Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 2020-055 ORDINANCE NO. 2020-055 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ISSUING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PD20-03 TO DEVIATE FROM, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE BUILDING SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE TO THE "R-MF"MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT FOR LOT 2, BLOCK A, GLADE/360 ADDITION (4501 STATE HIGHWAY 360) ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SITE PLAN APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 47 OF ORDINANCE NO. 82-73 AND ALL OTHER CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND SAFEGUARDS IMPOSED HEREIN; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY PERMIT; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application was made requesting issuance of a planned development overlay by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, after all legal notices requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control; protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements, and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting, and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width fortraffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; the effect on the overcrowding of the land; the effect on the concentration of population; the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of Grapevine,Texas, did considerthe following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested planned development overlay should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73 have been satisfied by the submission of evidence at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among otherthings the character of the existing zoning district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings and encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the granting of this planned development overlay, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, does find that the planned development overlay lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers, prevents the overcrowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for this planned development overlay and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified and, therefore, feels that the issuance of this planned development overlay for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City of Grapevine, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of this community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS: Ordinance No. 2020-055 2 Section 1. That the City does hereby issue a planned development overlay in accordance with Section 41 of Ordinance No. 82-73,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Grapevine, Texas, same being also known as Appendix"D"of the City Code, by granting Planned Development Overlay PD20-03 to deviate from, but not be limited to, the building separation requirements relative to the "R-MF" Multifamily District within the following described property: Lot 2, Block A, Glade/360 Addition (4501 State Highway 360) all in accordance with a site plan approved pursuant to Section 47 of Ordinance No. 82-73, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and all other conditions, restrictions, and safeguards imposed herein, including but not limited to the following: None. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map of the City of Grapevine, Texas, to reflect the herein planned development overlay. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of Grapevine zoning ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to secure safely from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Grapevine, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances which are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to Ordinance No. 2020-055 3 exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of Grapevine, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS on this the 20th day of October, 2020. APPROVED: --Ot4 William D. Tate Mayor ATTEST: GRAPF,,, � m Tara Brooks City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: -% (L City Ado r n-ey Ordinance No. 2020-055 4 I 'm CCAT ON MAP { L 1 1 V w E p t o ( l SITE u z� O< GLIDE RoaO Z O �.� I4 Z \ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET {$L 13G 6E D 130 Z p p Upp�^ 's� a G' W �� I n N t p S V 99 IFS'•,"lff;.. Im06,202D °�o 0 ELAN ° \\ GRAPEVINE _ lam a r w � = k: �� > � % co (9 o v W oH- THE PRESERVE , \ AT GRAPEVINE Z " a 1 1 J G Z LEGEND <1 55 SANITARY SEWER PIPE /J^ T TYPICAL 4.L SW SIDEWALK CASE NAME. AN GRAPEVINE CI CURB INLET CASE NUMBER '.STATE HIGHWAY PO L W AM WATER METER BDOCA LOCKION:45DSTATE HIGHWAY 360.LOT2 BLOCK A.GIADEl360 ADDITION F MH MANHOLE IM IRRIGATION METER V/ WE WATER EASEMENT ROW RIGHT OF WAY MAYOR SECRETARY 5 J CI PROPOSED CURB INLET DATE'. € 5_ PLANNING AND—ING COMMISSION GI PROPOSED GRATE INLET PRO SED MNHOLE TRAAFFFIC CI CULLATTION ouj f E < CHAIRMAN R EXISTING PAVEMENT O & PROPOSED FIRE LANE DATE: a' PRDPosED PavEMENrw R.o.w. SNEET:1 OF 45 e&� PROPOSED TRAIL SHEET NUMBER APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN 9 CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES �I PROPOSED SIDEWALK Q o DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I I LOCATIGN MAP n 4 c VERAL A m GREYSiAR �9 PRGPERTY w � CLAD=_ROAD . - o � � � m GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 3 2G0 1. G 20G Z O O W i N O m LL M � �r aw�QG G o 0 row�� °=w ow�0 Sir Q o A,, •ems SUBJECT %- PROJECT ELAN r "� GRAPEVINE h�? PHASE2 47.35 ACRES * �- ..98 .. 10,0812020 THE PRESERVE a AT GRAPEVINE `, W PHASE 1 20.36 ACRES q > wx uj 4, f / o0 t Lu L� O z Q Q w Q W CASE NAME:ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NUMBER.Z20-D3,CU20-21,PD2G03 H LOCATION:4501 STATE HIGHAAY 3 ,LOT 2, tf� BLOCK A,GLADE1300 ADDITION co y MAYOR SECRETARY v C €W_ DATE. W SW PLAN N ING AN D ZONI NG COMMISSION X oK� W P£ F. DATE: CHAIRMAN 4� O fr m SHEET:2 OF 45 SHEET NUMBER APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY MER IN CONFLICT WTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES gel 04§ s LOCATION MAP 'm �T T.sC— � � w z, - � p� SITE GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 c;20 40 80 �•J m: 5� j ` I / w GLADE D _. I _ IS Z -_ ��• —��� FLOODWAY LINE y./ / .s GOO PARK IS r1 r Y ED DRAINAGE EASEMENT VOL sr o " / m u v W R �:,� � •os- 1 0 0 us„ U ry <Y '; IF—ITARYSEWER EASEMENT O p p H MOIL.I—B,BE, —�=A-"i YY Fy D.R.T.0 T I THE GARDNER W I 60G n LOT 2,BLOCKA WLC PARTNERSHIP-WEST 44.5' WAS -z. -c e _ £~� �l ` `GLADE 3ED ADOR'ON (PART OF CALLED 23918 ACRES) L'—" =f iDD OF o n w 0Yc-\-- , ._ 1.N a� \N D5 OD1RTC.T UO WEd U e At, nod 9q, \^di (TYPE FR) G d2 tL ZINFINRYEDGE IE_ k \ ®E J I PO01. AREA 2V DRAINAGE EASEMEN. PROPOSED - DOC,NO,D219D2555B U I�rr' .x�U i- _ I' 1 ` BL6G6 / IO fe.P' i� �' r •/ RETAINING WALL O.P.RTC.T M r,f�` r 3 �1 1 (TYPE ifl) / 1 ,tiff (1YP-1 I _ 5 FD \t ZONE') 3 4 -51.t` - I ) n 51 r� -` If 1 I \\\ ? . I i o RISC FIRELANETVP tF % ( m I _-�ssIDEWAuc ._l / CLUBHDUBE 'l � i SSIDe FDIC w— _w E�f` �� :_ ,r,m 1. � _'._.. +_ -�•�F -r� P w- �.�_w_P5 -- ,4 - S i i&y �w'F'J-_- wR w__ __w_�-�_w—�Y�"� r,� w_ r.J - - ✓� 1`v P1ROP.ACCESS GATE �. r"t —r s. £ �-. - �1 yy®.p{y_- ss -R3-ee_�J MN HH sir �1 4' k 1 t0/1212620 h! \ PROP ACCESS GATE , d Y r' o l�.;r): ; :. ss WMt P. ~-. I FV.I I Y.:. _ 4L -. _ I `v Ff �`✓. vn 1 YL O PRGP06ED DUMPSTER P _E 1�1� PR9P IM IU o o r L w W T ! ry 22IX w. ° a O .x • n H -° �-j� M PROP SANrrARY SEWER �. dr. o M FDc TN -._ z FDC \ Py" sO �O MANHOLE(TYP.I PROPOSED DUMPSTER s u 4 FEES } it FH ABC O D) BB b , slDG3 `TT PS ice„ Lci s T�ui 'i st.G 2 Is P R' Ny)Gg BLOGi RYPE VI d' i GE2 (TYPE IV) N e RROP ACCESS GATE f ^p 2$.Y' `GARAGE i—O ®__ � _-4 /P � � � -PROP.id WATER ( Z i _ ,. .._I i �ENT igV 11.5' 61 D' 1BV- \� ,1®"�� _ _ �- _ � X 4CBUU)INGEETACK ___ _ __- W ` + I ______________- PROPOSED ___-____- -__-__ _ -_-_ -_-_ _-__ ___f ___--_--____ ______ _ ---------------- RETAINING WALL a W } ZONE mPt_— -- 1 1— -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- — Q a r w O t t W H- JT UNDERGROUND 1V WATER EASEMENT ._.._ _..._., ---- -- STATE HIGHWAY 360 _ D:PRT __.�... __._.» .v-._ _ ..__.__._ __ ___ ___..__ _._.___.._ __.__.._ DOC.NO D2D930528D OP.RT.CF Z F558 LLTR Ir. EASEEIENT A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY .Df NBT.No Dzi9Dzs55B ..._.._ -.. .. _ _._ Q NOTES - _ -- -- R r 1 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS -.- 1 - r DEFINITIONS NOTED OTHERWISE _LEGEND _ ....--._ ACCESSIBLE LE _ SINGLE-STORY BROWNSTONE:SINGLE STORY 2 AL L FAD AR.E?UNLc55 NOTED OTHERWISE. SiBLE PARKING SYMBOLS 3 HA JQ AP AINNG IARDS PROVED N aGCORDANCE © NUMBER 0 PARKINGIRE HYDRANT SPACES DUPLEX WITH ATTACHED GARAGES AND GUEST ALL G TCONIFGP,AL LOTS. -- UNIT MATRIX PARKING APPROXIMATE BUILDING HEIGHTS _ 3 ALL OAi_o MUST CGMPLY MTHAPPLICABLE ARE � PRGPOSED FIRE HYDRANT SITE DATA SUMMARY •BREEZEWAY FLATS TMENTRADITIONAL SURFACE BUILDING CODE TER L+E PUNLOPMENTOLSTR N urvrt o[scrervrmry .'+: 3 2 3 d 5 g ) 8 9 iD'ii t2 f3 td t5 rornD PARKEDED FRTM A COVERED BRSANDUNI WI NUMBER BUILDING TYPE HEIGHT 5 REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PUNS FOR INTERNAL - - CU4RENTZOf1lIG DEVELOPMENT CJSPR Ct:PCpI N g ACCESSED FROUACOVERED BREEZEWAY WITH ':.. SIDEWA K LOU TONS AND SIZES-LANDSCAPING '—`SAN TaRY SEVVERLNE AVAILABLE COVERED PARKING SPACES CLI-E. E or: 25 G' I STORY AREAS At JD OPEN SPACE. STORM SEWER LINE PROFOSEJ ZON t1G MULTI FAMILY DISTRICT(R-Mff I' ,,:: ,r;:vi::," r v v v : nr . is �✓ e,:,r..m,:„ r :: x... TUCKUNCER FIATS:APARTMENT FIATS WITH TUCK - ---- -SINGL - a"REFERENCE A.TT.4CHED GRRgfIG PUfJv FOR -- - - ✓ ✓ IS 0' I STORY _ _ TYP TYPICAL !_ I_-_ _ .. _._: -_.-- UNDER CORRIDOR ACCESS GARAGE PARKING AND i TYPE BROWNSTONE EX STI"lG AND PROPOSED TOPOC.RAPHIU --- -- .-- - 11} _ -- - PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM BOTH SIDES r-f ✓ + -L •EFFICIENCY UNITS:ONE BEDROOM UNITS WITH NET v TYPE S;IGL STORY Ig'-0" ISTORY _ ALLRET.Of15 C. SCEN1ALK -.- TOTALLOTARE.A a,35 ACRES O -t� - A, RQUIREEIT'�OF THE GF.APEV.NE SOIL --._ _._ %-E ,,. _ BRO ANSTONE E - _ _ CI C.,C,ILET -..._. _A.vE I1 1 E..L.f1.RAPeVINE > r , r- --__- RENTABLE AREA RANGING FROM]00.150 SO FT - TVCK.,IfDER _ROa.Ot!(,O.ITROL ORDIf P.f CE SHALL BE NcT _. -- -'-- - •NET SQ FT'.REPRESENTS CONDITIONED SPACE 3 TYPE�V SDQ 3S?ORIES - TOTAL BUILGfIG AFEA 3"+d SriD SF -ASENUMBERZ O-03.CU20 E1.PD`0-U] - 1 =..`!'r.._ . T CONDITIONED PA - FUTS SCONG THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTU CIC WATER METER LOCATION TPPI 3Tn EHGH✓JAY'_TLYT r C- ! AND UNCONDITIONED SPACE(BALCONYJ TYPE III 4C'Q' 3STOR!E fAAN-TOLE - FLOOR AREAR.4T.0 TOTAL BR FLATS/AY < r- r -�- v ✓ __. --� - STORAGE CLOSET) BREEZEWAY - IRRIGATION METE? BRED-M.4X 50`k1iOTAL LO ISWR BLCCK A.GUDE;36C R.DDIT:OtJ r H S TYPE _--BRcE SWAY , v 3STORIES yE LATER EASEMENT - r r„ TYPE FLATS dU G' 3 STORIES RON ft GH"OF WAY -. O L M1 PE,V CUa AREA i'a 33 V -- _--. - — _-- Q ZONE ACRES Z2IAC GA TO TYPE AS o" 3STORIEs PARKING DATA SUMMARY r.tAx ,.F.f J +• 1 COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT pSTRICT TO"R-MF' B ELATS iRAFr L,cIRCUU'oN -- - - ---- DATE. I r I FLATES - ,, _ O -. REQUIRE.PARKING -.-... TOTAL OP,!l.PACE 63._il"4 MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT FOR THE DEVELOPMENTOF s - TYPE <I PY IS 0' ISiOry -.._ .... -. ,f fn_0'"! A 326 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. -.. _- B O 0 - -.- SINGLE STORY- -PACE:UNIT SIJ _I.IG Pi:E.e l ".Jf C TYPE SL" ISTORY i 13-SJJTS) ER . uja ` .?r._. •CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST CU20XX IS A REQUEST BPR TO -.... s n B EEZEJ:Y -.-. -_ TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS 32�Ut1!TS '_i TO MT HE P THE ARKING C IYPEI : FLY TS SC-0 30TOR!ES TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED St9 '.PROPOSEDFIRE ulfIE H.r lcN % n.""I,m:;_ t x f r s a r % • r r,tI r i ri- ..x >a;. I FROM THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS,AND ALLOW -BREEZENAY T.... - - ' ur,.,crn;.,r v, c.+ :I :: r r( J n ,� v I s -..rc: <:.! FOR A REDUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK ii TYPE IL FLATS Jo0 3U.0!?IES PROVIDED PARKING TAL rILF1oEP,OF fdc DrlCOhU a 3-.I.. _.._._. I _._ .___.__. a--- F , --yr— I------ RELATIVE TO THE FLEXIBLE DESIGN STANDARDS IN TNCKut DER ' - - FROPGS,Ev PAVEfnE'1T N ROVV ..EUROOMS tJ [[[ ' r l _. !, THE-R-MF'MULTI.FAMILY DI STRICT. i_ TYPE FUT L 'OP ' ,URFACE PARKING la /pE ii TL ,f FEP Ui(, E., ?:=^,PT P,:E:.I'IG '3 .PUNNED cevELOPMENT ovERuv PD2o-xX IS L '" 3 ;'. _.-- �.,Ecalrer"r=La �r u;:rrr - SHEET:3 OF 45 REQUEST TO DEVIATE FROM BUT NOT BE LIMITED - -i l+ -- - 1 - - - -- 1 v .%i s,s TO THE BUILDING SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS IN id TYPEV F E} aJ o' 30TUr eU GARAGE P..,FNG 301 SHEET NUMBER `•r ',1: ,�_ THE"R-MF`MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT. YOE, Br't_c_+,.1Y E_ „_,..(.,._ _ 3:.Tt.Y_E TAf.Cct,.FARKI,IG 19 JoaELE<EC REATIOIALOPEI : ..PROD T..p. J LORE 't' .' :. .+ s ""'. J„M. { P.+CE D .L>.. 31 3 ^. -,g ,< ,.*-- I I%n 4: x .:3:� U, .,r*: TOtAL PARN.NG PROV!CEC 533 C:cP.RTMENT OF DE L i_N?.,EROCFEJ LOCATION MAP SITE GLADE BAD 0 LA -1 LOT 2,BLOCK A GLADE 360 ADDITION A DOC,NO, D219025558 THE GARDNER 360 WLC PARTNERSHIP-WEST \YS FILOODWAY LINE GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET (PART OF CALLED 23.918 0 20 40 so ACRES) EASEMENT TO T.R.A.15348,PG.75 2V A,AY VOL. IF 0 R.T.CLIT 0 0 IS 0-z PROPOSED -z RETANING WALL z ZONE MAIR) D, 'L 0 AV WIDE PE�-M-ENT S,N RARY S�-EASEMENT TO T,RA (CALLED PARCEL 4)JUDD DAUSENOMI?�� A FMENT IRST NO,WiM26715 w-YA z LA o RE -1V TRAIL m IiP 6 PROP.SAN MANHOLE -1 1��ER m �, Pnal p m I (D 2-a m G) PROP,FINE (`Y`N PROP.SANITARY SEWER (D PROPOSED DLIMPSTER AV HOME(TYP.) PROPOSED (D NETAININOWALL py G) -TT ZONE(TYP) 22V S, H F F. 22, Dm, I, �-g SE FED ABC (D FED 111<E STORAGE 40'BUILDING SETISAI 7 BLOC fO o POP,IV WATER BE 5 10, EASEMENT 0 28` A-IL PROPOSED TRASm uj E COMPICTORWILTHEICLOS A - - - P ACCESS DATE PRO > U, ------------------------------------- ---- -------------------------------- ---- ------- - ---------------------------------------------------------------T--------I Lu ------ Y1 0- 2u < z A CD 0 W LL 0 IF -BORODINO IV WATER PASEM NY uj z END R EASEMENT < IN I,NO,021M25558 DOC,NO,D2VAII6280 O.P.RT,C,T, ---STATEHIGHWAY-360-- ------ O.P.R.TC T 0 z IAV tABLEWIbTHRfG1FITZF-WAYj--- R NOTES Lu I ALL ��lEr4S[OriS ARE TO FACE QFCUnUtILESS LEGEND A NOT DOTHERSMSE PARKING SYMBOLS DEFINITIONS AL�^kCil�RE2U'ILESS"IOTEDOTHERIllSE A SINGLE STORY BROMYST-E EIUGL-E POTTY E HANDICAP MARKING IS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE (D NUMBER OF PARKING BRACES DUPLEXPX` ArTACHEDGARAGPSATIOGUEST LATH ADA STANDARDS CEO ALL LOTS UNIT MATRIX APPROXIMATE BUILDING HEIG 4 ALL GATES MUST COMPLY VATH APPLICABLE FIRE ID-E.FIRE HYDRANT SIFE DATA SUMMARY I •FREZZGAY1LATS TRAUTIONF-RFACE -WATER BUILDING EDEREEZE',I)AYWITT NUMBER SEMERENCE I-ALUDECAPE PLAINS FOR UTERNA CUR REM "IN DEVELOPMENT GITIACT IPCD� I I S IS I, I� 14 Il U-1 PARKED APARTMENT VAT STAIRSANDI-NITS BUILDING--TYPE' HEIGHT 5 1 RL SANITARY CEMI LINE ACCE-D FROM A COV- LNIGACA 1. AVAILABLE COVERED PAEANS SPACE, CLI-SHOLGE 2- 1 STORY SIDE LOCATIO11S AUD SIZES, FOULF-FAMILf EUITFICTD ME) TUCK HERE FLATS APARTMENT FLATS WITH THICK 6 AREAS AND OPEN SPACE ---------------�STORM SE1hEF LINE PROPOSEEZONNEE u- s 0 A Typ TYPIOM . ..... 'EFEPETCEATTACHADGRAD IL NO OR TOER CORRIDOR ACCESS GARAGE PAPKING AND I yyp,V SINGLE 1 11 -1 1 3TTSFY XISTING AND PROPOSEO TCP'.�G-AAPPDF 7-7 ERWANETSINE KILEAUALK U PEDESTRAN ACCESS FROM BOTH SIDES LIHGLE STGRY z-Olol. Ell 0 - AD_ THIN OIL TOTAL LOT AREA 47 35 ACRES LA3E EFFICIEHOY UNITS OUR BESTOOM UNI FS WITH NET 2 TYPE V 1�I I S.R1 7 ALL REQUIRELIENT1 OF THE GRAPE E B TU STONE, C� CURBITLET REN,ABLEIR-RINGINGFRTS.-R1 7�­- IDGI ED EON CONTROL OJEUTIANCE SHALL BE NET E��A,E.II-AN GRAPEY TIE II ISO FT REPRESENTS CONTS-OUEDETYACE B TYPEJV ID-1 I STORIES TOTAL BUILDHO AREA SEE 1.CF WATER METER C"ATI UMBERIEDICS,C 10 21 FLAT- MITC Ut-THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. - 'ROSS--0 FT OEIRESENTS COGITTOMED SPACE LOS FO I-STATE NYH-CAY CM LOT 2 F-E-1 BLOC A SLATEOSDATTSHON I EXTEFOR 4 TYPE[1 111 CH NIAIAHOLE FLQORAPB RAT-TOTAU STORAGE CLOSET) FLATS 7 E TLYANGARES TOTAL LOT I-1 U, IY ...BREEZEWAY AD A MAX EGA, 1. ARNATION METER 5 TYPE[ Y 1 3 STORIES WE GATER EAEMENT 7 TYPE I FREEZE- 4M A+ 1s11FIEX ROW !RIGHT OF WAY TUTALt11E11I.1S AREA 7`7.77- SECRETARY ------- ZONE CNAHGE REQUEST Z2ATXX IS A PEQT,ESTTO -BREEZEWAY FGX 7 FITO T 12 REZOUS 47 35 ACRES ORES- PUIT-PLANUES 1- 1-A- PARKING DATA SUMMARY „-TRAFFIC CIICLLATI.11 TOTAL E SITE COMtAERCE LE-OPLENT DOT-T TO A MF" CISTLEOTCRY REQUIRED PARKING KLN'Y.1 1131AGE ��AJL I F MH Y DISTRICT FOR TI-SE EIEVEL-JENT OF TYPE) IS C� (STORY I HY I'Me","O......AU�N 3 -IMII Y DEVELOPY11IT ETIFTY.-E �T III T 1-2 E,15�1�11 I ALEMENT, A TYPEV SINGLE s"By UI11T I IT. I GN.AWC IIC ICTORY 00 IIIITS ui �OHDITIOHAL USE REQUES OJI-XISARECHEST TOTE iE I A, EACEED THE 1EIGHTREQUIREYE To TYPE' 0 1 15NTEIEC TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED CHAIRL1111 BREEZEINAY I �PAOYXSSEC FIRE TOTAL fHTGEFR Cr NNIT3 12-11ITS `T3 VAiDYW FLATS FRO[A THE PARKIIIA PECUREMETTS AH- KI,q-,,, 1 AREDUCTlQNi�irHEFPG�itYA�,DS�TBACK II TYPE SC_--BREEZEWAY IT 13TCRIE3 PROVIDED PARKING 1.11 HISOCIR OF ATGAEFROOME FORA 11T -R-OC U) --- --- PROPOSED PAVEMENT fT I FMV F-TIVE TOTHE"EXIBLEDIESIGNSTITIRARUS IT TUC UNCER Y TYPE 11 11 1 -TNRIEX CMRFACF PARKItC I, IT!=PCF'U--,FA-Y "Is Y% 13 TYPE I TUCUT` I ISTOI F-TPIR-11A 73 --fl SHEET 4 OF 45 FIIT,'Fo TZ U_ F -T TO�EVA TE--,.T1X ITTI.1. SHEET NUMBER A, FITS F, T _TTYY�E �311AIE 11RI I L' I TYPE 11 4. 'El- INS TO T-31IT711IG- AI THE RAIF FAMILY 1ISI-T A, THAT PRGP031C U,,ABLE CE-PEATIMI11.1EN 1511YI A, "PI-VAI-DOES 1IOT UIHCFEE IIIT SU)YK If 11 TYPE I EEZIE-Al I C 5T.11EC TMICE.PARKING 3 IRITATI111-3 --T Y---Y� -77 7-777 TT,- III'COTE TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED SPACE 133 DEPARTI-IFTY-E ELQPTAr-EA-- .................. .............................. FI.54•x(SE)-512u -- ---- - "F -- ------ q- . --._--_-.--'-.'"-.---- i., --.-._----I / rtaW PE PERMANENT SANITARY 4- T�(�-T'RA —5=. -- ----.--- O F< (CA1LE6 PARCE[3jJUDGEMENT CAUSENO r2�D217 26715 s� �f - c, --- ; - s INST NO.D211R I CT ,. O.P.R T.C.T. �-- _ _- _ -- _._ - -_ _- _ - - IN FEET -- - - ss --..-.-. _ t 1 - I � 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 0� 20 40 0 _ i l o D � � z 3. n _F _ — _ IZ O ww Mm - - � UO t mPE N) - _ BLDG 10 _ m W F m O x 6EB Z��az ear o - � --' -- >o ------ -- --- --- ---- -- ---- ---- --- -- -- --- -- -- -------------- --- --- --- -- --- --- --- --- - _----_- -_-_ _ C N2s'O9'2lW 1325Aa n z a -- (DISTURBED) (DISTURBED) ©u' Y STATE HIGHWAY 360 .. (A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY) -. `� ... . ---------- b. ----- __ --.