The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 11 - HL01-08 Cottonbelt Railroad Historic SubdistrictZ' JkZT, Jan' -15-02 08:23A PvQsQvva7tion E3174103125 P.03 File #: HLOI-08 COTTONBELT RAILROAD HISTORIC IST ICT WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON MQN-QA Y JANUARY 11 2002 Procedure to Res Qnd; As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) Print Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: M - Fa n" r 7,0 fP, W -(Phone No.)—I-��Y- �9(— Telephone: (817) 410-31.55 Fax: (817) 410-3Q18 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Secretary Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P.O. BOX 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 rJAN 1 5 2002 1 i COMMENTSRECEIVED SUBDISTRICT PLANNING WRITTEN BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM O . D JANUARY , t ... �.. .. �.. • . 1 0. • rty Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), t (approve) protest) and/or (have the following comments) Print Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: No.) J'19 - - S2 -U Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Secretary Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 _. Grapevine, Texas 76099.. ... ReM 1-11.01 =08 RECEIVED II , SUBDISTRICT I R • PLANNING WRI17EN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BYTHIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5 PM ON MONDAY. JANUARY 14, 2002 Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), 1 fannrnval (nmtestl and/or (have the following comments) Print Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: .! A a Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Fax: (817) 410-3018 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Secretary Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104:. Grapevine, Texas 76099 December 16, 2001 JAN o 9 2002 PLANNING I received my fust letter from Mr. Gardea in June of 2000. At that time, I called Mr. Gardea and expressed my concerns as to how the proposals would affect my property at 204 W. Dallas Rd It was not a very satisfactory conversation and his only suggestion to me was that I should attend the meeting scheduled for June 14, 2000. Mr. Gardea did not tell me that my property could be left out of the proposal if I opposed it being included in the Historical District Mr. Jim Massey, one of the property owners on Dallas Rd affected by the Historical District proposals, called the first week in December, 2001. He wanted to know if I was in favor of my properly being included in the Historical District. I assured. Mr. Massey that I was not in favor of it as I ria not feel my property has any historical significance. Mr. Massey wanted to know if I would attend a meeting with the Commission if he could get one scheduled. He called again and advised that Mr. Russell Anderson, another affected property owner, had set up a meeting for us on December I Vh with Mr. Gardea, Mr. Massey, Mr. Anderson, and my husband and I attended that meeting. It was very enlightening in several ways. First, although. Mr. Massey has attended the scheduled meetings of the Historical Commission, it has been to no avail. Secondly, Mr. Gardea told Mr. Massey last year that if he did not want his propperty included, that they would block it out of the Historical District. Thirdly, Mr. Gardea has since told Mr. Massey that he cannot block out any of the properties as per the Commission's instructions. At our meeting, I expressed to Mr. Gardea that I failed to see any historical significance to our properties. It seems to me, the Commission could draw their line along the railroad excluding our properties on Dallas Rd. If a property owner on Dallas Rd desires to be included in the Historical District, then their property could be included As a result of Dallas Rd being widened, my property has been reduced in size to such a degree that it is impossible to improve the property without going through a variance process. About seven years ago, we were considering making some major improvements to the building. We hired a consultant to help us with all the nary requirements. After a couple of meetings with someone with the City involved in this process, he was told we would be wasting our time and money to pursue getting a variance permit I am only telling you of this experience so that you can understand why further restrictions would be a hardship. My property was a small church that had been disband when my Father purchased it approximately 36 years