HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-04-20 Joint Meeting AGENDA
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
JOINT CITY COUNCIL
AND
PLANNING & ZONING COMMI5SION MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 20 , 1982 AT 7 : 30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAPRBERS - 413 MAIN STREET
e�
I. CALL TO ORDER
II . INVOCATION: Reverend Lael Smith
First Presbyterian Church
III. OATH OF OFFICE
City Secretary to administer the Oath of Office
to newly elected City Official.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to
conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli-
cation Z82-14 submitted by Tomlin Properties .
B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to
conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli-
cation Z82-15 submitted by Mr. Earnest W. Poag.
C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to
conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli-
� cation Z82-16 submitted by Austin Patio Dude Ranch.
�� D. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to
conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli-
cation Z82-17 submitted by Mr. Roy Stewart.
E. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to
conduct a public hearing relative to an applica-
tion submitted by Mr. Bill Dennis for the reloca-
tion of a mobile home .
V. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the
Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to deliberate the
merits of the zoning cases and to consider further
published agenda items .
B. City Council to remain in session in the Council
Chamber to consider further published agenda items.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S . , AS AMENDED BY
�"' CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION,
THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEET-
ING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF
�„ APRIL, 1982 AT 5 :00 P.M.
l�
City Secret y
AGENDA
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 20 , 1982 AT 8 : 00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET
V. CITIZENS REQUEST AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS
VI . CONSIDERATION uF THE MINUTES
,�„ Meetings of March 23 , April 5 , 6 , & 13 , 1982
VII. PUBLIC HEARING
City Council to conduct a public hearing to
consider an application submitted by Mr. C.
C. Hall for the relocation of two portable
structures. City Council to also consider
subsequent resolution if approved.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
City Council to consider appointments to
various City Committees.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. City Council to consider the appointment of
a Mayor Pro Tem.
B. City Council to consider an ordinance relative
to the adoption of the Parks & Recreation Master
'°�F� P 1 an.
�„ C. City Council to consider a resolution authorizing
certain City officials to execute grant-related
agreements with the Texas Parks & Wildlife
Department.
D. City Council to consider a resolution authorizing
the Police Department to apply for a grant for
off-duty police services on U. S. Corps of
Engineers property.
E. City Council to consider and award the bid for
construction of the sub-fire station in the
southern portion of the City.
F. City Council to consider an ordinance determining
speed Iimits on Fairway Drive.
G. City Council to consider an ordinance relating to
stop signs on Fairway Drive and within Parra Linda
Estates.
H. City Council to consider an ordinance relating to
load limits on Fairway Drive.
I. City Council to consider awarding the contract for
i� construction of the Southwest Sewer Line and Pump
Station.
J. City Council to consider the closing of the Main
Street Bridge at Highway 114 for construction pur-
poses.
K. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relating to the adop-
tion of Planning & Zoning Commission bylaws and a
subsequent ordinance.
X. ZONING CASES & PLATS
A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning
Application Z82-14 (Tomlin Properties) and a
subsequent ordinance if applicable.
B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning
Application Z82-15 (Poag) and a subsequent ordi-
nance if applicable.
�
C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning
Application Z82-16 (Austin Patio Dude Ranch) and a
subsequent ordinance if applicable.
D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning
Application Z82-17 (Stewart) and a subsequent
ordinance if applicable.
E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Mobile Home
Application 82-02 (Dennis) .
F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final
plat of Brookside Addition.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
�
� IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY
CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON
THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 1982 AT 5 :00 P.M.
City Secre r
�
�
AGENDA
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 20 , 1982 AT 8 :00 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN STREET
�
V. NEP? BUSINESS
�+r
A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning
Application Z82-14 (Tomlin Properties) and make
a recommendation to the City Council.
B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning
Application Z82-15 (Poag) and make a recommenda-
tion to the City Council.
C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning
Application Z82-16 (Austin Patio Dude Ranch)
and make a recommendation to the City Council.
D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning
Application Z82-17 (Stewart) and make a recom-
mendation to the City Council.
E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider an
application to relocate a mobile home (Dennis)
and make a recommendation to the City Council.
F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the
final plat of Brookside Addition and make a
recommendation to the City Council .
�
G. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the
adoption of their bylaws and formulate a recom-
mendation to the City Council.
VI . CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
Meetings of March 11 , 16 , & 18 and April. 1 & 6 , 1982
VII . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION
VIII . ADJOURNMENT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S . , AS AMENDED BY
CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE
REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED
AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 1982 AT 5 : 00 P.M.
�
�
City Secr ry
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARR�N`!'
