Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-07-20 Joint Meeting AGENDA CITY OF GR.APEVINE, TEXAS JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMIS5ION MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 20 , 1982 AT 7 : 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET �::.:� I. CALL TO ORDER II. INVOCATION: Reverend David Whitington � Christ Our King Methodist Church III. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing on Zoning Application Z82-28 submitted by Mark A. Torres . B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing on Zoning Application Z82-30 submitted by Mary Louise Hurst. C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing on Zoning Application Z82-31 submitted by Don T. Gerschick. D. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing on Zoning Application Z82-32 submitted by C. C. Hall , Jr. E. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing on Zoning Application Z82-33 � � submitted by Ward Baugher , Jr. F. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- ��"� duct a public hearing relative to the replat of Shore- crest Acres as submitted by Bradcur Properties. G. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to con- duct a public hearing relative to the replat of Hampton Road Addition as submitted by Southland Builders , Inc. IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street , to deliberate the merits of the zoning cases , replats , and other published agenda items . B. City Council to recess and reconvene to consider other published agenda items. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE �" JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 1982 AT 3 :00 P.M. �,c.Y City Secre r AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 20 , 1982 AT 8 : 00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET ,� V. CITIZENS REQUESTS AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS & DISCUSSIONS VI. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meeting of July 6 , 1982 VII . NEW BUSINESS A. City Council to conduct a hearing requested by Group W Cable concerning the feasibility of providing cable service to residents in the Anderson-Gibson Road area. B. City Council to consider the engagement of an audit firm to review the 1981-82 City records. C. City Council to discuss the alcoholic beverage audit requirements and take any necessary action relating thereto. D. City Council to consider an ordinance adopting employee retirement updated service credits . E. City Council to consider authorizing a contract to assist the City in evaluating withdrawal from Social �:�.> Security. F. City Council to consider authorizing a contract with Ken Taylor relating to the paving of a portion of Peach Street. VIII . PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-28 (Torres) and a subsequent ordinance. B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-30 (Hurst) and a subsequent ordinance. C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-31 (Gerschick) and a subsequent ordi- nance. D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Plan- ning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-32 (Hall) and a subsequent ordinance. �"9 E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Plan- ning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-33 (Baugher) and a subsequent ordinance. � F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Plan- ning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of Shorecrest Acres. G. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Plan- ning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of Hampton Road Addition. IX. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON ,��, THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 1982 AT 3 :00 P.M. �� City Secr r �> ... �w.-�, �.,� �� AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 20 , 1982 AT 8 :00 P.M. CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN STREET V. OLD BUSINESS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning � Application Z82-28 (Torres) and make a recommen- dation to the City Council. VI . NEW BUSINESS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-30 (Hurst) and make a recommen- dation to the City Council. B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-31 (Gerschick) and make a recommen- dation to the City Council. C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-32 (Hall) and make a recommen- dation to the City Council. D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-33 (Baugher) and make a recommen- dation to the City Council. E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat � � of Shorecrest Acres (Bradcur) and make a recommendation to the City Council. �`_`� F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the replat of Hampton Road Addition (Southland) and make a recommendation to the City Council. G. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance for the purpose of adding a Townhouse Use District and make a recommendation to the City Council. VII . CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meetings of June 3 & 15 , 1982 VIII . