The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1979-03-20 Joint Meeting � � � � � � � � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS � � A GENDA � � SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP SESSION � TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 1979 AT 5: 30 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOM - 413 MAIN STREET s � � � � I. CALL TO ORDER � II. WORKSHOP SESSION � City Council to conduct a workshop session relative � to the proposed bond program. � � � III. ADJOURNMENT � � F � � #� f � � IN ACCORDANCE WITH A RTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS � AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, � � REGULAR SESSION, THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP � SESSION AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 1979 AT 1: 30 P.M. � � � � � � � � City ecr ar � � � � � � � � � � � � f r � � � � � x � & � � � � � � � � �. STATE OF TEXAS X COUNTY OF TARRANT � CITY OF GRAPEVINE � The City Council of the City of Grapevine , Texas met in Special Workshop Session on this the 20th day of March, 1979 , at 5 : 30 P.M. with the following present to-wit : William D. Tate Mayor David A. Florence Mayor Pro-Tem Ted R. Ware Councilman C. L. (Larry) Oliver Councilman � Doil Dalton Councilman William Shafer Councilman Charles Dunn Councilman constituting a quorum with the following City Staff Members : James L. Hancock City Manager Bob Hart Administrative Asst. : John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Lee Maness Finance Director Shirley Armstrong City Secretary CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Tate. He then advised that the purpose of the workshop was to consider the proposed bond program. The City Staff provided the Council with proposed projects and esti- mated costs for both General Obligation Bonds and Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds , (See Exhibits A and B attached hereto and made a part hereof) . ` =� City Manager Jim Hancock advised that a $ . 05 tax increase would be necessary if the Council elected to consider all of the City Staff' s recommendations . � Mayor Tate commented that he felt an effort should be made from the beginning to present a bond package to the voters without a tax in- crease. He added that considering inflation, the proposal should be limited to three (3) years . Mayor Tate further stated that the Water & Sewer Projects must have top priority. A short discussion followed during which construction of a sub-fire station was discussed. Councilman Dalton noted that the reduction in the key rate of fire insurance would be minimal compared to the tax dollars spent to build, equip , and operate the sub-station. Councilman Oliver stated that other cities were purchasing houses in residential areas and remodeling them for sub-stations for a min- imal cost. It was the consensus of the Council that the idea needed to be given some serious thought and research. There was a short discussion relative to the crowded conditions at � City Hall. It was noted that for a minimal cost, the Tax Department ;: could be moved to the Police Building. The City Staff was instructed to investigate the possibility of land acquisition, (the Tom Tatum property) near the Police Station. It was also memtioned that it might be necessary to repair some of the problem streets rather than attempting to reconstruct them. It was suggested that the rebuilding of Timberline be postponed until there was a decline in use of the street by heavy construction ve- hicles . A temporary overlay project was mentioned as an alternative to the Timberline situation. During discussion relative to Park & Recreation facilities , it was noted that Grapevine was fortunate to have more parks at the present time than most cities of comparable size. � 03l20/79 In regard to the Revenue Bond proposal , the City Staff was asked to determine the impact of a tax increase and/or a utility in- crease as a direct result of projects four and five (Water Plant Expansions and Sewer Line Expansion-Little Bear Creek. It was noted that further consideration would be given to proposed bond projects at the next workshop session. ? Mayor Tate asked the Council Members to review the information pro- vided and set basic priorities to determine what effects those pro- jects would have on taxes and utility rates . He advised that ex- � treme precaution should be taken to avoid a major tax increase now or in the future. There being no further discussion, the meeting was declared adjourned. PASSED AND APPROVED on this the ' _= day of , 1979 . ,/ ;.. � �{/�"��.��r�j�y --�V i' _ Mayor � ATTEST : City Secreta ; � (;11Y ur �t�j� r�� l�v� , �L.�� EXHIBIT A pROPOSED GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS � �OR CAPITAL It�,PROVEMENTS � � ; , , - -- = � -_— . . _— --- � - � } . _, PROPOSED PROJECTS AGGREGATE CITY STAFF { TO BE FUNDED AMOUNT RECOMMENDED E PROPOSED FUNDED � PROJECTS PROJECTS - � � � 1979-80 � . � _� � � 1 . " Construct Fire Substation at � Dove Road (supplement) $ 310, 000 . 00 $ 310 , Q00 . 00 ` � 2. Reconstruction of Streets in � ' Bellaire Subdivision 300 , 000 , 00 300,OQO . QO � � � 3. Widen Dallas Road to 4-Lanes 300, 000. 00 � t � 4. Street Development-Contingency � Fund 300 ,000 . 00 1QO, OOO . QQ � S. Comprehensive Drainage Study with � � topos and base map of City 150, 000. 00 150, 000. 00 � 6. Land Acquisition-Future Parks 25 , 000. 00 � [ 7 . Land Acquis3tion for Future City � Hall Complex 100, 000 . 00 . � 8. City Hall move to Police/Library � Building-renovate upstairs and � elevator system 150, 000. 00 14Q, OQ0. 00 � � Totals for 1979-80 Proposals $1 , 635 , 000. 00 $1 , 000, OOO. QO � � . � i � 1980-81 > � � 9 . Improvements to Dallas Road $ 300, 000. 00 " ! � � ; 10. lieveiopment oz aiternative � road near Snakey Road _ 300, OOO. QQ 300, OQ0. 00 � � � � „ Widen Dove Road from Park Blvd. , : 11 . to SnakeyI�oad 6Q0, 000. 00 200 , 000. 00 ' � fi s 12 . Widen and straighten Wall Street 500, OOO. QO ` � 13. Sreet Development Fund 275 , 000. 00 � � 14. Recreation Center 750, 000. 00 ; � 3 � 15 . Land Acquisition for Future Park 25 , 000. 