The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981-03-24 Joint Meeting CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 24 , 1981 AT 7 : 30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET �� I. CALL TO ORDER II. INVOCATION: Reverand David Whitington `'�"� Christ Our King Independent Methodist Church III . PUBLIC HEARING5 A. City Council & Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z81-13 , submitted by Mr. Mike Ross. B. City Council & Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z81-14 , submitted by Mr. S .L. Wyse. C. City Council & Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z81-15 , submitted by Mr. Ken Stiles. D. City Council & Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z81-16 , submitted by Mr. Bruce Casburn. ��,.a IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING � A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Conference Room to formulate their recom- mendations and to consider other published agenda items. B. City Council to remain in session to consider further published matters . IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61st LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED & POSTED ON THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981 AT 2 : 00 P.M. S irle Ar tx. "`"� City Secr ary � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 24 , 1981 AT 8 :00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET �� V. CITIZENS REQUEST and/or MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS VI. CON5IDERATION OF THE MINUTES �,,,, (March 17, 1981) VII . OLD BUSINESS City Council to consider an ordinance relative to the abandonment of a por- tion of Smith Street. VIII. PUBLIC HEARING City Council to conduct a public hearing rela- tive to a Service Station Application, submitted by Mr. Mike Ross. IX. ZONING CASES A. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission, relative to Zoning Application Z81-10 (Trailwood Mobile Home) and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. B. City Council to consider the recommendation of � R the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z81-13 (Ross) and a sub- ,�� sequent ordinance if applicable. C. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z81-14 (Wyse) and a sub- sequent ordinance if applicable. D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z81-15 (Stiles) , and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning Application Z81-16 (Casburn) and a sub- sequent ordinance if applicable. X. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S . , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, ,�,., REGULAR SESSION, THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 20th DAY OF MARCH, 1981 AT 2 : 00 P .M. Ww�r �� S ir ey Arms o City Secreta CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AGENDA SPECIAL PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETINC7 TUESDAY, MARCH 24 , 1981 AT 8 : ()0 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOM - 413 MAIN S7'REET ,� ,� V. NEW BUSINESS `"""�` A. Planning & Zoning Commission t:o consider Zoning Application Z81-13 (Ro:�s) , and make a recommendation to the C:ity Council. B. Planning & Zoning Commission t:o consider Zoning Application Z81-14 (Wy:�e) , and make a recommendation to the C;ity Council. C. Planning & Zoning Commission t:o consider Zoning Application Z81-15 (Stiles) , and make a recommendation to the C:ity Council. D. Planning & Zoning Commission t:o consider Zoning Application Z81-16 (Ca:�burn) , and make a recommendation to the C'ity Council. VI. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES (March 17, 1981) VII. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS and/or DISCt1SSIONS �" VIII. ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.,A.T.C.S . ; AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THf� 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE SPECIAL PLANNING AND ZONING COM- MISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED ArID POSTED ON THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981 AT 2 :00 P.M. . � i Shirle Arm ro g City Secret ry � � STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Joint and Special Session on this the 24th day of March, 1981 with the following persons present to-wit: William D. Tate Mayor �°' Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro-Tem C.L. Oliver Council Member ' Charles Dunn Council Member �, William Shafer Council Member Aulton D. Mullendore Council Member Marion Brekken Council Member constituting a quorum with the following members of the Planning & Zoning Commission: Duane Rogers Chairman Sharron Spencer Member Harlen Joyce Member Ron Cook Member Robert Sands Member Harold Anderson Member constituting a quorum with Member Gerald Norman absent, with the following members of the City Staff: James L. Hancock City Manager � Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Shirley Armstrong City Secretary � ;, , CALL TO ORDER �..� The meeting was called to order by Mayor Tate. INVOCATION Reverand David Whitington, representing Christ Our King Independent Methodist Church delivered the Invocation. INTRODUCTIONS & PROCEDURES Mayor Tate introduced members of the Planning & Zoning Commission and explained the procedure to be followed � during the public hearings. PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z81-13, MIKE ROSS The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z81-13, submitted by Mr. Mike Ross. Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called �,,,�, upon the City Secretary to explain the request of the applicant. �� The Council was advised that the property in question, Lots 5, 6, & 7, of Block 8, of the Lucas Addition, was presently zoned ."SP" Specific Use Permit for commercial and business uses; for the retail sale of alcoholic beve- rages for off-premise consumption only and the storage of 03/24/81 alcoholic beverages incidental to said retail sale, all according to a site plan. It was further noted that the requested zoning was for "SP" Specific Use Permit District Zoning for the storage, retail sale, and off- premise consumption of alcoholic beverages , (beer only) incidental to the operation of a convenience store and gasoline service station; further providing for the construction and operation of a car wash facility, all in accordance with a site plan; providing for compliance with "C-2" Community Business District construction re- ,,� quirements and further allowing all other uses as provided in the "C-2" Community Business District zoning category. Mr. Ross addressed the Council advising that he was sub- � mitting the revised site plan to allow for the construction of a new convenience store building and car wash facility. He explained that the new building would be located further from Northwest Highway allowing for better ingress-egress and more parking area. There being little discussion from the Council and Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the zoning request. There were none. Commission Member Harlen Joyce, therefore, made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Robert Sands and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Rogers, Spencer, Joyce, Cook, Sands, & Anderson Nays . None Absent: Norman n � Mayor Pro-Tem Ware then made a motion to close the Council • s � portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by ' Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: ,� Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore, Dunn, & Brekken Nays . None PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z81-14 , S.L. WYSE , The next order of business was for the City Council and ' I Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing ' �I relative to Zoning Application Z81-14 , submitted by Mr. '�, S.L. Wyse. � Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and asked the ' City Secretary to explain the application. The Council was advised that the property in question contained ap- proximately 85 acres and was located in the James Gibson Survey, bounded on the south by Bethel Road, on the east by the Dallas County Line and was east of Highway 121 to Lewisville. It was further stated that the current zoning was "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District, with the requested zoning being for "I-1" Light Industrial District Zoning. �w Mr. Sam Wyse addressed the Council advising that the property was owned by Airport Business Park with plans being for the , development of an industrial park. �,,; Several questions were asked by members of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to the access,i.bility of utilities, construction of buildings incorporating noise preventive measures, and road accessibility to the property. 03/24/81 Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. Mr. Mike Vela representing the Planning Department of D/FW Airport, advised that the Airport had responded to the request by formal letter. The City Secretary then read the following letter into the record: ------------------------------------ ,�,.:_, � ' March 24 , 1981 �t� Mr. Duane Rogers , Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission City of Grapevine P.O. Drawer 307 Grapevine, Texas 76051 Attention: Ms. Shirley Armstrong City Secretary Re: Zoning Application Z81-14 Dear Mr. Rogers: In response to your letter of March 13 , 1981, concerning the above referenced subject, we have prepared this written statement to outline our official posi- tion. Zoning Application Z81-14 requests a f. zoning change from "R-1" Single Family ` Dwelling District to "I-1•• Light In- "`�� dustrial District. ;,,� The projected noise levels for this area, prepared by the North Central Texas Council of Governments on October 14 , 1971, indicate that the subject parcel of land is situated within the middle zone of effect - Zone B and the extreme southern edge of this property lies within the zone of greatest effect - Zone C. A location in Zone B states that an industrial/manufacturing use may be generally considered without any special sound treatment; however, since part of this property is within Zone C , sound control in building design should be considered for the proposed building use. Based on the information outlined above, the DFW Airport does not object to the subject application if proper sound '"�`" control is incorporated in building de- sign. ��•► The above mentioned aircraft sound-exposure contour map has been attached for your reference. Sincerely, Jack D. Downey Deputy Executive Director 03/24/81 JDD: f s Attachment cc: M.J. Sganga B.R. Heath J. Hancock, City of Grapevine J. Baddaker, City of Grapevine --------------------------------------- There being no further discussion, Commission Member � Robert Sands made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Harlen Joyce and prevailed by the following vote: ""'�' Ayes . Rogers, Spencer , Joyce, Cook, Sands, & Anderson Nays . None Absent: Norman Councilman Mullendore then made a motion to close the Council ' s portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z81-15, KEN STILES The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing ; relative to Zoning Application Z81-15, submitted by <.