Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 04 & 25 - CU18-25 The Carter (Enclave II)TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 18, 2018 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU18-25 ENCLAVE II r--_1 I I -- ~---------- �— � Grapevine Lake I` 'D Lake Rd. I / APPLICANT: Kenneth Fambro PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE: The subject property is addressed at 2103 Anderson - Gibson Road and is proposed to be platted as Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Carter Addition. The site contains 20.08 acres and has approximately 501 feet of frontage along Anderson -Gibson Road. REQUESTED CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST AND COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to establish a master site development plan to include, but not be limited to the development of a 303 room co -branded hotel alona with the develoament of 275 multi-familv units. With this request, the applicant intends to utilize the Master Site Development Plan which was approved by the Council in February 2017 and allows the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council through the conditional use process, the ability to consider multiple requests through one application on tracts of land five acres in size or larger along with the ability to consider additional uses, including residential uses, without the need for a separate zone change request. Overall the subject site is a 20.08 acre tract that will be subdivided into two separate lots for the multi -family and hotel portions of the project. Two points of access will be provided, O:\ZCU\ CU 18-25.41 1 December 13, 2018 (1:OOPM) both from Anderson -Gibson Road that are not controlled access. The hotel portion of the project sits on 9.43 acres and will be a co -branded hotel five stories in height (approximately 66 feet) consisting of a Holiday Inn (155 rooms) and a Staybridge Suites (148 rooms) with a total of 303 rooms. Room sizes will range from the minimum 380 s.f. required, to a maximum of 925 s.f. A 61 seat restaurant is proposed along with 11,580 s.f. of meeting space and a 1,250 s.f. swimming pool. Relative to parking, 476 spaces are required; however, based on the parking study provided by the applicant 326 are provided with 66 of these spaces being shared with the accompanying multi -family project which would adequately serve the hotel project. The close proximity to the airport, and transportation to and from the airport by way of airport shuttles, taxis, and ride -sharing programs such as Uber and Lyft are factors stated in the study that reduce the demand for parking. The multi -family portion of the project contains four structures, four stories in height (approximately 50 feet) occupying 10.65 acres. A total of 275 multi -family units are proposed with a density of 25.8 units per acre. The unit mix is as follows: • One bedroom units (762-1,080 s.f.) 155 units • Two bedroom units (1,076- 1,365 s.f.) 120 units Required parking for the multi -family portion of the project is 550 spaces with the applicant providing 531 spaces (1.93 spaces per unit) with 66 of these spaces being shared with the accompanying hotel project. The parking provided falls into the following categories: • Surface: 330 spaces (66 shared) • Podium (below grade): 123 spaces • Tuck under (at grade): 40 spaces • Tandem (behind garage at grade): 38 spaces The attached parking study determined that the parking provided compares favorablywith the 1.9 spaces/unit of the immediately adjacent 243 -unit Enclave I project approved in 2012. The 66 spaces shared with the adjacent hotel will not need to be utilized by the hotel and would be available for the multi -family portion of the project, if necessary. Contained within your packet is an affidavit of compliance signed and sealed by the project architect stating the project is in compliance with the adopted Design Standards Manual for Multi -family and Vertical Mixed Use Development. Although the project is not within any of the five specific districts listed with the design guidelines, the applicant has selected from the 24 listed criteria those standards that are directly applicable to the subject site given its unique aspects such as, location, topography, access, and visibility, with particular attention given to District 4, Grapevine Mills South District—the most proximate of the districts with similar proposed development. The applicant has included some graphic exhibits that demonstrate compliance with specific elements of the design standards. O:\ZCU\ CU 18-25.41 2 December 13, 2018 (1:OOPM) Lastly, this request falls within both "Zone B" Middle Zone of Effect and "Zone C" Zone of Greatest Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. In Zone B, uses such as multi -family apartments, motels, office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, and personal/business services should be considered only if sound treatment is included in building design. Single-family residential and sound sensitive uses such as schools and churches should avoid this zone. Industrial and commercial uses that can tolerate high levels of sound exposure are appropriate in "Zone C." If the project is approved the applicant has agreed to the following: • A 25dB Noise Level Reduction as typically recommended by the FAA for all structures within the project; • Provide full disclosure of the airport noise impact to all first and subsequent purchasers/renters; • An avigation easement be dedicated on the plat PRESENT ZONING AND USE: The property is currently zoned "HCO" Hotel/Corporate Office District and is vacant. HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject property and the property to the north, east, and west was zoned 1-1" Light Industrial District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. The property to the south was zoned "L- I" Light Industrial District prior to the 1984 City Rezoning. In 1984 the City changed the zoning designation for the site to "PID" Planned Industrial Development. The property to the north was then rezoned in 1985 as a part of the "Terra Tract" to "R -MF -2" Multi -Family District (Case No. Z85-60, Ord. No. 85-60), however the property was not developed. In October 1995, the property to the north was part of a zoning request (Case No. Z95-06) whose purpose was to amend, revise, eliminate or terminate portions of the deed restrictions and the letter of agreement as adopted in Ordinance No. 85-60, and rezone portions of the site. Council considered and approved a zoning change (Z05-05), conditional use request (CU05-68), and planned development overlay (PD05-07) on the property to the north for a four tower, 12 -story condominium project at their January 17, 2006 meeting. The project involved the rezoning of approximately 11 acres from "PID" Planned Industrial Development District to "CC" Community Commercial District and a conditional use permit to exceed the height maximum of 50 feet. The planned development overlay was utilized to allow the multi -family use within the "CC" Community Commercial District. Although approved as submitted the Commission determined and the Council agreed to reconsider the request as part of a City initiated case to bring the zoning into compliance with the actual land use. At the March 21, 2006 meeting, Council approved a zone change (Z06- 04) and a planned development overlay (PD06-02) on the subject property rezoning approximately 11 acres from "CC" Community Commercial District to "R -M-2" Multi -family O:\ZCU\ CU 18-25.41 3 December 13, 2018 (1:OOPM) District for a condominium project consisting of four towers, each twelve stories in height containing 94 living units per each tower. The planned development overlay allowed for variances to density (35.5 units/acre), height (160 feet), side yard setback, building length and separation, parking (2.1 spaces/unit) and buffer area. This project was never developed. At the December 20, 2011 meeting Council considered and denied a zone change (Z11-06), conditional use (CU11-26) and planned development overlay (PD1 1-06) on the property to the north of the subject site to rezone approximately 11 acres from "R- MF -2" to "R -MF" to allow for a 278 -unit apartment project and a conditional use permit to vary from the established standards relative to density, height, parking and front yard setback and a planned development overlay to include but not be limited to deviation from building length, building separation and location, location of off-street parking and landscaping. On this same property to the north the council approved at their May 15, 2012 meeting a zoning change, conditional use request and planned development overlay to rezone 11 acres from "R -MF -2" Multi -family to "R -MF" Multi -family to allow for the development of a 243 unit multifamily project, a conditional use permit to vary from the established standards relative density, height, parking and the location of open space and a planned development overlay to deviate from building length, building separation, and landscaping. SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE: NORTH: "GU" Governmental Use District and R -MF" Multifamily District— existing Enclave I multifamily development and Cowboy's Golf Course SOUTH: "HCO" Hotel/Corporate Office District—Austin Ranch EAST: "R -MF" Multifamily District and "CC" Community Commercial District—Enclave 1 multifamily development and Grapevine Mills Mall WEST: "PID" Planned Industrial Development District and "HCO" Hotel/Corporate Office District—Cowboy's Golf Course and Austin Ranch AIRPORT IMPACT: The subject tract is located within "Zone B" Middle Zone of Effect and "Zone C" Zone of Greatest Effect as defined on the "Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. In Zone B, the following uses may be considered only if sound treatment is included in building design: multi -family apartments, motels, office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, and personal and business services. Single-family residential and sound sensitive uses such as schools and churches should avoid this zone. Industrial and commercial uses that can tolerate high levels of sound exposure are appropriate in "Zone C." The applicant intends to provide sound attenuation for all components of the project. O:\ZCU\ CU 18-25.41 4 December 13, 2018 (1:OOPM) MASTER PLAN APPLICATION: The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Commercial land use. The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan. THOROUGHFARE PLAN - Anderson -Gibson Road is not a designated thoroughfare as shown on the City of Grapevine's Thoroughfare Plan. /rs O:\ZCU\ CU 18-25.41 5 December 13, 2018 (1:OOPM) ir-041,jo I ME .ane u K "t TF 5 15.30AC Feet 0 200 400 600 800 �tPL 111 TI W�E Date Prepared: 11/512018 1A 21."a CU18-25 Enclave II This deto has been cemp0ed by Ore Oily of Orapevine ITh31S department. Various otAclal and unoRiclal sources wen used to gather this latmmffUom Every effort wee made Is snaum the ■emm" of this Cato, heeevar. no guarantee Is given or implied ea to the accuracy of said data. 035E SRA VINE. E.-- �; 4 CITY OF GRAPEVINE f., SITE PLAN APPLICATION Form "B" PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant Iagenticompany/contact �El . Real E.,ttit 11 tldi s. 1.._I..0 — Street address of applicant/agent: 3110 W. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 120 City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent Southlake, TX 76092 Telephone number of applicant / agent Fax number of applicant f agent. 817.742.1851 x14 iMobile phone number of applicant/agent 817.609.3990 Appl'icant's interest in subject property.., Purchaser PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address of subject property 2103 Anderson Gibson Road Legal description of subject property (metes & bounds must be described on 8 4/2"x 11" sheet) Lot 1 &2 Block A Addition - Size of subject property Z s: Acres Square fcotas e Present zoning classification: Proposed use of the property.• HCO- HOtel/Corp, Office Hotel and multifamily Give a general description of the proposed use or uses for the proposed development: Zoning ordinance provision rdquiring a conditional use: Master Site Development Plan PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of current property owner, Carter Grapevine Partners LP Street address of property owner.• _ 4021 Hilltop Drive City/ State/ Zip Code of property owner: - Southlake TX 76092 Telephone number of property owner. _ Fax number of property owner. 872.569.7340 Attach a final plat, or replat, of the approved subdivision by city council showing property bouridery lines, dimensions, easements, roadways, rail lines, and public rights -of way crossing and adjacent to the tract (1 blueline copy) If a master development plan is required, attach a statement showing the proposed use substantially conforms to the master development plan. Submit a site plan showing all information required by Section 47.E., Site Plan review requirements (see attached requirements). rovide all required information demonstrating compliance with all conditions imposed on any conditional use, site plan zoning, or conditional use zoning. All site plans must conform to the approved concept plan. Any changes to a site plan, approved with a conditional use or a conditional use, can only be approved bv cl`V council through the public hearing process. PART 4. SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF A FINAL SITE PLAN IHS Real Estate Holdings LP PrintApplicant's Name: � j v #% Signat e: The State Of Texas County of Tarrant Before Me Christina Lozano on this day personally appeared- Kenneth W Famhro, II (notary) (applicant) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for ther�rposes and densidengion therein expressed. (Seal) Given under my ha gfMaWPI office this day of -; , A.D. „ 2018 `•�t iSiINA w2'-, A" o� pSZY P(/i% s O I t 91 �; oIn And Fier State Of Texas{ r F ,._.. Carter Grapevine�i;�P'*� Print Property Owners Name: 'Property wrrer's Signature The state Of Texas county of Tarrant Before Me Christina Lozano on this day personally appeared (notary) (property owner) known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or ether document) be the personwhose name Is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the r r as and con sr erari . rr rn exprssed (seal) Given under my hand and seal of office this day of _ 201 S +�tttrirrrr �cJ%NA (p rrr +, C.a$t46#pdss- ,-s . 4t o ° y C' o ary n And For Stare Of Texas tl),`�il 'rr Exp. Mat "b'�%%% rrr rrr 1110" integrated 3110 W. Southlake Blvd. ' Suite 120 Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone (817) 742-1851 Fax (817) 742-1852 November 1, 2018 Scott Williams Director Development Services City of Grapevine 200 S. Main Street Grapevine. Texas 76051 Dear Mr. Williams; Integrated Construction Development Integrated Housing Solutions Integrated Property Management Integrated Senior Living Please let this letter serve as an official request to allow the conditional use of `Master Site Development Plan'- R- MF Multifamily District. The site is currently zoned HCO- Hotel Office District and is included in District 4 Grapevine Mills South of Section 22- R -MF Multifamily District Regulations. The site is located at 2103 Anderson Gibson Road. The use of `hotel' will remain on 9.4282 of the total 20.075 acres; multifamily will, be 10.6464 acres. Integrated Real Estate Group (Integrated) will be the overall master developer as well as owner/developer of the multifamily portion. Over its history, Integrated has constructed and developed over 10,000 multifamily units, including Enclave'at Grapevine, the adjacent multifamily community to the proposed site. The proposed 275 unit multifamily community will provide Class A unit amenities (see Exhibit G), gorgeous lake and golf course views, walkability and access to the City's hike & bike trail. The hotel portion will be developed by KADE Development, a Dallas -based real estate development company, whose portfolio includes 30 U.S. hotels such as Hilton, Marriot and IHG. The proposed hotel will be dual branded Holiday Inn and Staybridge Suites with 303 total rooms, conference space and a full service restaurant. The conditional use will not have an undue adverse effect on either the neighborhood or adjacent property. In fact, the area includes other multifamily zoned parcels. The conditional use will comply with all required ordinances, restrictions and district -specific design standards. The enclosed plan sheets and exhibits illustrate the specific site and building details deemed necessary for site development. Adhering to Section 22: R -MF Multifamily District Regulations, we have worked extensively with Architexas for several months to determine the best layout taking into account not only this site itself, but location in the City with corresponding access, topography, adjacency and views. All aspects of the Design Standards Manual for Multifamily and Vertical Mixed -Use Development will be strictly adhered to. Steep hillsides create falls of over 85 feet with multiple grade changes. We have developed various building types (including podium parking) to accommodate the existing grade changes and have a minimal effect on the natural grade. The use of retaining walls were rather strategic in an effort to minimize the "clear cut" effect of the existing vegetation. White we weren't able to totally eliminate their use, we did implement methods such as turn down foundations, parking structures within the grade and split detention pond placement to compliment the natural setting. City staff was instrumental in the design of utilities in order to lessen the environmental impact suggesting the use of borings (which add additional cost) instead of using above ditch installation, This heavily wooded site creates beautiful views of Grapevine and the Cowboys Golf Course which are arguably the best views in Grapevine (as described by Mayor Tate during our first development phase). An undisturbed 120 foot buffer is created to the north and east by the golf course preserving the natural setting. We've developed the sit to maximize this natural environment thus leaving approximately 19.6% of the total site (3.9 acres) undisturbed with existing setting vegetation. The main boulevard between both uses of multifamily and hotel create a `plaza' with connectivity to each use. Sidewalks vary from 5 to 15 feet to allow pedestrian access to adjoining commercial land uses. Completion of this development provides a continuous streetscape for Grapevine Mills Circle and a 10 foot wide connection to the existing hike & bike trail that already extends northward and will serve as a connection point for future development to the south. The addition of multifamily to the existing zoning, will not only increase rental housing options but provide foot traffic to the surrounding local businesses. The neighborhood is highly desirable in terms of location/access and is a destination for shopping, restaurants and entertainment experiences. Furthermore, additional housing in this area can draw influential demographic groups such as young professionals and empty nesters with spending power. This development is designed to provide connectivity to residential and commercial land uses which will further help expand the consumers base necessary to sustain this vibrant City for years to come. Sincerely, f. Kenneth W. Fambro, IF Vice President/Applicant 71LUE 'm i ra"n a n i am q i n c - October 1, 2018 Mr. Kash R. Patel Managing Director KADE Development 1125 Executive Circle, Suite 220 Irving, TX, 75038 Re: Grapevine Apartments + Hotels Parking Study Dear Mr. Patel: ARIZONA TEXAS NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA cu\$-Ges OCT 1201? Lee Engineering has completed our parking analysis for the proposed apartment and hotel complex in Grapevine, Texas. This letter report documents our study procedures and findings. INTRODUCTION The proposed Grapevine II development is planned to be located to the west of the Anderson Gibson Road and Grapevine Mills Circle intersection in Grapevine, Texas. It will consist of a 275 -unit multifamily development and a hotel complex with 303 rooms. The hotel complex (218,523 ft2) will contain two (2) hotels with a total of 303 rooms (one hotel will have 148 rooms and the other hotel will have 155 rooms). A site plan for the entire development is provided in Figure 1. This site plan identifies a total of 791 parking spaces forthe development, with 465 dedicated parking spaces forthe apartments, 260 dedicated parking spaces for the hotel and 66 additional parking spaces to be shared between the apartments and hotel. HOTEL PARKING ACCUMULATION DATA COLLECTION The projected parking demand for the hotel complex was estimated by counting the number of parked vehicles which were occupied at a similar hotel facility during overnight operations (between 4:00 and 4:30 AM) on a'Friday, Saturday and Sunday. This time period (overnight) was chosen based on parking demand data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers and the Urban Land Institute indicating that the peak demand for hotel land uses occurs during this time period. The existing Courtyard Dallas DFW Airport North/Grapevine and TownePlace Suites Dallas DFW Airport North/Grapevine (2200 Bass Pro Court) were selected as the site due to the similar characteristics of these hotels with the proposed hotel complex, as shown in Table 1. 3030 LB1 Freeway, Suite 1660, Dallas, TX 75234 (972) 248-3006 office (972) 248-3855 fax I www.leeengineering.com Page 1 of 6 .� zelig f#4, y �• ter_ $ ! His 5 ° o S RR iq �1 li . �pM0. s Sit PE R2 1� s k s ���� ° . Rill, 171 LLL+I I tltlYi ti Yl Will :A All im pe = .� _ — L= h as i Ing] i R__��l'' iPsi- illy �.keYytl_µ„E►.IGIOM � �� 8 xRs�er�emsw:eaue�d j �l}ff Table 1: Comparisons Between Existing Hotels and Proposed Hotel Complex The locations of the existing study hotel and the proposed hotel are shown in Figure 2. Parking accumulation data was collected on a Friday morning (June 1, 2018), Saturday morning (May 19, 2018), and Sunday morning (May 20, 2018). The number of vehicles in the parking lot was documented based on observations/counts of parking spaces in the parking lot between 4:00 and 4:30 AM on each of these days. Based on the parking accumulation data collected, there appeared to be a significant surplus of parking available on the property. Table 2 summarizes the study hotel parking demand. Table 2: Courtyard/TownePlace Suites Parking Lot Data EXISTING Courtyard/TownePlace Suites PROPOSED Hotel Complex 2 Number of Hotels_ 2 Are Hotels Connected? e Yes _ Yes Shared Parking? Yes Yes Number of Rooms 300 _ 303 Amount of Meeting Space 26,018 ft2 12,624 ft2 Dining Facilities? Yes Yes Distance Between Hotels =% mile The locations of the existing study hotel and the proposed hotel are shown in Figure 2. Parking accumulation data was collected on a Friday morning (June 1, 2018), Saturday morning (May 19, 2018), and Sunday morning (May 20, 2018). The number of vehicles in the parking lot was documented based on observations/counts of parking spaces in the parking lot between 4:00 and 4:30 AM on each of these days. Based on the parking accumulation data collected, there appeared to be a significant surplus of parking available on the property. Table 2 summarizes the study hotel parking demand. Table 2: Courtyard/TownePlace Suites Parking Lot Data The average of the data collected indicates that the parking lot was approximately 46% full and that the average occupied parking spaces/guest room ratio was 0.75. Lie FinanEsinc Page 3 of 6 Date Handicap All Other Total % Occupied Parking Spaces Spaces Occupied Spaces/Guest Room Available I -- 9 481 490 -- --- Spaces 6/1/2018 (Friday) 4 249 253 52% 0.84 5/19/2018 4 199 203 41% 0.68 Occupied Spaces (Saturday) 5/20/2018^ (Sunday) 4 2121 216 44% 0.72 The average of the data collected indicates that the parking lot was approximately 46% full and that the average occupied parking spaces/guest room ratio was 0.75. Lie FinanEsinc Page 3 of 6 Figure 2. Proposed Hotel and Study Hotel Location CITY CODE PARKING CALCULATION The number of parking spaces needed to accommodate the proposed development was calculated according to City of Grapevine's development code requirements. The City of Grapevine's Zoning Ordinance requires that "Apartment, Condominiums, triplex, fourplex" land uses providetwo (2) parking spaces foreach dwelling unit. The Zoning Ordinance also states that "Motels or Hotels with conference facilities with less than 25,000 square feet of conference area" require 1.5 parking spaces per guest room plus requirements for eating or drinking establishment. For an "Eating or drinking establishment with no service to auto," City Code requires 1 parking space for every 3 persons, based on the maximum occupant load of the establishment. Based on this information, the required number of parking spaces for the proposed apartments is 550 parking spaces and for the hotel is 476 parking spaces, as shown in Table 3. LEE 1cnan iinc Page 4 of 6 Table 3: City of Grapevine Code Parking Requirement Summary Proposed Land Use Dwelling Units City Code Cade Requirement Apartments 275 1:2.0 550 Proposed Land Use Guest Rooms City Code Code Requirement Hotel 303 1:1.5 455 Proposed Land Use Maximum Occupant Load City Code Code Requirement Hotel Restaurant 61 3:1 21 Total Required By Code 1,426 PARKING REQUIREMENT DISCUSSION As shown by the results of the parking data collected at the existing study hotel, that parking lot is less than 50% utilized on average. The lower parking usage can be attributed to several factors, including the close proximity to DFW Airport and the availability of transportation between the Airport and the existing hotel via taxis, transportation network companies (Uber, Lyft, etc.) and the airport shuttle provided by the existing hotel. The proposed hotel will have similar characteristics, including at least two (2) shuttles fortransporting customers to/from the airport and to/from area destinations (restaurants, shopping, etc.), as well as a designated rideshare pick-up/drop-off areas for ridesharing services. Based on the parking accumulation data collected at a similar hotel property, an average ratio of 0.75 parked vehicles/hotel room was identified. Applying this average ratio to the proposed hotel site results in a total of 228 parking spaces forthe proposed hotel, which is approximately 12% less than the number of dedicated parking spaces (260) provided for the hotel. Forthe apartments, a previous parking study was developed for Phase I of this apartment project (Enclave 1). This study, which is attached to this document, indicated that 1.9 parking spaces/room was being provided for that apartment complex. Applying this ratio to the proposed Enclave II apartments with 275 dwelling units, a total of 523 parking spaces would be provided. While the number of proposed dedicated parking spaces for the apartments (465) is less than the number identified in the previous study, this study indicates that the hotel complex would not need the "shared" parking being provided. Therefore, if these 66 "shared" parking spaces were assigned to the apartment land use, if necessary, a total of 531 parking spaces would be available for the apartment complex. CONCLUSIONS Based on the parking accumulation data collected at a similar hotel property, and a previous apartment parking study, the 791 parking spaces for the development could be assigned such that the parking count could accommodate both the apartment and hotel land uses. A total of 40 extra parking spaces would be available for the development, assuming an average ratio of 0.75 parked vehicles/hotel room that was identified (32 extra parking spaces) and the 66 "shared" parking spaces being utilized by the apartment land use (8 extra parking spaces). The proposed site plan with 791 parking spaces is predicted to provide sufficient parking for the property based on this study. LEiE Enanumne Page 5 of 6 We appreciate the opportunity to provide traffic engineering services to you. if you have any questions about our data collection or analysis, please do not hesitate to contact me at 972.248.3006. Sincerely, Kelly D. Parma, R.E., PTOE Senior Project Manager Lee Engineering, LLC TBPE Firm F-450 LIE MOMBERrnc Page 6 of 6 3434I.BJFREEWAY SUITE 1560 UAIAAS. TEXAS 75234 9721248-3408 FAX 9721248-3865 TOLL FREE 8681280-5046 LCC minEs c. April 6, 2012 Mr. Rick Simmons Integrated Real Estate Group 3110 W. Southlake Blvd, Suite 120 Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Parking Needs Assessment — Enclave at Grapevine Apartments Dear Mr. Simmons: Lee Engineering has assessed the parking needs of the proposed Enclave at Grapevine apartment complex located on Grapevine Mills Circle, west of Grapevine Mills Mall in Grapevine, Texas. The proposed multifamily development will include one, two, and three bedroom floor plans with a total of 243 units. The distribution of unit types is summarized In Table 1. Table 1: Enclave at Grapevine Unit Breakdown Type of Unit Number of .Units Number of Bedrooms 1 Bedroom 109 _ 109 2 Bedrooms 104 208 3 Bedrooms 30 90 Total 243 407 Area City Parking Requirements As part of this analysis, we identified the parking requirements for several cities in the Dallas -Fort Worth area, with the selected cities representing the largest in the Metroplex and cities adjacent to Grapevine. Table 2 summarizes the multifamily parking requirements for each of the selected cities. Table 2: Multifamily Parking Requirements of Selected Cities City Off-street Parking Requirement Arlington 2 / unit for first 54 units and 1.75 / unit for remaining units 1.5 / 1 bed unit Bedford 2.0 / 2 bed unit 2.5 / 3 bed unit 2 / (1 + 2 bed) units Coppell 2.5 / 3 bed unit 1 / 500 sf Dallas Maximum of 2 /unit for buildings > 36 feet tail 1.5 11 bed unit Denton 1.75 / 2 bed unit 2 / 3 bed unit Euless 1 / unit+ 0.5 / bedroom + 1 per 5 total units Fort worth 1 / bedroom plus 11254 sf of common area 2 / unit Flower Mound City of Grapevine's ordinance currently requires two (2) parkifig spaces per apartment unit. National Standard Parking Data The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Parking Generation (3'a Edition) includes parking demand data for multifamily developments. The Low/Mid Rise Apartment (Land Use Code 221) use was identified as the most similar to the proposed development with the largest sample size. Based on the data presented, peak demand for parking at a suburban multifamily development occurs between midnight and 4:OOAM. The average peak period demand observed at the 19 study sites was 1.2 vehicles per dwelling unit. The Urban Land Institute's publication Shared Parking (2nd Edition) recommends a base parking ratio of 1.5 parking spaces per unit for residential developments that are primarily for rent. The Eno Foundation's publication Parking suggests parking space zoning requirements for multifamily developments be based on the type of unit and number of bedrooms. Efficiency or Studio units need 1.0 space per unit, one bedroom units need 1.5 spaces per unit, and those with two or more bedrooms need 2.0 spaces per unit. Another publication, the Dimensions of Parking (5u' Edition), was developed jointly by the Urban Land Institute and the National Parking Association (NPA). This publication cites a recommendation for zoning standards from the NPXs Parking Consultants Council for Rented Multifamily units of 1.65 spaces per unit. Area City Parking Requirements and National Standards Applied to Proposed Development The required parking of the D -FW area cities and the national standards for an apartment complex with the proposed makeup of the Enclave at Grapevine was calculated and the results are presented in Table 3 and Table 4. Table 3: Parking Required for Enclave at Grapevine Applying D -FW Area City Requirements spaces Requiredtreet City Off-street Parking Requirement Variable Calculations Total 2 / unit first 50 units + 50 units Arlington 1.75 / unit for remaining 193 units 438 438 1091- bedroom units a 1.5 / 1 bed unit Bedford 2.0 / 2 bed unit 104 2 -bedroom units 447 447 2.5 / 3 bed unit 30 3 -bedroom units 2.0 / 1 bed unit 1091- bedroom units Coppell 2.0 / 2 bed unit 104 2 -bedroom units 501 501 2.5 / 3 bed unit 30 3 -bedroom units 1 / 500 sf 259,599 sf 519 Dallas Max 21 unit for buildings > 36' tall > 36 feet tall 486 (max) 486 1.5 / 1 bed unit 1091- bedroom units Denton 1.75 / 2 bed unit 104 2 -bedroom units 447 406 2/ 3 bed unit 303 -bedroom units 1 / unit + 243 units Euless 0.5 / bedroom + 407 bedrooms 495 495 1 per 5 total units 49 units Flower Mound 2 / unit 243 units 486 486 _ 1 / bedroom + 407 bedrooms Fort Worth 1 J 250 sf of common area 4,600 sf of common area 425 425 The results in Table 3 indicate that the proposed 452 spaces would fall above the parking requirements for half of the eight (8) area cities. The average requirement for the proposed development based on the requirements of the selected cites would be 461 spaces or 1.9 spaces per unit. The proposed development is providing 1.9 spaces per Unit for a total of 462 spaces. Table Al: Parking Required for Enclave at Grapevine Using National Standards _ Unit Type ITE parking Generation Document ULI ENO Shirred Parking Parking ULVNPA Dimensions of Parking 1 Bedroom 1.2 x 243units 1.5 x 243 units 1.5 x 189 1.65 x 243 2 Bedroom 2.0 x 104 3 Bedroom 2.0 x 30 Total 292 365 1 432 401 The results in Table 4 indicate that the proposed 462 parking spaces would exceed the requirements of these national standards. The average requirement for the proposed development based on the selected national standard publications would be 373 spaces or 1.53 spaces per unit. Conclusions The proposed parking supply for the Enclave at Grapevine apartment complex exceeds the requirements for four of the eight comparison cities and all of the national standards reviewed. The proposed supply is greater than the average parking requirements of the selected cities by one (1) parking space and exceeds the average of the national standards by 24 percent. If you have any questions regarding this study, please contact me at (972) 248-3006. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services. Sincerely,] l�. P-. Kelly D. Parma, P.E., PTOE Project Manager Lee Engineering, LLC TBPE Firm F-450 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-088 AN ORDINANCE ISSUING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CU18-25 TO ESTABLISH A MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 303 ROOM CO -BRANDED HOTEL ALONG WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF 275 MULTIFAMILY UNITS INA DISTRICT ZONED "HCO" HOTEL/CORPORATE OFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS FOR LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION (2103 ANDERSON-GIBSON ROAD) ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a conditional use permit by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested conditional use permit should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this conditional use permit, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the conditional use permit lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this conditional use permit and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this conditional use permit for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. Ordinance No. 2018-088 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 48 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the City Code, by granting Conditional Use Permit No. CU18-25 to establish a master site development plan to include, but not be limited to, the development of a 303 room co- branded hotel along with the development of 275 multifamily units in a district zoned "HCO" Hotel/Corporate Office District Regulations within the following described property: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Carter Addition (2103 Anderson -Gibson Road) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of Ordinance No. 2018-088 3 land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 18th day of December, 2018. APPROVED: William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Ordinance No. 2018-088 4 s N LVA Ln ARCHITECTURE GROUP 2344 Rg way 121 • Suitt 100 • Bedford, Texas 76021 P:817.S14.OS84 ArMeAG.wm November 1, 2018 Scott Williams Director Development Services 200 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 RE: Design Standards — Compliance letter "The Carter" Dear Mr. Williams, Thank you for the time and attention for our above referenced project. We are forwarding you this letter to confirm the status of our proposed development's compliance with the City's Design Standards. We are pleased to confirm that we are either in total compliance or in some cases in compliance with the spirit of the Design Standards. While we realize the site was not considered in one of the districts that was included in the design standards for the amended multifamily ordinance, we worked closely with Architexas on the district standards deemed reasonably consistent with our location (near Grapevine Mills Mall). In doing so, the most "appropriate" components from the entire design standard guidelines were used throughout our design not one specific area given the uniqueness of the property. As you know, the site presents many development challenges given heavy vegetation, power lines and topography — dropping approximately 85 feet across the site with extremely high slopes around the site. We've developed the site plan in a manner that engages both the nature vegetation and topography to enhance building/site design. Each building is four stories with two containing podium parking designed within the hillside. We worked closely with Architexas on incorporating the Design Standards through building architecture and site planning which creates a "Town Plaza" feel to engage pedestrians within the overall development. Site amenities for both the hotel and multifamily provide open areas that will be utilized by the entire community. Thank you for your consideration of this confirmation letter. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with the City Staff as we go through this process. Sincerely, J. Marc Tolson, AIA Managing Principal Architecture I Planning I Project Management A District -Specific Design Standards 1. Architectural Accommodations of Grade Change Complies: Does the plan retain grade to support the building plate including Yes No In Spirit terraces, patios, decks and any accessory buildings adjoined to the primary structure? Comments: The site has over 85 feet of fall with steep hillsides that create multiple grade changes. We've developed various building types — 5 story hotel, 4 story multifamily with (2) buildings containing subgrade podium parking and (1) building of tuck under garage parking to accommodate the existing grade changes (see attached topographic survey). In addition, the largest building was designed with turn -down footings on the foundation to have a minimal effect on the natural grade. Furthermore, we worked through multiple interactions of engineering to minimize retaining walls throughout the site (see Exhibit A). 2. Pedestrian Connection Beyond The Project And District Complies: Does the plan provide pedestrian connections from units within the Yes No In Spirit project to existing trails, sidewalks or other public and private walkways. Does the plan provide pedestrian connections to places within the development that abut pedestrian walkways that the City's approved plans identify for the future? Comments: The site was developed to accommodate a "Plaza" within the main boulevard. Sidewalks along this area range between 5-15 feet to allow pedestrian access to amenity areas. Collectively the design team has worked together to create connection points throughout the project development. The development will provide a 10' wide connection to the existing hike/bike trail that already extends northward and will serve as a connection point for future development to the south. 