00 < � i Totals for 1980-81 Proppsals $2 ,450 , 000 . 00 $ 800, 000. 00 � 1981-82 i � 16 . Development of Timberline $ 800, 000 . 00 $ 800,000. 00 . � � 17. Drainage and street improve- � � ments of Reed Addition 200, 000. 00 � T � lg. Drainage and street improve- ` ment of Lakeview Addition 100, 000. 00 � � 19 . Improvements to Church Street 5Q0,000. 00 `' 20, Improvements to Dooley Street 500,000. 00 � � � * Includes the sale of $200, 000. 00 General Obiligation Bonds � previously approved for the Dove Road Substation � '^'^To widen Dove Road to Kimball Road amounts to $600, 000 .00 �' To widen Dove Road from Park Blvd, to Snakey Rd. $200,000 ,00 ` ;< , � 1 CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS ' PRQPQSED GENERAL OBLIGATION B�NDS � FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ; i ; . � , PROPOSED PROJECTS AGGREGATE CITY STAFF TO BE FUNDED AM�UNT RECQMMENDED i PRQPOSED FUNDED j , PRaJECTS PROJEGTS - 1981-82 Contd. a - � 21 . �mprovemen�s to Central town streets SOQ ,04Q. 04 � 22 , City Hall Compl.ex Land Acquisition 25Q, OQO. OQ 1QO,Q00. 00 23. Athle�ic complex/fields � t7��i VQV. VU S�V��. �� i i 24, SubsCation for Fire Department , - South part of the City 350,OOQ. 00 40Q,OQO. QO To�als far 198I-$2 Proposals $4, 000 ,000. 00 $l, $50,000. 00 1982-83 25. Developmen� of Mustang Drive $ 500,OOQ. 00 $ SQO,Q4Q. OQ � Drainage & stree� impravement • ( 26, Reed Addita.on 175 ,000. 00 4 Stree� Impravements -Peach, "� 27 . Main, Turner, etc. 600,000. 00 2$ . Dove Laop Improvements lf?0,004. 00 Stree� Imgrovernents for South ; 29 . part af City- Kelsey Cour�, �P��rr , 600, 044. 00 55Q,000. 00 ' 30. S�reet Impravements -Misc. 250, 000. 00 ;; � � Land -Acquisition and Park ' ' 31 , Development - 250, Q00. 00 . , i . Totals for 19$2-83 Progosals $2,475 ,000. 00 $1, 050,000. 00 1983-84 � Additional Street & Drainage ; �2• Imprt�vements for �'Dell Court, i � Parr $ 175 , OQO. QO � f Im.provements for Hall- , � 33. Jahnson Road 7QO, OOO. QO $5Q, Q00..00 � S�reet DevelapmenC & Improve- 34. ments 200,004. Q0 ' ��, Recreation Genter Complex ; . , _ : . . _ 75Q,OOO. OQ 8QO,QOO. QO ; i Totals far 1983-84 Proposals �1, 82S ,OOQ. 00 $1 ,65Q,040.00 ' 19$4-85 � �� Dove Raad Tmprovements from $ 404, OOO. QO $ 400, QQ0lOQ � Ss' '�c.''�.� R d t c� K.iml�.a].1 R c�a cl �� Dooley Stree Improvements 504,OOO. QO 500,000.00 i i 3g Hughes Road Improvements SOO,OD0. 00 � �g . Cheek-Sparger Road 50Q, OOQ. 00 44. Misc . Streets & Development , Fund � 200,0OO. OQ 150 ,000.00 r � � CITY OF GR.APEVINE , TEXAS � PROPOSED GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS � . FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS � ; � � � � PROPOSED PROJECTS AGGREGATE CITY STAFF � TO BE FUNDED AMOUNT RECOMMENDED � PROPOSED FUNDED � PROJECTS PROJECTS w � � � 1984-85 Contd.. � 41 . Street & Drainage Improvements � Central City Area � �1 , 250, 000. 00 � � � 42 . Central Fire Station 400, 000 . 00 � � r 43. Doss Knight/Pool Road ` Improvements 750, 0OO. OQ 600 , O�O. QQ � � Totals for 1984-85 Proposals$4, 500 , 000 . 00 $1, 650 , QOO . OQ � � ��, �Total Proposals (1979-85) $� 16 , 88� . 000 . 00 $8, 000 , 000. 00 � u i �, , . ; � � � � _ � � � � � � ; # � I � ; � i ? , : � , { � € � } � . � f , rt �: � . , ; � ; . � s � § � . { � � , � � � . � r . 3 - a � � � � a ;. � � � k � CZTY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ' EXHIBIT B i PROPOSED WATER & SE��+TER REVENUE BONDS ] FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ! � � � � PROP�SED PR�JECTS AGGREGATE CITY STAFF TO BE FUNDED AMOUNT RECQMMEND�D - PRQPOSED FUNDED � " � PROJECTS PROJECTS . . _ . -' a � ' 1979-$0 ' � � l , Water System Fund $ 2QQ, OOO.. QO $ 2QO ,QOQ .00 i � 2 , Sewer System Fund. 200 , 004. 00 20Q ,04Q .fl0 � ? � �. Water Tower - South part af Tawn 1, 250, 004. 00 1,25Q,OQQ..00 { . ; . . � 4 Water Plant Expansions . . . . v � - . � � 1, 25Q ,OOO . Qq 1,450 ,000 .00 Total Revenue Bonds 1979-80 2 ,904, QQ0 . 04 �, 14Q,OOQ .00 ; I9$Q-81 _ . � � . � 5. Sewer Line Expansion-Little - ; Bear Creek $ 400, 0OO. OQ $ 4QO,OQO. QO � , , ! 6 . Temporary Starage Tank and • , Pump Station for TRA Water 100,000. 00 100 , 000 .00 �� ; ; 7 . Water System Fund - 3QQ,QOO�.QQ 30Q ,000 .00 � 8• Sewer System Fund - _ 300 ,000-.QQ 30Q ,OQQ ,00 � � ; 9 .- _ � • � Tatal Revenue Bands � � . 1980-81 � l� lOQ Q00' 00 1 100 000 00 , � � 1981-82 � �� Water System Fund $ lOQ,00Q. OQ $ 100 , 000. p0 i I + l� Sewer System Fund - lOQ ,000. Q0 100 ,000. 00 � Southern Water Zmprovements 1, QOQ, 000. 00 1,000,000. 00 12 . , • - ; - ' 13. Southern Sewer Zmprovements 6QO, OOO. QQ 600,000. 00 � 14. B�ar Creek Sewer Line ta TRA' S � Truck Lines 2 ,004,oaa. 00 -0- -i � ; , Tatal Revenue �ands j 198I-$2 $3 , 8Q4 ,000. 4Q $1 ,800,000. 00 � i 3 . C I'.I Y OF GRAt'�:V iI�E , `l'�;hAS PRC?POSED �JATER & SEWER REVENUE BONDS FQR CAPITAL IMPROVEriENTS , PROPOSED PRQJECTS AGGREGATE CTTY STAFF � TO BE FUNDED AMOUNT RECO2�1ENDED - PROl?OSED FLINDED - ' � PROJECTS PROJECTS ' 19$2-83 - � ':S . N.E. Water Develapment $ 640,OQQ. QO $ 6QO , OQ0. 00 � � .6 . N.E. Sewer Developmen� 400,000 . 00 400 , 000 . 00 � � s � ' Tc�tal Revenue Bonds � � 19$2--83 $1 ,04Q,OQO. OQ $1,04Q,000. 04 � , - � AGGREGATE REVENUE BOND TOTAL �g� $OQ, 000 :00 $7,OOO ; Q00 ,00 � � i -. � � � ; _ � .. � E _ _ � ; � � _ � i ; � j � � . � : � s, � . � � � , # � f � . � � ` . � � � ' � � 9 } . �: � . P } 1 S p. � x I 1 � � 3 _ 4 } `}': ' . � ' � • � �: . . `'�. y a � € �. � � 3 t. � 3: � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS � � A GE NDA � � JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING r TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 1979 AT 7: 30 P.M. � COUNCIL CF3AMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET � � i I. CALL TO ORDER � € 4 II. INVOCATION: Father B. Szarka = St. Francis Catholic Church � � III. PUBLIC HEARINGS � c � A. City Council and Planning & Zaning Commission � to continue the public hearing relative to � Zoning Application Z79-4 submitted by L. G. ' € Robinson and T. Bowling. � � k x; B. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission � < to hold a public hearing relative to Zoning f Application Z79-5 submitted by Bill Yancey � and Jean Wickman, Trustees, J. M. Williamson � Estate. � � � C. