. Areas protecting existing natural features and/or plant communities ii. Areas used for the surface management of storm water that are not structures iii. Any retained water iv. Project amenity areas that are visually accessible from streets and/or drives v. Playgrounds vi. Pedestrian trails vii. Borrowed street landscape areas viii. Pedestrian accessible areas between structures open to access by the project population Comments: We comply and well exceed this standard, offering all of the above elements in our proposed community in a quantity greater than the 20% standard. Aside from borrowed street landscape, pedestrian accessible areas and trails, project amenities, and all other internal open space that meets the above definitions, we have set aside approximately 4 acres of natural open space that will protect existing natural features and plant communities. Additionally, we will be providing a —1/4 mile 10' wide public hike/bike trail replete with fitness stations and nature informational placards. 2. Form giving influence: Open space provided within any development plan Complies: must serve as a frontage for at least 25% of the structures within the project, Yes No In Spirit where buildings can define the edge of open space, except for the Transit Center 7 fl District where street frontage is prioritized. Comments: We exceed this standard, which is a standard that renders the outdoor environment as a primary focal feature of the community. Very conservatively, at least 7 buildings meet this requirement out of the 20% requirement of 3.6 buildings. . 22 f. Preservation of Natural Drainage 1.Natural Drainageways: Any development plan for multifamily development Complies: in Grapevine must illustrate the extent to which natural drainage within the lot, Yes No In Spirit parcel or tract exists and is preserved through design initiatives that preserve, Imo' restore or replicate natural drainage patterns. Any disruption of natural drainage patterns must be approved by the City of Grapevine. Comments: We Comply. We have employed a dry riverbed design in certain areas of the site to help replicate the natural environment, catch and direct surface drainage off the site with the added benefit being that this design will provide an enhanced pedestrian experience for our residents and guests. 1111 23 g. Storm Weather Management Facilities 1. Storm weather management structures: Any development plan for mul- Complies: tifamily development in the City of Grapevine,where structured storm water Yes No In Spirit �. management solutions are requires must adhere to the following: x I. I i. Minimize structured means of water management: Plans must min- imize the use of cross drainage structures, armored channels, concrete flow ways, and other structured solutions to storm water management, unless such structures are for the purpose of creating a pedestrian or urban activity at a water edge. ii. Maintain natural shapes and form in the creation of detention/re- tention facilities and created drainageways (a.k.a. flow management facilities): Water collection points and/or pools created by nature have shapes that are clearly organic. Therefore,plans should avoid straight lines, hard angles, and regular geometric shapes in the creation of flow management facilities. iii. Landscape with natural elements: Where storm water management design creates conditions that support indigenous plants, measures must be taken to landscape such facilities in ways that allow such plants. iv. Respect natural sub-systems: Proper design of flow management fa- cilities should,where appropriate, include diverse ecological settings such as deep water (limnetic zones) in combination with shallow water(lit- toral zones),wetlands, ephemeral flows, and greater states of hydration which can support plant communities associated with these zones. Comments: We Comply. We have employed a dry riverbed design in various locations to help catch and direct surface drainage off the site while ensuring safety and quality of life for our residents by avoiding storm water flowing above ground, which can present risk to pets and residents alike during a runoff event. 24 h. Grading 1 Grading for multifamily development in the City of Grapevine must adhere to Complies: the following: Yes No In Spirit i. Avoid steep grades: Grades equal to or greater than 20% are consid- ered steep and shall not be graded to create building lots. However, indi- vidual buildings which make grade transition within the building,porch or terrace expansions are permitted and therefore the limited disturbance of grade needed to accomplish this is permitted also. ii. Conform to standards for tree protection: Any tree over three inches in caliper remaining on a lot, parcel or tract (that is, trees not approved for removal) and exposed to the building activity or within 30ft of the building activity(hereinafter regulated trees) shall be protected as fol- lows: a. Tree fencing: Regulated tree trunks shall be protected within a visible"tree fence" at least 36 inches tall and protecting the tree and ground around the tree to a minimum distance from the trunk equal to the distance of the tree drip line or 10 feet,whichever is less. b. Tree marking: All regulated trees shall be marked with a green surveyor tape which indicates"Protected Tree" status. („► c. Ground compaction avoidance: Measures shall be taken to min- imize ground compaction within the dripline of a Regulated Tree. Grading within the ground protected by a tree fence is prohibited. d. Maintenance of normal hydration: Measures shall be taken to maintain normal hydration of a Regulated Tree. Comments: Will Comply. We have no grades on site that exceed 20% related to building lot construction. We will comply and will use the best arborilogical practices to make sure preserved trees are protected so they will thrive post construction. 25 Part B: Building Design Standards a.Street Interface 1. Semi-public space adjacent to streets: Complies: `► Yes No In Spirit i. Canopies and store fronts are limited to urban setting such as primary street frontage in the Transit Center Character Zone. ii. In any single building block,there must be at least one expression of a first-floor, semi-public space within the street-facing elevation. If a cano- py of storefront is used to meet this standard, it must occupy at least 50% of the length of the elevation. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open space, each building block must have at least one first-floor pedestrian space that is part of the architectural design. i. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first-floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un-supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: We Comply. ( or 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open Complies: space, each building block must have at least one first-floor pedestrian space that Yes No In Spirit is part of the architectural design. i. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first-floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un-supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: We Comply. All of our buildings have multiple first-floor "pedestrian spaces" in the form of the access breezeways. 26 b. Elevation Composition 1. The exterior design of any multifamily structure must comprise an overall Complies: pattern. This pattern includes: Yes No In Spirit i. Regulating lines that organize its elements ii. Proportioning iii. Hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements Comments: We Comply. Our compositional intent complies as it enacts the use of"proportioning" and "hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements". CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 27 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 2. Openings and features of any building must have a common justification. Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. When a pitched roof design is used, all windows—except dormer win- �1 ❑ dows—must be below the cornice detail. l� ii. When a flat roof design is used, all windows must be at least 2ft below the parapet. iii. When both a pitched roof and flat roof design are used in the same elevation,the window heads must align horizontally. iv. Windows may abut the cornice detail if the window header modulates the banding or detailing of the cornice. v. Openings within an elevation must have a common reference line that engages the sill or head. vi. Windows within an elevation must have a common vertical reference line from the first to the top floor. vii. Windows must align with the features that define the architectural form. For example,windows in a gable cannot be arbitrarily distributed within the face of the gable unless specifically approved by the City. viii. Excepting first floor store front or vertical mixed-use structure, all openings must be square or portrait in orientation. ix. Windows, doors and other openings must be articulated within a pro- jected surround or header unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: We Comply. Please refer and compare to Architectural elevations. One nice item of note is that we are using accented stone sills and headers as our window projected surrounds. These standards above elevate the role of windows from mere utilitarian openings to architecturally striking features unto themselves. L CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 28 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 3. All elevations of a structure must receive equal treatment of style on all el- Complies: evations of a structure so as to avoid the common pitfall whereby only the Yes No In Spirit ur street-facing façade is adequately styled and structured. Comments: We Comply. Each and every building face presents the same high standard in this guideline. 4. Forms created within the elevation, such as towers,bays and plate changes, Complies: must be derived from functions within the plan. Design approaches which seek Yes No In Spirit to decorate a"space plan" derived independent of the elevation design are pro- hibited. '" Comments: We Comply. S 29 b. Street wall complexity and exterior offsets 1. Building offsets: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Residential building blocks may not have more than 50 linear feet of wall without a wall offset. ii. Horizontal wall offsets must be at least 4ft. This may include balconies if contained within the confines of the offset. Any balconies projected from the face must have an architectural enclosure. iii. Architectural forms such as enclosed porches, stair towers,projected bays or stacked balconies maybe projected from the building block or recessed within it and must be accompanied by a roof in the roof massing that corresponds to the architectural form. Comments: We Comply. • 30 d. Void to Solid Ratio 1. For the first floor of a vertical mixed-use plan wherein the first floor has a Complies: commercial use,the void-to-solid ratio must be greater than or equal to 1.5:1 Yes No In Spirit \r (the amount of void being greater than the amount of solid). The solid portions of the first floor facade must extend vertically to the floors above and parapet I.�J detail. Comments: Not Applicable. We are not a vertical mixed-use project. (Please excuse the check in the box. can't get it to un-check.) 2. For floors above the first floor in a vertical mixed-use plan (or for all floors in Complies: a residential plan),the void-to-solid ratio must be less than or equal to 0.5:1 (the Yes No In Spirit amount of void being less than the amount of solid). X Comments: We Comply. • 31 e. Architectural Enclosures 1. All projected stair towers, elevator shafts,and cantilevered building projec- Complies: tions (other than balconies) must be architecturally enclosed. This means that Yes No In Spirit they must be enclosed in an architectural skin and must be expressed as a roof form. X; ! 1 Comments: We Comply. • 32 f. Roof form: Rooves and the roof lines they create are essential design elements for higher-value structures. Visible roof design must: 1. Be legible. There must be a clear organization of a dominant roof mass from Complies: which subordinate roof masses extend. Yes No In Spirit Comments: We Comply. L 2. Be balanced. A single roof pitch must be used within the total composition. Complies: Different roof pitches are permitted for tower forms which are not engaged with Yes No In Spirit the general roof form. Permitted roof forms include gables,hips,barrels if used a secondary forms, sheds if used as secondary forms, and flat. '" Comments: We Comply. • 33 g. Style Integrity 1. The use of architectural detailing associated with a style must use the charac- Complies: teristic detailing of that style. Yes No In Spirit X C E Comments: We Comply. A few examples of features that we designed to in order to characterize the style are... * Large Roof Overhangs * Structural Bracing * Timber Frame Accents * Tapered Stone Columns * Architecturally Enclosed Balconies * Metal Awnings * 80% Stone 2. The use of systems or materials that replicate the work of a trade or artisan are Complies: prohibited. Construction details which are traditionally derived from the work Yes No In Spirit of an artisan (such as a metal smith, carpenter or stonemason) must use a mate- rial in which the characteristic craftsperson can work. F" Comments: We Comply. • 34 h. Chimneys 1. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles,the chimney must be ter- Complies: Lminated with a chimney cap that conceals the metal spark arrestor and visually Yes No In Spirit reads as a traditional tile flue system, unless otherwise approved by the City n I Il Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 2. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles,the chimney shaft must be Complies: enclosed with unit masonry, stone or 3-coat stucco with a minimum dimension Yes No In Spirit of 4.5ft x 3ft,unless otherwise approved by the City. (® Comments: L� Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. L 3. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles,the rise of the chimney shaft Complies: must be detailed so that the chimney has complexity in plan as well as elevation. Yes No In Spirit fl E Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. • 35 Part C: Building Construction Standards a.Materials and Application of Materials 1. Primary Material. At least 70% of the exterior facade of a 4-story structure or Complies: ~' 80% of the exterior façade of a 3-story structure or 100% of the exterior façade of Yes No In Spirit a structure less than 3 stories must be one of the following: FR; i. Brick. Clay brick,modular size,hard-fired and meeting severe weath- er standards. Embossed or molded brick is generally prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. All brick shall be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all building corners—both inside and outside—must be executed in a toothed masonry fashion. Weeping or slumped joints are prohibited. ii. Stone. Stone must be laid in a typical load-bearing pattern. Character- istics of such pattern include: 1. Tight mortar joints with no more than 30% of joints larger than 3/8 inches. 2. Coursed patterns such as Ashlar, Coursed Chopped Stone and Coursed Rubbed Stone. Mosaic and un-coursed rubble stone-work are prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. ( 3. Cultured stone or other faux stone products are prohibited. fir► 4. All stone must be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all cor- ners—both inside and outside—must be executed in a toothed ma- sonry fashion. iii. Other Stone. Cut stone/smoothed-face stone or Cut stone/smoothed- face stone that is mechanically attached with a stone veneer system may be used provided that the system uses a true stone. Comments: We will Comply. Stone will be real coursed stone to fit the (iii.) definition above. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 36 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 2. Secondary Material. No more than 30% of the building facade may be a sec- Complies: ondary material.This includes: Yes No In Spirit i. Stucco. 3-coat stucco on lath over a structural frame with expansion �' E joints concealed by filling the joint with expandable filler that is troweled flat with the stucco, is the same color as the stucco and that matches the stucco surface texture is permitted. Dryvit/EFS type systems are prohibit- ed. Stucco is not permitted in the Central Transit District. ii. Metal. Architectural metal wall systems are permitted. iii. Siding. Wood or Cementacious siding is permitted in those Character Zones where pitched roof styles are permitted. Comments: We Comply. We will be using a cementacious siding (along with 80% stone) to compliment the architectural design. This product also maintains itself over time and doesn't cup, buckle or warp like real wood tends to in the sometimes extreme Texas weather fluctuations. 