Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-10-19 Joint Meeting AGENDA CITY OF GRA.PEVINE, TEXAS JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING � TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19 , 1982 AT 7 : 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � I. CALL TO ORDER II. INVOCATION: Dr. George Clerihew First Baptist Church III . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing to consider Zoning Application Z82-48 submitted by Texas Power & Light Company requesting the rezoning of the northwest corner of Dove Road and West North- west Highway from "C-2" Community Business District to "SP" Specific Use Permit for the outside storage of light construction equip- ment, a light construction equipment operation, and other "C-2 " uses . B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to the �"" proposed comprehensive zoning ordinance. �, IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to deliberate the merits of the zoning cases and plats and to con- sider other published agenda items. B. City Council to remain in session in the Council Chambers and consider other items of business. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEET- ING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1982 AT 5 :00 P.M. � � �G� City ecre ar � AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19 , 1982 AT 8 :00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET V. CITIZENS REQUEST AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS � VI. CON5IDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meeting of October 5 , 1982 � VII . PUBLIC HEARING City Council to conduct a public hearing for the purpose of considering an application submitted �by General Telephone Company for the relocation of a building. City Council to also consider a subse- quent resolution. VIII . OLD BUSINE5S A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-45 (Miron) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable . B. City Council to consider an ordinance adopting the Planning & Zoning Commission Bylaws. IX. NEW BUSINESS A. City Council to consider applications relative to arts funding. ''�°'' B. City Council to consider and award the bids relative to the purchase of automobiles and trucks for use by various departments. C. City Council to consider and award the bid for the purchase of 2 police motorcycles. D. City Council to consider an ordinance amending the City Code for sewer customers not presently on City water service. E. City Council to consider an ordinance amending the City Code relative to customer deposits for utility services. F. City Council to consider the comprehensive zoning ordinance , first reading. G. City Council to consider Change Order No. 2 with Wright Construction Company relative to the Southwest Sewer Line Project. � H. City Council to consider a resolution giving notice of intention to issue City of Grapevine combination tax & � revenue certificates of obligation pursuant to Article 2368a. 1 for the purpose of acquiring a site and con- structing a permanent public improvement, to-wit a swimming pool facility. X. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-48 (TP&L) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of Rolling Lane Addition. C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of The Settlement. �.,, XI. ADJOURNMENT � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C. S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1982 AT 5 : 00 P.M. 1 City ecr a � � � � AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMI�IISSION MEETING TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19 , 1982 AT 8 :00 P.M. CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN � � V. NEW BUSINESS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Appli- cation Z82-48 (Texas Power & Light Company) and make a recommendation to the City Council . B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of Rolling Lane Addition and make a r�commendation to the City Council. C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of The Settlement and make a recommendation to the City Council. D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the preliminary plat of Countryside East Addition. VI . CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meetings of September 16 & 21 and October 5 , 1982 '"� VII. CITIZENS REQUESTS �; Mr. Larry Lightner to address the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the future development of his property within the City of Grapevine. VIII . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSIONS IX. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR 5ESSION, THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1982 AT 5 :00 P.M. � �� City S cret r � STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council and the Planning & Zoning Comnission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Joint Regular Session on this the 19th day of October, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 413 Main Street, with the follaving persons present to-,wit: � William D. Tate Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem Charles Dunn Council Member � C. L. Oliver Council Me.mber William Shafer Council N�r Marion Brekken Council Member Ron Dyer Council Memb�r constituting a quonun with the follawing members of the Planning & Zoning Commission: Sharron Spencer Chairman Ron Cook Vice Chairman Harlen Joyce Nlember Ann Glynn Member Gerald Nornian NIQ�nber Tom Paaers N1e.mber Klee Hawkins Member constituting a quonun with the following members of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney e� Shirley Armstrong City Secretary � CAI� TO ORDER � Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Dr. George Clerihew, Pastor of First Baptist Church of Grapevine. INTRODUCTIONS AND PROCIDURES Mayor Tate then introduced members of the Planning & Zoning Camnission and explained the procedure to be follawed during the public hearings. PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-48, TEXAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing to consider Zoning Application Z82-48 submitted by Texas Paver & Light Company. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon City Engineer Jim Baddaker to explain the request of the applicant. � Mr. Baddaker reported that the application was for the purpose of rezoning 2.206 acres located on tY�e northwest corner of Dove Road and West Northwest � Highway from "C-2" Comnunity Business District to "SP" Specific Use Permit District for the outside storage of light construction equipment, incidental to a light construction equipment rental operation, and further allaaing all other uses as permitted in the "C-2" Comrnuzity Business District. Mr. Mike McKinney, District Manager for Texas Paaer & Light Company, advised that his company was selling the property contingent upon the zoning being granted to allaw the desired land use by the prospective buyer. He added that a building would be constructed in accordance with the site plan submitted for the purpose of conducting a rental business. II 10/19/82 ', There was then general discussion relating to ingress/egress in proximity to ' Northwest Highway, pa.ving of the parking area, and the type of sign that would ', be associated with the business. ', Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the ', application. There were none. The City Secretary reported that no correspon- ' dence had been received regarding the requested zoning. ', There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Conmission Nlember Harlen �, Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion ��, '� was seconded by Member Gerald Norn�an and prevailed by the follawing vote: I�i Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Norman, Hawkins, & Pawers ,��, � Nays . None I�', Council Member Dunn then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the I public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council l�mber Shafer and pre- ', vailed by the follawing vote: II Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer � Nays . None ��, PUBLIC HEARING, COMPRF�III�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANC� The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Corrmission to conduct a public hearing relative to the proposed Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. '�I Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon Planni.ng & Zoning � Cananission Chairman Spencer to address those in attendance. Chairmaxz Spencer 'ii then gave a brief overview of the proposed ordinance. II Mayor Tate asked if there were questions fran Members of the Planning & Zoning �, Coir�nission or City Council. There were none. He then asked if there were � guests present to speak in regard to the ordinance. There were none. '"""� ' vZ �i Planning & Zoning Co�ranission 1�'Iember Gerald Nornian then made a motion to close ,�� their portion of the public hearing. The m�tion was seconded by D�mber Klee Hawkins and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Nornian, Hawkins, & Pawers Nays . None Council Member Dyer then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Brekken and pre- I vailed by the follawing vote: ', Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer I, Nays . None END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING The Planning & Zoning Conmission then recessed to the Civic Center to discuss the merits of the zoning case and to consider other published agenda items. !i The Council recessed briefly, after which they reconvened in the Council I Chambers with all men�rs present. CITIZII�lS REQUEST - JAMES SPRIGGS, G�RAT, �.T,F.pHONE COMPANY """"� Mayor Tate then introduced James Spriggs, Operations Manager for General �� Telephone Company of the Southwest. �,,,� I, Mr. Spriggs addressed the Council, outlined Public Utility Comnission Docket ��I No. 3957, and asked the Council's support relative to the adoption of said I docket. I� It was the general concensus of the Council that a letter on behalf of the City of Grapevine be sent to the Public Utilities Conm.ission encouraging their adoption of the proposed docLunent. No fornial action was taken. 