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission � to hold a public hearing relative to Zoning � Application Z79-6 submitted by Keith Cecil � c and Associates . � � D. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission �' to hold a public hearing relative to Zoning � Application Z79-7 submitted Steven I. Ginsberg '' representing Gulf Oil Company. � � E. City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission � to hold a public hearing relative to Zoning � Application Z79-8 submitted by Patti I. Hoff, � t general partner, Love-Henry & McAlister. �: t IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING � € A. City Council to remain in session to consider � further published agenda items. � � � B. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the Conference Room to discuss further business. � �' � � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED � BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, � THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEET- # ING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF i MARCH, 1979 AT 1: 30 P.M. � °s £ � ;; . � € _ i � City ecr ry �: � � � � � � � � � i 1 � i � i �g € s 1 i i � C. City Council to consider the recommendation of ; the Planning & Zoning Commission and a subsequent x ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-7, ; (Gulf Oil Company) . � ; i D. City Council to consider the recommendation of # the Planning & Zoning Commission and a subsequent � ordinance relative to Zoning Application Z79-8, � � (Patti Hoff) . � X. ADJOURNMENT ; � � c € a E �: IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A, T. C. S. , AS ANiENDED ' BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, � THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND � POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 1979 AT 1: 30 P.M. � � � g t . ; � City ecr ary � t � � � f r f � # s � F � � t � � E � x a P E, J: ` �. s ¢: � € � �: ; � ; N t S( E i. �- � . �. i i � � ! � � � , CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS � � ; � A GENDA = � � PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING � TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 1979 AT 8:00 P.M. � k CONFERENCE ROOM — 413 MAIN STREET t s 3 � � 3 � f V. OLD BUSINESS � � Planning & Zoning Commission to make a recommenda- � tion to the City Council relative to sign height � restrictions . z � i VI. NEW BUSINESS � < A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning ? � Application Z79-5 (Yancey & Wickman) and make a recommendation to the City Council. � B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z79-6 (Keith Cecil & Associates) and p make a recommendation to the City Council. � � ,. C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning � � Application Z79-7 (Gulf Oil Company) and make � a recommendation to the City Council. � � � F D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application Z79-8 (Patti Hoff) and make a recom- � � ' mendation to the Cit Council. Y ; � � � VII. MINUTES � Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the � minutes of December 19, 1978, January 16, 1979 � and February 20, 1979. �' VIII. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSIONS �' F: i IX. ADJOURNMENT � � � � � IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A. T.C.S. , AS AMENDED $ BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR �. SESSION, THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA � WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 1979 AT 1:30 P.M. F: � f ; i- City Secr a � � t= �: � s ._� � ' STATE OF TEXAS � COUNTY OF TARRANT � � CITY OF GRAPEVINE X j The City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission of the � City of Grapevine , Texas met in Joint Session on this the 20th � day of March, 1979 , at 7 : 30 P.M. with the following persons in attendance to-wit : i William D. Tate Mayor � David A. Florence Councilman � Ted R. Ware Councilman , C. L. (Larry) Oliver Councilman � Doil Dalton Councilman ' William Shafer Councilman ' Charles Dunn Councilman constituting a quorum with the following Planning and Zoning ; Commission members in attendance : Harlen Joyce Acting Chairman Jerry Burgess Member Dwayne Rogers Member � Robert Sands Member Bob Stewart Member constituting a quorum with the following City Staff Members : ; James L. Hancock City Manager Bob Hart Administrative Assistant John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Shirley Armstrong City Secretary CALL TO ORDER :� Mayor Tate called the meeting to order. � INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Father B. Szarka, St. Francis Catholic Church. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z79-4 - � The first order of business was for the City Council and the Planning � and Zoning Commission to continue the Public Hearing opened during , the meeting of February 20 , 1979 relative to Zoning Application No. Z79-4 submitted by L. G. Robinson and T. Bowling. � { The City Secretary advised the Council that the applicants had re- ' quested their application be withdrawn. Planning and Zoning Commission Member Dwayne Rogers made a motion to withdraw the application and close the Public Hearing. The motion ' was seconded by Member Bob Stewart and prevailed by the following vote : ; Ayes : Joyce , Burgess , Rogers , Sands , and Stewart � Nays : None ' Councilman Ware then made a motion to close the Council' s portion of the Public Hearing and withdraw the application. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dalton and prevailed by the following vote : ;� Ayes : Tate, Ware , Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Dunn, and Shafer Nays : None PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z79-5 '� The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to consider Zoning Application No. Z79-5 sub- mitted by Bill Yancey and Jean Wickman, Trustees , J. M. Williamson ' Estate. _ � } 03/20/79 � � The City Secretary explained that the property in question �Tas � a 2. 