3. Roof Material. Acceptable materials include: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Flat Roof. Flat rooves may be either a built-up bituminous roof or a membrane roof provided that it is installed in accordance with the man- ufacturer's specifications and issued a 30-year warranty. All flat rooves must be hidden from ground level view,behind a 12-inch parapet. ii. Pitched Roof. These may be either a standing-seam metal roof with standing folded and soldered seams,a commercial metal roof if approved by the City, slate, clay tile, or 40-year high profile composition single. All composition shingle rooves must have closed valleys. Concrete single products with a relief greater than '/2 inch are prohibited. iii. Parapet Cap. These must be either clay brick, cut stone, cast stone, tile,or terra cotta. Pressed metal maybe used if is it specifically created to decoratively cap a parapet and if specifically approved by the City. Comments: We will Comply. L CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 37 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 4. Material Change. Material changes in any elevation may occur only under the Complies: following conditions: Yes No In Spirit i. Change occurs at an inside corner. ii. Change that occurs at an outside corner must wrap the corner and change at a location at least 12 inches from that corner and be designed as the termination of an architectural detail. iii. Change that occurs wherein the different material is contained within a distinct architectural form that projects from the primary architectural mass. iv. Change that reflects an offset between a lower and an upper floor where the offset is at least 6 inches. Material changes within the same architectural plane are prohibited. Comments: We Comply. s CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 38 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 5. Relief.The City seeks to promote relief and dimension in architectural surfac- Complies: es, details, and motifs with the following requirements: Yes No In Spirit i. The following materials are prohibited: Fiberglass, Styrofoam or stuc- co-over-styrofoam,plastic, aluminum. Stucco applied to look like pro- jected stone, Stucco applied to look like cast stone, Stucco applied to look like terra cotta, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a corner, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a mitre or decorative shape, Masonite or Masonite products,com- position wood products used as an exterior material, trimcraft used as a soffit board, or other smooth finished soffit board. ii. Relief in the treatment of cornices, overhangs,gable projections,bay windows,dormers,water tables,belt coursers, sills, surrounds,timber components and other expressions must be executed in ways that pro- duce depth, shadow and texture. iii. In coursed rubble stonework, stones must be laid into the wall as the stone would lay on the ground. No more than 20% of the stones in any elevation may be"flipped" sideways. iv. The minimum projection in any built-up profiles and decorative assembly must be 3/4 inch per element of the assembly. A cornice detail comprised of three stepped bricks must have a total projection of 2 and 1/4 inches. Comments: As corroborated by City consultants, cementitious trim - provided it is dimensionally acceptable - will require less maintenance, have stronger architectural appeal, and exhibit superior durability in our climate than conventional wood. It will not cup, buckle or warp which starts to look rundown over time. Should City consultant allow, we would like the opportunity to explore (in-field mockup) and ultimately incorporate what we think will be an overall better trim product in terms of cementitious trim material use on the buildings. L CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 39 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 6. Carpentered Exterior Trim. Complies: Yes No In Spirit (k„ i. All carpentered exterior trim must be high-quality finished grade wood n stock. ii. If a trim installation is to be joined along any continuous run of mate- rial,the required joint must be a"spline joint:' iii. All outside corners must be mitered and blocked with sufficient clo- sure that the joint is not visible from the street. iv. Corners must be closed by a carpentered joint. Trim clips are prohib- ited. v. Facia and gable rake must be stepped at the drip mold unless hidden by a gutter. vi. Carpentered trim that forms the veneer pocket must have a complex- ity achieved in trim mold,built-up step molding, or other traditional detail such as a dentil mold. Comments: As corroborated by City consultants, cementitious trim - provided it is dimensionally acceptable - will requires less maintenance, stronger architectural appeal, and superior durability in our climate than conventional wood. It will not cup, buckle or warp which starts to look rundown over time. Should City consultant allow, we would like the opportunity to explore (in a field mockup) and ultimately incorporate what we think will be an overall better trim product in terms of cementitious trim material use on the buildings. • 40 b. Wall Construction 1. Wall Section. All wood-framed exterior walls must be constructed as follows: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. When shim- or flange-mounted windows are used in masonry ve- �1 neered walls, framing may be conventional 2x4 framing. I/� I I ii. When shim-mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or oth- er permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, exterior walls must be framed with 2x6 members in order to achieve a 3.5-inch minimum offset within the opening. iii. When flange-mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or other permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, a double 2x4 framing assembly is required that allows the flange to be mounted on the inner 2x4 section with the second 2x4 section providing the required offset from the window sash or door at the opening. Comments: We will Comply. 2. Parapets. Where there is a flat roof, a parapet must extend at least 12 inches Complies: above the roof surface and conceal the roof material from ground-level view. Yes No In Spirit C C E Comments: N/A • CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 41 b. Wall Construction (continued) 3. Cornice Detail. All wall terminations at the roof must have a cornice detail Complies: comprised of at least 2 projected elements. Parapets must have a cap detail com- Yes No In Spirit prised of at least 2 projected elements. (— Comments: We will Comply. 4. Window Surrounds, Belt Courses and Base Courses. Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. All openings in the exterior skin must have an architecturally appro- lu priate header and sill with an optional jamb. The required header and sill must project at least 3/4 inches beyond the wall veneer.Window headers or sills may be either stone,cast stone, terra cotta,heavy timber (where appropriate for the style), or wood (where appropriate for the style). ii. Other architectural details like belt courses and base courses must be executed in the above materials and have a minimum projection of 3/4 inch per element of detail. Comments: We will Comply. As mentioned above, our windows will have a cast-stone header and sill that will adhere to this requirement. • 42 c. Roof screening and appurtenances 1. Roof Projections. No plumbing stacks,venting stacks, skylights, or attic Complies: ventilators may penetrate the roof surfaces facing the street/drive. If there are Yes No In Spirit L, multiple street/drive facing exposures, no roof projection may penetrate the roof ri slope that slopes to the"fronting" street or drive. All such penetrations must be mounted straight and perpendicular to the ground (except for skylights and attic ventilators) and painted to blend with the roof color. Turbine vents are prohibit- ed. All vent stacks must have lead jacks. Comments: All our appliances for the residences are electric so there won't be an excessive amount of gas derived penetrations. The majority of roof penetrations will be limited to plumbing stacks and painted to match. We will have ridge vents and no turbines. 2. Roof Mechanical. Roof mechanical must be screened behind a parapet wall or Complies: platform that is recessed into a pitched roof so that the incline of the roof slope Yes No In Spirit ccreates a parapet wall. lel Comments: We will comply. Not applicable because mechanical equipment will be at grade. However, where and if we decided to place the mechanical equipment on roof, it will be screened per the above requirement. 3. Gutters, Downspouts, Scuppers and Collection Boxes. These must be copper Complies: or an enduring prefinished metal with a minimum 20-gauge thickness. Gutters Yes No In Spirit must be a minimum of 6 inches,half-round profile and attached with gutter n straps. Downspouts must be a minimum of 4 inches and round. Elbows and (^) bends must be a minimum of 4 inches,plain and round. Fascia mounted gutter systems are prohibited unless custom designed and integral to the architecture. Comments: We will Comply. • 43 d. Windows and Glazing 1. Glazing and Glazing Systems. Reflective glass is prohibited. Tinted glass and Complies: dark adhesive films where the transmission coefficient exceeds 27% is prohibited. Yes No In Spirit �. Stained glass is allowed provided that the glass is crafted in accordance with sol- x dered camping or"H" camping. No acrylic or pourable techniques are allowed. Glazing systems may be used in certain accent areas of specifically approved by the City. Comments: We will Comply. • 44 Part D: Landscaping, Fencing and Screening a. Site Landscaping t1 Leaf Mass Between Buildings. All multifamily development must provide Complies: trees between buildings. At least 60%of the planted area must be comprised of Yes No In Spirit over-story(canopy). Comments: We Comply. We have provided a significant amount of trees between each building and will exceed the requirement as the trees take root and mature. 2. Layered Landscaping at Building Entries. Landscaping must be provided at Complies: building entries and must be "layered." The building entry landscaping area must Yes No In Spirit be comprised of at least 3 layers: one upper layer of medium evergreen shrub n n approximately 30-36 inches high and 2 layers of shorter shrubs or one shrub and ISI L 1 an ornamental grass. These must be planted in beds having a minimum width of 72 inches. Upper layer shrubs must be 5-gallon container plants planted 30 inches on center with triangular spacing. Lower layer shrubs may be 3-gallon container plants planted 24 inches on center with triangular spacing. Comments: We will Comply. The planting areas defined on our landscape plan will allow for the layered look of ground covers and shorter up to large upper layer shrubs. All of our planting beds are at least 72" wide and we will comply with the size and spacing requirements of this section. • CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 45 a. Site Landscaping (continued) 3. All landscape beds must be associated with walkways,roadways, amenity Complies: feature,buildings or screens. Floating,ornamental or non-associated landscape Yes No In Spirit `rr beds are prohibited. Comments: We will Comply. All of the proposed landscape planting beds on the site are associated with or adjacent to pedestrian walkways and the buildings. All of our pedestrian walks meander through landscaped open spaces with the beds immediately adjacent to the walkways. The planting areas will be informal and will contain a mix of native and culturally appropriate landscape materials. 4. Plant Sizing. Shrubs that serve a screening function must be sized at the time Complies: Nor of planting such that they can serve as an effective screen within 2 years of the Yes No In Spirit planting date. 3-gallon plants must be planted 30 inches on center with triangu- n lar spacing and 2-gallon plants must be planted 24 inches on center with trian- gular I� I spacing. Smaller container and bedding plants must be planted at least 12 inches on center with triangular spacing.. Comments: We will Comply. Shrubs used for screening such as along our security fencing and plant material within the planting beds and building entrance areas will comply with the plant sizing requirements. • 46 b. Fences and Screening Walls 1. Fence Materials. Visible perimeter fences that are compliant with the General Complies: Standards may be made of unit masonry,wrought iron with unit masonry corner Yes No In Spirit columns, or masonry. If masonry, corner column and masonry interim column spacing is not to exceed 15ft and must have a masonry knee wall supporting '' wood or wrought iron infill. Comments: We will Comply. Our fencing has been designed to comply with these requirements. 2. Gate Materials. Gates in fences constructed in accordance with Dbl above Complies: may be made from wrought iron with a wrought iron frame (complying with Yes No In Spirit General Standards) or wood with frame members measuring a minimum of 1 and '/2 inches thick by 3 and '/2 inches wide and planks measuring at least 1 and '/2 inches thick. Gates must be comprised of the same material as the fence. Comments: We will Comply. • CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 47 b. Fences and Screening Walls (continued) 3. Corner Expression of Support Structure. All property corners of a property Complies: cline fence much be supported by a masonry column that is at least 10 square Yes No In Spirit inches. XI U E Comments: We will Comply. Cr 4. Thin wall construction, cast or embossed concrete walls,picket materials not Complies: in compliance with the General Standards, iron fences with mechanical connec- Yes No In Spirit tion assemblies,pre-fabricated decorative elements designed to slip over stock or n tubular steel shapes,and plastic or vinyl fence component systems are prohibit- t/\I ed. Comments: We will Comply. • 48 c. Street Visible Wrought Iron 1.Frames and other structural support members may not be less than 1 and 3/4 Complies: inches in either width measurement or 1 and 3/4 inches in diameter if round. Yes No In Spirit eipr Comments: We will Comply. 2. Pickets that are 5ft in length or height or less must have a minimum width of Complies: 3/4 inches in either width dimension or diameter.When pickets are longer or tall- Yes No In Spirit er than 5ft,the minimum with dimension is increased to 1 inch in the dimension that faces the street or 1 inch in diameter. ix; Comments: We will Comply. L 3. Panels must be made of metal plate material with a minimum thickness of Complies: 3/16 inches. Yes No In Spirit Comments: We will Comply. • CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 49 c. Street Visible Wrought Iron (continued) 4. The wall thickness of any tubular steel must not be less than 3/32 inches. Complies: Yes No In Spirit Comments: We will Comply. L. 5. Decorative elements such as finials and rings must be made of solid stock Complies: material and welded to the pickets or to the frame made from the pickets if the Yes No In Spirit pickets are solid stock material. Attachments to the pickets or frame and all other components of the wrought iron construction must be welded. Mechanical con- I` nections are prohibited. Comments: We will comply if applicable. • 50 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-019 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS GRANTING ZONING CHANGE Z18-01 ON A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE GREEN W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1083 (101 EAST GLADE ROAD), DESCRIBED AS BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND "PCD" PLANNED COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO "R- MF" MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of Grapevine, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas after all legal notices, requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these requested changes should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning change, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and, therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety, and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City of Grapevine Ordinance No. 82-73, being the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code of Grapevine, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended and changed by Zoning Application Z18-01 to rezone the following described property to-wit: being a 20.407 acre tract of land out of the Green W. Minter Survey, Abstract 1083, Tarrant County, Texas being Lot 1, Block A, Glade 360 Addition (101 East Glade Road), more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and Ordinance No. 2018-019 2 made a part hereof, which was previously zoned "LI" Light Industrial District and "PCD" Planned Commerce Development District, respectively, is hereby changed to"R-MF" Multi- Family District, all in accordance with Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to correct the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas to reflect the herein change in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety Ordinance No. 2018-019 3 and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of February, 2018. APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Ordinance No. 2018-019 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-020 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ISSUING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU18-02, ALLOWING THE APPLICANT TO EXCEED THE HEIGHT REGULATIONS, VARY FROM PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND ALLOW FOR A REDUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK IN A DISTRICT ZONED "R-MF" MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT FOR LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE 360 ADDITION (101 EAST GLADE ROAD) ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a conditional use permit by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this conditional use permit, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the conditional use permit lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this conditional use permit and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this conditional use permit for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Ordinance No. 2018-020 2 Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by granting Conditional Use Permit No. CU18-02 to allow the applicant to exceed the height regulations, vary from the parking requirements, and allow for a reduction in the front yard setback, in a district zoned "R-MF" Multi-Family District Regulations within the following described property: Lots 1, Block A, Glade 360 Addition (101 East Glade Road) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not Ordinance No. 2018-020 3 to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of February, 2018. APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Ordinance No. 2018-020 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-021 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS GRANTING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD18-01 TO DEVIATE FROM, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE BUILDING SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE TO THE "R-MF" MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT FOR LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADE 360 ADDITION (101 EAST GLADE ROAD) ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a planned development overlay by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this planned development overlay, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the planned development overlay lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this planned development overlay and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this planned development overlay for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Ordinance No. 2018-021 2 Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a planned development overlay in accordance with Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix"D" of the City Code, by granting Planned Development Overlay PD18-01 to deviate from, but not be limited to, the building separation requirements relative to the "R-MF" Multifamily District within the following described property: Lot 1, Block A, Glade 360 Addition (101 East Glade Road)all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein planned development overlay. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to Ordinance No. 2018-021 3 exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of February, 2018. APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Ordinance No. 2018-021 4 ri r iIII( TUTTT111111111 t[T UTTI:I T1JTI t rn 1 FL-- II I ` C I f • 44', p I� �. ' lir -�( I SITE OPEN SPACE 169,160 SF • I I (GROSS AREA) e 1"T"0 _ I('yI r 1 USABLE OPEN SPACE r Jr g I ; Pø ,Wilil• ,". ,' / Ji' i _ y if i I, Hs1iL �� ... 1 pt n n SWUM IA. 25.614 SF. ���� ��� G� I i ( ...Mr .._ ill i '' 11 =1 13.661 SF LOCATION MAP (N01 TO SCALE) / u 4;Y t ... .... t.734 SF - '' I:117 ' '.::.6%41' �t9 / • .... .. �.. , �/� r.. y" A \ �" ;,;�-: LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS(LOT 1.BLOCK Al p wT ACRES �T -�\Yl 't '9.660 Sr r�( '— '` ` 4,t, 0009TOTA91E AREA 220,994 Sr (20.407 ACMES) O CROSS 04-5 1 AREA 220,994 Sr Meet Oi STE . �( TOTAL N'1)TS/DW.PD1 SPACE AREA 475.374 ST 16.71%Cr SlE 1. V NUMBER 0f I./NTS/DWG.y 795/175,31e 9' 10.)A OF 91E \IAP ell" , .I.OIC® Aro1R➢ 1 a• wl '\C'\'\ . -1 P`-56° ItilESULLANOSGAElla wos IREE/400 Sr OF RECO. rooTA�.a.lwl0SC P( se�9005 "73.3.51147.75 �� to\G��a. 1 ME PER PLANTER aANo MO ERMNV6 YES YES Fa`O A PER FTER LA II .MNNQ `off OM 7 MOE PLANING MEA/30-YIN IEIp1T) YES TES - lir \1001411 SF''' S-SP 1 IIEE/50 LT Cr PCNNETER AREA 4�^ TES Y6 512(ESllnn.. EE1T1®A O - t Cr STE IN NCR-LENICUTAR OPER SPACE PER S:CRCI 53.SECRd 1(4),TABLE NSET . ._ t IRFE/3000 S Of NON-YF19CILM OPEN SPACE les tet 1 1REE/4000 SEC NON-1EHC%N1 OPEN SPACE PLUS EJOSRN0 11tEE5 IN ROOD PLAN AREA 1E5 4 .. OM,E CPFRL4l 9Pv PER SECTIG4 22,SECTION F(3) 99.750 Sr 20.5,000 ST 250 SF/UNIT (32.06%) El 1-7 Ne—_, GREYSTAR - THE PRESERVE OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT 1 0 25 SO 100 1-.50 Grapevine,Texas „r. . Y lit M "ell CA,r 44 3 r aro District Standard #1 -Architectural Accommodation of Grade Change . Oe 141 r-VUL VU[M.;t2l L�rltl'CI C114C� Rw BLDG 3 SLOG 2cr tt tib i1JR W BLDG 7 t. 8 F' -' °ot a I al Differen ce BLDG 12 RIWWW' #BLDG Buildings are designed to minimize use of retaining walls 15 and maximize architectural accommodation of grade change by: w - Implementing turn -down (thickened) footings - - stepping buildings down the grade throughout w�`-'` �' -`� development I era Is[ a 1U• � i F '�' � � • �,� fir: � I 0 9 P FF .x ti s 1 BLDG 1. 4 )G 3 BLDG 2 sold �6 � p ,. 3% CLU{niSE a Alto QJRTYAR W rG T { M BLDG 9 BLDG 10 ` ac" r � BLDG ' ^ 8' Wide Concrel li DG 13 Public Walking T .-:} ci �y S� PS Bad & Parking P= 0 a ro I Ida 1-. E R ore Idd UU• 0 0 PRAIRIL Sr ITINDt}PL c...s . PRAIRI! Pt X47 III AL III r a. lw s. ' i' �, •` " , rhe .t7k I a fir. L Ii-trirt Standard #t3 - Preserve & Restore Natural MC J ' I t 4 ,wr�rt fir•.. - ....Wr � 4 1 I • w r �b �` '' Area tee odisturbedo*O Dmarict Standard =5 — u { 1_; Eastern Buffer'`` -� F7D nsel Wooded Flood laiY p Mile to DFW Airport 35' Vertical Rise to Ai'r-#ort fro enFte of sits Fx Noise Reducing,Window If, Uni s r r ong Frontage Hoad 20' Vertical Drop to Center c •ontage Road rise Reducing Windows - A m sir. District Standard =3-:3 - Curvilinear Oraanizatic w N'o'n orthoonal Bid " � y•. Orientation ac • ^ry aw, i i Meandering Streets s. of gjg :. :. Intersections ter, ` ''r "- • i. ' '. 4 ok Reefor f Tree Layo uta. 4 Organ,ica ly Shaped f 06 MRS n.g A rea4 r , . 1 imtrict stancdarr �Pariunn uc >* bu WWI o� BLDG I' J BLDG3' _BLDG 2~ -, !' IX TYAR BLDG 7 Dc. a ♦ r,.� > BLDG 9 ►G 12 BLDG 10 .ti Z -Y . BLDWG I I ParKing Gonceaied Beninc Buildings, Landscape buffer_ and Grade Chance District Standard #22 - "Borrowed Landscape" (Parkway) 25'- 60'Widel*torrowed Landscape" (Parkway) for Street Enhancement (Between Property Line and Building Facade) General Standard - Internal Destinations Iwo, �r 4 Pavilion Park - Outdoor Grilling Stations/Dining '''"'-'C - Multimedia - Lawn Garpea ftoK vow cc cc t2_. + Acre Nature Preserve Dog Park and Wash Facility Public Trailhead & Parking Club Amenity & Grand Courtyard - 24 -Hour Fitness Center - Business Center - Digital Package Concierge - Clube&m with Kitchen/Games - Outdoor Fire Pit - Outdoor Grilling Stations/Dining - Outdoor Multimedia - Swimming Pool - Grand Courtyard District Standard #12 - Resort/Lodge Derived Styling Forms Large Roof_Overhangs Timber Frame Accents 80% Stone Tapered Stone Columns Ah ■ - W Ah i 9 0 oR Ah ■ m Ah MEPPPPP— -qqqqm 10 Ah lwbhl� 4s qr * r- - L-1 i.. A sia 0 r_ :rd[• ` wr AND - Mew WO E STING ! I CITY OF FORT WORTH PAVEMENT - CONNECTTO DALLASTORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT I I EXISTING VOL. 4892. PG. 439 STANDARDS DARRDS TAPERPAVEMENTWIDTH EXISTING ROODRAIN / / BOIINOARY, PER FEMA nATuoEN I I E0.9EMENT �. __--__----_------ _________1_--'0IY54'E _.. 4aBLDG SETBACK -_- ( % I� FROM ROW. / 1 PROP TURN LANE S1°20'13'W ! / ! PROP. FtREWNE (TVP) 3D.64 �( 1 I f CARPORT. ttP. CARPORT.TVP. } 1 1.: e..l_�ID �I2 Iy 593.83'OP OE'45"E 239.36' / - _ _ /-- r I l� 3 I, I;c i I / / / I - 0. ' ...k 0. i 1 �1 MH.. 1.-�.. _ rL Lrti i _ FH I b PROP. FUTURETRA 48'SSWR / / / / I ' --pN'� T ,O y 0.y>�J{- _�_ -y MH � I°a r STRIPBIG LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE _ �� F vutF_c.r IA w CLARE 5M1 � CLARE 1.60 SPACES l UNIT - __ ROAD 7D 'm 0 Z O ID W 7 EX TRA 36 s3tNR T f 11 / I I _ / ry` w -mow w E F F p I bl I • �J / 1 / i( R f �� I �.: PROP. PROP. FH ~ T-- II E PROP. - BLDG 2 GATE PROP. LEFT K APPROXIMATE 100 YEARWATER I BPE1. d - �`� DUMPSTER H - FH - TYPE 19. p TURN LANE Z SURFACE ELEVATION AND TYPE 1. �^ ® PROP. SWITCH 0 �F ISUNDEFOROUND Z i 9 'PLAN RECLAMATION 18 : 3 PROP. FH : "� I PROP. FIREIANE (TYPJ - TYPE NA - ' IN FE BLDG 3 BACK RAMP - ONCOR EAAEMENI / - TYPE IB .. I I GRAPHIC SCALE ET w u D �o T m EwsnNG zia ssR wE ROW. yU $ D EASEMENT I I/ I (��' { _:'.-•. I I n .°1n LANOSCME /' - 'T4.a' I I O Q d m u 1 I --�_ -1 / TYP-24V�"j ULL��X w mP) y ALL / \ I Q I SITE DATA SUMMARY / MH ( em __ �� 1t I I O - GUTTED 20NING U UI C: F O FOOL PROPOSED CLUB -.- cl I �I 3 I Q m vi -m ZONING R1,IF "E I I ( I - _ �,DDDRTYARD HO PUBLIC 'I i W/ Q19 Q m OD PROPOSED I II I I I IsLDOB _ ` RETAINING SPACES :GATE. 4 I -. �) 0z m TO]AL LOTAREA = p' S ' \ WALL PROP. (M1N2ACRES) (M8,945 SFJ20.41 AG °F6"Mm J / �EXL6TINGAPPROX 11 I / .. .. \ \ - •� I TOTAL BURRING AREA (t]SA3]S.F.14.03 AC. A / W Q W W CREIX CENTER 1 - ��I� or. PROP. FH - SPEED TMLE \ \ J H w Y `� I I FLOOR AREA RATro OTAL y til BUILDWG MEAOT)TAL LOT 20% R W Z /1 i l/ 1 I I - I BLDG6 15 I FH BDG9 PROP. FH \ ` 1 11 1 R OF MEA=MA%sox) �O Z P / C GI a� -- _� I T 'rte / TYPEN IXPP \ ` 1 1 EXISTING MPROK I I TYPEN g �'� `�C ` /9 q6 Y 1 I I l TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA (42],Sb S.F.)9.81 AC, oZ d CREEK BANK I I / 9.a _ - PROP a4A%TS%) 48% ® y '7- - aw MEDIAN TOTALOMN SPACE ■ - R ' BLDG ] .. (ei: � / t-: '-� � i TT I- s � ft \ � 3. F n a 'O ] �r9 I I (M ) H81.00I B.F.110.B0 AC. 0. T' ":V'.) �. / � m 1 c1 � IN 20% 5216 , ox PROP.. . M \ x 1 TOTAL SUILDBIG AND PAVED a 1 I r I I AREAS (42].538 S.F.) 9.81 AC. CARPORT, TYP I 4 \ DUMPSTER \ �Pm 1 it I - PROP. RA [' � / ^� PROP. FOTEVMNE 11 1 1 1 I a a s TJ / N PROP TURN LANE - TOTM NUMBER OF UNTfS 399 UNITS I PROP PH ( '.y:........, :'I'9 I PROP ROW TOTAL NUMBER OF 585 BEDROOMS - 11 II l .5 i w f� PROP.ORATE \ / / M1 U ttPE THi PROP.CURB I BEDROOMS i' ':4 INLET (TYP) I/ p MH n '"I ...DAVID E MEYERS � I UNG DENSITY 19.55 UNRS'ACRE 'P O,�" / I I� ILII i 1 I PROP. BTORM \ _ J PROPOSED MANHOLE (]YP) �a' 6 /� DOG WASH APPROXINATE WALL RYP) O -. \ ,.\J \ I / / 15'UNDERGROUND I / / �- 0 \\ / 10 DNCGR EASEMENT !/ STYPEI -'t0 V .'� I/ /OOC.REASEMENTp SWALE EXISTING MPROX TABLE DR1 \ \y s AINAGE BANK PROP. TRASH TYPE THt F 417' R U 7' RECYCLE BIN EXISTING MPROX ��� 11f f\ ! DRAINAGE SWAtE CENTER' V 4+- �j / PROP. FH \ // F' a - m".) .a f _,P BLnc,s a � PROP. M Ryp.) . T N L Q 7) M NW ,=w3 S / � \ \ 4yzo / / • .. \ \ �\ �% 4e^ , a.'�\i'' � STN,3100 .411 i\'° PROP. Fri PARKING DATA SUMMARY TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 639 639 1.60 SPACES l UNIT (INCLUDES 13 HC SPOTS) TOTALPARKINGPROMDED SURFACE PARKING �T (INCLUDES ,0 HC 6POT5) fil�0WEHM ©�7 PUBLIC TRAIL PARWNG (INCDES 1 HC VAN SPOT) (INCLUDES 100 CARPORT PARKING (INCLUDE54 HC SPOTS) TANDEM PARKWO 90 GATLAGE PARKING 140 u1At 2 o 0 O U U O rc^ am Q > Y NW LL W U) Tn �W�A// LL Z F a - 51W W °- Z (90 LL 0 LI O Z -PROP. IM (--`�,•'�j� f fJ DUMPSTER �' .({G` e- - - .. VNRARE VARIATIONSNOTEDWITt1AL ELETTERFOLLOTH WWGEUNITILIME(•A5' r U Cl \ O gyp)\ \,`Y�i�/ / i / (�\ gV �. FOREXAMPLE4TH UNRVARIAPONSREFZ MINORALTEMTIONSTOT,ERASE \Yv J� 2 �/ / / _ G�i• Np,FU` MR PLANS BVWOOWS,ADJUSTMENTS, TUBS VS. SHOWERS, BALCONY Sm, ETC.). W TYPE NA 15'UNDERGROUNDONCOR EASEMENT J DOC. NO.Dzo9DSNO N� \a, / PROP. 2a STORM ESM]. �,(�� �'�/ .j6O•N0 \/ PROPERTY \ O ® PROP. / UNE - ^ ) '/ BlDG,6 METER S`O LEGEND rjOV l tt J\0�' APPROXIMATE BUILDING HEIGHTS 1o94AcE S�FROM'UL�uGIR N1DU3TRLA DSTRC MDfiO] / FH PROP. FN P H v. 0C>T(i� njF1� Es ACCESSIBLE PARIUNGSYMSOL (REFERTOMCHPLANSFORBLDGMATERNLS) ACRESFROMRCO'PLAMffOCONILYMMFRCEDEVELOPMENT .. 9 STRICT TO *R� PARKIN :./ mpusuc\� PROP. GATE ,.�)O(L5� O PROPOSED FIRE HYDNUMBEROFPARMNDRANT DSPACESIEVE3OPMENT OF AM 399 UNITWLTNFAMRY DEVELOPMENT n• \ \\ SPACES W a O Al SS SANTTARY SEWER PIPE BUIID4IG NO. BUILDING TYPE HEIGHT Q • EXCEED THE USE REQUEST CUI&0215AIYFROM THE v \ R 1a 160703" IYP. IYPICAl CLUBHOUSE 3B-0' iSTORY EXCEED THE HEEMENTSU AND IDR FROM THE .Q�/ ` \ PAR,UNG REOUIRESETBAC MID ALLOW FORAItEOUCTONIN IL CASE NAME PRESERVE Z DEFINITIONS to \ \ � sQ O6 y R=378 9.72' SW SIDEWALK 2 TYPE III LODGE PIAT 39-0' 3STORIES THE FROM YARD SETBACKRI TO THE FLEXIBLE CASE NUMBER 2,ed1, CU18i12.PD1801 \ i \ L-39 CI CURB INLET 3 TYPE III LOOM FLAT 39'-0' 3 STORIES DEISGN STANDARDS IN THE R#' MULTfAMILY DISTRICT. W LOCATON:101 EAST GLADE ROAD; LOT 1, BLOCK • BROWNSTONE S STORY GUEST WITH `6' \ AO 28°10'40'YV WM WATER METER ,o AGLAD ADDRION G ATTACHED GARAGES AND GUEST PARKWG Oj \ R 4 TYPE NA LODGE FLAT 3411' 35TORIES Pl/JAm OEVEIDPMENi OVERLAY PD,B-011SAREOUEST I J 6 URBM FUITS: URBAN APARTMENT FLATS WRH G, -� : C=398.93' MH MANHOLE THE IQ ^ TUCK UNDER CORRIDOR ACCESS GARAGE PARKWG \ \ 5 TYPE RESORT FIAT -0' 3STORIES • TODEVIATEFROM BUT NOT BE D.IUDING L.L ANDPEDESTRIANAOCESS FROM BOTH SIDES 7PUBLIC TRNL \- N24°54'46"W PROPOSED I7WATEft IM IRRIGATON METER SEPARATON RC-0DREl1ENTSWTHE'R4JF MULTIFAMLY J • BREEZEWAY FLATS TRADITIONAL SURFACE PARgNG SPACES\ 5° 'D5'V✓ '4180 �` WE WATEREASEMENT 5 TYPE II RESORT FLAT 34-0' 3STORIES DISTRICT. ('D^ 1,' BY 80RE UNDER ALL V �. YG� SECRETARY E3,J PARIESDARARTMACOw EDBRSEZEWAY I "AC SI 461,30, \ LANES OF SH 380 ROW RIGHTOED CU T TYPEI RESORT FLAT 3B -O 3STORIES ACCESBLE FROM AD PARQN BREEZEWAY WTM VMI - _ _ \ ' CI PROPOSED CURB INLET Ai AVAILABLE COVERED PARKING SPACES � e - B TYPE N LODGE FLAT 330 3 STORIES _ EFFICIENCY UNITS:ONE BEDRODM UNITS WTTH NET PROP, -- o, �.A Q O PROPOSED GRATE INLET ° x RENTABLE AREA RANGING FROM TOP7W SO. FT AaES3 -� �� r� EPD \( 1�"M MH PROPO9EOMARHOLE 9 TYPEN LODGE FLAT 39'-0' 3STORIES t gj NET 80 FT: REPRESENTS CONDITIONED SPACE EENT. \ 3 ::Ay PROP. DECEL LANE ERv1C EX y 10 TYPE -1 BROWNSTONE 39N1 3 STORIES $$p 8+^ MOU�NCONDI ONED SPACE IFT: REPRESENTS OB�ALOCONY.E%TERIOR PIiOP. MASTER ITIONED SPACE` V�,\ . \\ �` \ 518 5".- ��..� -1 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION 11 TWEII RESORT FLAT W'-0' 3STORIES STORAGE CLOSET) Z6P \ \� ^u0 f �F°ft' ��� gN B JNO EXISTING PAVEMENT 12 TYPE THi BROWNSTONE 3W -V 3STORIES PROPOSED i .e. PROPOSED to WIDE MONO SIGN / / / / / FOR Y' Ro.w. `. NOR�Nf''• PROPOSED FIRE LANE 13 TYPE RESORT FLAT 3A-0' 3 STOVES 4w� 5dp WATER MNN EASEMENT Wim/ / - �Q I 14 TYPE TH1 BROWNSTONE 3P-0' 3STORIES �5 ^' CONNEOSED13,=LFBGIMPEVI EROAD. / J Ny5 Cj���\G� / O PROPOSED PAVEMEMWRO.W. 15 ttPEN RESORTFUT 34�V 33TORIES H ��wi / a18 Qf BORINS STAGING ® 18 TYPE NA LODGE FIAT 99'HP 35TORIES TO PROPOSED TRAIL 0anw�s1 RAPEVINE ROAD i f,- \j QPM 17 TYPEI RESO6T FLAT 34-0' 33TORIE3 '.] WATER MAIN id:9 i%ice / _ IX. B'WATER PROPOSED SWEWALJ6 18 TYPE NA LODGE FIAT 39'd 3STORIES NOTES 1. ALL OMENSIONS MESO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWLSE 2. ALL FIRE N DRWANT LESS NOTEfI OCATED SE. 3. ALLFlRAP UARANTS A PRONID LOCATED W AN CE WITH ADA IENT STAN. 4. HANDICAP MPPI(WG IS PI20WDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADA STANDARDS FOR ALL LOTS 5. ALLGATESMUSTCOMPLYWTTHFORINTERNAL ECODE 6. REFERENCE LANIDSCMEPIANS FORINTERNAL SO)EWALK LOCATIONS AND SIZES, IANDSCAPWO AREAS MD OPEN SCALE ]. ALL BUILUNGDEND TO OR CESACK TO TOFACF_ION IS SEPARATION LS 50' MW AFID END TO END OR FACEIBACK TO ENO SEPARATION IS THE GREATEROF3a MIN OR BUILDOKa HEWTR. 8. REFERENCE ATTACHED GRADING PLANE FOR EMSTWG AND PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDMONS.EM 9. ALL REOUIREMS OF THE GRAPEVINE SOL EROSION CONTROL ORDNANCE LL SHABE MET DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 10. PLL ONSITE ELECTRICK CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WftH NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOUTED UNDERGROUND. DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ME CHAIRMAN fil�0WEHM ©�7 DATE: SHEET: 2 OF 35 SHEET NUMBER Rra��eno6©0 ARPRON%L LIOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK W CONFLICTrNIMANYCODESOROROWANCES 2 DEPARTMENTOF DEVELOPMEM SERVICES I B7Q?7�®iifk706=d®�^J �m�®OotiFFf�61� ��®6ffiJO®� m u1At 2 o 0 O U U O rc^ am Q > Y NW LL W U) Tn �W�A// LL Z F a - 51W W °- Z (90 LL 0 LI O Z -PROP. IM (--`�,•'�j� f fJ DUMPSTER �' .({G` e- - - .. VNRARE VARIATIONSNOTEDWITt1AL ELETTERFOLLOTH WWGEUNITILIME(•A5' r U Cl \ O gyp)\ \,`Y�i�/ / i / (�\ gV �. FOREXAMPLE4TH UNRVARIAPONSREFZ MINORALTEMTIONSTOT,ERASE \Yv J� 2 �/ / / _ G�i• Np,FU` MR PLANS BVWOOWS,ADJUSTMENTS, TUBS VS. SHOWERS, BALCONY Sm, ETC.). W TYPE NA 15'UNDERGROUNDONCOR EASEMENT J DOC. NO.Dzo9DSNO N� \a, / PROP. 2a STORM ESM]. �,(�� �'�/ .j6O•N0 \/ PROPERTY \ O ® PROP. / UNE - ^ ) '/ BlDG,6 METER S`O LEGEND rjOV l tt J\0�' APPROXIMATE BUILDING HEIGHTS 1o94AcE S�FROM'UL�uGIR N1DU3TRLA DSTRC MDfiO] / FH PROP. FN P H v. 0C>T(i� njF1� Es ACCESSIBLE PARIUNGSYMSOL (REFERTOMCHPLANSFORBLDGMATERNLS) ACRESFROMRCO'PLAMffOCONILYMMFRCEDEVELOPMENT .. 9 STRICT TO *R� PARKIN :./ mpusuc\� PROP. GATE ,.�)O(L5� O PROPOSED FIRE HYDNUMBEROFPARMNDRANT DSPACESIEVE3OPMENT OF AM 399 UNITWLTNFAMRY DEVELOPMENT n• \ \\ SPACES W a O Al SS SANTTARY SEWER PIPE BUIID4IG NO. BUILDING TYPE HEIGHT Q • EXCEED THE USE REQUEST CUI&0215AIYFROM THE v \ R 1a 160703" IYP. IYPICAl CLUBHOUSE 3B-0' iSTORY EXCEED THE HEEMENTSU AND IDR FROM THE .Q�/ ` \ PAR,UNG REOUIRESETBAC MID ALLOW FORAItEOUCTONIN IL CASE NAME PRESERVE Z DEFINITIONS to \ \ � sQ O6 y R=378 9.72' SW SIDEWALK 2 TYPE III LODGE PIAT 39-0' 3STORIES THE FROM YARD SETBACKRI TO THE FLEXIBLE CASE NUMBER 2,ed1, CU18i12.PD1801 \ i \ L-39 CI CURB INLET 3 TYPE III LOOM FLAT 39'-0' 3 STORIES DEISGN STANDARDS IN THE R#' MULTfAMILY DISTRICT. W LOCATON:101 EAST GLADE ROAD; LOT 1, BLOCK • BROWNSTONE S STORY GUEST WITH `6' \ AO 28°10'40'YV WM WATER METER ,o AGLAD ADDRION G ATTACHED GARAGES AND GUEST PARKWG Oj \ R 4 TYPE NA LODGE FLAT 3411' 35TORIES Pl/JAm OEVEIDPMENi OVERLAY PD,B-011SAREOUEST I J 6 URBM FUITS: URBAN APARTMENT FLATS WRH G, -� : C=398.93' MH MANHOLE THE IQ ^ TUCK UNDER CORRIDOR ACCESS GARAGE PARKWG \ \ 5 TYPE RESORT FIAT -0' 3STORIES • TODEVIATEFROM BUT NOT BE D.IUDING L.L ANDPEDESTRIANAOCESS FROM BOTH SIDES 7PUBLIC TRNL \- N24°54'46"W PROPOSED I7WATEft IM IRRIGATON METER SEPARATON RC-0DREl1ENTSWTHE'R4JF MULTIFAMLY J • BREEZEWAY FLATS TRADITIONAL SURFACE PARgNG SPACES\ 5° 'D5'V✓ '4180 �` WE WATEREASEMENT 5 TYPE II RESORT FLAT 34-0' 3STORIES DISTRICT. ('D^ 1,' BY 80RE UNDER ALL V �. YG� SECRETARY E3,J PARIESDARARTMACOw EDBRSEZEWAY I "AC SI 461,30, \ LANES OF SH 380 ROW RIGHTOED CU T TYPEI RESORT FLAT 3B -O 3STORIES ACCESBLE FROM AD PARQN BREEZEWAY WTM VMI - _ _ \ ' CI PROPOSED CURB INLET Ai AVAILABLE COVERED PARKING SPACES � e - B TYPE N LODGE FLAT 330 3 STORIES _ EFFICIENCY UNITS:ONE BEDRODM UNITS WTTH NET PROP, -- o, �.A Q O PROPOSED GRATE INLET ° x RENTABLE AREA RANGING FROM TOP7W SO. FT AaES3 -� �� r� EPD \( 1�"M MH PROPO9EOMARHOLE 9 TYPEN LODGE FLAT 39'-0' 3STORIES t gj NET 80 FT: REPRESENTS CONDITIONED SPACE EENT. \ 3 ::Ay PROP. DECEL LANE ERv1C EX y 10 TYPE -1 BROWNSTONE 39N1 3 STORIES $$p 8+^ MOU�NCONDI ONED SPACE IFT: REPRESENTS OB�ALOCONY.E%TERIOR PIiOP. MASTER ITIONED SPACE` V�,\ . \\ �` \ 518 5".