The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985-10-15 Joint Meeting� � d � i � 's k h i AGENDA ' CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ; REGULAR 30INT CITY COUNCIL i & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUE;SDAY, OCTOBER 15 , 1985 AT 7 :30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET I . CALL TO ORDER ' II . INVOCATION: Council Member Niarion Brekken III . JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application ' Z85-11 submitted by Transwestern Property Company. I B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z85-24 submitted by Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Ent. , Inc. � C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- � duct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application ! Z85-25 submitted by the City of Grapevine. j i D. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- � duct a public hearing relative to Conditional Use Application CU85-02 submitted by Chart Development. � � � � E. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- � duct a public hearing relative to Conditional Use � Application CU85-03 submitted by Worrell & Associates . ' F. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- � duct a public hearing relative to Conditional Use Application CU85-04 submitted by the City of Grapevine. I IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS i i A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to consider other published agenda items. { B. City Council to recess briefly before considering further business . e � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- SION, THE REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 11'I'H DAY OF OCTOBER, 1985 AT 3 : 00 P.M. "� --�-�— l�t� City Secretary ; i i AGENDA ' CITY OF GRAPEVIPIE, TEXAS ' REGULAR CITY COliNCIL NIEETING ' TliESDAY, OCTOBER 15 , 1985 AT % : 3C P.M. ' COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 NiAIN STREET ' V. CITIZENS REQUESTS ' Vi. PUBLIC HEARING i City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to concrete street requirements and take any necessary , action. I i VII . NEW BUSINESS I A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the j Streetscape Committee relative to the proposed downtown � Streetscape Project and take any necessary action. B. City Council to consider an ordinance relative to ;, traffic control. ' C. City Council to consider the annual capital recovery ' fee analysis and take any necessary action. �' D. City Council to consider amending solid waste disposal I rates and take any necessary action. ' E. City Council to hear a presentation relative to the ' State-wide water referendum and consider a subsequent � resolution. � i i VII1 . OLD BUSINESS ; A. City Council to consider an ordinance amending water ! ; and sewer rates . i IX. EXECUTIVE SESSION i A. City Council to recess to the Conference Room to i discuss real estate pursuant to Article 6252-17, � V.A.T.C.S. , Subsection (f) . j a 1 B. City Council to reconvene in the Council Chambers and � take any necessary action relative to real estate. � � X. PLI�NNING & ZONING CQN'�ISSION RECOMMENDATIONS � i A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the � Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Appli- , cation Z85-11 (Transwestern) and a subsequent ordi- � nance, if applicable. � � B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the � Plannir.g & Zonir�g Commission relative to Zoning Appli- � cation Z85-i4 (�TOyre-Myers) and a subsequent ordi- � � r�ar�ce, if applicabie. � � C. City Cour�ci� to cor}s�der the recom.mendatien c�f tYie � Planning & Zcninc� Commission relative t.o Zc�ning Pppli- � cation Z85-�5 �City) and a subsequer�t ordinar.ce, if � applicable . � D. City Council tc consider the recommendation of the � Planning & Zoninq Commission relative to Ccnditional Use Appiicatien CU85-02 (Chart) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable . � i E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Conditional Use Application CU85-03 (Worrell) and a subsequent � ordinance , if applicable. ; F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the � Planning & Zoning Commission relative to CU85-04 (City) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. � G. City Council to consider the recommendation of the � Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of ' Lots 3 & 4 , Block 1 , J. J. Daniel Addition. i H. City Council to consider the recommendation of the i Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of the Triple M Addition. I. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative tc the replat of Banyan Flace. � I ,7 . City Council to consider the recommendation of the � Planninq & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of � the Westwood Addition. i K. City Council to consider the recommendation of the ', Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat ' of Lots 1-6 , Block 2, Lewis T. Baker Addition. ' L. City Council to consider the recommendation of the i Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat j of tY�e DFVv" Industrial Park, Phase 4. ; I M. C� ty Cour.cil to corlsider the reccmmendation of the I Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat I of Lot 3 , Rlock 1 , A. F. Leonard Addition. ; lv'. City Council to consider the recommendation of the i Flanning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- i nary plat of Lots 42-45 , Block 1 , Windmill Estates , j � O. City Council to consider the recommendation of the ; Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- � nary plat of High Country Estates , Phase 3 . F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- � nary plat of certain lots in Blocks 1 & 2 , Glade � Landing Addition. � �. City Council to consider the recommendation of the � Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the prelimi- ? nary plat of the Timberline South Addition. � 3 XI . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION � XII . ADJOURNMENT ,_� '� IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- � SION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED 4 AND POSTED ON THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1985 AT 3 : 00 � P.Ni. �� w City Secretar � � E � AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS I REGliLAk PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ' TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15 , 1985 AT 7 :30 P.N. ' CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN STREET ' V. NEW BUSINESS ' A. Flanning & Zoning Commission to consider Zonirig Appli- ', cation Z85-11 (Transwestern) and make a recommendation to the City Council . B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- ' cation Z85-24 (Joyce-Myers) and make a recommendation , to the City Council. , C. Planning & Zcr.ing Commission to consider Zoninq Appli- ' catior. Z85-25 (City) and make a recommendation tc the '� City Cour.cil . � { D. PJ.