84 acre tract of land on the east side of Main Street , north � of the American Bank of Commerce. She noted that the present zoning � was "R-1" Single Family Dwelling Di.s� "rict with the requested zoning �. being "C-2" Community Business District Zoning. A presentation was not made on behalf of the applicants . � � Mayor Tate asked if there were any questions from the Planning and � Zoning Commission in regard to the zoning request . There were none. � Members of the Council were then asked if they had any questions ± relative to the application. There were none. � � � There were no guests present to speak for or against the applica- � tion. � � � Member Jerry Burgess then made a motion to close the Planning and � Zoning Commission' s portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was ` seconded by Member Robert Sands and prevailed by the followin; vote : � � Ayes : Joyce, Burgess , Stewart , Rogers , and Sands � � Nays : None � Councilman Dalton then made a motion to close the Council' s portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman � Florence and prevailed by the following vote : � � Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Ware, Dalton, Dunn, and Shafer � Nays : None � � PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z79-6 ` k The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission to hold a Public Hearing for consideration of Zoning Application No. Z79-6 submitted by Keith Cecil and Associates . Z ` � t The City Secretary advised that the property in question contained � slightly over seventeen (17) acres located on the south side of � West Northwest Highway (near Manor Drive) and extending southward to West Wall Street. She further stated that the applicants were re- � questing that the zoning be changed from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling � District to "R-3" Multi-Family Dwelling District . 4 Mr. Keith Cecil then made a presentation advising that plans for the property were to build three (3) story apartments using the natural beauty and terrain of the l.�.nd to enhance the appearance of the pro- � ject. He then made a slide presentation of a similar project he had � � built in the City of Austin, Texas . � � x Mayor Tate asked if there were any qu?stions from the Planning and � Zoning Commission. There were none. � ; Several questions were then asked by members of the Council. � Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present in the audience to , speak for or against the application. . The following persons spoke u in opposition to the zoning request : �: Mrs . Sharon Spencer Mr. J. J. Remelius Mr . Ron Cook � 101 Manor Way 404 Bluebonnet 403 Bluebonnet � c � Mr. Gerald Gregg Mr. Jack Roper r4r . Bill White $ 508 Bluebonnet 421 Bluebonnet 306 Crestview � � Mrs . R. C. Patterson Mr . Bob LewE7.len Mr. Jerry Jordan � 1550 W. Wall Grapevine Resident 509 Bluebonnet �! � The general consensus was that the above mentioned persons opposed � the zoning request because of the following reasons : (a) added traffic � congestion on West Northwest Highway, Wall Street, and other area 3 streets ; (b) increased Police problems generally associated with � apartments ; (c) decrease in neighboring property values ; (d) expected � drainage problems , especially toward the north; (e) crowded school � , , r # � i i , conditions because of increase in the number of inhabitants0.3/20/79 � (f) too many apartments already in Grapevine as opposed to res- idential areas ; (g) increase in neighborhood noise. Mrs . Tillery, an adjacent property owner, stated that she had no a opposition to the zoning request because she felt it would increase � the possibility of the sale of her property. Mr. Allen Myers , present owner of the property in question, advised that several offers had been previously made for the purchase of ! said property. He advised that those offers had been refused be- cause he did not feel the proposed usages were in the best interest of the City of Grapevine. He further noted that he was quite pleased � when approached by Mr. Cecil and advised of the quality of the pro- posed apartment project. Mr. Myers further stated that his interest in Grapevine was not purely financial, but that it was his intent to sell the property in the near future. The City Secretary then read into the record letters from the � following persons (letters attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibits "A-C" ; C. H. Oliver, Mr. & Mrs . A. G. Simmons , and Billy and Alice Hardin) . , A short discussion followed among the Council during which Council- man Dunn stated that he felt those attending in opposition of the zoning case were representative of a large number of the City' s res- idents . He noted that the City Council and Planning and Zoning Com- : , mission might want to consider a workshop session in the near future to regain a sense of direction of the future development of Grapevine regarding residential development as it related to Multi-Family de- velopment. ' There being no further discussion, Planning and Zoni.ng Commission ' Member Robert Sands made a motion to close the Commission' s portion of tlie Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Dwayne Rogers and prevailed by the following vote : 3 Ayes : Joyce, Rogers , Burgess , Stewart , and Sands Nays : None Councilman Shafer then made a motion to close the Council. ' s portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Council.man Florence and prevailed by the following vote : � Ayes : Tate, Florence, Ware, Oliver , Shafer, Dunn, and Dal.ton Nays : None � PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION N0. 279-7 ' � The next order of business was for the City Council and the Planning j and Zoning Commission to hold a Public Hearing relative to Zoning , Application No. Z79-7 submitted by Steven I. Ginsberg, representing Gulf Oil Company. , The City Secretary advised that the property in questi.on contained a 0. 