The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1979-07-17 Joint Meeting } � � � 1 3 , � � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS � AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ; TUESDAY JULY 17 , 1979 AT 7 :30 P .M. ! COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET i i I � ; I. CALL TO ORDER # i II . INVOCATION : Reverend David Whitington � Christ Our King Independent Methodist Church € � � III. PUBLIC HEARINGS � � A. City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to hold a Public Hearing on Zoning Application Z79-18 submitted by White Advertising. � � B. City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to � hold a Public Hearing on Zoning Application Z79-19 , submitted by Bob Taylor Real Estate , Inc. � E C. City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to � hold a Public Hearing on Zoning Application Z79-20 ; submitted by MICO Corporation. � 's D. City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to � conduct a Public Hearing to consider amending the ' zoning ordinance as it relates to the following : � ; l. To consider eliminating multi-family construction � in the "C-1" Neighborhood Business District and the "C-2" Community Business District zoning � categories . � 2 . To consider amending the accessory building � setback requirements in the "R-1" Single � Family Dwelling District. 3 . To consider an amendment that would allow the City Council the ability to require screening and to increase setbacks without the necessity of a site plan category. IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING A. City Council to remain in session to consider further published agenda items . B. Planning and Zoning Commission to recess to the Conference Room to discuss further business . � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T. C. S . , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE , REGULAR SESSION�, THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEET- ING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1979 AT 3 :00 P .M. ; � _� � City ecr t y � � � � � � � y � t � \ � � , � CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS � AGENDA � REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING � TUESDAY, JULY 17 , 1979 AT 8 :00 P .M. � COUNCIL CHANBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � 4 � � V. PRESENTATION � City Council to present a plaque of apprecia�ion � to retiring city employee Lynn Hanna. � � VI . CITIZENS REQUESTS AND/OF MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS � > � VII. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES (JULY 3 , 1979) % � VIII. NEW BUSINESS � � x A. City Council to consider awarding the � bid for carpet and carpet installation & in the Golf Course Restaurant/Pro Shop � and Concourse Center. � B. City Council and City Staff to discuss � enforcement of the City Code relating � to Certificates of Occupancy. C. City Council to consider a traffic ordinance pertaining to the re- routing of thru trucks . � � D. City Council to set the date for a � Public Hearing for the purpose of = considering an applicat�on to re- � locate a metal building. � � � E. City Council to consider the recommen- � dations of the Planning and zoning � � Commission pertaining to the following amendments to the Zoning Ordinance : � s � � l. The elimination of multi-family ;: construction in the "C-1" Neighbor- F hood Business District and in the � "C-2" Community Business District � Zoning categories . � 2 . Amendment of the accessory and 4 building setback requirements �.n the "R-1" Single Family Uwelling � Districts . � £' 3 . An amendment that would allow the � City Council the ability to require ¢ screening and to increase setbacks � without the necessity of a site p].an � category. IX. ZONING CASES AND PLATS A. City Council to consider the recoznmendation & of the Planning and Zoning Commission and a � subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning � Application Z-79-18 (White Advertising) . j B. City Council to consider the recommendation � of the Planning and Zoning Commission and a � subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning � Application Z79-19 (Taylor) . � � � � � � � Council Agenda , continued � July 17 , 1979 � � � � k � � C. City Council to consider the recommendation � of the Planning and Zoning Commission and a � subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning � Application Z79-20 (MICO) . ' � t D. City Council to consider the recommendation k of the Planning and Zoning Commission relative f to the final plat of Rolling Hills Addition. � l ' E. City Council to consider the recommendation i of the Planning and Zoning Commission relative � to the final plat of Marina Del Rey. " � � � X. ADJOURNMENT f I � � � � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T. C. S . , AS AMENDED ' ' BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE , REGULAR � , SESSION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PRE- � , PARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1979 AT ' � 3 : 00 P.M. � � � � � � a � � C� ec a ° Y � � 4 : 4 , � � � � � 7 3 � ; � � � 3 f , ; i � g3 � ? , � 3' , r , C d I � , � � � 5 {' t � � � S � � t s � e a � � a y € � � � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS � AGENDA � REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING � TUESDAY, JULY 17 , 1979 AT 8 :00 P .M. ` CONFERENCE ROOM - 413 MAIN STREET � � g � � s V. ZONING CASES � � � A. Planning and Zoning Commission to consider � Zoning Application Z79-18 (White Advertising) � and make a recommendation to the City Council. � � B. Planning and Zoning Commission to consider � Zoning Application Z79-19 (Taylor) and make � a recommendation to the City Council. i 5 C. Planning and Zoning Commission to consider = Zoning Application Z79-20 (MICO) and make a � recommendation to the City Council. � � D. Planning and Zoning Commission to consider the following amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and make a recommendation to the City Council. � � l. To eliminate multi-famil.y construction � in the "C-1" Neighborhood Bus�.ness � District and in the "C-2" Community Business District Zone categories . � � 2 . To amend the accessory building set- ` back requirements in the "R-1" Single � Family Dwelling District . � � 3 . To consider an amendment that would allow the City Council the ability � to require screening and to increase ; setbacks without the necessity of a ` site plan category. ` � VI. PLATS � A. Planning and Zoning Commiss�.on to consider the � final plat of Rolling Hills Addition and make � a recommendation to the City Council . � B. Planning and Zoning Commission to consider the ` final plat of Marina Del Rey and make a � recommendation to the City Council . E � � C. Planning and Zoning Commission to consider � the preliminary plat of Dove Creek Addition. i � VII. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS S:/OR DISCUSSIONS � � s� v VIII. ADJOURNMENT 4 k t G IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T. C.S . , AS AMENDED � BY CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE , REGULAR SESSION, � THE REGULAR PLANNtNG & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS � PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1979 AT � 3 : 00 P.M. t k � $ City ecr a � � � 1 � 07/17/79 a i ! STATE OF TEXAS X COUNTY OF TARRANT � CITY OF GRAPEVINE � The City Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine met in Joint Session on this the 17th day of July, 1979 at 7 : 30 P .M, with the following persons present to-wit : ; � William D. Tate Mayor David Florence Mayor Pro Tem ; Ctiarles Dunn Council.man ' Ted Ware Councilman � Larry Oliver Councilman Aulton Mullendore Councilman � William Shafer Councilman constituting a quorum with the foll.owing PJ.anning & Zoning Commission Members present to-wit : iDwayne Rogers Chairman Harlen Joyce Member Ron Cook Member . Bob Stewart Member Sharron Spencer Member Robert Sands Member � constituting a quorum with Jerry Burgess absent with the � following City Staff Members present : James L. Hancock City Manager Bill Eisen Assistant City Manager John F. Boyle , Jr. City Attorney Shirley Armstrong City Secretary CALL TO ORDER ' Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Reverend David Whitington of Christ Our King Independent Methodist Church. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION Z79-18 - [�1HITE ADVERTISTNG The first order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to hold a Public Hearing on Zoning Appl.ication Z79-18 submitted by White Advertising. � Mayor Tate declared the Public Hearing open and ca1.�.ed upon the City Secretary to explain the request of the appJ.icant and the location of the property. She advised that the property in question was two small tracts of land located within the boundaries of D/FW Airport on railroad right-of-way near the railroad' s intersection with State Highway 121 (Spine Road D/FW) . She added that the applicants were seeking to rezone the property from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District to "I-1" Light Industrial District for the purpose of constructing billboard advertising signs . � � � 07/17/79 � � ; � � Mr. Scott Keeshin, attorney representing White Advertising � made a short presentation emphasizing the fact that the property was railroad right-of-way and not owned by Dallas/ i Fort Worth Regional Airport. He added that he and his client � were prepared to cooperate in any way with airport personnel . i Mayor Tate advised that questions were in order from the : Planning & Zoning Commission or the Council . There was � little discussion. The Mayor then asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. There were none. t The City Secretary then read the following letter into the record: ; April 11, 1979 � � White Advertising International � Attn: Mr. John Crocker � P. O. Box 609 € Grand Prairie , Texas 75051 � Dear Gentlemen: � � You have requested permission from the St . Louis � Southwestern Railway Company o� Texas for re- vising the zoning on property underlying the � site of two proposed signboards . € Please be advised that the St . Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas is agreeable to the ' change in zoning on property as identified on ' the two attached drawings identified as Drawing No. 78-8888 and 78-8887 . ' Very tru7.y yours , � C. R. Johnson ° SB :bmc � Attachments There being no further discussion, Member Harlen Joyce made a motion to close the Planning & Zoning Commission' s portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Robert Sands and prevailed by the following vote : � � Ayes : Rogers , Stewart , Joyce , Cook, Spencer & Sands � Nays : None } Absent : Burgess Councilman Shafer then made a motion to c�.ose the Council ' s portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by ° '' Councilman Ware and prevailed by the following vote : £ Ayes : Tate, Florence, Ware, Dunn, Shafer , Mullendore & Oliver Nays : None NOTE : (The above Public Hearing was reopened later �n the meeting. See continuation o� Minutes . ) � t A � � 5 X & 6 � � � � S 07/17/79 ' PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION Z79-19 - BOB TAYLOR The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a Public Hearing on Zoning Application Z79-19 submitted by Bob Taylor Real Estate , Inc. Mayor Tate declared the Public Hearing open and called upon the City Secretary to explain the location of the property and the requested zoning. The City Secretary advised that the property in question was located on the Northwest corner of the intersection of County Road 3036 (Wautauga/Smithfield County Line Road) and County Road No. 3129 . She noted that ; the property was presently zoned "C-2" Community Business District with the requested zoning being "I-1" Light Industrial District Zoning. Mr. Taylor then made a short presentation advising that he represented both the present property owners , Joe and Mary Brown, and the prospective purchaser, Rucker Construction Company. He added that a construction facility with offices was planned for the site. A short discussion followed among members of the Planning & Zoning Commission and Council relative to the availability of city services to the site. t Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for or against the application. There were none. There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Commission Member Ron Cook made a motion to close their portion of the _ � Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Robert Sands � and carried by the following vote : Ayes : Rogers , Joyce , Cook, Stewart , Spencer & Sands Nays : None ? Absent : Burgess Councilman Ware then made a motion to close the Council' s portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro-Tem Florence and prevailed by the following vnte : Ayes : Tate, Florence , Oliver, Dunn, Ware , Shafer & Mullendore Nays : None PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION Z79-20 - MICO CORP . The next order of business was for the City Council & Planning & Zoning Commission to conduct a Public Hearing on Zoning Application Z79-20 submitted by MICO Corporation. Mayor Tate declared the Public Hearing open and called upon the City Secretary to advise those in attendance of the location .� of the property in question and the request of the applicant. The Secretary noted that the property contained approximately one acre and was located on the West side of Sonnet Drive , North of and adjacent to Dove Elementary. She advised that the present zoning was "PD" Planned Development with the requested zoning being "SP" Specific Use Permit incidental to the construction of townhouses . ; ' � � � �, � 07/17/79 � � � � � � k � Mr. Walter Elliott of Elliott & Hughes Engineering firm made � a short presentation on behalf of the applicant . � � There were no questions from the Planning & Zoning Commission. � Councilman Dunn suggested that a screening fence be � constructed along the South property line to separate the � € townhouses from the school site primarily because of the � heavily used soccer fields in that area. � � Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak � for or against the application. Mr. Allan Turnipseed, i President of Marina Del Rey Homeowners Association advised � that he represented the association and was in attendance � to express their favoritism of the requested zoning . � � There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Member ; Bob Stewart made a motion to close their portion of the ` Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Harlan � Joyce and prevailed by the following vote : � � Ayes : Rogers , Joyce , Cook, Stewart , Spencer & Sands a � Nays : None � Absent : Burgess � Councilman Mullendore then made a motion to close the � Council' s portion of the Public Hearing. The motion �aas � seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following � vote : z k i Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer , Mullendore ; & Ware � Nays : None ' REOPEN PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING APPLICATION Z79-18 � ' Mayor Tate advised the Council and Planning & Zonning � Commission that a request had been made by Mr. Don Savage , 4 Planning & Engineering Department D/FW Airport to reopen � the Public Hearing relative to the zoning application � submitted by White Advertising. The Mayor then noted ; that a motion or discussion was in order in response to ; the request. � ; 4 Planning & Zoning Commissioner Bob Stewart made a motion � to reopen their portion of the Public Hearing relative to � Zoning Application Z79-18. The motion was seconded by € Member Robert Sands and prevailed by the following vote : ; Ayes : Rogers , Joyce , Cook, Stewart , Spencex & Sands ; Nays : None ; Absent: Burgess # 4 Councilman Dunn then made a motion to reo�en the Council ' s k portion of the