--- .s ---- ---- _... es --------- -. ee ----- T - w ° F R _ / 1 D o0 - I� I THE oARDNER aeo � ( WLCPARTNERSHIP-WEST LOT 2,BLOCK A PART OF CALLED M.9/8 ACRES) ADDITION ( __.. 0219D25558 VOL.15 ,PG.75 _ 15,SANTARY SEWER EASEMENT D.R.T.C.T- I `✓� - i \� �i / VOL.15WO.PG.542 D.R.T.C.T. .. DRAINAGE EASEMENt iw rtbw 1- V C.T. BLDG 5 f- mPE H2) �I' �� � ... r 0T Q (TYPE III) _. 1, Z W �J1 I s � a > y} dT a z LL � z_ L �J GLOBNousE - _ _---' -�— l" /t Z Of 11 FLV I_ FL m - - -Fl_ -F-_ FL _ OCKA _ —�•—I .�-- __—F�- -- 1 - --F,_� FF- - -FF---—- --- — -- —F` .=-Ft— LL� 4L- - I I I atoG z t�M Z eLOGa a'C'1 - mPEvl �� _-- I •� (TYPEVI PE • ___ — _ Jf O m � ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- ------- — +— -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -------------------------------------------------- ---- ---- -- ---------- cn = --- ------------ —-----__---------- — — ----------__--- -- ---------- _ _- -- -- -- '--' -- -- -- 1-- T1- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - 0 w z =� Nzs•,aa5w 1505.ST Z � k g € i t x STATE HIG'HWAY-360 (A CAR®TABLE NTf�TR RIGW$$F-WAYS_a SHEET NUMBER q EX-1 UNIT DESCRIPTION Bldg.No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TOTALS Net.SQ. Gross SQ. No.of UNITTYPE DESCRIPTION NET GROSS Bldg,Type V V IV III 1 I I V V I 111 II 11 IV I Total No.of Units FT.Per FT.Per Units Unit Type Unit Type Types Al Efficiency 1 Bdr/1 Bath 705 786 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 3,525 3,930 '.. AlA Efficiency 1 Bdr/1 Bath 705 810 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 3,525 4,050 '.. ',. A1B Efficiency 1 Bdr/1 Bath 705 786 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 10 7,050 7,860 A1C Efficiency i Bdr/1 Bath 705 810 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 10 7,050 8,100 A2A Efficiency 1 Bdr/1 Bath 710 771 ill 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 8 5,680 6,168 A2C Efficiency 1 Bdr/1 Bath 710 771 III 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 2,940 3,084 A2D 1 Bdr/1 Bath 757 818 III 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 o 0 12 9,084 9,816 A3 lBdr/iBath 753 811 II, IV 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 4 3,012 3,244 AM I Bdr/1 Bath 770 828 11, IV 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 16 12,320 13,248 A38 i Bdr/1 Bath 753 811 11, IV 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 0 20 15,060 16,220 AK 1 Bdr/1 Bath 814 872 11, IV 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 8 6,512 6,976 220 68% A4 1 Bdr/1 Bath 840 910 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 10 8,400 9,100 A41A 1 Bdr/1 Bath 862 933 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 15 12,930 13,995 A4B 1 Bdr/1 Bath 840 910 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 4,200 4,550 AS I1 Bdr/1 Bath 791 872 III 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 12 9,492 10,464 A5A 1 Bdr/1 Bath 809 891 111 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 12 9,708 10,692 ASB 1 Bdr/1 Bath 807 888 III 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 8 6,4S6 7,104 A5C 1 Bdr/1 Bath 807 888 111 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 3,228 3,552 A6 1 Bdr/1 Bath 855 903 11, IV 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 16 13,680 14,448 A6A I Bdr/1 Bath 872 920 11, IV 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 16 13,952 14,720 '. A7 1 Bdr/1.5 Bath/Study 1,022 1,092 111 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 12 12,264 13,104 s : A7A 1 Bdr/1.5 Bath/Study 1,117 1,170 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 8 8,936 9,360 B1 2 Bdr/2 Bath 1,100 1,172 1 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 20 22,000 23,440 BIA 12 Bdr/2 Bath 1,100 1,172 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 10 11,000 11,720 B2 2Bdr/2Bath 1,129 1,192 IV 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 8 9,032 9,536 88 27% s j B2A 2Bdr/2Bath 1,129 1,200 1 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 30 33,870 36,000 B3 2 Bdr/2.5Bath 1,268 1,396 11, IV 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 4 0 20 25,360 27,920 03A 2 Bdr/2.5 Bath 1,332 1,460 IV 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 5,328 5,840 4 1% Cl 3 Bdr/2.5 Bath 1,354 1,405 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 4 5,416 5,620 4 1% COTTAGE 3 Bdr/2.5 Bath 1,693 2,179 V 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 13,544 17,432 8 2% Subtotal 2 2 30 36 24 24 24 2 2 24 36 32 32 1 30 24 Total 324 304,454 331,293 324 100% - Avg S.F.(Net) 940 = I Attached 4 4 14 4 4 8 8 14 60 GARAGES a Detached 48 e SURFACE f 10/7/2020 i I E I e . CASE NAME:ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NUMBER:Z2D03,cuA n,PDZ110S LOCATION:4501 STATE HIGHWAY 360,LOT Z BLOCK A,GLAOEl 0 ADDITION MAYOR 2 DATE: � PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION E 1 SITE PLAN - REFER CIVIL DRt4LUINCxS - -? DATE : ? SHEET, 5 DF F 45K. 6 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN {'. CONFLICT WITH ANY CODESORORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES R i to op zo^o v a aye - - ---------------- - - -------- h-71 F— KITCHEN KITCHENN KITCHEN KITCHEN ENTRY BATH- ENTRY BATH BATH BAT ENTRYf ENTRY PanII W.I.C. 77 , W.I.C. W.I.C. W.I.C. F771WH . ............ Ll LIVING DINING BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM LIVING DINING LIVING DINING LIVING DINING 14'-1'xl7'-10' 14'-I'x17'-10' 14'.I"x17'.70' LL==—-—old VLBALC/PATI, BALC/PATIO BALC/PATIO fi PATIO gg BALC/PATIO BALC/PATIO Ll UNIT '41r, UNIT 1415 UN IT 4174 UN IT '41 yes ws� 'I�l I I�I'F CASE NAME ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NUMBER: LOCATION 4W;MS=ATE'=G"Al'YM=LOTZ BLOCH A,GLADEfSW ADDITION DAM PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE SHEET, 6 OF 45 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICTWITH MY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARWENTOF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 10.08 20 C" i —-- --— — --- —--— — -- — —— — �LE( _ e > _ x ENTRY ENTRY _ ENTRY _-- KITCHEN KITCHEN KITCHEN E I Tv Ili� _ �iL L e,b�SiGW�R W.I.C. W.I.C. _____ —____— W.I.C. BATH �I BATH BATH M, �J BEDROOM LIVING/DINING BEDROOM LIVING!DINING BEDROOM LIVING/DINING 10'-»•K19'-2' 11*-B•K2n-2' iT-B'x2Q-2• € S I BALC/P' BALC/PATIO I=BALC/PATIO o „T 2 --C 1 UN I T -42�4 a UNIT 142D UNIT �42 -1,4;:"_-,' !m,s —'�1oNSF sIe csF Tn e'F T�I csr e 60.5E NAFE:ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NURSER:Z20Ef,W2621,PD� LO TION:4WI STATE HIGHWAY WO,LOT Z, RLOOKA,GLAOE DADDITION DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING 001011 ION GATE x SHEET, 7 OF 45 y e ' APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORT(IN 5 CONRICTWITHANY CODESORORD,NANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 10,08.20 ; R -- -- t GAR. ACCESS I 1 Mj % fi --- — KITCHEN _ R KITCHEN I KITCHEN � 'KITCHEN I � 1 � W.I.C. W.I.C.WJ.C. y W.I.C. ENTRY r ENTRY -�; _ W.I.C. i ENTRY ENTRY -- — � � l_LI�L Lil LI T 1IJ - r CnC \� _ '6.00�vv� r 31rCL ' I - onF k � �_. I I - BATH BATH BATH BATH i. LIVING!DINING LIVING/DINING LIVING!DINING L LIVING/DINING _ MI t 1'-B'x 14'4• r� 11'•9'x 14'-0' rr i t'-H'x 14'-0' t i'-3'x 14'-4' lit- BEDROOM - BEDROOM — BEDROOM BEDROOM g , i i'-0'x 13'-10' 1 V-0'x iZ-4 11'-0'x 13'10 -017' 'x 1Z4' � s BALC/PATIO BALC/PATIO BALC/PATIO BALC/PATIO I UN IT 143G UN IT 143B 2„_�'-0" UN IT 14314 1 UNIT .43 l ' G' a14Ns ,4 Js31J5F ��4„ �, 0., 8.2 Sr Sii GSF 828 G5� fi'i GSF CASE NAME:ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NL A SER:Z2603,C2621,PDA LOCATION:4 W i STATE NIGNWAY 360,LOT Z BLOCK A,GLADMI10 ADDRION 1 DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 6 oa1E. /F 9n i SHEET, 8 OF t APPROVAL DOES NOTTA V ORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES fr DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2 i0.08.20 ;r r: ra. < F I.,c 17 71 fi -A KITCHEN 11KITCHEN 71 KITCHEN L _j W.I.C. W.I.C. W.I.C. ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY c LL— —j— ------------------------- LEI,!:i BATH BATH L 71 a. '� BATH Ell� I 36�6D 71,B LIVING DINING 15*-7'.17'-(r SW) LIVING/DINING �R, 15,.r x IT-O' BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM 12'-5-x 14W 14'-4'x 10-11' 14 .19-11' BALC/PATIO BALC/PATIO BALCIPATIO UNIT 4414 A4 UNIT A45 CASE NAME ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NtNMM�STATE,OIG"2A1,WD,LLOCKT O 4501 N Y O T Z DAM PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DAM SHEET, 9 OF 45 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY MW IN CONFLICTWITH ANY CODES ORORDINANCES DEPART,IENTOFDEVELOMENTSESVIGES IM8 20 M, II I ,E W W.I.C. W.I.C.WIC KITCHEN W.I.C. IF KITCHEN ENTRY KITCHEN ENTRY KITCHEN ENTRY KITCHEN ENTRY —71 'I c sHcWU "C'm L I __j J! L-i--j 4 c' ILI i U10 =:7 n7 WH II BATH i B �j ATH L BATH BATH LIVING l DINING LIVING DINING LIVING I DINING LIVING DINING 711 L W.1.C. W.I.C. W.I.C.W.I.C. BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM 17-5*.19-10' ll'.7*.12'-3* 1� ii,.rx lu-io, I=BALC/PATIO BALC/PATIO BALC/PATIO BALC/PATIO UNIT 45r, UNIT 455 UNIT UNIT Arp CASE NAINIE,ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NUMBER 226Q9,�I PM,0 LOCATI N:4501 STATE HIGHWAY LOT Z 810�A,GUDEWO ADDITION DAM PUNNING AND ZONING COMMSSION C� DATE_ SHEET, 10 OF 45 APPROVAL DOES NOT A�R 0 la==W'N CONFLICT INITHANY CODE ORORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 10 08 2 0 10 t E ' f 6 ' —TUB —'t TJE - — —_jf KITCHEN ENTRY KITCHEN ENTRY Io MUD Ji BATH , i ii� BATH r 71 —li F FEI DINING j DINING ' �� e•UTILITY UTILITY e io•xirs P io•x�r a• b I p Ill �., i LIVING LIVING --- irs•x�r-o• i �r-s•xir-0• s ill � W.L.C. W.I.C. 11 BEDROOM BEDROOM 71'-0'z 13'-0' / � 11'-D•x 11`-10• • \ � — BALC/PATIO — BALC/PATIO CASE uLE,ELAN GaAPErrNE fr CASE NURSER: i,P020-03 g "'i LOCATION:4W;STATE HIGHWAY MD..LOT Z, � &.00K A,GLADE/DBDADDITION MAYOR DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION € Y w DATE. UN IT 14Co.4 UNIT ,4Co SHEET, 11 q 2�_ ...... — ❑F 45 e��NSF / 1 U 1 4—� —0 ass NSF x k 9^C GSF / 9C3 GSF � "p APPROVAL NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN 8 {-Sf CONFLICT.WIlTH ANY CODES 0RORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES c 1C.0S20 E i I r j I I I —— fi A I� r I UTILITY STUDY i� ENTRY W I.C. STUDY r.lrxa'-10' UTILITY � �o•-B-xB'-io� s ENTRY - KITCHEN KITCHEN LBATH LL", DINING DINING3E o0 B'-6'x70'8' BATH 01li . PDR. v I LIVING �OR. � � LIVING 74'-6'x 13'-D' ( \ 12=7`x 73'-0' lu—j BEDROOM BEDROOM 10'-17'x 13'-1' W.I.C. (\� ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NIN.BCASE EER:n20. WU I.PD10-00 6 LOCATION:4501 STATE HIGHWAY W,,LOT I, nBALC/PATIO BALC/PATIO eLDGKA,G ADEasDADDInoN x -- -- - 41 z 7_ - DATE. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION i <:Ph Nlt �4'1�4 UNIt �,� ` DAE SHEET,s12 r --- ... 2 '�"— 111�NSF � 4"= lozs Nsr r �, fl �4' 1i U., 1t'GSF —� GS'_GSf APPROVAL DOES NOT AOTHORIZE ANY WORK IN F 'Ltir CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES cl y F� 0 c z ENTRY I W.I.C. ENTRY LIVING!DINING M.BEDROOM M.BATH a 18-2 x13-3 i I 'I'! ` I � KITCHEN N m -u�,., F-�• F - I i " t '! �-;«- -_- - t � Imo. f .�T in LKITCHEN M BATH-, LIVING - 15-3'x 12'4' 1 F Ll 2 �I s 3" BEDROOM 2 t r i-u , '� i � L �.r-�,, 1Dvrxlo-10• - --- � BEDROOM 2 12'-rxil'.m W.LC. I DINING -- W.I.C. - - e'-lrxs W.I.C. 6 II '- M.BEDROOM 1- e ' BALC/PATIO 1z'-s x 1r-r I _-- UNIT 51.4 /4' C,' Lzs ws 00 I SF QUD ri /�; ENTRY / W.I.C. c E RY M.BATH M.BEDROOM . I o FfiN 'A 1n10 xlrr �./ M`�a Q LIVING 1 DINING ni NUD 7 16'.2'x 13.3* U � 47uE /\ s�n� m J N a a �,-jj KITCHEN ` m 35x66 $ i SH�N�tF SHOWER] L-I i) I 1 mob, KITCHEN LIVING M.BATH Na _ 15'-3'x 1r-4' 11,31 BEDROOM 2 'SHOWER WE \ CASE NAME ELAN GRAPEVINE s t0'-ti"z 10'-10' CASE NUMBER MBERi STATE042,HIGHWAY 22AYD LOT 3, BEDROOM LOCAnON RLOCK A,GLADFJ3 ADDRION e Ll�N�l % W.I.C. / —MAYOR— � W.I.C. W.LC. — -- DATE o 4i Q M.BEDROOM PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION E BALC/PATIO — - - -- - 12'-T x 11'-r _ DATE- P c SHEET, 13 t OF 45 2 APPROVAL DOES NOTAVTNORIZEANY WORK IN j s CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES UNIT 52 UNIT 151 PR 4.—1, O„ 'i9B N F 4 —� —C DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Q_Q8_20 i a, i I , U I V 'GAR. ACCESS ru LT f . pok. I PDT. ENTRY," ENTRY UTILITY UTILITY F7L Ir Ili 0 0 W.I.C. W.I.C. z T LIVING DINING I r"li II Lu 6 6 LIVING If DINING w 14'-0*x 234r 14'-T.2X-(r V-1, 0 Lj 37, S'HOWI j SHOWER 1-36 r-71 F HOWER 3 TJB A 113 7AZI ED I -17 1 — n ElT L i BATH 2 BATH 2 M.BEDROOM M.BEDROOM CASE�E ELAN GRAPEVINE BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 2 12*-O�xll*4O* 4�1—i ll*-4'.13'-4* 11 ll*-4*xIX4* �E-�ER�.W=I.P02(R(O SHOWER ER I LOGT ON:4501 STATE KGHWAY W,LOT Z K�A,GLAD�ADDMON W.I.C. c r=:�= D �JDATE PLANNING AND ZONING WMNSSION DATE� UN I Ir 15304 SHEETi 14 UN I-r 153 OF 45 �1�1 R,' APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE MY WORK IN L 4' CONFLICT WITH Y CODESORORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 10,08 20 "2`1 ----------- ENTRY KITCHEN BEDROOM 2 W.I.C. [I ODD I it 7 71-111 LIVING I DINING 13'-2*A 20'-Il* M.BEDROOM I.C. 12*-g*A 1 V-3' L L -W" F BEDROOM 3 x C NA�E�GRAPEVINE BALC/PATIO CASE NUMBER:Z21X*,CU�21,PD2 LOCAT ON 4S)l STATE HIGHWAY 360,LOT Z BLOCK A.GLADE) ADDITON MAYOR ---- DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE (-,-'�=UNIT cl SHEET, 15 OF 45 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN CONFLICT WITH MY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVK;ES 10.0820 �0 - I �____� BEDROOM#3 =I GARAGE - BATH 2i, UTILITY BEDROOM#2 W.I.C. ,r-0•x111-0° W.I.C. I I 3�42 DINING i =_H'cwER�I ENTRY ,D'-0 2 41i PWDR. I ' Tel �; _ J L s LIVING M.BEDROOM 16'-B•x13'-11° m' j ,r-e•x,r-6 [L"w I I g KITCHEN ---- CASE NAME:ELAN GRAPEVINE - ❑ �__--_ tJ of CASE NUMER:M-03,CU2431,PD2 0 ' LOCATION:4WI STATE NIGMAY 3MI,LOT; BLOCK A,GLADE13W ADDITION I/2 16'-]W _— DATE: r 9'-IG --------- � PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 6 d DATE rIOTT0(14(3rM 3 SHEET, 16 s_ OF 45 2175 GSF fC APPROVALDOES NOT CODES OR ORDINANCES IN 7° '2 ,.FfJ CONFLICTK'ITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES � �f G DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 10,08.20 0 J r I IF a 01 D _-- ul _- - r r [ — f A — -= -y - J LEll � o r E a E / ✓I _ o SU I LD INCH I - 2ND FLOOR e jLLj 1 -0 s A413 A4A — _ G`A SPIIKLR CLOS Is'r F�ooR I STP �i S7R2Id jam} E B1. B1 A CAS ENAIVE ELAN CLIGRAPEVINE — 1 CASE NUMBER.2Z0.03,CUl -5 q' LOCATION:150t STATE HIGHWAY 380,LOT 2 BLOCK A.GLADE360 ADDITION A,1 I", � l � DATE_� Y f ( \�✓ / �/ i �jI=/ 1 - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION b t r 6 e _ r rye DAM a _.' <�..� SHEETI ll OF 45 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN L CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES b - J DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPMENTSERVICES 1 e 10.08 20 cl i o i 4 a � a " r Alll t .. t /77 F - a " — 71' L z �-3UILDING I - ROOF LA a "L 142'-9 I Do �1) 2 A )) pp Tn a� L Li r ill 0 i ; \ STk,# C NAW NER�uo-w cuso-zi.Poa�m f�. f loGTwk.'E0,STATE HIGHWAY M.LOT 2. g - j j eLocK u A,GoErwoaom noN ---- MAYOR DATE r F PIANNING AN IN 6 D ZONING COMMISSION t 9 t k I g gyp- s 1 � GATE' � SHEET. 18 OF 45 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN € I CONRICT WITH ANY GOD ES OR ORDINANCES a DEPARTMENT OP DEVELOPMENTSERVICES $ I 10.08.20 z 3 ,r .ab+4 tAwx+.�t.�+.v#�nnh tit+... HWhs. .. ..,:_ . ... _._. .. ...., .. .... ..... ........... . ..:. .. .,.... �...... ;,,,..,... - KEYNOTE LEGEND: I A, T L 0 El El 4 El El 0 El[�D M 12 El El El El El ED El ED El EO �o K I 'T �1.1 IREF IvEu-'r"- F�iL 0 11 jj FPF1-CR I I J ,t f F VE[�j I Tj E F F CE TT IV is r F t I I !II ----------- 4: HI F 0 El IFFT7 '1 1 T 1'2 E I F(,I z I T I ,11 T _J_J_J ---------- IM-7 L ED A -4- T A'T 1 11 ED 6, F2�1 Fl� F'71 �1 Q21 �X M2 21 M21 nK F,1� n 311 F Ft F IT MSUNFY (-/"I JL AT10HI, 87 �TAKIN FROV,F f E TO F PLATE BUIL.DiNa RM'I ELM\/, `A[CIJLAT'10r�S — 0,19. 1 -TAKEN FRO,FFE TO TOP OF PLATE BALCONIES INCLUDES AS SOLID ' T ZB FBI m m M D POINT oP FRO, HT I II _LF O L T Y-2-t- -E� J." PE AP-� v 3 CASE INAVIE:ELAAGRAPPONE CASE NUI Z2 ,CUZA21,PD APT.LVF 2 LOCATON.,IWI STATE NG"AY W.LO T2, j ,MR LT 5ZLT_ DATE if AFT LIT.1 PLANNING AND ZOWW COMMISSION __1 FI-11 �3� ED Eh F,ED F!, �2A Fl�. 2A 2D 20 Al 2D eC 8 1B 2k 2A iA DATE MAS011PY CALCULATIONS — 92—Q% 711 SHEET, 19 FROM UP To TOP OF PLATE DF 45 T APPROVALDOESINOTALIT110-ZEAN 01�114 Y�CONFLICT WITH ANN' r_,-�BUILDING T-t-fzrm I FRONT MLM\/. VOID.SOLD CALCULATIONS — 0,18�1 CODES OR ORDINANCES 7871 _7 FROM UF,TO TOP OF FATEDEPAFtWENTOFDEVEUOl.ENTSERVICES BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID 10.0&20 v El KEYNOTE LEGEND, L 2 E 11 i It INi ----— -------- FGLI-ElElkl f 11Y'P I,!- 7 _4 GE A,,—, i(Ul It NNll,FRcf E I-H I N GI OF L I` IT'll M SIAII 1,1--": nr r ml SIT rl -PT 12A IA r7l Irk, It!I 0I r2DI I%,'S I al CAL U ITJ Jj FROV FIE l_TCl O PLITE BUILDING L VCO COLP »TAK H-FCu F I E Tu TOP 01 PLATE FALCOME,',CLJTtED AI SOUT1 7. F Rl 7351 f-3-BI MB -T- L7 MO)PC,OF OF ROOF HT L,:--i L-L I IT PL 7 CAGE NkW:ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NUMBER Z20 C 20-21,PD20 G LOCATION:4501 STATE HIGHWAY W,LOT 2, 71 DAM APT LV_ I PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ❑ a h x �Y, ----Epmlgww— F DATE. MASMiRT C6 LCULA-1101JS -- 86.5% T� SHEETi 20 '%TArEI MW F I I TO Ill 11 ILITI DIF 45 r-,-�BUIL.DlNa Tyfzrm I Lrar-T ral-ray. A- VAL-M.-ALITINO—ANY-OWIN VOIF-:SOLID CALCUI /,II0-1JS--- 0111:1 CONFLICTWTHANYCOOES 4,PCIM Ul,T 17 l-1 TOP AT PLAN DEPARTNENTOFDEVELOPM�ENTSE—CES BALCONIES OCLUDIP)AS SOLID 10,0820 i r T I � 11 I I z.l I — f { LF Tz 1 �I I PE� -- �I { _ — 2 _ l� - „„ ➢ _ F ¢ �r . h ' IEj, — C: Mir"I i € BUILDING II - 2ND FLOOR 199'-11' I I a L—————— L—————- C� 1 BUILDING II - IST FLOOR g U U I 8 STR #1 t I T cTR # F I ( _y y \ CASE NAME ELAN GRAPEVINE s BL�TIO—_ �j BLOCXANG ADE360ADD10NAY 360,LOT 13 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION b / \✓ p i �I � SHEET: z ❑F 45 e APPROVAL GOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY V/ORK IN ANY CODES OR CDEPARTAIEN+ ORDINANCES OF DEVELOPME �-S 10 0a.20 ' M r.. 1 i r, r I r_ - ='I r � i > I r rt e a UILDIN12 11 - Poor- El i „r �_ ❑ I — ip 5UILDINCX ii - 3RD r-LOOR STR2 I � -- (I �I -- I I I — I I cnsE NAME.ELAN ORAPanNE -- a ('�7 y CASE NUMBER:Z2D03,CU2 I,PD2 B3 op �'� E�� v = �� i� M Qp �! gJ LOCATION;4EOI STATE NI6NWAY W.LOT 2, / 1 �I � � -- ( �p F.