7 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Highway 114 and South Main Street. She further noted that the applicants were requesting to change the zoning from "C-2" Community Business Dis- J trict to "SP" Specific Use Permit Ditrict Zoning for the retail 1 sale, storage, and off premise consumption o� a7,coholi.c beverages , j beer only, incidental to the operation of a service stati.on and con- venience store and other uses as permitted under the "C-2" Community Business District Zoning. ! Mr. Steven Ginsberg then made a presentation on behalf of Gulf Oil 1 Company. He stated that his clients had both public convenience ' and profit motive in mind in establishing a service station and grocery related outlet. He then made mention of distances to res- idential districts , schools , churches , and other service station/ � convenience stores in the area. � There were no questions from the Planning and Zoning Commission or from the Council. No guests were present to speak for or against ��i the application. �� i � 03/20/79 � There being no further discussion, Membez Dwayne Rogers made a � motion to close the Commission' s portion of the Public Hearing. �. The motion was seconded by Member Bob Stewart and prevailed by � the following vote : � Ayes : Joyce, Burgess , Stewart , Rogers , and Sands � Nays : None � � Councilman Oliver then made a motion to close the Council' s por- � tion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Council- � man Dunn and prevailed by the following vote : � � Ayes : Tate , Florence , Oliver, Ware, Dalton, Dunn, and Shafer � � Nays : None ' � PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z79-8 � � s The next order of business was for the City Council and the Plan- � ning and Zoning Commission to hold a Public Hearing relative to � Zoning Application No. Z79-8 submitted by Patti Hoff, General Part- � ner, Love-Henry and McAlister. � � 4 The City Secretary advised that the property in question contained � approximately thirteen (13) acres of land located on the east side � of Highway 157 (in the extreme southern section of the city) in the a G. M. Bell Survey. She further advised that the applicants were � requesting that the zoning be changed from "R-1" Single Family � Dwelling District to "I-1" Light Industrial District . � P Mr. Kenneth McWaters then made a short presentation on behalf of � Mrs . Hoff. He explained that the proposed usage �f the property Y was for garden type office space facilities . He noted that the � "I-1" Zoning was requested to accommodate light inhouse assembly ; relative to non-customer businesses . ; � There was little discussion from the Planning and Zoning Commission �. k and the City Council. No guests were present to speak for or � g against the application. � � � There being no further discussion, Member Robert Sands made a mo- � tion to close the Planning and Zoning Commi.ssion' s portion of the � Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Bob Stewart and s prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Joyce, Stewart , Sands , Burgess , and Rogers Nays : None � Mayor Tate noted that following a short recess , the Council would � reconvene in the Conference Room to discuss further publ�shed agenda � items . He advised that because of the large number of interested � persons in attendance relative to the zoning cases , the Planning � and Zoning Commission would remain in session in the Council Chambers . � The public was invited to attend either session. � � Mayor Tate called the Council to order in the Conference Room. � MINUTES � The first order of business was consideration of the minutes of � March 6 , 1979 . There being no additions or corrections to the � minutes , Councilman Dalton made a motion to waive the reading of the minutes of March 6 , 1979 and approve them as printed. The mo- tion was seconded by Councilman Florence and prevailed by the fol- _ lowing vote : � � Ayes : Tate, Florence , Oliver , Ware, Dalton,Dunn, and Shafer � Nays : None � 4 � MEMBERSHIP - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an � ordinance amendment to increase the membership of the Planning and � Zoning Commission to seven (7) . � � ; � � 03/20/79 The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinanc�. ' City Attorney John Boyle gave a brief summary of the contents of � the ordinance. There ��. no discussion fzam the Council, Councilman Dunn made a � motion that the ordinance be adopted. The motion was seconded by i Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Dunn, Ware, and Shafer Nays : None { ORDINANCE N0. 79-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE AMENDING � TITLE CHAPTER SECTION 19-1 OF THE GRAPEVINE CITY CODE BY INCREASING THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE PLAN- NING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM SIX (6) MEMBERS TO SEVEN (7) MEMBERS ; AMENDING THE REMOVAL PROCEDURE; REMOVING THE MAYOR AS AN EX-OFFICIAL MEMBER; PRO- ; VIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND DECLARING AN EMER- ; GENCY. APPOINTMENTS - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ! The next order of business was for the City Council to consider appointments to the Planning and Zoning Commission. It was noted that following the upcoming election in April, appoint- � ments would need to be made relative to all city committies and ' boards . Threfore , Councilman Oliver made a motion to table consid- eration of appointments to the Planning and Zoning Coznmission until after the City Election. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the folllowing vote : Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Dunn, Ware, and Shafer Nays : None ORDINANCE - HOUSING BOARD - BUILDING CODE BOARD L r s The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an ordinance providing for the same persons to serve on both the Hous- ing Advisory and Appeals Board and the Uniform Building Code Board of Appeals . The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. � . . . There being no discussion, Councilman Florence made a motion to adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dunn ; and prevailed by the following vote : a � Ayes : Tate, Florence , Oliver, Dalton, Dunn, Ware, and Shafer I Nays : None ORDINANCE N0. 