HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-10-17 Joint Meeting i
�
� CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
A GENDA
JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1978 AT 7:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET
" I. CALL TO ORDER
II. INVOCATION: Rev. Albert Warnken
Memorial Baptist Church
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. City Council & Planning & Zoning Commission to hold a
public hearing for the purpose of o�nsidering zoning
application Z78-20 submitted by Bob Taylor.
B. City Council & Planning & Zoning Commission to hold a
public hearing for the purpose of considering zoning
a lication Z78-21 submitted b Br an Snowden.
PP Y Y
C. City Council & Pla�nning & Zoning Commission to hold a
public hearing for the purpose of considering zoning
application Z78-22 submitted by Theron S. Bradford,
Trustee.
D. City Council & Planning & Zoning Commission to hold a
public hearing for the purpose of considering zoning
application Z78-23 submitted by Billy Lane and Phil
Oliver.
IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
A. The Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the
Conference Room to consider further business.
B. The City Council to remain in session to consider
other published agenda items.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY _
CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE
JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER,
1978, AT 2:00 P.M.
City Sec tary
W
z
H
W
a
W
O
E1
H
U
E1
a 00
H l�
U �
Q
CzW'J OU
H W
U m
O
M,
W
W
H U)
a E1
w z
Ul O
a
N ly.
N
c�D7 z
-- a
W
U) U
EW1 � H
�D O
O
M
E1 W FC
w o EA
O H c!)
z O �D
O CYQ
9�
W � z
AH r -I N
U) H
z A E1
O z H
0
z
H
U
H
a
P4
a
1
04
O
.� a) to
4J 5 (IJ
�4 A X0.1
O rU
4-1 >i
41 a)
tl•r11~
C C O
ro •r -I
� U a) �
U U] (C) ,7
X0004
p o p
Q ro ~ 0
(Si ra 44
Q) C O
4J -U 4J
(U
: 3 4J
V tr O -r-1
o -H � —1
U � a
O a) 4J >1
-P 4J 4J
0 C -r1
r -I ra -A U
.,q
U 4a U) (1)
0 O N �
4J
U(On a) C
>1 04 4J
4J p C 4J
U a E 3
I
r -I
r I
�
�
I
'H El
O
I
a)
1
O
a)
ri
U)
is
i4
a)
M
E! -r4
.0
1
a)
a
V
a)
4J
C
•r -I
4
C
•r4 1-I
4J
104
3.4
4J
-r1
4J •
-H
U
U)
a)
o
Ul
I
N
U
N
U
44
r,
44
S:: O
44
U
W
O
rl
ro a)
�
rtS
O
•rl 0
O
•rl U
O
•r1
C
a)
4H
P
O
�4 4J
$4
a)
C U
C C
C
rt
a)
O
.0
rtS U)
O
.0 p
C
O C
C
O (a
C
O
C
4J
•
4
ro
4
4J
3>i
4
4J O
O
N N
O
N z
O
N
•r1
U]
4J
H
4J
O U)
4J
4-1
H
C
rl
-4
r-1
ra
o
a)
,�
0
i~
-1)
:�
I~
4J
o -H
4J
o ra
4-)
o
P
4J
H
4a
rt
O
t)i
(Ti
O m
(0
4J ra
(0
4-) )•4
(0
4J
O
0
O
u
p
m C
p C
V
}4
ra
O
ra
4J
ra
C
4-1
C •rl
C
4-I •,1
C
a) O
a)
C
a)
C
C
a)
r -I
4J
O
ra p
O
73
a)
5
a)
> C
a)
>
(a
EjU
3
zs:
4Za0
4
r.0
4rr
4`0
8
ra
V
Ul
a)
p
-r-I
C
rtS
C •r♦
C
M 4-I
O
rtS
O
(a ra
O
rt
C
C
C
(ti
4
r—I
P
4-4 C
r i
p
U
r l ra
U
