HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 03 - PD20-01 Pecan Ridge AdditionTO:
FROM:
MEETING DATE
SUBJECT
F
I I
ti
--� Grapevine
Lake
��e R
I a.
I •I a
Northwest
HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER
SCOTT WILLIAMS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
JULY 21, 2020
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICAL REPORT OF PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD20-01. 1708 DUNN STREET
I
I
I
I.H. I
r' I
a I
I sy oFw � I
Hall -Johnson �s Airport
� a I
I T____.m o I
L _1
Glade Rd.
H _
APPLICANT: Ronny Nordling
PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE:
The subject property is located at 1708 Dunn Street
and proposed to be platted as Los 1-8, Block A,
Pecan Ridge Addition. The addition contains 2.0185
acres and has approximately 247 feet of frontage
along Dunn Street.
REQUESTED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting a planned development overlay on the subject property to
deviate from a reduction in front yard setback, reduction in right-of-way width and reduced
lot depth for one lot in the proposed subdivision.
It is the applicant's intent to develop an eight -lot single family detached subdivision on a
two -acre tract of land currently accessed from and with frontage upon Dunn Street. If
approved, the proposed eight lots will have frontage upon a newly developed street/cul-de-
sac (tentatively named Carter Court) approximately 317 feet in length. This proposed
subdivision has a density of 3.96 dwelling units per acre—the "R-7.5" Single Family District
allows for a maximum of four dwelling units per acre. The average lot size is 8,967 s.f. and
the largest proposed lot is 10,878 s.f. in size and the smallest is 7,872 s.f. The "R-7.5"
Single Family District establishes a minimum of 7,500 s.f. for the size of a lot.
0:\ZCO\PD20-01.4 1 July 15, 2020 (1:37PM)
Given the configuration of the subject property, the applicant is requesting the following
items to be considered through the planned development overlay process:
• Reduction in right-of-way from fifty feet to forty feet. The property has a maximum
width of 248 feet which cannot support the development of a street with fifty feet of
right-of-way and single family lots developed on each side of the street that are a
minimum of 100 feet in depth. As has been done on a number of occasions in this
type of scenario, the right-of-way is proposed to be reduced to forty feet in width,
and a pedestrian access, drainage and utility easement, five feet in depth is placed
on each lot in the subdivision. The paved portion of the street still remains at 31
feet (back of curb) and there will be four and one half feet of right-of-way remaining
along with the five feet of easement to contain a sidewalk, water, sewer, drainage
and any franchise utilities that are necessary.
• Reduction in front yard setback from thirty feet to 25 -feet. The applicant proposes
to reduce the front yard setback by five feet primarily to provide greater separation
from the existing residential development to the south of the proposed development
and the new homes to the south of the new street. To maintain consistency in the
development the applicant proposes the reduction of five feet throughout the
subdivision. To provide greater separation from the new development and
established residential development the applicant proposes to increase the rear
yard setback from 25 -feet to thirty feet.
• Reduction in lot width. The proposed Lot 6 in the subdivision cannot meet the
minimum lot depth of 100 feet. Due to a previous small subdivision of the property
in the past this lot has a mean depth of 95.4 feet. This is the only lot in the
subdivision that needs the planned development overlay consideration for lot depth.
PRESENT ZONING AND USE:
The property is currently zoned "R-7.5" Single Family District and is undeveloped.
HISTORY OF TRACT AND SURROUNDING AREA:
The subject and surrounding properties to the north, south, east and west were rezoned
from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District to "R-7.5" Single Family District during the 1984
City rezoning.
SURROUNDING ZONING AND EXISTING LAND USE:
NORTH: "R-7.5" Single Family District—single family residences
SOUTH: "R-7.5" Single Family District—single family residences
0:\ZCO\PD20-01.4 2 July 15, 2020 (1:37PM)
EAST: "R-7.5" Single Family District—single family residences
WEST: "R-7.5" Single Family District—single family residences
AIRPORT IMPACT:
The subject tract is located within "Zone A" zone of minimal effect as defined on the
"Aircraft Sound Exposure: Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport Environs" map. Few
activities will be affected by aircraft sounds in Zone A, except for sound sensitive activities
such as auditoriums, churches, schools, hospitals, and theaters. The applicant's proposal
is an appropriate use in this noise zone.
MASTER PLAN APPLICATION:
The Master Plan designates the subject property as a Residential Low Intensity land use.