79-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE PROVIAING FOR THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE HOUSING ADVISORX AND APPEALS BOARD AUTHORIZED BY THE UNIFORM HOUSING � CODE , 1973 EDITION, AND THE BOARD OF APPEALS j AUTHORIZED BY THE 1976 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM ' BUILDING CODE TO CONSIST OF THE SAME MEMBERS ; t PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. ORDINANCE - S�IMMING POOL FENCES ' The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the ordinance on second reading providing for fences around swim- ming pools . � The City Secretary read the caption of the pra�osed ordinance. ' Following a short discussion, Councilman Dalton made a motion to approve the ordinance on second reading. The motion was seconded ; by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote : � 03/20/79 � i � Ayes : Tate, Florence , Oliver, Ware, Dalton, Dunn, and Shafer � Nays : None � � ORDINANCE N0. 79-9 � � AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , � PROVIDING FOR SWIMMING POOLS TO BE SURROUNDED � BY A FENCE; PROVIDING SPECIFICATIONS ; PROVID- : ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE TO EXISTING SWIMMING POOLS ; PROVID- ' ING A PENALTY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. � ; The Council was then advised that the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion had adjourned. Therefore , the Council reconvened in the ' Council chambers to continue with their published agenda items . � t ORDINANCE - SIGN HEIGHTS � � € � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider � the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and a � subsequent zoning ordinance amendment pertaining to sign height � requirements . � k The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance . � f: City Engineer Jim Baddaker advised that the Planning and Zoning p � Commission recommended the existing 50 foot maximum sign height � be retained an all requests for signs in excess of that hei�ht be � refer�ed to the Board of Zoning Adjustments and further recommended � that all plans for signs over ZO feet carry the seal of a registered �, engineer. The City Manager then advised that it was the recommendation of the � City Staff that the sign height ordinance be amended to allow a ; sign height not to exceed 60 foot along controlled access highways in a 200 foot width on either side of the highway and also to re- 4 quire construction plans of signs over 20 feet to carry the seal of ��=. a registered engineer. � � `ff 3 Following a short discussion, Councilman Dunn made a motion to � accept the recommendation of the City Staff and adopt the ordinance � in accrodance with the recommendation of the City Staff. The motion was seconded by Councilman Ware and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate, Florence , Oliver, Ware, Dalton, Dunn, and Shafer Nays : None � tt � ORDINANCE N0. 79-16 d �. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF GRAPEVZNE ' S � BASIC ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE HEIGHT � REQUIREMENT FOR GENERAL BUSINESS AND ADVERTIS- � ING SIGNS AND PROVIDING FOR PLANS TO BE CERTI- � FIED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ON ; ALL SIGNS IN EXCESS OF TWENTY FEET (20 ' ) IN � HEIGHT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PRO- � VIDING A PENALTY AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BID- GREENS MOWER - GOLF COURSE .- ; � � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider �� and award the bids for the purchase of a greens mower and tractor for use on the Golf Course. The City Manager advised the Council of the following bids received � relative to the greens mower. � Goldthwaite ' s of Texas , Inc. -- $4,420 . 00 ° P. 0. Box 630 1401 Foch � Fort Worth, Texas � ! 3 �: � 1: _ _ 03/20/79 ' ; Colonial Motor Company -- $4,650 . 00 P. 0. Box 59225 2030 Walnut Hill Lane Dallas , Texas 75229 He further advised that the City Staff recommended the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Goldthwaite' s of Texas , Inc. in the amount of $4,420 . 00. Councilman Dalton made a motion to accept the recommendation of �.� the City Staff and award the bid for the purchase of a reens , mower to Goldthwaite' s of Texas , Inc . in the amount of �4,420 . 00. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Dalton, Shafer, Ware, and Oliver Nays : None BIDS - TRACTOR - GOLF COURSE ` Mr. Hancock advised the Council of the following bids received re- � lative to the purchase of a tractor with loader for use on the Golf Course. Hatcher Tractor Co. , Inc. -- Massey Ferguson Tractor --$9 ,441. 93 � Loop 820 and Wilbarger with loader P. 0. Box 15249 � Fort Worth, Texas 76119 Trinity Equipment Company -- John Deere Tractor --$8 ,922 . 00 � 3230 E. Carpenter Fwy. with loader Irving, Texas 75062 Mr. Hancock advised that the City Staff recommended acceptance of the low bid of $8 , 922. 00 as submitted by Trinity Equipment Company. ;x 1 Councilman Florence made a motion to accept the recommendation of the City Staff and award the bid to Trinity Equipment Company in the amount of $8 , 922 . 00. The motion was seconded by Councilman j Oliver and prevailed by the following vote : ; Ayes : Tate, Florence , Dunn, Dalton, Shafer, Ware , and Oliver Nays : None AUTHORIZATION - UTILITY RATE STUDY `" The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the ' authorization of Freese and Nichols to prepare a utility rate study. City Manager Jim Hancock advised that the proposed capital improve- ments program and subsequent bond election would necessitate a ' ; utility rate study to assure that the net revenue from operations were sufficient to fund additional bonds . He also noted that the capital expenditure on the proposed TRA line needed to be examined as to its impact on operating costs . Mr. Hancock advised that the estimated cost would be a maximum of $20 ,000 . 00 depending on the detail necessary during the study. � Councilman Dalton then made a motion to accept the recommendation of the City Staff and authorize Freese and Nicho�.s to prepare the , a utility rate study with the City Manager and City Staff to deter- mine the depth of the study. The motion was seconded by Council- man Florence and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Dalton, Shfer, Ware, and Oliver Nays : None BID- POWER RESCUE TOOL The next order of business was for the City Council to consider and award the bid for the purchase of a power rescue tool� � � 6 �: 03/20/79 � � � The City Manager advised that the City Staff recommended accep- ; tance of the only bid received as follows : � Texas Firefighters 32A Rescue Tool $5 , 766. 