The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986-01-07 Regular Meeting � I , .�GENDA i CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS � REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING I TUESDAY, JANUARY 7 , 1986 AT 7 : 30 P.M. � COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � 3 i 1 I . CALL TO ORDER � , � II. INVOCATION: Council Member Ron Dyer � III . CITIZENS REQUESTS ' . i Mr. Floyd Gray to update the City Council relative to � establishment of a Justice of the Peace Court in � ; Grapevine. j , IV. CONSENT AGENDA Consent items are deemed to need little Council delibera- � tion and will be acted upon as one business item. Any j member of the City Council or member of the audience may � request that an item be withdrawn from the consent agenda and placed before the Council for full discussion. ' ; Approval of the consent agenda authorizes the City Manager, � ; or his designee, to implement each item in accordance with ; iStaff recommendations. � i A. Consideration of the minutes of the meetings of ! � November 19, December 3 , and December 17, 1985 . City ! Secretary recommends approval as published. ; B. Consideration of an ordinance amending Chapter 3 ' Article III of the City Code changing the wording from Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport to International I Airport. City Secretary recominends approval. � � C. Consideration of a resolution calling the 1986 City i Officers Election for Saturday, April 5, 1986 . City � Secretary recommends approval. j i D. Consideration of a traffic control ordinance authorizing stop signs at the intersection of Sierra Drive and Cimarron Trail. Public Works Director i recommends approval. ' j E. Consider award of the bid for the purchase of one copy � machine. Public Works Director recommends award to the ; � low bidder in the amount of $19, 434 .00, authorizing � 60-month lease purchase agreement ($323 . 90/month) , and � authorizing a maintenance agreement. � I F. Consider award of bid for the purchase of a booster � pump station at the Grapevine Municipal Golf Course. � Golf Professional recommends award to low bidder in the � amount of $6, 476. 00. I 1 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS � ; A. City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to '1 the Tarrant County Community Development Block Grant � Program (CDBG) proposed 12th year projects . 3 � � B. City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to g levying an assessment for the paving and improvement of ! Butterfield Drive. � C. City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to � levying an assessment for the paving and improvement of I Dove Loop Road. � � � i � � � D. City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to � levying an assessment for the paving and improvement of Timberline Drive. � VI . OLD BUSINESS � � A. City Council to consider the replat of Lot 1 , Block A � of the Triple M Addition and take any necessary action. � B. City Council to consider an ordinance amending the � Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance relative to "R-5. 0" Zero s Lot Line District regulations and take any necessary � action. � VII . NEW BUSINESS � , E A. City Council to consider an ordinance levying an i assessment for the paving and improvement of � Butterfield Drive. B. City Council to consider an ordinance levying an assessment for the paving and improvement of Dove Loop Road. � � C. City Council to consider an ordinance levying an assessment for the paving and improvement of Timberline Drive. � ', a ; D. City Council to consider award of the bid for the i ' purchase of a 5-inch hose for the Fire Department. ! Y E. City Council to consider a resolution awarding the bid � to other than the low bidder for the purchase of a Life ; 'i Pack for the Fire Department. F. City Council to consider request from Lone Star Gas Company relative to franchise renewal and subsequent ' ordinance on first reading, if applicable. ; � G. City Council to discuss change order procedures and j take any necessary action. ! � I H. City Council to consider the recommendation of the ; Facilities Committee relative to the architect for the � ' civic center/auditorium facility and take any necessary ' action. � I . City Council to consider limiting the Mayor' s office to � a maximum of two terms and take any necessary action. { ; VIII. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION i I IX. ADJOURNMENT ' �� f � � , � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SES- ; SION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED ; AND POSTED ON THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 1986 AT 3 : 00 P.M. � I� � Cit Secretar ' � ; � � , I'' t ! � � ' , i ' j � � ' i ��' EMERGENCY AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ' REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING � TUESDAY, JANUARY 7, 1986 AT 7: 30 P.M. I COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET i I � � i i VIIA. EXECUTIVE SESSION I � i { A. City Council to recess to the Conference Room to ' i discuss personnel pursuant to Article 6252-17, ' i V.A.T.C.S. , Subsection (g) . ! i j i � B. City Council to reconvene in the Council Chambers ' � and take any necessary action relative to � personnel. � VIII . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION i IX. ADJOURNMENT i i i ( THIS EMERGENCY AGENDA WAS PREPARED BECAUSE IMMEDIATE ' �� ACTION IS NECESSARY TO INSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF GRAPE- � VINE, TEXAS. a , � , I i � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS j AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE i REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING '; EMERGENCY AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE � 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1986 AT 10 : 00 A.M. ; �'� i � i I � i 's , � � City Secretar ! � � i i 1 3 1 I 1 � � I € s i ; � � I i I E+ I i � � 5 (€ 4 i �' � r j � � STATE OF TEXAS �� COUN'I'Y OF TAR�NT CITY OF GRAPE�IINE � � The City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Regular Session on ; this the 7th day of January, 1986 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 413 Main Street, with the following members present to-wit: Tcm Pow�rs Mayor � Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem � Marion Brekken Council Mesnber Ron Dyer Council M�ember ; Jim Glynn Council M�nber ; Sharron Spencer Council Member � C. Shane Wilbanks Council Member � constituting a quonun, with the following memb�rs of the City Staff: � � 4 i James L. Hancock City Manager ! Kelvin Knauf Assistant City Manager i John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Karen Spann City Secretary i CAI�L � ORDER ; j Mayor Pow�rs called the meeting to order. � I INVC)CATION � � The Invocation was delivered by Council Member Ron Dyer. CITIZENS REQUF�T, MR. FLOYD GRAY j � Mr. Floyd Gray, 106 Starr Place, updated the City Council relative to establishment of a Justice of the Peace Court in Grapevine. (This matter had ' previously been considered by the City Council on December 17, 1985.) Mr. Gray advised that Tarrant County had agreed to pay for utilities if the City wc�uld provide for a meeting place for a JP Court. He noted one possible `` location on Worth Street. ; No action was taken by the City Council following Mr. Gray's c�nts. f CITIZENS RF�iJEST, MR. JESSE WILLIAM.SON Mr. Jesse Williamson, 1134 Terrace Drive, Water & Sew�er Superintendent, expressed gratitude to the citizens and the City Councils he has served for the past 24 years as a City employee. Mr. Williamson will retire on January 31, 1986. I T Mayor Pow�ers then offered congratulations and appreciation of Mr. Williamson's service. � CaiVSENT AGENDA ` The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the consent agenda items, which were deemed to need little deliberation and were acted u n as one business item. Ma r Pawers asked if there was an member of the Yo Y Po . I', � audience or the City Council who wished to r�ave an iten frcm the consent s � agenda for full discussian. There were none. � Consideration of the Minutes City Secretary rec�nded approval of the minutes of November 19, December 3, and December 17, 1985 as published. � � Motion by Council MP.mber Wilbanks and seconded by Council M�r Spencer to � approve as rec�nded prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Powaers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None � �. x � ; � � � � � O1/07/86 Ordinance, Amend Code Cha ter 3, Regional Airport to International Airport City Secretary recam�ended that an ordinance amending Chapter 3 Article III of the City Code changing the w�rding fran Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport to International Airport be tabled to January 21, 1986. � a Motion by Council Member Wilbanks and seconded by Council Member Spencer to � table as recce�n�ended prevailed by the ensuing vote: � Ayes: Powers, Wa�e, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None Resolution, Calling 1986 City Officers Election � City Secretary recamiended approval of a resolution calling the 1986 City � Officers Election for Saturday, April 5, 1986. The caption of the proposed resolution was presented for the record. ( Motion by Council Member Wilbanks and seconded by Council Me.mber Spencer to � approve as reccem�ended prevailed by the ensuing vote: � k Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None RFSOLUTION NO. 86-01 � A