The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-03-16 Joint Meeting AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 16 , 1982 AT 7 : 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET �.;.� ,,,�,�, I. CALL TO ORDER II. INVOCATION: Dr. Jim Able First United Methodist Church III . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z82-09 submitted by International Aerospace Corporation. B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z82-10 submitted by Don Gerschick. C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z82-11 submitted by Alston Homes. D. City Council and Pl:anning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli- '� "' cation Z82-12 submitted by William Paris. „�„� E. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Appli- cation Z82-13 submitted by George Wright. IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, to deliberate the merits of the zoning cases and to consider further published agenda items. B. City Council to remain in session to consider further published agenda items. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C. S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61Sm LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 1982 AT 5 :00 P.M. � � . rl� City ecr ar AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 16 , 1982 AT 8 : 00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET V. PUBLIC HEARINGS ��.;.� A. City Council to conduct a public hearinq to con- sider an application submitted by Dr. Don Gerschick �..� for the relocation of a portable structure. B. City Council to conduct a public hearing to con- sider an application submitted by C. O. A. Industries of Texas for the relocation of a portable structure. VI . CITIZENS REQUESTS &/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS VII . OLD BUSINESS A. City Council to consider an application for the temporary reconstruction of Fairway Drive. VIII . NEW BUSINESS A. City Council to consider an ordinance directing the giving of notice of intention to issue $600 ,000 City of Grapevine, Texas Waterworks and Sewer 5ystem Revenue Bonds , Series 1982 . B. City Council to consider an ordinance authorizing � the issuance of $2 , 370 ,000 City of Grapevine, Texas General Obligation Bonds , Series 1982 . `"`°°'"' C. City Council to consider and award the bid for Park Department maintenance equipment. D. City Council to consider a resolution authorizing a grant application for funding for a multi- channel recording system and related personnel. E. City Council to consider a resolution authorizing a grant application for funding of a Crime Preven- tion Specialist Project. F. City Council to consider a resolution authorizing a grant application for funding of lake patrol personnel. G. City Council to consider a resolution authorizing a joint application with the City of Bedford for funding of a Narcotics Investigator. H. City Council to consider Change Orders No. 1 and No. 2 with Marriot Brothers Contractors relating �� to Bellaire Addition street improvements. I. City Council to consider awarding the contract for painting of the water towers. IX. PLANNING & ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS ZONING CASES & PLATS A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-08 (Robbins) and a subsequent ordi- nance if applicable. B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-09 (International Aerospace) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-10 (Gerschick) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. �;., ,. D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning � � Application Z82-12 (Paris) and a subsequent ordi- nance if applicable. E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-13 (Wright) and a subsequent ordi- nance if applicable. F. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of Dooley Street Condominiums. X. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C. S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 1982 AT 5 : 00 P.M. �. :� �d�►�.. City Se e ry �� AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 16 , 1982 AT 8 :00 P.M. CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN STREET �"„� � V. OLD BUSINESS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-08 (Robbins) and make a recom- mendation to the City Council. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-09 (International Aerospace) and make a recommendation to the City Council. B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-10 (Gerschick) and make a recom- mendation to the City Council . C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-12 (Paris) and make a recommen- dation to the City Council. D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z82-13 (Wright) and make a recommen- � - dation to the City Council. E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final �""°" plat of Dooley Street Condominiums and make a recommendation to the City Council . F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the preliminary plat of Westport Village. VII. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES Meetings of February 11 , 16 , & 25 and March 2 , 1982 VIII . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS &/OR DISCUSSIONS IX. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 1982 AT 5 :00 P.M. /��_ .�it�,�-.�T�.� City Secr tary STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANI' CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council and the Planning & Zoning Comnission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Regular Session on this the 16th day of March, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Ch�unbers, 413 Main Street, with the follawing persons present to wit: �::.