The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1979-11-20 Joint Meeting l i � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ; AGENDA ' REGULAR JOINT CITY COUNCIL � & 1 � PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20 , 1979 AT 7 :30 P. M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN I I. CALL TO ORDER ' i II. INVOCATION: Commissioner Jerry Burgess ± III. PUBLIC HEARINGS i A. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission � to continue the Public Hearing on Zoning i Application Z79-34 submitted by Brookside Associates , Inc. ' B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission � to conduct a Public Hearing on Zoning Application �' Z79-36 submitted by Mr. Ben Syc. " I C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission ? to conduct a Public Hearing on Zoning Application � Z79-37 submitted by Grapevine Apartment II ' Associates. D. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission i to conduct a Public Hearing on Zoning Application � . Z79-38 submitted by the City of Grapevine. 1 E. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission j to conduct a Public Hearing on Zoning Application � Z79-39 submitted by Paradies Airport Shops , Inc. ! F. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission � j to conduct a Public Hearing on Zoning Application ; Z79-40 submitted by SMB Stage Line. � IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING � A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the � Civic Center, 311 Main Street to deliberate � the merits of the zoning applications . � { B. City Council to remain in session in the Council � Chambers to consider further published agenda � s items . � � R i IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C. S . , .AS AMENDED � BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, THE REGULAR � JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1979 AT 2 :00 P.M. � � � gF E t . � I � � i E i i � � c �g E � � I ; i i CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS a a AGENDA ! REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1979 AT 8 :30 P. M. ! COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � i � , i # i V. CITIZENS REQUEST AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS � : � VI. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES (November 6 , 1979) � � VII. NEW BUSINESS � I A. City Council to consider a resolution relative to The Trinity River Authority revised contract with Tarrant County Water Control District for the purchase of raw water. � 1 B. City Council to consider and award the bid for � the purchase of kitchen equipment for the Con- � course Center. � � C. City Council to consider and award the bid for � the purchase of Police Department vehicles . � � D. City Council to consider an ordinance amending � the City Code of Ordinances , Chapter 21 , Section ; 28 , relative to The Tourist & Convention Bureau Chairman appointment. � E. City Council to appoint the Chairman of The ` Tourist & Convention Bureau. � ; F. City Council to consider a resolution amending � the tax roll for the fiscal year 1979-80. 8 � G. City Council to consider the lease purchase ` agreement between the City of Grapevine and � Municipal Funding Corporation of America. � K H. City Council to consider a resolution approving � and endorsing the 1979 Community Development � project for the City of Grapevine , Texas . ? � � VIII. ZONING CASES � � A. City Council to consider the recommendation of � the Planning & Zoning Commission and a subsequent � ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-34, A (Brookside Associates , Inc. ) . � � B. City Council to consider the recommendation of the � Planning & Zoning Commission and a subsequent � ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-36 , � (Ben Syc) . � � � � C. City Council to consider the recommendation of ` the Planning & Zoning Commission and a subsequent �' ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-37 , � (Grapevine Apartment II Associates) . �" � D. City Council to consider the recommendation of k the Planning & Zoning Commission and a subsequent � ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-38 , _ (City of Grapevine) . � � � � � � . � � � � � 9 � 0 j � 3 � 1 E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and a � subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning � Application Z79-39 , (Paradies Airport Shops , Inc. ) . � � � F. City Council to consider the recommendation of ; ' the Planning & Zoning Commission and a subsequent � ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-40, (SMB Stage Line) . � i IX. ADJOURNMENT � i � � t` � � � : � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 V.A.T.C.S . AS AMENDED � , , ( BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE , THE REGULAR � CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS � THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1979 AT 2 : 00 P.M. ? ! �q # f �5 d � 4 E � � . � � F € ! z � � � � i � K E # d � t F � E � � � e � � i � E � i � i e � ; e � t E � 3 f � i ' 1 i � I CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS ; i AGENDA REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING � TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20 , 1979 AT 8 : 30 P.M. � CIVIC CENTER - 311 MAIN STREET � i i , i � � V. NEW BUSINESS � i A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider j Zoning Application Z79-34 (Brookside j Associates , Inc. ) and make a recommendation � to the City Council. B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z79-36 (Ben Syc) and � make a recommendation to the City Council. � C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider ? Zoning Application Z79-37 (Grapevine � Apartment II Associates) and make a recommend- ation to the City Council. f D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider � Zoning Application Z79-38 (City of Grapevine) � and make a recommendation to the City Council . � E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider � Zoning Application Z79-39 (Paradies Airport � Shops , Inc. ) and make a recommendation to the City Council. � � F. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider � Zoning Application Z79-40 (SMB Stage Line) � and make a recommendation to the City Council. � VI. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES (October 16 , 1979) � s r VII. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSIONS � VIII. ADJOURNMENT � � ! � s t � � � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C. S . , AS � AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, � THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING � AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY � OF NOVEMBER, 1979 AT 2 :00 P. M. � � � � � . � € SHIRL � CITY SEC ARY € � � t { � � � � � s � x � Y} t � i Sp{ [ � �. £' ! f t t L� %y k f STATE :OF TEXAS X € � � COUNTY OF TARRANT � � � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE X �� The City Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission of the � City of Grapevine, Texas met in Joint Session on this the 20th � day of November, 1979 with the following persons present to-wit : � r William D. Tate Mayor � David A. Florence Mayor Pro Tem � Charles Dunn Councilman `' C. L. "Larry" Oliver Councilman ` William Shafer Councilman Aulton D. Mullendore Councilman Ted R. Ware Councilman � � constituting a quorum with the following Planning and Zoning = Commission Members : t Duane Rogers Chairman Harlen Joyce Member Ron Cook Member Sharron Spencer Member ` Robert Sands Member Jerry Burgess Member R. 0. "Bob" Stewart