RESOLUTION OF 'I'HE CITY COUNCIL OF Tf� � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS PROVIDING FOR THE � 1986 CITY OFFICERS EI�DC.'TION TO BE HELD ON � APRIL 5, 1986; DETERMINING THE POLLING � PLACE; APPOINTING AN ELDC..'TION JUDGE; AND PROVIDING SPDCIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CONDUCTING OF SAID II�E7CTION Ordinance, Stop Signs � Public Works Director recce�enended approval of an ordinance authorizing stop signs to be placed 1) on northbound C�marron Trail at Sierra Drive and 2) on southbound Cim-�rron Trail at Sierra Drive. q � The caption of the proposed ordinance was presented for the record. ; M�otion by Council Nlember Wilbanks and seconded by Council Member Spencer to ': approve as reccannended prevailed by the ensuing vote: � i Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None , ORDINI�NCE N0. 86-01 � 1 � AN ORDINANCE OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S, AN�iDING C�iAP`I�R 23, SECTION 30, OF � THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, BY � ADDING STOP SIC�TS AT CERTAIN I+OCATIONS � DFSCRIBID HEREIN; AUTHORIZING TI� ERFJCTION ' R OF TRAFFIC REGUL�TION SIC�TS; REPEALING � CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A PIIVALTY NOT 'I�0 EXCEm THE SUM OF 'IWO �: HUNDRID DOLI�ARS ($200.00) AND A SEPARATE OFF�TSE SHALL BE DEF�lED CONY�II'1�ID UPON , EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH A VIOLATION � OCCURS; PROVIDING A SEVEF2ABILITY; AND I D�RING AN II�TCY � Bid Award, Copy Machine for City Offices on Dallas Road Public Works Director rec�nded award of the bid for the purchase of one copy machine to Royal Business Machines for their low bid amount of � $19,434.00, authorizing 60-month lease purchase agreement ($323.90/month) , and ' authorizing a maintenance agreement ($28,894.80) . Total five-year cost, $48,328.80. � (2) � � O1/07/86 i ; ; i Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks i Nays: None � PUHLIC HEARING, PROPOSID STRF�'T ASSESSMENT DOVE I+OOP ROAD � The next order of business was for the City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to levying an assessment for the paving and improvement of i Dove Loop Road. Mayor Pawers opened the public hearing. � � Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised the proposed assessment on Dove Loop Road included both sides fran the south property line of the Dove ; Crossing subdivision extending north to the south property line of the United �, States Army Corps of Engineers property (this was improvement of an existing ' roadway) . Total project cost was $411,557.95 with the proposed assessntient of , abutting property owners being estimzted at $18,601.67 (curb & gutter only) . ; � Mr. Bill Deacon, 315 W. Hudgins, Grapevine, gave testimony as a realtor � familiar with the market value of land in the area. Mr. Deacon advised the ; abutting properties had been enhanced. as a result of such road improvements, � ho�vvever, the effect of the increased land value varied. His recca�mendation was then reviewed as follows: 1. For single family residences with front yard abutting subject street ; - assessment of 100� of the curb and gutter cost. i, i 2. For single family residences with side yard abutting subject street - assessment of 50� of the average curb and gutter assessment for houses fronting on the same street. j ,' I ; 3. For single family residences with rear yard abutting subject street - ; r no assessment recammended. � i 4. For commercial, duplex, townhome, apartment, or mobile ho�ne park uses �` � abutting subject street - assessment of 100g of the curb and gutter i cost. i i I 5. For raw land abutting subject street - assessment of 100$ of the curb � and gutter cost. � � Mayor Paw�ers then opened the floor to members of the audience who wished to c�nt. Mr. Ken Dow�ll, 1934 Limerick Lane, questioned the proposed assess- ' � ment on his property, which does not abut Dove Loop Road. There being no other persons who desired to speak concerning the proposed Dove � Loop Road assessment, it was deternuned that the City Council would continue � on to the next public hearing pending verification by the Public Works Depart- � ment of the assessment of Mr. Dowell's property. The public hearing remained 1 open. ' PUBLIC HEARING, PROPOSID STREET ASSESSMENT TTMRF.RT,� D�� ' i The next order of business was for the City Council to conduct a public hearing relative to levying an assessment for the gaving and improvement of Ti.mberline Drive. � i The public hearing was declared open by Mayor Po�rers. � Public Works Director Jim Baddaker advised the proposed assessment on Timberline Drive included both sides fran the west right-of-way line of State Highway 121 northwest to the south right-of-way line of Mustang Drive (this was improvement of an existi.ng roadway) . Total project cost was $1,198,996.63 with the proposed assessment of abutting property awners being estim�ted at � $75,526.60 (curb & gutter only) . Mr. Baddaker continued by rec�nding that four (4) lots in Creekw�od Estates � fronting on Timberli.ne Drive not be assessed, as that curb & gutter was � installed by the developer before the reconstruction project. Mr. Bill Deacon, 315 W. Hudgins, gave testimony as a realtor familiar with the ; market value of land in the area. Mr. Deacon advised the abutting properties � ! (4) � � � � 5 .