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
The City Council and the Planning & Zoning Co�nission of the City of
Grapevine, Texas met i3z Joint and Regular Session on this the 20th day of
April, 1982 at 7:30 p.m, with the following persons present to wit:
,�, William D. Tate Mayor
Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem
Charles Dunn Council Member
� C. L. Oliver Council Nlember
William Shafer Council NIember
Marion Brekken Council M�mber
Ron Dyer Council Nl�mber
constituting a quorum, with the follawing members of the Planning & Zoning
Conunission:
Sharron Spencer Chairman
Ron Cook Vice Chairn�an
Harlen Joyce N�r
Ann Glynn Nlember
Klee Hawkins Nlember
Gerald Norman Nlember
constituting a quorum with Nlember Harold Anderson absent, with the follawing
members of the City Staff:
James L. Hancock City Manager
Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager
John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney
Shirley Armstrong City Secretary
�
� CAI�, TO ORDER
� Mayor Tate called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION
The Invocation was delivered by Reverend Lael Sh�ith, First Presbyterian
Church.
OATH OF OFFICE
The first order of business was for the City Secretary to ach�iinister the Oath
of Office to the newly elected City Official. Charles Dunn, duly elected to
Council Place One (1) , was then given the Oath of Office.
PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-14, 'IbNII�IN PROPEKI'IES
The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning
Co�nission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-14
submitted by Tomlin Properties.
Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon City Planner Marc
Guy to explain the request of the applicant. The Council and Planning &
�"'* Zoning C�unission were advised that the property in question was 11.4 acres
located on the southeast side of Highway 26 at the Highway 114 intersection.
Mr. Guy further stated that the present zoning was "R-1" Single Family
� Dwelling District with the requested zoning being for "I-1" Light Industrial
District.
Mr. Dave Dennison then made a brief presentation on behalf of Tomlin
Properties.
Members of the Planning & Zoning Conanission then asked questions pertaining to
the availability of utility services. There were no questions fran the City
Council.
04/20/82
Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the
application. There were none.
The City Secretary then introduced a letter from Mr. Jack Dawrley, �ecutive
Director of DFW Airport, in which he advised the applicant of the noise levels
of the tract in question.
There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Ca�russioner Harlen Joyce
made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was
seconded by Nlember Klee Hawkins and prevailed by the follawing vote: �e.�,
Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Norman, Glynn, & Hawkins
Nays . None
Absent: Anderson �`�
A motion was then made by Council Nlember Ron Dyer to close the Council's
portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Nle.mber
Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dyer, & Dunn
Nays: None
PUBLIC �G, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-15, POAG
The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning
Co�nission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-15
submitted by Mr. Earnest W. Poag.
Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon City Planner Marc
�.iy to explain the request of the applicant. Mr. Gtiiy advised. that the
property in question was located within the strip shopping center on the
southeast corner of Tanglewood and Mustang Drive (2709 Mustang Drive) . He
advised that the current zonir.g was "C-2" Comnunity Business with the
�� ��
r ested zonin bein for SP cific Use for coin-o rated ame machines
� g 9 � Pe g
incidental to the operation of a game room establishment in accordance with a +*�►
site plan. �
Mr. Poag then made a brief presentation on his awn behalf.
��
Questions fran the Council and Planning & Zoning Comnission related to the
nt�nber of machines requested, hours of operation, supervision, size of the
building, and lack of cleanliness and grounds upkeep of the area in question.
Follawing the discussion, the City Secretary reported that she was in receipt
of two letters of opposition fran Mr. & Mrs. Machen Abernathy and Mr. & Mrs.
Thomas G�.iertin, both families being residents of the Oak Creek Subdivision.
Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the
application. There were none.
Planning & Zoning Commission Member Ann Glynn then made a motion to close
their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Nlember Rc�n
Cook and prevailed by the follaaing vote: �
Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Nornian, & Hawkins
Nays . None
Absent: Anderson
Ma.yor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the ��
public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council A�r Shafer and
prevailed by the follawing vote:
�.�
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliv�r, Shafer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer
Nays: None
PUBLIC FiF�R�IG, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-16, AUSTIN PATIO DUDE RANCH
The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning
Comnission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-16
submitted by Austin Patio Dude Ranch.
04/20/82
Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked Mr. C-�.iy to repnrt the
request of the applicant.
Mr. G�iy advised that the property in question was 14.4 acres located in the A.
W. Anderson Survey, Abstract Ntunber 26. He further noted that the current
zoning was for a Specific Use Permit relating to alcoholic beverages in
relation to a dude ranch, with the requested zoning being for the same, with
ancillary uses added, including game machines with the submission of a
reviewed site plan.
�
Mr. Jack Beachum, representing the applicant, made a brief presentation
reviewing the revised site plan using a pictorial layout of the proposed
development.
There were few questions from the Planning & Zoning Comnission and City
Council.
Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the
application. There were none. The City Secretary then reported that she was
not in receipt of any letters or petitions concerning the requested zoning.