�, William D. Tate Mayor Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem ,� Charles Dunn Council Nlember C. L. Oliver Council Member Marion Brekken Council Member Ron Dyer Council Member constituting a quorum with Council Member William Shafer absent, with the following members of the Planning & Zoning Comnission: Sharron Spencer Chairman Ron Cook Vice Chairman Harlen Joyce Member Ann Glynn Me,mber Harold Anderson Member constituting a quonurt with Nlembers Klee Hawkins and Gerald NormaYi absent, with the follawing members of the City Staff: Jim Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Shirley Armstrong City Secretary �`,,� CAI� TO ORDER I � Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Mayor Pro Tem Ted Ware. INTRODUCTIONS & PROCEDURES Mayor Tate then introduced me�nbers of the Planning & Zoning Co�nission and explained the procedures to be follawed during the public hearings. PUBLIC HF.AR�VG, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-09, INTERNATIONAL AEROSPACE The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Conanission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-09 submitted by International Aerospace Corporation. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon City Planner Marc Guy to explain the request of the applicant. Mr. Guy noted that the property in question was located at 204 West Nash Street. He added that the present zoning was "R-1" Single Family, with the requested zoning being for "C-1" Neighborhood Business District. � Mr. Tooker, representing International Aerospace Corporation, then made a brief presentation, after which questions were asked by members of the �. Planning & Zoning Co�nission and City Council. Mayor Ta�e then asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. There were none. The City Secretary reported that she was in receipt of one letter from Mrs. D. C. E�nory relative to the requested zoning. There being no further discussion, Comnissioner Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Coa�missioner Ann Glynn and prevailed by the follawing vote: , 03/16/82 Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, & Anderson Nays . None � Absent: Hawkins & Norman ' Counci].m�-uz Dyer then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the , public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council NIember Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None ,,,�,� Absent: Shafer PUBLIC HFARIlVG, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-10, GERSC�iICK ,�� , The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-10 �, submitted by Don Gerschick. I! Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon the City Planner �, to explain the request of the applicant. Mr. Guy reported that the property ' in question was located at the northeast corner of Lucas and West Northwest � Highway. He added that the present zoning was "C-2" CorrarnuZity Business District with the requested zoning being for "SP" Specific Use Permit for a landscaping and grass sales operation, allawing for the outside storage of materials, and further allawing all other uses as permitted in the "C-2" C�mxnity Business District, in accordance with a site plan. A brief presentation was then made by Mr. Gerschick, after which questions were entertained fran the Planning & Zoning Coiranission and City Council. Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. There were none. The City Secretary reported that she was not in receipt of any correspondence regarding the case. I, There being no further discussion, Conmissioner Cook made a mc�tion to close '�� ' their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Comni.ssioner z Joyce and prevailed by the follawing vote: ,�� ' Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, & Anderson ' Nays . None ' Absent: Hawkins & Normaxz Councilman Oliver then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the ' public hearing. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro 'I�m Ware and prevailed by the follaaing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer PUBLIC HEARING, Z�TING APPLICATION Z82-11, ALSTON HONIES ' The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Cor�nission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-11 sukamitted by Alston H�nes. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked Mr. Guy to explain the requested zoning. � ', It was reported that the applicant has requested the application be withdrawn. '' There being no further discussion, Comnissioner Ann Glynn made a mption to � close their portion of the public hearing. The mption was seconded by , Co�n.issioner Harold Anderson and prevailed by the follawing vote: ��, Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Glynn, Anderson, & Joyce I Nays . None '� Absent: Hawkins & Norman ' Counci]m�z Dyer then made a motion that the Council close their portion of the ', public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Brekken and ', prevailed by the follawing vote: 03/16/82 Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Duruz, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer PUBLIC HEARTNG, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-12, WILLIAM PARIS The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z82-12 submitted by William Paris. � Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked City Planner Marc Guy to explain the requested zoning. Those in attendance were advised that the � applicant was requesting a "SP" Specific Use Permit District zoning for the operation of a restaurant facility with the retail sale and serving of alcoholic beverages for on-premise cons�tion only and including facilities for coin-operated game machines, off-premise catering services, and further allawing all other uses as permitted in the "C-1" Neighborhood Business District, all in accordance with a site plan. Mr. Paris then addressed the Council and reviewed his renovation plans. A lengthy discussion then ensued during which qu�stions were asked by the Planning & Zoning CoiYmtission and Council relative to the rnunber and location of the proposed game machines, hours of operation, and potential fire hazards. Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests present to speak for or agai.nst the application. There were none. The City Secretary reported that she was not in receipt of any correspondence relative to the requested zoning. There being no further business, Conanissioner Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Cor:unissioner Ann Glynn and prevailed by the followir�g vote: Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Glynn, Anderson, & Joyce �° Nays . None 3 Absent: Hawkins & Norman � Council Mea�r Brekken then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the public hearing. The mption was seconded by Counci]man Dyer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z82-13, G�OIZGE WRIGHT The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a pui�lic hf,a�-:�icr Y•E�l.a.tive to Zoning Application Z82-13 submitted by Mr. George Wright. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon the City Planner to explain the request of the applicant. Those in attendance were adVised that the 5.18-acre tract out of the P. R. Splane Survey was currently zoned "C-2" Co�rnanity Business with the requested zoning being for a "SP" Specific Use Permit District for the construction of townhouses, in accordance with a site plan. �'"` Mr. Rob Vance then addressed the Council on behalf of the applicant and presented site plans and artist rendering of the proposed developirent. � N�rous questions were then asked by the Planning & Zoning Coirani_ssion and Council relative to utility development, yard setbacks, unit size, street access, and future development, parking and anticipated traffic congestion. Mayor Tate then asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. There were none. The City Secretary reported that she was in receipt of a letter from the awner of the property (Mr. J. M. Lairsen, Jr.) in question requesting favorable consideration of the application. There being no further discussion, Coirunissioner Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Ann Glynn and prevailed by the follaving vote: �I� Ayes . Spencer, Cook, Glynn, Joyce, & Anderson I Nays : None Absent: Hawkins & Norman ' Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to close the Council's portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Counci]man Oliver and prevailed by the follawing vote: �� Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Ihu�u1, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None ' Absent: Shafer w�w ' IIVD OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING I�' The Planning & Zoning Commission then recessed to the Civic Center to deliberate the merits of the zoning cases and to consider further published agenda items. I!� Mayor Tate then called a brief recess, after which all members of the Council I reconvened with the exception of Council Nf�nber Shafer. PUBLIC HEARING, PORTABLE STRUCT[TRE R�L,OCATION, COAC��'1AN INDUSTRIES I The ne�t order of business was for the City Council to conduct a public ' hearing to consider an application submitted by C. O. A. Industries of Texas ', for the relocation of a portable structure. �'i Mayor Tate declared. the public hearing open and asked the City Secretary to explain the request of the applicant. The Council was advised that Coachman Industries was requesting permission to locate a portable structure on their property at 729 East Dallas Road. Mr. Hugh Gruver then made a brief presentation during which he reviewed the "�� , site plan and noted an alternate location for the proposed building. � ', There being little discussion, Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present �; I to speak in regard to the application. There were none. The City Secretary ii advised that no letters or petitions had been submitted as a matter of record. I�I No further testimony was presented. As a result, Council Nlember Brekken made a motion to close the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council ' NIember Dyer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, I�uruz, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer The City Secretary then read the caption of the resolution concerning the building relocation. , Counci]man Dunn made a m�tion to approve the application by adoption of the ', resolution. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed ' by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer , Nays . None ' Absent: Shafer � �' RESOLUTION NO. 82-08 i �.r� ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GRAPE,'�TIl�TE, T�S, ', PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT AUI'f�iOR- i IZING Tf� REL�OCATION OF A BUILDING; PROVIDING I FOR A NON-TRANSFERABLE PERNLZT; PROVIDING A SITE I PLAN; AND PR()VIDING FOR AN EE'FDCI'IVE DATE 03/16/82 FAIFdnTAY DRIVE, TII�'lPORARY RECONSTRUCTION The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an application for the temporary reconstruction of Fairway Drive. City Engineer Jim Ba.ddaker advised that the lease agreement for the temporary road had been approved by the Corps of �hgineers. He added that in the event the Council wanted to pursue the County's construction of the ten�orary roadway, the City Staff needed authorization to execute the license agreement �, with the Corps of Engineers and authorization to allow the County Co�nissioner to proceed with construction. � A lengthy discussion then ensued relative to the amount of sunur�r traffic a temporary facility �uld be able to endure, and to the public safety and liability aspects surrounding both a temporary road and existing conditions. There was also some discussion relative to not constructing the terr�orary facility until a definite answer had been received from the Corps of Engineers concerning the permanent solution. Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to authorize the City Staff to go foYward with the temporary project. The motion was seconded by Council NIember Brekken and failed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, & Brekken Nays . Durul, Oliver, & Dyer Absent: Shafer Follawing a short discussion, Councilman Oliver made a motion to table a decision on the matter pending word fran the Corps of Engineers on their intentions regarding a permanent road. Counci]man Dunn seconded the motion, and it prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer �i � ORDINANCE, NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE $600,000 REVEN[TE BONDS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance directing the giving of notice of intention to issue $600,000 City of Grapevine, Texas Wate�orks and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 1982. City Manager Jim Hancock gave a brief report on the capital improvements program. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Council Member Brekken then made a motion that the ordinance be adopted. The motion was seconded by Council Member Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer ORDINAI�TCE NO. 82-10 AN ORDINANCE DIREC.�I'ING THE GIVING OF NOTICE OF �* INI`ENTION TO ISSUE $600,000 CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS WA'I'ERWORKS AND SEtiaER SYSTEM REVE[WE BONDS, SERIFS 1982; AND DECLARING AN II�RGEE[�IICY � AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE $2,370,000 GIIVERAL OBLIGATION BONDS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance authorizing the issuance of $2,370,000 City of Grapevine, Texas General Obligation Bonds, Series 1982. City Manager Jim Hancock gave a brief autline of the general obligation bond projects. 03/16/82 Following a short discussion, Council Nlember Dyer made a motion to authorize the City Staff to issue general obligation bonds in the ampunt of $2,370,000. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Brekken and prevailed. by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer A4�,RD BIDS, TRACI'ORS AND RIDING NIOWER, PARK DEPAR'IT�NT ,,,,,,,� The next order of business was for the City Council to consider and award the bid for Park Department maintenance equipment. �w Assistant City Manager Bill Eisen reported that the following bids had been received: TRACI'OR BIDS C�ANY PRODUCT TOTAL BID Clemons Tractor Co. 2 Ford Diesels, #4610 $21,978.00 Dallas Turf Equipment 2 John Deere Diesels, #2240 $22,937.48 Trinity Equipm�nt Co. 2 John Deere Diesels $24,498.00 RIDING MOWER BIDS C��-' PRODUCT TO'I'AL BID Colonial Nbtor Co�a.ny Jacobsen #66042 $7,990.00 Goldthwaite's of Texas Hustler �cel 295 $8,900.00 Mr. Eisen then reported that the Jacobsen riding mower did not meet "'"'�1I � specifications and reco�nded that the riding mr�wer bid be awarded to Goldthwaite's of Texas. He added that the Staff recomnended the tractor bid �; be awarded to Clemons Tractor Company. Mayor Pro Tem Ware made a motion to accept the reco�anendation of the City Staff and award the bid for the tractors to Clemons Tractor Company in the amount of $21,978 and to award the bid for the riding mower to Goldthwaite's of Texas in the amount of $8,900. The motion was seconded by Counci]man Oliver and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer RESOLUTION, GRANT APPLICATION, MCTLTI-CHANNII, RECORDING SYSTEM The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution authorizing a grant application for funding for a multi-channel recording system and related personnel. The City Manager explained that the project �uld permit the communication station of the Police Depar-tment to record, on tape, incoming emergency telephone lines and all police and ambulance radio transmission. He added that the Texas Criminal Justice Council's portion of the grant wr�uld be '""'""" $11,672.42, with the City of Grapevine paying $3,890.80. The City Secretary then read the caption of the proposed resolution. ,,,� Councilman Dyer made a motion that the resolution be adopted. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer 03/16/82 RESOLUTION NO. 82-09 A RESOI,tJ`I'ION OF Tf� CITY COUNCIL OF � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, AUI'HORIZING THE CITY OF GRAPE- VINE TO APPLY FOR A GRAN.P FROM TI� LAW IIVF'ORCE- MME�VV`T ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION PROVIDING NECESSARY FUNDING, WITHIN THEIR GUIDELINES, FOR PERSONNEL AND � PURCHASE OF EQUIPM�VT � RESOLUTION, GRANT APPLICATION, CRIME PREVENTION SPEJCIALIST The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution "`� authorizing a grant application for funding of a Crime Prevention Specialist Project. The City Manager reported that this was the third year funding for the Crime Prevention Officer. He added that the Texas Criminal Justice Council's portion of the project was $13,795, with the City's portion being $20,693. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed. resolution. Counci7man Dunn then made a motion that the resolution be adopted. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer RESOLUTION NO. 82-10 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TE�S TO APPLY FOR A GRANT FROM Tf� TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION � � RESOLUTION, GRANT APPLICATION, LAt� PATROL PERSONNEL � The next matter to come before the Council was consideration of a resolution authorizing a grant application for funding of lake patrol personnel. Mr. Hancock advised the Council that the grant request for personnel and equipment for Lake Grapevine had been denied twice in the past; hawever, the contents of the current application provided for personnel only. He added that, if approved, the Texas Criminal Justice Council would provide 100� of the funding, $92,400. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed resolution. Councilman dyer made a mr�tion that the resolution be adopted. The mption was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the followinq vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer RESOLUTION NO. 82-11 � A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, AUTfiORIZING Tf� CITY OF GRAPE- VINE TO APPLY FOR A GRANT FROM THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE �,,, ADMINISTRATION PROVIDING NECESSARY FUNDING, WITHIN THEIR GUIDELINES, FOR PERSONNII� RESOLUTION, GRANr!' APPLICATION, NARCOTICS INVESTIGATOR The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution authorizing a joint application with the City of Bedford for funding of a Narcotics Investigator. 03/16/82 The City Manager explained that this was the second year funding for the narcotics grant. He added that it allawed for total funding of monies to purchase drugs, rental of vehicles, and others for both cities to operate a , drug enforcement program. He continued to advise that the total cost of the I program, pa.id by the Texas Criminal Justice Council for the City of Grapevine, ', was $36,000. �', The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed resolution. Council Nlember Brekken made a mc�tion that the resolution be adopted. The ,�� ', motion was seconded by Councilman Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: , Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer �k* ', Nays . None ' Absent: Shafer RESOLUTION N0. 82-12 I A RESOI�JTION AUTHORIZING Tf� POLICE CEiIEF OF THE I CITY OF GRAPEVINE AND THE POLICE CFiIEF OF TI� CITY �', OF BIDFORD Zb SUBMIT A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE !, T�AS CRIMINAI� JUSTICE COUNCIL FOR A NARCOTICS i, INVESTIGATOR I CHANGE ORDERS ONE AND TWO, BELZAIRE ADDITION STREEI' IMPROVII�1'I'S II'� The next order of business was for the City Council to consider Change Orders I No. 1 and No. 2 with Marriot Brothers Contractors relating to Bellaire Addition street improvements. City Engineer Jim Baddaker explained the two change orders, attached hereto and made a part hereof as E�hibits "A" and "B". The Council was advised that , it was the reco�r�reazdation of the City Staff that the change orders be , aPProved. �w� ; � Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a nation to accept the reco�idation of the City �� Staff and approve Change Order No. 1 in the aampunt of $80,400 and Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $2,188.63. The motion was seconded by Council Nlember Brekken and prevailed by the follawing vote: ' Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer ' Nays . None Absent: Shafer WATER TOWER PAINTING CONTRACTS BID AWARD The next order of business was for the City Council to consider awarding the contract for painting of the water towers. City �gineer Jim Baddaker reported that the following bids had been received: ' BID TABUL�ATION , TOTAL COMPLETION AMOUNT TIME ', BIDDERS BID CAL�II�]DAR DAYS �'"°"� �'�, D Brothers Painting Corporation $50,000.00 60 � 265 London Bridge Ftoad ,�,�, ', Virginia Beach, Virginia 23454 ', Pittsburgh Tank & Tawer, Inc. $79,362.00 45 j P. 0. Box 746 �', Pittsburgh, Kansas 66762 I' He added that it was the reco�azdation of the City Staff that the bid be j awarded to "D" Brothers Painting Corporation for their low bid of $50,000. 03/16/82 Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to accept the reconariendation of the City Staff and award the bid for the painting of the water tawers to "D" Brothers Painting Corporation in the amount of $50,000. The m�tion was seconded by Council Member Dyer and prevailed by the follawing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer � It was then the general concensus of the Council that the color for both tawers be white tanks with beige stands. �, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIl�VDATION, Z82-08, ROBBINS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to Zoning Application Z82-08 (Rc�bbins) and a subsequent ordinance. Chairman Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission recom�nded approval of the requested zoning in accordance with the revised site plan as submitted, providing for the parking area to be constructed with a hard surface, and providing for a six-foot screening fence around the Mr. "M" facility. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Council Nle�nbers Dyer and Brekken expressed concern that the entrance to the facility would be provided from a private road. Following a short discussion, Councilm�l Dunn made a mption to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission and approve the requested zoning by adoption of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the follawing vote: '� � Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, & Dunn q ' Nays . Brekken & Dyer ,�.,�, Absent: Shafer ORDINANCE N0. 82-11 AN ORDINANCE ANIENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, TFIE COMPREEIII�TSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPE- VINE, TEXAS, SANIE BEING ALSO HIWWN AS APPII�IDIX "A" OF � CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANr.CING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A I�OT, TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATID IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXA.S, BEING A PART OF Tf-3E P. R. SPI�ANE SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 1453, ALEX THOMPSON SUR�IEY, ABSTRACT N0. 