Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 03, 28 - CU18-08, SU18-02 The Shack/The Wallis/The Baker
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: APRIL 17, 2018 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU18-08, THE SHACKS, THE WALLIS AND THE BAKER ------------- - i� ti^ Qo�e Grapevine Lalk i� APPLICANT: Lucilo Pena I— Ra. l l � I.H. 1635 PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE. \ta��ood,P= ��° The subject property is located at 3570, 3580 North Grapevine Mills Boulevard and 3155 Stars and Stripes Way and is proposed to be platted as Lot 16, sti gip° Airport s Block A, Charleston Addition and Lots 1A1, 3A1 Hall-Jc"n=on �m I , L; T____o 3A2, 5ARA1, 5ARA2, Block A, Grapevine Mills L-' - , - Crossing Addition. The entire property contains Glade Rd. approximately 30 acres and has 1,544 feet of frontage along North Grapevine Mills Boulevard, 1,330 feet of frontage along State Highway 121 and 339 feet of frontage along Stars and Stripes Way. REQUESTED CONDITIONAL USE AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to establish a master site development plan to include. but not be limited to buildina elevation improvements to the existina multi - tenant building, along with the addition of new multi -structure retail and restaurant development. and two. four-story multifamilv structures and two. three-storv. brownstone ctrl lrtl l rPc The City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission first considered an approximate O:\ZCU\CU18-08.4 1 April 11, 2018 (9:04AM) 19 -acre portion of the subject site at a February 20, 2007 meeting establishing a planned commercial center (CU06-55) along with a first phase 49,348 s.f. multi -tenant retail structure and two, 40 -foot pylon signs. A subsequent revision to the planned commercial center (CU07-13) approved a 7,900 s.f. tire and battery store (National Tire and Battery) along with a 20 -foot pylon sign. With this request, the applicant intends to utilize the master site development plan process to significantly alter the subject site to include substantial changes to the exteriorfagade of the existing 49,348 s.f. multi -tenant building and provide an additional 27,400 s.f. of new construction in the form of four buildings that will be used for retail and restaurant purposes on this 19 -acre parcel. To the immediate south of this retail portion of the subject site, a 10.5 -acre portion of property will be developed for multifamily purposes which includes two separate, four-story multifamily structures and associated structured parking and two, three-story brownstone structures. Relative to the 19 -acre retail portion ("The Shacks") of the site that has frontage along North Grapevine Mill Boulevard and State Highway 121, the applicant intends to improve the exterior fagade of the existing 49,348 s.f. structure by adding awnings, pergolas and accenting to enhance the existing building and ensure it complements the proposed new construction. In addition to these facade improvements the applicant will commit (see the included letter) to constructing 27,400 s.f. of new retail/restaurant space in the form of four, separate structures with an obligation to construct two of the buildings with a minimum of 12,000 s.f. on or before the commencement of the multifamily development. Parking required for the retail portion of the request, including the existing retail structure, and all proposed retail and restaurant uses totals 578 spaces; the applicant has provided 627 spaces. Immediately south of the retail portion, a 10.5 -acre tract is proposed for multifamily development. Specifically, two stand-alone, four story structures ("The Baker" and "The Wallis") along with their respective conjoined parking structures will be constructed. Also included are two, three story brownstone structures. In total, 432 multifamily units are proposed with a density of 41.18 units per acre. The unit mix is as follows: • Efficiency units (695-723 s.f.) 59 units • One bedroom units (750-1,025 s.f.) 259 units • Two bedroom units (1,006-1,345 s.f.) 104 units • Three bedroom brownstones (1,945 s.f.) 10 units The applicant will be providing parking primarily in the form of structured parking for each building. Based on the included parking study 692 spaces are required at a ratio of 1.6 spaces per unit. The applicant has provided 718 spaces at a ratio of 1.7 spaces per unit as follows: 0:\ZCU\CU18-08.4 2 April 11, 2018 (9:04AM) • Structured parking 656 spaces • Surface parking 42 spaces • Attached garage (brownstones) 20 spaces Access to the multifamily portion of the site is primarily from an access easement that bisects the entire 30+ acres site and provides access to/from both North Grapevine Mills Boulevard and Stars and Stripes Way. Contained within your packet is an affidavit of compliance signed and sealed by the project architect stating the project is in compliance with the recently adopted Design Standards Manual for Multifamily and Vertical Mixed Use Development. Specifically, the multifamily portion of the subject site is within District 5, Grapevine Mills North District. This district has seven, district specific standards along with the general standards required of all districts. The applicant has included some graphic exhibits that demonstrate compliance with specific elements of the design standards. PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "CC" Community Commercial District with a planned commercial center designation and is partially developed with an approximate 49,348 s.f. multi -tenant building. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject and surrounding properties were rezoned in the 1984 City Rezoning from 1-1" Light Industrial District to "HCO" Hotel Corporate Office District and "PID" Planned Industrial Development District. The subject property was rezoned (Z96-08) in June 1996 to "CC" Community Commercial District for a retail shopping development that never occurred. The property to the west currently occupied by the Grapevine Mills Mall and its associated outparcel development was rezoned in 1995 to "CC" Community Commercial District to facilitate the development of the mall. Numerous conditional use requests have been approved at this location since the development of the mall. The property to the immediate south is developed as an Ashley's Furniture store. At the October 19, 2004 meeting, Council approved a conditional use permit (CU04-32) for the establishment of a 15 -acre planned commercial center as well as the signage necessary to serve the site that is located just south of the Ashley Furniture site. Across Grapevine Mills Boulevard North to the north several conditional use permits have been approved for Magic Mike's convenience store with gasoline sales (CU98-01) and Speedway Grapevine Car Wash (CU04-01). Council approved at the February 21, 2006 meeting a conditional use permit (CU06-03) to establish a planned commercial center in conjunction with a furniture store (La -Z -Boy) and a 40 -foot pylon sign along Grapevine Mills Parkway. At the February 20, 0:\ZCU\CU18-08.4 3 April 11, 2018 (9:04AM) 2007 meeting the Council approved a conditional use request (CU06-55) that established a planned commercial center on the subject 18+ acre tract along with a first phase 49,000 s.f. multi -tenant building and two, 40 -foot pole signs. Conditional use request CU07-33 was approved by the Council at their June 19, 2007 meeting and approved a 7,900 s.f. tire and battery store (NTB National Tire and Battery) along with a 20 -foot pole sign within the planned commercial center. Conditional use request CU13-26 was considered and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee at their November 6, 2013 meeting and allowed for the subdivision of one undeveloped lot into two separate lots for future development. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "CC" Community Commercial District—Magic Mike's convenience store, Speed Way Grapevine carwash, vacant property SOUTH: "CC" Community Commercial District—Ashley's Furniture, vacant property EAST: City of Coppell WEST: "CC" Community Commercial District—Grapevine Mills Mall, Rooms To Go, Chuck -E -Cheese, Michael's AIRPORT IMPACT: The subject tract is located within "Zone B" Middle Zone of Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. In Zone B, the following uses may be considered only if sound treatment is included in building design: multi family apartments, motels, office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, personal and business services. Single family residential and sound sensitive uses such as schools and churches should avoid this zone. The applicant's proposal is an appropriate use in this noise zone. MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a C/MU Commercial/Mixed Use land use. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION: The Thoroughfare Plan designates Grapevine Mills Parkway as a Type A, Major Arterial with a minimum 100 -foot right-of-way developed as six lanes with median. North Grapevine Mills Boulevard is designated a Type B, Major Arterial with a minimum 80 -foot 0:\ZCU\CU18-08.4 4 April 11, 2018 (9:04AM) right-of-way developed as four lanes with median. yrs 0:\ZCU\CU18-08.4 F April 11, 2018 (9:04AM) 1AM � 1 P¢�N JR5 315�ZN Cc CD TR 541 3.0610 R -M F TR 5B1C 7.0486 AC M X U TR 15 A &463 �'CpOgst 20.327 TR 1113A 8.3340 3p1 i� \TR 1A TR 1A IIPK dH } �Ap�V BSSAC AP 5 G App 1�6d�e� V)SA A IKfC-,� ::....... ............01..::::: 1.9891 2 4.226- 4\PRo �:7R:t:::::::::::::•'' } 601 ............. v %\ 2RA- J,_-M\��.� 4.388 - 46ot1N 1.2059 AR1 2.874 OR 1.284 SR 5.304 2.034 /// 5 N� 1 1 2 RA 4.192 � 530 Feet 0 200 400 600 800 SGI VINE R 't F. X 1 s = A W- -E I a Date Prepared: 4/6/2018 C U 18-08 The Shacks/The Wallis/The Baker This date hes been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this Information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this date, however, no guarantee h given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Form "A" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant/ agent:/company/contact Lucilo Pena - Billingsley Company Street address of applicant/ agent 1722 Routh Street, Suite 770 City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone number of applicant/ agent: Fax number of applicant/agent 214.270.0999 1214.270.0992 Email address of applicant/agent Mobile phone number of applicant/agent PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property 3155 Stars and Stripes Way and 3510 N. Grapevine Mills Boulevard Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 1/2"x 11"sheet) Lot MF - 1 / Retail - 1 to 5 Block A Addition Size of subject property MF - 10.4935 AC / Retail - 14.111 AC Acres MF - 457,097 s.f / Retail - 614,669 s.f. Square footage Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property. CC Retail and Multi -Family Circle yes or no, if applies to this application Outdoor speakers Yes No Minimum /maximum district size for conditional use request Zoning ordinance provision requiring a conditional use: Section 25. CC Community District PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current properly owner.• Billingsley Company Street address of property owner. 1722 Routh Street, Suite 770 City/State /Zip Code of property owner.• Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone number of property owner., Fax number of property owner., 214.270.0999 214.270.0992 FEB 05 2018 L By cuts-rR ® Submit a letter describing the proposed conditional use and note the request on the site plan document ® In the same letter, describe or show on the site plan, and conditional requirements or conditions imposed upon the particular conditional use by applicable district regulations (example: buffer yards, distance between users) ® in the same letter, describe whether the proposed conditional use will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use, or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. Also, describe how the proposed conditional use will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. ® Application of site plan approval (Section 47, see attached Form `B'). ® The site i plan submission shall meet the rer;uirements of Section 47, Site Plan Reg uirements. ® All conditional use and conditional use applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. ® All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings maybe continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. ® Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or conditional use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. 09 1 have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or conditional use permit and acknowledge that all r&-wirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND PLACE A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Lucilo Pena Print Applicants Name:Applicant's Signature: The State of S County Of A La-Z AS Before Me —s D 00AJT >~ 'A on this day personally appeared (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the p+-urpcyses and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this a LLQ' day of l�� r� eV A-%ZV , A.D. DONNA L CARTER - - -- - - - – Notary Public, State of Texas Notary Public, State of Texas 'L 2021 Notary In And For State Of Texas �n, QS Comm. Expires 07-11- ". P Notary ID 12199925 Cxl2�4P�1//iL1 t?%IQ055 /� aC�- %Jo al Print Property Owners Name: The State Of -!E4 AS County Of-A4LAIS Before MeJ_)e)JtJA)A" C (notary) Lte-- eg��- ProperfyoiN4iiiaAaevelopmentO Oration,. as authorized representative of Owner on this day personally appeared LuCI LO ' >` (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of FCAR-V A ,/ A.D. DONNA L CARTER - - -- - - - – Notary Public, State of Texas Comm. Expires 07-11-2021 Notary In And For State Of Texas Ngtaly ID 12199925 (�TodTr FEB 0 9 2018 IU By Cute -01? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT All Conditional Use and Special Use Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date. All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled. Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a conditional use or a special use permit can only be approved by city council through the public hearing process. Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all filing fees. The application, along with the required filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration. Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period. I have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for conditional use or special use permit and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal. Signature of Applicant Date: 04 Signature of Owner Date: Za D Ffe � 092018 � Br_ Parking Study for The Charleston Prepared for Billingsley September 30, 2016 By Binkley Bellfield, Inc. consulting engineers Texas Registration Number F-257 INTERIM REVIEW ONLY This document is not for permit or construction. Name: Cameron L. Williams, P.E. License: 110416 Date: 9/30/16 TBPE Firm Registration No. 257 Cameron L. Williams, P.E., PTOE, PTP D b }� FEB 0 5 2018 Binkley & Barfield, Inc. • TBPE F•257 • 1801 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 101 - Richardson, Texas 75080 Tel: 972.644.28001 Fax: 972.644.2817 1 www.binideybarfield.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...................................................................................................................................1 StudyArea Conditions..................................................................................................................1 Lot1........................................................................................................................................1 Lot2........................................................................................................................................1 Multi -Family & Townhome.......................................................................................................1 TripGeneration.............................................................................................................................2 Grapevine Parking Requirements.................................................................................................3 Provided Parking Requirements...................................................................................................4 SharedParking analysis...............................................................................................................4 Area Parking Requirements ............................................. Conclusions and recommendations..............................................................................................7 Appendix....................................................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF TABLES Table1. Land Use Data................................................................................................................1 Table2. Trip Generation Data......................................................................................................2 Table 3. AM Peak Hour— Internal and External Trips..................................................................2 Table 4. PM Peak Hour — Internal and External Trips..................................................................2 Table 5. The Charleston Parking — City of Grapevine Required Parking (Method 1) ...................3 Table 6. The Charleston Parking — City of Grapevine Required Parking (Method 2) ...................3 Table 7.The Charleston — Proposed Parking................................................................................4 Table 8. Shared Parking Analysis — Full Development.................................................................5 Table 9. Shared Parking Analysis — Lot 1.....................................................................................5 Table 10. Shared Parking Analysis —Lot 2...................................................................................5 Table 11. Municipal Parking Requirements Comparison..............................................................6 Table 12. Required Parking Comparison by Municipality.............................................................6 Traffic & Parking Analysis — Bower Street Development Binkley & Barfield, Inc. i INTRODUCTION At the request of Billingsley, Binkley & Barfield Consulting Engineers (BBI) has completed a parking study for the proposed development called The Charleston in Grapevine near the intersection of SH 121 and Grapevine Mills Blvd. This report documents the results of that study including: study area conditions, data collections, analyses, findings, and recommendations. Provided in the Appendix is a proposed site plan. !STUDY AREA CONDITIONS The proposed development is bounded by Grapevine Mills Blvd on the north and State Highway 121 on the south. The proposed development consists of multi -family, townhome, restaurant, and retail land uses. Provided below is a summary of the proposed development. LOT i Lot 1 has a total building area of 27,400 SF which consists of 6,900 SF of retail, 17,500 SF of restaurant (sit-down), and 3,000 SF of restaurant which includes a drive-thru lane. LOT 2 Lot 2 has a total building area of 17,850 SF which consists of 6,650 SF of retail and 11,200 SF of restaurant. There is a separate parcel adjacent to Lot 2 which is could potentially consist of 3,000 SF of restaurant land use. MULTI -FAMILY & TOWNHOME The multi -family component is located between Lot 1 and Lot 2 just north of Stars & Stripes Way. The multi -family consists of approximately 430 units in two separate buildings while the townhome component consists of eight units. This land use data is summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Land Use Data Land Use Development Segment ITE Code ` y Units Quantity Lot 1 Retail (Shopp in Center 820 SF 6,900 High Turnover Sit -Down Restaurant 932 SF 17,500 Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru 934 SF 3 000 Lot 2 Retail (Shopping Center 820 SF 6,650 High Turnover Sit -Down Restaurant 932 SF 11,200 Additional Parcel -High Turnover Sit -Down Restaurant 932 SF 3,000 Multi-family/Town Apartment 220 Units 430 Townhomes 231 Units 8 Parking Study — The Charleston Binkley & Barfield, Inc. f Estimated vehicle trip ends to and from the study area were calculated utilizing trip generation rates and characteristics collected and compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the ninth edition of their trip generation manual. Table 2 has been prepared to summarize the associated trip generation data and the calculated trips that are anticipated to be generated by the proposed land uses. For simplicity, the similar land uses have been combined together. Table 2. Trio Generation Data Land Use (ITE Code) Daily ^ (vpd) AM Peak (vph) PM Peak (vph) Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Shopping Center 820 579 13 8 5 50 24 26 Hi h Turnover Restaurant 932 4,031 343 189 69 44 154 67 175 312 98 267 187 125 51 47 174 93 Fast -Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru 1,488 136 A artment 220 2,860 219 Townhomes 231 NIa 4 715 1 311 3 404 4 731 3 1 439 1 292 _ Total Residential 8,958 Utilizing NCHRP Internal Trip Capture Rates, an internal trip capture analysis was completed for the proposed development. Table 3 and Table 4 summarize the development's internal and external trips for the AM and PM Peak Hours respectively. As can be seen in this analysis, internal trips account for approximately 12% of the trips in the AM Peak Hour and 21 % in the PM Peak Hour. This should result in a reduced parking need for the development. Furthermore, the internal residential trips alone account for approximately 5.5% and 7.8% of the trips in the AM and PM Peak Hours. It would be anticipated that these patrons would be walking from the multi -family to the restaurant and retail land uses. Table 3_ AM Paak Wneir— Intarnml nnri Cv+nrn�l Tri— Land Use Retail Total 13 --- - Enter - -- --- Exit Internal External Total Internal External Total 2 6 8 2 3 5 Restaurant 479 37 221 258 3 218 221 Residential 223 3 42 42 269 45 311 37 42 141 362 178 404 �_ Total 715 Table 4. PM Peak Hour — Internal and External TO Land Use Total --- - Enter - -- --- Exit IL_ _ Internal External Total Internal External Total Retail 50 14 10 24 15 11 26 Restaurant 410 28 210 238 40 132 172 Residential Total 271 731 35 77 142 362 177 439 22 77 1215 72 94 292 Parking Study — The Charleston — — — -- Binkley & Barfield, Inc. — — 2 GRAPEVINE PARKING REQUIREMENTS The City of Grapevine's "Off -Street Parking Requirements" states the following regarding shopping center and restaurant parking: • Eating/Drinking Establishment no service to auto: 1 per 3 persons (max occup. load) • Eating/Drinking Establishment with service to auto: 12 + 1 per 50 SF • Retail Establishments in Buildings: 5 + 1 per 200 SF • Shopping Centers, Malls, & Multi -occupancy: 4 per 1,000 SF (25,000 SF — 400,000 SF) • Eating/Drinking Establishment in Shopping Center: 10 additional per 1,000 SF The actual restaurant uses and building occupancy are unknown at this time. Furthermore, the parking rates could be calculated via multiple methods due to the type of proposed development. The first method would include the Eating/Drinking Establishments with assumed occupancy loads. For this method it was assumed the restaurant with no auto service would include 30% "back -of -house space" with an occupancy load of one person per 200 SF with the remaining the remaining 70% loaded at one person per 15 SF. Based on this information Table 5 summarizes what is understood to be the required parking spaces per the "Off -Street Parking Requirements". Table 5. The Charleston Parkin — City of Grapevine Required Parkinq (Method 1 Area Parameter I Retail- Restaurant Drive-Thru Totals -in Retail E uivalent Rate Lot 1 SF 6,900 17,500 3,000 27,400Fper 17,500 3,000 Parkin 45 281 72 398F 246 Lot 2 SF 6,650 11,200 - 17,850 11,200 - Parkin 44 180 - 224F - Additional SF - 3,000 - 3,000 SF Parcel Parkin - 49 - 49_per 1,000 SF Totals SF 13,550. 