�nr.irig & Loriir.g Commissior. t� consider Conditior_al j lise F,pplicatian CU85-02 �Chart) and make a recom- I, mendatior_ to the City Council. ', E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Conditional I Use Application CU85-03 (Worrell) and make a recom- ' mendatien to the City Council. ; I F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Conditional � Use Application CU85-04 (City) and make a � recommendation to the City Council. , I G. Planning & Zoning Commission tc consider the replat of ; Lots 3 & 4 , Block 1, J. J. Daniel Addition and make a j recommendation to the City Council. ! H. Planning & Zoning Ccrosnission to consider the replat of the Triple N'i Addition and make a recommendation tc the ' Cit.�� Cc�:ncil. � 1 I . Pl.anninq & Zor.ing Commission to consider the replat of � Banyan Place and make a recommendation to the City � Council. � � J . Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat of � the Westwood Addition and make a recommendation to the � City Council. � K. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat � of Lets 1-6 , Block 2 , Lewis T. Baker Addition and make � a recommer,dation to the City Council. � L. Flanninq & Zonir..g Commission to consider the final plat of tr,e DFW Industriul Park, Fhase 4 , ar.�C make a recom- mendation to the City Council. M. Planning & Zoning Commissicr� to consider the final plat of Lct 3 , Block l , A. F . Leonard Addition and make a � recommendation to the City Council. N. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- nary plat of Lots 42-45, Block 1 , Windmill Estates and make a recommendation to the City Council. 0. Flanning & Zoning Commission to consider the prelimi- � r.ary plat of High Ccuntry Estates , Phase 3 , and make a reccr��n�endatien. to the Ci ty Ccuncil. �' � � I � P. Plar.ning & Zoning Commission to consider t.he prelimi- ', nary plat of certain lots in Blocks 1 & 2, Glade ' Landing Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council. Q. Planning & Zoning Conanission to consider the prelimi- ' nary plat of the Timberline South Addition and make a ', rECOmmendation to the City Council. VI . CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES � � Meeting of July 16 , 1985 ; 1 VII . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION ' VIII . ADJOURNMENT I i � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C .S . , AS AN:ENDED � BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- � , SION , TF3E kEGULAR PL,ANNING & ZONING CONi1�;ISSION MEETING � tiGEIvBP. WAS PREPARFD F�D PUSTED ON THIS THE 11Tfi DAY GF ; OCTOREkr 198� AT ? :GG P .Ni. i I i i _ C�'1,�..v�-_-----__ _- � City Secre�ary ' ,' i i ; i i � ; ; � 1 � � i � � i , � 3 � , � � � � , � � , � I � � � s € 1 � � � � � � � � � � � E � � � � f i � i ' STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANI' CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council and Plann;nq & Zoning Cce�mission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Reqular Joint Session on this the 15th day of October, 1985 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Ch�mbers, 413 Main Street, with the following me.znbers of the City Council present to�ait: 'I'an Powers Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem Marion Brekken Council Member Ron Dyer Council Member Jim Glynn Council Member Sharron Spencer Council Member C. Shane Wilbanks Council Member constituting a quor�un, with the following me.mbers of the Planning & Zoning Conmission: Richard L. Atkins, Jr. Chairman Ron Cook Vice Chairn�an Peggy �gholm Member Donald A. Florence Member Catherine Martin Member constituting a quonun, with Cc�missioner Harlen Joyce absent, with the � following members of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager Kelvin Knauf Assistant City Manager John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney t Karen Sparuz City Secretary CAI�L 7� ORDER Mayor Paaers called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Council MemUer Brekken. PUBLIC F�ARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z85-11, Z�2ANSWESTERN PROPERTY COMPANY The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Cca�mission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z85-11 suhnitted by Transwestern Property Co�npany. The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Pawers. Director of Canmunity Develognent H. T. Hardy review�ed the application. He noted the case was previously considered in public heari.ng on March 19, 1985 and subsequently tabled. On June 18, 1985, the Planning & Zoning Conmission recamlended the application be denied and the one year waiting period for ' resuL�n.ission be waived. At that time, the City Council chose to table the matter pending receipt of a utility study and requested the case go back to joint public hearing. The property in question is approximately 40 acres located north of Bethel Road between S.H. 26 and S.H. 121 North. The tract is currently zoned "PID" Planned Industrial Developnent District and the requested zoning is "HCO" Hotel/Corporate Office District. � Mr. Barry Knight, attorney representing the applicant, then reviewed the case ' noting available access to the site. Utilities, drainage, and other concerns of the previous public hearing were also addressed. Questions and c�nts fran the C�mission and Council followed. Topics of discussion included proposed develognP.nt, streets, and drainage. Conments w�ere also offered by Mr. Jim Haney of Transwestern. Mr. Knight offered to consult his client concerning possible developer contributions to the cc�rm�anity. i ; , a � � � � � � � � � 10/15/85 � � � � Mayor Pawers then invited those guests present to voice their opinion on the ` � matter; however, no one wished to c�m�e.nt. The following letter was read into g the record: � � � � ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ � , October 8, 1985 � � Mrs. Joy Carroll 6 City of Grapevine � Planning & Zoning � Department of Coimlunity Develogtient # P.O. Box 729 x Grapevine, Texas 76051 ` � x Dear Mrs. Carroll: � ; In reference to your notice of public hearing for zoning application � Z85-11 referencing the request in zoni.ng change for the 36.654 acre � tract at Highway 121 and County Road 3149, it is my considered � opinion that the change in zoning requested wr�uld enure to the � advantage of the City of Grapevine and the community in general. It � will be my reccannendation that the zoning change be approved. � � Sincerely, ; t ; Philip E. Whittlesey, Jr., M.D. � President � Austin Ranch �terprises, Inc. � ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ;: � There being no further discussion, a motion to close the public hearing was � made by Cc�nmissioner Florence. Comnission Member Engholm seconded the motion, � which prevailed by the