� � SLOCH A.GlADH360 AD01TIDN A3B ,", G1 SJ F; A, ETA A3B DAM t -- PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION F ❑ F9. E i / SHEET, 22 OF 45 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN a ,. CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES fr DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ---IT - 6 L---1 -- __ 10.0 20 i t ❑ KEYNOTE LEGEND, Hl� - ---------- El El 0 0 12 E)0 ED 1711 El YEIT ED El El El El 0 E�l 0 U ED F❑0 El W I I 44 4 IFF[,- -�T71tj Tl V - ---------- F,71 1 i�7 r i 7 i2l'H 11 b -,I F 1,11N, R[T.L EtU K IT(�EFF,61 1,11 T� J, , - r �il -�T �Pl tS -7 T F: 71 API,UV� 1 -4 1 4d n 1�1 ED ,�, 1 i i [l l� 7 r Fl n m ,mEF2E El M r6 1,Sl II P L-ALC ,LA JI(flS 911,2'7 El R(lll�F E.TO T F CF PLATE BU I Lm INCX T-1-ps II RE,4R mxmv. V51D:s,uLD CALCUL 0,12:1 FROM F.F.C.TO TOP OF PLATE, BALCONiE'INCLUIIED AS SOL],' 4 1�El ED [PEI ID llp m 77 7 I -T M,D PC):[,T OF ROOF HT T G PL. -F� -77 Fm -01—� -T NANIE ELAN GRAPEVINE NUMBER 720-05,WZ0.21,PD2603 'ION:4WI STATE HGHWAY,,,,C.LOT2, -0: AFT -2 -Zi A,I3LADEMO ADDETION DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COWISSIIDN -ITz IA ED ED ,A rh rti i3i Eli 2 A ❑ lb v DATE. MASONRY CALCULATIONS 89.3) SHEET, 23 'TAKEN FROM U.1 TO TOP OF PLATR OF 45 _S: BUILDING T-ilzrm 11 FRONT Mrmv. AFF VALDOESNOTAURNHO�A VOID:SDUD CALCULATIONS - 0-191 P CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES 'TAKFIJ FROMF.F.E.TO TOP OF PLATE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A 77-=I�7 U BOCONES INCUIDED AS l(LO — 10.08 20 ED KEYNOTE LEGEND, ED ED El El El CO Q El El Q El -71,1 WTI LF, 'IT F�l 1: 1 1"�I�E I F- :7,ITT CEVF hT -H- C S I W1 I I L TP C E,A I A F F I(A- IET14 11,1NIK,11CII-F,',IW TIkE I',- 11S,IF,1, TOFFT,11'' T, Ll I0 �1� T 11 1� Fl- .-T 1- 0 fl 17 AFT LIT j, Li F2,1 30 ED F2,11 'sn FFOV F F E TO TOP OF PLATE IBU I L. -r m-my. v"')IP: IL: 12:J! IAI EN`PC.FEE.10 10,01 FLAT- � 6F.LC t IE NC16DEC AS SOJC m MIE PUNT OF POCO FT T.O.PL, T -2 OL T --a CASE NAME:ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NUMBER Z200.t,CU20-21,PDZD&I -AP-L v, N LOCATIO 45()l STATE HHIGHWAYW,LOT 2, BLC(AAO LjE ------- DATE APT L,';- I PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION fi 12AI �IA Mll 3DI 1 DATE 1-0 MASUHR Y CALCUI A.IONS 90.7 SHEETi 24 -TIREII FRCRI F1,E TC TOP OF PLATE OF 45 APP VALD0ESNOTALTHORJZEANYwOflxIN CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES 5u 1 L.D I Na -r.-I-pra 11 Larr ml-mv. VOU:T`OLIT -A� LCULATIONS 0 2 0- �TANE[T FROM PF,E,TO TO'01 IIATE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 64COHES INCIAIDED AS SOLID 10 08,20 s R 4�LF A I I ; ■ — — Pii I , s ,I i� I i El JL _ ❑: I r �r — f7 _ r k - � i I en�n. / r I E a 1 t � SUILDING ill - 2ND FLOOR i E 3 1 0 r. DI I A5 �i F J UF13 � Ai F ❑ I F J SUILDINC� III 1ST FLOOR r mm sTR kill, ® n-_ _ —�I 5C ®i. SPNKLR u� A � — CLOS. \ \ —' 1�—�I [_ CASE NAME.ELAN GRAPEVINE pp d p T� CASE NUMBER:T'ATE'CUXFP1,P LO �9/'. III k < / � _ �\ �; LOG4TION:46015TATE HIGHWAY 3eQ LOT 1, ^ eSA TMI / ueT Ata - BLCCKA,GLADH OADDITION ]C O mC�Omlu = NgE1T0:S$U7 n n — DATE Y _ s � - I PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE'. --- --- - 7, -- — ---- SHEETI 25 i ❑F 45 APPROVAL WOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN g CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES j DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES s z x : s „ o r .. _, err: ,. ... .. ,..... .-... ....... ..: ..._ ... ... . ,._ ,._., .,. ,.. .. _,. � ., .,. .,._.� ., ... , .:.. '�Ad.�t. r. e k v s t z } i 1 e L Y r". s ' 'r'- - _-- ._ .t xis inoiunrt ` I e -..- I--- -t - T7 1 3UILS�INC� III - ROOF _ I'll 55'-4' ----- j I I � I 1; � i I � t' rIvIl LL - _ - - - - Bu I Lm INCH I I I - 3RD FLOOR -- — I I <S I R — �#1 STIR #A� _R #3 (� LnAN�NAM EUNoitAPEwNE CASE NIMSER'MCC,CU 1,PD9 _ ' ✓ ` e 1 501 STATE WONWAYM,LOT; Z A-B EaSo nDomoN - 13 �L- -I i eu rwu F- lam' nr man —1 - -- A2A ����ptl V� FL ' ��" A2A - oAE —— — — — i PIANNIN6 AND ZONING COMMISSION 6 / g I FF DATESHEET, 26 7--- -� -- - , gPPROVAl ODES NOTALITFIORIZE ANY WORK IN Y -, � CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 55 'O.G8.2� F d x z y C I El KEYNOTE LEGEND, M EJ ED ED El El 0 Ep El=3 E F EE p ! E E0 �p E U A 1 -1 J fib, F,,�11 F Ll L­ 1� -1 HEEF UMIN'-1 I[IT'-, V I T 1:1, f F E II IFFF Er r T 1.'_I C 1-- 77 t FEF 1 0 1 SI�AEUCIW_�T�TEP, -- �_ IM, T I _ . 4 > { rTA F El [TC11 LLD El ED 0 F,� ni, �t r,-, t �L ED F�D 2 1� F2_61 rl�, �2� )I,]T� -- 94,"% UL SON FY f I A z �1AKEN FFQM F F E TO TCr Or PLATE mrm,4m ELEV. V�-,10�SuL,D CA-1­1ULATiONS — 0,18:i ITAkE FROM F.F.E.TO 710P OF PLATTL BALSORES RF-LOCED AS SO U opip m M2E 2, A [PT7 M D IOINT OF RSCF HT TT PL A PST -LvL 3 C. CASE ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE WMER,Z2�,CUM.2i,P� LOCATION:4W1 STATE RHG"AY W,LOT 2, APT _V' 2 % J ­7- T DATE izAar P�NMANDZON$�COMMJSSION A� I 21' F2 1� �21 I"S� F211 t El 2A P Fh ----crwn&MT— [M ED �IA ��C �111�31 FT] OE DATE F, MAS(1NRT` CALCUI ATiONIS 91.12% SHEETi 27 FFOM,.FE TO TOO OF FLATS OF 45 APPROVALDOESNOTAUTHORVEAWWORKIN 4 � 15ull-DINCX Typra I I I ;:FQONT mxv. VC)IF CONFLICT"�ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES _)�SOLID CALCULATIONS — 0,16:1 -]AkEN FROM,FF,F TO TOP�PLATE I DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SEWCES Ell, BALCOMES Mi USED AS SOLD A T ElKEYNOTE LEGEND: El p DI 4 ED ED ----------- 3b f p L t'IT 5-AT[,& q 111,,1,-A rv I. 11 IFU J11[11 1 L� I-1 T I;,H I TOE F C�I,'[I-P1A I;I 4 f 'FIS H(� TEL IF E I -77T7777;7T 7= DEILI TS11:[J,1 W:-ST-51[­ hAI SI°TEII l P O� 1 *1 LVL I LCJ2D B ED rit F111 r,❑D1 [A S,C I P C'A L L A T C) IS 91: 9 FRO11 FSE TO PTO OL PLATE r,.,�5UIL-MING T`rPrm Ill RIGHT r=Lrm\/. VOTU:SCID U,,i-CULATIONS - U 11:1 Feu F F E TO-,C1 FIT PLAT,1�1787�71 ITAI,I FR RALCONES INCLUDED AS SOLID —F 11FO IT T 0,PL 4 1B APT L 3 jJ Fh� CASE NANE:ELAN GRAPEVINE WE NUMBER M�Ci POY APT.LV' LOCATION:4WI STATE HG—AY W,LOTS,2 BLOCK A.GLAOE/360ADDITION S- VAYM b—TAKY 7 DAM —L APT LTO.1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 2u U [A IA12AI �!A 26 �21 �1� M.ASONF'i CALCUI AT10HS 94.18% 771 SHEET, 28 �Ii,KEN FROM F,F.E TO TOP OF PLATE OF 45 1, APPROVAL DOES NOT ALTHCIRZE A BUILDING TYPE Ill LEFT rm L rm V. MNFLICT WITH MY MDES OR 01=1=1N 3 VDID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 0,13�1 TA,EDO OPOM F.F.E.TO TOP 01 PLAT, J DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7�t BALCCl,'IES NCLUGED AS SOLID i J I I , I 1 n� DILI � I ..Dl - 1 L� c ?J1 T _ — - - - k Y_ 741 I � I II li �I to f u' ! E - Oil LL x r� �! -�� E ]j. � - L � o I I ' F / S I P BUILDING I V - 2ND r-LOOP. i GG --- --- -- -- G G G G G G ! CLOS_v _— o 1 ST 3 + _ 2 7 f ST 5/-+, oCjfF— o v �f_ Tlfl ` { — !I `L��F{ CASE NAME ELAN GRAPEVINE _ -— - CASE NDABER:22D03,W2PIt.PD2]8i € LOCATION:4WI STATE NIGH4VAY WD.LOTZ ;j L_ JI �✓,✓ 1 - eLocK A,ca.Aoaaeo ADDITION i::..a (mjam 'I�" JIB /. I® Q 5C AI, L UJ.j .� �d7 II _ _ - 5`'��. GATE PLANNING AND ZONING WMMISSION \ i 1 S DATE: b - Y Y SHEET, ---r— � _ —_- z OF 45 ——— ——— vk d'I+`L APPROVAL DOES NOTAGTHORIZE ANY WORK IN Y El CONFLICT WITH ANY COOESORORDINANCES \ DEPAItWENTOFDEVELOWENTSERVICES I � I I > L. 7 c I » , ? Lz , n _ z I r � : r ) i i R t- - _ HUILY�INC� IV - ROOF { 1 - i I ----- -------------- I I B 2 AB ABA ABA AB Da L NCB I 3RD FLOOR S?R 5 vi �— VTR - — .\A t i �t + _#� i� E ZI ! _— — Qc B CASE NAME.ELAN GRAPEVINE MB - \ / CASE NUER-Z20-W,Ct 21 PD? i.�e �° --✓ �_ .. —�J ,.�1 LOCATION:4MI STATE HIGHWAY M.LOT I — - - I —__ ( l - � BLOCK A.GLADE/380 ADDITION ---- AA A3A A3A ® A3B / I� _ - DATE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION E i ! i DATEIF SHEET, 30 ❑F 45 = r _ U APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WOPo(IN E ' CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES Y DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOMENT SERVICES C 10.0820 > r, �A� .z, Merwc+.ate �3s..-. sk➢._ , ,:.,. " , ,.,..., , ... ,. ,,, .-.,, ,., .. , .., -, . > .,,,: t.s -, KEYNOTE LEGEND: '01��i ED 1E El 0 ED � Ej ED El ED El El 4 a ❑oQ ED El ElE El EJ El El El o E, El ED 4 MME] 0 LE P 'iSN' 0,1)T1, 11 --------------- 7 s T, If F II I T-c F E. T I 11E I r(L-� I P Ir 1:i I I EDAI H1,T ---------- 7 T---T L T 1,' sl OIL I'll HAP PE",11 7 J U-1 T E11011 C IEV-PEL I'l l, 11 FIV, 7771. 1-1 711", A.I. L.L A j -j -7 IT Y 14- -------------------------- 7 j?A F271 .AI r2 C� I]2� M,1�j Ed F2� FIl ED FK� 2D U NR CALCUl 94.77 EO TFOV F FE TO TOF OF ELATE qrz,4m rmi-ray. 'J' FIC.F F E TO',01 OF?LATE BALC141ES INCL EEC AS SC,Ir' �In ID cp Ep ED ID [P (p -'? 2B -1 4 r771 IF 7 B NO,POINT OF ROO, Hl. II - -- ---------- 4 r, .0 PL AP� LVL 3----------- El. sr F CASE NAME ELANGRAPEMNE CASE NEI Z2D33.W20-]1,P ART VL 2 LOCATION:4WI STATE MGHWAYW,LOTz 77 ---------- i -T 117�---------------- L.A,�D�ADDITION P DATE ART LJL. 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Ui 121 2u 12CI 2A 1 ; AC�21 M" E c, f3 111� fi 0 DATE M A,S 0 N,R Y CALCULATIONS — 89 5 6' SHEET, 31 'TAKEN FROM F.FE TO TOP OF PLATE sf" C OF 45 A CV RONT 0 IN su I�.D INa r.1-prm mxv. CONFLICT--ANY 0ODE.M DIRDINAN=ES' APP VAILDOESNOTAUTHOMMA VOID:SOLID CA! CULATIONS -- 0�1 9:1, 1 fr +IAU N FROM VY E,TO TOP CA FLIII L DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BALCONTS INCLUDED AS SOLD 10,08 20 S r El KEYNOTE LEGEND, — F - - `F Fr'FrjF - 1 I�1 o 0 4 0 0 o Q o 0 0 } - � --- - � F�TFE,1 I � ,_ I E I TI 11 II,? 1 T F I ! � I 7 o - - -- 1 - 4 1 6' - - - -- - --- PILL I � iyy F 1C L 11 11 V1l rJ < PIE L f 'f 1 _ EFr -d -- --------- - fi AF Li i �i., i IE © � 1A U 2' 2h 2G M S(:)HF A.CUL TION . 88 9'F" -TAIEI rFPOM-E TO TOP OF FLAiE ���BUILDINC� TYPE IV - RIGHT ELEV. VOID:C;I LC, c�;!-Cu�AT'1C)HS 11C:1 TP39 I F E.TO uP OE FLnr 5 BALC NEB INCLUDED A JL:D $ j � I E ' Q 7'. 36 4 33 2B F a MIS POINT C ROOF +L III — -_ __0 PL r JB i_LVL 3 �l a� ' CASE NAME:ELAN GRAPEVINE - CASE NUMBER:Z26-0D,CUe0.2f,PD20N —AFT.LVL. L LOCATION:4WI STATE HIGHWAY SED,LOT2, BLOCK A,GLADEMD ADDITION 14 DATE: a.- APT LVL, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION '11 2A ✓L 2C IA. 6 .�'.' 21 2. Q F�c ?D Q =,sue j R— Y DATE: E MASONF CALCULATIONS 90% SHEET, 32 TP-'EN FROM E TO TOP CE PLATE OF 45 e DUILDING TYPE IV - LEFT ELEV. APPROVAL GOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORN IN 8 \/i,fJ.SOI , ��1 CU A'F,GiNS 0,1G�1 A y CONFLICT WITH ANY GO OR OROINANCES /8 -0" L SENL TRW r E TO TOP DE PLATE � DEPARTMENT OF DEVE40PMENi SERVICES BALCONES INCLUDED AS SOLD i > n , ' I I I, e II I I I I F I ; i f e I p i � s t Y I- L s� BUILDING 1/ - corr,4GE ROOF G ;77::_,•—o- fi s i I c I x r 1 i Y , _ — z �j 13 / CTI CASE NAME:ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NLMeER:zmw.CU2m1,PoA i / LOCATION:4501 STATE HIGHWAY M,LOT 2 BLOCK A,GLADEl360ADDITION I t I I DATE: 1 L T Cb oD i PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION i E DATE'. § ; �— -- 9-9— — -------- Cf ,;; SHEET: 33 OF 45 BUILDING r - �/0���/! APPRWAL DOES NOT CODES IR ORDINANCES WORK IN g CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES 1 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 8 I Ci B 2P c S I E3KEYNOTE LEGEND: - --------- hl��'�!II7'CT—F�l T F-'l E) El El 0 El El El El El ED IL I L-,A Pf 6 f FlH I T,D:IT I I L RHP Fr I it! IA i 11 t -------- ------—--- Fl, BF�'�F I LUIRL), 1, E-11 F L i IF LE TI IT IML 77777 �7 T �PL To El EA� I El I Ell r7l'�' El P',D El I ED E�F� El El El ull 1! 'JF Yf:AL-JL l FIL) T*-J FRNA FIF TJ TOP UF PLATE AF EN FFOM E I TTF L,-PLATE BUILDING TYPE v -�LmrT r LEV- BUILDING TYPE V RIGHT ELMV.\'- -T C. V O�1 L,AD-H I C, A 'TA ','FF FM o'OP 0 PLATT -lAi,ELJ IFA)F L TOT FIT I-A E BILCUIlEs IKLUIEE,AS SrLJf BALI-QNES H-LILDID AS SOLI- . Ep rp to Ep 1ss El Fll ............. Slio-OILL T' FulF IT Ill"K PCOP HI T7 T 0 IL 1 1,13 PL T TEL INFT LVL 1 APT ITA 121I)l 2 ha �l 271 r.� �IB �'B �n F �'A 2�1 F, �,A VASONIRY CALCULATIONS 100% MASONRY CA!CULATIONS -- 96 7% FROM FEE.TO LOT OF PLATE 'TAKEN FROM F.FE TO TOP 01 PLATE BUILDING TYPE V - RE�4R ELEV. BUILDING TYPE 1/ - rmovr r=Lrav VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS - 010:1 VOID:SOI!E) CALCULATION-- - 0 40:1 FRO.FF.E TO TOP OF PLATE •TAKEN FROM FEE TO TOP OF PLATE BALCONIES INCLUCEU AS SOLID BALCONIES NCLUD- AS SOLID CASE NAME:ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NUMBER Z"'WZ"'P�NL LOCATIO45)l STATE HIGHWAYMO,LOT2, SLOCI(A.GLA[)EI60 ADDITION CAM PINNING AND ZONING COMMISSION -C, DATE SHEETi 34 OF 45 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORH IN CONFLICT WITH ANY WOES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 10.0820 i I �I .--/ �",-_. T y q r -- — PATIO — — — .--- ------ — — i I Iii 11 ' Ln: l !i vl FITNESS m — DINING/LOUNGE 26'-1"x 28'-6' �rrI — (' F__ CLUB ROOM �� I I� ® -- � -- -- -- _ g 'I I) 2<•-s•x2m-o" � t'� � GAME ROOM —_ — �I ,7'-fi"x 23'-1" n I � KITCHEN I � rl MEN'S �\WOMEN'S� E ;,* � — - - - - - - - - - - MECH \ WORK g i MECH ROOM 22•-10'x 14•1' MICRO i MAIL I 2D<x 29'-1 CONF. r BUSINESS CENTER j tr-6"x16••6" LEASING LOBBY 16'-6'x24,-0. MECH f — - ''. ' MAINT F t \? MICRO 1OWx14'-6 ' CONF. ( '� �, 9-e xes OFFICE / �� �� El �,i NANO NANO NANO 0 I I CONF. CONF. CONF. ENTRY ! t' 6'-8'x 9'-6' b'-T x 9'-6" � 5 t -- - -- -- - - - -- a CASE NAN£:ELAN W LASE 6ER NM,CJ D LOCATION: LOT 3 BLOCKA,GLPDfDADDITION g5 21'-1D F/2" MAYOR SECRETARY DATE PLANNING AND ZONING GOWSSION CHAIRMAN � GLIB i�L14N DATE $ 6"=�'—o" ` SHEET; 35 APPROVAL DOES NOT AU ORIZE ANY WORKW CONFLKT WRR ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES � DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES s: u x . + 0 171-1 El El Ep El 13 ------------- m El E] -,A IbEF',LWF-HSI_ FAT IN, 'K,'Ot FIL:-, ----- - -------—-------- F FIb(I-fK1FIjF L,SH 6 FIAT!t 'd I]- "I T ------- ------------- ----------- -—-- ------------- L! —J!I,TF FTF L E PIT 1W.1 1�TO T -- -------- ------------ T­IFI I TII I �T(IF!FT,'S, TEP F- -71 J L Ell El ED F I El Ed 0 12j �21 I'll I LIRJ LJA im-, - AIEN�FCtl FIE-T,�FP-j�It ATE Ph E!J TPCEI F F E 11 T11�F 1�17E CLU5 FRONT ELEVATION J r�� CLUB - LOPT ELM\/ATION VIU'­L�L, C�ILUJL,� I �IAP N FFAw�F E TO�O`OF VJID: BALLONLS INCLUDE,AS IF FROM I F I TO OFF OF PLATE EDHALCOtI ES INCLUDED AS SOLID =­=L M4 r38 KA:L'PO,NT OF ROOF HIT LAD POINT 01 P20F±1T,, T_ T, I---1— 1- A-, LL_ 17 j ------ 1, 0 1�LJ I:! T 0 PL, ... .......... FL 7 Ej�O� ff E AF, -Ij T" F F.E, E. Fl_,� h�E DI 10 n2l r2t [IAI �M F2 F2 28 F2� �2� �2. IIAJ rts MASONRY CALCULATiONS - 88,7% MASONRY CALCULATIONS 83.450 'TAKEN FROM F.F.E.II)LEI OF PLATE FROM F.11 TO III OF PLATE VOID:SOLIDATJSJ�S ri_-� CLU5 RIGHT ELEV4TION CALCULATIONS 0 46i I VUD­SOLID CA! CULATIO14S — 0,22: EN FROM A F.E TO T A OF PLATE 'TAKEIN FROM A TO,TO TOIF OF FLATS 781 CA BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID BALCONIES INCLUDED AS SOLID CASE�E ELAN GWE'A�E CASE NUMBER,ZZ�.CU�21.P� LOCATION.4�1 STATE HIGHWAY W,LOT 2. SLOI A.GLADS-1 ADDITION DATE_ PLANNING AND ZONING COVIIASSION DATE F'�, P SHEET, 36 OF 45 APPROVAL GOES NOT AaI­IQ�A CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR OFOW1 WORK i Or DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES—CL-1 10,0&20 r. A' j j r -—- ------ --- s Roo; K 5�5 � III I s" I F I / I e E I / --_._---- ------ n r � t i CASE NAME:ELAN GRAPEVINE !� LOCATIA.GLADEMDADMON Y3N',LOT 3, £ BLOCK A.OLPDE�ADORION � r SECRETARY DATE Y PLANNING AND ZONING COWSSION 1 a,4i�.4cx�1'Lolx �p D R N DATE X SHEET; 37 uu OF 45 s MY OR AN ORDINANCES g CONFLICT WfiN 4NY CODES OR OROWPNCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 10,0820 s 7 i El KEYNOTE LEGEND: i I'I I I I: I�� El Q 0 O D LQ III eti I ul uc` I CE IY f 1c _ C F[I _Fj I,'] F Ix M I Ol ' L <F 1F Y s I,CG 4 1 E I A r IF' S tt _A41 ,. nSI..I[ 'C..h1 ?F :IF 'F tilCl i- TA E .f IF I i U- ----- - 1 IA 2C 2d TR ZD '� 1A MASCNR I CA' �JL,"' .,NS — 9' ' —EN I.OV FE 1r TOP OF P,17E tYP I CA L G'x,4m 4(2m ;erm I E L E1/,4'C f ON _ F FP;D'FF F TO 01 FLATT BA COMES INSLUDEE,AS SOLID R 3 � T TI TI E / / -- --- --------_-- III POINT OF ROOF IT i I I ii a II PL -------------------- --- - - LCIOME ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE NIJAI IM.Z2 CU=1.PD20. -{ LOCA A,GLSDt STATE DIMON Y 360,LOT Z i ' - BLOCK A,GLADE/360ADDITION � i I ' € i DATE: tt PLANNING AND ZONING COMN45510N 6 �., to 61 1A': 2A 1A 2C 7A MA' C)IJf;Y CAL"C LAT C)1 — OATS: s 'T..YEN FROM FFE TO TOP OF PLAT- � SHEETI 38 GARAGE rr (/�/. I 7 ! F'� /'�t / 1;, ❑F 45 ' �/rl��I�I��RE 1 ��/N� EI�E�� I ION i/`)L).I�LV CACLC CA T�VI��S — ll. +, APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN P . 1 A M1 FROM FFE TO TOP TO PEA E E CAI CCN E.:INCLUDED AS SOLID CONFLICT WTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENTI OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES e 1vn .0�i.LC I El KEYNOTE LEGEND: - x x > ;TFI .51.E I P F LP CI Ol Fl � fI EF L[V F N, E',C Tf1 F 1! 4 11`� S G r' I I F I EI I { f If l i iH I f, �L, i cE{ r EE 1I — -_ E IF. „VE_Y 1 1 - - - TI : .UF - r -E[ -PF I F umn: 7 - -- t UI hl,lL,a EI, OF E . I : _ r - FP - I , ` a I , s lylc —F�I 1 <..— — F e -B A - --- 1 if 1JM3 F Bc -I ✓C FEc_1 1 P 1_J /y C,4Rf=ORT ELEVATION SECTION 1 4 -1'—C CARP F7 ELEV SECT i I I Y : I 1 E T 3a 471 3U' 3A k E I MID POINT OF ROOF HT_ 1 o i —r r'0 P� — 20 '-7 S 3 ]T rrL 1 , I _ CASE NAME'ELAN GRAPEVINE -, 1 `� ].--. { �' CASE NL ER:ZZOO.3,CU1b21,PDZA03 7 LOCATION:4501 STATE HIGHWAY 360,LOT Z BLOCK A,GUI)M60 ADDITION20 5 I T 1- 1 F.F.E. _ DATE: OR 2k PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION F z Ir r Tj ,IN `�U r``� DATE. xTArEN FOM FFE.TO TOP OF PLATE F ` SHEETt 39 �i� ��III�J I VOID:SOLID CALCULATIONS 0:1 OF 45 Cx,4R,4rTE SIDE ELEVATION FI.E N FROWFF.E TOATTOP OL PLATE ,}.y'r E '+<,}1 APPROYALWIE NOT CODES ORE ANY WORKIN g CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES / DEPARTMENT 1 OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 'I < I f 0.08.20 �I n t w, _r C a a f Jordan & Skala Engineers ''-7855 Noet Dallas Park—Y•Suite 32D Dahas.eX,75287 P,469,385,1616 f.469,385 1615 texas Rey eyed Ena reering firm F-4990 ¶i15 DRAW IfJG IS THE PROPERTY OF JCRDAN S. SKA?A ENGINEERS INC-A OIS NOT TO BE REPRODUC D-N M,CLE OR N PART WnH,0'T F RIrr[1?ERIAISSCN BY JORDAN&SKALA ELOI PIPES, w :D ZV) Q X W w 0 w > U z w Lu w QL w w � PRINT DATEEC D ISSUED FOR �� L —: r T-I IT T J j< ff�'�!-M��q �. 3F it I t. tz iLk _E, REvlsloNs a DATE DESCRIPTION t a , _v , Project Number.TBD Drawn By:JR Checked By:MJ OVERALL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET TITLE R�ALE V=1--L' OVERALL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ,II SHEET NUMBER E 1 .02 -- NOT;SSUED FOR CONSTRUCTIOP+ i i Jordan & Skala Engineers j17855 No H,D V—Perk Y S--.e 321 D.,]P,,TX,7528? p.469,385_1616.f.469.385,1615 Texas Regi,!ered Engineering Firm F 4990 i i THIS DRA WING:S THE PROPER+CF JORDAN E S KALA ENGIN_ERS INC.AND IS NOTTO BE R_FRODU CED IN WHOLE OR^.PART W!THC,7 WRII'=.UI PERMISSION BY JORDAN&SKAIA ENGINEERS. i Z 7 W z � � Q Q X W oe �w Q UJI ry V) CL LLJ J j L L , �Y ryryCC , _a , tY ' :� • - - - , - PRINT RECORD ,' ` -.e' ..,„`"< , ,• - - - _ - - - - DATE ISSUED FOR , J. , t , • , , ` ' p REVISIONS , • a DATE DESCRIPTION I Project Number.TBD Drawn By:JR Checked By:MJ PARTIAL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET TITLE OVERALL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET NUMBER E 1 .02A -- NOT ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION i oil K Jordan & Skala Engineers 17855 North Dallas Park—y•Suite 320 r Dams,TX.75287 p.469,385.1616•f-469-385,1615 -_ ?exas Registered Engineering arm F-4990 i t s I I ?HIS DRA W ING tS THE PROPERTY OF JORDAN& SKALA ENGNEERS INC.AND IS`,OT TO BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY JORDAN&SKALA ENGINEERS. F J z W ZCD - = - - T < Lu Lid ua -IT uj CL Is ri • , y , - •,. • ate" � - . W ujL . Z, J" PRINT EC I _ - ISSUED FOR -' DATE "1. , 1 } - - C • , • I , L L -�- ---- --- --- REVISIONS s DATE DESCRIPTION Project Number:TBD Drawn By:JR Checked By:MJ �1 PARTIAL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET nr E SCALE.t"=50'-0" PARTIAL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET NUMBER E 1 .02B NOT ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION GRAPHIC SCALE 200 0 200 400 a v m fV O N )R.ADGLADE ;FORT WORTH � TIONAL O ONINGRACTGLADE ROAD r r ■ /t ■ li DDD LOCATION MAP ,FEE ■■■■■■■■■■+■■■■■■� // ■ 1 : - r,,l �/ PARKS NOT TO SCALE f/h. ■ ,1�.