Member k constituting a quorum with: � James L. Hancock City Manager � Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager i John F. Boyle City Attorney � Shirley Armstrong City Secretary � CALL TO ORDER � / Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Commission Member, Dr. Jerry � Burgess. INTRODUCTIONS , PROCEDURE ; Mayor Tate then introduced the members of the Planning & Zoning Commission and explained the procedure to be followed in regard to the Public Hearings. PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z79-34 - BROOKSIDE The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to continue the Public Hearing on Zoning Application Z79-34 submitted by Brookside Associates , Inc. Mayor Tate declared the Public Hearing open and asked the City Secretary to explain the request. Mrs . Armstrong explained that the application had been filed by Mr. Kenneth McWaters , President , Brookside Associates , Inc. , and referred to two tracts of land generally located on the east side of Park Boulevard near West Northwest Highway. She noted that the applicant was requesting to change the zoning of Tract I from "C-1" Neighborhood Business District to "SP" Specific Use Permit District Zoning incidental to the construction and operation of a limited ;�; i . � s t i t , j 11/20/79 ; number of two story garden apartments and other uses as permitted ' under "C-1" Neighborhood Business District Zoning. The City i Secretary added that the applicant had requested to change the zoning of Tract II from "C-1" Neighborhood Business District Zoning to "SP" Specific Use Permit District Zoning incidental to the construction of attached Single Family Dwellings , and other uses as permitted under "C-1" Neighborhood Business District Zoning. � i Applicant, Kenneth McWaters was then introduced to make his � presentation. ' j Mr. McWaters gave a brief history noting that in 1975 his firm , had purchased approximately twenty-seven acres contingent upon the existing "C-1" zoning which was obtained without opposition at that time. He added that in 1977 the northern portion of the tract was rezoned to a Specific Use Permit for the construction of twenty-one townhomes . He added that the � planning, approximately two years ago, was to limit the commercial � usage to West Northwest Highway frontage, south of a natural � barrier which was a drainage way located along the southern edge � of Tract I. He continued to say that construction included � garden apartments north of the commercial area with a con- f tinuation of the townhouses north of that tract to finish out ; the development. He added that those plans and investments had � continued until being interrupted by the removal of the multi- ; family uses in a commercial zoning categories . i ; Mr. McWaters advised that the townhouse project on Tract II had � ten units proposed in accordance with a site plan submitted. He i further noted that the site plan followed almost identically the I same restrictions and requirements as uses in the previous town- ; house project. He then provided the Council with copies of the ? proposed site plan, noting that the units would be 1300-1500 � square feet each, generally two story, with a density request of eight units per acre. He noted that the front and rear � yard setbacks varied but were noted individually on the site plan. Mr. McWaters then advised that he would continue the � concrete walkways behind the curbs and dedicated concrete paved � alleys on a sixteen foot right-of-way. � , � Mr. McWaters then explained that the apartment request was for i eighteen units per acre and noted that the design included two � story garden apartments with recessed semi-private stairs , with � six floor plans ranging from 1000 square feet to 1400 square feet . � He then pointed out that his request was in compliance with the ; City' s Master Plan and that the street access was acceptable for � apartment traffic. The applicant then presented the Council with ; colored photographs taken of the area in question. � � � Mr. McWaters was asked several questions by the Planning & Zoning ? Commission relative to rental fees and the total number of � apartments proposed for the tract. The Commission was advised ; that fifty four apartment units were planned with the rental fees � projected to be somewhat higher than existing comparable apart- � ments within the City. � � In regard to questions from the Council , Councilman Dunn stated ! that in reviewing the Minutes of the zoning request in 1975 , � he did not find that any mention was made in reference to the ' � original intent of constructing apartments in the area upon ; which "C-1" zoning was requested. Mr. P�IcWaters added that � reference to multi-family dwellings was evidenced in relation g to the other two tracts being considered for rezoning at that ; time. He added that the Specific Use Permit issued in 1977 , ' � e s � � I a � � i ; � � k 11/20/79 relative to the twenty-one townhomes , encompassed portions of ' tracts zoned "C-1" , "R-1" , and "R-3". He continued to say that � at that time, his firm' s comments were that they were not commercial t developers and that any commercial land not used for residential purposes would be sold for commercial development. i G t Councilman Oliver also expressed concern about the original intent � of development when the "C-1" was requested in 1975 and that he was equally concerned about apartments abutting a single family � � area. [ Councilman Mullendore complimented Mr. McWaters on the construction � of the existing townhomes and asked if there was a possibility of ` continuing a townhome project on both tracts in question at this ` time rather than apartments. Mr. McWaters answered that the area � would without question lend itself to townhomes , but that economi- � cally speaking, it would not be a feasible investment for his firm. � In regard to a letter of opposition received from Ms . Patti Hoff, Councilman Dunn asked is Ms . Hoff was a member of the Board of Directors of Brookside Associates , Inc. Mr. McWaters answered that she was neither an officer nor a director, but a minority �: stockholder. Councilman Dunn then asked if Ms . Hoff was a director � in 1975. Mr. McWaters answered "no" , and added that she was a 5 director in 1979 and left the participation of the firm in 1979. s Mayor Tate asked Mr. McWaters if the intent of his zoning request " was to have the flexibility of a multiple use zoning category and " if there was an uncertainty as to whether or not the property would � be developed as multi-family or sold for commercial development. � Mr. McWaters answered that plans had been drawn to develop the f property as stated in the zoning request, however, if those plans � could not be carried through, the entire property would be sold. � € 1� Mayor Tate commented that the Council ' s recent action to eliminate � � ' multi-family construction from commercial zoning categories had � prompted this zoning application. He added that one of the purposes � of that Council action was to allow the Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission to better determine for what a piece of property was going to be utilized. � There being no further Council discussion, Mayor Tate asked if '; there were guests to speak for or against the application. � � Mr. Richard Pillar, 2006 Candle Court, advised that he represented � a large number of residents from both the Brookside and Park Place areas . He advised that they opposed the zoning request and sited � the following reasons : (1) Drainage problems ; (2) Overcrowding � of schools ; (3) Availability