- ��..� -1 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION 11 TWEII RESORT FLAT W'-0' 3STORIES STORAGE CLOSET) Z6P \ \� ^u0 f �F°ft' ��� gN B JNO EXISTING PAVEMENT 12 TYPE THi BROWNSTONE 3W -V 3STORIES PROPOSED i .e. PROPOSED to WIDE MONO SIGN / / / / / FOR Y' Ro.w. `. NOR�Nf''• PROPOSED FIRE LANE 13 TYPE RESORT FLAT 3A-0' 3 STOVES 4w� 5dp WATER MNN EASEMENT Wim/ / - �Q I 14 TYPE TH1 BROWNSTONE 3P-0' 3STORIES �5 ^' CONNEOSED13,=LFBGIMPEVI EROAD. / J Ny5 Cj���\G� / O PROPOSED PAVEMEMWRO.W. 15 ttPEN RESORTFUT 34�V 33TORIES H ��wi / a18 Qf BORINS STAGING ® 18 TYPE NA LODGE FIAT 99'HP 35TORIES TO PROPOSED TRAIL 0anw�s1 RAPEVINE ROAD i f,- \j QPM 17 TYPEI RESO6T FLAT 34-0' 33TORIE3 '.] WATER MAIN id:9 i%ice / _ IX. B'WATER PROPOSED SWEWALJ6 18 TYPE NA LODGE FIAT 39'd 3STORIES NOTES 1. ALL OMENSIONS MESO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWLSE 2. ALL FIRE N DRWANT LESS NOTEfI OCATED SE. 3. ALLFlRAP UARANTS A PRONID LOCATED W AN CE WITH ADA IENT STAN. 4. HANDICAP MPPI(WG IS PI20WDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADA STANDARDS FOR ALL LOTS 5. ALLGATESMUSTCOMPLYWTTHFORINTERNAL ECODE 6. REFERENCE LANIDSCMEPIANS FORINTERNAL SO)EWALK LOCATIONS AND SIZES, IANDSCAPWO AREAS MD OPEN SCALE ]. ALL BUILUNGDEND TO OR CESACK TO TOFACF_ION IS SEPARATION LS 50' MW AFID END TO END OR FACEIBACK TO ENO SEPARATION IS THE GREATEROF3a MIN OR BUILDOKa HEWTR. 8. REFERENCE ATTACHED GRADING PLANE FOR EMSTWG AND PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDMONS.EM 9. ALL REOUIREMS OF THE GRAPEVINE SOL EROSION CONTROL ORDNANCE LL SHABE MET DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 10. PLL ONSITE ELECTRICK CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WftH NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOUTED UNDERGROUND. DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 2 OF 35 SHEET NUMBER ARPRON%L LIOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK W CONFLICTrNIMANYCODESOROROWANCES 2 DEPARTMENTOF DEVELOPMEM SERVICES I XB' -g p 30'-9' yT._a- BALC. PATIO — — MUD BENCH BEDROOM W.LC• ,P -d x 12-p' BALC. PATIO -- L� BEDROOM NTRY KITCHEN 1T-6' x 10•-5' IW -2' X T -d ° ANNE II I /\ LIVINGLL= I =1`_ n' -a X n• -r W.A.C. I L71' DININGe LIVING DINING BATH - 15'-6 X 14'-6BATH LFV! NG DINING x „'-6 X 20'-4' ID 10❑°• NOQ ._ _�� "E BATH L --e-.: - L� W. BEDROOM � 9ENW L - _�_ �\ KITCHEN ° r= z d X -r KITCHEN WIDE 0 11'-d X 9'-r L -i -- — — ENTRY ENTRY o — — — — 9 E"Z UN t �4 �0UNIt A4 UNIt .42NET: 839 1 4 1-0 NET: 770 GROSS: 502 / GRO55: 972 / GROSS: 771 • A60: VARIATON-NB CHANGED TO SHOWER A4u: VARIATION -TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER Ata: VARIATION -DIRECT ENTRY TO GARAGE ' A2b: VARIATION -DIRECT ENTRY TO GARAGE & TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER ' A2c: VARIATION -TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER z9._g zr-g 16-5 0 NUO BENCH o BALC. PATIO ENTRY 7EWRY o ° KITCHEN r T 14'-4' X 12'-D' BEDROOM" G W.I.C. ( ° Iz'-r X 11'-d KITCHEN W.I.C. Tal x 9._p. W.I.C. W L NNE NEJ PAN. BATH 0❑° PAN. C W/D L_ W.H. W. F b �— BATH • LNING DINING r BATH I2• -d x I -r - 0 LNING DINING 0❑ BEDROOM.Y� „•�; <,_� LNING DINING „',• X ,4'-P Ir -i x lE'-d _ PAN CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE \� CASE NUN L �10 EEXE01. CU ,602AND PD 1601 i \ — LOGTON: 101 EAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A GLADFJ3E0 ADDRION KITCHEN BEDROOM -- 9•-1' x 12•4 ° — � 11'-d % 12'-6 ° _ W.I.G. DATE - , / / r W.H. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I r W.H. � - - B€SK fill �iNE , O � ° ENTR j,7 7, ',: =;; " o — — — BALC. PATIO J - ,,,_�__._ L_L y LIN I t .45 BALC. PATIO CWI1I474>— i DATE' NET: 794 p i GROSS: 857 3 UNIT 143 LIN I 1 MSX 1 SHEET: 3 OF 35 • ASa: VARIATION -ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER WINDOW BUMP • AS b: VARIATION -ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER WINDOW BUMP NET: 751 NET: 705 • A5c: VARIATION—NB CHANGED TO SHOWER �/4=—O/}"_� -Q APPROVAL GOES NOT AIRHORIZE ANY WORKIN • ASd: VARIATION -ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER WINDOW BUMP/TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER GROSS: 810 GROSS: 786 CONPLICTWITHANYCODP 0RONDHANCCS - • A3u: VARIATION -DIRECT ENTRY TO GARAGE & ELONGATED KITCHEN ISLAND A,D: VARIATION -TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER • ASe: VARIATION -ENTRY DOOR ADJUSTMENT/OUTSIDE CORNER WINDOW BUMP/NB CHANGED TO SHOWER • A3b: VARIATION -TUB CHANGED TO SHOWER DEPARTMENTOFDEVELDPMENTSEWCEs 12/22/2017 UNIT PLAN -THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners ARCH I T E C T R E I ^ LAN D P L A N N N G 3 , GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP x�x�T DRME�D E„�D DSU % 09 -7 a7 . M -T _DEscN 'p JDa No. wo33 � BEDROOM 2 1a•-10' x 1a-1 LIVING 13'-Y x ,P-9' M. BEDROOM 12'-6 X 12-2 W.LC. IO `2J L F77 - BATH DINING ON. 17•-4• % -� PDR. M. BAT I < I W.I.C. � PAN. ILIw \ W.I.C. BEDROOM 3 r T, KITCHEN uuD ewcH 101-1a' x 1a'-1 L i J� 13'-Y x 12'-V O �_ UNIt c1 ✓ 1/4 =1 _D" NET: 1,393 GROSS: 1,441 UNIT B3 NET: 1,269 GROSS: 1,384 M. BEDROOM Y ,2'- % BEDROOM W.LC. I BEDROOM 2 n• -a' 1 W.LC. I M. BATH La o KITCHENIT EN K % BATH � o UN. 7 +r NCH LIVING�DINING TRENCH PNV FRY UNIT 51 f' 1/4„—�'—D° NET: 1,092 GRO55: 1,164 BALC. PATIO tg�a X CASE NAME:THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER Zt&at, CU IB AND PO 1801 LOCATON: 101 EAST xYADE ROA➢ LOT 1, BLOC( A GLADEx38a ADDRION OATS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE: UNIT 52 UNIT Al SHEET: 4OF35 1' •I/NET: 1,129 �•_�� O,r GROSS: 1,1$2 4�_�, D„ / ' NET: 1,020 GROSS: 1, 079 APPROVALDOESNOTAIRHORREANYYA]RNIN CONRICT- ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMEN, SERVICES 12/22/2017 UNIT PLAN -THE PRESERVE GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP Meeks +Partners ARC X I T E I N T U R E LAN N P L A I N G �a,,RDEB,Gy 4 , ao9 No. 1403 � f UNIT THI - 3RD FLOOR (-I� UNII tHI- 2NC FLOOR f. �74,._�' 7 2a' -a' r-,1 UNIT THI - 1St FLOOR GRC55: 1,920 �!!1!! - I UNIT PLAN -THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners A R C H I T U E C T R E M LAN D P L A N N I N G ��'!l1111 , rE.NNOWw.owvf smenm. HasraN,nc>mrs GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP CpH[9N�y 0E9CN �_ - ,IOB N0. 14033 � II A J b ENTRY PATIO r-,1 UNIT THI - 1St FLOOR GRC55: 1,920 �!!1!! - I UNIT PLAN -THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners A R C H I T U E C T R E M LAN D P L A N N I N G ��'!l1111 , rE.NNOWw.owvf smenm. HasraN,nc>mrs GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP CpH[9N�y 0E9CN �_ - ,IOB N0. 14033 � BEDROOM 2 BER", ,,._Q BATH J M. BATH 0 I�l>I M. ,BEDROOM ( � �1=1 TH2 - 3RD FLOOR I UNIt tH2 - 2ND FLOOR UNIT PLAN - THE PRESERVE GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP zo'-v 16 T FLOOR NET: 1,515 GROSS: 2,187 Meeks +Partners A R C H I T E C T U R E L A N D P L A N N I N G - , eaoo rEuowei wu..E su�noo-nasrax,rxnmv mxr�ui o�v�, � aae No. 14033 �, %) ��' 7H214- 3RD FLOOR 7 11 214 - 2ND FLOOR @=U"'=1T+12A - 1St1'-0" NET: t,s3o caoss: 2,220 CASE NAME THE PRESERVE CPSE NUMBER: ZI"I, CU 18-02 AND PD 18-01 LO TION 101-- LOT 01EAST GLADE ROADLOT 1. BLO-A. GLADEf38D ADDITION —VAPOR v— DATE: PIANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION D DATE SHEET: 7OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY NARK IN CONFLICT WITN ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 12/22/2017 UNIT PLAN -THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners ARC H I T E N I T R E M 7 LAN D P L A N N N G Ie000Mww.0 oRrh slmEnm-HasraN,r<Trma - GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP �ruN. oEw;N� JOB NO 1033 UNIT TH3 - 3RD FLOOR UNIT TH3 - 2ND FLOOR �1� UNIT TH3 - 1ST FLOOR ��4••—�'-0" NET: 1.747 GRO55: 2.M 12/22/2017 UNIT PLAN -THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners ARCHITECTURE M 8 L A N D PLAN N I N G R�4 , GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP mxcmruK oesr,V J09 N0. 14033 SUILDINa 7 -r -PE I - LEVEL 2 ... J L ® --- - ® - - Al a Al CASE NAME:TNEPRESERYE GENII MZ150,.CN,SOt ANDPDIMI LOGTION ,O, EAST G m ROAD LOT,. BLOCK & GLAOB A MION I l� �J DATE: PLANNING AND MN— COMMISSION rr i z SHEET: 9 OF 35 f3UfLDINC� tYPE I - LEVEL I grC( (�x' 1 APPROVALDOESNOTAIIfNORQEANMWIN ESQ /�,-�a.. CO WCT,WTN ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES OEPARIMEN�OF OEVELOPMENi SERNCES 1z zz zoi% Meeks + Partners BUILDING PLAN - THE PRESERVE ARCN ECTURE LAN DPLMANNING 9 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP�`� cax�niN.oEaw d00 N0. 14033 I CASE NAME:THEPRESE PD 21 1 GSE N06®ER: 80,, CLl 1601 AND 1841 ® �,'.,,,. % ® ® ® LOT.. BL= A. GLADE AOWM Ala Al �averr— I _- DATE PLANNING ANO ZONING CO IS610N Sm I�F fJS��L� J S � GTE �1 SHEET: 100E 35 BUILDING 'iYi�E I - LEVEL 3 1 i:r APPROVALDOEB NOTARHORREANYK9RS CONFlJCT WITH ANYCODE60R ORgNANCES DEPARTMEw OF DEVELOPNEIR SERV 12/22/2017 BUILDING PLAN -THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners A R C H I T E C T U RE 1 0 L A N D P L A N N I N G oRrv,;suDEnro-xolsmx,TxTmrs GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP mNr ruu oEsr3+ JOB N0. 14037 I I I A L PARKING 4A.L PARKING STALL 'f ANOTE: CARPOR S MAY VARY IN LENGTH AND NUMBER OF BAYS PROMDED. REFER TO SNE PIAN. 1/4•'= l •-O" CARPORT ELEV-SECT KEYNOTE LEGEND: TYPICAL STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING - A FIBER CEMENT SIDING - B TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL ACCENT ROOF COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS FIBER CEMENT TRIM -MITERED CORNERS TYPICAL 6' PLANE CHANGE } RIBBED MTL. ROOFING 72 1 Q4 I'I _ MID POINT OF ROOF U HGT. PAN1E0 SR. BRACING RE MANUF. L PANTED SIL COLUMN - _ RE: MANUF. b I _ - CONCI FINSN SURFACE RE CML DFtNGS. ..:t B CARPORT ELEV4T I ON 4 SECTION I I I A L PARKING 4A.L PARKING STALL 'f ANOTE: CARPOR S MAY VARY IN LENGTH AND NUMBER OF BAYS PROMDED. REFER TO SNE PIAN. 1/4•'= l •-O" CARPORT ELEV-SECT KEYNOTE LEGEND: TYPICAL STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING - A FIBER CEMENT SIDING - B TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL ACCENT ROOF COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS FIBER CEMENT TRIM -MITERED CORNERS TYPICAL 6' PLANE CHANGE } 1 I'I _ MID POINT OF ROOF U HGT. L - LEVEL 3 I _ ..:t - _ --...: _[_F. 1 t rT- _ _ L• -ii - _... _.. _ LEVEL 2 _ . CPSE DN E TRHFPRESERVE MB ZSCU, 802AND PD IBUI LOCATION: ,O, EASTT GLADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK AGLADE/350 ADDRION LEVEL t DATE: r4_`� SU I LD INC5I TYPE 1 4 14 - FRONT ELEVATION MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 81% _ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:6.2 DATE: .TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE SHEET: 11 OF 35 k BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID APPROVAL CONFLICT DOES NOT AHTHORIZE ANY WORK IN WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 12/22/2017 Meeks +Partners BUILDING ELEVATIONS — THE PRESERVE ARCHITECTURE N LAND P L A N N I G �A i>If1 11 , GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP X1356810] - p I ceP,wL - 1013 LA0. 140.13 ' BUILDING TYPE 1 4 14 - SIDE ELEVATION 1 /8..=1 1-0„ MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. LEVEL 3 'm LEVEL 2 in LEVEL I MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 84% VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:6.8 .TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE h BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. m LEVEL 3 __ L TL 1: .-. '\ CASE NAME THE PRIEERVE t L . Iffl ..0_._ — — CfSE BLOCK EAST G/3601AOORIONP01841 ,..W T ON: 101 ROA° ... 7 f __— _ [_ ....I Y— Tb MAYOR S C tf iV LEVEL Lo r: — t LEVEL 1 �PLANNING MID ZONING COMMISSION o, OA gxA � w MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 82% y� �,� BU I LD LNG TYPE 1 4 114 - RE14R ELEVI4T I ON' SHEET: 12 OF 35 /8..—T. O' q� KY APPROVAL DOES NOT AC7HORIZE ANY WORK IN VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:4.8 -- ti CONFLICT— ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE DEPARTMENT OF DE-LOPMENT SERVICES & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID 12/22 2017 Meeks + Partners BUILDING ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE A R C H I T E CT N E C I LAN D P L A N N N G M_ 12 16a0SNEMORUL DRIVE 91f1EH4�-Hg16fp11, T%iNR = GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP ___GN dOB NO. 14033 c KEYNOTE LEGEND: TYPICAL STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING - A FIBER CEMENT SIDING - B TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL ACCENT ROOF COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS FIBER CEMENT TRIM -MITERED CORNERS TYPICAL 6' PLANE CHANGE gym\ SUILOINCz 't%r'i=E II - LE\/EL 2 CASE NAME: T E PRESERVE CASE NOWM Z18O1. CG 1802 PO 1801 LOGTION:101 EAST G M ROAD LOT 1. BLOCK A, GLgOE AGGRION GATE: PENNING AND ZONING COMMISSION }. ^ BUILDING 7YF'E II - LEVEL 1 L N .rte SHEET: 13 OF 35 3.5 q �s APPROVALOOESNOTAW OR12EANYWORNIN C WCTWITHANYCODESORORgNANCE3 DEPARRAENfO GEYEL0-SERV CES 12/22/201] Meeks +Partners BUILDING PLAN -THE PRESERVE ARC HT LLACI O RE L A N D P A N N I N G 1 , 13 ,emr�oRw:ow�anrslao-Nmsrn+.n�,mre GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP caxcePni.N. oE�r;N JOB NO. 14033G SU I LD INCA TYPE 11 - LEVEL 3 GSE NAME:THEPRESERVE GSENUMBER,Z1B01,Ml5 AND PD1BD1 LOCATION:101 EAST GLAOE ROAD LOT 1. BL= A. GLADE ADDITION MAYOR ..—IANl DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AN DATE SHEET: 14 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AU HORIZE ANY MW IN CONFECT WITH ANY =00 OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT DE—OPMEIrt SERVICES 12/22/2017 e BUILDING PLAN THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners ,.. ARCHZTE CT RE 14 LAND P L A N N I N G �I GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP 40001BDWA Rb ESU Etlro_� �, .I8Y5931T.�. mxcEPnlu. DEsau JOB N0. 14033 KEYNOTE LEGEND: TYPICAL STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING - A FIBER CEMENT SIDING - B TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL ACCENT ROOF COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS FIBER CEMENT TRIM -MITERED CORNERS TYPICAL 6' PLANE CHANGE AID POINT OF ROOF HOT. m LEVEL 3 m � KEYNOTE LEGEND: TYPICAL STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING — A FIBER CEMENT SIDING — B TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL ACCENT ROOF COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS F18ER CEMENT TRIM—MITERED CORNERS TYPICAL 6" PLANE CHANGE Meeks + partners BUILDING ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE LAN D P L A R C D I T E N T N I R E N G p 16 A N GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUPM�o�m_xo. xn� mxcmiui oESc� JOB N0. 14033 ` r,,�BUILDING TYPM III - LEVEL 2 IR_I. �,� SUILDINC� TYPE III -LEVEL 1 CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE LASE NDMSER: 21 S01, CU 1SOt AND PD 18-01 LO 1, -EL 101 EAST RADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A, GLADEIS80 ADDRION DATE: PLANNING pND 20NING DOMMISSIDN DATE SHEET: 17 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AOTNORIZE ANY WTIRK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDNANCES DEPARRAEIROFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES meeKs +,Partners `, BUILDING PLAN - THE PRESERVE ANDPLECTURE Y'(�/,� 17 LANDPLAN NING -@F �F' GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP oxafPruNomw dOR % 1403 � CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE GSE NUWER,21&01, CU lS-AND PD iBO1 LOGTION: 101 EAST DUDE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A GLADESBO MION GATE PUNNING AND ZONING COIANUSSION DATE: SHEET: 18 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN % CONFECT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES S DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERNCES 6 12/22/2D Meeks +Partners BUILDING PLAN - THE PRESERVE ARCHITECTURE M LAN D P L A N N I N G •-�■ 18 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP mN�TmuL DEsw � .TOB N0. 14033 � MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 80% Bull-DINGi'YPE ill - FRONT EL VAT I ON VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:7.7 .TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. rn —LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 a 4 A i1 LEVEL 1 r dtfl �OFt KEYNOTE LEGEND: TYPICAL STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING — A FIBER CEMENT SIDING — 8 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL ACCENT ROOF COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS FIBER CEMENT TRIM—MITERED CORNERS TYPICAL 6" PLANE CHANGE CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASENUMEER: ZlE ,CU1802ANDPD1801 LOCATION: 101 EAST CiADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A. GIADEi8 ADCITION DATE: PLANNING AND 20NING COMMISSION cHAIRNAN DATE: SHEET: 19 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AITTHOWZE ANY WORK IN C -CT W TH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT S -CES Meeks + Partners BUILDING ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE ARC I PL I EANN TNIREN G �I D LAN M ^ L w y 80001FMIXi W.0 W lE 6Nr1E M W - ROUSTON, T%T(1f5 : GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP mNc,=vluu DEyv� SOB NO. 14033 ' MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. b EVEL 3 b Li LEVEL 2 iv LEVEL 1 BUILDING TYPE III - SIDE ELEVATION MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 85% VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:10.8 -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLO MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. to LEVEL 3 b -._ T _ Lu & A 1 CPSE NMAE: THE PRESERVE CASE 1&0 { {I L . "+ L NUMBER:2,, CU iB02AND PD 1801 LOT 1. BIOCK A GLADEA3BOEADDRION k m e —ON 101 EAST _ - LEVEL 2 i e` ^-^ e._._. ......