� O1/07/86 Y :! � 1 had been enhanced as a result of such road improvemPalts, however, the effect � � of the increased land value varied. Mr. Deacon's recc��endation relative to � assessc��ent along Timberline Drive was the same as for the Dove Loop Road � project: � E 1. For single family residences with front yard abutting subject street � - assessment of 100� of the curb and gutter cost. _ _. 2. For single family residences with side yard abutting subject street - �: assessment of 50$ of the average curb and gutter assessment for y houses fronting on the same street. k 3. For single family residences with rear yard abutting subject street - no assess�ent reccx�mended. € � � 4. For commercial, duplex, townhoane, apartment, or irabile home park uses � abutting subject street - assessment of 100� of the curb and gutter r � cost. a � 5. For raw land abutting subject street - assess�ent of 100� of the curb F; and gutter cost. � Follawing these coa�ments, Mr. Deacon gave the oath of truth regarding all of s his preceding testimony. � � � Mayor Paw�ers then invited those mP.mbers of the audience to speak concerning � � the proposed assessment. The following persons offered c�nts: � , � ; � 1. Mr. Tibor Penzes 3. Mr. John Hall � #1 Echo Cove #10 Echo Cove 2. Mr. David Spalding 4. Mrs. Linda Ott � 2706 Ztain Creek Cove 3031 Timberline Drive ; k '� Most of the discussion concerned drainage and clarification of the � rec�ndation relative to the Creekwood Estates lots. It was emphasized that assessnent was for the curb & gutter costs only, and not for the street bed. �: i School district participation in the assess-ment was also discussed. i � The follo�aaing letter was then read by the City Secretary: I t j ��_��_�� ! January 7, 1986 City Council Grapevine, Texas 76051 Dear Ma or and Council Members: Y This letter is in reference to the proposed street assessment along ' Timberline Drive. � Dallas North Properties, Inc. feels that the street assessment is �� unfair and inequitable for the following reasons: y 1. The street is a major thoroughfare and benefits the whole 5 southwest Grapevine neighborhood and not just a few people who have adjacent property on the street. Also, most of the � property owners do not even face T�mberline Drive, but rather # have sideyards on T�mberline Drive. If the City feels a need to recover sa�ne of the funds for street improveznents, the whole neighborhood should be assessed rather than a chosen few. i t � 2. Our specific subdivision, Timbercreek Village, has lots that have � � only a side yard on TimUerline Drive. Granted, the street ` improvement was an improvement for the neighborhood; but if it improved the value of the lots adjacent to the street, it also improved the value of the lots in the rest of the subdivision -- as well as the rest of the neighborhood. � 4 �5 F (5) � ; f � � � � � O1/07/86 � � 3. Further, if the City would have built the street when the bonds were approved and in a timely manner, in all probability, there wr�uld be no need of any assessment at all. Please consider our concerns and the concerns of others who own property along Timberline Drive and do not levy a street assessment. This is not a dead end street or a lead in street for the exclusive use of a single subdivision, but a major roadway enjoyed by all and benefited by all. Therefore if the City feels a levy is absolutely necessary, then the levy should be shared by all. Sincerely, Ron Jackson Dallas North Properties, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ There being no further caYments, a motion to close the public hearing was offered by Council Member Dyer. A second was made by Council Member Brekken, � and the motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: Ayes: Pow�ers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None REPLAT, TRIPLE M ADDITION The next item before the City Council for consideration was the replat of � Lot 1, Block A of the Triple M Addition and take any necessary action. � The Triple M Addition is located on the south side of West Northwest Highway, � west of the Dove Road intersection, and is zoned "HC" Highway C�rcial. The Planning & Zoning C�mission reccemtendation made on DecP�r 17, 1985 was for approval by a vote of 6 to 1. The matter had been tabled at that time by the �:.: City Council. Public Works Director Jim Baddaker review�ecl the previous concerns of the City Council, which included reservations about the "shared" parking concept. He noted that the applicant had sukmitted deed restrictions stating that shared parking among all existing or future lots of the subdivision would not be � restricted by signs or any other means. Following brief Council deli.beration, a motion was made by Council Nlember � Glynn to approve the replat of the Triple M Addition with the deed restric- ! tions as suk�nitted. Mayor Pro Tem Ware offered a second to the motion, which � prevailed by the ensuing vote: � Ayes: Paw�rs, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None � ORDINANCE, AMENDING COMPRF��TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE R-5.0 ZERO L(y!' LINE DISTRICT - ; The next item considered by the City Council was an ordinance amending the Canprehensive Zoning Ordinance relative to "R-5.0" Zero Lot Line District regulations and take any necessary action. � Director of Cce�nanity Develognent H. T. Hardy reviewed the proposed amP�nch�ents � � as rec�nded by the Planning & Zoning Conmission on December 17, 1985. These included 1) certain format changes, 2) deletion of certain references as a "single-family" use (it was felt this implied a low density develognent, and Zero Lot Line is a meditnn density use) , 3) designation under "Purpose" as an intended buffer, 4) amencfinent frcgn 11 feet to 12 feet between structures, and � 5) minimLUn and max�mtun tract sizes of 3 acres and 5 acres respectively. Lengthy Council discussion followed. Topics of concern included the quality of R-5.0 develo�ent in general and the intended use as a buffer. � The caption of the proposed ordinance was presented for the record. ', � A motion was then offered by Council Member Spencer and seconded by Council Ni�mber Glynn to adopt the ordinance as recammended by the Planning & Zoning Cce�mission. The motion failed by the follawing vote: (6) � _--? � � q F � O1/07/86 Ayes: Glynn, Spencer, & Wilb�nks � � Nays: Powers, Ware, Brekken, & Dyer � � Additional deliberation ensued, during which the possibility of eliminating � this zoning district was noted. ` � E A need for certain ame_ndments was recognized, and Council Member Brekken made a motion to approve the ordinance amending R-5.0 District regulations with the � following changes to the Planning & Zoning C�mission rec�ndation: ` k 1. The last sentence under "Purpose" shall read as follavs: "This '� district is intended to be a zero-lot-line dwelli.ng district allowing ` a maximwn density of eight (8) units per acre." � x � 2. Deleti.ng Items D4 and D5 under "Limitation of Uses", these being the minimum and maximum tract sizes. E �: The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the ensuing k vote: ` � Ayes: Paaers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, & Glynn ` Nays: Spencer & Wilbanks � � ' ORDINANCE NO. 86-02 AN ORDINANCE AN�IDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, � j THE CC�IPFZEI�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF Tf� � j CITY OF GF2APEVINE, TEXAS, SAN1E BEING ALSO ! KNOWN AS APPIIVDIX "D" OF THE CODE OF ORDI- NANCFS OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TExA.S, BY PROVIDING FOR ANlENDNID.VTS AND C�iANGES TO DISTRICT REGUI,ATIONS BY AN�lDING SDCTION 16 REL�TIVE � R-5.0 ZERp I�OT LINE DIS- TRICT; PROVIDING A PE[�1AL,TY NOT TO F,XCEED �. THE SUM OF ONE THOUSAND DOT,TARG ; ($1,000.00) FOR EACH OFFE[�TTSE AND A SF.PA- � RATE OFFEL�IISE SHALL BE DEF�7ED CON7MITI�D � UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHIQi A VIO- z LATION OCCURS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY � CLAUSE; D�CI�,RING AN II�RGENCY AND PRO- � VIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE PUBLIC HEARING, CONTINUATION, PROPOSID STREET ASSFSSMENT DOVE I�OOP ROAD The next item of business was for the City Council to continue the public � hearing relative to levying an assessment for the paving and improvement of Dove Loop Road, which was recessed pending receipt of information frcan the �'i' Public Works Department. � � Mr. Baddaker reported that Mr. Kenneth Dowell was notified in error and that � the proposed assessment does not apply to his property but to property owned � � by Mr. Billy J. NlcGuire, 1335 La�a Vista. Staff recommended continuing the i public hearing until February 4, 1986 to allaw for the additional property � owner notification. Council Member Spencer offered a motion that the public hearing be continued on February 4, 1986. Council M�nber Wilbanks seconded the