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSIONS IX. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C. S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE �"`� REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 1982 AT 3 :00 P.M. �.,�� lJ3. City Secr r STATE OF TEXAS COUN'I'Y OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council and the Planning & Zoning Comnission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Regular Joint Session on this the 20th day of July, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 413 Main Street, with the follawing persons present to�ait: � William D. Tate Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem Charles Dunn Council Nl�er "'�"` William• Shafer Council Member Marion Brekken Council Nlember Ron Dyer Council Member constituting a quorum with Council N�er C. L. Oliver absent, with the following m�mbers of the Planning & Zoning C�mission: Sharron Spencer Chairntian Ron Cook Vice Chairmari Harlen Joyce Nlember Ann Glynn Nlember Klee Hawkins N�er constituting a quor�n with Members Tan Powers and Gerald Norman absent, with the following me.mbers of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager Ben Brooks Acting City Attorney Shirley Armstrong City Secretary i°�� CALL TO ORDER � �� Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Reverend David Whitington representing Christ Our King Methodist Church. INTRODUCTIONS & PROCIDURES Mayor Tate then introduced members of the Planning & Zoning Co�nission and explained the procedure to be follaaed during the public hearings. PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-28, MARK A. TORRES The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Comnission to conduct a public hearing on Zoning Application Z82-28 submitted by Mark A. Torres. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked City Planner Marc Guy to explain the request of the applicant. It was noted that the property in question was a 1.64 acre tract located on the northeast corner of Dooley and Wildwood. Mr. Guy added that the current zoning was "R-1" Single-Family �' Dwelling District with the requested zoning being for "SP" Specific Use Permi.t District for taunhanes, in accordance with a site plan. Mr. Torres then addressed the Council giving a brief personal history and then outlined in detail the scope of the proposed project. There were then n�nerous questions froan the Council and Planning & Zoning Co�n.ission relating to street dedication, yard setback requirements, and construction material. Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the requested zoning. 07/20/82 The following persons spoke in opposition: Mr. Rex Scott, 1166 Butterfield; Mr. Dave Wargetz, 1107 Silverlake; Mr. Don Dina, 978 Riverside; Ms. Connie Fn�rp, 1161 Butterfield; Ms. Carolyn Nottingham, 1102 Silverside; Mr. Ed Alexander, 1173 Butterfield; Mr. Sam Pedraza, 1031 Cable Creek; Mr. John Mayfield, 1174 Silverlake; and Ms. Lisa Harder, resident of The Woods S'�zbdivision. Mr. Wargetz then submitted a petition containing 106 signatures in opposition to the requested zoning. Ms. Carolyn Iieen, realtor, and Mr. Pat Lind (address unknown) spoke in favor of the zoning change. ,� The City Secretary reported that she was in receipt of one letter of opposition signed by twenty-one families residing in the area in question; one �.�, letter of opposition fran Ryland Homes; and one letter of favoritism fro�n Mr. G�iy Kelley. Following a request fran Mr. Woody Miller, Ryland employee, the City Secretary read the follo�,eing letter into the record: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ July 20, 1982 TO : Tf� MII�RFR� OF Tf� GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL AND THE GRAPEVINE PI�ArTNING AND ZONING COP�M'I.ISSION. RE : ZONING APPLICATION Z82-28-CHANGE OF ZONING FROM R-1 TO "SP" FOR ZbWNHOUSES. FROM: GARY J. SMITH RYI�AND HOMES VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS 1000 MAIN STREET, GRAPEVINE AS SINGLE—FAMILY HONIEBUILDERS IN Tf� GRAPEVINE SUBDIVISI�.V KNOWN AS "THE WOODS", WE AT RYI�ND OBJECT TO THE REZONING OF THE R-1 PROPERTY TO "SP" ('I'OY�INHOUSES) . OUR OBJF7C.'TION IS BASID ON THE '� FOLI.�OTnTING: � 1. SINC� SEP'I�,�."1BER OF 1980 WE HAVE CONSTRUC'I� APPROXIMATELY �y 125 SINGI,E FAMILY DWELLINGS IN "TfiE Tn]'pODS", WITH APPROXIMATE— LY 72 ADDITIONAL L�OTS LEFT TO CONSTRUCT OUR HOMES ON. DUE 'PO THE EXISTING ZONING, MANY OF OUR HONIEQWNERS HAVE BEEL�1 UNDER TI� IMPRESSION THAT FURTE-IER CONSTRUCTION ABUTTING "THE WOODS" WOULD BE OF SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS, 2. WE FF�L THAT RUNNING DIR�C.,TLY FROM SINGLE FAMILY IlVTO 'I�OWN— HONIF',S ON CABLE CREEK DRIVE WILL C'OMPRC�IISE Tf� IN1'EGRITY OF THIS SINGLE FAMILY COMMUNITY, 3• 'I�iE PROPERTY IN QUESTION DIR�CTLY ABUZTS "THE V�700DS", A CONIMpNITY OF SINGLE FANIILY HOMES. THERE IS NO BUFF'ER BLTWEII�T SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTI—FAMILY. WE FEEL, THAT WfiINEVER SINGLE FANIILY AND MULTI—FAMILY ARE I COMBINID IN A COrM1CJNITY, A BUFFER SUCEi AS AN OPII�1 AREA, I PLAYGROUND, SWINIl"BNG