_... _ ... ........ LEVEL m ��PLANNINGANOZONINGCOMMISSION DA MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 83% BU I LD INCA tYPE III - ROAR ELEVATION SHEET: 20 OF 35 VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:7.0 o g APPRDVA DOEGNDTADT„DWZEANYWOPo IN ” -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE CONFLI—THANYCOOESORORDINANCES & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOP—S—CES 12/22/2017 Meeks + partners BUILDING ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE A R C N I T E T R E N I LAN D P L A N N N G m 20 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP BOOo EMWUL DRrvEsuDEnro, roDS DN X M9 mNrmruAL DESGN 1131 N0. 74033 6 KEYNOTE LEGEND: TYPICAL STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING - A FIBER CEMENT SIDING - B TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL ACCENT ROOF COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS FIBER CEMENT TRIM -MITERED CORNERS TYPICAL 6" PLANE CHANCE BUILDING TYPE IY - LI=\/8L 1 CASE NAME: THE WiES— CASE NUMBER Zl"l, LU l—AND PD 18D1 LOCATION: 101 EAST GLADE ROAD LM 1. BL= A. GIADE/S50 ADMION —'F�. AVD DATE PENNING AND ZONING COMMIMION WTE SHEET: 21 OF 35 APPROVALDOESNOTANT MZEANYWORNIN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES BUILDING PLAN - THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners ARCH I T EC T U RE ^ L A N D P L A N N I N G L lama �NrnuLow�EaREnm-xolmon,TxTmrs GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP cGncmwLDEscv, _JOB N6. 14033 6 b E �,� SUILDINC� TYPE IV - LEVEL 2 CASE NMIE: THE PRESERVE USE NUMER: Z1501, W /SO2 AND PD 1501 LOCA11ON: - EAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1, BL= A, CJhOE A MIM DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE SHEET: 22 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUiHORIiE -WIN CONFECT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENTOFO OPMENTSERVICES 12/22/2017 Meeks +Partners BUILDING PLAN - THE PRESERVE ARCHITECTURE A■�/�, ^^ L A N D P L AN N I N G • `e `/L oRULoRn.E smEnm-Rousm+,rxTmn ' GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP WxL9+lO,1LDF&DN JOB N0.1033 C. �,� BUILDING$ tYi�� IY - LBvEL 3 CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE GSE NUWM Z1801, W ,802 AND PD 1801 L 101 EAST GIADE ROAD LOTm 1. , BLOCKA GI-ADEI9fi0 ADDRION DATE: PUNNING AND ZONING COMA 10N DATE SHEET: 23 OF 35 MPRDVAL DOESNOTADTNOMMAN MWIN C RICT--ODES ORORDINANCES DEPARIMEM OP DEN:LOPMEW SEANCES Meeks + Partners BUILDING PLAN - THE PRESERVE A N D H P L A N N I LA K N I N E G L A N 23 ; GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP GONNctrlu,u oEa<a1 SOB N0. 1403 F KEYNOTE LEGEND: TYPICAL STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING - A FIBER CEMENT SIDING - B TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL ACCENT ROOF COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS FIBER CEMENT TRIM -MITERED CORNERS TYPICAL 6" PLANE CHANGE i,� BUILI�INC� tYPE IV - FRONT ELEVI4TION MASONRY CALCULATIONS — 80% VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS — 1:5.6 ,TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE h BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLD LINT OF ROOF HGT CASENAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: 21891, CU 1892 AND PD 1801 LOCATION: 101 EAST G -DE ROAD LOT 1. BLOCK A. GLADEJG5 ADDUION MAYCR DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION E DATE SHEET: 24 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY W9RK IN OONRICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES O EPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE Meeks +partners M L A R C H I T E C T U R E ^� LAN N D P LAN IN G e leom tiFMORULORIVEsurrE mao. NousTplrxnms GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP 71 ==7 �.re e, A, mxcmru.L DEycya JOB NO. 14033 1a LEVEL 3 >o LEVEL 2 m LEVEL 1 CASENAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: 21891, CU 1892 AND PD 1801 LOCATION: 101 EAST G -DE ROAD LOT 1. BLOCK A. GLADEJG5 ADDUION MAYCR DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION E DATE SHEET: 24 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY W9RK IN OONRICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES O EPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE Meeks +partners M L A R C H I T E C T U R E ^� LAN N D P LAN IN G e leom tiFMORULORIVEsurrE mao. NousTplrxnms GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP 71 ==7 �.re e, A, mxcmru.L DEycya JOB NO. 14033 MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 80% r HUILDINla 1 yfmrm Iy - RE,4R ELE\,/,4tION VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS — 1:8.6 JAXEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOUD BUILDING ELEVATIONS GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP KEYNOTE LEGEND: TYPICAL STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING - A FIBER CEMENT SIDING - B TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL ACCENT ROOF COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS FIBER CEMENT TRIM -MITERED CORNERS TYPICAL 6" PLANE CHANGE AID POINT OF ROOF HOT. +n LEVEL -2 LEVEL 2 CASENAME: THE PRESERVE bo CASE NUMBER: 21801, W 18 AND PD 1801 LO[ATION: 101 EAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1. BLOCK A. GLAD- ADD(TION __LEVEL 1 _ MAYOR S CSR TA Y_ DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION eel) A U aPb , A ` .. � Y.... �g�i1 DATE: SHEET: 25 OF 35 ;a ` FOF i�.' APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANYWORK I CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORq=N E DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Meeks + Partners ARCHITECTURE LAN D PLAN N I N G �A #MI 25 i6WOMFMORW.BRINE 6V11El100-HOIbTON,T%TMg mt 8818!-]81d33V)-♦w.n-bpmua.mm � = L coN�ruKOESON JOB N0. 14033 ` r BLDG. tYPE tHl - LEvEL 2 � BLDG. tYPE tH1 - LEvEL 1 CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z1801, W 180] AND PD 1801 LOCATION: 101 EAST OLAOE ROAD LOT 1. BLOCK K GLADEI380 A WION DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GATE: SHEET: 26 OF 35 APPROVAL ODES NOT AIR MZE ANY MW IN CONRICT`M ANYCODESORORDINANCES OEPARRdENi OF DEVELOPMEIR SERVICES 12 22 2017 BUILDING PLAN -THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners A RCN I T E C T UR26 E L A N D P L A N N I N G L 18�m IB�OfUl10PJl£OAiE atm-HOLR,O[T%TNR '... GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP caxcEPruu oma J08 NO.. 1403 BLDG. TYPE tHi - LBvEL 3 CASE NAME:TVEPRESERVE GSE NUMBER 21801, W 1803 AND PD 18-01 - DR IOI EAST G X ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK P, GLADEYJBO AODRION DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE: SHEET: 27 OF 35 APPROVAL GOES NOT AUTNOMW ANY VAORK IN CONRIOT`MTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT 9ERNCE3 BUILDING PLAN -THE PRESERVE Meeks +Partners ARCHITECTURE L A N D P L A N N I N G 2 L7 GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP DON fP DN DEsa oe NO, 14033 %-� BLDG. tYPE TH 1 - rmoyr ELE\/A�r I ON MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 80% VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:5.0 -TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE & BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID AID POINT OF ROOF HOT. b LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 in LEVEL 1 x:rsx�� CASENAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: 71"I. CU 1Bffi AND PD,BD1 LOCATION: 101 EAST OLADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A GLADEf380 ADDITION DATE: PLANNING AND 20NI NO COMMISSION DATE' SHEET: 28 OF 35 APPROVALDOESNOT ODES ANYKNIN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES ORR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE Meeks +partners m A R C H I T E C T U R E ^ LAN D P L A N N I N G L o GRAPEVINE, TX- GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP �� DRMDRMEBW .m-� cEvn1N_oEslca+ JOB N0. 14033 KEYNOTE LEGEND: 1 TYPICAL STONE VENEER 2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - A 3 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - B 4 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL 5 ACCENT ROOF 6 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 7 ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS 8 FIBER CEMENT TRIM -MITERED CORNERS 9 TYPICAL 6' PLANE CHANGE I MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. � LEVEL 3 b LEVEL 2 b LEVEL 1 x:rsx�� CASENAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: 71"I. CU 1Bffi AND PD,BD1 LOCATION: 101 EAST OLADE ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A GLADEf380 ADDITION DATE: PLANNING AND 20NI NO COMMISSION DATE' SHEET: 28 OF 35 APPROVALDOESNOT ODES ANYKNIN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES ORR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE Meeks +partners m A R C H I T E C T U R E ^ LAN D P L A N N I N G L o GRAPEVINE, TX- GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP �� DRMDRMEBW .m-� cEvn1N_oEslca+ JOB N0. 14033 CLUBHOUSE FLOOR PLAN i 1 �8'-1 •-0" NST_ 6,721 so. FT. caoss: ssse so. Fr. CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE GSENIJWMZI"I,MlS AND PD1801 LOGTION: fat EASTC x ROAD LOT 1, BLOCK A GLADEJS80 ADDITION GTE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GTE SHEET: 29 OF 35 APPROVAL GOES NOT ANTHORM ANY MW IN CON- WITH ANYCODES OR ORNNANCES DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES NleeKs + Partners CLUBHOUSE PLAN - THE PRESERVE A R C H I T E C T U RE 29 LANDPLANN IN G , GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP� n� ID,.�Sl6! . �L55B31iT - vw.,. mN�PR DEy as Na. faoa� MID POINT OF ROOF HOT. MID POINT OF ROOF HOT KEYNOTE LEGEND: TYPICAL STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING - A FIBER CEMENT SIDING - 8 TYPICAL METAL GUARDRAIL ACCENT ROOF COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF ARCHITECTURAL BRACKETS FIBER CEMENT TRIM -MITERED CORNERS TYPICAL 6' PLANE CHANGE STORE FRONT SYSTEM MASONRY CALCULATIONS - 94% •TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE of 14'-0' MID POINT OF ROOF HGT. VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 1:3.7 •TAKEN FROM FF TO TOP OF PLATE k BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLD ............. ._... CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBETL 21801. CU 1601 AND PD 1801 LOCATION: 101 EAST ( ROAD -: :....._.... ;� LOT I, BLOCK A. GlA0E350080 ADDITION Lu�- b b 7I{1II000...WW� PLANNING ANO ZONING COMMISSION OATE: o j Sam _ nN SHEET: 30 OF 35 CLUBHOUSE - FRONT ELEVEVF4TION� 111 i�+ (C 4 �ij� �-:-� APPROVCTWTH NOTCODES RORIN WORNIN CONRICT WITH ANY CODES OR OftDINPNCE3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SEWICES 12/22/2017 Meeks + partners CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS - THE PRESERVE A H C N I T T R E LAN D P L A N N N G M A N I 30 EOu EMO W DME9 EY 00-Hq GRAPEVINE, TX - GREYSTAR DEVELOPMENT GROUP mN�rluAiDEstGv JOe NO 14033 C �l -a — — — �, OUTLINE OF EXISTING _ TREE MASS-TYPI/ L, }APPROXIMATE CENTER 1 `LINE OF ENVINGCREEK -t REMAINDER TRACT LOT 2, BLOCK A y 4 2062567 SQUARE FEET � v 47350 ACRES 1. EXISTING 36 TRA SANITARY SEWER LINE CONCEPTUAL TRAIL ROUTE -SEE SHE 33-35 OUTLINE OF EXISTING - TREE MASS -TYPICAL \/�// / ��.-f�s EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT EXISTING 20'AND FUTURE 80' TRA SANITARY SEWER L9 / /// \ EASEMENT / FUTURE 48" TRA SANITARY SEWER LINE SO5'58'bf1 5 L4 // / ------------- ZONING TRACT LOT 1, BLOCK A 888,946 SQUARE FEET 20.407 ACRES SEE SHEET 32 FOR CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN 200 100 0 200 400 SCALE: 1-200'-9' 200'-0' UNETABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N89°1T09'YV 21.89 L2 N14'16'31'W 126.04' L3 N00'3Z19"W 286.88' L4 NO6°5910911E 62.50' L5 NDO°08'35"E 51.65' L6 S05°58'30"E 155.70' L7 S24°02'30"E 163.50' L8 S45"26'30"E 49.50' L9 S65°1413010E 93.90' L10 S12°58'30"E 138.30' L71 505053130'W 135.80' L12 S11°40'30"E 154.00' L13 S17°59'30'W 53.80' L14 S09°58'30'E 145.00' L15 S38'11'3O'E 129.00' L16 S40053'3V'E 115.60' L17 S080024301W 67.70' L18 S20°44'301W 85.80' L19 S49°26'30'E 263.70' L20 S7304713011E 101.20' L21 S42'36'7Z'E 146.00' L22 S29025'251W 100.00' L23 S20'23'40'W 54.55' L24 540°58'41"E 130.10' L25 S14"34'30"E 99.40' L26 S39°37'45"E 95.97' L27 S65°07'45'E 176.46' ZONING TRACT LOT 1, BLOCK A 888,946 SQUARE FEET 20.407 ACRES SEE SHEET 32 FOR CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN 200 100 0 200 400 SCALE: 1-200'-9' 200'-0' LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) GSE NAME: THE PRESERVE GSE NUMBER Z-1, W1B42 AND PD -1 UO MON: 101 GST GLIDE ROAD LOT 1 , BLOCKA, GLAOEI380 ADDITION MA�r RE-s�ETc n Y GATE. PIANMNG AND ZONING COMMISSION GATE SHEET: 31 OF 35 APPROVAL ODES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN COWUCT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDNANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SEWICES DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 5 s Qp 9A SITE Q N Z4 ZONING r� TRACT DE ROAD GLAW o DE ROAD w z a i LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) GSE NAME: THE PRESERVE GSE NUMBER Z-1, W1B42 AND PD -1 UO MON: 101 GST GLIDE ROAD LOT 1 , BLOCKA, GLAOEI380 ADDITION MA�r RE-s�ETc n Y GATE. PIANMNG AND ZONING COMMISSION GATE SHEET: 31 OF 35 APPROVAL ODES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN COWUCT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDNANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SEWICES %h LANDSCAPING IN FRONT % L r Iar PROPOSED R�ETAINING""l 7 Utz W_ PAR TYP WALL ALONG PROP 100 YR. i I / I OVERLOOK / FLOOD PLAIN. -� , jlr,� / I l / STORM WATER- MANAGEMENT / i•. I! AREA "DRY RIVER BED"WITH �: NATIVE PLANT SPECIES Q AREA GROSS PARKING AR _ 2 20.9946 4 SF 24.867.4.86% OF SITE ICU NUMBER OF UNTOTAL N HTS/BLDG. E SPACE AREA 399 / 175.3749Z578 SF 19.73% OF SITE 55.41% OF SITE NOTE: DISTURBED NATURAL_. J PRESERVE AREAS ARE TO BE SEEDED WITH A NATIVE GRASS TUBULARSM& PERIMETER FEWE EX. 36" TRA , SWR. EASEMENT SEED MIX, AND ESTABLISHED WITH TH TEMPORARY IRRIGATION. ,�.�.-t, EX. 48" TRA A v SAN. SNR. A { ® J� -i► STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AREA !!! "DRY RIVER BED'VATH�r NATIVE PLANT SPECT I , PROPOSED RET AWING WALL ALONG PROP 100 YR;` FLOOD, PLAIN.. PROP STORM DRAIN- SEMNT. \ • � T OUTLINE 1 d TRAIL HEAD AND ENTRANCE TO ` TRAIL ALONG CREEK. TO INCLUDE MONUMENT/SIGNAGE, BENCH, TRASH RECEPTACLE AND BIKE RACK/ TRAIL HEAD PARKING 8 SPACES J TOTAL INCLUDING 1 ACCESIBLE PARKING SPACE LANDSCAPING IN FRONT % L r Iar SZ (�OVER 7 Utz W_ PAR TYP II i I / I OVERLOOK / . MAXTUBE STEEL POST Q ��.i J SEATING AREA LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS (LOT 1, BLOCK A) 8M,9463' SQUARE FEET 20.407 ACRES PROPOSED DOG , In 110 MONUMENT SIGN (NOT TO SCALE) �: wo 71A WASH BUILDING Q AREA GROSS PARKING AR _ 2 20.9946 4 SF 24.867.4.86% OF SITE ICU NUMBER OF UNTOTAL N HTS/BLDG. E SPACE AREA 399 / 175.3749Z578 SF 19.73% OF SITE 55.41% OF SITE EX. TRA SAN. TUBULARSM& PERIMETER FEWE EX. 36" TRA , SWR. EASEMENT ,�.�.-t, — ® J� -i► STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AREA !!! "DRY RIVER BED'VATH�r NATIVE PLANT SPECT r \ I RETAINING WALL �� pOLArJT \ 1 TREE PER PLANTER ISLAND AND TERMINUS YES YES % ��PET CONCEPTUAL ROUTE FOR PROPOSED HIKE AND J__ BIKE TRAIL ALONG CREEK �� SHEETS 33-35 MAINTENANCE PROVISION: P R 6.TION OF TH -R P VIN ,SEE 4 � � - 1 1jJ1ASEMENT X. DRAINAGE ��x FLOOR.ULAR asPROJECTSURROUNDED BY � I , PROPOSED RET AWING WALL ALONG PROP 100 YR;` FLOOD, PLAIN.. PROP STORM DRAIN- SEMNT. \ • � T OUTLINE 1 d TRAIL HEAD AND ENTRANCE TO ` TRAIL ALONG CREEK. TO INCLUDE MONUMENT/SIGNAGE, BENCH, TRASH RECEPTACLE AND BIKE RACK/ TRAIL HEAD PARKING 8 SPACES J TOTAL INCLUDING 1 ACCESIBLE PARKING SPACE 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SITE LANDSCAPING IN FRONT 285,000 SF U z men —IJ_ car HAIL I 7 Utz W_ O2 1- TUBE STEEL PICKETS O 4" O.C. 1 l �I TRAIL ALONG FRONTAGE ROAD . MAXTUBE STEEL POST Q elO01e. S� LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS (LOT 1, BLOCK A) 8M,9463' SQUARE FEET 20.407 ACRES PROPOSED DOG , In 110 MONUMENT SIGN (NOT TO SCALE) �: wo 71A WASH BUILDING Q AREA GROSS PARKING AR _ 2 20.9946 4 SF 24.867.4.86% OF SITE ICU NUMBER OF UNTOTAL N HTS/BLDG. E SPACE AREA 399 / 175.3749Z578 SF 19.73% OF SITE 55.41% OF SITE "_ TUBULARSM& PERIMETER FEWE 1. �i1000LEGEND ,�.�.-t, — ® J� -i► _ TRASH RECEPTACLE ��lot 1_�� r \ I RETAINING WALL �� pOLArJT \ 1 TREE PER PLANTER ISLAND AND TERMINUS YES YES % ��PET I I� Eli' MAINTENANCE PROVISION: P R 6.TION OF TH -R P VIN YARDS. TYPICAL AT EACH FIRST ��� �4t.'s°�@+�,�♦ea ZONING GROIN ANCE - The owner, tenant and their agent, if any shall r/ '��i'�� ��x FLOOR.ULAR asPROJECTSURROUNDED BY � ILI 4 PET YARDS. TYPICAL AT EACH FIRST • FLOOR. SURROUNDED BY TUBULAR � NON-yEHICuuR OPEN mAOG AND<r'APIu. ping quire ping landsca All re d landsca shall be maintained if a neat and orderly manner at all timer This shall include mowing, edging, Its— 0 PROP OSED SHADE CANOPY TREE 0 ,"DRIFTS"� pruning, fertilizing, thing, watering, weeding, and other such activities common the maintenance of landscaping. Landscaped areas shall fit• •/t ■i ` •q PLANT LIST AND/OR NATURAL TO / Val" rl - - RECEPTACLE 1 TREE/3000 SF OF NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE 165 181 1 TREE/4000 SF OF NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE FROM APPROVED ITY PLANT LIST planta net part 11or the landscaping. All plant materials shall be _ .. .I �,.�•"g■ ii 9111. v is I11 1•Ir. yr iv with plant material of similar variety and size. Will wr ,I( l .%F.— filp ; R 1i 1i.� 4,1,� �T„l.It� � / �p`.l�l 1 �L -' •w - 1 "- GP � _ / �, �ieA ger ;V; l�+ i`l9� •�I � .��� '.. ,�f L5 ''y/�' '��� APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST i•Dlli��� .•tl� a� 1' �­Me ��®\\ '." _I 7••II �� \\7'� ,� �� P AREAS - FROM APPROVED CITY 01 ` �- -. - :'�� ����! ,f/ ��' X74• * •!i ��"a•.a' PIP. PLANT LIST tk ROF ft �MiNN!9707 ��yy S1,11 NO IM 0 1✓�'����3�i q - . .