3. Preserve and/or Restore The Natural Characteristic Of the District Complies: Does the plan include landscape development that continues the Yes No In Spirit natural characteristics of the projects surroundings? 0 ❑ Comments: The landscape plan includes tree species natural to the site and comparable to those we're working to save onsite. We will look to extend the native vegetative mosaic into the project and such plant materials will be arrayed in natural drifted forms. 1IPage A 4. Perpetyate Residentially Derived Styling And Forms Does the plan use the following architectural components? • Pitched roof (gable or hip) • Organized roof massing where a dominant roof has subordinate roofs that extend form it. • 12 inch roof overhang • Roofed porches and balconies • No more than 45 horizontal feet of continuous wall without a horizontal offset of at least 4 feet • Dormers that break the cornice • Windows that align both horizontally and vertically • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmetrically within the form • Three stories maximum. These three stories may be over a parking podium. • Openings are treated with a jamb and/or head surround • The Void -to -Solid relationship for window -in -wall elements is less than 50% Complies: Yes No In Spirit 0 ❑ ❑ Comments: Arrive has designed the project based on required design standards per City requirements and have maintained the spirit of the style with included elements as listed above. We worked in tandem with Architexas to adhere to the Grapevine Mills South District while at the same time incorporating the architecture with the nature grade as best as possible. 5. Provide Buffer Adjacent to Residentially Adverse Conditions Complies: Does the plan provide a buffer between residential land use and Yes No In Spirit adjacent environmental conditions (e.g. loud sound) that would ❑ ❑ negatively impact the livability of the residential land? Comments: The site is buffered on the north and west by Cowboys Golf Course (an average of 120 feet of undisturbed vegetation), to the south by vacant land and to the east by (2) hotels and existing multifamily development. We conform to the existing adjacent environment; therefore, no additional buffers are deemed necessary. 21 Page 6. Providq A Land Use And Scale Transition Between Multifamily/Vertical Mixed -Use Development And Abutting Single Family Development If the plan abuts an area of single-family residential land use, does it provide a "residential transition"? A residential transition must include two components: • Height Transition: For any element with a height above 35ft, this element can't exceed one foot above 35ft in height for every 1ft of setback beyond 15ft. For example, you may have 36ft at 16ft setback, 37ft at 17ft and so on. • Scale Transition: Any element located within 20ft of a property line abutting a single-family land use must not have an elevation face area more than 1200 sq. ft. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 0 ❑ ❑ Comments: The master site plan takes into account the vertical elements of the mixed-use (hotel) and proceeds to a transition to a lower pedestrian scale along the street elements at the multifamily buildings. Existing site characteristics were paramount to the development configuration; therefore, we worked to encompass natural elements to minimize verticality where needed by designing within the grade. While no single-family residential abuts our property, we worked to make the transition between mixed-use component and residential to be cohesive and complementary to each other. 7. Provide Development That Maximizes Uses Appropriate To The Value Complies: Of The Setting And/Or Characteristic Of The Context If the surrounding street -level use is NOT predominately residential, Yes No In Spirit does the plan provide --or is the structure such that it could be leased ❑ ❑ ❑ to provide--first-floor or street -level land uses that are consistent with the context? If the plan has a distinct locational opportunity (such as being close to logistic, movement or transit hubs), does it provide—or is the structure such that is could be leased to provide—first-floor or street - level land uses that are consistent with this context? If the answer to either question is YES, does the plan provide—or could be rented to provide –these land uses for at least 70% of the street -fronting first -floor space? Comments: This standard is not applicable to our district. CEJ 31 Page 8. ,Perpetpate Commercially Derived Styling And Forms Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms that include the following elements: • A predominately flat roof concealed by a raised parapet of at least 12in in height. • All openings are vertically and horizontally aligned. • Balconies are projected. • Steel construction is exposed. The first floor plate is at least 15ft high at the street level. • Void -to -solid relationships are 50% or greater void. Comments: This standard is not applicable to our district. Complies: Yes No In Spirit ❑ ❑ ❑ 9. Preserve And Extend Thematic Streetscapes Complies: Does the plan continue the established streetscape of its surrounding Yes No District? ❑ ❑ This includes: • Matching light fixtures and spacing of light fixtures. • Matching tree species, scale, placement and spacing. • Matching paving material and paving pattern. • Continuation of defined inset areas for on -street parking. Comments: This is not applicable to our district. In Spirit 11 41 Page [A :1 10.,Mainta;n Compatibility With District Thematic Sign Features Does the plan provide signage that is compatible with signage in the surrounding District? This includes: • Maintaining the relationship of signage to street -fronting building planes. • Marinating the general appearance of the District's signage. • Maintaining sign illumination consistent with the District and its nightscape. • Use of sign types consistent with the District and the context. This includes commercial tenant signs, premise signs and project signs. Complies: Yes No In Spirit Q ❑ ❑ Comments: The development signage will be compatible with existing signage currently within the District as well as new requirements. We plan to install a dual sided monument sign along Anderson Gibson, with additional brand signage at the front facade of three buildings (see Exhibit E). 11. Provide Responsive Interface To Open Space And Open Space Amenities Does the plan address open space in ways that extend the open space into the project? This includes: • Elimination of parking aprons in the foreground between the structure and the open space. • Extension of landscape species and patterns characteristic of the open space into the project. • Orientation of buildings to that building placement breaks free from the normal orthogonal relation to street and bears relationship to features of the larger landscape. • Extension of trails into the project. • Use of fence design that does not visually disrupt the continuous ground plane. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 2 ❑ ❑ Comments: We've identified numerous opportunities to extend the open space into the overall development. The "Plaza" area as well as the (2) lawn areas create pedestrian friendly environments. The plaza has zero curb transitions to encourage walkability throughout the site. Block building orientations allow for both pedestrian access and open space engagement. The site provides connectivity to the trail system which further extends to the north. Each building will contain access control doors in lieu of site fencing (with exception to pools and detention pond areas), thus no visual disruptions (see renderings). 51 Page 12., Resort/Lodge/Prairie Styling And Forms Does the plan use architectural styles derived from resort/lodge/prairie architectural precedents? These include: • Flat pitched gable or hipped rooves with long and un- interrupted ridges and cornices. • Large roof overhangs with structural bracing such as brackets, angled braces, canted braced and exposed rafters. • Tapered columns that are full masonry or have masonry bases. • Use of flat roofs to accent pitched roofs. • Variable plate heights. • Vertical and Horizontal alignment of openings. • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmetrically within the form. • Use of decks and terraces. Architecturally enclosed balconies. • Projected window jambs and/or headers. • Structural details derived from timber construction detailing. • Use of siding and masonry. • Upper story insets within, or projections over, a lower story base. Comments: This is not applicable to our district. Complies: Yes No ❑ ❑11 In Spirit 61 Page 13. ,Curvilinear Organization Of The Development Plan Does the plan have a curvilinear organization? This includes: • Gracefully meandering streets and drives with bends in the street and drive alignment that is responsive to grade. • Merging street intersections where operations permit. • Organically -shaped parking areas. • Building orientations that are not tied to uniform street frontage. • Drifted groupings of trees in lieu of straight rows with uniform spacing. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 0 ❑ ❑ Comments: The site is curvilinear in appearance with organically -shaped parking. Our site plan conforms to all of the above bullet points as demonstrated by street configuration and meandering parking design arranged within the current topography. 14. Conceal Visibility Of Service And Parking Functions Does the plan place service and parking functions so that such functions are NOT in the foreground yard space between any arterial or primary street and the buildings that are facing the street? Comments: This is not applicable to our district or site. A Complies: Yes No ❑ ❑13 In Spirit 71 Page 15. PerpetVate Historic/Indigenous Derived Architectural Styling And Forms Complies: Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms derived from the Yes No historic or indigenous character of the District? Such aspects include: ❑ ❑ • Commercially -scaled first floor with a 15ft plate. • For building of three floors or greater, a tripartite architecture. • Decorative and embellished front parapet. • Street canopy. • Portrait orientation of openings and subversion of openings. • Continuous vertical corners often expressed as pilasters. • Occasional use of roof forms as accent elements on the front elevation. • Void -to -Solid ration with greater void at the street level and greater solid at other levels. • Treatment of openings with jamb and/or header surrounds. • Use of belt courses to establish horizontal reference for placement of openings. • Use of decorative brick bands and details. Comments: This is not applicable to our district. 16. Use Of Thematic Exterior Material, If Such Material Is Characteristic Of District And Complies With The General Material Standards If there is a surrounding District context, does the plan continue with the use of the dominant and characteristic material of the surrounding District? If so, is the use of that material in compliance with the General Material Standards of the Building Manual? Dominant use of material means material that comprises at least 70% of the building exterior excluding openings. Comments: This standard is not applicable to our district. [A Complies: In Spirit Yes No In Spirit ❑ ❑ ❑ 81 Page 17..Orthogonal/Block Orientation Of The Development Plan Complies: Does the plan have a block/orthogonal organization? Yes No In Spirit This includes: 13 ❑ ❑ • Straight streets with right angle intersections. • Continuous street wall defined by alignment of buildings. • Uniform spacing of street trees and street fixtures. • Continue the urban blocks which are adjacent to the project. • Have decorative cross walks or other intersection enhancements. Comments: This is not applicable to our district. 18. Pedestrian/Residential Activity Connection Between The Public Street Complies: And Living Units Fronting The Street Does the plan present the public street with an external expression of Yes No In Spirit the residential activity? This means that the street level of the residential development is not commercially used or made capable for commercial use. This includes porches, stoops, terraces, patios, fenced front yards and steps up from an approach grade. Comments: This is not applicable to our district. 19. Maintain Height And Scale Compatibility With The Height And Scale Complies: Characteristic Of District When height and scale are important attributes of the surrounding Yes No In Spirit District's identity, is the plan compatible with this height and scale? E] El ❑ Such compatibility can be achieved through one or both of the following: • Upper -story setbacks that create a building mass at the street consistent with context. • Horizontal offsets at the street level which reduce the lower floor presentation of mass when the characteristic block size is exceeded. This creates the image of a block that is further subdivided through built recognition of individual properties as described in the "Bay Modulation" section of the Building Manual. Comments: This is not applicable to our district. 14 91 Page 20. Use of,Bay Modulation Patterns That Are Compatible With Bay Complies: Modulation Of The District Does the plan create a street frontage that continues the bay Yes No In Spirit modulation of the block? Bay modulation refers to the architectural El ❑ ❑ expression of individual buildings within the block face. This is important to emulate the traditional block face of a downtown where buildings are normally built lot -line to lot -line in direct juxtaposition. In such downtowns, there is a complex street wall referred to as the "Bay" and the rhythmic and varied offset and appearance of that bay is referred to as "Bay Modulation". Comments: Not applicable to our district. 21. Provide An Urbanized Streetscape Complies: Does the plan provide an urbanized streetscape along the primary Yes No In Spirit street frontage that is consistent with the characteristic urban street 13 11 fabric within the District? Key features of an urbanized streetscape include: The architectural plane fronting the primary street must create a continuous street wall along the primary street frontage. Buildings must establish a "built -to" zone which extends from the primary street front property line and extends into the property a distance of 3ft and at least 75% of the primary street frontage must lie within this zone. NOTE: the location and depth of this zone may be modified upon City approval when the modification results in lateral expansion of a side walk space for a sidewalk restaurant or sidewalk retail or in the creation of an arcade along the street. • Street trees used in the streetscape should continue the use of an existing tree species when the larger urban setting contains a thematic tree. If the surrounding urban setting does not have a thematic tree, the plan must choose from a list of approved plants. Street lights must continue the uniform spacing and placement characteristic of the surrounding primary street. When a larger urban setting contains a thematic light or light standard, the plan must use that light standard. When no thematic light exists, the plan must choose a light or light standard appropriate for urban streetscape use. • Decorative paving should continue the characteristic paving material and pattern of the urban context when that context includes a thematic sidewalk treatment. When no thematic treatment exists, the project must use a sidewalk paving material and pattern appropriate for urban streets-scape use. Comments: (W This is not applicable to our site. 101 Page 22 -Provide A "Borrowed Landscape" For The Primary Street Frontage Complies: Does the plan provide a "borrowed landscape" along the primary Yes No In Spirit street frontage that preserved the general character of the District? ❑ ❑ ❑ This includes: • Elimination of parking aprons or walls between the building and street unless the landscape space abutting the street is greater than 20ft. • Creation of an expanded parkway that is varied in dimension with the minimum parkway expansion being 15ft from the street right of way and with variations in width occurring at least every 200ft. Creation of pads for horizontal mixed use qualifies as varied Borrowed Landscape space. • Use of a pedestrian trail in lieu of a pedestrian sidewalk. Sidewalks within the borrowed landscape space must be meandering pedestrian ways at least 8ft wide. Comments: Not applicable to our site. 23. Promote Horizontal Mixed Use Complies: Does the project create opportunities for stand-alone retail/restaurant Yes No In Spirit pads within the street frontage of the primary street? In no case ❑ ❑ should the provision of a retail pad consume more than 50% of the multifamily frontage. Where the multifamily frontage is 300ft or less, a retail pad leave -out is not required. This retail pad requirement may be waived upon City Approval but a requirement for variable street definition (#24) still applies. Comments: The hotel retail/restaurant use at first level along with residential constitute a horizontal mixed use. 24. Provide Variable Street Definition Within The Block Face Along Primary Streets Does the plan create a variable street definition through the variable setback of multifamily structures fronting the primary street? No more than 50% of the project frontage may adhere to a uniform setback dimension. Horizontal offsets in the development plan set back line must be no less than 1Oft. Comments: Not applicable to our site. A Complies: Yes No In Spirit ❑ ❑ ❑ 111 Page A 14 A District Standards Application Matrix 121 Page District Specific Standards 360/Airport Grapevine Grapevine Gaylord/SH Central (A = Applicable) District Mills South Mills North 26 District Transit District District District 1 Architectural accommodation of rade change 2 Pedestrian connection beyond project and district 3 Preserve/restore characteristic natural mosaic 4 Residentially derived styling and forms/ itched roof 5 Buffer adjacent environmental encroachments 6 Land use/scale transition from MF/SF 7 Maximize value capture opportunities 8 Commercially derived styling and forms 9 Preserve/perpetuate thematic streetsca e 10 Compatible with district, thematic signage features 11 Responsive interface with open s ace and amenities 12 Resort/lodge derived styling and forms 13 Curvilinear organization of development plan 14 Conceal visibility of service/parking functions from arterials/primaryarterials/primary roads 15 Historic/indigenous derived styling/ forms 16 Use of thematic exterior material if characteristic of district and complies with standards 17 Orthogonal, block organization of develo ment plan 18 Pedestrian/residential activity connection between street and living unit fronting street 19 Height and scale compatibility with height and scale characteristic of district 20 Bay modulation pattern compatibility with thematic bay modulation of district 21 Urbanized streetsca e 22 Provide "Borrowed" landscape for street enhancement 23 Promote horizontal mixed-use 24 Variable street definition to create a more complex streets ace 121 Page General Standards for Multifamily Development Part A: Site and Design (W a. Contextual Relationships 1. Community Structure: Complies: Each plan for a project larger than 100 units must provide: Yes No In Spirit i. Benches: at least one every 700ft or one per block, ❑ ❑ whichever is less ii. Bike Racks: a capacity for 4 bikes at each residential building and 14 at the central pedestrian facility iii. Trash Disposal Units: one trash receptacle at each bench iv. Pedestrian Lighting: one light standard at least every 1 00f Comments: Each of the above items will be strategically placed throughout the development (near buildings, dog parks, open space and along the Plaza). 2. Cognitive Structure: Complies: Development site plans should avoid a "maze -like" arrangement of Yes No In Spirit streets and drives and should provide a clear demarcation of sub- areas arranged with reference to an internal destination. Comments: Buildings, streets and drives are arranged in a manner to enhance the internal destination created by the Plaza along the main intersection. Furthermore, pavilion area, dog park, pool, clubhouse, etc. all work 4W together to provide a pedestrian accessible site. [A 3. Edge Definition: Complies: Planting of the edge must provide visual concealment of at least 70% Yes No In Spirit of the perimeter fence using evergreen plants. Moreover, at least 2 0 70% of these plants must have foliage from ground to top capable of providing a screen. Edge screening must be planted in natural drifts that appear as native plant clusters. Comments: While our site doesn't have perimeter fencing, the landscaping is designed in a manner that enhances the existing environment. Landscape screening will be utilized in nature drifts as native plant clusters. 4. Traffic Calming: Complies: Any multifamily plan must illustrate traffic calming measures using Yes No In Spirit traffic tables, intersections, traffic circles, chokers, roadway neck downs at intersections, center island narrowing or rumble strips. Speed bumps are prohibited. Comments: Our site contains both a roundabout feature as well as traffic table. These features not only aid in calming traffic but also provide pedestrian access and connectivity between open space areas. 131 Page b. Conneptions Beyond The Project 1. Relationship With And Connections To The City Fabric: Complies: The site plan for any multifamily development must portray the extent Yes No In Spirit to which the following elements of the City Fabric are continued or ❑ ❑ otherwise responded to: Curb Cuts and Driveways: Development plans must seek to continue flow between projects by coordinating points of ingress and egress so that efficient maneuvers to and from serving public streets are possible. Coordination of routing traffic volumes anticipated by individual project TIA's is a required consideration of a development plan being considered by the City. Thoroughfares And Roadways: A development plan that lays within the path of a thoroughfare as planned or committed to by adjacent development or of a thoroughfare that has been adjusted by the Council must make provision for the extension of the right of way of such thoroughfare when traffic projected densities necessitate extension. iii. Trails: A proposed multifamily development plan must consider appropriate trail routing through the proposed development so that a cohesive trail network can evolve over time. iv. Open Space: The proposed development plan must consider (W extension of the open space or expansion of the open space, or consider how development portrayed by the development plan can relate to and define the open space. [A V. Contextual Characteristics: Any multifamily development plan must illustrate how various aspects of the context will also be manifest in the development design. Key aspects of the context include streetscape themes, continuity of water or water bodies, extension of indigenous plan drifts, continuity of road sections, treatment of parking, protection of and continuity with adjacent land uses, continuation of tree canopies and canopy species, continuity of natural features, extension of surface water management strategies, and continuity of edge treatments. Comments: i. Not applicable as the site does not allow for connectivity given the topography. ii. Not applicable. iii. Our site will connect to the existing trail system located along Anderson Gibson. iv. Open space will be shared between the hotels and multifamily. V. We are developing the site in the context of existing topography and vegetation. Various building orientations take into account the natural site features. The use of retaining walls will be limited to only those areas necessary for support of parking and building structures. 141Page c. Lot Ocpupancy 1. Complies: (W In a development plan that's required to be curvilinear as outlined by Yes No In Spirit the District Specific Standards, such a plan must establish a building relationship to the street such that: At least 60% of the interior street and drive -fronting buildings within the development plan design and 75% of buildings facing public streets serving the project must be sited so that the front building plane (the plane facing the street) is not parallel to the street right of way. ii. A minimum of 30% of the yard space along interior streets and drives, and 50% of the yard space fronting public streets serving the project, must be covered by a landscape approach defined by organic plant massing and natural drifts. Comments: i. Each building has been sited to address the street, which combined exceeds 60% of the interior street and drive -fronting buildings. ii. 100% of our 15' buffer along the ROW consist of landscape and plant material in natural drifts. 2. Building Relation to the Street and Orthogonal Plan Layouts: Complies: Plan designs that are required to be orthogonal, as outlined by the Yes No In Spirit District Specific Standards, must establish a building relationship to the street such that: The development plan must establish a "build -to" line for the interior streets and drives of the project that will vary from the required 3ft build -to line along the plan's exterior public streets as specified in the District Specific Standards. This build -to line must be at least 9ft from the street or drive back of curb. The presence of repetitive stoops, terraces or porches which project into the yard space created by the build -to line cannot be closer than 5ft to the street or drive back of curb and must project at least 4ft from the primary building mass. These projections must be architecturally contained such that they are part of the overall fagade composition. The offset space created between the projected stoop, porch or terrace and the primary building mass must be a landscape space, leaving a 5ft minimum pedestrian space at the street edge. Comments: Not applicable to our site as we are pursuing a "curvilinear" plan. 151 Page d. Parking: Placement and Configuration 1. Parking Facility Type: Complies: L Structured Parking: Parking within the Transit Center Yes No In Spirit Character Zone must be structured when the project exceeds 21 ❑ ❑ 20 units per acre. Projects exceeding 40 units per acre in any other Character Zone must provide structured parking. ii. Surface Parking Areas: Projects with a unit density between 28 and 39 units per acre that provide aggregated surface parking must comply with the following: Aggregated parking areas with more than 70 parking spaces (not including street or drive head -in parking) must be located in a place that is not visible to the primary street serving the project or located so that the parking area may be screened. Parking garages located such that they face a public street must have architectural elevations that complement the design style of the multifamily structures. "Complement" in this context means that they must share similar horizontal offsets, organization of openings, and use of materials. 2. Aggregated parking areas in non -orthogonal development plan designs must also have a curvilinear configuration. 3. Aggregated parking areas must be landscaped. Comments: All aggregated parking areas have been shaped for a more natural configuration. 2. Head -in Parking Along Streets Complies: Before the parking demand for aggregated parking areas is Yes No determined, head -in street and drive parking must be provided to the ❑ extent permitted by the streetscape design. Comments: Head -in street and drive parking along the Plaza area is provided in conjunction with the zero curb streetscape design. 11 In Spirit 11 161 Page CEJ e. Site Open Space Requirement 1. Open space as a percent of total development area: Complies: At least 20% of the site area identified in any multifamily plan must be Yes No In Spirit set aside as open space. Site areas that qualify as open space set asides include: Areas protecting existing natural features and/or plant communities. Areas used for the surface management of storm water that are not structures. iii. Any retained water. iv. Project amenity areas that are visually accessible from streets and/or drives. V. Playgrounds. vi. Pedestrian trails. vii. Borrowed street landscape areas. viii. Pedestrian accessible areas between structures open to access by the project population. Comments: Over 44% of the multifamily site shall be set aside as open space which will include many of the above features. We've worked to keep a large portion of the said open space undisturbed — approximately 19.6% (3.9 acres) of the overall site. This preserved area includes roughly 2.4 acres on the hotel site and 1.5 acres on the multifamily site. Project amenity areas will be visually accessible from interior drives through strategic view corridors. The site open space will be easily accessible via pedestrian walkway corridors by project population (see Exhibit D). 2. Form Giving Influence: Complies: Open space provided within any development plan must serve as a Yes No In Spirit frontage for at least 25% of the structures within the project, where buildings can define the edge of open space, except for the Transit Center District where street frontage is prioritized. Comments: We comply by providing two separate open lawn areas which function within the pedestrian accessible Plaza area, allowing transition between development structures and site open space. 171 Page f. Preservation of Natural Drainage 1. Natural Drainageways: Complies: Any development plan for multifamily development in Grapevine must Yes No In Spirit illustrate the extent to which natural drainage within the lot, parcel or ❑ ❑ tract exists and is preserved through design initiatives that preserve, restore or replicate natural drainage patterns. Any disruption of natural drainage patterns must be approved by the City of Grapevine. Comments: The intent of the current grading concept plan is to preserve the steep treed slopes along the perimeter of the property adjacent to the Cowboys Gold Course (i.e. north, west and southwest portions of the site). To accommodate for the steep topography, the multi -family buildings located along the north and west sides of the site incorporate subgrade podium parking and tuck under garages. The site will also comply with the tree protection provisions of the city's ordinance. g. Storm Weather Management Facilities 1. Storm weather management structures: Any development plan for multifamily development in the City of Grapevine, where structured storm water management solutions are required must adhere to the following: i. Minimize structured means of water management: Plans must minimize the use of cross drainage structures, armored (W channels, concrete flow ways, and other structured solutions to storm water management, unless such structures are for the purpose of creating a pedestrian or urban activity at a water edge. Maintain natural shapes and form in the creation of detention/retention facilities and created drainageways (a.k.a. flow management facilities): Water collection points and/or pools created by nature have shapes that are clearly organic. Therefore, plans should avoid straight lines, hard angles, and regular geometric shapes in the creation of flow management facilities. iii. Landscape with natural elements: Where storm water management design creates conditions that support indigenous plants, measures must be taken to landscape such facilities in ways that allow such plants. iv. Respect natural sub -systems: Proper design of flow management facilities should, where appropriate, include diverse ecological settings such as deep water (limnetic zones) in combination with shallow water (littoral zones), wetlands, ephemeral flows, and greater states of hydration which can support plant communities associated with these ( zones. Complies: Yes No 2 ❑11 In Spirit 181 Page Comments: The proposed drainage plan preserves the natural drainage patterns of the site. The site currently drains toward the Cowboys Golf Course located immediately west and north via sheet flow runoff to the existing drainageways (natural ditches/ravines) along the southwest and north quadrants of the site. The western portion of the property with steep topography that slopes toward the existing golf cart path is planned to be left in a natural state (i.e. natural buffer to remain ranges from 40 feet to 200 feet). All drainage patterns will be approved by the City of Grapevine Engineering Department prior to construction (see Exhibit C). h. Grading Grading for multifamily development in the City of Grapevine must Complies: adhere to the following: L Avoid steep grades: Grades equal to or greater than 20% Yes No In Spirit are considered steep and shall not be graded to create building lots. However, individual buildings which make grade transition within the building, porch or terrace expansions are permitted and therefore the limited disturbance of grade needed to accomplish this is permitted also. Conform to standards for tree protection: Any tree over three inches in caliper remaining on a lot, parcel or tract (that is, trees not approved for removal) and exposed to the building activity or within 30ft of the building activity (hereinafter regulated trees) shall be protected as follows: a. Tree fencing: Regulated tree trunks shall be protected within a visible "tree fence" at least 36 inches tall and protecting the tree and ground around the tree to a (W minimum distance from the trunk equal to the distance of the tree drip line or 10 feet, whichever is less. b. Tree marking: All regulated trees shall be marked with a green surveyor tape which indicates "Protected Tree" status. c. Ground compaction avoidance: Measures shall be taken to minimize ground compaction within the dripline of a Regulated Tree. Grading within the ground protected by a tree fence is prohibited. d. Maintenance of normal hydration: Measures shall be taken to maintain normal hydration of a Regulated Tree. Comments: The intent of the current grading concept plan is to preserve the steep treed slopes along the perimeter of the property adjacent to the Cowboys Gold Course (i.e. north, west and southwest portions of the site). To accommodate for the steep topography, the multi -family buildings located along the north and west sides of the site incorporate subgrade podium parking and tuck under garages. The site will also comply with the tree protection provisions of the city's ordinance (see Exhibit B). 191 Page Part B: Site and Design a. Street Interface 1. Semi-public space adjacent to streets: Complies: i. Canopies and store fronts are limited to urban setting such as Yes No In Spirit primary street frontage in the Transit Center Character Zone. 0 ii. In any single building block, there must be at least one expression of a first -floor, semi-public space within the street - facing elevation. If a canopy of storefront is used to meet this standard, it must occupy at least 50% of the length of the elevation. Comments: The first floor contains multiple projected, covered areas that constitute a first floor expression of a semi- public space within the street elevation. 2. Residential Design Standards: Complies: If building frontage defines the edge of an open space, each building Yes No In Spirit block must have at least one first -floor pedestrian space that is part of 21 [3 the architectural design. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first -floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions within which any area of un -supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: All buildings have access breezeways and lobbies which function as first -floor pedestrian space. b. Elevation Composition 1. The exterior design of any multifamily structure must comprise of an Complies: overall pattern. This pattern includes: L Regulating lines that organize its elements. Yes No In Spirit ii. Proportioning. 2 1] E] iii. Hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements. Comments: The design reflects horizontal regulating lines that reflect the character of the style thru brick & stucco bands & material transitions. The design also uses proportions to delineate public & private realms and to contextually fit with in the surrounding buildings and environment. Additionally, the design reflects hierarchy to organize architectural elements and to define base middle and top of the architectural style of the buildings. 201 Page if 2. Openings and features of any building must have a common justification. Complies: i. When a pitched roof design is used, all windows—except Yes No In Spirit dormer windows—must be below the cornice detail. ❑ ❑ ii. When a flat roof design is used, all windows must be at least 2ft below the parapet. iii. When both a pitched roof and flat roof design are used in the same elevation, the window heads must align horizontally. iv. Windows may abut the cornice detail if the window header modulates the banding or detailing of the cornice. V. Openings within an elevation must have a common reference line that engages the sill or head. vi. Windows within an elevation must have a common vertical reference line from the first to the top floor. vii. Windows must align with the features that define the architectural form. For example, windows in a gable cannot be arbitrarily distributed within the face of the gable unless specifically approved by the City. viii. Excepting first floor store front or vertical mixed-use structure, all openings must be square or portrait in orientation. ix. Windows, doors and other openings must be articulated within a projected surround or header unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: We comply (see elevations as a generic reference). 3. Complies: All elevations of a structure must receive equal treatment of style on Yes No all elevations of a structure so as to avoid the common pitfall whereby ❑ only the street -facing fagade is adequately styled and structured. Comments: Each building fagade is designed in the same style and structure as outlined in the design standards. 4. Forms created within the elevation, such as towers, bays and plate changes, must be derived from functions within the plan. Design approaches which seek to decorate a "space plan" derived independent of the elevation design are prohibited. Comments: Refer to rendering/elevations for compliance standard. Complies: Yes No R1 ❑11 In Spirit 11 In Spirit 211 Page c. Street wall complexity and exterior offsets 1. Building offsets: L Residential building blocks may not have more than 50 linear feet of wall without a wall offset. Horizontal wall offsets must be at least 4ft. This may include balconies if contained within the confines of the offset. Any balconies projected from the face must have an architectural enclosure. iii. Architectural forms such as enclosed porches, stair towers, projected bays or stacked balconies maybe projected from the building block or recessed within it and must be accompanied by a roof in the roof massing that corresponds to the architectural form. Comments: Refer to elevations for compliance standard. d. Void to Solid Ratio 1. For the first floor of a vertical mixed-use plan wherein the first floor has a commercial use, the void -to -solid ratio must be greater than or equal to 1.5:1 (the amount of void being greater than the amount of solid). The solid portions of the first floor facade must extend vertically to the floors above and parapet detail. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 2 ❑ ❑ Complies: Yes No In Spirit ❑ 0 ❑ Comments: This standard is being complied with in that portion of the hotel where the first floor entertainment is available to the street. However, those portions which enclosed the conference facility cannot comply. 2. For floors above the first floor in a vertical mixed-use plan (or for all floors in a residential plan), the void -to -solid ratio must be less than or equal to 0.5:1 (the amount of void being less than the amount of solid). Comments: Refer to rendering for compliance standard. Complies: Yes No 2 ❑11 In Spirit 221 Page (W e. Architectural Enclosures 1. Complies: All projected stair towers, elevator shafts, and cantilevered building Yes No In Spirit projections (other than balconies) must be architecturally enclosed. 0 0 This means that they must be enclosed in an architectural skin and must be expressed as a roof. Comments: Refer to elevations for compliance standard. f. Roof form Roofs and the roof lines they create are essential design elements for higher -value structures. Visible roof design must: 1. Be legible. Complies: There must be a clear organization of a dominant roof mass from Yes No In Spirit which subordinate roof masses extend. 0 13 1] Comments: (W Refer to elevations for compliance. 2. Be balanced. Complies: A single roof pitch must be used within the total composition. Yes No In Spirit Different roof pitches are permitted for tower forms which are not engaged with the general roof form. Permitted roof forms include gables, hips, barrels if used as secondary forms, sheds if used as secondary forms, and flat. Comments: Refer to elevations for compliance. g. Style Integrity 1. Complies: The use of architectural detailing associated with a style must use the Yes No In Spirit characteristic detailing of that style. R Comments: The development will comprise of materials that comply with this (standard in that such materials allow the proper execution of style W appropriate details shown on the elevations. 231 Page (2. Complies: �r The use of systems or materials that replicate the work of a trade or Yes No In Spirit artisan are prohibited. Construction details which are traditionally R1 ❑ El derived from the work of an artisan (such as a metal smith, carpenter or stonemason) must use a material in which the characteristic craftsperson can work. Comments: The development will comprise of materials that comply with this standard in that such materials allow the proper execution of style appropriate details shown on the elevations. h. Chimneys 1. Complies: In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the chimney must Yes No In Spirit be terminated with a chimney cap that conceals the metal spark E] ❑ ❑ arrestor and visually reads as a traditional tile flue system, unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: Not applicable as no chimneys are present within our development style. 2. Complies: In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the chimney shaft Yes No In Spirit must be enclosed with unit masonry, stone or 3 -coat stucco with a ❑ minimum dimension of 4.5ft x 3ft, unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: Not applicable as no chimneys are present within our development style. 3. Complies: In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the rise of the Yes No In Spirit chimney shaft must be detailed so that the chimney has complexity in ❑ ❑ El plan as well as elevation. Comments: Not applicable as no chimneys are present within our development style. 14 241 Page Part C: Building Construction Standards a. Materials and Application of Materials (W 1. Primary Material At least 70% of the exterior facade of a 4 -story structure or 80% of the exterior fagade of a 3 -story structure or 100% of the exterior fagade of a structure less than 3 stories must be one of the following: Brick. Clay brick, modular size, hard -fired and meeting severe weather standards. Embossed or molded brick is generally prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. All brick shall be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all building corners—both inside and outside—must be executed in a toothed masonry fashion. Weeping or slumped joints are prohibited. ii. Stone. Stone must be laid in a typical load-bearing pattern. Characteristics of such pattern include: 1. Tight mortar joints with no more than 30% of joints larger than 3/8 inches. 2. Coursed patterns such as Ashlar, Coursed Chopped Stone and Coursed Rubbed Stone. Mosaic and un - coursed rubble stone -work are prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. 3. Cultured stone or other faux stone products are prohibited. 4. All stone must be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all corners—both inside and outside—must be executed in a toothed masonry fashion. iii. Other Stone. Cut stone/smoothed-face stone or Cut stone/smoothed-face stone that is mechanically attached with a stone veneer system may be used provided that the system uses a true stone. Comments: We will comply where applicable. Complies: Yes No In Spirit 2 ❑ ❑ i. The design uses modular brick, which will be laid in typical load bearing pattern, no "stacked" joints with inside and outside corners laid with typical toothed masonry fashion. ii. Not applicable as stone is not used. 1. Design will comply and will use no more than 30% of joints larger than 3/8". 2. Design currently does not use any stone finishes. 3. Design currently does not use any stone finishes. 4. Design currently does not use any stone finishes. (W 5. Design currently does not use any stone finishes 251 Page 2. Secondary Material Complies: No more than 30% of the building fagade may be a secondary Yes No In Spirit material. This includes: 0 E] 11 Stucco. 3 -coat stucco on lath over a structural frame with expansion joints concealed by filling the joint with expandable filler that is troweled flat with the stucco, is the same color as the stucco and that matches the stucco surface texture is permitted. Dryvit/EFS type systems are prohibited. Stucco is not permitted in the Central Transit District. Metal. Architectural metal wall systems are permitted. iii. Siding. Wood or Cementitious siding is permitted in those Character Zones where pitched roof styles are permitted. Comments: We will comply. A 3 -coat stucco system is being designed and spec'd for this project with control joints that are filled with expandable material and to be troweled flat with the stucco. 3. Roof Material. Complies: Acceptable materials include: Yes No In Spirit i. Flat Roof. Flat roofs may be either a built-up bituminous roof El E] or a membrane roof provided that it is installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and issued a 30 -year warranty. All flat roofs must be hidden from ground level view, behind a 12 -inch parapet. Pitched Roof. These may be either a standing -seam metal roof with standing folded and soldered seams, a commercial metal roof if approved by the City, slate, clay tile, or 40 -year high profile composition shingle. All composition shingle roofs must have closed valleys. Concrete shingle products with a relief greater than 1/2 inch are prohibited. iii. Parapet Cap. These must be either clay brick, cut stone, cast stone, tile, or terra cotta. Pressed metal may be used if it is specifically created to decoratively cap a parapet and if specifically approved by the City. Comments: We will comply. 261 Page 4.. Material Change. Complies: Material changes in any elevation may occur only under the following Yes No In Spirit conditions: i. Change occurs at an inside corner. ii. Change that occurs at an outside corner must wrap the corner and change at a location at least 12 inches from the corner and be designed as the termination of an architectural detail. iii. Change that occurs wherein the different material is contained within a distinct architectural form that projects from the primary architectural mass. iv. Change that reflects an offset between a lower and an upper floor where the offset is at least 6 inches. Material changes within the same architectural plane are prohibited. Comments: We will comply; we will provide an 6" offset for materials changes in vertical face of same plan (such as brick to stucco). 5. Relief Complies: The City seeks to promote relief and dimension in architectural Yes No In Spirit surfaces, details, and motifs with the following requirements: 0 ❑ i. The following materials are prohibited: Fiberglass, Styrofoam or stucco -over -styrofoam, plastic, aluminum, Stucco applied to look like projected stone, Stucco applied to look like cast (W stone, Stucco applied to look like terra cotta, cementitious boards used in any application which makes a corner, cementitious boards used in any application which makes a mitre or decorative shape, Masonite or Masonite products, composition wood products used as an exterior material, trimcraft used as a soffit board, or other smooth finished soffit board. ii. Relief in the treatment of cornices, overhangs, gable projections, bay windows, dormers, water tables, belt coursers, sills, surrounds, timber components and other expressions must be executed in ways that produce depth, shadow and texture. iii. In coursed rubble stonework, stones must be laid into the wall as the stone would lay on the ground. No more than 20% of the stones in any elevation may be "flipped" sideways. iv. The minimum projection in any built-up profiles and decorative assembly must be 3/ inch per element of the assembly. A cornice detail comprised of three stepped bricks must have a total projection of 2 and '/ inches. Comments: We comply (see Exhibit H). 271 Page 6. Carpentered Exterior Trim Complies: L All carpentered exterior trim must be high-quality finished grade Yes No In Spirit wood stock. ii. If a trim installation is to be joined along any continuous run of material, the required joint must be a "spline joint". iii. All outside corners must be mitered and blocked with sufficient closure that the joint is not visible from the street. iv. Corners must be closed by a carpentered joint. Trim clips are prohibited. V. Fascia and gable rake must be stepped at the drip mod unless hidden by a gutter. vi. Carpentered trim that forms the veneer pocket must have a complexity achieved in trim mold, built-up step molding, or other traditional detail such as a dentil mold. Comments: We will comply (see Exhibit 1). i. As discussed with Architexas, our window trim for the top floor portion of the building (4th/5 th floor) will be a pre -fab hardi-trim board set into the stucco field. Wood trim details will be used for the gable detailing at the top floor ( 4th/ 5th floor) as shown on our elevation exhibits. A "spline joint" will be used if a trim installation is to be joined along any continuous run of material. iii. All outside corners to be mitered and blocked so that a joint is not visible from the street. iv. Building corners will be finished and closed by a "carpentered joint', no trim clips. v. Fascia and rakes must be stepped at the drip, unless hidden by gutter. vi. Currently we do not plans to have any "veneer pockets". 281 Page b. Wall Construction 1. Wall Section Complies: (W All wood -framed exterior walls must be constructed as follows: Yes No In Spirit i. When shim— or flange -mounted windows are used in masonry 0 veneered walls, framing may be conventional 2x4 framing. When shim -mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or other permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, exterior walls must be framed with 2x6 members in order to achieve a 3.5 -inch minimum offset within the opening. iii. When flange -mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or other permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, a double 2x4 framing assembly is required that allows the flange to be mounted on the inner 2x4 section with the second 2x4 section providing the required offset from the window sash or door at the opening. Comments: We will comply. 2. Parapets Complies: Where there is a flat roof, a parapet must extend at least 12 inches Yes No In Spirit above the roof surface and conceal the roof material from ground- R1 ❑ El it level view. Comments: We will comply. 3. Cornice Detail Complies: All wall terminations at the roof must have a cornice detail comprised Yes No In Spirit of at least 2 projected elements. Parapets must have a cap detail ❑ comprised of at least 2 projected elements. Comments: We will comply. 4. Window Surrounds, Belt Courses and Base Courses Complies: L All openings in the exterior skin must have an architecturally Yes No In Spirit appropriate header and sill with an optional jamb. The ❑ required header and sill must project at least 3/ inches beyond the wall veneer. Window headers or sills may be either stone, cast stone, terra cotta, heavy timber (where appropriate for the style), or wood (where appropriate for the style). ii. Other architectural details like belt courses and base courses must be executed in the above materials and have a minimum (W projection of % inch per element of detail. 291 Page Comments: We will comply. i. We will comply and will provide head & jambs in appropriate material that is appropriate for the style. Our architectural style uses stucco for the top portion of the building and therefore we would use a (W stucco head and sill as it is appropriate for the style. Per your guidelines stucco on foam shapes are prohibited — to use high quality wood, would be prohibited on multi -family budget; please clarify what materials we can use that are affordable and appropriate to the style. ii. We will comply and will provide a min. projection for architectural elements of %". c. Roof screening and appurtenances Roof Projections No plumbing stacks, venting stacks, skylights, or attic ventilators may penetrate the roof surfaces facing the street/drive. If there are multiple street/drive facing exposures, no roof projection may penetrate the roof slope that slopes to the "fronting" street or drive. All such penetrations must be mounted straight and perpendicular to the ground (except for skylights and attic ventilators) and painted to blend with the roof color. Turbine vents are prohibited. All vent stacks must have lead jacks. Comments: We will comply. Complies: Yes No 0 ❑ 2. Roof Mechanical. Complies: Roof mechanical must be screened behind a parapet wall or platform Yes that is recessed into a pitched roof so that the incline of the roof slope creates a parapet wall. Comments: We will comply. 3. Gutters, Downspouts, Scuppers and Collection Boxes These must be copper or an enduring prefinished metal with a minimum 20 -gauge thickness. Gutters must be a minimum of 6 inches, half -round profile and attached with gutter straps. Downspouts must be a minimum of 4 inches and round. Elbows and bends must be a minimum of 4 inches, plain and round. Fascia mounted gutter systems are prohibited unless custom designed and integral to the architecture. Comments: We will comply. L No 11 Complies: Yes No 0 ❑ In Spirit 11 In Spirit In Spirit 11 301 Page d. Windows and Glazing 1. Glazing and Glazing Systems Complies: Reflective glass is prohibited. Tinted glass and dark adhesive films Yes No In Spirit (W where the transmission coefficient exceeds 27% is prohibited. ❑ Stained glass is allowed provided that the glass is crafted in accordance with soldered camping or "H" camping. No acrylic or pourable techniques are allowed. Glazing systems may be used in certain accent areas of specifically approved by the City. Comments: We will comply. c 311 Page Part D• Landscaping, Fencing and Screening a. Site Landscaping 1. Leaf Mass Between Buildings Complies: (W All multifamily development must provide trees between buildings. At Yes No In Spirit least 60% of the planted area must be comprised of over -story (canopy). Comments: We comply as the amount of trees planted between buildings will exceed this requirement. 2. Layered Landscaping at Building Entries Complies: Landscaping must be provided at building entries and must be Yes No In Spirit "layered". The building entry landscaping area must be comprised of R1 ❑ 11 at least 3 layers: one upper layer of medium evergreen shrub approximately 30-36 inches high and 2 layers of shorter shrubs or one shrub and an ornamental grass. These must be planted in beds having a minimum width of 72 inches. Upper layer shrubs must be 5 - gallon container plants planted 30 inches on center with triangular spacing. Lower layer shrubs may be 3 -gallon container plants planted 24 inches on center with triangular spacing. Comments: Will comply 3. Complies: All landscape beds must be associated with walkways, roadways, Yes No In Spirit amenity feature, buildings or screens. Floating, ornamental or non- E] (W associated landscape beds are prohibited. Comments: Will comply; all landscape beds are associated with pedestrian areas, roadways, amenities or buildings. These planting areas will coincide with the large pedestrian areas and will include pots, tree wells, etc. to ensure the survival of the plant material. 4. Plant Sizing Complies: Shrubs that serve a screening function must be sized at the time of Yes No In Spirit planting such that they can serve as an effective screen within 2 ❑ years of the planting date. 3 -gallon plants must be planted 30 inches on center with triangular spacing and 2 -gallon plants must be planted 24 inches on center with triangular spacing. Smaller container and bedding plants must be planted at least 12 inches on center with triangular spacing. Comments: Will comply b. Fences and Screening Walls (W 1. Fence Materials Complies: 321 Page Visible perimeter fences that are compliant with the General Yes No In Spirit Standards may be made of unit masonry, wrought iron with unit ❑ ❑ masonry corner columns, or masonry. If masonry, corner column and masonry interim column spacing is not to exceed 15ft and must have a masonry knee wall supporting wood or wrought iron infill. Comments: Not applicable as our site does not contain perimeter fencing. However, any fencing required for pools, dog parks, etc. will comply. The design standard established with Architexas calls for screen walls throughout the site which we've incorporated and enhanced into private tenant yards. Yards in this condition typically only exist in single family settings so they'll be a unique amenity to this development (see Exhibit F). 2. Gate Materials Complies: Gates and fences constructed in accordance with Db1 above may be Yes No In Spirit made from wrought iron with a wrought iron frame (complying with ❑ ❑ General Standards) or wood with frame members measuring a minimum of 1 and 1/2 inches thick by 3 and Y2 inches wide and planks measuring at least 1 and Y2 inches thick. Gates must be comprised of the same material as the fence. Comments: Not applicable as our site does not contain perimeter fencing. However, any fencing required for pools, dog parks, etc. will comply. 3. Corner Expression of Support Structure Complies: All property corners of a property line fence must be supported by a Yes No In Spirit masonry column that is at least 10 square inches. ❑ ❑ ❑ Comments: Not applicable as our site does not contain perimeter fencing. 4. Thin wall construction, cast or embossed concrete walls, picket materials not in compliance with the General Standards, iron fences with mechanical connection assemblies, pre -fabricated decorative elements designed to slip over stock or tubular steel shapes, and plastic or vinyl fence component systems are prohibited. Comments: Will comply Complies: Yes No 0 ❑11 In Spirit 331 Page c. Street Visible Wrought Iron (W 1. Complies: Frames and other structural support members may not be less than 1 Yes No In Spirit and 3/ inches in either width measurement or 1 and % inches in Q ❑ ❑ diameter if round. Comments: Not applicable as our site does not contain perimeter fencing. However, any fencing required for pools, dog parks, etc. will comply. 2 Complies: Pickets that are 5ft in length or height or less must have a minimum Yes No In Spirit width of 3/ inches in either width dimension or diameter. When ❑ ❑ pickets are longer or taller than 5ft, the minimum with dimension is increased to 1 inch in the dimension that faces the street or 1 inch in diameter. Comments: Not applicable as our site does not contain perimeter fencing. However, any fencing required for pools, dog parks, etc. will comply. 3 Complies: Panels must be made of metal plate material with a minimum Yes No In Spirit thickness of 3/16 inches. 0 ❑ ❑ Comments: Not applicable as our site does not contain perimeter fencing. However, any fencing required for pools, dog parks, etc. will comply. 4 Complies: The wall thickness of any tubular steel must not be less than 3/32 Yes No In Spirit inches. Q ❑ ❑ Comments: Not applicable as our site does not contain perimeter fencing. However, any fencing required for pools, dog parks, etc. will comply. 5 Complies: Decorative elements such as finials and rings must be made of solid Yes No In Spirit stock material and welded to the pickets or to the frame made from ❑ ❑ the pickets if the pickets are solid stock material. Attachments to the pickets or frame and all other components of the wrought iron construction must be welded. Mechanical connections are prohibited. Comments: Not applicable as our site does not contain perimeter fencing. However, any fencing required for pools, dog 4W parks, etc. will comply. 341 Page - _ •GENERAL NOTES • � / r •.♦ I � \` • The bearings and distances shown hereon are based on a local coordinate system based y'i----'>." -- r 1 1 /r - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1 -^ / on NAD83, Texas North Central Zone 4202, scaled from d to surface at N: 7,036,561.57 _ �- -' .iP k° /�1X'� //$j;ri!,+%'- U.S. ARMY CORPS ENGINEERS &' •, and E: 2A33,780.71 using a combined scale factor of 1.0001468754, derived from GPS /----.��. ;:' `i! /' , r .- %,// \It1 X11' TRACT NO. AJA I 1 1 :,\ ::-\\�,+:: - PAY - 1 I !o svauiramaysmulll CIVIL ACTION NO. 1461 -MLN4f-01/� DISC .' by "k RTK observations using the North Texas vR5 Network (maintained Western Data i� __ - , �- _ LONe. )/f vL017cPg a?., I i Systems). / I - ♦ ' / 1. �_ _ / / U I I ! i //h/ Jlllilll I I ; I t 1 ` ( t I ' ll • l I I \ i 1 11 ,,gJ CANTON• lgll)il I I, • According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map Published by the Federal Emergency "�\ /I \ I l` _ -- = -_:�aT -'+� _ s _V L_, -/!t( --AiIIIIII I/If' 1 f \ I I j 1 1\��\1� ?I I '_ 11� 1!/11 1 III _ - 1 11I ! f Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, the subject property appears - - - _ _ -- --- - _ _ _ __- - _ _ _ _. =-3 VA.- I'0I'E - 674.89' 1 1 1 1 U \\ �\ 1 I I f Li Il 11 1"i �_ 1 I to be looted In Zone ")" (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual Chance 1 I r _Hr1�EasIGN-= % I 1 \ floodplain), and Zone "X -Shaded" (areas determined to be inside the 1% annual chance I 1 CALLED: 4.9827 ACRES-_ %1 =- • _'_�rI tg== 1 y ////, floodpialn)as shown on Map No. 48439CO110K; map revised September 25, 2009, for I/ f \'�J YI/1!� ����'�1BUILpNc \'' IIII' \ /' iii_-==--C/�l'�^`�- IY/1 j / !I 1 I \\ �Illl''V�{I CITY OF GRAPEVINE 102 Tarrant County and incorporated areas. This flood statement does not imply that the / / // / �� / _ _ _,_ _ _ - =� ��-& I / - \'' \ 1 I I ,'rY r YY; , ! U Las property and/or structures looted In zones "x" and "x -Shaded" will be free from I P.O. BOX 95104-'"°s"// fE S=1 / ' // _1%//ip'//!i��_ -_-_ a=_= - 5s� ��/ '� /!/ ! / I I I i 1\\ t?:\l l •I SII'llll�iii;l!Iilll\�`I�j 1O/ ,coding or flood damage. This flood statement shall not create liability, on the part of the E I GRAPEVINE TX. 76099-9704 { 1 y ra,I 11' \ ear. S \ice% l \. INS. O.P.R.T C.T. / / / \ - 1 I J /f � I \ 1 \. ♦- _ r'V/////q 111(fJ!!/r �`%i i `�\�\\\�' _. I ! \ /\\ •\ ? _IIII was prepay prepare \ _ _ \ This surveyed without the benefit of a Title Commitment d by a title "♦ 2749 ANDERSON - �' / / / /i / /•I Illlft81i to l ' Q \ \\; tympany. The easements shown hereon are the only easements known by Spooner & -+ 1 jlki 1 /� \\\�\\ �\ �•y'��� ��%--\\\\\\ _ X11 / rf/ // /1 \ j ( +-JI III / !�'+�\ G/BSON ROAD i \ \//! ( \\�\ Associates and does not Imply that the any other easements, covenants, restrictions, or 1 ;1 Av /f^ /!! / fillfIiil�l?\?\it/\\\ \ _\\i"i//i ��%- �: 1111\, 1111``----` I K/ / /!-\�\. / /I \\\• �� `eI / \ \ -I 3® other matters of record do not affect the subject property. No other research was ♦ \ _ / /� / 1 1 ; \M\,\ by Spooner & Associates, Inc \ ♦/\\\ 1 �/ r i \`� \C�\\\,\ \\.._-_ / \c1r •/ 'v l t. \ \'.�\so, performed 1 l /�\\\\\\\\l�\\\\`_esa�c\11l/ j.f �•' �; \\. \\`\ \ • Under round utilities shown hereon were taken from m ♦ I ' record formation actual ♦ \,(•�1\'a ! \\\l\\�"•��•/, � /�� \\\\i\\\\ .•\\1\ a1 it / / / / �'"a''. _ a \ GRAPHIC SCALE INFEET /•=BO' locations were not field verified except at surface structures such as manholes, fire `�` ` GIUTEORAIN ?eY\`\\\ti \ t\�1�///1 // ilii\�\\\\W ,; 11�I J/!!'//r/ir,�vffi\\ls�\11\1,1\\\I,\\,- -7 \\\\"/hydra or show ataconcerning .Noattempt hasbeen made as panty this Survey muni pl/p.boserAce I \\\ 1 /� \\ii3 1 \ttt \II11 J(///� �i%�_%_��%'1'1 i\1\J f(�f IIf�TJ1\\\\\\\\\�\\1\\\\��_,"\\\\l li t\_�\f I J // ' ,�/^' 1 � \ EX 60' EASEMENTANDRIGHT-OF-WAY GRxshow data concern in the depth or condition of a utility examined munla alonside service \ '/ \ I I ))I I IV / / _ /}/ ?\ \ \\ \ \\\ _ / �' ' IP' as a \- I famiry. Subsurface and environmental is made lcoincerninwere trwt he existence of underground codneideredd or I k\_♦ fib 011l\� IlliI ll iii wv///��' %��' "�)/i/l/aPi/Ji//\\\\\A`\\\\\\1111\i1\\ "" \\"_% ��'��1• / I ! /!/; �jl �`�' i/I�i li TO TEXAS POWERd LLAS overhead containers oof this Survey. r facilities, which may affect the use or development of the ubject ♦ 1 I f \\ 1 � I I I II �I c \' .y° / � // /III/1` \\\\; �\ \� � �I� / ' I � / / 1 11 ' ! / ALL LIGHT COMPANY OF 8, & 18, 1 �n ` tract of land. Z-E.M. 1\1 If .III \`Z 1111!\S\\\�l\`fib\\1\\fes !/!//i/%//IJJ/I/J�f/l t\��1\\11111\1111�%5 _^�\ IJI' _Y TRACTNO. 18-197.18-198.818-199" //^-�_��\ \\ \ t('I CENTERED ONIMPROVEMENTS • All visible underground utilities that were marked from Texas One Call 811 are shown on FLOODHA2MD1 I SAND TRAP ' II 111\ \\ t III\\\��\`/fl� I / \\\1�\\`I\\�\�y\lll/moi, ��/'//%.---�\��\\ \s\\.! / I / - `,!/1" J(•lJ• I AS 86362682 0/86636683,5 ergro 1 'i /. z 1 UO\ I1 !f / / / \ \ \ \\ \ , I this survey. Underground Sewer, Water and Storm Drain lines shown are from visible I - r ♦ \ ` \ \ 1 1 . ( , \ 1 1 .1 In X 11? \� f \))A1V�•II I Ill l / �- �/ / \ I l , l l i 11\ !11 /// \ f / �/ /- �\\ \\\ \; \� { / , 1 N j S 0186362684 0 P R T C T evidence and provided utility plans. Pipe sizes of all underground utilities were unknown I l ! . \R�1\l at the time of survey. .r t,l\�\ \\\11 11111 I\IQ:/il/�����___ 1\IIII !I !11 ilj(I)1\IjIIII/'!11111 /!/rr / / / ! 1 l \ / • The size or shape of the tree/bush symbols included hereon do not necessarily represent I (W,(TEUINW / I I c 1 IIII { !/I I7 1 1\) 11))1iI fflllll//////// t\ �\ I\I\I \ \\'-_ _`//I % " -� %'� \�� \\1\\\\; ;,W\�11/ / , r ! 1 f •(I the actual size and shape of the corresponding trees bushes or their mnoPles. They �i♦ cr0068913. OPR TCT Yui}}=� �T144 11 111111//illll/I/�/%/JI//�ylf(111/1fJJIJj/�/ i/ �r r 11l J /\\��!I\\`� \\\� �'1II. _ _ �/' "'1\�\\\\\\1\Qir \`// / /I V represent lootion only. 1 1 \ \ l \ - / !11111 ill/�/ //1 %/I�4//JI%llI/1IIPilll / / / /1 J \\ \ \\\j.J- 1 _ I \ \\ \• \� I / o i I 1 IX. PUBLIC UTILITY. I/l 1)I7/////171f (1111 1 11\\\\\':!_- \ _:�•/1':VIII'IACCES5.8 MIKE/BIKE TRAIL EASEMENT • The Surveyor has no knowledge of any changes In street right-of-way lines either I / / Tb \ I I ! /� f/ 11/l/)fl/J//%a�%/ �JI!����•�;%Il ,' 1 f '� If/I ' // !/ \\ 1 ? ` \\ 11'x''//' '� _\�1\\\\\\\\ �ti�'(1(/1=Yi /i ��I,I) Obd_PAY BUILDING 1 I ORDINANCE N0. 1006-76 completed or proposed. Surveyor hereby advises all interested parties to consult with / / I y :1 I I Y P 8 1 designing or constructing I 1 \\I I1 II,W I%//// /!/jJ////%/!ll/I/ll(/��1///1/IJ/!%'/ /!I 1 j I I / 111 \\� !1`� ////J r' _-\1\\\\\\�•ul° - f /�iH 1 I EN. 14'FIRELANE. ACCESS. II the Gt of Grapevine concerning this subject prior to planning, desi V ,-\,\i J Improvements near any right-of-way.tllllllllb0��11f11I�i////'1%(/Ji// // / //11\\\ \\\11 --,/II/ / / _ \\\\;P\\:. _i= \\'\�.11l l� ` ,!/$•nom --1 h�-dUTILITY EASEMENT 1 / / / ! / / \ \ \ \ �. 1 1 / I / INS 0207343374 O. P R C T I I //?AIIA\\\1111111y11\1111Jr/// I 11 //J! % ////rN /4ir/iiiri/111) A. I 1 / / i/1 fi%//!A/%/ii/yirii/ /O/� I ;� �lI \\\♦ _ 1 1 �II(11, 1 I IX10 urn ES74 it I J I \�\�- -- _ _\\\ y% 1\??J t f f \\ lNs D1o7343374 II / _-OP.R.TC T. I// //I 11 l/ I` ``\ ` J I /� ' \ {\ 1/—_ •l�llll / \\ oRA/N RIMEl•51T.Po' r I, I I • • // !� i// I/ /1/IJ7J1/I / \ ' _ J ooaEL>rr 1,... 1 NRTER GRAPEVINE l / /l/J%! ';IIII!/ IH//�// I'/J�r r I f I J I /r _ \- IIII / wrrara 1 PARTNERS, LP 6 EE OF INCE oruTEal¢/Jiir41/ �i��0�!!j/I%IJ flifllll t 11 j 1 / i J t \\ /I \\ / \ , _ y rll J\ \ .. \7 _$Dd DUMPsrER isG CARTER, TRUSTEE OF THE 1/,.RTER /1/ ! I�/ji//IJ// �Iv n ) I REVOCABLCONSTAE TRUST DATED fli Itl$l/JJ 1 �I/�811��1j1I I 11 1\\ `\\ \\\1//! ,3sP;ev,w„ -_ d Underil utilities denoted with this symbol are is APRIL 13, 1999. 1 ( 41111)ffllfli /i�/lu///��%//!i//i I l \ \ \ \ / �` \ 1 1 II , 1 I ! ._- - f ` - representation of the lines shown on the ground at the tithe of INS. D210214154, / I 'III! ; j ! /////y /i / \ \ \ \ _ _ . \ 1 i I _ - - - �- _ _ rBc _ �p , N86`3579'E - 221.14' A server marked by Texasal1 and utility plans as provided by D207343374, ll�/1ff II11 _I ji;Ih WIII'V�. i{SIHII 1 / \- •45 \ �\ - e '/� \\ '' 1 1 1 - I 1 _ - - - r - = f 1 ` // / fa•a}u pdG{4�s •.f I Other Spooner&Associate,, Inc. hereby waives.1111ab11M to the 11 II'�I Ilia II {\\\\1 illi/l \ \ \ \ \ !(i/.', / \ s i ! I I , �'(--ecce._ yE7M/taMA)aozy- location and/or exisbance of underground utilities denoted whh & D204189024, I I I t I to 1' it 11\\N\ 1 \\\ 1111 \ \ \ - \ \ r ' •. \ \ . ( I 1 I I \ \ l : \ EX UTIL ESy7 O.PR. T. C.T I 111 1� 1y111 \\ 1 \ -_ / .\•4\' 1 / Icer \aro \ this symbol• I / + \ I I 1 1 •� H " 1 telt\I1V1111N1y0111111!I 1 \ \ _ _ _ \ \ \ ` - ` / _ 1 \ 1 1 ) I i I ! f \ \ \ h O I' ALLED.' 0.19 ACRES! 11 SNS DZP73n374-' ! // i \ 1111! $IIIc 14111j1'IIyllllyllillj�1;111tiIf1111111I1 1 I \\ ``\ _/'/ // '_ 1 ,\I Irj 1\ 1 I. 1 i I I I �' / � If I CARTER GRAPEVINE I ,�o P.R. r!C.T 9a. urEaarav-••P \ \ 1 l l l/ J/ jj1 I jf111 111 Ill!I Illlil111!111111111 -1.. --'� I' PARTNERS, LP . ��il., I I 1 ili! /I 1Ntl/\I\\\a\\\\??�\\\Ij111 I 1 I �L'-'�I` - INS 0207343374 IWAVTY 1~ (NorroswE) I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I i I WATEAVA LT INVERT A 10 I!/I_N1\111\l1\\11111tH\\NIIi11`j0\\\\\$\�.�`\` ll X11\i\f\Ill\11\ll\ \j 1 1 \- _-'^'I' _�T• OP.R.T.C.L \ ` corlii�Al ons i v/ /III \\\?\\Q \ll\p\Vi�Z\`\ - /✓/// $ Y F p 11 - / / 1111iyt • !AREA OF MIHN/H1EFLOODwAZAAD)/!///W I\Ill\\V�\�`��`'::� � �l\\j�llllli I(�"/O� Ili ll /I/!l/I///II f / /' - ''1_t'I1 /I Jr 111 11 y 'LEGEND' Igo— Ir 1 Iy\i\I\11{IVI ItNt1�j�Ij11I 11"11• ��c - �hijLll�Il/I/�li Il1i1411\ T \ I -E xsHwED•\\\�1111nit lllftl 1°\�\� %' '� if^Jf rllil IIII I \ \� _ ;I li'l u` 1/ 1., 1 II 0 CONTRO —T —ore— OVERHEAD EL£C. \ (pa%ANNUALCHANCE 1 2 \ \\ \y\\ \ \\\� \,\ I� 1 I19 V11110II1. �\�_\�- _ r %�':�f'-1 - •',y /ice 1: f f f I \ 'I I ! 1 1 \ \\ • _ _ f I i; I i I�1 >ZS1 ` ; f y / I if NIYER PIX£=;—U.G. ELECTRIC �I HOOD HAIARIX --GONG PAV \\t\1,^\\�\\ee;\\\�\\I�111III{IIIII\\t������� —iii ����,'�•/,4y1,:' i"Jif\ 1 \I I11 \Il\\\—�— 'NS i'f 'Il lll{ei t i 'I rr� Q !'•' I ( I II 3 / ' GUV WIRE —UG. 1El£UNE Jr♦ �= —\ \ \ 1\\ \ \ \'\ \\\\\�\\\�Itt�-���� _moi -' %�Irr'9q/1• 1 I l \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \—_ _-- '1 !�'fl D "//-I 1 , I\ I 1 pr• ,I / I I g {Y uGHrFOLE—°—cHaN UNKFENCE -I I•`•e"�_ •a.a��'`\,'�:�;'�\\\\Il\\\\��:���.__�"%:� -,F; �s�l,.lirdy/r'°kilr �1 , 1 0h• , .� cups WOOD FENCEJJIjj r - f 655, Q ELEcrRlcwu cox —, ♦ I ^ _-..�y'� \ :�\ \\\ ����\��\';.��:- %%///l-( /I//\IIII\1\l\\�\W� =���: \\\�___; _--_ jj/i i;fl`If! III / A-, la ELECTRIC BOx(PANED fENLE (OTNERI ///_1\i�.� J �_ �,`\\\ \ \\ `\\ \`��\\\.\�`..._ \„ j///j71I \\ \\\\\�V�.\\��=� - \�\�\\�\, \' � _�-� -�=ice � l!I / / ,1 I'� - _�\,. \ /, WIMEp ♦ ��%,/ ASPHALTEDGE Tse •Jfr \ \\ \'` \ \\ \\� 1 I\\mac= _ , \�\, - 4 TELEPHONE MMKER /'...__ / NS` \ \�\\\ _\�iG II �. ��: h\\=�-••_ - ___ -+-�I;MIP F i ��: coNCRETEaaEA -�:� ''%; / \\\\��v 1111 \\ \\�\\\��\��o \II`_.`� \`\\ \\�¢�� `l -r=_o __-- ___ '+s 111.1�\t\11 -7-r \\c BoiTlGMadn.ToEgi..ssim s f TELEfvroNE wsER.\ \ �l / 1mcmF 1\ ��--'t \ \\ \ \�',\ \�C\ \.It \ .�`` \� _ C`� \= __--_- ___-- t .'ti-\1�\t_-.Na - r/ '/�/iTitos i ♦' l r --as- -T P, cFHONE FVLLBOX CIRF IRONROD KITH LAPfOUND �'�J j \ — /% R1fT �!/� \\I✓,�_-_�\ \` \ \���%\ l\� — �— �"'_ y-\i�� � � F; �-1 / /��Ili y r CONC.vX NPs �TNM�OORI¢�51.se�• O cws IaoNaoD wrnr cwssr \ et \�..1 \ c1 r'Po. t^ �T/ .1 \Jr\\\\\\\ i \I \. \ \ _ _ _ c = -_�- �•' _ \ _. I _ ./.•;:/ vmapi 1 ® Ac coMPREssoa uNlr - 1 \\ IRF IRON ROD FOUND -� `\. \ ` I \ k \ MaLeox xcF x rFOUNo �\ !! • \i - 11/I'II c;4 _ �, ' _ //' . _ 1 �', GAS_ jy�\`\ \• '— / g 4 }�\��_�_.// -\ �•?A\ \ . _ / //`,L f,.j PR.Tc r PLATRECIJRD.S /7 \fin / // /. �\ _ _ y IMP, TARRANT COUNTY TEWS PAV TREE (AS DESCwBED) DRTLT. DEED RECORDS .TEE 90X '.l :'/, I/ :•� - .!�_ i\ -. I "R �/ , /=_ \ PAV. -00-1, _ _ / /.- — _ t 1 \ +•x \. / y !..`Fi.�'` i n// l P J` ' \ /l !l / BUSH (GENERALI OPR.TCT OFFICIAL FROFERTV RECORDS ♦ /I I - / '., \ •.\ \ = 1 \\,\ // /� //FII/X _ 1 /,r( , TAPoVANTLOUNTY TEXASh14C'. \'. O ArERMMIHO(F © WATER METER DQ WATER t'J FIRE HVpRANT a sURVEYASSTRALTUNE Qs say. sEwER MavHOLE PaoPERrvcoaNER "A" 1 i 1 11! _ 81276 Q SAN. SEw CLEANOUT O uMNERFOUND.A -M. A"- 18.y �D / _ - _ / l/I II TI � // 1 / ^ I � ♦ / 3 / a' _ / „ g I ,r .� + - -aro = _ I li I I I 1 I J -ht /, 0' OD STORM DR.UN MANHOLE ® MONUMENT MARKER 3 ( aS I. Uf 1'1 / ��'' yiFl ! •!• (•� /.w 2� / FOUNO.ASN01E0 {'•' —/-p a FX UTIU EASEMEN➢ — \ Plan laaf3T,asea9 g U:WI .(\\ / H \ \( I t ® IRRIGA ITION CONTROL VALVE • FROPERNCORNEA SET I / O /Ifi'OF S9RAPEy/lyE \\t JI f i \\ \ ' BpTTpar FLOpR El•IBSa9?\?\lIX 60'ETO M1TIXAS POWER OF WAY NP3 NO PARWNG 9IGN INS P196161052 O/j ff77 TC 7/� \ \ \ SIGN SLS SPEED UMITSIGN / — ! r 1 •` / h ' LIGHT COMPANY OF DALLAS ' n/ GTS STOPSI(w I Yd - TRACT NO ROvE ' I I NVERr REFFAENLE �S HANDICAP Snx ' _ CENTERED ON IMPROVEMENTS -ZONING INFORMATION• X555 a5 SPOT -TION HWYs HIGHWAY SIGN \ - AS CALLED IN INSTRUMENT EC 55535 EDGE OF WNCREIEELEVANON cels TRaL SIGN SEPTIC Tab( /// D186362678. OPRTCT ! l m ,• Ch' NFS 7' / The subject property is currently zoned "HCO""PID"(Hotel And GTsssss GurrER ELEvanoN I SOMERA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC I / / cit / ffl : I '- a / o / Corporate Office Distnct)(Planned Industrial Development District, per TL Sssss rovoF cuRe ELEVATrox I 115WCANON PERDIDO ST. I / / +,� / $i� w / the Gry of Grapevine Zoning Map. _a,d" TOPOF wAUELEvanoN I SANTA BARBARA, CA. 93101-3210 ITTCALLED:3.0313fa:RES 2 y'\' lot / DESCRIBED IN 7333, P.1383 / /WH/TTLESEY INVESTMENTS, ¢' / The surveyor hereby advises the developer to contact the eery of D. R. T. C. T. I INC. NO.1 LB / -c. PAv Grapevine Planning and Zoning Department to further verify all Zoning P.O. BOX 652 fa• IXR` I ab / Restrictions prior to the development of the subject property. GRAPEVINE, TX. 76099-0652, 2009 ANDERSON GIBBON ROAD ( 11v RaO, nIXi? /l I V.7567, P.919, D.R.T.C.T W Z W^ >_LL � Q W U a Q = W a > IL O J U Z W realeatato g.0UP DATE:02DS401S S&A JOB NO. 18-003 SCALE: 1• = 60' DRAWN BY W. McCOOEY CHECKED BY: E. SPOONER REVISIONS: SHEET 1 OF t 0 w 0 FFE = 5 RETAINING FFE = 5 WALL GOLF PATG 13' _ ELE�NATURAL GROUND aoI OSI am BUILDING #1 BUILDING #3 BUILDING #4 FOURTH FLOOR FLOOR -4 THIRD FLOOR FLOOR -3 FLOOR ZGATURALSECOND FLOOR -2 — -mom - 1 FIRST FLOOR GARAGE FIFE = 540.00 PODIU„y4.P! RAiiG FIRE BUILDING #3 LANE -EXPOSED GRADE BEAM ARKING FLOOR SPACES \ �-t16 L.F. @ 2% CROSS SLOPE MAX FIRST FLOOR GARAG SECTION CUT A—A' RETAINING WALL —FIRE / / LANE / / PARKIN GOLF PA SPACES / GR ELEV.95 _ J / <I wz z o,o- m SECTION CUT B—B' SCALE: 1" = 30' SCALE: 1" = 30' HOTEL FLOOR - 4 FLOOR - 3 FLOOR - 2 FLOOR - 1 FIFE =544.0 PARKING SPACES SECTION CUT C—C' SCALE: 1" = 30' =a� BUILDING #4 HOTEL E HOTEL Z FOURTH FLOOR U) O F—N D O W. D Q c FLOOR - 4 U =~ THIRD FLOOR FLOOR -4 BUILDING #3 U) W a O U) JZ FLOOR -3 SECOND FLOOR C FLOOR -2 PROPOSED SIDEWALK FIRST FLOOR GARAG -FLOOD�- U U Q U' �rco FFE=5440 IKO BUILDING #2 6 FIRE o LANE FLOOR -3 OUTDOOR 60' SEATIN I ONCOR ESMT PARKING PARKING I I RETAINING ARKIN SPACE I I FLOOR -4 FOURTHFLOOR WALL SPACES FLOOR -2 ARKIN ARKIN FLOOR - 3 DOG PARK THIRD FLOOR PACES SPACES544.0 FLOOR -1 qR PARKIN FLOOR - 2ZARKJNG-� PACES SPACES SECOND FLOOR RETAINING Fes- — — -Ff.WR- — WALL / -ANE FIFE= 540.00 _ FIRST FLOOR FFr _ "AA A7 DRIVE / "SLA ' RETAINING lJ1NE / / LAN � �ADA FIRE FIRE ` PODIUM PARKING = 527 0 PFF ROUTE LANE \ `LANE TAINIf ELEV. = 502.5 WALL i SIDEWALK �- WA o GR ORAL — OElEN710f�� tib L.F. @ 2% CROSS SLOPE MAX POND 0. D POND ACCESSTO ACCESSTO .0 I 4:1 SLOPE -/POND AREA 3'1 SLOPE POND AREA SECTION CUT C—C' SCALE: 1" = 30' SECTION CUT E—E' SCALE: 1" = 30' ELE� NATURAL > FIRE GROUND LANE I i o 0. ARKING � m SPACES SECTION CUT D—D' SCALE: 1" = 30' W J IL I zm LL 0� Z9 O C3 �r a� W �lp =a� BUILDING #4 (FFE = 556.00) E HOTEL Z FOURTH FLOOR U) O F—N D O W. D Q c FLOOR - 4 U =~ THIRD FLOOR U) D_ Z Z RETAIUNVIANLL U) W a O U) JZ FLOOR -3 SECOND FLOOR C FLOOR -2 PROPOSED SIDEWALK FIRST FLOOR GARAG -FLOOD�- U U Q U' �rco FFE=5440 IKO O 6 FIRE o LANE OUTDOOR 60' SEATIN I ONCOR ESMT PARKING PARKING I I DO SPACE SPACE I I SECTION CUT E—E' SCALE: 1" = 30' ELE� NATURAL > FIRE GROUND LANE I i o 0. ARKING � m SPACES SECTION CUT D—D' SCALE: 1" = 30' W J IL I zm LL 0� Z9 O C3 �r a� W �lp This document is released fa the purpose of pre6minmy review under the authority of JOSEPH T. REUE P.E. 66156 October 9,M 2018 K o rrol to used for const-tion/bidding Purposes BGNE NONE S"rsaE SKEET NUMBER: =a� J Z U) O F—N D O W. D Q U =~ U) D_ Z Z U) W a O U) JZ ¢ U W LL U to a ELEV. = 511.3 U U Q U' �rco IKO O 6 L This document is released fa the purpose of pre6minmy review under the authority of JOSEPH T. REUE P.E. 66156 October 9,M 2018 K o rrol to used for const-tion/bidding Purposes BGNE NONE S"rsaE SKEET NUMBER: / I N 77 $ s o 2. 9 J1 I °ybAWw6Ws13 Rs,. "° 1 j o _485 / / - VJ5 - T1ETENTTON AHtiISO°90 4f[.WTISm50 I �]I' -� 1 ±45 t20 ° roc { x slo I D sD' ar t2� i .• SK': 0 at op ' oi '8' j 4t''`,p t4 9t1 J'" J jl HO t23 I. PRELFM196 Y GRADING PLAN ON 14%36. DETAILED GRADING PIANS WILL BE PROVIDED ON 1204 WITH FOR SEPARATE MULTIFAMILY _ ' 1 III AND HOTEL CML CONSTRUCTION PUNS. oP .. 14 11 eJ X11 Y 11 -3�` II '19c p� \ 3. - x�,( 2. ALL UTILITY WORK (LE WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM DRAINAGE) SWLLL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE 5gO - - M1 X _ x., `N °► STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. oR < \ \ i2 3. THE EXISTING ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ALL EXISTING SIRUCIURES SMALL BE TERMINATED. IF NECESSARY, THE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC UTILITY, ACCESS AND HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG I N 11 o , .. ''\ '� - I I : Ft EL _9 Dl `j• - i, THE FRONTAGE OF THIS SITE SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR RELOCATED. THE EXACT ROUTING OF THE NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LOCAL ELECTRIC FRANCHISE UTILITY OWNER. ALL ONSfTE ELECTRICAL R•f I . �, \ __-� -- y. CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW CONSIRUCRDN SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. ' \ BD 1 I e 4. ,� 4. THE EXISTING GAS SOME TO ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE TERMINATED. IF NECESSARY, THE EXISTING CAS LINES ALONG 5 \ -° /�� THE WEST SIDE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC UTILITY, ACCESS AND HIKE AND BICE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THIS SITE C epos, 0 - - ° SHALL BE REMOVED AND/0R RELOCATED. IF NECESSARY, ALL GAS LINE REMOVAL AND/OR ABANDONMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE z II T _ } « LOCAL GAS FRANCHISE UTILITY OWNER. 