80 � Equipment Company 30�� Extension Hose 198 . 65 � P. 0. Box 570 Total Bid 5�,�5� � New Braunfels , Texas 78130 � Mr. Hancock also noted that $5 , 000. 00 of the cost would be paid � with Revenue Sharing Funds . � Councilman Oliver made a motion to accept the recommendation of � the City Staff and award the bid to Texas Firefighters Equipment � Company in the amount of $5 , 965 . 45 . The motion was seconded by � ; Councilman Shafer and prevailed by the following vote : ; � Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Dalton, Shafer, Ware, and Oliver ' E, Nays : None � ORDINANCE - ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z79-5 - The next order of business was for the Cz.ty Council to consider � the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and ` a subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Application No . Z79-5 . � Administrative Assistant Bob Hart advised that the Planning and �: Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the applica- � tion. � � The City Secretary then read the caption of the proposed ordinance . � � Councilman Florence made a motion that the ordinance be adopted. � The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate , Florence , Dunn, Dalton, Shafer, Ware, and Oliver Nays : None g � ORDINANCE N0. 79-15 ' AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10 , THE � � COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ; GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS TITLE 10 OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , GRANTING � A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS , BEING A PART OF THE WILLIAM DOOLEY SURVEY, ABSTRACT ; N0. 422 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , MORE � FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF `' THIS ORDINANCE, ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "R-1" SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT � ZONING, CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING F ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVER- f ABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING � CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. �. ORDINANCE - ZONING APPLICATION NO. Z79-6 � The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and a � subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning App�.ication No. Z79-6 . � > Mr. Hart reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission had voted � unanimously to deny the application. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance . � Councilman Dalton made a motion to accept the recommendation of the # Planning and Zoning Commission and deny the application. The motion was seconded by Councilman Ware. s�' i � r 03/20/79 Councilman Dalton then stated that he felt it would be in the best interest of the City to consider a workshop to review the zoning situation within the City for the purpose of insuring balanced zoning in the future. Mayor Tate commented that he would have preferred to table the item for further study based upon all of the comments made during the Public Hearing. He noted that the Council had already granted some commercial and Multi-Family Zoning in the same area between Northwest Highway and Wall Street with some residential screening. � He added that he was not necessarily in favor of the application as submitted, but did feel that further indepth consideration needed to be given as to what the highest and best use would be for that property in an effort to regain some consistency in that area. Mayor Tate then called for a vote in regard to Councilman Dalton' s motion as stated above. It prevailed by the following vote : Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Dalton, Oliver, Shafer , and Ware Nays : None � ORDINANCE - ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z79-7 The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and a subsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Application No. Z79-7 . Mr. Hart advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission had rec- ommended denial of the application by a vote of 3 to 2 . The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. It was the consensus of the Council Members that they did not feel � beer should be made available to pass-thru traffic on Highway 114. It was also noted that the property in question was located next ' door to a family restaurant and that no other establishments sell- ,� ing beer had been permitted along Highway 114. Councilman Dalton then made a motion to accept the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and deny the application. The motion was seconded by Councilman Florence and prevailed by the following vote : d Ayes : Tate, Florence, Dunn, Dalton, Oliver , Shafer, and Ware Nays : None � ORDINANCE - ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z79-8 The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and a suqsequent ordinance relative to Zoning Appliation No. Z79-8. ' Mr. Hart reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission had voted unanimously to approve the application. The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance. i Councilman Ware made a motion to accept the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and adopt the ordinance. The mo- tion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the follow- ing vote : � � Ayes : Tate , Florence, Dunn, Oliver, Dalton, Shafer , and Ware Nays : None , ORDINANCE N0. 