POOL OR SOME.'IZ3ING OF A SIMILAR NATURE I SHOULD BE USID TO SEPARATE THE DIF`FERII�ICE IN CURB p,ppFAT,, I AND STREE'I' II�EVATION. �� AS A NATIONAL HOMEBUILDER, WE RECOC�TIZE THE NEID FOR 1�LL TYPES OF HOUSING IlV TODAY'S ECONOMIC ENVIROI�Il�'IQ�'I', HC7f�lEVER, WE AISp REC:�'p(��1IZE THAT COMNI[JNITIES THROUC�iOUT Tf� COUNTRY ARE DOING BEZTER CpMM[7NITY PI�ANNING IN REGARDS TO IACATING TYPES OF HOUSING. THEY ARE DOING THIS BY SEGREGATING BY SIZE, BY SINGI� FAMILY, BY DUPI�XES, BY 'I'OWNIiOMES, BY QUATRAPL�S. BY SEGREC�TING HOUSING, CONIM[TNITIES ARE FINDING BETI'ER LOpKING STREET SCE[JES AND BEPI�R ECONONIIC OPPOR— TUI�IITIFS FOR TF� BUYERS, BUILDIIZS, AND DE�7�LpPERS. WE STRONGLY REC�VD THAT � EXISTING ZONING RII�IAINS INTACT AND I THAT THE PROPOSID 'POWNHOME.S BE L�CKK'ATID SOUTfi OF WII,DWOOD LANE. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0�/2o/s2 'I'here being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Co�nission Member Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Ann Glynn and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, & Hawkins Nays . None Absent: Pawers & Nornian Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the ,,�.� public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer �'"` Nays . None Absent: Oliver PUBLIC �G, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-30, MARY L. HURST The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing on Zoning Application Z82-30 submitted by Nlary L. Hurst. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked City Planner Marc Guy to explain the request of the applicant. Mr. Guy advised that the property in question was a 1.27 acre tract out of the Thomas Mahan Survey, generally, the 900 block of West Northwest Highway. It was reported that the current zoning was "R-1" Single-Fami.ly Dwelling District with the requested zoning being for "C-2" Co�anunity Business District Zoning. Ms. Hurst then addressed the Council advising that there were no u�u�diate plans for the development of the property. There being no discussion among me.mb�rs of the Council or Planning & Zoning Conmiission, Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the proposed zoning. 3 � Mr. Jesse Woods, 2746 Manchester, spoke in favor of the zoning change. � The City Secretazy then reported that she was in receipt of one letter of favoritism from Mr. John Stevenson, and one letter of opposition from Mrs. R. E. Oyer. There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Conunission Member Ann Glynn made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The mption was seconded by Member Klee Hawkins and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, & Hawkins Nays . None Absent: Powers & Norman Council Me.rnber Dunn then made a mption to close the Council's portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Me.rr�r Dyer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver �++ PUBLIC �ARTNG� ZONING APPLICATION Z82-31, GERSCHIC,K The next order of business was for the Planning & Zoning Co�unission and City �, Council to conduct a public hearing on Zoning Application Z82-31 submitted by Don T. Gerschick. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked City Planner Marc Guy to explain the requested zoning. Mr. Guy reported that the property in question was a 10,351 square foot tract out of the A. F. Leonard Stiirvey, generally knawn as 306 East Northwest Highway. He added that the present zoning was "C-2" Comnunity Business District Zoning with the requested zoning being for a "SP" Specific Use Permit for the operation of a truck repair garage and other uses as permitted in the "C-2" Comrnznity Business District Category. 07/20/82 Dr. Gerschick then addressed the Council and reviewed the site plan in relation to the requested zoning. During the discussion that follawed, Dr. Gerschick advised that although the site plan indicated asphalt parking, it was not his intent to provide asphalt in the parking area. Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. Mr. Mike Ferguson and Mr. A1 Patterson (addresses unknown) spoke in favor of the requested zoning. The City Secretary reported that she was not in receipt of any correspondence concerning the application. � There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Co�nission Member Klee Hawkins made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Nlember Ann Glynn and prevailed by the follawing vote: ,,,�,�, Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, & Hawkins Nays . None Absent: Powers & Nornian Council Nlember William Shafer then made a motion t ' � o close the Council s portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council l�mber Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-32, C. C. HAI�, JR. The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Corrmission to conduct a public hearing on Zoning Application Z82-32 submitted by C. C. Hall, Jr. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon City Planner Marc Guy to explain the requested zoning. Mr. Guy reported that the property in question was a one acre tract of land out of the A. F. Leonard Survey, located "'�// generally on the west side of Dooley Street near its intersection with East �7� Northwest Highway. He added that the present zoning was "C-2" C�nity �� Business District zoning with the requested zoning being for "I-1" Light Industrial District. Mr. Hall then addressed the Council and explained that the intended use of the property was to facilitate a welding business. Follavi.ng a short discussion among members of the Planning & Zoning Ca�ission and the City Council, Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak in regard to the requested zoning. Mr. Rex Scott, 1166 Butterfield, Mr. John Mayfield, 1174 Silverlake, and one unidentified guest spoke in opposition to the proposal, primarily because of the poor condition of Dooley Street. Mr. Gary Tischler, 2825 M�esa Verde, and Mr. Idzssell Norton spoke in favor of the zoning, indicating that a sufficient amount of off-street parking would be available. The City Secretary reported that she was not in receipt of any correspondence on the matter. There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Co�nission Member Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. 'I'he motion was seconded by Co�ranission Member Ann Glynn and prevailed by the follawing vote: ,�.: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, & Hawkins Nays . None Absent: Pcywers & Norn�i Council Me.mber Brekken then made a mr�tion to close the Council's portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver 0�/2o/s2 PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-33, WARD BAUGHEft, JR. The next matter to come before the Council was for the Council and Planning & Zoning Conanission to conduct a public hearing on Zoning P,pplication Z82-33 submitted by Mr. Ward Baugher, Jr. Mayor Tate declared. the public hearing open and called upon City Planner Marc Guy to explain the request of the applicant. Mr. Guy reported that the property in question was a 10,090 square foot tract of land out of the Thomas ,��-:�. Mahan Survey, generally }mown as 1016 West Northwest Highway. He further noted that the current zoning was an "SP" Specific Use Permit Zoning for the storage, sale, and on-premise constunption of alcoholic beverages incidental to the operation of a restaurant, in accordance with a site plan and other uses as permitted in the "C-2" C.onmlunity Business District Zoning Category. Mr. Guy added that the request of the applicant was for the same type zoning with a revised site plan. Mr. Baugher then briefly addressed the Council and explained the revised site plan. There were no questions from the Council or Planning & Zoning Comnission. Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak in regard to the zoning request. There were none. The City Secretary reported that no correspondence had been received concerning the matter. Planning & Zoning Comnission Member Klee Hawkins made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Ann Glynn and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Glynn, Joyce, & Hawkins Nays . None Absent: Powers & Nornian Council Member Dyer then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the �"� public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council b�mber Shafer and � prevailed by the follawing vote: �� Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver PUBLIC HEARING, REPLAT SHORDCREST ACRES, BRAI)CUR PROPERTIES The next order of business was for the City Cotancil and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to the replat of Shorecrest Acres as submitted. by Bradcur Properties. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. • City Engineer Jim Baddaker advised that the purpose of the replat was to subd.ivide Lot 11 of the Shorecrest Acres Subdivision into two lots of approximately equal proportions. He then outlined the availability of utility services. Mr. Baddaker further advised that the replat had not yet been presented to his office in final form. He therefore reco�nded that final consideration of the replat be deferred until the Staff had an opportunity to review the final doc�unent in detail. Mr. Mike C�.irtis, representing Bradcur Properties, briefly addressed the Council outlining the scope of the change. Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the � requested replat. There were none. The City Secretary reported that she was in receipt of a letter fran Mr. and Mrs. G. Richard Grant stating no opposition to the requested replat if off-street parking was provided, approved, and used. There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Conmi.ssion N1e��ber Klee Hawkins made a m�tion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Nlember RQn Cook and prevailed by the following vote: 07/30/82 Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Hawkins, Joyce, & Glynn Nays . None Absent: Pawers & Norman Council Nlember Duruz then made a m�tion to close the Council's portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Member Ron Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None ,�,� � Absent: Oliver PUBLIC HEARING, REPLAT HAMPriipN ROAD ADDITION, SOUI'HI�ND BUILDERS ��.