10/19/82 CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTFS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the minutes of October 5, 1982. Council �er Brekken advised that Page 4, Paragraph 3, needed to be amended to reflect that the gentleman addressing the Council on behalf of General Telephone Cornpany was Mr. Raymond Winters rather than Mr. Rayrtond Bennett. The error was aclmowledged by the City Secretary. � Council D'lember Brekken then made a motion to approved the minutes of October 5, 1982 as amended. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Sha.fer � and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None PUBLIC HEARING BUILDING REL�OCATION, HMA 82-07, GII�TERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY The next order of business was for the City Council to conduct a public hearing for the purpose of considering an application submitted by General Telephone Cornpany of the Southwest for the relocation of a building. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked the City Secretary to outline the request of the applicant. It was noted that the applicants were requesting permission to place a 12' x 26' building on their property at 2001 West Northwest Highway for utilization as a tenq�orary office facility. Mr. Jack Kiser, Land and Building Engineer for the telephone company, addressed the Council, reviewed the site plan, and answered several miscella- neous questions from members of the Council. Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. There were none. �^ :� ; Council NI�mber Dyer then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the � public hearing. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None RESOLUTION, BUILDING RELOCATION, HMA 82-07, c�'�:RAT, T�LEPHONE COMPANY The City Secretary then read the caption of the proposed resolution. There being no discussion, Council Member Oliver made a motion to approve the application by adoption of the resolution. The mption was seconded by Council Nlember Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None RESOLUTION NO. 82-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR Z�iE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT AUTfiORIZING Tf� REL�OC:ATION OF A �""" PORTABLE BUILDING; PROVIDING FOR A NON-TRANSFERABLE PERM_ZT; PROVIDING A SITE PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE � ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-45, MIRON The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recomnen- dation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to Zoning Application Z82-45 (Miron) and a subsequent ordinance. The City Council was reminded that the Planning & Zoning Congnission had, during the meeting of October 5, reco�nended denial of the application by a vote of five to one. 10/19/82 The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. After a short discussion, Council Nlember Dunn made a motion to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and deny the application. Council Nlember Dunn later withdrew the mption. Following a very lengthy discussion, Council N1P.mber Dyer made a motion to grant the requested zoning with the conditions that an affidavit be filed with the City Secretary at the end of sixty days (beginning October 19, 1982) shawing whether or not gross sales fran food represent at least fifty percent ��, (50%) of total sales and, in the event that the actual sales of food for the stated period do not amount to 50% of the gross retail sales at the location, the awner's Certificate of Occupancy shall be inur�ediately terminated with no ��;, other action being required of the City and the Certificate of Occupancy, as it relates to the sale of alcoholic beverages, shall terminate, and the sale of alcoholic beverages incidental to the operation of a restaurant sha.11 cease and no longer be an authorized use within said zoning district, provided, hawever, in the event that the sales of food for the stated period do ampunt to at least 500 of the gross sales, this condition shall be no longer of any force and effect. The motion was seconded by Council Member Dunn and pre- vailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . Shafer ORDINANC� NO. 82-69 AN ORDINANCE AMIIVDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE COMPREFiII�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, S�NIE BEING ALSO KIVOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANI'ING A ZONING C�i1�NGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A LOT, 'I'RACI', OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATID IN TARRANr COUN'I'Y, TEXAS, �""�! BEING A PART OF THE ORIGINAL 'I'OWDT OF � GRAPEVINE SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE FLTLLY AND COM- �r