79-14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10 , THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , SAME BEING ALSQ KNOWN AS TITLE 10 OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , GRANTING j A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS � � 03/20/79 � � � BEING A LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND ; BEING SITUATED IN TARR.ANT COUNTY, TEXAS , BEING ; A PART OF THE G. M. BELL SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. ; 234 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS , MORE FULLY � AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS i ORDINANCE , ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF � SAID PROPERTY FROM "R-1" SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING F f DISTRICT TO "I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT = ZONING, CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ; � PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ; ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO � SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC � INTEREST, riORALS , AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND `';, A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE ; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLARING AN EMER- GENCY. ; � ADJOURNMENT ; � a There being no further business to come before the Council, a mo- tion was made by Councilman Oliver to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and all in attendance voted aye. � � � PASSED AND APPROVED on this the � � da of � , 1979 . � � � /v .Ci�� Mayor � ATTEST: � t � � � � City S cre r �� ; � � F � � � g' i � � i {; y { � � 7 v. 3 �. a 1 r �. $ � F: d' v F t i f �: e' € i'. � g }; � ' � EXHIBIT A � � , � � � � � March 19, 1979 1 1 ? Td: Grapevine City Gouncil ' and Members of the Planning and Zaning Commissian � I would like to express to you my oppositian and cancern involving Zaning agplication Z7q=6. I am a groperty owner within 200 feet, across Northwest Highwa�► fram the property i.n question. I oppose the zoning change for four reasons: number ane, the city's Master Flan calls for the gra�-�.er-ty to be a low population density area -- not Multi—family; number two, with the establishment of the Brookside additian to the west af ine , s:�� there has been a marked increase in the water f1QW.that passes down the branch �� through the Manor Oaks additian. There is a considerable amount of trash from the construction in the Brookside addit3.on. With the eanstruction af apartments ac�oss Northwest Hwy. and the large expanses of asphalt drives � and parking to be estab�.ished would only increase the water flow under ' North�est Hwy which conriects with the branch coming from the Brookside addition. This abv.i.ous increase in the water flow would be detrimental ta my property; � ' number three, I believe the construction of apartments would surely I.ower ; , ' the value of my praperty; and faurth, I don't see any w�y that Narthwest Highway � can handle the increase in traffic flow that would occur if apartments were built on the land in question. It definitely is not the highest or best use j for that land. I wish to appeal to you on thi.s matter. � � Respectfully urs, � . /� ,,,�G'!'�,�J�"' , C.H. Oliver 100 Crosscreek Dr. Grapevine, Texas i ; . d. � , � � � , � EXHIBIT B . } � � � � � � a � � . � � �' z � f, � �. � i , �t, _.._ C� ,�j � � �! j � �� / / � . � � / � � `" 'L�'.e�c-,' ��..- "�� j-��t y�„ Gc.{�a.,0 ��! � C-...�`-..G�L.�3'L�C—� � � � � � CJ � � .;��-.e-�.--�..�. �,,�, ; r i � - / - ' .-l � i ��-�'{'.-Lt,/.G�-1� � �f�k�,:,,�""`"�"-� -'/1iL 1 ��.�.2G�L�-�L � � t , / � �f✓.' F " tCa '��It_,..�.. �--72�i�—� .�(,i��-�-t�.E.�C.��%� 7�"`'-- t� � � r / � � , � E: I � /� J �y �/�1( � �/f��`�� ^--{�/'�,� ,//�/� (/`/�( y�"�,�f/'/ ` � � f•�' �`+�'I"/ _�//�./�.." � ��./�.'".�/ � `5.�1l._��+..J �-^^'L�--�_"4^�n. / �t4'.�-'_ p. 'Si (�/� G V� f l �i�t�� I �2"` _ � � i � � 'k��7�-�� ,� # � '� �ir f �y� � � , } � ��z�i�2. �{�,/ ,�� f i -Z'""`,� �.-c L'�:..C�G�.r�,, r ; 1�� .� � i r �- . �f � � � �� -<.�--� �l�-=- �1�.�. -��,.�..X�.� � � i f �: , � � �,�..� � ', � / � v�.� �-' ..�Gti�' �-�—� `--�,�._,-'— ��'--�- � f t j� � � I � C_-�.,,2,,� �� ~�+�.,.- .L-�yL�,��;,�-�:.�c� �iGt;C_.r'.� ��z�--- I'�� ' , r (/.' t � � � , � �-t,c1� ��C�.,• ��-�Z!./�-- ��L�-'�--- ��-CZ.�..- :� �"7�-��— � � r ,� a 1 G- L�� - � � A � j� � � �� `-""-�"" 'i�'�—fr "„� � L�iL�'C-.�C...--0"'7L-- �(,-� � 1 /1�I�� i�f.{�� ' r : ! �/ L�L'✓!� �� / 7"�-G D�--C �' L --- �.�'.r�'Q..-�-�" L"" �. ��, �� r ! � j � t� � c "Z_� (/�tr�..�_-�� ` `�;f %� `� � ��'� ' � ' �/�-�,�L— �t:�r'��L� « �.E'� G t C��,r� � t / � ` � ` - -- ' ' ' � � � ��'Y�ze� -C,v -cr��-- Ci�'L� � �`'�''�`�,.� �- >� F � ��`�'�``�- � �'�. (�.�u �-z2�- l� :G�'�,� •4 t_L.,L��..� � � � t l/ L'' /1 f j/J r t j ��`��/ ��`/y� ��' �'L-�C-�r--7•-C•--7 - . �_ir��( /� , yp, " F�/ � //� � i„"C..._ [ � �� f.,..��4,/' �.r(.2'....-'f / v� ,.V ! f Y _._.—,� / ',�/'/ ��^�---}'L-�.,.c-G��-L�.c-.�--�-' -�- �� t/ ' . '°��✓�,'i' S� ,�'�iL�� ,f� ' � � ,�G-3��-1.--�3 ��'a ; E e ? . �y � � . . ' ' . . . �. , fi - £ t` • • . 4 � [ . 4. r k � EXHIBIT C � � . i � � 1 I � � i � � �: rn_p_.,.._.�..�-w..., � �,�-�-��t..,-.ru�.-..t.�. V 4-`K`,`,.�z. !J�-°--e�.�- ..-y.t.R.,_...,lt.�......�' / '...�o.�-...w-�•,�.. : l� �-r-�-AC- r'�ati,.�...-� ' I�'-J�-- ..t�,.-<-�.�C/ �i �-"-�cc� CI"Gt--ci G�..-C.�..-t-�-�./ � -'�2?�4.4.^-.�. L��rj .�.-''-�..l�r-u,.,., �r ^ / "�- �p . t�"C-c---f� '__��..�.y� _-c-s.d .�"�i,�.Yp�-r��c..t.....� �t.it�`�-u-�-�- .--y"---=-"��'-�.GG A G'! ��.-c..� �..�-�- .�-�-�__�__�.�.-.u,�-P,�.�,. n-� �--�--t-�--' �=�..rG _-�- _,..�4.��..e.� - �-�.�' �-...�.,� �,--R--��..� � _,..��'�=-- .. - �' � �,�<�.�., �t.�,r..�- � ..��-�--j � �,�,�. �-��-��,��c-- --�-�--- � ��//J .1�-"'"� / _,�•Z'��_�-.41� �`-�,.�.�!'_�`c_.:./ � .-�-rJ4'-t-c•,-a,, , . L" �L� �� C..GvCL-�'�-a"c-,C/ --^''`r" "'�-�^'� , IG�.�.."''_„ : ' ��,,2„G,��c-�...-�-- � -�''�,y``�.�`r ��+ �--, / ��,�,L�..�,t._� --��"�` � -`� _.,�,o-.,>�:�_.,�_..- .�-�--�- <�� __•-�6u--� � ��t,�--,�/ _ C,�-�--^--�or-t--- _, ,t„<,,,,, �.,.--,G�I-,a-=-�-�-�-'(-- �� f ��,J �i-� ��c-- c'�-a �-r�.<� �'.r�-n..-�-�-c.�-..G- o�,�.��,.�J'� ? 0�_..,.. ..-� �`�.�� ` / � ,�,,�l�G�-�'' --�"°`�x".�- i�-` � _.;clL2., _..c.-2- x�-,�L_.L...�--� � a J i �!L..�.. _._-c..c-f-�j,,c.,- ��-/ L,.'��7"""'�z.�..-c....s-�'_.G�,..v/ G�--�-�..^�-� �-u-.--<..<._..�/ -''Gt / ,,[ G��"'�� -`�i '�.t-z ��-�'.2�„Ci .�r«/�f�.�av' , ' p � � �j�a_� -Lf�c j r1 G^ !f , { /��_,�� f,��-�G Cc�� ,. -�/ �i ��,� ��...�, �r�-�---� �G o,�� i I " j � � ' . i . � 4 • �