motion, which ,�, prevailed by the ensuing vote: �" I Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None +' � ORDINANCE, I�'VYING ASSF5SN�1T, BUTI'ERFIII�D DRIVE i The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance g i levying an assessment for the paving and improvement of Butterfield Drive. ? z � Since the public hearing relative to this matter had been held earlier in the a meeting, the caption of the proposed ordinance levying an assessment for the k improvement of Butterfield Drive was now read by the City Secretary. k ¢ � � ; � :i (7) � � � � O1/07/86 A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council N�ember Dyer to adopt the ordinance levying the assessment for Butterfield Drive as � rec�nded by the City Staff. The mption prevailed by the ensuing vote: � Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks j Nays: None � ORDIl�IANCE N0. 86-03 AN ORDINANCE L�,'VYING ASSESSMENTS FOR PART OF THE COST OF IMPROVING PORTIONS OF A CERZ'AIlV STRE�T IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S, TO WIT: BUTTERFIELD STREEr FRQM THE NOR`I�i RiGHT-OF-4�,Y LINE OF WILD6�1l�OD r.�� NOR'I'�I 585 FEET; FINDING THAT NOTICE � OF TI� PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEF�T MAILID AND � PUBLISHED AS REQUIRID BY LAW; FIXING CHARGFS AND LIENS AGAINST THE RF�L AND � TRUE OWNERS TfiERDOF; PR(7VIDING FOR COIr � I,DCTI�1 OF SUQ3 ASSESSN�]TS; AND PROVIDING LVf�1 THIS ORDINANCE SHAr�, TAI� EFFECT ORDINANCE, LEVYING ASSESSMELVT, DOVE 7AOP RQAD The ne� order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance � levying an assessment for the paving and improvement of Dove Loop Road. � The public hearing on this matter had been continued until February 4, 1986 � and, therefore, no Council action was taken. � ORDINANCE, L�'VYING ASSFSSNIENT, TTMRF'.RT,INE DRIVE � The next it�n before the City Council for consideration was an ordinance levying an assessment for the paving and improvement of T�mberline Drive. � ` � Since the public hearing relative to this matter had been held earlier in the a meeting, the caption of the proposed ordinance levying an assessment for the � improvement of Timberline Drive was naw read by the City Secretary. , I The City Council then discussed the proposed assessment in �ight of the � test�ny given by Mr. Bill Deacon relative to variable property enhancement. � City Staff was directed to approach the Grapevine-Colleyville School District ; Board of Trustees to solicit their participation in the assessment for schools I, abutting Timberline Drive. i ; i Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a m�tion to adopt the ordinance levying the assessment for the improvement of Timberline Drive as follows: � 1. For Lot 1-Block 1, Lot 2-Block 1, Lot 1-Block 3, and Lot 2-Block 3 of � Creekw�ood Estates - no assessment. ! 2. For single family residences with front yard abutting subject street - 100� assessment. i 3. For single family residences with side yard abutting subject street - � 50� assessnent of the average assessment for houses fronting on the � same street. , ; , �. � 4. For single family residences with rear yard abutting subject street - no assessment. 5. For co�ercial, duplex, townhame, or apartment uses abutting subject ; street - 100$ assessment. I � 6. For raw land abutting subject street - 100� assessment. � f The motion was seconded by Council Member Dyer and prevailed by the ensuing � vote: � i Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks Nays: None �g) � � � i: � � O1/07/86 ; ., ORDINANCE N0. 86-04 ¢ AN ORDINANCE Lh'VYING ASSESSMEN'I'S FOR PART � � OF THE COST OF IMPRUVING PORTIONS OF A � CF�RTAIN STRF�ET IN Z'I� CITY OF GRAPEVIlVE, � � TEXAS, Zl� WIT: TIMBERLINE DRIVE FROM THE WEST RIGfiT-0E-4�,Y LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY � 121 (WILLIAM D. TATE AVENLTE) NO1�I'EiWE.ST TO � TI� SOUZ�3 RIC�iT-OF-4�,Y LINE OF MUSTANG � DRIVE; FINDING THAT NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC � HF.ARTNG HAS BEIIQ MAILID Al�ID PUBLISI-iID AS k: REQUIRID BY LAW; FIXING Q3ARGES AND LIENS � AGAINST TI� RF.AL AND TRLTE OWNERS THEREOF; � PRUVIDING FOR COLL�C.'I'ION OF SUC�i ASSESSN�I'S; AND PROVIDING WHELV THIS ' ORDINANCE SHAT� TAI� EFFEC,�' � BID A�,RD, LARGE DIAM�!'ER HOSE, FIRE DEPAR`ii��NT � Y The next order of business was for the City Council to consider award of the � bid for the purchase of a 5-inch hose for the Fire Depar�t�nent. 7 Fire Chief Bill Paw�ers review�ec7 the bid tabulation for the purchase of a large � diameter hose. Chief Paw�ers recamlended award of the bid to Casco Industries : I for their low bid amount of $22,528.00. � , � There being little discussion, a mr�tion to accept the Staff recoam�endation and � i award the bid for the purchase of