ensuing vote: �' F � E' Ayes : Atkins, Cook, Engholm, Florence, & Martin � Nays . None = Absent: Joyce � � j Council Member Dyer also made a motion that the public hearing be closed. A ; ! second was offered by Council Member Glynn, and the motion prevailed by the £ following vote: � Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks # Nays: None � � � a 'f PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z85-24, FRID JOYCE-MARY MYERS ENT., INC. � � The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning � Conmission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z85-24 F sulsnitted by Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Ent. , Inc. 5 � The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Pow�ers. ` i Mr. Hardy, Director of Cca�munity Develo�xnent, advised the tract in question � included 22.5 acres of land fronting on the north side of Hall-Johnson Road � and south of High Country Estates. The zoning change requested was fran � "R-20" Single-Family D�a�elling District to "R-12.5" Single-Family Dwelling � District. � # The applicant's representative, Mr. David Fielding, addressed the plan for � develo�aneazt. He advised five lots abutting hcanes on Marsh Lane would r�nain � zoned "R-20" with the remaining 59 lots proposed to be developed under the requested "R-12.5". Deed restrictions concerning use of land, size of living area, and masonry requirements, among other items, were also presented. Slides of the subject tract and the surrounding area were then sho�nm. � f Mr. Jess Hall, property owner, and Mr. Fred Joyce, applicant, requested favorable consideration of the zoning change. � 4 t�� #: � & � i � � s £ 10/15/85 � � �� Marsh Lane in the Woodcrest Estates Addition of Grapevine fulfilled � our foremr�st objectives of openness, an undulating w�oded terrain, � � quality homes and quality neighbors who obviously invested their � � hard earned savings and labor to achieve the same spacious happiness s we now enjoy. a We understand the desirability of Grapevine and particularly an area = like ours; and as citizens of Grapevine we intend to support those � City leaders who are unyielding to the pressures to sacrifice the everlasting quality of space for the temporal gains of higher � density develognent. We do not understand any support for a move � towards a greater density develogrient adjacent to an "R-20° developed area like ours that has been nourished and so pridefully � cared for over the years. There are many other undeveloped areas not adjacent to developed "R-20" areas wherein a higher density � develognent wnuld not lessen the neighborhood ambiance and existing investment of Grapevine citizens. � The City of Grapevine has a unique opportunity and responsibility ' not to succumb to today's pressures of land exploitation at the expexise of the quality of both today and tomorrow. We sincerely request a "no change" vote of the elected Council � MP.mbers and Planning & Zoning Cca�mission. Your ethical and farsighted actions will help maintain what �ook so very long to create--and if ever lost never to be regained. Respectfully, Douglas & Kathi Mullen 3401 Marsh Lane � ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : � ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ � � October 8, 1985 The Honorable Me�nbers of the Grapevine City Council: � Re: Zoning Application Z85-24 - Fred Joyce and � Ma.ry Myers Enterprises, Inc. The downzoning of this property frcm its current "R-20" Single- Family status to "R-12.5" status would negatively impact both the Woodcrest Addition (in which our home is located) as well as � adjacent neighborhoods. Since we are among those property owners who wnuld be most adversely affected, we must rp otest any down- grading of the current "R-20" status. � Two major considerations underlie our protest. First, dangerously inferior roads and bridges are the only access routes to and from our homes. There are no current plans to improve Hall-Johnson and Pool Roads. To encourage greater density in this area would certainly endanger even m�re persons who travel these roads. � Finally, we protest this downzoning because w�e believe that � attractive, uncrowded neighborhoods offer more than just aesthetic value. They increase--or at least sustain--the value of all cce�munity hon�es. It is upon such hane values that the city and school tax agencies levy our property taxes. If an area's inherent value is degradated by careless zoning, the city's tax structure is � necessarily undermined also. � � In future years, w�e hope that Grapevine has not become similar to � Arlington or Irving with overcro�ading, burdenscartie traffic jams and �' increasing crime. Careful consideration of all downzoning requests �; � �' � (4) �: R' � C � k' F ¢ � 10/15/85 I � i ' today is the only way we can prevent building urban problems into { � Grapevine's future. �` � Respectfully, '� Julian T. & Anne F. LaCrosse `` 3321 Marsh Lane " ;� { ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ � October 15, 1985 � � Mayor Tan Pawers � City Council and Planning & � Zoning Cca►mission City of Grapevine P.O. Box 729 Grapevine, Texas 76051 ` ti t Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: ; ; I wr�uld like to take this opportunity to voice my support for the , a� rezoning frcm "R-20" to "R-12.5" of property awned by J. J. Hall and � naw on contract to Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises Inc. , I feel that High Country is a quality developnent and will be glad to see it carried on through to Hall-Johnson Road. ; :� I am a Marsh Lane hameowner and do not feel this rezoning will in E � any way jeopardize the value of my property. , j Sincerely, � ,:� � Mike Davis 3312 Marsh Lane � ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ � i � Also referenced for the record were (1) a letter frc�n Mrs. Kathryn Barnes, `� 3322 Marsh Lane, in opposition to the project, (2) a petition containing 116 signatures of neighboring citizens opposed to Zoning Application Z85-24, and (3) a petition supporting the project, which contained 349 signatures. A motion to close the public hearing was then offered by Cc�ttmissioner Martin and seconded by Ccxmiissioner Florence. The motion prevailed by the following i vote: Ayes : Atkins, Cook, F�gholm, Florence, & Martin ; Nays . None � Absent: Joyce , Council Member Dyer also made a motion to close the Council's portion of the � public hearing. A second was made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware, and the motion � prevailed by the ensuing vote: i � Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks ,� Nays: None � RECFSS & RECONVII�IE , � Mayor Pawers announced that a brief recess would be taken by the City Council � and Planning & Zoning Carmission before considering further business. With � the exception of Comnissioner Joyce, all mFmbers of both bodies w�ere present ; upon reconvening mcenentarily. � PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z85-25, MEADOV�.