31,700 3,000 48,250 13.91 Parking 89 510 1 72 671 per 1,000 SF 11 ..v 01 UF. CU auuuo vaaeu un Lwo sepuldle Dll um9s Due to the nature of the proposed development the Shopping Center, Malls, and Multi - occupancy requirements would likely apply as well. Table 6 summarizes the requirements based on "Off -Street Parking Requirements" for this second method of calculation. T_L�— w I aFAe Q. i ne Unarieston i ar — Uty or Gra evine Re wired Parkin Method 2 Area Parameter -in Retail Restaurant Drive-Thru Totals Equivalent Rate Lot 1 SF 6,900 17,500 3,000 27,400?er Parkin 28 246 72 3460 SF Lot 2 SF 6,650 11,200 - 17,850 SF Parkin 27 157 - 184 Additional Parcel SF - 31000 - 3,000 SF Parkin - 43 - 43 tals SF 13,550 ! 31,700 3,000 48,250Parkin 55 446 72 573 SF As can be seen, the first method requires slightly less than 100 more spaces than the second calculation method. Parking Study — The Charleston Binkley & Banleld, Inc. — — — 3 Palms asom The proposed development is requesting a variance the City of Grapevine's parking requirements. Table 7 summarizes the parking being proposed by the development. Table 7.The Charleston — Proposed Parking Area Parameter Retail I Restaurant Drive-Thru Totals Equivalent Rate Lot 1 SF 6,900 17,500 3,000 27,400 11.09 per 1,000 SF Parkin - - 72 304 Lot 2 SF 6,650 11,200 - 17,850 10.36 Parkin - - - 185 per 1,000 SF Additional SF - 3,000 - 3,000 15.33 Parcel Parkin - - - 46 1,000 SF Totals SF 13,550 31,700 3,000 48,250 11.09 �Parkinq 72 535 1,000 SF When comparing required parking via the first method to proposed parking rates, Lot 1 has a 94 less parking spaces than required while Lot 2 has 39 less parking spaces than required. When the additional parcel is factored in the overall provided parking is 136 less than required. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) provides a rates and methodologies for calculating shared parking for multi -use developments. Some broad assumptions which included the following: • Visitors require 90% of the gross leasable space • Employees require 10% of the gross leasable space • Weekend parking ratios • Noon time of day adjustments • December monthly adjustments • Non -captive ratio of 90% The 90/10 split on the visitor/employee usage of space is felt to be conservative as the earlier assumption in the report utilized a 70/30 split. Secondly, the day of the week, time of the day, and ratios and adjustments selected represent what are expected to be the busiest times of the week, day, and month. Per the ULI Shared Parking manual, "Non -captive ratio is an estimate of the percentage of parkers at a land use in a mixed-use development or district who are not already counted as being parked at another of the land uses." Table 8 represents the full development, Table 9 represents Lot 1 by itself, and Table 10 represents Lot 2 by itself. As can be seen, based on these assumptions, which should represent the busiest time of the week, day, and month, the proposed parking is adequate. Parking Study — The Charleston Binkley & Barrield, Inc. 4 Table 8. Shared Parking Analvsis — Full Development Table 9. Shared ParKing Analysis — LOT 7 parking pBase arking ;Monthly Day Time of Time ime Adjusted Base Land Person SF Parking + Parking Monthly of Non- Adjusted Use 100% Non- Ratio Need Adj. Day Captive Need Adj. Day Captive Need 1120 3 4 100% Ad'. 90% 4 Fine/ Visitor 28530 17 486 100% 100% 90% 438 Casual 100% 90% 242 Casual Retail Visitor 5985 3.2 20 100% 85% Dining Em to ee 3170 3 10 100% 100% 90% 9 Fast Visitor 2700 12 33 100% 100% 90% 30 Food Employee 300 2 1 100% 100% 90% 1 Retail Visitor A?l 95J 3.2 40 100% 85% 90% 31 Emplovee 1 Employee 1355 � 0.8 2 100% 100% 90% 2 Total: 296 Total: 1 572 Total: Total: 511 4 Table 9. Shared ParKing Analysis — LOT 7 parking pBase arking ;Monthly Day Time of Non- Adjusted Base Time Time Ratio Need Add. Adj, Land Person SF Park' ng Parking Monthly 100% Non- Adjusted Use Ratio Need Adj. Day Captive Need 1120 3 4 100% 100% 90% 4 Fast Ad.. 0 12 0 100% Fine/ Visitor 15750 17 268 100% 100% 90% 242 Casual Retail Visitor 5985 3.2 20 100% 85% 90% 16 DiningEmployee 665 1750 3 6 100% 100% 90% 6 Fast Visitor 2700 12 33 100% 100% 90% 30 Food Employee 300 2 1 100% 100% 90% 1 Retail Visitor 6210 3.2 20 100% 85% 90% 16 Emplovee 1 690 0.8 1 100% 100% 90% 1 Total: 329 Total: Total: 296 Table 10. Shared Parking Analysis — Lot 2 Land person SF parking pBase arking ;Monthly Day Time of Non- Adjusted Use Ratio Need Add. Adj, Captive Need Fine/ Visitor 10080 17 172 100% 100% 90% 155 Casual Dining Employee 1120 3 4 100% 100% 90% 4 Fast Visitor 0 12 0 100% 100% 90% 0 Food Employee 0 2 0 100% 100% 90% 0 Retail Visitor 5985 3.2 20 100% 85% 90% 16 Employee 1 665 0.8 1 100% 100% 90% 1 Total: 197 Total: Total: 176 Parking Study — The Charleston Binkley & Barfield, Inc. 5 .AREA PARKING REQUIREMENTS Research was completed to evaluate parking requirements of other municipalities in the area as they compared to the City of Grapevine. Table 11 provides a summary of the parking requirements which were researched. Note, all the cities researched, with the exception of Southlake, did not provide separate parking requirements for restaurants with drive-thru lanes. Table 12 provides a comparison of the required number of parking spaces the development would be required to have in each municipality. Table 11. Municipal Parking Requirements Comparison Table 12. Required Parking Comparison by Municipality city Retail Retail Restaurant Drive-Thru Carrollton 1 per250 SF 1 ger 125 SF n/a Co ell 1 per 200 SF 1 f.er 100 SF n/a Dallas 1 per 250 SF 1 per 100 SF n/a Frisco 1 per 250 SF 1 per 100 SF n/a McKinney 1 per 250 SF j 1 per 150 SF n/a Plano 1 per 200 SF 1 per 100 SF n/a Richardson 1 per 333 SF 1 per 100 SF n/a Southlake 1 per 200 SF 1 per 100 SF 1 12+1 per 50 SF Table 12. Required Parking Comparison by Municipality city Retail Rest. Lot 1 Drive-Thru Total Retail Lot 2 Rest. Total Add. Parcel Overall Total Delta Grapevine 45 281 72 398 44 180 224 49 671 - Carrollton 28 140 24 192 27 90 117 24 333 -338 Co ell 35 175 30 240 34 112 146 30 416 -255 Dallas 28 175 30 233 27 112 139 30 402 -269 Frisco 28 175 30 233 27 112 139 30 402 -269 McKinney 28 117 20 165 27 75 l 102 20 287 -384 Plano 35 175 30 240 34 112 146 30 416 -255 Richardson 21 175 30 226 20 112 132 30 388 -283 Southlake 35 175 72 282 34 112 146 30 458 -213 As can be seen in Table 12, the City of Grapevine's parking requirements require between 213 and 384 more parking spaces than several other municipalities in the area when using the method presented in Table S. For this specific site this equates to an increase of parking between 32% and 57%. Parking Study — The Charleston Binkley & Barfield, Inc. FROM •l,"In "Tn-plamne • • • --.. _... The proposed land uses and their proximity to one another should create a true mixed -used development and as such, the land uses will benefit from internal trip capture as well as shared used parking. This internal trip capture, coupled with the walkability of the site, should reduce the parking demand. This reduced demand is expected to range between 5.5% and 21 %. It is expected the biggest reduction will come from residents living and parking in the multi -family and walking to the proposed restaurants. When compared with other municipalizes the City of Grapevine's parking requirements would dictate between 32% and 57% more parking spaces for this proposed development. Furthermore, the shared used parking guidelines from ULI indicated the proposed development provides adequate parking for even the anticipated busiest times of the day, week, and year. As the development's proposed parking stands today, the requested variance from the City of Grapevine's parking requirements is 94 less for Lot 1, 39 less for Lot 2, and 136 less when the entire site is analyzed. Note, if Method 2 of the required parking calculation is utilized then the reductions are less. Based on the anticipated parking demand due to the mixed-use nature of the site, comparison with other municipalities parking requirements, and the likely shared used parking it is requested and recommended to accept the proposed parking as it is felt that the proposed parking is more than adequate for this site. Parking Study — The Charleston Binkley & Barfield, Inc. APPEN01 4 CONCEPT/SITE PLAN .................................................. ITE TRIP GENERATIONSHEETS.................................... ITE INTERNAL CAPTURE CALCULATION SHEET .............. ...........1 PAGE ...........1 PAGE ...........1 PAGE Parking Study — The Charleston Binkley & Barfield, Inc. $ 22 4,763 S F. B 1.ARES Il f� WSTING I T PARK STARS 8 STRIPES WAY ?'• r� ower I - �7MFF':G WEAL -::GRAPEVINE MILLS 77 ' �._..d.. �LLDt. �._..-.�..._ _._.W. — �_ .:I .! - 7.63ACRES ' J --� R•� &•``� _ '32.30651 I N: v.� EXISTING ot z,� :1 I, F /r rMENTS - GARAGE / / F0. TABULATIONS LOT 1 SITE AREA: 318,989 SF 17.32 ACRES TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 27,400 SF RETAIL- 6,900 SF �1 RESTAURANT 20,500SF I+ TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 304 SPACES AT 11.111000 THIS IS A CHANGE FROM THE PD, VARIANCE REQ LOT 2 SITE AREA: 143,773 SF 13.30 ACRES TOTAL BUILDING AREA 17,850 SF RETAIL fi 650 SF RESTAURANT 11,200 SF TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 185 SPACES AT 10.411000 'THIS IS A CHANGE FROM THE PO VARIANCE REO THE CHARLESTON GRAPEVINE TX ZONING STUDY - 06 Scale 1 -60 Date 09 29 16 q E E U) $ � § D � e w 0 § k2 0 co - ® ~ co 0 m w cn m 0 �e $x m - K / 2 a/ CL 0) < �( a 7- c 04 ® f G w- ƒ< « 2 0 § - Cl) k / �0 \- CD � / ® / 2 265 .he c o CO/ c (D< w i k % k k F Q 2 e CN ® U � o _ o m 2 # ƒ \ 2 § / \ k CD m 2 © # 7 3 3 k / ƒ § k »| \ � � / S $ $ & @ @ £ n CO w kw W ` < k 8 = § § k k :010 0 c§ o% c \ § E = 2 % oL G » § § Q k o / - % n ■ e m a � \ Cl) / \ m - \ - \ 2 k / co to \ U k / Q C) § � k C) o co 00 co \ 0 C \ , \ \ I k / CD < § a / L k 20�< / m \ 7 k m �j e e w k k \ � � c w § iu� 7 2 0 3 ƒ & 7 % > ■ < < EL cu *0 'D '0 k \ \ cts F- F- / F- -6 � 2 CNC) § LU k k � k Ld § ■ •- « k » ( iL CD LL CL« /cm Kz c o LU �- t:z o w Eo F- 0 t @ k $ Internal Capture Report - Phase 1 AM & PM Peak Hour Project: Grapevine Open Date: 9/28/2016 Analysis Date: 9/28/2016 AM Entering Trips I Exiting Trips Category Internal External Total Percent Internal External Total Percent Cinema 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% Hotel 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% Office 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 00/0 Residential 3 42 45 7% 37 141 178 21% Restaurant 37 221 258 14% 3 218 221 1% Retail 2 6 8 25% 2 3 5 40% All Other Land Uses 1 0 0 D D% 0 0 0 0% Totals 42 1 269 1 311 14% 42 362 404 1 10% PM Entering Trips I Exiting Trips Category Internal External Total Percent Internal External Total Percent Cinema 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% Hotel 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% Office 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% Residential 35 142 177 20% 22 72 94 23% Restaurant 28 210 238 12% 40 132 172 23% Retail 14 10 24 58% 15 11 26 58% All Other Land Uses 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% Totals 77 362 439 18% 77 215 292 26% Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, 2012 TRIP GENERATION 2014, TRAFFICWARE, LLC Duke February 22. 2018 Lucy Billingsley Billingsley Company 1722 Routh Street, Suite 770 Dallas, TX 75201 Re: The Charleston of Grapevine Dear Lucy, I just wanted to let you know that your proposed development, The Charleston of Grapevine, is just what the area needs in Grapevine. A new, vibrant, and life -enhancing development will help add to the overall area. Your description of new urbanism with technology, convenience and a vast array of amenities will help substantiate this type of development. Our experience in Grapevine was extremely beneficial for our company. We had nothing but positive dealings with the City of Grapevine when we developed our multifamily deals over a 10yr period beginning in the late `90's. Billingsley Company brings a level of expertise to any sort of new development that any city would welcome into the market. The Charleston, a combination of retail and residential, is a deal that the City of Grapevine will use to help define this area in the DFW metroplex. Every city and developer want to be a part of something special. This particular deal will fill that role for both parties. I am eager to watch The Charleston become a reality. Good luck! Cordially, Robert J. Stone III Duke. Inc. 13740 Midway, Suite #804 Dallas, Texas 75244 972-385-1676 Edward V Stone 1709 Altacrest Drive Grapevine, Texas 76051 City of Grapevine February 22, 2018 Attn: Ron Stombaugh Planning and Zoning Asst. Director 200 S Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 To Planning and Zoning Commissioners and City Council Members, I am writing to you regarding the proposed development, The Charleston of Grapevine, located west of State Hwy 121 and bordered by Stars and Stripes Way and Grapevine Mills Boulevard. As a long-time resident and local business person, I fully support the request for the required zoning change to allow a multi -family living and retail development. I am aware of the City's desire to develop the area in consideration and feel this would be an outstanding addition to Grapevine. The Charleston will be a premier development adding a combination of upscale living and great retail experience and will bring an increase to already existing businesses throughout the area. Included is a page showing the area of development. I believe the infrastructure of the area also supports and accommodates the development that will be of economic benefit to the City and desired by residents and visitors. Please consider the request and make the necessary zoning change promptly. Regards, Edward Stone ��r��EvinE mftb- GOLF CARS March 22, 2018 Mayor and City Council Planning and Zoning Commission City of Grapevine 200 S. Main St. Grapevine, TX 76051 Re: The Charleston at Grapevine Dear City Council Members and Planning and Zoning Commissioners: One of my long-term customers is proposing to bring their development project to the City of Grapevine. I am glad to see a multi -family development with the quality, the character, and the significance of The Charleston. Grapevine has long -needed to have offerings to attract the millennials to live in our city. This one reflects our heritage, and our character with the brick and the street and the neighborhood style. I strongly believe this project will attract new residents that will benefit the City of Grapevine and its local businesses. I give it my full support. Yours sincerely, Tent' undley Grapevine Golf Cars 1380 W. Northwest Hwy Grapevine, Texas 76053 P: 817-251-8032 March 19, 2018 Mayor and City Council Planning and Zoning Commission City ofGrapevine 200 S. Main St. Grapevine, TX76U51 Re: The Charleston at Grapevine Dear City Council Members and Planning and Zoning Commissioners: This land has sat empty for 30 years, and this project seems to be incredibly creative. The neighborhood retail, the parks, the public amenities, and the quality ofthe multi -family help redefine the Mills Mail area and to a fresh, earthy urbanity. It is a great presence on lIl for introducing people to our city. It also brings in more residents to support the retail inthe area which has gone thrumany rough years. Yours sincerely, Jessica Wester, Office Manager PeiserQMankinSurveying, Inc, 623E.Dallas Rd. Grapevine, TX76O5I March 05, 2018 Mayor and City Council Planning and Zoning Commission City of Grapevine 200 S. Main St. Grapevine, TX 76051 Re: The Charleston at Grapevine Dear City Council Members and Planning and Zoning Commissioners: I am glad to see a multi -family development with the quality, the character, and the significance of The Charleston. Grapevine has long -needed to have offerings to attract the millennials to live in our city. This particular one reflects our heritage, and our character with the brick and the street and the neighborhood style. I give it my full support. Yours sincerely, Mike Geddes Area Manager—OSP Planning & Design Planning AT&T — C&E SW ADGATE PARTNERS 11704 Wilshire Blvd. #260 Los Angeles, CA 90025 310.479.8400 City of Grapevine Department of Development Services Ron Stombaugh, Director of Development Services 200 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 March 12, 2018 RE: The Charleston at Grapevine Dear Mr. Stombaugh, On behalf of the owners of the "Lone Star Crossing," a project neighbor, I am pleased to provide a letter of endorsement for the Charleston of Grapevine project. The Billingsley Company has shared their project plans and reviewed them in detail with us. In our view the project is well thought out and is being developed to a very high standard. We welcome the additional housing units, which we see as critical to the future economic viability of the city. We have been owners and operators of retail focused real estate in this market for almost ten years. Over our tenure we have seen a dramatic shift in demand for traditional retail product as on-line sales cannibalize the traditional brick and mortar system of delivering consumer products across the country. Our view, which is consistent with most developers, is that demand for traditional suburban retail real estate is going to continue to evolve towards more entertainment focused projects. The Shacks being proposed as part of the larger Billingsley project represents a great example of where retail is going. Grapevine is positioned nicely for luxury multi -family product and is well represented by what Billingsley is proposing. This project, along with other projects, will help increase demand for retail. We have received little interest from traditional retail tenants on our land holdings in Grapevine. The additional housing stock will be a benefit to the community, our project and the city of Grapevine. Moreover, the Charleston will provide substantial short and long term economic benefits to the community of Grapevine. The scale of the project will create many short term, high paying construction jobs, and also several permanent long term retail service jobs. We strongly support the project and believe it will set a high standard for how mixed use projects create vitality in the city Grapevine. Regards, cAt&tkv � L V1.1 Chester Congdon INDIANAPOLIS, iN 46226 PHONE 317.860.2940 FAX 317.860.2941 111.4 U.S. J1141L March 13, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 Dear City of Grapevine Planning & Zoning Commissioners and City Council: As the owner of the building located at 3400 Grapevine Mills Parkway, Grapevine, TX 76051, I'm writing to you regarding the proposed change in zoning for the property situated on the west side of State Highway 121, south of Grapevine Mills Blvd., and north of Stars and Stripes Way, as shown on the attached Exhibit A. Aller reviewing the proposed plans, we are fully in favor of the change in zoning to allow multi- family residential development at the location. We believe this is the highest and best use for this site. The addition of up to 422 multi -family units will bring life and pedestrian activity to the area; thereby, improving our business. This increase in business will result in more tax revenue for the City of Grapevine. In closing, we urge the City of Grapevine Planning and Zoning Commissions and City Council to promptly approve this case. Sincerely, C,jNards Grapevine Development III, LI' Managing Member t March 8, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 Dear City of GrapevinePlanning and Zoning Commissioners and City Council: As the store manager of La -Z -Boy located at 3450 Grapevine Mills Parkway, Grapevine, TX 76051, I'm writing to you regarding the proposed change in zoning for the property situated on the west side of State Highway 121, south of Grapevine Mills Blvd., and north of Stars and Stripes Way, as shown on the attached Exhibit A. La -Z -Boy notes that they are also the owner of their building. After reviewing the proposed plans, we are fully in favor of the change in zoning to allow multi- family residential development at the location. We believe this is the highest and best use for this site. The addition of up to 422 multi -family units will bring life and pedestrian activity to the area; thereby, improving our business.This increase in business will result in more tax revenue for the City of Grapevine. In closing, we urge the City of Grapevine Planning and Zoning Commissions and City Council to promptly approve this case. Regards, Sherian Capo Store Manager La -Z -Boy Furniture Galleries March 51, 2018 Lucy Billingsley Billingsley Company 1722 Routh Street, Suite 770 Dallas, TX 75201 Ms Billingsley, I wanted to write and advise that I have recently become aware of the planned Charleston project at Grapevine Mills Parkway and SH 121 in Grapevine TX. As a 10 year resident of this region I wanted to write and express how thrilled I am at the prospect of this development coming to fruition. Currently my wife and I are beginning the process of considering our next move, as our teenage children will graduate from the Grapevine Colleyville School District and be on their way to College within a few years. I have been searching potential next step locations and have become most concerned at the prospect of having to move from the area due to a lack of quality accommodation for downsizers such as ourselves. The Charleston project checks all the boxes we have been looking for and we anxiously hope and await its arrival. I understand that at this time your company is in the development approval process with Grapevine City, so I wanted to offer my support in your cause for the reasons outlined above. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance, and I look forward to seeing the project come to life, we may well be your first residents! Thank you, Cl yton G b n 15 Theresa Lane Colleyville TX 76034 `Toll `Brothers America's Luxury Home Builder - March 07, 2018 Mayor and City Council Planning and Zoning Commission City of Grapevine 200 S. Main St. Grapevine, TX 76051 Re: The Charleston at Grapevine Dear City Council Members and Planning and Zoning Commissioners: I am glad to see a multi -family development with the quality, character, and the significance of The Charleston, especially knowing the Billingsley Company is behind it. Grapevine has long -needed to have offerings to attract the millennials to live in our city. This particular one reflects our heritage, and our character with the brick and the street and the neighborhood style. give it my full support. Yours sincerel , T mas (Vlurra Group President Toll Brothers, Inc. 2557 SW Grapevine Pkwy., #100 Grapevine, TX 76051 New York Stock Exchange • Symbol TOL TEXAS DMSION 2557 Southwest Grapevine Parkway, Suite 100, Grapevine. TX 76051 • (817) 329-8770 • Fax (817) 488-2496 tollbrothers.com ENCORE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP 1705 WEST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY SUITE 260 GRAPEV[NE, TEXAS 76051 M 917 -Z9 -T30 FAX $17481-1344 Febmary 28, 2418 City of Grapevine % Ran Stombaugh 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, TX 76051 Re: Billingsley Development Project Zoning Case - Hwy 121 and Grapevine Mills Boulevard City of Grapevine P&Z and City Council: As an owner of property immedicably adjacent to the proposed Billingsley Company multi -family residential and retail development at Hwy 121 and Grapevines Mills Parkway {as shown on the attached FANt Aj, I would like to register our support for the project and the proposed Zoning change required to allow the multi family development component. It is our opinion that the combined use development that has been proposed iR the highest and best use for this property and will add value to both this immediate area and the City of Grapevine. We encourage both the P&Z and City Council to take the steps necessary to allow this development to go forward. Thank you. Dennis H. Clark President, Finale Management Company LC General Partner, Encore Retail Development Company LP BAY WEST GROUP 2 HENRY ADAMS STREET, SUITE 450 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94103 415 / 552-7700 FAX 415 / 552-7760 City of Grapevine Department of Development Services Ron Stombaugh, Director of Development Services 200 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 March 5, 2018 RE: The Charleston at Grapevine Dear Mr. Stombaugh, On behalf of the owners of the "Lone Star Crossing," a project neighbor, I am pleased to provide a letter of endorsement for the Charleston of Grapevine project. The Billingsley Company has shared their project plans and reviewed them in detail with us. In our view the project is well thought out and is being developed to a very high standard. We welcome the additional housing units, which we see as critical to the future economic viability of the city. We have been owners and operators of retail focused real estate in this market for almost ten years. Over our tenure we have seen a dramatic shift in demand for traditional retail product as on-line sales cannibalize the traditional brick and mortar system of delivering consumer products across the country. Our view, which is consistent with most developers, is that demand for traditional suburban retail real estate is going to continue to evolve towards more entertainment focused projects. The Shacks being proposed as part of the larger Billingsley project represents a great example of where retail is going. Grapevine is positioned nicely for luxury multi -family product and is well represented by what Billingsley is proposing. This project, along with other projects, will help increase demand for retail. We have received little interest from traditional retail tenants on our land holdings in Grapevine. The additional housing stock will be a benefit to the community, our project and the city of Grapevine. Moreover, the Charleston will provide substantial short and long term economic benefits to the community of Grapevine. The scale of the project will create many short term, high paying construction jobs, and also several permanent long term retail service jobs. We strongly support the project and believe it will set a high standard for how mixed use projects create vitality in the city Grapevine. Regards, Bill Poland February 30, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 Dear City of Grapevine Planning and Zoning Commissioners and City Council: The Leather Sofa Co., located at 3 100 Grapevine Mills Parkway, Suite 103, Grapevine, TX 76051, is writing to you regarding the proposed change in zoning for the property situated on the west side of State Highway 121, south of Grapevine Mills Blvd., and north of Stars and Stripes Way, as shown on the attached Exhibit A. After reviewing the proposed plans, we are fully in favor of the change in zoning to allow multi- family residential development at the location. We believe this is the highest and best use for this site. The addition of up to 422 multi -family units will bring life and pedestrian activity to the area; thereby, improving our business. This increase in business will result in more tax revenue for the City of Grapevine. In closing, we urge the City of Grapevine Planning and Zoning Commissions and City Council to promptly approve this case. Regards, By: The Leather Sofa Co. Name:– Rob Herman Title:— Leather Specialist February 13, 2018 City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 Dear City of Grapevine Planning and Zoning Commissioners and City Council: As the general manager of Fuzzy's Taco Shop located at 3100 Grapevine Mills Parkway, Suite 101, Grapevine, TX 76051, I'm writing to you regarding the proposed change in zoning for the property situated on the west side of State Highway 121, south of Grapevine Mills Blvd., and north of Stars and Stripes Way, as shown on the attached Exhibit A. After reviewing the proposed plans, we are fully in favor of the change in zoning to allow multi- family residential development at the location. We believe this is the highest and best use for this site. The addition of up to 422 multi -family units will bring life and pedestrian activity to the area; thereby, improving our business. This increase in business will result in more tax revenue for the City of Grapevine. In closing, we urge the City of Grapevine Planning and Zoning Commissions and City Council to promptly approve this case. Itega ds. t� ! Lindsey Hodge General Manager ORDINANCE NO. 2018-037 AN ORDINANCE ISSUING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 48 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE, BY GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU18-08 TO ESTABLISH A MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO BUILDING ELEVATION IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING MULTI -TENANT RETAIL BUILDING ALONG WITH APPROXIMATELY 25,800 SQUARE FEET OF NEW MULTI -STRUCTURE RETAIL AND RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT AND TWO, FOUR STORY MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURES AND TWO, THREE STORY BROWNSTONE STRUCTURES TOTALING 432 UNITS IN A DISTRICT ZONED "CC" COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS (3570 AND 3580 NORTH GRAPEVINE MILLS BOULEVARD AND 3155 STARS AND STRIPES WAY) ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) DECLARING AN EMERGENCYAND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a conditional use permit by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among otherthings the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this conditional use permit, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the conditional use permit lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and Ordinance No.2018-037 2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this conditional use permit and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this conditional use permit for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by granting Conditional Use Permit No. CU17-08 to establish a master site development plan to include but not be limited to building elevation improvements to the existing multi -tenant structure along with approximately 25,800 square feet of new multi - structure retail and restaurant development, and two, four story multifamily structures and two, three-story brownstone structures totaling 432 units in a district zoned "CC" Community Commercial District Regulations within the following described property: Lot 1, Block A, Charleston Addition and Lots 1A1, 3A1, 3A2, 5ARA1, 5ARA2, Block A, Grapevine Mills Crossing Addition (3570 and 3580 North Grapevine Mills Boulevard and 3155 Stars and Stripes Way) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, Ordinance No.2018-037 3 commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 17th day of April, 2018. APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary Ordinance No.2018-037 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Ordinance No.2018-037 14881 Quorum Drive, Suite 550. Dallas; TX 75254 972.726.9400 5 April, 2018 Mr. Ron Stombaugh Development Services Assistant Director 200 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 RE: Zoning Change Application The Charleston Multi -family and The Shacks at Grapevine Mills Crossing Retail Applicant: Billingsley Development Dear Mr. Stombaugh, Thank you for your assistance with our zoning application referenced above. This application is in reference to the properties generally located south of Grapevine Mills Boulevard, north of Stars and Stripes Way and fronting the Texas 121 Frontage Road along its eastern boundary. The retail portion of the project site is approximately 6.92acres and the multi -family portion of the project site is approximately 10.49 acres. In response to the requirement of the zoning application, we provide this letter to affirm our belief that the design of the proposed mixed-use multi -family and retail development complies with the City of Grapevine's Design Standards. Accompanying this letter is the completed checklist indicating our compliance to the letter or in spirit with all applicable requirements. As is the case with every development process at this early stage, allowances must be made for reasonable modifications as the design is developed in further detail. However, we affirm that it is our intention to remain in compliance with the spirit and the intent of the Design Standards at all times. In addition, by this letter, we confirm that on or before commencement of the multi -family development, the owner will begin two retail/restaurant buildings with a minimum of 12,000 SF on the lots north of the multi -family development. The entire new retail development will consist of 27,400 SF of retail space and two parks when fully built. Upon or before completion of the balance of the retail/restaurant development, the owner will enhance the fagade of the existing neighboring retail anchor to the west to compliment the new development with recommended enhancements including canopies, patios and opening the corner with glass. Thank you very much again for your assistance and we look forward to working with you and your staff as we continue through completion of the approval process. Sincerely, Robert W. Lamkin, AIA Hensley Lamkin Rachel, Inc., President HENSLEY LAMKIN RACHEL, INC-- THE WALLIS AND THE BAKER OF GRAPEVINE DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS GRAPEVINE MILLS NORTH DISTRICT LiLlm BILLINGSLEY - GRAPEVINE b% SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS GRAPEVINE MILLS NORTH DISTRICT BILLINGSLEY - GRAPEVINE 2. Pedestrian Connection Beyond The Project And District The main central organizing street provides a pedestrian connection from the entire project to adjacent public sidewalks and to multiple retail areas. The main street also connects all the internal parks, courtyards, and plazas to the rest of the neighborhood. This gives residents and visitors a unique pedestrian experience that starts on the retail buildings and retail parks then carries the energy of the street retail into the Multi -family by first come to the workout facility, then to the leasing and then to the plaza and parks elements. There is a strong retail, residential, and public realm indoor and outdoor at the street level. SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS GRAPEVINE MILLS NORTH DISTRICT BILLINGSLEY - GRAPEVINE 4. Perpetuate Residentially Derived Styling And Forms This site is part of a large commercial district that is not near single family areas, topography or golf courses. The design inspiration is compatible with existing near multi -family developments. SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS GRAPEVINE MILLS NORTH DISTRICT BILLINGSLEY - GRAPEVINE 6. Provide A Land Use And Scale Transition Between Multifamily/ Vertical Mixed -Use Development And Abutting Single Family Development. Our project is a horizontal mixed use developed around a strong pedestrian spine that connects the various uses around it. The site is also not abutting single family developments so all transitions are developed internally in order to preserve the continuity of the commercial district. 23. Promote Horizontal Mixed Use. The proposed master plan for this development is for a horizontal mixed- use. A retail component is provided along Grapevine mills boulevard, which is one of the two primary streets abutting this development. As a horizontal mixed-use development with multiple fronting streets, we located the retail along 100% of the frontage along Grapevine mills boulevard, which is a predominant retail street. The master plan also shows how the multi -family buildings and the retail buildings are connected by engaging them along a centralized main street that connects the entire project from our two main streets, Grapevine Mills Boulevard and Stars and Stripes. SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS GRAPEVINE MILLS NORTH DISTRICT BILLINGSLEY - GRAPEVINE 8. Perpetuate Commercially Derived Styling And Forms Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms that include the following elements: 1. A predominately flat roof concealed by a raised parapet of at least 12in in height - Yes 2. All openings are vertically and horizontally aligned - Yes 3. Balconies are projected - Yes 4. Steel construction is exposed - Yes S. The first floor plate is at least 15f high at the street level - This is a horizontal mixed-use development, not a vertical mixed- use development. 6. Void -to -solid relationships are 500/b or greater void - Yes .h ,' .,y.. 2t- I' THE WALL _ LIS ,,_n„ R, -F SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION BACK ELEVATION 06 - MONUMENT SIGN 10. Maintain Compatibility With District Thematic Sign Features. Proposed signs are compatible with ,gjA District signs. SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS GRAPEVINE MILLS NORTH DISTRICT BILLINGSLEY - GRAPEVINE � MFTtf. -T()fJF FANS. FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION 07 - GROUND SIGN SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS GRAPEVINE MILLS NORTH DISTRICT BILLINGSLEY - GRAPEVINE UBAPEVINE MILLS BBULEVAFW - _ r • Residents -only Park SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS GRAPEVINE MILLS NORTH DISTRICT BILLINGSLEY - GRAPEVINE 11. Provide Responsive Interface To Open Space And Open Space Amenities. Open spaces in this development play a great part of the extension of the pedestrian streetscape. Building orientations, planting selections and sidewalk patterns are all intentionally done to invite the interaction with our open spaces and to invite the public in. The main street connects all the internal parks, courtyards, and plazas to the rest of the neighborhood. This gives residents and visitors a unique pedestrian experience that starts on the retail buildings and retail parks then carries the energy of the street retail into the Multi -family by first come to the workout facility, then to the leasing and then to the plaza and parks elements. E%STING 0a."� –! � ' I L I I 1 -- — - --- • SAW _ • THE SM _ -.. _ _ -_ . - •', I i • rrFv, - I i • Residents -only Park SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS GRAPEVINE MILLS NORTH DISTRICT BILLINGSLEY - GRAPEVINE 11. Provide Responsive Interface To Open Space And Open Space Amenities. Open spaces in this development play a great part of the extension of the pedestrian streetscape. Building orientations, planting selections and sidewalk patterns are all intentionally done to invite the interaction with our open spaces and to invite the public in. The main street connects all the internal parks, courtyards, and plazas to the rest of the neighborhood. This gives residents and visitors a unique pedestrian experience that starts on the retail buildings and retail parks then carries the energy of the street retail into the Multi -family by first come to the workout facility, then to the leasing and then to the plaza and parks elements. SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS GRAPEVINE MILLS NORTH DISTRICT BILLINGSLEY - GRAPEVINE a 13. Curvilinear Organization Of The Development Plan. A main central street that meanders from north to south is the main organizing element of the master plan. The orientation of buildings, landscaping and open spaces configuration also help define the centralized main spine that helps organized the development BILLINGSLEY - THE WALLIS AND THE BAKER MF SUBMITTAL District -Specific Design Standards Architectural Accommodations of Grade Change Does the plan retain grade to support the building plate including terraces, pati- os, decks and any accessory buildings adjoined to the primary structure? Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. 2. Pedestrian Connection Beyond The Project And District Does the plan provide pedestrian connections from units within the project to existing trails, sidewalks or other public and private walkways. Does the plan provide pedestrian connections to places within the development that abut pedestrian walkways that the City's approved plans identify for the future? Comments: 04.04.18 Complies: Yes No In Spirit ❑ ❑ ❑ Complies: Yeses No In Spirit i' 17 7 The main central organizing street provides a pedestrian connection from the entire project to adjacent public sidewalks and to multiple retail areas. Ground floor units facing the main street have direct access to the sidewalk. 3. Preserve and/or Restore The Natural Characteristic Of The District Does the plan include landscape development that continues the natural charac- teristics of the projects surroundings? Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. Complies: Yes No In Spirit ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Perpetuate Residentially Derived Styling And Forms Does the plan use the following architectural components? . Pitched roof (gable or hip) • Organized roof massing where a dominant roof has subordinate roofs that extend form it. • 12 inch roof overhang . Roofed porches and balconies . No more than 45 horizontal feet of continuous wall without a horizon- tal offset of at least 4 feet . Dormers that break the cornice . Windows that align both horizontally and vertically • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form . Three stories maximum. These three stories may be over a parking podium. • Openings are treated with a jamb and/or head surround . The Void -to -Solid relationship for window -in -wall elements is less than 50% Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit r F F Not applicable since site is part of a large commercial district that is not near single family areas, topography or the golf course. 2 5. Provide Buffer Adjacent To Residentially Adverse Conditions Complies: Does the plan provide a buffer between residential land use and adjacent envi- Yes No In Spirit ronmental conditions (e.g. loud sound) that would negatively impact the livabili- ty of the residential land? Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. 6. Provide A Land Use And Scale Transition Between Multifamily/Vertical Complies: Mixed -Use Development And Abutting Single Family Development. Yes No In Spirit If the plan abuts an area of single-family residential land use, does it provide a "residential transition"? A residential transition must include two components: . Height Transition: For any element with a height above 35ft, this ele- ment can't exceed one foot above 35ft in height for every lft of setback beyond 15ft. For example, you may have 36ft at 16ft setback, 37ft at 17ft and so on. • Scale Transition: Any element located within 20ft of a property line abutting a single-family land use must not have an elevation face area more than 1200 sq. ft. Comments: Our project is not a vertical Mixed -used development; it is a horizontal mixed use development. Its not abutting single family developments. - requirement does not apply 3 7. Provide Development That Maximizes Uses Appropriate To The Value Of The Complies: Setting And/Or Characteristic Of The Context. Yes No In Spirit If the surrounding street -level use is NOT predominately residential, does the plan provide—or is the structure such that it could be leased to provide—first- floor or street -level land uses that are consistent with the context? If the plan has a distinct locational opportunity (such as being close to logistic, movement or transit hubs), does it provide—or is the structure such that is could be leased to provide—first-floor or street -level land uses that are consistent with this context? If the answer to either question is YES, does the plan provide—or could be rent- ed to provide—these land uses for at least 70% of the street -fronting first -floor space? Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. 8. Perpetuate Commercially Derived Styling And Forms Complies: Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms that include the following Yes No In Spirit elements: � F7 F • A predominately flat roof concealed by a raised parapet of at least 12in in height yes . All openings are vertically and horizontally aligned yes . Balconies are projected yes • Steel construction is exposed yes • The first floor plate is at least 15ft high at the street level not applicable since this is not a vertical mixed-use building . Void -to -solid relationships are 50% or greater void yes Comments: Our proposed building designs use an urban block form compatible with the large scale commercial buildings that surround our site. 9. Preserve And Extend Thematic Streetscapes Does the plan continue the established streetscape of its surrounding District? This includes: • Matching light fixtures and spacing of light fixtures • Matching tree species, scale, placement and spacing • Matching paving material and paving pattern • Continuation of defined inset areas for on -street parking Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 7 F7 7 10. Maintain Compatibility With District Thematic Sign Features. Does the plan Complies: provide signage that is compatible with signage in the surrounding District? This Yes No In Spirit includes: F • Maintaining the relationship of signage to street -fronting building planes • Marinating the general appearance of the District's signage • Maintaining sign illumination consistent with the District and its nightscape • Use of sign types consistent with the District and the context. This in- cludes commercial tenant signs, premise signs and project signs. Comments: Proposed signs are compatible with District signs. R 11. Provide Responsive Interface To Open Space And Open Space Amenities. Does the plan address open space in ways that extend the open space into the project? This includes: . Elimination of parking aprons in the foreground between the structure and the open space yes . Extension of landscape species and patterns characteristic of the open space into the project yes . Orientation of buildings to that building placement breaks free from the normal orthogonal relation to street and bears relationship to features of the larger landscape yes • Extension of trails into the project • Use of fence design that does not visually disrupt the continuous ground plane yes Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit X ❑ 7 Open spaces in this development play a great part of the extension of the pedestrian streetscape. Building orientations, planting selections and sidewalk patterns are all intentionally done to invite the interaction with our open spaces and to invite the public in. 12. Resort/Lodge/Prairie Styling And Forms. Does the plan use architectural Complies: styles derived from resort/lodge/prairie architectural precedents? These include: Yes No In Spirit • Flat pitched gable or hipped rooves with long and un -interrupted ridges and cornices . Large roof overhangs with structural bracing such as brackets, angled braces, canted braced and exposed rafters • Tapered columns that are full masonry or have masonry bases • Use of flat roofs to accent pitched roofs • Variable plate heights • Vertical and Horizontal alignment of openings • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form • Use of decks and terraces • Architecturally enclosed balconies • Projected window jambs and/or headers • Structural details derived from timber construction detailing • Use of siding and masonry • Upper story insets within, or projections over, a lower story base Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. 7 13. Curvilinear Organization Of The Development Plan Complies: Does the plan have a curvilinear organization? This includes: Yes No In Spirit • Gracefully meandering streets and drives with bends in the street and drive alignment that is responsive to grade • Merging street intersections where operations permit • Organically -shaped parking areas . Building orientations that are not tied to uniform street frontage . Drifted groupings of trees in lieu of straight rows with uniform spacing Comments: A main central street that meanders from north to south is provided in the master plan. The orientation of buildings, landscaping and open spaces configuration also help define the centralized main spine that helps organized the development 14. Conceal Visibility Of Service And Parking Functions Does the plan place service and parking functions so that such functions are NOT in the foreground yard space between any arterial or primary street and the buildings that are facing that street? Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. Complies: Yes No In Spirit F— F7 D 15. Perpetuate Historic/Indigenous Derived Architectural Styling And Forms. Complies: Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms derived from the historic or Yes No In Spirit indigenous character of the District? Such aspects include: F . Commercially -scaled first floor with a 15ft plate • For building of three floors or greater, a tripartite architecture . Decorative and embellished front parapet • Street canopy • Portrait orientation of openings and subversion of openings • Continuous vertical corners often expressed as pilasters • Occasional use of roof forms as accent elements on the front elevation • Void -to -Solid ratio with greater void at the street level and greater solid at other levels • Treatment of openings with jamb and/or header surrounds • Use of belt courses to establish horizontal reference for placement of openings • Use of decorative brick bands and details Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. 9 16. Use Of Thematic Exterior Material, If Such Material Is Characteristic Of Dis- Complies: trict And Complies With The General Material Standards. Yes No In Spirit If there is a surrounding District context, does the plan continue with the use of 171 F7 the dominant and characteristic material of the surrounding District? If so, is the use of that material in compliance with the General Material Stan- dards of the Building Manual? Dominant use of material means material that comprises at least 70% of the building exterior excluding openings. Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. 17. Orthogonal/Block Orientation Of The Development Plan. Does the plan have Complies: a block/orthogonal organization? This includes: Yes No In Spirit • Straight streets with right angle intersections n E 7 • Continuous street wall defined by alignment of buildings • Uniform spacing of street trees and street fixtures • Continue the urban blocks which are adjacent to the project . Have decorative cross walks or other intersection enhancements Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. 18. Pedestrian/Residential Activity Connection Between The Public Street And Complies: Living Units Fronting The Street. Yes No Does the plan present the public street with an external expression of the resi- ❑ dential activity? This means that the street level of the residential development is not commercially used or made capable for commercial use. This includes porches, stoops, terraces, patios, fenced front yards and steps up from an ap- proach grade. Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. 19. Maintain Height And Scale Compatibility With The Height And Scale Char- Complies: acteristic Of District. Yes No When height and scale are important attributes of the surrounding District's ❑ ❑ identity, is the plan compatible with this height and scale? Such compatibility can be achieved through one or both of the following: • Upper -story setbacks that create a building mass at the street consistent with context . Horizontal offsets at the street level which reduce the lower floor pre- sentation of mass when the characteristic block size is exceeded. This creates the image of a block that is further subdivided through built rec- ognition of individual properties as described in the "Bay Modulation" section of the Building Manual. Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. a In Spirit 11 In Spirit 11 20. Use Of Bay Modulation Patterns That Are Compatible With Bay Modulation Complies: Of The District. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a street frontage that continues the bay modulation of the F7 F7 block? Bay modulation refers to the architectural expression of individual build- ings within the block face. This is important to emulate the traditional block face of a downtown where buildings are normally built lot -line to lot -line in direct juxtaposition. In such downtowns, there is a complex street wall referred to as the "Bay" and the rhyth- mic and varied offset and appearance of that bay is referred to as "Bay Modula- tion" Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. 12 21. Provide An Urbanized Streetscape. Does the plan provide an urbanized streetscape along the primary street frontage that is consistent with the char- acteristic urban street fabric within the District? Key features of an urbanized streetscape include: • The architectural plane fronting the primary street must create a con- tinuous street wall along the primary street frontage. Buildings must establish a "built -to" zone which extends from the primary street front property line and extends into the property a distance of 3ft and at least 75% of the primary street frontage much lie within this zone. NOTE: the location and depth of this zone may be modified upon City approval when the modification results in lateral expansion of a sidewalk space for a sidewalk restaurant or sidewalk retail or in the creation of an arcade along the street. • Street trees used in the streetscape should continue the use of an exist- ing tree species when the larger urban setting contains a thematic tree. If the surrounding urban setting does not have a thematic tree, the plan must choose from a list of approved plants. • Street lights must continue the uniform spacing and placement charac- teristic of the surrounding primary street. When a larger urban setting contains a thematic light or light standard, the plan must use that light standard. When no thematic light exists, the plan must choose a light or light standard appropriate for urban streetscape use. . Decorative paving should continue the characteristic paving material and pattern of the urban context when that context includes a thematic sidewalk treatment. When no thematic treatment exists, the project must use a sidewalk paving material and pattern appropriate for urban streets - cape use. Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. 13 Complies: Yes No In Spirit 7 22. Provide A "Borrowed Landscape" For The Primary Street Frontage Does the plan provide a "borrowed landscape" along the primary street frontage that preserved the general character of the District? This includes: . Elimination of parking aprons or walls between the building and street unless the landscape space abutting the street is greater than 20ft . Creation of an expanded parkway that is varied in dimension with the minimum parkway expansion being 15ft from the street right of way and with variations in width occurring at least every 200ft. Creation of pads for horizontal mixed use qualifies as varied Borrowed Landscape space . Use of a pedestrian trail in lieu of a pedestrian sidewalk. Sidewalks within the borrowed landscape space must be meandering pedestrian ways at least 8ft wide. Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. 14 Complies: Yes No In Spirit 17 [1 7 23. Promote Horizontal Mixed Use Complies: Yes No In Spirit Does the project create opportunities for stand-alone retail/ restaurant pads with- in the street frontage of the primary street? In no case should the provision of a retail pad consume more than 50% of the multifamily frontage. Where the multifamily frontage is 300ft or less, a retail pad leave -out is not required. This retail pad requirement may be waived upon City Approval but a requirement for variable street definition (#24) still applies Comments: The proposed master plan for this development is for a horizontal mixed-use. A retail component is provided along Grapevine mills boulevard, which is one of the two primary streets abutting this development. As a horizontal mixed-use development with multiple fronting streets, we located the retail along 100% of the frontage along Grapevine mills boulevard, which is a predominant retail street. The master plan also shows how the multi -family buildings and the retail buildings are connected by engaging them along a centralized main street that connects the entire project from our two main streets, Grapevine Mills Boulevard and Stars and Stripes. 24. Provide Variable Street Definition Within The Block Face Along Primary Complies: Streets Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a variable street definition through the variable setback of multifamily structures fronting the primary street? No more than 50% of the project frontage may adhere to a uniform setback dimension. Horizontal offsets in the development plan set back line must be no less than 10 ft. Comments: Not applicable to the Grapevine Mills North District. M A* = When closer to topography and golf course A** = When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 16 District Specific Stan- 360/Airport Grapevine Grapevine Gaylord/SH Central Tran - dards (A = Applicable) District Mille South Mills North 26 District sit District District District 1 Architectural accommo- A A dation of grade change 2 Pedestrian connection A A A A A beyond project and district 3 Preserve/restore charac- A A teristic natural mosaic 4 Residentially derived A A* styling and forms/ pitched roof 5 Buffer adjacent environ- A mental encroachments 6 Land use/scale transition A A from MF/SF 7 Maximize value capture A A opportunities 8 Commercially derived A A*, A styling and forms 9 Preserve/perpetuate A thematic streetscape 10 Compatible with district, A A A thematic signage features 11 Responsive interface A A A with open space and amenities 12 Resort/lodge derived A A styling and forms 13 Curvilinear organization A A A A of development plan 14 Conceal visibility of ser- A A A vice/parking functions from arterials/primary roads 15 Historic/indigenous A derived styling/forms 16 Use of thematic exterior A material if characteristic of district and complies with standards A* = When closer to topography and golf course A** = When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 16 17 Orthogonal, block orga- A nization of development plan 18 Pedestrian/residential A activity connection between street and living unit fronting street 19 Height and scale com- A patibility with height and scale characteristic of district 20 Bay modulation pattern A compatibility with the- matic bay modulation of district 21 Urbanized streetscape A 22 Provide "Borrowed" A landscape for street en- hancement 23 Promote horizontal A A mixed-use 24 Variable street definition A to create a more complex street scape A* = When closer to topography and golf course A** = When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 17 General Standards for Multifamily Development Part A: Site and Design a. Contextual Relationships 1. Community Structure: Each plan for a project larger than 100 units must Complies: provide: Yes No In Spirit i. Benches: at least one every 700ft or one per block, whichever is less '' 17 1D— ii. ii. Bike Racks: a capacity for 4 bikes at each residential building and 14 at the central pedestrian facility iii. Trash Disposal Units: one trash receptacle at each bench iv. Pedestrian Lighting: one light standard at least every l 00ft Comments: Required elements are provided, please refer to the Landscape plan for locations of benches, lights and bike racks. The bike parking for the buildings will be provided inside the parking structures. 2. Cognitive Structure: Development site plans should avoid a "maze -like" Complies: arrangement of streets and drives and should provide a clear demarcation of Yes No In Spirit sub -areas arranged with reference to an internal destination. FX_ 7 7 Comments: No maze -like site plan configuration is provided. The main centralized street creates an organizing element that provides clear demarcations for all sub -areas that connect to it. 3. Edge Definition: Planting of the edge must provide visual concealment of at least 70% of the perimeter fence using evergreen plants. Moreover, at least 70% of these plants must have foliage from ground to top capable of providing a screen. Edge screening must be planted in natural drifts that appear as native plant clusters. Comments: If and where there is perimeter fencing we will comply. 4. Traffic Calming: Any multifamily plan must illustrate traffic calming mea- sures using traffic tables, intersections, traffic circles, cliokers, roadway neck downs at intersections, center island narrowing or rumble strips. Speed bumps are prohibited. Comments: A traffic table is provided at the transition of the multi -family and the retail. 18 Complies: Yes No In Spirit 1X7 1:7 71 Complies: Yes No In Spirit IF 7 1-7 b. Connections Beyond The Project 1. Relationship With And Connections To The City Fabric: The site plan for any multifamily development must portray the extent to which the following elements of the City Fabric are continued or otherwise responded to: i. Curb Cuts and Driveways: Development plans much seek to continue flow between projects by coordinating points of ingress and egress so that efficient maneuvers to and from serving public streets are possible. Coordination of routing traffic volumes anticipated by individual project TIAs is a required consideration of a development plan being considered by the City. ii. Thoroughfares And Roadways: A development plan that lays within the path of a thoroughfare as planned or committed to by adjacent devel- opment or of a thoroughfare that has been adjusted by the Council must make provision for the extension of the right of way of such thoroughfare when traffic projected densities necessitate extension. iii. Trails: A proposed multifamily development plan must consider appropriate trail routing through the proposed development so that a cohesive trail network can evolve over time. iv. Open Space: The proposed development plan must consider exten- sion of the open space or expansion of the open space, or consider how development portrayed by the development plan can relate to and define the open space. v. Contextual Characteristics: Any multifamily development plan must illustrate how various aspects of the context will also be manifest in the development design. Key aspects of the context include streetscape themes, continuity of water or water bodies, extension of indigenous plan drifts, continuity of road sections, treatment of parking, protection of and continuity with adjacent land uses, continuation of tree canopies and canopy species, continuity of natural features, extension of surface water management strategies, and continuity of edge treatments. Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit F 17 7 The proposed main central street helps meet the guidelines above by providing vehicular and pedestrian traffic through the development and back into the City of Grapevine street system. The proposed streetscape also serves as an organizing element for building orientations and open spaces connectivity. These main street also gives the opportunity for the development to link to any future trails systems that can get developed around the site. c. Lot Occupancy 1. In a development plan that's required to be curvilinear as outlined by the Dis- Complies: trict Specific Standards, such a plan must establish a building relationship to the Yes No street such that: FX7 7 i. At least 60% of the interior street and drive -fronting buildings within the development plan design and 75% of buildings facing public streets serving the project must be sited so that the front building plane (the plane facing the street) is not parallel to the street right of way. ii. A minimum of 30% of the yard space along interior streets and drives, and 50% of the yard space fronting public streets serving the project, must be covered by a landscape approach defined by organic plant mass- ing and natural drifts. Comments: In Spirit F The proposed master plan meet the intent of the guideline by providing buildings that frame spaces around the main central street. 2. Building Relation to the Street and Orthogonal Plan Layouts: Plan designs that are required to be orthogonal, as outlined by the District Specific Standards, must establish a building relationship to the street such that: i. The development plan must establish a "build -to" line for the interior streets and drives of the project that will vary from the required 3ft build - to line along the plan's exterior public streets as specified in the District Specific Standards. This build -to line must be at least 9ft form the street or drive back of curb. ii. The presence of repetitive stoops, terraces or porches which project into the yard space created by the build -to line cannot be closer than 5ft to the street or drive back of curb and must project at least 4ft from the primary building mass. These projections must be architecturally contained such that they are part of the overall facade composition. The offset space created between the projected stoop, porch or terrace and the primary building mass must be a landscape space, leaving a 5ft minimum pedestrian space at the street edge. Complies: Yes No In Spirit F F7 Comments: We comply with all the requirements above. Our site plan is not strictly orthogonal. 20 d. Parking: Placement and Configuration 1. Parking Facility Type: i. Structured Parking: Parking within the Transit Center Character Zone must be structured when the project exceeds 20 units per acre. Projects exceeding 40 units per acre in any other Character Zone must provide structured parking. ii. Surface Parking Areas: Projects with a unit density between 28 and 39 units per acre that provide aggregated surface parking must comply with the following: 1. Aggregated parking areas with more than 70 parking spaces (not including street or drive head -in parking) must be located in a place that is not visible to the primary street serving the project or located so that the parking area may be screened. Parking garages located such that they front a public street must have architectural eleva- tions that complement the design style of the multifamily structures. "Complement" in this context means that they must share similar horizontal offsets, organization of openings, and use of materials. 2. Aggregated parking areas in non -orthogonal development plan designs must also have a curvilinear configuration. 3. Aggregated parking areas must be landscaped Comments: Complies: Yes No E [I171 The required parking for this development is provided on two structured parking garages. 2. Head -in parking along streets: Before the parking demand for aggregated parking areas is determined, head -in street and drive parking must be provided to the extent permitted by the streetscape design. Comments: No head in parking is provided for the multi -family development. 21 Complies: Yes No 17 17 In Spirit In Spirit 71 e. Site Open Space Requirement 1. Open space as a percent of total development area: At least 20% of the site area identified in any multifamily plan must be set aside as open space. Site areas that qualify as open space set asides include: i. Areas protecting existing natural features and/or plant communities ii. Areas used for the surface management of storm water that are not structures iii. Any retained water iv. Project amenity areas that are visually accessible from streets and/or drives v. Playgrounds vi. Pedestrian trails vii. Borrowed street landscape areas viii. Pedestrian accessible areas between structures open to access by the project population Comments: refer to landscape plan for location and calculations of open spaces. 2. Form giving influence: Open space provided within any development plan must serve as a frontage for at least 25% of the structures within the project, where buildings can define the edge of open space, except for the Transit Center District where street frontage is prioritized. Comments: Complies: Yeses� No�I In Spirit L^' 1 Complies: Yes No In Spirit Z El 17 Please refer to landscape plan for location and calculations of open spaces along structures. 22 f. Preservation of Natural Drainage 1. Natural Drainageways: Any development plan for multifamily development Complies: in Grapevine must illustrate the extent to which natural drainage within the lot, Yes No In Spirit parcel or tract exists and is preserved through design initiatives that preserve, F7restore or replicate natural drainage patterns. Any disruption of natural drainage patterns must be approved by the City of Grapevine. Comments: The current site conditions have a natural drainage channel that runs north to south, which is now proposed to flow through box culverts across the retail site and around the parking structure facing the highway. This measurements don't provide any disruption of the natural drainage currently available on the site. Please refer to the attached civil and landscape plans. 23 g. Storm Weather Management Facilities 1. Storm weather management structures: Any development plan for mul- tifamily development in the City of Grapevine, where structured storm water management solutions are requires must adhere to the following: i. Minimize structured means of water management: Plans must min- imize the use of cross drainage structures, armored channels, concrete flow ways, and other structured solutions to storm water management, unless such structures are for the purpose of creating a pedestrian or urban activity at a water edge. ii. Maintain natural shapes and form in the creation of detention/re- tention facilities and created drainageways (a.k.a. flow management facilities): Water collection points and/or pools created by nature have shapes that are clearly organic. Therefore, plans should avoid straight lines, hard angles, and regular geometric shapes in the creation of flow management facilities. iii. Landscape with natural elements: Where storm water management design creates conditions that support indigenous plants, measures must be taken to landscape such facilities in ways that allow such plants. iv. Respect natural sub -systems: Proper design of flow management fa- cilities should, where appropriate, include diverse ecological settings such as deep water (limnetic zones) in combination with shallow water (lit- toral zones), wetlands, ephemeral flows, and greater states of hydration which can support plant communities associated with these zones. Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit F7 F No storm weather management structures are provided for this development, requirements do not apply. h. Grading 1 Grading for multifamily development in the City of Grapevine must adhere to Complies: the following: Yes No In Spirit i. Avoid steep grades: Grades equal to or greater than 20% are consid- ered steep and shall not be graded to create building lots. However, indi- vidual buildings which make grade transition within the building, porch or terrace expansions are permitted and therefore the limited disturbance of grade needed to accomplish this is permitted also. ii. Conform to standards for tree protection: Any tree over three inches in caliper remaining on a lot, parcel or tract (that is, trees not approved for removal) and exposed to the building activity or within 30ft of the building activity (hereinafter regulated trees) shall be protected as fol- lows: a. Tree fencing: Regulated tree trunks shall be protected within a visible "tree fence" at least 36 inches tall and protecting the tree and ground around the tree to a minimum distance from the trunk equal to the distance of the tree drip line or 10 feet, whichever is less. b. Tree marking: All regulated trees shall be marked with a green surveyor tape which indicates "Protected Tree" status. c. Ground compaction avoidance: Measures shall be taken to min- imize ground compaction within the dripline of a Regulated Tree. Grading within the ground protected by a tree fence is prohibited. d. Maintenance of normal hydration: Measures shall be taken to maintain normal hydration of a Regulated Tree. Comments: The current site conditions do not create any steep grades with our lots or building layouts. Grading conditions along the site are very flat. Tree protection will be provided for any remaining tree that meets the criteria for protection. Part B: Building Design Standards a.Street Interface 1. Semi-public space adjacent to streets: Complies: Yes No i. Canopies and store fronts are limited to urban setting such as primary street frontage in the Transit Center Character Zone. �=' ii. In any single building block, there must be at least one expression of a first -floor, semi-public space within the street -facing elevation. If a cano- py of storefront is used to meet this standard, it must occupy at least 50% of the length of the elevation. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open space, each building block must have at least one first -floor pedestrian space that is part of the architectural design. i. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first -floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un -supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: Is In Spirit El A first floor expression is provide with combinations of cover porches, change of materials, recess balconies and projected canopies. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open Complies: space, each building block must have at least one first -floor pedestrian space that Yes No In Spirit is part of the architectural design. C F7 F i. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first -floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un -supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: A pedestrian carriageway is provided on the side of the building facing the main plaza. 26 n11■1n11,1 :n nn ■��; � � � ■■■$� tl9 1 ■n::n: nnnn III n I rIn� 11 i:::::::n:: l .: n11u11n11 un 11 1■u °0 ■■ ■■ n ...... :�_::= 11 1■■■■ ■ n i■. na 11 n n- ..n nn 11 ■■ n n .... �n o ... nn 11 i ■ri s o e� SII ■■ ni n nin nn 11 ■■ ■■ n ■■ nun ;;;;;; nll�i milli 11n11_ Inn 11111 1G§¢ y _ _1,r • 1 a aa -■a . MsW4 I w ■ y �'■ mom ISPINe, nn nn 17 Nn n 11111,1 JOHN El 1111 111111 11111 �� n■■n nn■■ nnn nun nn■■ nnu nnnmilli :: flfl11 111111 111 111111 sa�ij 111 111 =' in>f1111eu i'�"'If:aw Idi�@,�il�[f�1�etwlilleui ewl:lltini !11 ®�111111�e_��ea111��®® 111 ItliVll lllKld'i ,EiNlllliii, � ila�lot IL's �' P� ;;i"t1, lfllea tla+I 1111111 I � "" I11 ®�■■11■i1, i�� _ — - �-- a i�6111BB G1, 1,i ;. I�j� to of to et — tt:� rt at to n ee ^--� ii ii ei ie si "�' ie ii ii ii ■■ ■■ ��I ”' �__.-,�etnartt ea�ttatn a se� I■■"■■� '� � � �i� � _.,1 F L:'. ■��; � � � ■■■$� tl9 1 ■■■ ■ ■■■ 1 ■ ■ ■ f d i ■■ � 11 d ■ � ■■� 111 ����■ ■■■ � ■■■ ■■■ � 1 � '-■■■ ■■■. ■■■ ■■ ■■ ■■■ ■■�� RUN ■■■ ■■ ®Ni 1 ■■■. 111.■■■ ■ ■ III ■ ■ III ■■■ ■■ `�� ■■ ■■■ _ 11�. ■■■ ■■■� I ■■■ ■■■ ■■� ■ ■■■ ■ate: E s„r. rP} 4 11 11 P.Ee' we r 1G§¢ y _ _1,r • 1 a aa -■a . MsW4 I w ■ 1 I 1 �'■ mom ISPINe, 17 Nn ._ 111 111111 sa�ij 111 111 =' in>f1111eu i'�"'If:aw Idi�@,�il�[f�1�etwlilleui ewl:lltini !11 ®�111111�e_��ea111��®® 111 ItliVll lllKld'i ,EiNlllliii, � ila�lot IL's �' P� ;;i"t1, lfllea tla+I 1111111 I � "" I11 ®�■■11■i1, i�� _ — - �-- a i�6111BB G1, 1,i ;. I�j� to of to et — tt:� rt at to n ee ^--� ii ii ei ie si "�' ie ii ii ii ■■ ■■ ��I ”' �__.-,�etnartt ea�ttatn a se� I■■"■■� '� � � �i� � _.,1 F L:'. b. Elevation Composition (continued) 2. Openings and features of any building must have a common justification. Complies: Yes No i. When a pitched roof design is used, all windows—except dormer win- dows—must be below the cornice detail. '- ii. When a flat roof design is used, all windows must be at least 2ft below the parapet. yes iii. When both a pitched roof and flat roof design are used in the same elevation, the window heads must align horizontally. iv. Windows may abut the cornice detail if the window header modulates the banding or detailing of the cornice. yes v. Openings within an elevation must have a common reference line that engages the sill or head. yes vi. Windows within an elevation must have a common vertical reference line from the first to the top floor. yes vii. Windows must align with the features that define the architectural form. For example, windows in a gable cannot be arbitrarily distributed within the face of the gable unless specifically approved by the City. viii. Excepting first floor store front or vertical mixed-use structure, all openings must be square or portrait in orientation. ix. Windows, doors and other openings must be articulated within a pro- jected surround or header unless otherwise approved by the City. yes Comments: LN In Spirit 17 The proposed elevations use multiple combinations of window treatments, most of them reflecting the strategies described above. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 28 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 3. All elevations of a structure must receive equal treatment of style on all el- Complies: evations of a structure so as to avoid the common pitfall whereby only the Yes No street -facing facade is adequately styled and structured. IX E Comments: All the facades of the proposed buildings have the same level of detail and attention that street -facing facades have. 4. Forms created within the elevation, such as towers, bays and plate changes, must be derived from functions within the plan. Design approaches which seek to decorate a "space plan" derived independent of the elevation design are pro- hibited. Comments: In Spirit F Complies: Yes No In Spirit C 7 F7 All proposed created forms in the elevations are the result of functions in the plan. Towers and bays correspond to usable areas within the units they serve. 29 b. Street wall complexity and exterior offsets 1. Building offsets: Complies: Yes No i. Residential building blocks may not have more than 50 linear feet of wall without a wall offset. IF ii. Horizontal wall offsets must be at least 4ft. This may include balconies if contained within the confines of the offset. Any balconies projected from the face must have an architectural enclosure. iii. Architectural forms such as enclosed porches, stair towers, projected bays or stacked balconies maybe projected from the building block or recessed within it and must be accompanied by a roof in the roof massing that corresponds to the architectural form. Comments: In Spirit 17 To comply with the building offset requirement, we proposed to use the recess balconies as the required offset. To complement this strategy, the roof line over the balconies is modified also. The only exception to this rule we want to proposed is on the two townhome buildings, the design of these buildings is more pure in form, as they are reminiscent of old industrial buildings. 30 d. Void to Solid Ratio 1. For the first floor of a vertical mixed-use plan wherein the first floor has a Complies: commercial use, the void -to -solid ratio must be greater than or equal to 1.5:1 Yes No In Spirit (the amount of void being greater than the amount of solid). The solid portions of the first floor faqade must extend vertically to the floors above and parapet detail. Comments: Our proposed development does not include any vertical Mixed-use plans, thus requirement does not apply. 2. For floors above the first floor in a vertical mixed-use plan (or for all floors in Complies: a residential plan), the void -to -solid ratio must be less than or equal to 0.5:1 (the Yes No In Spirit amount of void being less than the amount of solid). n F F7 Comments: Our proposed development does not include any vertical Mixed-use plans, thus requirement does not apply. 31 e. Architectural Enclosures 1. All projected stair towers, elevator shafts, and cantilevered building pro) ec- Complies: tions (other than balconies) must be architecturally enclosed. This means that Yes No In Spirit they must be enclosed in an architectural skin and must be expressed as a roof form. 17 17 F7 Comments: Projected elements in the proposed facades comply with the requirements for architectural enclosures. All exposed stairs are enclosed and expressed as part of the architecture for the building they serve. 32 f. Roof form: Rooves and the roof lines they create are essential design elements for higher -value structures. Visible roof design must: 1. Be legible. There must be a clear organization of a dominant roof mass from Complies: which subordinate roof masses extend. Yes No In Spirit 9 F ❑ Comments: The proposed development uses a flat roof system with a parapet wall, which becomes the clear roof line. 2. Be balanced. A single roof pitch must be used within the total composition. Complies: Different roof pitches are permitted for tower forms which are not engaged with Yes No In Spirit the general roof form. Permitted roof forms include gables, hips, barrels if used a 17 ❑ secondary forms, sheds if used as secondary forms, and flat. F Comments: Our proposed design uses a flat roof. 33 g. Style Integrity 1. The use of architectural detailing associated with a style must use the charac- Complies: teristic detailing of that style. Yes No In Spirit F F F Comments: The proposed development uses multiple architectural styles to create variation throughout the development. The selected styles use appropriate detailing that relates directly to the character each style tries to convey. 2. The use of systems or materials that replicate the work of a trade or artisan are Complies: prohibited. Construction details which are traditionally derived from the work Yes No In Spirit of an artisan (such as a metal smith, carpenter or stonemason) must use a mate- rial in which the characteristic craftsperson can work. 17 Comments: The proposed design does not uses works of an artisan as part of the architecture. Requirement does not apply. 34 h. Chimneys 1. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the chimney must be ter- Complies: minated with a chimney cap that conceals the metal spark arrestor and visually Yes No In Spirit reads as a traditional tile flue system, unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: No chimneys are provided. Requirement does not apply 2. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the chimney shaft must be Complies: enclosed with unit masonry, stone or 3 -coat stucco with a minimum dimension Yes No In Spirit of 4.5ft x 3ft, unless otherwise approved by the City. F7 F 71 Comments: No chimneys are provided. Requirement does not apply 3. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the rise of the chimney shaft Complies: must be detailed so that the chimney has complexity in plan as well as elevation. Yes No In Spirit F7 F7 Comments: No chimneys are provided. Requirement does not apply 35 Part C: Building Construction Standards a.Materials and Application of Materials 1. Primary Material. At least 70% of the exterior facade of a 4 -story structure or Complies: 80% of the exterior facade of a 3 -story structure or 100% of the exterior facade of Yes No a structure less than 3 stories must be one of the following: i. Brick. Clay brick, modular size, hard -fired and meeting severe weath- er standards. Embossed or molded brick is generally prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. All brick shall be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all building corners—both inside and outside—must be executed in a toothed masonry fashion. Weeping or slumped joints are prohibited. ii. Stone. Stone must be laid in a typical load-bearing pattern. Character- istics of such pattern include: 1. Tight mortar joints with no more than 30% of joints larger than 3/8 inches. 2. Coursed patterns such as Ashlar, Coursed Chopped Stone and Coursed Rubbed Stone. Mosaic and un -coursed rubble stone -work are prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. 3. Cultured stone or other faux stone products are prohibited. 4. All stone must be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all cor- ners—both inside and outside—must be executed in a toothed ma- sonry fashion. iii. Other Stone. Cut stone/smoothed-face stone or Cut stone/smoothed- face stone that is mechanically attached with a stone veneer system may be used provided that the system uses a true stone. Comments: Refer to provided elevations for all material calculations. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 36 C 71 In Spirit 7 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 2. Secondary Material. No more than 30% of the building facade may be a sec- Complies: ondary material. This includes: Yes No In Spirit L Stucco. 3 -coat stucco on lath over a structural frame with expansion `" M joints concealed by filling the joint with expandable filler that is troweled flat with the stucco, is the same color as the stucco and that matches the stucco surface texture is permitted. Dryvit/EFS type systems are prohibit- ed. Stucco is not permitted in the Central Transit District. ii. Metal. Architectural metal wall systems are permitted. iii. Siding. Wood or Cementacious siding is permitted in those Character Zones where pitched roof styles are permitted. Comments: Refer to provided elevations for all material calculations. 3. Roof Material. Acceptable materials include: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Flat Roof. Flat rooves may be either a built-up bituminous roof or a membrane roof provided that it is installed in accordance with the man- LX 17 7 ufacturer's specifications and issued a 30 -year warranty. All flat rooves must be hidden from ground level view, behind a 12 -inch parapet. ii. Pitched Roof. These may be either a standing -seam metal roof with standing folded and soldered seams, a commercial metal roof if approved by the City, slate, clay tile, or 40 -year high profile composition single. All composition shingle rooves must have closed valleys. Concrete single products with a relief greater than 1/2 inch are prohibited. iii. Parapet Cap. These must be either clay brick, cut stone, cast stone, - tile, or terra cotta. Pressed metal maybe used if is it specifically created to decoratively cap a parapet and if specifically approved by the City. Comments: We are using a flat roof system with parapet wall for our roof system. The proposed parapet caps use a combination of brick and framed out caps to created a significant cornice. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 37 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 4. Material Change. Material changes in any elevation may occur only under the Complies: following conditions: Yes No i. Change occurs at an inside corner. yes ii. Change that occurs at an outside corner must wrap the corner and change at a location at least 12 inches from that corner and be designed as the termination of an architectural detail. not applicable iii. Change that occurs wherein the different material is contained within a distinct architectural form that projects from the primary architectural mass. not applicable iv. Change that reflects an offset between a lower and an upper floor where the offset is at least 6 inches. Material changes within the same architectural plane are prohibited. yes Comments: All material transitions provided in this project comply with the requirements above. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 38 In Spirit E a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 5. Relief The City seeks to promote relief and dimension in architectural surfac- Complies: es, details, and motifs with the following requirements: Yes No In Spirit '- -" i. The following materials are prohibited: Fiberglass, Styrofoam or stuc- F co -over -styrofoam, plastic, aluminum. Stucco applied to look like pro- jected stone, Stucco applied to look like cast stone, Stucco applied to look like terra cotta, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a corner, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a mitre or decorative shape, Masonite or Masonite products, com- position wood products used as an exterior material, trimcraft used as a soffit board, or other smooth finished soffit board. complies ii. Relief in the treatment of cornices, overhangs, gable projections, bay windows, dormers, water tables, belt coursers, sills, surrounds, timber components and other expressions must be executed in ways that pro- duce depth, shadow and texture. yes iii. In coursed rubble stonework, stones must be laid into the wall as the stone would lay on the ground. No more than 20% of the stones in any elevation maybe "flipped" sideways. not applicable iv. The minimum projection in any built-up profiles and decorative assembly must be 3/ inch per element of the assembly. A cornice detail comprised of three stepped bricks must have a total projection of 2 and 1/4 inches. yes Comments: CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 39 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 6. Carpentered Exterior Trim. i. All carpentered exterior trim must be high-quality finished grade wood stock. ii. If a trim installation is to be joined along any continuous run of mate- rial, the required joint must be a "spline joint" iii. All outside corners must be mitered and blocked with sufficient clo- sure that the joint is not visible from the street. iv. Corners must be closed by a carpentered joint. Trim clips are prohib- ited. v. Facia and gable rake must be stepped at the drip mold unless hidden by a gutter. vi. Carpentered trim that forms the veneer pocket must have a complex- ity achieved in trim mold, built-up step molding, or other traditional detail such as a dentil mold. Comments: Complies: Yes No In Spirit IF All carpentered exterior trim proposed in this project is fiber cement in nature. All the transitions described above are being met and reproduced with the same level of quantity in fiber cement trim. Fiber cement trim - provided it is dimensionally acceptable - will required less maintenance, have stronger architectural appeal, and exhibit superior durability in our climate than conventional wood. It will not cup, buckle or warp which starts to look rundown over time. 40 b. Wall Construction 1. Wall Section. All wood -framed exterior walls must be constructed as follows: Complies: Yes No In Spirit L When shim- or flange -mounted windows are used in masonry ve- neered walls, framing maybe conventional 2x4 framing. ' ii. When shim -mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or oth- er permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, exterior walls must be framed with 2x6 members in order to achieve a 3.5 -inch minimum offset within the opening. iii. When flange -mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or other permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, a double 2x4 framing assembly is required that allows the flange to be mounted on the inner 2x4 section with the second 2x4 section providing the required offset from the window sash or door at the opening. Comments: 2x6 walls are provided in all exterior walls, regardless of the material skin used on the outside. The required 3.5 inches should not be a problem to achieve. 2. Parapets. Where there is a flat roof, a parapet must extend at least 12 inches Complies: above the roof surface and conceal the roof material from ground -level view. Yes No In Spirit Comments: All parapets provided will exceed the 12 inches minimum. The current configuration is set for a minimum height of 42 inches. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 41 b. Wall Construction (continued) 3. Cornice Detail. All wall terminations at the roof must have a cornice detail comprised of at least 2 projected elements. Parapets must have a cap detail com- prised of at least 2 projected elements. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 1 Comments: Cornice and parapet caps will exceed the required minimum 2 projected elements. 4. Window Surrounds, Belt Courses and Base Courses. Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. All openings in the exterior skin must have an architecturally appro- ❑ priate header and sill with an optional jamb. The required header and sill must project at least 3/4 inches beyond the wall veneer. Window headers or sills may be either stone, cast stone, terra cotta, heavy timber (where appropriate for the style), or wood (where appropriate for the style). ii. Other architectural details like belt courses and base courses must be executed in the above materials and have a minimum projection of 3/ inch per element of detail. Comments: Projections around openings will meet the required 3/4 inch offset beyond the wall veneer. 42 c. Roof screening and appurtenances 1. Roof Projections. No plumbing stacks, venting stacks, skylights, or attic Complies: ventilators may penetrate the roof surfaces facing the street/drive. If there are Yes No In Spirit multiple street/drive facing exposures, no roof projection may penetrate the roof "fronting" ❑ slope that slopes to the street or drive. All such penetrations must be mounted straight and perpendicular to the ground (except for skylights and attic ventilators) and painted to blend with the roof color. Turbine vents are prohibit- ed. All vent stacks must have lead jacks. Comments: All roof penetrations are conceal behind the proposed parapet wall. 2. Roof Mechanical. Roof mechanical must be screened behind a parapet wall or Complies: platform that is recessed into a pitched roof so that the incline of the roof slope Yes No In Spirit creates a parapet wall. ❑X 17 17 Comments: All mechanical equipment will be screen by the proposed parapet wall. 3. Gutters, Downspouts, Scuppers and Collection Boxes. These must be copper Complies: or an enduring prefinished metal with a minimum 20 -gauge thickness. Gutters Yes No In Spirit must be a minimum of 6 inches, half -round profile and attached with gutter ❑X ".__J C straps. Downspouts must be a minimum of 4 inches and round. Elbows and bends must be a minimum of 4 inches, plain and round. Fascia mounted gutter systems are prohibited unless custom designed and integral to the architecture. Comments: Proposed scuppers, collection boxes, and downspouts meet the minimum requirements for thickness and size. 43 d. Windows and Glazing 1. Glazing and Glazing Systems. Reflective glass is prohibited. Tinted glass and Complies: dark adhesive films where the transmission coefficient exceeds 27% is prohibited. Yes No In Spirit Stained glass is allowed provided that the glass is crafted in accordance with sol- dered camping or "H" camping. No acrylic or pourable techniques are allowed. Glazing systems may be used in certain accent areas of specifically approved by the City. Comments: No reflective glass is proposed in this development. 44 Part D: Landscaping, Fencing and Screening a. Site Landscaping 1 Leaf Mass Between Buildings. All multifamily development must provide Complies: trees between buildings. At least 60% of the planted area must be comprised of Yes No over -story (canopy). Comments: In Spirit F The configuration of the master plan does not allow for a leaf mass between buildings. The main organizing street separates all buildings. However, each side of the streets provides plenty of open space next to each building to satisfy this requirement. 2. Layered Landscaping at Building Entries. Landscaping must be provided at building entries and must be "layered" The building entry landscaping area must be comprised of at least 3 layers: one upper layer of medium evergreen shrub approximately 30-36 inches high and 2 layers of shorter shrubs or one shrub and an ornamental grass. These must be planted in beds having a minimum width of 72 inches. Upper layer shrubs must be 5 -gallon container plants planted 30 inches on center with triangular spacing. Lower layer shrubs may be 3 -gallon container plants planted 24 inches on center- with triangular spacing. Comments: CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 45 Complies: Yes No In Spirit Z E 7 a. Site Landscaping (continued) 3. All landscape beds must be associated with walkways, roadways, amenity feature, buildings or screens. Floating, ornamental or non -associated landscape beds are prohibited. Comments: Complies: Yeses No In Spirit Fx 17 Landscape beds provided are associated with walkways and project amenity features, like plazas and open spaces. 