Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-04-20 Joint Meeting AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMI5SION MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 20 , 1982 AT 7 : 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAPRBERS - 413 MAIN STREET e� I. CALL TO ORDER II . INVOCATION: Reverend Lael Smith First Presbyterian Church III. OATH OF OFFICE City Secretary to administer the Oath of Office to newly elected City Official. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z82-14 submitted by Tomlin Properties . B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z82-15 submitted by Mr. Earnest W. Poag. C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli- � cation Z82-16 submitted by Austin Patio Dude Ranch. �� D. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z82-17 submitted by Mr. Roy Stewart. E. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to an applica- tion submitted by Mr. Bill Dennis for the reloca- tion of a mobile home . V. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to deliberate the merits of the zoning cases and to consider further published agenda items . B. City Council to remain in session in the Council Chamber to consider further published agenda items. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S . , AS AMENDED BY �"' CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEET- ING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF �„ APRIL, 1982 AT 5 :00 P.M. l� City Secret y AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 20 , 1982 AT 8 : 00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET V. CITIZENS REQUEST AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS VI . CONSIDERATION uF THE MINUTES ,�„ Meetings of March 23 , April 5 , 6 , & 13 , 1982 VII. PUBLIC HEARING City Council to conduct a public hearing to consider an application submitted by Mr. C. C. Hall for the relocation of two portable structures. City Council to also consider subsequent resolution if approved. VIII. OLD BUSINESS City Council to consider appointments to various City Committees. IX. NEW BUSINESS A. City Council to consider the appointment of a Mayor Pro Tem. B. City Council to consider an ordinance relative to the adoption of the Parks & Recreation Master '°�F� P 1 an. �„ C. City Council to consider a resolution authorizing certain City officials to execute grant-related agreements with the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department. D. City Council to consider a resolution authorizing the Police Department to apply for a grant for off-duty police services on U. S. Corps of Engineers property. E. City Council to consider and award the bid for construction of the sub-fire station in the southern portion of the City. F. City Council to consider an ordinance determining speed Iimits on Fairway Drive. G. City Council to consider an ordinance relating to stop signs on Fairway Drive and within Parra Linda Estates. H. City Council to consider an ordinance relating to load limits on Fairway Drive. I. City Council to consider awarding the contract for i� construction of the Southwest Sewer Line and Pump Station. J. City Council to consider the closing of the Main Street Bridge at Highway 114 for construction pur- poses. K. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relating to the adop- tion of Planning & Zoning Commission bylaws and a subsequent ordinance. X. ZONING CASES & PLATS A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-14 (Tomlin Properties) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-15 (Poag) and a subsequent ordi- nance if applicable. � C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-16 (Austin Patio Dude Ranch) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-17 (Stewart) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Mobile Home Application 82-02 (Dennis) . F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of Brookside Addition. XI. ADJOURNMENT � � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 1982 AT 5 :00 P.M. City Secre r � � AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 20 , 1982 AT 8 :00 P.M. CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN STREET � V. NEP? BUSINESS �+r A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-14 (Tomlin Properties) and make a recommendation to the City Council. B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-15 (Poag) and make a recommenda- tion to the City Council. C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-16 (Austin Patio Dude Ranch) and make a recommendation to the City Council. D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-17 (Stewart) and make a recom- mendation to the City Council. E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider an application to relocate a mobile home (Dennis) and make a recommendation to the City Council. F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final plat of Brookside Addition and make a recommendation to the City Council . � G. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the adoption of their bylaws and formulate a recom- mendation to the City Council. VI . CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meetings of March 11 , 16 , & 18 and April. 1 & 6 , 1982 VII . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION VIII . ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S . , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 1982 AT 5 : 00 P.M. � � City Secr ry STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARR�N`!' CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council and the Planning & Zoning Co�nission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met i3z Joint and Regular Session on this the 20th day of April, 1982 at 7:30 p.m, with the following persons present to wit: ,�, William D. Tate Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem Charles Dunn Council Member � C. L. Oliver Council Nlember William Shafer Council NIember Marion Brekken Council M�mber Ron Dyer Council Nl�mber constituting a quorum, with the follawing members of the Planning & Zoning Conunission: Sharron Spencer Chairman Ron Cook Vice Chairn�an Harlen Joyce N�r Ann Glynn Nlember Klee Hawkins Nlember Gerald Norman Nlember constituting a quorum with Nlember Harold Anderson absent, with the follawing members of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Shirley Armstrong City Secretary � � CAI�, TO ORDER � Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Reverend Lael Sh�ith, First Presbyterian Church. OATH OF OFFICE The first order of business was for the City Secretary to ach�iinister the Oath of Office to the newly elected City Official. Charles Dunn, duly elected to Council Place One (1) , was then given the Oath of Office. PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-14, 'IbNII�IN PROPEKI'IES The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Co�nission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-14 submitted by Tomlin Properties. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon City Planner Marc Guy to explain the request of the applicant. The Council and Planning & �"'* Zoning C�unission were advised that the property in question was 11.4 acres located on the southeast side of Highway 26 at the Highway 114 intersection. Mr. Guy further stated that the present zoning was "R-1" Single Family � Dwelling District with the requested zoning being for "I-1" Light Industrial District. Mr. Dave Dennison then made a brief presentation on behalf of Tomlin Properties. Members of the Planning & Zoning Conanission then asked questions pertaining to the availability of utility services. There were no questions fran the City Council. 04/20/82 Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. There were none. The City Secretary then introduced a letter from Mr. Jack Dawrley, �ecutive Director of DFW Airport, in which he advised the applicant of the noise levels of the tract in question. There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Ca�russioner Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Nlember Klee Hawkins and prevailed by the follawing vote: �e.�, Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Norman, Glynn, & Hawkins Nays . None Absent: Anderson �`� A motion was then made by Council Nlember Ron Dyer to close the Council's portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Nle.mber Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dyer, & Dunn Nays: None PUBLIC �G, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-15, POAG The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Co�nission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-15 submitted by Mr. Earnest W. Poag. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon City Planner Marc �.iy to explain the request of the applicant. Mr. Gtiiy advised. that the property in question was located within the strip shopping center on the southeast corner of Tanglewood and Mustang Drive (2709 Mustang Drive) . He advised that the current zonir.g was "C-2" Comnunity Business with the �� �� r ested zonin bein for SP cific Use for coin-o rated ame machines � g 9 � Pe g incidental to the operation of a game room establishment in accordance with a +*�► site plan. � Mr. Poag then made a brief presentation on his awn behalf. �� Questions fran the Council and Planning & Zoning Comnission related to the nt�nber of machines requested, hours of operation, supervision, size of the building, and lack of cleanliness and grounds upkeep of the area in question. Follawing the discussion, the City Secretary reported that she was in receipt of two letters of opposition fran Mr. & Mrs. Machen Abernathy and Mr. & Mrs. Thomas G�.iertin, both families being residents of the Oak Creek Subdivision. Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. There were none. Planning & Zoning Commission Member Ann Glynn then made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Nlember Rc�n Cook and prevailed by the follaaing vote: � Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Nornian, & Hawkins Nays . None Absent: Anderson Ma.yor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the �� public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council A�r Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote: �.� Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliv�r, Shafer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer Nays: None PUBLIC FiF�R�IG, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-16, AUSTIN PATIO DUDE RANCH The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Comnission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-16 submitted by Austin Patio Dude Ranch. 04/20/82 Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked Mr. C-�.iy to repnrt the request of the applicant. Mr. G�iy advised that the property in question was 14.4 acres located in the A. W. Anderson Survey, Abstract Ntunber 26. He further noted that the current zoning was for a Specific Use Permit relating to alcoholic beverages in relation to a dude ranch, with the requested zoning being for the same, with ancillary uses added, including game machines with the submission of a reviewed site plan. � Mr. Jack Beachum, representing the applicant, made a brief presentation reviewing the revised site plan using a pictorial layout of the proposed development. There were few questions from the Planning & Zoning Comnission and City Council. Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. There were none. The City Secretary then reported that she was not in receipt of any letters or petitions concerning the requested zoning. Planning & Zoning Conun.ission Nlember Klee Hawkins then made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by N�r Gerald Norman and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Hawkins, Joyce, Glynn, & Normari Nays . None Absent: Anderson Counci]man Oliver then made a mption to close the Council's portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council NlQsnber Brekken and prevailed by the follaaing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None 3 ZONING APPLICATION Z82-17, ROY STEWAI�!' �+ The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Co�nission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-17 submitted by Mr. Roy Stewart. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon the City Planner to e�lain the requested zoning. Mr. G�.iy reported that the property in question was. the northeast corner of Vine and Airline Streets (1133 Airline) . He noted that the present zoning was "R-1" Single Family with the requested zoning being for "C-1" Neighborhood Business District. Mr. Stewart then made a brief presentation advising that he intended to use the space for the construction of an office structure. During the discussion that followed, Mr. Stewart was asked if he would consider r�applying the application for a Specific Use Permit for Office Facilities rather than for "C-1". Mr. Stewart answered yes. Mayor Tate then asked if there were any guests present to speak for or against � the application. There were none. The City Secretary then reported that she was in receipt of two letters, from ,� Mr. Thomas Ba� and Mr. Conner Lam, expressing favorable consideration of the requested zoning. There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Canunission Member Klee Hawkins made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Mesnber Gerald NormaYl and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Nornian, Glynn, Joyce, & Hawkins Nays . None Absent: Anderson 04/20/82 Council Nlember Shafer then made a m�tion to close the Council's portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Dyer and prevailed by the follaaing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None PUBLIC HEARING, MOBILE HOME APPLICATION 82-02, BILL DENNIS The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning .�� Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to an application submitted by Mr. Bill Dennis for the relocation of a mobile home. � ,� Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked the City Secretary to explain the request of the application. Those in attendance were advised that the applicant was requesting permission to locate a m�bile home on the rear of the property at 605 East Dallas Road. Mr. Bill Dennis then addressed the Council and reviewed a site plan advising that the m�bile home would be used for living facilities for himself and his wife. He further noted that the property was c7wned by his mother, who lived in the house located on the same property. Mr. Dennis advised that the lot was extremely deep and fronted on the north of the railroad. He comnented that because of placement of the mobile h�, it would not be seen from Dallas Roa.d. Follawing the presentation, there were few questions from the Planning & Zoning Commission and Council. Mayor Tate asked if there were any guests present to speak for or against the application. Mrs. Dennis, mpther of the applicant, addressed the Council !I requesting favorable consideration for safety security reasons. I! The City Secretary advised that Mrs. Wilkins, ad�acent property awner to the ' west, had telephoned and reported that she had no objections to the request. �� The City SecretaYy then reported that she was in receipt of one letter from � Omega Industries also stating that they had no objections to the request. �,,:,� There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Comnission M�mUer Klee Hawkins made a mption to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Nlember Ann Glynn and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Norn�z, Joyce, Hawkins, & Glynn Nays . None Absent: Anderson Council Mesnber Charles Dunn then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the public hearing. The mr�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None END OF JOINT PUBLIC HF.,ARIl�IG Mayor Tate advised that the Council w�uld recess briefly before reconvening in the Council Ch�aznber to consider further published agenda items. He commented further that the Planning & Zoning Canmission would reconvene in the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to deliberate the merits of the public hearings and �* to consider other published matters. REC.'ONVENE , � Follawing the recess, Mayor Tate declared the meeting called to order with all members of the Council in attendance. MISCII�I�NEOUS REPORTS The City Secretary reported that the coffee cups, bumper stickers, and T-shirt decals given to the Council were compliments of the Grapevine Library Board and Staff in recognition of Public Library Week currently in progress. 04/20/82 CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES The next order of business was consideration of the minutes of March 23, and April 5, 6, and 13, 1982. Council N1�iber Brekken then made a motion to waive the reading of the minutes and approve them as published. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: „� Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None � PUBLIC HEARING, PORTABLE BUILDING APPLICATION, C. C. H1�LL The next order of business was for the City Council to conduct a public hearing and consider a subsequent resolution concerning an application submitted by Mr. C. C. Hall for the relocation of two portable buildings. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked the City Secretary to explain the request of the applicant. The Council was advised that Mr. Hall was seeking permission to locate two portable buildings on the property at 706 East Northwest Highway to be used by General Telephone C.ornpany. Mr. Hall then addressed the Council and outlined the placement of the buildings on the property and their intended use. There being little discussion from members of the Council, Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. There were none. The City Secretary reported that she was not in receipt of any letters or petitions regarding the matter. ,�� Councilman Dyer then made a motion to close the public hearing. The m�tion J ;�, was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None The City Secretary then read the caption of the subsequent resolution, which provided for the approval of the portable buildings. Council Nlember Brekken made a motion that the resolution be adopted. The m�tion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 82-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, 'I�S, PROVIDING FOR TI� ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT AUTHOR- IZING THE REL.�OCATION OF 'I'WO PORTABLE BUILDINGS; PROVIDING FOR A NON-TRANSFERABLE PERMIT; PROVID- ING A SITE PI.AN; AND PROVIDING AN EEFECTIVE DATE '"°�' COMNIITI�E APPOIN`13�IIV�rS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider appointments � to various City Cair�nittees and Boards. Board of Zoning Adjustments Mayor Tate advised that three regular positions and one alternate position needed to be filled on the Board of Zoning Adjustments. Counci]m�n Dunn then made a motion that current members Doug Lamb and Gerald 'I'hompson be reappointed. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote: 04/20/82 Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a mr�tion that Glenn Deavers be appointed to the Board of Zoning Adjust�nents. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None � �� Counci]srk�n Shafer then made a motion that Joel Stiner be appointed to the position of Alternate N�unber One on the Board of Zoning Adjustments. His motion was seconded by Counci]man Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote: ,�,,,, Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Citizens Advisory C�ittee Mayor Tate advised that appointrnents needed to be made in all eleven districts of the Citizens Advisory Conunittee, some of which ha.d not received any applications. District One (1) and 'It� (2) Because of lack of applicants, there were no appointments made in Districts One and 'Itao. District Three (3) Council N1�znber Brekken made a motion that Beverly Davydiuk be reappointed representative of District Three of the Citizens Advisory Co�ittee. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: �� Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dur�z, & Dyer � Nays: None �� District Four (4) Counci]man Oliver made a mption that Mary McCullough be reappointed to represent District Four. The mr�tion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer Nays: None District Five (5) There being no applicants, there were no appointments made to District Five (5) . District Six (6) Council Member Brekken made a motion that Rudolf Fernandez be reappointed to represent District Six (6) of the Citizens Advisory Conanittee. The motion was seconded by Council Member Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Sha.fer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer Nays: None >� District Seven (7) and Eight (8) There were no applicants for Districts Seven (7) and Eight (8) , therefore, no appointrnents were made for those Districts. District Nine (9) Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion that Rudy Paniagua be appointed to represent District Nine (9) . The mr�tion was seconded by Counci]man Dyer 04/20/82 and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None District Ten (10) Council N1�.mber Brekken made a motion that Robert Downs be reappointed to represent District Ten on the Citizens Advisory Co�dttee. The mQtion � was seconded by Councilman DuYuz and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer � Nays: None Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion that June Fogel be appointed to represent District Ten. The motion was seconded by Counci]man Oliver and prevailed by the follc7wing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None District Eleven (11) Because there were no applicants, no appointments were made to District Eleven (11) . Electrical Board Mayor Tate advised that three appointrnents needed to be made to the Electrical Board. Council Member Brekken made a motion that Bill Dawkins be reappointed to the Electrical Board to fill the requirement of an employee of Texas Pawer & Light Com�aziy. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the - -� follaaing vote: � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer � Nays: None Council M�mb�r Shafer then made a motion that Bob Taylor be reappointed to the Electrical Board to fill the requirement of a member fran any profession. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer Nays: None Golf Course Advisory CoirHnittee Mayor Tate advised that four appointments, including a Council representative, needed to be made to the Golf Course Advisory C�mi.ttee. Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion that Council Member Shafer be reappointed to represent the Council on the Golf Course Advisory Conanittee. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, �, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer �/�,�„�,�ji1 d� � Nays: None ��� °�� �t _� g� �4bsfain� -�`llec`��r �°`°`� Council Member Oliver then made a mption that Doil Dalton be reappointed to the Golf Course Advisory C�ittee. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Council Mea�nber Dyer then made a motion that Bobby Wise be reappointed to the Golf Course Advisory Co�nittee. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, Dyer Nays: None 04/20/82 Nlayor Pro Tem Ware then made a mr�tion that Kurt Mullick be appointed to the Golf Course Advisory Coa�nittee. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Grapevine Housing Authority Mayor Tate advised that two appointm�_nts needed to be made to the Grapevine �� Housing Authority. Council Member Dyer made a motion that W. D. Willhoite be reappointed to serve ,�;„� on the Housing Authority. The motion was seconded by Council Member Dunn and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None A second appointment was not made to the Housing Authority because of lack of applications. Housing Advisory & Appeals Board and Uniform Building Code of Appeals Board Mayor Tate advised that the same board �ers served on both of the coim�ittees and noted that four appointments needed to be made. Councilman Oliver then made a motion that Joe Lipscomb be reappointed. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follaai.ng vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Council Nlember Shafer then made a �tion that John Ferguson be reappointed. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Dunn and prevailed by the follawing ""�"" vote: � �.�, Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Council Member Oliver then made a mption that H. J. H r be rea inted. a� PPo The mption was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed. by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to reappoint Brent McPherson. The motion was seconded by Council Member Oliver and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Li.brary Board Mayor Tate advised the Council that four appointments and one appointment for an unexpired term needed to be made on the Library Board. �� Councilman Oliver made a motion that Frances Halstead be reappointed to serve on the Li.brary Board. The motion was seconded by Counci]man Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: �..,� Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Council Member Brekken made a motion that Ma.ry McC�.illough be appointed. to the Library Board. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None 04/20/82 Council N�r Dyer then made a motion that John Page be appointed to the Library Board. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follcxaing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Council �r Dunn then made a motion that Ed Vinson be appointed to fill the unexpired one-year term on the Library Board. Council Member Oliver seconded ,�* the mption and it prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Ihann, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer �, Nays: None Council Me.mber Brekken then made a mr�tion to appoint Bartley Nourse to the Library Board. The motion was seconded by Council Me,mber Dyer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Park & Recreation Board Mayor Tate advised the Council that four appointments needed to be made to the Parks and Recreation Board. Council Member Shafer made a mption that Jerzy Brawn be reappointed to the Park & Recreation Board. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Duruz, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Council Member Brekken then made a motion that Julian Dyke be reappointed to � the Parks and Recreation Board. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember � , Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote: � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Council Nl�mber Dyer then made a mption that Margaret Bates be reappointed to the Parks and Recreation Board. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Council l�mber Brekken then made a mr�tion that Bobbie Nery be appointed to the Parks and Recreation Board. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dver Nays: None Planning & Zoning Co�nission The Council was advised that three appointments needed to be made to the Planning & Zoning Ccxtunission. � Council Member Duruz made a motion to reappoint Sharron Spencer to the Planning & Zoning Corrrtnission. The motion was seconded by Council Member Oliver and �, prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None Council Nlember Dyer made a motion to reappoint Gerald Norman to the Planning & Zoning Comnission. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Durui, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None i 04/20/82 Council Member Brekken then made a motion to appoint Tom Pawers to the Planning & Zoning Conunission. The motion was seconded by Council Ntember Dunn and prevailed. by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None MAYOR PRO TEb4 APPOIN'IT�tQVT, 1982-83 The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the ��* appointment of a Mayor Pro Tem for 1982-83. Council N1emb�r Brekken made a mQtion that Ted Ware be rea inted Ma or Pro PP� Y �� Tem. The motion was seconded by Councilm�z Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Abstain: ware PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN, ADOPTION - ORDINANCE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance relative to the adoption of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Mr. Terry Cheek, representing Schrickel, Rollins, and Associates, presented the lan to the Council and outlined its contents P • Following questions fran Council Members, Mayor Tate asked the City Secretary to read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Dyer and prevailed by the follaving vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Sha.fer, Brekken, & Dyer ''"""" Nays: None )o ��� ORDINANCE NO. 82-17 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, 'I`EXAS, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE CONIPRF.�]II�TSIVE MASTER PARK AND RECREATION PLAN; PROVIDING A SEVER- ABILITY CL�AUSE; AND DDCLARING AN �'[�TCY GRANr.P SIGNATURE AUrl�iORIZATION, 'I�XAS PARKS & WILDLIFE DEPARTNNIENNT The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution authorizing certain City officials to execute grant-related agreements with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Departrnent. The City Manager explained the need for the resolution after which the City Secre read the ca tion. tarY P P Ma or ro Tem Ware made a motion to ado t the resolution. The motion was Y P seconded by Council N1�.mber Brekken and revailed b the follawin vote: P Y 9 Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None �� RESOLUTION NO. 82-20 �� A RESOI�7TION OF Tf� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, DESIC�TATING CERTAIlV CITY OFFI- CIALS AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTING FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, IN DEAL- ING WITH TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMELVT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN 'PHE LAND AND [nTP,'I`ER CONSERVATION FUND ACT OF 1965; CERTIFYING THAT Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER SUCH PROGRAM 04/20/82 RESOLUTION, OFF-DUI'Y POLICE OFFIC�R.S TO PATROL LAKE GRAPEVINE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution authorizing the Police Department to apply for a grant for off-duty police services on U. S. Corps of Engineers property. The City Manager explained the need for approval of the resolution. Follaving a short discussion, Mayor Tate asked the City Secretary to read the caption of the proposed resolution. Council Member Brekken then made a mr�tion that the resolution be adopted. The motion was seconded by Council N1e.�nber Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None RESOLUTION NO. 82-21 A RESOI�UTION OF Tf� CITY COUDTCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING Tf� CITY OF GRAPE- VINE TO EN`I�R INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE U. S. �RMlY CORPS OF INGINEERS FOR LAW ELVF'ORCII�Nr.0 WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF GRAPEVINE BY USE OF OFF-DUTY POLICE OFFICERS TIMBERLINE SUB-FIRE STATION, BID AWARD The next order of business was for the City Council to consider and award the bid for construction of the sub-fire station in the southern portion of the City. City Engineer Jim Baddaker presented the follcxaing bids and reco�nded that �) the bid be awarded to the law bidder, JPS Building Corporation. BIDDER ALTERNATE LUMP SUM BID LUMP SUM BASIC BID JPS Building Corp. $124,300.00 $125,000.00 Denrick Const. Co. $135,269.00 $136,509.00 Taylor-Hall Const. $144,020.00 $143,045.00 Scobil Contractors $146,249.00 $146,749.00 Pete Durant & Assoc. $155,650.00 $156,550.00 Cardinal Builders $165,300.00 $167,000.00 Bailey Alexander $163,946.00 $164,882.00 The Craftsman, Inc. $167,000.00 $168,504.00 M & L Construction $147,701.00 $176,000.00 Shultz & Hawell $170,690.00 $179,990.00 Altan Concrete Const. $183,300.00 $183,816.00 Council Member Oliver then made a motion to accept the rec�ndation of the City Staff and award the bid to JPS Building Corporation for the lump sum basic bid of $125,000. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Dyer and prevailed by the follaving vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None �� SPEED LIl`'IITS, FAIAaAY DRIVE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance determining speed limits on the Fairway Drive detour around the spillway washout. City Engineer Jim Baddaker reconanended that the speed limit be set for twenty miles per hour (20 m.p.h.) . The City Secretary then read the caption of the proposed ordinance. 04/20/82 Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to accept the reco�ndation of the City Staff and adopt the ordinance. The mption was seconded by Council Nlember Dyer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None ORDINANC� NO. 82-18 AN ORDINANC,E OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, T.E�B, �� SPECIFYING � RFASONABLE AND PRUDENT SP� FOR PUBLIC STRE�rS AND AIZEYS WITHIN THE CITY; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PR(�- �,,,� VIDING FOR A PE[�1ALTY OF FINE NOT 'PO EXCEID 'IWO HUNDRID DOLI�RS ($200.00) FOR EAGH OFFIIVSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECI�ARING AN II�IERGII�TCY II IE STOP SIGNS, FAIFd�IAY DRIVE, PARRA LINDA ESTATES, PHASE II The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance relating to stop signs on Faizway Drive and within Parra Linda Estates, Phase II. City Engineer Jim Baddaker advised the Council of the proposed locations for the stop signs. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. There being little discussion, Council Member Marion Brekken made a motion to , adopt the ordinance. The m�tion was seconded by Council N�er Shafer and I prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer "'�''� Nays: None �Z �� ORDINANCE NO. 82-19 AN ORDINANCE ANIENDING CHAP7.�R 23, SEGTION 30, OF TI� CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, BY ADDING STOP SIGNS AT CERTAIN I�OCATIONS DESCRIBID HEREIN; AUZ'fiOR- IZING THE ERECrION OF TRAFFIC REGULATION SIGNS; RE- PEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SE�'VIIt- ABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PELV��LTY; AND DECI�ARING AN ET"�RGFdVCY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REC�TDATION ZONING APPLICATION Z82-14, �,IN PROPERTIES The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning C�snission relative to Zoning Application Z82-14 (Tomlin Properties) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. Chairnian Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning CoimLission recomreazded approval of Zoning P,pplication Z82-14 by a vote of six (6) to zero (0) . �� The City Secretary then read the proposed ordinance. Council Nlember Oliver made a motion to adopt the ordinance. The motion was �=.� seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 82-20 AN ORDINANCE ANI�IDING ORDIN��NCE NO. 70-10, Tf� COMPREfiIIQSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF 04/20/82 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAI� BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPIIVDIX "A" OF Z�-IE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S, GRAIVTING A ZONING C�iiANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A IiOT, TRACT, OR PARCII� OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATID IN TARRANI' COUNTY, TEXA.S, BEING A PA1�I' OF THE A. FOS'I`ER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 518, IN � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S, MORE P'ITLI�Y AND CONIPL�'.1'EI�Y DESCRIBID IN Tf� BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A C;EIANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "R-1" SINGLE-FAMILY DWEL.LING DISTRICT TO "I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRT�L DISTRICT; CORREC.PING THE OFFICIAL ZONING �"""` MAP; PRESEI2VING AI�L OTHER PORTIONS OF � ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CI�USE RE- LATING TO SEVERABILITY; DEZ'ERMINING THAT Z� PUBLIC INr1�RESTS, MORAIS AND G�FRAT, WELFARE DENIAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AN�TDMEN''r THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PIIVALTY; AND DECLAFtIl�TG AN F7�iF:RGFt�T(,',y PI,ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl�IDATION ZONING APPLICATION Z82-15, Tn]AYNE POAG The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reconBnendation of the Planning & Zoning Co�n.ission relative to Zoning Application Z82-15 (Poag) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. Chairn�an Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Corrffrtission reco�nended that the request be denied by a vote of six (6) to zero (0) . She added that reasons for denial included that the Connnission did not feel that the zoning requested was the highest and best use of the property, that the parking was , inadequate, and because of the voiced opposition of neighboring residents. �* (3 ' Follawing a discussion among members of the Council, Council Men�k�er Brekken � made a motion to accept the reco�Zdation of the Planning & Zoning Consn.ission and deny the application. The mption was seconded by Council Member Dyer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, .Sba�2, Brekken, & Dyer�P����j Nays: .D1en�' ��c���r �� .�s ��� PLANNING & ZONING CON]MISSION RECODM'�TDATION � ZONING APPLICATION Z82-16, AUSTIN PATIO The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reco�nda.tion of the Planning & Zoning Co�ission relative to Zoning Application Z82-16 (Austin Patio Dude Ranch) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. Chairman Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Cor�ission reco�.nded approval by a vote of six to zero, and that it was also recomn�nded that because of the complexity of the request, the City Attorney be instructed to draft the necessary ordinance. Council Member Oliver then made a motion to accept the recomrendation of the Planning & Zoning Conan.ission and approve the requested zoning with the City Attorney being instructed to draft the ordinance. The mption was seconded by Council N1�mber Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: ;�,,; Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl�TDATION ZONING APPLICATION Z82-17, ROY STEf�RT The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to Zoning Application Z82-17, (Stewart) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. 