Public Hearing in regard to Zoning Application � Z79-18 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Ol�ver and • � prevailed by the following vote : � Ayes : Tate, Florence , Oliver , Ware, Dunn, Shafer � & Mullendore � Nays : None � s s � t � � � � � 07/17/79 _ Mr. Savage then came forward and advised that Mr. Ernest '� Dean, Executive Director of Dallas/Fort Worth Regional r Airport had asked him to appear before the Council and Planning & Zoning Commission and go on record as stating � that D/FW Airport opposed the requested zoning. He added that it was the practice of the Airport to strictly prohibit any advertising signs within their boundaries for the purpose , of providing a more scenic atmosphere. Mr. Savage noted that two such signs had already been constructed within airport boundaries in the City of Coppell , but that action was being taken to have them removed. Mayor Tate then asked if Mr. Keeshin would like to make a � reply to the comments made by Mr. Savage. Mr. Keeshin stated that he felt their request unique in that they were dealing with a right-of-way situation and were not asking permission , to have property rezoned for the purpose of placing signs on airport property. Both Mr. Sava e and Mr. Keeshin ex ressed a desire of g P cooperation. ' City Attorney John Boyle asked Mr. Savage if the D/FW Airport ' owned the underlying fee of the property in question. Mr. ' Savage advised that Mr. Wells , Airport Attorney, had not had the time to research that question, but that it may be necessary to investigate the title held by the railroad. Mr. Boyle then stated that it appeared both the applicant and the Airport were in agreement that D/FW Rules & Regulations ' - would be applicable relative to the requirement of obtaining an additional permit from D/FW Board. Mr. Savage advised that if such an application were made to the Airport Board, , it would be denied. He stated, however, that the legality may be such that a permit is not required. There being no further comments , Planning & Zoning Commissioner � Bob Stewart made a motion to reclose their portion of the ' Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Robert Sands and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Rogers , Stewart , Joyce , Cook, Spencer & Sands Nays : None Absent : Burgess Councilman Mullendore then made a motion to reclose the Gouncil' s portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Ware and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate , Florence , Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware Nays : None fi� PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDING BASIC ZO�ZING ORAINANCE - THREE ITEMS Item One (1) - The Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council to consider amending the basic zoning ordinance by eliminating multi-family construction in the "C-1" and "C-2" Zoning categories . Mayor Tate declared the Publ.ic Hearing open. , � � t 07/17/79 � � f � � City Engineer, Jim Baddaker explained the proposed � e amendment in detail as well as problems associated � with the existing ordinance. � Planning & Zoning Member Bob Stewart asked if a change � of that nature would in effect be "back zoning"? The Y City Attorney answered that it would be a reduction of a principle use of the zoning categories , and added that it ' was permissable to alter the requirements and restrictions � within various categories . ; � Member Harlen Joyce asked if the change would effect 4 � projects already under construction. Mr. Baddaker answered ' that it would not effect those projects where building ! permits were taken out prior to the effective date of the i amendment ordinance. � � Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present to speak for � or against the application. Mrs . Frank Pilney asked if � the proposed change meant that if the property was located � in a residential area, apartments coul.d be built. Mayor � Tate answered no , and explained the meaning of the proposed € change. � The City Secretary then advised that she was in receipt of � a letter of opposition to the amendment. She then read the � following letter into the record: ' � : July 10 , 1979 � � Mrs . Shirley Armstrong � City Secretary � (� � City of Grapevine, Texas � P .O. Drawer 1547 Grapevine, Texas � fi Re : Approximately 2 . 76Q2 Acres , located at the � Southeast Corner of Mustang Road and the proposed extension of Tanglewood Drive in � Grapevine , Texas . � t Dear Mrs . Armstrong and Members of the Council : � I purchased the above described property from Lomas � & Nettleton Financial Corporation in December o� 1978 . Prior to my acquisition of the property, I visited with the City of Grapevine and it �tas con�irmed to me that the property was zoned C-2 (Community Business) . ` I was informed that this zoning provided �or several � various commercial uses that my needs required, but also had the ability to be used for multi-�amily � purposes . The property was larger than my needs at that particular time but because of the capability of a multi-use, I moved forward and purchased the property. Since that time , I have marketed the € property on a basis of a commercial use for that 4 frontage on Mustang Road and a multi-�amily or duplex use for that portion of the property fronting 4 on the