4. Plant Sizing. Shrubs that serve a screening function must be sized at the time of planting such that they can serve as an effective screen within 2 years of the planting date. 3 -gallon plants must be planted 30 inches on center with triangu- lar spacing and 2 -gallon plants must be planted 24 inches on center with trian- gular spacing. Smaller container and bedding plants must be planted at least 12 inches on center with triangular spacing.. Comments: No shrubs serving a screening function are provided. 46 Complies: Yes No In Spirit C ❑ 7 b. Fences and Screening Walls 1. Fence Materials. Visible perimeter fences that are compliant with the General Complies: Standards may be made of unit masonry, wrought iron with unit masonry corner Yes No In Spirit columns, or masonry. If masonry, corner column and masonry interim column spacing is not to exceed 15ft and must have a masonry knee wall supporting wood or wrought iron infill. Comments: No perimeter fence or screen walls are provided. 2. Gate Materials. Gates in fences constructed in accordance with DbI above Complies: may be made from wrought iron with a wrought iron frame (complying with Yes No In Spirit General Standards) or wood with frame members measuring a minimum of 1 and I/2 inches thick by 3 and 1/2 inches wide and planks measuring at least 1 and LX F7 7 1/2 inches thick. Gates must be comprised of the same material as the fence. Comments: No gates are provided. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 47 b. Fences and Screening Walls (continued) 3. Corner Expression of Support Structure. All property corners of a property line fence much be supported by a masonry column that is at least 10 square inches. Comments: No property line fence is provided. 4. Thin wall construction, cast or embossed concrete walls, picket materials not in compliance with the General Standards, iron fences with mechanical connec- tion assemblies, pre -fabricated decorative elements designed to slip over stock or tubular steel shapes, and plastic or vinyl fence component systems are prohibit- ed. Comments: No perimeter fence is provided so requirements above do not apply. 48 Complies: Yeses No In Spirit ❑ ❑ Complies: Yes No In Spirit c. Street Visible Wrought Iron 1.Frames and other structural support members may not be less than 1 and 3/ Complies: inches in either width measurement or 1 and 3/4 inches in diameter if round. Yes No Comments: No perimeter fence is provided so requirements above do not apply. 2. Pickets that are 5ft in length or height or less must have a minimum width of 3/4 inches in either width dimension or diameter. When pickets are longer or tall- er than 5ft, the minimum with dimension is increased to 1 inch in the dimension that faces the street or 1 inch in diameter. Comments: No perimeter fence is provided so requirements above do not apply. X F7 In Spirit 7 Complies: Yes No In Spirit C E 7 3. Panels must be made of metal plate material with a minimum thickness of Complies: 3/16 inches. Yes No Z 177 Comments: No perimeter fence is provided so requirements above do not apply. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 49 In Spirit c. Street Visible Wrought Iron (continued) 4. The wall thickness of any tubular steel must not be less than 3/32 inches Comments: No perimeter fence is provided so requirements above do not apply. 5. Decorative elements such as finials and rings must be made of solid stock material and welded to the pickets or to the frame made from the pickets if the pickets are solid stock material. Attachments to the pickets or frame and all other components of the wrought iron construction must be welded. Mechanical con- nections are prohibited. Comments: No perimeter fence is provided so requirements above do not apply. 50 Complies: Yes No ❑ In Spirit Complies: Yeses No In Spirit L` ❑ ❑ GRAPEVINE MILLS BLVD --- ---- -- ----- ---- ---- ---- / a � o ----�- ---- , � a� �THESHACKS AT GRAPEVINE EXISTING MILLS RETAIL �� I CROSSING U i (i } Ll I Lj Y I ry Q 0- � } n _z W a C7 I i II I II , g , , THE WALLIS THE BAKER MULTI F IL AY- gl THE BROWNSTONES STARS & STRIPES WAY �— FUTURE PHASE VICINITY MAP QN LOT 5AR2 GRAPEVINE MILLS BOULEVARD LOT 5ARIA L r LOT 3A1 G '9 9 FUTURE RETAIL FUTURE I O RETAIL 6,000 SF C4 7 )nn cF � I I - ---- IT I) i U V I I PARKING DATA / LOT 3A2 PARKING DATA / LOT 3A1 PARKING DATA / LO 5T AR1A I TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 72 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 99 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 3,000 SF REST. W/ DRIVE THRU 3,000 SF RESTAURANT 42 7,200 SF RESTAURANT — 14,200 SF RETAIL 57 — — —] -- - TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 75 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 119 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED SHOPPING CENTER RETAIL. 4 SPACES PER 1000 SF RESTAURANTS IN SHOPPING CENTERS: 10 ADDITIONAL SPACES PER 1000 SF INDOOR COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT: 1 PER 100 SF RESTAURANT W/ DRIVE THRU: 1 PER 50 SF, PLUS 12 VICINITY MAP N SITE DATA APPROXIMATE BUILDING HEIGHTS PARK O PROPOSED RETAIL U 11,200 ♦ I 6 >m LOT 3A2 _ PROPOSED RETAIL Ull / 0/ SITE LOCATION SOUTH WEST CORNER OF GRAPEVINE MILLS BLVD AND TEXAS 121 FRONTAGE ROAD GRAPEVIN MILLS BLVD CURRENTZONING CC LOT AREA 301,714.375 S.F. SITE PROPOSED RETAIL & RESTAURANT (6.9262 ACRES) P s� LOT AREA 236,822.489 S.F. i EXISTING BUILDING (5.4366 ACRES) TOTAL LOT AREA 538,536.864 S.F. (12.3628 ACRES) i BUILDING AREA 27,400S.F. PROPOSED RETAIL & RESTAURANT •_ •- BUILDING AREA 48,931 S.F. EXISTING BUILDING TOTAL BUILDING AREA 76,331 S.F. BUILDING NUMBER BUILDING TYPE HEIGHT 1 RETAIL 25'-10" 1STORY 2 RETAIL 3 RETAIL 22'-8" 27'-0" 1 STORY 1 STORY 4 RETAIL 18'-4" 1STORY 5 EXISTING BUILDING 32'-0" 1STORY SITE LEGEND PARKING DATA / LOT 5AR2 PARKING DATA SUMMARY 101 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 101 2,527 SF RESTAURANT 17,439 SF RETAIL 19,928 SF INDOOR COMMERCIAL 9,037 SF NON OCCUPIED SPACE 123 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED OBUILDING NUMBER DENOTES T MIN. WIDE HANDICAP PARKING SPACE LSITE PLAN - RETAIL 01 SALE , 306 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 36 70 200 0 310 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 578 627 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION S�LyED ARO s T'. f o�zt s � i T9TF t CASENAME: THESHACKSTHE RCVIJIVIVJ CHARLESTON REV NO. DATE DESCRIPTION B CASE NUMBER: CU18-08 OCA RON: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEY/NEMULS BLVD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY —MA CUP MULTI-FAMILYSUBMITTAL YOR SECRETARY DA FE: RETAIL SITE PLAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SR1F mnmw"�am,ern. ® CHAIRMAN r95UN Stemmas Frvy-Sure aav sues. T-7`307 N DATE: SHEET: U2 OF Z7 Pn�n/� xw F (97I/715.9Dr ��m ]BPE Rg No. F-359') APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFCIC, W/TH ANY COOES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET ORO/NANCES. DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERV/CES OSA 0- APR/C 2018 2 Or 27 GRAPEVINE MILLS BOULEVARD LOT 3A1 LOT 3A2 LOT 5AR2 LOT 5AR1A _ —-- — -TOT J1 I- M Is IROPOSED RETAIL / PROPOSED O i/ I — --- --- —� I RETAIL I / RE Ti IL--- —� I I + i l 1A ---- - I - - FUTURE RETAIL � PARK O EXISTING RETAIL / EXISTING ( o RETAIL I O I I I O O J / I — � — • COURTYARD - --- -- _ 1 L I D Dm _ _ I PARK Q D •.. / RTYAR > I I I L STRUCTURE a s .PARKING.. — II ULTIF Y- _ d « "•„� K STRUCTURE _ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L LANDSCAPE TABULATIONS: LOT SARI LANDSCAPE TABULATIONS: LOT 5ARIA LANDSCAPE TABULATIONS: LOT 3A1 LANDSCAPE TABULATIONS: LOT 3A2 GRAPHIC PLANT LEGEND ,.ANDSCAPENOTES dmdraL.,m.9,e.,m.-�a+e abne^rema.wr mamwar r.»Tc:eda^+a+p m=<e.,.at INTEPWR VEYICLNfl OPEN SPACE REOUIPEM i5'.1 f 1 ++roaapewz C EN (25 fly sf:30swwsl INTERIOR VERICULAR OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS:Is9,635 a.f.,tA swxsl INTEHIOft VEHIWIAft OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS:l1A, 152 s.f.; 119swusl INTERIOR VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE REOUIREMENi5: 11),055 s.i.; ]Ss>avn) `pN�50A N R«wmens Mim ml0tdgmzsparebigar«mre gequvemenb Minimum lg5dgrpse w+ng ar«bx Rmuremenb. Miimmm1015 of rg ar«tlbe ] Cwerwbhtl bareaas.:mry wserywn mdy Neaeed QtU� A1,99 gosa wraing artabbe ReOJ nMinv 10'A Ig sa wrki 3m lar,aapace .Inv«ra Iarbapaw ar«,t)rree 3•d. In,aarape M)reeJmNIL. K xar«(1) 3m. EVERGREEN CANOPY TREE ° EXISTING TREE 'm'm"`''�""'°°"”'°xm°�r^' mbrer9^'m ""'TMd 1��P 0.4 ry a vi wrsWal rreR3rea bnaspaw m«. xraW s.r.mregveebMapace aa,. pn 100si dreg Mwsr�rx area. pe aW at:m�:ree laMxax a«. .aawwmwue: W,Imimd 11 l.•ee per Faai'19-sIaM,111 Mmm^^p11111r«x'wnirg lslarm.11) Mnmumdl xrpnk n9 sbM,ltl Mi -mum pfitl pn w'an9 bbM lti Curmvureapanetlebomewydnwm N.e„y,eera � � � 9a15 islaM per l2 parki,gspams gs1B-slats per l2 xr.irg slay ¢aIB'isMM w•12 parlvgzps� 9'a18 ialaM pm l2 pats rgsraxs 1 Ptl°� a y V Q R«— Pr Rbgdrea `Rw Required PrwMai Rrydren PrwNM .gaP°AP°• a Cmrvo.rowaxaa emmmum 2%Woe«ay rmm M.[nauna 5 o 12586,.1. 12rA s.l. e9pSs.l. S,a6is.l. fi3OtS s.l. B119z,1. 1]06 a,1, 2,92a.i s.f. `A-./ DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREE MID-SIZE CANOPY TREE q 2B' }Q. J 1261pnMav islaMs 12611awLLM ;tol wrkirq lslaMs (121Pwbed lfol pmalrg lslaMa 1101gwidetl 161 wMln9 isMMs 191 prwMetl 5 penrgneeeemr uan eeemmm>ovnes.+i.dml w9^9 am.Odro lE Df t� ISO l26)be«3'W. 12<1bb«JMI. ;t011r«s,7�. (t9l Yees.Jw. 1f011rm,3'pal. ;301 Pe«,7rd (611rres 7ral. 191 be«, 3'd. ,�}� wrssv Maara:omanauucros ,6.18 ^O O INTERIOR PAR KWGSCREENREOUREMENTS: IN, PARKING SCREWREGUREMENTS: INTERIM PARKING SCREEN REQUIREMENTS INTERIORPARMNG SCREEN REGUIRE6ENf5: / _ 1 ORNAMENTAL TREE 5. aarme.�.mmmmtrml. w.-.rr„u.ra,9m„n a,.m,rra N d flegureme,1s: 36'M. wem al Yme dinaMl:Om, Reg6er^ermt: 3fi'nr.xeenn Pme pf inaMlMro, Rmuirme,15: 36'M sue«al4me of lnsGlaly{ R«ui•emeMs: 3E',I.sbee,ali-eiBl3lafm \'l'F-I � �a^e Pm pr m•mergreen pmnSngaMg mtreig pr 3o•erargem pmdmg nprg wAi a3J wa gram pa^e ab a DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREE tlsalaWHs siree1409agepe ajaM ,al alms «eelfv, gree, Plarai^g abn9 Palb'9 or 30'sie rg rg paring y mge rc ajaxd wl Doan, M.ren rcaNgepr ajamd Nal alms seen IrmMge a ajxea y�� CASE NAME: THE SHACKS?HE REV/$/ONS vweM xwAa 1,<pxrrv,aanvs. plbpeml ppplmlM. pmwm owbari«. KYR LARGE EVERGREEN SCREEN CHARLESTON REV NO. GATE DESCRIPTION BY CASENUMBER: CUIBOB m N PwdU Prwraal Prwmen PwdM MID-SIZE CANOPY TREE LOCATION 3510, 3580 N.GRAPEVINE MILLS BLVD NOs1vEHICUTAR OPEN SPACE REOUIREMENT6:23fiB12bt 0.1 NONNEHWN1f UR OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS: IB.3•RSis:.) NGNNEHICUT6859,1.1 AR OPEN SPACE REOU REMENis:ltdt NGNNCI:IAR EXIOPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS:' 41 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY Mimm.s^,692ffiiLl � PLANTING BEDS e pryurn«nb. Mmmun l5t dgas nm ar«mPe Regwrer-enb Mintlmum l5%dgroea slls areamua pepu rmieels. Mmimm tSK ^! R enb: ISXd m mweNwlarp sot p gross ate armbx mp n^� gmsssle ar«mre SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER E ce^axx -regvea g^.mmdn ownaw«. wtd�baeP miorM naw«sotd y:rm alrw wmarnx Wtdr�.:m CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL Z.� aro m,sl lxwiminl«me rolyad. area muslxwnlm ue lrx xml vara. ar«muslmwinvr Ile Ile rmmr� ar«-.tel ee »nn^Ire l,ertmlymt 7 i MAYOR SECRETARY 3 ppr«,Jeal. cer3W0a.r.d «�:ea ;fnr«.7ra'. w'3 W0si.mr,g,vaa Ill vee, ra.lxr 3,=,.L,rrewlm p11ree, r3,i)CLO prreg+'aa iz"" MID-SIZE CANOPY TREE TURF o Ima«pe ar«, IaMspace aMa. Iarlaapace a«. wndawx ar«. :i:.. • 'a DATE: (p by Regurtd Prarieed Repuie« Prwihe R«uvetl Prwl«d S -M PrwbW PlANN1NGANDZON/NGCOMM/SSION ® Soli 36s21ANB s;, 11511 26,6W.M,.'.I16bt1 TT6tAa.LpsA1 312989(. 125At) 21.51.16 a,L;1st1 z9,129.P1t1.p931 62,3.92a.nstl n,ods.3s a.c rzsA°vl NOTE: ALL REWIRED TREES TO SE SELECTOE FROM smpeafUPecb.6,b N N (12)— 1311— 1611•«, ISal be« 12)nees ;151 Lies R)Ixes 11Blb«s CITY Of GRAPEVINEAPPROVEDTREE LIST W PERIMETER REWIREMFMS: PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS- PERIMETER REW'REMENiS: PER REQUIREMENTS; CHAIRMAN S: OATS ��0� L950N Snevnnrs Fm Suite bLgO RpArem«m: Ill lr«J W.. xr601.1.dgg pagwremenls'. It)b«3'd.. w•501.I.alm9 R«3remmla: In v«rm.,erwl.Lamg pequiremenls: ll)vse 3•d., Per 501.'.abg LANDSCAPE PLAN -RETAIL Dauaa. raa, rSzuT g ¢ sna pairab, site perimeln. site w'imeP+, silo pedrnemr. Q� WOlTO73S-= fax: r9T1)T3530 , ^uraperix Mills BNa;(11651113.1 G•awaire Mill, BNd: 131050(.1 ur«eetx Millz BN& C3 VIII Gm i«MIPs BNd: j26t18111 SCALE: 1<0 SHEET.'3Of 2) 3510 N ReRn« Prwiaed RagdrM PnaaM Regdrea PrwbaO gequirad Prwiba APPROVAL DOfS NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK - - TBPA .NOF. 171 C 31ue«,r W. 191 ve«Jal. (6)be«, 3•caL I>!ue«,7«L _Iu«s,7cal. (n uses Jpal. (5)Veer. 3•c:l. :51 ire«, 7d. i° IN CONFLICTW/THANYCOOES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET Oy 0 20 40 B0 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTSERWCES BOA BDA ZOR18 SHOWN 3 OF 27 NOTE: ALL THE REOUIREMENTS OF THE GRAPEVINE SOIL EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE SHALL BE MET DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL RADII ARE T UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. GRAPEVINE MILLS BOULEVARD I /-R 3s• R 35'� R 35' R 35'LOT 3A2 LOT 5AR1A LOT 3A1 N89'21'55'E 1071.10' '06 __ — -- -- ---, �ca J R50' 1- R25 R2 R10' SSPAQ9' 10 SPA Q9' 10 SPA Q9' R35 10.SPA @9' 705PAQ 9' 10 SPA@9' m 9SPAQ9' R5' R 35' 35' R 20' R50' R 20' R 35'� R 10' R10' R20' R RS' RS' R5'� R10' IL^\\ 9 SPA Q 9' 2s.ar 10'SPA @ 9' 'Q � Q !-R 3S 12 SPA Q 9- Y Z 13- SPA Q U - 8 ❑ ❑ IROPOS s e Rs' ❑ ❑ RETAI R 5' '{ - a ❑oO1ao.6n a °' Ja,", --__ m,, 8FUTURE RETAILR5• 11 SPAQ9' F RE S R10' 5 s y ^yv P ! 9, ! - x m V / !A B. - _ __�' 8 ❑ N-❑ 2aar R5, R.5� ( O.�o" R 25'J \-R 10' — O O y N R26- / . ❑ �R 5' LOT LINE R 10' / R 10' �R 35' R 25'� rR 5' R 25' 5 SPA @9' PARK 1-.-T 6SPA@9' �I ao.uv aa.ar d m / `'PROPOSED a I�I RETAIL • ��-a SS3° ❑ a a PARK x6.51' Rp EXISTING I \ RETAIL \ 13 SPA @9' wQ NN ❑ �ag ❑ ❑ s m m 3 I a R 5' � I e ♦ ♦ ❑ R 20'� e - o -i 24 0? R 20 Z R 35' O za.ar R 5 1 R 35' 4 35' - —1 R20 �R 20' R 6 LR35' R 20' - COU &RD - - I � N89° 21'54'F 1080.15' 4— DOG PARK / NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 7P ff RICHARD CARSON, JR. 04/06/18 c ASE NAME. THE SHACKSITHE HEVISIONS 'HARLESTON ASENUMBER: CU18-08 OCA DON: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEVINE MILLS REV NO DATE DESCRIPTION BY L VD. 3155 STAR5 AND STRIPS WAY CUP MUL Tl-FAMIL Y SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY RETAIL SITE PLAN DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMI551ON e� wamm, m� CHAIRMAN 1956N $�emmwrs Frvry-5vifa ban oma. real GATE: SHEET: 4 OF 27 ��0� rszaz Pn: (9n113S3dJ0 F. (9121 I -3001 www. TLS�E Reg Na F-3590 APPROVAL OOE5NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DESIGN DRAWN GATE SCALE SHEET ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF --T—.— --T—.— HLR NLR APRIL 2018 4 OF 27 �2T-10-a.LL �fc� uxvas a�rrvtxc- STORFfRON.- s. oxcE 01 - NORTH ELEVATION 100% MASONRY 12-0 25'-0" BRfi x- �n rt iOFvix �� BRft'k- FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION BACK ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION 05 -TRASH ENCLOSURE DATE DESCRIPTION BY ASE NUMBER: CUIS-08 2'-0" 8'-6" 7CATION: 3570, 3580N. GRAPEVINEMILLS xET axEfs o.-0. P.NFu , CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY -- - DATE. s, o,eE ,T„NF 1 SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION BACK ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION 06 - MONUMENT SIGN 9faTIR F/MY 6lXp 07 - GROUND SIGN SHEET: 05 OF 27 02 - WEST ELEVATION 100% MASONRY 03 - SOUTH ELEVATION 100% MASONRY 04 - EAST ELEVATION 100% MASONRY FLOOR PLAN 01 03 01 BUILDING 1 - PROPOSED RETAIL SCALE. N T.S .lrerr.�: rr.�. Fycnrerr.�.lf 4F'Rf0 ARC w ° � f,�vf S�gTF a0F ASE NAME THE SHACKS/THE Kt ViblUNS 'HARLESTON REVNO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY ASE NUMBER: CUIS-08 7CATION: 3570, 3580N. GRAPEVINEMILLS LVD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY -- - DATE. BUILDING i - ELEVATIONS / TRASH & SIGNAGE PIANNINGAND20NING COMMISSION SRIf CHAIRMAN ® 9faTIR F/MY 6lXp DATE. SHEET: 05 OF 27 ���t850N T. O7 Lb Ras. Teras ]5101 Pn: ry �1 ]aixm Fav: (972) ?JS.” mile Rag NR. F -3W APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DESIGN DRAWN DA 7E SCALE SHEET Ll-OBA APRIL 5 OF 27 DEPARTMENTOF DEVELOPMENTSERVICES �,B 01 01 - NOR I H ELEVATION „ 100% MASONRY zza• a.l.l. »1 T .,._.;? 1ELEVATION 11'. MASONRY 7 T.O. STOREFRONT /3 - SOUTH ELEVATION 10 • 04 - EAS I ELEVATION 100% MASONRY T.O. PARAPET us a.L.L. T.O. STOREFRONT D-0-atL. 1 ------------------------ i FLOOR PLAN 03 BUILDING 2 - FUTURE RETAIL I 1 SCALE N.T.S NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ASE NAME- THE SHACKSITHE REVISIONS 'HARLESTON ASE NUMBER: CUIS-08 DATE DESCRIPTION 6 TO 01 - NOR I H ELEVATION „ 100% MASONRY zza• a.l.l. »1 T .,._.;? 1ELEVATION 11'. MASONRY 7 T.O. STOREFRONT /3 - SOUTH ELEVATION 10 • 04 - EAS I ELEVATION 100% MASONRY T.O. PARAPET us a.L.L. T.O. STOREFRONT D-0-atL. 1 ------------------------ i FLOOR PLAN 03 BUILDING 2 - FUTURE RETAIL I 1 SCALE N.T.S NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ASE NAME- THE SHACKSITHE REVISIONS 'HARLESTON ASE NUMBER: CUIS-08 DATE DESCRIPTION 6 TO OCATION: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEV/NEMILLS LVD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY CUP MUL TI-FAMIL Y SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY BUILDING 2 - ELEVATIONS DA TF. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Sff1f luitr�e acN�crt, rc CHAIRMAN ® ® roF- GATE: �_�M 1w TaFrw0r7 SHEET06 OF 17 7w .9a . _ TPER.'y APPROVAL OOESNOTAUTHOR/ZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANYCODES OR DES/GN DRAWN DATE I SCALE SHEET ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES OCi7 OEL4 APRII L 6 OF 27 01 - WEST ELEVATION 100% MASONRY UL - SUU I N tLtVA I IUN 100% MASONRY 27'a a.f.f. T.O.PARAPET L �� I za" 8.0. ANMING TIE Y T.O. SCREEN $ 03 - EAST ELEVATION $ 100% MASONRY W os,�a .zo>rr aa, r PARAPET Ift : — — — — l.. I I I I • • 04 - NORTH ELEVATION 100% MASONRY BUILDING 3 - PROPOSED RETAIL O 1 SCALE'. N T.S I 04 FLOOR PLAN 's • Iz-0-a.r.r. B.O. CANOPY a.l.L NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ZEPED ARC 9 1 89 y♦ W � T SrgTE eCF ti+P CASE NAME THE SHACKS/THE REVISIONS R VNO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHARLESTON DISE NUMBER: CU18-08 OOITION: 3570, 3580N. GRAPEV/NEMIUS �CCiq LVD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY CUP MUL TI-FAMIL Y SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: BUILDING 3 - ELEVATIONS PLANNING ANOION/NG COMMISSION SRIi- NM¢ye aa�mcn, arc. 04 - NORTH ELEVATION 100% MASONRY BUILDING 3 - PROPOSED RETAIL O 1 SCALE'. N T.S I 04 FLOOR PLAN 's • Iz-0-a.r.r. B.O. CANOPY a.l.L NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ZEPED ARC 9 1 89 y♦ W � T SrgTE eCF ti+P CASE NAME THE SHACKS/THE REVISIONS R VNO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHARLESTON DISE NUMBER: CU18-08 OOITION: 3570, 3580N. GRAPEV/NEMIUS LVD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY CUP MUL TI-FAMIL Y SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: BUILDING 3 - ELEVATIONS PLANNING ANOION/NG COMMISSION SRIi- NM¢ye aa�mcn, arc. CHAIRMAN ® ® D.A-T Fmy-Su1eKw LyYBd. Tun 1SN1 DATE: SHEET.' 07 OF 17 �: f9nJ 755,xm F.I. rens Tay-.)uof 7SPER g No. F3S8p APPROVAL OOESNOTAUTHOR/ZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET 064 OBA / 18 p018 7 O7 OF 27 ORDINANCES OEPARTMfNTOFDfVELOPMENTSERV/CES 02 U1 - VVEb I tLtVA I IUN 100% MASONRY UZ - NVK I H tLtVA I IUN 100% MASONRY VJ--oI —E—I IVIV 100% MASONRY sroaEFro�H, 000roro.rErv�. 04 - SOUTH ELEVATION 100% MASONRY BUILDING 4 - FUTURE RETAIL 0 SCALE'. N.T.S m CD NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION <EPEO ARC' ciy + y Sr9TP a0F tE+P ;ASE NAME THE SHACKS/THE REVISIONS ;HARLESTON ASENUMBER: CU18-08 REVNO. GATE DESCRIPTION B OUTION: 3570, 3580N. GRAPEVINEMILLS 'LVD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY MAYOR SECRETARY CUP MULTI-FAMILYSUBMITTAL BUILDING 4 - ELEVATIONS DATE: PLANNINGANO ZONING COMMISSION STf1T ..c Varcyeae.tm CHAIRMAN ® _ 1,950N Sfeimlars Fiwy-SiiM4 DATE: eros, r ,s ssm7 ��� SHEET. 08 OF 27 rrrw vnlaeram can Far fvnl rsa'.oi TBPE Rp. Ab. F-.i5B0 APPROVAL DOESNOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET ORDINANCES.APR/L DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES 0L34 OBA 2078 8 OF 27 REFERENCE: CU18-03 & SU18-01 01 - WEST ELEVATION -I,,-R.., C511J x/ 4W -V 02 - EAST ELEVATION - L REFERENCE: CU18-03 & SUIB-01 UJ - NUK I Fi tLEVA I IUN 111-11- ---,..yIT-51-1u�fsrrm: ,roxrFRoxr sroRCFRoxr -e 1-1 —RI BUILDING 5 - EXISTING BUILDING NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4EPEO ARS 9 � E 08 ti U a 9 ¢ n • f a91b 5 yrE OF T�.I,P :ASE NAMETHE SHACKS/THE REVISIONS :HARLESTON REVNO 1 GATE DESCRIPTION 6 ASE NUMBER: CUIB-08 Or4TION: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEV/NEMILLS ILVO. 3155 STARS AN0 STRIPS WAY MAYOR SECRETARY CUP MUL TI-FAMILYSUBMITTAL DATE BUILDING 5 - ELEVATIONS PLANNINGANDZONING COMMISSION ® SR1r- iaww. anvwi.. x. CHAIRMAN _ DATE: f%ON Sfemmorrs Fwy-Stiro 2) TaaaaTBPE 15107 _ Lblbs. SHEET, 09 OF 27 K»� Faa: (971) )35,1rof Reg NP. F-.1590 APPROVAL DOESNOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET INCONFLICTWITHANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. APRIL 9 OF 27 DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVECES OBA OBA 2018 38'-8" f REFERENCE: CU18-03 & SUIMI 48,931 SF fARAP� N O N 01 — - 4 h 69'-1" 70'-5' 233'-2" 02 - EAST ELEVATION - L REFERENCE: CU18-03 & SUIB-01 UJ - NUK I Fi tLEVA I IUN 111-11- ---,..yIT-51-1u�fsrrm: ,roxrFRoxr sroRCFRoxr -e 1-1 —RI BUILDING 5 - EXISTING BUILDING NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4EPEO ARS 9 � E 08 ti U a 9 ¢ n • f a91b 5 yrE OF T�.I,P :ASE NAMETHE SHACKS/THE REVISIONS :HARLESTON REVNO 1 GATE DESCRIPTION 6 ASE NUMBER: CUIB-08 Or4TION: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEV/NEMILLS ILVO. 3155 STARS AN0 STRIPS WAY MAYOR SECRETARY CUP MUL TI-FAMILYSUBMITTAL DATE BUILDING 5 - ELEVATIONS PLANNINGANDZONING COMMISSION ® SR1r- iaww. anvwi.. x. CHAIRMAN _ DATE: f%ON Sfemmorrs Fwy-Stiro 2) TaaaaTBPE 15107 _ Lblbs. SHEET, 09 OF 27 K»� Faa: (971) )35,1rof Reg NP. F-.1590 APPROVAL DOESNOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET INCONFLICTWITHANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. APRIL 9 OF 27 DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVECES OBA OBA 2018 f / fARAP� 02 - EAST ELEVATION - L REFERENCE: CU18-03 & SUIB-01 UJ - NUK I Fi tLEVA I IUN 111-11- ---,..yIT-51-1u�fsrrm: ,roxrFRoxr sroRCFRoxr -e 1-1 —RI BUILDING 5 - EXISTING BUILDING NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4EPEO ARS 9 � E 08 ti U a 9 ¢ n • f a91b 5 yrE OF T�.I,P :ASE NAMETHE SHACKS/THE REVISIONS :HARLESTON REVNO 1 GATE DESCRIPTION 6 ASE NUMBER: CUIB-08 Or4TION: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEV/NEMILLS ILVO. 3155 STARS AN0 STRIPS WAY MAYOR SECRETARY CUP MUL TI-FAMILYSUBMITTAL DATE BUILDING 5 - ELEVATIONS PLANNINGANDZONING COMMISSION ® SR1r- iaww. anvwi.. x. CHAIRMAN _ DATE: f%ON Sfemmorrs Fwy-Stiro 2) TaaaaTBPE 15107 _ Lblbs. SHEET, 09 OF 27 K»� Faa: (971) )35,1rof Reg NP. F-.1590 APPROVAL DOESNOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET INCONFLICTWITHANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. APRIL 9 OF 27 DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVECES OBA OBA 2018 EXISTING RETAIL PROPOSED RETAIL BUILDING 5 - EXISTING BUILDING SCALE. N T.S NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION aEREO ARO e + H w � f'�z• �S�4lE AOF �E+Py V �1 ASE NAME. THE SHACKSITHE mt: VIJKIIVJ 'HARLESION ASE NUMBER: CUI9-08 REV NO DATE DESCRIPTION B OCATIOM 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEVINE MILLS LVO. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY CUP MUL TI-FAMIL Y SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY BUILDING 5 - ELEVATIONS DATE. PLANN/NGANO ZONING COMMISSION SRIf �u xBvtrn.. nc. CHAIRMAN ® 1550 N Slemmrors Frwy-SW 6IXA DATE SHEET. 