-FOOT HEIGHT .i. '1/f1I/CL� .� -;►,e„ _«VONMM (vde �fiY!� /offy I�� t :�.:�.� ,�� _, •til I"' �:. .� �i R_'II�5•!�!_ h� # ..l, � ..in- r. !�. �► R 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SITE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL INTERACTION OF PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT AND LANDSCAPE EDGES IULAR STEEL FENCING WITH FI`NINr ANO &V t LANDSCAPING IN FRONT 285,000 SF U z men —IJ_ car HAIL I 7 Utz W_ O2 1- TUBE STEEL PICKETS O 4" O.C. 1 l �I TRAIL ALONG FRONTAGE ROAD . MAXTUBE STEEL POST Q elO01e. S� LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS (LOT 1, BLOCK A) 8M,9463' SQUARE FEET 20.407 ACRES PROPOSED DOG , In 110 MONUMENT SIGN (NOT TO SCALE) �: wo 71A WASH BUILDING Q AREA GROSS PARKING AR _ 2 20.9946 4 SF 24.867.4.86% OF SITE ICU NUMBER OF UNTOTAL N HTS/BLDG. E SPACE AREA 399 / 175.3749Z578 SF 19.73% OF SITE 55.41% OF SITE "_ TUBULARSM& PERIMETER FEWE 1. �i1000LEGEND ,�.�.-t, z( i BENCH AREA NTH -i► _ TRASH RECEPTACLE ��lot B r \ I RETAINING WALL �� pOLArJT \ 1 TREE PER PLANTER ISLAND AND TERMINUS YES YES % ��PET LAYERED LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS AT PERIMETER LANDSCAPING Eli' MAINTENANCE PROVISION: P R 6.TION OF TH -R P VIN YARDS. TYPICAL AT EACH FIRST ��� �4t.'s°�@+�,�♦ea ZONING GROIN ANCE - The owner, tenant and their agent, if any shall r/ '��i'�� ��x FLOOR.ULAR asPROJECTSURROUNDED BY � ILI 4 PET YARDS. TYPICAL AT EACH FIRST • FLOOR. SURROUNDED BY TUBULAR � NON-yEHICuuR OPEN mAOG AND<r'APIu. ping quire ping landsca All re d landsca shall be maintained if a neat and orderly manner at all timer This shall include mowing, edging, STEEL FENCE TO MATCH PROJECT FENCE. - \ < PROP OSED SHADE CANOPY TREE 0 ,"DRIFTS"� pruning, fertilizing, thing, watering, weeding, and other such activities common the maintenance of landscaping. Landscaped areas shall - d a BENCH AREA WITH TRASH °- .. .� PLANT LIST AND/OR NATURAL TO / ... . - - RECEPTACLE 1 TREE/3000 SF OF NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE 165 181 1 TREE/4000 SF OF NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE FROM APPROVED ITY PLANT LIST planta net part 11or the landscaping. All plant materials shall be TUBULAR STEEL FENCING WITH PLUS EXISTING TREES IN FLOOD PLAIN AREA YES POSSIBLE, TO RESTORE al maintained in a healthy and growing condition as is appropriate for i the season of the year. Plant materials which die shall be replaced A USABLE OPEN SPACE iv with plant material of similar variety and size. •_ ORNAMENTAL M ���1I�•��••'ppI•177����■■��®® �� \ � \� _ / �, �ieA ger ;V; l�+ i`l9� •�I � .��� '.. ,�f L5 ''y/�' '��� APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST i•Dlli��� .•tl� a� 1' � �jMK �+�o'° ♦��T. \\7'� L'„,`/"a\.\� R. P AREAS - FROM APPROVED CITY 01 4 t ffl%idl' PLANT LIST tk i 4 :tea i 1✓�'����3�i LONG FRONTAGE ' . .-FOOT HEIGHT TUBULAR STEEL FENCE • • • PROPOSED RETAINING WALL INTERACTION OF PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT AND LANDSCAPE EDGES IULAR STEEL FENCING WITH FI`NINr ANO &V t LANDSCAPING IN FRONT 285,000 SF U z men —IJ_ car HAIL 8' WIDE CONCRETE FRONTAGE ROAD O2 1- TUBE STEEL PICKETS O 4" O.C. 1 l �I TRAIL ALONG FRONTAGE ROAD . MAXTUBE STEEL POST Q elO01e. S� LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS (LOT 1, BLOCK A) 8M,9463' SQUARE FEET 20.407 ACRES PROPOSED DOG ® 2- TUBE STEEL BOTTOM RAIL - Y i� M PQ TOTAL SITE AREA 889SF (2ACRES) 8, wo 71A WASH BUILDING Q AREA GROSS PARKING AR _ 2 20.9946 4 SF 24.867.4.86% OF SITE ICU NUMBER OF UNTOTAL N HTS/BLDG. E SPACE AREA 399 / 175.3749Z578 SF 19.73% OF SITE 55.41% OF SITE V TUBULARSM& PERIMETER FEWE SCALE: 1/2" = V -O" z( i BENCH AREA NTH «�N TRASH RECEPTACLE ��lot B r \ I RETAINING WALL �� pOLArJT \ 1 TREE PER PLANTER ISLAND AND TERMINUS YES YES % ��PET LAYERED LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS AT PERIMETER LANDSCAPING BASED ON FINAL DESIGN. ALL PLANT MATERIAL WILL CONFORM TO SECTION 53 MAINTENANCE PROVISION: P R 6.TION OF TH -R P VIN YARDS. TYPICAL AT EACH FIRST ��� �4t.'s°�@+�,�♦ea ZONING GROIN ANCE - The owner, tenant and their agent, if any shall r/ '��i'�� ��x FLOOR.ULAR asPROJECTSURROUNDED BY � be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all 4 PET YARDS. TYPICAL AT EACH FIRST • FLOOR. SURROUNDED BY TUBULAR � NON-yEHICuuR OPEN mAOG AND<r'APIu. ping quire ping landsca All re d landsca shall be maintained if a neat and orderly manner at all timer This shall include mowing, edging, STEEL FENCE TO MATCH PROJECT FENCE. - \ < % OF SITE IN NON VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE ,"DRIFTS"� pruning, fertilizing, thing, watering, weeding, and other such activities common the maintenance of landscaping. Landscaped areas shall - d a BENCH AREA WITH TRASH °- .. .� PLANT LIST AND/OR NATURAL TO / ... . - - RECEPTACLE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL INTERACTION OF PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT AND LANDSCAPE EDGES IULAR STEEL FENCING WITH FI`NINr ANO &V t LANDSCAPING IN FRONT 285,000 SF U z men —IJ_ car HAIL 8' WIDE CONCRETE FRONTAGE ROAD O2 1- TUBE STEEL PICKETS O 4" O.C. 1 l �I TRAIL ALONG FRONTAGE ROAD . MAXTUBE STEEL POST Q elO01e. S� LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS (LOT 1, BLOCK A) 8M,9463' SQUARE FEET 20.407 ACRES ® 2- TUBE STEEL BOTTOM RAIL - Y i� M PQ TOTAL SITE AREA 889SF (2ACRES) 8, 5 APPROVED ORNAMENTAL PICKET FINIAL O Q AREA GROSS PARKING AR _ 2 20.9946 4 SF 24.867.4.86% OF SITE ICU NUMBER OF UNTOTAL N HTS/BLDG. E SPACE AREA 399 / 175.3749Z578 SF 19.73% OF SITE 55.41% OF SITE V TUBULARSM& PERIMETER FEWE SCALE: 1/2" = V -O" z( i REQUIRED PRONOEO I PROPOSED INTERIOR LANDSCAPING (GROSS PARKING SQUARE FOOTAGE z 0.10) 22,099 SF 44,395 SF B r \ I RETAINING WALL 1 TREE/4GO SF OF REDD. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE 56 TREES 73 TREES pOLArJT \ 1 TREE PER PLANTER ISLAND AND TERMINUS YES YES QUANTITY AND VARIETY MAY CHANGE LAYERED LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS AT PERIMETER LANDSCAPING BASED ON FINAL DESIGN. ALL PLANT MATERIAL WILL CONFORM TO SECTION 53 MAINTENANCE PROVISION: P R 6.TION OF TH -R P VIN BUILDING ENTRANCES (MIN 2• NIDE PLANTING AREA/30- MIN HEIGHT) YES YES GRAPEVINE LANDSCAPING REGULATIONS. ZONING GROIN ANCE - The owner, tenant and their agent, if any shall - i l 1 TREE/50 LF OF PERIMETER AREA YES YES be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all 4 PET YARDS. TYPICAL AT EACH FIRST • FLOOR. SURROUNDED BY TUBULAR � NON-yEHICuuR OPEN mAOG AND<r'APIu. ping quire ping landsca All re d landsca shall be maintained if a neat and orderly manner at all timer This shall include mowing, edging, STEEL FENCE TO MATCH PROJECT FENCE. - \ < % OF SITE IN NON VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE NOTE: ALL PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE APPROVED CITY pruning, fertilizing, thing, watering, weeding, and other such activities common the maintenance of landscaping. Landscaped areas shall - d a BENCH AREA WITH TRASH °- PER SECTION 53, SECTION I 4 • TABLE INSET () PLANT LIST AND/OR NATURAL TO / re be kept fres of trash, litter, weeds and other such material - - RECEPTACLE 1 TREE/3000 SF OF NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE 165 181 1 TREE/4000 SF OF NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE THE SITE AND WILL BE SELECTED, planta net part 11or the landscaping. All plant materials shall be TUBULAR STEEL FENCING WITH PLUS EXISTING TREES IN FLOOD PLAIN AREA YES POSSIBLE, TO RESTORE al maintained in a healthy and growing condition as is appropriate for i the season of the year. Plant materials which die shall be replaced SCREENING AND LAYERED LANDSCAPING IN FRONT USABLE OPEN SPACE ANDRE AND EXTEND THE NATURAL MOSAIC OF THE ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT with plant material of similar variety and size. 8' WIDE CONCRETE TRAIL ALONG PER SECTION 22, SECTION F (3) 99,750 SF 285,000 SF INTO THE SITE. FRONTAGE ROAD 250 SF/ UNIT (32.06%.) DESIGNED BY: g, ZONING DOCUMENT6301 . 1 1- D Quouorumrive DRAWN BY:200 B NOT FOR CONSfRGCTION earl, T_ 75240 Atltl13' r {T Main 972.248.7676 Fax 972248 1414 CHECKED BY: 916 0F �+Plbipertners.com OF j NO. REVISIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION I BY I DATE N0. REVISIONS DURING PLAN REVIEW BY DATE 2/7/18 NOTES: COLOR FINISH: LOW -GLOSS BLACK c E CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z18a1, CU1802 ANO PD1MI LOCATION: tot EAST GLIDE ROAD LOT 1 , BLOCK A, GLADEI3a0 ADOm0N SEMETARY WTE: PLANNING ANO ZONING COMMISSION —IR -N 69PJ— SHEET: 32 OF 35 APPROVAL GOESNOTAUTI REEANYV.ORKIN CONFDCTLMTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES CEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES LANDSCAPE PLAN N0. " LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN GRS001 THE PRESERVE AT GRAPEVINE SHEET NO. Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas 32 0 i >\..,•�"I i c� ,�c _..... tt'�—.,�,/ "NAN 50 25 o 50 toD ,✓ _-,.._ U _� l /%,�5e �,�/ �' ate; ..� - r/ j % SCALE. 1"=50._0.. APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF flJ --� _ EXISTING CREEK ✓,� 1% �-_' / _. T� �� ` \ "� i•'-� 11 �- R 1 j ��' f"Jr /� J -- EXERCISE/ INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE- 1 L ��;'s -� , l•V..,,. S \..�.-___i �= �L..,..-_.'v.J.� J r' ('` -�.i �/ UST y �V L �.. r YI ! - . T \�� 1 HBe / i--�'�--� "\ --' -. C ` `� f f� / /'/ ✓% �,`j/:» _,, �" CONCEPTUAL HIKE F FOR PROPOSED SED HIKE - 9 _ _ OUTL NE OF EXISTING -.- -^\ �,,.,: \�./.. -i TREE MASS -TYPICAL ..,_,�._/ � E -"'-- f-'��"-...--. -, �' " FUT. TRA 60 ���� �✓-_,..r 0-'7 1= v = SANITARY / I / „'. "'_ f- SAN. SWR. �!'' '�-...�. `„"�✓^✓� J SEWER 36 j i ✓ .. EX TRA 20 = _ EXERCISE/ INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE SANITARY r� ESMT. > OR BENCH AREA' SEWE-�R r'ti - _-/ ` ESMT- nl `".• --"_.--� /� , I - - i _ / ,✓/'- - �✓ OUTLINE - r , SAN SWR � � ^ I�f�� C \ E�'ALOTz Z , ,67 SQUARE FEET Tr -NOTE NOTE THE lTRAIL _AYOUT SHOWN , IS ;.CONCEPTUAL THE FINAL TRAIL = 111 - _ _ �i L,, I •, � - �` �-- ? ! LAYOUT IS TO BE DETERMINED IN THE Q1 FIELD AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION r� , c ir v� CONCEPTUAL ROUTE---...---'� I I �\ _ _f-�f FOR BIKE FOR PROPOSED HIKE I AND BIKE TRAIL- { 1} r�'� _ _� _ _ \ I DRAINAGE �?✓ i J' rl RETAINING WALL' �+,"1� I i. �''1f- m� Y "'y` ESMT �I�` 1 / ' t / ALONG PROP. 100 YR �' ✓ / i 15' �1 - r 1•/ _ FLOODPLAIN \ r SANITARY SEWER Is -l? / i " I I,- ` ;� V� 11� ,✓ ESMT _ G l — f o 4 \ 1 I l �\ ��� �'r- II i s �.._J flt~, - �/ I1`,�i I`,l /�.. .. 1 / �_1 j -'r_' --�'.' "✓-1.�-� fS ONCOR ELEC. `\ �f1�j 1�--d R.O.W. & ESM T N25'1 '3ew 158593' _ s _ /N _-- --- - TRA IL HEAD FOR THE PROPOSED HIKE f - O ..-_---7-- 1 "` '�'v------ _ - ` AND BIKE TRAIL. TO INCLUDEBENCHES, TRASH RECEPTACLE, BIKE RACK \ f� � "_-�---"-"..._-� ✓._ _._�, �,r-=-""'� �v � � /"'"�---_J SIGNAGE AND 8 PARKING SPACES INCLUDING 1 � --- (VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.) ACCESSIBLE SPACE IF REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET 32 DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) CASE NAME. —PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z-1, CU -2 AND PD -1 LOC ATION:101 EAST GI -ADE ROAD LOT 1 , BLOGC A, GLADE/3E0 ADDITION MAYOR S C ARY DATE. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CFaIfiMNN DATE. SHEET: 33 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IS u ZII.Y+n" f Z �K iii REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET 32 DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) CASE NAME. —PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z-1, CU -2 AND PD -1 LOC ATION:101 EAST GI -ADE ROAD LOT 1 , BLOGC A, GLADE/3E0 ADDITION MAYOR S C ARY DATE. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CFaIfiMNN DATE. SHEET: 33 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES �/ 3 -i . "'� IMF "AN 1� % OUTLINE S EXISTING TR EEM S ff i ,- 4 OUTLINE OF EXISTING TREE MASS -TYPICAL %sem _ / OR f APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF /-/� EXISTING CREEK �/ / � �✓� � // i (- \\\ •, ,C % TURNAROUND '1o\ END CONCEEND OF TRAIL,F !!! \ UU r ✓ _ --� \--- -----^ SWR _ 7 f�\ / r N /y J• r- CONCEPTUAL ROUTE r +1 FUT. 46" SA� \ FOR PROPOSED HIKE" _-OUTLINE OF EXISTING \ \ ANDBIKE TRAIL-• 7 REE MASS ,TYPICAL i r TRA SANITARY _ EX. 20SEWER.-,l - TRA SANITARY ESMT. _ 1, --- r SEWE ESMTR _ - LOT 2, BL-OCJC,4 / if \ �' tf NEE TRAIL LAYOUT SHOWN IS - W 2062,567`SOUARE FEET j� �/ I ''�-S�~ CONCEPTUAL. THE FINAL TRAIL / LAYOUT IS TO BEDETERMINED IN THE _ �y , v A af3 J FIELD AT TI ME OF CONSTRUCTION. 50 ACRES �� r /"` W 0 �ay DRAINAGE z0 I ESMT- _' OUTLINE OF EXISTING- U� TREE MASS -TYPICAL SANITARY J f �~ / /f/ �' I SEWER ^� / -' /,� i/ 1 \/ f \ r/ ------ (--T \ 4 ® ESMT. "�� ! f f r _.---- - '� - J 25',036'W 15&5 W Y —15. 360 --------- '092T"W ,325.,0 ONCORELEC. .1" �~ ! B RIGH"A --------- -- N25 '- R.o.w.s -� I � STAWIDTH R.O.W.) ESM. �-=' i (VARIABLE \ f 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE 1-50'-01' DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TRACT LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) CASE NAME: THE PRESERVE CASE NUMBER: Z16-01, CU -2 AND PU18­01 LOCATION: 101 EAST GLADE ROAD LOT 1 , SLOCKA, GLADEl60AODITON MAYOR SECRETA- DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAS DATE: SHEET: 34 OF 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHOR12E ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 0 0 CL T 0L 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE. 1" = 50'-0" DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT H. S s p 9� SITE tip 5 y PH.1 rn GLADE ROADW o ADE ROAD � a OUTLINESS E CENTERLINE OF TYPICAL EXISTING APPROXIMATE w o EXISTING CREEK 223Mi 2g1' 6 � � N 99° LOCATION MAP o 65 p of (NOT TO SCALE) TREE MASS a 545°A b.50p"E 9 Spa, s��o — S24°0230"E 163.50' E S. 0 a GULL I NE OF EXISTING _---- -- TREE MASS - TYPICAL EXI 36' SAN. SWR. _— — ------___ —_— ~W_W — — _— FUT. 48' SAN. SWR. --------------- W ------------- Z ------------- NOTE. THE TRAIL LAYOUT SHOWN IS = -------------- CONCEPTUAL THEFINALTRAIL F LAYOUT ISTO BE DETERMINED IN THE ___—_— hsa°oB3s - _ -------- —FIELD AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. � Ho6s9'/// ----------- a 62-- ------ -- S" ----------- FUT.60'--_---- N n i� TRA SANITARY ___----- ��� SEWER co EASEMENT 1 LOT 2, BLOCK A N J 2,062,567 SQUARE FEET i EX. 20' 47.350 ACRES TRA SANITARY / SEWER/ EASEMENT / ------ _------_— E ___------ N25°09'2T'W 325.10' F (V RF9S\CR N14'16'31 ^yt. — R<193985' c <F la qp sss,� 5 L_56529 STATE HIGHWAY 360 c R.OW &EASEMENT g642''W (VARIABLE WIDTH R.O.W.) o no�NF R Ng ° — GhBCh35fi329' O917p —___----- fi30� a N�4 ?D CASE WMEER Z18 -0i5 C318-02 AND PDte-01 4 LOCATION'. 101 EAST GLADE ROAD N A41°47'08" LOT1 BLOCKA, GLADE WADUTION R=320.00' 0 L=233.37' T=122.15' ChB=N20'59'09' W MAYOR SEC�- 2 Ch=228.24' to Onre: a PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I 0 C—T-�— o it cv DATE. n 0 SHEET: 35 OF 35 N o_ APPROVALDOESNOTADTFIORIZEANYWORKIN Y CONFLICT- ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTN- OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES K O DESIGNED BY: PROJECT LANDSCAPE PLAN NO. 0217,118 ZONING DOCUMENT0 1630Suite200B TRAIL PLAN — SHEET 3 ORS001NOTFORCONSTRUCTION Addison, Texas 75240 Main 972.248.7676Fax 9722481414 THE PRESERVE AT GRAPEVINE SHEET NO.CHECKED BY:N0. REVISIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION BY DATE N0. REVISIONS DURING PLAN REVIEW BY DATE Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas 35 0 MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER \69— MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2018 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A, GLADE 360 ADDITION PLAT APPLICATION FILING DATE February 13, 2018 APPLICANT Paul Gardner, Silvertree Partners REASON FOR APPLICATION Platting unplatted property to build apartment complex PROPERTY LOCATION North of Glade Road and east of SH 360 service road ACREAGE 67.757 ZONING Existing LI & PCD Proposed R-MF NUMBER OF LOTS Two (2) PREVIOUS PLATTING No CONCEPT PLAN Z18-01 , CU18-02 SITE PLAN PD18-01 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT No AVIGATION RELEASE Yes PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED No C:\Users\sporter\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\6EK9H87L\Glade360_P.doc PLAT INFORMATION SHEET PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A, GLADE 360 ADDITION I. GENERAL: • The applicant, Paul Gardner with Silvertree Partners is preliminary platting 67.757 into an apartment complex. The property is located north of Glade Road and east of State Highway 360 service road. II. STREET SYSTEM: • The development has access to Glade Road and SH360. • ALL abutting roads: X are on the City Thoroughfare Plan: Glade Road 7 are not on the City Thoroughfare Plan: SH360 Periphery Street Fees are due as follows: Type of Roadway Cost / LF Length Cost Major Arterial (A) $ 234.57 / LF Major Arterial (B) $ 178.35 / LF Minor Arterial (C) $ 203.06 / LF Minor Arterial (D) $ 170.33 / LF Collector (E) $ 170.33 / LF Collector (F) $ 150.98 / LF Sidewalk $ 25.00 / LF Curb & Gutter $ 15.00 / LF Periphery Street Fees are not due: X Developer is required to construct the north half of a Four(4) Lane Undivided Roadway of Glade Road to match up with the four (4) lane bridge over SH360. III. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: • The site drains northeast towards Bear Creek. • The developer will be required to design for onsite as well as offsite drainage in accordance with the requirements of the City of Grapevine's Code of Ordinances. C:\Users\sporter\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\6EK9H87L\Glade360_P.doc IV. WATER SYSTEM: The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. 