1532, & THE THOMAS RAS'I'ER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474, IN Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TE�S, MORE F2TLZY AND COI"1PI�'1'EI�Y DESCRIBID IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDER- ING A C�IANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPEFrI'Y FROM "C-2" CONIl�IIJNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CATE- GORY TO "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DISTRICT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A ROLLER SKATING AREL�tA AI�ID RII�'I'ED ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING A MAXIMUM OF 20 COIN-0PERATID C-�ME MACHINES, PROVIDING Tf-iAT THE �" PARKING ARE1� BE CONCREI�, ASPHALT, OR AN EQUIVA- LIIV'r, AND FURTf��R PROVIDING FOR A SCREIIVING FIIVCE, pT,T, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN; CORREC.'I'ING Tf-iE irw++ OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTfiII2 PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CL�AUSE REL1�T- ING TO SEVEF2ABILITY; DE'I�RMINING Z�3AT Tf� PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GF,[�IERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CEIANGE AND ANIENDNIIIV`!' THEREIN N1ADE; PROVID- ING A PE[�1ALTY; AND DDCLARING AN EMERGE[�ICY 03/16/82 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REC�MIIIVDATION, Z82-09, Il�I`ERNATIONAL AEROSPAC� The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recomnendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to Zoning �, Application Z82-09 (International Aerospace) and a subsequent ordinance. ', Chairn�n Spencer reported that it was the rec�arendation of the Planning & ' Zoning Co�nission that the application be denied. ' The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. �'+� I�I Following a short discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Ware ma.de a r�tion that the ' application be approved by adoption of the ordinance. The motion was seconded „�,,� by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, & Dyer Nays : Dunn ' Absent: Shafer I ORDINANGE NO. 82-12 I, AN ORDINI�NCE ANIENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10, THE '� COMPREEiE[JSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOW AS , APPE[�TDIX "A" OF � CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, '� TEX1�S, GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT, ', OF LAND DESCRIBID AS BEING A L�OT, TRACT, OR ' PARCEL OF I11ND LYING AND BEING SITUATID IN TARRANT COLTNrI'Y, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF � ORIGINAL TOWN OF GRAPEVINE SUBDIVISION IN Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE FUI�LY AND COM- PLEI�LY DFSCRIBID IN � BODY OF THIS ORDI- NANCE; ORDERIiVG A CHANGE IN � USE OF SAID I PROPERTY FROM "R-1" SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDIIVTIAL � DWELLING DISTRICT TO "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSI- �� NESS DISTRICT COR�t'ING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ;a /o , MAP; PRESERVIlVG AI.L OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ,�� ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RII.�ATING TO SE�IERABILITY; DETERMIiVING THAT TI� PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GII�IERAI� WELFARE DENF�ND A ZONING CEIANGE AND AME[�1DMENT 'I�III�EIN �E; PROVIDING A PEL�ILTY; AND DECLARING AN II�GIIVCY ', PI,ANNING & ZONING CONINLZSSION RECONII"�TDATION, Z82-10, GERSC�iIQZ I, The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the '�I recomnendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to Zoning Application Z82-10 (Gerschick) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. Chairman Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Conxnission recommended ', approval with the follawing conditions: (1) A six-foot, solid screening ', fence on the north and eastern boundaries of the property; (2) A four-foot, ' chain-link fence along Lucas and fronting on Northwest Highway; (3) Providing for a crushed stone surface for the area where such items as fertilizer, railroad ties, and equi�anent will be stored and in the area of parking; (4) Providing that all railroad ties be stored at the rear of the property behind the existing gas station; and (5) Providing for the size of the building to be amended on the site plan to reflect 14' x 32' . "'"'�' The applicant then requested permission to amend the site plan. Upon being ' advised by the Mayor that the public hearing had already been closed, the �� applicant requested that the application be withdrawn. Councilman Dunn then made a motion to accept the request for withdrawal. The ' motion was seconded by Counci]man Oliver and prevailed by the follawing vote• , Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer I Nays : None , Absent: Shafer 03/16/82 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONA�ID.VDATION, Z82-12, PARIS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recormlendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z82-12 (Paris) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. Chairm�i Spencer reported that the Planning & Zoning Conmission reco�unended denial. � The applicant then addressed the Council and requested that the application be withdrawn. � Council N�er Brekken made a mption that the request for withdrawal be granted. The mption was seconded by Counci7inan Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer PII�NNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECONIM�iDATION, Z82-13, WRIGHT The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recomnendation of the Planning & Zoning Comnission relative to Zoning Application Z82-13 (Wright) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. Chairman Spencer advised the Council that the Planning & Zoning Comnission reco�snended denial. Following a short discussion, Councilman Dyer made a motion to accept the recamnenda.tion of the Planning & Zoning Comnission and deny the application. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: �'� Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer �� Nays . None � Absent: Shafer PUBLIC HEARIl�IG, PORTABLE BUILDING APPLICATION, GERSCHIC� The next order of business was for the City Council to conduct a public hearing to consider an application submitted by Dr. Don Gerschick for the relocation of a portable building. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. In light of the withdrawal of the corresponding zoning application, there was no discussion. Councilman Dunn then made a mption to close the public hearing. The m�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer Nays . None Absent: Shafer DECISION, PORTABLE BUILDING APPLICATION, GERSQ3ICK �"" There being no discussion, Councilman Oliver made a motion to deny the application. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the following vote: � Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Brekken, Dunn, & Dyer , Nays . None Absent: Shafer FINAL PLAT, DOOI�Y STREET CONDOMINIUMS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recoirHnendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the final plat of Dooley Street Condominiums. 03/16/82 City E7igineer Jim Baddaker presented the plat to the Council and advised that the Planning & Zoning C�ission had recommended approval by a vote of s� to zero. �, There being little discussion, Councilman Dunn made a motion to accept the ' reco�nendation of the Planning & Zoning Conm�ission and approve the final plat ', of Dooley Street Condominiums. The m�tion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware ', and prevailed by the follawing vote: ', Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer ,,�,�,, ', Nays . None ' Absent: Shafer AI)JOUFtt�Il�LV'I' `�'� ' There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilman Oliver i, made a motion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dyer and '�,, prevailed by the follawing vote: �I Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Brekken, & Dyer ', Nays . None , Absent: Shafer �I PASSID AND APPROVED BY Z'f� CITY COUNCIL OF Tf� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on '� this the � day of �� , 1982. I APPROVE! � , Mayor ' �# ', AZTEST: rL ' ��i City Secretary �� ,:r Exhibit "A" to the Council . : : �, : _ ... _,Ma.nute s of March 16 . . 19 8 2 . . - _ ..f � . ..= : . - - . - _ . .- _ .+� ..4,,..'S.,j t' -•_, c .. F .,:5 a'?�i.M°%�h'<.,�.'`rba: e�+`v..�{ C ..iu.,>q'"�,''i y�c'!r�-�.-"t`�a'*�'3y1`"7:+��`a+� '��.�^s7�°+� � .�;P;#!�,`?_x.5� °C�..:�Y 2'a.��_.t:�, .. �..� �.. .. . .. .. . . . . . � . � . . ..: �.�_..,. ....'., - ' . - � �....,. .��" .� ..... .. � � " � . � . . � .yif 4�`��, F {A�Jl i9'i . y'S1 uF N T��:' TJS�#�n�^�1 L�T� ��h � �T �� 1Q�.-a�Y- {"' Y (��.�1,,��R''�'',Y�dI'�yn,l,��7�a`"� it;r+R4'��.. , - +� ��y-�h''�n�.lY ' i T�`�f �. �n'��.i 1.. �.R _} ke'+ m'�6 �� '! 3`�'ib"'Wy�`a"Rw b`�.=3� b,¢� , �r �a �W ��' ..R . s K' ^' _.�� ' i��,. P� �;:��k � �kr ��•'��.�W�, :.i t # s s V ` ��r� �'�, .+ r '� v a t,,k� u r �b w s �'h."�� zo �� 4 a I �''^n� J � +�,�� x f �' . t � � �,f� 1 t +7v �„� � dit C .., '. � , � c . � 4 : . i � z � �� s r ! : u, . .,� { .� ' � y.. yx s�� ..,«�',Mvis,'yt'� � �,y'�}�� ,m'� �1 �M � ��yf,��ltp.. �i ?��='" „ a rj ,�{�'t J ��} � ,�$ c�4 4,'kth �� b'�'k}wy��i,�o-�^�t C I �itik�� ,*,,��.""5We'4b � � :'lEy'�"Y,,,�+�{ r y:a p _ 1 s` ,� H y� _i a� § ��, .� �a � ., ��.. 1 .�.�rj �+�"�}�t iy,a .f.'� v.��..r Yyh.. �o : �3 w r 3 � �.c- � •-,. ':,v �;1�,a. ��t" �e,.�r . .,.. �y � X., .. � �(cry- L � � �wt'�,y,y _ � � 'HCHANGE OR EXTRA WORK�� ORDER �;'�� f��ff ��`�"�� ° <f,;��, , �, � � � x a �„*'�t '`��d P � �� v� '" �`� W' • . v i r '� �� f y:La�'0 � '�' >u+�t.N � t�a �'�� Y w �x t f ti,�� t ... .'. , ` " ,z b �� , ; v �� ;u��h��t�� `��`'� ' �`,t�� t�' � °�'�,. t m� n Paving and Storm Drains ;t` , f��}�1� lM1�� r � 4 Y ( PROJECT: Bellaire Street ,�,, , ,� �y} �. � ;�� . . o: .: '. �,. . t . 7 h��d''��l` : � } � ,�� CONTRACT GPV 80095 ; ,��- , • ; < x T , s ,�,�ra��'�?�,t,�� ,� x �k� " ".' �, �1 r .;/ 4 }; `"n�'C�:� "°� '�' k+. p° �' �Y '� � '� t �w`k, nE.' '`' ,•}F . P .., ��,. .�: �i �tx��ay�' r ` � rr � n P�{., ��' �.r. vs �t �t�r t�,�.�� vr ., " � . 1 - � �4y �' q Y 1� � 1 4 t W t .;:, .. ' >} OWNER ��C�ty`of Grapevi ne, Texa s ��'�r:�� < µ: �.F4�wa��, � ��x4 z}� � �� F t r�+s�-iy'i� At'1, � '�c.�.'"yt� 3#F} :'�xs.r�,�d�yt-s��'�� ,�y�s,�$� h�!"t "t��'�� ' �,n w �� Y i 4�.�".: $A�1+v7�'��'°V ��'.t x" 8nU ri n t sX'.� ch�"':`�$w a�N�'Y}i' (�'"�'�{.��s1 e� �`rv � y r." r �` .�,k . '.,":� : '''� � �� `" t � �r ° � �. �,, �� i �k i� � �`x�+'� C �,J �� ;,�ti �e r � ' �Marriott Brothers �'y`Inc � � `�' �' S�'u* � ' ' "' �' '�"� � l ��t y 1� s �,t i �.� �.; i�';H � : '� c ,�� . � t � ��,,� . CONTRACTOR: i � , « � �r � a R ' � , �� , ,,�,. � �` � : A�t.�, - e �e^ {, aw,r rp N .n, � 1 P�� :r ti la�� s� �. 4�.s��%r�- ti �'� f � � CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 � „y� r DATE February 23 19g2 4 d'�° � k . � � �'��_ � tT.�� t �' r{.:; �u � .�r :;'c j � l6 .,• y N4 r� y ��;1N,g r YaY:��i��; yyi, �,�Sh �4�'y�eS.�w x;�#,�rv ��t.+,�Jk. .'� 1,� �e }f�w y�� #{ . '4;{ � ��i yi i� � ...t t , a i* `° �Y?i`t a � . ��:�'4a'''�"�a�'.'. �"�w'+�� t ._ K�,. M �'' 6*�ys� � � � n ,� �,,� � �h � r �; ,:� T . B �P FO �MED G .} � ,. ,�,�k��,�� q��;� r � �� ` CHANGE OR EX RA+� WORK TO E ER R '� i'��'�� <<��' ^. s w: ,5��a k�,1 u.�1 r*k��x � p � y, '-, . �1 . �4 . M'��?t i '� �e-i #��y;, , ��..xa 4 " +� �� g'f .:. p :. � %�pL ' �^ A .': �, : ...��i^ k .1: +�° r ` � �. �, r r - � -� . • `s��'.. �� ` .- ,, ., rt�i h1"9*t Y 'I'�n{p�hfR �. , '��"""� L Estimated quantity of Hot Mix ,Asphaltic Concrete �n Proposal Item rlo 2��y� is ��;��} 4 l:�i�' b� ,•� yA '}5 ; ��!)t a��I�'V 'h,� �T'A' �,Ay,.']} ( }. � incorrect due to a typographical error Change as follows � <4 � � ,r � s : :�..,' „ - Y I. . .�,i.!�y � { ,�«, iw 4r . �' r . �. �,ur'4 t . � _� , ��, �Est�mated y��y Unit ,a� r 4'Ns,� s � Uni t ` ',- . - ,� ��° ; A�� ; .Y No Descri pti on of Item _ �r , � uanti t ��{4� Pr�ce 4��Amount �x-� ` ' )y ��'� ' ' _-::� �� - :"t a e,., f f .;�_. . . � t R �.� .�- i '� t -^ �s '' 2 5" Hot Mi�x Asphal tic Concrete 28� 067 S Y { � � ��.� ' , � r� $8 04 $225,658 68 ; , �� , : ,. ; � , > , ,; , r : t . ��, i, ;�x x � � s. G - .,3!� -,h �.`� � � �t ° � t`� - ",�� C � '�, �; } t j t^� 4 i .f Y s. � t ,i � ra,N�,d'a't '�;r� tRtfk 1� � � _ �� t ... .. - _ Y "'� � _ � �i.� 4� 'C' _ Y� r a �� , i� r�rw t�F' t i .