-� ■ ,�`.1 r■ LANDSCAPE PLAN: SHEET LP-2 ■ LANDSCAPE PLAN: SHEET ( ) ■ LANDSCAPE PLAN: SHEET LP-4 LANDSCAPE PLAN: SHEET - ■ 1 UWDSCAPE PLAN: SHEET LP - , BLDG 13 G'4 �' (PHASE G °--- '� •• , lip CLUBHOUSE 6 • \� J` 1 w l ■ L I —� s1,OG+6 AID,— eLOG m "<_. SLDa.e sLDc.e' BLD0.1 eLDB.x eLDc.3 ■ - ■a■■■u■■■■■■■�ti■■■■■■■i■■mom■MEN■l■■aa■■�a■tia�aaa■ ■■■■■■■■'■■■■ti■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■aIN %MMEME■■ ■ommomm■■■o _ STATE HIGHWAY.360 _ FRONTAGE ROAD _ J a i s N E i= _ N TOTAL SITE OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS (LOT 2, BLOCK A) 662158 SQUARE FEET 14.28 ACRES TOTAL SITE AREA: 2.062,567 SF TOTAL DEVELOPABLE AREA 622,158 SF (14.28 ACRES) TOTAL RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED: 250/UNIT 81.000 SF GROSS PARKING AREA 196,798 SF 31.63%OF SITE y, TOTAL RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 512,471 SF(24.5%) TOTAL NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE AREA 262,252 SF 42.15%OF SITE m TOTAL ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 1.006,614 SF(48.8%) NUMBER OF UNITS/BLDG.SF 324/163,109 SF 26.22%OF SITE CASE NAME:ELAN GRAPEVINE REQUIRED PROVIDED CASE NUMBER:Z20-03,CU2 21,PD2 3 > LOCATION:4501 STATE HIGHWAY 360,LOT 2, N INTERIOR LANDSCAPING BLOCK A.GLADEP.180 ADDITION (GROSS PARKING SQUARE FOOTAGE z 0.10) 19.680 SF 44.395 SF ; 1 TREE/400 SF OF READ.INTERIOR LANDSCAPE 49 TREES 61 TREES 1 TREE PER PLANTER ISLAND AND TERMINUS YES YES F MAYOR w PERIMETER LANDSCAPING (MIN 2'WIDE PLANTING AREA/30•MIN HEIGHT) YES YES DATE: uzi i TREE/50 LF OF PERIMETER AREA YES YES PLANNING ANO ZONING COMMISSION NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING %OF SITE IN NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE I PER SECTION 53,SECTION I(4),TABLE INSET -ZT�fy o i TREE/3 000 SF OF NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE 87 91 o t TREE/4000 SF OF NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE PLUS EXISTING TREES IN FLOOD PLAIN AREA YES DATE: j LI AB F R CR ATONA oP N PA. SHEET:40 OF 45 PER SECTION 22,SECTON F(3) 81.000 SF 512,471 SF N 250 SF/UNIT (24.5%) p APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN Q CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES N O O PROJECT OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN NO. � 2121 Midway Road 0. i Suite300 GRS JBI Carrollton,Texas 75006 002 a 972.248.7676 BP No.6F-438 THE PRESERVE - PHASE 2 SHEET N0. PARTNERS TBPLS No.10076000 Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas LC-1 p CURVED SEATWALL DOG FOUNTAIN DOG PARK ENCH - GRAPHIC SCALE J / 30 0 30 60 APPROXIMATE OUTLINE OF EXISTING TREE MASS- TYPICAL ! -- / EXISTING 10'WIDE (2)BIKE RACKS PAT .) / CONCRETE TRAIL EACH BUILDING('TYP.) / ----- i \ DALLAS/FORT WORTH ti ` ! ! (PHASE I) ---_-------- '-�._:i ^,;\ INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BENCH AND `/`-' y \ \ AIRPORT a. ` / ——— —————— - _— (PH RECEPTACLE ' TRASH R CE - / ——— --- - s j - — — (PHASE t ----_---/--- m i r--- B SITE a �o i -------- / ,. _ SRO \ ZONING c5 ------ O -'" SCE \ —— ———— � ROAD �N7 B'S9'34" _j CE — — z 3' � kT GLADE ROAD o LA RO -----_..---� TRAIL CULVERT +CE .+ + , + RO — t RO - te o w I � a o z i CE .. LO+ PROPOSED PET I s 1 p FIRST ) ICE � , � �� WHERE SHOWN ON EACHICAL z �+RO p6 FLOOR.SURROUNDED BY LOCATION MAP o + _ / TUBULAR S rEEL FENCE/MATTCHPROJECTFENCETO (NOT TO SCALE) d -+RO iR0 . tD0 �M BLDG.s \ ' LEGEND 's L�- CE PROPOSED 4`CALIPER SHADE/ + BLDG.S / BLDG.7 ( COS' p'. °' I - CANOPY TREE FROM THE ( } _•, a + APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST RO -.:' I +CE t+6 SHADE TREE LIST: BLDG.4 CM +RO I O RED OAK 1 J ' LO LIVE OAK !I �O / I EXISTING CO CHINQUAPIN OAK ('�j I -. - tv PROPOSED I PHASE I CP CHINESE PISTACHE CE CEDAR ELM 1 L ,. C I * 'CM T CM +Rp BRASH ENCH AND I *PROPOSED 6`CALIPER SHADE TREE s RO CM + : RECEPTACLE - -.`� •Ty ,fY 'fY LO "'TY L—L PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREES ' (TYP.j +gyp +CP � � t1.0 � � FROM APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST s n' ORNAMENTAL TREE w I Ni< A LIST: Nor +CP '',; ` t^ ---^_}'Tw_--- w ---rr i P.- * 0. I CM CREPE MYRTLE r _ - w— —aW RO RO +CP r {-- ---w s '�w'_ rr E — o ———rr—., *4 1 TY TREE YAUPON —�— __ JFIJF— LAYERED -- - 1 w — — — ffi ss B w .. w n w I ❑ PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTING a: -- LANDSCAPE -- -- ( �'---� PROPOSED WIDE AREAS-FROM APPROVED CITY WIW PLANTINGS el— I PROPOSED ss �_� -"""" - `ae CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED PLANT LIST =1= es_ �i=-- _ - "CONCRETE SILK +.'; ;}CP �—.. 1� DUMPSTER—�7 a es (a1(n I,,— I nr—ss _ �__,—vi——-- CP„ --rl——— ——n. ——tt—— ri---. 4.�� .\\` fCP J PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK N El ZIZ`* P �P. /' ` �' --. \�\ \ APSA 4' PROPOSED RETAINING WALL `v `` EXISTING PROPOSED 6-FOOT HEIGHT o +CP \ �` TRAIL HEAD TUBULAR STEEL FENCE g + r _ v v 2� BLDG.2 I CP,. i - _ -_. +C = \�\ +C� PROPOSED PET YARDS o BLDG.3 — �� ,g —— v PROPOSED LIGHT BOLLARD 6 I CM P _ P F: --,n I- ��- i, 1 CM'. I i - : PROPOSED CARPORTS , pr, r 1 { -- — ----- - - GARAGE c GARAGE '® +CP - E ,\ =------ to I +Lo 1 1 'CO > 01 DO _ +�'^'� ` a� 1 CASE NAME:EWJ GRAPEVINE 'a }.—'�Cp - B _.. — 'CM---•' 1p _—,_ — O — -- -. *+�—...-- -,_.— p — p,_-----___--.__— —_ __ _—_-- — — CASE NUMBER:Z2p-03 CL120.It.PD20.p3 1 to Wf. ( to Op r — `TFi LOCATION:4501 STATE HIGHWAY 360.LOT 2. 1—_.�_ -----.�__.— —T_ — _-- --♦--... ---- ---- -- — --+.__ _*-- --- — — — _ — — — — —_f-- ----- — MN BLOCK A.GLADEO60ADDITION un CO RB RB TRB t— RB RB T,0 __p0 _ Do_ — — — ---- ° ° _ STONE CE ONCOR M � r 15' GOR ESMT. —"` w AT FENCE ; .+. _ __ — ..{_ -- CORNER(TYP.) RB CO N25'10'36'W 1508452' CO CO DLO CO MAYOR W W_ EXISTING TRAIL DATE: N PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I N — STATE HIGHWAY 360 — PROPOSED PET YARDS. PROPOSED 5'WIDE (2)BIKE RACKS AT EACH LAYERED --- - PROPOSED RETAINING - - --- -- -- --TUBULAR STEEL FENCING WITH -- ---- TYPICAL WHERE SHOWN -- -_ CONCRETE SIDEWALK _ _.. BUILDING(TYP.) _ _... LANDSCAPE _.. DATE: j WALL-REF.CIVIL. SCREENING AND LAYERED ON EACH FIRST FLOOR. PLANTING: FRONTAGE ROAD FENCE TO BE ON TOP LANDSCAPE IN FRONT SURROUNDED BY TUBULAR SHEET;41 OF 45 OF RETAINING WALL. -- -_ .. _-. -.- -----_ STEEL FENCE TO MATCH " ._ _ _- -.. --. ❑ _ -._-.- _.. o PROJECT FENCE - - -_- APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE RCA NANCES WORK QZ CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCE6 � DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES N MAINTENANCE PROVISION: PER SECTION 53 OF THE GRAPEVINE --- o ZONING ORDINANCE— The owner,tenant and their agent,if PROJECT any shall be jointly and severally responsible for the NOTE:ALL PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE PROJECT j maintenance of all landscaping.All required landscaping shall FROM THE APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST NOTE; 2121 Midway Road LANDSCAPE PLAN be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times This AND/OR NATURAL TO THE SITE AND PLANT QUANTITY AND VARIETY MAY CHANGE Suite300 GRS ' -- shall include mowing,edging,pruning, fertilizing,watering, WILL BE SELECTED,WHERE POSSIBLE, BASED ON FINAL DESIGN.ALL PLANT .o weed rig, and other such activities common to the mantenance TO RESTORE AND EXTEND THE MATERIAL WILL CONFORM TOSECTION53 Carrollton,Texas 75006 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 00, of landscaping.Landscaped areas shall be kept free of trash, NATURAL MOSAIC OF THE ADJACENT GRAPEVINE LANDSCAPING REGULATIONS. litter,weeds and other such material or plants not c part of 972,248.7676 SHEET NO. / the landscaping All plant materials shall be maintained in a DEVELOPMENT INTO THE SITE. _ s healthy and growing condition as s appropriate for the seas PARTNERS TBPE No.F-438 THE PRESERVE PHASE 2 of the year, Plant materials which die shall be replaced with an TBPLS No.10076000 plant material of similar variety and size. _ Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas Lp 0 o, 7 .a ?o? i St4�34'30• 99 � E f� " 48 \\✓'�` APPROXIMATE — — — ` CENTERLINE FOR EXISTING CREEK -- - - - - GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 30 60 DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT a APPROXIMATE OUTLINE a EXISTING BENCH AND OF EXISTING TREE MASS TRASH RECEPTACLE TYPICAL w SITE EXISTING IO'WIDE (PHASE I) _-------- ----� Q v o ZONING 10 CONCRETE TRAIL ——— —\ TRACT - (PHASE 1) —. — — c1 \ —� ---.———-- r; w �..�..� �...� K —. -- —__———_ s: _ ---_--__---i � END OF PHASE 1 TRAIL-----—— _ - '� _ GLADE ROAD °o GLADE ROAD BEGINNING OF PHASE 2 TAIL R ---. ,t .«. -- — ��. f« -- .-.�. - -------- - -. - ---- _ -- -- I � ° ------ g —_—.—. — --T —T- CE♦ PROPOSED PET 4 I - ' ,`" —— ———— ——` — I«v PROPOSED ♦CO YARDS.TYPICAL�( z (2)BIKE RACKS FOR �� -----— CO i \ WHERESHOWN i ARBOR ON EACH FIRST LOCATION MAP EACH BUILDING(TYR) — —— �_.. _ ♦CE SYNTHETIC TURF FLOOR. ° 1 PROPOSED ♦ r \ SURROUNDEDBY4 (NOT TO SCALE) a RETAINING WALL --- „�.r.. _ -,'." _ * CE ♦ ,t [: .. ss � ♦Cp TUBULAR STEEL 1 _ _ ♦ ♦C p ( *COFENCE TO MATCH♦RO "' RO - ♦ PROJECT FENCE La - ----- DLO LEGEND -a_ - INFI E I v a, k P --- 1 L ♦O R - - y NITY EDGE U .F PROPOSED 4�CAlIPER SHAD POOL ( w 'I R� 1 ) CANOPY TREE FROM THE •RB 1 I ' _... BLDG.11 _ O __ ) C- I 'G. SEAT WALL ♦ APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST ' l; PROPOSED PET YARDS. SURROUNDED BY I - FIRE PIT/ I SHADE TREE LIST: (-= r BLDG.12 TUBULAR STEEL FENCE TO • I I OVERLOOK AREA 1 LO LIVE OAK TYPICAL WHERE SHOWN I 1 ' ON EACH FIRST FLOOR ,,_ ( ABA a POOL DECK I j RO RED OAK 1 ♦RO I 1 (� GRILLS 1 C BLDG,4 I CO CHINQUAPIN OAK MATCH,PROJECT FENCE } 1- __- S .. ' I ) I THETIC T�IRF ELM •-) CP CH NCE SEPISTACHE 1 I ( l 8 SYN PROPOSED 6'CALIPER SHADE TREE cM OM 'o i POOL FENCE POOL FENCE bl + 1 O PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREES CLUBHOUSE �� QM RO ;Y' ia E FROM APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST ( � O tY 7Y I J ORNAMENTAL TREE LIST: CP ♦CP O -ten` + RO,. G I..... + .". ♦Ci FFI~ RB REDBUD �I� ♦ ♦ ♦ W W CM CREPE MYRTLE WIW_n—— w — — w_n— p . ttOa WIW TY TREE YAUPON �Ic PROPOSED5'WIDE — =— a se fAIFA PROPOSED LANDS ••I CONCRETE SIDEWALK >�� ;/ PROPOSED BENCH AND, I i I•• AREAS-FROM APPROVED CCAPE ITY ING ZIZ *CP ♦ P c� TRASH RECEPTACLE(TYP.)aR \ e e o PR\ \ /D g LU W PLANT LIST v ❑ ss � ss ax _ —— —a—__n — — _ ci —— _ \w ♦CP . 1 + .. 6 WIDE �—Z�Z UIU C ♦ I —�" / VIV PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK n =I= ♦ ♦ t CONCREESIDEWALK�� n� JIJ D CP C { NiF ' ♦I COMPACTOR -.._ -........ * C + �1-- ._- j .... I � �2 ' ? '' PROPOSED RETAINING WALL o � L _ _ �' CP __ o 2 BIKE RACKS R TUBULAR STEEL PENCE i — — () FO R 1' t BLDG. _' ' *♦LO EACH BUILDING(TV ) PROPOSED PET I 4 - - I ♦RO EA I� YARDS o_ 4.j _ rr .. , If �-1 _. __. - •� c / *"*RC I *'DLO A�LO PROPOSED LIGHT BOLLARD v E P BLDG.8 *to BLDG.1 1 BLDG.10 I -- --- ° N._ ... ` -. ` I *;LO o `i- I F : +' PROPOSED CARPORTS _ _ . t 1 CP GARAG rho e r ♦(20. cM to I *♦k0 + *4Lo I i I *♦c Ro to o T I _'-__--*♦io- --- -'T` ca ax0 --rye --�cM -- --- - --*sta- ---- �p i- -- --- -'-C°-- Tito- ao w.E. _ . * CASE NUMBER'ZZD-03C UV20-2t.POYU03 _ RO �20 — ____ _ _ -RB _— —— -- 1 LOGTION:4W f STATE HIGHWAY 380�LOT I. v .n C _____— o 'ONCOR E T. -T -. — - �----- ---- ---- --- ---- BLOCK A GLADE080 ADDITION N . _� �o RS ite "GM O 1 rri PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, i i 58 SQUARE FEET REFER TO CIVIL.FENCE TO BE DATE. :•CM LAIpPE CA CALM ATIONS LOT 2.BLOCK AI 662,1 662.1 ACRES ON TOP OF RETAINING WALL.14.28 N PROPOSED BENCH AND PLANNING ANp ZONING COMMISSION TOTAL DEVELOPABLE AREA 622.158 SF (14.28 ACRES) TRASH RECEPTACLE jTYP.) i GROSS PARKING AREA 196,798 SF 31.63%OF SITE - - ----- - - TOTAL NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE AREA 262,252 SF 42.15%OF SITE STATE HIGHWAY 360 PROJECT LAYERED NUMBER OF UNITS/BLDG.SF 324//63.109 SF 26.22%OF SITE _- _ -. --- / TUBULAR STEEL FENCING WITH _ p - --- MONUMENT -' - ---- -- LANDSCAPE - --- ---- -_--- DATE: � REQUIRED PROVIDED SCREENING AND LAYERED FR�AITA/'`E ROAD SIGN / PLANTINGS INTERIOR LANDSCAPING _ -. -.... - LANDSCAPE IN FRONT FRONTAGE�I VV //''11 VV //'•11 � (GROSS PARKING SQUARE FOOTAGE K 0.10) 19,680 SF 44,395 SF SHEET:42 OF 45 1 TREE/400 SF OF REOD.INTERIOR LANDSCAPE 49 TREES 61 TREES 1 TREE PER PLANTER ISLAND AND TERMINUS YES YES PERIMETER LANDSCAPING -- _.-_ APPROVAL ODES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY W00.K IN Q CONFLICT WTTH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES (MIN 2'N1DE PLANTING AREA/30-MIN HEIGHT) YES YES DEPARTMENT OF DEVPIOPMENT SERVICES H 1 TREE/50 LF OF PERIMETER AREA YES YES NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING %OF SITE IN NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE PROJECT CT PER SECTION NO SECTION i R TABLE INSET 2121 Midway Road LANDSCAPE PLAN w 1 TREE/3000 SF OF NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE 87 91 SOe 300 GRS 1 TREE/4000 SF OF NON-VEHICULAR OPEN SPACE Carrollton,Texas 75006 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 002 ° PLUS EXISTING TREES IN FLOOD PLAIN AREA YES i 972.248.7676 SHEET NO. USAB F�MEN SPACE S PER SECTION 22.SECTION F(3) 81.000 SF 262,252 SF PARTNERS TBPE No.F-438 THE PRESERVE PHASE 2 .. zso SF/UNITaz.1s%> TBPLS No.10076000 Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas LP-2 .o 0 i r i TYPICAL 24"Sp.STONE COLUMN STONE \ . 2 AND PATTERN TO MATCH BUILDINGS NOTES: 6(TYP)PANELS(t!) COLOR FINISH: t s OLOW-GLOSS BLACK ` I tO Y TUBE STEEL TOP RAIL i 7--/ GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=30' ' i I-TUBESTEEL PICKETS @ 4"O.C.MAX. / 30 0 30 60 O3 3"TUBE STEEL POST W 4 I O 2'TUBE STEEL BOTTOM RAIL 2� O5 APPROVED ORNAMENTAL PICKET FINIAL --- ! O 16�T0 E 44. I "lb DALLA5/FORT WORTH tS Sp9 INTERNATIONAL \ AIRPORT a w N z rvP. a� w SITE o a 8'TUBULAR STEEL PERIMETER FENCE ZONING N I� 5 TRACT � SCALE:112"=V-D" APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE OUTLINE w CENTERLINE FOR OF EXISTING TREE MASS- EXISTING CREEK / TYPICAL BE N PHASE 2 TRAIL "s GLADE ROAD o GLADE ROAD (2)BIKE RACKS AT / PROPOSED 10'WIDE - - a 1 EACH BUILDING(TYP.) CONCRETE TRAIL -------- ----- ----------- ( PROPOSED LOCATIONINFORMATION FOR _--- ---- NATURE INFORMATION - __-- 1 PLACARDS WITH BENCH -- — ---- - ------------- I z __—__ — ———— -- r x 1 — 1 ------ s y r r r r (NOT TO SCALE) --_ ----- 20'U.E ,� - ---- 77 d.l- _ LOCATION MAP x EE --- --------- - - LEGEND N LE e_ - %� 0 PROPOSED 7+"' r. r -;.-- ;...�;, fr fix✓-,, --. „`;�'z;-"' ".;_.. x ,Orr . RETAINING WALL r n 9 s�'C r `rY?a„ .- __-_-. .. ,..,,,, _ 6.r ——�-:%„,.�!�' —-- PROPOSED 4'CALIPER SHADE! CANOPY TREE FROM THE ♦ APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST SHADE TREE LIST: _------_--- CONCRETE TRAIL------- + CP P _ 4 I DO LIVE OAK C - ( *GE ,I PROPOSED PET YARDS. ..I RO RED OAK E------ ♦ *pE *CE -'� } I - L BLDG.12 ':-1 CO CHINQUAPIN OAK CE c__- b, TYPICAL WHERE SHOWN * CE CEDAR ELM ^ ----- ON EACH FIRST FLOOR. ,-.,. R� I CP CHINESE PISTACHE Ja *CO `(�'G BLDG.13 _ .. SURROUNDED BY F I- FITNESS AREA PHASE 2 P TUBULAR STEEL FENCE TO 1 *PROPOSED 6"CALIPER SHADE TREE rWI� *CE G ""' MATCH PROJECT FENCE ,1 u Iw W I W *CO PROPOSED I , �I N PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREES yly *CO DUMPSTER *C 2:d O FROM APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST PROPOSED BENCH "-- "- 1` JIJ I ORNAMENTAL TREE LIST: AND TRASH tiE ♦ - 'Md.1 1 WIW CP r RB REDBUD ZIZ RECEPTACLE(TYP.) MC + _ ——— —— CM CREPE CP _ TY TREE YA PONE + .�a w (� w w III,W JIJG PROPOSED PET YARDS.TYPICAL CO --—F�— __ _ —FL— _ L T� �:T VIWHERE SHOWN ON EACH FIRST w w w wµ -- _ _w PROPOSED5'WIDE FLOOR.SURROUNDED BY -PROPOSED 5'WIDE w w w —"— _Fiw��w CONCRETE SIDEWALK I PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTING ' I TUBULARSTEEL FENCE TO *CO �� ,.�,,.. +` -----CONCRETE SIDEWALK-- -- -.. --- -- w -. -_ -- - s% s_ _ _ (j/IW PLANT LIST PROVED CITY MATCH PROJECT FENCE 88 ss ss -_--"i— ZIZ *� _. ✓ —G—— sa se ---§i,�- _. 'JIJ _ _ F�� ❑ AREAS-FROM -- — — �� "' •O RO *RO OI(� PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK a —rw P C * O _ � � s "`�iL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL � .,M ( / I I t - ♦ :1 _,� PROPOSED 6-FOOT HEIGHT oN l = E ( _ 4 O --------------- DOO - TUBULAR STEEL FENCE _ .n, =. { •�•! PROPOSED BIKE REPAIR I� ' 1 RB BLDG.15 ��' _ n r -�: _ -.- STRUCTURE }R PROPOSED PET YARDS o • ,. - I-.-I -. •' ` BLDG.14 PROPOSED LIGHT BOLLARD ti WI TH SHADE �._ I i v4 I , *R PROPOSED CARPORTS m [, GARAGE e d 0� r O ,10'W,E.. _ RO -- - ~LO--'"�i'.p -•Ra_'- O -ns ,fie -- - AO-.1 ___ m 1 -.._.. - - -�'-- '_R --i - ...: - - -- __--*-- - - -.----'�'-- -'a3 ---�._,-_- GcM c - - ----- -- - -- ---- -- casENuMeE z�o cuiortPozo-os __-gip _ _ RD- _ - - - i0_ - RQ �LO {CO _ EpE RO-_- _ - i5' IFONCOR ESMT.- - -- -- BLOCK A GLADEr�W ADOTI=AY LOT 2. N 1 LOCATION:9501STATE HIGHWAY CO CID CO RO LO CO CO 725-0927' 1325+0'— CO 0 .. " *CO *CO *CO w x DATE TUBULAR STEEL FENCING WITH STONE COLUMNS AT CORNER(TYP.) (2)BIKE RACKS AT LAYERED PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ZI SCREENING AND LAYERED LANDSCAPE IN FRONT EACH BUILDING(TYP.) LANDSCAPE PROPOSED PLANTINGS RETAINING WALL STATE HIGHWAY 360 DATE: U FRONTAGE ROAD w SHEET:43 OF 45 0 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY IN Za CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCEM4CE S DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES O O PROJECT it 2121 Midway Road LANDSCAPE PLAN No. Suite 300 GRS o Carrollton,Texas 75006 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 002 a TBPENo.F- THE PRESERVE - PHASE 2 SHEET NO. PARTNERS TBPE No..100 TBPLSNo.10076000 Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas LP-3 0 0 J GRAPHIC SCALE 2sT 5 I I Sh%Z�o� 30 0 30 60 / 1 I I I APPROXIMATE OUTLINE OF EXISTING TREE MASS- TYPICAL 1 DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERN INTERNATIONAL - AIRPORT a / I I 2 N w SITE o APPROXIMATE 1 tt¢ M ZONING o CENTERLINE FOR 4 30' E 220.50' EXISTING CREEK N y TRACT 5332 c rn 13 I I � GLADE ROAD o GLADE ROOD I I I z '- 258�0 S/ LOCATION MAP o APPROXIMATE OUTLINE 1 (NOT TO SCALE) a OF EXISTING TREE MASS- 1 TYPICAL 1 --- - ------------------ LEGEND 1 APPROXIMATE OUTLINE _ -- OF EXISTING TREE MASS- ROPOSED SHADE I CANOPY TYPICAL _ -+ - _ �_- -- - APPROVED 1 --_ I _ �..