17 The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. Additional off site water system improvements will be necessary to serve the site. V. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: X The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. VI. MISCELLANEOUS: Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are not required for: Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits for: Lots 1 and 2, Block A, Glade 360 Addition Single Family Residential ( $ 2,414/ Lot) 17 Multifamily ( $ 1 ,134/ Unit) Hotel ( $ 43,632/ Acre) Corporate Office ( $ 20,523/ Acre) Government ( $ 4,414/ Acre) Commercial / Industrial ( $ 5,739 / Acre) V Open Space Fees are not required for: Lots 1 and 2, Block A, Glade 360 Addition Open Space Fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits and/or any public infrastructure improvements for R-5.0, R-TH, Zero Lot District ( $ 1,416.00 / Lot) R-7.5, Single Family District ( $ 1 ,146.00 / Lot) R-12.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,071 .00 / Lot) R-20.0, Single Family District ( $ 807.00 / Lot) C:\Users\sporter\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\I NetCache\Content.Outlook\6EK9H87L\Glade360_P.doc Public Hearing Only Variances were required on the following items: Front building line ❑ Allowing a setback of 3 feet for the rear property line for an accessory building Lot width & depth Max. Impervious Area I I Landscaping Regulations, allowing no landscape buffer between the edge of the parking area and the adjacent property line. I I The following items associated with this plat are not in accordance with the current subdivision standards: 50' ROW dedication not met: Developer is proposing to dedicate variable width private access easements throughout the development. The access easements will be owned and maintained by a Home Owners Association (HOA). Length of cul-de-sac street exceeds the 600-foot limit: Driveway Spacing not met. VII. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS: A. The City has determined that the right-of-way and easements required to be dedicated for streets, utilities, drainage, access, sidewalks and other municipal needs and services are consistent with the City's ordinances and master plan, are reasonable and are connected to the proposed project in the following manner: The right-of-way provides for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ( The onsite utility easements provide for a utility network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite drainage easements provide for a drainage network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite access easements provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. I J The onsite sidewalk easements provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. C:\Users\sporter\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\6EK9H87L\Glade360_P.doc B. The City further finds that the required dedication is related both in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development as follows: The right-of-way is necessary to provide for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. [71 The onsite utility easements are necessary to provide for a utility system to serve this development and connect to existing utilities on surrounding property. ® The onsite drainage easements are necessary to provide for storm drainage improvements to serve the development of the site. ® The onsite access easements are necessary to provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. The onsite sidewalk easements are necessary to provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. 71 All of the dedications benefit the development to at least the extent of the impact of such on the development. VIII. RECOMMENDATION: The members of the City Council and The Planning & Zoning Commission consider the following motion: "Move that the City Council (Planning and Zoning Commission) approve the Statement of Findings and the Preliminary Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block A, Glade 360 Addition." C:\Users\sporter\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\6EK9H87L\Glade360_P.doc 2.z mj�/ ii i / CITY'OF FORT WORTH DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT VOL. 5070, PG. 408 518 09 _--_--- CENTER OF BEAR CREEK - - - C CI ORT WORTH D LA F FORT WORTH NTE iSNAL AIRPORT P VOL 5350, PG. 677 / _514 \ »ry s 5,22 c\ 520 LOT $ BLOCK A \ i 375.1 h _ \� ��// �?\ � A,4 ((0c�1�q}"� 9•` 5J . 516._., h° `%� 2.062.567 SQUARE FEET 1s sAr gy SEWEP / 7- c4 lO�OF \ K+OI'2 < r sI0 s° 47.350 ACRES w. 16028, x+0\542 / / 0. fie' N a1 �4,yEMr i'�?�y. _ , / 1 /C Wp" S ,� 10 ! _ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 100 AR 5'0 MAP REV15E0 SEPTPLAIN PER EMBER 2009. , 2009.4J9C0115K •Ipa•�• 7" F'4, , w 4v,Avv s S48 '4!o'p�''e4%T 711E50 - J MLC PAR - WEST S 5 Vvq: r v PART OF- \\\\ 1219111 10. PGCS) E CURRENT ZONING' R i �� �0 f. 522 \ \\ // / n n/ \\ h V' / i� �� OTS � • �` � s \\ / 52- / e• O N°'`1 a \ / /' x 0 ����- `� \\�\ ,.✓/5.a". -� � s h1 N1DT-��ast)� tc� � � hry "(�v GRAPHIC SCALE W FEET 1 inch= 100 ft LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCA ( LE) -- -- t0 to 61W5t.1 6 NOTES: \ 4 5 1. THE BASIS OF BEARING IS DERIVED FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS USING THE CITY OF APPRO)�YATE LaAnoN v tao rEM - GRAPENNE GEODETIC MONUMENTS. (COORDINATE SYSTEM: NORTH CENTRAL ZONE OOOP AN P. fENA YAP No: a 39cD115K \t�1859'34'E `�, 26 I l / 171 526 S2B 4202 STATE PLANE COORDINATES, HAD 83) 15' T -OF -NT ANO.. S7 \\ ./ MM RENSED 4➢TEYBER.25.-2008.- .'sW J 7 NCNT-OF-WAY O• W. Y' _THE GARDNER. 350 532 ONOCNCRNEUECTBC _`EBY\ �Y UC �. :��\� 526 � � ` �- I � � � � WILD PARTNERSHIP =WEST 524 _ _ y,L 2 BENCHMARK: CITY OF GRAPEVINE MONUMENT NO. 9 (ELEVATION -589,64') .SI a. NO. D209305276- OAt1ED ) h CITY OF GRAPEVINE MONUMENT NO. 72 (ELEVATION=576.96') N25i 52 VOL 1551& Pa 75.- - ' 3. ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURACE Il \\ _S2Soz A - OJRRENt ioxwN PC9 - I_- - h'Le gyA RATE MAP NUMBER 48439CO 15K MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 25. 2009, A PORTION _ - - - CI1 OF THE SUBJECT TRACT UES W E THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA ZONE AE. \ PROPOSLU ZONING R YF .e y - Q CITY OLS'F OR WORTH , RP AREAS DETERMINED TO BE INSIDE THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS SHOWN ON THE DALLAS WOR RNATIONAL: AIRPORT MAP. \ iJ 89 PG,'439 526 5,T253. 41 ECEIVEIC 53B ' F E g 1 4 20 i d {{i s34- \ \ 5 st sir SAZioT 1. BLOCK A 54 , .�� - 1 " - - 544. Qa VNwsGUARE FEET- - - - CUR%!E TABLE UNE TABLE GLADE 360 ADDITION NO, LENGTH DELTA RADIUS TANGENT CHORD BEARING COM C1 47.83' 00539'09• 488.00' 23.79' S5315126•E 47ZV C2 23.92' 015-4112- 30.00' 12.84' N35 -WOO -E 23.29' C3 24.30' 01976'25• 71.00 12.27 N232r37-E 2418' 04 MEW 06820'25• 30.00' 10.78' N049Y3n 29.79' Gs 37.10• 07030'49• 30.00 21ZV S6076'o0•E 34.78' 00 2OLTr 212DSW 71.00' 247.18' SIOVD'10•W 138.48' C7 528' 00015'41• 30.00' 1.04' N87V0'WW 3.20' GO 87.91' 00120'04• 3774.77 43.98' N25 -49'41•W87.90' L63 S291 17•E 166.06' GO 394.2r OOOUVOY 37"72' 197.37 S7699'40•E 394.09• CIO 298.30' 00471'40• 3774.72' 149.27 S2a34'39'E 290.75 C11 559.66• OIEF41'47' 1954.BS• 280.88• N3371'42 W 507.84• C12 572.5r 015.41.47" 1954.60' 2 -XV s3371-474 ara53' LINE TABLE UNE TABLE GLADE 360 ADDITION UNE TABLE UNE TABLE N0. BEARING LENGTH NO BEARING LENGTH N0. BEARING. LENGTH NO, BEARING LENGTH u N891rO9•W 21 or L2G sw3wwi: 99.44 L39 N25W'27-w 1325.10' L58 5292yi7-E 191.27- L2 N141671•W 126.04' L21 S397r45•E 95.97' L40 N1214'50•M' 278.76' L59 S792S49•E 40.77 L3 NOG1719•W 26055 L22 S55107145•E 176.48' L41 N45102'4 W 1061' Leo S90Dd90'E 300.74' L4 N0039'09•E 0250' L23 N047S32•E 80.27 L42 N9000'" 53.79' Let S90V0'00•E 301.68' V NWIW35•E 51.0.7 L24 NW49'2a•E 277.10' L43 MWWO0•W 6047 L52 S792S48•E 54.37' L6 S4526.30•E 49.50 L7S 419-40'16•11! 29.91' L44 N45b74e•W 17.69' L63 S291 17•E 166.06' L7 S8514'3o•E 9}90' L20 N37'W21•E 6017 1 L45 N1214'90•W 277.06' L54 S27W48'4 195.37 LB S125W30•E 136.30' L27 S33'44'57•W 07.0.2 L45 N25W 27•W 1325.10' LOs S31MSIO-E I 101.08' L9 S05ZS30•W 13580 L28 SW4928•11 206.27' L47 N251070•W 151351' POWER POLE L10 51 mwurM' s3.B0 L29 SIX 32-04' 76.W L48 SO4'49'24•W 19.57 L11 S3611'30'E 129.00 L30 N2510.30•W 2ILW L40 N2510'30•W 10.00' L12 S401SS30"E 115.110' L31 NW49'24•E 25.00' l50 MOV4924-E 19.57 L13 SOUDZ36•W 67.74 L32 S25IW38-E 19.50' L31 N2S10'36•W 70.12' L14 S2D'44'3L1'W 85.95 l33 N6371'31•E 15.00' L52 14411j735•W 4253' L15 S73'4r30•E 101.20 l34 N2524'31•W 54.05' L53 N413735•11' 39.99' L15 S42!WI2•E 146.01' Las S2574.31•E 725r L54 NO2-5729•E 21.05 L17 5292015.04 100.00' L30 54119'29•E 104.60 L55 S4110.29•E 104,09' Lia mv7S40•W 54.55' L371 S6371'31•W15.00' L55 S31'0310•E 102.21' U9 S403a'41•E 130.10' 011 W2510136•W 159195' L57 52738481 rI.S.411 \ \\ \ \ I 546 20.407 AGREE__ - h" .. I B 1 :.............................. w� ) 1aFw 1ER uR RT9GP. 546 1• AN ON LIIBTED PARTNERSHIP .511 ' -.VOL gfl06..Pa..4.3 - o - CURRENT ZONING: U PR40SED ZOMNG R YF 1�51y 4 Stdo s^ in \ �� / r°A•.c - 562 564 568.:. 09 h tih�. �tihti6ry 0Q 9 ti Stlj�t• \.w„ x �'`\ \ s� fl® yg9lrye EA fA,wiI)y 552 5,Y, SSx THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN CABINET_ SLIDE DATE 44 PRELIMINARY PLAT GLADE 360 ADDITION LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A 6hr 67.757 ACRES OUT OF THE 1�yo5ti0° +1 o Q ELIJAH C. CLARY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 323, LEGEND CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS EXISTING ZONING: LI & PCD PROPOSED POB MON AD POINT OF BEGINNING HIGHWAY MONUMENT WITH ALUMINUM DISC ay99;S SILVER TREE PARTNERS APPLICANT e IRF IRON R00 FOUND Dallas, Texas 75248 a`L1y5 s CURS CAPPED IRON ROD SET 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 ya. t MON ROW MONUMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY THE GARDNER 360 WLC PARTNERSHIP -WEST OWNER ' rya / y� HWY HIGHWAY 1011;5 ESMT EASEMENT 1810 Arlingate Lane i Q "'ib'1 / q'5.•. 0 ELEC ELECTRIC r PP POWER POLE Contact: Chuck McKinney TBPE No. F-438 TBPLS No. 10076000 UGL UNDERGROUND LINE TV TSP TRAFFIC VAULT TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE / / TSB TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX LP LIGHT POLE.���d/ ` CONC CONCRETE MHST MANHOLE STORM a:i. W/.. THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN CABINET_ SLIDE DATE 44 PRELIMINARY PLAT GLADE 360 ADDITION LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A 6hr 67.757 ACRES OUT OF THE 1�yo5ti0° +1 o Q ELIJAH C. CLARY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 323, AND THE GREEN W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1083 ° CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS EXISTING ZONING: LI & PCD PROPOSED ZONING: R -MF SILVER TREE PARTNERS APPLICANT 55< 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 )C���y>� Dallas, Texas 75248 t ? v �r t-% GRAPEVINE HOLDINGS, LTD OWNER 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 ya. t Dallas, Texas 75248 N THE GARDNER 360 WLC PARTNERSHIP -WEST OWNER ' 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 Dallas, Texas 75248 f KFF, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AN OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OWNER 1810 Arlingate Lane i Columbus, Ohio 43228 I JBI PARTNERS, INC. SURVEYOR 16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 200 8 (972) 248-7676 Addison, Texas 75001 ' Contact: Chuck McKinney TBPE No. F-438 TBPLS No. 10076000 February 13, 2018 Sheet 1 of 3 A - CFNTE)1 OF a...CREEK \ S � JB Sat - 5q5 \ 11 �i 528 - ` \� -// i � S� 325:186SJ4 530 ' 6 s° _S e SIF CITY RT WORTH - 538 SJB ` f DALLAS/FORT WORTH IN ATIONAL AIRPORT a` 525 Vd e 5350. PG. 0� 532 536 t 526 538 EASFAIENyq�T - SZo 532 UTINY _ 2g TD TRA. (CALLED P20M » 5 voL 739Z PG xox 5 a '. _ - 26 - 528 - 526. s $' C see CF �V LD. 5zs �a 52g5z� AG .30 7n�E FAR CREEK S2ass LOCATION MAP 5528 5 52° . � p (NOT TO SCALE) qq, ry R Q V / �� � l3 v 1'D � V � � /G �Q � 524 - - f�3� , 536 ¢S8 $ V A\ SIJ CR1 Aei vbR"t'gV.H, �� 526 - - -' - 4 5�, 11 .ti _ "s�D.S :ASS 5522 - �a szS50"d2'e^' ' un, ° c •� �c�z 3OSE h `s 522 ro \ \�`v eco ,NSi4q c Lam, �Ae� 7:50 N_00'O53 \ \ \'0 '08% 6 5 GRAPHIC SCALE - - 68.58 \,( sa�ao \ - 528 ADT 2 BLB( Ok h 5 IN seer )po J, A 41�7'0b 60 D0' ° '�5� St 2116$567 SQUARE FEET, W tK� 1 c6 = 100 fL N41 .. �_ /� 47.350 -ACRES s R-320.Ob'� �S��Qz� L=233.37' - 557\ % ii T=122.15' S EASEMENT IND _ _ S. I \ /h ���///» ChB=N20'S909'W Pµ LL DEUWRY ° oGateys \\/�\ / GRAPEVINE HOLDINGS. LTS \ Ch=228.24' Doc. NO. Dzon3oszn \ 5\ \ °za `N / / (CALLED 30.341 ACRES) Szo �� Nr \ / / , 7� VOL 16182 F'G.-9ry^ 5�^ 16'41'42 CURRENT ZONING POD �3 536 R=1939.85' t \Sze y"1==565.29' °ret %o ro T T=284.66' 1'0 L rc"'D°eP q 551'8 e�°'}o sza j� \ ChB-N33'31'42"W \\�/ / rR4. t'v Aa NA4 �� 524 2V Unum EASEMENT eti tw / \ �� /� / fct�E ym W(IJ S+Hi y TO WL ii9�2 FrDG �zob 7) Ch=563.29' �`D n, s\ .uo��'_W4rey ,re / 528 4°oE4.rp 522 ,}. 5492630'E 263.70' L� 5 CIS. C \ \ Zz AST sJa\\ \ ��yt yry,, � - � 526 \ � �i32 - 524, CURVE TABLE 161E TABLE NO. LENGTH DELTA RADIUS TANGENT CHORD BEARING CHORD C1 47.52- 00539'09• 455.00' 25.79' S6315'26•E 47.51' C2 2192- 013-41'12•30.00' 1264' N35WOl-E 23.29' C3 24.30' 01936'25• 71.00' 1227' N232r371 24.16' 04 30.50' 05826'25• 30.00' 16.76' N049Y371 29.29' C5 37.10' 07030'49• 30.00' 21.34' Sww'00•E 34.76• CS 26277' 21292-06• 71.07 247.18' S1090'101W 136.48' C7 1211' 00015'41• 1 30.07 1.64' 1 M57MO.09-W 3.28' Ce 67.91' 0012094• 3774,72' 4196' N25 -49.41-W 57.90' C;- 394.2r 0059702' 3764.72' 197.3Y S2S`0W40•E 394.09• CIO 29&37 -L'.Mr 3774.72' 749.25 S265C39•E 296.23' C11 659.85' 016'41'47- 1964.85' 286.80' .1-421 561. C12 57257 1 016'41'47- 1964.65' 268.33' S3331'42'E 57055' LINE TABLE 161E TABLE UNE TABLE LOS TABLE NO. BEARING LENGTH NO, BEARING LENGTH N0. BEARING LENGTH NO. BEARING LENGTH L1 N891r09'W 21.69' L20 S14'3C30•E 99.40' L39 H25MV27'W 1325.17 L58 S292S17-E 101.27' L2 N1416'31'W 1264,4' L21 S393T45'E 9697 L40 N1214'WW 276.76' L59 S792S48'E 4670' L3 N0032'19'W 20600' L22 58597'451 17648' L41 N459Y40W 10.61' L60 S9090'OLYE 30674' L4 NOS'WO9'E 8250' L23 N0433'3YE 5622' L42 NWWOOIW 53.77 L61 S909W00'E 301.66' LS. N001xf351 51.55 L24 N64'4928'E 277.17 L43 NOOWOO'W 60.47 L62 5797X481 S4,S/ LO S457530'E 49.57 L25 N19'4716'W 29.91' LK N459Y45'IY 17.69' L63 S29R71TE 18606' L7 S5514'30'E 93.90' L25 N3750'21'E 60.17 L45 N1214!5" 277.06' l84 52735481 10632' LB S12353CrE 13630' L27 S33'44'S7-W 07.65 L40 N2599'27 -W 1326.15 L65 53195701 101.05' L9 5053S30'W 135.80' L26 S64'49'20'W 206.27' L47 N2510 -35-W 181151' L10 S1759'30'W 53.87 L29 SO43S3YW 76.66' L46 S64'40'24W 19.57 1.71 S3811'30•E 129.07 L30 N251736'W 2697 L49 N251736'W 10.00' L12 S403S30'E 11687 L31 NW49'24'E 25.00' L50 N54'49'24'E 19.82' L13 S009Y30'W 87.77 L.32 52517361 19.55 L51 N25IV36'W 79.12' L14 S2744'31YW 8687 L33 NG"1'311 1600' L52 N413Y35'W 4255 L15 S73'4r3O'E 101.25 LK N2324'31'W 54.05' L13 N4132 -35'W 39.89' L76 54235721 148.07 WS 52624311 7287 L54 40237-291 21.05' L17 S292525'W 100.00' L36 54119'291 104.66' L55 5411729•E 104.89' L18 5207540'W 54.85' L37 S5331'31•W 1605 LSB 53193'101 10221' L19 S40354/1 730.17 138 N2510'36'W 1595.95' L57 S273548'E 19646' \ \\INN S B \ PRELIMINARY PLAT 538 1 11 \ / .7 '57: Nu GLADE 360 ADDITION JB o /. LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A I 67.757 ACRES OUT OF THE ELIJAH C. CLARY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 323, \�� N LEGENDANO THE GREEN W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1083 5586 v 15' EASEMENT AND $ \ POB POINT OF BEGINNING 55,8 !,' IGHTTROF-WAY EU ERY \ \ / CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS MON AD HIGHWAY MONUMENT WITH ALUMINUM DISC - \ `04 IRF IRON ROD FOUND CO1'1P LLD - CIRS CAPPED IRON ROD SET GOD N0. 0209305277 _ \\ m 1 / n \ / EXISTING ZONING: U k PCD N. MONUMENT `` \\ / PROPOSED ZONING: R -MF HwyROW RIGHT-OF-WAY \ / " HIGHWAY ESMEASEMENT a?; A, SILVER TREE PARTNERS APPLICANT SM� \� ELEC ELECTRIC 17101 Preston Road Suite 100 972 669 99 ( ) - 55 PP POWER POLE Dallas, Texas 75248 UGL UNDERGROUND UNETV TRAFFIC VAULT TSP TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE TSB TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX / GRAPEVINE HOLDINGS, LTD LP LIGHT POLE / OWNER GONG CONCRETE / 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 MHST MANHOLE STORM Dallas, Texas 75248 NOTES 1. THE BASIS OF BEARING IS DERIVED FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS USING THE CITY OF7-}{E GARDNER 360 WLC PARTNERSHIP -WEST GRAPEVINE GEODETIC MONUMENTS. (COORDINATE SYSTEM: NORTH CENTRAL ZONE OWNER 4202 STATE PLANE COORDINATES, NAD 83) 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 2. BENCHMARK! CITY OF GRAPEVINE MONUMENT NO. 9 (ELEVATION=589.64') Dallas, Texas 75246 CITY OF GRAPEVINE MONUMENT NO. 12 (ELEVATION= 576.96') 3. ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURACE KFF, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RATE MAP NUMBER 48439CO115K MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 25, 2009, A PORTION AN OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OWNER OF THE SUBJECT TRACT LIES WITHIIN SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA ZONE AE. AREAS DETERMINED TO BE INSIDE THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. 