PLEI�LY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANC�; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPER'I'Y FROM "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DISTRICT FOR THE STORAGE, RETAIL SALE, AND ON-PRII�LTSE CONSUMPTION OF Ai,COHOLIC BEVERAGES INCIDENTAL TO Tf-iE OPERATION OF A RESTAURAN'!', IN ACCORDANC,E WITH A SITE PLAN, AND PROVIDING FOR 0'I'I�'R USES AS PERMITI`ID IN THE "C-2" COMM[JNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CATEC'�ORY TO "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERNLZT DISTRICT FOR THE STORAGE, RETAIL SALE, AND ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES INCI- DENTAL TO THE OPERATION OF A RESTAURANT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A REVISID SITE PLAN, AND FUR�R ALL�OWING ALL OTHER USFS AS PROVIDID IN Tf� "C-2" CONIl�ICJNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CA7.�(',ORY; PROVIDING F[JR�R FOR CERTAIN CONDITIONS; CORREC.'TING THE OF'FICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING AT,T, OZZ�Et PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; '"""'""� PROVIDING A CI�USE REL,ATING TO SE�IERABILITY; DEI�RMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERFSTS, MORALS AND GIIVERAL WELFARE .„�� DII`�AND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMII�IDMIIV�r �RFIN MADE; PROVIDING A PE[�TALTY; AND DF�LARING AN II�'lERGENCY BYI�WS, PLANNING & ZONING CON�+LZSSION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance adopting the Planning & Zoning Commission Bylaws. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. 10/19/82 City Manager Jim Hancock briefly reviewed the Bylaws. Council Mexnber Oliver then made a motion that the ordinance be adopted. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None ,�,,, ORDINANCE NO. 82-70 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE BYLAWS OF THE PI�NNING & ZONING CONA4IS- SION; PROVIDING A PEL�IIAI,TY; PROVIDING A SE�IERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DDCLARING AN F:MF:RC;F�T(.',y GRANTS-IN-AID F'[JNDING, CHRISTMAS PARI�DE, CHRIS'I'N1�S PLAY, AND GRAPEVINE FILLIFS APPLICATIONS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider applications relative to arts funding projects. The City Council was advised that three applications had been received as follaws: (1) A request for $2,000 from the Grapevine Chamber of Co�rce relative to the Christmas Candle and Choir Parade ($1,000 for float prize money and up to $100 per choir and band for prop and cost� funds) . (2) A request for $1,600 from the Grapevine Chamber of Ca�rerce relative to the stage production entitled "A Gift of Christrnas". � � ; (3) A request fran the Grapevine Fillies Booster Club for $5,200 to sponsor �; five selected drill team members and a sponsor on a trip to the Aloha Bawl in Hawaii to participate in a national drill team perfo�ice. Council Member Dyer, Chairman of the Review Co�anittee, advised that he and other Conm�ittee Members Ted Ware and Marion Brekken had considered each application and fornlulated a recotranendation on each matter. Chairnian Dyer advised that it was the unanimpus recommendation of the Review Comnittee to approve the request from the Chamber of Comn�rce for $2,000 relative to the Christ�nas parade. Council Member Oliver then made a mption that the recommendation of the Co�nittee be accepted and the application approved. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Chairman Dyer advised that it was the unanimous reco�ndation of the Review Committee that the request fran the Chamber of C�rce for $1,600 for the Christr�as play be approved. !!�"" Council Me.mber Oliver made a motion to accept the rec�ndation of the Connnittee and approve the application. The mr�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro , Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: � Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer . Nays . None Chairnian Dyer then advised that the Co�nittee had unanimously voted to recom- mend denial of the request fran the Fillie Booster Club to sponsor the trip to Hawaii. He co�nted that the Comnittee preferred to participate in an activity that w�uld benefit the entire drill team rather than a select group. Follawing a short discussion, Council M�mber Dyer made a mr�tion to accept the reconanendation of the Review Corranittee and deny the application. The mption was seconded by Council Nlember Oliver and prevailed by the follawing vote: ' 10/19/$2 ' Ayes . Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays : Tate & Dunn , BID AWARD, VARIOUS CITY VEEIICLES ' The next order of business was for the City Council to consider and award the ', bids relative to the purcha.se of aut�biles and trucks for use by various ' departrnents. ', Assistant City Manager Bill Eisen reviewed the bid tabulation (attached hereto ,w■�, 'I and made a part hereof as �hibit "A") . He then made the follawing reco�n- i dations: ', v�;r i VEHICLES DEALER BID ', Police Cars (7) Fred Oakley Nbtors $60,592.00 ', Long Bed Pickups (3) DZcNatt Chevrolet $22,557.00 ', Short Bed Pickup Hudiburg Chevrolet $ 7,320.97 ' Cab & Chassis McNatt Chevrolet $ 8,245.00 ' Dun� Bed Truck Hudiburg Chevrolet $16,048.00 I��I �ill-Size Sedan -----Reco�nd Rejection of All Bids------ I�� Station Wagon Payton Wright Ford $ 9,331.06 ' Compact Pickups (2) Hudiburg Chevrolet $13,558.00 Crew Cab Pickup McNatt Chevrolet $10,334.00 ', Compact Car Payton-Wright Ford $ 6,671.47 ii �� ' b I, For clarification purposes, Mr. Eisen advised that the bid fran Grubbs Datsun ,�,� ', for the compact pickups failed to m�et specifications and reco�nded the bid ', be rejected. He also added that the bids for Police cars submitted by I Hudiburg Chevrolet and McNatt Chevrolet and the bid by Preston � Chrysler-Plymouth for the crew cab pickup failed to meet specifications. Mr. Eisen also infornied the Council that an addendtun to the specifications of the full-sized sedan was mailed, but all bidders did not receive the addition until after the bid deadline. As a result, the Staff rec�nded that bids on the sedan be rejected in an effort to give all bidders an equal opportunity to meet specifications. ', Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to accept the recomrendations of the ' City Staff as stated. The motion was seconded by Council l�mber Dunn and ' prevailed by the follawing vote: '�, Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer 'I Nays . None � BID AWARD, MC7I'ORCYCLES FOR POLICE DEPAR'I�N`I' ', The next order of business was for the City Council to consider and award the ', bid for the purchase of two police motorcycles. , a�.� ', Mr. Eisen reported that the following bids had been received: �� �t 10/19/82 BIDDER UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Kawasaki City $4,490 $ 8,980 Irving Kawasaki of Ft. Worth $4,689 $ 9,378 Fort Worth Texas Harley Davidson $5,895 $11,790 �,,, Fort Worth (Chain-Drive Model) � Texas Harley Davidson $5,995 $11,990 Fort Worth (Belt-Drive Model) Texas Harley Davidson $6,195 $12,390 Fort Worth (Mpdel FLHT) The Council was then advised that it was the reco�ndation of the City Staff that the bid be awarded to Kawasaki City of Irving. Council Member Oliver made a motion to accept the reco�nendation and award the bid to Kawasaki City on their low bid of $8,980. The motion was seconded by Council Nlemb�r Brekken and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None ORDINANCE, SEWER RATES ANIENDID The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance amending the City Code for sewer customers not presently on City water ser- +�""" vice. � ! � Finance Director Lee Maness advised the Council of the need for the amendment and reco�nded that a monthly charge of $11.26 be adopted for sewer service for homes tied to City sewer service but not to City water service. The City Secretary then read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Council Member Brekken made a motion that the ordinance be adopted. The motion was seconded. by Council Member Oliver and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None ORDINANCE NO. 82-71 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, AMQ�IDING SECTION 25-27 OF THE GRAPEVINE CITY CODE REI�ATING TO WASTE WATER RATES; PROVIDING A PE�fALTY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND DECLAR2NG AN F1�9ERGENCY �.�. ORDINANCE, UTILITY DEPOSITS � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance am�ending the City Code relative to customer deposits for utility services. Mr. Maness addressed the Council and recommended that the miniirnam residential deposit for utility services be increased to $50.00. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Nlayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to accept the recoim�endation of the City Staff and adopt the ordinance. The mption was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the following vote: , 10/19/82 ', Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer ' Nays . None ' ORDINANC� NO. 82-72 ' AN ORDINANCE OF 'I'HE CITY COUNCIL OF Tf-iE ' CITY OF GF�PEVINE, TEXAS, AMQVDING SECTION ',, 25-36 REL�F,TING TO COST DEPOSITS OF 4�TER, �, WASTE WATER, AND REFUSE SERVICE; PROVIDIlVG 'i A PE[�l�LTY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY; ,�� I PROVIDING AN EFF'ECTIVE DATE; AND DECLARING ' I p�t IIHF�RGENCY �.t.«r I COMPREEIIITSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, FIRST RFIIDING ', The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the Comprehen- sive Zoning Ordinance, first reading. ', The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. ', Council Nlember Dunn made a mr�tion that the ordinance be adopted on first , reading. The motion was seconded by Council N1�nber Brekken and prevailed by ' the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None �', ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 II AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A COMPREEIII�tSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR Z� CITY i OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS T0: ��, 1. ESTABLISH ZONING DISTRICTS; li �� I 2. REGULATE THE HEIGHT AND SIZE OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUC'I'tTRES; �' 3. SET THE PERCENTAGE OF Tf� TRACT THAT MAY BE OCCUPIID, AND FOR �� WHAT PURPOSES; 4. ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM SETBACKS AND OTHF..R OPEL�T SPACFS, AND THE DENSITY OF POPULATION; 5. REGULATE THE I,OCI3TION AND USE OF BUILDINGS, STRUCT[JRES, AND i�ND FOR RESIDIIVCE, BUSINESS, TRADE, C,ONIl�RERCE, II�TDUSTRY OR O�R I PURPOSES; �� 6. REGULATE THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION, ALZ�TION, I REPAIR OR USE OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTCTRFS OR I,AND WITHIN SUCH DISTRICTS; 7. PROVIDE FOR O'I'�IER REQUIRII�ITS, CONDITIONS, LIMITATIONS AND 0'PHER CRITII2IA FOR THE USE AND DE�IEI�OPMENrI' OF PROPERTY. ESTABLISHING ZONING DISTRICTS AND BOUNDARIES, PROVIDING FOR ZONING MAPS AND ZONING OF NEWLY ANNE�� TERRITORY, ESTABLISHING AND CREAT- I ING: II 1. SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICI'S - R-20, R-12.5, AND R-7.5; """"'" 2. 'I'WTo-FAMILY DISTRICTS - R-3.5; 3. THREE AND FOUR FAMILY DISTRICT - R-3.75; �� I 4. MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICTS - R-MF-1 and R-MF-2; ' 5. 'I'OWNHOUSE DISTRICT - R-TH; I 6. MOBILE HOME DISTRICT - R-MH; , 7. MODUI,AR HOME DISTRICT - R-MOD.H; ' 8. PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICI' - P-0; 10/19/82 9. NEIGHBORHOOD CON]MMERCIAL DISTRICT - C-N; 10. CC�M2UNITY C�RCIAL DISTRICT - C-C; 11. COl"1�'lERCIAL OUTDOOR DISTRICT - C-OU; 12. C�RCIAL �RE�30USE DISTRICT - C W; 13. FREEWAY DISTRICT - M-FW; � 14. LIGHT Il�TDUSTRIA.L DISTRICTS - ML; � 15. INDUSTRIAL PARK - AIRPORT RELAZ'ED DISTRICT - IP-AR; 16. SITE PLAN DISTRICT - S-P; 17. PLANNID UNIT DEVII�OPMENT - PUD PROVIDING FOR RAILROAD RIGHTS-OF WAY AND TRACKS, TENIPORARY USFS OF PROPEI�PY, PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, OFF-STRE�!' PARKING REQUIREN�ITS, OFF-STREE.'I' 7AADING REQUIREMII�'I'S, PARKING AND LOADING ARF� DEVEL�OP- MEN'I' STANDARDS, PARKING I�OTS AND PUBLIC GAF�GES AND FILLING STATION STANDARDS, ACCFSSORY AND PRINCIPAL BUILDING STANDARDS AND REQUIRE- MIIV�!'S, CORNER I�OT STANDARDS AND REQUIRII�NTS, HEIGHT LIMITATIONS, RDQUIRID YARD AND SETBACK AREAS AND PROJECTIONS INTO REQUIRID YARDS. PROVIDING FOR DIDICATION OF PUBLIC PARKS, PUBLIC STRF�i'S, PUBLIC DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMQVTS 'I1� ADEQUATELY SERVE TF� PROPERTY AT NO COST TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE. PROVIDING FOR SCREEL�IING, LANDSCAPING, BUFFERING, WAI�S AND FENCES. PRO`TIDING FOR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY COMPLIANCE, AND NON-CONF'ORMING USES AND COMPLETION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS. � G� R�QUIRING SITE PLAN DISTRICT ZONING Wf�RE THE STORAGE, POSSESSION, � SALE, SERVING OR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ARE PERMITI�D BY THE LAW OF � STATE OF TEXAS, AND PROVIDING FOR STANDARDS AND SPECIAL REGUL�ATIONS WITHIN SUCfi DISTRICT. PROVIDING THAT ORDINANC� N0. 70-10 OF TE-� CITY OF GRAPEVINE PASSID AND APPROVID BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, APRIL 7, 1970 AS ANIENDID, AND ORDINANCE NO. 55-6 PASSID ON AUGUST 2, 1955, AT,T, ZONING DISTRICT REGUI�ATIONS AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS HERETO- FORE ESTABLISI�D UNDER SAID ORDINANCES AND AS INDICATID UPON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EEFECZ' UNTIL AMII�iDID OR CHANGID � CONF'ORM TO � DIS- TRICTS, REGCTI�TIONS AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF THIS ORDINANC.E. PROVIDING A PROC,EDURE FOR CHANGING EXISTING ZONING TO DISTRICT USES, CLASSIFICATION AND REGULATION UNDER THIS ORDINANCE. PROVIDING FOR ZONING MAPS AND USE DESIGNATIONS AND CHANGES. PROVIDING THAT USES NOW PROHIBITID BY OTHER ORDINANCES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTID. PROVIDING FOR APPLICATIONS FOR ZONING CHANGES, FEES, PROCIDURES AND � NOTICES. P12�lIDING FOR A ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND DUTIFS OF SUCH BOARD. � DEEINING CERTAIl�I WORDS AND PHI�SES. PROVIDING FOR CHANGES AND AN4�IDME1�]TS OF Tf-iE ORDINANGE, ZONING DISTRICTS, ZONING USE DESIGNATIONS AND CI�ASSIFICATIONS AND PROCE- DURES. PROVIDING THAT AIZ NEW APPLICATIONS FOR ZONING C�IANGES SHALL BE GRANTID UNDER THIS ORDINANCE. PROVIDING FOR ELVF'ORCIIKII�I'I' OF Z�IE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE. ', 10/19/82 �� PROVIDING FOR A PII�II�LTY OF NOT LESS THAN ONE DOLI�R NOR NYJRE Tf�AN ', TWO HUNDRID DOI�E2S FOR A VIOLATION OF 'I'I� TERNIS AND PROVISIONS OF '', THIS ORDINANCE. PROVIDING THAT EACH DAY ANY VIOLATION OR NON-COMPLIANCE CONTINUES, ', SHAIS� CONSTITUTE A SEPARATE OFFEL�TSE. PROVIDING THAT EXCEPTIONS N� NOT BE NEGATIVID IN COMPLAINTS. ' PROVIDING FOR CAZ�INES AND SAVING CLAUSES. ,�r�, ', SOUI�iWEST SEWER LINE PROJDC.'T, CHANGE ORDER #2 �, ' The next order of business