of Utilities and (4) Strain on City � � Services . � � Mrs . Richard Pillar also stated her opposition to the requested k zoning. Ms . Pattie Hoff requested permission to speak and advised the Council that at the present time she was unaware of not being an officer of Brookside Associates , Inc. , and that as of yesterday ,� she was no longer a member of the Board of Directors , both of � which occurred after she took the position of being opposed to the f requested zoning. She further noted that she had held the position of Secretary. There being no further guests to speak, Mayor Tate asked the City Secretary if she had received any letters or petitions . She answered "yes" , and read the following two items into the record: t � � � � � i C 11/20/79 s October 8 , 1979 # f C Dear Ms . Armstrong, � � With reference to the zoning variance proposed by t the Brookside Addition to the City Council of t Grapevine, we the undersigned, are vehemently ; opposed to the construction of a two story apart- ? ment complex north of the Northwest Highway at � � Park Boulevard. The residential community of ; the Brookside Addition presently consists solely ' of single family dwellings , attached and un- � attached, representing several million dollars ! worth of privately owned real estate. As homeowners � and tax payers , the location of Grapevine was � originally presented to us as a well planned j community, representing economic growth and a � family neighborhood environment. If the construction ' of a two story apartment complex is permitted, it � will severely jeopardize that concept. i Dove Elementary School services the educational � needs of our area. The school is presently so � overcrowded as to necessitate the use of two addi- ; tional "Barracks" buildings on the grounds which are � being used as classrooms for our children. The influx ; of elementary school age children in an apartment com- € plex would tax these facilities to an even greater � extent. Presently our children have to either walk or ; ride bicycles to school. Multi-family housing will ! only add to the traffic congestion and create safety ; hazards for these young children on Park Boulevard. i E We do not wish to encounter the general urban problems ' 's related to an apartment complex in our suburban � � neighborhood. Vandelism, crime, the possibility of � drug abuse, always seem to rise in an area of transient � people. Renters do not share the same financial risks � as the private homeowner, and are therefore not as generally concerned with their surroundings . As real � estate owners we foresee a devaluation of our property because of this proposed construction. { Several nf us own property bordering the proposed ; boundaries. Because of the height of this two story complex, our privacy will be immediately limited. The � use of flood lighting in a parking area is offensive to � the neighborhood. The cul-de-sacs bordering this property � consist of five private dwellings each. There is pre- ! sently no noise from the small amount of local traffic. ; With a large paved parking lot behind our homes , we expect a dramatic increase in the noise level. ; The natural slope of this adjoining land leads to drainage r directly into our yards . Once a parking lot is paved, ; the problem may become severe. Is the capacity of the ; sewage treatment plant enough to adequately handle this � additional volume? What of the additional trash, especially " k if large volume containers , such as dumpsters , are used? � t Over the past several months we have had continual problems � with the Brookside Addition regarding their responsibility ' to maintain these vacant lots. Constant pressure had to � be exerted by homeowners here to get these lots mowed. Y � E. i tig h H � � � s § t i t €k C 4' � 11/20/79 � � Several of us finally appealed to the City of F Grapevine directly to take action against the Brookside Addition. These fields have just € recently been mowed, but only after a citation � was issued by the town. The center islands of � Brookside Drive have still been left untouched. � If we have these continual problems with the � :� developers , why should we believe that the maintenance of an apartment complex will be � any better? � We would like to extend an invitation to every � City Council and Planning and Zoning Board member t to come to our neighborhood. We are proud of what � we have accomplished here in the few short months � that our construction has been completed. We do not wish to see this small neighborhood environment t destroyed by an element unconductive to the original concept . As homeowners and taxpayers in Grapevine, we would � welcome the opportunity of expressing our opinions , with you. You have the capacity of reinforcing or 4 destroying a neighborhood. As an elected or appointed ` official, we have that you will be responsive to our � views . � Very truly yours , � f NOTE : The petition contained forty (40) signatures . � � r � October 16 , 1979 " J � � � City of Grapevine Grapevine, Texas 76051 Attention : Ms . Shirley Armstrong � City Secretary ` i: Re : Zoning Application No.Z79-34 � F � Gentlemen: k As an individual who is a stockholder and � director of Brookside Associates , Inc. , the owner of the property which is the subject of the above zoning application, I want to make known to the City my opposition to the request of which I was unaware until it was brought to my attention by homeowners in the subdivision. As a director, I was never consulted concerning such proposal. I � feel that commercial zoning , which is presently : ,;� designated for the area is the highest and best R use for the property and with present growth ` patterns in Grapevine will best serve the community by retaining this commercial designation. Yours very truly, �' Patti I. Hoff � � � �� E {' 11/20/79 All discussion being completed, Planning and Zoning Commission ; member Harlen Joyce made a motion to close the Council ' s � portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Bob Stewart and prevailed by the following vote : r Ayes : Rogers , Joyce, Cook, Stewart , Burgess , Sands & Spencer ; ; Nays : None � Mayor Pro Tem Florence then made a motion to close the Council's = portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by ; Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote : � Ayes : Tate, Ware, Florence, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer & Mullendore � Nays : None ! i PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION Z79-36 , BEN SYC � i The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning � and Zoning Commission to conduct a Public Hearing on Zoning � Application Z79-36 submitted by Mr. Ben Syc . ( . 