Planning & Zoning Conun.ission Nlember Klee Hawkins then made a motion to close
their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by N�r Gerald
Norman and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Hawkins, Joyce, Glynn, & Normari
Nays . None
Absent: Anderson
Counci]man Oliver then made a mption to close the Council's portion of the
public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council NlQsnber Brekken and
prevailed by the follaaing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
3 ZONING APPLICATION Z82-17, ROY STEWAI�!'
�+
The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning
Co�nission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-17
submitted by Mr. Roy Stewart.
Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon the City Planner
to e�lain the requested zoning.
Mr. G�.iy reported that the property in question was. the northeast corner of
Vine and Airline Streets (1133 Airline) . He noted that the present zoning was
"R-1" Single Family with the requested zoning being for "C-1" Neighborhood
Business District.
Mr. Stewart then made a brief presentation advising that he intended to use
the space for the construction of an office structure.
During the discussion that followed, Mr. Stewart was asked if he would
consider r�applying the application for a Specific Use Permit for Office
Facilities rather than for "C-1". Mr. Stewart answered yes.
Mayor Tate then asked if there were any guests present to speak for or against
� the application. There were none.
The City Secretary then reported that she was in receipt of two letters, from
,� Mr. Thomas Ba� and Mr. Conner Lam, expressing favorable consideration of
the requested zoning.
There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Canunission Member Klee
Hawkins made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The
motion was seconded by Mesnber Gerald NormaYl and prevailed by the follawing
vote:
Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Nornian, Glynn, Joyce, & Hawkins
Nays . None
Absent: Anderson
04/20/82
Council Nlember Shafer then made a m�tion to close the Council's portion of the
public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Dyer and prevailed
by the follaaing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
PUBLIC HEARING, MOBILE HOME APPLICATION 82-02, BILL DENNIS
The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning .��
Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to an application submitted by
Mr. Bill Dennis for the relocation of a mobile home.
� ,�
Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked the City Secretary to
explain the request of the application. Those in attendance were advised that
the applicant was requesting permission to locate a m�bile home on the rear of
the property at 605 East Dallas Road.
Mr. Bill Dennis then addressed the Council and reviewed a site plan advising
that the m�bile home would be used for living facilities for himself and his
wife. He further noted that the property was c7wned by his mother, who lived
in the house located on the same property. Mr. Dennis advised that the lot
was extremely deep and fronted on the north of the railroad. He comnented
that because of placement of the mobile h�, it would not be seen from Dallas
Roa.d.
Follawing the presentation, there were few questions from the Planning &
Zoning Commission and Council.
Mayor Tate asked if there were any guests present to speak for or against the
application. Mrs. Dennis, mpther of the applicant, addressed the Council
!I requesting favorable consideration for safety security reasons.
I! The City Secretary advised that Mrs. Wilkins, ad�acent property awner to the
' west, had telephoned and reported that she had no objections to the request. ��
The City SecretaYy then reported that she was in receipt of one letter from �
Omega Industries also stating that they had no objections to the request.
�,,:,�
There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Comnission M�mUer Klee
Hawkins made a mption to close their portion of the public hearing. The
motion was seconded by Nlember Ann Glynn and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Norn�z, Joyce, Hawkins, & Glynn
Nays . None
Absent: Anderson
Council Mesnber Charles Dunn then made a motion to close the Council's portion
of the public hearing. The mr�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and
prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
END OF JOINT PUBLIC HF.,ARIl�IG
Mayor Tate advised that the Council w�uld recess briefly before reconvening in
the Council Ch�aznber to consider further published agenda items. He commented
further that the Planning & Zoning Canmission would reconvene in the Civic
Center, 311 Main Street, to deliberate the merits of the public hearings and �*
to consider other published matters.
REC.'ONVENE , �
Follawing the recess, Mayor Tate declared the meeting called to order with all
members of the Council in attendance.
MISCII�I�NEOUS REPORTS
The City Secretary reported that the coffee cups, bumper stickers, and T-shirt
decals given to the Council were compliments of the Grapevine Library Board
and Staff in recognition of Public Library Week currently in progress.
04/20/82
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
The next order of business was consideration of the minutes of March 23, and
April 5, 6, and 13, 1982.
Council N1�iber Brekken then made a motion to waive the reading of the minutes
and approve them as published. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware
and prevailed by the following vote:
„� Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
� PUBLIC HEARING, PORTABLE BUILDING APPLICATION, C. C. H1�LL
The next order of business was for the City Council to conduct a public
hearing and consider a subsequent resolution concerning an application
submitted by Mr. C. C. Hall for the relocation of two portable buildings.
Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked the City Secretary to
explain the request of the applicant.
The Council was advised that Mr. Hall was seeking permission to locate two
portable buildings on the property at 706 East Northwest Highway to be used by
General Telephone C.ornpany.