r -I C
U
r -I
(tS
a)
a)
a)
3
U
O
tr
o
o
tr o
a)
a) C
v
a) (0
a)
a)
M
ru
rtS
I`1
I1
40-1
(0
Ei
N
N
M O
4J
a)
ra
z-1
r- 4J
1.4
r -I
u
a)
C
a)
- ,
m
C
i3
C
tr
p
r1
p
a)
rC
O
.0
O C
,-C
O
p
rtf
in
4J
(a
C
RS
O
ty) 0
RS
O M
•n
4J
-H
4J
-H a)
4J
-1
O
f I
•
r4
4-1
C U
4-1 C
O
EQO
(n ra
U)
4H
S4
�4
�
p
5
S•4
H p
p
r lP
p
U) r -I
P
Ul 3
�4
U)
ra
a)
O
Q)
u
Q)
O
a)
>,
V -H
a)
>v ra
04
a)
•r1 a,
Q)
•r1 O
a)
-r-I
ro
ra
U
ra
RS
ro
r
ro
r -I
•r4 U
ro
r -I •ri
ra
(If
ra
ra
p
•rl
rl
pr
l
-r-I
Q
>
-r-I
Q >
4J
ri
0 E I
H
0C
U)
r-1
I
CQ
U)
44
U)
4J
U)
.S:
U)
04
O ra
Ul
104 O
U)
U)
O
Ul
O `-'
N
O
C
r -I
C
C
C
4J
C
0
p 0
C
(1s p
-rl
C
U
C
U
C
U
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
04 U)
O
104
r-1
U)
O
O
O
r-{
O
N
U
is
U
U
U
(a
U
O
O
U
O
(0
E-+
U
t)) N
U
til N
U
S
N
a)
4J
C "1
4J C•
rl
C I
C 1 6
C
I
-
O
is
O>1
O
O
O U
O
O
U
O
•ri 00
O
O
-r-I 0o O
O
-rl
0o
O
4J
C
4J
C
4J
C
4J
4-I
-r1
4J
4-1 -H
a)
a
4,
C t\
4J
4J
C I\ 4J
4J
C
I\
4J
'H
RS
N
4-4
Ul (4S
4-4 Ul
04
O N
a)
O N Q)
O
N
a)
r -I
ro
r -I
114
r -i
r-♦
(Ti
-H
r-4
M -r-I
U)
A
r -I
N
f I
ri
N )•4
r -I
N
p
.r-1
•r.
H
;✓
-r-I
4-1
-H
4J
> 4--I
r4
4J >
'Z
•r4
C
Q)
rl
[' Q)
-4
C
Q)
U>
U
O
u
0
U
U)
-H O
U
w -r-I
C
<
U(Z
O
'C
U(Z
O s~
U
L6
O
.0
C
O
C
U
C
C
A
C
A
O
C
.11
4J
C
rl 4J
C
•r1
4J
C
�4
U]
C
Q)
0
>1
(D
C
>1
•rl
U)
C
tai 4J
C
tr 4J
C
m
4J
0
04
(a
O
a)
O
Ul
O
4J
Q) U)
O
4J Q)
4J
W
O
C 01j)
O
C 0 tr
O
C
m
tp
U
W
U
u
U
N
U
-r1
U (TJ
U
-H U
C
U)
U
-r1
U C
U
•r1
U
C
Q)
rl
U
•rl C
U -rl
Q)
<
C rl
•rl
S" •r4 •r{
C
•rl
-r-I
>,
U
H
>1
>
>1
U
>i
4J U
41
5
U
Jy
C r 4
C
>1
C r -I C
>4
C
r -I
C
4J
C
U]
4J
p
4J
�4
-P
a)
m �4
4J
0 U)
0
4J
rt 04
-rl
4J
(0 Q -r1
4J
(IS
04
•ri
•r4
(a
:Z)
-r-I
a)
-H
"i
-r-I
,S'
C C
-r4
.0 0
�-1
C7
•14
-4 04
(a
-r-I
r -I ,Q M
-H
r -I r -I
04
(0
U
C
w
U
U)
U
a4
U
4J
h 04
U
4J h
04
z
U
P4 M
4J
U
W M -P
U
a
(Z
4J
H
�
z
w
O
�
H
D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission relative to zoning
application Z78-23 (Lane & Oliver) , and an ordi-
nance pertaining thereto.
E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zaning Commission relative to the replat
of Creekwood Estates.
XI. EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. City Council to recess to the Conference Room to
discuss pending litigation pursuant to Article
6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , Section 2, Subsection (f) ,
Texas Civil Statutes.
B. City Council to reconvene in the Council Chambers
� and take any necessary action relative to pending
litigation.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY
CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, �EGULAR SESSION,
THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND
POSTED ON THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1978, AT 2:00 P.M.
.