4 4 Mayor Tate declared the Public Hearing open and called upon the City Secretary to explain the request of the applicant. ; , Mrs . Armstrong advised that the applicant was requesting to change � the zoning of 405 East College from "R-3" Multi-family Dwelling ! District to "C-1" Neighborhood Business District or in the ' alternative, a "SP" Specific Use permit for the operation of ; a dance s tudio. Ms . Connie McCaffity, attorney then made a presentation on ; behalf of the applicants stating that Mrs . Syc planned to have ' twenty to twenty-two students for tap and ballet lessons . She . � added that excessive noise or traffic was not anticipated. � �� 'i There were no questions from the Planning and Zoning Commission. � Several Councilmembers expressed concern about allowing a : commercial usage in a residential area. ; Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or '� against the application. Mr. Chet Holt , Howard Holt and Mr. Otis 0'Kelley expressed opposition to the requested zoning. ' The City Secretary was then asked if any letters or petitions had been received. She answered "yes" and read the following ' five letters into the record: ' November 20 , 1979 , Dear Ms. Armstrong : ' I am opposed to a change in the zoning of 405 East College. This would cause a devaluation of the property already established on this street. The Church property which has been there as ' such for 75 years would be adversely affected. Yours truly, ' Louise Wiggins ' 307 E. College ' ; e t � � November 20 , 1979 � �: Dear Sirs : We are opposed to the rezoning of ��7936 on East � � College. � Mr. John F. Bartley � : Mrs . Joan L. Bartley � r t November 20, 1979 f: City Council F Planning & Zoning Commission � Grapevine, Texas � � We, Bart H. and Hazel M. Himes reside and hold title to the property at 322 E. College St. This property, being across the street from the property that is being considered for this zoning change. � We would like to go on record, as being opposed to E this change. � We purchased our home and property approximately € thirteen years ago as our place of residence. In that thirteen years , we have enjoyed a quiet resi- � dential neighborhood. � We feel it would be unfair to all the residents in � this area to allow this Skip Zoning change. Approxi- � mately two months ago, the property immediately West � �� of the property being considered for this change, � � was denied a zoning change. Therefore, we feel this �: change should also be denied. , � We cannot see any reason to skip from Smith Street, t over some nice residences to zone this commercial. `' This would in effect, be one lot zoned commercial, � surrounded completely by residential property. We feel this would not be the logical change to allow. � R' We will appreciate your thoughtful consideration of � denying this zoning change. (k I Respectfully: � � Bart H. Himes � Hazel M. Himes � November 20, 1979 � k h I am against the Zoning Change. �� Mrs. L. T. Lemons �� 324 E. Franklin � Grapevine, Texas , 76051 i There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Member Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Bob Stewart and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Rogers , Joyce, Cook, Spencer , Sands , Burgess & Stewart Nays : None ; i � � � � � 11/20/79 � Councilman Dunn then made a motion to close the Council' s � portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by ; Councilman Ware and prevailed as follows : ; � Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Ware & Mullendore ; Nays : None g � PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION Z79-37 , ' GRAPEVINE APARTMENT II ASSOCIATES i The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning � & Zoning Commission to conduct a Public Hearing on Zoning Application Z79-37 submitted by Grapevine Apartment II Associates . j � The Public Hearing was declared open by the Mayor after which the ' City Secretary explained the zoning request. She advised that ; the application referred to two tracts of land located generally � on the Northwest corner of the intersection of Timberline and � Highway 157 . She further stated that both tracts of land were � currently zoned a combination of "C-2" and "R-3" with the request $ being for Tract I to be rezoned to "R-3" and Tract II to be re- _ zoned to "C-2" . � Mr. Jeff Mean, Vice President of Williams Investments made a ; short presentation on behalf of the applicants . ; � � Questions following from the Planning & Zoning and Council centered ; around the number of size of the apartment units to be constructed � as well as street access . Mr. Mean noted that approximately 200 units would be built E ranging in size from 626 to 825 square feet with rental fees � from $245 to $295 per month without utilities. ' The City Staff noted that the proposed widening of Highway 157 � and the future street improvements on Timberline Drive (included in the next Bond proposal) would amply accomodate the excess � traffic. � s i Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or j against the application. ; � r Mr. Dan Cameron, 2828 Canyon Drive , noted that he represented ; numerous residents of the Oak Creek Addition and requested that ; consideration of the zoning application be tabled to allow ; those residents more time to further consider the zoning appli- x cation. He stated that they were opposed to the zoning primarily � because of the $250 - $300 per month apartments being built in � an area containing $55 ,000 to $300 ,000 homes . He noted the depreciation of property values , overcrowding of schools and ; traffic congestion as major concerns . � : Mr. Harvey Miller, 2847 Canyon also expressed opposition to ' the requested zoning. The City Secretary advised the Council that she was not in receipt of any letters or petitions . � � There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Member � Sharron Spencer made a motion to close their portion of the � Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Jerry � Burgess and prevailed by the following vote : � � � Ayes : Rogers , Joyce, Cook, Spencer, Sands , Burgess & Stewart Nays : None � � Y( E � � � i � � � � � �' 11/20/79 � € Councilman Oliver then made a motion to close the Council' s � portion of the Public Hearing. Councilman Mullendore seconded the motion and it prevailed by the following vote : [ , Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware � Nays : None k � PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION Z79-38-CITY OF GRAPEVINE ,,� � The next order of business was for the City Council and the � Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a Public Hearing on Zoning Application Z79-38 submitted by The City of Grapevine. Mayor Tate declared the Public Hearing open. � City Engineer, Jim Baddaker noted that the request was to � change the zoning of the Grapevine Municipal Golf Course from "SP" Specific Use Permit District Zoning for the Municipal Golf Course, City of Grapevine Concourse Center and all related and incidental activities and for the on premise storage , sale and consumption of beer to "SP" Specific Use Permit District Zoning for the Municipal Golf Course, City of Grapevine Concourse � Center and all related and incidental activities and for the ' storage, sale and on premise consumption of mixed alcoholic beverages. He noted that he had omitted the parking lot from the � request so that alcoholic beverages could not be consumed in the parking area. � There was little discussion from the Planning and Zoning Commission � and Council. � The City Secretary advised that she was in receipt of one letter which was read into the record as follows : � .