Mr. Hall then addressed the Council and outlined the placement of the
buildings on the property and their intended use.
There being little discussion from members of the Council, Mayor Tate asked if
there were guests present to speak for or against the application. There were
none.
The City Secretary reported that she was not in receipt of any letters or
petitions regarding the matter.
,�� Councilman Dyer then made a motion to close the public hearing. The m�tion
J ;�, was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
The City Secretary then read the caption of the subsequent resolution, which
provided for the approval of the portable buildings. Council Nlember Brekken
made a motion that the resolution be adopted. The m�tion was seconded by
Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer
Nays: None
RESOLUTION NO. 82-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, 'I�S,
PROVIDING FOR TI� ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT AUTHOR-
IZING THE REL.�OCATION OF 'I'WO PORTABLE BUILDINGS;
PROVIDING FOR A NON-TRANSFERABLE PERMIT; PROVID-
ING A SITE PI.AN; AND PROVIDING AN EEFECTIVE DATE
'"°�' COMNIITI�E APPOIN`13�IIV�rS
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider appointments
� to various City Cair�nittees and Boards.
Board of Zoning Adjustments
Mayor Tate advised that three regular positions and one alternate position
needed to be filled on the Board of Zoning Adjustments.
Counci]m�n Dunn then made a motion that current members Doug Lamb and Gerald
'I'hompson be reappointed. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and
prevailed by the follawing vote:
04/20/82
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a mr�tion that Glenn Deavers be appointed to the
Board of Zoning Adjust�nents. The motion was seconded by Council Member
Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
� ��
Counci]srk�n Shafer then made a motion that Joel Stiner be appointed to the
position of Alternate N�unber One on the Board of Zoning Adjustments. His
motion was seconded by Counci]man Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote: ,�,,,,
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Citizens Advisory C�ittee
Mayor Tate advised that appointrnents needed to be made in all eleven districts
of the Citizens Advisory Conunittee, some of which ha.d not received any
applications.
District One (1) and 'It� (2)
Because of lack of applicants, there were no appointments made in
Districts One and 'Itao.
District Three (3)
Council N1�znber Brekken made a motion that Beverly Davydiuk be reappointed
representative of District Three of the Citizens Advisory Co�ittee. The
motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing
vote:
��
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dur�z, & Dyer �
Nays: None
��
District Four (4)
Counci]man Oliver made a mption that Mary McCullough be reappointed to
represent District Four. The mr�tion was seconded by Councilman Shafer
and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer
Nays: None
District Five (5)
There being no applicants, there were no appointments made to District
Five (5) .
District Six (6)
Council Member Brekken made a motion that Rudolf Fernandez be reappointed
to represent District Six (6) of the Citizens Advisory Conanittee. The
motion was seconded by Council Member Shafer and prevailed by the
following vote:
�
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Sha.fer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer
Nays: None
>�
District Seven (7) and Eight (8)
There were no applicants for Districts Seven (7) and Eight (8) ,
therefore, no appointrnents were made for those Districts.
District Nine (9)
Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion that Rudy Paniagua be appointed to
represent District Nine (9) . The mr�tion was seconded by Counci]man Dyer
04/20/82
and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
District Ten (10)
Council N1�.mber Brekken made a motion that Robert Downs be reappointed to
represent District Ten on the Citizens Advisory Co�dttee. The mQtion
� was seconded by Councilman DuYuz and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer
� Nays: None
Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion that June Fogel be appointed to
represent District Ten. The motion was seconded by Counci]man Oliver and
prevailed by the follc7wing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
District Eleven (11)
Because there were no applicants, no appointments were made to District
Eleven (11) .
Electrical Board
Mayor Tate advised that three appointrnents needed to be made to the Electrical
Board.
Council Member Brekken made a motion that Bill Dawkins be reappointed to the
Electrical Board to fill the requirement of an employee of Texas Pawer & Light
Com�aziy. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the
- -� follaaing vote:
� Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer
�
Nays: None
Council M�mb�r Shafer then made a motion that Bob Taylor be reappointed to the
Electrical Board to fill the requirement of a member fran any profession. The
motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer
Nays: None
Golf Course Advisory CoirHnittee
Mayor Tate advised that four appointments, including a Council representative,
needed to be made to the Golf Course Advisory C�mi.ttee.
Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion that Council Member Shafer be reappointed to
represent the Council on the Golf Course Advisory Conanittee. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, �, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer �/�,�„�,�ji1 d� �
Nays: None ��� °�� �t _� g�
�4bsfain� -�`llec`��r
�°`°`� Council Member Oliver then made a mption that Doil Dalton be reappointed to
the Golf Course Advisory C�ittee. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember
Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Council Mea�nber Dyer then made a motion that Bobby Wise be reappointed to the
Golf Course Advisory Co�nittee. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware
and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, Dyer
Nays: None
04/20/82
Nlayor Pro Tem Ware then made a mr�tion that Kurt Mullick be appointed to the
Golf Course Advisory Coa�nittee. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember
Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Grapevine Housing Authority
Mayor Tate advised that two appointm�_nts needed to be made to the Grapevine ��
Housing Authority.