04/20/82 Chairnian Spencer reported that it was the reco�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Conmission that the applicant be authorized to withdraw the current application requesting "C-1" zoning and reapply on the May 18 agenda. for a Specific Use Permit for an office facility and, further, that the filing fee for the second application be waived. Council Nlember Oliver made a motion to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Conanission and withdraw the application and to accept an application for the May 18 meeting of a Specific Use Permit for office facilities, and that the filing fee be waived. The mc�tion was seconded by �, Council MP�nber Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dyer, & Dunn �,,� Nays: None PI,�NNING & ZONING COMMISSION REC�IDATION MOBILE HOME APPLICATION, BILL DENNIS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Co��ission relative to Nbbile H� Application 82-02 (Dennis) . Chairir�an Spencer reported that it was the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Co�ssion that the application be denied. She added that the vote was four (4) to two (2) . Mayor Tate r�aninded the Council that under the existing ordinance, if the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends denial, the Council only has the ability to ratify that decision. Council Member Dyer then made a motion to accept the recommenda.tion of the ', Planning & Zoning Conmlission and deny the application. The mr�tion was ', seconded by Counci7man Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote: ' Ayes: Tate, Dunn, Oliver, Brekken, & Dyer �'""'� Nays: Ware & Shafer ��, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECON�IDATION �� FINAL PLAT, BROOKSIDE ADDITION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reco�a�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Co�nission relative to the final plat of Brookside Addition. City EYigineer Jim Baddaker reported that it was the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Corr¢riission that the plat be approved. Follaaing review of the plat, Mayor Pro 'I'em Ware made a motion that it be approved. The motion was seconded by Council MQ.mber Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None IAAD LIMIT, FAIFdn7AY DRIVE DETOUR ROAD The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance relating to load limi.ts on FaiYway Drive detour road. �� City Ehgineer Jim Baddaker advised the Council that it was his reco�ndation that a load limit not be inq�osed at this ti.me. .�;.,� Council N�er Oliver therefore made a mption that the item be tabled. The motion seconded by Council Nle�nber Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, Shafer, & Dyer Nays: None BID AWARD, SOUTHWEST SEWER LINE AND PUMP STATION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider awarding the bid for construction of the Southwest Sewer Line and P�ur�p Station. 04/20/82 City �gineer Jim Baddaker presented the follawing bids and recomnended that the bid be awarded to Wright Construction Company on its low bid of $318,169. BIDDER AMOUNT BID CO1��LEI'ION TIME Wright Construction Cair�pany $318,169.00 120 Calendar Days Regional Utilities Company $329,338.85 75 Calendar Days Mario Sinacola & Sons $338,978.59 120 Calendar Days Atkins Brothers Equipment Co. $344,732.53 120 Calendar Days Turner Construction Conq�any $347,119.40 120 Calendar Days Oscar Renda Contractors $418,961.00 120 Calendar Days C & W Utility Contractors $451,119.05 130 Calendar Days �, Hall Construction Company $461,912.00 130 Calendar Days Council N�r Dunn then made a motion to accept the recommendation of the City Staff and award the bid to Wright Construction Ccxnpany on its low bid of $318,169. The motion was seconded by Council NIemUer Dyer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None CIASING OF MAIN STRF.�ET BRIDGE AT STATE HIGHWAY 114 The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the closing of the Main Street Bridge at Highway 114 for construction purposes. City IIzgineer Jim Baddaker advised that according to the construction schedule, the Main Street Bridge is to be taken out of service in SeptPanb�r, 1982, with ccx�letion in April, 1983. H. B. Zachry, Inc. , the construction company, has suggested that the present bridge be closed in June after the service roads are opened. He added that this w�uld complete the entire Main Street bridge work in October, 1982, rather than in April, 1983. Mr. Baddaker advised that his staff had contacted the businesses in the area that would be '�" most affected by the closing, and they all preferred that the bridge be closed ��> in June for completion of the work as early as possible. � Follawing a short discussion, Council Nlember Dyer made a mption to authorize the City Staff to proceed with a request to the State Highway Departsnent to close the bridge in June. The m�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follaving vote: Ayes: Tate, 6Vare, Oliver, Shafer, Ihznn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None PI.�ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION BYLAWS, ORDINANCE The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recoiranendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relating to the adoption of the Planning & Zoning bylaws and a subsequent ordinance. Comnission Chairman Sharron Spencer reviewed the draft of the proposed bylaws and advised that the Planning & Zoning Ca�nission reconmended appraval. During the discussion that follawed, the technical use of the words "may" and "desire" in Item III B (Reg�zlar Meetings) and Item IV A-1 (Withdrawals) was questioned. Also, It�n II was entitled "Election of Officers", but the content related to appointment of �ers. Because of the uncertainty, Councilman Oliver made a motion to table consideration of the bylaws. The mr�tion was seconded by Councilman Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays: None ADJOURIVN�IT There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilman Shafer made a motion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Counci]man Dyer and prevailed by the following vote: 04/20/82 Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer Nays: None PASSID AND APPROVED BY Tt-� TY COUNCIL OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the day of , 1982. APPROVID: �� ��� � Mayor A'�!�'�ST: ity Secre � /� �-� �� u, �