The applicant's proposal is in compliance with the Master Plan.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN APPLICATION:
Dunn Street is not a designated thoroughfare as shown on the City of Grapevine's
Thoroughfare Plan.
rs
0:\ZCO\PD20-01.4 3 July 15, 2020 (1:37PM)
3 16 11 23
1
30 45 49 64
GG 4 15 10
TR 1B3�i �f 22
1.3 AC 1
1 5 14 9 31
44 50 63
1 6 13 8 21
E
,GV 1004
0 32 43 51 62
TR 1B1A P g9►, 7 12 7
1.8 AC 31g o 20
v
2 8 11 ~ 6
33 42 52 61
1 9 10 5 19
TR 1B1CPARK c 4 34 41 �g 60
.74 AC v\VO 18 o'
GP'R�16 1 2 3 O r
3
6 40*S8 54 59
PQQ 35
5 1 1 4 r:ti:............
::i;4?1;A:: i Rr:
VICTOR AN .. "�" .
POIN 16 36 39 55 58
1R ADD 2
15 37 38 56 57
TR 1B2 11AR 11BR 12G F►v�13 14
1.65A .f1�` �C n r t►T
G10
..� -
5
4
3
2
1
9
7R
1 6
Gra evine -
333
25
32
34
4
14
TR 3A2
17
H
F
F
1.65 AC
22
26
31
35
40
13
Al39
18
21
27
30
36
12
d 19
20
28
29
37
38
11
0
-
.5
`
Ffl hvlrw
10
9
1 �2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Feet
0 100 200 300 400
PD20-01
. I % ,{ a
W�E
4 a
1708 Dunn Street
Date Prepared: 7/7/2020
This data has been compiled by the City of Grapevine IT/GIS department. Various official and unofficial sources were
used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no guarantee is
given or implied as to the accuracy of said data.
NDCoh)olv I
O*XZCU\l Formslapp.pd.doc
2/94/201' JUN 01 2020
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
APPLICATION
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name applicantlagent/com any/contact
Z
-
Street addre of applicant/ Qaag %
LIZ/
City/State/Zip Code of applicant/agent.
Telephon,6 n TIberof applidantlagent
Fax number of applicant/ agent
Email address of applicant/ agent
Mobile phone number of applicant/ agent
�•
L7 7 U6—
is interest in sub' ro y:
PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION
Street address of subject property
170F 7n ST L?•''4/4
A
e /X
Legal description of subject property {metes & bounds must b 6 described on 8 ?/2" x 19" sheet)
Lot Block Addition
Sire of subject property
2,fl9.2 Acres
�]
/ Scare
Present zoning classification I Proposed uuse of the property.
cJ—
minimum / maximum district size for request
Zoning ordinance provision requesting deviation from:
Sec %5 "r 7a
PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name of current properly owner
f76' vb
Z-Gc
Street address of property owner
N,9,411C
!</,
2 .2
City/ State /Zip Code of property owner.
Telephone num7ber of property owner.
Fax number of property owner.•
I W
O*XZCU\l Formslapp.pd.doc
2/94/201' JUN 01 2020
p pako - D I
❑ Submit a letter describing the proposed Planned Development and note the request on the site plan document.
❑ Describe any special requirements or conditions that require deviation of the zoning district regulations.
4 Describe whether the proposed overlay will, or will not cause substantial harm to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in
the neighborhood.
❑ Describe how the proposed planned development will add to the value, use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood.
❑ The site plan submission shall meet therequirements of Section 47, Site Plan Requirements.
❑ All planned development overlay applications are assumed to be complete when tried and will be placed on the agenda for public
hearing at the discretltin of the staff. Based on the size of the agenda, your application maybe scheduled to a later date.
❑ All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry. Public hearings may be continued to
the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be tabled.
❑ Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned development overlay can only be approved by
city council through the public hearing process.
❑ I have read and understand all the requirements as set forth by the pAplication for planned development overlay and acknowledge
that all requirements of this application have been met at the time of submittal.
PART AL SIGNATURE TO AUTHORIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST AND PLACE A PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REQUEST SIGN ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
The State
County Of ii
Before Me �3.� I1�.Y s[ f� - - on this day personally appeared �ri L. fjOv C It I1_Q.
(notary) (applicant)
known to me (or pawed to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instnrment and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
(Seal) Given _ day of . A.D.
ASHLEY HERRON
•= My Notary ID # 126194848
Expires Apri130
F , 2022
N&gry In And For S f Texas
Print PropertyF0—w;nWahhkrnperty Owners
The StateOf�."
county Of �rf 6O,0,t
Before Me m .. IT �G � q _ on this day personally appeared 4ae—- — C
(nay) J (property owner)
known to me (or proved to me on the oath of card or other document) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
(Seal) Given under my hand and seat of office this day of A.D.
�.. fary 1 And For Stafe Uf Texas
O.1ZCU19 FoirnslaW.pd.doc
211412017 E� 1 Us U r F
�; JUN 012020 E
P A�o 0
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 1
All Planned Development Overlay Applications are assumed to be complete when filed and
will be placed on the agenda for public hearing at the discretion of the staff. Based on the size
of the agenda, your application may be scheduled to a later date.