� � � November 20, 1979 � E � Honorable Mayor � City Council Members € Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission z ATTN: Mrs. Shirley Armstrong , City Secretary ` City of Grapevine � City Hall � Grapevine, Texas 76051 � Re: Zoning Application No. � Z79-38 (9 Nov 79) Re- zoning of Golf Course, � Grapevine Lake Project. Gentlemen: � � r The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers neither favors nor F opposes the proposed zoning change. We wish to remind � the City, however, that adoption of the proposed zoning change does not constitute authority or Corps ' approval to store, sell, or consume alcoholic beverages on Grape- ; vine Lake Project lands , including such land leased and � licensed to the City of Grapevine. Such authority and approval is the perogative of the Secretary of the Army � or his designee and has not, as yet been granted. ; � Jerry D. Brite Reservoir Manager cc: Ch, Ops Div Ch, Real Estate { � � � � 11/20/79 � t There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning s Member Robert Sands made a motion to close their portion � of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Jerry Burgess and prevailed by the following vote : ; � Ayes : Rogers , Joyce, Cook, Spencer, Sands , Burgess & Stewart Nays : None ' Councilman Shafer then moved to close the Council 's portion ` of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Council- man Ware and prevailed as follows : ; t Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer , Ware � and Mullendore Nays : None PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION Z79-39 PARADIES AIRPORT � SHOPS. � G The next order of business was for the City Council and i Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a Public Hearing ; on Zoning Application Z79-39 submitted by Paradies Airport ; Shops , Inc. � € Mayor Tate declared the Public Hearing open and called ; upon the City Secretary to review the request of the � applicant. � k Mrs . Armstrong advised that the 1. 516 acres in question f was located within the boundaries of D/FW Airport . She ; further noted that the applicants were requesting a i zoning of "SP" Specific Use Permit for the operation of ; a retail store and for the storage and retail sale of ; beer for off premise consumption. � /� i Mr.Joe Nowlin spoke on behalf of the applicants advising � that the establishment would be comparable to a commissary � and would be for the convenience of airport personnel. ; � There was little discussion and the City Secretary advised � that she was not in receipt of any letters or petitions. ; Planning & Zoning Member Harlen Joyce made a motion to close the Planning & Zoning' s portion of the Public Hearing. � The motion was seconded by Member Bob Stewart and prevailed ; by the following vote : ! i Ayes : Rogers , Joyce, Cook, Spencer , Sands , Burgess & ` Stewart ' ; Nays : None ' A motion was then made by Councilman Ware and Seconded by Councilman Dunn to close the Council ' s portion of the ? Public Hearing. The motion prevailed as follows : _ Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore # and Ware � Nays : None � � { PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION Z79-40 r SMB STAGE LINE � � � The next order of business was for the City Council and � Planning and Zoning Commission to conduct a Public Hearing � on Zoning Application Z79-40 submitted by SMB Stage Line. x 4 S d � £ ;i t � S � i a � �. � 11/20/79 Mayor Tate declared the Public Hearing open and called upon �' the City Secretary to explain the request. � Mrs. Armstrong noted that the 2 . 0841 acre tract was located � generally on the west side of S.H. Business 114, East of the ` Sunshine Harbor Addition. She advised that the current zoning � was "C-2" Cotrnnunity Business District with the request being � for "I-1" Light Industrial District Zoning. � � ,, Mr. Joe Kiesendahl spoke in regard to the application stating � that the intended use of the property was to construct a E building suitable for housing their corporate headquarters and for the maintenance of their vehicles. He added that there would be underground storage tanks for fuel purposes. t , � There were few questions from the Planning & Zoning Commission and Council. Mr. Terry Curcio, 1041 Easy Street and Mr. Mark Tucker spoke � in opposition to the zoning request. Judge Floyd Gray requested that his name be removed from the � petition of opposition, previously submitted to the City Secretary and stated that he did not oppose the zoning change. � The City Secretary then read the following two items into the � record: � November 15 , 1979 � € We, the undersigned, are opposed to the proposed rezoning of Tract 2G out of the E. Moore Survey, Abstract ��1029 . We feel it should remain zoned t ,�� as "C-2" Community Business District Zoning and � not be changed to "I-1" Light Industrial District s Zoning. � NOTE : The petition contained thirty two (32) signatures ` after the deletion of Judge Gray' s name. � November 20, 1979 � To Whom It May Concern: � � I wish to go on record opposing the rezoning of E Tract 2G out of the E. Moore Survey, Abstract ; Number 1029 from "C-2" Community Business District � Zoning to "I-1" Light Industrial District Zoning. � ! k I feel that this change in zoning would be de- f trimental to the tranquility of our adjacent ` residential neighborhood. I further feel that a #. light industrial development may create a possible pollution problem in the area. These two conditions would adversely affect the value of the property in � our area. � � F Respectfully, � ; ; Geraldine L. Williams = 1048 Easy Street r Grapevine, Texas 76051 ` � There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Member Bob Stewart made a motion to close their portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Harlen Joyce and prevailed by the following vote : ; � ; 11/20/79 i � Ayes : Rogers , Joyce, Cook, Spencer, Sands , Burgess & Stewart ` Nays : None � � Councilman Mullendore then made a motion for the Council to � close their portion of the Public Hearing. Councilman Dunn ? seconded the motion and it prevailed by the following vote : � Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware � Nays : None � � 3 Considering the late hour Councilman Dunn made a motion to ; table further consideration of all zoning cases until the next ; Council Meeting. The motion died from lack of a second. ' ! RECESS � ; Mayor Tate announced that the Planning & Zoning Commission would recess to the Civic Center to consider the merits of � the zoning cases . He added that following a short recess the Council would reconvene in the Council Chambers . The public � was invited to attend either meeting. ; � RECONVENE ` i � The Council reconvened in the Council Chambers with all members present and were called to order by Mayor Tate. ? � MINUTES � I The next order of business was consideration of the Minutes of ; November 6 , 1979. � x Mayor Pro Tem Florence made a motion to waive the reading of j the Minutes and approve them as published. The motion was � seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following � � vote : / Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer , Mullendore & Ware Nays : None � , TRA REVISED CONTRACT � � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider ° a resolution relative to the Trinity River Authority revised � contract with Tarrant County Water Control District for the purchase of raw water. � s` � The City Secretary read the Caption of the proposed resolution. � r � City Manager, Jim Hancock; Mr. Warren Brewer, TRA Representative; ; and City Engineer, Jim Baddaker reviewed the proposed contract ; with the Council. Mr. Hancock also noted that it was the recommendation of the City Staff that the resolution be adopted. � It was pointed out that the revised contract was an exhibit to ; the resolution. ; � Following a short discussion, Councilman Ware made a motion that � the resolution be adopted. The motion was seconded by Mayor � Pro Tem Florence and prevailed as follows : € ` � � Ayes : Tate, Florence , Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware � Nays : None � � � � � � � � � � E I I � � � c F � � � � RESOLUTION N0. 