�tE PARK {i The next order of business was for the City Council ar�d Planning & Zoning ' Conmission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z85-25 j sukx�iitted by the City of Grapevine (N�eadc�an�re Park) . , � { (5) 'i r I 10/15/85 % . �. The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Pavaers. Director of Cc�nmunity Develognent H. T. Hardy reported the tract in question i was zoned "HC" Highway C�rcial and was located on the south side of West i Northwest Highway and w�est of Dove Rpad. The proposed conditional use request ; was for mini-warehouses on the rear portion of the tract (proposed Lot 6 of � the Triple M replat also under consideration on the 10/15/85 agenda) . � ' Mr. Russ Cook, 1320 Knob Hill, Carrollton, Texas, representing the owners of � the property, addressed the City Council concerning the proposed develognent. ; He noted a total of five existing and proposed. c�rcial/retail buildings � w�uld front on Northw�est Highway, with the mini-warehouses to be located ; behind them. ; % The exact location of the conditional use request was addressed during the � ; ensuing discussion. The parking requirements and proposed platting of � ; buildings on individual lots were also of concern. I � i No one present wished to speak either for or against the matter when invited ; by Mayor Pawers to do so. It was also noted that no petitions or ; correspondence had been received. IA motion to close the public hearing was made by Co�missioner Martin and ; seconded by Cannissioner Engholm. The motion prevailed by the follawing vote: s' Ayes : Atkins, Cook, Engholm, Florence, & Martin ' Nays . None � � Absent: Joyce ` ; � k Council Me.mber Spencer made a mr�tion that the Council's portion of the public hearing be closed. Council Nlember Wilbanks offered a second, and the motion � ; prevailed by the ensuing vote: �` Ayes: Po�w�ers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � � Nays: None , PUBLIC HEARING, QONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CU85-04, SEWER TRF�7.i�T1T PI�ANT � x � The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning ` Conmission to conduct a public hearing relative to Conditional Use Application S` CU85-04 submitted by the City of Grapevine. �' �� Mayor Po�w�ers declared the public hearing open. i � j Mr. Hardy introduced the item, noting the property was zoned "GU" Goverrune.ntal Use District and was located east of the existing City shop area at Shady Brook and North Scri.bner Street. The requested conditional use was for �` expansion of the sewer treatment plant. ;; ;: ' Public Works Director Jim Baddaker reviewed the details of the project. Being �' a portion of the Grapevine Service Center Addition, the plant expansion was proposed for Block 3, approximately 16 acres. Future use of the remainder of � i the tract was reviewed, as well as the construction schedule for the sewer plant. Proposed thoroughfares and landscaping w�ere also discussed. e matter the Althou h no one resent wished to ccx�ment relative to th , g P following letter was read into the record: i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ; October 15, 1985 City Council and Planning & � Zoning Cce�mission ' City of Grapevine In reply to your letter of October l, 1985, pertaining to Notice of ; Public Hearing for Conditional Use Permit Application CU85-04. ; � � � � . � ,� (�) � � � ; i � � s � a � ' 10/15/85 ; i I iy Y i 1 � This is to give you notice that we have no objection to the Condi- ' � tional Use Permit Application. � 3 � � � ; E. L. & Nacmi Langley � 705 N. Main s 3 ; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ � � ; Correspondence in opposition to the proposed sew�er plant expansion was � referenced as received fran Clinton and Freda Brock, 809 Mt. Vernon Road, $ � Fairfield, Illinois. � ; There being no further discussion, a motion to close the public hearing was made by Ccanmissioner Florence. Ccnmission Ntember Cook seconded the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: � Ayes : Atkins, Cook, Engholm, Florence, & Martin � Nays . None Absent: Joyce � A motion to close the public hearing was also offered by Council Member � Wilbanks. The mption was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: � Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None MISC�T�ANEOUS DISCCISSION, Z85-11, ZRANSWESTERN Mr. Barry Knight then advised he had consulted with his client, who offered the following contributions in conjunction with the Transv�stern project: (1) � to identify the Bethel Road entrance to the City with a sign and landscaping, � m�imtun $10,000; and (2) to provide $25,000 toward tem�orary signalization at � S.H. 26 and Bethel Road. Questions fran Council and Ccmnission followed. No formal action was taken. E}�CLfrIVE SFSSION Mayor Pawers then announced the Planning & Zoning Ccx�mission was to recess to the Civic Center to consider further agenda it�ns. The City Council would recess to the Conference Roan to discuss real estate pursuant to Article � 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S., Stiibsection (f) . Upon reconvening momentarily in the Council Chambers, all members of the City Council were present. City Manager Jim Hancock advised no Council action was necessary as a result of the closed session. MAIN STREET CONINLZTI�E, STREE'I'SCAPE RDCC�IDATION � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reccan- � mendation of the Streetscape Crnmittee relative to the proposed downtawn � Streetscape Project and take any necessary action. � City Manager Jim Hancock introduced Ms. Kate Singleton, the Main Street Project Director. Ms. Singleton outlined the scope of the streetscape project and noted the Streetscape C�m.ittee, a subca�anittee of the Main Street C�mittee, recammended engaging the consulting firm of Johnson, Johnson & Roy � to provide their services for the streetscape project. � � Representatives of this firm, Mr. Clarence Roy and Mr. Thanas Lawrence, then made a slide presentation, which depicted s� possibilities for the Grapevine = project and illustrations of previous projects. During the ensuing discussion, it was noted that the City Council would review � the concept design plans after each phase. The fee for streetscape design � services was approx�mately $45,000. � Council M�ember Brekken then made a motion to accept the reco�mendation of the � Streetscape Ca�nittee and engage the consulting firm of Johnson, Johnson & � Roy. A second was offered by Council Member Spencer, and the mr�tion prevailed by the ensuing vote: � � �g � ) � � � � � '� 10/15/85 � � � Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks ` � Nays: None �� i � ! PI�ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REC,'QNY�iDATION, Z85-11, T�NSWESTERN � A k Y� � : The next it�n considered by the City Council was the recammendation of the � Planning & Zoning Conmission relative to Zoning Application Z85-ll � (Transw�estern) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. �. � i P Comnission Chairn�an Atkins advised the Planning & Zoning Comnission k' , reccxm�ended approval of the requested Hotel/Corporate Office Zoning District i � on this tract in northeast Grapevine. The vote was 4 to 1. � e I 1 Brief Council discussion followed the reading of the caption by the City � 4 Secretary. � jA mption to accept the Ccu�mission's recommendation and adopt the ordinance was �, 1� then made by Council Member Glynn. Mayor Pro Tem Ware seconded the motion, �� which prevailed by the ensuing vote: � � Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � � Nays: None � i � j ORDINANCE N0. 