� Mr. Ken Stiles. �► Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon the City Secretary to explain the requested zoning. Mrs. �` Armstrong advised that the property in question was slightly over four acres located on the west side of Dunn Street in the Samuel Freeman Survey. She further stated that the present zoning was "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District with ' the request being for "SP" Specific Use Permit District for ' the construction of single family attached dwellings in ac- , cordance with a site plan, providing for compliance with all , construction requirements in the "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District. ' Mr. Ken Stiles then addressed the Council and Planning & Zoning Commission and presented a site plan of the proposed ' development. Questions were asked pertaining to the availability of sewer and water, square footage of each unit, and the common drive- ways shown on the plat. The following guests then spoke in opposition to the requested zoning: Mr. Bob Murphy, 1869 Chris Craft Drive; Mr. & Mrs. Richard Grant, 1846 Anglers Plaza; Kathlene Piller, 2006 � Candle Court; Mr. Joe Kennedy, 1855 Anglers Plaza and Mr. Bob Blackwell, 1617 Silverside Drive. The concerns expressed included the Master Plan revision proposing that multi-family ,��, units be near a thoroughfare, traffic congestion, street parking, child safety and concern for multi-family near single family areas. The City Secretary was then presented a petition containing sixty-seven signatures in opposition to the requested zoning. 03/24/81 The following letter was then read into the record: ---------------------------------- Dear Council Members & Concerned Citizens of Grapevine Being unable to attend this evenings Council meeting, I am requesting that you read this letter to voice my strong opposition to two zoning re- "�"" quests being presented tonight. The ' first one does not affect my property directly, but it does affect my com- � munity and those that have a substan- tial investment in their homes already located in that area. This request is for the Specific Use Permit at the ,. north end of Dunn Street, now zoned Single Family. To grant this change which directly and acutely affects these homeowners, certainly is not fair or even reasonable. In addition, these types of requests are becoming common place and too frequently granted. . . . Tuesday after Tuesday, Grapevine residents are required to fight for the quality of their neighborhoods. We have more than enough real estate in Grapevine zoned to suit the type of construction that Mr. Stiles is re- questing. The second request I strongly oppose involves the property at 101 Brookside ;,,�, Drive at Northwest Highway. I insist ' that you deny this change which affects my immediate neighborhood for the very � same reasons I stated previously. We do not want business "dotted•� all-over our neighborhood, which we do take pride in and enjoy. Please help we citizens in developing orderly growth and a well- planned community. Thank you for this consideration of my views. Dennis P. Slechta 2018 Brookside Drive Grapevine, Tx. 76051 488-0042 --------------------------------------- There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Com- mission Member, Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded . by Commission Member Robert Sands and prevailed by the following vote: ,�*. Ayes . Rogers, Spencer, Joyce, Cook, Sands, & Anderson Nays . None �wr Absent: Norman Councilman Oliver then made a motion that the Council close their portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the following vote: 03/24/81 Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z81-16, BRUCE CASBURN The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a public hearing relative to Zoning Application Z81-16 , submitted by Mr. Bruce Casburn. � Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open and called upon the City Secretary to explain the application. It was reported that the property in question, Lot l , Block �wr 1, Brookside Addition (101 Brookside Drive) , was currently zoned "R-1" Single Family Dwelling with the requested zoning being for "C-2" Community Business District Zoning, or in the alternative, any higher zoning that is more re- strictive by use or restrictions . Mr. Casburn then addressed the Council and Planning & Zoning Commission noting that the property is bounded on the west by commercial zoning and on the south by Northwest Highway. He added that the intended use was for a real estate office, or other low traffic commercial uses. Questions were then asked pertaining to ownership of the property and deed restrictions. Mr. Terry Bland, 202 Brookside then addressed the Council in opposition to commercial zoning being requested in a re- sidentially platted neighborhood and presented a petition con- taining thirty-four signatures. Applicant, Bruce Casburn, then addressed the Council, expressed � concern for the opposition, and respectfully requested that the application be withdrawn. � There being no further discussion, Member Sharron Spencer made a motion that the request for withdrawal be accepted. The motion was seconded by Member Harlen Joyce and prevailed by the following vote: ', Ayes . Rogers, Spencer, Joyce, Cook, Sands , & Anderson ' , Nays . None ' Absent: Norman ', Commission Member Ron Cook then made a motion to close their I' portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by I Member Robert Sands and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Rogers, Spencer, Joyce, Cook, Sands , & Anderson Nays . None Absent: Norman Councilman Dunn then made a motion to accept the request for withdrawal and to close the Council ' s portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mullendore and prevailed by the following vote: ,�„ Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None �� 03/24/81 END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Tate announced that because of the number in attendance regarding the zoning applications, the Planning & Zoning Commission would recess and reconvene in the Council Chambers, while the Council would recess and reconvene in the Conference Room. Guests were invited to attend either meeting. COUNCIL RECONVENE � Mayor Tate called the Council back to order with all members present. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES � The next order of business was consideration of the Minutes of March 17, 1981. There being no additions or corrections, Councilman Mullendore made a motion to waive the reading of the minutes and approve them as published. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore, Dunn, & Brekken Nays . None ORDINANCE, ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF SMITH STREET The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance relative to the abandonment of a portion of Smith Street. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. � The Council was reminded that the application for abandonment had been submitted by First Baptist Church and that a presen- tation had been previously been made by Dr. George Clerihew during the meeting of March 3 , 1981. There being little discussion, Councilman Oliver made a motion that the ordinance be adopted. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None ORDINANCE NO. 81-17 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING, ABANDONING AND VACATING A PORTION OF SMITH STREET IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , AS HERE- INAFTER DESCRIBED; PROVIDING A SEVER- ABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EMER- GENCY PUBLIC HEARING, SERVICE STATION APPLICATION, MIKE ROSS ,� The next order of business was for the City Council to con- duct a public hearing relative to a service station applica- tion, submitted by Mr. Mike Ross. � Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. Mr. Ross addressed the Council advising that in conjunction with his zoning application, he was requesting a continuation of his existing service station through the submission of a revised site plan. He then presented an artist rendering of the new facility. 03/24/81 There being little discussion, Mayor Tate asked if there were any guests present, or if there were any letters to be presented. There were none. Council Member Marion Brekken then made a motion to close the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Mullendore, & Brekken '"""� Nays . None It was the general concensus of the Council that a decision wwr pertaining to the application not be made until the zoning application was acted upon later in the meeting. ZONING APPLICATION Z81-10, TRAILWOOD MOBILE HOME The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission, rela- tive to Zoning Application Z81-10 (Trailwood Mobile Home) , and an ordinance if applicable. A brief history was given advising that during the meeting of March 17, 1981, the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended denial by a vote of four to two. The Council was advised that in the event 20� of the neighboring property owners opposed a zoning request, a 3/4 vote (6 members) of the Council would be necessary to approve the request. Because there were only five members of the Council in attendance during that meeting, and there was sufficient opposition, a motion was made to table consideration of the zoning pending a full Council. Y The City Secretary then advised the Council that applicant, .�, Herbert Martin had since requested that the application be referred back to the Planning & Zoning Commission for fur- ther review. Mr. Martin was in attendance and further explained that he wanted the matter referred back to the Planning & Zoning Commission for guidance on what they feel would be the best use of the property. City Attorney, John Boyle noted that in the event the applica- tion was denied, because of the manner in which the case had been advertised, the applicant would be prohibited from reapplying for mobile home zoning "or any higher or more ', ; restrictive zoning" , for a period of one year. It was ex- ' I plained that if the applicant knew what an acceptable use ', would be, he would have an opportunity to withdraw the current ', application, and resubmit a request for a suitable use. ' There being little discussion, Councilman Dunn made a motion to refer the application back to the Planning & Zoning Commission for further study. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore, & � Brekken Nays . None 03/24/81 ZONING APPLICATION Z81-13, MIKE ROSS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission, relative to Zoning Application Z81-13 (Ross) , and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. Commission Chairman, Duane Rogers reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission had recommended approval with the pro- vision that the entrance/exit on the southeast corner of �, the property be omitted from the site plan, and that a common entrance be provided on the south side of the prop- erty on Northwest Highway. �"' The City Secretary then read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Mayor Pro-Tem Ware made a motion that the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission be accepted and the ordinance adopted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mullendore and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Dunn, Mullendore, & Brekken Nays . None ORDINANCE NO. 81-18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10 , THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A LOT, C� TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING �� SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A PART OF THE W.C. LUCAS ADDITION, IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND �" COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS USES; FOR THE RETAIL SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION ONLY & THE STORAGE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES , INCIDENTAL TO SAID RETAIL SALE, ALL ACCORDING TO A SITE PLAN; TO "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE STORAGE, RETAIL SALE, AND OFF PREMISE CON- SUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES , (BEER ONLY) , INCIDENTAL TO THE OPERATION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE & GASOLINE SERVICE STATION, FURTHER PROVIDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION & OPERATION OF A CAR WASH FACILITY, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR COMPLIANCE WITH "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT CON- STRUCTION REQUIREMENTS; AND FURTHER ALLOWING ALL OTHER USES AS PROVIDED IN THE "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CATEGORY; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRE- ,� SERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC � INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMER- GENCY 03/24/81 SERVICE STATION APPLICATION, ROSS The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the service station application, submitted by Mr. Ross. Councilman Mullendore made a motion that the application be approved. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore, Dunn, & ,.s„ Brekken Nays . None ZONING APPLICATION Z81-14 , WYSE � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Com- mission, relative to Zoning Application Z81-14 (Wyse) , and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. Chairman Rogers advised that the Planning & Zoning Com- mission unanimously recommended approval of the requested zoning. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordi- nance. Council Member Brekken then made a motion that the recommenda- tion of the Planning & Zoning Commission be accepted and the ordinance adopted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore, Dunn, & Brekken s�' Nays . None """'"� ORDINANCE NO. 81-19 �� AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10 , THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDI- NANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, I SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" '�� OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , 'i GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF I� LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A LOT, TRACT, ' OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS , BEING , A PART OF THE J. GIBSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. ', 586 , IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE ', FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY I OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN I THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "R-1" ' SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ZONING CATEGORY, CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRE- SERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL ""� WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMEND- MENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY �:�,v ZONING APPLICATION Z81-15, STILES The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning 03/24/81 Commission, relative to Zoning Application Z81-15 (Stiles) , and a subsequent ordinance if applicable. Chairman Rogers reported that the Planning & Zoning Com- mission voted to deny the application by the following: three for the motion, two opposing the motion, and one abstention. The following reasons were sited for denial: The proposed use did not conform to the proposed master plan useage, excess traffic, and concern for the opposition � expressed by residents of the area in question. A short discussion then followed among members of the ;�, Council during which concern was expressed that the area was platted for single family residents , and further concern relating to the common driveways and proposed traffic related problems. Councilman Dunn therefore made a motion to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and deny the application. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the fo�lowing vote: Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore, Dunn, & Brekken Nays . None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council , Councilman Oliver made a motion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Council Member Brekken and prevailed by the following vote: �l Ayes . Tate, Ware, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore, Dunn, & ""�" Brekken Nays . None � PASSED AND APPROVED on this the � day of , 1981. APPROV . � "�---��-3C.! t Mayor ATTEST: City Se y � �