�� The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Co�nission to conduct a public hearing relative to the replat of Hampton Road Addition as submitted by Southland Builders, Inc. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. City Engi.neer Jim Baddaker explained that the replat would establish a twenty-five foot (25') alley on the south boundary of the addition with a thirty foot (30') alley easement extending north to Ha�ton Road. There being no discussion among me.mbers of the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the proposal. There �re none. The City Secretary then reported that she was not in receipt of any correspondence on the matter. Planning & Zoning Commission M�e.mber Harlen Joyce made a m�tion that their portion of the public hearing be closed. The m�tion was seconded by Nlember Klee Hawkins and prevailed by the follaaing vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn & Hawkins Nays . None �+� Absent: Pawers & Nonnan ,� Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the � public hearing. The motion was seconded by Nlember Marion Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Brekken, Dunn, Shafer, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING The Planning & Zoning Comnission then recessed to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to deliberate the merits of the zoning cases, replats, and to consider other published agenda items. Mayor Tate then called a brief recess of the Council. R�(..'OIV�7ETlE The Council later reconvened in the Council Chambers with all members present except Council N1�nber Oliver. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES � The next order of business was consideration of the minutes of July 6, 1982. �,� Council Member Brekken made a motion to waive the reading of the minutes and approve them as published. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Duruz and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver o�/ao/sa PUBLIC HEARING, CABLE TV SERVICE, ANDERSON-GIBSON ROAD AREA The next order of business was for the City Council to conduct a public hearing requested by Group W Cable concerning the feasibility of providing cable service to residents in the Anderson-Gi.bson Road area. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. Mr. C. C. Hall, Jr. , representing Group W Cable read the following letter into •� the record: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ �e,� July 14, 1982 Mayor William D. Tate and �ers of the City Council City of Grapevine P. O. Drawer 1547 Grapevine, Texas 76051 Dear Mayor Tate and Council Members: Please find enclosed materials relating to the extension of cable service to Anderson-Gibson Road. The enclosed materials we feel support our position that no reasonable rate of return can be made by extending cable service to Anderson-Gibson RQad. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Yours truly, GROUP W CABLE Robert M. Garner III �"�� General r7anager '� RMG�ddk �� CC: Mr. Bill Eisen Mr. Jim Hancock ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. Hall then advised that the estimated cost of construction to provide cable to the Anderson-Gibson Road area was $47,252.19. He added that the estimated annual revenue fran the area was $542.40. Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests present to speak regarding the matter. Mr. William Ihnfeldt and Mr. Larry Foster, both residents on Anderson-Gibson Road requested that cable service be provided. An unidentified guest residing at 4812 �l.iless-Grapevine Road in the southern portion of the City requested that his area also be considered for cable service. A lengthy discussion then ensued among members of the Council. Following the discussion, Council Member Dyer made a motion to close the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Member Dunn and prevailed ��" by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver After considerable discussion, Mayor Tate reactivated the Cable TV Comnittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tem Ware and Council Nlember Ron Dyer. Upon a request for volunteers, Council �er Brekken agreed to serve on that Conmittee. Mayor Tate asked that the Conanittee review the matter and respond back to the Council for further consideration. No fornial action was taken. 