10 OF 17 MCM (bPas. (Sn72S.3OM Teras l40) Fn: rynl rssaoof iBPE RM. Ab. F -.'KBO APPROVAL OOESNOTAUTHOR/ZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE I SCALE SHEET ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOFOEVELOPMENTSERVICES 0/34 ORA APRIL 2018 7� r OF�� STRUCTURE PARKING I I � FIRE LANE FIRE LANE i COURTYARD I yR iV URBAN FLAT BUILDING DOG / PARK COURTYARD STRUCTURE PARKING SITE DATA SITE LOCATION CORNER OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 121 AND STARS & STRIPES WAY CURRENT ZONING CC PROPOSED ZONING R -MF TOTAL LOT AREA 456,944.40 S.F. (MIN 2 ACRES) (10.49 ACRES) BUILDING AREA 785,368 S.F. UNCONDITIONED SPACE (BALCONY, EXTERIOR STORAGE CLOSET) (220,908 S.F. - GARAGE) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA CASE NAME- THE SHACKS/THE CHARLESTON CASE NUMBER: CU18-08 (MAX 75%) CIVIL TOTAL OPEN SPACE (MIN 20%) LANDSCAPE TOTAL BUILDING AND PAVED AREAS CIVIL TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS 432 TOTAL NUMBER OF BEDROOMS 558 UNIT DENSITY 41.18 UNITS/ACRE DEFINITIONS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION • BROWNSTONE: THREE STORY TOWNHOME WITH ATTACHED GARAGES AND GUEST PARKING • URBAN FLATS: URBAN APARTMENT FLATS WITH INTERIOR CORRIDOR ACCESS FROM STRUCTURE PARKING AND X HANDICAP PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM BOTH SIDES • EFFICIENCY UNITS: ONE BEDROOM UNITS WITH NET RENTABLE AREA RANGING FROM 700-750 SQ. FT. • NET SQ. FT.: REPRESENTS CONDITIONED SPACE E{LED AR w • GROSS SQ. FT.: REPRESENTS CONDITIONED SPACES AND C UNCONDITIONED SPACE (BALCONY, EXTERIOR STORAGE CLOSET) ,q } TE OF tC m•y•lb CASE NAME- THE SHACKS/THE CHARLESTON CASE NUMBER: CU18-08 REVISIONS REVNO 1 DATE DESCRIPTION BY OCATION: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEVINE MILLS LVD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS MR SECRETAWAY CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL AYORY DArE: SITE PLAN PLANNINGAND ZONING COMMISSION SRI( CHAIRMAN DATE—N S—F.wy-Sucre 60W DPNas. Teres 1 - SHEET: 11 OF 27 Fax: ffl Z) ]J —1 78PERV NP, F.35B0 APPROVAL DO£SNOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK DESIGN DRAWN !LITE SCALE SHEET I N CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES HLF HER18 / q ./ / OF 27 0 a L ..� ---- p� �� ..•- ¢4ta� i1tu� s, �■Y � _ t1F ,biz. � , O ��• .aA� �, I�° �ja .,..:1� •y.' m ler Fi'�I�JL♦ai�j f♦,>�.;e:";� i �,s i3 r �- �i� ■..� rill=■■■■GIA 9�i �,� �- �� ��-. 'fl.�6�1. s\' `�'�' r ':■ r- Q1�ac �a9 ■ 34r, n a >>Ibt �8�s'� :�� 5..'lllr�� s.■r�0■' �� f� W �Ita elS� •t'�%q �: „ • '`�, ®' r�� J ..ate � � � �-e �► � , '�/ +.., Y''•ON ' Via, � -;,tom :.�" • �;� �.�i � , . �, `�'� �e ` ' �' 1►' � ........� 'its' !., ?. � �y7�'a �1'' �o 'Ii;� - �i�o- `. .fi I�i �+ .�7� '.iil Jt� nib As ;JV -. � ♦. ����tA: ��T=� s NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Q,�'.pNDSC4pt.�9 ti� N D. AO r5 P 9 lfir p 9rF OF S �} 6.18 CASENAME THESHACKS HE REVISIUNS CHARLESTON C45EIVUMBER: CU'8-03 LOCATION: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEVWNf M/LL5 REV NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY BL VD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WA Y e CUP MULTI-FAMILYSUBMITTAL MAYOR 5EC7?E7ARY DATE' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION smr �m.a'am. he GRAPHIC PLANT LEGEND CHAIRMAN Srervmrs Flay. Sure 6Ltl0 ctaua., rau TSarr LANDSCAPE NOTES SHEET: 12 OF 17 FA' I9T21 )Js.%Ktl : rsnl7umor ��0� )7S www TBPE Reg. No F -]SHO APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR f Cwwwdw shall onry NI ensdrg wb proposes ste elemeroandnm/y DRAWN DATE MI0.51ZE CANOPYTREE SHEET An.+,t dmydrsaepamm Sursydbdeuscrgrnbieaswas '' EVERGREEN CANOPY TREE BDA APRIL 2018 AS SHOWN •/ 12 OF 27 sepp-dr dlss r MI0.SIZE CANOPY TREE LARGE EVERGREEN SCREEN 2 Cad —shall lxaN Ale ",,9uMer2mund aolioes am -I AN Af -', 1 ,� "maids. Cw4radw shall"wass mutiwr when w ,k qin thenmYlyaf ur oq-,b aolih'es DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREE PLANTING BEDS 3. Cxvadwls Lar drp. CANOPY TREE SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER rrspmsde Oda'.w .,K, -l aaCuryaam pem is TURF 0.1111ZE DECIDUOUS CANOPY'FEE � ORNAMENTAL TREE A Cmvadwb Ppwdearrndmun lX sops arayLranaY.ari.�mc 5. All parXirg dedsaMlawrt areas to be separafetl dy geel edgrig Al—b Ix IOVwledadjawo(bsdewelkswmr6a NOTE: ALL REQUIRED TREES TO BE SELECTDE FROM s AulaMxapeweas1Ge100%oigatedw;0 CITY OF GRAPEVINE APPROVED TREE LIST LANDSCAPE PLAN - MULTI -FAMILY imgadm sydem wb snNli Duce rwn arb M1evxe.m'�rs 0� scram: Iva 0 A 40 30 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Q,�'.pNDSC4pt.�9 ti� N D. AO r5 P 9 lfir p 9rF OF S �} 6.18 CASENAME THESHACKS HE REVISIUNS CHARLESTON C45EIVUMBER: CU'8-03 LOCATION: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEVWNf M/LL5 REV NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY BL VD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WA Y e CUP MULTI-FAMILYSUBMITTAL MAYOR 5EC7?E7ARY DATE' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION smr �m.a'am. he N CHAIRMAN Srervmrs Flay. Sure 6Ltl0 ctaua., rau TSarr DATE' SHEET: 12 OF 17 FA' I9T21 )Js.%Ktl : rsnl7umor ��0� )7S www TBPE Reg. No F -]SHO APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVE(OPMENTSER VICES BDA BDA APRIL 2018 AS SHOWN •/ 12 OF 27 NOTE: ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRAPEVINE SOIL EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE SHALL BE MET DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL RADII ARE T UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. I I I I I I I 26.00' R 5' R 15 R 15' I / I I I R 202.13' ssmewn�x 26.00' 25.83' 24100' 49.83' } R 12' 41 ssioen.0 a. R37 zss.es' seroN DOG 4 11 69 Sa.sz• rye. 06 PARK COURTYARD COURTYARD R 30' 2g 9g, STRUCTURE R56' PARKING 0 ^ti MULTIFAMILY �� ^�6 g'7s• BUILDING ,/'STREET LIGHT 9Sp, (TYP) TI 3y OF' / STRUCTURE / PARKING pP �9 45.87' 0 po M1ry / 9 54' 108.6( m COURTYARD / % / 16.57' O z 2 / � oD. g / s� PLAZA R 351-1 100 ULTIFAMILY R35'41� mss• BUILDING • R15' 9� �O �Qc R NSTONE �• i2� 56' BUILDING STREETLIGHT ivy.lro I 379 S O SSA (TVP) 41 ' MULTIFAMILY 0 / •-��.' BUILDING I zso0• R1• ROWNSTON ~ R30• ! (TY BUILD[ �� c gs'NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION PARK R35' / 229.78' I • �0_ / �F_ PARK, : j s s, . � l • 21 1 ' R 35' — ssoewux ' / R35' !�1 jw�„ . . $ RICHARD CARSON, JR � 40851 N8B° 11' SOVJ 339.24' � � _ / rN85° 11' 52'W 40.95' y� 11 04/06/18 STARS &STRIPES WAY SITZ y1'35`W CASENAME' THESHACKS7THE CHARLESTON KLvlJlul)?J REVNO DATE DESCRIPTION BY CASE NUMBER.' CU18�08 LOCATION: 3570,3580N. GRAPEVINEMILLS BLVD. 31555TARSANO STRIPS WAY E CUP MUL TI-FAMIL Y SUBMI TIAL MAYOR SECRETARY MULTI -FAMILY SITE PLAN DATE: 0 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION smrne N m 0 CHAIRMAN 195pN 3lenrmara F(xy-$vile 6000 DATE: 08!!86, Tates )5M) ��0� q SHEET: 13 OF 17 Pn. !971/7353000 Fu' (9l1)73S.XA31 IBPE Reg. Na. l 3590 APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHOR/ZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITHANYCODES OR DESIGN DRAWN I DATE I SCALE SHEET -1HLR APRIL C 13 Or 27 DEPARTMENTOFOEVELOPMENTSERVICES 20 T 09 UNIT A7 SCALE. 118'= 1'-0' BLDG /s 04 UNIT A2 SCALE. 118'= 1'-0' BLDG /6 A DI Fl-21UNIT A10 l l UNIT A9 UNIT A8 SCALE-. 118'= 1'-0' BLDG /6 SCALE: 118'= 1'-0' SLOG i1 l 0 SCALE- il8'= 1'-0' BLDG M 8 /1 06 UNIT A6 SCALE'. 118'= 1'-0' BLDG /7 NG BEDROOM�� L DATE: TYPICAL BUILDING PLANS BATH PLANNINGAND ZONING COMMISSION UTCWEld KITCHEN BATH0 DATE: KITCHEN LJ D— ��M re:es 75207SW7 SHEET: 14 OF 27 09 UNIT A7 SCALE. 118'= 1'-0' BLDG /s 04 UNIT A2 SCALE. 118'= 1'-0' BLDG /6 A DI Fl-21UNIT A10 l l UNIT A9 UNIT A8 SCALE-. 118'= 1'-0' BLDG /6 SCALE: 118'= 1'-0' SLOG i1 l 0 SCALE- il8'= 1'-0' BLDG M 8 /1 06 UNIT A6 SCALE'. 118'= 1'-0' BLDG /7 03 UNIT Al SCALE. i(8'= 1'-0' BLDG #6 07 UNIT A5 SCALE. 118'=1'-0' BLDG/88/7 BEDROOM LIVING DATE: TYPICAL BUILDING PLANS BATH PLANNINGAND ZONING COMMISSION UTCWEld KITCHEN 01 25 03 UNIT Al SCALE. i(8'= 1'-0' BLDG #6 07 UNIT A5 SCALE. 118'=1'-0' BLDG/88/7 02 UNIT E2 SCALE 118' = 1'-0' BLDG /8 LIVING/DINING BEDROOM LIVING DATE: TYPICAL BUILDING PLANS BATH PLANNINGAND ZONING COMMISSION UTCWEld CHAIRMAN 02 UNIT E2 SCALE 118' = 1'-0' BLDG /8 LIVING/DINING BEDROOM MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: TYPICAL BUILDING PLANS BATH PLANNINGAND ZONING COMMISSION SRI( btivye stl.ecn,�c CHAIRMAN r� DATE: KITCHEN LJ D— ��M 06 UNIT A4 SCALE: 118'=1'-0' BLDG s6 I BEDROOM II LIVING I KITCHEN 1°,411 01 UNIT E1 SCALE'. 118'= t'-0' BLDG /6 BEDROOM ul ,-III LIVING r � L_ J KITCHEN 05 UNIT A3 SCALE. 118'= 1'-0' BLDG /T NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION y��PED 4RL,H � o - s � 12495 P Z + 9Tf OF � NAME THE SHACKSIFHE LESTON VUMSER. CUIH-0 'ION: 3570. 3580 N GRAPEVINE MILLS CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: TYPICAL BUILDING PLANS PLANNINGAND ZONING COMMISSION SRI( btivye stl.ecn,�c CHAIRMAN ® ® DATE: 1950N Slaemore Flw62tl D— ��M re:es 75207SW7 SHEET: 14 OF 27 O+ nl Fa: (914 nSYAt TB.aE Rey. No. F -.ids APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DESIGN Df7AWN DATE SCALE SHEET ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT",DEVELOPMENT5ERV/CES HCR -12018 APRIL 14 OF 27 06 UNIT B6 SCALE: 118'=1'-0' BLDG 46 03 UNIT B3 SCALE. 118'•1'-0' BLDG 48a 01 aUNIT THC1 - 3RD FLOOR SCALE. 118'=1'4T DLCG tl68IS FU UNIT THC1 - 2ND FLOOR OV SCALE'. 118'=1'-0' BLDG 48819 05 UNIT B5 SCALE', 118•+1'4• BLDG 06887 02 UNIT B2 SCALEBLDG 06 rt r 2 CAR GARAGE =gin 59 13.7% ONE BEDROOM L g! 60.0% TWO BEDROOMS 104 FIA 07 UNIT THC1 - 1ST FLOOR SCALE: 118'= V4Y BLDG 488 49 04 UNIT B4 SCALE'. 1B'=1'4Y BLDG e7 01 UNIT B1 SCALE: 116'= 1'-0' BLDG a6 TIE WALLIS AND THE BAKER OULU UNITTABULATIONS NET UNRAIEA 4 of Units Unit (Efficiency) Net BLDG 86 BLDG 47 BLDG RB BLDG K9 %of Total Units Total Net Area ES 695 27 0 0 0 6.3% 18,765 SF E2 723 321 01 01 0 7.4% 23,1365E TOTAL 59 13.7% 41,901 SF Unit(2Bedroom) Net 4of Unita %of Total Units Total Net Area BS 1,006 12 0 01 0 2.8% 12,072 SF B2 7,031 2 0 0 0 0.5% 2,062 SF B3 1,167 29 8 0 0 8.6% 43,1795F 94 1,187 0 120 0 2.8% 14,2445F BS 1,216 19 19 0 0 8.8% 46,208 SF 86 12/5 3 0 01 01 0.7% 4,035 SF TOTAL 1041 20.1% 121,800 SF Unit(38edroom) Net 4of Units %of Total Units Total Net Area THC1 1 1,945 01 01 51 51 2.3%1 19.450 SF TOTAL 10 L3% 19,450 SF TOTAL I 431 386,146 SF UNITMI% EFFICIENCY 59 13.7% ONE BEDROOM 259 60.0% TWO BEDROOMS 104 24.1% THREE BEDROOMS 10 2.3% TOTAL 432 100.00% UNIT AVERAGE EFFICIENCY 710 SF ONE BEDROOM 784 5F TWO BEDROOM 1,171 SF THREE BEDROOM 1,945 SF TOTALAVERAGE 894 SF NAME THE SHACKSITHE 7LESTON NUMBER: CUIX09 TION: 3570,3580N. GRAPEVIREMILLS 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY MAYOR SECRETARY OATS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE: SHEET 15 OF 27 APPROVAL DD ESNOTAUTHORIZEANV WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION y�ri.% 0 ARCy W 0 1 w • i C � IZ�gS P �+ qrf Of 6 4•S'� CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL TYPICAL BUILDING PLANS ® Sem sewax4., �. ��� f950N 8A+mmons Frwy. SUM B D,uaereran ran r5207 Phron/nsaaro F,•: (97z)7xs3wr ZR. No. F-3SB0 DESIGN I DRAWN DATE I SCALE SHEET HLR I HLR I APRIL I 2018 I 15 OF 27 01 BUILDING 6 - 1ST FLOOR PLAN D SCALE 103'=I'- eLO. tlS A< I El I s_ I A_ I A- I A. I 3. I AA 02 BUILDING 6 - 2ND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1133•=1'-0• KNSN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �tEaED ARO 17495 P qTE OF t�+ :ASE NAME- THE SHACKS/THE KC VIJ/VIVJ WARLfSTON ASENUMBER: CU18-08 REVNO. DATE DESCRIPTION 8 OCA "ON: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEVINE MILLS LVD 3155 STARS ANO STRIPS WAY CUP MULTI-FAMILYSUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY TYPICAL BUILDING PLANS DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SfTIT r.trr�.aitns. �c CHAIRMAN ® ® - - 6IXtl 1950N SIemrur.. DATE: SHEET: 16 Of 27 �mWM _ Da9as. PM1 T)735J 7SX7Re Texaz 15201 F f I* F -S ia=E Rp No. F-.9590 APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK I N CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES HLR HLR gpR/L 2018 C �V x� OrC G 7dlld� I .T �11•'�- 1,= I�i� �;I mill, THE BAKER c 'i■ n ■■ ■ ■ �- u ■■ ■ n n ■■ u u ■■ •• 11111111 �' ..... ■■ ■I■ �[ NONE ■■ .■ �� ■■ ■■ �� ■■ ■I■ ■■ .■ .. OUR ■i .:■ ■i''11 ■ �Ip 1_111 ■ ��I �!� 1111111 anon v, u■i■ an■■ onn ann n■'■ nn■' ■• 111111 ■■u me 11's anon am Oman ■■u u■■ onnn ■■ moon ■■■u _ onon anan ■■an moon ...... ��_ -` ��_ al ! � ��_ 111111 I ■■1 ■■■■■�! um -�■■j anon anon �I ■ u■■ JIM n■� -- uuu ■■I ■! .: 111111 an■■ — nu — Oman Inn — an — anan — 'nano' ■■ 111111 an ■■ moon" u ■■ " some ■■ .. on No on„ on an „ an u soon„ = ■■ ■■ ■■ �� 111111 I ■■1 moon �I■ moan �■ ■■n nan �■ ■■u ■� ■■an ■■ uu■■ 111111 III n - on ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ No - ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ 111111 ii ii n ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii �� 111111 I, anon n un n anon mon n anon a ■■n n un■■ 111111 onMral■lnlll Op! n'liiwuluPimnil���!■!!!2111■v■!anwoo n�1H7■I�lu���■ ■I■11'h!!!■ln a n'l�f; , - -- - - Illi! '"• i''1 1!111 f� ii ii I sm: • 1111111 ■ 1p 111 11 C III 1111111 ■■" 11 1110, I1111 1111 11 an I 111111 11 ■ II 111111 1111 — 11 11. lillliuuuulllui I111111 C:. :I X11111 ;II II � � 1111 111 I Illq 1117 Ih II IIIIIILII Iltll IIII Ylll I l liiiiuuufal u u ■■ u, II PLO mgI I III VIII 1111111111111 7■ ■I a ■I 11111 111111 VIII III ■■ ■■' a ■■ .11 I IIii1111111I IIIIIIII '111111 n ■■ Ijj anon ....11 I IYI1111IIIIIIIII ■I I 11111: u ■I I■ ■I II IIII IIh VIII IIII ■I 7dlld� I .T �11•'�- 1,= I�i� �;I mill, THE BAKER c 'i■ n ■■ ■ ■ �- u ■■ ■ n n ■■ u u ■■ •• 11111111 �' ..... ■■ ■I■ �[ NONE ■■ .■ �� ■■ ■■ �� ■■ ■I■ ■■ .■ .. OUR ■i .:■ ■i''11 ■ �Ip 1_111 ■ ��I �!� 1111111 anon v, u■i■ an■■ onn ann n■'■ nn■' ■• 111111 ■■u me 11's anon am Oman ■■u u■■ onnn ■■ moon ■■■u _ onon anan ■■an moon ...... ��_ -` ��_ al ! � ��_ 111111 I ■■1 ■■■■■�! um -�■■j anon anon �I ■ u■■ JIM n■� -- uuu ■■I ■! .: 111111 an■■ — nu — Oman Inn — an — anan — 'nano' ■■ 111111 an ■■ moon" u ■■ " some ■■ .. on No on„ on an „ an u soon„ = ■■ ■■ ■■ �� 111111 I ■■1 moon �I■ moan �■ ■■n nan �■ ■■u ■� ■■an ■■ uu■■ 111111 III n - on ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ No - ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ 111111 ii ii n ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii �� 111111 I, anon n un n anon mon n anon a ■■n n un■■ 111111 onMral■lnlll Op! n'liiwuluPimnil���!■!!!2111■v■!anwoo n�1H7■I�lu���■ ■I■11'h!!!■ln a n'l�f; , - -- - - Illi! '"• i''1 1!111 f� ii ii lil I:1 li ii ,■ .I u ■, I■- � I■1 � Mem1 ■ 1p 111 11 ■■ ■1 TIME 11 ■■" 11 1110, I1111 1111 11 CC Ci _� IiBllllll 11 VIII ■■ ■■: ■■ ■■ �lan an l ■ IIIIIIIII111171111 1111 — 11 11. lillliuuuulllui X111 11 I r `i II 1. IIIIIIIIIII111 Ci 7dlld� I .T �11•'�- 1,= I�i� �;I mill, THE BAKER c 'i■ n ■■ ■ ■ �- u ■■ ■ n n ■■ u u ■■ •• 11111111 �' ..... ■■ ■I■ �[ NONE ■■ .■ �� ■■ ■■ �� ■■ ■I■ ■■ .■ .. OUR ■i .:■ ■i''11 ■ �Ip 1_111 ■ ��I �!� 1111111 anon v, u■i■ an■■ onn ann n■'■ nn■' ■• 111111 ■■u me 11's anon am Oman ■■u u■■ onnn ■■ moon ■■■u _ onon anan ■■an moon ...... ��_ -` ��_ al ! � ��_ 111111 I ■■1 ■■■■■�! um -�■■j anon anon �I ■ u■■ JIM n■� -- uuu ■■I ■! .: 111111 an■■ — nu — Oman Inn — an — anan — 'nano' ■■ 111111 an ■■ moon" u ■■ " some ■■ .. on No on„ on an „ an u soon„ = ■■ ■■ ■■ �� 111111 I ■■1 moon �I■ moan �■ ■■n nan �■ ■■u ■� ■■an ■■ uu■■ 111111 III n - on ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ No - ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ ■■ - ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ 111111 ii ii n ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii �� 111111 I, anon n un n anon mon n anon a ■■n n un■■ 111111 onMral■lnlll Op! n'liiwuluPimnil���!■!!!2111■v■!anwoo n�1H7■I�lu���■ ■I■11'h!!!■ln a n'l�f; , - -- - - 1 ■ Illllll'I ■■ ■■ .■ a ■■ ■■i1 u'—!■I 1■ ■I 1� , A ■■ ■■� on on �-an ■■I ,■ .I u ■, I■- � I■1 VIII VIII ,VI IIII; JiMINI VIII IVIf[ u IVI .'1� gni �1♦1� i ■■ ■■ ■■ nI �u on, a ---:I a ■I 1■� � �mi ■■—■■' ■■ ■■ �■■ ■[ ,■ —I■I ,■° ■I 9■ �... ■ _ ,■ —,■ ,■ ■I 1■' I■1 ;■■ ■■, ■■ ■■ ? ■■ ■■ ,■I—�■I u1 ■I I■I't■I ■: u— ■■ ■rl P! !IP !l' a —�■I a !r 1■-:�' E■1 ■■ ■■: ■■ ■■ �lan an l "Illlllp IIIIIIIII111171111 VIII Iiln! VIII '.II 11. lillliuuuulllui I'Il I VIII IIII dill I ...I IIIIIIII1,111iIIIlII 1 1 Ililb VIII IID II 1. IIIIIIIIIII111 Ci I IIIIII VIII q _. 111 I Illq 1117 Ih II IIIIIILII Iltll IIII Ylll I l liiiiuuufal u u ■■ u, II PLO mgI I III VIII 1111111111111 7■ ■I a ■I 11111 111111 VIII III ■■ ■■' a ■■ .11 I IIii1111111I IIIIIIII a -i■I a ■I lil IIII VIII. II7 II;I n ■■ Ijj anon ....11 I IYI1111IIIIIIIII a ■I 1■ ■ I 1 1[ II 11' ''.IIII II, i■ ■i j u u ■ ■ W77 770 ■IIIIIIIIIIIIIItII!II■ u ■I I■ ■I II IIII IIh VIII IIII u1 -'■I 1■ ■I 1 'I I � n n ■■ n I llllllYrll I u —'■I u ■I VIII '.111 ■■ a mon I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII mol- ■I u ■ ,■ 'IIII VIII I anon' ■■ on � :1111111II11111 gll!II n o:::, FEE 1■ an ii - ii in �1 �I.�� :::: �� : -: I� j - ■■ ■■ I■■ an- 'an ■■,. a ■I 1� �I _ � � �7 '0 _ Ion■ ■■ ■■ ■■. ■■ ■■ n .. 1■ ■I ��'. a I■I— ■I Is I I ■■ ■■. mono �i ��j ,r■I - \I ■■■■; Y'u moil._.., an ■■� 1111111■ I' MMJHLR �--1 d1 0 IIII 111111 Ill! - .IIII' lil i olui IVU IIIN illi! IVI � s■ �`��� ^ VIII VIII ,VI IIII; JiMINI VIII IVIf[ u IVI .'1� gni �1♦1� i IVI WIY i WI_� IN ill un 1 f .�,.,- IU Fu ■ -iii II - HIMM11 I! r1i�1. 011--- 1111 SII U777. I ? lul fel MMJHLR �--1 d1 0 TOP OAF PARAPET— TOP OF PLATE TOP OF DECK = JC' -1151B" Tov of DECK 1264." ATE _ �=1x1'9' tP �_OP OF 0-t 1/B" PLATE _ iOP OF CONC -F.F �REIATIVE DATUM =tOB O' Imlim � Ell ■■ ■■■ 1 1no L:� �m ■■ n rI, 0111 s� OP OF PAPAP 02 NORTH ELEVATION ALE, Y32- I'-0' BLDG #6 TOP of pECK iOP OF DECK _,,E- 11 t'r TIB' TOP OF PLATE,. — n "WHIN P OF CONO.-FF,. RELAi vE pATUM 100'-0' 03 NORTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE. Y3x' = 1'-0' BLDG t6 FB TOP OF PAPA�PET iOP Oa PLgTE_4_' — — - 5� O Y' OP OF PECK — TOP OF�LATE TOPIEDEC TOP OF PLATE Y — @ TOP OF PLATE. — = 11O -t tIB-t t/B' T-1112 OF CONC - F F ,. ELATIVE DATUM =100-0' l i■ 1 �p 1 so i■ i■ i i� i - ■ 11 ■■■ ism@=!■1 ■■ ■ MEul�■■��--- ,mG:h�i�i�B�IPI�I I i�gi�l����i::lw`uruu'�in91@N.� VIII ■o ■W.■i mTON ELEVATION iOPT _ Toa o�30?E — TOP OF DECK 'STOP OF \— TOP OF \ '� TROP oQ�E�\— i'P \ 04 NORTH ELEVATION 3LVpIXB SCALE. Y]x'=t'-0 ' KEY PLAN LEGEND 1W-0 304�V TOP OF PLATEn —==145'�31G" - iOP OF DECK =13a'-,1 SIB" — TOP OFU�LATE _-11:-,IF DECK J Jl4" TOP OF PLATE n x, 9' i P F K 11 TOP OF PLATE,. BUILDING 6, �— ox Oa NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION — TOP OF PA�PAPEi — Tovos ]HE.� y��RED AR�ti M. y o PIT ¢ — TOP oF°�0 9TP OF Z� ay1G T P pECK CABS NAME THE SHACKS?Hf REVISIONS =,xJ'-0Y4' CHARLESTON REV NO. DATE DESCRIPTION B toP OF PLATE CASE NUMBER: CU18-08 — �-- f f'-'0 LOCATION. 3570, 3580 K GRAPEVINE MMS LVO. 3155 STARS ANO STRIPS WAY MAYOR SECRETARY CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL TOP OF PLATE . DAA BUILDING 6 -ELEVATIONS P(ANN/NG ANO ZONING COMMISSION ® ® SfTIf lai�cpe arhbus, uc CHAIRMAN TOP OF CONC RELATIVE DAtUMOR INAICES, , DATE: 195pN BfemrlP FnrY Sum HUp 00-0 Lbm T 7407 SHEET.' 18 OF 27 PK�nl F- ryiI/ TSS3mf iR°E RN M.F-1590 APPROVAL ODES NOTAUTHORIZE ANY WORK DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET IN CONFLICT O N W/TH ANY CODES OR OfPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES HLR HCR APRIL 18 OF 27 zB,B 3 TOP OF 3lPARAPET _ iSl'-0 " TOPe OF PARAPET �TO,PA�Q E _ 9-= OP1JC'-ti 5l8' OF DECK ='s OP33'A; — n+ i 123'] P ]!4- OPt2t'01 PIT - t ]JIB' TOPb' t cK TOP OF PLATE 6:1 tR'. TOP OF GONG -1 F �RELATrvE DATUM =t00-0' ;T P TE MATERIAL ELEVATION LEGEND 4 BRICK VENEER SYSTEM 4 CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING 4 SYSTEM 4 FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM 4 BALCONY SYSTEM 4 RAILING SYSTEM 4 CANOPY SYSTEM QWINDOW SYSTEM 4 EXTERIOR DOOR SYSTEM REV NO PARAPET WALL METAL 9 FLASHING CAP 10 FLAT ROOF SYSTEM Fill METAL PANEL NOTES 1. PER SECTION 54. MASONRY REQUIREMENTS - ALL THE PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIALS USED IN THIS PROJECT ARE OF EQUAL CHARACTERISTICS TO WHAT IS CONSIDERED MASONRY PER THIS SECTION. KEY PLAN ©N LEGEND BUILDING 6 01 EAST ELEVATION D SCALE: 3/32-= t'-0- BLOC as 02 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3132 =1'-0' 81LOG.. TOP OF P—P,--- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION E0.ED ARC S, f 9T lIa95 �,�P f OF Z a 94 ASE NAME THE SHACKSITHE HL VISIONS CHARLESTON REV NO OATE DESCRIPTION A ASE NUMBER: CUIS-08 OCATION: 3570, 3SBO N. GRAPEVW£MILLS LVD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY _UA CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL rOR SECRETARY DATE: BUILDING 6 - ELEVATIONS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SRIf ,m4s4Pwen..�R. CHAIRMAN - ® _ -S i85pN Shnrm4rs Fr eKW DATE: SHEET.' 19 OF 17 IW Lbllas. Texas?07 PA ryn Far: ISM% 3SSI MPE Rap NP135R0 APPROVAL DOESNOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK I N CONFL ICT WITH ANY COOES OR DESIGN DRAWN CATE SCALE SHEET ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES HLR HLR APRIL 7018 ,/ 7 / 9 OF Z/ MATERIAL ELEVATION LEGEND 4 BRICK VENEER SYSTEM Ht VISICINS WINDOW SYSTEM 4 CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING SYSTEM n L1^I EXTERIOR DOOR SYSTEM 4 FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM n Y PARAPET WALL METAL FLASHING CAP 4 BALCONY SYSTEM 10 FLAT ROOF SYSTEM 4 RAILING SYSTEM 71 METAL PANEL 4 CANOPY SYSTEM CHAIRMAN ® KEY PLAN LEGEND NOTES 1. PER SECTION 54. MASONRY REQUIREMENTS - ALL THE PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIALS J' USED IN THIS PROJECT ARE OF EQUAL CHARACTERISTICS TO WHAT IS CONSIDERED MASONRY PER THIS SECTION. O BUILDING 6 STEEL CONCRETE CABLE 01 WEST ELEVATION SCALE. 132' = 1--0' BLDG . 02 WEST ELEVATION SCALE. 3132-- 1- BLDG 16 _TOP of RooF „ TOP OF PA_, PAS@ ?OP xOF PLATE TOP OF DECK = 134'-11 31S" OP OF PA19 TE TOP OF X�' TOP OFOF P TOP OF DECK tOP OF PLATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION `µEO ARO 5 ti s - n 12495 P qTE OF S6+ CASE NAMETHE SHACKSVTHE Ht VISICINS CHARLESTON CASE NUMBER: CU1808 11 01 DATE DESCRIPTION fi OCA"'0".3570,3580N. GRAPEVINE MILLS LVD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY MAYOR SECRETARY CUP MUL TI-FAMIL Y SUBMITTAL BUILDING 6 - ELEVATIONS DATE. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SRIT �Avu.4atr4crc CHAIRMAN ® t350N SNnmom Fm - Kq] DATE: LbYas. Tuan 75202 7 7 SHEEP 20 0E 17 �(n) Fns 1974 135 3 0 01 —Re Ab. F.i530 APPROVAL DOESNOTAUTHOR/ZEANYWORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET ORDINAIL— DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMEN T SER VICES HLR HLR .9PRIL 2018 20 OF 27 =O" 145'-03/a TE iOP OF PECK TOP WGLATE 3 02 WEST & EAST ELEVATION SCALE'. 3132--1'4- BLDG 96 01 NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATION SCALES 3d32-'-0- BLDG 46 MATERIAL ELEVATION LEGEND 4 BRICK VENEER SYSTEM BRIRLDING 2 SYSTEM 4 FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM 4 BALCONY SYSTEM The Baker WHOLE OPENINGS MPAN FA PANEL PANEL SIDING BRICK Mn PANEL% PANEL% SIDING% BRICK% EKTERIOR ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION -01/08 14,926 6,456 0 103 1,582 6,785 0% 1% 19% 80% SOUTH ELEVATION -01/09 7,701 2,789 356 0 405 4,151 7% 0% 8% 85% EAST ELEVATION -02/09 13,549 5,198 0 100 1,461 6,791 0% 1% 17% 81% SOUTH ELEVATION -03/09 12,035 3,881 0 595 757 6,802 0% 7% 9% 83% NORTH ELEVATION -01/10 2,709 908 0 0 129 1,672 0% 0% 7% 93% NORTH ELEVATION -02/10 3,484 771 0 0 0 2,713 D% 0% 0% 100% SOUTHEAST ELEVATION -03/10 11,718 4,415 668 0 540 6,095 9% 0% 7% 83% NORTHWEST ELEVATION -04/10 7,219 2,774 686 0 483 3,276 15% 0% 11% 74% NORTH ELEVATION -01/11 1,990 117 0 0 0 1,873 0% 0% 0% 100% EAST ELEVATION -02/11 6,238 1,949 512 0 884 2,893 12% 0% 21% 67% COURTYARD ELEVATION W rLEVATION 10,934 4,526 0 1,170 2,394 2,850 0% 18% 37% 44% S 5,4901 4615 ol L280 305 1,4261 0% 45% 11% 50% EASTELEVATION 1 10,934 4,5261 Ol 1,1701390 2850 O% 1896 37% 44% NORTH ELEVATION 1 5,4901 2,6151 ol 1,280 305 1,426 D% 45% 11% 50% BUILDING OVERALL 1 114,414 43,54 2,2221 5,6981 11,63811 3% 8% I6% 73% 02 WEST & EAST ELEVATION SCALE'. 