Council Member Dyer made a motion that W. D. Willhoite be reappointed to serve ,�;„�
on the Housing Authority. The motion was seconded by Council Member Dunn and
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
A second appointment was not made to the Housing Authority because of lack of
applications.
Housing Advisory & Appeals Board and Uniform Building Code of Appeals Board
Mayor Tate advised that the same board �ers served on both of the
coim�ittees and noted that four appointments needed to be made.
Councilman Oliver then made a motion that Joe Lipscomb be reappointed. The
motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follaai.ng vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Council Nlember Shafer then made a �tion that John Ferguson be reappointed.
The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Dunn and prevailed by the follawing ""�""
vote: �
�.�,
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Council Member Oliver then made a mption that H. J. H r be rea inted.
a� PPo
The mption was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed. by the follawing
vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to reappoint Brent McPherson. The
motion was seconded by Council Member Oliver and prevailed by the follawing
vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Li.brary Board
Mayor Tate advised the Council that four appointments and one appointment for
an unexpired term needed to be made on the Library Board.
��
Councilman Oliver made a motion that Frances Halstead be reappointed to serve
on the Li.brary Board. The motion was seconded by Counci]man Dyer and
prevailed by the follawing vote: �..,�
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Council Member Brekken made a motion that Ma.ry McC�.illough be appointed. to the
Library Board. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by
the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
04/20/82
Council N�r Dyer then made a motion that John Page be appointed to the
Library Board. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by
the follcxaing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Council �r Dunn then made a motion that Ed Vinson be appointed to fill the
unexpired one-year term on the Library Board. Council Member Oliver seconded
,�* the mption and it prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Ihann, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
�, Nays: None
Council Me.mber Brekken then made a mr�tion to appoint Bartley Nourse to the
Library Board. The motion was seconded by Council Me,mber Dyer and prevailed
by the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Park & Recreation Board
Mayor Tate advised the Council that four appointments needed to be made to the
Parks and Recreation Board.
Council Member Shafer made a mption that Jerzy Brawn be reappointed to the
Park & Recreation Board. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and
prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Duruz, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Council Member Brekken then made a motion that Julian Dyke be reappointed to
� the Parks and Recreation Board. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember
� , Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote:
�
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Council Nl�mber Dyer then made a mption that Margaret Bates be reappointed to
the Parks and Recreation Board. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember
Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Council l�mber Brekken then made a mr�tion that Bobbie Nery be appointed to the
Parks and Recreation Board. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Dyer
and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dver
Nays: None
Planning & Zoning Co�nission
The Council was advised that three appointments needed to be made to the
Planning & Zoning Ccxtunission.
�
Council Member Duruz made a motion to reappoint Sharron Spencer to the Planning
& Zoning Corrrtnission. The motion was seconded by Council Member Oliver and
�, prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
Council Nlember Dyer made a motion to reappoint Gerald Norman to the Planning &
Zoning Comnission. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and
prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Durui, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
i
04/20/82
Council Member Brekken then made a motion to appoint Tom Pawers to the
Planning & Zoning Conunission. The motion was seconded by Council Ntember Dunn
and prevailed. by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
MAYOR PRO TEb4 APPOIN'IT�tQVT, 1982-83
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the ��*
appointment of a Mayor Pro Tem for 1982-83.
Council N1emb�r Brekken made a mQtion that Ted Ware be rea inted Ma or Pro
PP� Y ��
Tem. The motion was seconded by Councilm�z Dyer and prevailed by the
follawing vote:
Ayes . Tate, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays . None
Abstain: ware
PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN, ADOPTION - ORDINANCE
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance
relative to the adoption of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
Mr. Terry Cheek, representing Schrickel, Rollins, and Associates, presented
the lan to the Council and outlined its contents
P •
Following questions fran Council Members, Mayor Tate asked the City Secretary
to read the caption of the proposed ordinance.
Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to adopt the ordinance. The motion was
seconded by Council Nlember Dyer and prevailed by the follaving vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Sha.fer, Brekken, & Dyer ''""""
Nays: None )o
���
ORDINANCE NO. 82-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, 'I`EXAS,
APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE CONIPRF.�]II�TSIVE MASTER
PARK AND RECREATION PLAN; PROVIDING A SEVER-
ABILITY CL�AUSE; AND DDCLARING AN �'[�TCY
GRANr.P SIGNATURE AUrl�iORIZATION, 'I�XAS PARKS & WILDLIFE DEPARTNNIENNT
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution
authorizing certain City officials to execute grant-related agreements with
the Texas Parks and Wildlife Departrnent.