79-37 11/20/79 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN p AMENDATORY WATER SUPPLY CONTRACT BETWEEN ;: THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , AND TRINITY " RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS � � E � BIDS - CONCOURSE CENTER KITCHEN EQUIPMENT � f The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � and award the bid for the purchase of kitchen equipment for the � Concourse Center. �" �' The City Manager introduced Mr. A1 Mikusek, architect who re- � viewed the bid tabulation as follows : � TIME OF � BIDDER AMOUNT COMPLETION � Gernsbacher' s $54,356. 90 days Metro Restaurant Supply 53 ,577 60 days Mr. Mikusek reported that the bid of Edward Don Company was not accepted because the bid package was not sealed and contained no �' bid bond. He then recommended that the bid be awarded to Metro � Restaurant Supply in the amount of $53 ,577 . � Mayor Pro Tem Florence made a motion to accept the recommendation and award the bid to Metro Restaurant Supply in the amount of $53, 577. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and pre- � vailed by the following vote : � Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware ,;> Nays : None � `� BIDS - POLICE VEHICLES � k The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � and award the bid for the purchase of Police Department vehicles. � � The City Manager reviewed the bids received as follows : k $ � � � UNIT TOTAL PRICE PRICE � Payton-Wright Ford � (302 CID Engine) $6 ,451. 92 $32 ,259. 60 � f Payton-Wright Ford (351 CID Engine) $6 ,574. 92 $32 ,874.60 Hudiburg Chevrolet � (305 CID Engine) $6 ,933.00 $34,665 . 00 s Hudiburg Chevrolet { (350 CID Engine) $7 ,068. 00 $35 ,340. 00 � � Kircher Pontiac �' (301 CID Engine) $6 ,996. 00 $34,980. 00 � � Mr. Hancock advised that the purchase of four police cars had been approved in the budget, but after further review the City Staff felt that five vehicles were needed to obtain less mileage and �` over use of the other units . He added that $50,000 had been set f aside in the proposed budget for additional city vehicles if needed. � �. i € € .- � . � � } � § ; 11/20/79 � � i Mr. Hancock then recommended that the bid for the purchase of five vehicles be awarded to Payton-Wright Ford in the amount of ° $32 , 874. 60 thereby indicating a preference of the 351 CID Engine � over the 302 CID Engine. Several Councilmen then expressed a desire to at least experiment '' with one of the smaller engined units. Councilman Ware therefore made the following motion: To award the bid to Payton-Wright Ford for the purchase of one (1) 302 CID Engine Unit in the amount of $6 ,451. 92 and four (4) 351 CID Engined units at a i cost of $6 ,574. 92 each. ' The motion was seconded by Councilman Mullendore and prevailed ' by the following vote : � i Ayes : Tate , Florence, Dunn, Oliver , Shafer, Mullendore & Ware i Nays : None ' ; i ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - TOURIST AND CONVENTION BUREAU � , ' The next order of business was for the City Council to consider , an ordinance amending the City Code of Ordinances , Chapter 21, Section 28 , relative to the Tourist and Convention Bureau , Chairman appointment. ' The City Manager explained that upon the request of the Council , ' an ordinance amendment has been prepared providing for the ' Chairman of the Tourist and Convention Bureau to be appointed by , the Council. ' E The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. ' Councilman Dunn made a motion that the ordinance be adopted. l I, The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the �f' following vote : ' Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware ' Nays : None ; ORDINANCE N0. 79-68 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 21-28 (a) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS BY ADDING THERETO ' PROVISIONS PROVIDING FOR THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TOURIST AND CONVENTION BUREAU TO BE APPOINTED ' BY THE CITY COUNCIL; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; ' AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. ' TOURIST & CONVENTION BUREAU CHAIRMAN APPOIN'TMENT The next order of business was for the City Council to appoint , a Chairman to the Tourist & Convention Bureau for the 1979-80 ' term. ', Councilman Oliver made a motion that Mr. Shane Wilbanks be t' appointed Chairman of the Tourist & Convention Bureau for 1979-80. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware Nays : None ' � � 11/20/�9 � � TAX ROLL AMENDMENT � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � a resolution amending the tax roll for the fiscal year 1979-80. � � Finance Director Lee Maness noted that the adjustments were � minor and that the tax roll would be amended periodically throughout � the year to maintain a current status . He then reviewed the � proposed amendments. r � The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed resolution � noting that the amendment schedule was an exhibit to the resolution. � i Councilman Mullendore made a motion that the resolution amending ; the tax roll be adopted. The motion was seconded by Councilman � Dunn and prevailed by the following vote : � �. Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware Nays : None � RESOLUTION N0. 79-39 � A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY � OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS AMENDING THE ADOPTED TAX ROLLS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1979 ON PROPERTY ` WITHIN THE CITY. � LEASE AGREEMENT - IBM COMPUTER-SYSTEM 34 F The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � the lease purchase agreement between the City of Grapevine and � Municipal Funding Corporation of America. Finance Director Lee Maness explained that the lease agreement referred to the new IBM Computer System 34. He explained that � '� the contract amount was $1793 . 00 per month with renewal and/or � terminations of the agreement at the end of each fiscal year. � He added that the City would be able to take ownership of the � � e uipment upon completion of the fifth year for one dolalr s (�1. 00) . He advised the Council that the agreement did not �. include maintenance. Councilman Mullendore then made a motion to accept the recommendation � of the City Staff and accept the agreement as summarized. The � motion was seconded by Councilman Ware and prevailed by the following vote: � z Ayes : Tate, Florence , Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware � Nays : None p � s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a resolution approving and endorsing the 1979 Community Development � project for the City of Grapevine , Texas. Assistant City Manager Bill Eisen explained that the City had � been notified of the eligibility to apply for a grant in the � amount of $100 ,000 under the 1980 Community Development Project. � Mr. Eisen advised that it was the recommendation of the City � Staff that the application be submitted to fund improvements `° and expansion of the Senior Citizen facility. He added that ': approval of the proposed resolution would serve as Council' s � endorsement of the proposed project. ; � The City Secretary then read the caption of the proposed resolution. � f i j � � � i 11/20/79 $ f � E § Councilman Dunn made a motion that the resolution be adopted. ; The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed ; by the following vote : ; f Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware � Nays : None � i RESOLUTION N0. 