All public hearings will be opened and testimony given by applicants and interested citizenry.
Public hearings may be continued to the next public hearing. Public hearings will not be
tabled.
Any changes to a site plan (no matter how minor or major) approved with a planned
development overlay can only be approved by city council through the public hearing
process.
Any application for a change in zoning or for an amendment to the zoning ordinance shall
have, from the date of submittal, a period of four months to request and be scheduled on an
agenda before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. If after said period of
four months an application has not been scheduled before the Commission and Council said
application shall be considered withdrawn, with forfeiture of all riling fees. The application,
along with 'the required -filing fee may be resubmitted any time thereafter for reconsideration.
Delays in scheduling applications before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City
Council created by city staff shall not be considered a part of the four month period.
1 have read and understand all of the requirements as set forth by the application for planned
development overlay and acknowledge that all requirements of this application have been met
at the time of submittal.
Signature of Applicant
Date. a ZO
rl
%K Signature of Owner
Date.
0:1ZCU11 Farmslapp.pd.dcc
2/14/2017
JUN 01 2020
3 �
1fi i4 i�'o:8t * 5�-�qe t-.�yrdlPwt y�
.t ,, '�R•.t'f
4
pbao- o I
Case Name: SWC Building, LP Pecan Ridge Project
Case Address: 1708 Dunn St Grapevine, Texas 76051
Current/Proposed Legal Description: Tract 1 and 2 of the Samuel Freeman Survey Abst. No. 526 approx. 2.05
acres/ Lots 1-8 Block A Pecan Ridge
Section
Regulation
Proposed Deviation
Explanation
Provide relief from
proximity of adjacent
Section 15 G.1.
Depth of front yard, feet -30
Depth of front yard, feet -25
property buildings
Intrusion of adjacent
property causes irregular
Section 15 G.S.
Depth of lot 100 ft
Lot 6 avg depth 94 ft
back depth on Lot 6
Intrusion of adjacent
Standard Public
property and deviaiton
Works Construction
31 ft street BC to BC and 5 ft
still meets construction
Details
40 ft ROW
PD UE on each side
standards
Intrusion of adjacent
Standard Public
property and deviaiton
Works Construction
40 ft turning radius with 5 ft
still meets construction
Details
50 ft cul-de-sac
PD UE each side
standards
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-033
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ISSUING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY PD20-01 TO DEVIATE FROM FRONT YARD
SETBACK, REDUCTION IN RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH, AND
REDUCED LOT DEPTH REQUIREMENTS IN THE "R-7.5"
SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF
ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS,
RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING
ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS
AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF
THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PERMIT;
PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF
TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a planned
development overlay by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning
ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and
prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of
the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and
prerequisites having been complied with; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing
called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as
to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied:
safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area
immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control;
protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements,
and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established
character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to
traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic
reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the
immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this
ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking
and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking
areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on
light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of
population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing
called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, did consider the following
factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development
overlay should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire
hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same,
the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and
air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of
population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been
satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among otherthings the character of
the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view
to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land
throughout this City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is
a public necessity for the granting of this planned development overlay, that the public
demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning
changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property
with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was
made -land
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the
planned development overlay lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety
from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue
concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water,
sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that
there is a necessity and need for this planned development overlay and has also found
and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding
and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was
originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this planned development
overlay for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best
interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps
promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community.
2
Ordinance No. 2020-033
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS:
Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a planned development overlay in
accordance with Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73, the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix "D" of the
City Code, by granting Planned Development Overlay No. PD20-01 to deviate from front
yard setback, right-of-way width, and lot depth in the "R-7.5" Single Family District within
the following described property: Lots 1-8, Block A, Pecan Ridge Addition (1708 Dunn
Street) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance
No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions,
restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following:
None.
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map
of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein conditional use permit.
Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein
above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of
Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City
of Grapevine, Texas.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have
been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting
health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been
designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated
to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safely from
fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent
overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate
provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business,
commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with
reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its
peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of
buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City
of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said
ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in
direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be
severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of
land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity
of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein.
3
Ordinance No. 2020-033
Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to
exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed
committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues.
Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of
Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace
and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an
emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety
and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective
from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 21st day of July, 2020.
ATTEST:
Tara Brooks
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
0
Ordinance No. 2020-033
APPROVED:
William D. Tate
Mayor
86.00
tlV.00'
30' Budding Lne
30' Budding 1ne
30' Buddng Lme
30 Buddng Lme
j
V
J1
O $
$
t0
® Driveway N
�
a
N
�
�BuAdrn9 Una
One
25'Budding Line
25'Budding b-
4'Walk Way "25.38,
Dnvew��_25',Budd,,k3
alk
4' Walk Way Dnve�'4' waY
4' Walk Way Driveway
78 72'
38. 13'
Carter Court
40' R.O.W.