City ecr a
� �
� �
� �
�
_
�
_
�
E
�
�
€
€
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS =
� �
EMERGENCY AGENDA ITEM `
's
f TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1978 AT 8: 00 P.M. �
COUNCIL CHAMBERS — 413 MAIN STREET i
�
�
# �
F
�
E
;
�:
F
a
s �
{ f
F �
IX. NEW BUSINESS �
} �
4
�
E. City Council to consider a resolution requesting �
that the name of the Grapevine Independent School g
District not be changed. ;
r
>
t
�
5
�
E
4
E
's g
i �
The emergency item was placed on the City Council agenda `
�
because immediate action is necessary to insure the health, �
safety. and general welfare of the citizens of Grapevine, ;
�
Texas . �
� i
E �
�
C
s
� #
�
�
�
f ;
�
� �
' �
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A. T. C. S . , AS AMENDED �
BY C�3APTER 227, ACTS OF T�E 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, �
€
THE EMERGENCY AGENDA ITEM WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE ;�
i 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1978 AT 4:45 P.M, �
�
[
�
�
. ,,
�
�
3
City Secre ry
�
i
a
�
t
r
3
�5k
Y:
{:
3
S'
6`
e
k
�
s
k%
�
¢6
R
6
�
�
�
�:
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
A GENDA
REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1978 AT 8:00 P.M.
CONFERENCE ROOM - 413 MAIN STREET
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider zoning
application Z78-20 (submitted by Bob Taylor) , and
�� make a recommendation ta the City Council.
B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider zoning
application Z78-21 (submitted by Bryan Snowden) , and
make a recommendation to the City Council.
C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider zoning
application Z78-22 (submitted by Theron S. Bradford,
Trustee) , and make a recommendation to the City Council.
D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider zoning
application Z78-23 (submitted by Billy Lane and Phil
Oliver) , and make a recommendation to the City Council.
E. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider a replat of
Creekwood Estates and make a recommendation to the City
Council.
VI. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1978
VII. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS and/or DISCUSSIONS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17. V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY
CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61S'� LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE
REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED
AND POSTED ON THIS THE 13T:i DAY OF OCTOBER, 1978 AT 2 :00 P.M.
City Secr ary
�,
E
�
�
�
z
STATE OF TEXAS �
COUNTY OF TARRANT �
CITY OF GRAPEVINE �
The City Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City 'x
of Grapevine, Texas met in joint session on this the 17th day of ``
October, 1978 at 7 : 30 P.M. with the following members present to- �:
wit :
�
William D. Tate Mayor �
David A. Florence Mayor Pro Tem �
' Charles Dunn Councilman
Larry Oliver Councilman �
Doil Dalton Councilman �
William Shafer Councilman �
Charles Gideon Coouncilman �'
constituting a quorum with the following Planning & Zoning Commission �
Members in attendance: ���
�
Ted Ware Chairman
Harlen Joyce N:ember �'
Bob Stewart Member t
Dwayne Rogers Member �
� Robert Sands Member �
constituting a quorum with Dr. Jerry Burgess , absent, with the following �
� City Staff Members in attendance : �
James L. Hancock City Manager �
Bob Hart Administrative Assistant
John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney �
Shirley Armstrong City Secretary �
�
� = CALL TO ORDER �
�
�
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Tate. �
�
; INVOCATION �
j
The invocation was delivered by Reverand Albert Warnken, Memorial �
Baptist Church. �
' PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z78-21 �
d
' Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. i
� 2
� The City Secretary explained that the applicant , Mr. Bryan Snowden, �
; was requesting that a 2 . 5 acre tract of land located on the southeast �
' corner of Highway 114 and West Northwest Highway be rezoned from
"C-2" Community Business District to "I-1" Light Industrial District. �
i �:
; Mr. Snowden then made a short presentation explaining that plans �
� were to construct individual 2 , 000-3 , 000 square feet buildings �:.
? with office fronts for lease by construction related businesses . �
; a
I �
Mrs . Edith Tillery, property owner to the southeast of the property �
in question, advised that she was opposed to the zoning for fear it �.
would effect the value of her adjoining property. �
�
Mr. Cecil Elfinbine, Attorney, representing the Board of Missions �
(property owners to northeast) advised that plans were to construct
a church on the neighboring property and requested that if the zoning
was granted, that a screening fence be required between the church
owned property and the property in question.