�- 1 ---------.------ --- 2VUE. I ------"----__ - CITY -- _----------_.-__-- ---___ SHADE TREE LIST SS _-_- _ " I-. I _ AK CONCRETE TRAIL � %" 1 t____ - -__--- 1 1 �-- - _. I • '" ----- CP CHINESE PISTACHE _ LO LIVE OAK RO RED OAK .E .1 - {40'.S.S.E.s [1 °`-{: °' tom`" --____--- 1 � , a T �' I CE CEDAR ELM -- " - _ l I - --_ -._- yam: ,s, N; _. ss 8B I I �,... ___- --._ O R PLANT LIST s, JIJ LAW- PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREES , _ - • F, . F --_- .,. FROM APPROVED CITY PLA :'•:r .sue'-:'. �. „' >H.,,,-__---- ;.::�;. I 6 I I a -4. ­ „r`-s„e:mar.... I ORNAMENTAL TREE LIST: _40'SS�. _. M�,�.. �"". ��.>�.�' ''� " ...T .. rr�':,,%-�,s ' '�.�'r,�a^=��`s.;:.M�.z.r .�.,.1� '.�%.x�- tom, ;- 1� 1 k%v-� .. ` �-'..-.✓ tea,- ---- �I� RB REDBUD � � � Z Z CM CREPE MYRTLE - -. ,.-, _ '. 3. -� . TY TREE YAUPON PROPOSED LOCATION FOR I II ❑ PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTING NATURE INFORMATION AREAS-FROM APPROVED CITY PROPOSED TRAIL JIJ PLANT LIST PLACARDS WITH BENCH I I I CULVERT =I= 1 PROPOSED IV WIDE I II i F �I� ❑ PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE TRAIL 6 I is, PROPOSED RETAINING WALL o- SANITARY }- DRAINAGE�} NOTE: 111A I"PizI SEWER EASEMENT THE TRAIL LAYOUT SHOWN IS CONCEPTUAL. 1 — PROPOSED 6-FOOT HEIGHT N JI J THE FINAL TRAIL LAYOUT IS TO BE DETERMINED TUBULAR STEEL FENCE •- 1.{. ESMT. IN THE FIELD AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. I 0 WIW LOT 2,BLOCK --------- PROPOSED PET YARDS o J =1= 2,062,567 SQUARE FEET APPROXIMATE OUTLINE I I I . PROPOSED LIGHT BOLLARD NI W 47.350 ACRES OF EXISTING TREE MASS- I I I i —1 ( o TYPICAL cd:W ZZ I I 1 / I PROPOSED CARPORTS =�= - -- - --- --- -- -- --- ------ ------- -------- -----"---_ 10'W E. I I i(PE ' CASE NAME:ELAN GRAPEVINE - �" - _ --------- � _ _- -- ----- ------ -----�-�z-- =1 --- --- _ -- ---- - -- - -- --- ------ -----� Lo�cEAnory asoi sr�aTE wOa�wa Maeo�Lor z, � - _--- -__--- -t N ORESMT. �,� I I ( 16ONC SMT. --_-__-- - -- -- --- ----------( BLOCKA GLADE=ADD91ON C ( -_ ------- ------ - �O C NCORE -- - -- - - -- ---1.—�- - - -- -- -- -- -- --- - --J - •"'�' ❑ GATE: V=5 ----- - - 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION e�16'41'47' STATE HIGHWAY 360 �mqAWN- Ra1939.85' K L-565.29' FRONTAGE ROAD DATE CB-N33.31'42'W c-ss3.z9' SHEET:44 OF 45 APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK W Z - CONFLICT WITH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES N O O LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT r 2121 Midway Road No. � Suite300 GRS o Carrollton,Texas 75006 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 002 a 972.248.7676 F-438 THE PRESERVE - PHASE 2 SHEET"°. TBPENo. PARTNERS TBPLS No.10076000 Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas LP-4 APPROXIMATE OUTLINE APPROXIMATE OUTLINE OF EXISTING TREE MASS- GRAPHIC SCALE OF EXISTING TREE MASS- -_ TYPICAL -.. TYPICAL51259'30•E tom. 30 0 30 60 APPROXIMATE L.. �65 CENTERLINE FOR EXISTING CREEK / ISM.Jp DALLAS/FORT WORTH S INTERNATIONAL / 3pE 4950 AIRPORT a 524 E 163.50' z v w SITE 0 ZONING o N c TRACT 1 w yf o ro GLADE ROADW o GLADE ROAD Q I ----- APPROXIMATE OUTLINE -- ----- - ------ 1 z OF EXISTING TREE MASS- --- TYPICAL -------- - --- LOCATION MAP _- - x --------- s (N LE(NOT TO SCA ) � — ='"�1 a 2ouE ---- ---- 6< — m LEGEND 40 S.S.E. - _ ,,,cE } " ----------"-----� PROPOSED SHADE I CANOPY --�.-_--.-. OVED 1 TREE FROM THE APPROVED ,A.. ♦ CITY PLANT LIST ,.. 1 SHADE TREE LIST LO LIVE OAK RO RED OAK CO CHINQUAPIN OAK PROPOSED IV WIDE O,IG. CE CEDAR ELM CONCRETE TRAIL LL!I JFI',J CP CHINESE PISTACHE i W taco O PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREES iPROPOSED LOCATION FOR yd FROM APPROVED CITY PLANT LIST i o / NATURE INFORMATION 1 ORNAMENTAL TREE LIST: PLACARDS WITH BENCH ZIZ.. Re CM REDBUDCREPE MYRTLE NOTE: m_3 TY TREE YAUPON / s i THE TRAIL LAYOUT SHOWN IS CONCEPTUAL. =I= - THE FINAL TRAIL LAYOUT IS TO BE DETERMINED V 1 V PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTING IN THE FIELD AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. FIB AREAS-FROM APPROVED CITY LOT 2,BLOCK Al PLANT LIST 2,062,567 SQUARE FEET = 'J 47.350 ACRES -"'� i ❑ PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED RETAINING WALL N ..I PROPOSED 6-FOOT HEIGHT 6i TUBULAR STEEL FENCE 0 PROPOSED to WIDE ( '� PROPOSED PET YARDS o CONCRETE TRAIL - _ I . PROPOSED LIGHT BOLLARD APPROXIMATE OUTLINE r 71 OF EXISTING TREE MASS- 1 I PROPOSED CARPORTS E N89'I7'09'w ! ! .� \� TYPICAL J � __ /!I / A'i47fi'31•W/(44 m CASE NMAE:ELAN GRAPEVINE CASE LOCATION: STATE HIGHWAY 311,L > - -.-_.--------_-=_ BLOCK GLARE/980 ADDITION �O.LOT 2. CC ` Ai 5235 y 50 BLOCK ON:45D1 STATE ADDITION r N c /y OAN \\ �4og0\ y R 32 00p -�p,'(E kA Ftv--- DATE: N r L-233.37' \ o S FR�N PGE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Ca i- CHAIRMAN C) o \` 0 DATE: j \ J SHEET:45 OF 45 Q APPROVAL DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN Z CONFLICT W RH ANY CODES OR ORDINANCES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES N O O LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT 2121 Midway Road N0. i Suite 300 GRS Carrollton,Texas 75006 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 002 972.2 .7676 TBPENo.F-438 THE PRESERVE - PHASE 2 SHEET N0. PARTNERS TBPLS No.10076000 Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas LP-5 .o L � r L W � O v — o alsoz w L� 4--J Q U w Zoning Case Z20-03, CU20-21, PD20-03 Table of Contents Affidavit of Compliance 1. Affidavit of Compliance a. Architect's Affidavit b. Architects Approval Letter c. Design Guidelines 2. Design Guideline Exhibits CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner, L.P. Attention: Andrew Ord 600 E Las Colinas Blvd, Suite 2100 Irving, Texas 75039 Via Electronic Mail Rons ra evinetexas.gov Mr. Ron Stombaugh 200 South Main Street Grapevine, Texas 76051 RE: Zoning Change Application for Property at 4501 State HWY 360 Rd., Applicant: CRP-GREP Elan Grapevine Owner, L.P. Dear Ron; Thank you for your assistance with our zoning application referenced above. Pursuant to your previous conversations with Greystar,we are forwarding this letter to confirm the status Of the proposed development's compliance with the City's Design Standards. Accompanying this letter is our completed District-Specific Design Standards checklist. As you will see from reviewing the accompanying checklist, we are pleased to confirm that we are either in virtually total compliance with the Design Standards, in almost all cases to the letter, or, in a few instances, in compliance with the spirit of the Design Standards_ Of course,we are at the beginning of the zoning and entitlement phase, and as is normal during any development process, allowances must be trade for reasonable modifications as the design is further developed in detail_ In any such event, it is our intention to remain in compliance with the spirit and intent of the Design Standards at all times. Thank you very much for your consideration of the accompanying checklist. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with City Staff as we go through this process. ` Sind 3'yoursj Donald eeks,AIA Meeks+ Partners, CC: Andrew Ord Architect for Greystar Archircxas 11 - 111 October 7,2020 Mr.Ron Stombaugh Grapevine Development Services 200 S.Main Street Grapevine,Texas 78051 Dear Mr.Stombaugh, This letter is to inform you that Greystar's submittal for The Preserve,Phase 2 is the product of extensive review by,and collaboration with,Robin McCaffrey and me.This process started with an early review of the site and continued through development of the site plan as well as architectural design. The Site Plan Review process was guided by 3 primary objectives of Grapevine's Mufti-Family Ordinance,namely: 1. Creation of Community 2. Connection to the social fabric of Grapevine 3. Integration with the natural fabric of the site and its setting Robin and I feel that the final site plan achieves these important objectives and complies with the MF Standards regarding site plan design. Upon agreement regarding the site plan,Rabin and I worked extensively with Greystar on architectural design.The architectural Design Review Process was guided by 5 primary objectives of Grapevine's Multi-Family Ordinance,namely: 1. Craftsmanship 2. Integrity of elevation composition and building farm 3. Connection to the ground plane 4. Addressment of the street 5. Material change execution Again,Robin and I feel that the final building design achieves these important objectives and complies with the MF Standards Building design. Therefore,Robin and I affirm that The Preserve Phase 2 complies with the standards of the Multi- Family Ordinance. Sincerely, Craig Melde,Sr.Principal Dallas I Austin I San Antonia 1907 Marilla St. 29005.Congress Ave. 417 81"Street www.architexas.eom Second Floor Suite 200 San Antonio,Texas 79215 Dallas.Texas 75201 Austin,Texas 78704 p 214.748.4561 p 512.444.4220 p 210,998,2422 District-Specifilc Design Standards 1. Architectural Accommodations of Grade Change Complies, Does the plan retain grade to support the building plate including terraces, pati- Yes No Fn Spirit os,decks and any accessory buildings adjoined to the primary structure? Comments: Will Comply. We've identified a number of opportunities to accomplish this, In specific, there are 3 prominent locations where we have designed turn-down footings. These are high impact locations that will be enjoyed esthetically and functionally by residents and their visitors. Additionally, many of the building will have 2' to 4' breaks (step-downs) in the foundations that allow the buildings to step down with the declining grade which minimizes retaining walls and maximizes the retainage of grade in order to support the building plate. It is worth noting that we are constrained by FEMA requirements on some accounts where we need walls for flood modeling considerations. Mesa Planning and Architexas are very aware and their will be some benefits to this as well Z. Pedestrian Connection Beyond The Project And District Complies: Does the plan provide pedestrian connections from units within the project to Yes No In Spirit existing trails,sidewalks or other public and private walkways. 7 7 7 Does the plan provide pedestrian connections to places within the development that abut pedestrian walkways that the City's approved plans identify for the future? Comments: We Comply. Elan Grapevine ("EG" - subject community) will connect to the neighboring Preserve community ("Phase 1") via the shared trail system which will then extend another —1/2 mile from EG up to Euless Grapevine Rd. The "trail" design will be a 1 Q' wide concrete hikelbike trail with benches, lighting, dog park and fitness structure to compliment the existing Phase 1 design standard. Sidewalks will also be connected to facilitate pedestrian connections between communities. As an additional note, EG will also tie into the existing round-a-bout with a vehicular connection. Please refer to Exhibit 2 showing trail build-out to date. 3. Preserve and/or Restore The Natural Characteristic Of The District Complies: Does the plan include landscape development that continues the natural charac- Yes No In Spirit teristics of the projects surroundings? Comments: Will Comply. Our landscape plan includes natural drifts and groupings/groves of trees that will be restorative to the site and will extend the natural mosaic open space (34 acres of "on property" open space) into the site. Tree species used will be natural to the site and from the City's approved plant material list. As per Mesa Planning and Architexas guidance, tree groves will provide heavy screening along the 360 Frontage Rd., to reknit the the natural landscape, as shown on plan. Please refer to corresponding Exhibit 3. 4. Perpetuate Residentially Derived Styling And Forms Complies: Yes No In Spirit Does the plan use the following architectural components? �; C C • Pitched roof(gable or hip) f • Organized roof massing where a dominant roof has subordinate roofs that extend form it. 12 inch roof overhang • Roofed porches and balconies • No more than 45 horizontal feet of continuous wall without a horizon- tal onset of at least 4 feet • Dormers that break the cornice • Windows that align both horizontally and vertically • Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form • Three stories maximum. These three stories may be over a parking podium. • Openings are treated with a jamb and/or head surround • The Void-to-Solid relationship for window-in-wall elements is less than 50% Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 2 5. Provide Buffer Adjacent To Residentially Adverse Conditions Complies: Does the plan provide a buffer between residential land use and adjacent envi- Yes No III Spirit ronmental conditions (e.g.loud sound) that would negatively impact the livabili- ty of the residential land? Comments: To the West, our development will be set away from Hwy 360 by a generously landscaped ("borrowed landscape") public and private street scape. Additionally, the community will be buffered by a generous tree canopy along 360, providing an attractive "tree-soaped" frontage for the public realm. Lastly, the buildings will be equipped with acoustically rated and engineered windows specifically designed to perform within the required indoor/outdoor noise level transmissions recommended by our acoustical engineer and as required by DFW Airport on Phase i. To the North and East, our development is buffered by... almost a mile of open space, 34 acres on our legal plat alone, the trail, Sear Creek, and towering trees that provide privacy and seclusion. 180 degree unobstructed private views into the natural opens space, trail and creek are also included for over half of all the residences. Our development will effectively "re-knit" the natural landscape and tree canopy that once existed but were removed during the reconstruction of the TRA sanitary-sewer line. See Exhibit 5 6. Provide A Land Use And Scale Transition Between Multifamily/Vertical Complies: Mixed-Use Development And Abutting Single Family Development. Yes No In Spirit If the plan abuts an area of single-family residential land use, does it provide a "residential transition"? A residential transition must include two cornpolients: ' Height'Transition: For any element with a height above 35ft, this ele- ment can't exceed one foot above 35ft in height for every lft of setback beyond 15ft. For example,you may have 36ft at 16ft setback.Sift at 17ft and so on. . Scale Transition: Any element located within 20ft of a property line abutting a single-family land use must not have an elevation face area more than 1200 sq. ft. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 7. Provide D eve]opment Zliat Maximizes Uses Appropriate To The Value OfIhe Complies: Setting And/Or Characteristic Of The ConteNt. Yes No In Spirit If the surrounding street-level use is NOT predurninately residential, does the F 7 plan provide—or is the structure such that it could be leased to provide—first- floor or street-level land uses that are consistent with the context? If the plan has a distinct locational opportunity(such as being close to logistic, movement or transit huhs), does it provide—or is the structure such that is could be leased to provide—first-floor or street-level land uses that are consistent with this context? If the answer to either question is YES, does the plan provide—or could be rent- ed to provide—these ]and uses for at least 70%of the street-fronting first-floor space? Comments: We perceive the value of the setting, characteristic of the context, and the distinct locational opportunity to be Nature (34 acres of open space) and how we are leveraging our relationship within that context. Our development maximizes this setting by "re-knitting" the 34 acres of natural landscape into our site design, constructing the 3rd 1 f2 mile phase of a public hike/bike trail and trail-head so people (both our residents and the Grapevine community) can enjoy this environment, and delivering the resort style architecture to compliment and flow with the natural setting. We're also including a dog park, informational nature placards and a fitness station along the trail to auament and compliment the natural setting. See Exhibit 7 p 8. Perpetuate Commercially Derived Styling And Fornls Complies: Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms that include the following Yes No In Spirit elements: 17 F_ F A predominately flat roof concealed by a raised parapet of at least 1 2in in height • All openings are vertically and horizontally aligned • Balconies are projected • Steel construction is exposed • The first floor plate is at least 15ft high at the street level • Void-to-solid relationships are 50% or greater void Comments: Not applicable to 3601Airport District. 4 9. Preserve And Extend Thematic Streetscapes Complies: Does the plan continue the established streetscape of its surrounding District? Yes No In Spirit This includes: 71 fir-; F7 • Matching light fixtures and spacing of light fixtures [~ • Matching tree species, scale, placement and spacing • Matching paving material and paving pattern • Continuation of defined inset areas for on-street parking Comments; Not applicable to 3+60/Airport District. 10, Maintain Compatibility With District Thematic Sign Features. Does the plan Complies: provide signage that is compatible with signage in the surrounding District?This Yes No In Spirit includes: • Maintaining the relationship of signage to street-fronting building planes • Marinating the general appearance of the District's signage • Maintaining sign illumination consistent with the District and its nightscape • Use of sign types consistent with the District and the context. This in- cludes commercial tenant signs,premise signs and project signs. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 11. provide Responsive Interface To Open Space And Open Space Amenities. Complies: Does the plan address open space in ways that extend the open space into the Ores No III Spirit project?This includes: 7 • Elimination of parking aprons in the foreground between the structure and the open space •Extension of landscape species and patterns characteristic of the open space into the project • Orientation of buildings to that building placement breaks free from the normal orthogonal relation to street and hears relationship to features of the larger landscape • Extension of trails into the project • Use of fence design that does not visually disrupt the continuous ground plane Comments: Not applicable to 360lAirport District. 