proposed Tanglewood Drive extension. � u f d 3 � R � � f € t � � � � , 07/17/79 In the telephone conversation with Mr . Jim Baddaker, City of Engineer of Grapevine , on Monday, July 9 , I learned that there was a . proposed Change in Use , of the present C-2 zoning classification to go before the Council on July 17 , 1979 that would prohibit multi- family or duplex use. As I mentioned to you previously, I purchased the property upon the verification for the City that it had multiple ; uses under its C-2 zoning classification. I feel there are many investors that have � purchased property based upon the same type : of criteria which my decision was made. To change the zoning classification for new commercial property is one thing, but to re-classify property bought under the existing C-2 ordinance would be unjustifiable to the present owner. I therefore request that I be noted as being in opposition to the new C-2 proposal. I would appreciate consideration of the Council in this matter. Yours truly, SHERWOOD BLOUNT & COMPANY, REALTORS John R. McDearman �� JRMcD/dl / Item Two (2) - City Council and Pl.anning & Zoning Commission to consider amending the accessory building setback requirements in the "R-1" Single Family Dwelling District. Mr. Baddaker explained that the recommendati.on of the City Staff was to permit one story accessory structures within six (6) feet of the rear property 1ine. He �urther suggested that any structure above one story be setback one (1) �oot for each foot of height above one (1� story to a maximum setback of twenty-five teet . There was no discussion from the Planning & Zoning Commission or Council. Mayor Tate asked if there were any guests present to speak for or against the proposed amendment . There were none. Item Three (3) - City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission to consider an amendment that would allow the City Council the ability to require screening and to increase setbacks *� without the necessity of a site plan category. The City Engineer , Mr. Baddaker , explained that the present ordinance does not allow the City Council to increase setbacks or require screening on a case by case basis . He added that an ordinance permitting additional requirements of this nature would allow the Council to have the flexibility to require additional setbacks and/or screening in a specific instance where the proposed zone district requirements are not restrictive enough to protect adjacent land owners . He also suggested that the Planning & Zoning Commission should be permitted to recommend additional setbacks or screening when considering specific zoning changes . � . � 07/17/79 � � i € � Mayor Tate advised that discussion was in order from the � Planning & Zoning Commission and Council. No significant ; comments were made. '' The Mayor then asked if there were guests present to speak � for or against the proposed Amendment. There were none. � i There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Member ; Ron Cook made a motion to close their portion of the Public � Hearing relative to amendments of the basic zoning ordinance. : ! The motion was seconded by Sharron Spencer and prevailed by ! the following vote : � Ayes : Rogers , Joyce , Cook, Stewart , Spencer & Sands I Nays : None � Absent : Burgess Councilman Oliver then made a motion to close the Council ' s � � portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by � Mayor Pro-Tem David Florence and carried by the following � vote : � � � Ayes : Tate , Florence, Oliver , Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore � & Ware � Nays : None � END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING � � ; The Planning & Zoning Commission then recessed to the � Conference Room to deliberate the merits of the zoning � cases and further published agenda items . ; � Mayor Tate announced that the Council wou7.d recess for five � to ten minutes before continuing to considez other items on � E their agenda. p The Council reconvened with all members in attendance . z R � PRESENTATION The next order of business was for the City �ouncil to � present a plaque of appreciation to retiring city employee € Lynn Hanna. � Mayor Tate gave a brief history of Mr. Hanna' s employment noting that he had served the city in good faith for twenty- � two years . Because of Mr. Hanna' s illness , the plaque was � accepted by Mr. Jesse Williamson, Utility Superintendent . � r CITIZENS REQUEST AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS � Retail Merchants Situation � Mr. Eddie Windom, representing Retail Merchants Association r appeared before the Council and requested that Barton and � Jenkins Streets be made one way to help alleviate traffic E on Main Street. The group also suggested that the City ; consider moving the fence back around the downtown water tower to provide some additional parking space. # � Following Mr. Windom' s presentation Mayor Tate commented � that although the one way street suggestion may solve some problem, it would also create others . He suggested that one = of the only other alternatives would be for the downtown � merchants to consider a joint venture in purchasing property � for parking purposes . � � � # � � � � € i I � � � � 07/17/79 ' In regard to relocating the fence around the Barton Street Water