85-64 f i � � AN ORDINANCE AN�IDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, �� ! Tf� COMPREf�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPE'NDIX "D" OF TFiE CITY CODE OF ; GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, C�2AN'I'ING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A IAT, TRA�T, OR PARCEL OF I�F,I�ID LYING AND BEING SIT[J�TID IN TARRANT COLAVTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE H. SUGGS SURVEY, ', ABSTRACT NO. 1415, AND THE A. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 26, IN Tf� CITY OF �i GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE FLTLLY AND COM- ' PLEI'ELY DESCRIBID IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A C�3ANGE IN THE USE OF � SAID PROPIItTY FRC�4 "PID" PLANNID �' INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT TO "HCO" HOTEL/ ; CORPORATE OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT; COR- RF]CTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING AIZ OTfiER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A C�.AUSE RFT,ATING TO S�BILITY; DETFFiMINING THAT ' TF� PUBLIC Il�l'I'ERFSTS, NIORALS AND C�IERAL � WELFARE DIIKAl�ID A ZONING CHANGE A1�ID ANIEND- MENT '1�IEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT i TO E�C�ID TI� SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOLL�2S ($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFII�TSE SHAT,T, � BE DEQ'� CUNIl�IIT'I� UP�T EAC�i DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOI�ATION OCCURS; AND i DF]CLARING AN II�RC',EDTCY i '� PI�INNING & ZONING CONJMISSION RECOAM�LVDATION, Z85-24, JOYCE-MYERS i j The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recc�r � '� mendation of the Planning & Zoning Cca�mission relative to Zoning Application ? Z85-24 (Joyce-Myers) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. � Mr. Atkins reported the Planning & Zoning Co�mission rec�nded approval of , the zoning request frcm "R-20" to "R-12.5" Single-Family by a vote of 3 to 2. It was noted that approval by the Council w�uld take a three-qua.rter vote, as `� more than 20 percent of the surrounding property within 200 feet was � represented by owners in opposition. ' A lengthy discussion ensued with one point of concern being whether this case � w�uld set a precedent for other properties zoned "R-20". I� The caption of the proposed ordinance was read for the record. 1 { � r (9) � � P I , , s � �� 10/15/85 � t i a ; A motion was then made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council Nlember � ? Glynn to accept the recammendation and adopt the ordinance for Zoning Appli- i � cation Z85-24. The m�tion failed by the following vote (lack of three-fourths � vote) : I ; Ayes: Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, & Wilbanks i ; Nays: Powers & Spencer j � PI�ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REC�IDATION, Z85-25, MEADCX�RE PARK � i � i The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the rec�r ; mendation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�mission relative to Zoning Application ; Z85-25 (City) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. t 3 � Planning & Zoning CcxYmission Chairntian Rick Atkins advised of their unanimous � � reca�ndation for approval of the °GU" Governmental Use District requested � for the Meadaanere Park area. � City Secretary Karen Spann read the caption of the proposed ordinance. ; i ; Council N1e.mber Wilbanks offered a motion to accept the Commission's reccan- mendation and adopt the ordinance. A second was made by Council Member Brekken, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: � � # Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None � $ � ORDINANCE NO. 85-65 a AN ORDINANCE ANIELVDING ORDINANCE N0. 82-73, � TfiE COMPREE�ISIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF TI� � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO � KNOWN AS APPIIVDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF � GRAPE�TINE, TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CHANC� � ' ON A TRACT OF I�AND DESCRIBID AS BEING A � L�OT, TRACT, OR PARCII, OF I�I�ID LYING AND � BEING SITUATID IN Tf� COUNTIFS OF TARRANT � AND DIIV'1'ON IN 'I'I� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, £ 'I�.S, NIORE FU7�Y AND COMPI�'Z�LY DESCRIBID IN TI� BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN Tf� USE OF SAID PROPER'IY FRC�Ni � "R-20" SINGLE-FANIILY DWII�LING DISTRICT TO � "GU" GOV�R�rAL USE ZONING DISTRICT; � CORRECI'ING TI� OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRE- � SERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF Tf� ZONING � ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A GLAUSE REL�F,TING TO SEVERABILITY; DEI'ERMINING THAT Tf� PUBLIC � INTER�TS, MORAIS AND GENER�L WII�F'ARE DIIKAND A ZO�G CHANGE AND P.1�[VDN�!' � �RFIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO g EXCEm THE SUM OF ONE THOUS�ND DOT.T,ARS ($1,000.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFIIVSE SHAI.L � BE DEENIED COrM�1ITI� UPON EACH DAY DURING � OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; AND DECLARIDTG AN EMERGII�TCY � � PLI�NNING & ZONING COTM'iISSION RECCY�M�TDATION, CU85-02, CHA1�I' DEVEL�OPN�NT � �. The next item before the City Council was to consider the recommendation of �, the Planning & Zoning C�mission relative to Conditional Use Application � CU85-02 (Chart) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. _ �; The Planning & Zoni.ng Canmission recam�endation, as reported by Chairnnan � Atkins, was for approval of the conditional use for off-premise beer sales in conjunction with the operation of a convenience store. Their vote was � unanimous. � � � The caption of the proposed ordinance was read into the record. � Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to accept the rec�ndation of the Planning � & Zoning Ccxtmission and adopt the ordinance. Council Member Dyer offered a � second, and the motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: � � (10) � ;. � � 10/15/85 " r: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None � E ORDINANCE NO. 85-66 ` i ,' AN ORDINANCE ISSUING A CONDITION�L USE PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 48 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 TI� COMPREF�TSIVE � ZONING ORDINANCE OF TFIE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, 7.