1810 Arlinyate Lane Columbus, Ohio 43228 JBI PARTNERS, INC. SURVEYOR 16301 Ouorum Drive, Suite 200 B (972) 248-7676 Addison, Texas 75001 Contact: Chuck McKinney TBPE No. F-438 TBPLS No. 10076000 THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN CABINET__, SLIDE DATE February 13, 2018 Sheet 2 of 3 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF TEXAS @ COUNTY OF TARRANT 0 WHEREAS, KFF Limited Partnership, an Ohio limited partnership, The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership -West, and Grapevine Holdings, LTD are the owners of a parcel of land located in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, being a part of the Elijah C. Clary Survey, Abstract Number 323, and being a part of the Grean W. Minter Survey, Abstract 1083, and being all of that called 14.324 acre tract of land described in deed to KFF Limited Partnership, an Ohio limited partnership as recorded In Volume 14006, Page 43, Tomant County Deed Records, and being all of that tolled 23.918 tract of land described in deed to The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership -West as recorded in Volume 15348, Page 75, Tarrant County Deed Records, and also being a part of that called 30.341 acre tract of land described in deed to Grapevine Holdings Ltd as recorded In Volume 16182, Page 9, Tarrant County Deed Records, and being further described as follows: BEGINNING at a highway monument with an aluminum disc found at southwest comer of said 14.324 acre tract, said point also being at the Intersection of the north right-of-way of Glade Road (a variable width rlght-of-way) with the east right-of-way of State Highway 360 (a variable width right-of-way); THENCE along the east right-of-way line of State Highway 360 as follow. North 29 degrees 23 minutes 17 seconds Wast, 193.24 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found far comer, North 27 degrees 58 minutes 48 seconds West, 195.10 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for comer, North 31 degrees 03 minutes 10 seconds West, 99.30 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for comer; North 41 degrees 19 minutes 29 seconds West, 104.66 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for caner, Northwesterly, 399.12 feet along a curve to the right having a central angle of D6 degrees 02 minutes 03 seconds, a radius of 3789.72 feet, a tangent of 199.74 feet, and whose chard bears North 28 dograw 10 minutes 40 seconds West. 398.93 feet to a one-half Inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped 'JBI' set for comer, North 25 degrees 24 minutes 31 seconds West, 26.27 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for comer, North 02 degrees 57 minutes 29 seconds East, 52.70 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for comer, North 24 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds West, 21.60 feet to a one-half inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped 'JBI' set far comer, said point being the northwest caner of said 14.324 acre tract, Wald point ciao being the southwest comer of that sold 23.918 acre tract; North 25 degrees 05 minutes 05 seconds Waist, 40.30 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found far comer, North 81 degrees 25 minutes 40 seconds West, 30.15 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found for comer, North 25 degrees 10 minutes 36 seconds West, 1585.93 feet to a one-half Inch Iron rod found far comer, said point being the northwest comer of said 23.918 acre tract, said point also being the southwest comer of said 30.341 acre tract; North 25 degrees D9 minutes 27 seconds West, 1325.10 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found far comer, Northwesterly, 565.29 feet along a curve to the left having a central angle of 16 degrees 41 minutes 47 seconds, a radius of 1939.85 feet, a tangent of 284.66 feet, and whose chord boors North 33 degrees 31 minutes 42 seconds West, 563.29 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found far comer; North 41 degrees 52 minutes 35 seconds West, 50.00 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found far caner, Northwesterly, 233.37 feet along a curve to the right having a central angle of 41 degrees 47 minutes 08 seconds, a radius of 320.00 fest, a tangent of 12215 feet, and whose chord bears Nath 20 degrees 59 minutes 09 seconds West, 228.24 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum din found far comer, North DO degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West, 68.58 feet to a highway monument with an aluminum disc found far caner, North 89 degrees 17 minutes 09 seconds Wool, 21.89 feet to a one-half Inch Iron rod with yellow cap stamped 'JBI' set for comer In the eget right-of-way line of Eulon-Grapevine Road par a street right-of-way deed to the City of Grapevine as recorded in Document Number D205161589, Tarrant County Deed Records; THENCE along the east right-of-way line of Euless -Grapevine Road as follows: North 14 degrees 16 minutes 31 seconds West, 126.04 feet to a one-half Inch Iron rod with yellow cap stamped 'JBI' set for comer, North 00 degrees 32 minutes 19 seconds West, 286.88 feet to a one-half Inch Iron rod with yellow cap stamped 'JBI' set far comer; North 06 degrees 59 minutes 09 seconds East, 62.50 feet to a five-eighths Inch Iron rod with yellow cap stamped 'SURVCON INC.' found for comer, North 00 degrees 08 minutes 35 seconds East, 51.65 feet to a point for comer In the centerline of Bear Creek, sold point also being in the west line of the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport; THENCE along the centerline of Bear Geek and the mat line of said 30.341 care tract and the west line of the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport as follows: South 65 degrees 26 minutes 08 seconds East, 325.18 feet to a point for comer, South 05 degrees 58 minutes 30 seconds East, 155.70 fast to a point far comer, South 24 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds East, 163.50 feet to a point for amen,, South 45 degrees 26 minutes 30 words East, 49.50 feet to a point far comer, South 65 degrees 14 minutes 30 seconds East, 93.90 feet to a point for comer. South 12 degrees 58 minutes 30 seconds East, 138.30 feet to a point for comer, South 05 degrees 53 minutes 30 seconds West, 135.80 feet to a point for comer South 44 degrees 39 minutes 30 seconds East, 258.10 feet to a point for comer, South 33 degrees 24 minutes 30 seconds East, 220.50 feet to a point for comer, South 50 degrees 22 minutes 30 seconds East, 287.50 feet to a point for comer; North 71 degrees 31 minutes 30 seconds East, 268.20 feet to a point for comer, South 11 degrees 40 minutes 30 seconds East, 154.00 feet to a point far caner; South 17 degrees 59 minutes 30 wconda West, 53.80 fest to a point for comer, South 09 degrees 58 minutes 30 seconds East, 145.00 feet to a point for comer, South 38 degrees 11 minutes 30 seconds East, 129.00 feet to a point for comer, South 40 degrees 53 minutes 30 seconds East, 115.60 feet to a point for caner, South 08 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds West, 67.70 feet to a point far comer, South 49 degrees 56 minutes 30 seconds West, 271.30 feet to a point for comer; South 20 degrees 44 minutes 30 seconds West, 85.80 feet to a point for comer, South 49 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds East, 263.70 feet to a point for comer, South 73 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East, 101.20 feet to a point for comer; South 42 degrees 36 minutes 12 seconds East, 146.00 feet to a point for comer, South 29 degrees 26 minut" 25 seconds West, 100.00 feet to the northeast comer of sold 23.918 acre tract of land; THENCE continuing along the centerline of Bear Geek and the east line of said 23.918 acre tract and the west line of the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport as follows: South 20 degrees 23 minutes 40 seconds West, 54.55 feet to a point for comer, South 40 degrees 58 minutes 41 seconds East, 130.10 fast to a point for comer, South 14 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds East, 99.40 feet to a point for comer, South 21 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds East, 222.15 fest to a point for caner, South 44 degrew 08 minutes 29 seconds East, 375.19 feet to a point for caner, South 39 degrees 37 minutes 45 seconds East, 95.97 feet to a point far comer, South 65 degrees 07 minutes 45 seconds East, 176.46 feet to a point for comer•, South 20 degrees 43 minutes 45 seconds East, 212.81 feet to a point for comer, South 48 degrees 50 minutes 35 seconds East, 144.20 feet to a point for caner. South 79 degrees 25 minutes 45 seconds East, 205.58 feet to a point far comer, THENCE continuing along the east line of said 23.918 acre tract and the west line of the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport as follows: South 01 degrees 20 minutes 13 second West, 30.64 feet to a point far comer, South 01 degrees 06 minutes 45 seconds East, 239.36 feet to a five-eighths Inch iron rod found at the southeast comer of sold 23.918 acre tract, sold point also being the northeast comer of said 14.324 acre tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 00 minutes 54 seconds East, 993.83 feet along the west line of the Dallas/Fort Wath International Airport to a monument with brow disc found far comer, said point being the southeast comer of said 14.324 acre tract, said point also being in the north right-of-way line of Glade Road; THENCE along the north right-of-way line of Glade Road as follows: West, 234.43 feet to a one-half Inch Iron rod with yellow cap stamped 'JB1' set far comer. North 79 degrees 23 minutes 48 seconds West, 132.59 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 2,951,513 aquae feet or 67.757 ear" of land. NOW, THEREFORE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT KFF Limited Partnership, an Ohio limited partnership, The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership -West, and Grapevine Holdings, LTD dose hereby adopt this plat of GLADE 360 ADDITION, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, and does hereby dedicate to the public use forever the right-of-way and comments, shown hereon. The easements shown hereon are hereby reserved for the purposes as indicated. The utility easements shall be open for all City or franchised public utilities for each particular use. The maintenance of paving on the easements is the responsibility of the property owner. No buildings or auxilloy structures shall be constructed, reconstructed, or placed upon, over, or across the easements as shown. Sold easements being hereby reserved for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities using, or desiring to use same. Any City or franchised utility shall have the full right to remove and keep removed all or parts of any fences, trees, ahn.ibs. or other Improvements or growths which in any way endanger or Interfere with the construction, maintenance, or efficiency of Its respective system on the comments and all City or franchised utilities shall at all times have the full right of ingress and egress to and from and upon said easements for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, patrolling, maintaining, and adding to or removing all or parte of its respective system without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. We have reviewed the Cityrs findings concerning dedications and I do agree that the statements are true and correct. This plat approved subject to all plotting ordinances, rules, regulation., and resolutions of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Witness my hand this the day of 2018 (Signature of KFF Limited Partnership Repressnative) (printed Title of KFF Sign") STATE OF $ COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for The State of Texas, on this day peremally appeared known to me to be the person and officer whose name Is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the some for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the _day of 2018. Notary Public, State of Texas Witness my hand this the day of 2018. (Signature of The Gardner 360 WLC Partnershp-West) (printed Title) STATE OF $ COUNTY OF BEFORE ME, the undersigned, o Notary Public In and for The State of Texas, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person and officer whose name Is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and In the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the _day of 2018. Notary Public, State of Texas Witness my hand this the day of 2018. (Signature of Grapevine Holdings, LTD) (printed Title) STATE OF § COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for The State of Texas, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the _day of 2018. Notary Public, State of Texas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISION: Date Approved: Chairman: Secretary. GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL: Date Approved: Mayor: City Secretary. AVIGATiON RELEASE THE STATE OF TEXAS $ COUNTY OF TARRANT 11 WHEREAS, KFF Limited Partnership, an Ohio limited partnership, The Gardner 360 WLC Partnership -West, and Grapevine Holdings, LTD, hereinafter called 'Owner', are the owners of that certain parcel of land situated in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, being said property as described as shown on this plat. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of ONE AND 00/100 (=1.00) DOLLAR and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which Is hereby fully acknowledged and confessed, Owner does hereby waive, release, remise and quitclaim to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport Board, the Cities of Dallas, Texas and Fort Worth, Texas, their successors and assigns. hereinafter coiled "Cities", for the use and benefit of the public and Its agencies, any and oil claims for damages of any kind to persons or property that Owner may suffer by moron of the passage and flight of all aircraft in the air space above Owner's property above the height restriction as presently established by Ordinance No. 73-50 for the City of Grapevine, known as the Airport Zoning Ordinance of the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport, to an Infinite height above some, whether such damage shall originate from noise, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel and lubricant partial", and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft, landing at. or taking off from, or operating at or on the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport This instrument does not release the aware or operators of aircraft from liability for damage to person or property caused by falling aircraft or falling physical objects from aircraft, except as stated herein with respect to noise, fumes, dust, fuel, and lubricant particles. It Is agreed that this Release shall be binding upon said owner and his heirs and assigns, and succewors in interest to said property, and it Is further agreed that this instrument shall be a covenant running with the land, and shall be recorded In the Dead Records of the county or countl" in which the property Is situated. EXECUTED at Texas, this _ day of 2018 (Signature of KFF Limited Partnership Represenative) (printed Title of KFF Signee) STATE OF § COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for The State of Texas, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person and officer whose name in subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the some far the purposes and considerations therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the _day of 2018. Notary Public, State EXECUTED at Texas, this _ day of 2018. (Signature of The Gardner 360 WLC Partnershp-West) (printed Title) STATE OF 6 COUNTY OF J BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and far The State of Texas, on this day personally appeared- known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the some far the purposes and considerations therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the _day of 2018. State of Texas EXECUTED at Texas, this _ day of 2018. (Signature of Grapevine Holdings, LTD) (printed Title) STATE OF $ COUNTY OF 4 BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for The State of Texas, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the parson and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same far the purposes and conelderations therein expressed and In the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the _day of 2018. Notary Public, State of Texas THIS PLAT WAS FILED IN CABINET- SLIDE DATE Surveyor's Certificate Know All Men By These Presents That I, Mark W. Harp, of JBI Partners Inc., a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas, do hereby certify that I prepared this plat and the field notes made a part thereof from an actual and accurate survey of the land and that the comer monuments shown thereon were properly placed under my personal supervision, In accordance with the platting rules and regulations of the State of Texas and the City of Grapevine, Texas. Dated this, the _day of 2016 FOR REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY PURPOSES ONLY Mark W. Harp, R.P.LS. J 6425 JBI Partners, Inc. STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for The State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Mark W. Harp, known to me to be the person and officer whose name Is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the _day of 2018. Notary Public, State of Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT GLADE 360 ADDITION LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A 67.757 ACRES OUT OF THE EUJAH C. CLARY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 323, AND THE GREEN W. MINTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1083 CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS EXISTING ZONING: U & PCD PROPOSED ZONING: R -MF SILVER TREE PARTNERS APPLICANT 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 Dallas, Texas 75248 GRAPEVINE HOLDINGS, LTD OWNER 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 Dallas, Texas 75248 THE GARDNER 360 WLC PARTNERSHIP -WEST OWNER 17101 Preston Road, Suite 100 (972) 669-9955 Dallas, Texas 75248 KFF, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AN OHIO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OWNER 1810 Arlingate Lane Columbus, Ohio 43228 JBI PARTNERS, INC. SURVEYOR 16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 200 B (972) 248-7676 Addison, Texas 75001 Contact: Chuck McKinney TBPE No. F-438 TBPLS No. 10076000 2018 Sheet 3 of 3