�'
Mr . Richard Eakins , potential investor in the project, spoke in favor �
of the requested zoning and advised that the buildings would be con- �
structed in a manner that would enhance the appeareance of the area. �
�:
Mrs . Alva Herndon, a neighboring property owner advised that she �
objected to the requested zoning.
i
10/17/78
k if h a licants would �
Planning & Zoning Chairman, Ted Ware, as ed t e pp
be willing to consider a Specific Use Permit. Mr. Snowden answered �
yes .
Harlen Joyce, Planing & Zoning Commission member asked if the
applicant would object to construction of a screening fence.
Mr. Snowden answered no. �
Councilman Dalton stated that he felt to grant the application €
would be spot zoning that would not be compatable to the area. ;
There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Commission
member Bob Stewart made a motion to close their portion of the
public hearing. The motion was seconded by member Dwayne Rogers , �
and prevailed by the following vote :
Ayes : Ware, Joyce, Rogers , Sands , Stewart
Nays : �ane
Absent : Burgess
There being no further discussion from the Council, Councilman Dunn
made a motion to close the Council' s portion of the public hearing.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Dalton and prevailed by the �
following vote : `
' Ayes : Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Dunn, and Shafer
�
Nays : None
j PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z78-22 �
�
i Mayor Tate declared the public hearing open. �
�
The City Secretary explained that the applicant, Mr. Theron S . Bradford,
Trustee, was requesting that a 25 . 54 acre tract of land located on
the west side of Park Boulevard be rezoned from "R-1" Single Family Dw , in
to "C-2" Community Business District Zoning.
� Mr. Bradford explained that since the construction of Park Boulevard
I provided a buffer between the residential area and the property in
� question that light commercial zoning along the frontage and possible
town homes on the western edge of the property would be acceptable
i uses for the property.
�
� Councilman Dunn asked what type zoning the future land use map rec-
� commended for the property. The City Manager answered low density
i residential.
There being no further questions from the Council or Planning &
Zoning Commission, Mayor Tate asked if there were any guests present
to speak for or against the zoning.
Mr . Edmond Fry, property owner to the west asked what were the in-
tentions in relation to the right-of-way road that provided access
to his property. Mr. Bradford stated that he was not aware of the
road, but that if it was deeded right-of-way, certainly access would
not be denied Mr. Fry to his property.
Mr. Henry Varnic, representative of the Church of Christ , (adjacent
property owners on the south) asked what uses were included under
the "C-2" Zoning category and added that the church would be opposed
to any type of heavy industry.
There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Commission member
Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the public hearing .
The motion was seconded by member Robert Sands and prevailed by the
following vote :
Ayes : Ware, Joyce, F.ogers , Sands , and Stewart
Nays : None
Absent : Burgess
�
�
�
lO�l / � / 8 P
Councilman Oliver then made a motion to close the Council' s portion
of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Gideon
and prevailed by the following vote :
Ayes : Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Shafer, and Dunn
Nays : None
�
PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z78-23 ;`-
�
Mayor Tate declared open the public hearing. �!
The City Secretary explained that the applicants , Mr. Billy Lane Y
and Mr. Phil Oliver were requesting that a 1. 7 acre tract of land on k`
the east side of Minters Chapel Road be rezoned from "MH" Mobile Home �
Dwelling District to "I-1" Light Industrial District.
x:
Mr. Lane then made a short presentation explaining that the majority �'
of the surrounding property was already "I-1" zoning and that he �
felt the highest and best use of the property would be "I-1" .
There were no questions from the Planning & Zoning Commission or �
i'
the City Council, tt
;
, Mayor Tate asked if there were any guests present to speak for or
against the application. There were none. �
�
There being no discussion, Planning & Zoning Commission member ;;
Robert Sands made a motion to close their portion of the public
:� hearing. The motion was seconded by member Harlen Joyce and pre- f
vailed by the following vote : �
�
Ayes : Ware, Joyce, Stewart, Sands , and Rogers �
Nays : None �
Absent : Burgess �
�
Councilman Florence then made a motion to close the Council' s portion �'
of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer 4:
and prevailed by the following vote :
�
Ayes : Tate,� Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Dunn, and Shafer �
Nays : None �'
' �
� PUBLIC HEARIIVG - ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z78-20
� �
''; Mayor Tate declared open the public hearing. �
; .
� Applicant, Bob Taylor, advised that the property in question con- �
� tained approximately 10. 6 acres and was owneci by Mr. Carl R. Brumley.