�A8 SANIE BEING ALSO I�TOWN AS APPENDIX � "D" OF THE CITY CODE, BY GRAN`rING A CONDI- � I TIONAL USE PERMIT FOR � S'I'ORAGE, POS- I SFSSION, RETAIL S�LE, AND OFF-PRENLZSE � CONSUMPTION OF AL�COHOLIC BEVERAGFS (BEER ONLY) IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OPERATION OF ; A CONVII�TIIIVCE STORE IN A DISTRIC.T ZOIVED "HC" HIC�i4�Y COrM�1ERCIAL UNDER CITY OF i GRAPEVINE ORDINANCE N0. 82-73 AI.L IN I ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PUR- j SUANT 'I+0 SP7CTION 47 OF ORDIN�TC,E N0. 82-73 ; AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND j �' SAF�GUARDS 7NIPOSID HEREIN; CORR'E]C'.PING Tf� ;' OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL 0'rHER PORTIONS OF TI� ZOrTING ORDINANCE; PROVID- ; ING A C�,AUSE REI�ATING Z+0 SEVER�BILITY; � DEI'ERMINING THAT Tf� PUB�LIC INTERESTS, F MORAL�S AND G.ENERAI� WELFARE DENIAND TI-� � i ISSUANCE OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; � PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO F�XCEID THE SUM � OF ONE THOUS�IND DOLL�ARS ($1,000.0 0) At�ID A E � SEPARATE OFFEDTSE SHALL SE DEII�D CONY�IITTED � UPON EAC�-I DAY DURING OR d�T WHIC�I A VIO- � LATION OCCURS; AND DECLARING AN IIHERGEL�CY � E € PI�ANNING & ZONING CONA'IISSION REC'UNA�iDATION, CU85-03, VJ�RRIIZ & ASSOCIATES �; The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reccgn- r mendation of the Planning & Zoning Cce�mission relative to Conditional Use � Application CU85-03 (Worrell) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. � Ccx�mission Chairman Rick Atkins reported their recomrendation for denial of � � this conditional use request for mini-warehouses. The vote was 4 to 1. He �: � noted reasons for denial included parking and access concerns. s i � ,�! The caption of the proposed ordinance was then read by the City Secretary. ` Following brief deliberation, a motion was made by Council M��ber Dyer to > � accept the Conmission's recc�mendation and deny Conditional Use Application � ' CU85-03. Council Member Spencer seconded the motion, which prevailed by the " �� ensuing vote: F ; ; Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None � ;, j PI,ANNING & ZONING CONIl�IISSION RECONY�iDATION, CC185-04, SE,'WER TREA'IY�.V'I' PI,ANT � � f j The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recanr ; mendation of the Planning & Zoning Coamtission relative to Conditional Use � Application CU85-04 (City) and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. �: { ' �° ' Planning & Zoning Conmission Chairman Atkins advised of their unanim�us � � approval for expansion of the sew�er treatment plant. City Secretary Karen = Spann presented the caption of the proposed ordinance. a � 'I"here being little discussion, a motion was made by Council Member Wilbanks to � 'i accept the Co�mission's rec�ndation and adopt the ordinance. Council � ' Men�r Brekken seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: ` i € � Ayes: Pauers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks ; Nays: None € � � � ;'; ; (11) � , � , " a � � i � i ' 10/15/85 � f 1 � ORDINANCE NO. 85-67 ; � AN ORDINANC� ISSUING A CONDITIONAL USE � ; PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SDCTION 48 OF I ORDINANCE N0. 82-73, TI-iE CC�REHII�TSIVE � � ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, 1 Z�AS SANIE BEING �L.SO IQ�iOWN AS APPENDIX i s "D" OF THE CITY CODE, BY GRANTING A ` ; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ; : CONSTRUCTION AND OPII�ATION OF A 2 M.G.D. ACTIVATED SLtJDC�, TERTIARY TREA7.T'lEN'I' AND ; SEWER PLANT EXPANSION IN A DISTRICT ZONID � "GU" C�C�'F�F2�1'I'AL USE UNDER CITY OF � GRAPEVIrTE ORDINANCE N0. 82-73 ALL IN � ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED � 3 PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AI�ID ALL OTHII2 CONDITIONS, RFS'I'RZCTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS INIPOSID � `; HEREIN; CORREX.TING THE OFFICIAL ZONING � # MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE � 3 ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CL�AUSE ' RELIITING TO SEVERABILITY; DEPERMINING THAT � i THE PUBLIC �'RFSTS, MORAIS AI�ID GIIVERAL ; WELFARE DEM�ID THE ISSUANCE OF THIS � � CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; PROVIDING A � �� PEDIAI,TY NOT TO EXC� THE SUM OF ONE � ? THOUSAND DOLT�2S ($1,000.00) AND A SEPA— � RATE OFFE[�TSE SHALZ BE DF�EMED CONII�IITI�D � UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHI(�i A VIO— � LATION OCCURS; AND DECLARING AN ENIERGINCY � PI�NNING & ZONING CC�M'LISSION RDCC�TDATION, RII�LAT, J. J. DANIEL ADDITION � � ; The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recan- � ' mendation of the Planning & Zoning Cca�mission relative to the replat of Lots 3 � � & 4, Block 1, J. J. Daniel Addition. � � The proposed replat is located on Pine Street just south of its intersection � with Nash Street and will combine two lots into one lot. The tract is zoned "R-7.5" Single-Family. Mr. Atkins reported the Planning & Zoning Comnission's unanimous recc�mendation for approval. � A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council Member Spencer � to accept the rec�ndatio� of the CamiLission and approve the replat of this � portion of the J. J. Daniel Addition. The mQtion prevailed by the ensuing � vote: � � Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None � � �: PIANNING & ZONING CONII�IISSION RECON�iDATION, REPLAT, TRIPLE M ADDITION � � � The next it�n considered by the City Council was the recamnendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to the replat of the Triple M Addition. � � The Triple M Addition is zoned "HC" Highway Camnercial and is located on the � south side of West Northw�est Highway, west of Dove Road. A related � Conditional Use Application (CU85-03) for mini warehouses on a portion of this � tract had been denied. Chairman Atkins noted the Co�imission's reccarmendation ° � for denial of the proposed replat. Their vote was 4 to 1. � � There being little discussion, a motion to accept the rec�ndation of the � Planning & Zoning Ccx�mission and deny the replat of the Triple M Addition was � offered by Mayor Pro Tem Ware. Council Me.mber Spencer seconded the m�tion, � which prevailed by the ensuing vote: � �' � Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None � � � � � � � � (12) � � ; � 10/15/85 PLANNING & ZONING CONII�iZSSION RECONIlKEIVDATION, REPLAT, BANYAN PLACE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reccm- ' sion relative to the re lat of Ban an P annin & Zonin Conmis a i n of the 1 mend t o p y g