HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-05M(SC �epbris
June 5, 1984 - Meeting of the Site Plan Review Cam-Littee
The Site Plan Review Can-nittee of the City of Grapevine, Texas, met
at 5 PM, Tuesday, June 5, 1984, in the Conference Roan of the Department
of Public Works, Police -Library Building, 307 West Dallas Road, with the
following persons present, to wit:
J.R. Baddaker, P.E. Director of Public Works
H.T. (Tommy) Hardy Director of Conn -unity Development
Jijn Glynn City Councilman
Sharron Spencer Planning and Zoning Ccmission Chairwoman
Joy Welch Secretary
Mr. Baddaker summarized the re -written site plan review process and the
purpose of the Committee. It was noted that the Ccmmittee will still
review everything with the exception of single family permits. In the
general discussion for clarification of members present, Mx. Jim Glynn
and Mrs. Sharron Spencer, cited that the Director of Public Works would
have the final say as to site plan approval; that the Committee would
commient on each site plan presented for the purpose of noting needed
revision of the Zoning Ordinance, Section 47, governing Site Plan
Review. Members briefly reviewed said Ordinance. The attached list
notes such recommended ordinance changes.
Kaker & Ware
Applicants being contractors for owner Burl Gilliam who plans a retail
shopping center at 1115 West Northwest Highway, the southwest corner of
Dove and Northwest Highway, zoned Highway Caamrcial, Mr. Baddaker
advised that the applicant had agreed to dedicate the needed 5 feet of
right-of-way on Dove. Mr. Baddaker noted that if there is not 35 feet
of ROW from the centerline on Wall, he would be approaching the
applicant for additional ROW totaling 70 feet. If any amendment is maft
to the plat, it was noted that the plat would then come back through th4
review process. Mr. Baddaker noted that if additional ROW was taken, it
would shift the plat in the area of parking and possibly require
applicant to approach the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Mrs. Spencer
advised that she would be against the applicant requesting consideration
for a variance fran the Board of Zoning Adjustment for set back
requirements. Mr. Hardy noted that the proposal as it exists is for
building a strip shopping center with access on Dove and Northwest
Highway. It was also noted that as now written, the Landscaping
requirments are for only 2% of the parking area in the Highway
Commercial District. The general consensus of the Cam-Littee was to
consider amending the landscaping requirement similar to the CN District
requirements. Applicants were notified May 30, 1984, by the Department
of Public Works that their final site plan was complete.
Site Plan Review Meeting
6-5-84
Page 2
aw-s"'32gam
The subject application, filed May 23, 1984, was reviewed and Department
of Public Works' findings were that the final site plan was complete;
and notification of such was mailed to Mr. mitton, applicant and
contractor on June 1, 1984. Located at 120 Central Avenue (Lot 2, Block
2 of Central Business Park), for a Property owner, Robert J. Fowler will
repair automatic transmissions in this 5100 square foot metal building;
with parking requirements being only one per 100 square feet. (It was
Ccomitte's general consensus that this would not be enough parking for
this size building; the committee would double or tripple the
requirement for parking spaces in this instance. Present zoning is HC,
land use designation is medium density commercial. No specification is
in the new ordinance as far as off-street parking garages. The existing
of parking requirement will only acccmTcdate the employees (an example
is as occurred at Wall and Dooley). This was not a problem, with the HC
district. It was noted that at present, there is no development within
200 feet of the property.
An application for a final site plan review was submitted by Mr. Roy
Stewart on May 23, 1984, for property located at 1117 South Ball. Mr.
Stewart also owns the property for which he plans a small strip shqppiji�t
center. The present zoning is CN, and the Master Plan's designation i
for low density residential. The discussion pertained principally to
landscaping and a possible waiver for a rear setback; however the
Committee was unsure as to what should be that requirement; would
rfossibly not need to be 25 feet. Mr. Baddaker and Mr. Hardy advised
that the site plan met all requirements.
Following further general discussion, the meeting was declared adjourni
at approximately