ago. Major changes were made to the structure to convert it to a sheet metal shop with living quarters in the rear or Sunday School area. If the building was still basically the same and had become a retail business of some type such as an antique store, I could see how it would warrant being a part of the Historical District. But with all the changes made to the building and being in an industrial area, I just can't see any advantage to being included in the Historical District. Mr. Gardea advised us in our meeting that any decisions concerning the proposed Historical District were up to the City Council. Therefore, I am sending this letter to each of the Council members for their consideration. I sincerely hope each of you will consider the property owners' desires for their properties when you make your decision as to allowing certain properties to be excluded from the proposed Historical District. Thank you. u Fe HL01w08 COTTONBELT RAILROAD HISTORICJAN 1 1 00� r ■ RECEIVEDISTRICT PLANNING WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE THAN 5 PM . MONDAY. a JANUARY , 2002 Procedure to Respond: As (a Properer within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), 1 (approve) protest) and/or (have the following comments) ,!y� T 8 c n ,.,eOnAilwQ 7-v 4?w,4-LAR yAto, 7'Rltfo-- ;1-- 770 r#e- go7'r ---e llr ,0.°t T,'cT. '7- 1,EE1. 7XII i)V IvWiV Alo7-,fie,`..°fid'' /rt r -K o/" In T CA 417 M 6 /,f .Z �. Ater mw-rrz �' 'y�S y✓oi1�0 �p� ,�RAwri- ,/�h'otl�`"p p�,q ip/��,�i"y% w.E ,p.;0 r/ ��vE T?`�� '0- � p 8�T w,�' INADC?, 7�M� �pGl1 Tf�E"r.. ; .,/ wRl�":`� �► r^E' f7.O ,NaT"t�.a�t'" i" Q rtdN�''°'"�'�d Aa�"s; o'r'!�o Bloc c�and Su�dsion am an No.) 57 y) Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Fax: (817) 410-3018 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Secretary Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 -77 &4Z , zkg Ap! Ijc Cr" '11"C-10 7, 1- iiiRX MW -0 /+ �. Ater mw-rrz �' 'y�S y✓oi1�0 �p� ,�RAwri- ,/�h'otl�`"p p�,q ip/��,�i"y% w.E ,p.;0 r/ ��vE T?`�� '0- � p 8�T w,�' INADC?, 7�M� �pGl1 Tf�E"r.. ; .,/ wRl�":`� �► r^E' f7.O ,NaT"t�.a�t'" i" Q rtdN�''°'"�'�d Aa�"s; o'r'!�o Bloc c�and Su�dsion am an No.) 57 y) Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Fax: (817) 410-3018 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Secretary Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 File COMMENTSSUBDISTRICT PLAMYing WRITTEN THAN 5 PM ON MONDAY,ARII Procedure to Respond: As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), i (appy') (per and/or (have the following comments) q A /V SDA 1JM fi, JAX-yYl. 1 1 9 l i 4. Print Name and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: �! CoA- ae-�-3t2. e0rirODD; (Phone No.) el %' ff- - q �-l9 Telephone: (817) 410-3155 Fax: (817) 410-3018 Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Secretary Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 JAN -15-2002 02:45 AM KELLY MOORE PAINT CO 817 279 7079 P.01 t COTTONBELT RAILROAD{ I ° SUBDISTRICT P1,4/VIV 1NO WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO LATER THAN "PMte, M AY JANUARY -14.1, 200 As (a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest ) and/or (have the following comments) " Rmw+ " . ,:�= Az/o �ceL A2LIM&f) a•1u propel' , le5 .af} 1ifi6r °`VAIJAC51i CAA 44 .e Print Name and Address, or Lot. Block and Subdivision: c� eA6.e��D (Phone No.)„$i? ;L25 of, 4,? --2.11-70 b`5 Telephone. (817) 410.3155 Pax: (8"i7) MO -301g Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Secretary Department of Development Services City of Grapevine P.O. Sox 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 File 14LO148 RECEIVED COTTONaELT A { {i )ANSUBDISTRICT PLANNING COMMENTSWRITTEN MUST BE By • • i ` �' JANUARY THAN Procedure to Responds Asa Property Owner WdWn 200 feet of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) ( (protest) and/or (have the following comments) I "PROTEST01 the application of the Grapevine Historic Preservatioin Commission in their attempt to create the Cottonbelt Railroad Sub-Distr' P -- importance as to create restraintst r,aagainst �Genadjacent businesses no one in support%jof the Sub -District. I do beleive that the property_ in}questaAnacn^�ent-bnralaerevtQW Ler- needed, print Dame and Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: 411 W. Dallas Road Signature:, Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Secretary Department of Development Services Cita of Grapevine P.O. Box 951.04 Grapevine, Texas 76099 817 481 3333