Tower , the City Manager advised that he would have to discuss the matter with the State Health Department since their agency had required the fence at the original time of ; the water tower construction. ' Mayor Tate then instructed the City Engineer and other staff members to meet with Mr. Windom in an effort to assist the downtown merchants . � Mr. Windom then officially filed a petition with the City Secretary in regard to the above mentioned matter. Doyle Jordan Drainage Problem � , Mayor Tate then asked if Councilman Mullendore had a report 1 relative to Mr. Jordan' s drainage problem which was discussed ; during the Council Meeting of July 3rd, 1979 . i Councilman Mullendore advised that he had investigated the situation and had filed a report with the City Staff. He further noted, that based on his statements , the staff was � preparing to draft a letter taking care of the matter. + He added that his investigation revealed that a drainage � easement had been violated by a number of the property , owners in the area. He continued to say that numerous ; , fences would have to be removed before the drainage area could be cleaned and made effective. The City Manager advised that the City Engineer would have to draft a letter to all property owners in violation of , ,,� the easement right-of-way and that they would need to be given a reasonable length of time to move their fences . �I Mr. Hancock further noted that one-hundred percent cooperation was not expected. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES (July 3 , 1979) The next order of business was consideration o� the minutes of July 3 , 1979 . Councilman Oliver made a motion to waive the reading of the Minutes and approve them as written. The motion was seconded by Council.man Dunn and prevailed by the , ; following vote : Ayes : Tate , Florence , Ol.iver, Dunn, [�Tare, Mullendore & Shafer Nays : None CARPET BIDS - GOLF COURSE RESTAURANT/PRO SHOP & CDNCDURSE CENTER The next order of business was for the City Council to consider awarding the bid for carpet and carpet installation in the Golf Course Restaurant/Pro Shop and Concourse Center. City Manager , Jim Hancock advised that one bid was received as follows : Total Contract Sum For Installation Carpet Services , Inc. 1402 Hi Line Dallas , Texas 752Q7 $26 , 040 . 1Q � � � t 07/17/79 � � . ; E � � He then recommended, in light of the fact that only one � bid was received, that the bid be rejected, and that the ' City Staff be authorized to readvertise , to mail invitations to bid to various carpet dealers , including local merchants i and accept further bids . � � Councilman Mullendore made a motion to accept the recommendation of the City Staff and disallow the bid of Carpet Services , � Inc. on the basis that it was a single bid and authorize the � City Staff to advertise for further bids . The motion was � seconded by Councilman Ware and prevailed by the following = vote : " Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Ware, Mullendore, Dunn j & Shaf er ' Nays : None � � t Councilman Ware asked if there was something in the specifi- � cations that caused only one bid to be submitted. The City � Manager stated that the specifications provided for the carpet � to be spike proof (able to withstand golf shoe spikes) and x that not all dealers are able to provide that quality carpet. ; Mayor Pro-Tem Florence stated that he did not feel as rigid # specifications were needed on the carpet for the Concourse � Center. ° � The City Manager advised that he intended to request an alternate bid for the Concourse Center in the rebidding process . � CODE-ENFORCEMENT - CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY � € The next order of business was for the City Council and City �� 3 Staff to discuss enforcement of the City Code relating to � Certificates of Occupancy. ` � City Engineer Jim Baddaker explained that the City o� Grapevine � adopted the 1976 edition of the Uniform Bui�ding Code which ' provided a Certificate of Occupancy be issued to every tenant g within a building or structure. He further commented that to � insure the health and safety of the citizens o� the City the � Staff recommended this code be enforced with the ef£ective date � of August l, 1979 . He then outlined the procedure for enforcement ; and noted several examples of property presently in violation of ; city standards . � k There was a short discussion among members o� the Council and ' City Staff during which no opposition was expressed in regard �' to the enforcement of the aforementioned code. x t No formal action was taken. F TRAFFIC ORDINANCE - TRUCK ROUTES E The next order of business was for the City Council to consider �- ` a traffic ordinance pertaining to the re-routing of thru trucks . � The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. � � Policy Chief, Bill McLain explained the problems involved with trucks on downtown and residential streets . ,: E t , � � � � � r e , � �. � � � i , �, �7�17�79 � � Following a short discussion, Councilman Dunn made a motion ' the ordinance be adopted. The motion was seconded by i Councilman Ware and prevailed by the following vote : � Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Mullendore & Ware Nays : None E 4 ORDINANCE N0. 