79-38 ,�- � ; RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ENDORSING THE ; 1979 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR � THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS. � ZONING APPLICATION Z79-34 - BROOKSIDE ; E The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and a � subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-34, � (Brookside Associates , Inc. ) . � � It was reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission had � recommended approval of the application as requested, but R requiring an eight foot (8 ' ) screening fence along the Eastern � boundary of Tract I to separate the apartment complex from the � residential area. � The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. � Following a lengthy discussion, Councilman Ware made a motion � to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission � and approve the zoning application as requested, but in addition j requiring an eight foot (8' ) screening fence along the Eastern � boundary of Tract I and also requiring a minimum of 1000 square /�� feet per apartment unit. The motion was seconded by Council- � man Mullendore and prevailed by the following vote : � 3 Ayes : Tate, Florence , Ware and Mullendore � Nays : Dunn, Oliver and Shafer ; ; , , ORDINANCE N0. Z9-b3 ; AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10 , THE COMPRE- ? HENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A'� OF THE CITY CODE ; OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT ! OF LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND ; LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS , BEING A 3 PART OF THE BROOKSIDE ADDITION IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , _ TEXAS , MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF � � THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY � FROM "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING, T0 : TRACT I. "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DISTRICT ZONING � i INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPER- � ATION OF A LIMITED NUMBER OF TWO STORY � GARDEN APAR1'MENTS , PROVIDING FOR A SCREENING , ; FENCE; PROVIDING FOR MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE � PER UNIT, PROVIDING FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL z "R-3" MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT CON- e STRUCTION REQUIREMENTS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED � HEREWITH; AND FURTHER ALLOWING OTHER USES AS PERMITTED UNDER THE "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD � BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CATEGORY. TRACT II. "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DISTRICT ZONING � INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ATTACHED � SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS , IN ACCORDANCE � � � � � � i ; � � � E # 6. ` � o- 11/20/79 WITH THE ATTACHED SITE PLAN; AND FURTHER �: ALLOWING OTHER USES AS PERMITTED UNDER � THE "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DIS- � TRICT ZONING CATEGORY. � CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS � OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVER- � ABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS , MORALS AND � � GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN �; MADE;PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. � .� ZONING APPLICATION Z79-36 - BEN SYC � ' � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and a � subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-36 , (Ben Syc) . It was reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission by vote � of six to one recommended denial of the request based on the � assumption that approval would constitute spot zoning. >. r: Councilman Dunn then made a motion to accept the recommendation � of the Planning & Zoning Commission and deny zoning application Z79-36. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and pre- k. vailed by the following vote : � Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dunn, Mullendore and Ware � Nays : Shafer � � ZONING APPLICATION Z79-37 - GRAPEVINE APARTMENT II ASSOCIATE� '` f � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider ` the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and a � suqsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-37 , M� (Grapevine Apartment II Associates) . � �� Planning & Zoning Chairman Duane Rogers reported that the Planning � and Zoning Commission had recommended approval of the application � by a vote of six to one. ` � The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. � � Councilman Oliver and Ware stated that they were not opposed to � the land use as requested but were very concerned about the small � size of the apartment units . The City Staff was instructed to place an item on the next agenda relative to an amendment in the � minimum square footage of apartment units . ° Councilman Ware then made a motion to accept the recommendation of � the Planning & Zoning Commission and approve the application by adoption of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro � Tem Florence and prevailed by the following vote : � Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dunn, Mullendore , Ware & Shafer � Nays : None � ORDINANCE N0. 79-66 k C � AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10 THE COMPRE- � HENVISE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, � TEXAS , SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE � ON TWO TRACTS OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS , BEING A PART OF THE W.D. SHEPHERD SURVEY, ' ABSTRACT N0. 1393 , IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , MORE � FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS � ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY AS FOLLOWS : a � � z g L 5 € i , i I � 11/20/79 � TRACT I. FROM A COMBINATION OF "R-3" MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING DIS- ' TRICT AND "C-2" COMNNNITY ' BUSINESS DISTRICT TO "R-3" ' MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT. ! ' TRACT II. FROM A COMBINATION OF "R-3" MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING DIS- TRICT AND "C-2" COMNNNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT TO "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PRO- VIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DE- TERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND j GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMEND- : MENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND ' DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. ' ; I ZONING APPLICATION Z79-38 - CITY OF GRAPEVINE I The next order of business was for the City Council to consider ; the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and a ' subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-38 , ' (City of Grapevine) . ', Planning & Zoning Chairman Duane Rogers advised that the , Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the appli- ' cation by a vote of five for, one against and one abstention. ' The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. � Mayor Pro-Tem Florence made a motion that the recommendation f��l of the Planning & Zoning Commission be accepted and the ordinance adopted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate , Florence , Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware � Nays : None ' ORDINANCE N0. 79-67 ' AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10 , THE COMPRE- HENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , ' SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF ; GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF ; LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A LOT, TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND ! LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING ' A PART OF THE S . BURNLEY SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 179, THE ± J. M. BAKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 167 , THE JOHN ROBERTS i SURVEY, ABSTR.ACT N0. 