90.13' 83, 97' 98
4'Walk Way Dnveway Dnveway 4' Walk Way Dnveway
25' Bwldmg Lne 25' Bu,ld�ng Ltne
� � O
6
U V
� N O
a _
o
3d Building Lne 30' Buddng Line
30' Buddng I--
4' Walk Way
25' Budding Line �25 38
D eway
4' Walk Way
`e5Burld
8
0
I -
0 O v
— 3
a �
VI
30' Buddng t,ne
Lot Schedule
Lot
Let 5 pt.
g'
Lot
Wdth
Lot
Depth
Max Building
Lot Coverage
Max Impervious
Lot Coverage
1
8594
85.86
100
31.0%
38.0%
2
WOO
80
100
29.9%
40.4%
3
7872
78.72
100
32.7%
39.9%
4
10578
1 t 6.94
100 AVG
27.8%
43.4%
5
8859
90.31
120
08 AVG
29.4%
41.4%
6
9435
98.74
107.81
94 AVG
27.7%
34.6%
7
5436
83,97
107.38
00 AVG
32 2%
39.D%
8
9662
90
107.15
28.4%
35.2%
r
F....I
ii%►i:.Hiusiiivr+
87384
Planned development overlay PD20-01 is a request to deviate from but not be limited to reduction in front yard setback, reduction in right-of-way width/radius and lot depth.
From elevation A *-&L FACAnF T Ct XICK, POCK ANn MA50NPY 512%,
d
Y4Et 11 i
....87384......
10, to
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMBER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDITON
MAYOR
DATE:
SECRETARY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SHEET: OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
from, ��ovation P '*&1 FACAP7 TO 6� PQCK, POCK ANP MA50NPY 5112IN6,
7r.
•., al
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMBER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDrrON
MAYOR SECRETARY
DATE:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMNIISSION
SHEET: OF:
``����►�`''`'(1' APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
From �levatiorn C *Al FACADE rt0 P� 130CK, POCK ANP MA50NPY 51PIN6.
7 -*
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMBER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDITON
MAYOR
DATE:
SECRETARY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN
DATE:
SHEET: OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
From �l ovabon P *ALL FACAP? TO �PICK, POCK ANP MA50NPY 51[21%,
�p-
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMBER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDITON
MAYOR SECRETARY
DATE:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN
DATE:
SHEET: OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
Front evation TALI. FACAnf TO P� DPZICK, POCK ANn MA50NPY 51PING.
zm
p_ L
VV
...........Ill.....................,
KEITH HAM56 i
...............................
IL 8I 384
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMBER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDITON
MAYOR
DATE:
SECRETARY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DATE:
SHEET: OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
From Novation F �*--AL� FACAP� TO Cf 130CK, POCK ANP MA50NPY 51LAN6,
K'IT*H* �A. HRi ILT{?►'d
............................87384
...
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMBER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDITON
MAYOR
DATE:
SECRETARY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN
DATE:
SHEET: OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
Front elevation G *A,I FACVI TO �P09, FM ANP MA50NPY 51PIN6,
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMBER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDITON
MAYOR
DATE:
SECRETARY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SHEET: OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
Front �levation H *ALA FACA12� fO �f C3PICK, POCK M2 W60WY 51121%.
K E I NAM-1LT'OW
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMBER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDITON
MAYOR
DATE:
SECRETARY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DATE:
SHEET: OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
FrA Novation I *AL FACPV� fO �t IXIGK, POCK MP MA50NPY 51PINCA,
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMMER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDITON
TURISTWO-1
DATE:
SHEET: OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Front �levabion J TALI. FACAP� fO �� X19, POCK ANP MA50WY 5 %.
,j
L......................... 4t
KEITH M. HAM -7*4
1& 87384 -A,
x_
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMBER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDITON
MAYOR
DATE:
SECRETARY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DATE:
SHEET: OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
Prod, Nevation K *-AL FACAPE fO CIF INICK, BOCK ANn MA50NPY 512%.
............. ....
KEITH M. HAMILTON
87384
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMBER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDITON
SECRETARY
F _-a
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DATE:
SHEET: OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
Front �levation L *AL FACA5T TO 13� 130CK, POCK ANP MA5MY 51PING,
R_
I` "
CASE NAME: PECAN RIDGE
CASE NUMBER: PD20-01
LOCATION: 1708 DUNN ST.; LOTS 1-8
BLOCK 1, PECAN RIDGE ADDITON
MAYOR
DATE:
SECRETARY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DATE:
SHEET: OF:
APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY
WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR
OR ORDINANCES.
MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL,
AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
FROM: BRUNO RUMBELOW, CITY MANAGER
MEETING DATE: JULY 21, 2020
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
LOTS 1-8, BLOCK A, PECAN RIDGE ADDITION
PLAT APPLICATION FILING DATE.............................................................July 14, 2020
APPLICANT............................................................................................. Ronny Nordling
REASON FOR APPLICATION ........ Platting property to build eight (8) residential homes
PROPERTY LOCATION....................................................................... 1708 Dunn Street
ACREAGE.............................................................................................................. 2.0185
ZONING................................................................................................................... R-7.5
NUMBEROF LOTS....................................................................................................... 8
PREVIOUS PLATTING.................................................................................................No
CONCEPT PLAN................................................................................................ PD20-01
SITEPLAN.................................................................................................................... No
OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT.................................................................................. Yes
AVIGATION RELEASE............................................................................................... Yes
PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED....................................................................................No
C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 30223_1025440\Agenda Memo 30223.doc
PLAT INFORMATION SHEET
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
LOTS 1-8, BLOCK A, PECAN RIDGE ADDITION
r,FNFRAI
• The applicant, Ronny Nordling, SWC Building, LP is preliminary platting 2.01
acres into eight (8) residential lots. The property is located at 1708 Dunn Street.
STREET SYSTEM:
• The development has access to Dunn Street.
• ALL abutting roads: ❑ are on the City Thoroughfare Plan:
® are not on the City Thoroughfare Plan:
❑ Periphery Street Fees are due as follows:
Type of Roadway
Cost / LF Length Cost
❑ Major Arterial (A)
$ 234.57 / LF
❑ Major Arterial (B)
$ 178.35 / LF
❑ Minor Arterial (C)
$ 203.06 / LF
❑ Minor Arterial (D)
$ 170.33 / LF
❑ Collector (E)
$ 170.33 / LF
❑ Collector (F)
$ 150.98 / LF
❑ Sidewalk
$ 25.00 / LF
❑ Curb & Gutter
$ 15.00 / LF
® Periphery Street Fees are not due: Developer will construct curb and gutter
plus sidewalk for the Dunn Street frontage adjacent to Pecan Ridge Addition
Development per City Code.
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM:
• The site currently drains predominately west into Dunn Street.
• The developer will be required to design for onsite as well as offsite drainage in
accordance with the requirements of the City of Grapevine's Code of
Ordinances.
C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 30223_1025440\Agenda Memo 30223.doc
IV. WATER SYSTEM:
❑ The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is adequate to
serve the development.
® The existing water supply system bordering the subject site is not adequate
to serve the development. Additional off site water system improvements will
be necessary to loop water service to serve the site.
V. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM:
® The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is
adequate to serve the development.
❑ The existing sanitary sewer collection system bordering the subject site is
not adequate to serve the development.
VI. MISCELLANEOUS:
❑ Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are not required for:
® Water and Wastewater Impact Fees are due prior to the issuance of building
permits for: Lots 1-8, Block A, Pecan Ridge Addition
® Single Family Residential ( $ 2,414/ Lot)
❑
Multifamily
( $ 1,134/ Unit)
❑
Hotel
( $ 43,632/ Acre)
❑
Corporate Office
( $ 20,523/ Acre)
❑
Government
( $ 4,414/ Acre)
❑
Commercial / Industrial
( $ 5,739/ Acre)
❑ Open Space Fees are not required for:
® Open Space Fees are due prior to the preconstruction meeting for public
infrastructure improvements for: Lots 1-8, Block A, Pecan Ridge Addition
❑ R-5.0, R-TH, Zero Lot District ( $ 1,416.00 / Lot)
® R-7.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,146.00 / Lot)
❑ R-12.5, Single Family District ( $ 1,071.00 / Lot)
❑ R-20.0, Single Family District ( $ 807.00 / Lot)
C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 30223_1025440\Agenda Memo 30223.doc
❑ Public Hearing Only
❑ Variances were required on the following items:
❑ Front building line
❑ Allowing a setback of 3 feet for the rear property line for an accessory
building
❑ Lot width & depth
❑ Max. Impervious Area
❑ Landscaping Regulations, allowing no landscape buffer between the
edge of the parking area and the adjacent property line.
® The following items associated with this plat are not in accordance with the
current subdivision standards:
® 50' ROW dedication not met: Developer is proposing to dedicate
variable width private access easements throughout the development.
The access easements will be owned and maintained by a Home
Owners Association (HOA).
❑ Length of cul-de-sac street exceeds the 600 -foot limit:
❑ Driveway Spacing not met.