79-33 � � AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE ESTABLISH- :� ING A TRUCK ROUTE ON CERTAIN SPECIFIED STREETS AND HIGHWAYS PROHIBITING TRUCK TRAFFIC ON ALL OTHER STREETS AND HIGHWAYS AND PROVTDING EXCEPT- IONS ; PROVIDING FOR SIGNS ; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY � ; CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY AND DECLARING AN � ' EMERGENCY � � PUBLIC HEARING DATE - PORTABLE BUILDING APPLICAT�ON �' � The next order of business was for the City Council to set ' the date for a Public Hearing for the purpose of considering � an application to relocate a metal building. �' � ; The City Secretary explained that an application had been � ; submitted by Mrs . Rebecca Carlson requesting permission to retain a portable structure on 2410 Los Robles . The Secretary advised that the only action necessary by the Council was to � � set the date for the Public Hearing, and suggested August 7 , � 1979. t` k Councilman Ware made a motion to accept the recommendation �� of the City Staff and set the Public Hearing for August 7 , 1979 . The motion was seconded by Councilman Mullendore and ' prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate, Florence , 01.iver , Dunn, Shafer, Mu�.lendore & Ware Nays : None � BASIC ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS - RECOMMENDATIONS FROM P&Z 1 The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission pertaining to amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. City Engineer Jim Baddaker gave the following recommendations � from the Planning & Zoning Commission: � ! Item One (1) - The elimination of multi-family ' construction in the "C-1" Neighborhood Business District and in the "C-2" Community Business District Zoning Categories ; Recommendation: That the multi-family use be e iminate from the "C-1" and "C-2" Zoning Districts and that any owners of land with. "C-1" or "C-2" zoning categories desiring to use their land for multi-family development, be required to make application on an indivi- � dual basis for rezoning to a multi-family category. ; � . � � � 07/17/79 � � ; � � Item Two (2) - Amendment of the accessory and building setback requirements in the "R-1" ` Single Family Dwelling Districts ; I Recommendation; The Planning & Zoning ; Commission recommended that the item be ' tabled until their next meeting so that ± the City Staff could provide suggestions � ' on how to define the height restrictions . Item Three (3) - An amendment that would allow ; the City Council the ability to require screening e and to increase setbacks without the necessity of e a site plan category; { � Recommendation : Unanimous approval of the 3 amen ment as presented by the City Staff. i � Councilman Ware then made a motion to approve the recommendation ; of the Planning & Zoning Commission and instruct the City � Attorney to draft an ordinance concerning the aforementioned � items one and three. The motion was seconded by Councilman = Oliver and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate , Florence, Oliver, Ware, Dunn, Shafer � & Mullendore � Nays : None � � F ZONING ORDINANCE - ZONING APPLICATION Z79-18 � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and a subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-18 as > submitted by White Advertising. �, � c i Mr. Baddaker advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission � voted to disapprove the application until the Airport Board � issued a sign permit. � The Mayor asked for clarification as to whether the Planning � & Zoning Commission voted to table the item or if they voted � to deny the application. Mr. Baddaker confirmed that the i recommendation was to deny the application and in the event ° the Airport Board granted a sign permit, the applicants � would have to submit a new zoning application. Councilman Dunn then made a motion to accept the recommendation � of the Planning & Zoning Commission and deny zoning application � Z79-18. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and � prevailed by the following vote : $ Ayes : Tate , Florence, Ware, Oliver, Dunn, Sha�er � & Mullendore � Nays : None ZONING ORDINANCE - ZONING APPLICATION Z79-7.9 The next order of business was for the City Council to �. consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning f Commission and a subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-19 submitted by Bob Taylor. � Mr. Baddaker advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission � recommended approval of the application. � The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. " �; � �. fi � Y � �". 7 � { 07/17/79 � € kg C E C Councilman Florence made a motion to accept the recommendation `: of the Planning and Zoning Commission and approve the application � ' and adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Councilman F ' Ware and prevailed by the following vote : � Ayes : Tate, Florence , Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Ware " & Mullendore Nays : None � ORDINANCE N0. 