1300, THE JAMES GIBSON SURVEY, � ABSTRACT N0, 587 , THE A. ANDERSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. � 26 , AND THE M. HOOD HEIRS SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 699 ! IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , MORE FULLY AND COM- ; PLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE, ORDERING ; A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM, "SP" SPECIFIC j USE PERMIT DISTRICT ZONING FOR THE MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE, � CITY OF GRAPEVINE CONCOURSE CENTER AND ALL RELATED AND j INCIDENTAL ACTIVITIES AND FOR THE ON PREMISE STORAGE, SALE � AND CONSUMPTION OF BEER, T0, "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT � DISTRICT ZONING FOR THE MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE, CITY OF i GRAPEVINE CONCOURSE CENTER, AND ALL RELATED AND INCI- i DENTAL ACTIVITIES AND FOR THE STORAGE , SALE, AND ON � PREMISE CONSUMPTION OF MIXED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ; � CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ; PRESERVING ALL OTHER : PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, PROVIDING A CLAUSE � I i ; i a i � � E 's � i 11/20/79 � RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE � PUBLIC INTERESTS , MORALS, AND GENERAL WELFARE � DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN � MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. � � ZONING APPLICATION Z79-39 - PAR.ADIES AIRPORT SHOPS � � � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and a � subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-39, � (Paradies Airport Shops , Inc. ) . � It was reported that the Planning � Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request by a vote of five for and one against. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. � � Mayor Pro Tem Florence made a motion to accept the recommendation � of the Planning & Zoning Commission and adopt the ordinance. The � motion was seconded by Councilman Ware and prevailed by the � following vote: t � k Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware Nays : None � ORDINANCE N0. 79-65 � � AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10 THE COMPRE- � HENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF � GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE GEORGE BURGOON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 125 , WITHIN a� THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DALLAS/FORT WORTH REGIONAL AIRPORT, � IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS , MORE FULLY "� AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE AND = ` IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED SITE PLAN, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY TO A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT � FOR THE OPERATION OF A RETAIL STORE , AND FOR THE STORAGE ` AND RETAIL SALE OF BEER FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION ONLY, � AND OTHER USES AS PERMITTED UNDER THE "C-2" COMMUNITY � BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CATEGORY; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL � ZONING MAP ; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING � ORDINANCE ; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS , MORALS AND GENERAL � WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE ; � PROVIDING A PENALTY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. a � ZONING APPLICATION Z79-40 - SMB STAGE LINE � 4: The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and a � subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-40, � (SMB Stage Line) . ¢: Planning & Zoning Chairman Duane Rogers advised that the Planning � & Zoning Commission had recommended approval of the request by a � � vote of six to one. � Councilman Oliver and Mayor Pro Tem Florence noted that they would � . oppose the "I-1" Light Industrial request , but would be in favor of a Specific Use Permit, to serve the needs of the applicant. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. 3 � � � � s � f i � � ; a i � � i g 11/20/79 1 ! ' " Councilman Oliver then made a motion to adopt the ordinance ' providing for a Specific Use Permit for the construction and operation of the SMB Stage Line Corporate office and related maintenance facility and other uses as permitted under the "C-2" Community Business District category. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mullendore and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware Nays : None ORDINANCE N0. 79-64 , AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10, THE COM- PREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF THE � CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A LOT, , TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED ' ; IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS , BEING A PART OF THE E. MOORE ', SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 1029 , IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , '' ! TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY ; OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING ; TO "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE S.M.B. STAGE LINE ' � CORPORATE OFFICES AND ANCILLARY OR ACCESSORY USES FOR ' AN ENCLOSED GARAGE MAINTENANCE FACILITY, WITH WASH RACK FOR UPKEEP AND MAINTENANCE OF VEHICLES OWNED BY ' THE BUSINESS , AT THE SPECIFIED LOCATION, AND INCLUDING ' ALL OTHER USES AS PERMITTED IN THE "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING CATEGORY; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO ', SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS , , MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND �' AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. �° I � ADJOURNMENT i � There being no further business , Councilman Oliver made a motion � to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Florence ; and all in attendance voted aye. ; � PASSED AND APPROVED on this the 4th , day of,.��mber , 1979 . � � � � R � i ATTEST: � ; E a . # . _ CITY E A Y € � 3 � 3 � � t 3 � � Y i i � S F{ $p Y Z � d � � � � � £ � �: � 11/20/79 AMENDMENT TO THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 20, 1979 �. P A I Z - 4 R0 KSIDE � PUBLIC HEARING, ZON�N� A� LIC T ON 79 3 , B 0 �` In regard to guests present to speak far or against the applica- � tion, Ms . Gena Lovic addressed the council citing her opposition Y to the requested zoning . Ms . Lovic stated that she was a practic- � ing geo�ogist and had reviewed the drainage concept of the � �' area in question. She added that it was her professional opinion �; that if apartments with parking lots were constructed on the site, a severe drainage problem would be created. . � PUBLIC HEARING, ZONING APPLICATION Z79-36 , BEN SYC � The City Secretary also read the following letter of opposition into the record: f � � � November 16 , 1979 City of Grapevine � Grapevine, Texas 76051 � Ref: Zoning Application Z79-36 � City Council & Planning Zoning Commission: � � As property owners adjacent to 405 East College, Ben � Syc owner, we do not feel that it would be proper � to change the zoning from "R-3" r'Iulti-Family Dwell- ing District to "C-1" Neighborhood Business District '<' Zoning or for a Specific Use Permit. This rezoning � would be considered spot zoning and would only � create future problems in the area. � 4 � � Sincerely, ' � � (s) Henry Kovarnik � For the elders � � of Church of Christ � 416 East College St . � � C � � E � € k: , � S � � � ' f � { € �