12. Resort/Lodge/Prairie Styling And Forms. Does the plan use architectural Complies: styles derived from resort/lodge/prairie architectural precedents? These include: Yes No In Spirit • Flat pitched gable or hipped rooves with Iong and un-interrupted ridges and cornices . Large roof overhangs with structural bracing such as brackets,angled braces, canted braced and exposed rafters • Tapered columns that are full masonry or have masonry bases • Use of flat roofs to accent pitched roofs • Variable plate heights • 1f'ertical and Horizontal alignment of openings •Openings in architectural forms defined by a roof are located symmet- rically within the form Use of decks and terraces ■ Architecturally enclosed balconies • Projected window jambs and/or headers • Structural details derived from timber construction detailing • Use of siding and masonry • Upper story insets within,or projections over,a lower story base Comments: We Comply. A few examples of features that (but not limited to) we designed to in order to characterize the style are... " Large Roof [overhangs with exposed rafters . Vertical and horizontal alignment of openings. . Structural Bracing * Timber Frame Accents * Tapered Stone Columns * Architecturally Enclosed Balconies y Metal Awnings . 80%+ Stone All these architectural features, and more, help the community to meld into the natural setting, compliment neighboring architectural theming for continuity, and make it feel a part of the environment that is its' home. Please refer to Exhibit 12. 13. Curvilinear Organization Of The Development Plan Complies: Dues the plan have a curvilinear organization?'This includes: Yes No In Spirit • Gracefully meandering streets and drives with bends in the street and =J drive alignment that is responsive to grade • Merging street intersections where operations permit • Organically-shaped parking areas • Building orientations that are not tied to uniform street frontage • Drifted groupings of trees in lieu of straight rows with uniform spacing Comments: We comply, We conform to all 5 bulleted points above. The site plan is non-orthogonal in nature, is not regimental in design and is curvilinear in its' appeal. Our site meanders in an artful non-orthogonal arrangement providing aesthetically pleasing visual interest for both the community and our residents while optimizing view corridors towards the open space. See Exhibit 13. 14. Conceal Visibility Of Service And Parking Functions Complies: Does the plan place service and parking functions so that such functions are Yes No In Spirit NOT in the foreground yard space between any arterial or primary street and the buildings that are facing that street? Comments: Yes. We comply. The public realm is buffered by a large "borrowed landscape" setback of dense tree groves (Average of 46.3' across the entire frontage), retaining walls that face away from the ROW and a meandering sidewalk. Parking and trash functions, while balancing other important guidelines, are strategically situated away and screened from public by means of berms, tree groves, buildings and retaining walls. 15. Perpetuate Historic/Indigenous Derived Architectural Styling And Forms. Complies-. Does the plan employ architectural styles and forms derived from the historic or Yes No In Spirit indigenous character of the District?Such aspects include; • Commercially-scaled first floor with a 15ft plate • For building of three floors or greater, a tripartite architecture • Decorative and embellished front parapet • Street canopy • Portrait orientation of openings and subversion of openings • Continuous vertical corners often expressed as pilasters • Occasional use of roof forms as accent elements on the front elevation • Void-to-Solid ratio with greater void at the street level and greater solid at other levels • Treatment of openings with jamb and/or header surrounds • Use of belt courses to establish horizontal reference for placement of openings • Use of decorative brick bands and details Comments: Not applicable to 360JAirport District. s I6. Use Of Thematic Exterior Material,If Such Material Is Characteristic Of Dis- Complies: trict And Complies With The General Material Standards. Yes No In Spirit If there is a surrounding District context,does the plan continue with the use of the dominant and characteristic material of the surrounding District? If so, is the use of that material in compliance with the General Material Stan- dards of the Building Manual? Dominant use of material means material that comprises at least 70% of the building exterior excluding openings. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Air-port District. 17. Orthogonal/Block Orientation Of The Development Flan. Does the plan have Complies: a block/orthogonal organization?This includes; Yes No In Spirit • Straight streets with right angle intersections • Continuous street wall defined by alignment of buildings • Uniform spacing of street trees and street fixtures • Continue the urban blocks which are adjacent to the project • Have decorative cross walks or other intersection enhancements Comments: Not applicable to 360IAirport District. 10 18. Pedestrian/Residential Activity Connection Between The Public Street And Complies: Living Units Fronting The Street. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan present the public street with an external expression of the resi- dential activity? This means that the street level of the residential development is not commercially used or made capable for commercial use. This includes parches, stoops, terraces,patios,fenced front yards and steps up from an ap- proach grade. Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 19. Maintain Height And Scale Compatibility With The Height And Scale Char- Complies: acteristic Of District. Yes No In Spirit When height and scale are important attributes of the surrounding District's identity;is the plan compatible with this height and scale?Such compatibility can be achieved through one or both of the following: • Upper-story setbacks that create a building mass at the street consistent with context • HorizontaI offsets at the street level which reduce the lower floor pre- sentation of mass when the characteristic block size is exceeded. This creates the image of a Block that is further subdivided through built rec- ognition of individual properties as described in the "Bay Modulation" section of the Building Manual. Comments: Not applicable to 360IAirport District. 11 20. Use Of Bay Modulation Patterns That Are Compatible With Bay Modulation Complies; Of The District. Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a street frontage that continues the bay modulation of the block? Bay modulation refers to the architectural expression of individual build- ings within the block face. 'this is important to emulate the traditional black face of a downtown where buildings are normally built lot-line to lot-line in direct juxtaposition. In such downtowns,there is a complex street wall referred to as the `Bay"and the rhyth- mic and varied offset and appearance of that bay is referred to as`Bay Modula- tion" Comments: Not applicable to 360/Airport District. 12 1. Provide An Urbanized Streetscape. Does the plan provide an urbanized Complies: streetscape along the primary street frontage that is consistent with the char- Yes No In Spirit acteristic urban street fabric within the District? Key features of an urbanized streetscape include: •The architectural plane fronting the primary street must create a con- tinuous street wall along the primary street frontage, Buildings must establish a "built-to" zone which extends from the primary street front property line and extends into the property a distance of aft and at least 75% of the primary street frontage much Iie within this zone. NOTE: the location and depth of this zone may be modified upon City approval when the modification results in lateral expansion of a sidewalk space for a sidewalk restaurant or sidewalk retail or in the creating of an arcade along the street. . Street trees used in the streetscape should continue the use of an exist- ing tree species when the larger urban setting contains a thematic tree. If the surrounding urban setting does not have a thematic tree,the plan roust choose frorn a list of approved plants, Street lights roust continue the uniform spacing and placement charac- teristic of the surrounding primary street. When a larger urban setting contains a thematic light or light standard,the plan roust use that light standard.When no thematic light exists,the plan must choose a light or light standard appropriate for urban streetscape use. Decorative paving should continue the characteristic paving material and pattern of the urban context when that context includes a thematic sidewalk treatment_When no thematic treatment exists, the project must use a sidewalk paving material and pattern appropriate for urban streets- cape use. Comments: Not applicable to 360lAirport District. 13 2. Provide A "Borrowed Landscape" For The Primary Street Frontage Complies; Dees the plan provide a "borrowed landscape' along the primary street frontage Yes No In Spit-it that preserved the general character of the (District?This includes; rl�__ • Elimination of parking aprons or walls between the building and street I unless the landscape space abutting the street is greater than 20ft • Creation of an expanded parkway that is varied in dimension with the minimum parkway expansion being 15ft from the street right of way and with variations in width occurring at least every 200ft. Creation of pads for horizontal mixed use qualifies as varied Borrowed Landscape space • Use of a pedestrian trail in lieu of a pedestrian sidewalk. Sidewalks within the borrowed landscape space must be meandering pedestrian ways at least Sft wide. Comments: We Comply. Our "borrowed landscape"/"expanded parkway" includes a variable width open space along the street frontage to the ROW (ranging from 31.4' (one specific corner location) to 67.6' for an average of 46.3"} with private pedestrian sidewalks along the frontage providing access to residences. The public pedestrian connectivity routes through the more serene —1 mile of hike/bike trail all the way up to Euless Grapevine Rd. northward. Our security fencing is set back from the street to the building level so the frontage area does not give the appearance of a "compound". The dense tree drifts along the frontage and "borrowed landscape" area extend the natural mosaic of the adjacent areas into the site. See Exhibit 22. 14 23. Promote Horizontal Mixed Use Complies: Yes No In Spirit Does the project create opportunities for stand-alone retail/restaurant pads with- in the street frontage of the prim j�ary street? In no case should the provision of a =� I' 17-11 retail pad consume more than 50%of the multifamily frontage. Where the multifamily frontage is 300ft or less, a retail pad leave-out is not required. This retail pad requirement may be waived upon City Approval but a requirement for variable street definition (#24) still applies Comments: Retail is infeasible for this location for the following reasons... • Access constraints: Access is poor due to right-in right-out limited access off of 360 frontage. South bound traffic would have to exit Glade Rd. and double back to the south, only to do those same gymnastics to get back on 360 if they wanted to head south. This is too much effort for what is already a bad commercial/retail location in our opinion. The land-use has to be a "destination" designation. • Demand constraints: There is inadequate consumer density demand ("rooftops to support retail") as the airport land dominates most of the retail trade area circle of influence. Additionally, due to COVID19 and other very impactful macro trends in the retail industry, forcing retail in this area would not be recommended. • Operator constraints: Retail operators have overwhelmingly selected 121 and Glade Road to the west and Highway 114 to the north as viable locations. The site has been zoned commercial for over two decades with no interest along this stretch of what has become more of a residential corridor of 360 due to the constraints outlined above, 24. Provide Variable Street Definition Within The Block Face Along Primary Complies: Streets Yes No In Spirit Does the plan create a variable street definition through the variable setback of "` multifamily structures fronting the primary street? No more than 50%of the project frontage may adhere to a uniform setback dimension. Horizontal offsets in the development plan set back line must be no less than 10 ft. Comments: We comply and far exceed both the 50% and the 10ft. rule above. In accordance with the natural and organic theme of the design, the building's fronting both the public trail and the 360 Frontage Rd. are canted in differing angles that create a varied presentation of the architecture to the public realm (both from Hwy 360 and the public Hike/Bike Trail from behind) in a way that is non-regimental and non-uniform. Our closest building to the property line/ROW along the frontage roads is 31.4' vs. the 10' minimum above. Max setback is 67.6'. 15 District Specific Stan- 360/Airport Grapevine Grapevine GaylordlSH Central Tran- dards(A =Applicable) District Mille South Mills North 26 District sit District District District 1 Architectural accommo- A A dation of,grade change 2 Pedestrian connection A A A A A beyond project and district 3 Preserve/restore charac- A A teristic natural mosaic 4 Residentially derived A A.* styling and forms/ pitched roof 5 Buffer adjacent environ- A mental encroachments 6 Land use/scale transition A A from MFISF 7 Maximize value capture A A opportunities 8 Commercially derived A A'` A styling and forms 9 Preserve/perpetuate A thematic streetsca e 10 Compatible with district? thematic signage features 11 Responsive interface A ,A 1 with open space and amenities 12 Resort/lodge derived A Z styling and forms 13 Curvilinear organization A .A of development plan 14 Conceal visibility of ser- A ;� ,A vice/parking functions from arterials/primary roads 15 Historic/indigenous A derived styling/forms 16 Use of thematic exterior A material if characteristic of district and complies with standards A* =When closer to topography and golf course A** =When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 16 17 Orthogonal,block orga- A nization of development plan 18 Pedestrian/residential A activity connection between street and living unit fronting street 19 Height and scale com- A patibility with height and scale characteristic of district 20 Bay modulation pattern A compatibility with the- matic bay modulation of district 21 Urbanized streetsca e A 22 Provide"Borrowed" A landscape for street en- hancement 23 Promote horizontal A A A mixed-use 24 Variable street definition A to create a more complex street scape A*=When closer to topography and golf course A** =When closer to Regional Roadways and other commercial areas 17 General Standards for Multifamily Development Part A: Site and Design a. Contextual Relationships 1. Community Structure: Each plan for a project larger than 100 units must Complies: provide: Yes No In Spirit i. Benches: at least one every 700ft or one per black, whichever is less E, ii.Bike Racks:a capacity for 4 bikes at each residential building and 14 at the central pedestrian facility iii. Trash Disposal Units: one trash receptacle at each bench iv. Pedestrian Lighting: one light standard at least every 100ff Continued from below(Due to lack of space) Bike racks will be located at each building as required. In addition we will provide a bike rack at the proposed trail head into the creek trail. Pedestrian lighting of open spaces and trail amenities will be designed to Comments: comply. Will Comply. We have strategically placed benches and trash receptacles at locations to both comply with the requirements and to work in the open space areas we have created. See above... 2.Cognitive Structure: Development site plans should avoid a"maze-like" Complies: arrangement of streets and drives and should provide a clear demarcation of Yes No In Spirit sub-areas arranged with reference to an internal destination. F F_ F7 Comments: There are various sub-areas (Pavilion area, Courtyards, Dog Park, Trail-head & Clubhouse etc.) integrated throughout the site that will drive community interaction through Cognitive Structure. o 3.Edge Definition: Planting of the edge must provide visual concealment of Complies: at least 70%of the perimeter fence using evergreen plants. Moreover, at least Yes No In Spirit 70%of these plants must have foliage from ground to top capable of providing a screen. Edge screening must be planted in natural drifts that appear as native plant clusters. Comments: The landscaping along our ornamental fencing will further screen the material to soften the edge of our community. 4.Traffic Calming: Any multifamily plan must illustrate traffic calming ynea- Complies: sores using traffic tables, intersections, traffic circles,chokers, roadway neck Yes No In Spirit downs at intersections, center island narrowing or rumble strips. Speed bumps n are prohibited. El Continued from below reduce internal speeds. They will also provide Comments: safe pedestrian access and connectivity between the open space areas. We Comply. In multiple locations where the street runs are longer we've employed raised cross-walk tables to slow traffic speeds internal to the project. Curvilinear nature of roads will also is b. Connections Beyond The Project 1.Relationship With And Connections To The City Fabric; The site plan for Complies: any multifamily development must portray the extent to which the following `des No In Spirit elements of the City Fabric are continued or otherwise responded to: F 17 r i. Curb Cuts and Driveways: Development plans much seep to continue flow between projects by coordinating points of ingress and egress so that efficient maneuvers to and from serving public streets are possible. Coordination of routing traffic volumes anticipated by individual project TIANs is a required consideration of a development plan being considered by the City. ii. Thoroughfares And Roadways: A development plan that lays within the path of a thoroughfare as planned or committed to by adjacent devel- opment or of a thoroughfare that has been adjusted by the Council must make provision for the extension of the right of way of such thoroughfare when traffic projected densities necessitate extension. iii, Trails:A proposed multifamily development plan must consider appropriate trail routing through the proposed development so that a cohesive trail network can evolve over time. iv, ©pen Space: The proposed development plan must consider exten- sion of the open space or expansion of the open space, or consider how development portrayed by the development plan can relate to and define the open space. v. Contextual Characteristics: Any multifamily development plan must illustrate how various aspects of the context will also be manifest in the development design. Key aspects of the context include streetscape themes,continuity of water or water bodies, extension of indigenous play drifts, continuity of road sections,treatment of parking, protection of and continuity with adjacent land uses,continuation of tree canopies and canopy species,continuity of natural features, extension of surface water management strategies, and continuity of edge treatments. 