g Place. The Banyan Place townhouse develognelzt is located south of Peach Street and $ �� extends fran North Scribner Street to North Main Street. It was noted that this replat corrected errors in the legal description. The Planning & Zoning Cca�mission rec�nded approval by a vote 5 to 0. fi � Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to accept the rec�ndation and approve € I the replat of Banyan Place. The mr�tion was seconded by Council Member Spencer '�: ' and prevailed by the following vote: h � ', ; Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None � I = � PI,AI�TING & ZONING COMNlISSION RECONIl�VDATION, REPLAT, WES'li�V�00D ADDITION I �I The next iteqn before the City Council was to consider the recamiendation of i the Planning & Zoning Conmission relative to the replat of the Westw�od Addition. � ; � This tract is located behind Dove Elementary School, east of Hood Lane, and is � 1 proposed for tc�mhouse develoFxnent. The proposed replat would correct errors � � in the legal description. Mr. Atkins advised the Commission unanimously � � recam�ended approval of the replat. ' � A motion was then made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council Member Spencer to accept the recc�.ndation of the Planning & Zoning C�mission and n r vailed b the w 't' n The motio e approve the replat of the estw�od AdcU. io . p y ' ensuing vote: 4' Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks r �, Nays: None ; V PLAIVNING & ZONING CONII�IISSION RECONY�IDATION � t. FINAL PLAT, LEWIS T. B1�KF�Ft ADDITION Y' j The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reca�mendation of the Planning & Zoning Ccmnission relative to the final plat �` of Lots 1-6, Block 2, of the Lewis T. Baker Addition. � � ; This 3.5 acre tract is located at the far north end of Lakeview Drive near � Grapevine Lake and is zoned "R-12.5" Single-Family Dwelling District. �' ! Planning & Zoning Ccmnission Chairman Rick Atkins reported their unanimous i reca�ndation for approval. i ;. Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to accept the CcxYmission's rec�ndation and � approve the final plat of this portion of the Lewis T. Baker Addition. A r second was offered by Council Member Spencer, and the motion prevailed by the k � ensuing vote: r j Ayes: Pow�ers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilb�n.ks � ' Nays: None PI�IVNING & ZONING CON�'IISSION RECONY�TDATION FINAL PLAT DFV1 IlVDUSTRIAL PARK PH�SE 4 i r � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the �_ ; rec�zdation of the Planning & Zoning Cce�mission relative to the final plat �` of the DF�nI Industrial Park, Phase 4. h G F This 13.6 acre tract is located south of State Highway 114 between M�etro rz � Circle and Minters Chapel Road. The property is zoned for Light Industrial y use. The Planning & Zoning Camnission rec�.ndation as reported by Mr. €; � Atkins was for approval. Their vote was 5 to 0. � : t ; K � II �[ � ( I 4 � � i ; (13) � i � ti � : � 4 J � i ! 10/15/85 � ,3 P i r � _, A motion to accept the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Conmission and � r approve the final plat of DFW Industrial Park, Phase 4 was made by Mayor Pro ; � � Tem Ware. Council Member Spencer seconded the motion, which prevailed by the � { following vote: { i ' Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks j � Nays: None � ; PLANNING & ZONING CONIl"1ISSION RECONA�IVDATION � FINAL PLAT, A. F. I�ON�D ADDITION � s � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recom- � mendation of the Planning & Zoning Camni.ssion relative to the final plat of ; Lot 3, Block 1, A. F. Leonard Addition. , P r This tract of land is zoned "HC" Highway Ccxmlercial and is located on the � ' southeast corner of East Northwest Highway and Dooley Street. A Conditional Use Application (CU85-02) had been approved earlier for off-premise beer sales in conjunction with the operation of a convenience store. Mr. Atkins reported � the Ccannission's unanimous rec�ndation for approval of this final plat. � 's 3 A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware to accept the recaRnendation of the � Planning & Zoning C�mission and approve the final plat of this portion of the A. F. Leonard Addition. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Spencer and prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None � , PIANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECON�'IENDATION � PRII,INiINARY PLAT, LOTS 42-45, BLOCK 1, WII�TDNIILL FSTATES � � The next item before the City Council was to consider the rec�ndation of � the Planning & Zoning Ccmmission relative to the preliminary plat of Lots � 42-45, Block 1, Winc�nill Estates. g � € The property in question contains 6.258 acres zoned "R-20" Single-Family Dwelling District, and is located adjacent to the existing Windmill Estates subdivision on the east side of Pool Road at High Meadaw Road. The Planning & � Zoning Ccx�mission rec�ndation, as reported by Mr. Atkins, was for approval. � The vote was 5 to 0. � � Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a mr�tion to accept the Comm.ission's rec�ndation and � approve the preliminary plat of this portion of WincDnill Estates. A second was offered by Council Member Spencer, and the motion prevailed by the ensuing � vote: � Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None PLANNING & ZONING CONA�LISSION REC;ONY�NDATION � PRELIMINARY PLAT, HIGH COUN'I'RY ESTATES, PHASE 3 The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recom- mendation of the Planning & Zoning Conmission relative to the preliminary � plat of High Country Estates, Phase 3. � This proposed single-family subdivision includes 22.5 acres located on the � north side of Hall-Johnson Road and south of the existing High Country "' �. subdivisions. Zoning Application Z85-24 requesting a change froan "R-20" to "R-12.5" had been denied earlier. The Planning & Zoning Camnission, having � approved the zoning case, rec�nded approval of the preliminary plat. Their vote was 3 to 2. � Following brief discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to reject the � Caimission's reccanriendation and deny the prel�miriary plat of High Country � Estates, Phase 3, due to denial of the zoning application. Council Member � Spencer seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: � � Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None � (14) � a 10/15/85 PLANNING & ZONING CODM9ISSION REOO1�A�iDATION � PRELIMINARY PLAT, GLADE I�NDING ADDITION ' ,. The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the rec��ndation of the Plannin & Zonin Cce�mission relative to the relimin g g P �'Y . . . replat of certain lots in Blocks 1 & 2, Glade Landing Add.ition. � � This proposed single-family subdivision is located north of Glade Road on the I � f z Road Mr. Atkins re rted the Plannin & Zonin Cc�miission east side o Ba