The City Manager explained the need for the resolution after which the City
Secre read the ca tion.
tarY P
P
Ma or ro Tem Ware made a motion to ado
t the resolution. The motion was
Y P
seconded by Council N1�.mber Brekken and revailed b the follawin vote:
P Y 9
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
��
RESOLUTION NO. 82-20
��
A RESOI�7TION OF Tf� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, DESIC�TATING CERTAIlV CITY OFFI-
CIALS AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTING FOR AND ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, IN DEAL-
ING WITH TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMELVT FOR
THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN 'PHE LAND AND [nTP,'I`ER
CONSERVATION FUND ACT OF 1965; CERTIFYING THAT Tf�
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, IS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE
ASSISTANCE UNDER SUCH PROGRAM
04/20/82
RESOLUTION, OFF-DUI'Y POLICE OFFIC�R.S TO PATROL LAKE GRAPEVINE
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution
authorizing the Police Department to apply for a grant for off-duty police
services on U. S. Corps of Engineers property.
The City Manager explained the need for approval of the resolution.
Follaving a short discussion, Mayor Tate asked the City Secretary to read the
caption of the proposed resolution.
Council Member Brekken then made a mr�tion that the resolution be adopted. The
motion was seconded by Council N1e.�nber Dyer and prevailed by the follawing
vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
RESOLUTION NO. 82-21
A RESOI�UTION OF Tf� CITY COUDTCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING Tf� CITY OF GRAPE-
VINE TO EN`I�R INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE U. S.
�RMlY CORPS OF INGINEERS FOR LAW ELVF'ORCII�Nr.0 WITHIN
THE CITY LIMITS OF GRAPEVINE BY USE OF OFF-DUTY
POLICE OFFICERS
TIMBERLINE SUB-FIRE STATION, BID AWARD
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider and award the
bid for construction of the sub-fire station in the southern portion of the
City.
City Engineer Jim Baddaker presented the follcxaing bids and reco�nded that
�) the bid be awarded to the law bidder, JPS Building Corporation.
BIDDER ALTERNATE LUMP SUM BID LUMP SUM BASIC BID
JPS Building Corp. $124,300.00 $125,000.00
Denrick Const. Co. $135,269.00 $136,509.00
Taylor-Hall Const. $144,020.00 $143,045.00
Scobil Contractors $146,249.00 $146,749.00
Pete Durant & Assoc. $155,650.00 $156,550.00
Cardinal Builders $165,300.00 $167,000.00
Bailey Alexander $163,946.00 $164,882.00
The Craftsman, Inc. $167,000.00 $168,504.00
M & L Construction $147,701.00 $176,000.00
Shultz & Hawell $170,690.00 $179,990.00
Altan Concrete Const. $183,300.00 $183,816.00
Council Member Oliver then made a motion to accept the rec�ndation of the
City Staff and award the bid to JPS Building Corporation for the lump sum
basic bid of $125,000. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Dyer and
prevailed by the follaving vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
��
SPEED LIl`'IITS, FAIAaAY DRIVE
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance
determining speed limits on the Fairway Drive detour around the spillway
washout.
City Engineer Jim Baddaker reconanended that the speed limit be set for twenty
miles per hour (20 m.p.h.) .
The City Secretary then read the caption of the proposed ordinance.
04/20/82
Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to accept the reco�ndation of the City
Staff and adopt the ordinance. The mption was seconded by Council Nlember Dyer
and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
ORDINANC� NO. 82-18
AN ORDINANC,E OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, T.E�B, ��
SPECIFYING � RFASONABLE AND PRUDENT SP�
FOR PUBLIC STRE�rS AND AIZEYS WITHIN THE
CITY; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PR(�- �,,,�
VIDING FOR A PE[�1ALTY OF FINE NOT 'PO EXCEID
'IWO HUNDRID DOLI�RS ($200.00) FOR EAGH OFFIIVSE;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECI�ARING
AN II�IERGII�TCY
II IE
STOP SIGNS, FAIFd�IAY DRIVE, PARRA LINDA ESTATES, PHASE II
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance
relating to stop signs on Faizway Drive and within Parra Linda Estates, Phase
II.
City Engineer Jim Baddaker advised the Council of the proposed locations for
the stop signs.
The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance.
There being little discussion, Council Member Marion Brekken made a motion to
, adopt the ordinance. The m�tion was seconded by Council N�er Shafer and
I prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer "'�''�
Nays: None �Z
��
ORDINANCE NO. 82-19
AN ORDINANCE ANIENDING CHAP7.�R 23, SEGTION 30, OF
TI� CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, BY ADDING STOP
SIGNS AT CERTAIN I�OCATIONS DESCRIBID HEREIN; AUZ'fiOR-
IZING THE ERECrION OF TRAFFIC REGULATION SIGNS; RE-
PEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SE�'VIIt-
ABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PELV��LTY; AND DECI�ARING
AN ET"�RGFdVCY
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REC�TDATION
ZONING APPLICATION Z82-14, �,IN PROPERTIES
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the
reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning C�snission relative to Zoning
Application Z82-14 (Tomlin Properties) and a subsequent ordinance if
applicable.