6ontinueul from below: iv.We Comply. Open space will be shared and extended between future land-uses and tracts of land. Y.We Comply.We are re-knitting the natural fabric as a part of our built environment in an aesthetically pleasing meandering arrangement as a backdrop to the enhanced ecology. Comments: i. We Comply. We are connecting to the existing trail head/public parking round-a-about to the south so that our residents will also be able to access the main trailhead. ii. 'NIA iii. We Comply. At full build-out, a 4-phase (4 different landowners) —2-mile extension of a I O' wide hike and bike trail has been coordinated all the way to Bear Creek Park as a part of this development proposal, thus fully connecting the existing Grapevine hike and bike trail system with the southern gateway of the City. Phase 2's (—.5 MI.) will be constructed as a part of this development_ See Exhibit p 19 c. Lot Occupancy 1. In a development plan that's required to be curvilinear as outlined by the Dis- Complies: trict Specific Standards, such a plan must establish a building relationship to the Yes No In Spirit street such that: i. At least 60% of the interior street and drive-fronting buildings within the development plan design and 75% of buildings facing public streets serving the project must be sited so that the front building plane (the plane facing the street) is not parallel to the street right of way. ii. A minimum of 30% of the yard space along interior streets and drives, and 50% of the yard space fronting public streets serving the project, must be covered by a landscape approach defined by organic plant mass- ing and natural drifts. Comments: i. 5 out of the 7 (71.4%) interior buildings are not parallel to the interior street right-of-ways they front on. 7 out of the 8 buildings (87.5%) that front public streets are not parallel to the street right of way they front on. The curvilinear nature of the street pattern inherently keeps the buildings from being parallel to the street. 10 out of the 16 buildings have unobstructed views of the creek, trail and open space. ii. We will comply. The defined parameters above will feature the themed organic plant massing and naturalistic drifts. See Exhibit. p 2. Building Relation to the Street and Orthogonal Plan Layouts: Plan designs Complies: that are required to be orthogonal, as outlined by the District Specific Standards, Yes No In Spirit trust establish a building relationship to the street such that: i.The development plan must establish a "build-to" line for the interior J�I streets and drives of the project that will vary from the required aft build- to line along the plats exterior public streets as specified in the District Specific Standards. This build-to line trust be at least aft form the street or drive back of curb. ii.The presence of repetitive stoops, terraces or porches which project into the yard space created by the build-to line cannot be closer than 5ft to the street or drive back of curb and trust project at least Oft from the primary building mass.These projections must be architecturally contained such that they are part of the overall facade composition. The offset space created between the projected stoop,porch or terrace and the primary building mass must be a landscape space,leaving a 5ft minimum pedestrian space at the street edge. Comments: Not applicable to 3601Airport District. 20 d. Parking: Placement and Configuration 1.Parking Facility Type: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Structured Parking: Parking within the Transit Center Character Zone must he structured when the project exceeds 20 units per acre. Projects exceeding 40 units per acre in any other Character Zone must provide structured parking. ii. Surface Parking Areas: Projects with a unit density between 28 and 39 units per acre that provide aggregated surface parking must comply with the following: 1. Aggregated parking areas with more than 70 parking spaces (not including street or drive head-in parking) must be located in a place that is not visible to the primary street serving the project or located so that the parking area may be screened. Parking garages located such that they front a public street must have architectural eleva- tions that complement the design style of the multifamily structures. "Complement" in this context means that they must share similar horizontal offsets, organization of openings, and use of materials. 2.Aggregated parking areas in non-orthogonal development plan designs must also have a curvilinear configuration. 3.Aggregated parking areas must be landscaped Comments: Not applicable because our proposed development's density is 20 units/acre- However, all our aggregated parking does have a curvilinear configuration and is landscaped. 2, Head-in parking along streets: Before the parking demand for aggregated Complies: parking areas is determined,head-in street and drive parking must he provided Yes No In Spirit to the extent permitted by the streetscape design. — �1 Comments: 1• • We Comply. Head-in street and drive-parking is maxed out throughout the site and zonally spaced out to accommodate maximum convenience to the resident. 21 e. Site Open Space Requirement 1. Open space as a percent of total development area: At least 20%of the site Complies: area identified in any multifamily plan must be set aside as open space. Site areas Yes No In Spirit that qualify as open space set asides include: E i, Areas protecting existing natural features and/or plant communities L� li, Areas used for the surface management of storm water that are not structures iii. Any retained water iv. Project amenity areas that are visually accessible from streets and/or drives v. Playgrounds vi. Pedestrian trails vii. Borrowed street landscape areas viii. Pedestrian accessible areas between structures open to access by the project population Comments: We comply and well exceed this standard, offering all of the above elements in our proposed community in a quantity greater than the 20% standard. Aside from borrowed street landscape, pedestrian accessible areas and trails, project amenities* and all other internal open space that meets the above definitions, we have set aside approximately 33 acres of natural open space (not including what we have internal to the project) that will protect existing natural features and plant communities. Additionally, we will be providing a —.5 mile 1 O' wide public hike/bike trail. 2, Form giving influence: Open space provided within any development plan Complies: must serve as a frontage for at least 25%,of the structures within the project, Yes No In Spirit where buildings can define the edge of open space, except for the Transit Center District where street frontage is prioritized, Comments: We exceed this standard, which is a standard that renders the outdoor environment as a primary Local feature of the community. Very conservatively, 9 out of 16 buildings front directly onto the hike/bike trail - more than double the requirement. 22 f. Preservation of Natural Drainage 1, Natural Drainageways: Any development plan for multifamily developanent Complies: in Grapevine must illustrate the extent to which natural drainage within the lot, Yes No In Spirit parcel or tract exists and is preserved through design initiatives that preserve, restore or replicate natural drainage patterns. Any disruption of natural drainage patterns must be approved by the City of Grapevine. Comments: We Comply, We have employed a dry riverbed design in certain areas of the site to help replicate the natural environment, catch and direct surface drainage off the site with the added benefit being that this design will provide an enhanced pedestrian experience for our residents and guests. 23 g. Storm Weather Management Facilities 1. Storm weather management structures: Any development plan for mul- Complies: tifamily development in the City of Grapevine, where structured storm water Yes No In Spirit management solutions are requires must adhere to the fallowing: FX-1 7 F i.Minimize structured means of water management: Plans must min- imize the use of cross drainage structures, armored channels, concrete flow ways, and other structured solutions to storm water management, unless such structures are for the purpose of creating a pedestrian or urban activity at a water edge. ii. Maintain natural shapes and farm in the creation of detention/re- tention facilities and created drainageways(a.k.a. flow management facilities):Water collection points and/or pools created by nature have shapes that are clearly organic.Therefore,plans should avoid straight lines,hard angles,and regular geometric shapes in the creation of flow management facilities. iii.Landscape with natural elements: Where storm water management design creates conditions that support indigenous plants, measures must be taken to landscape such facilities in ways that allow such plants. iv. Respect natural sub-systems. Proper design of flow management fa- cilities should,where appropriate, include diverse ecological settings such as deep water (lininetic zones) in combination with shallow water Oit- toral zones), wetlands, ephemeral flows,and greater states of hydration which can support plant communities associated with these zones. Comments: We Comply. We have employed a dry riverbed design in various locations to help catch and direct surface drainage off the site while ensuring safety and quality of life for our residents. 24 h. Grading 1 Grading for multifamily development in the City of Grapevine must adhere to Complies: the fallowing: Yes No In Spirit i, Avoid steep grades: Grades equal to or greater than 20%are consid- ered steep and shall not be graded to create building lots. However, indi- vidual buildings which snake grade transition within the building,porch or terrace expansions are permitted and therefore the limited disturbance of grade needed to accomplish this is permitted also. ii. Conform to standards for tree protection: Any tree over three inches in caliper remaining on a lot,parcel or tract(that is, trees not approved for removal) and exposed to the building activity or within 30ft of the building activity(hereinafter regulated trees) shall be protected as fol- lows: a.Tree fencing: Regulated tree trunks shall be protected within a visible "tree fence" at least 36 inches tall and protecting the tree and ground around the tree to a minimum distance from the trunk equal to the distance of the tree drip line or 10 feet, whichever is less. b.Tree marking: All regulated trees shall be marked with a green surveyor tape which indicates "Protected Tree" status. c. Ground compaction avoidance: Measures shall be taken to min- imize ground compaction within the dripline of a Regulated Tree. Grading within the ground protected by a tree fence is prohibited. d. Maintenance of normal hydration: Measures shall be taken to maintain normal hydration of a Regulated Tree. Comments: Will Comply. We have no grades on site that exceed 20%. We will comply and will use the best arborilogical practices to snake sure preserved trees are protected so they will thrive post construction. 25 Part B: Building Design Standards a.Street Interface 1. Semi-public space adjacent to streets: Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Canopies and store fronts are limited to urban setting such as primary street frontage in the Transit Center Character Zone. L'X ii. In any single building block,there must he at least one expression of first-floor, semi-public space within the street-facing elevation. If a cano- py of storefront is used to meet this standard, it must occupy at least 50% of the length of the elevation. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open space, each building block must have at least one first-floor pedestrian space that is Bart of the architectural design. i. Store fronts must he set within a minimum first-floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un-supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: We Comply. 2. Residential Design Standards: If building frontage defines the edge of an open Complies: space, each building block must have at least one first-floor pedestrian space that Yes No In Spirit is part of the architectural design. i. Store fronts must be set within a minimum first-floor plate height of 15ft. and must be comprised of vertical and horizontal subdivisions with- in which any area of un-supported glass is no smaller than 16 square feet. Vertical and horizontal subdivisions shall be at least two inches wide. Comments: We Comply. All of our buildings have multiple first-floor "pedestrian space" in the form of the architectural featured access breezeway, 26 b. Elevation Composition 1. The exterior design of any multifamily structure must comprise an overall Complies: pattern. This pattern includes: Yes No In Spirit i. Regulating lines that organize its elements ii. Proportioning iii. Hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements Comments: We Comply. Our compositional intent complies as it enacts the use of "proportioning" and "hierarchy of dominant and subordinate elements". We also employ "Regulating lines that organize its elements". CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 27 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 2. Openings and features of any building must have a common justification_ Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. When a pitched roof design is used, all windows—except dormer win- F7 {— dows—must be below the cornice detail. El ii. When a flat roof design is used, all windows must be at least zft below the parapet, iii. When both a;bitched roof and flat roof design are used in the same elevation, the window heads must align horizontally. iv. Windows may abut the cornice detail if the window heavier modulates the handing or detailing of the cornice. v. Openings within an elevation must Have a common reference line that engages the sill or head. vi. Windows within an elevation must have a common vertical reference line from the first to the top floor, vii. Windows must align with the features that define the architectural form. For example,windows in a gable cannot be arbitrarily distributed within the face of the gable unless specifically approved by the City. viii. Excepting first floor store front or vertical mixed-use structure,all openings must be square or portrait in orientation. ix. Windows,doors and other openings must be articulated within a pro- jected surround or header unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: We Comply. Please refer and compare to Architectural elevations. One nice item of note is that we are using cast-stone sills and headers as our window projected surrounds. These standards above elevate the role of windows from mere utilitarian openings to architecturally striking features unto themselves. See Exhibit. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 28 b. Elevation Composition (continued) 3. All elevations of a structure must receive equal treatment of style on all el- Complies: evations of a structure so as to avoid the common pitfall whereby only the Yes No In Spirit street-facing facade is adequately styled and structured. Comments; We Comply. Each and every building face presents the same high standard in this guideline. Please see building elevations for confirmation. See {Mans. 4. Forms created within the elevation,such as towers,bays and plate changes, Complies: must be derived from functions within the plan- Design approaches which seek Yes No In Spirit to decorate a "space plan"derived independent of the elevation design are pro- L _hibited, [� Comments: We Comply. 29 b. Street wall complexity and exterior offsets 1. Building offsets; Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Residential building blacks may not have more than 50 linear feet of EX � r--� wall without a wall offset. 41J ii. Horizontal wall offsets must be at least Oft. This may include balconies if contained within the confines of the offset. Any balconies projected from the face must have an architectural enclosure. iii. Architectural forms such as enclosed porches, stair towers,projected bays or stacked balconies maybe projected from the building block or recessed within it and must be accompanied by a roof in the roof massing that corresponds to the architectural form. Comments; We Comply. 30 d. Void to Solid Ratio 1, For the first floor of a vertical mixed-use plan wherein the first floor has a Complies: commercial use,the void-to-solid ratio must be greater than or equal to 1.5:1 Yes No In Spirit (the amount of void being greater than the amount of solid). The solid portions of the first floor facade must extend vertically to the floors above and parapet detail. Comments: Not Applicable. We are not a vertical mixed-use project. (Please excuse the check in the box. I can't get it to un-check.) 2. For floors above the first floor in a vertical mixed-use plan (or for all floors in Complies: a residential plan), the void-to-solid ratio must be less than or equal to 0.5:] (the Yes No In Spirit amount of void being less than the amount of solid). 1777 Comments: We Comply. J� e. Architectural Enclosures 1.All projected stair towers,elevator shafts, and cantilevered building projec- Complies: tions (other than balconies) must be architecturally enclosed.This means that lies No In Spirit they must be enclosed in an architectural skin and must be expressed as a roof M farm. k� Comments: We Comply. 32 f. Roof form: Rooves and the roof lines they create are essential design elements for higher-value structures. Visible roof design must: 1. Be legible, There must be a clear organization of a dominant roof mass from Complies: which subordinate roof masses extend. Yes No In Spirit Comments: We Comply. 2. Be balanced. A single roof pitch must be used within the total composition, Complies: Different roof pitches are permitted for tower forms which are not engaged with Yes No In Spirit the general roof form. Permitted roof forms include gables,hips,barrels if used a secondary forms,sheds if used as secondary fortes, and Flat. '1 Comments: We Comply. 33 g. Style Integrity 1. The use of architectural detailing associated with a style must use the charac- Complies: teristic detailing of that style. Yes No In Spirit E F Comments: We Comply. A few examples of features that we designed to in order to characterize the style are.,. " Large Roof Overhangs * Structural Bracing h Timber Frame Accents Tapered Stone Columns * Architecturally Enclosed Balconies * Metal Awnings * 80% Stone and Brick 2.The use of systems or materials that replicate the work of a trade or artisan are Complies: prohibited. Construction details which are traditionally derived from the work Yes No In Spirit of an artisan (such as a metal smith, carpenter or stonemason) must use a mate- rial in which the characteristic craftsperson can work. Comments: We Comply. 