VII. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS:
A. The City has determined that the right-of-way and easements required to be
dedicated for streets, utilities, drainage, access, sidewalks and other
municipal needs and services are consistent with the City's ordinances and
master plan, are reasonable and are connected to the proposed project in
the following manner:
❑ The right-of-way provides for future widening of public streets that will
serve the development of this site.
® The onsite utility easements provide for a utility network to serve the
development of this site.
® The onsite drainage easements provide for a drainage network to
serve the development of this site.
C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 30223_1025440\Agenda Memo 30223.doc
® The onsite access easements provide cross access capabilities to
this site and surrounding property.
❑ The onsite sidewalk easements provide for a sidewalk network to
serve the development of this site.
B. The City further finds that the required dedication is related both in nature
and extent to the impact of the proposed development as follows:
❑ The right-of-way is necessary to provide for future widening of public
streets that will serve the development of this site.
® The onsite utility easements are necessary to provide for a utility
system to serve this development and connect to existing utilities on
surrounding property.
® The onsite drainage easements are necessary to provide for storm
drainage improvements to serve the development of the site.
® The onsite access easements are necessary to provide cross access
capabilities to this site and surrounding property.
❑ The onsite sidewalk easements are necessary to provide for a
sidewalk network to serve the development of this site.
® All of the dedications benefit the development to at least the extent of
the impact of such on the development.
VIII. RECOMMENDATION:
The members of the City Council and The Planning & Zoning Commission
consider the following motion: "Move that the City Council (Planning and
Zoning Commission) approve the Statement of Findings and the Preliminary
Plat of Lots 1-8, Block A, Pecan Ridge Addition."
C:\Users\tbrooks\AppData\Local\Temp\Agenda Memo 30223_1025440\Agenda Memo 30223.doc
VICINITY MAP
1"=1000'
Garza Acicl'n
co,10- - S(d_
PRTCT
Total Plotted Area 87,926 So J-1:
Net Plotted Aeo 67,825 Sq. F I
Right -of -Wry Ded;coticr Area 16,190 Sq.it
Ea set-1 Deocct:c%r, Area. 391 1 So, F t,
STATE - OF TEXAS
COUNn OF I ARRANT
WFILRI AS. 170 Dunn 1 LC, hFoeinaNI, -rIled'O-e-' 2 rf-Lr I' ira Ian., I
fo,UhIflt .... iTKd III 1ho- on Ihil PIII,
NOW THE RCI()RF Iid flan 'If 111, , .1 0,,, -d N) IM (I1.00) DOLLAR X.d o1i Food -d -I-bl-d-u- the-r -d'sluffi,-, hb, fIiUI
,,R'Iprd Iol -fl-d. 0-, d"', h.0, pel-L. -d q-6"I"
F, ( �-, fD li. Tex '1 it TN nl -'Uh- ... I B-gol, N,IL-f- -11,j % "f1h, P,INII, rd 1" Ao,."', Lo,
d--L ,la,,} k.d to p-orT, ., Prue tty IhIII 0,111I I.ffl by t 1 of , P.-II, -d flight ,, .11 --R III th, no` So- 5hoO,oc, jp,,,T,i,h,-
PmBently k-III 11 h, AupIll, ZIR1,19 f FId-FIL EFLII-FlIrl 1N -1-11 AUP- III !III I"Ima, .,h-
o_b1i,hLd b, OHJUIIIi- No B."D I,), The Cl ofG.,
11,0- such dal hAIoTqgl,IT' HoT I.,[ and Uhn-I P-wit,, -10! Ikzt, he -Ld h, A, Iliodo,
,,k,pg "IT f-r, ,, ,p,,ILjU,j i, ,, - I,, uLj1l,-I- W-1, fi,a,I-po,i,Il Aupr
IF, o, op-lo-4 --!l Il oti"t, T-I --,ol
-1, -PlIf fi-,,dint WIT 11)d III I
)I I, ugx, Ill 11II, 'huh He ho,&,y Up- j od ,od ,.d th.,I
cus.nanlu -,g igh the iird, izi,il! bidl h, I-1Idt,d III, Duc It d, flill on .1 1,, oh F -P
I X I CL I I -Da, I .... this - -, &F of - ---- 1010
11 Al L OF 1 FXAS I
CO{ I '1 01 fARRAN I I
fj,ioIL - ifr
f-gome and.,,know lederd i, n,, IF,,, IS,, _ijrlj jhr fa the pLIT- -d -d-If,n ,expressed
,md,, .,y I,mli I, Id -I o! I!,, J,I� 'If T"'
KIII., -Plhllcsoa, „1 1
L 0
v, ii��
J14 -bW SiLvertake Estntps
Vol 388-156 Pq 26
PRTCT
y
zcnec, F 75
R L k t o' c D
uc, L
361-.66' 'Pli. Md
N 89-21 '54" E -
54.6' 1-16.9
78.72'
I ZoTI d R7,5
e
Park View Estates i F-
vo.i 388-11 68 F I�17e-
7,
cY L
PRTCT 1 L O?A,'W 5rUf fW S sour I- X'
78 SAqL
M 0 A 872 Sq.F t 1'2497"
FI
4 1 8 e000 Sq,F 7
(A > -I� 0.1637 Ac, 0 0,1807 z Ac.