Chairnian Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning CoimLission recomreazded
approval of Zoning P,pplication Z82-14 by a vote of six (6) to zero (0) .
��
The City Secretary then read the proposed ordinance.
Council Nlember Oliver made a motion to adopt the ordinance. The motion was �=.�
seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
ORDINANCE NO. 82-20
AN ORDINANCE ANI�IDING ORDIN��NCE NO. 70-10, Tf�
COMPREfiIIQSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
04/20/82
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAI� BEING ALSO KNOWN AS
APPIIVDIX "A" OF Z�-IE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE,
TEXA.S, GRAIVTING A ZONING C�iiANGE ON A TRACT
OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A IiOT, TRACT, OR
PARCII� OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATID IN
TARRANI' COUNTY, TEXA.S, BEING A PA1�I' OF THE
A. FOS'I`ER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 518, IN �
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXA.S, MORE P'ITLI�Y AND
CONIPL�'.1'EI�Y DESCRIBID IN Tf� BODY OF THIS
ORDINANCE; ORDERING A C;EIANGE IN THE USE OF
SAID PROPERTY FROM "R-1" SINGLE-FAMILY
DWEL.LING DISTRICT TO "I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRT�L
DISTRICT; CORREC.PING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
�"""` MAP; PRESEI2VING AI�L OTHER PORTIONS OF �
ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CI�USE RE-
LATING TO SEVERABILITY; DEZ'ERMINING THAT Z�
PUBLIC INr1�RESTS, MORAIS AND G�FRAT, WELFARE
DENIAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AN�TDMEN''r THEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING A PIIVALTY; AND DECLAFtIl�TG AN
F7�iF:RGFt�T(,',y
PI,ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl�IDATION
ZONING APPLICATION Z82-15, Tn]AYNE POAG
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the
reconBnendation of the Planning & Zoning Co�n.ission relative to Zoning
Application Z82-15 (Poag) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable.
Chairn�an Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Corrffrtission reco�nended
that the request be denied by a vote of six (6) to zero (0) . She added that
reasons for denial included that the Connnission did not feel that the zoning
requested was the highest and best use of the property, that the parking was
, inadequate, and because of the voiced opposition of neighboring residents.
�*
(3 ' Follawing a discussion among members of the Council, Council Men�k�er Brekken
� made a motion to accept the reco�Zdation of the Planning & Zoning Consn.ission
and deny the application. The mption was seconded by Council Member Dyer and
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, .Sba�2, Brekken, & Dyer�P����j
Nays: .D1en�' ��c���r ��
.�s ���
PLANNING & ZONING CON]MISSION RECODM'�TDATION �
ZONING APPLICATION Z82-16, AUSTIN PATIO
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the
reco�nda.tion of the Planning & Zoning Co�ission relative to Zoning
Application Z82-16 (Austin Patio Dude Ranch) and a subsequent ordinance if
applicable.
Chairman Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Cor�ission reco�.nded
approval by a vote of six to zero, and that it was also recomn�nded that
because of the complexity of the request, the City Attorney be instructed to
draft the necessary ordinance.
Council Member Oliver then made a motion to accept the recomrendation of the
Planning & Zoning Conan.ission and approve the requested zoning with the City
Attorney being instructed to draft the ordinance. The mption was seconded by
Council N1�mber Shafer and prevailed by the following vote:
;�,,; Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl�TDATION
ZONING APPLICATION Z82-17, ROY STEf�RT
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the
reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to Zoning
Application Z82-17, (Stewart) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable.
04/20/82
Chairnian Spencer reported that it was the reco�ndation of the Planning &
Zoning Conmission that the applicant be authorized to withdraw the current
application requesting "C-1" zoning and reapply on the May 18 agenda. for a
Specific Use Permit for an office facility and, further, that the filing fee
for the second application be waived.
Council Nlember Oliver made a motion to accept the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Conanission and withdraw the application and to accept an
application for the May 18 meeting of a Specific Use Permit for office
facilities, and that the filing fee be waived. The mc�tion was seconded by �,
Council MP�nber Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dyer, & Dunn
�,,�
Nays: None
PI,�NNING & ZONING COMMISSION REC�IDATION
MOBILE HOME APPLICATION, BILL DENNIS
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the
rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Co��ission relative to Nbbile H�
Application 82-02 (Dennis) .
Chairir�an Spencer reported that it was the recommendation of the Planning &
Zoning Co�ssion that the application be denied. She added that the vote was
four (4) to two (2) .