was for the City Council to consider Change Order '� No. 2 with Wright Construction Company relative to the Southwest Sewer Line ' Project. ' City E�gineer Jim Baddaker outlined the contents of the Change Order, attached �', hereto and made a part hereof as E�hibit "B". ', The City Secretary then read the caption of a resolution declaring an emer- !, gency and approving Change Order #2 in the amount of $55,326.00. Follawing a short discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a mr�tion to adopt the � resolution. The mption was seconded by Council Nlember Dyer and prevailed by I, the follaaing vote: I Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer , Nays . None ' RESOLUTION NO. 82-36 ', A RESOLUTION OF � CITY COUNCIL OF THE ', CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, APPROVING A """'� '�, c��1GE o��x 'ro 'r� sovTxwEsr sEwIIt Ln�rE la j CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT; AUTHORIZING AND ,�� ', DIRE�rING THE MAYOR 'I1� EXEL�[JTE SUCH CHANGE ' ORDER; AND DECLARING AN II�RGEDICY SWIrM�IING POOL, CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution giving notice of intention to issue City of Grapevine Combination Tax and Revenue Certificates of Obligation pursuant to Article 2368a.1 for the purpose I of acquiring a site and constructing a pern�nent public improvement, to�wit a I swi.ira�ing pool facility. I, The City Manager advised the Council that this matter had been placed on the ', agenda prematurely and recommended it be tabled. There being no discussion, Council Me.�er Dunn made a motion to accept the reco�nendation of the City Manager and table the item. The motion was sec- onded by Council Meml�r Oliver and prevailed by the follawing vote: ' Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Duruz, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer I Nays . None , �� I PL�ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECODM-�NDATION ', ZONING APPLICATION Z82-48, TFXAS POWF�R & LIGHT COMPANY , ,�+ '�, The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the rec�n- ', dation of the Planning & Zoning Cc�unission relative to Zoning Application ' Z82-48 (Texas Pawer & Light Co.) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. ', Planning & Zoning Co�nission Chairman Sharron Spencer advised that the Plan- ', ning & Zoning Coirunission recommended approval of the requested zoning includ- , ing a 50' x 50' addition to the rear of the building, which was added to the ' site plan during the public hearing. 10/19/82 The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Council Meml�er Oliver made a motion to accept the reconunendation and adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Council Member Shafer and prevailed by the follaaing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None �,,,,,,,,, ORDINANCE NO. 82-74 AN ORDINANCE ANIENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, Tf� COMPREEIII�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE �""' CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING AISO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF � CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A L�OT, TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TAR�NT COUNZ'Y, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE T. MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1050, IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE FUI�LY AND COM- PLETELY DESCRIBID IN Tf-iE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPEfrI'Y FROM "C-2" CONIl�I[JNITY BUSI- NESS DISTRICT TO "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DISTRICT FOR � OUTSIDE STORAGE OF LIGHT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTT INCIDENTAL TO A LIGHT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMQVT RIIV'rAL OPERATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN, AND FURTHgt ALI�OWING ALL OTI-iER USES PERMI'ITID IN THE "C-2" COMNl[JNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CATEGORY; CORRDCTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALS, OTHER �"' PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVID- �` ', ING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; � DE'I�RMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS IvjQg�,$ p,jVp GFTTFRAT, WEI�'ARE DIIK�IND A ZONING CHANGE AND ANIENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVID- ING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EN�RGII�CY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECON�iDATION ROLLING LANE FINAL PLAT The ne�t order of business was for the City Council to consider the reco�n- dation of the Planning & Zoning Cairunission relative to the final plat of Rolling Lane Addition. Chairn�an Spencer advised that the Planning & Zoning Comnission unanimously reconn�ended approval of the plat as submitted. City Engineer Jim Baddaker reviewed the proposed plat and outlined the status of the utility services. Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a mption to accept the reco�rendation and approve the final plat of Rolling Lane. The mption was seconded by Council Nlember Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: � Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None � PI,�NNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONII�IDVDATION Tf� SETPLE►vrFT�'r FINAL PLAT The final order of business was for the City Council to consider the recomn�n- dation of the Planning & Zoning Conunission relative to the final plat of The Settlement. Chairm�l Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Ca�n.ission recommended approval by a vote of seven to zero. City Engineer Jim Baddaker presented the plat to the Council. ' 10/19/82 II� There being little discussion, Council Member Brekken made a motion to accept ' the recoi�enendation of the Planning & Zoning Cammission and approve the final ' plat of The Settlement. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer , Nays . None '� ADJOURI�NT ' �� �, There being no further business to come before the Council, Council Member I Oliver made a motion to adjourn. The mr�tion was seconded by Council Nlember ' ! Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote: ��, ',, Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer ', Nays . None , PASSID AND APPROVID BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, Z�XAS on this the �L� day of y� ��p ,,� .,�i�-{'�� . 1982. , APPRO . .�--�0'�� �' Mayor �, AZTEST: I � � City Secre /z 'I �� I�'�I �� �� vwr+ EXFiIBIT ��A�� 'It� Tf� C�tAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL MINLTI'ES OF 10/19/82 -�-i H � +� o ,�-i +.� � � � o � o�o 0 �; W M � ( �o rn � I � oo S-1 M •rl l� •rl ao •rl I ul �o •.-I 1 t� rn � a..� O +� � � N �-i 1 N t'� �-I I �o 'a' � � rn - t�- � ' � r� � i t�i�- t� � �� �-� � O O M l'7 O M (Ya O tfl M 00 O O �, � 1 I O O N Ol 1 M al � H I I �D .-1 t''1 �' I M �P Q.i O O O O O O � V r-I '-i r-i '-i '-i r-1 �/} {/} V} tJ� t/� i? O O lO 00 O V' H (I� O O �t' O O [� � � � 1 l0 I I 000 N � �-10 00 MO 1 01 I I tfl r-I tn b� 'd' '-i M r-I d' r-I 1 N I I ul I �D �r rn 1 rn I t� I U a cYi M � �lY v' cA �''� U� �' cf� e-�1 rl �--I r--I �-I r-1 {/} t/?� th t/} t/} {J} HZ Z O O � M � E+ C� I 1 I 1 1 �''1 1 � �3-I �t' H � � � � � � � � �o a �r . . . � � � � (x� O S.I O }.� tf 1 S-I t11 l� O M N �I' N O � O N N t!1 O N � C j � t� �-1 I O Sx-1 � �-I I d' Q � tf1 •�-Ui 01 � O I �n O O p I N H �i' o� � ao 00 � � c� �, o �+ � rn a � � �., � � � g ,-i � c� 3 ,-i ai o 0 � � � � N � � � �H �- z � z � � � �- . o �r u� o 0 Q O tll N O lD � � I I I I �r 'd' rn o0 oD � � � t I I 1 0 �-+ ao 00 0 . . . . �„ �o tD �o �o rn � � � � � <n- in- � � r� ' O � �1 O N O� '--I Ol O t� [-1 Cl� O Lfl l0 tf1 OJ O rl H W H • � pq � 1 I � N N t!1 M d' N I FC � I I l� lo M d' ct' N tC) U . . . . . � t�n� � ci� t�i�- cCO � t°�° H E-i � � o �n � � � o � O N al O O O � C� . . . . . � f� I I �' �o M � �O M �o . . . . . . . H� ,'�� W l� [� t� t� l� [� [� LYa (/� t/� t/� t/} tf} s/? tl} t/} Q C!l O t�Cl O 0�0 t�f) O C � I I oo �n ao �n � u1 r ZH � , Ol l� l0 N N tf') N • S a N N N N N N N t/} t/} t? iJ)- </? tJ� tJ} 00 t.f) O l0 O l0 �jHC�ly� �f' c�j I � O � O1 � 1 N � O RS O �W �-1 �l; lo I u1 N .-I I � tC) N U �(yQ � l0 � l0 � l0 }� lfl l0 l0 � l� {/?� C7 (7 c/?� CV �r t/�- s/?� � � � � � �� � a �n a .0 z� +� � a� °� .° a�i o w o �c Q �, � � � � �� � � � � � � � � � � � �� � � � � � � o Q �, � � � � � � ro �C, o � �Q � � -� .� � � � � �� C� •� 'L2 4�-I r-i cA r�-I =�1 � � � r�-I � � 4�-� •�i b � � �i � ro � O � � � � z � 3 � � � � wH aQ xw a � cnA � � x °� . •.^ 1TnTm P77�19 1V 111li 1D11 D , � C����l�s �� ��'�:�:� 'b'�fl�?K �R��;t GRAI'EVINE CITY COUNCIL ru�s oF lo/19/sa PROJECT: South4,'est Se�ver Li nes CONTRACT: GPV 81118 OWNER: City of Grapevine, Texas CONTRAC;��: t�)right Construction Company, Grapevine, Texas CHANG� �'?���R NO. 2 DAtE• October 16, 1982-: � ,� CHA�G� ��t ���'�� b''J�R;{ �O 8� P�:��S3�ti�3�t) '�"' In lie:: of constructing sanitary setiver lines of the 5izes and depth re- quired (�n� designed) to carry donestic sewage flotivs for the Countryside Estates ���ivision, you are hereby requested to install increased sizes of li:;=_�, as necessary, to accomodate seti�rage flows from lines serving area n�r�r of.said subdivision. Payment for this extra �vork shall be made e:� �he basis of the difference in cost between the two systems as reflec��u by the attached breakdowns. Extra C��s�s: Lines "A" and "B" - $26,345.50 Ouzfa7l Line "D° . - � 28,980.50 ?otal Additional Cost - $55,326.00 � � Previous -��.:�tract amount � $325,358.Q0 Net(in=rp�s?1(�Is[�c�,dc�in cantract arr�ount 55,326.00 P.evi���- �:,}ract amount . �380,6$4.00 � � � ' Net(iRt*�s?;{c�1�24�a��in sontract time of com�l�tion 30 Ddys �,,, Revised _�ntroct iime of compietion lE0 CALENDAR DAYS Recommended by Approved by OW�lER . FREESE AND NICHQLS � � g �� � � � ` / / ��f'/�� ���� Y 8y - - . Disfributia�: Approvecl by CONTRACZ'OR 1—Owner � I—ControcFor • B t/Y�_�4� 1—F. &N. O{fice y I—Re:. Eng.