a large diameter hose to Casco Industries in the amount of $22,528.00 was made by Council Member Spencer. Council Member Glynn seconded the motion, which prevailed by the ensuing vote: ; Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Na s: None � Y ;` I RE.SOLUTION, BID AWARD, DEFIBRILL�ATOR/CARDIOSCOPE/R�C.'ORDERS, FIRE DEPAR'IMENT The next ite�n before the City Council was to consider a resolution awarding the bid to other than the low bidder for the purchase of an electrocardic ; monitor/defibrillator for the Fire Department. Fire Chief Bill Powers and Deputy Fire Chief Don Wilson reviewed the bids �� received for the purchase of 3 portable, battery-operated defibrillator/ z cardioscope/recorders for use in conjunction with the paramedic program. Bids were as follows: 1. Dixie, USA (Medical Research Laboratories, Inc.) - $15,692.52 (Did not meet bid specifications) 2. A,ero Products (Survival Technology) - $16,800.00 � � � 3. First Responder Medical (Birtcher) - $20,520.00 i 4. Physio-Control Corporation - $21,105.00 3, � 5. Cardiac Resuscitator Corporation - $26,044.50 Followin a thorou h examination of the roducts and the bids received it was 9 g P . ff a the bid be awarded to Ph sio- reca�mendation of the Cit Sta th t the � Y Y Control Corporation. Factors taken into consideration were design � characteristics, structural designs, pawer source, weight, and service � availability. � r Questions and c�nts fran the City Council ensued, after which the City � Secretary presented the caption of the proposed resolution. ` � Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion that the resolution be adopted and the � bid be awarded to Physio-Control Corporation in the amount of $21,105.00. Council Me.mber Brekken seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following � vote: Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks F� Nays: None � � � (9) � x � � O1/07/86 RF50LUTION NO. 86-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S PROVIDING THAT BIDS WERE PROPERLY TAKIIV ADID REVTEWID FOR ; TFIF PURCHASE OF Z�iREE (3) PORTABLE, ' BATrERY-0PERATED DEFIBRILL�A'POR/C.ARDIO- � SCOPE/R�CORDERS; PROVIDING THAT � BID BE € ° A4�1F2DID TO A FIRM dI�R THAN THE I�OW � BIDDER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE ORDIlJANCE, LONE STAR GAS FRANCHISE REL�1EIn�,L, FIRST RE,ADING The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a request from � Lone Star Gas Cc�npany relative to franchise renewal and subsequent ordinance � on first reading, if applicable. ' � $ City Manager Jim Hancock advised the 25-year franchise agreement with Lone � Star Gas Ccunpany was to expire March 7, 1986. A renewal for 20 years was requested by the company with franchise fees remaining at 1�� for sales at the airport and 3$ for sales in the remainder of the City. Mr. Vernie Henderson, District Manager for Lone Star Gas Company, briefly � reviewed the request for renewal and noted the association his ccYnpany has had in serving the City si.nce 1929. City Staff recammended a section be included in the ordinance concerning , relocation of gas lines within right-of way on City construction projects, and i this was the main point of the ensuing discussion. Payment of the franchise � fee on a semi-annual or quarterly basis was also noted. � The caption of the proposed ordinance was then read by the City Secretary. A motion was offered by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and seconded by Council Nl�nber Glynn to approve the ordinance on first reading with the follawing changes to I be negotiated and included prior to second reading: (1) A section dealing j with prcanpt relocation of utility lines on City construction projects and (2) � quarterly or se�ni-annual franchise fee payment. The Council Utility Catmiittee � was to be consulted, if necessary. The motion prevailed by the ensuing vote: � I Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None j � ORDINANCE NO. 86-05 � AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO IANE STAR GAS CON�ANY, A DIVISION OF EEI�TTSERCH CORPC� RATION, A CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND � ASSIC�IS, A FRANCHISE TO FURNISH AND SUPPLY GAS 'PO TI� GII�TII�L PUBLIC IN Tf� CITY OF i GFt1�PEVINE� TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS� FOR 'I�IE TF2ANSPORTING, DELIVERY, SALE, AND DISTRI- ; BUTION OF GAS Il�T, OUT OF, AND THROUGH SAID i MUNICIPALITY FOR ALL PLh2POSES; PROVIDING I FOR Tf� PAYMENT OF A FEE OR C�iARGE FOR THE USE OF � STREE��S, ALJ�E.'YS, AND PUBLIC 4�3YS; AND PR0�7IDIlVG THAT IT SHAI.L BE IN LIEU OF OTHER FEFS AI�ID CHARC�S, EXCEPTING AD VAL,ORII�i TAXES; AND REPEALING ALL PRE- � VIOUS GAS FRANCHISE ORDINANC�S � e DISCUSSION, CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURES i The next order of business was for the City Council to discuss change order � procedures and take any necessary action. � � Public Works Director Jim Baddaker reviewed present policy concerning contract � change orders as follows: � , 1. Deductive change orders reducing contract amounts are approved at the ' Staff level and are not suhmitted to the Council for approval. j I (10) � � � � � ; O1/07/86 � � � t 2. Change orders for minor time extensions are approved at the Staff � level. Major t�me extensions (more than 10 to 15 days) are sulsnitted to the Council for approval. � 3. Change orders increasing contract amounts up to $5,000 are approved € by Staff, if funds are available. Change orders increasing contract z amounts over $5,000 are su�mitted to the Council for approval. � � � Mr. Baddaker solicited Council discussion relative to any policy changes � 'ti desired. Topics of discussion included time extensions, weather logs, and � Staff authorization for approval of small items. � � � r ! Although no formal action was taken by the City Council, the general concensus � � was that the change order policy should remain as presen�ed by Mr. Baddaker. � � . s ARCFiI2'�CI' FOR CIVIC C�LVTER/AUDITORILA�I FACILITY � FACILITIES CC�M'LTTI'E� RDCC�Il�ID.VDATION � � � � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the � recammendation of the Facilities Ca�mittee relative to the architect for the € civic center/auditoriwn facility and take any necessary action. � � Council Member Dyer, Chairn�n of the Facilities Canmittee, advised the � Canmittee rec�nded the Council authorize negotiations with Hatfield/ � Halcomb architects for a contract agreement under which Hatfield/Halcomb w�uld � be allovaed to go forward with the civic center/auditorium project, which had � been under review since Spring of 1985. The contract would included certain ; jab stipulations and fees and, if negotiated, would be presented to the City � Council for approval. � � Following brief Council deli,beration, Council Member Wilbanks made a motion to � accept the rec�ndation of the Facilities Cc�mittee to negotiate a contract ; agreement for retention of Hatfield/Halcanb architects relative to the civic center/auditorium project. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and �� prevailed by the ensuing vote: � � Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None � � CONSIDER LIMITATION OF Tf� MAYOR'S TIIWRE AND SUBSD��LTENT Q�ARTER AN�VT EL�(.TION 2 4 3, The next order of business was for the City Council to consider limiting the Mayor's office to a maximum of tw� terms and take any necessary action. : Mayor Powers advised this item had been placed on the agenda at his request. � � ' f ld r ire an L�m�.t�.ng the Mayor s office to a maxun�n o twc� ternis wou equ � amenc�uent to the City Charter by a vote of the people. The possibility of including this matter on the April, 1986 City Officers Election ballot was discussed, as well as other needed changes in the Charter. � i It was generally concurred by the City Council that there was no imnediate t need for consideration of the proposed Charter amenc�nents. The matter was � referred to the City Secretary for study to deternnine necessary changes to the � City Charter for Council review by the end of August, 1986. � '1 k No formal action was taken by the City Counci . � � � F�7(.'UTIVE SESSION ' } Mayor Pa�rs then announced that the City Council would recess to the � Conference Roan to discuss personnel pursuant to Article 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S, Subsection (g) . ` All members of the City Council were present upon reconvening in the Council � . Chambers. City Manager Jim Hancock advised no action was necessary as a � result of the closed session. � � . � � � � ;� cll� � � g 7 �3 R � O1/07/86 k � € � MISCQ�L�INDOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION � � During miscellaneous discussion, the City Staff was directed to notify zoning � applicants that the new policy of the City Council would be to limit zoninq case presentations to a maxim�un of twenty (20) minutes. � 1 AD�70URDIl�IT j � The deliberations of the City Council having been concluded, a motion to � adjourn the meeting was offered by Mayor Pro Tem Ware. The motion was �' seconded by Council Meqnber Dyer and prevailed by the following vote: � Ayes: Powers, Ware, Brekken, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, & Wilbanks � Nays: None , PASSID AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on � this the 21st day of January , 1986. � � � APPROVED: ? ii ! �� . � � � �, .n ✓. �t./�./�" j.' .. � Mayor i i � ATI�.ST: i i i � I City Secretary � �- i i I � � � � i 1 f � , � � s � k � � ft I � i� P � � � t � (��`/