Mayor Tate r�aninded the Council that under the existing ordinance, if the
Planning & Zoning Commission recommends denial, the Council only has the
ability to ratify that decision.
Council Member Dyer then made a motion to accept the recommenda.tion of the
', Planning & Zoning Conmlission and deny the application. The mr�tion was
', seconded by Counci7man Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote:
' Ayes: Tate, Dunn, Oliver, Brekken, & Dyer �'""'�
Nays: Ware & Shafer ��,
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECON�IDATION ��
FINAL PLAT, BROOKSIDE ADDITION
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the
reco�a�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Co�nission relative to the final plat
of Brookside Addition.
City EYigineer Jim Baddaker reported that it was the rec�ndation of the
Planning & Zoning Corr¢riission that the plat be approved.
Follaaing review of the plat, Mayor Pro 'I'em Ware made a motion that it be
approved. The motion was seconded by Council MQ.mber Shafer and prevailed by
the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
IAAD LIMIT, FAIFdn7AY DRIVE DETOUR ROAD
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance
relating to load limi.ts on FaiYway Drive detour road.
��
City Ehgineer Jim Baddaker advised the Council that it was his reco�ndation
that a load limit not be inq�osed at this ti.me.
.�;.,�
Council N�er Oliver therefore made a mption that the item be tabled. The
motion seconded by Council Nle�nber Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, Shafer, & Dyer
Nays: None
BID AWARD, SOUTHWEST SEWER LINE AND PUMP STATION
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider awarding the
bid for construction of the Southwest Sewer Line and P�ur�p Station.
04/20/82
City �gineer Jim Baddaker presented the follawing bids and recomnended that
the bid be awarded to Wright Construction Company on its low bid of $318,169.
BIDDER AMOUNT BID CO1��LEI'ION TIME
Wright Construction Cair�pany $318,169.00 120 Calendar Days
Regional Utilities Company $329,338.85 75 Calendar Days
Mario Sinacola & Sons $338,978.59 120 Calendar Days
Atkins Brothers Equipment Co. $344,732.53 120 Calendar Days
Turner Construction Conq�any $347,119.40 120 Calendar Days
Oscar Renda Contractors $418,961.00 120 Calendar Days
C & W Utility Contractors $451,119.05 130 Calendar Days
�, Hall Construction Company $461,912.00 130 Calendar Days
Council N�r Dunn then made a motion to accept the recommendation of the
City Staff and award the bid to Wright Construction Ccxnpany on its low bid of
$318,169. The motion was seconded by Council NIemUer Dyer and prevailed by the
following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
CIASING OF MAIN STRF.�ET BRIDGE AT STATE HIGHWAY 114
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the closing of
the Main Street Bridge at Highway 114 for construction purposes.
City IIzgineer Jim Baddaker advised that according to the construction
schedule, the Main Street Bridge is to be taken out of service in SeptPanb�r,
1982, with ccx�letion in April, 1983. H. B. Zachry, Inc. , the construction
company, has suggested that the present bridge be closed in June after the
service roads are opened. He added that this w�uld complete the entire Main
Street bridge work in October, 1982, rather than in April, 1983. Mr. Baddaker
advised that his staff had contacted the businesses in the area that would be
'�" most affected by the closing, and they all preferred that the bridge be closed
��> in June for completion of the work as early as possible.
�
Follawing a short discussion, Council Nlember Dyer made a mption to authorize
the City Staff to proceed with a request to the State Highway Departsnent to
close the bridge in June. The m�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and
prevailed by the follaving vote:
Ayes: Tate, 6Vare, Oliver, Shafer, Ihznn, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
PI.�ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION BYLAWS, ORDINANCE
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the
recoiranendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relating to the adoption of
the Planning & Zoning bylaws and a subsequent ordinance.
Comnission Chairman Sharron Spencer reviewed the draft of the proposed bylaws
and advised that the Planning & Zoning Ca�nission reconmended appraval.
During the discussion that follawed, the technical use of the words "may" and
"desire" in Item III B (Reg�zlar Meetings) and Item IV A-1 (Withdrawals) was
questioned. Also, It�n II was entitled "Election of Officers", but the
content related to appointment of �ers.
Because of the uncertainty, Councilman Oliver made a motion to table
consideration of the bylaws. The mr�tion was seconded by Councilman Dyer and
prevailed by the follawing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer
Nays: None
ADJOURIVN�IT
There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilman Shafer
made a motion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Counci]man Dyer and
prevailed by the following vote:
04/20/82
Ayes: Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer
Nays: None
PASSID AND APPROVED BY Tt-� TY COUNCIL OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on
this the day of , 1982.
APPROVID:
��
��� �
Mayor
A'�!�'�ST:
ity Secre
�
/�
�-�
��
u, �