5. THE EXISTING CABLE AND PHONE SERVICE TO M1 EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE TERMINATED. IF NECESSARY, THE EXISTING CABLE AND PHONE LINES ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC UTILITY, ACCESS AND HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG 1 1 ,� ` - ' i •- THE FRONTAGE OF THIS SITE SITYL BE REMOVED AND/OR RELOCATED. THE EXACT ROUTING OF Off NEW UNDERGROUND CABLE AND 111\ }2A �': mum THE SERVICE FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATE WITH THE LOCAL CABLE AND PHONE FRANCHISE UTILITY OWNERS 11 I o • 7D� _� �� `I '�� �I 1.I 6. THE EXISTING 60' TEXAS POWER A LIGHT EASEMENT AND THE EXISTING FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE. 1 1 WI' N err3Q >d�ALL OMER DOSED CONSTRUCTION WORK WITHIN THE LIMITS OF EXISTING 60 TEXAS POWER k LIGHT EASEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY ME SUCH y = LEGEND =540.UV I P I �. HWS�--• g,G - eoaU `�-' � II= xE8595.00 EXPOSED BEAN GRID I I J I x 595.00 TCW OF PMTLEM SPOT GRADE w 650-- I 1 t 4 s oedr - R I I x595.0 FINISHED GROUND SPOT GRADE / ews320I x TW545.0 TOP OF WALL SPOT GARDE 2 `7111 go { mvv.� enu.o3?'`1 r { OtJRTY 53 _ �E p=y BN5400 I i 1I I x 9W545.0 BOTTOM OF WALL SPOT GRADE / IAY5J25 .,04,41TC SH °� I _ c, , _ 11 =540.0 FINISHED FLOOR flLVA1pN 19 / ,�f8 A WW540.0 o Q y BAy. 1t FF FLOW ARROW 3 - 0 I 1 00 715121`tb •7}q� iW5NJ.6 = i y� BWSJ9A - S -^P _ X . I ,r ILII_, / 541 N�k 9W442.9 TWA I WAsw.o 1 �, VIJAE }4 -,JP _ x' �'t I,/ I VICINITY MAP x SCALE 1' - ,ODD / RW5J7.o Hisao + _ _ SSx'N .NW p . sw.eo ^y ° � I I , _ / ♦ / �� FF 544.0 -¢I / F a I I •L .7 IAL .��i, rlf ZONING CASE: CONDffIONAL USE CASE: - _ - _ - • - - _ - _ PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY CASE: h t2 s _ - i-r,s A A 'x eg@ I, ; 11 SUBMITTAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 04, 2018 I t°CASE CASE HHUMeeNcvlrER raDmoN 7S,7Q.X JCLOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON QMH ROAD; LATS t37 390 a� S,p SIJ. I 1 556.00 .30 1R2. BLOCK 1, CURTER ADDITION . h � ' � - - ^' '\ ��Br i I ,00 � 1 � ' sfis I 1 •r � �2 g4'' A���I 1 � � 1� � I I LL � • / •� '� MAYOR SECRETARY 6 v LX DATE .F - v;� IW5000 51610 X927601~ � B� I A6 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION in r � 555 tso 1 � I D 4�/// =� I fiW49°.o ,u1R1d, L.' I T N .1 i t 11 - L ♦ - .6(" 1 i -/ - l CHAIRMAN! - f SALT od LE RM - _ \ * - x555.70, -F 544:0 - A nsaT r • ^ N BOTTOAaFtGOR EL-55C.0 i 551.30' wrE: - - IW4e9A- lo~ xs--.e - _ Q5 / t)1i0AAFL srn rl o re '6-. 9W5460 b len;��r, - APPROVAL NOT WITH ANY12ODES WORK I •"'c.. / j d:3O - ' -' - S /' i °N OR ORDINANCES DR i i { CONFLICT DEPATMET55.9,DEVELOPMENT SERCES / DE34T NA A ��X1&50�.�' .6p191➢ 7M5060 (t 7W5133� I B]A ° i �/ - //�i/ /i PRELIMINARY ROUGH GRADING PLAN K240 I � -1 1 J� ��/. / � • -/, / / / / - - - -- - - - - - �.. TMStI d , „CARTERf ADDITION„ a _ _ - �\\\,ot�"s33A / r,.•- / ��°d x A 20.075 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE H. SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO 1415 AND THE N88°OZ'44'W- 812.78' A.W.ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO 26 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY ' , - _ - - 51,5 >• _ _. 1 / / / �\ Y69D / / APPLew.. OWER / _ / 763.00 90 /• This dOWmMt 9 Me9sed for AIIEGPMLD AFI! ESTATE fROUP GWIIX C1W'ENNE PA101ER V 3110 W. YJITn4AIQ ILW7., ilio 4021 IBl10P prf. U -- 1 - n / / ♦ ` // / the p pose of prim ry SdT116AIF. RXAS "L SOn1LWE 1L5U5 16092 / '� ♦ // review under the outhority of (ILA 742-lW (9n) see-n4o '.e CONfKI: IrDEN MWIO OINo0: NKx OR1ER a,sd THOMAS A LUNZIIAN. P.E Octot r 233,, 2018 BURGESS & NIPLE 1OMNI CORPORATE Oi, SURE 290, STAFFORD, TX T7477 m / It i9 Tat to be used for OA .0 P1g consE: (269 9601105 construction/bidding Purposes TOPE FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F -IMM SflEAREACAICULATIONS-MULTI-FAMILYDEV9DPMENT 405AA TOTALIDT ARFA ACRES 10.647A OTAL LOT AREA 463793SF. - _ TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 2545885.1. 54.9% BUILDING 2- BLDG AREA 14365 TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 94,789S.F. 2[13% `1 30 S8 TOTAL PAVING(PARKING &DRIVE AREA 241SF. 28. BUILDING 4 -BLDG AREA 27,1166 TOTAL FLATWORK(SIDEWALK, POOL& HIKE AND BIKE) b .- R 50 DETENTION AREAS !\ Y/A M LEAD 1arJRNu 9 2097955.F. 45.1% TOTAL LOTAREA (ACRES) 11 Z? 71, < - aES - IS FLATSAUT ��E APFIIDWF COWER NIB,AIIED NAL ESM1E GROUP CARIFi1 QWPENE FTAIIEIM IP 311= SWMNZ MM. jIA 4011 NUW Cil This docU t is released for RESTAURANT +/-61 SEATS 330- SURFACE (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) Mutt: ILL74ETH IA19LD CPRAtr: NO, GRIER authority 9f M� AS w.. 1d1150E9A19NG .- TaEWf.. smw MEETING SPACE �i 259 4, 2018 ler 4. October 10701 CORPORATE OL, BARE 290, STAFFM TK N477 x''.. ��fDLI1WiXII T :''F9R i1RF' FdIPQibll wallEN r _ EF�Nf10N AREd" DATWAPML 13.191", TBPE FIPM PEGISTMRON NO. F -1W34 t 1/ J""1ffFt MULTIFAMILY _ '7^', � ? - it 275 UNITS • w SflEAREACAICULATIONS-MULTI-FAMILYDEV9DPMENT BUILDING AREA CALNUATONS MULN-FAMILYDEVEIOPMENT TOTALIDT ARFA ACRES 10.647A OTAL LOT AREA 463793SF. BUILDING I -BLDG AREA 31,420 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 2545885.1. 54.9% BUILDING 2- BLDG AREA 14365 TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 94,789S.F. 2[13% BUILDING 3 -BLDG AREA 30 S8 TOTAL PAVING(PARKING &DRIVE AREA 241SF. 28. BUILDING 4 -BLDG AREA 27,1166 TOTAL FLATWORK(SIDEWALK, POOL& HIKE AND BIKE) 28,156 S.F.(6.2%) TOTAL BUILDING AREA ISF) 51,735 TOTAL OPEN SPACE 2097955.F. 45.1% TOTAL LOTAREA (ACRES) 10.647 �J < U 7 B I I LRU4�D2 I �? II s�u�wtuwunoes-NomDEv¢orMv4r BUILDINGAREA C11WILATIONS \ $� I i ,� ' . L 4T f2Y 11 1 III OTA! LOT AREA ACRES 9.628A IIOIELDEVHOPMEN7 Y 1 M , 5 4%M TOTAL IDTARFA 610,681 S.F. TIAL BIIIIgNGARFA$ 52,735 CALLED 4927 ACRES .� 1 x p - Y- y ` ".� TOTAL IF&ERVIOUS COVERAGE 7(6280 S.F. 50.0K TALIOTAREA ACRES 9.428 CITY OF GRAPEVINE \ ODI Sf�ACE 53 - it 't! O I P I 3 s - P.O.BOX9v104 1 'ct7 c4, m 515 tt ii Le ryry _ TOTALOULDINGCOVERAGE 5 7355.F. 17.6% 67 DE�2r I. . :I GRnPE v1NE, TX 760,5 9714 \ ,se7 5 C C 1 TOTAL PAVING )�_ I �l ' I ]37 S.f. 33. rvS 0'95143?F7 CPRTC7 TOTAL FLATWOPWOE 5% AND[R 967SF. 19% _ OTALOPENSPACE GOANDERSO4045.1. 50.0% ( r 2 N ( `>'], i \L - _ !BSON ROAD . Hf. � � '•• StliONHG'PiR-COCE MULT9:FAM4Y SITE v I wHl w/� I _ SFIEAREA CALCULATIONS -OVERALL DEVELOPMENT BURDING ARFA GLCUUTIONS °� vq1 tN[wµL • yry 4 S _ 1Q847pGRES - - j" ALIDTAREA(ACRES) 20.075 OVEMLLOEYODPAffNT ..� I ILj pNtf! �,� _ _'1 4.,L. TOTAL LOT AREA 66S,272S.F. TIAL BUILDINGARFAIS 115924 I I 4 - ) ) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 459,86RS.F. SL6% TOTAL LOT AREA (ACRES)20075 JJ t I J i AMENITY - NI VAR A I 'III TOTAlBU1lDING COVERAGE 145,9:4S.f. 16.7% I 1 ARFJ1 O ";( j, - lkf TOTAL PAVING PARKING&gUVE AREA) S.F. 30.9%) -,8 TOTAL FLATWORK SIDEWAIIL,POOL&HIKE AND DIKE) 44,I75S.F. S.lA6 OTALOPENSPACE 414,99S.F. 47.4% Exhibit D N 0 50' 100' HORIZONTAL SCALE VICINITY MAP SGJi i' = 1000' NOTES: 1. SANITATION CONTAINER SCREENING WALLS AND PAD SITE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS. 2. LIGHTING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITHIN CITY OF GRAPEVINE CODES. 3. ALL FIRE LANE RADII AT INTERSECTIONS ARE 35' UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 5. ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRAPEVINE SOIL EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE SHALL BE MET DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL ON-SITE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. 7. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 53 OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ZONING CODE. 8. REFER TO THE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF AND SURROUNDING THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. m h ! • r `r - ^ — - - - \ —�` ¢ x TOTALHOTEL OTMULTIFAMILY: 10.647 ACRES 326 - SURFACE PROVIDE ( WHICH 66 ARE SHAR ) LO HOTEL: D OF ED PARTNERS, LP - --- �� BUILDING DATA: MULTIFAMILY: AGPRO/AL DOES NOT AUR ORIZE ANY w K PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY CASE: °u !!, 531 - SURFACE PROVIDED (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) awmNWCEs ' 303 ROOMS 123 - PODIUM MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN for �(:. 40 -TUCK UNDER TRUSTEE OF THE CONSTANCECARIER ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE / HOTEL #2 -155 UNITS 38 -TANDEM GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY APFIIDWF COWER NIB,AIIED NAL ESM1E GROUP CARIFi1 QWPENE FTAIIEIM IP 311= SWMNZ MM. jIA 4011 NUW Cil This docU t is released for RESTAURANT +/-61 SEATS 330- SURFACE (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) Mutt: ILL74ETH IA19LD CPRAtr: NO, GRIER authority 9f M� AS / MEETING SPACE THOMAS A P.E. P. LU 259 4, 2018 ler 4. October 10701 CORPORATE OL, BARE 290, STAFFM TK N477 I is not to be used for t PHONE (280 98]-1705 DATWAPML 13.191", TBPE FIPM PEGISTMRON NO. F -1W34 MACE JOSEPH T. MUE y MULTIFAMILY 13207343374 275 UNITS 1j (/ BUILDING 1 - 94 UNITS - 4 STORY W/PODIUM & TUCK UNDER �1� D204189024, mom E \ BUILDING 4 - 46 UNITS - 3/4 STORY W/ TUCK UNDER `'�� R I l� t■ r �Illli o Ii��GllI I N iiR RILI � / � RTI s - •P .� II Vii' us _ � � �1 •..�aiil. Exhibit D N 0 50' 100' HORIZONTAL SCALE VICINITY MAP SGJi i' = 1000' NOTES: 1. SANITATION CONTAINER SCREENING WALLS AND PAD SITE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS. 2. LIGHTING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITHIN CITY OF GRAPEVINE CODES. 3. ALL FIRE LANE RADII AT INTERSECTIONS ARE 35' UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 5. ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRAPEVINE SOIL EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE SHALL BE MET DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL ON-SITE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. 7. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 53 OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ZONING CODE. 8. REFER TO THE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF AND SURROUNDING THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. m h ! • r `r - ^ — - - - \ —�` ¢ x TOTALHOTEL OTMULTIFAMILY: 10.647 ACRES 326 - SURFACE PROVIDE ( WHICH 66 ARE SHAR ) LO HOTEL: D OF ED PARTNERS, LP - --- �� BUILDING DATA: MULTIFAMILY: AGPRO/AL DOES NOT AUR ORIZE ANY w K PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY CASE: IN CONiLCr WITH N^• CODES HOTEL: 531 - SURFACE PROVIDED (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) awmNWCEs ' 303 ROOMS 123 - PODIUM MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN for �(:. 40 -TUCK UNDER TRUSTEE OF THE CONSTANCECARIER ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE / HOTEL #2 -155 UNITS 38 -TANDEM GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY APFIIDWF COWER NIB,AIIED NAL ESM1E GROUP CARIFi1 QWPENE FTAIIEIM IP 311= SWMNZ MM. jIA 4011 NUW Cil This docU t is released for RESTAURANT +/-61 SEATS 330- SURFACE (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) Mutt: ILL74ETH IA19LD CPRAtr: NO, GRIER authority 9f M� AS / MEETING SPACE THOMAS A P.E. P. LU 259 4, 2018 ler 4. October 10701 CORPORATE OL, BARE 290, STAFFM TK N477 I is not to be used for t PHONE (280 98]-1705 DATWAPML 13.191", TBPE FIPM PEGISTMRON NO. F -1W34 MACE JOSEPH T. MUE y MULTIFAMILY 13207343374 275 UNITS 1j (/ BUILDING 1 - 94 UNITS - 4 STORY W/PODIUM & TUCK UNDER �1� D204189024, E \ BUILDING 4 - 46 UNITS - 3/4 STORY W/ TUCK UNDER r �Illli o Ii��GllI I N iiR RILI � / us n ASO E / L - - --- �� BUILDING DATA: MULTIFAMILY: AGPRO/AL DOES NOT AUR ORIZE ANY w K PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY CASE: IN CONiLCr WITH N^• CODES HOTEL: 531 - SURFACE PROVIDED (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) awmNWCEs ' 303 ROOMS 123 - PODIUM MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN for HOTEL #1 - 148 UNITS 40 -TUCK UNDER A 20.075 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE H. SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE / HOTEL #2 -155 UNITS 38 -TANDEM GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY APFIIDWF COWER NIB,AIIED NAL ESM1E GROUP CARIFi1 QWPENE FTAIIEIM IP 311= SWMNZ MM. jIA 4011 NUW Cil This docU t is released for RESTAURANT +/-61 SEATS 330- SURFACE (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) Mutt: ILL74ETH IA19LD CPRAtr: NO, GRIER authority 9f M� AS / MEETING SPACE THOMAS A P.E. P. LU 259 4, 2018 ler 4. October 10701 CORPORATE OL, BARE 290, STAFFM TK N477 I is not to be used for t PHONE (280 98]-1705 comm-tion/biddiq purpose TBPE FIPM PEGISTMRON NO. F -1W34 MACE JOSEPH T. MUE MULTIFAMILY j 275 UNITS 1j (/ BUILDING 1 - 94 UNITS - 4 STORY W/PODIUM & TUCK UNDER �1� BUILDING 2-44 UNITS -4 STORY W/PODIUM BUILDING 3-91 UNITS -4 STORY \ BUILDING 4 - 46 UNITS - 3/4 STORY W/ TUCK UNDER P P �T MWpv COMUEN ESS EASDAM {TRACT 5) E%EC VOL lREO 02/79/97° ' .. DRPP o!P-'LatrmN Rccui xc ww. wa. . 1((CURB) UNLET RLM EL=556.09' 00TT0lA FLOOR EL=551.30 • F DETENTION AREA c. IND 6V'.� F/ '" RSCRRRw4KR CITY}:ODE:,. - _ s Hr m 7? , r N88.O 44'Wr°8fZ7b ✓ m „' _\ pw /% / 2 \ \ or� •� /BREAKLINE ;o E 7 . A _ S _ LI— _ —..1 _ — .o\ FEATURE mcE ar rxmrE tar of mnna ott or // BREAKLINEco_ s c ZONING CASE: CONDITIONAL USE CASE: AGPRO/AL DOES NOT AUR ORIZE ANY w K PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY CASE: IN CONiLCr WITH N^• CODES SUBMfTTAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 04, 2018 awmNWCEs DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN for "CARTER ADDITION" A 20.075 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE H. SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE A.W. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY APFIIDWF COWER NIB,AIIED NAL ESM1E GROUP CARIFi1 QWPENE FTAIIEIM IP 311= SWMNZ MM. jIA 4011 NUW Cil This docU t is released for SOOIHNfE IFKb ]N21 SCAM MAS 71MN (417) 742 -IMI (972) Seg -)NO the Purpose of P rr i -,y Mutt: ILL74ETH IA19LD CPRAtr: NO, GRIER authority 9f M� AS BURGESS & NIPLE THOMAS A P.E. P. LU 259 4, 2018 ler 4. October 10701 CORPORATE OL, BARE 290, STAFFM TK N477 I is not to be used for t PHONE (280 98]-1705 comm-tion/biddiq purpose TBPE FIPM PEGISTMRON NO. F -1W34 MACE JOSEPH T. MUE '10 50UARE FOOT 5I&N I; Ir I I INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED CABINETS WITH TENANT L0605 Pv I � I i N II I _ ' O � I PJ `— � 3 I O PJ i I � � I ' l I I � I t PJ i 1/2" THICK ADDRE55 NUMERALS MOUNTED FLUSH TO STRUCTURE iJ PLANTER STYLE BASE WITH STONE rt TO MATCH ARCHITECURAL PETAIL'_ tb OF TENANT BUILDINGS — 5Ft-6 in --7ft-O in 6 ft - O in �{ rd Holidaylrtn Eft UG STAY, Pal R I !14 V t T Z 8 = ... r __ APARTKEN_T I QHS FOURCE -Doc TIONS Your signature acknowledges full cowwuwic• g g approval of the design layout and its content, releasing Fource Communications, Ltd, from any responsibility regarding incorrect information and design. 02018 All ideas, arrangements and plans Any colors shown are only representative of actual colors to be used. Final colors will be matched as indicated or represented by these drawings are dosely as possible. Colors shown tend to vary due to some materials used in the industry the property of Fource Communications, Ltd. and were created, evolved and developed for use on and in connection with the specified project. No part of the drawings, designs, arrangements or ideas herein shall be duplicated or used for any purpose whatsoever without the express written consent of Fource Communications, Ltd. 5Ft-O in 3ft-6 in �2ft-Oin� ., IREG \ ; \. i Signature - EXTERIOR %' 1 x SIGNAGE *a 41 Fm 16 W amm = V 4 Communications, Ltd. from any responsibility regarding incorrect information and design. 4).M =tea ,. i / ,SHEET L MOM ., \ ; \. i Signature - EXTERIOR %' e acknowledges Your signature acknowledges full approval of the SIGNAGE ;. design layout and its content, releasing Fource Communications, Ltd. from any responsibility regarding incorrect information and design. Any colors shown we only representative of actual colors to be used. Final colors will be DESIGNER INITIALS grade \ \. 12/ 10/2018 EXTERIOR %' SIGNAGE ;. ,. / ,SHEET NO. rr i s X _.�',,Ii C R 5 •�+U Gh4T FCDh$;P 1 1 i�%N .110101 . Illllllll�llllllllll�llllllllill l3 r f a■■■■■■■■■■r 110■■■■■■■■■BY i TO DETENTION AREA ON AREA TER BUFFER (SO ) 88°07'44"W 81i 1 101 �ILDII r i HL KUS .1 o¢ I � -fOR'Y IL, s F I I j;l Ih k&' i b t 1`ti.. t11 LOBBY----�` s�4r°a `d$` u' o) j itr t fL 'Y'° ri R 1- r Or, CONFERENCE t g, ROOMS Uji LL� EX. 60;tASEME,NT AND RZHT-OF-WAY TO: TEXAS PO}VER & LIGHT GOMPANYIOF DALLAS (TRACT AJO. 18 -196 - CENTERED OWIMPROVEMENTS AS CALL�'D IN INSTRUMENT D186�62678, O.P.R.T.C.T. , , 1 / � I � , , i o \ >� \- �10'SANITAR 10' PERIMETER BUFFER (SOUTH) EASEMENT BUILDIN 4-STORYw (5 / TUCK UND 46 UNIT TUCK U GAR. GAR. v; LL GAR. I N GAR. / • ENT/ FEATIRE � LL 2 m t t � / 1 wLu `I t1 It t 0 W ' 0 1' 1 ° CD t p 0 z L6 I FOURCE _Dace corruaic•noas Your signature acknowledges full approval of the design layout and its content, releasing Fouroe Communications, Ltd. from any responsibility regarding incorrect information end design. ®2018 All ideas, arrangements and plans Any colors shown are only representative of actual colors to be used. Final colors will be matched as indicated or represented by these drawings are closely as possible. Colors shown tend to vary due to some materials used in the industry. the property of Fource Communications, Lid. 1..�....- - and were created, evolved and developed for use on and in connection with the specified f project. No part of the drawings, designs. arrangements or ideas herein shall be duplicated or used for any purpose whatsoever r without the express written consent of Fource Communications, Ltd. TiIREG F 5 t: 7 0 ' N t / Cb UJ o Inow / MC �. / L7 / C OWN Si,n.- -D Your signature acknowledges fut approval of me design layout and its content, releasing Fource Communications, Ltd. from any responsibility regarding incorrect information and design. Any colors shown are only representative of actual colors to be used. Final colors will be matched as closely as possible. Colors shown tend [o vary due to some materials used in me indust . DESIGNER INITIALS EH 12/10/2018 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE y ,::�,. ,_ a �-` � � �. ;� -- �: 4. " `� t � _r� -il�! 1r �` �:' i `t •:. .vt .. --,�, .' . t i� r �`�� s a_ • i "�� ` , . �! �. ,''� ;, { �`�►' '< � x:��.sa. .� � ��y.. r P' y ,::�,. ,_ a �-` � � �. ;� -- �: 4. " `� t � _r� -il�! 1r �` �:' i `t •:. .vt .. --,�, .' . t i� r �`�� s a_ • i "�� ` , . �! �. ,''� ;, { �`�►' '< � x:��.sa. .� � Executive Summary Apartment Amenities Audio Package — with Surround Speakers* Expansive l OFT/ 12ft. Ceilings with 8 ft. doors.* Under Cabinet Lighting Wood Plank Flooring Pantry Built-in shelves Under Mount Sinks 42" Painted Cabinets Open Kitchen Plan with Island* Single Basin Farmhouse Kitchen Sink Vegetable Sprayer Granite or Quartz Countertop USB Charging Stations in Kitchen/Master Designer Glass Backsplash Stainless Steel Appliances Side -by -Side Refrigerator with Ice and Water in Door Balcony with Storage* Separate Dining* Ceiling Fans in Living area and All Bedrooms 2" Wood Blinds Entry Coat Closet Wood Shelving in all Closets Large Walk-in closets with Built-in Shoe Shelves Walk -In Shower* Framed Mirror in Bathrooms Garden Soaking Tubs* Linen Closets* Double Vanity* Private Yards in Select Units* Washer/Dryer connections Wine Fridge* Golf Course Views* Community Amenities Concierge Services Valet Trash Podium parking Elevators in Every Building Controlled Access Fully Equipped Wellness Center Free Weights and Kettlebells Peloton Bikes Yoga Room Business Center with Mac/PC Conference Room Poker and Gaming Lounge Billiards with Wi-Fi Cafe Media lounge Starbucks Coffee Bar Shuffleboard Pingpong WiFi in all common areas D-Ij Exhibit G w m W a 4 y ul w = o � m I- y U K c a SLOPED /PROJECTED ROW LOCK BRICK CAP, TTP. BUILDING WRAP, TYP. BLOCKING AS REQUIRED TYP. PROJECTED BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, TYP. EXTERIOR SHEATHING BRICK VENEER, TYP. 02 WALL SECTION - BRICK / 5TUGCO TRANSITION SCALE: N.T.S. \ \ A WALL STUCCO TTP. 17FMETAL LATH \ \ BJILDW. PAPER AS SPECD PCI PJC CONTROL JOINT SET M FULL BED O: SEALANT FILLED WTH EXPANDABLE AND TROWELD FLAT WITH STUCCO EXTERIOR SHEATHING REF. STRUCTURAL NOTE: SEALANT 4T VERTICAL CONTROL JOINT ALL JOINTS AND NTERSECTIONS MAGNA WALL STUCCO TTP PETAL LATH BUILDING PAPER AS SPECD PCI PVC CONTROL JOINT SET IN RILL BED OF SEALANT FILLED WITH EXPANDABLE AND TROWELD FLAT WITH STUCCO EXTERIOR SHEATHING REF. STRUCTURAL V NOTE: SEALANT AT ALL JOINTS AND INTERSECTIONS HORIZONTAL CONTROL JOINT COMP. SHINGLE SCALE= 3'=1'-0' ROOF TYP. m <'s 12 0 N STUCCO MOLD. u RADIANT BARRIER 9 d 6 3/4' SEAL, JOINT, TTP. 3 AS SPEC'D 3/S .' '� ROU LOCK BRICK CAP, TYP. 3/S INSULATION PER O 3R COM CHECK TTP. BLOCKING AS REQUIRED 0 TYP PROJECTED BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, TTP. a / EXTERIOR SHEATHING. A A A A I VENTED HART AAG61 JA9'f or. --= OSA9-18 d� SOFFIT TYP. 866N0 SCALE: 1-1/2'=1'-m' x,,,,E. TL -U ARCHITEXAS DETAILS kS NOTED CAULLK a SEAL JOINT, SEALANT ON BACKER ROD, TTP, 2X6 PAINTED HARI- n TRIM BOAR, TYP. STUCCO 'J' MOLD, ON BACKER ROD, CAULK e SEAL, JOINT, TYP. STUCCO ON METAL LATH, TYP. SLOPE STUCCO 'J' MOLD, ON BACKER ROD, CAULK a — s SEAL, JOINT, TYP. 2X6 PAINTED HARD[ - BOARD TRIM, TTP. WINDOW AS SPEC'D TYP. 3 WINDOW AS SPECT) m TYP. • 4 1/4' o PAINTED WOOD CA51NG / TRIM, TTP. ao PARI—TRIM 2X6 PAINTED d BOAR, TYP. m s -2X x6 PAINTED HARD[ m TRIM BOAR, TYP. w= STUCCO 'J' MOLD, ON BACOKER ROD, CAULK a 3` 6 3/4'TY w m W a 4 y ul w = o � m I- y U K c a SLOPED /PROJECTED ROW LOCK BRICK CAP, TTP. BUILDING WRAP, TYP. BLOCKING AS REQUIRED TYP. PROJECTED BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, TYP. EXTERIOR SHEATHING BRICK VENEER, TYP. 02 WALL SECTION - BRICK / 5TUGCO TRANSITION SCALE: N.T.S. \ \ A WALL STUCCO TTP. 17FMETAL LATH \ \ BJILDW. PAPER AS SPECD PCI PJC CONTROL JOINT SET M FULL BED O: SEALANT FILLED WTH EXPANDABLE AND TROWELD FLAT WITH STUCCO EXTERIOR SHEATHING REF. STRUCTURAL NOTE: SEALANT 4T VERTICAL CONTROL JOINT ALL JOINTS AND NTERSECTIONS MAGNA WALL STUCCO TTP PETAL LATH BUILDING PAPER AS SPECD PCI PVC CONTROL JOINT SET IN RILL BED OF SEALANT FILLED WITH EXPANDABLE AND TROWELD FLAT WITH STUCCO EXTERIOR SHEATHING REF. STRUCTURAL V NOTE: SEALANT AT ALL JOINTS AND INTERSECTIONS HORIZONTAL CONTROL JOINT 05 STLlGGO CONTROL JOINT - DETAIL_ SCALE= 3'=1'-0' <'s 0 V - STUCCO MOLD. u ON BACKER ROD, CAULK 1 6 3/4' SEAL, JOINT, TTP. ^� SLOPED / PROJECTED 3/S .' '� ROU LOCK BRICK CAP, TYP. 3/S INSULATION PER O 3R COM CHECK TTP. BLOCKING AS REQUIRED iL b TYP PROJECTED BRICK SOLDIER COURSE, TTP. / EXTERIOR SHEATHING. �•151J• BRICK VENEER TYP. AAG61 JA9'f or. iz0 a OSA9-18 d� 05VERTICAL TRANSITION C BRICK/ 5TUC 0) 866N0 SCALE: 1-1/2'=1'-m' x,,,,E. TL -U ARCHITEXAS DETAILS kS NOTED U - J � Q � Lu Lu O NQ � W H 2 � a= X• CEDAR WOOD FINISHTTP, CEDAR WOOD TRM LEDGE, AS SE C' DOL A5 SPEC'D ON MI WOOD FINISH ON BUILT -OUT WOOD IX CEDAR WOOD WRAP STUCCO ON METAL FRN-IING, TTP. CEDAR WOOD TRIM LEDGE. EXTERIOR BELQP, T P. A C� MIERIOR STUCCO ON METAL PAINTED WOOD LATH, TYP. TRIM BOARD, TTP. PAINTEDDMAGNA UALL STUCCO SWINDOL� CEDAR WOOD FASCIA BOARD, ON FETAL LATH. AS PC \ \ \\ \ \ \ // \ 3'-3' + 5 IR' 3'-1' 5 IR' ELEV. VIEuI EXTERIOR CEDAR WOOD TRM LEDGE, J BELOW, TTP. IX CEDAR WOOD WRAP STUCCO ON METAL 51R' 3'-3' IX CEDAR WOOD WRAI B LATH, TTP. CEDAR WOOD TRIM LEDGE, EXTERIOR BELCWI. TVP. 51R' INTERIOR j J IX CEDAR WOOD WRAP STUCCO ON METAL IX CEDAR WOOD WRAI ON BUILT-UP COLUMN LATH, TTP. ON BUILT-UP COLUI'M PLAN VIEW 05 Cz,45EL DETAIL - PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1-1/2'=1'-D' MTERIOR STUCCO ON METAL LATH, TTP CEDAR WOOD " EXTERIOR TRIM LEDGE. BELOW, TTP. 51R' MTERIOR IX CEDAR WOOD LRA ON MILT -UP COLIUMJ C -VENTED HARDI-50FNT TTP. -7X6 U10.OD CEDAR TRIM TTP. -STUCCO 'J -MOULD' TTP. -MOCK MG AS REL%IIRED TTP -INSULATION AS PER COMCHECK -2X6 LOCO CEDAR TRIM. TTP. -5TUCCO 'J -MOULD' TTP -VERTICAL CEDAR TRIM BOARD. REF. TO ELEVATION "VERTICAL CEDAR TRIM BOARD, REF. TO ELEVATION "WNDOW AS SPEC D TTP -PAINTED WOOD CASING / TRIM, TTP "X CEDAR WOOD FNISH WRAPPED AROUND WOOD FRAMING. -WOOD SHEATHING TTP. 2.6 BUILT -OUT WALL FRAMWI TTP. SHIMS AS REO 0, TTP BLOCKING AS REQUIRED 1 TTP. EXTERIOR SHEATHING INSULATION AS PER COMCHECK MAGNA WALL STUCCO ON FETAL LATH, TTP. SECTION VIEUJ ARCHITEXAS DETAILS S89°22'04"E-674.89' `\ DETENTION AREA RET. ET. Hr. WALL W/ \ 15' FLAT SPOT 15' MT SPOT VAPIABLE HT. OUTSIDE BUILDING VARIABLE WR OUTSIDE BINDING RET. WAl1 w/ FOR FIRE ACCES RE. WALL W/ FOR FIRE ICCE ACCESS TO DETENTION AREA \ EVUIIG� VARMBE HT. RE. WNL - r--� \\ W/ 44 ea BUILDING 2 -a`STOAYDING 1 � vv/PobwM 4STORY W/PODIUh Cft(LED.a adl7(;R,�S 00 \ 86 CITY OF GRAI0 \ \ 86 Pool PACE • •37 PODS PACES P.O. B(.X 4�' cR1FEwNE rx >o \ 6 TU6 NDER "'INS. D79914207;�T L I ee ♦ E) E 2719 ANDIRSO`f I _ 7 , crsoNRoar � I I _ m a'1 VMVBIE Hf. —.. IRE. WALL W/ RULIN _ ... 1\ \I I 8 11 „ GOLF COURSEUSE EA REFFRICTED 11 I 1154 FLAT SPOT EMENT T0: CITY OL GPAPDANE INS D200068913 O.P.R.T.C.T. 40 I = 3 Em F41 J iY h AM NITY es I OV LOO /AREA �t�i�� o ��������� • �E6immLl MEN i���� I:�. II II _ TOTAL LOTAREA(ACRES) 20.075A OVERALL DEVELOPMENT BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS SITE AREA CALCULATIONS -MOLT -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT (( TOTAL LOTAREA ACRES 20.D75 TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 14S,924S.F. IE7R TOTAL LOTAREA (ACRES) — 10.647A MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL OPEN SPACE 414,599 SF. 47.42j TOTAL LOTAREA 463,783SY- BUILDINGS -BLDG AREA 31,420 II w 7 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 2K58B S.F. 154.9%) BUILDING 2 -BLDG AREA 14,345 I ca TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 94,189 S.F.(20.3% BUILDING 3 -BLDG AREA 30,558 O \ TOTAL PAVING IPARKING & DRIVE AREA) 132,241 S.F. (28.5%) BUILDING 4 -BLDG AREA 17,866 II II EX. 60' EISEMkMD IT TOTALFLATIVORK(SIDEWALK,POOL&HIKEAND BIKE) 28,158 S.F. (6.1%i TOTAL BUILDING AREA SF 94,189 4 T0: TANO I )1 11 TOTAL OPEN SPACE 209, 1955. F. 145.1%) TOTAL LOTAREA ACRES 10.647 III • , RE. WRL W/ IMIING ; 1+ ill � SITE AREA CALCULATIONS- HOTEL DEVELOPMENT BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS TOTAL LOT AREA ACRES 9A28A NOTELDEVELOPMENT III TOTAL LOT AREA 410,684S.F. TOTAL BUILDING AREA SF 5735 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 20S,280ST. 5'0.0% TOTAL LO7ARfi1 ACRES 9.428 r- TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 51,73S S.F. 126% s�EEEEEPa TOTAL PAVING PARKING&DRIVE AREA 137,578 S.F. ii S% T TOTALFLATWORK(SIDEWALK,POOL &HIKE AND BIKE) 1%967S.F. 3.996 TOTAL OPEN SPACE 2054045. F. 1500% 1 I II ( BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS TOTAL LOTAREA(ACRES) 20.075A OVERALL DEVELOPMENT I u TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 45SLOWS.F. 526% TOTAL LOTAREA ACRES 20.D75 TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 14S,924S.F. IE7R a' SSEASEMENT TOTALFATWORK SIDEWALK POOL&HKEANDBIKE 44,125 ST. 5.0% TOTAL OPEN SPACE 414,599 SF. 47.42j CO II CO o I ca EX. 60' EISEMkMD IT EY. RKAR OF WAY III 4 T0: TANO I )1 11 LIGHT rnMPNx OF a twos - III I II MME HT. SII — RE. WRL W/ IMIING ; 1+ RE. WALL W/ / PALING Ott US In O S-1 US o—_- _ ---_—___—_ LB ____—_ _— CARTER GRAPEVINE I LB es R 1 I PARTNERS, LP B1-�— CONSTANCECARTER, I / PLAZA TRUSTEE OF THE I _ P _ _ CONSTANCE CARTER a I E — — — — — "TRAFFIC TABLE"— h — — — — ! REVOCABLE TRUST 1 = I \ I WER FD DATEDAPRIL 13, 1999, INS. 0210214154. / RA4ING�\ • T VMMNE M. _ — ---- — �. 0207343374. �, wN1 w/ B 0 204 18 90 24 \ ® r.0 O F's I / HOTEL SITEeaEo.,a , YI27IPg _ / I 9.428 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING , I I -..------ --- ,ora. I STAYBRIDGE 303 TOTAL ROOMS I / SURES 5 - STORY 1 FEW SNC AMENI AR A b 6 a 6 �- � I� I 1345 9' 6 I I gal _— A VARABIE M. x x x U Y2 I RD. WALL w/I �I m RAU ane. 1 YS HOLIDAY I - INN zY I I { I O wE I i I BUILT S m l j 4S /TUC VRLAR541 E W. „ ® �- - W II I / RET. WALL W1 � I 1 TUC / a / ® ♦ OE SKARE RCK-UP/ V/" LE DROP-OFFSTpNRENC N�WN1 O ® AOCfI9 i m ACCESS TO DETENTION AREA DETENTION AREA WALL ARABLE SCREENING PERET. 'UMp'R CITY CODE e I \ N88„0744 6_ _ �L _ +� _ _ BREAKLINE! ENTRY v oo Ocox or FFWUJx EDGE a FERIIM 1.1KE or PW6UM NRF CL PAmaxcyACF I.m rt T1PIG1. KwoKAP sPrcE urour Trnrw vAN WNIMf vox urrAn NR NTS HR oo LI - SITE AREA CALCULATIONS- OVERALL DEVELOPMENT BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS TOTAL LOTAREA(ACRES) 20.075A OVERALL DEVELOPMENT TOTALLOTAREA B744675.F. ITOTAL BUILDING AREA SF 145,924 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 45SLOWS.F. 526% TOTAL LOTAREA ACRES 20.D75 TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 14S,924S.F. IE7R TOTALPAVING(PARKING&DRWEARFA 269,819 S.F. 30.996 TOTALFATWORK SIDEWALK POOL&HKEANDBIKE 44,125 ST. 5.0% TOTAL OPEN SPACE 414,599 SF. 47.42j I N 0 50' 100' HORIZONTAL SCALE B VICINITY MAP SONE 1- = 1000' NOTES: 1. SANITATION CONTAINER SCREENING WALLS AND PAD SITE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS. 2. LIGHTING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITHIN CITY OF GRAPEVINE CODES. 3. ALL FIRE LANE RADII AT INTERSECTIONS ARE 35' UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 5. ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRAPEVINE SOIL EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE SHALL BE MET DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL ON-SITE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. 7. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 53 OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ZONING CODE. 8. REFER TO THE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF AND SURROUNDING THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. Da• LOT DATA: TOTAL AREA: 20.075 ACRES MULTIFAMILY: 10.647 ACRES HOTEL LOT: 9.428 ACRES BUILDING DATA: HOTEL: 4 303 ROOMS f HOTEL #1 - 148 UNITS HOTEL #2 - 155 UNITS II RESTAURANT +/-61 SEATS I MEETING SPACE (+/-11,580 SOFT) PARKING DATA HOTEL: 326 - SURFACE PROVIDED (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) '228 - SPACES REQUIRED PER PARK STUDY BY LEE ENGINEERING DATED AUGUST 30, 2018 MULTIFAMILY: 531 - SURFACE PROVIDED (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) 123 - PODIUM 40 -TUCK UNDER 38 -TANDEM 330 - SURFACE (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHAR MULTIFAMILY 275 UNITS tk, t'iAp i1 {E I/ I� BUILDING 1 - 86 UNITS - 4 STORY W/PODIUM & TUCK UND n ri lye :� / BUILDING 2-44 UNITS -4 STORY W/PODIUM 1� \\ BUILDING 3 - 91 UNITS - 4 STORY BUILDING 4 - 54 UNITS - 4 STORY W/ TUCK UNDER 1 1 1 1 LIC COMMON AC ESS EASEMENT (TRACT 5) EXECUTED 02/19/97 VOL. 12693, PG. 029 (CURB) INLET RIM EL=555.09' tiBOTTOM FLOOR EL=551.30' BREAKLINE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU18-25 IS A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 303 ROOM CO -BRANDED HOTEL ALONG WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF 275 APARTMENT UNITS. SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: TIwZn _ a APPROVAL ODES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN for "CARTER ADDITION” A 20.075 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE H. SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE A.R. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26 DFe 2/03/2D1S GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY INTE/ r ` ESTATE CARR GRAPEVINE WNS. V 31 10 W. SCuMILvrEBLVD.. 1120 4021 HILLTOP W. T '•• • ••• SIRAWff. ITOM 76D92 SOLnME. TDAS 76092 THOMAS A. LUNZMfAfN (817) 742-1851 (9R) 569-7340 122259 K. CN[CT' KENNETH FAMBRD DONFADT: MCN CARO ass%,y BURGESS & NIPLE 10701 CORPORATE DR., SUITE 290, STAFFORD, TK 77477 It is rot to be used for PHONE (281)980-7705 TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F-10834 construction/bidding purposes COMACE JOSEPH T. ROUE O 2� 6 uu ii r ME{LAI ATY O MATCHLINE / n MATCHLINE / CLUBHOUSE I / nosu� 0 o Lg o o - PEVfNE / L6 10 SHARED SPACES R 7 tO SHARED SPACES SHARED SPACES 11 6 BSHAREO SPgCE6 LP a ® -1 _ i - ARTER I / _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PLAZA _ _ _ _ _ _ _ F THE _ CARTER o II / 'TRAFFIC TABLE" I I TRUST 13, 1999, / 4 _o a o L -* q- -s' , N 1 41.54 l _ ©® / m v 4. I FlTNE55 W.E.- 024. HiI, OR EAT BOOM _I 45 m! HOTEL SITE REA—ST 9L"1,�-i y ky ry , I 9.428 ACRES LOBBY PROPOSED BUILD ',, S p� 1347' STAYBRIDGE 303 TOTAL ROOMS SUITES 5 TTL B S m 7 t I n E. © 6 b b b b b W I - -- xxxxi ® HOLIDAY 2 INN FasI O 1 RESTAURANT I / (D © I I I I I I I ©b 4 IDE SHARE PICK-UP/ DROP-OFF LOCATION n. fe CONFERENCE ROOMS IS © 1386 ACCESS TO DETENTION AREA III I1 'm6 E ,L, I DETENTION AREA 26'F U.E. Q — — 7 '. W 07 4 ; 128 .76' — — -- 7-/ NOTES: 1. SANITATION CONTAINER SCREENING WALLS AND PAD SITE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS. 2. LIGHTING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITHIN CITY OF GRAPEVINE CODES. 3. ALL FIRE LANE RADII AT INTERSECTIONS ARE 35' UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 5. ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRAPEVINE SOIL EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE SHALL BE MET DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL ON-SITE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. 7. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 53 OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ZONING CODE. 8. REFER TO THE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF AND SURROUNDING THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 311-4 a. mD6 a nInWE RMEPA K 29E LENT Nit 1Clo'sanrta SEWER----- V� \ EASEMENr fo ENTRY ao FEATUR �I \ � 1 t OI I co � I � 1 o I Z L6, c , i' LOT DATA: HOTEL LOT: 9.428 ACRES BUILDING DATA HOTEL: 303 ROOMS HOTEL #1 - 148 UNITS HOTEL #2 -155 UNITS W/ RESTAURANT +/- 61 SEATS MEETING SPACE (+/-11,580 SOFT) PARKING DATA: 326 - SURFACE PROVIDED (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) '228 - SPACES REQUIRED PER PARK STUDY BY LEE ENGINEERING DATED AUGUST 30, 2018 SITE AREA CALCULATIONS- HOTEL DEVELOPMENT LINE TABLE 9.428 AC LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S89"23'33"E 31.77' L2 S12`42'41"W 112.2' L3 N57'23'39"W 19.62' L4 S19°21'08"W 55.06' L5 S86°31'27"E 54.65' L6 N89°59'08"E 293.81' L7 1428°52'541 9.60' LS S89°59'56"E 412.16' L9 SOO"00'04"E 81.86' L10 S89°54'11"E 41.73' LSl SOO"12'09"W 385.22' L12 568.5316"E 145.05' NOTES: 1. SANITATION CONTAINER SCREENING WALLS AND PAD SITE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS. 2. LIGHTING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITHIN CITY OF GRAPEVINE CODES. 3. ALL FIRE LANE RADII AT INTERSECTIONS ARE 35' UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 5. ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRAPEVINE SOIL EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE SHALL BE MET DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL ON-SITE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. 7. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 53 OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ZONING CODE. 8. REFER TO THE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF AND SURROUNDING THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 311-4 a. mD6 a nInWE RMEPA K 29E LENT Nit 1Clo'sanrta SEWER----- V� \ EASEMENr fo ENTRY ao FEATUR �I \ � 1 t OI I co � I � 1 o I Z L6, c , i' LOT DATA: HOTEL LOT: 9.428 ACRES BUILDING DATA HOTEL: 303 ROOMS HOTEL #1 - 148 UNITS HOTEL #2 -155 UNITS W/ RESTAURANT +/- 61 SEATS MEETING SPACE (+/-11,580 SOFT) PARKING DATA: 326 - SURFACE PROVIDED (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) '228 - SPACES REQUIRED PER PARK STUDY BY LEE ENGINEERING DATED AUGUST 30, 2018 SITE AREA CALCULATIONS- HOTEL DEVELOPMENT TOTAL LOT AREA (ACRES) 9.428 AC TOTAL LOT AREA 410 694 S.F. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 205,280 S.F. (50.0%) TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 51,735 S. F. 126% TOTAL PAVING(PARKING &DRIVE AREA 137,578 S.F. 33.S% TOTAL FIATWORK (SIDEWALK, POOL AND BIKE 159675.F. 3.9% TOTAL OPEN SPACE 205,404 S.F. 50.0% BDIIDING AREA CALCULATIONS HOTEL DEVELOPMENT TOTAL BUILDING AREA SF 51,735 TOTAL LOT AREA (ACRES) 9.428 N 0 20' 40' 80' HORIZONTAL SCALE VICINITY MAP SCALE T- = 1000' ZONING CASE: CONDITIONAL USE CASE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY CASE: SUBMITTAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 04, 2018 CASE NAME: CARTER ADDITION CASE NUMBER: CUIS-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD; LOTS 1h2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: — 2 W APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN HOTEL LOT for "CARTER ADDITION" A 20.075 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE H. SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 1415 AND THE A.W. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26 2 /2078 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY APFUGIN/03 Pj�` OF TF+ INITGUTED WA ESTN ATE GROUP cvmR TwNsE IN E PARRI M LP ]IIA W.E BLVD. 7110 1021 IILTOP OR SO -y♦ U8LIKE. 7 T 2 74091 SWTNE N,I6YA5 76092 ( THOMAS A. LUN2MAN (617)17) 742-1&51 NF(972) 5�-7310 ................................ COMALT: KENIETN AYBRO CpINCT: I6DI OVDER i 122259 / ,7GEN5�� BURGESS & NIPLE Fss�adn� E`�' 10701 CORPORATE DR., SUITE 290, STAFFORD, TX 77477 Drawing is not to be used for PHONE: (281)980-7705 construction/bidding pUTpO3eS TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION LA0. F-10834 CONTACT: JOSEPH T. REUE D. S89w22'04'E — 674.89' a p \ DETENTION AREA RVA VWBUEE W/ HT. ` IS' FLAT SPOT RAILING 0 15' FLAT SPOT VARIABLE HT WMDE BUILDING VARIABLE M. OUTSIDE 9ADNG RET. WALL W/ FOR FRE ACCE . REI. WALL W/ 2 \FOR FIRE RNLW RNUN AC CESS TO DETENTION AREA MBL VARE M RET. WALL I— — -- ---- --- — — r-- _ \ w/ RAUN I I O al BUILDING 2 BiJILDING � I 1 I 4-STOB Ybv/PODIUM ) VII 1 4 -STORY W/POD UM CALLED: 4.5827 ACRES \ Ul CITY OF GRAPEVINE I 86 ODI�1 PACE 37 PODI M- PACES P O. BOX 957(14 fiY GRAPEVINE. TX 76099-9704. N \ \ I 6 TU NDER OIS o 99142 287. o.P R TCT L 1 I I oa 749 ANDERSON 3 11 I c _ _ ...0 GISSON ROAD 1'7 I I 0 Co"8 V ABLE Hr. O RET. WAL RNUNG, I - II \ 1 I I Iw 11 I GOLF COURSE RESIRDTED 1 1 15I FLAT SPOT3 USE EASEMENT 1 WrsDE BUEOINc To. CRY OF CP/PFNNE roR tl aE ACC 3 AS. D2000699I3 OP. RTCT. b I I I a pld M l I 3 1 Y' A / h / AMLNITY OV / FFFFFFTTT���RRftiiiL00 /AREA / CARTER GRAPEVINE f / L6 / PARTNERS, LP d CONSTANCE CARTER, I / PSA / TRUSTEE OF THE CONSTANCE CARTER a I E _ _ _It f� REVOCABLETRUST 1� TABLi' DATED APR2 13, 1999, • 9 v 1 INS. D270214T54. \` /vARu>LE Hr — -- 4� -- D207343374, RET. WALL w/ r: �aL18 - Hess wE- 80204189024, / nPRTcr 11111 111'111AIIC11 L1111111 E p ('I11111111,� , , 111111�i NOTES: 1. SANITATION CONTAINER SCREENING WALLS AND PAD SITE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS. 2. LIGHTING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITHIN CITY OF GRAPEVINE CODES. 3. ALL FIRE LANE RADII AT INTERSECTIONS ARE 35' UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 5. ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRAPEVINE SOIL EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE SHALL BE MET DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL ON-SITE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. 7. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE LANDSCAPING FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 53 OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ZONING CODE. B. REFER TO THE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF AND SURROUNDING THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. —a - g PAN . SPr Lemfi ITS SS H0 1 SOWER POLE LINE TABLE EK. 60' EASEMENT ARD I LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S89°23'33"E 31.77- L2 S12°42'41"W 112.2' L3 N57°23'39"W 19.62' L4 519'21'08"W 55.06' LS 586031'27"E 54.65' L6 N89°59'08"E 293.81- L7 N28=52'54"E 9.60' L8 S89059'56"E 412.16' L9 SOO'WO'V'E 81.86' L10 S89'54'11"E 41.73' Lll SOD'12'09"W 385.22' L12 S68°53'16"E 114 n5' SS H0 1 SOWER POLE BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT EK. 60' EASEMENT ARD I f BUILDING 2 -BLDG AREA 14,345 EY. RIGHT OF WAY T0: TEKAS POWER h 1 I• TOTAL BUILDING AREA (SF 94,189 3 a i II �p 10.647A I: l TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 254,588 S.F. (54.9% J TOTALPAVING PARKING&DRIVE AREA 132,241SF. 28.5% TOTAL FLATWORK(SIDEWALK,POOL&HIKE AND BIKE) ENC ��w 012`10111� 1 I■� rn �� I■o BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT EK. 60' EASEMENT ARD I f BUILDING 2 -BLDG AREA 14,345 EY. RIGHT OF WAY T0: TEKAS POWER h 1 I• TOTAL BUILDING AREA (SF 94,189 uG+Rr mw,wr a Du1As wee IIs I I I 10.647A I: l TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 254,588 S.F. (54.9% TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 94,189 S.F. 20.3% TOTALPAVING PARKING&DRIVE AREA 132,241SF. 28.5% TOTAL FLATWORK(SIDEWALK,POOL&HIKE AND BIKE) ARlAKE HT, TOTAL OPEN SPACE 209,195 S.F. 45.1% RET. WNL w/ '.11 F I I ��w 012`10111� 1 I■� rn �� I■o o ENTRY 00 �, FEATURI n _ 6L__1_ '0 BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT _. BUILDING I -BLDG AREA 31,420 BUILDING 2 -BLDG AREA 14,345 BUILDING3-BLDG AREA 30,558 BUILDING 4 -BLDG AREA 17,866 TOTAL BUILDING AREA (SF 94,189 TOTAL LOT AREA (ACRES) 10.647 SITE AREA CALCULATIONS- MUL71-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL LOTAREA ACRES 10.647A TOTAL LOTAREA 463,783S.F. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 254,588 S.F. (54.9% TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 94,189 S.F. 20.3% TOTALPAVING PARKING&DRIVE AREA 132,241SF. 28.5% TOTAL FLATWORK(SIDEWALK,POOL&HIKE AND BIKE) 28,158 S.F. (6.1%) TOTAL OPEN SPACE 209,195 S.F. 45.1% ImIF 4• a rn ■t 11 S o ENTRY 00 �, FEATURI n _ 6L__1_ '0 F: LIC COMMON AC? C ESS EASEMENT 7 (TRACT 5) (,CUTED 02/19/97 VOL 12693, PG. 039 BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT _. BUILDING I -BLDG AREA 31,420 BUILDING 2 -BLDG AREA 14,345 BUILDING3-BLDG AREA 30,558 BUILDING 4 -BLDG AREA 17,866 TOTAL BUILDING AREA (SF 94,189 TOTAL LOT AREA (ACRES) 10.647 SITE AREA CALCULATIONS- MUL71-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TOTAL LOTAREA ACRES 10.647A TOTAL LOTAREA 463,783S.F. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 254,588 S.F. (54.9% TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 94,189 S.F. 20.3% TOTALPAVING PARKING&DRIVE AREA 132,241SF. 28.5% TOTAL FLATWORK(SIDEWALK,POOL&HIKE AND BIKE) 28,158 S.F. (6.1%) TOTAL OPEN SPACE 209,195 S.F. 45.1% F: LIC COMMON AC? C ESS EASEMENT 7 (TRACT 5) (,CUTED 02/19/97 VOL 12693, PG. 039 / �� LOT DATA: TOTAL AREA: 10.647 ACRES 3 0 50' 100' HORIZONTAL SCALE VICINITY MAP SCALE 1- = 1000' BUILDING DATA: 275 UNITS BUILDING 1 -86 UNITS -4 STORY W/PODIUM & TUCK UNDER BUILDING 2 -44 UNITS -4 STORY W/PODIUM BU LID NG 3 - 91 UNITS - 4 STORY BUILDING 4 - 54 UNITS - 4 STORY W/ TUCK UNDER PARKING DATA: 531 - SURFACE PROVIDED (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) 123 - PODIUM 40 -TUCK UNDER 38 -TANDEM 330 - SURFACE (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) 2/03/2018 :...................... THOMAS A. LUNZMAN •. 122259,,,,.E �.7..CENSFq'� �/ORAL Drawing 1 to be Ind for construction/bidding purposes v �C,5 ) CALLED2. 324 ACRES TRACT A -R, BLOCK 6 \ \ BREAKLINE GRAPEVINE HILLS ADDITION 1 _ _ _ _ _ .1;4Q..4—SLIDE 5503. P.R. T.C_T CASE NAME: CARTER ADDITION CASE NUMBER: CU18-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD; LOTS 1@2. BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: sHa = .' u APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MULTIFAMILY LOT for "CARTER ADDITION" A 20.075 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE H. SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE A.A. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY OWNEk INTEGRATED REAL ESTATE GROUP CARRR WPEINE PAIUMERS, LP 3110 W. SOUTNANE BLVD., /1211 1021 HILLTOP DR. SOUIWXF, TETTS 7= WJTHAE, TOMS 7M (81 1 742 -IMI (272) 569-7340 CONTACT: KDMEM FA BRO CONTACT: NCK ONFU BURGESS & NIPLE 10701 CORPORATE DR., SURE 290, STAFFORD. TX 77477 PHONE: (281)980-7705 TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION N0, F-10834 CONTACT: JOSEPH L BELIE _. 1 NCErn,r ae , eor iCURI AO'7 / �� LOT DATA: TOTAL AREA: 10.647 ACRES 3 0 50' 100' HORIZONTAL SCALE VICINITY MAP SCALE 1- = 1000' BUILDING DATA: 275 UNITS BUILDING 1 -86 UNITS -4 STORY W/PODIUM & TUCK UNDER BUILDING 2 -44 UNITS -4 STORY W/PODIUM BU LID NG 3 - 91 UNITS - 4 STORY BUILDING 4 - 54 UNITS - 4 STORY W/ TUCK UNDER PARKING DATA: 531 - SURFACE PROVIDED (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) 123 - PODIUM 40 -TUCK UNDER 38 -TANDEM 330 - SURFACE (OF WHICH 66 ARE SHARED) 2/03/2018 :...................... THOMAS A. LUNZMAN •. 122259,,,,.E �.7..CENSFq'� �/ORAL Drawing 1 to be Ind for construction/bidding purposes v �C,5 ) CALLED2. 324 ACRES TRACT A -R, BLOCK 6 \ \ BREAKLINE GRAPEVINE HILLS ADDITION 1 _ _ _ _ _ .1;4Q..4—SLIDE 5503. P.R. T.C_T CASE NAME: CARTER ADDITION CASE NUMBER: CU18-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD; LOTS 1@2. BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: sHa = .' u APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MULTIFAMILY LOT for "CARTER ADDITION" A 20.075 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE H. SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE A.A. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY OWNEk INTEGRATED REAL ESTATE GROUP CARRR WPEINE PAIUMERS, LP 3110 W. SOUTNANE BLVD., /1211 1021 HILLTOP DR. SOUIWXF, TETTS 7= WJTHAE, TOMS 7M (81 1 742 -IMI (272) 569-7340 CONTACT: KDMEM FA BRO CONTACT: NCK ONFU BURGESS & NIPLE 10701 CORPORATE DR., SURE 290, STAFFORD. TX 77477 PHONE: (281)980-7705 TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION N0, F-10834 CONTACT: JOSEPH L BELIE i� ti 0 O a S89°22'04'E - 674.89' \\ OUTFALL W/ EROSION PROTECTIO 3B HOPE DETENTION AREA (vueuc PEM°iE FDG °R D REHOIE FDG fiTA,A PPE STAID PIPE )I 4-STDRYWI/0OdIUM I 7F GRAPEVINE \ \ I v \ s onrsTNo., PIPE TX OX f5104 fi099970a. N \ I �. ..... - _��...�...... II I 7.0 P.R.TC.T 1 Pony nERSON 11 ROAD EO I I I / tr -..3 WM 1' • WM. 19' 1"3 I I - wT IPIJfiIJC) - 2 II I O o I I I Dm STAND I 11 11 I - 8 • L wm B'SS vaTq \\ \\ I _..— �, x rrrx3Ne PwvA - 3A'A'O� • sxXs 3'Xr- _- `3 BUILDING 3 75 UNITS -3.s / REN07E FDG - y / sTAND PPE w / �• / DRY STAND GHMC,E M PDWT / E 0.L IIyWIIIIIIIIDIIIIIIL�lllllllllllll%WIIIII login / 1 / � � � `rL / o � qyo� ❑, sXo ❑ aao as ❑ { j PEVINE CARTER, I I / �. rxr THE s xw•ER'xWaF9 Da CARTER TRUSTx- 154.99, 41 74, 24, T. PROPOSED BUILDING / SSTORY / I _ 303 TOTAL ROOMS -__liff IC ---- STAYBRIDGE 1- l / 9 SUITES c 1 I D I x F I s eb a 6 x - W ;n HOLIDAY 2 ❑ INN 9 _UT 111111111 / d 'C / axr I fl I I LrlxebeAir61 1 !"1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /-'� OUTFALL W/ DETENTION AREA N88°07 44-W -• 812.76' I / � S / I / p •. \ E,ts�NENr \�. ONNFCTTC ^ \ \ EX. 1 \ , O I ( � I I/ DS I wy ey3�`Q gPOV" v �' Px TO BEM (CURB) INA / 80170M_ 10 &� OI t DD ,1= VER¢°N _ ? i it REAKLI ' /S aS I / :NTS, psi 9-0652, PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN / / 1 VERIZON- D /// for T.C.T I "CARTER ADDITION" / A 20.075 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE A. SUGGS SURVEY, A ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE A.W. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26 2/03/2DTB GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY ;F jJ1 MEGMIED RA ESTATE GROUP rl/fTER GURYNE PARR Npb, lP 3110 W. SWHAKE &W, AIA 4021 NLLNP DR. / AAAA .......... ................. SMAKAXE TEOS 76091 S UTHAM TEYAS 76092 / caarEcrro Es se THOMAS A. LUNZMAN (817) 742 -IMI (972) 369 -TWO / •••••••••••••••••••••••••••� • INABLE TO OPEN FOR INVER I < 122259 WACT: XOADN FAME O CONACT: M ONM ATTEMPED SEVERALTIMES l y C%�� - BURGESS & NIPLE 10701 CORPORATE DR., SUITE 290, STAFFORD, TX 77477 / N is not to be used for PHONE(281)98D-7705 „ I / construction/bidding purposes TOPE FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F-10834 :I CONTACT: JOSEPH L REI[ N 0 50' 100' HORIZONTAL SCALE LEGEND O PRCPDiD W- SINTER -Huf Elm NG SMIIAY SEWER WNNXE �F76' S5 - - - E%6RM: SNttxx SEYFR 6' A UP FROWhID SA�rtA� Ar,£R o PRroo;ED rArtR sEm^u Ex5ttG wlrm 1Eim PROPD4D FlAE XiDRIxT OP"ING nIE NDRNIf - PRDPbaEp Y1114 IX61N0 vN.W r PmIOAD MRP DnRrS (11%. nW. 45, rs) 6' R PAAYD MiFlt UKE - •y' x-,- - - ElmNO TIARA UE .35' PADS PRWOSED A' 11IrD/Fr: 9LDS AIO lm1W El43EIn ZONING CASE: CONDITIONAL USE CASE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY CASE: SUBMITTAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 04, 2018 — NNE: GNTIfix —nn.. CASE NUMBER: CU18-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD; LOTS 1&2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SAEEr _ a APPROVAL DOES NOT AUIIHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I 11 hG NOTES: 44j. II'(. !� I 1. PREUNINARY UTILITY PIAN ON 24X36. DETAILED UTILITY PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED ON 22X34 WITH FOR SEPARATE MULTIFAMILY AND HOTEL CML CONSTRUCTION PLANS Z I I 2. ALL URUTY WORK (I.E. WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM DRAINAGE) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE 11 11 !I STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. O0 ` w - j, 3. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THIS PROPERTY WILL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF PER CITY AND/OR COUNTY EMDTE Fnn 01 1 -1 O 11 - CODE. ALL EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEMS SHAH BE REMOVED/OISPOSED OF PER CITY AND/OR COUNTY CODE. srANOPIP6 1 LLL _ ISI .� ^ I 4. THE EXISTING ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE TERMINATED. IF NECESSARY, THE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC UTILITY, ACCESS AND HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THIS SITE SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. THE EXACT ROUTING OF THE NEW UNDERGROUND —�_ M I ELECTRIC SERVICE FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LOCAL ELECTRIC FRANCHISE UTILITY OWNER. ALL ONSfTE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. to .___•_ n% 5. IF NECESSARY, THE EXISTING GAS LINES ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC UTILITY, ACCESS AND HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL EkKMENT ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THIS SITE SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR RELOCATED. IF NECESSARY, ALL CAS LINE I oREMOVAL AND/OR ABANDONMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LOCAL GIS FRANCHISE UTILDY OWNER. II, FL c., 5200 a I C U I� ti1 I 6. IF NECESSARY, THE EXISTING CABLE AND PHONE LINES ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC UTILITY, ACCESS AND HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THIS SITE SHLAI.L BE REMOVED AND/OR RELOCATED. THE EXACT ROUTING °O 1-- OF THE NEW UNDERGROUND CABLE AND PHONE SERVICE FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATE WITH THE LOCAL CABLE AND PHONE FRANCHISE UTILITY OWNERS. q NECT TO o.J M EX. IWRCP ) - 7. THE EXISTING 60' TEXAS POWER & LIGHT EASEMENT AND THE EXISTING FACILITES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE. - ALL PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WORK WITHIN THE LIMITS OF EXISTING 60' TEXAS POWER & LIGHT EASEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE �. DPT STATION PUMP IT ST TION PUMP OWNER OF SUCH EASEMENT. —' bPHASi yyW/6p HZ 65 NP 8. BACKFLOW PREVENTION SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH CONNECTION TO THE CITY WATER SYSTEM (LE. DOMESTIC, FIRE AND IRRIGATION LINES). BACKFLOW PREVENTION SFWl BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE BACKFLOW REQUIREMENTS. BURGESS & NIPTF, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM DESIGN FOR THIS PROJECT. THE FIRE LINE SOME — - 'gI ) 7 �I4AI SIZES SHOWN ON THIS UTILITY PLN! ARE PRELIMINARY IN NATURE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE 9. THE DOMESTIC WATER AND IRRIGATION UNE SERVICE/METER SIZES SHOWN ON THIS UTIUITY PLAN ARE PRELIMINARY IN NATURE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE. IRpNF MFT Ano 10. THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE SIZES TO ALL PROPOSED BUILDING SHOWN ON THIS UTILITY PLAN ARE PRELIMINARY IN NATURE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE. co I� o y I — •R L b ! !ME I ; I T ..D.e. �, . •EDIT N88°07 44-W -• 812.76' I / � S / I / p •. \ E,ts�NENr \�. ONNFCTTC ^ \ \ EX. 1 \ , O I ( � I I/ DS I wy ey3�`Q gPOV" v �' Px TO BEM (CURB) INA / 80170M_ 10 &� OI t DD ,1= VER¢°N _ ? i it REAKLI ' /S aS I / :NTS, psi 9-0652, PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN / / 1 VERIZON- D /// for T.C.T I "CARTER ADDITION" / A 20.075 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE A. SUGGS SURVEY, A ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE A.W. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26 2/03/2DTB GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY ;F jJ1 MEGMIED RA ESTATE GROUP rl/fTER GURYNE PARR Npb, lP 3110 W. SWHAKE &W, AIA 4021 NLLNP DR. / AAAA .......... ................. SMAKAXE TEOS 76091 S UTHAM TEYAS 76092 / caarEcrro Es se THOMAS A. LUNZMAN (817) 742 -IMI (972) 369 -TWO / •••••••••••••••••••••••••••� • INABLE TO OPEN FOR INVER I < 122259 WACT: XOADN FAME O CONACT: M ONM ATTEMPED SEVERALTIMES l y C%�� - BURGESS & NIPLE 10701 CORPORATE DR., SUITE 290, STAFFORD, TX 77477 / N is not to be used for PHONE(281)98D-7705 „ I / construction/bidding purposes TOPE FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F-10834 :I CONTACT: JOSEPH L REI[ N 0 50' 100' HORIZONTAL SCALE LEGEND O PRCPDiD W- SINTER -Huf Elm NG SMIIAY SEWER WNNXE �F76' S5 - - - E%6RM: SNttxx SEYFR 6' A UP FROWhID SA�rtA� Ar,£R o PRroo;ED rArtR sEm^u Ex5ttG wlrm 1Eim PROPD4D FlAE XiDRIxT OP"ING nIE NDRNIf - PRDPbaEp Y1114 IX61N0 vN.W r PmIOAD MRP DnRrS (11%. nW. 45, rs) 6' R PAAYD MiFlt UKE - •y' x-,- - - ElmNO TIARA UE .35' PADS PRWOSED A' 11IrD/Fr: 9LDS AIO lm1W El43EIn ZONING CASE: CONDITIONAL USE CASE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY CASE: SUBMITTAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 04, 2018 — NNE: GNTIfix —nn.. CASE NUMBER: CU18-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD; LOTS 1&2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SAEEr _ a APPROVAL DOES NOT AUIIHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES U.S. ARMY CORPS ENGINEERS TRACT NO A 3A I �i CIVIL ACTION NO. 1461 Now °22'04"E - 674. �-�� A1A111Hli I / ( ROU L - 1 I " ' � �� D IN I I w I 1.07 I I B K', j mI U NOE 11hITS " 1 I�~ C14 ll Ji� P I ' TUCI{(VINOf s� I 1 Ilia - ii 0.21 Durr Lwl l / B3II sourHPOND C5 1.46 AC -FT. OFSTORAGE I / -. -_ 4%, \ C11 Willa 037 3 ' OS 84 I OS C- E I 0.32 I � / fp ENYRV ala 2.07 / / FEATURE A PRELIMINARY DETENTION NUMBERS I NORTH POND ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE: 25.5 CFS (INCLUDES PRE -DEVELOPED OFFSITE FLOWS FOR ADDITIONAL DETENTION) CALLED: 3.0313 ACRES ESTIMATED STORAGE REQUIRED: 1.10 AC -FT ESTIMATED STORAGE PROVIDED: 1.10 11 / WHITTLESEYINVESTMENTS, DRAINAGE AREA: 9.01 ACRES (OF WHICH 1.95 ACRES FROM OFFSITE) / INC. NO. 1 L6 OUTLET CONTROL SHALL BE SIZED TO ALLOW DISCHARGE OF EXISTING CONDITION FLOWS; ROCK RIP RAP SHALL P.O. BOX 652 r // ° I ALSO BE PROVIDED AT OUTFALL FOR EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. I GRAPEVINE, TX 76099-0652. • // V7567, P.919, D.R /T.C.T , SOUTH POND I ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE: 34.2 CFS (INCLUDES OFFSITE FLOWS) _ 3 ESTIMATED STORAGE REQUIRED: 1.50 AC -FT ESTIMATED STORAGE PROVIDED: 1.50 AC -FT ♦ I DRAINAGE AREA: 13.67 ACRES (OF WHICH 2.07 ACRES FROM OFFSITE) O OUTLET CONTROL SHALL BE SIZED TO ALLOW DISCHARGE OF EXISTING CONDITION FLOWS; ROCK RIP RAP SHALL 5 ALSO BE PROVIDED AT OUTFALL FOR EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. ' / I • SOL I I O I I I I, 11 n /\ 1 1 k I 1 �4a?!A II C10 ae '1 ro I (C(Ut6j INLET PoM EtSY09' � I BOTTOM FLODk EL°55 7(1' .. - Icuae) wLET EOTTOM FLL /i / / / CALLED: 2.324 ACRES TRACT A -R. BLOCK 6 GRAPEVINE HILLS ADDITION / CAB. A, SLIDE 5503, P. R. T. C. T. GRAPEVINE LODGING PARTNERS LP 2240 W GRAPEVINE MILLS CIR GRAPEVINE. TX. 76051-2077 V. 16745. P 141, D.R.T. C. T. T -I 1. THE ONSITE TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO US BY AN ACTUAL ON THE GROUND SURVEY BY SPOONER & ASSOCIATES. THE OFFSITE TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE PLAN WAS SCALED FROM TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS THAT WE RECEIVED FROM THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE 2. PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND DETENTION PLANS ON 24X36. DETAILED DRAINAGE AND DETENTION PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED ON 22X34 WITH FOR SEPARATE MULTIFAMILY AND HOTEL CML CONSTRUCTION PLANS. N (ID 0 60' 120' HORIZONTAL SCALE ' PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA CALCULATIONS Designation ,I C Tc IS1300 QS Q100 min.) (in/hT) iNhr) d5 ds NOTES Al I I B L I A8 6.60 2 tl A9 S l� W/ ICIh: DRAINS TO NORTH POND A2 M29 0.75 4 m 660 T Tb v f A3 0.74 - 10 6.60 TLSO 3.68 6.42 DRAINS TO NORTH POND CfTY OFGRAPEVINE ` ?J BORA 10a .m GRI�_9,4 TX 6La"} ` . \\ B2fVDER. \ I I ACE s„ ... ..: .. ...... O.SS �'s _ � 3 O 11 � �� y BAD q DRAINSTO NORTH POND 1 �.. 1.75 I -Li 1.29 0.75 10 660 1150 6.39 1L13 DRAINS TO NORTH POND A7 0.75 a4oe s .,Bso,vPtar I 660 V DRAINS TO NORTH POND A8 0.58 ° I. 6.613 IL50 2.85 4.96 DRAINS TO NORTH POND A9 °oE rmv.rr _-GILII I~OEA]AILCT1ETi �_IaeI M75 10 660 z I\ 111 10.52 AID 079 075 .~ AAREA R \ IL50 3.90 6.80 DRAINSTONORTHPOND C1 033 075 10 660 1LSO 164 186 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND {"pp 0.25 0.75 o ai 660 3150 L25 117 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C3 0.38 0.75 10 660 ILSO L90 3.32 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C4 0.52 10.75 30 (1 1LS0I 259 4.50 DRAINS TO 5011TH POND C5 0.41 0.75 10 660 TLSO 2.03 3.54 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C6 U 0.75 30 660 1150 L61 280 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C7 1-41 I 10 660 A4 ORAINSTO SOUTH POND - AS I °� 0.75 10 I • a I 0.27 A2 0.51 BUILDING 3 0.43 I 1150 L33 L32 I $ CIO M78 0.75 10 u ---4 0.29 y"111!S'" Cll STOiRY - .�-�� sr ri 660 1150 L82 3.18 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C12 1.07 h 30 660 TLSO 131 9.26 A3 C13 1 0.21 0.75 10 660 DRAINSTOSOUTH POND C14 175 / ~ / / DATE LOQfC I I \ a1r 074 " a1- r , . e { DRAINS TO SOUTH POND Pool L - A6 1.29 L49 ` OS A- 10 1 660 1 1L50 7.40 IZ891 DRAINS TOSOUTH POND jL �-. ... v - 1.95 CIS C-1 2.07 10.75 41,14 660 1150 10.26 17.88 SHEET FLOWS TO SOLIM POND OFF-SITE) OSA-1 1.95 0.75 CARTER GRAPEVINE r 311.50 9.66 1693 r r Bl 0.92 PARTNERS, LP LONSTANCECARTER TRUSTEE OF THE % 4' Al 3150 4S7 7.97 SHEET FLOW (OFF-SITE) B2 1.75 CONSTANCECARTER 1 / REVOCABLE TRUST DATEDAPRE IX 1999, \ ,NS.021013a,50 \ l D'40 ----u,J 11 30..32 ~o. SHEET FLOW OFF-SITE 63 D207343374 1 C1 - .i° C3 (1 CS SHEET FLOW OFF-SITE) OS B4 _. r i 0.33 - r x-Tt"' a 9.a]B_AC S _ 0.41 a BUIL POSE�B B = -� aw 1r� STAYBRIDGE 303"IAL 3"IAL R -I C4 ■ S BWIES 5 -,STD RvC7 I { h ' 40 C2 0.52 I I A9b I 1 141 C9 ��x I / ( ROU L - 1 I " ' � �� D IN I I w I 1.07 I I B K', j mI U NOE 11hITS " 1 I�~ C14 ll Ji� P I ' TUCI{(VINOf s� I 1 Ilia - ii 0.21 Durr Lwl l / B3II sourHPOND C5 1.46 AC -FT. OFSTORAGE I / -. -_ 4%, \ C11 Willa 037 3 ' OS 84 I OS C- E I 0.32 I � / fp ENYRV ala 2.07 / / FEATURE A PRELIMINARY DETENTION NUMBERS I NORTH POND ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE: 25.5 CFS (INCLUDES PRE -DEVELOPED OFFSITE FLOWS FOR ADDITIONAL DETENTION) CALLED: 3.0313 ACRES ESTIMATED STORAGE REQUIRED: 1.10 AC -FT ESTIMATED STORAGE PROVIDED: 1.10 11 / WHITTLESEYINVESTMENTS, DRAINAGE AREA: 9.01 ACRES (OF WHICH 1.95 ACRES FROM OFFSITE) / INC. NO. 1 L6 OUTLET CONTROL SHALL BE SIZED TO ALLOW DISCHARGE OF EXISTING CONDITION FLOWS; ROCK RIP RAP SHALL P.O. BOX 652 r // ° I ALSO BE PROVIDED AT OUTFALL FOR EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. I GRAPEVINE, TX 76099-0652. • // V7567, P.919, D.R /T.C.T , SOUTH POND I ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE: 34.2 CFS (INCLUDES OFFSITE FLOWS) _ 3 ESTIMATED STORAGE REQUIRED: 1.50 AC -FT ESTIMATED STORAGE PROVIDED: 1.50 AC -FT ♦ I DRAINAGE AREA: 13.67 ACRES (OF WHICH 2.07 ACRES FROM OFFSITE) O OUTLET CONTROL SHALL BE SIZED TO ALLOW DISCHARGE OF EXISTING CONDITION FLOWS; ROCK RIP RAP SHALL 5 ALSO BE PROVIDED AT OUTFALL FOR EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. ' / I • SOL I I O I I I I, 11 n /\ 1 1 k I 1 �4a?!A II C10 ae '1 ro I (C(Ut6j INLET PoM EtSY09' � I BOTTOM FLODk EL°55 7(1' .. - Icuae) wLET EOTTOM FLL /i / / / CALLED: 2.324 ACRES TRACT A -R. BLOCK 6 GRAPEVINE HILLS ADDITION / CAB. A, SLIDE 5503, P. R. T. C. T. GRAPEVINE LODGING PARTNERS LP 2240 W GRAPEVINE MILLS CIR GRAPEVINE. TX. 76051-2077 V. 16745. P 141, D.R.T. C. T. T -I 1. THE ONSITE TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO US BY AN ACTUAL ON THE GROUND SURVEY BY SPOONER & ASSOCIATES. THE OFFSITE TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE PLAN WAS SCALED FROM TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS THAT WE RECEIVED FROM THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE 2. PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND DETENTION PLANS ON 24X36. DETAILED DRAINAGE AND DETENTION PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED ON 22X34 WITH FOR SEPARATE MULTIFAMILY AND HOTEL CML CONSTRUCTION PLANS. N (ID 0 60' 120' HORIZONTAL SCALE E5111MTED INLET GTPACITY 44' GRATE INLET IN SUMP - 312.7 CFS (ASSUMED 50% CLOGGED 3'x3' GRATE INLET IN SUMP = 39.6 CFS (ASSUMED 50% CLOGGED) 5' CURB INLET IN SUMP = 37.4 CFS 10' CURB INLET IN SUMP = t 14.70 CFS LEGEND A-1 DRAINAGE AREA DESIGNATION 5.00 DRAINAGE AREA (ACRES) al - al - al DRAINAGE AREA DIVIDE UNE f- DRNNAGE AREA FLOW ARROWS -530- / EXISTING CONTOURS 11.. ALL PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINES ARE PRIVATE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 2. SEE PRELIMINARY ROUGH GRADING PUN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON GRADING ZONING CASE: CONDITIONAL USE CASE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY CASE: SUBMITTAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 04, 2018 CASE NAME: CAI MO." CASE NUMBER: CU18-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1&2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PUNNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: Mr¢r � a as APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFUR WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE & DETENTION PLAN for "CARTER ADDITION" A 20.075 ACRE TRACT IDCATED IN THE R. SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE A.R. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26 2/03/2018 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY OF „orf APRII oLxR 88GaMITO Ri ESTATE GROUP Cii GRAMNE PARI ERS, IP Ai • 3110 W. STXR14N0: BLV, 1170 A021 HILLTOP OR SOUpINE, 7M 78097 SOIRIAAIE. TEMS 76W2 THOMAS A. LUNZMAN (617) 742-itim (972) 51]310 00101 K MEIN FAMM =UCL: = CARTER FS`1�E?t,1*M ��AL BURGESS & NIPLE It i�tobebe used 10701 CORPORATE DR., SUITE 290, STAFFORD, rX 77477 construction/bidding Purposes PHONE: (281)980-7705 TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F-10834 CONTACT: JOSEPH T. REI[ PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA CALCULATIONS Designation Area aces C Tc IS1300 QS Q100 min.) (in/hT) iNhr) d5 ds NOTES Al 0.40 0.75 10 6.60 1 11-50 I L96 3.42 DRAINS TO NORTH POND A2 M29 0.75 10 660 1150 L4S 2.53 DRAINS TO NORTH POND A3 0.74 0.75 10 6.60 TLSO 3.68 6.42 DRAINS TO NORTH POND A4 051 0.75 10 6.60 11-50 2.54 4.42 DRAINSTO NORTH POND AS 0.43 0.75 10 BAD 1LSO 114 3.72 DRAINSTO NORTH POND A6 1.29 0.75 10 660 1150 6.39 1L13 DRAINS TO NORTH POND A7 0.52 0.75 10 I 660 1150 7571 4.49 DRAINS TO NORTH POND A8 0.58 0.75 W 6.613 IL50 2.85 4.96 DRAINS TO NORTH POND A9 M56 M75 10 660 I 1150 176 4.82 DRAINS TO NORTH POND AID 079 075 10 660 IL50 3.90 6.80 DRAINSTONORTHPOND C1 033 075 10 660 1LSO 164 186 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C2 0.25 0.75 10 660 3150 L25 117 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C3 0.38 0.75 10 660 ILSO L90 3.32 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C4 0.52 10.75 30 (1 1LS0I 259 4.50 DRAINS TO 5011TH POND C5 0.41 0.75 10 660 TLSO 2.03 3.54 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C6 032 0.75 30 660 1150 L61 280 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C7 1-41 075 10 660 1150 699 1218 ORAINSTO SOUTH POND CB 0.26 0.75 10 660 1LSO L31 2.28 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C9 0.27 0.75 10 660 1150 L33 L32 DRAINS TOSOUTH POND CIO M78 0.75 10 660 1L50 3.84 669 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND Cll 0.37 0.75 30 660 1150 L82 3.18 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND C12 1.07 0.75 30 660 TLSO 131 9.26 DRAINSTOSOUTH POND C13 1 0.21 0.75 10 660 SLSO L03 180 DRAINSTOSOUTH POND C14 175 075 10 1 660 11.50 869 15.14 DRAINS TO SOUTH POND Cis L49 0.75 10 1 660 1 1L50 7.40 IZ891 DRAINS TOSOUTH POND CIS C-1 2.07 10.75 10 660 1150 10.26 17.88 SHEET FLOWS TO SOLIM POND OFF-SITE) OSA-1 1.95 0.75 30 660 311.50 9.66 1693 OFF-SITE DRAINS TO NORTH POND Bl 0.92 0.75 10 660 3150 4S7 7.97 SHEET FLOW (OFF-SITE) B2 1.75 A75 10 11 IL50 865 15.07 SHEET FLOW OFF-SITE 63 L46 0.75 30 (1 1L50 7.20 1255 SHEET FLOW OFF-SITE) OS B4 0.32 0.75 1D 660 1150 L59 277 SHEETFLOW OFF-SITE E5111MTED INLET GTPACITY 44' GRATE INLET IN SUMP - 312.7 CFS (ASSUMED 50% CLOGGED 3'x3' GRATE INLET IN SUMP = 39.6 CFS (ASSUMED 50% CLOGGED) 5' CURB INLET IN SUMP = 37.4 CFS 10' CURB INLET IN SUMP = t 14.70 CFS LEGEND A-1 DRAINAGE AREA DESIGNATION 5.00 DRAINAGE AREA (ACRES) al - al - al DRAINAGE AREA DIVIDE UNE f- DRNNAGE AREA FLOW ARROWS -530- / EXISTING CONTOURS 11.. ALL PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINES ARE PRIVATE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 2. SEE PRELIMINARY ROUGH GRADING PUN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON GRADING ZONING CASE: CONDITIONAL USE CASE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY CASE: SUBMITTAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 04, 2018 CASE NAME: CAI MO." CASE NUMBER: CU18-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1&2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PUNNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: Mr¢r � a as APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFUR WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE & DETENTION PLAN for "CARTER ADDITION" A 20.075 ACRE TRACT IDCATED IN THE R. SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE A.R. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26 2/03/2018 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY OF „orf APRII oLxR 88GaMITO Ri ESTATE GROUP Cii GRAMNE PARI ERS, IP Ai • 3110 W. STXR14N0: BLV, 1170 A021 HILLTOP OR SOUpINE, 7M 78097 SOIRIAAIE. TEMS 76W2 THOMAS A. LUNZMAN (617) 742-itim (972) 51]310 00101 K MEIN FAMM =UCL: = CARTER FS`1�E?t,1*M ��AL BURGESS & NIPLE It i�tobebe used 10701 CORPORATE DR., SUITE 290, STAFFORD, rX 77477 construction/bidding Purposes PHONE: (281)980-7705 TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F-10834 CONTACT: JOSEPH T. REI[ w o- - S89°22'04'E-674.8 ' ° N,pB° Wim$ ��4 III N x��. �ti�� � 111 ". .co 450, �o, x502.0 'I ews13.oc,}� .o 1 I \ _RA�*,duET�vTION py4r)(soo.eoKsgA ..,50,50I IbwIIV . tc eo III x R4s.MD 0 60' 100• \ \ s Ni, c r�yr`' M1° 50 ) HORIZONTAL SCALE �f. F III _,�A ,�° M1° '4 ti _ 2 -_ 6p6 Abo �41 NOTES: 1. PRELIMINARY GRADING PIAN ON 24X36. DETAILED GRADING PINTS WILL BE PROVIDED ON 22X34 WITH FOR SEPARATE MULTIFAMILY ' ND HOTEL CML CONSTRUCTION PLANS. 2. All UTILITY WORK (I.E. WATER, SANBARY SEWER AND STORM DRAINAGE) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3. THE EXISTING ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE TERMINATED. IF NECESSARY, THE EXISTING OVERHEAD �- -1. �� - TW33e.o - ELECTRIC FRONTAGE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC EXACT ACCESS AND HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG I THE FRONTAGE OF THIS SITE SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR RELOCATED. THE EXACT ROUTING OF THE NEW UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 3 SERVICE FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LOCAL ELECTRIC FRANCHISE UTILITY OWNER. ALL ONSITE ELECTRICAL fl CONDUCTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. co- I I ro - _ ,9""" 4 I I 4. THE EXISTING GAS SERVICE TO ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES SHAH BE TERMINATED. IF NECESSARY, THE EXISTING CAS LINES ALONG M I. �I .'d, s`�o Y� THE WEST SIDE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC UTILITY, ACCESS AND HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THIS SITE ', SHALL BE REMOVED ANDOR RELOCATED. IF NECESSARY, All CAS LINE REMOVAL AND/OR ABANDONMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE �_ i m LOCAL GAS FRANCHISE UTILITY OWNER. � 1� I ^' y I 5. THE EXISTING CABLE AND PHONE SERVICE TO ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE TERMINATED. IF NECESSARY, THE EXISTING CABLE AND PHONE UNES ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE VARIABLE WIDTH PUBUC UT81TY, ACCESS AND HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THIS SITE SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR RELOCATED. THE EXACT ROUTING OF THE NEW UNDERGROUND CABLE AND L ews385 nv5w PHONE SERVICE FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE COORDINATE WITH THE OCAL CABLE AND PHONE FRANCHISE UTILITY OWNERS. 1 1 0 ,, S� L • �.1 I"'.' ,•,.�9J 1 (_� I I - • I IIIF 1 1 I / _ _ _ c +dam - 1 (I THE EXISTING 60' TOW POWER & LIGHT EASEMENT AND THE EXISTING FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE. ALL PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WORK WITHIN THE LIMITS OF EXISTING 60' TEXAS POWER & LIGHT EASEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE dfiP' _ 950' _J)6 OWNER OF SUCH EASEMENT. 7.00 NA 90 1 I 'oo LEGEND I FF 0.00 _ ' _ LN ' 13:0 If xEB595.00 EXPOSED BEAM GRADE 4 tqy x595.00 TOP OF PAVEMENT SPOT GRADE I r � ��' �? _ 1 x595.0 FINISHED GROUND SPOT GRADE _ e TTT III x TW545.0 TOP OF WALL SPOT GRADE"' OURTY . e. ±539. ? IO . 4ao I 6 OW5400 xBW545.0 BOTTOM OF WALL SPOT GRADE °NW 9-532.5x 7zWAy s _o, .S LT . ,jl,l I II II I FF = 540.0 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION SITE L 1w541 0"334.o x 534337 - o e `t5 FLOW ARROW BIY5J90 0 21 2.30 �'4 ��T v1%5u 6-"'0BW0 W56 19. 115 5J9 541. ` -� -- --- TIT �° &w5420 IW542.s� OM1. Seo y,1T�s. f�� "5425: 6 I II A\ -�,1�, �i z.s0 _ -�I �,�--pt'2 4 �'ab •q rL- s, ° ° 4_/ .\�r "�7 .gi _-+e'� rWy377 44W 555' 0 qi ,e. qit 564..60 5407 Ti07\ 4.2 sx5� 1, uNnf Ta 'FOR OW539 o 45-43.0 _ _- Ear _.. - °` ?'L ,�,� / ' - x 51'N•7. I m VICINITY MAP _. SCALE 1' = 1000' I / ews37.0 �. + --_. --- -- - - - a27iaz5 °_?qz f -.a �.s s+aeo ^4 TWsss.o �.a . ' I FF x 544.0 srAYewODE SURES „ I �" ' 6p Y i ZONING CASE: CONDITIONAL USE CASE: exszso rbs4zs PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY CASE: ° SUBMITTAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 04, 2018 wF- 6.515.0 Q I -'� • yT 76 9t 9894 E NAME: CAT AD MON O a - I I CASE NUMBER: CU18-25 ~50.. ` + 8X X 96 J I I I V I 1 'Flb - - LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD; LOTS �o3n H' Y R .�1/ SN - - 1 y 1&2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION r. BWs09.ox v4, suso HOLIDAY "- I g.m - If) sw.00 sss sss.3o o - N54z0 -- te> o m -l•Y ' 3` "V 4� 0 a � IRN ., R „` 88 - I gK548.0 �� ,., I \,563bB 21- �1.50: ^�'� � � I IJ„ i _ . W� MAYOR SECRETARY 'kb -'r„ &ws00.o sld 0\ .e0 -- ,. I �'� �,.A A40 x�zr � � - ��� I A{� I � DATE: AND ZONING COMMISSION I'll, W490.0_ 8 �618� l \rr 11 LL a _ 11 54 10 15 ` a .� i x� _ ry �j 542,567-I Sig " _ /- CHAIRMAN // ✓ -S35.J0/66d.00 / DATE: X521.50 ,�--'t8% 28%- _ ,�.. % 42. w3 FF _ 544.D 1. _�., :1 �. v / /�. /��. FJTTOM FI.DOR EI. „] il. BW4915 M51800 / 52.1 5 4 `' S �O 1 50x 9 .. �% I 7019!'LAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK CES {j ` fWf>46�,.0 5 j3✓r 't.. _.. [ i i 1 IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES iW521. r I � I '0546.0 n45s1.o -z-&x2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES �x64 so °EJ6@§r�N A ZW24 �-�.0 V rr PRELIMINARY ROUGH GRADING PLAN 2.m� 0 1{1II / I\Y492.0 6X491.0 49240 �� &WS040�1W520p0� '--`- 512.00 1.58 :a�, f �.. 5 _ 2 Z'/� *9S.OBN54J5.0y 0 1 OR� �.y� x 555.70 I �/. ID e^- x/ for \/ A 20.075 ACRE PRAAAA LOCATED"CARTERADDITION" H. SUGGS SURVEY, . �0x558A5 ABSTRACT NO. 1415 AND THE �� �_ -_- - � •--- _ - X 55543 ( �- , 1 ESSA)9 -----"�sQm- --x rs Ec Ye-'_, \,. �83�D/B A.A. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 26 X88°07 44^W - 812.76' Es oil-- Ea -� / SE of re GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY x 558 / U Ma - x 3790 f i ....... ..... .... NIECPATED AFIL ESTATE ONW CNW GRAPEY E PARINEIS, W THOMAS NZM;N 3110 SSU 7WQ21A 4021 �� UOP � 7� // / •• .......................... ••12225 (817) 742-1851 (972) 569-840 �7�ENSEO \ CDNTACF. KLNNEIH FAYBRO COKIACT NO CWM / t I m50`SSVOryAt BURGESS & NIPLE It is not to be used for 10701 CORPORATE DR., SUITE 290, STAFFORD. TX 77477 o0 /':. / Construction/bidding purposes PHONE: (281)980-7705 j O // TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION NO. F-10&34 0 1 W K u� 0 M 0 2 CONC. PAV i ' l DRENCH WITH COMPOST TEA OR GARRETT )UICE AT TIME OF INSTALLATION TREE STAKING TO BE PROVIDED ONLY AS REQUIRED OR AT REQUEST OF OWNERILANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REIMBURSED AT PER TREE COST EXISTING NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL ONL SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH AS SPECIFI TAPER FROM 1/2" AT TRUNK TO 3 -5 - AT OUTSIDE EDGE TREE HOLE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE TFm MODEL 65BG-NS BELOW-GRADE— TREE STAKING AS MNFG. BY 'TREE STAKE SOLUTIONS' (www. treestakesoludons.com) C0 CIL, 0 Q I I=I to � v revisions IN t DETENTION AREA t 1 I � . .•- F 26'FAU.E t i ' l N88°07 44"W — 812,76 r` EASEMENT EX. UTILITY EASEMENT T W �eQ TO. CITY OF GRAPEVINE ENTRY DRENCH WITH COMPOST TEA EX. 60;�ASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY INS. D196161052, O.P.R.TC.T. ORGARRETT)UICE ATTIME ad EATUjEE,'_� OF INSTALLATIONTO: TEXAS POWER & V V TREE STAKING TO BE PROVIDED / LIGHT COMPANY OF DALLAS ONLY AS REQUIRED OR AT REQUEST OF OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT "TRACT N,©. 18-196" K�Q' / , AND REIMBURSED AT PER TREE COST - CENTERED OdIMPROVEMENTS AS CALL) U IN INSTRUMENT EXISTING NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL ONLY—D186�k678, O.P.R.T.C.T. QO t� / ♦�0NPS SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH AS SPECIFIED GRADE I o� •` / �, TAPER FROM 1/2" AT TRUNK TO 3-5" —EXISTING FINISH GRADE 0 / 0 AT OUTSIDE EDGE TREE HOLE Q �3 m € UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 9 N MODEL AKI GS S MNFG.Y— , 10' PERIMETER BUFFER (SOUTH) L6 / a TREESTAKINGAS MOW. BELOW -GRADE _ -IliI I` "TREE STAKE SOLUTIONS" (www.treestakesoluUons.mm) TREE PLANTING TREE PLANTING SHADE TREE - 3" CAL. and Smaller TYPICAL MULTI -TRUNK TREE not to sole not to style �/ jo scale: I" = 40'-0" 40 120 UASL NAML. LANILN AUUIIION CASE NUMBER. CU18 25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD LOTS 1&2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND 20NING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 7 OF 33 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES W ¢d Ln U Z Lu Ln file name: c:\GapehlEHdI d9-bM GrapevPeEndae dx9 gar Sri' � rl' ► _ �d ��` I -.c�1:_�i�� C0 CIL, 0 Q I I=I to � v revisions IN t DETENTION AREA t 1 I � . .•- F 26'FAU.E t i ' l N88°07 44"W — 812,76 r` EASEMENT EX. UTILITY EASEMENT T W �eQ TO. CITY OF GRAPEVINE ENTRY DRENCH WITH COMPOST TEA EX. 60;�ASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY INS. D196161052, O.P.R.TC.T. ORGARRETT)UICE ATTIME ad EATUjEE,'_� OF INSTALLATIONTO: TEXAS POWER & V V TREE STAKING TO BE PROVIDED / LIGHT COMPANY OF DALLAS ONLY AS REQUIRED OR AT REQUEST OF OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT "TRACT N,©. 18-196" K�Q' / , AND REIMBURSED AT PER TREE COST - CENTERED OdIMPROVEMENTS AS CALL) U IN INSTRUMENT EXISTING NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL ONLY—D186�k678, O.P.R.T.C.T. QO t� / ♦�0NPS SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH AS SPECIFIED GRADE I o� •` / �, TAPER FROM 1/2" AT TRUNK TO 3-5" —EXISTING FINISH GRADE 0 / 0 AT OUTSIDE EDGE TREE HOLE Q �3 m € UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 9 N MODEL AKI GS S MNFG.Y— , 10' PERIMETER BUFFER (SOUTH) L6 / a TREESTAKINGAS MOW. BELOW -GRADE _ -IliI I` "TREE STAKE SOLUTIONS" (www.treestakesoluUons.mm) TREE PLANTING TREE PLANTING SHADE TREE - 3" CAL. and Smaller TYPICAL MULTI -TRUNK TREE not to sole not to style �/ jo scale: I" = 40'-0" 40 120 UASL NAML. LANILN AUUIIION CASE NUMBER. CU18 25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD LOTS 1&2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND 20NING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 7 OF 33 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES W ¢d Ln U Z Lu Ln file name: c:\GapehlEHdI d9-bM GrapevPeEndae dx9 F A-- 0 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. ARMY CORPS ENGINEERS -1 ' CONC. PAV TRACT NO. A -3A CIVIL ACTION NO. 1469 __________\ •__ _________I � //// -` FOUNDATION WALL y��{T// FOR FIRE All W/ RAILIN 1 -r YL S�T91/PbdIJMI u �u`uJ. 111 4i r S.' 84 UNITS pppp -4.>DV AS 15 Gt CT,] 11 6 G 9 '.20 G2 E t _5�— 1J -J i L JJ I Ii L -VL a LI _LLI F -' i::: ARIABLE HT. MULTI -FAMILY SITE RET. WALL W/ / .0V1w__I T I—f T1r41 - — exp Al... RAILING I ILL �N I vv ILL 8w J FITNESS 4 -STORY R20 SF 91 UNITS MATCH LINE ' NON -VEHICULAR TREES PERIMETER TREES ORNAMENTAL TREES 0 0 MIN. 300 GAL. MIN. 6" CAL. MIN. 3" CAL. (TOTAL - 27) (TOTAL -12) (TOTAL -11) CRAPE MYRTLE LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA RED OAK QUERCUS SHUMARDI LIVE OAK QUERCUS VIRGINIANA CHASTE TREE VITEX AGNUS-CASTUS LIVE OAK QUERCUS VIRGINIANA BURR OAK QUERCUS MACROCARPA YAUPON HOLLY ILEX VOMITORIA CEDAR ELM ULMUS CRASSIFOLIA PARKING SCREEN 0 MIN L. Aft w (TOTAL - 45) MIN. 3" CAL. CHINQUAPIN OAK QUERCUS MUHLENBERGIA (TOTAL -8) BURR OAK QUERCUS MACROCARPA EASTERN RED CEDAR JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA ELAEAGNUS ELAEAGNUSTBBEN]II' CEDAR ELM ULMUS CRASSIFOLIA ELDARICA PINE PINUS ELDARICA NEEDLEPOINT HOLLY ILEX CORNUTA'NEEDLEPOINT DWF WAX MYRTLE MYRICA PUSILLA 0 MISCANTHUS MISCANTHUS SINENSIS INTERIOR PARKING TREES MIN. 3" CAL. (TOTAL - 17) BALD CYPRESS TAXODIUM DISTICHUM %� POND CYPRESS TAXODIUM ASCENDENS (\�+ SWEETGUM LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA f� MIN. 3" CAL. - 78) G(TOTAL LACEBARK ELM ULMUS PARVIFOLIA MIN. 3" CAL. CEDAR ELM ULMUS CRASSIFOLIA (TOTAL -13) CHINESE PISTACHE PISTACIA CHINENSIS EASTERN RED CEDAR JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA ELDARICA PINE PINUS ELDARICA LANDSCAPE LEGEND , \ 9 M LIFT I� 1 STATIO W/FENC I HCS I ;o I 1 ¢ I� C ONC. PAV — a y HCS �ry I I I i I 1 PSANITARY COMMON COMMON BERMUDA LANDSCAPE BED BERMUDA SOD SEEDING REF. NOTES (CYNODON DACTYLON) (CYNODON DACTYLON) SOD INSTALLATION NOTES: a. ALL SUBGRADE SHALL BE ACCEPTED AT ROUGH FINISH GRADE. IF ANY EXISTING VEGETATION IS EVIDENT, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SPRAY AREA WITH BROAD SPECTRUM HERBICIDE APPLICATION TO REMOVE ANY VEGETATION. b. AFTER APPROPIATE TIME TO ENSURE A VEGETATION IS DEAD, TILL SUBGRADE AND RAKE SMOOTH, REMOVING ALL DEAD VEGETATION, STONES, CLODS AND DEBRIS. C. SOD SHALL BE VIGOROUS, WELL -ROOTED AND SHALL BE DELIVERED AT A UNIFORM SOIL THICKNESS. d. SOD SHALL BE LAID WITH ALTERNATING ]DINTS. e. ALL SOD SHALL BE ROLLED TO CONSISTENT SURFACE, FILLING JOINTS WITH COARSE SAND AS REQUIRED. SEEDING INSTALLATION NOTES: a. ALL SUBGRADE SHALL BE ACCEPTED AT ROUGH FINISH GRADE. IF ANY EXISTING VEGETATION IS EVIDENT, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SPRAY AREA WITH BROAD SPECTRUM HERBICIDE APPLICATION TO REMOVE ANY VEGETATION. b. AFTER APPROPIATE TIME TO ENSURE A VEGETATION IS DEAD, TILL SUBGRADE AND RAKE SMOOTH, REMOVING ALL DEAD VEGETATION, STONES, CLODS AND DEBRIS. t. SEED SHALL BE HULLED, TREATED LAWN -TYPE SEED, DELIVERED TO SITE IN ORIGINAL SEALED CONTAINERS. MINIMUM PURITY GERMINATION SHALL BE 90%. d. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED BY TEMPORARY MEASURES TO BE DETERMINED BY CONTRACTOR TO ACHIEVE 90% GERMINATION AND TWO SUBSEQUENT MOWINGS. J (;1 I Y KlzQU1KtMtN I S OFF-STREET PARKING AREAS (IP) INTERIOR LANDSCAPING GROSS PARKING MIN. 10% GROSS PARKING TO BE LANDSCAPE 312,001 SF PARKING x 10% = 31,200 SF REQUIRED 33,013 SF PROPOSED 1 TREE PER 400 SQ. FT. REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA 31,200 SF = 78 TREES REQUIRED 400 78 TREES PROPOSED PERIMETER LANDSCAPING (P) 15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO PUBLIC STREET 1 TREE PER 50 LIN. FT. ANDERSON GIBSON 669 LF = 13.39 = 14 TREES REQUIRED 50 0 19 TREES PROPOSED 15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINES 1 TREE PER 50 LIN. FT. SOUTH PROPERTY LINES 1016.02 LF = 20.32 = 21 TREES REQUIRED 50 ACHIEVED THRU PRESERVATION AREA WEST PROPERTY LINES 994.40 LF = 19.89 = 20 TREES REQUIRED 50 ACHIEVED THRU PRESERVATION AREA NORTH PROPERTY LINE 674.89 LF = 13.50 = 14 TREES REQUIRED 50 AREA ACHIEVED THRU PRESERVATION AR NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE (NV) TOTAL SITE 874,467 SF NON -VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE 329,804 SF (37.72% off site) 1 TREE PER 3000 SF OPEN SPACE 329,804 SF= 109.93 = 110 TREES REQUIRED 3000 87 TREES PROPOSED + PRESERVATION AREA UIL f� EX. `fi0' EASEM&W AND RIGHT, OF WAY T0: •TE6XAS POWER & LIGHT CgMPANY OF )ALLAS i I I ' —A1 ---�—� LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE LEGEND FOR SHEETS L-1 AND L-2. 2. PLANT LIST TO BE USED AS AIDE TO BIDDER ONLY. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES. 3. ALL BEDS SHALL BE ACCEPTED AT ROUGH FINISH GRADE. IF ANY EXISTING VEGETATION IS EVIDENT, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SPRAY AREA WITH BROAD SPECTRUM HERBICIDE APPLICATION TO REMOVE ANY VEGETATION. 4. AFTER APPROPIATE TIME TO ENSURE A VEGETATION IS DEAD, TILL SUBGRADE AND RAKE SMOOTH, REMOVING ALL DEAD VEGETATION, STONES, CLODS AND DEBRIS. 5. AFTER INSTALLATION OF STEEL EDGING, ALL BEDS SHALL BE TILLED TO A DEPTH OF 4-6", RAKING OUT ALL DEAD VEGETATION. 6. APPLY A 2-3" DEPTH OF ORGANIC MATERIAL OVER ENTIRE BED AND TILL INTO EXISTING SOIL. ORGANIC MATERIAL SHALL BE ONE OF FOLLOWING: VITAL EARTH COMPOST BACK -TO -EARTH SOIL CONDITIONER LIVING EARTH COMPOST SOIL BUILDING SYSTEMS COMPOST SILVER CREEK MATERIALS COMPOST 7. TOPDRESS ENTIRE BED WITH MINIMUM 2" DEPTH SHREDDED NATIVE CEDAR MULCH. 8. ALL SHADE TREES AND ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AS PER DETAILS ON SHEET L-1. 9. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGA north scale: 1" = 40'-0" 0 40 120 20 80 CASE NAME: CARTER ADDITION CASE NUMBER: CU18-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIETON ROAD; LOTS 1&2. BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: SHEET: 8 OF 33 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES file name: c:16ra0eMne-Endaxl IOg-0ase_Grapewine-Entlavex.dwg sheet SCALE: 1,16"=V WEST SIC SCALE: 1/16"=1-0" CASE NUMBER: CU 18-25 iliun LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROM; LOTS 18:2. BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: y¢tt 09 r 33 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFECT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ♦40 BASE BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal Owner KADE22' D E V E L O P M E N T 1125 Executive CIrcte, STE 220, Irving, TX 75038 972-510-5258 w.kadeo Inforakadeone com Holiday Inn X (� =w -Z J j Q W No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2018.12.07 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME ELEVATIONS DRAWING NO. 9/33 2 I JUU I" SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" EAST SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0' CASE NAME: -ER AOOnION CASE NUMBER: CU 1&25 LOCATION: 2107 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1&1. BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: 10 a33 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK N CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 64- d b IW4- BASE4 BASE4 2901 CUNT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal Owner: KADE^ DEVELOPMENT 1125 EAecutive Circle, STE 220, Irving,T%75038 972-510-S258 wvVw.ked-rmt.com Infolkadeone.<om -Holiday Inn x cD =w Z J > Q W o_ No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2018.12.07 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEETNAME ELEVATIONS DRAWING NO 10/33 s a 1 IOUBLE QUEEN'. ING SUITE 1 ING SUITE 2 ING SUITE ADA IRANDTOTAL ROOM MATRIX 585 2ND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 4%858 3RO LEVELFLOOR PLAN ROOM TYPE ARRA 5 1ST 2ND 3RD 4rN 5m TOTAL % % STUDIOSHOWERA4 381 11 13 13 13 13 63 43% STUDIO SHOWER A4 EXTENDED 448 1 0 0 0 O 1 2% STUDIO TUBA 387 0 3 5 5 5 18 12% 58% STUDIO SHOWER A4 WIDE B 443 0 1 1 1 1 4 3% 1 SR K SHOWER 529 3 3 3 3 3 1s 10% I BR K SHOWER WI DE S -WIDE 570 1 1 1 1 1 5 3% 1 BR K SHOWER B7 569 0 2 2 2 2 8 5% 1 BR DQ TUB B5 586 0 0 1 1 1 3 296 �% 1 SR DQADA.TUB B3 568 1 1 0 0 a 2 1% I BR BY CHUTE B8 710 D 1 1 1 28RTUB&SHOWERC4 875 4 4 4 4 4 20 14% 2BRADASHOWERCI 878 1 1 1 1 17% GRANDTOTAL 22 30 32 32 32 148 100% 10096 s a 1 IOUBLE QUEEN'. ING SUITE 1 ING SUITE 2 ING SUITE ADA IRANDTOTAL 1 I � 1 y �11.-E O O O O O 1, O O O 1 01 -- 4F I rq— PROPOSED BUILDING E 1 all SBS AND HI 235,333 SF 4qe o 5 STORY, 303 TOTAL ROOMS 148 ROOMS (SBS), 155 ROOMS (HI) - ,. 323 PARKING SPACES c I I W U01 Hi uq i i �- ++ n@i L I AM[ AF I 1 y 1 ----------------- 1 — — -- — -- — -- — -- - -- - -- -----------------------.-- —.------------------------------ 1 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"=30' KEY PLAN VICINITY MAP GSE NUMBER: CU 1&25 ix,n LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1&2. BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: 11 ar 33 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR OROINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BASE+ BASE4 2901 CUNT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal Owner: KADE^ DEVELOPMENT 1EaKetive Circle STE 220, Irving, TX 75038 9T�s10-s2se w .kadeonesom Infobpkadeone—m t -Holiday Inn X =w Z J> Q LU D 0 U No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2018.12.07 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SITE PLAN DRAWING NO. 11/33 FLOOR AREA 5 IST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SL956 2ND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 4%858 3RO LEVELFLOOR PLAN 45,840 4TH LEVELFLOOR PLAN 45,840 STH LEVELFLOOR PLAN 45.840 TOTAL 235,333 1 I � 1 y �11.-E O O O O O 1, O O O 1 01 -- 4F I rq— PROPOSED BUILDING E 1 all SBS AND HI 235,333 SF 4qe o 5 STORY, 303 TOTAL ROOMS 148 ROOMS (SBS), 155 ROOMS (HI) - ,. 323 PARKING SPACES c I I W U01 Hi uq i i �- ++ n@i L I AM[ AF I 1 y 1 ----------------- 1 — — -- — -- — -- — -- - -- - -- -----------------------.-- —.------------------------------ 1 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1"=30' KEY PLAN VICINITY MAP GSE NUMBER: CU 1&25 ix,n LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1&2. BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: 11 ar 33 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR OROINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BASE+ BASE4 2901 CUNT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal Owner: KADE^ DEVELOPMENT 1EaKetive Circle STE 220, Irving, TX 75038 9T�s10-s2se w .kadeonesom Infobpkadeone—m t -Holiday Inn X =w Z J> Q LU D 0 U No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2018.12.07 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SITE PLAN DRAWING NO. 11/33 FIRST FL( SCALE: 3/64"=P-0" .do.0- BASE4 BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal owner: KADE^ DEVELOPMENT 1135 Executive Circle. STE 210, Irving,TX 75038 972-510-5258 www.kadeone.com InfoPkadeone.com -Holiday Inn X cD t =w Z J > QLU o_ No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2018.12.07 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME FLOOR PLAN DRAWING NO. 12/33 we wUM ulllun CASE NUMBER: CU 1&25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON CARTER ROAD; LOTS 142. BLOCK 1, CARTER ADpipN MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE; alta 13 0 33 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BASE4 BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal OVmer: KADE^ DEVELOPMENT 1125 Executive Circle, STE 220, lmlr& TX 75038 972-510-5258 Ww kadeone.com Infookadeone.com 1 -Holiday/ Inn 0x =w — Z J > <w a D� No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2018.12.07 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME FLOOR PLAN DRAWING NO. 13/33 ROOM MATRIX SBS ROOM TYPE AREA(SF) IST 2ND 3RD 4TH STH TOTAL % I % STUDIO SHOWER A4 381 11 13 13 13 13 63 43% STUDIO SHOWER A4 EXTENDED 448 i 0 0 0 0 1 1% STUDIOTUBA 387 0 3 5 5 5 i8 12% STUDIO SHOWER A4 WIDE 8 443 0 1 1 1 1 4 3% I BR KSHOWER B 529 3 3 3 3 3 25 30% 1 BR K SHOWER WIDE B -WIDE 570 1 1 1 1 1 5 3% 1 BR K SHOWER B7 569 0 2 2 2 2 8 5% 1 BR DO TUB 85 588 0 1 0 1 1 1 3 296 2s% 1 OR DO ADA.TUB 63 568 1 1 0 0 0 2 1% I BR BY CHUTE 88 710 0 1 1 1 1 4 3% 28RTUB&SHOWERC4 875 4 4 4 4 4 20 14% 2 BR ADA SHOWER CI 878 1 1 1 1 1 5 3% 17% GRANDTOTAL 22 3D 32 32 32 1 148 100% 100% we wUM ulllun CASE NUMBER: CU 1&25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON CARTER ROAD; LOTS 142. BLOCK 1, CARTER ADpipN MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE; alta 13 0 33 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BASE4 BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal OVmer: KADE^ DEVELOPMENT 1125 Executive Circle, STE 220, lmlr& TX 75038 972-510-5258 Ww kadeone.com Infookadeone.com 1 -Holiday/ Inn 0x =w — Z J > <w a D� No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2018.12.07 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME FLOOR PLAN DRAWING NO. 13/33 J THIRD FL SCALE: 3/64"=1'-0" BASE' �I BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal Owner: KADE^ DEVELOPMENT 1125 Executive Clrcle, STE 220, Irving, T% 75038 972310-5258 www.kadeone.com infookad—e.com Holiday !nn x =L Z J j Q W a 0� No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2018.12.07 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME FLOOR PLAN DRAWING NO. 14/33 BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal Owner. KADE^ DEVELOPMENT 1125 Executive Circle. STE 220, lmi g, TX 75038 972-510.5258 vnvw.katleone.com InloOkadeone.com 'STAYBRIDGE a� s Ij I I r N0.1 ISSUE DATE I PROJECT STATUS DATE 2018.12.07 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME FLOOR PLAN DRAWING NO. 15/33 V ED FIFTH FL( SCAL CASE NAME: CARTER ADDITION CASE NUMBER: CU 1&25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1@2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: see 6 a 33 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT PATH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES W'04.0' BASE BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal Owner: KADE^ D E V E L O P M E N T 1125 Executive Circle, STE 220, Irving, TX 75038 972-510-5258 -,,:deone.com Infoft deone.com AHolida Inn 0x =w Z J > Q W No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2016.12.07 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME FLOOR PLAN DRAWING NO. 16/33 ROOM MATRIX 585 ROOM TYPE AREA(SIF) 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH STH TOTAL % % STUDIO SHOWER A4 381 11 13 13 13 13 63 43% STUDIO SHOWER A4 EXTENDED 448 1 0 0 0 0 1 1% STUDIOTUBA 387 0 3 5 5 5 18 12% 58% STUDIO SHOWER A4WIDE B 443 0 1 1 1 1 4 3% IBRKSHOWERB 529 3 3 3 3 3 15 10% 1BRKSHOWERWIDEB-WIDE 570 1 1 1 1 1 5 3% 1 FIR K SHOWER B7 569 0 2 2 2 2 8 5% 1BR DO TUB B5 S86 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2% 25% 1 BR DO ADA.TUB 83 1 568 1 7 1 0 To 1 0 1 2 1 1% 1 BR BY CHUTE BB 1 710 0 1 11 1 4 3% 2 BR TUB & SHOWER U 875 4 4 4 4 4 20 14% 2 BR ADA SHOWER CI 878 1 1 I 1 I 5 3% 17% GRANOTOTAL 1 1 22 1 30 1 32 1 32 1 32 1 U8 j 100% 10096 V ED FIFTH FL( SCAL CASE NAME: CARTER ADDITION CASE NUMBER: CU 1&25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1@2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: see 6 a 33 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT PATH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES W'04.0' BASE BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal Owner: KADE^ D E V E L O P M E N T 1125 Executive Circle, STE 220, Irving, TX 75038 972-510-5258 -,,:deone.com Infoft deone.com AHolida Inn 0x =w Z J > Q W No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2016.12.07 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME FLOOR PLAN DRAWING NO. 16/33 CL ' N I Y b a W VENEER C xd W rn — - a L6 _ — 3 2 N L () _N L7 CGMP. BHINGLE WNDM ROGF, TTP.1 BPEG'D• M BUILvs�.- I.-pDING I -EXTERIOR ELEVATION 01 ecAte BUILDING I -EXTERIOR ELEVATION 02 acAtE anr- r -m• VENEER I\ p !• O 1a I S' W ]0 !GAIL LCALL BUILDING I -EXTERIOR ELEVATION 03 ee a ja._ r -p• BRICK : 85% STUCCO: 15% CASE NAME CARTER ADDITION CASE NUMBER: CUIS-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON G48SON ROAD; LOTS 1k2, BLOCK 1• CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: a _ d -&- APPROVAL aAPPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LJ 0 U; E C m Z � a 0 O u - 3 V •/ Q N seu Q� MOh o `hyo T,f TL Of 1�' AAGeY. -13111. 12/10/2018 .n.oAre. 08-09-18' ulscr.,v ' REYIEW No. A5.01 S NOTED SIR � _ _ r ry EL r' v ■ 0 BF9gC�LVINE)CLU AS 5PEC'D. TYP.\ ROCf, P 7 LE BTU= COMP. ER ROOF, TYP -�E SPEC. UNDCLU - R '— L=?1=all-�1{���la- 1I4=;I;:_II m BRICK WINDM w VENEER SPECD o` c GI u'S -- N DO M CDd L m N ILII L d d � LUa m m m C 0) a en Q Z o «? W Lu CL' v w Lu N Ur N M A M y O � I x, BUILDING 2 -EXTERIOR ELEVATION 01 xwe �•- I. -o. BUILDING 2 -EXTERIOR ELEVATION 03 scale srrs•- r -o• BRICK : 85% STUCCO: 15% BUILDING 2 -EXTERIOR ELEvATION e s• m m m I xu, vv.rr SUILDiNG 2 -EXTERIOR ELEVATION 04 swe s sr- r -m• CASE - CARTER AU."... CASE NUMBER: CUIS-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD; LOTS Ik2. BLOCK 1. CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DAIS 9AFF. 10 Of J1 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SECTION SECTION 04� 2 402 01 N BUILDING - 02 CD I A5.03 BLDG 2 -EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS IN u c i c mz o O U - r w r 3 a •� x x se,u MCN orQ ;ir •In pf n.aDl' 12/10/2018 08-09-18 ores RE14 Nu A5.03 S NOTED II♦11I■I-I. ■IIIII■IIII ialI ISI w ISI µ„ ffi t' 1 e s• m m m I xu, vv.rr SUILDiNG 2 -EXTERIOR ELEVATION 04 swe s sr- r -m• CASE - CARTER AU."... CASE NUMBER: CUIS-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD; LOTS Ik2. BLOCK 1. CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DAIS 9AFF. 10 Of J1 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SECTION SECTION 04� 2 402 01 N BUILDING - 02 CD I A5.03 BLDG 2 -EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS IN u c i c mz o O U - r w r 3 a •� x x se,u MCN orQ ;ir •In pf n.aDl' 12/10/2018 08-09-18 ores RE14 Nu A5.03 S NOTED _�'�' ''9iC_i='■C_''�=iii ii i�� i'tim'_IZ_'imi=vilmiClinticllCliiiiCiQ.i'1.��.i'ti_si1 ili'GiiCi i ii'i : _ � ■. __ _.,ii�ii�i��iuu ■i■I IC' 11 ■I■I■I ■I■f I — ■I Il11■I �� CI■I lel CI .{ CI■I 1f II1\I I I■ 1 LI LI LI LI I�II�II�I 1.1 LI LI LI LI■I V■Ii�. LI �.I LG=°I"—"��I' LI LI ■I - "�°i� IIII 11111111 .I -@I�11��� LI ■I LI I■I •� in iL �1 LI L� I■ LI 111.11.11.1 it�I LI LI LI 111iiilA .11 I■III.IV■II11_II� 11- I� IV_II�11 - ,III=IIII VI__I �II1 _-__ _.1[ARIE--_I_-_-_�_�I 161 VIII LII! imillil giIII 1111111 �IIIIM�i���iif�iii' IIII 1111111 IIIII'�=ti�l■�ip ' ll.11.i VIII IIII'i i■f� m. µ / � � l __ _ _ �� _. I -- ---.__ I � � = -1■I _ I I I -1 11 1 I--- � i -� _ J101101 ■SII ---I■I I■L I I - _- _ I■I I■I I■I I■I - ---_ ■I . ,■L I■I ■I =< -- I■I - ■I � - I■I -- ° ==- ---1■I I■L _.--<_._ --_- ■I I■I -- -- _ _ _ � - I■I _ .. --- -- - - -- - -- �li�il� - _-- �uWllr. _ ==-�IIIr■nlll� _ 111nh� __ �Ini� �__ � ; � ; ...:_._.. I I I ___ _ _ I■L_ �■I - =- __ _ I■I ■ ---1■- ■I _: _ � __ _ L�:� I■tl■I.I L■I.� -'=`-° ■LI■I-1■I ■I=__=.■I�■L� _-_ I■1 =__ =_-.._ _-_I■ I■I -_:_ ='- -.._ -■ ■ - _.._, _ - 1■I ___ -- I _ ■ -- -- - — ------ _ II IIIIIiII _: - . -_._ _ __ _ --- t, -_-_,IIII IIII- VIII ---- 1u1 Illul 11111 -__,==IIII luu ulll= _Ilu ulu. LIII uu ulu,mll_=__ r (,II'll'll'I - - - - - --- ■- I■- ■- I■- __ ■_ __ _ - - _ _ _ � w �----�11TIIr--- - -_---�I,Inll�-- - -----:vvv�l�ll�=IIIIIIIIIIII ;_= _ �llnlll� _� .; - - - -■ �I ■-. ■- �I_ ■- n _ ■ Illi. - == mac_ =_ -- _,c-aaseaomaarauoa�..raooma-.__ ___- - - ___. - ____ __ -- __ __-ate - rr is _ _ _ _ =v �1�-=_=--_ :ate _, _ .ea w_ _ice _ r_ _ - ■1 1■I_I■I 1■I _ - 11= -■I ■I = - �Vh�l�r. ■ ■ .� ■I ■ �h��r.— �i��,�r, _, -- --- ® — _ __ �:I — a_ I■I ISI =- ��.�� ' I■I I■I == "- _ ..III._..._. III=- -_- - _ - _�_�r� ,...�.._�_._. - - �_------=IIIIIIII __---- � - ------ - IIIIIIII �I.__�._.�_ _L-.L-.L._£_3�h1�I■I� _---.L-.L-.I----- I I I- ■ ii Miami OF ■ ■I _.I ■1 111111: I I .1 IIIIIIII - v I�IIII�I ID 101 °�alal=��Ql��el ii :I :II!Inhlr 1: I:�liI�Ir :I -----:lila _I! II V W Weis, - Ill! I , IN imi FPO- --OEM IA 1=11 1M A 55M iii qwA" iii 101 UNIT I I UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT TUCK -UNDER GARAGE PARKING[I DRIVE �ARKING �O ARC n o.x $jA r LL AAGBT lT•4T er. 2018 N.n� recrHmm IiLVILW R ALIO S NOTED . N Q1 CASE NAME: CARTER ADDITION CASE NUMBER: 01118-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1&2. BLACK 1. CMTER ADDIRON MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: •ecn x a MPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH MY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Ep ARC 6•R •• T T igy�n�4 �1•t pF AAGeY JMT eV 201 $,v. on ulscrNiue REVIEW z Al. 11 S NOTED x� • G11 NAME GAR RJi ADOIIION CASE NUMBER: CU18-23 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS I&Z BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: - 6 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES • ��SpE V R a R si-1 �M q1C OF AAGB JMTOeY 2018 at un oi[I-r rtue REVIEW' A1.12 S NOTED Cf N N W N of 0 0 �C �n4 �R zFi q1[ OF AAGa JMToB1 2018 A1.13 S NOTED p� ARC �y G T =fit C Q i-1 e 7f� pF AAGe JMTDeY 2018 uo,, year —. REVIEW x A1.14 S NOTED i� I 1 03 ELM r-m.BUILDING 2- SECOND FLOOR BUILDING 2- FOURTH FLOOR 05 fcaLe vIc•- r -m• (0 x BUILDING 2- FIRST FLOOR xe w.•- r -m• BUILDINm 2- GROUND FLOOR/ PODIUM 01 su�E ��I6 04 MUBUILDING 2- THIRD FLOOR me•- r -m• IASL NAML: CUAU IVN CASE NUMBER::18 WNDERS -25 LOCATION 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: 10T5 1k2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: stcc m a ++ APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WN sE:u. �e0 ARCy � 4 y�py1•� �3A Keg' • AAGer: JMT er. 2018 REV�W z A1.20 S NOTED • - mf 8 v 3 sE:u. �e0 ARCy � 4 y�py1•� �3A Keg' • AAGer: JMT er. 2018 REV�W z A1.20 S NOTED • N l BUILDING 3- 2NDFLOOR �2 - IA6'- �'-0' CASE NUMBER: CU78-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1&2, BLOCK I, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WIXiK IN CONFLICT WTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ME SF.4I. � ARC T R �R a • AAGe, JMT nY 2018 ni. on o�Ecrnurne REVIEtV�a. A1.31 S NOTED UNIT UNIT B2 &4 AN FITNESS B2 ROOM IYTII 11 �i i � ,■11 SII i�...o -1 tl► �N care — QN -. __ o co.r - �r5 V- G MOM o x.11 SII �,r:.o 1,120 SF t1► C � ^ •ri sWill � � ^ n� � II�' Lia m • I a'!J- . • '� I ,a IL91a. �•� 1_ .a lJl• � z■� ;ttttf+�;�=�I�� rs �ll�1_�i�; . ► N 0 it �N in �-�-i J , V� :i ► ' I -w'Q �I: .Ilt■ ■�■I �.� ��.� • : I■cv alt 1. �.��i -.a �� -►71 • � �I - ftf71 � �I - � tttttttt� ; �.� �� is// T. � �-' Ila �1 fV � - - 4. is-- 1�.'i� V1 1► �31 '-' . _�� f• ► ' QI i�H■ . : s:� 19 Olr_ Imm • iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii .. .. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ' ,mm cu CIZI I I■ CASE NUMBER: CU78-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1&2, BLOCK I, CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WIXiK IN CONFLICT WTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ME SF.4I. � ARC T R �R a • AAGe, JMT nY 2018 ni. on o�Ecrnurne REVIEtV�a. A1.31 S NOTED • • 0 .p 9+` 4� T, rt OF iF• AAG •. JMToeY 2018 REVIEW` A1.32 S NOTED • 0 BUILDIN?— 4- FIRST FLOOR PLAN 01 sceiE mr, I,v. BUILDING 4- SECOND FLOOR PLAN CASE NAME: CARTER ADDIRON CASE NUMBER: CUTS -23 LOCAOON: 2107 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1R2. BLOCK 1. CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT M ANY CODES OR ORDINARCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES • M 16 TEAL spy ARcq � e Mn` 4 r1i! OF'� AAG9 JMToPY 2018 a. o.a uEcr.�me RET'IEW�z A 1.40 S NOTED I� s� UNIT Ye.•�1 �I ■ _ eas N ■ 10■-ee � V T u� d!/�I 11. .O IQLJ, t■JL.O _ soy N �• ■. a {_V �' V T 0�s- � � �u IaIII i■�{wi!fs=� I�S SITI ►I1 n 4' � Ms�� �=��W��■, N • e ■ N ••. ^T—�.G"�� T V���r •L:O10/ IL■, �1 _ ■ If<s' T ���/t��1 -0 '� mai �1�, FE _� --- ■ ■ N■ ll N■ - OFF% Maim f I i71 i71 =� BUILDING 4- SECOND FLOOR PLAN CASE NAME: CARTER ADDIRON CASE NUMBER: CUTS -23 LOCAOON: 2107 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD: LOTS 1R2. BLOCK 1. CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT M ANY CODES OR ORDINARCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES • M 16 TEAL spy ARcq � e Mn` 4 r1i! OF'� AAG9 JMToPY 2018 a. o.a uEcr.�me RET'IEW�z A 1.40 S NOTED c�l • 01 BUILDINGS u 4- THIRD FLOOR FLAN rte. C UNIT WE UNIT B2 B2 I -A El A., MENEras N mi 01 BUILDINGS u 4- THIRD FLOOR FLAN 4- FOURTH FLOOR FLAN As 2018 A1.41 uS'NOTED W�- rte. C UNIT WE UNIT B2 B2 I -A El A., mi 4- FOURTH FLOOR FLAN As 2018 A1.41 uS'NOTED W�- K1 6 41'-0. UNIT BI FLOOR PLAN 01 sae 3f6'-1'-0' 36'-0' 53'- 4' V I r l 1 I rA ncEr - LIVtWV TERRACE EMRrANM6 B 20�-T• a�M•-,M1� ,y ONW GUE6T ,•-rxlr-a UNITx�µ J w�.oa, ewfWOM ENTERTANMC, DEDR�1 .; B 3 - -- - -j11m01Vtll / _ n- 1 -- RA N EENT �POWb R I WALK-IN WH I CLOSET ® L PAN. uaD J UNIT 52 FLOOR PLAN UNIT -3 FLGOR PLAN a2 sxe ,/I6• -r -a m3 oue ve•_, The Carter -Grapevine November 12, 2018 Building Type I - 55+ Building Type II Building Type III Building Type IV Total 4 Levels + Podium 4 Levels + Podium 4 Levels 3/4 SPLIT + TU garages Unit Count Ini4 CA FT I WIT TVPF it AC I INITQ I INIT TVDP it nr I INITQ I WIT TVDF A 11F I INITC I WIT TVDF 4 (TG I INITQ I INIT TVDP It nP I INITC o I 31'-2' 33'-2 CL d (7 UNIT UNIT V c W N H� d � � P Al A2 4) 0 N �� r F ® .7z O <1 ✓ LCL �' a d T N =�c_2--L=�n-n r• d i a N 1 UNIT Al FLOOR PLAN 1 UNIT A2 FLOOR PLAN C d (m4 .l •, c ,Ab'- I'-0' C� xN.E ,A6'- I'-0' x. a 0 3l - UNIT A3 FLOOR PLAN 0(0SCALE 3/6'• I• -O' FF rIc suma AAMIN 1 ARCHITECTURE GROUP CASE NAME: CARTER ADDITION CASE NUMBER: CU18-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD; LOTS 1&2. BLOCK 1• CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: — — � -AL- APPROVAL APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORRE ANY WORK IN CONfUCT WIN ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ro M seu ) 11 - 12-18 2018u_I�n. rn NEVIF.W A2.00 S NOTED A-1 A-1 A-1 A-1 76 .III A-2 A-2 A-2 63 -� A-3 A-3 16 B-1 B-1 B-1 B-1 63 B-2 B-2 B-2 B-2 53 B-3 4 Total # of Living 86 44 91 54 0 275 Units: TOTAL: Total Sq.ft. Of units 83,487 44,032 84,208 49,190 260,917 o I 31'-2' 33'-2 CL d (7 UNIT UNIT V c W N H� d � � P Al A2 4) 0 N �� r F ® .7z O <1 ✓ LCL �' a d T N =�c_2--L=�n-n r• d i a N 1 UNIT Al FLOOR PLAN 1 UNIT A2 FLOOR PLAN C d (m4 .l •, c ,Ab'- I'-0' C� xN.E ,A6'- I'-0' x. a 0 3l - UNIT A3 FLOOR PLAN 0(0SCALE 3/6'• I• -O' FF rIc suma AAMIN 1 ARCHITECTURE GROUP CASE NAME: CARTER ADDITION CASE NUMBER: CU18-25 LOCATION: 2103 ANDERSON GIBSON ROAD; LOTS 1&2. BLOCK 1• CARTER ADDITION MAYOR SECRETARY DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN DATE: — — � -AL- APPROVAL APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORRE ANY WORK IN CONfUCT WIN ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ro M seu ) 11 - 12-18 2018u_I�n. rn NEVIF.W A2.00 S NOTED 00 `^C Q�NpSBl'J Nps b,�'ONY C14 w- - u 3du " • j, � Q � ate-+ eo P v � -/ U ill Lill Irf7i 11 -M -L - - _ rT,, i 11 P - ------ \ o��os�'� -- } j a ------ Nosy Z ul n ev — #3 #� # # # # o 3 \ *S t o � ,�4 ' � zoo r nl 7du h` — i � -P V 11 F fi ...- . _- .-.___ - ______ r_____ _ ___ ______ _____ —__-_ -__ - m \ -�,....mow a �_ i _ a z 88'6EL—3.8E.6LoLOS ° .ZY'ELE—M.L0.8 >OOS Ili W 4 Lg gyL —BMS pngy OON a a iE Zazo=ter e d' j IP L olo�� uy01-�- y I e � 1 r � in �� � j •yj 2¢� LU U -i °LL ,a wdz —z P a z2o U00 It o to >y I O�ZOt 1 e 1 1 LU 5e I e G I wi P r :fi co w �1 i} a ' PZ } + 'ao — J mgr ,. O � ¢ t I 1=- I I I I I - : I I I o ro 1--i p ¢ LU c -- W LU ,88'44Z — M.£4,8£o40N ,lS.y04q'i+r � U Q_ r »�11B 1HL3YNr3d Aim ___- \ I GD ----------------- fl 1 ----- ,_ , "' J 2 NUN 1r SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" J 1 Wt5 161UL ELLVA I IUN SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" BASE BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com Seal Owner: KADE^ DEVELOPMENT 1125 E—u1Nro arde, 5TE no. Ir n Tx 75038 e72-510-5258 —.ka0eone.com Infookadeone.com Holiday lnn x (D =L -Z J > Q LU 0- r) IY Ur No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2016.12.06 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME ELEVATIONS DRAWING NO. All 2 I5UUIH51 SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" tHJ I b I U SCALE: 1/16"=1'-D" BASE ` BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com i ►- A i 1 1- A- 1 i 1- ! 1 t! I r!! r 1 r!!! 1 f A —.._. —_ f 1-► TT -1-T I I -� 7 I I Seal Owner: K A D E NO DEVELOPMENT 1125 Eaecutly Circle, STE 220, Irving, T% 75038 972-510.5258 www.kademusom Infookadeone.com lHolidgy Inn x =w Z J> Q w D_ D� No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2018.12.06 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME ELEVATIONS DRAWING NO A3.2 _—- Ir---- 1fT - T T -7-I-"T 1 7 f 1 - -liwL !- ®- �_ ®_ 1 InFimm _lam_®U-19_�- _ - ® ®IE ®' ja in limi ® ® ®,n mfi as wRi 2 I5UUIH51 SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" tHJ I b I U SCALE: 1/16"=1'-D" BASE ` BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 www.base-4.com i ►- A i 1 1- A- 1 i 1- ! 1 t! I r!! r 1 r!!! 1 f A —.._. —_ f 1-► TT -1-T I I -� 7 I I Seal Owner: K A D E NO DEVELOPMENT 1125 Eaecutly Circle, STE 220, Irving, T% 75038 972-510.5258 www.kademusom Infookadeone.com lHolidgy Inn x =w Z J> Q w D_ D� No. ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS DATE 2018.12.06 DRAWN BY DH CHECKED BY VDR SCALE AS NOTED PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME ELEVATIONS DRAWING NO A3.2 ofA w v BUL INCz 3 -EXTERIOR ELEvATION M.,. ax•. rs 01 ecus Ror ro ecxe Emam COMP. %4WOLE WNDM AS MET COMP. °uRPYiE BIiICY. UND W VBEER faA'F, TTP. 0f4OD, TTP RAILlG ROOF, TTp. YBffItR 81°EOD• c4m.. ekw.0 mcm ROGF• TTP.7 9PEOD• r �Ims i �R ,rem ' e �ITJOINF.Mi � � ..��� �, ,► i fig i... ,.. . :*RM 05 r -ME L11 1! gal n-11,21 Iffffil !HNIFFillom m- IT "-p i A5.04 BLDG 3-EXTERI2R ELEVATIONS I VJ as 0 g < a e 0 U N - Ism 2 •, G .v IL SFAL n fro s�4 �s r �>! of AAG + JMT � 11/12/2018 s08-09-18 .Rhe rss RENEW w s NGTEo A5.04 m STAYBRIDGE 13 7-7 10 6m 19 lk SAN a. IV oil SWW--IWA-AL M g. 6?:4t-t3ae y VOW ` IJI ,q +t r ;r' .. -.- � � hka � '...� ` �'- rr. e E� 'f� ♦wg ,s�7v �r .: },d � "�rl['�y 4��\ -<T� s „ r � __+.,�..�' ... "I - � . ,. JS ♦ �y R.v 7�styfx+���y� - — � �. ,.. ,5,� - _ _ . {� 1� ` f r'`J _.. _ -- -:i�' � M� _:�'i r --C/C..�y/ � - /� '�• f+�' .'T - II i>' — .�. •mss+"'' 9=:r�' � ��� .A�•" �w - r .v � r�"'Va li F I 1 t! �►- �•i j � 1�' ; t� l i, _�-1 ail x,11 1� •' — '`z-1=��'-. ft 9PO Ll I noon flaw lk JA ii .0 f ,i 7; on—am I* — 4--t 7 - SO semi& Alf =s �I -jr11 _ y U ANN ij r 'r s _ r ._c'•� ��' _ '. IlilI II �I IIII�I�I' I + ,F,� 1 � / fid•' Jlil.�I'!S''�,} ► ��� ��F !I�IIEIil�l11 .• _ - - _ .. - '"�' 1 �1t I F Wl-,Y itec nginee w .b .com �� MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 18, 2018 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION PLAT APPLICATION FILING DATE ...................................................December 11, 2018 APPLICANT .................................... Kenneth Fambro II, IHS Real Estate Holdings, LLC. REASON FOR APPLICATION................................................... Platting property to build a hotel and a multi -family units building PROPERTY LOCATION .....................................................2103 Anderson Gibson Road ACREAGE................................................................................................................ 20.07 ZONING............................................................................. HCO- Hotel Corporate Office NUMBER OF LOTS...................................................................................... Two (2) Lots PREVIOUS PLATTING.................................................................................................No CONCEPTPLAN..........................................................................................................No SITEPLAN.......................................................................................................... CU 18-25 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT.................................................................................. Yes AVIGATION RELEASE............................................................................................... Yes PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED....................................................................................No C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 7088_597144Wgenda Memo 7088.doc PLAT INFORMATION SHEET PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION I. GENERAL: • The applicant, Kenneth Fambro with HIS Real Estates Holdings, LLC is preliminary platting a 20.07 acre site into two (2) lots. The property is located at 2103 Anderson Gibson Road. II. STREET SYSTEM: • The development has access to Anderson Gibson Road • Abutting roads: ❑ on the City Thoroughfare Plan- ® not on the City Thoroughfare Plan: ❑ Periphery Street Fees are due as follows: Type of Roadway Cost / LF Length Cost ❑ Major Arterial (A) $ 234.57 / LF ❑ Major Arterial (B) $ 178.35 / LF ❑ Minor Arterial (C) $ 203.06 / LF ❑ Minor Arterial (D) $ 170.33 / LF ❑ Collector (E) $ 170.33 / LF ❑ Collector (F) $ 150.98 / LF ❑ Sidewalk $ 25.00 / LF ❑ Curb & Gutter $ 15.00 / LF ® Periphery Street Fees are not due III. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: • The existing stormwater flows into the Hilton Branch. • The developer will be required to design for onsite as well as offsite drainage in accordance with the requirements of the City of Grapevine's Code of Ordinances. C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 7088_597144Wgenda Memo 7088.doc IV. WATER SYSTEM: ® The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ❑ The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. Additional off site water system improvements will be necessary to serve the site. V. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: ❑ The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ® The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. VI. MISCELLANEOUS: ❑ Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are not required for: ® Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits for: H/A Grapevine Water and Wastewater (voluntary assessment by property owner & City - late 1990's) ❑ Single Family Residential ( $ 2,414/ Lot) ❑ Multifamily ( $ 1,134/ Unit) ❑ Hotel ( $ 43,632/ Acre) ❑ Corporate Office ( $ 20,523/ Acre) ❑ Government ( $ 4,414/ Acre) ❑ Commercial / Industrial ( $ 5,739 / Acre) ® Open Space Fees are not required for: Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Carter Addition ❑ Open Space Fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits and/or any public infrastructure improvements for: ❑ R-5.0, R-TH, Zero Lot District ( $ 1,416.00 / Lot) ❑ R-7.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,146.00 / Lot) ❑ R-12.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,071.00 / Lot) ❑ R-20.0, Single Family District ( $ 807.00 / Lot) C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 7088_597144Wgenda Memo 7088.doc ❑ Public Hearing Only ❑ Variances were required on the following items: ❑ Front building line ❑ Allowing a setback of 3 feet for the rear property line for an accessory building ❑ Lot width & depth ❑ Max. Impervious Area ❑ Landscaping Regulations, allowing no landscape buffer between the edge of the parking area and the adjacent property line. ❑ The following items associated with this plat are not in accordance with the current subdivision standards: ❑ 50' ROW dedication not met: Developer is proposing to dedicate variable width private access easements throughout the development. The access easements will be owned and maintained by a Home Owners Association (HOA). ❑ Length of cul-de-sac street exceeds the 600 -foot limit: ❑ Driveway Spacing not met. VII. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS: A. The City has determined that the right-of-way and easements required to be dedicated for streets, utilities, drainage, access, sidewalks and other municipal needs and services are consistent with the City's ordinances and master plan, are reasonable and are connected to the proposed project in the following manner: ❑ The right-of-way provides for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements provide for a utility network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite drainage easements provide for a drainage network to serve the development of this site. C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 7088_597144Wgenda Memo 7088.doc ® The onsite access easements provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. B. The City further finds that the required dedication is related both in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development as follows: ❑ The right-of-way is necessary to provide for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements are necessary to provide for a utility system to serve this development and connect to existing utilities on surrounding property. ® The onsite drainage easements are necessary to provide for storm drainage improvements to serve the development of the site. ® The onsite access easements are necessary to provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements are necessary to provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. ® All of the dedications benefit the development to at least the extent of the impact of such on the development. VIII. RECOMMENDATION: The members of the City Council and The Planning & Zoning Commission consider the following motion: "Move that the City Council (Planning and Zoning Commission) approve the Statement of Findings and the Preliminary Plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Carter Addition." C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 7088_597144Wgenda Memo 7088.doc 5•B"IRF (CM APPROX LOCATION tom- F'.- ('SOF FLOOD ZONE UNITED STATES OFAMERICA 1 I N 703710097 ��?C(Rp ! - ` \ LIMITS l ZONED \ I 1 l- U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1 15'2/13, 353.79 'GV + 1 I P.F. G. FROM NfOCl1 (NAD83 GRID) 117 -(CMJ - 160' TRACT NO. A -3A- CIVIL ACTION NO. 1461 Af2'GRF'PEISER _ ----=__--481- - eIA AMAWAr SEARS =7--f7 180 "_. -------1 -- _ ---- , S05'06.715-0.61' 1 -----------S89°22V4'E-674.89'` ARMvcoRPsoF .464 • 486' - - / -- _ - _ _ _- _ . - - -- - - ..6� / /I II ENCINEERs BRASS r I eo \ 1! Hyl _ - - _ - __ _ �, MON. FOUND rr I O 444 / ZONE X' - - - ,^° •A7279B6"(CM waTEREABEAENTNOTE / _ _ _ _ - - - - - UNLESSSHOMNOTHERMSE HEREON, ALL PROPOSED WATER EASEMENTS ARE PARALLEL AND \ \ t I I o J 41 PERPENDICULAR TO THE ADIOMNG BREL NE, ACCESS, \ \ w] ANOU77UTYE4SEMENr \ :� \ I a. • I - 0 30' 60' 120' - j \ /� I / I �" ht� \ \\ \ - I \�.\ \\\ _ _ - i\yl f\I \� ! �\ ' \ \ I,. \ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I 1' = 60' (IF ON 22'X34' SHEET) / ^ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' / 15'X 15'WATER ESMT. \ _ _ \ 1 i VARIABLE WIDTH \ I� -r • es --- i 1 Z \ /� / •� •\ \ \ )/ 1 5. �o - (eYrwsPun '• f0•X1GwATERESMr. I F TYeAACCESS Fxr .I •I � \ I� \ \ ( 1/2•GRF I (BY THISPL,tn eGGG���9 \ �'•211r (cM ' I / ue \ \ \ \ \ \ (BrTMSPun ci1�_1z \r .L.>aa•\_' 1_- \7 / v jF9iW4 2,16- /-- 7,1 \ SPW 1y5y1 44 -E -293,e9' 7 UNE -�--- 112 C1\.\ \ \ I ( .76.0 I i / \ 1 y / 528 11 I 1 I \ �\ S \ \ 1 / rl� / I b L � ,/ �' - -_ `\ �" \ iT\°.'• /� � E' I / I EX. OLFC COURSE H 1 ! / \ 1 1 \ I GOLF COURSE / 1 I \� 1 \ \ 'c I I RESTRICTED USE ESMT `�.�L�e_ VOL. 14281 FG. 513, / / y- - - \ \ 4 / _/ \ \ 1 / II I '( LOT 1, BLOCK 1 D.R. r.c. T, y �t67 I 1 \ 7' J C56 5\7 L_\ ♦ L69 / �\/ hII II/II wti1 r.,j`�li y¢wmoo II ENCMVEATGRLPEVIffI II \`�rTOC.I. N0. D21419B442 I / l I l - L43 1 442 O.P.R.T.C.T./J II _� I 1a WATERESMT. - 1 I I) I 3 I- / ` �,L .c... ZONED i 'R -MF' LBs 10•WATER ESMr. \ (Br THIS Pun \I. Q _ I 1rz•a" RF J J/ / 3. �I (By TNrs Pun \ 1 .m \LI2 SII 1 I f r,eS lCl ,�__ol I I `Ml '2111•(CM / $I �1 I \ LOT2 \-' \ \ /l BLOCK 10.e4e4 acREs i I7 1 \ \ t I 1 (463,757 SO. FT.) \ I \ I I I / \ (1 I Ex. unurvESMT �-1+1 / \ I I MIN. F.F. 505' \ $ I 'j \! T.C.G.I. NO. D10]3433]4, I I I // i / )� 1 \ .I II I I ) _ I I OPRTO.r I CALLED: 4.9827 ACRES / l // / IiY.TERESUT. 1 ENDREaREIUNDER _ - _ II THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE / / / !Br nRs Pun I HEAvrTREE `III COVERAGE VOL. 13848, PG. 447, / JJ/) _ (\ 11 0 D. R. T. C. T. / / / / 6 / / l l / / /' ) I 48.0 I ZONED 1 I / II 589.5938.15 1112.18• T�-�1 I I ! i�'`!\+pc112•dRF�� - I� I' 'f I1� 'PID' I ) ) ) l J /. / / // / J Nag .59WE-293.81' ,I _ J/ \. SN• S - _ _ i ANI - _ _ / I C1i -! �.J\ I Ty♦c �QN- 'It s•ArD4 p,•oos-FR / Iw 1 / �a\\LWEST-3a3.e3' - 1•IPF / N86°35'29'15- 221.14'.F.._.-•••.-- D" C51 b ad 1� " �I°4r• �i /` /7444-- Ia1 -',> I Lp - C/RS; f I I 1 (/) I 1 / / / _. ��_ {_---'^ _ 7444• ALL/ �y;' me I�i� I ue U9 I-------- -�� C 3S• - 1 I 11 I I� }t 1 \ L� ,Le2 C47-------- - EAST-3zesr I ! --- �t,_� ofe �•cf9 •b / y I 1 1 II \ 1 I I\ \ \ cS1/ \ \ \\ I Z Ls1 $ r` L8 C T - _ L32 \ \ ? 1,2 d� I D I` n 037 Cie ,, JPHLAND' 1 l 1 1 I�T(C6p I 1 L63 SE f / .. 1 i 'b -I Y I L3, •- `\`y /6 �3 �'y\ `/�j / Le0 a FIVRARIABLELMIEACCE ACCESS \ fOX11'WATFJ7ESMT �TC30�- lil ` ) `4 ) 4'.... UrRnYEASEA+ENr (Bvn+rsPLAn W. WATER ESMT 1e.93• _' .\ 1 ` 1 G ". 