e . po g g s II unanimously recce�mended approval of the preliminary replat. k: , A motion was then made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council Member ` I Spencer to accept the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Cce�mission and � j approve the preliminary replat of this portion of the Glade Landing Addition. � iThe motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: i Ayes: Pow�ers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None PLANNING & ZONING CONA'IISSION RECONY�iDATION PRII�IMINARY PLAT, TIMBERLINE SOiJ'l�i ADDITION � �� The next item before the City Council was to consider the rec�ndation of ' the Planning & Zoning Cc�mission relative to the preliminary plat of the r I Timberline South Addition. ` i � The Timberline South Addition is proposed for single-family developnent and is � located on the south side of Timberline Drive extending fran the Creek��od subdivision east to the proposed Heritage arterial. The Planning & Zoning � Cc�mission recamlended approval of the preliminary plat. The vote was 5 to 0. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker noted a discrepancy in the location of the = arterial as depicted by the proposed site plan map presented during the 1984 ; � city-instigated rezoning hearings and subsequent legal descriptions. ;: Mayor Pro Tem Ware offered a motion to accept the Conmission's recatmendation � for approval of this preliminary plat and to locate the arterial as shown on the site plan map presented by Mr. Baddaker. The motion was seconded by Council Niember Spencer and prevailed by the ensuing vote: � ; Ayes: Pow�ers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer & Wilbanks ; � Nays: None I 1 ORDINANCE, TRAFFIC REGCTII�TION, S`I'OP & YIELD SICTTS ` � The next item before the City Council was to consider an ordinance relative to ' traffic control. i a Public Works Director Jim Ba.ddaker briefly reviewed the proposed ordinance, which provided for addition and deletion of certain stop sign locations, �; I correcting certain existing stop sign references in the Code, and deleting certain yield rightrof-way designations. Sc�ne of the deletions w�ere simply duplicate listings in the Code. All areas of the City were included, and � additional stop sign listings were by subdivision nam�e. , I r F ' During the ensuing discussion, it was requested that the following stop signs � be removed fran consideration in this ordinance: �� 1. Ntunber 34 - Grapevine Lake Estates - On Westbound High Drive at � Oakwood Drive. ;' � € 2. Number 51 - Placid Peninsula A�ddition - On Southbound M�ercury Drive F at Peninsula Drive. ; I The caption of the proposed ordinance was presented for the record. A motion was then made by Council M�ember Spencer that the ordinance be adopted � i' with the above items re�aved. Council N1Q.mber Wilbarilcs seconded the mr�tion, ` which prevailed by the ensuing vote: ; � p: I � F � � a ' (15� i , � -a ; � � ', i i 10/15/85 ; j I i i Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks '� Nays: None � r ; ORDINANCE N0. 85-68 ' i ' ; AN ORDINANC� OF TF� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, ! � 'I�XAS, AN�IVDING C�iAPTER 23, SECTION 30, OF ; i t Tf� CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEX�1S, BY + ADDING AND DELETING S'!'OP SIQVS AT CERTAIN � � IACATIONS DESCRIBID HEREIN AI�ID BY � '' CORRECTION CERTAIN EXISTING S'I'OP SIQ�T � ; DFSIGNATIONS; AN�TiDING C��APTER 23, S�CTION � � 31 BY DEI�`i'ING YIELD RIGHT-0E-4�,Y SIC�TS AT � CERTAIl�T LOCATIONS DFSCRIBID HEREIN; � � AUTHORIZING TI� EREC,'TION OF TRI�FFIC � ' REGUI,ATION SIC�iS; REPEALING CONFLICTING j � ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A PEI�LTY NOT TO � EXCEID THE SUM OF 'I'W� HUI�IDRID DOLLARS � ; ($200.00) AND A SEPARATE OFFEI�TSE SHALL BE a DEII"� CODM�IITI�D UPON EACH DAY DURING OR � ? ON WHICH A VIOLATION OCCURS; PROVIDING A � � SEVERABILITY; AI�ID DEC.L�ARING AN II`�RGII�TCY � ? DISCUSSION, AN�IDNIENT OF SOLID 4�II�STE DISPOSAL RATES i ; The next order of business was for the City Council to consider amending solid � ` waste disposal rates and take any necessary action. � City Manager Jim Hancock advised that GSX Corporation of Texas had requested a � 20 percent increase in solid waste disposal service rates for the City. He � noted the Staff had begun to study the request and recam�nded referral of the � matter to the Utility Cca�mittee. � Mr. Dennis Marchetti, representing GSX Corporation, then gave a brief � presentation noting the need for the requested increase. ° � � Questions and c�nts fran the Council followed, and the general concensus � agreed with the Staff recommendation for referral to the Utility Conmittee. � No formal action was taken. � � RESOLUTION, SUPPORTING THE STATE-WIDE Tn1P,TER REFERII�TDUM � The next order of business was for the City Council to hear a presentation � relative to the State wide water referendiun and consider a subsequent � resolution. � Assistant City Manager Kelvin Knauf advised that the State-wide water � referendiun would appear on the November 5 ballot as Constitutional Amendments � No. 1 and 2. He gave a brief slide presentation, which detailed the proposed plan. � � City Secretary Karen Spann then read the caption of a proposed resolution � supporting adoption of the water plan. �, A motion to approve the resolution was made by Council Me.mber Glynn and � seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware. The motion prevailed by the follawing vote: �; � Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None � � � RESOLUTION N0. 85-52 �: ,. € A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ADOPTION OF THE � NEW TEXAS V�,TER PLAN AT Z� NOVII�ER 5, � 1985 CONSTI'IUTIONAL AN�iDN1E[VTS II,ECTION � MISC�LLANEOLTS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION � � Because of the late hour, it was noted. that the following items w�uld be � tabled for consideration on October 22, 1985: �: �: � � � (16) � � � �, `€ 10/15/85 � 1. City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to concrete street requirements and take any necessary action. 2. City Council to consider the annual capital recovery fee analysis and take �'' any necessary action. 3. City Council to consider an ordinance amending water and sewer rates. � AA70URl�]'r ' � � The deliberations of the City Council having been concluded, a motion to �:" adjourn was made by Council Member Brekken and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware. � The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: t Ayes: Po�rers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks ' Nays: None PASSID AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the lg� day of November , 1985. � APPROVED: � k! f Mayor ATI'F',ST: ' F � I � � City Secretary � � I t � � ; �: i � � i � � r i 1 i 1 ` � , ; � i 1 � , ; % ; ; ; � j €; i � � (17) } � � �