0�/2o/g2 AUDITORS E�TGAGII�]T LEITER The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the engagem�nt of an audit finn to review the 1981-82 City records. Finance Director Lee Maness addressed the Council and advised that the firm of Peat, Mazwick, Mitchell & Company was selected for the audit for fiscal year ending September 30, 1981, with proposed audit fees submitted for each of the next four (4) years. He then introduced Mr. Donald C. Spitzer, partner in the firm, who presented the engagem�nt proposal. „�� Council Memb�r Dunn, Chairman of the Audit Conanittee, reported that his Comnittee was pleased with the 1980-81 audit and recommended the firm's �y,.,� services be continued. A mption was then made by Council NIember Dunn to engage the firm of Peat, Mazwick, Mitchell & Com�any for the ptazpose of auditing the City's 1981-82 records. The motion was seconded by Council N1�mber Brekken and prevailed by the followin g vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Shafer, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver ALC.'OHOLIC BEVERAGE AUDIT REQUIRII�]TS, DISCUSSION The next order of business was for the City Council to discuss the alcoholic beverage audit requirements and take any necessary action relating thereto. City Finance Director Lee Maness addressed the Council and reviewed the contents of Section 4-5 of the City Code, which requires essentially that . restaurants serving alcoholic beverages file with the City Secretary, on an annual basis, an affidavit shaving gross receipts and sales of the business, with at least 500 of the total sales being food. He added that the entity was also required to furnish copies of gross receipts and figures furnished to the '"�'� State for alcoholic beverage tax purposes. � Council Member Dunn then advised that he had requested the City Staff to � a provide an estimate fro�n the city auditors regarding their costs to audit firms falling within this category to deternzine their compliance with Section 4-5 of the City Code. He added, hawever, that the current ordinance does not provide for auditing abilities. In the discussion among mQ_mbers of the Council, the follawing questions were raised: (1) Could the existing City ordinance be amended to provide the City the authority to require the auditing procedure; (2) Could the auditing fee be assessed to the entity being audited; (3) Could more frequent reports be required (quarterly) to insure compliance with existing codes. It was the general concensus of the Council that the City Attorney be asked to review the current ordinance and advise the Council at the next meeting of suggested changes and/or solution to the questions raised during the discussion. No fornial action was taken. ORDINANCE, II�IPIAY� UPDATID SERVICE CRIDITS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance "'"�` adopting employee retirement updated service credits. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance, after which y Assistant City Manager Bill Eisen outlined its contents and purpose. There being little discussion, Council Member Brekken made a motion that the ordinance be adopted. The motion was seconded by Council M�ember Shafer and prevailed. by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver 07/20/$2 ORDINANC,E NO. 82-41 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND ALLOWING, UNDER 'Pf� ACI' GOVERNING THE 'I`EXAS MUNICIPAL REI'IRII�NT SYS'I'EM, "UPDATED SERVICE CRIDITS" IN SAID SYSTEN! FOR SERVIC.E PERFORMID BY QUALIFYING NIF�'IBERS OF SUCH SYSTFM IN Z� IIKPLOYMEN'I' OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTI�IE DATE FOR SUCH ACTIONS � :, SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM WITHDRA4�li.�� FIRM HIRID FOR �YSIS `'°"`" The next order of business was for the City Council to consider authorizing a contract to assist the City in evaluating withdrawal from the Social Security program. Assistant City Manager Bill Eisen explained the need for such a service and recommended the hiring of the firm of Gronto, Kebodeaux, and Bliese of Houston. It was reported that the Personnel Committee, chaired by Council Nl�.mber Dunn, rec�ended the hiring of said firm. Council M�mber Dunn then made a motion to accept the recomnsndation of the City Staff and Personnel Conmittee and engage the firm of Gronto, Kebodeaux, and Bliese to assist the City in evaluating withdrawal from the Social Security program as outlined. The mption was seconded by Council Nfember Brekken and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver PEAC�i STRE�'I' PAVING, KEL�T TAYfAR CONTRACT If The next order of business was for the City Council to consider authorizing a � contract with Ken Taylor relating to the paving of a portion of Peach Street. City Ehgineer Jim Baddaker e�lained the scope of the project and outlined the alternatives available to the Council. He then recommended that the Council initiate assessment proceedings and enter into a refunding contract with Mr. Taylor that w�uld refund any assessment fees collected to him. It was added that, under this option, Mr. Taylor would be financing the construction with the City acting as a collection agency. Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a mption to instruct the City Attorney to prepare the contract as reco�lded by the City Staff. The motion was seconded by Council Member Dyer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays None Absent: Oliver PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECODM'�iDATION ZONING APPLICATION Z82-28, TORRES The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the � reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning Comziission relative to Zoning Application Z82-28 (Torres) and a subsequent ordinance. � Planning & Zoning Comnission Chairman Sharron Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Co�nission unani.mously reco�nded denial by a vote of five to zero. Ms. Spencer added that the reasons for denial were that the plan was not consistent with Master Plan reco�ndations and did not provide for adequate setbacks. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Council Nlember Dyer then made a motion to accept the reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning Commi.ssion and deny the application. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: 0�/2o/sa Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver PI�NNING & ZONING COMMISSIOIV RECOb�IQ�IDATION ZONING APPLICATION Z82-30, HURST The ne� order of business was for the City Council to consider the recom�ndation of the Planning & Zoni.ng Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-30 (Hurst) and a subsequent ordinance. ,,�,� Chairman Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Comnission rec�nded approval of the application by a vote of three to two, �� The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a mc�tion to accept the reco�ldation of the Planning & Zoning Co�nission and adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, D�uruz, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver ORDINANCE NO. 82-42 AN ORDINANCE ANIF�]DING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, Tf� CONIPREHII�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, Z�XAS, SAN� BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPIIVDIX "A" OF � CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF I,AND DESCRIBID AS BEING A I�OT, TRACT, OR PAR— CEL OF L�AND LYING AND BEING SI'ITJATID IN TARRANI' COUN'I'Y, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE THOMAS MAHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 1050, IN Z� CITY OF GRAPE— �"+� �1INE. TEXAS, MORE FUIS,Y AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBID fd IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE �� IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "R-1" SINGLE— FAMILY DWII.d,ING DISTRICT TO "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CATEGORY; CORRECTING Z� OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING AI�L OTfiER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINAI�TCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE REL,ATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERNLIl�TING THAT 'Pf-� PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORAIS AND G�RAT, WELFARE DII�l�ID A ZONING �TGE Al�ID ANIENDMEIVT 'rHF:RFIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN II"1ERGII�TCY PI�IVNIlVG & ZONING RECONIl�IDATION ZONING APPLICATION Z82-31, GERSCHICK The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Ca�nission relative to Zoning Application Z82-31 (Gerschick) and a subsequent ordinance. Chairm�-uz Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Co�n.ission rec�nded approval by a vote of five to zero with the follawing two provisions (1) That the asphalt paving as shc�m on the site plan as filed be deleted; (2) That �*" no wrecked or inoperable vehicles shall be parked or stored on the property. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. ,,,� Council M�r Brekken made a motion to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Co�nission and adopt the ordinance. The mQtion was seconded by Council Me.mber Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver 0�/20/82 ORDINANC� NO. 82-43 AN ORDINANCE AD�IDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE COMPRE��TSIVE ZONING ORDINI�NCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPE�IDIX "A" OF TI� CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CEIANGE ON A TRACI' OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A I�OT, TRACT, OR PAR- CEL OF I.,AI�ID LYING A1�ID BEING SITUATID IN TARRAN'I' ��,;fr COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF TI� A. F. LEONARD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 946, IN 'I�IE CITY OF GRAPE- VINE, TEXAS, 1�RE FULLY AND COMPI�'I�I,Y DE- SCRIBID IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDTNANCE; ORDERING �` A C�iANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPEI�I'Y FROM "C-2" COMNICTNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CAT'F�CGORY TO "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DISTRICT FOR THE OPER- ATION OF A TRUGK REPAIR GARAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN, PROVIDING CERTAIl�1 CONDITIONS, AND FUKI'HER PROVIDING FOR ALL O'I�iII2 USES AS PII2- MITI�D IN 'I'fiE "C-2" COTM'1[TNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CATEC'�ORY; CORRDCTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING Mp,p; pRFSERVING ALL 0'i�iER PORTIONS OF Tf� ZONING pRDINANGE; PROVIDTNG A CLAUSE RII�ATING TO SE�IER- ABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC 1'NI`ERESTS, MORAIS, A1�ID GE[�TERAL WEI�ARE DENIAND A ZONING CHANVE AND AME�iDMENT 'I�IEFtEIN MADE; PROVIDING A PE�IALTY; AND DECLARING AN II�lERGE[�TCY PI,ANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECODM'IELVDATION ZONING APPLICATION Z82-32, HA.Li� The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reco�azdation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to Zoning �e� Application Z82-32 (Hall) and a subsequent ordinance. 