1 )� I O (BYTHISPLA7) $ I J ! (BVTHIsrLAn LOTI1 1 al I I�rcoz �I fo•x16 1� G1 �1� 4n� /( I I:°; IN S 43 1 `Ti \ \ 1\\ BLOCK I r 1im� t'. (BY THIS M \ I Imo- 14282ACRES \ li -�y o,. I 1 �}Y \\ \cz7 l ) :_•,.L O�WF ! \ \ \ \ 1 I (410,691 SO. FT.) 1 ! vARABLEWUTH I 35.0`/ j 3 g Li / \ FIREIANE ACCESS d w o m 10'X 1a WATER ESMT / MIN. F.F. 505' I UTDTY IS PLAT) I .I O Z ^,° y Y ��� �Q9� / V'a h dRS ) i m y � 2 V \ 1 (BYTMSPun i / 20NING (BvrHisPun I: / 1 g o ° I nP �1MI grb? �� SEE �C r ) z da 1°�' -A -,\%f / / 'HCO" / I I 1 > �® INSET / r i o w 143.er / ,�T' � �"+� / _ b �,{ I I / •. v %J/ ) ) ORS ,)' '/ Pot CO 1rz•CIRF \ 1 t ' t -/ _ �wEsi''349:91":�- ) / 1 ��s\ 1 \ $i 1, i , I I zOo2 r C' _ _ 1 \\ � 7117- (CAI) \ 1 1 1 t 1 va/iueLE wrorH i - %�7/"/ ,-/7 !J I 1 \ 1 \ ssz - �I m I I � O ! \ \ 1 1 1 \ FIRELANE. ACCESS d / _ �'i // / / 1 \ \ \ "b I 1 m °IO / sNi \ 1 \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 UDLITYEASEMENr - j / / / / ' \ \ �\ \ \ / �I I '� I I L� Qs III+v�oO CALLED: 1.299 ACRES Y \ (eYTHIsnLan _ - �\ `1 1 b /�/_ / I A\` \ \ \ \ 1 _ �� / 1 \ \�-__648._. _ vo. 1, ,� I/1� ' �. wli�I$,/� 1 / ,,�• OF ;N / '�1rz'fRF \ \ \ 1 4p0 �/ / / \ \ \ Y �I 1 p ss 'i I \ 1 // /Iy /i Ai VOL. 12747, PG 498 J, \\/ '`(cM \ \ \ ♦ SURYIF 1 1\ sae _ _ `- \ 1, _1-, / ) (I T a I_ VARIABLE ` \ FIREIANE ACCESS d --1 28.a ® UTRJTYEASEMENT I u / °��, \ zoNEx \ IJP ����®" \\', -- - faXI(YWAERESWT - I - - / : , /I // I/ I �$I s I (BYTHISPLAT) _ /_ \ s� pa 4 �pl� _ s r _ 1 sNaoEo/ I I \ I \ 11 // / - �_ i6 SANITARY •\ Y \ �, \ - I I' SEWER FASEMEM �\ xSIMEO'� // I\\ - _ t \- `sz. __ =1= _f - (BrTHisPun \APPROX.I �'' I� ,g�' w�f�1l,/ 1 ) R 7G( 9 •1.r 1 `�\ \\ �\ SEE S.S. ESMT. DETM I�r - �LINEN /, // •i' f �J�IMK O Y P _ lira -S 1 _ - - _ 1$.\\ �` I / ro 1 _APPROX. LOCATION \ - - - - - \ \ _ \ I 1 ' //� / 4 \ OF FLIOOI�ZONE `\ IJ i' _ _ \L71 1}° P 1 /m �,• l' , %i , �in��_� �• I 4i \ //�.-%r O�//�� �,0///,�' in�,LP'I•- 1.;l 1 - , 1 U • \ , 1 _ / - - ` \ , k - /_ / f0• WA7ERESMf rTRIISPu L79 // ! oRA/NAGEESMr. a L3-` /7s3u / $ (SYMISPLAn / \\�.\ '/� J/ ESMTWTAIE L _ ._ _ _- - - / / '\ \ ../ i � // // / 117-03 0j i EX 15'UTILITY EASEMENT \ _ / / •/ / / ,\ VOL 1277. PG. 1060 DR.TC.T- \ \� \25UTIL/TY ESMT. SRI' JR "i---- _ /LI-(ABANOONEDBYMISPLAn-`�733.21N (BYTNIS PLAn / (BY TMS PIA (CM) -7- --'a- -'/f liT --_ N'l,- /--- -+- C- ,-_�� /%J 1 n /. )`�•� / / T T'yi i % l_ _/-1_1 �`1 / 1�,L .L74 / H.IOE FEN - _ _ �,��� r. b _ SBD-" 7 >��a-r _ 7-\ / - --.Cj, \ ZONING N88°07W'W-81Z76` \ _ �� SEE "CC. C -u1 I -T"1.'T-y'TT/ Z552s� o / NSET / TRACTA-R, BLOCK 341 h.\ •a- •` R ' rrz• "ORF / GRAPE MTLSADDl7FON \ ' LEGEND' t"3-- - _ - " \ • \ \ \\ 1 1 \ 1\ I ! I I I I / \ j ' / • \ (CAI) �� \ \ L75 10 •sa 2466• / ' / CAB. A SLIDE 5503, \ \ /' ,/ P.R.TC.T. \ , GRF IRON ROD FOUND LMTHCAP D.RT.C.T. DEED RECORDS. TARRANT-+ \ 1 \ \ \ � a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ t \ \ / / i\ 1 l `.., \� \\ \ ♦ O. }' 11' aRF CIRS IRONRODWTHCAPSTAMPED COUNTY, TEXAS �� \ I\ \ \ CALLED:3.0313ACRES \ 3 . / •ARTHux 'SPOONERd ASSOOATES'SET P.R.T.C.T. PLATRECORDS, TARRANT ��}�j- WHITILESEY INVES TMENTS, INC. NO.1 IRF IRON ROD FOUND COUNTY, TEXAS 1\ ^/ Sr.-� _ I I m ENGINEER: TRACT 1' IN VOL 7333, PG. 1383, 1 m : y1 fa, ORF OWNER: MON. MONUMENT O.P.R.TCT. OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS. - D.R.TC.T. I 00 f ! ,/ I I ` ° •ARTHUR• FOR CORNER TARRANT COUNTYTEXAS •4 / / V ^ I ��' CONSTANCE CARTER REVO. TRUST PGM CONTROLLING MONUMENT CURVE TABLE ArrcLENGTHOF s. ar 1 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CH.BEARING CH. LENGTH TABLE 50.00 31.51' SSO-W09W 30.99- C2 30.00 18.90 UNE BEARING DISTANCE UNE BEARING DISTANCE UNE BEARING DISTANCE UNE BEARING DISTANCE UNE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N572339W 19.67 L16 N89'59'S0'E 55.83' L31 N79'26S9"E 20.66' L46 N87542M 54.62 L61 EAST 1275' L2 S1921'09'W 55.06' L17 SSS'06'46E 16.27 L32 N89'1647E 29.59 L47 S89'5937W 76.05' L62 S45'00'DO"E 9.60' L3 S86'31'2TW 54.65' LIS S89'49'09"E 29.88' L33 N26`STS3"W 29.14' L48 N00.003'W 11.68 L63 S460914W 70.00 L4 S8912333E 31.77 L19 N79'28.591E 20.66 L34 S69'5634W 93.17 L49 N29.54'39W 64.03' L64 N45'00'OOW 10.00 L5 S12'4741"W 11220 L20 N88°4T49"E 118.99 L35 NO(TW10W 96.67' L50 N89'48'7ZW 4.55' L65 N89'5319W 17.23' L6 N28°5254"E 9.60' L21 S11'3621"E 25.11' L36 NI24.47`017W I 57.27 L51 N00.11.4rE 38.65' L68 S00'W4ZW 15.00 L7 SOO*WOXW 81.86 L22 N11'W21W 25.11' L37 NORTH 60.13' L52 S89'48'12"E 20.00 L67 589.59.16E 246 L8 S89.54.11'E 41.73' L23 S88'1312M 4.31' L38 S63'3043"E 15.06' L53 S00.11'48W 38.65 L68 N89 -43.17W 10.00' L9 S6WSTIWE 145.05 L24 S27'1008W 31.56 L39 N36'O0'38W 7215' L54 N89'48'1ZW 5.45 L69 NOD -21.36W 10.00 L70 N68'41'44W 19.OT L25 368'53'16'E 7.27 L40 N63.3043W 3.34' L55 S29'54'39'E 64.03' L70 S89°431Z'E 7.45; L71 N3T4T02W 16.35' L26 N68.5316W 33.79' L41 N00'03'4ZW 9299 L56 SOUTH 36.61' L71 WEST 10.00 L72 N88'S316W 126.43 L27 S68'5316E 18.ST L42 N89'5637"E 75.98' L57 NB8'OT44W 15.01' L72 SOUTH 10.00 L73 S89.58'34W 106.35 L28 S27.1008W 31.56 L43 S89-SIV25-E 54.71' LSB NORTH 41.97 L73 EAST 5.21' L74 N00'0010W 96.67 L29 N68'5316W 63.82 L44 500.0910-E 26.00' L59 WEST 23.76' L15 N24'4T09W 57.2T L30 S89 -49.09-E 29.88 L45 N89 -5959'E 56.59 L60 N00.072TE 15.00' 112 C1\.\ \ \ I ( .76.0 I i / \ 1 y / 528 11 I 1 I \ �\ S \ \ 1 / rl� / I b L � ,/ �' - -_ `\ �" \ iT\°.'• /� � E' I / I EX. OLFC COURSE H 1 ! / \ 1 1 \ I GOLF COURSE / 1 I \� 1 \ \ 'c I I RESTRICTED USE ESMT `�.�L�e_ VOL. 14281 FG. 513, / / y- - - \ \ 4 / _/ \ \ 1 / II I '( LOT 1, BLOCK 1 D.R. r.c. T, y �t67 I 1 \ 7' J C56 5\7 L_\ ♦ L69 / �\/ hII II/II wti1 r.,j`�li y¢wmoo II ENCMVEATGRLPEVIffI II \`�rTOC.I. N0. D21419B442 I / l I l - L43 1 442 O.P.R.T.C.T./J II _� I 1a WATERESMT. - 1 I I) I 3 I- / ` �,L .c... ZONED i 'R -MF' LBs 10•WATER ESMr. \ (Br THIS Pun \I. Q _ I 1rz•a" RF J J/ / 3. �I (By TNrs Pun \ 1 .m \LI2 SII 1 I f r,eS lCl ,�__ol I I `Ml '2111•(CM / $I �1 I \ LOT2 \-' \ \ /l BLOCK 10.e4e4 acREs i I7 1 \ \ t I 1 (463,757 SO. FT.) \ I \ I I I / \ (1 I Ex. unurvESMT �-1+1 / \ I I MIN. F.F. 505' \ $ I 'j \! T.C.G.I. NO. D10]3433]4, I I I // i / )� 1 \ .I II I I ) _ I I OPRTO.r I CALLED: 4.9827 ACRES / l // / IiY.TERESUT. 1 ENDREaREIUNDER _ - _ II THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE / / / !Br nRs Pun I HEAvrTREE `III COVERAGE VOL. 13848, PG. 447, / JJ/) _ (\ 11 0 D. R. T. C. T. / / / / 6 / / l l / / /' ) I 48.0 I ZONED 1 I / II 589.5938.15 1112.18• T�-�1 I I ! i�'`!\+pc112•dRF�� - I� I' 'f I1� 'PID' I ) ) ) l J /. / / // / J Nag .59WE-293.81' ,I _ J/ \. SN• S - _ _ i ANI - _ _ / I C1i -! �.J\ I Ty♦c �QN- 'It s•ArD4 p,•oos-FR / Iw 1 / �a\\LWEST-3a3.e3' - 1•IPF / N86°35'29'15- 221.14'.F.._.-•••.-- D" C51 b ad 1� " �I°4r• �i /` /7444-- Ia1 -',> I Lp - C/RS; f I I 1 (/) I 1 / / / _. ��_ {_---'^ _ 7444• ALL/ �y;' me I�i� I ue U9 I-------- -�� C 3S• - 1 I 11 I I� }t 1 \ L� ,Le2 C47-------- - EAST-3zesr I ! --- �t,_� ofe �•cf9 •b / y I 1 1 II \ 1 I I\ \ \ cS1/ \ \ \\ I Z Ls1 $ r` L8 C T - _ L32 \ \ ? 1,2 d� I D I` n 037 Cie ,, JPHLAND' 1 l 1 1 I�T(C6p I 1 L63 SE f / .. 1 i 'b -I Y I L3, •- `\`y /6 �3 �'y\ `/�j / Le0 a FIVRARIABLELMIEACCE ACCESS \ fOX11'WATFJ7ESMT �TC30�- lil ` ) `4 ) 4'.... UrRnYEASEA+ENr (Bvn+rsPLAn W. WATER ESMT 1e.93• _' .\ 1 ` 1 G ". 1 )� I O (BYTHISPLA7) $ I J ! (BVTHIsrLAn LOTI1 1 al I I�rcoz �I fo•x16 1� G1 �1� 4n� /( I I:°; IN S 43 1 `Ti \ \ 1\\ BLOCK I r 1im� t'. (BY THIS M \ I Imo- 14282ACRES \ li -�y o,. I 1 �}Y \\ \cz7 l ) :_•,.L O�WF ! \ \ \ \ 1 I (410,691 SO. FT.) 1 ! vARABLEWUTH I 35.0`/ j 3 g Li / \ FIREIANE ACCESS d w o m 10'X 1a WATER ESMT / MIN. F.F. 505' I UTDTY IS PLAT) I .I O Z ^,° y Y ��� �Q9� / V'a h dRS ) i m y � 2 V \ 1 (BYTMSPun i / 20NING (BvrHisPun I: / 1 g o ° I nP �1MI grb? �� SEE �C r ) z da 1°�' -A -,\%f / / 'HCO" / I I 1 > �® INSET / r i o w 143.er / ,�T' � �"+� / _ b �,{ I I / •. v %J/ ) ) ORS ,)' '/ Pot CO 1rz•CIRF \ 1 t ' t -/ _ �wEsi''349:91":�- ) / 1 ��s\ 1 \ $i 1, i , I I zOo2 r C' _ _ 1 \\ � 7117- (CAI) \ 1 1 1 t 1 va/iueLE wrorH i - %�7/"/ ,-/7 !J I 1 \ 1 \ ssz - �I m I I � O ! \ \ 1 1 1 \ FIRELANE. ACCESS d / _ �'i // / / 1 \ \ \ "b I 1 m °IO / sNi \ 1 \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 UDLITYEASEMENr - j / / / / ' \ \ �\ \ \ / �I I '� I I L� Qs III+v�oO CALLED: 1.299 ACRES Y \ (eYTHIsnLan _ - �\ `1 1 b /�/_ / I A\` \ \ \ \ 1 _ �� / 1 \ \�-__648._. _ vo. 1, ,� I/1� ' �. wli�I$,/� 1 / ,,�• OF ;N / '�1rz'fRF \ \ \ 1 4p0 �/ / / \ \ \ Y �I 1 p ss 'i I \ 1 // /Iy /i Ai VOL. 12747, PG 498 J, \\/ '`(cM \ \ \ ♦ SURYIF 1 1\ sae _ _ `- \ 1, _1-, / ) (I T a I_ VARIABLE ` \ FIREIANE ACCESS d --1 28.a ® UTRJTYEASEMENT I u / °��, \ zoNEx \ IJP ����®" \\', -- - faXI(YWAERESWT - I - - / : , /I // I/ I �$I s I (BYTHISPLAT) _ /_ \ s� pa 4 �pl� _ s r _ 1 sNaoEo/ I I \ I \ 11 // / - �_ i6 SANITARY •\ Y \ �, \ - I I' SEWER FASEMEM �\ xSIMEO'� // I\\ - _ t \- `sz. __ =1= _f - (BrTHisPun \APPROX.I �'' I� ,g�' w�f�1l,/ 1 ) R 7G( 9 •1.r 1 `�\ \\ �\ SEE S.S. ESMT. DETM I�r - �LINEN /, // •i' f �J�IMK O Y P _ lira -S 1 _ - - _ 1$.\\ �` I / ro 1 _APPROX. LOCATION \ - - - - - \ \ _ \ I 1 ' //� / 4 \ OF FLIOOI�ZONE `\ IJ i' _ _ \L71 1}° P 1 /m �,• l' , %i , �in��_� �• I 4i \ //�.-%r O�//�� �,0///,�' in�,LP'I•- 1.;l 1 - , 1 U • \ , 1 _ / - - ` \ , k - /_ / f0• WA7ERESMf rTRIISPu L79 // ! oRA/NAGEESMr. a L3-` /7s3u / $ (SYMISPLAn / \\�.\ '/� J/ ESMTWTAIE L _ ._ _ _- - - / / '\ \ ../ i � // // / 117-03 0j i EX 15'UTILITY EASEMENT \ _ / / •/ / / ,\ VOL 1277. PG. 1060 DR.TC.T- \ \� \25UTIL/TY ESMT. SRI' JR "i---- _ /LI-(ABANOONEDBYMISPLAn-`�733.21N (BYTNIS PLAn / (BY TMS PIA (CM) -7- --'a- -'/f liT --_ N'l,- /--- -+- C- ,-_�� /%J 1 n /. )`�•� / / T T'yi i % l_ _/-1_1 �`1 / 1�,L .L74 / H.IOE FEN - _ _ �,��� r. b _ SBD-" 7 >��a-r _ 7-\ / - --.Cj, \ ZONING N88°07W'W-81Z76` \ _ �� SEE "CC. C -u1 I -T"1.'T-y'TT/ Z552s� o / NSET / TRACTA-R, BLOCK 341 h.\ •a- •` R ' rrz• "ORF / GRAPE MTLSADDl7FON \ ' LEGEND' t"3-- - _ - " \ • \ \ \\ 1 1 \ 1\ I ! I I I I / \ j ' / • \ (CAI) �� \ \ L75 10 •sa 2466• / ' / CAB. A SLIDE 5503, \ \ /' ,/ P.R.TC.T. \ , GRF IRON ROD FOUND LMTHCAP D.RT.C.T. DEED RECORDS. TARRANT-+ \ 1 \ \ \ � a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ t \ \ / / i\ 1 l `.., \� \\ \ ♦ O. }' 11' aRF CIRS IRONRODWTHCAPSTAMPED COUNTY, TEXAS �� \ I\ \ \ CALLED:3.0313ACRES \ 3 . / •ARTHux 'SPOONERd ASSOOATES'SET P.R.T.C.T. PLATRECORDS, TARRANT ��}�j- WHITILESEY INVES TMENTS, INC. NO.1 IRF IRON ROD FOUND COUNTY, TEXAS 1\ ^/ Sr.-� _ I I m ENGINEER: TRACT 1' IN VOL 7333, PG. 1383, 1 m : y1 fa, ORF OWNER: MON. MONUMENT O.P.R.TCT. OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS. - D.R.TC.T. I 00 f ! ,/ I I ` ° •ARTHUR• FOR CORNER TARRANT COUNTYTEXAS •4 / / V ^ I ��' CONSTANCE CARTER REVO. TRUST P.F.C. (CAI, PGM CONTROLLING MONUMENT CURVE TABLE ArrcLENGTHOF s. ar 1 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CH.BEARING CH. LENGTH C7 50.00 31.51' SSO-W09W 30.99- C2 30.00 18.90 N50'S909°W 18.59 C3 30.00' 1IDT N79'27'21"W 11.00 C4 56.00' 87.99 N45'00'48W 79.21' C5 30.00 1298' N12'23.40'W 12.88' CS 30.00 34.15 N57'23'35W 3233 C7 56.00 87.96 N45'00'001W 79.20 C8 75.00' 86.30 N32-ST5TE 81.67 C9 90.05 106.21' S33'49'28'W 100.16 C10 56.00' 88.04' N44-ST39'E 79.26 C11 67.80 Z7.06 S77'37'Z7"E 28.86 C12 84.00 31.77 S79.0636E 1.53 31.53- C13 C13 56.00 90.22' S45°382rE 80.78' C14 30.00' 25.54' S24 -0635"E 24.77 C15 36.00' 13.58' S37'41'10'E 13.50' C16 30.00' 16.36' S422941"E 16.15 C17 30.00 16.60 S73.5T58"E 16.39' Cie 30.00 5.60' N84 -49.55-E 5.59 CIS 88.00 14.70 S84275ZW 14.69 C20 56.00 78.36 S51.417rE 7212 C21 30.0 6258' 371WOCE 51.84' C22 30.00 16.41' N50 -51.51W 16.29 C23 56.00 53.68' N39'04'06'W 51.65 C24 30.00' 41.98' N51'4127W 38.84' C25 30.00' 46.07 S44'13'"W 41.68' C26 56.0' 26.28' Slra34W 26.04' C27 61.50' 41.50' S4630.01'W 40.77 C28 30.00' 70.39 S01'0833E 55.31' C29 3.00 7.76 S36464TW 5.77' C30 30.00 16.54' S53'064PE 16.33' C31 30.00 14.06 S13'43'34W 13.95 C32 35.50' 23.85' N4625'OTE 23.41' C33 58.0' 49.80' S4G'3SOU'W 48.18' C34 30.00' 50.27' S6306'33W 44.59' C35 30.00 3s or N34'26.36W 33.94' C36 30.00' __Sl 91 N53'2636E 4820 P.F.C. (CAI, PGM CONTROLLING MONUMENT L•s.ao' ArrcLENGTHOF s. ar 1 / / / ZONING oo O I N�.i / � / � I o 7 I �" 58.00' BURGESS & NIPLE FOD. VOL FOUND VOLUME ESMT ESMT BY EASEMENT I EASEMENT CALLED.' 8.3128 ACRES / "NCO' INVESTMENTS, INC. NO. 1 I / Z , I ? 1 1 I �A / / :� I I h / / PN: ATTN: CONSTANCE CARTER 70703 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 118 47.64' PAGE RO.W. RIGHT -0F -WAY IN ZONING WHnnESEY TRACT 2- IN VOL 7333, PG. 1383, 47AY I / / OWNER CARTER GRAPEY/NE PARTNERS, LP STAFFORD TEXAS 77477 81) 996. 705 (2IRMN.F-1 C.L T.C.C.I. NO TARRANT COUNTY GIEPX'S N1Z2340'W "H D.R.T.C.T. I SIRS L9 irz'GRF'Sa.366' OR/VF TBPF FIRM NO. F-10831 TS C43 IN57FLUMENi NUMBER 47.12 N45.00'OOW 4243' C44 N. 7.036,94834 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76093 ATTN: THOMAS LUNZMAN, P.E. 53.08' C45 116.05' 29.86 N60'0127E ' E: 2111,128.38 WAD83 GRID) PH: 972-S"- PN: 97L569.7310 ATTN: NICK CARTER 33.42 THIS DOCUMENT IS PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY ERIC S. SPOONER, R.P.L.S. DECEMBER 12, 2018 SURVEYOR: C��RRP/%%� SST S A� 309 91ERS STREET. SLIM 104 t3AESS• TEXAS 76M9 (817)6BS43448 WWWOOOffRSURVEYOR6.W51 Teas FFW NO. f W5W SAA ]OB NO. IMM • VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE) E M D DETAllS AND INSETS DEC 1 2 201 CASE NO. _ PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CARTER ADDITION BEING A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF A20.0746 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE HENRY SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415, AND THE ANDREW W. ANOER5ON SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 26, CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 20.0746 ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING ALL OF THOSE GRAPEVINE PARTNERS CERTAIN TRACTS OFLAND CONVEYED E CARTER , IF LE TRUST CARTER, TRUSTEEOF THE CONSTAEDEED CE THEREOF REVOCABLE TRUST DATED APRIL 13, 1999, BY THE DEEDS THEREOF FILED FOR RECORD IN TARRANT COUNTY CLERK'S INSTRUMENT3371, D2041"024 8 D2102111S4, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, S, TARRANARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. ZONED:"HCO" 2 LOTS - 20.0746 ACRES DECEMBER - 2018 SHEET oft CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CH. BEARING CH. LENGTH C37 58.00' 16.33' S81'2759"E 16.Z7' C38 56.00' 70.46' N94.49 -WE 10.44' C39 30.00' 47.64' 54593'39"E 4279' C40 30.00' 47AY N45'DOAM 4243' C41 56.00' 24.22' N1Z2340'W 24.07 C42 56.00' 63.76 NS7'23'36 W 60.35 C43 30.00' 47.12 N45.00'OOW 4243' C44 49.00' 56.OT N3T46'49'E 53.08' C45 116.05' 29.86 N60'0127E 29.77 C46 30.00' 33.42 N84'34'13"E 31.72 C47 101.00' 46.69' S76'4522"E 46.26' C48 29.84' 31.54' S59.4933"E 30.09 049 36.00 9.21' S36'54'091E 9.18' C50 29.6T 23.10 522.71'01"E 22SZ C51 66.00' 30.51' N76'4522W 30.24' C52 30.00' 40.79 N24'33'301W 37.72 C53 116.05' 29.11' N07'tZ34'E 29.03' C54 30.00' 47.14' N44'S72T'E 4244' C55 176.00 49.00' N82-WOS-E 48.84- 056 238.95 133.32 S89'5924"E 131.60' C57 176.00' 48.82 S81'5711"E 48.6T C58 30.00' 47.21' S44.4946•E 4248' C59 30.00' 46.99 S45'0TW 27 4233' C60 41.80 16.88' 577.13'44"E 16.77 C61 110.00' 4273 S78'58'OB"E 41.87 C62 30.OG 47.69 545.0428"E 4282' C63 30.00' 47.31' S45'3ZOGW 4256' C64 150.00' 41.61' N81'5711W 41.48' C65 264.95' 147.83' N89'5924W 145.92' C66 150.00' 41.76 S82.0905W 41.67 C67 30.00' 47.10 N45'02'43W 4241' C68 30.0' 47.16 N44-ST39"E 4245' C69 201.00 128.20 N71'3919"W 126.04' C70 195.00' 102.11' N14 -54'33W 100.95 C77 185.00' 96.8T S14 -5418"E 953E C72 217.00' 13280 Sll'5Z5TF 130.87 E M D DETAllS AND INSETS DEC 1 2 201 CASE NO. _ PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CARTER ADDITION BEING A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF A20.0746 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE HENRY SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415, AND THE ANDREW W. ANOER5ON SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 26, CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 20.0746 ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING ALL OF THOSE GRAPEVINE PARTNERS CERTAIN TRACTS OFLAND CONVEYED E CARTER , IF LE TRUST CARTER, TRUSTEEOF THE CONSTAEDEED CE THEREOF REVOCABLE TRUST DATED APRIL 13, 1999, BY THE DEEDS THEREOF FILED FOR RECORD IN TARRANT COUNTY CLERK'S INSTRUMENT3371, D2041"024 8 D2102111S4, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, S, TARRANARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. ZONED:"HCO" 2 LOTS - 20.0746 ACRES DECEMBER - 2018 SHEET oft • OWNER'S CERTIFICATION • STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT§ WHEREAS, Carter Grapevine Partners, LP, and Constance Carter, Trustee of the Constance Carter Revocable Trust Dated April 13, 1999 are the owners a 20.0746 acre tract of land situated in the H. Suggs Survey, Abstract No. 1415 and the A.W. Anderson Survey, Abstract No. 26, City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, said 20.0746 acre tract being all of a called 0.19 acre tract of land conveyed to Carter Grapevine Partners, LP by deed as recorded Instrument No. D207343374, Official Public Records, Tarrant County, Texas (O.P.R.T.C.T.), said 20.0746 acre tract being all of a called 19.585 acre tract of land conveyed to Carter Grapevine Partners, LP and Constance Carter, Trustee of the Constance Carter Revocable Trust Dated April 13, 1999 by deeds recorded in Instrument No. D204189024 and D210214154, O.P.R.T.C.T., said 20.0746 acre tract of land being herein more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8 iron rod with cap stamped "SPOONER 5922" set (5/8" CIRS) at themost southerly south property corner of the said 0.19 acre tract, same being a south lot corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Enclave at Grapevine, being an Addition to the said City and State, according to the plat thereof filed for record in Instrument No. D214196442, O.P.R.T.C.T., said beginning point being on the westerly right-of-way line of Anderson Gibson Road, being a variable width public rightof-way; THENCE, North 57. 23' 39" West, along the southwest property line of the said 0.19 acre tract and along the said westerly right-of-way line, 19.62 feet to a 5/8" CIRS at a common property corner of the said 0.19 acre tract and the said 19.585 acre tract; THENCE, along the easterly property lines of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being the said westerly right-of-way line of Anderson Gibson Road the following courses and distances, South 19' 21'08" West 55.06 feet to a 5/8" ORS; South 27' 10' 08" West 362.41 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped "SCI 2466'found; South 21' 07' 02" West 139.95 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped "SCI 2466" found at the most southerly southeast property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract; THENCE, South 86' 31' 27" West, along a south property line of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being the said westerly rightof-way line of Anderson Gibson Road, 54.65 feet to east property line of a called 3.0313 acre tract of land conveyed to Whittlesey Investments, Inc., No. 1 by deed there of recorded in Volume 7567, Page 919, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.T.GT.); THENCE, North 00' 48' 09" West, along the said property line, 148.61 feet to a 3/4" iron rod found at the northeast property corner of the said Whittlesey tract, same being a southeast property comer of the said 19.585 acre tract; THENCE, North 88' 07'44" West, along the south property line of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being the north property line of the said Whittlesey tract, at a distance of 386.00 feet passing the northwest property corner of the said Whittlesey tract, same being the most northerly northeast property corner of a called 8.3128 acre tract of land conveyed described as 'Tract 2", conveyed to the said Whittlesey in the deed filed for record in Volume 7333, Page 1383, D.R.T.GT., and continuing in all a total distance of 812.76 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found at the southwest property corner of the said19.585 acre tract, said 5/8" iron rod found being the southeast property corner of a called 4.9827 acre tract of land conveyed to the City of Grapevine by deed as recorded in Volume 13848, Page 447, D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE, along the common property lines of the said 19.585 acre tract and the said 4.9827 acre tract the following courses and distances. North 03' 58' 57" East, 445.01 feet to a 5/8" CIRS; North 15' 51' 18" East 304.51 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped "SCI 2466"found; North 04' 38' 43" West 244.88 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found at the northwest property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being the northeast property corner of the said 4.9827 acre tract, said 5/8" iron rod found being on the south property line of a tract of land conveyed to the United States of America, by Civil Action No. 1461, dated 11-29-1948; THENCE, South 89' 22' 04" East, along the north property line of the said 19.585 acre tract and along the said south property line of the USA tract, 674.89 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument stamped "A22 1986" found at a west lot corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, Enclave at Grapevine; THENCE, South 89' 23' 33" East, continuing along the said north property line of the 19.585 acre tract and along a south lot line of said Lot 1, 31.77 feet to the most northerly northeast property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract, from which a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped "Peiser and Mankin Survey" found bears South 05. 06' 47" East 0.62 feet; THENCE, along the east property line of the said 19.585 acre tract and along a west lot line of said Lot I the following courses and distances: South 01' 14'38" East, 139.88 feet to a 5/8" CIRS; South 00' 18'01" West, 373.42 feet to a 1" iron pipe found; THENCE, North 86' 35' 29" East, along a north property line of the said 19.585 acre tract and along a south lot line of said Lot 1, 221.14 feet a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped "Peiser and Markin" found at the most easterly northeast property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being the north property corner of the said 0.19 acre tract; THENCE, South 71' 20' 44" East, along the northeast property line of the said 0.19 acre tract and along a southwest lot line of said Lot 1, 128.35 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped 1PH LAND SURVEYING" found at the most easterly northeast property corner of the said 0.19 acre tract; THENCE, South 12' 42' 41" West, along the southeast property line of the said 0.19 acre tract, same being a northwest lot line of said Lot 1, 112.20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Herein described tract contains 20.0746 acres 1874,448 square feet) of land. The basis of bearings for this survey is Enclave at Grapevine, Phase 1 being an Addition to the City of Grapevine according to the plat thereof recorded in Instrument Number D214196442, Official Public Records, Tarrant County, Texas. CONTINUED NOW, THEREFORE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, LP., does hereby adopt this plat of CARTER ADDITION, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, and does hereby dedicate to the public use forever the rightof-way and easements shown hereon. The easements shown hereon are hereby reserved for the purposes as indicated. The utility easements shall be open for all City or franchised public utilities for each particular use. The maintenance of paving on these easements are the responsibility of the property owner. No buildings or auxiliary structures shall be constructed, reconstructed, or placed upon, over, or across the easements as shown. Said easements being hereby reserved for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities using, or desiring to use same. An City or franchised utility shall have the full right to remove and keep removed all or parts of any fences, trees, shrubs, or other Improvements or growths which in any way endanger or interfere with the construction, maintenance, or efficiency of its respective system on the easements and all City or franchised utilities shall have the full right of ingress and egress to and from and upon said easements for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, patrolling, maintaining, and adding to or removing all or parts of its respective system without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. I have reviewed the City's Findings concerning dedications and I do agree that the statements are true and correct. This plat approved subject to all platting ordinances, rules, regulations, and resolutions of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Witness my hand this the day of 2018 CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, LP., a Nevada limited partnership BY: AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation General Partner Nick Carter, President CONSTANCE CARTER REVOCABLE TRUST dated April 13, 1999 Constance Carter, Trustee STATE OF § COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said State, on this date personally appeared known to me personally to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 2018. Notary Public in the State of Texas STATE OF § COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said State, on this date personally appeared known to me personally to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of z018. Notary Public in the State of Texas • AVIGATION RELEASE STATE OF TEXAS§ COUNTY OF TARRANT§ WHEREAS, hereinafter called "Owner", is the owner of that certain parcel of land situated in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as shown on this plat. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of ONE AND 00/100 ($1.00) DOLLAR and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby fully acknowledged and confessed, Owner does hereby waive, release, remise to the Ci of Grapevine, Tarrant Texas the Dallas -Fort Worth and quitclaim ty pe County, International Airport Board, the Cities of Dallas, Texas and Fort Worth, Texas, their successors and assigns, hereinafter called "Cities", for the sue and benefit of the public and its agencies, any and all claims for damages of any kind to persons or property that Owner may suffer by reason of the passage and flight of all aircraft in the air space above Owner's property above the height restriction as presently established by Ordinance No. 73-50 for the City of Grapevine, known as the Airport Zoning Ordinance of the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport, to infinite height above same, whether such damage shall originate from noise, vibration, fumes, dust, fuel and lubricant particles, and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft, landing at, or taking off from, or operating at or on the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport. This instrument does not release the owners or operators of aircraft from liability or damage or injury to person or property caused by falling aircraft or falling physical objects from aircraft, except as stated herein with respect to noise, fumes, dust, fule and lubricant particles. It is agreed that this Release shall be binding upon said owner and his heirs, assigns and successors in interest to said property; and it is further agreed that this instrument shall be a covenant running with the land, and shall be recorded in the Deed Records of the county or counties in which the property is situated. EXECUTED in Tarrant County, Texas, this the _ day of 2018. CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, L.P., a Nevada limited partnership BY: AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation General Partner Nick Carter. President CONSTANCE CARTER REVOCABLE TRUST dated April 13, 1999 Constance Carter, Trustee STATE OF § COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said State, on this date personally appeared known to me personally to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 2018. Notary Public in the State of Texas STATE OF § COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said State, on this date personally appeared known to me personally to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 2018. Notary Public in the State of Texas • SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT§ I, Eric S. Spooner, of Spooner & Associates, Inc., a Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Texas, do hereby delcare that I prepared this plat from an actual and accurate survey on the land and that the corner monuments shown thereon were properly placed under my personal supervision in accordance with the platting rules and regulations of the State of Texas and the City of Grapevine, Texas. COUNTY OF TARRANT§ BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said State, on this date known to me personally to be the person personally appeared ERIC S SPOONER,p y whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND ANd SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of .2018. Notary Public in the State of Texas • GENERAL NOTES' • The bearings shown hereon are based on the found monumentation of the plat of Enclave at Grapevine, Phase I, being an Addition to the City of Grapevine, according to the plat thereof recorded in Tarrant County Clerk's Instrument No. D214196442, Official Public Records, Tarrant County, Texas. • According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, the subject property appears to be located in Zone "X" (areas determined to be outside the 0.2 % annual chance floodplain), Zone "X -Shaded" (areas determined to be inside the 1% annual chance floodplain), as shown on Map No. 4843900030K,, map revised September 25, 2009, for Tarrant County and incorporated areas. This flood statement does not imply that the property and/or structures touted in Zones "X" and "X -Shaded" will be free from flooding or flood damage. This flood statement shall not create liability on the part of the Surveyor. • This survey was prepared without the benefit of a Commitment for Title Insurance prepared by a Title Company. The easements shown hereon are the only easements known by Spooner & Associates and does not imply that any other easements, covenants, restrictions, or other matters of record do not affect the subject property. No other research was preformed by Spooner & Associates, Inc. • Zoning Classifications indicated on this plat reflect the zoning in place at the time of preparation of this plat and does not represent a vested right to the zoning indicated hereon. • Existing or future minimum set -backs established by City Ordinance shall take precedence over building lines indicated on this plat. • Notice: Selling a portion of this addition by metes and bounds is a violation of City subdivision ordinance and state platting statues and is subject to fines and withholding of utilities and building certificates. OWNER: ENGINEER: CONSTANCE CARTER REVD. TRUST BURGESS & NIPLE PN: THIS DOCUMENT IS ATTN: CONSTANCE CARTER PRELIMINARY Eric S. Spooner, RPIS Date FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY Texas Registration No. 5922 ERIC S. SPOONER, R.P.L.S. TBPLS Firm No. 10054900 DECEMBER 12, 2018 STATE OF TEXAS § ATTN: THOMAS LUNZMAN, P.E. COUNTY OF TARRANT§ BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said State, on this date known to me personally to be the person personally appeared ERIC S SPOONER,p y whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND ANd SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of .2018. Notary Public in the State of Texas • GENERAL NOTES' • The bearings shown hereon are based on the found monumentation of the plat of Enclave at Grapevine, Phase I, being an Addition to the City of Grapevine, according to the plat thereof recorded in Tarrant County Clerk's Instrument No. D214196442, Official Public Records, Tarrant County, Texas. • According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, the subject property appears to be located in Zone "X" (areas determined to be outside the 0.2 % annual chance floodplain), Zone "X -Shaded" (areas determined to be inside the 1% annual chance floodplain), as shown on Map No. 4843900030K,, map revised September 25, 2009, for Tarrant County and incorporated areas. This flood statement does not imply that the property and/or structures touted in Zones "X" and "X -Shaded" will be free from flooding or flood damage. This flood statement shall not create liability on the part of the Surveyor. • This survey was prepared without the benefit of a Commitment for Title Insurance prepared by a Title Company. The easements shown hereon are the only easements known by Spooner & Associates and does not imply that any other easements, covenants, restrictions, or other matters of record do not affect the subject property. No other research was preformed by Spooner & Associates, Inc. • Zoning Classifications indicated on this plat reflect the zoning in place at the time of preparation of this plat and does not represent a vested right to the zoning indicated hereon. • Existing or future minimum set -backs established by City Ordinance shall take precedence over building lines indicated on this plat. • Notice: Selling a portion of this addition by metes and bounds is a violation of City subdivision ordinance and state platting statues and is subject to fines and withholding of utilities and building certificates. OWNER: ENGINEER: CONSTANCE CARTER REVD. TRUST BURGESS & NIPLE PN: ATTN: CONSTANCE CARTER 10701 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 118 OWNER STAFFORD, TEXAS 77177 CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, LP PH: (281) 980-7705 4013 HILLTOP DRIVE TOPE FIRM NO. F-10834 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 ATTN: THOMAS LUNZMAN, P.E. PH: 911-S69-7340 ATTN: NICK CARTER •INSETA torn \\�4• ryry. LOTI moo` \ \ I!1'CIRF 'SCI 2066• (NOT TO 5CALE)• • INSET B .. t 1 to72 n� A c7 C 2 'v�2 m U (NOT M SCALE) • DRAINAGE ESMT DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Date Approved Chairman Secretary SURVEYOR: ASSOCIATES Nx4>,� 209OYERSSIREEr. B 100. ElAESS,TW676U6 (817)605848 WNW-POONER511RVEYORS.COM TBPLB F WA ND.10050.900 88A XJB Ix).16003 ri 12 I/ILI1J, L50� I I `L54 II II II $I Ig �I tg I I� II II rIPF I I (cKp II II II II LOT II III I I LOT $II �I I II «IIS oll� 8118 11N II II 195 AT �I rev MIS PLT. vLAn II II L,11�017 of\\\\ G m\\m 3N'IRF \ (CMI \\ �11N ell II I • S.S. EASEMENT DETAIL (NOTTOSCALE) GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL Date Approved Mayor City Secretary CASE NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1 CARTER ADDITION BEING A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF A 20.0746 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE HENRY SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415, AND THE ANDREW W. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26, CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 20.0746 ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING ALL OF THOSE CERTAIN TRACTS OF LANGC ONVEYED TO CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS LP 8 TRUST D CARTER, TRUSTEE OF THE E DEED THEREOF CARTER REVOCABLE RRORD TRUST RATTO APRIL 13, 1999, BY THE DEEDS THEREOF FILED FOR RECORD INTARRANT COUNTY CLERKS INSTRUMENT3371, 0201189014 8 0230214154, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, S, TARRANARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. ZONED:'HCO" 2 LOTS — 20.0746 ACRES DECEMBER — 2018 SHEET oft MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 18, 2018 SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION PLAT APPLICATION FILING DATE ...................................................December 11, 2018 APPLICANT .................................... Kenneth Fambro II, IHS Real Estate Holdings, LLC. REASON FOR APPLICATION................................................... Platting property to build a hotel and a multi -family units building PROPERTY LOCATION .....................................................2103 Anderson Gibson Road ACREAGE................................................................................................................ 20.07 ZONING............................................................................. HCO- Hotel Corporate Office NUMBER OF LOTS...................................................................................... Two (2) Lots PREVIOUS PLATTING.................................................................................................No CONCEPTPLAN..........................................................................................................No SITEPLAN.......................................................................................................... CU 18-25 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT.................................................................................. Yes AVIGATION RELEASE............................................................................................... Yes PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED....................................................................................No C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 7089_597239Wgenda Memo 7089.doc PLAT INFORMATION SHEET FINAL PLAT APPLICATION LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, CARTER ADDITION I. GENERAL: • The applicant, Kenneth Fambro with HIS Real Estates Holdings, LLC is final platting a 20.07 acre site into two (2) lots. The property is located at 2103 Anderson Gibson Road. II. STREET SYSTEM: • The development has access to Anderson Gibson Road • Abutting roads: ❑ on the City Thoroughfare Plan- ® not on the City Thoroughfare Plan: ❑ Periphery Street Fees are due as follows: Type of Roadway Cost / LF Length Cost ❑ Major Arterial (A) $ 234.57 / LF ❑ Major Arterial (B) $ 178.35 / LF ❑ Minor Arterial (C) $ 203.06 / LF ❑ Minor Arterial (D) $ 170.33 / LF ❑ Collector (E) $ 170.33 / LF ❑ Collector (F) $ 150.98 / LF ❑ Sidewalk $ 25.00 / LF ❑ Curb & Gutter $ 15.00 / LF ® Periphery Street Fees are not due III. STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: • The existing stormwater flows into Hilton Branch. • The developer will be required to design for onsite as well as offsite drainage in accordance with the requirements of the City of Grapevine's Code of Ordinances. C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 7089_597239Wgenda Memo 7089.doc IV. WATER SYSTEM: ® The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ❑ The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. Additional off site water system improvements will be necessary to serve the site. V. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: ❑ The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is adequate to serve the development. ® The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is not adequate to serve the development. VI. MISCELLANEOUS: ❑ Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are not required for: ® Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits for: H/A Grapevine Water and Wastewater (voluntary assessment by property owner & City — late 1990's) ❑ Single Family Residential ( $ 2,414/ Lot) ❑ Multifamily ( $ 1,134/ Unit) ❑ Hotel ( $ 43,632/ Acre) ❑ Corporate Office ( $ 20,523/ Acre) ❑ Government ( $ 4,414/ Acre) ❑ Commercial / Industrial ( $ 5,739 / Acre) ® Open Space Fees are not required for: Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Carter Addition ❑ Open Space Fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits and/or any public infrastructure improvements for: ❑ R-5.0, R-TH, Zero Lot District ( $ 1,416.00 / Lot) ❑ R-7.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,146.00 / Lot) ❑ R-12.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,071.00 / Lot) ❑ R-20.0, Single Family District ( $ 807.00 / Lot) C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 7089_597239Wgenda Memo 7089.doc ❑ Public Hearing Only ❑ Variances were required on the following items: ❑ Front building line ❑ Allowing a setback of 3 feet for the rear property line for an accessory building ❑ Lot width & depth ❑ Max. Impervious Area ❑ Landscaping Regulations, allowing no landscape buffer between the edge of the parking area and the adjacent property line. ❑ The following items associated with this plat are not in accordance with the current subdivision standards: ❑ 50' ROW dedication not met: Developer is proposing to dedicate variable width private access easements throughout the development. The access easements will be owned and maintained by a Home Owners Association (HOA). ❑ Length of cul-de-sac street exceeds the 600 -foot limit: ❑ Driveway Spacing not met. VII. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS: A. The City has determined that the right-of-way and easements required to be dedicated for streets, utilities, drainage, access, sidewalks and other municipal needs and services are consistent with the City's ordinances and master plan, are reasonable and are connected to the proposed project in the following manner: ❑ The right-of-way provides for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements provide for a utility network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite drainage easements provide for a drainage network to serve the development of this site. ® The onsite access easements provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 7089_597239Wgenda Memo 7089.doc ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. B. The City further finds that the required dedication is related both in nature and extent to the impact of the proposed development as follows: ❑ The right-of-way is necessary to provide for future widening of public streets that will serve the development of this site. ® The onsite utility easements are necessary to provide for a utility system to serve this development and connect to existing utilities on surrounding property. ® The onsite drainage easements are necessary to provide for storm drainage improvements to serve the development of the site. ® The onsite access easements are necessary to provide cross access capabilities to this site and surrounding property. ❑ The onsite sidewalk easements are necessary to provide for a sidewalk network to serve the development of this site. ® All of the dedications benefit the development to at least the extent of the impact of such on the development. VIII. RECOMMENDATION: The members of the City Council and The Planning & Zoning Commission consider the following motion: "Move that the City Council (Planning and Zoning Commission) approve the Statement of Findings and the Final Plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Carter Addition." C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 7089_597239Wgenda Memo 7089.doc 0 30' 60' 120. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET T = 60' (IF ON 22'7034' SHEET) SEESHEET2OF2 FOR EASEMENT DETAILS AND INSETS CALLED: 4.9827 ACRES THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE VOL. 13848, T. PG. 447, T D. R. C. CIRS r "'/R/R (CM) Y8' IRF (CK PPROX. LOCATION ! .92 OF FLOW N' 7037,100OD ZONE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA E: 2,911, 35379 1rz•GaF -_LIMIT$ ./ U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (NA083 GRID) 21 n• (cM) _-. `- - "" TRACT NO. A•3A - CIVIL ACTION NO. 1461 P.F.C. FROM WHICH A 12' GRF'PE/SER 6 MANKIN' BEARS S05 -06'47'E-0 61- m'\ IRON RODFOUNDWTHCAP IRONROO WTHCAPSTAMPED D.RTC.T ARMYCORPS OF ENGINEER BRASS/ I / / CALLED: 3.0313 ACRES jp ZONE \ UNE TABLE 31.51' 'SPOONER 6 ASSOCIATES' SET MON FOUND -A22 1986' (CM) PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT WHITTLESEY INVESTMENTS, INC. NO. 1 \ UNE WATER EASEMENT N07E UNLESSSHOWNOTHERWISE DISTANCE UNE BEARING DISTANCE LINE \ DISTANCE HEREON, ALL PROPOSED WATER BEARING DISTANCE UNE BEARING t Lt N57'23'39W EASEMENTS ARE PARALLEL AND L16 1489°59.595 56.83' L31 W \ \ L46 PERPENDICULAR TO THE ADJOINING FIRELANE, ACCESS, 54.62 L61 EAST 12.75' L2 \ 1 55.06' AND UTILITY EASEMENT S58'06'48"E 16.2T L32 I o \ 3 S89'563TW 76.05' L62 I o I \ S86'31'2TW 54.65' L18 I h I e \ N26'51'53W 29.14' L48 °0 N04'03'07 11.68' L63 S46 -09'14"W 10.00' L4 S89'23'33 -E 31.77 \ 15'X15'WATERESMT 20.65' VARIABLE WIDTH S89'58'34 -W CIR$ _ \ 12'CIRF(BY '211T (CM) (BYTHIS PLAT 10Xf0'WA TERESMT THIS PL4n L16 64.03' FUTILITY EASEMES. (BYMIS PEA T) N45'00'WW 10.00' L5 S12'42'41"W 112.20' L20 N88°47`49"E 118.99' L35 _LL3/78' / Ld5 599°59'44'E-232.16' -�- a, \\C!, N89'48'17W 4.55' L65 N89°53'19W 17.23' L6 N28'SZ54"E 9.60' L21 569°5944°E-233.58' 25.11' L36 N24°4rOrVV 57.27 12 GRF I 260 a \ I I I 'SCI 2466' FXVARIABLE 065 . WIDTH _ _ _ _ _ 1 GOLF COURSE 1 \\� 14] C6� X60 L46 °P I - -RESTRICTED USE ESMT I _ _ _ _ _ _ _t46_ VOL 1d2S1, PG 513, I I D.R. T. I L67 cs5 Csfi c57 I I i r.l h Q LOT 1, BLOCK f N I 74.2 - _ - - - _ I w ENCLAVE AT CRAP 6442, w I '1(G c 7'1 rq TOC.1. NO. D214196442, I i L42 L43 LTO \'� it a w `� I y I I L69 I I I I L I w y ^' I O.P.R.T.C.T. a 8 1 I C II /IT{�f0'WATER ESMT. f0'WATER ESMT m1I I 13 Ml �x2I `-L65 (BYTHISPLAT) (BYTHISPLAT Y I I 1 1rz• cIRF 8 I L6e I N ' -_ 6 I l m z l �U ,X �''211rlcM) I I LOT2 b z I I I_ BLOCK/I� SII I l g wm rho b / 10.618/ACRES I I I I y y / I (463,757 SO. FT.) I 81 I Ex unury EsuT /-{A i I - ,� TC CL NO, D20734337A l IV 10 WATER ESMT �i al II I I I I I O.PRTC.T (BYTHISPLAn II/ I I II I I I 1 \ / Oyu 1G S89°59'58"E-412.16' I I I I C_ 'FUSER IRE ------- i 11 I - i 14 � y I ^A \`I-5 WEST -343.83' �h9 I i 1'IPF 0051 ____________________ 048 Ij cl O4 N86°35'29'E-221.14' S'Jr. \II\\ 1I�J Cp5/ <3g�� m 74.H' !`� I C1I6I �C2 _LIB L19 L20 Tpe3 )I\ \ 1 / _ _ _ _ _ C47 -______ ___ EAST-32853'�_ L6f-�\ C 1 I , C7 -+g 019-_________-�\\� L8 1 132 _- \ / 112 HE Lys- 12' CIRF L6314' _ - - - - _� C'+ GJI G38 �C�L \ � \ I VPH LAND' r '2//]'(CMI I / FIRELANE, ACCESS f0'X 14'WAT-') L59 vF' I y L3f 1 \P /,Lh L23 C, v\ L64 UI'l EA EMENT (BY THIS PIAT 10'W IER ESMT �I L30 I 18.93'1 \ /G ) •r I 1 I O (BY THIS PLAT 8 I / - ICI YEASEME =1 I LOT/ 'I I 1 ¢oz TER 15' NI 1' y I I^ BLOCK / I I I 3 rn N WATER ESMT. I I , •d 1 ^ O D I xI I� 9.4282ACRES JI (Bvnll$Pun I AB (BYVI FIRELANE, II .iII II xw" z~y UtOm mA° otiT CCO �EAC yO 0X 10 WATER ESMT ZONING UPLEAEMEN7CD50'(410.691 SQ. FT) WwgyG� \y lH I sJ�q YPL_AT ��HISPLAT 'HCO' A®srbqA SEE INSET O od w6sT 249sr W¢ ________-___ I B• H w \9 ----- \ POINT OF I I $ I I 0 CRS \ ________________- \ J�irz'CIRF WEST- _246.97__CO\ \ �I I I� 1 ^'I Ix �°020� BE CIRS C7 * '2117' (CAO VARIABLE WIDTH \ \ C' F/RELANE, ACCESS 6 \ \ y, i 1 UTILITYEASEMENT / (BYTHIS Pun CALLED: 1.299 ACRES CITY OF GRAPEVINE / `12•lRF j}v �1 I o I Ip I I / / VOL. 12747, PG. 498 / c49 � n� ��✓ �\ 1 I z I n vaaABEwDTH , / D.R.Tc.T. "'I I I I f^ FIRELANE ACCES56-�I 28.0 'T� 3' UTIL/rYEASEMENT I I -'�\ \ rd1 ✓ r,� �a�y 10 X 10'WA TER ESMT-- I I I y� (BYTH/SPLIT I / IONEX �J 1j�Lv� �F��prp��` U (BYTNISPLAT I sSSAANI ARY 1 SEWER EASEMENT I I APPROX.LOCATION Is THI %' I I �- CfSURVEYLINE ^� 6 SEE S.S ESMT. DETAIL ' J\ APFROX. LOCATION I^ I I (� l OFFLOOOZONE I I I" I/ �m / •' t== LIMITSLlf10'WATERESMT/ WITH(BY THIS PLAT)L73// lHsT \Q� SEE DRAINAGE \ I ESMT DETAIL ' EX. 15' UTILITY EASEMENT 1 _ - - - - _ \ / VOL 12477. PG 1060, O.R.T OS L13 /,C3 (ABANDONED BYTHIS PLAT 25' U7/CITY ESMT 10 ______ 733 20' (BYTHISPLA7) ' S PLAT ESMT. . (BY THIS; \--y I� ? `/g \ V F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ o_ / / 1 / L57 \ -N SEE I \ uI / / \ N88°0744'07-812.76' / \_� \ ve' IRF N1. SET / / / TRACT A -R, BLOCK 6 \ / � GRAPEVINE MILS ADDITION i2' cIRF \ �\ lL 4" / / •sG 2466• / / CAB. A, SLIDE 5503, \ \ CIRF CARS IRON RODFOUNDWTHCAP IRONROO WTHCAPSTAMPED D.RTC.T DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS I / / CALLED: 3.0313 ACRES 3 \ 1 UNE TABLE /2'GRF 'aaTliuR• 31.51' 'SPOONER 6 ASSOCIATES' SET P,R.T C . PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT WHITTLESEY INVESTMENTS, INC. NO. 1 18.90' UNE BEARING DISTANCE UNE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE UNE BEARING DISTANCE UNE BEARING DISTANCE Lt N57'23'39W 19.62' L16 1489°59.595 56.83' L31 N79'28'59"E 20.66' L46 N89°54'25"W 54.62 L61 EAST 12.75' L2 S19'21'08"W 55.06' L17 S58'06'48"E 16.2T L32 N89'164rE 29.58' L47 S89'563TW 76.05' L62 S45 -00'00"E 9.60' L3 S86'31'2TW 54.65' L18 S89'49'09"E 29.88' L33 N26'51'53W 29.14' L48 °0 N04'03'07 11.68' L63 S46 -09'14"W 10.00' L4 S89'23'33 -E 31.77 L19 W9'28'59'E 20.65' L34 S89'58'34 -W 93.19 L49 N29'54'38"W 64.03' L64 N45'00'WW 10.00' L5 S12'42'41"W 112.20' L20 N88°47`49"E 118.99' L35 00W NO0''1 96.67' LSO N89'48'17W 4.55' L65 N89°53'19W 17.23' L6 N28'SZ54"E 9.60' L21 S11°36'21"E 25.11' L36 N24°4rOrVV 57.27 L51 N0'11.49 -E 38.65' L66 SO0-W42W 15.00' L7 S00'00'UVV 81.86' L22 N11'3921'W 25.11' L37 NORTH 60.13' L52 S89'48'12"E 20.00' L67 S89°59'18"E 246' L8 S89°54'1 VE 41.73' L23 S88'13'26W 4.31' L38 563'30'43"E 15.06' L53 S00'11'48"W 38.65' L68 N89'43'1ZW 10.00' L9 S68'5316"E 145.05' L24 S27'10'08"W 31.56' L39 N36°0'39W 7215' L54 N89'48'1ZW 5.45' L69 N0°21'36"W 10.00' L10 N68'41'44'W 19.OT L25 S68°53'16"E 7.29' L40 W3'30'43"W 3.34' L55 S29°54'38"E 64.03' L70 S89-431Z'E 7.45' Lll N32.4TOZW 16.35' L26 N68'53'16W 33.79' L41 N00°03'4ZW 92.99 L56 SOUTH 36.61' L71 WEST 10.00' L12 N68'53'16W 126.43 L27 S68'53'16'E 18. ST L42 1`489'563T'E 75.98' L57 N88'07'44'W 15.01' L72 SOUTH 10.00' L13 S89-58.3407 106.35' L28 527°70'08'07 31.56' L43 S89 -54'25-E 54.71' L58 NORTH 41.92' L73 EAST 5.21' L14 N0'00.10W 96.67 L29 N68.53 -IM 63.82' L44 SGOTV10"E 26.00' L59 WEST 23.76' L15 N24 -47-09-W 57.27 L30 S89 -49-09 -E 29.88' 1 L45 I N89'5W50E 56.59 L60 NDO.07.27"E 15.00' 12 GRF I 260 a \ I I I 'SCI 2466' FXVARIABLE 065 . WIDTH _ _ _ _ _ 1 GOLF COURSE 1 \\� 14] C6� X60 L46 °P I - -RESTRICTED USE ESMT I _ _ _ _ _ _ _t46_ VOL 1d2S1, PG 513, I I D.R. T. I L67 cs5 Csfi c57 I I i r.l h Q LOT 1, BLOCK f N I 74.2 - _ - - - _ I w ENCLAVE AT CRAP 6442, w I '1(G c 7'1 rq TOC.1. NO. D214196442, I i L42 L43 LTO \'� it a w `� I y I I L69 I I I I L I w y ^' I O.P.R.T.C.T. a 8 1 I C II /IT{�f0'WATER ESMT. f0'WATER ESMT m1I I 13 Ml �x2I `-L65 (BYTHISPLAT) (BYTHISPLAT Y I I 1 1rz• cIRF 8 I L6e I N ' -_ 6 I l m z l �U ,X �''211rlcM) I I LOT2 b z I I I_ BLOCK/I� SII I l g wm rho b / 10.618/ACRES I I I I y y / I (463,757 SO. FT.) I 81 I Ex unury EsuT /-{A i I - ,� TC CL NO, D20734337A l IV 10 WATER ESMT �i al II I I I I I O.PRTC.T (BYTHISPLAn II/ I I II I I I 1 \ / Oyu 1G S89°59'58"E-412.16' I I I I C_ 'FUSER IRE ------- i 11 I - i 14 � y I ^A \`I-5 WEST -343.83' �h9 I i 1'IPF 0051 ____________________ 048 Ij cl O4 N86°35'29'E-221.14' S'Jr. \II\\ 1I�J Cp5/ <3g�� m 74.H' !`� I C1I6I �C2 _LIB L19 L20 Tpe3 )I\ \ 1 / _ _ _ _ _ C47 -______ ___ EAST-32853'�_ L6f-�\ C 1 I , C7 -+g 019-_________-�\\� L8 1 132 _- \ / 112 HE Lys- 12' CIRF L6314' _ - - - - _� C'+ GJI G38 �C�L \ � \ I VPH LAND' r '2//]'(CMI I / FIRELANE, ACCESS f0'X 14'WAT-') L59 vF' I y L3f 1 \P /,Lh L23 C, v\ L64 UI'l EA EMENT (BY THIS PIAT 10'W IER ESMT �I L30 I 18.93'1 \ /G ) •r I 1 I O (BY THIS PLAT 8 I / - ICI YEASEME =1 I LOT/ 'I I 1 ¢oz TER 15' NI 1' y I I^ BLOCK / I I I 3 rn N WATER ESMT. I I , •d 1 ^ O D I xI I� 9.4282ACRES JI (Bvnll$Pun I AB (BYVI FIRELANE, II .iII II xw" z~y UtOm mA° otiT CCO �EAC yO 0X 10 WATER ESMT ZONING UPLEAEMEN7CD50'(410.691 SQ. FT) WwgyG� \y lH I sJ�q YPL_AT ��HISPLAT 'HCO' A®srbqA SEE INSET O od w6sT 249sr W¢ ________-___ I B• H w \9 ----- \ POINT OF I I $ I I 0 CRS \ ________________- \ J�irz'CIRF WEST- _246.97__CO\ \ �I I I� 1 ^'I Ix �°020� BE CIRS C7 * '2117' (CAO VARIABLE WIDTH \ \ C' F/RELANE, ACCESS 6 \ \ y, i 1 UTILITYEASEMENT / (BYTHIS Pun CALLED: 1.299 ACRES CITY OF GRAPEVINE / `12•lRF j}v �1 I o I Ip I I / / VOL. 12747, PG. 498 / c49 � n� ��✓ �\ 1 I z I n vaaABEwDTH , / D.R.Tc.T. "'I I I I f^ FIRELANE ACCES56-�I 28.0 'T� 3' UTIL/rYEASEMENT I I -'�\ \ rd1 ✓ r,� �a�y 10 X 10'WA TER ESMT-- I I I y� (BYTH/SPLIT I / IONEX �J 1j�Lv� �F��prp��` U (BYTNISPLAT I sSSAANI ARY 1 SEWER EASEMENT I I APPROX.LOCATION Is THI %' I I �- CfSURVEYLINE ^� 6 SEE S.S ESMT. DETAIL ' J\ APFROX. LOCATION I^ I I (� l OFFLOOOZONE I I I" I/ �m / •' t== LIMITSLlf10'WATERESMT/ WITH(BY THIS PLAT)L73// lHsT \Q� SEE DRAINAGE \ I ESMT DETAIL ' EX. 15' UTILITY EASEMENT 1 _ - - - - _ \ / VOL 12477. PG 1060, O.R.T OS L13 /,C3 (ABANDONED BYTHIS PLAT 25' U7/CITY ESMT 10 ______ 733 20' (BYTHISPLA7) ' S PLAT ESMT. . (BY THIS; \--y I� ? `/g \ V F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ o_ / / 1 / L57 \ -N SEE I \ uI / / \ N88°0744'07-812.76' / \_� \ ve' IRF N1. SET / / / TRACT A -R, BLOCK 6 \ / � GRAPEVINE MILS ADDITION i2' cIRF \ �\ lL 4" / / •sG 2466• / / CAB. A, SLIDE 5503, \ \ CIRF CARS IRON RODFOUNDWTHCAP IRONROO WTHCAPSTAMPED D.RTC.T DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS I / / CALLED: 3.0313 ACRES 3 \ 1 w /2'GRF 'aaTliuR• 31.51' 'SPOONER 6 ASSOCIATES' SET P,R.T C . PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT WHITTLESEY INVESTMENTS, INC. NO. 1 18.90' N50'50VM / C3 IRF IRON ROD FOUND N79 -2721-W COUNTY TEXAS I 'TRACT I'IN VOL. 7333, PG. 1383, 40 4A / 111 12' GRF OWNER. MON MONUMENT O P R T.C.T. OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS. COUNTY 7IXA$ D.R.LC.T. / 0 ' v I ti 'ARTHUR' CONSTANCE CARTER AEVO. TRUST PFM CORNER C7 T ARRANT O / 1 O / 75.00 (CM) CONTFOR CONTROWNGMONUMENT L•5.0' ARCLENGTHOF5.00' 90.05' 106.21' I 1 10D.16- 0.16CIO CIO FNO FOUND (B.TP) BYTHIS PLAT I CALLED: 8.3128 ACRES 67.80' I I / PH: - VOL. VOLUME ESMT EASEMENT WHTTTLESEY INVESTMENTS, INC. NO.1 C13 1 I yh / 7 ATTN: CONSTANCE CARTER PG. PAGE FLOW R/GMVF-war S24'06WE 24.77 C15 36.00' OWNER NO. TC No TARRANT COUNTY CLERK'S C16 30.07 TRACT 2'IN VOL. 7333, PG. 1383, S42'29'41'E 16.16 C17 CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, LP 16.60' INSTRUMENTNUMRER 16.39' C18 D.R.TGT. GRS L9 f2'CIRF SG 2466' N'7,035,948.34 4021 HILLTOP DRIVE SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 86.00 14.70' S94'2252W 14.69' C20 56.07 78.36 E: 2414/28.36 PH: 972469-7340 C21 30.00' 62.58' S71'22WE 51.84' C22 30,W (NAD93 GRID) ATTN: NICK CARTER ENGINEER. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Date Approved Chairman Secretary SURVEYOR: �.aBenn. eavww / Sher Lake / Pan > VION/TYMAP > (NOT TO SCALE) NIPLE SPOONER& A CURVE TABLE e CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CH. BEARING CH. LENGTH Ct 50.00 31.51' $50150O91w 30.99' C2 30.00 18.90' N50'50VM 18.59 C3 30.00 IIOT N79 -2721-W 11.00' C4 56.00' 87.93' N45'W48"W 79.21' C5 30.00' 12.98' N12'23'40W 12.88' C6 30.07 34.15' N57'23'95W 32.33' C7 56.07 87.96' N45'0IDD"W 79.20 C8 75.00 86.30' N32'1757'E 81.67 C9 90.05' 106.21' 533.4928-W 10D.16- 0.16CIO CIO 56.00 88.04' N44 -5739•E 79.25 Cit 67.80' 27.06' S7r3T27'E 26.88' C12 84.00' 31.72' S79'06'WE 31.53' C13 56.07 90.27 S45'3827E 80.78' C14 30.07 25.54' S24'06WE 24.77 C15 36.00' 1 13.58' S37'41'ITE 13.50 C16 30.07 16.36' S42'29'41'E 16.16 C17 30.00' 16.60' $73'5758"E 16.39' C18 30.00' 5.60' N84.495SE 5.59' C19 86.00 14.70' S94'2252W 14.69' C20 56.07 78.36 S51-412rE 7212' C21 30.00' 62.58' S71'22WE 51.84' C22 30,W 16.41' NW51'51W 16.20 C23 56.00 53.68' N39.04'D6'YJ 51.65' C24 30.00 41.98' N$1'4127W 38.64' C25 30.W 46.07' S44.13'aw 41.68' C26 56.07 26.28' S13.4334W 26.04' C27 61.50 41.50 S46'3nlW 40.72' C28 30.07 70.38' SOV0833-E 55.31' C29 3.00' 7.76' S36.4547W 5.77' C30 30.07 16.54' S53'0640E 16.33' C31 30.07 14.0' S13'4334'W 13%' C32 35.50' 23.95' N46.25WE 23.41' C33 56.07 49.80 S40.3507W 48.18- C34 30.07 50.2T $63'06'33W 44.59' 23530.0' 10.95' 36.OT N34'26'38W 33.94' 036 30.07 55.97 N53763SE 48.20 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Date Approved Chairman Secretary SURVEYOR: �.aBenn. eavww / Sher Lake / Pan > VION/TYMAP > (NOT TO SCALE) GRAPEVINE CITY COUNC LRECEIVED /� THIS DOCUMENT IS Date Approved DE y P JIAZ IY.�R y FYOOR I PURPOSES ON ERIC S. SPOONER, R.P.L.S. p DECEMBER 12,1018 Mayor 1 City Secretary CASE NO. BURGESS & 10701 CORPORATE DRIVE SUITE 118 NIPLE SPOONER& A CURVE TABLE e CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CH. BEARING CH. LENGTH C37 58.0 16.33' S81'2759E 16.ZT 038 56.00' 10.46 N84'49'55•E 10.41 C39 30.00 47.64' S45'lT39E 4279' C40 30.00 47.13' N45'0'48W 4243' C41 56.00' 24.22' N12'23'40•W 24.03' C42 56.07 63.74' N57 -23'35W 60.35' C43 30.00' 47.12' N45'0'07W 4243' C44 49.00' S6.OT N32'46'49E 53.06' C45 116.05' 29.86' N60'0173 -E 29.77 C45 30.00' 33.47 N84 34'13'E 31.77 047 101.00 46.69' S76'45=E 46.28 C48 29.84' 31.54' S59'48'33'E 30.09' C49 36.07 9.21' S36'54'WE 9.18' CW 29.67" 23.10' S22'11.1'E 2257 051 68.00 30.51' N7W45'ZPW 30.24' C52 30.07 40.79' N24'33'30W 37.72' C53 116.05' 29.11' 407.1234-E 29.03' C54 30.00 47.14' 444.5727-E 4244' C55 176.00' 49.00' N82.0010SE 48.84' C56 238.95' 133.37 S89'5924'E 131.60' C57 1 176.00 1 48.82' S81'57*11'E 48.6T 058 30.00' 47.21' S44'49'46E 4248' 059 30.00' 46.99' $4.5'072707 4233' C60 41.80' 16.88' ST7.13'44"E 16.77' C61 110.07 42.13' S78'58'08"E 41.87 C62 30.07 47.69' SAS -04.28'E 4287 C63 30.00' 47.31' S45'32'00W 4256' C64 150.0' 41.61' 1191-1111 41.46' CBS 264.95' 147.83' N8915924W 145.97 C66 150.0' 41.76' S82'0'05'W 41.62' C67 30.07 47.10' N45.02'43W 4241' C68 30.0 47.16' N44'57'39'E 4245' C69 201.07 128.20' NII.38.19W 126.04' C70 195.0' 10211' N14.54'33"W 10.95' 771 185.0' 96.87 S14 -54'38"E 95.76 C72 211.07 I 13200 S71'5750E 130.67 GRAPEVINE CITY COUNC LRECEIVED /� THIS DOCUMENT IS Date Approved DE y P JIAZ IY.�R y FYOOR I PURPOSES ON ERIC S. SPOONER, R.P.L.S. p DECEMBER 12,1018 Mayor 1 City Secretary CASE NO. BURGESS & 10701 CORPORATE DRIVE SUITE 118 NIPLE SPOONER& A su7PDaD rexAs nen e PN: (781) NO. 705 TBPE FIRM N0. F-1 4 309 STREW SIKIE 106 aLMR%FV ATTN: THOMAS IUNZMAN, P.E. LUNZ 7)685 YORSTEXAOM (Bin EBi8M8 'AM'W.SPOD SSAJCB EYOf"M I9PlS FHM N0. 10050.900564 JOB NO 18003 THIS PLAT WAS FILED ON _ 2018111 Instrument No, 0 - FINAL PLAT OF LOTS I & 2, BLOCK I CARTER ADDITION BEING A PLAT OF A 20.0746 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE HENRY SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 141S, AND THE ANDREW W. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26, CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 20.0746 ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING ALL OF THOSE CERTAIN TRACTS OF LAND CONVEYED TO CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, LP B CONSTANCE CARTER, TRUSTEE OF THE CONSTANCE CARTER REVOCABLE TRUST DATED APRIL 13, 1999, BY THE DEEDS THEREOF FILED FOR RECORD IN TARRANT COUNTY CLERK'S INSTRUMENT NO. 0207343374, 0204189024 A D230214154, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. ZONED:"HCO" 2 LOTS - 20.0746 ACRES DECEMBER - 2018 SHEET oft • OWNER'S CERTIFICATION - STATE OF TEXAS 4 COUNTY OF TARRANT § WHEREAS, Carter Grapevine Partners, LP, and Constance Carter, Trustee of the Constance Carter Revocable Trust Dated April 13, 1999 are the owners a 20.0746 acre tract of land situated in the H. Suggs Survey, Abstract No. 1415 and the A.W. Anderson Survey, Abstract No. 26, City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, said 20.0746 acre tract beingall of a called 0.19 acre tract of land conveyed to Carter Y Grapevine Partners, LP by deed as recorded Instrument No. D207343374, Official Public Records, Tarrant County, Texas (O.P.R.T.C.T.), said 20.0746 acre tract being all of a called 19.585 acre tract of land conveyed to Carter Grapevine Partners, LP and Constance Carter, Trustee of the Constance Carter Revocable Trust Dated April 13, 1999 by deeds recorded in Instrument No. D204189024 and D210214154, O.P.R.T.C.T., said 20.0746 acre tract of land being herein more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8 iron rod with cap stamped "SPOONER 5922" set (5/8" CIRS) at the most southerly south property corner of the said 0.19 acre tract, same being a south lot corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Enclave at Grapevine, being an Addition to the said City and State, according to the plat thereof filed for record in Instrument No. D214196442, O.P.R.T.C.T., said beginning point being on the westerly rightof-way line of Anderson Gibson Road, being a variable width public right-of-way; THENCE, North 57' 23' 39" West, along the southwest property line of the said 0.19 acre tract and along the said westerly right-of-way line, 19.62 feet to a 5/8" CIRS at a common property corner of the said 0.19 acre tract and the said 19.585 acre tract; THENCE, along the easterly property lines of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being the said westerly right-of-way line of Anderson Gibson Road the following courses and distances, South 19' 21'08" West 55.06 feet to a 5/8" CIRS; South 27' 10'08" West 362.41 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped "SCI 2466"found; South 21' 07' 02" West 139.95 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped "SCI 2466" found at the most southerly southeast property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract; THENCE, South 86' 31' 27" West, along a south property line of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being the said westerly rightof-way line of Anderson Gibson Road, 54.65 feet to east property line of a called 3.0313 acre tract of land conveyed to Whittlesey Investments, Inc., No. 1 by deed there of recorded in Volume 7567, Page 919, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.T.CT.); THENCE, North 00' 48' 09" West, along the said property line, 148.61 feet to a 3/4" iron rod found at the northeast property corner of the said Whittlesey tract, same being a southeast property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract; THENCE, North 88' 07' 44" West, along the south property line of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being the north property line of the said Whittlesey tract, at a distance of 386.00 feet passing the northwest property corner of the said Whittlesey tract, same being the most northerly northeast property corner of a called 8.3128 acre tract of land conveyed described as "Tract 2", conveyed to the said Whittlesey in the deed filed for record in Volume 7333, Page 1383, D.R.T.C.T., and continuing in all a total distance of 812.76 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found at the southwest property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract, said 5/8" iron rod found being the southeast property corner of a called 4.9827 acre tract of land conveyed to the City of Grapevine by deed as recorded in Volume 13848, Page 447, D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE, along the common property lines of the said 19.585 acre tract and the said 4.9827 acre tract the following courses and distances. North 03' 58' 57" East, 445.01 feet to a 5/8" CIRS; North 15' 51' 18" East 304.51 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped "SCI 2466" found; North 04' 38' 43" West 244.88 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found at the northwest property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being the northeast property corner of the said 4.9827 acre tract, said 5/8" iron rod found being on the south property line of a tract of land conveyed to the United States of America, by Civil Action No. 1461, dated 11-29-1948; THENCE, South 89' 22' 04" East, along the north property line of the said 19.585 acre tract and along the said south property line of the USA tract, 674.89 feet to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Monument stamped "A22 1986" found at a west lot corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, Enclave at Grapevine; THENCE, South 89' 23' 33" East, continuing along the said north property line of the 19.585 acre tract and along a south lot line of said Lot 1, 31.77 feet to the most northerly northeast property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract, from which a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped "Peiser and Mankin Survey" found bears South 05' 06' 47" East 0.62 feet; THENCE, along the east property line of the said 19.585 acre tract and along a west lot line of said Lot 1 the following courses and distances: South 01' 14'38" East, 139.88 feet to a 5/8" CIRS; South 00' 18'01" West, 373.42 feet to a 1" iron pipe found; THENCE, North 86' 35' 29" East, along a north property line of the said 19.585 acre tract and along a south lot line of said Lot 1, 221.14 feet a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped "Peiser and Mankin" found at the most easterly northeast property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being the north property corner of the said 0.19 acre tract; THENCE, South 71' 20' 44" East, along the northeast property line of the said 0.19 acre tract and along a southwest lot line of said Lot 1, 128.35 feet to a 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped 1PH LAND SURVEYING" found at the most easterly northeast property corner of the said 0.19 acre tract; THENCE, South 12' 42' 41" West, along the southeast property line of the said 0.19 acre tract, same being a northwest lot line of said Lot 1, 112.20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Herein described tract contains 20.0746 acres (874,448 square feet) of land. The basis of bearings for this survey is Enclave at Grapevine, Phase 1 being an Addition to the City of Grapevine according to the plat thereof recorded in Instrument Number D214196442, Official Public Records, Tarrant County, Texas. CONTINUED NOW, THEREFORE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, LP., does hereby adopt this plat of CARTER ADDITION, an addition to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, and does hereby dedicate to the public use forever the rightof-way and easements shown hereon. The easements shown hereon are hereby reserved for the purposes as indicated. The utility easements shall be open for all City or franchised public utilities for each particular use. The maintenance of paving on these easements are the responsibility of the property owner. No buildings or auxiliary structures shall be constructed, reconstructed, or placed upon, over, or across the easements as shown. Said easements being hereby reserved for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities using, or desiring to use same. An City or franchised utility shall have the full right to remove and keep removed all or parts of any fences, trees, shrubs, or other improvements or growths which in any way endanger or interfere with the construction, maintenance, or efficiency of its respective system on the easements and all City or franchised utilities shall have the full right of ingress and egress to and from and upon said easements for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, patrolling, maintaining, and adding to or removing all or parts of its respective system without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. I have reviewed the City's Findings concerning dedications and I do agree that the statements are true and correct. This plat approved subject to all platting ordinances, rules, regulations, and resolutions of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Witness my hand this the day of 2018 CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, L.P., a Nevada limited partnership BY: AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation General Partner Nick Carter, President CONSTANCE CARTER REVOCABLE TRUST dated April 13, 1999 Constance Carter, Trustee STATE OF § COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said State, on this date personally appeared known to me personally to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 2018. Notary Public in the State of Texas STATE OF § COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said State, on this date personally appeared known to me personally to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of .2018. Notary Public in the State of Texas • AVIGATION RELEASE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § WHEREAS, hereinafter called "Owner", Is the owner of that certain parcel of land situated in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as shown on this plat. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of ONE AND 00/100 ($1.00) DOLLAR and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby fully acknowledged and confessed, Owner does hereby waive, release, remise and quitclaim to the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport Board, the Cities of Dallas, Texas and Fort Worth, Texas, their successors and assigns, hereinafter called "Cities", for the sue and benefit of the public and its agencies, any and all claims for damages of any kind to persons or property that Owner may suffer by reason of the passage and flight of all aircraft in the air space above Owner's property above the height restriction as presently established by Ordinance No. 73-50 for the City of Grapevine, known as the Airport Zoning Ordinance of the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport, to infinite height above same, whether such damage shall originate from noise, vibration, fumes, dust, fueland lubricant particles, and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft, landing at, or taking off from, or operating at or on the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport. This instrument does not release the owners oro operators of aircraft from liability M or damage or injury to person or property caused by falling aircraft or falling physical objects from aircraft, except as stated herein with respect to noise, fumes, dust, fule and lubricant particles. It is agreed that this Release shall be binding upon said owner and his heirs, assigns and successors in interest to said property; and it is further agreed that this instrument shall be a covenant running with the land, and shall be recorded in the Deed Records of the county or counties in which the property is situated. EXECUTED in Tarrant County, Texas, this the _ day of 2018. CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, L.P., a Nevada limited partnership BY: AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation General Partner Nick Carter, President CONSTANCE CARTER REVOCABLE TRUST dated April 13, 1999 Constance Carter, Trustee STATE OF IF COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said State, on this date personally appeared known to me personally to be I. person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 2018. Notary Public in the State of Texas STATE OF § COUNTY OF ¢ BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said State, on this date personally appeared known to me personally to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 2018. Notary Public in the State of Texas • SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § I, Eric S. Spooner, of Spooner & Associates, Inc., a Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Texas, do hereby delcare that I prepared this plat from an actual and accurate survey on the land and that the comer monuments shown thereon were properly placed under my personal supervision in accordance with the Grapevine, Texas. platting rules and regulations of the State of Texas and the Ci of Gra e P g B City P , GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 2018. Notary Public in the State of Texas ' METES IS BOUNDS DESCRIPTION DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING a 0.1513 ave tract of land located in the Andrew W. Anderson Survey, Abstract No. 26, City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, said 0.1513 ave tract of land being a portion of a called 19.585 acre tract of land conveyed to CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, EP and CONSTANCE CARTER, TRUSTEE OF THE CONSTANCE CARTER REVOCABLE TRUST DATED APRIL 13, 1999, by the deeds thereof filed for record in Tarrant County Clerk's Instrument No. 0204189024 and D210214154, Official Public Records, Tarrant County, Texas (O.P.R.T.C.T.), said 0.1513 acre tract of land being a variable width Drainage Easement, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows; BEGINNING at a point on the west property line of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being an east property line of a Called 4.9827 acre tract of land conveyed to the City of Grapevine, by deed thereof filed for record in Volume 13848, Page 447, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said beginning point being North 03'58'57" East, a distance of 106.64 feet from a 5/8 inch iron rod found (Controlling Monumentl at the most westerly southwest property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being a southeast property corner of the said 4.9827 acre tract; THENCE departing the said property lines, over and across the said 19.585 ave tract, the following courses and distances: North 86'50'07" East, a distance of 45.35 feet; South 68.53'46" East, a distance of 46.33 feet; North 08'34'44" East, a distance of 24.39 feet; North 22.01'4(r West, a distance of 66.86 feet; North 55.03'10" West, a distance of 25.56 feet; South 87'50'39" West, a distance of 40.22 feet to the said west property line of the 19.585 acre tract, same being the said east property line of the 4.9827 acre tract; THENCE South 03'58'57" West, along the said property lines, a distance of 85.25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The hereinabove described tract of land contains a computed area of 0.1513 acres (6,590 square feet) of land, more or less. - INSETA' .\•�'•. •.` Lorz cq ryry. •• LOT 0���1s 20 112' ?oy, \\ Sa2C F � 'SG 1466' (NOT TO SCALE) • INSET B' THIS DOCUMENT IS SURVEYOR: PRELIMINARY I LOT2 FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY Eric S. Spooner, Res Date ERIC S. SPOONER, R.P.1.5. Texas Registration No. 5922 DECEMBER I2, 2018 TBPL5 Firm No. 10054900 �&SPOONER& STATE OF TEXAS § 10701 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 118 COUNTY OF TARRANT § OWNER BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the said State, on this date personally appeared ERIC S. SPOONER, known to me personally to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the day of 2018. Notary Public in the State of Texas ' METES IS BOUNDS DESCRIPTION DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING a 0.1513 ave tract of land located in the Andrew W. Anderson Survey, Abstract No. 26, City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, said 0.1513 ave tract of land being a portion of a called 19.585 acre tract of land conveyed to CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, EP and CONSTANCE CARTER, TRUSTEE OF THE CONSTANCE CARTER REVOCABLE TRUST DATED APRIL 13, 1999, by the deeds thereof filed for record in Tarrant County Clerk's Instrument No. 0204189024 and D210214154, Official Public Records, Tarrant County, Texas (O.P.R.T.C.T.), said 0.1513 acre tract of land being a variable width Drainage Easement, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows; BEGINNING at a point on the west property line of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being an east property line of a Called 4.9827 acre tract of land conveyed to the City of Grapevine, by deed thereof filed for record in Volume 13848, Page 447, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said beginning point being North 03'58'57" East, a distance of 106.64 feet from a 5/8 inch iron rod found (Controlling Monumentl at the most westerly southwest property corner of the said 19.585 acre tract, same being a southeast property corner of the said 4.9827 acre tract; THENCE departing the said property lines, over and across the said 19.585 ave tract, the following courses and distances: North 86'50'07" East, a distance of 45.35 feet; South 68.53'46" East, a distance of 46.33 feet; North 08'34'44" East, a distance of 24.39 feet; North 22.01'4(r West, a distance of 66.86 feet; North 55.03'10" West, a distance of 25.56 feet; South 87'50'39" West, a distance of 40.22 feet to the said west property line of the 19.585 acre tract, same being the said east property line of the 4.9827 acre tract; THENCE South 03'58'57" West, along the said property lines, a distance of 85.25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The hereinabove described tract of land contains a computed area of 0.1513 acres (6,590 square feet) of land, more or less. - INSETA' .\•�'•. •.` Lorz cq ryry. •• LOT 0���1s 20 112' ?oy, \\ Sa2C F � 'SG 1466' (NOT TO SCALE) • INSET B' ENGINEER: SURVEYOR: CONSTANCE CARTER REVD. TRUST I LOT2 BURGESS & NIPLE PH: �&SPOONER& \ c`'� \ e 10701 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 118 OWNER � =C CARTER PARTNERS, LP PH: (281) 980-7709 TOPE FIRM NO. F-10834 ETTDA5 309SYERSSIRE. SLM=BAES5.76039 LTOGRAPEVINEDIV 4027 HILLTOP DRIVE TX 76092 $ v (817)La58M8 'N'NN�ORSCOM (NOTTO SCALE) 'Na39'WsN55'03'10'yV25.56'z ES \ N. cmgm,. \�) 1) ;3e2S8'(c • GENERAL NOTES' • The bearings shown hereon are based on the found monumentation of the plat of Enclave at Grapevine, Phase I, being an Addition to the City of Grapevine, according to the plat thereof recorded in Tarrant County Clerk's Instrument No. D214196442, Official Public Records, Tarrant County, Texas. • According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, the subject property appears to be located in Zone "X" (areas determined to be outside the 0.2 % annual chance floodplain), Zone "X -Shaded" (areas determined to be inside the 1% annual chance Floodplain), as shown on Map No. 48439CO01OK; map revised September 25, 2009, for Tarrant County and incorporated areas. This flood statement does not imply that the property and/or structures located in Zones "x" and "X -Shaded" will be free from flooding or flood damage. This flood statement shall not create liability on the part of the Surveyor. • This survey was prepared without the benefit of a Commitment for Title Insurance prepared by a Title Company. The easements shown hereon are the only easements known by Spooner & Associates and does not imply that any other easements, covenants, restrictions, or other matters of record do not affect the subject property. No other research was preformed by Spooner & Associates, Inc. • DRAINAGE ESMT. DETAIL (NOTTOSCALE) L52 I I ;111 12 Lsoll �54 II II II 81 iq „Ilg II II rvPF II (cM) II II II II ton II III III LOT $II $1 I II of Ih 8118 �IIy 11 II 15 8.9. T �I (er THISPLAPLAT) I I II nl �cn o\ �\ G VI'IRF \ � l lz ell Il d2.fr 1 10.15' ' S.S. EASEMENT DETAIL (NOTTOSCALE) Zoning Classifications indicated on this plat reflect the zoning in place at the time of preparation of this plat and does not represent a vested right to the zoning indicated hereon. Existing or future minimum set -backs established by City Ordinance shall take precedence over building lines indicated on this plat. Notice: Selling a portion of this addition by metes and bounds is a violation of city subdivision ordinance and state platting statues and is subject to fines and withholding of utilities and building certificates. OWNER: ENGINEER: SURVEYOR: CONSTANCE CARTER REVD. TRUST BURGESS & NIPLE PH: �&SPOONER& ATTN: CONSTANCF CARTER 10701 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 118 OWNER STAFFORD, TEXAS 77477 CARTER PARTNERS, LP PH: (281) 980-7709 TOPE FIRM NO. F-10834 ETTDA5 309SYERSSIRE. SLM=BAES5.76039 LTOGRAPEVINEDIV 4027 HILLTOP DRIVE TX 76092 ATTN: THOMAS LUNIMAN, P.E. (817)La58M8 'N'NN�ORSCOM PH: 972-569THLAKE, PH: 972-969-1340 T09S FYB I NO 1LO5490DSM10BN0 18003 ATTN. NICK CARTER THIS PLAT WAS FILED ON 20181n Instrument No. 0 CASE NO. FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1 CARTER ADDITION BEING A PLAT OF A 20.0746 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE HENRY SUGGS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1415, AND THE ANDREW W. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 26, CITYOFGRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS, SAID 20.0746 ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING ALL OF THOSE CERTAIN TRACTS OF "No CONVEYED TO CARTER GRAPEVINE PARTNERS, LP & CONSTANCE CARTER, TRUSTEE OF THE CONSTANCE CARTER REVOCABLE TRUST DATED APRIL 13, 1999, BY THE DEEDS THEREOF FILED FOR RECORD IN TARRANT COUNTY CLARK'S INSTRUMENT NO. D207343374, D204189024 & D210214154, OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. ZONED:"HCO" 2 LOTS - 20.0746 ACRES DECEMBER - 2018 SHEET 2 oft