34 h. Chimneys 1. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the chimney nest be ter- Complies: zninated with a chimney cap that conceals the metal spark arrester and visually Yes No In Spirit reads as a traditional tile flue system, unless otherwise approved by the City. F- C 0 Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 2. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles,the chimney shaft roust be Complies: enclosed with unit masonry,stone or 3-coat stucco with a minimum dimension Yes No In Spirit of 4.5ft x A, unless otherwise approved by the City. Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 3. In pitched roof styles and other traditional styles, the rise of the chimney shaft Complies: roust be detailed so that the chimney has complexity in plan as well as elevation. Yes No In Spirit Comments: Not applicable. We don't have Chimneys. 35 Part C: Building Construction Standards a-Materials and Application of Materials 1. Primary Material. At least 70% of the exterior facade of a 4-story structure or Complies: 80% of the exterior fad ade of a 3-story structure or 100%of the exterior Parade of Yes No In Spirit a structure less than 3 stories must be one of the following; 17 � 7 i. Brick. Clay brick, modular size,hard-fired and meeting severe weath- er standards. Embossed or molded brick is generally prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. All brick shall be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all building corners—both inside and outside—must he executed in a toothed masonry fashion, Weeping or slumped joints are prohibited, ii. Stone. Stone must be laid in a typical load-bearing pattern. Character- istics of such pattern include: 1.Tight mortar joints with no in ore than 34%n of joints larger than 3f8 inches. 2. Coursed patterns such as Ashlar, Coursed Chopped Stone and Coursed Rubbed Stone. Mosaic and un-coursed rubble stone-work are prohibited unless specifically approved by the City. 3. Cultured stone or other faux stone products are prohibited. 4. All stone must be laid so as to avoid stacked joints and all cor- ners—both inside and outside--must be executed in a toothed ma- sonry fashion. iii. Other Stone. Cut stonelsrnoothed-face stone or Cut stone/smoothed- face stone that is mechanically attached with a stone veneer system may be used provided that the system uses a true stone. Comments- We will Comply. Stone will be real coursed stone to fit the (iii.) definition above. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 36 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 2. Secondary Material. No more than 30% of the building facade may be a sec- Complies: ondary material. This includes: Yes No In Spirit i. Stucco. 3-coat stucco on lath over a structural frame with expansion joints concealed by filling the joint with expandable filler that is troweled flat with the stucco, is the same color as the stucco and that matches the stucco surface texture is permitted. Dryvit/PFS type systems are prohibit- ed. Stucco is not permitted in the Central Transit District. ii. Metal. Architectural metal wall systems are permitted. iii. Siding. Wood or Cementacious siding is permitted in these Character Zones where pitched roof styles are permitted. Comments: We Comply. We will be using a cementitious hoard and batten siding (along with 80% stone and brick) to compliment the architectural design. This product also maintains itself over time and doesn't cup, buckle or warp like real wood tends to in the sometimes extreme Texas weather fluctuations. See plan elevations. Mote we have zero stucco in our proposed development. 3. Roof Material.Acceptable materials include; Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. Flat Roof. Flat rooves maybe either a built-up bituminous roof or a F 77 membrane roof provided that it is installed in accordance with the man- ufacturer's specifications and issued a 30-year warranty. All flat rooves must be hidden from ground level view,behind a 12-inch parapet. ii. Pitched Roof. These may be either a standing-seam metal roof with standing folded and soldered seams, a commercial metal roof if approved by the City, slate, clay tile, or 40-year high profile composition single. All composition shingle rooves must have closed valleys. Concrete single products with a relief greater than '/z inch are prohibited. iii. Parapet Cap. These must be either clay brick,cut stone, cast stone, tile,or terra cotta. Pressed metal maybe used if is it specifically created to decoratively cap a parapet and if specifically approved by the City. Comments: We will Comply. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 37 a.Materials and Application of Materials {(continued) 4, Material Change. Material changes in any elevation may occur only under the Complies: following conditions: Yes No In Spirit i. Change occurs at an inside corner. E'` 17 ❑ ii. Change that occurs at an outside corner must wrap the corner and change at a location at least 17 inches from that corner and be designed as the termination of an architectural detail. iii. Change that occurs wherein the different material is contained within a distinct architectural form that projects from the primary architectural mass. iv. Change that reflects an offset between a lower and an upper floor where the offset is at least 6 inches. Material changes within the same architectural plane are prohibited. Comments: We Comply. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE. 38 a,Materials and Application of Materials (continued) 5.Relief. The City seeks to promote relief and dimension in architectural surfac- Complies: es, details, and motifs with the following requirements: Yes No In Spirit i. The fallowing materials are prohibited: Fiberglass, Styrofoam or stuc- F co-over-styrofoam,plastic, aluminum. Stucco applied to look like pro- jected stone, Stucco applied to look like cast stone,Stucco applied to look like terra cotta, cementacious boards used in any application which makes a corner,cementacious boards used in any application which makes a mitre or decorative shape, Masonite or Masonite products, com- position wood products used as an exterior material,trimcratt used as a soffit board,or other smooth finished soffit board. ii.Relief in the treatment of cornices, overhangs, gable projections,bay windows, dormers, water tables, belt coursers, sills, surrounds, timber components and other expressions must be executed in ways that pro- duce depth,shadow and texture, iii. In coursed rubble stonework,stones must be laid into the wall as the stone would lay on the ground. No more than 20%of the stones in any elevation may be"flipped"sideways. iv.The minimum projection in any built-up profiles and decorative assembly must be 3/4 inch per element of the assembly.A cornice detail comprised of three stepped bricks must have a total projection of 2 and inches. Comments: As corroborated by City consultants, cementitious trim - provided it is dimensionally acceptable - will require less maintenance, have stronger architectural appeal, and exhibit superior durability in our climate than conventional wood. It will not cup, buckle or warp which starts to look rundown over time. We will be using real Cedar for the larger beams where (similar to Phase 1) cementitious trim is not dimensionally large enough to achieve the design intent. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 39 a.Materials and Application of Materials (continued) G. Carpentered Exterior Trim, Complies: Yes No In Spirit i. All carpentered exterior trim must be high-quality finished grade wood stock. ii. If a trim installation is to be joined along any continuous run of mate- rial, the required joint joust be a"spline joint." iii. All outside corners most he mitered and blocked with sufficient clo- sure that the joint is not visible from the street. iv. Corners must be closed by a carpentered joint. Trim clips are prohib- i ted. v. Facia and gable rake must be steppes{ at the drip mold unless hidden by a gutter. vi. Carpentered trim that forms the veneer packet must have a complex- ity achieved in trim mold,built-up step molding,or other traditional derail such as a dentil mold. Comments: As corroborated by City consultants, cementitious trim - provided it is dimensionally acceptable - will requires less maintenance, stronger architectural appeal, and superior durability in our climate than conventional wood. It will not cup, buckle or warp which starts to look rundown over time. We will be using real Cedar for the larger beams where (similar to Phase 1) cementitious trim is not dimensionally large enough to achieve the design intent. At carpentered wood outside corner conditions, we will be using a rabbetted joint (not mitered) as this proved on Phase 1 to be the most successful solution to provide a clean and consistent looking outside corner. This method was also corroborated by the City architectural consultant. 4D b. Wall Construction I. Wall Section. All wood-framed exterior walls must be constructed as follows: Complies.- Ye s No III Spirit i. When shim- or flange-mounted windows are used in masonry ve- neered walls, framing may be conventional 2x4 framing. L ii.When shirr-mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or oth- er perrTLitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, exterior-walls must be framed with 2x6 members in order to achieve a 3.5-inch minimum offset within the opening. iii.When flange-mounted windows are used in stucco veneer walls or ether permitted material that does not require a masonry ledge or that does not project more than 3.5 inches from the sheathing, a double 2x4 framing assembly is required that allows the flange to be mounted on the inner 2A section with the second 2x4 section providing the required offset from the window sash or door at the opening. Comments: We will Comply. 2.Parapets.Where there is a flat roof, a parapet must extend at least 12 inches Complies: above the roof surface and conceal the roof material from ground-level view. Yes No In Spirit Comments: N/A CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 41 b. Wall Construction (continued) 3. Cornice Detail. All wall terminations at the roof must have a cornice detail Complies: comprised of at least 2 projected elements. Parapets must have a cap detail coin- Yes No In Spirit prised of at least 2 projected elements. ® 7] 77 Comments: We will Comply. 4, Window Surrounds, Belt Courses and Lase Courses, Complies: Yes No In Spirit i, All openings in the exterior skin must have an architecturally appro- priate header and sill with an optional jamb. The required header and sill must project at least 3I inches beyond the wall veneer.Window headers or sills may be either stone, cast stone,terra cotta,heavy timber(where appropriate for the style),or wood(where appropriate for the style). ii. tither architectural details like belt courses and base courses must be executed,in the above materials and have a minimum projection of 3/4 inch per element of detail, Comments: We will Comply. As mentioned above, our windows will have a cast-stone header and sill that will adhere to this requirement. 42 c. Roof screening and appurtenances I. Roof Projections, No plumbing stacks, venting stacks, skylights,or attic Complies: ventilators may penetrate the roof surfaces facing the street/drive, If there are Yes No In Spirit multiple street/drive facing exposures, no roof projection may penetrate the roof C r� slope that slopes to the`'fronting"street or drive, All such penetrations must be mounted straight and perpendicular to the ground (except for skylights and attic ventilators) and painted to blend with the roof color. Turbine vents are prohibit- ed. All vent stacks must have lead jacks. Comments: All our appliances for the residences are electric se there won't be an excessive amount of gas derived penetrations. The majority of roof penetrations will be limited to plumbing stacks and painted to match. We will have ridge vents and no turbines. 2.Roof Mechanical, Roof mechanical must be screened behind a parapet wall or Complies: platform that is recessed into a pitched roof so that the incline of the roof slope Yes No In Spirit creates a parapet wall, { 7] 7] Comments: J� We will Comply, 3. Gutters, Downspouts, Scuppers and Collection Boxes. These must be copper Complies: or an enduring prefinished metal with a minimum 20-gauge thickness. Cutters Yes No In Spirit must be a minimum of inches,half-round profile and attached with gutter straps. Downspouts must be a minimum of 4 inches and round. Elbows and FX7 C bends must be a minimum of inches,plain and round. Fascia mounted gutter systems are prohibited unless custom designed and integral to the architecture, Comments: We will Comply_ 43 d. Windows and Glazing 1.Glazing and Glazing Systems, Reflective glass is prohibited. Tinted glass and Complies: dark adhesive films where the transmission coefficient exceeds 27% is prohibited. Yes No In Spirit Stained glass is allowed provided that the glass is crafted in accordance with Sol- dered camping or"H"camping.No acrylic or pourable techniques are allowed. Glazing systems may be used in certain accent areas of specifically approved by the City. Comments: We will Compty. 44 Part D: Landscaping, Fencing and Screening a. Site Landscaping 1 Leaf Mass Between Buildings. All multifamily development must provide Complies; trees between buildings. At least 60% of the planted area must be comprised of Yes No In Spirit aver-story (canopy). Comments: We Comply. We have provided a significant amount of trees between each building and will exceed the requirement as the trees take root and mature. 2. Layered Landscaping at Building Entries. Landscaping must be provided at Complies: building entries and must be "layered:' The building entry landscaping area must Yes No In Spirit be comprised of at least 3 layers: one upper layer of mechum evergreen shrub ` approximately 30-36 inches high and 2 layers of shorter shrubs or one shrub and an ornamental grass. These must be planted in beds having a minimum width of 72 inches. Upper layer shrubs must be 5-gallon container plants planted 30 inches on center with triangular spacing. Lower layer shrubs may be 3-gallon container plants planted 24 inches on center with triangular spacing. Comments: We will Comply. The planting areas defined on our landscape plan will allow for the layered look of ground covers and shorter up to large upper layer shrubs. All of our planting beds are at least 72" wide and we will comply with the size and spacing requirements of this section. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 45 a. Site Landscaping (continued) 3. All landscape heels must be associated with walkways, roadways,amenity Complies: feature,buildings or screens. Floating,ornamental or non-associated landscape Yes No In Spirit beds are prohibited. Comments: We will Comply. All of the proposed landscape planting beds on the site are associated with or adjacent to pedestrian walkways and the buildings. All of our pedestrian walks meander through landscaped open spaces with the beds immediately adjacent to the walkways. The planting areas will be informal and will contain a mix of native and culturally appropriate landscape materials. 4. Plant Sizing. Shrubs that serve a screening function must be sized at the time Complies; of planting such that they can serve as an effective screen within 2 years of the Yes No In Spirit planting date. 3-gallon plants must be planted 30 inches on center with triangu- lar spacing and 2-gallon plants must be planted 24 inches on center with trian- '' F 17 gular spacing. Smaller container and bedding plants must he planted at least 11 inches on center with triangular spacing.. Comments: We will Comply. Shrubs used for screening such as along our security fencing and plant material within the planting beds and building entrance areas will comply with the plant sizing requirements, 46 h. Fejices and Screening Wads 1, Fence Materials, Visible perimeter fences that are compliant with the General Complies: Standards may be made of unit masonry,wrought iron with unit masonry corner Yes No In Spirit columns, or masonry. If masonry,corner column and masonry interim column spacing is not to exceed 15ft and must have a masonry knee wall supporting wood or wrought iron infill. Comments: We will Comply. Our fencing has been designed to comply with these requirements. ?. Gate Materials. Gates in fences constructed in accordance with Dbl above Complies: may be made from wrought iron with a wrought iron frame (complying with Yes No In Spirit General Standards) or wood with frame members measuring a minimum of 1 and �/2 inches thick by 3 and '/z inches wide and planks measuring at least 1 and EX '/2 inches thick. Gates must be comprised of the same material as the fence. Comments: We will Comply CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 47 b. Fences and Screening Walls (continued) 3. Corner Expression of Support Structure.All property corners of a property Complies: line fence much be supported by a masonry column that is at least 10 square Yes No In Spirit inches. LX. F U Comments: We will Comply. 4.Thin wall construction, cast or embossed concrete walls, picket materials not Complies: in compliance with the General Standards,iron fences with mechanical connec- Yes No In Spirit tion assemblies,pre-fabricated decorative elements designed to slip over stock or tubular steel shapes,and plastic or vinyl fence component systems are prohibit- IF El 1:1 ed. Comments- We will Comply. 48 c. Street Visible Wrought Iron 1.Frames and other structural support members may not be less than 1 and 3/4 Complies: inches in either width measurement or 1 and 3/ inches in diameter if round. Yes No In Spirit F El Comments: We will Comply. 2. Pickets that are 5ft in length or height or less must have a minimum width of Complies: i inches in either width dimension or diameter.When pickets are longer or tall- Yes No In Spirit er than 5ft, the minimum with dimension is increased to 1 inch in the dimension � I!that faces the street or 1 inch in diameter. L Comments: We will Comply 3. Panels must be made of metal plate material with a minimum thickness of Complies; 3/16 inches. Yes No In Spirit Comments: We will Comply. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 49 c. Street Visible Wrought Iron (continued) 4, The wall thickness of any tubular steel must not he Iess than 3/32 inches. Complies: Yes No In Spirit F 7 Comments: We will Comply. 5. Decorative elements such as finials and rings must be made of solid stock Complies: material and welded to the pickets or to the frame made from the pickets if the Yes No In Spirit pickets are solid stock material. Attachments to the pickets or frame and all other components of the wrought iron construction must he welded. Mechanical con- nections are prohibited. Comments: We will comply if applicable_ 56