1( Chairman Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission recomnended `���� denial by a vote of four to one, primarily because of anticipated traffic problems. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Following a lengthy discussion, Council Member Brekken made a mption to accept the reco�nexidation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and deny the application. The motion failed for lack of a second. Council Niember Dyer then made a motion to accept the rec�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission and deny the request for "I-1" Light Industrial, but to waive the filing fee if the applicant chose to refile the application under the Specific Use Permit Zoning Category. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver PI�NNING & ZONING CONY�IISSION RECONP�NDATION ZONING APPLIC�ITION Z82-33, BAUGHER The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-33 (Baugher) and a subsequent ordinance. Chairman Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission recomnended approval by a vote of five to zero. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to accept the reco�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Co�nission and adopt the ordinance. The mption was seconded by Council Nlember Shafer and prevailed by the follawing vote: o�/Zo/$a Ayes . Tate, Ware, Shafer, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver ORDINANCE N0. 82-44 AN ORDINANC� ANIENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, Tf� COMPREEI.IIVSIVE ZONING ORDIN�NCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAMF; BEING AI,.SO KNOWN AS APPE�TDIX "A" OF � CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, ,,,�,� TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF I�AND DESCRIBID AS BEING A I�OT, TRACT, OR PAR- ��, OF I,AND LYING A1�ID BEING SI'I�JATID IN TARRANr �.,� COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF � THOMAS MAH�N SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1050, IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEX1�.S, MORE F'[TLLY AND CONIPLEI'ELY DESCRIBID IN Tf� BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDER- ING A Q�ANGE IN 'PfiE USE OF SAID PROPER'I'Y FROM "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DISTRICT FOR THE STORAGE, SALE, AND ON-PRIIKISE CONSUMPTION OF AL�COHOLIC BEVERAGES INCIDII�ITAL TO THE OPERATION OF A RESTAURANT, IN ACCORDANCE L�1ITH A SITE PLAN TO "SP" SPECIFIC USE FERNLIT DISTRICT FOR THE STORAGE, SAL�E, AND ON- PRF��IISE CONSUNIP'I'ION OF AT.,COHOLIC BEVERAGES INCI- DENTAL TO TfiE OPERATION OF A RESTAURANI', IN ACCORDANCE WITH A RE�TISID SITE PLAN, AND FUR'1�IEft PROVIDING FOR ALL OZ'HER USFS AS PERNlITTID IN THE "C-2" CONIMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CATEC-,ORY; CORRECrING 'I� OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING AT,T, OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINZ�NCE; PROVIDING A CI,P,USE RII.,ATING TO SEVEFZABILITY; DEI�RMINING THAT � PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GII�L WEL- FARE DII�IAND A ZONING Q�ANGE AND A1�TDN�!' THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PII�LTY; AND DECI�R.Il�tG AN II�RGENCY �� J� PI�Al�]NING & ZONING CONID'IISSION R�M�IDATION REPLAT SHORECREST ACRES `�" The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reco�r�endation of the Planning & Zoning Co�nission relative to the replat of Shorecrest Acres. It was reported that the Planning & Zoning Co�nission tabled consideration of the item pending the submission of the plat in final form. No formal action was taken by the Council. PLANNING & ZONING COrM�LtSSION RECOPM�IDATION REPLAT HAMP'PON ROAD ADDITION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the replat of Ha�ton Road Addition. It was reported that the Planning & Zoning Co�nission recomnended approval by a vote of five to zero. City EYigineer Jim Baddaker then outlined the change in the replat. "� Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to accept the reco�ndation of the Planning & Zoning Co�nission and approve the replat. The m�tion was seconded by Council Nle�iber Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: � � Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver MISCET�T�NEOUS REPORTS The City Manager then advised the Council that, if they posed no objections, a � Budget Workshop had been planned for Tuesday evening, July 27, 1982 at 0�/20/82 6:30 p.m. in the Concourse facility. The City Staff was instructed to proceed with the planned wr�rkshop. AA70URl�'IENT There being no further business to come before the Council, Council Nlember Marion Brekken made a m�tion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Dunn and prevailed by the follawing vote: �,. Ayes . Tate, Ware, Dunn, Shafer, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Oliver � PASSID AND APPROVID BY TI� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, '1�XAS on this the � �J day of _ _, 1982. APP . '"�•��-�d��x.+ ` Mayor ATTEST: City Secre � � �