3132--1'4- BLDG 96 01 NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATION SCALES 3d32-'-0- BLDG 46 MATERIAL ELEVATION LEGEND 4 BRICK VENEER SYSTEM CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING 2 SYSTEM 4 FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM 4 BALCONY SYSTEM 4 RAILING SYSTEM 4 CANOPY SYSTEM KEY PLAN LEGEND QWINDOW SYSTEM BUILDING 4EXTERIOR DOOR SYSTEM QPARAPET WALL METAL NOTES: FLASHING CAP 1. PER SECTION 54. MASONRY 10 FLAT ROOF SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS • ALL THE PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIALS D1 USED IN THIS PROJECT ARE OF 11 METAL PANEL EQUAL CS TO WHAT S CONSIDERED IMASONRY o PER THIS SECTION. Q N 01 BUILDING 7 - 1ST FLOOR PLAN D SCALE. j Al Al Ax Ax Az oz 94 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I�J FRED AR yt C5 w `3 w �+ •` 0 02 BUILDING 7 - 2ND FLOOR PLAN "e OF 5 I! SCALE. 1132=1'-0' BLDG!] 2..W :ASENAME THESHACKSITHE Ht VISIONS :HARLESTON ASE NUMBER: CV18-08 REVNO GATE DESCRIPTION fi OCADON. 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEVINE MILLS 'LVD. 3155 STARS AND STRIPS WAY CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: TYPICAL BUILDING PLANS P(ANN/NGAND ZONING COMMISSION® smr W�xNMucirc. CHAIRMAN ® — 1%pN - SUAe 9tlp DATE: SHEET.' 22 OF Z7 ��� O,e 1..7 p'Pn1 F : (YR) T1s3mf TBPERy. No. F-.i5d0 APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANYWORK I N CONFL ICT WRH ANY CODES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTSERVICES HLR HLR APRIL 2018 22 OF 27 11! I11 plop 14 IIIIlil6i I� uilliill! Iliiniiii �� IlulVillll I'IGhiiiii �I111111JIIII IMI IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII�� Moll �� milliillll Illllliuu u --- -hIIII_oIIIIIIIIJIIIIViail ■■11■1111111■ 1111�� =iIIIIIIIIIIIIIII011ilu In iIlV�nlllllllllllloj III iIuIIlllllilHilllilllll IIII I IIVi � "" 111111 0-IIIII 'J ..l l ...1.1 IIIIIIII i -IIIII 11 1 II II " III III II III nnu�n IIIII l � � �. 1 Iln I'III■■..■..�=oil iG-......■:_......................�� ■�■■■� 1.1I�III�I�IIIIIHill IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�� X11 Fill ,�nnu u u nuu u u nun . ■■uuu u u nuu u n nnu ■■ = E ■-"..11nn1nI1 11 1I 11IIn n n I111n ■ 11 II nII1I 11 n 1IIIn -- 1 "'_�INIIIIIIIIIN ■■ 11 ■■�fim �� _ ._ ��.n1� -.,.. IIIII - niLl nnn [a 0 F— Iu11tiIIIIIitlIIIL Illllullllllllillll IIVI IIIIIIIIIIII�� iu'iiiIIIIII:INIVui' hr —�— a�� n In " Ul !ill Mumu ■... __ IIIIIIIIIII IIIIII'' _Illlllllllu [II�IIIIIIIIIRVIIIIIVIIIIIIIIIIillll�� Illlillllllllllllliiiio ___I JIIIVIIIIII]IIIVniihl I —�— iiiiiimnli�l uuiluiil ,III II .III II I ■ 111111 111MY —111 11n11 111111 11—n . 11 11 11 11 1 1 11 n 11 11 11 11 11 11 ■ 11 11 11 1 11 11 1 Bo8lI' 11 11 11 11 11 Ilii lllilllllll In i III- III— 1- i■�r"�ii�i��"�■v ■i■■� 111111 1111 nn11 1111 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 u 11 11 I'm �� 11 11 11 11 �IlAlllllllll911111 IIIII IInIIIILIpII�� ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ INN ��i�................... 111111 n�11 111111 ■ 1111 �,"„ ;; ;; "' ��"�� MINION ■■ 1111 n 11 11 11 11 11 n 11 I.. bVALLIS 1i1 1 n n n� fi0q, .n....n nunu ..... ��I�IIIII 11�1111111 1IIIII 1IIIII �Illlpl 1I :IIIII�I�� nin�n� n�n�1�1I Hff Illill�iiul! I IiGlliillllli JuiiJil/ Illlilllllir IIVI�IIIf IIII�IIIIIE : IIIIhVllhil@IIIGi'.IiilNiilllNl 17 �— llll� liilil'��IllliliuiimuiImlill r.� IIIIIIIIIIIM■IAII`Iil!Iillilllllllllll �_ I IIIInF IIIIIIIIpII Illl 11 lll:lt4'� IIIIIIIIIIII�III IIIII IIIIIIII�� �-- — --- uiilllllll1�mnu, I. —�— —�— iiiiiimnli�l uuiluiil ■ 111111 111MY —111 11n11 111111 11—n . 11 11 11 11 1 1 11 n 11 11 11 11 11 11 ■ 11 11 11 1 11 11 1 Bo8lI' 11 11 11 11 11 �IIIIIIIIIIIW��IIIIII ■■ ■■ .........lilllllll■-pIla.l.... 1111 11 11 11 11 U11n 11 11 11 11 1111 111111 11n�1111 11 1 1 1 1 11 II 11 11 1 1 11 11 1 111111 11 11 . 15 11 11 ; nuu 1n n1 uun nnn n u ��"�� n n unu uuu u1 II nuu MM[HLR 1__I 0 0 KEY PLAN LEGEND Tov ov corvc -E.F RELATIVE DA7lIM iOP OF PAPAPI -z ANORTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32' =1'-0' BLDG 17 �Z SOUTHWEST ELEVATION D SCALE 3 2'=1'-0' BLDG.] SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: -2'- "-0' BLDG .7 NAME- THE SHACKS7THE 70N: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEVINEMILLS 3155STARS AND STRIPS WAY o N BUILDING 02 o� �s NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ��ESLED ARch a qlF 12495ZZ S + OF F. a'y•1b CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY DA rE: BUILDING 7 - ELEVATIONS PUNNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RIi S.c rmr em CHAIRMAN ® ® DATE: 1950N Shnmon FM'-SVAe4W SHEET' 24 OF 27 LblOs. p' n1 ��� Teiu TW7 Fu: ryn)T.'g TRaE Re➢ Ab. F -.i590 APPROVAL DO ESNOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANYCODES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTSERVICES I HLR I HLR APR/L 24 OF 27 2018 3 The Wallis WHOLE w OPENINGS rvuwl-gyri. PANEL SIDING BRICK I PANEL% I SIDING% I BRICK% MATERIAL ELEVATION LEGEND 8MRIOR ELEVATIONS NORTHWEST ELEVATION -01/12 10,982 4,240 562 344 5,6 87 8% 5% 87% ISI I T I `�-' BRICK VENEER SYSTEM NORTHEAST ELEVATION -02/12 11643 4,3% 265 604 6,378 4% 8% 88% SDIr IaMr vtl:kc�eIrc. CHAIRMAN SOUTHEAST ELEVATION - 03/12 11,6v 4,595 516 zls 6,2ae 7% 3% gp% 2 CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 01/13 8,110 2,602 0 0 51508 0% 0% 10096 SYSTEM NORTHWEST ELEVATION 02/13 10,811 31908 0 0 6,903 5% 0% 10D% SOUTHEAST ELEVATION -03/13 9,359 3,186 257 612 5,3D4 4% 10% 86% n FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM WEST ELEVATION -01/14 4,144 L523 187 237 2,197 7% 9% 84% �i I SOUTHWEST ELEVATION -02/14 1,983 739 71 271 902 6% 22% 73% EAST ELEVATION -03/14 2,738 141 58 0 1,639 3% 0% 97% 14 I BALCONY SYSTEM SOUTHELE IATION-04/14 3,846 983 0 0 2,863 0% 0% 10096 COURTYARD ELEVA110Ns IYI 15 I RAILING SYSTEM NORTH ELEVATION 5,156 2,123 177 1,945 1,003 6% 64% 33% 'T' WEST ELEVATION 5,099 2,576 191 780 1,539 8% 32% 62% 6296 B CANOPY SYSTEM EASTELEVATION 5,049 2,576 191 780 1,539 8% 32% SOUTH ELEVATION 5,156 2123 177 1,945 1,003 6% 60% 33% BUILDING OVERALL 1 95,644 36,4111 2,6521 7,7361 49,10 4% 13% 83% 3 8 9 i &P qF P4PAPET 'i0a5'O�OF JPLATE 5'-0 QL 1 iOPT.•t]4'�ii SIB" - PLA TE �'-753778,_ MAIL roves _ I T�11 _ S T DECK - 1 TI TT TT rOP OF CONI -FF RELATIVE DATUM 04 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 392' = 1-0' BLDG P7 OP OF PAPAPET 4 PL -ATFL -34-1150 1,0;g PLATE OP OF ECK • 123'-0 ]!4' PATE P OF DECK r�oP OF_r�4T€, TOP OF CONC. - F F RELATIVE OATUM 02 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION D SCALE: SI32-=1'-0- BLDGB7 TOP OF PLATE =14s'o m4-$ OP F K • tJ4'�tt SIB' _ TOPTOP 0�3PL�0 P K = t2]'-] ]ra' T�QQ ��QQ��'.7714' •tom _ T_OPOFCON�G -FF* RELATIVE O;TUM�' . tare 10P OAF PAPAPET_ 'T rOPe._-33 d.Ti9'� TOP1'� 1",F TOP OF CONC. - F eRELATNE DATUM • tare' QWINDOW SYSTEM 4 EXTERIOR DOOR SYSTEM REVNO PARAPET WALL METAL 8 FLASHING CAP 70 FLAT ROOF SYSTEM 77 METAL PANEL SOUTH ELEVATION Q3 SCALE: 392'=1'-0' SLOG i7 _01 OF>APAPET TOPTOP OF PLATE_' m4 _ TOPOFFILATE 01 WEST ELEVATION SCALE. &32-1-A' BLDG 97 • 100'L' NOTES 1. PER SECTION 54. MASONRY REQUIREMENTS- ALL THE PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIALS USED IN THIS PROJECT ARE OF EQUAL CHARACTERISTICS TO WHAT IS CONSIDERED MASONRY PER THIS SECTION. KEY PLAN LEGEND O N NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION y��9LED AR�y F l IN 9S P qrF OF ASE NAMETHE SHACKS/THE Kt VIS7UNS HARLESION ASENUMSER. CU18-09 REVNO DATE DESCRIPTION 6 OCAT/ON: 3570, 3580N. GRAPEV/NEMIUS LVO. 3155 STARS ANO STRIPS WAY CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE' BUILDING 7 - ELEVATIONS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SDIr IaMr vtl:kc�eIrc. CHAIRMAN ® _ t850N Sommer. FroW07 6P7J DATE: SHEET. 25 0f 17 ��� Qvllas, Tsru TROI 1* (2) Far: (9TZ) )oSYVi TBPER... APPROVALINC"OOESNOTAWHOR/ZEANY WORK IN CONFL/CTWITHANYCODES OR DESIGN ORAUNN DA7E SCALE SHEE7 ORDINANCES. OEPARTMENTOFOEVELOPM£NTSERV/CES HLR HL1T8 25 OF 27 3 The Wallis PANEL% I SIDING% I BRICK% I MATERIAL ELEVATION LEGEND NORTHWEST ELEVATION -01/12 10,982 4,240 562 344 5,836 9% 5% 87% NORTHEAST ELEVATION 02/12 11,643 4,396 265 604 6,378 10 4% 8% 8R% SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 03/12 IL617 4,595 516 218 6,288 DRAWN 7% 3% 90% SOUTHWEST ELEVATION -01/13 8,110 2,602 0 0 51508 0% 0% 10096 NORTHWEST ELEVATION -02/13 10,811 3,908 0 0 6,903 0% 0% 10D% SOUTHEAST ELEVATION -03/13 9,359 3,186 257 612 5,304 4% 10% 8696 WEST ELEVATION -01/14 4,144 1,523 187 237 2,197 7% 9% 84% SOUTHWEST ELEVATION -02/14 1,993 739 71 271 902 6% 22% 73% EAST ELEVATION -03/14 2,738 841 58 0 1,&39 3% 016 9796 SOUTH ELEVATION -04/14 1 3,M61 901 ol 01 2,863 0% 016 100% COURIYARD EIFVAT10N5 NORTH ELEVATION 5,156 2,113 177 1,945 1,003 6% WESTELEVATION 5,049 2,576 191 780 1,539 8% 32% 62% EAST ELEVATION 5,049 2,5761 191 7B0 1,539 8% 32% 62% SOUTH ELEVATION 1 5,-1 Z1231 1T71 3,9451 1,003 I e%I 64% 33% BUILDING OVERALL 1 95,644 36,41 2,6521 7, 49,10 1 4%1 13% 83% 4 BRICK VENEER SYSTEM 4 CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING SYSTEM 4 FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM 4 BALCONY SYSTEM 4 RAILING SYSTEM 4 CANOPY SYSTEM QWINDOW SYSTEM 4 EXTERIOR DOOR SYSTEM 8 PARAPET WALL METAL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FLASHING CAP 10 FLAT ROOF SYSTEM 17 METAL PANEL 02 WEST & EAST ELEVATION BCALE. 3 '= I' BLDG 67 01 NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: M2'=1'-0' BLDG97 KEY PLAN LEGEND NOTES 1. PER SECTION 54. MASONRY REQUIREMENTS - ALL THE PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIALS USED IN THIS PROJECT ARE OF EQUAL CHARACTERISTICS TO WHAT IS CONSIDERED MASONRY PER THIS SECTION. NAMETHE SHACKSIFHE LESTON VUMBER:CU18-08 70N: 3570, 3580 N. GRAPEVINE MILLS 3155STARSAND STRIPS WAY O N BUILDING 7 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION yt.�FED AROH G: y l� 17495 -�P qrf OF ZE ry. 9 4 CUP MULTI -FAMILY SUBMITTAL MAYOR SECRETARY DATE. BUILDING 7 -COURTYARD ELEVATIONS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SRIF lad¢ye a�i:ma ec CHAIRMAN _ OATF:��� I9_`ON Sfemmru FiwYW7 6IXtl SHEET: 26 OF 17 Pn: fen) risA]W Far: ryn1 �+` XVI am.can iBPE Rey Ab. F-.i5B4 APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WI M ANY CODES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE I SCALE SHEET ORDINANCES. DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES HLR HLR APRIL 2018 `LV Or 'L v:5mF NC m Ll Q 07 BUILDING 8 & 9 - THIRD FLOOR PLAN SCALE: I— = 1'-0• BLDG 88 419 O6 BUILDING 8 & 9 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1116' - 1'-0" BLDG #8 8 OS 05 BUILDING 8 & 9 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1116-= V-0- BLDG /84IS The Brownstones BRICK VENEER SYSTEM OUILDING48& 9 -SOFT. CEMENTTTIOUS LAP SIDING PANEL% BIIICK% SYSTEM WHOLE OPENINGS PANEL I BRICK BALCONY SYSTEM E"AnON RAILING SYSTEM 4 CANOPY SYSTEM APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR NORTH ELEVATION 4,025 1,607 2,109 1396 8796 SOIIIH ElEVA710N 4,126 3,140 02,986 HCR 096 1OD96 WEST ELEVATION 1,912 686 125 1,101 10% 9096 EASTELEVATION I L92,31 3261 6A 1,536 BUILDING OVERALL 11,9Q 3,759f 4951 7,732 $ TOP OJ PAPAPET 3)' )B-- b 10e P OF PIA Tl "TOP OF DECK 22'-3 3/4' 10�. P.OFPLATE 70P F n m =111-7— $=OP OF PLgTE _ 0'-1 UB• L TONC OP OF C T 'LA NE DATUM = oo'a - MATERIAL ELEVATION LEGEND 4 BRICK VENEER SYSTEM QEXTERIOR CEMENTTTIOUS LAP SIDING 4 SYSTEM 4 FIBER CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM 4 BALCONY SYSTEM 4 RAILING SYSTEM 4 CANOPY SYSTEM 4 WINDOW SYSTEM QEXTERIOR DOOR SYSTEM _ PARAPET WALL METAL 9 FLASHING CAP 70 FLAT ROOF SYSTEM 17 METAL PANEL 04 WEST ELEVATION SCALE. 3132-1-4- BLDG 18 8 /9 NOTES 1. PER SECTION 54. MASONRY REQUIREMENTS- ALL THE PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIALS USED IN THIS PROJECT ARE OF EQUAL CHARACTERISTICS TO WHAT IS CONSIDERED MASONRY PER THIS SECTION. ?FF PAPAPET b O PLATE P OF 7 TOP OF DECK y, � $192 PLATE P F m =111'7713K m W iOPp'-t OF PLATE _ 1 B" 7 b gDP o. - . '� ELAof ivEceCEF DAruM =room ,$iOP70F PAPAPET 13b TO +_POIP,ATE _ • 1 K 11'3314'p1 2 — A._O._O_..TP LAIE _ OP OF DELLA 111-7 79" Ov—g _ 8 ie b OPOF '�REtATIVE DF�UM 02 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3132'•1'42 BLOG80d S FO -11 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3132 =1'-0• BLDG /B 8 09 KEY PLAN 0N LEGEND BUILDING ® & �9 02 01 03 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3131' - 1'-0' SLOG 88 8 89 NAME: THESHACKSITHE 'ION: 3570,3580N. GRAPEVINEMILLS 3155 STARS ANO STRI PS WAY iIF OF PAPAPET b 1-o: 0P OF PLATE •TT'$ 7 ov DFD c =12'3314• -TOP OF 21,40 . 110'4- b OF TOP oDECK A - OFD )/B' iOP TE OF PLA •11a-1 ti Tov of corvc - F F �FiArivF�si A�uMs = Dam NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION O AAOti (t � Y qrf OF ZC a•s•16 MAYOR SECRETARY CUP MUL TI-FAMIL Y SUBMITTAL DATE: BUILDING 8 & 9 - PLAN & ELEVATIONS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION smr ® 1'_'�%x°wauausme CHAIRMAN _ DATE.' f950N [2100 SHEET. 27 OF 77 ��� DPm, rs ,7SZ07rte LbllaS. Ta4as 1510T M: ryTS T45JOC1) Fu: M72) )35.3Wr 1HPE Rae. M. F]580 APPROVAL DOES NOTAUTHORIZEANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR DESIGN DRAWN DATE SCALE SHEET ORDINANCES OEPARTMENTOFOEVELOPMENTSERWCES HCR HLR APRIL 201R �� OrC �7 Mr. Stombaugh, Planning and Zoning Members, City Council Members. April 9, 2018 Attached is the essence of our presentation on zoning case to come before you on April 17tH In this summary, we have tried to, as succinctly as possible, address existing retail, future retail and our zoning request to include MF. Shacks of Grapevine Mills Crossing, The Wallis and The Baker Development Summary Basic Facts and Request: Total Billingsley -owned property is 27 acres zoned CC. This presentation involves 5.4 built acres and approximately 17 acres for more retail and MF. The one existing retail building has 49,348 square feet with Altitude occupying 32,637 square feet. Tonight, Corky's (13,675 square feet) is before you, and, should their request be approved, this building will then be 95% leased. We have owned the remaining 22.5 acres of raw land for 30 years. Despite our marketing efforts over all these years, and with 7 different brokerage teams, we have not succeeded in attracting major retail to this site. Thus, we are coming forth with a plan regarding 17.79 acres. Our request is for 10.47 acres to be multifamily and 7.32 in CC. Once the proposed plan is built, we will have 77,466 square feet of retail in 5 buildings and 432 residential units and 5.04 acres of raw land zoned CC. Parcel Land Square Feet Square Feet # of # of Parking (Acres) (Occupied) (Total) Units Existing Retail 5.44 32,637 48,931 310 Proposed Retail 6.92 27,400 352 Proposed MF 10.47 432 718 (676 garage) Future Retail 1.74 Raw Land CC 3.30 Total 27.84 76,331 432 1,380 Units Mix Unit Size 1 -bedroom 695 — 723 sq ft 2 -bedroom 750 —1,025 sq ft 3 -bedroom 1,945 sq ft Total # of Units # of Units 318 104 10 432 Open space requirements for MF are 20%, and we are providing 31%. Open space requirements for retail are 15%, and we are providing 19.8-26.4% per lot. Our multifamily neighborhood is designed following the Designs Standards Manuals for Multifamily and Horizontal Mixed-use Development in Grapevine, Texas, prepared by Architexas and Mesa Planning. We are asking for no exceptions and commit to building a minimum of an additional 12,000 retail square feet in 2 or more buildings simultaneously with the multifamily. We look forward to commencing construction in Q4 2018. Strategically. both our retail and our MF fill spots in the market that are not being served. Goals of the development: Create a remarkable public realm that assures the long-term success of the neighborhood. Reflect the personality, history and essence of Grapevine. Be a significant front door for the city on 121. Build a retail environment that is the opposite of a strip center and rather is an activity center. Enhance the existing retail tenants and building and integrate them into the overall development. Manifest the intent of the Design Standards Manual in all construction details. Have a community that enriches with time. Bring sophisticated, casual urban living to this market. What's our style in getting there? We recognize that retail is the biggest amenity for residential. and retailers rely on neighbors to be their primary customers. These two go hand in glove. We are integrating The Shacks leading into The Wallis and The Baker by energizing the street with outdoor seating, parks, resident workout facility, leasing center, splash fountain and plaza. Existing and new retail are linked via patios and parks and shared customers strengthening each. First, we create the public realm including the spinal road, a variety of kinds of parks, art, plaza at the heart and front doors, gardens and patios on every street. A place is first created via the public realm and the buildings are the back drop. We are offering our residents and public alike access to 7 very different parks. Our residents also enjoy 2 private courtyards and a resident only dog park. We serve the pedestrian first, and then the cars. Group or community spots, private spots. Quality, historic relevance, technology for tomorrow. Every ground floor unit has a front door on the street. The parking is hidden and in the back. Our sidewalks link our residents to the area trails and amenities. Buildings need multiple facades, bricks, roof lines and heights. Variety in unit types adding brownstones gives residents choice. What does this deliver to Grapevine? Having met with many of our retail neighbors, they are excited about the project and the added residents living in North Grapevine Mills Mall District. Our earthy retail environment should be exciting, easy and strong enough to be a destination for families, corporate neighbors and area residents. The residences will be top quality in every way. Coming in through the heavily -landscaped property into their garage, entering into fully-airconditioned buildings and hallways, residents will live in a home that enriches with time. In only a few years, our brick facades will feel as if they are part of the fabric of the community and have passed the test of time. Finally, we want to build community that attracts young career -oriented people who fall in love with the city. Thanks for giving us this opportunity, we hope to make you proud. Lucy Billingsley and team The Shacks at The Wallis & r1wRlw"A"Iffis- Grapevine Mills Crossing The Baker of Grapevine mow/OW �rw *q Yom- �Dt \ - RETAIL & RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Grapevine, Texas A Development by Billingsley Company 1 Development Plan Overview 2 _-�`�. J _ _ _ — _ :.., _ "� s _ _fid ��✓ i= ; _ '_ OF�- J s � � _ � /'..'jR".•" // "_"-Gs. �_� _�i.�.�Zs_��. ..moi Mir - 6 .�1► vim,:%- _ .. a � .t � , L ` _ - - s 10, I • ► ".. ..ter ME maw Development Plan Overview Grapevine Mills North District Q If r M -L= -- -= --- THE SHACKS 1 GRAPEVINE AT GRAPEVINE MILLS CROSSINGT ' MILLS CROSSING r r- 4 o• rr�rrr r a � • � ` i I �' 'r •Y ►N int � / �, j;,. UM e �•"�t„1'1H a '_,� •'° `�# � � 4 � �• . �. y4f 2499 AIA 0 _ r `►e ���t ' j eF.� � r✓.J k j 26 _. � • � t ! �! I The Shacks at Grapevine Mills Crossing The Wallis& The Baker of Grapevine 0 ##Aj INE-J11Ld BOULEVARD LOT SAH2 LeT 5AR7/C — — i — LPT�. ora�z _ _ I f I-7 I L J /.i I I I{ I' I I I I _ l l l# l r (� - I_ - 1— — I—✓ I PROPOSIr ED i PROPOSED RETAL I I I I I I F'��',i+R_E I,I11� �'I �IIIII IIIIIIII1�1 �� �' I — JA- I I I I I II I I I '- i —I I I I�� I ' , � I-- I — ' •� � II I � 1 I RETAII � f I I PARK I �= �. �, Fxlsrrrc . • • • . RFTAII J —_ 1 n1 I r— EASTING RETAIL I r — _ I he Lawn 10 1. - I - I - ' GARAGE i GARAGE - ----I------------ ry THE BAKER THE WALLIS / i • • i 7 E eL ° I FM i i r. _ � gat ►s •�`. � / Residents -only Park 11 10 Public Park STARS & STRIPES WAY _= Parks &Green Spaces 5 The Shacks at Grapevine M RETAIL THE *111s Crossing LJ 4 Buildings — 27,400 rentable square feet LJ 2 Parks — for games and dining LJ THE SHACKS for small restaurant stands and gifts LJ Phase 1 of at least 12,000 rentable square feet to be built with multi -family LJ Update fagade on existing retail to better connect 74 -@mow vow F4% lie Mow MW INC Odpr 6%- IL IV rW: SSSS Lmom NENE soon ■ NOON SSSS NNW EMEN SEEN MEMO 0101110101ININININ■iiii Nunn 011010011010101010mall immommommommmi moor COL m' �. �•I::: ._ APL ON Owl- AMR 11 J Oil iu iu w 0. ■o■ ■�■ ■r. An MEN ■E■ ■& ii ■iii 4■ son NINE■i& �■■ NNE -A ME i!!lint .• � is �rs�, �._i� .. i i ow. r -w W-' !x I t neon cup SEEMEMEMMI IMIiIMiii! on0 Ag kPLE • •'�i II 0000 a 4, 00 mmmmm mm 4 �� 11 t �-mom J3 •` - � ' �'n - - - � : =t � T � t - J. � - . _ .. '- - _ - --- — _— _ - Existing Grapevine Mills Crossing Enhancement 4 The Baker& The Wallis of Grapevine RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES ❑ Retail with 10-16 restaurants, shops and services ❑ Link to Grapevine trail system ❑ 7 Public parks ❑ 1 Resident dog park ❑ 2 Courtyards ❑ 1 Resident pool ❑ 1 Workout facility ❑ 1 Clubroom ❑ 1 Library and 1 reading room 13 High -Density Multifamily ZI 10.49 acres -' 432 dwelling units -i 74% one -bedroom apartments 24% two-bedroom apartments 2% three-bedroom brownstones L-1 Average unit size of 900 S.F. Ample parking 1.7 spaces per unit - Attached parking: 20 spaces I Structured parking: 656 spaces Surface parking: 42 spaces (5.8%) Total parking: 718 spaces Parks on Residential Site 5 public pocket parks = 1.05 acres 3 residents -only -=.63 acres 16 % of site are formal parks Site Facts LLIS THE WA svl -17 MYill ARM& 00p, I MOMMEW JUNIP101- NNW fir "Out ...... Nt 10 NNW 40._. ')60 0.— )60 f tL L7 ic lob- u -IAlW, 47, f, L 14 MI -14-1 The Brownstones at The Wallis Facing Stars and Stripes & internal I i q* THE BAKER !- "�^ r 11i j111I1 - _ �. �• i .tee a - ji is! BAKE k X THE WALLIS J, r wow -go .00--- wwwo—ow I PM .. ....... I" -40— AL r. .y r �' � esu —�._ _ _ ,!a � � n � _ � E g9 _ :• ^_ ■OWLakr7 -11L. bibGW f x � t fpppa •. 1 ♦ 7 40P Example of a curb -less — sidewalk at an existing pro * ct NOW 'FOR, W .t jyw jI tip MR ein `.' � W iii �■!0 / ! erwN,� ���,..� ' - into I .. rryll P11 ,logo' logo', h90 A i 1 I I r.::" -I V. mow= rvJff Ut o rA- IT 7 lot AN - Volker; *ol '" � � ��. y rr_ 46 SItt J ter-' S. 1 too MR 10 06 • .tip � 'f 1 'q4 -a � ` t � /I �'*� „- �, al in lie w 7 3 1 1 E _ _ ' � �; � ` 4 i " t � . � �t �� `• �� � � R _ tee'- .. - i � Y t - '!. Its. m AD - -=-xs 1 a -aft I jZ77;7-1- P; Oman ftwo !oil >•- OibuT � � i Aavm wz J-1 Aavm E _ ■aria � �• j ��� �i �!� 00 Ai =z �_ law AWOW 41 el0 1 y, d f N �♦ rr yy�5?�i1i�R'' A` ,,,►� �`fil. *�, �• � .' ��` ';�1 _ ter45,•�'.�'!� .yr �`. •- -a ° j �f,.ti• � � � 26 Bacon's Dog Park Adjacent to The Vineyard Park ,.111.1 L L i t ��• ll1LL �r f � � \ � .P i A _ i i - '+pYz,.. -1♦, s'»t+.oc7;'E:-.: - ;{lG. .^- y Y t � * i,' . � q ''{ •; v �p .� X11. r 44-a J. - ',, `�• S,gnNz ,+ f hr. try _ �^. Ago WILL Is ml it lik --gyp N .My '$fir • CHARLrS i t j, 1 JLLi W* i At t7 v Multi -Family Concept Interiors All from Billingsley -built communities INTERIOR AMENITIES&FINISHES ❑ Solid core paneled entry doors ❑ Designer built-in computer station/desk with bookshelves* ❑ Full-size washer and dryer connections* ❑ Full-size stackable washer and dryer included* ❑ Pre -wired for cable throughout ❑ Individual hot water heaters ❑ Multiple USB outlets ❑ Continuous nylon plush carpet and faux -wood plank flooring ❑ Faux wood flooring through entire apartment (first floor units) ❑ Garden -style oval soaking tubs* ❑ Walk-in showers* ❑ Spacious walk-in closets ❑ Large linen closets ❑ Custom Pendant lighting and track lighting ❑ Mud room with built-in cabinets and Carolina Hutch* ❑ Ceiling fans in living room and master bedroom ❑ Nine and ten foot ceilings throughout ❑ Kitchen pantry and gourmet dining island* ❑ Energy Star appliances including built-in microwave ❑ Stainless steel sinks with disposals ❑ Upscale stainless steel appliance packages ❑ Granite countertops in kitchen and baths ❑ Under cabinet kitchen lighting ❑ Faux Wood Blinds ❑ Private balconies, terraces, and patios* *In select units • 4, Multi -Family Interiors a IL r �►� p4p a fAr . �! ... L�► • t r • .. — /��� 0. � .