b 8594 SqFt7-:�- 0
v, Un
-4,66
at
Lone � 0.1973 Ac- o
2t,' Blak, L"Oe 25 6,
R 7� > Z ED
S I A1 1, of I E XAS , I
COUNI) uT I ARRANT
h l_I, 17,, UoI,I L[_C I k IF,.- o I I- t tIod P,, If I, d-d --d, d D2 I r I 1103 ITT I I, W! VLh [I, K
Tana, ( ollr,t, T - Ims (OPR F('T) a 1111`1 g, roor, T, rlieuL.dv It .... il"d I,, LF"',
H,mg I-, ,,I I.,j ,., ,fF, S--1 I r-o,,,i 52� 1 1- 1 h-4, F, -'Ie t10 I'M,
I F, To - -dcf Off!, 1A I
., I deed I H,I IT I 1 1. pl,,,h, d-il I- - D? I � 111) 1 It, R-I-6. I r:y, T-I,,
(OPRTCTI , .
d,,-h,d
1,16INNIN6 11 11 5�811110 IIIII 11111 1q, 'o.1h-I 1-, 14 1 Io-- I 0PRTC1 --d h-9 -I' IF Ill-h
h,,, llI of 12, SII--Il A,",- p,, the rl,i --i.d it V-1-,, 3SA�LPLy, t, I.
-IJLN I F R,, I,, , I
('I N I,,' . I 1 4 2 1 ?' IIr OL I IITT II-Pl 1 1) 1 -S-o � di f 24- .,oil I d fund GH
2 I,- _1 6 OP 1 7 1(1
THI NCI NII-0- R9 21 54 1 all, depa-19 III, IoW lint of DIt"'I ST-I and " lif, th, - ,- the 1of Sil-40,, ,t� III,,
.Flod,,d N III. 3M-1 5Tl, PL91 PH I ('I I pi`361 61 F- 1, 1,, 1 1 1, Y" land To the ,,,rT,,- laidn" 2, 1721111 ITM;, OP9 Tt T.
THL\( L S.Ih V 01'06" L-, 'Ifl, them 11 1— A,:- P1, IT,, pfliI -,d,d In la P, F)
u PpT, oft T,,02 H,11 I, a I i-) IM, ft-f� ,d ,, !I, '_flh-, c,,,- of said 1 1, D2L,1 1117 1, OPHI ('I
I HUNI I, Soo,) Kl` 21" cn''1 rHt ,,IF the lo-III11h nnnh k.,c of-d Shoxecse., A-,�, ,1 128 24 J- the
R-thes'! "'o- Iif I oa 13. Sho-r"I �,- ard h, ll C-H,l of a I -I of I-d "", ,j I, U,h,,h &
'A'-, Per the 0,,d recorded II,D2I1,0I3L29 OPRICT.
ifit,N(l N-IhW30 Ili If- r,ol-odf II'd i", I IF- 'o-, "f,, wnid Nee -burl.
I IF[ M. I South 'P, 9
M 11195 2" '1"1 and " ah . .p Pf, ,II, IF, ofih,-I
I FILH( I, So,�lh V 44 12" IN"" I ,1 20 TO 1- 2" 'Illyl rot ro-d L" d" -ol" of, -d W-r-I" trace_
T 1IFNt t soi,gh 1,9 29 s,," 'A -. a IU,ui- of 144 (11 fire; w IF, POVII ()I FIT 61M,["', and o 'ACIIIIII'd -, <If
Is' ,926 Square Feet oI 2,1)1 N 1 -111 of 1,,nd
8,arulgit N!,-i on God North. NA D 83, N-h ( ro A 11, u, Z I H1 4 211-'
NON, I I I L RL TOR F, KNOW A I I too N' B N TJ I F S E PH ES L N TS. !III 17 IIS Du.i I L I I . da I, I, b) adnP, Ili I B it! " I "I Pel, nr
Ridge AMINO. 11 AddWto ( f, if '-p-me, Tl,.,rI I w
' I -- rd It ,- 1-eb) 1,6-, 1, ihpuhh, U- f-F-
i-I -F-T, 'ho, Il h-o'. 11',` 'ho"', h,dI,,,,. - h-h, '-'-f"I lk P,,,p-, l, ,dl�-d
hill) IF, opIll ix ITT bran,h-d publ" I'law, f,PT
"""Ol,
l U."T'-. .. ....... I-'
T., la--, 1, 01, -p I"i of ILI PI'SIVII, --, I') Wild t..- i-L I,
III pl-d o-, ,, Thl -' h, Sd Mog h ... 13 . ....... di Ox -1-1
I ,U pohl., d--p, u., o,, mll Any ,,ly ,, fri-fi-d I I II hI,\r 111, fill] 119h, to
and H,op I-Il-d MI -1 P-1 -1 and i1ol",- I, Imlh. ,I .,hol " I. pw,h, 'T"], I,, -) I,> I,-fo, 1,d
rrfere"Ithellh ', oI-F. ., o, the ea. er. rd IF ci,, ., fr-h-d
hl" h,ill att I- IT- I],, flit .,gh, f g dq-, i""I, "'Id .1"'I -d i ff,, (-po" "!