�, a s r . F� _ + ti'� . t ' n � ��.ax'� 7 �, � � .� s ��.t' 7� d a'S°n a P�� . • _��P ';a �l�� r a ._ ,�;� :eJ i v 1 ' �� f , .. ; . . , .- .... ...�, a .� . . . ... . .. . ' ` Previous contract amount � _' , � ' `'� . , . . , . ,.$ 481 ,199.44 � : , , , . . � Net(increase�(d�e�C�c�t�74�)in cont�act amount �,;$ 80,400.00 �,,, Revised contract amount ' $ 561 ,599.44 Net{increase)(ci�x��)in contract time of completion ,. 20 Cdlendat^ Ddys �'"" Revised contract time of completion ' 170 Cdlendar Ddys . . .- , , �.:-, . . . _ . . . �.: , .,, . w �,,. .. . . , , . . . . . . ., . . ._...._.... . . - ... . ,. -� . . . . .. . . , .. . .� ... . . ,,,'. . � . � . . . � � ... - .. . .-�., . .. . . . : , .: -�. Recommended by ' Approved by OWNER F```�.' �, FREESE AND NICHOLS / � %� 1 , ,` �j.� By r ��., . �,,�; -,�` �- � �� / M� _ gy; . .a- -Z- � � Distribution: Approved by CONTRACTOR i—Ow�er 1—Controe+or - � .�' � r� ` � . I—F. �N. Offics i . By�� t e' t;/L .,..o...... �_Res. Eng. _ Exhibit "B" , Page l , to ,. . . , � -: �:-,: .:... _;;,:;..•. . .. . : . , _ - ,. - :.,. .. :_ -: the Council Minutes o March 16 , 1982 .:� -:.. �yP ... . ... 1 '1. ('«.'� �ai''.Y3 'tti.�fi YZ"..Y � ..\! .t,' ' -.. ._ '� ... .- .. ,.. , � � . . .. . ... . _ .. . . . . . . . � . . .,s„q.k:. -Y- . . . - . _._ . . . i .,. .-.. , ��N h � � . . � � , , ,.z f.l� ..�. . � .. . . ; . � . :.�." � . . � n rF r �. �a� . -. ' z •�. . � , . `,�_ �� ° ,�. _. :: -1�, . . . . . � ;,. _ . �� CNANGE OR EXTRA WORK ORDER . , , � ,. n � . ..�. ....j .^ � 1'.� ; , i � 3. '� ; ss � PROJECT '�� Paving and Drainage - Bellaire and Vicinity, - , r `_ 1 CONTRACT. GP`J 80095 , �. � OWNER: � Ci ty of Grapevi ne �.: ':' ' � ..,_ s '�'� .�.� � 4 4 5'� � " >4CONTRACTOR. Marriott Brothers, Inc. � � . , ��,;; ,r �, r k`� � {� �CHANGE ORDER NO. '"Two� �(2) �' �DATE:�� February��24�,��1982 � � � � � �� ,; .: ; x x .; , ,_ , • aV r � �'"�� GHANGE OR _EXTRA WORK TO BE PERFORMED , a';�. ;� �,��«� . . , .. � . , , , � , PART A - �Storm Drain along Ball Street: ` � ' '' ' `` � � � �•'� . � 4 ,... A high tension electrical installation has been constructed at the ; , proposed storm drain location (Ball St. and Terrace Drive). Existing sewer ` `;'line precludes moving new man hole to the west. The proposed new location �'"" ` extends through the 20 ft. curb inlet on Terrace Drive. For details, see , `:Sheets 1-A, 9, and 25 �' . , .�.. ,.. �.: :� ,.. . ,. ., . .. ,�� ,., .. _ , , , PART B - Outfall Channel from Storm'Drain to Hwy. Culvert ".� � On Highway 114, the� culvert under the service road was lengthened �- 100 ft. 'and the flow line was raised (approximately 0.77 ft.). Proposed � adjustment would revise the profile from Sta. 3+02.25 to the Highway ��culvert at 7+99.3. For details, see sheets 25 and 26. " � PART C - Provision for reversing direction of garbage trucks at the south ' ,;; end of Pi ne Street. ,.. ; , :; ,,: . . _ '�• •' - ' For Deta i 1 s see Sheet 16. � � . � '` � ., �. � , � - , ; , _ , , � �• �� :: ,; . . , , , - ` . � � ,� , ; , . , .` : � :_ y .: , , , , �"r Exhibit "B" , Page 2 , to , the Council Minutes of . . . , - ,. . _ . _..-. � 1�Iarch l�i'; � �982 : . �'' > _ ,�,.:,""` ,s. r . � - , . ' . . , - - .6" . . ... _.. . . ,... . - . . -... -.-.. . . .�..'-.-.. ��. .,�a.�.. .., sa ..Lp�...'�M %.:u'+�,��'i,>i ivl,rokM4 u i'M.. Jl.'+�il��SXm^i�� x„ M tla. - q •� �-.� .. �, ,. .� �re.�:. . i; . . . . . � . . �... , . , ..: � . � �:.. . .,.r. . . -' ' ,.. . "":;'.. :_�.l I f. _ t �,1� { •.4 a n . .. u ,;�17,�r t fi*� Y �.r �. � � � �;�"� � r `S '� dsy�x� ( : �a a n� '° .♦ � � � 4 ' yvt. l ...�y° Y� . ' ��v:�' Ia ;. . y f�.t�nl i �a kp : , � ''�r 5 � . � ,.;i'�. � _.�...�' �,. `'. V +' , k��f,t�'r y'.�. {y 7 d}: r ` 4 7lp,Hrt 1 r �. 1 ��'E y � `•� k ,* #�.:�. : SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES �� , ' ��, w ��'� ��, s.. _ �. . . ��.� � o �� 'a . . '' ' . . � ' �. � r. , £±:. . .� .F �;ITE�d ..; � � � , . UANTITY . � : CONTRACT� . �'" A�10UNT 'PART A � - - PRICE :. DELETED ADDED . � -: : � � . � � , ,,, �,. � � � <_;��21" RCP �� .� � 10 Lin. �Ft. ��$27.00 , E 270.00 ` ,. ' %��36" RCP `i :�;9� Lin. �Ft. ��34.00 ��306.00 � . .. ; � : , . �°�. � � . : � t t Revise Inlet per Sheet 1-A � � ;� ; . ; $ 576.00 � 3 { .� . .,. ' �t,� � t� �; r, ,PART A TOTAIS � $ 576.00 576.00 . �r . , ..�� . . ,. � �PART B , r��` :F �', , �; � 1 t ��? � :� i ; � ! .� � � � �,.:-. t . y , k. k- t -'� n �` ' . , .. 1� r�� fi � : 1 .. Y � . r , . . . .. . �` z ,1 f .� 1 y ' �t � Unclassified Chan. Excavat. �.� �135 C Y ` { t�s ' � 3.50 ' r $ 472.50 ` � ,� t � �� ' ��..�� x.' z�� . �PART B TOTAL$ 'P � �� 2.5 { 47 0 4r � � � i} 7= r- � L� 4t'k 1 . ,� t , }j c ,�j i. _ y t :. t 1 LL��Q�� f�= �S �� i �'r � w r. � .. � t. x � �., . a�tr yp� � . '� salt ��.,, J i � '�, x, �� s'i�r��. t ,.a� 7 f�^ s a �1 ` � � '�� .. r�; . :. . 'hY. � F 3 ) •.� �;` ..'i :', ��• ? i ° 'S°�H,M.A.C. ' � �`' ' � �154 S.Y. 8.04 � �e��$1 ,238.16 �""" r .�7" Curb & Gutter ,�: <.' : :181 L.F. ` 5.85 ;� '� 1 ,058.85 r'�,�6" Lime Stab. Subgrade �� ' 214 S.Y. :_. � . 1 .08 �:`: 231 .12 'Hydrated Lime ` ,. '"` ''� ` . 0.5 Ton � 68.00 " �'" 34.�0 � :Unclassified St. Excavation .�.� 44 C.Y. ,�� 2.25 ,. ��' �` � 99.00 - ;' �� ;; ,. ; �: PART C TOTALS w ,6 .13 .. .� � ;i � . < i� '� �. ..ti � TOTALS A,B & C `� ; $1 ,048.50 $3,237.13 -.:NET INCREASE - THIS CHANGE � '� � .::�2,188.63 t� �� . � '�'fw �+x,!, k Frt . �7v b t - Previous contract amou�t ` ` . :; .' �4561 ,599.44 Net(increase)�7��in contract amount , :-$ 2,188.63 Revised contract amount . ..;', . ' ° �. ``'Y $563,788.07 v ' ' . Net(increase)(decrease)in controct time of completion NOne � .. . , . : . . . : ;' ; v ' Revised contracf time of cc,mpletion ` . . : 170 �r..or , ` ` Recommended by Approved by OWNER FREESE AND NtCHOLS `" ` ,� � � � C� �.- � By ; g � . , . G�:.� _ _ �Y Di:tribu+ion: � Approved by CONTRACTOR . " �—oW�.� : `.. � I—Con4roc+or � I—F. �N. Of�c• x By_ / i—a.s. E�9.