79-35 � AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10 , THE �' � COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF � GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS APPENDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE , � TEXAS , GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF �' � LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A LOT, TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT 4 , COUNTY, TEXAS , BEING A PART OF THE J. R. DOSS � SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 440 , IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , ' TEXAS , MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN ` THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE ; ORDERING A CHANGE � ' IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "C-2" COMMUNITY � BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING TO "I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ZONING; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING � ' MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE 20NING �' ORDINANCE ; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINTNG THAT THE PUBLIC INTERESTS , �: MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE � AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; � AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. ZONING ORDINANCE - ZONING APPLICATION Z79-20 e' The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and a � subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-20 submitted by MICO Corporation. Mr. Baddaker reported that the P].anning & Zoning Commission j unanimously recommended approval. of the requested zoning. ` 1 � ' The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. Councilman Dunn stated that he would prefer a screening ' fence be required as a part of the o.rdinance and therefore, made the following motion: To approve the application as . requested and adopt the ordinance providing for a six (6) , foot screening fence along the South and West property lines . � Following a short discussion, Councilman Dunn amended his motion to state approval of the application as requested and adoption of the ordinance providing for a six (6) �oot screening fence along the South property line. The amended motion was seconded by Councilman Ware and prevailed by the following vote: ' Ayes : Tate , Florence, Oliver, Ware, Aunn, Sha�er & Mullendore Nays : None E � , , � � � � � � � 07/17/79 � � � ORDINANCE N0. 79-34 � � AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10 , THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF � GR.APEVINE , TEXAS , SAME BEING ALS�O KNOWN AS � APPENDIX "A" OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A TR.ACT OF ; LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A LOT, TRACT , OR PARCEL ' OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT � COUNTY, TEXAS , BEING A PART OF THE J. L. HALLUM " SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 722 , IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN � THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE ; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "PD" PLANNED ; DEVELOPMENT TO "SP" SPECIFIC USE PERMIT DISTRICT ; INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF TOWNHOUSES , i PROVIDING A 6 ' SCREENING FENCE ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE ; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING � TO SEVER.ABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC ; INTERESTS , MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND � A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE ; � PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. � } FINAL PLAT OF ROLLING HILLS ADDITION = The next order of business was for the City Council to consider ? the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative ' to the final plat of Rolling Hills Addition. r s Mr. Baddaker reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval. He then provided members of the Council � with copies of the plat and a short discussion followed: ; � F Councilman Ware then made a motion to approve the final plat o� E Rolling Hills Addition. The motion was seconded by Councilman ' '- � Dunn and prevailed by the following vote : ; 4 Ayes : Tate , Florence, Oliver, Ware, Dunn, Shafer � & Mullendore � � Nays : None � FINAL PLAT OF r1ARINA DEL REY � � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider : the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative � to the final plat of Marina Del Rey. � � � Mr. Baddaker reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Staff recommended approval o� the pl,at as submitted. � He provided copies of the plat for Council, Members and a short discussion followed. : ; Councilman Mullendore then made a moti.on to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and � City Staff and approve the final plat of Marina Del Rey. ' The motion was seconded by Councilman Ware and prevai�ed z by the following vote : f• Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver , Dunn, [�Iare, Shafer = & Mullendore Nays : None � � G � � � � � � � � � �; � 4 � i' 07/17/79 � ;' � � � ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council , -� Councilman Dunn made a motion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Mayor Tate and prevailed by the following vote : � Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dunn, Shafer, Ware ° & Mullendore � Nays : None � i � t' � � PASSED AND APPROVED on this the��/L day of ' , 1979 . ;, � �;�� .c��' � Mayor � :. ' ATTEST: C � �' r � � /�, City ecr tar � � , i { i , I i � ; � � i i ! �