-ol ldd,n --I.g Ai Imp,- of I', I-PelhIl )-m
J,r,, - I-Fd 'I'F 'Itt i'-�gd'd I, III IT, 4"e, IF., lh
STAFF 01 HXASi
cot Ol I ARRANT k
lit o" !, Not") Puhh,, ,,I thi, It- p,--dk UPP-ld kl,oten to
-m
I I, d , h"'d 'I'l ,I I'fil" thl,
T, If Shorecrest Acres W
o n e 6 R 7 5 v Carter Court
i '08 D ihn
-t 2
f g.
33 N 89'21 7 317.34'
-0-P
tract 1
40, ROW
T,
`�L uE
Victorian Point
9c), 13,
�-E-A-`-
.3 �9
98.74'-
Colo. A,Slci. 405
0
15,x,51'
Esmt
PRTCT
c"t 6
F
gIne
'gyp'9435
SW
S`662 'SoF t
Lc,- 7 g
0.2166 Ac
C�
L---
2 5-' Eg-cl
Dunn Street,
SCT.Ft
0 c,
1937 A
Variable Wicth ROW
0,2218 Ac:
re
29,09' E
S 89*44-35-7-11T9_57,
Zl�:net, 7
DebrahA,,CharLPS
WeemS
Beginning
54.05
Biz
Iff
S -t9*-29'
14 4.0 5'
-cl
it
Shorecrest Acres
10 "1 `9 5"
71� III.
Shorecrest Aces
Vol-388 -L,Pg 8,
.3�
1.14
L2= S 1*44'12" W 20-04'
Vol 388-153,Pc 90
PRTCT
jFvEyr). I CI�Ti, 1--41[
PQTI-7
11,,I,,�l EI llI c, nip "i I
FrviE �
-d "Ic.,
y I
Per Texo Administrative Code, TBPLS RULE §663.1&
C rt Ifl-VOR - Pref"'i'"Y.
NOTE. THIS SURVEY DRAwINC IS PROVIDED
far REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY, this document shall NOT
SOLELY FOR THE USE OF THE CURRENT PARTIES & HAS BEEN CREATED,
No LICENSE
_Ps Corded for any TI�Uraose,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED To COR" THIS SURvD
V --1 r7
EXCEPT AS IS NECESSARY IN CONJUNCTION
Tern R I' S
WITH THIS ORGtNAL TRANIAMON,
' N-tI2 ,
VEI, - 2=0 AI111 L- SlIr-Yl- lrI/Milh'W 8 0-
Vol-31:51:5-L.,ti-g .1
PRTCT
t
8859 Sq.Ft,
b 0.2034 Ac:
> ,
J
7 5-
89*29 50' -1 i2 :2
X - -_'4( L, - E
ea R C,
E
WD OWNEEVELOPER
0_ 170E
U_ EEC
D-IPpe,: RIND BAdIN UP
7 C-hKI THIA
T,vi Clud TO- 76262
(Al . Barry N.IdUN
LAND SURVEYOR
Michael e 0..I.RPLS
Afolal UXIHI S-slfe Inc-
%9 E L-
K"WT T- 7 6262-1,H'
phIRA: 817.614.11R017
ra 817-379 Se
m6000- .1
F, LA14 N ON 1,fa-COTA, S1 15 S 11 ON
Dote Appru'eo.
RAFEVNE t,1TY COIJHL'L
,jote Ap�,,ro,,Ld
City �ecretj,,`,
For REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY,
this document shall NOT
be recorded for any purpose.
PRELIMINARY PLAT
of
LOTS I through 8, BLOCK A
PECAN RIDGE ADDITION
out of the
Samuel Freeman Survev
Abstract No 526
Grapevine, Taiiant. County. Texas
2.0185 Acres, Zoned R 7,5
8 Lots
Submitted June 2, 2020
n- Plat Fiala ac DPFUI,P,F,It N,. - I`H` -