� He stated that the request was to change the zoning of said property �
' from "R-1" Single Family Dwelling to "C-2" Community Business District. F
� He noted that present plans included the construction and operatian �
� of a restaurant. �
�
� There were few questions from the Council and Planning & Zoning �'
? Commission. f
� 5
Mayor Tate asked if there were any guests present to speak for or �
� against the application. There were none. �
�
There being no further discussion, Planning & Zoning Commission �
member Harlen Joyce made a motion to close their portion of the �
public hearing. The motion was seconded by member Bob Stewart, and
prevailed by the following vote :
Ayes : Ware, Stewart, Rogers , Joyce, and Sands �'
Nays : None �'
Absent : Burgess �
�
Councilman Charles Gideon then made a motion to close the Council' s �
portion of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Council- �
man Oliver and prevailed by the following vote :
�
�
:
�
:i �`
�
io/i�/�a �
Ayes : Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Dunn and Shafer �
Nays : None °
s
�
�
END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING �
The Planning & Zoning Commission then recessed to the Conference �
Room to consider further business while the Council remained in �
session in the Council Chambers . �
F5k
P
MINUTES - (August 22, September 5 , & 19 , and October 3 , 1978) �
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the �
minutes of August 22, September 5 and 19 , and October 3 , 1978 . €
Councilman Florence made a motion to waive the reading of the . �
minutes and approve them as published. The motion was seconded by �
Councilman Gideon and prevailed by the following vote : �
Ayes : Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Dunn, and Shafer �
Nays : None �
PUBLIC HEARING - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS
The next order of business was for the City Council to conduct a
public hearing for the purpose of determining the various Community
Development needs in the low and moderate income areas within the
City Limits of Grapevine.
Bob Hart , Administrative Assistant, advised that the City of Grapevine �
could apply for as much as $125 , 000 in Community Development Funds �
if a portion of the chosen project pertained to housing rehabilitation.
He then read into the record the following statement provided by . �
Tarrant County:
; <,` �
' SUMMARY STATEMENT FOR TARRANT COUNTY HOUSING
� AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
� CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
4
The Housing and Community Development Block Grant �
; Program of Tarrant County is now in its fourth year. �
Since 1975 , the Tarrant County Consortium has been
allocated a total of $7 , 194, 000 for Community Devel-
opment Projects ; and since 1976 , the Consortium
has received a total of $2, 237 , 256 for implementa-
tion of a Housing Assistance Program. The total
amount of Federal Grant money allocated to the
; Tarrant County Housing and Community Development
' Block Grant Program since 1975 is $9 ,421 , 256 .
In 1978 , the fourth program year, Tarrant County
and the Urban Consortium applied for and received
$2 , 603 , 000 for implementation of its Community
Development Program, and $931, 128 for the contin-
uation of its Housing Assistance Program. The
Tarrant County Planning Department expects that
it will receive approximately $2 , 725 , 000 in 1979
and $2 , 967 , 000 in 1980.
The primary purpose of the Community Development
Program is to upgrade Low- and Moderate-Income
neighborhoods . The following categories , and
the projects listed under each category, are
examples of activities which have :been a�proved by
the Department of Housing and Urban Development
for Federal Funding :
l. Public Works Projects
. Water System Construction and Improvements
. Streets , Curbs and Gutter Construction & �
Improvements ,
. Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems Construction �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
. �
i
4
1��17��$ �
2 . Public Facilities
. Senior Citizen' s Centers and Community
Centers Construction and Repair
3 . Recreation
. Parks Construction, Development and
Improvements "
. Recreation Facilities Construction
�
4. Public Services �
. Fire Hall Construction and �Pumper �
Truck Purchase �
5. Housing �
. Housing Rehabilitation
. Housing Rental Assistance Payments
y
Since 1975, the City of Grapevine has received �
' � approval for and implemented the following pro- �'
j ects : 4
4:
l. Senior Citizen Building ;
2 . Westside Outfall Sewer �
3 . Peach Street & Turner Street Improve- �
ments
�
The following activities are eligible to be in- �
cluded in the City' s projects : �
�
�
1. Acquire and Dispose of Real Property r.
2 . Acquire, Construct, Reconstruct, Re- �
habilitate, Install or Improve Public, �
Commercial and Industrial Facilities �
3 . Clear, Demolish, Remove or Move Buildings �`
and Structures �
4. Provide Public Service �
5 . Remove Architectural Barriers �:
6. Rehabilitate Private Property and Public �
Residential Structures and Modernize �
Public Housing ��
7 . Enforce Building and Housing Codes �
8. Historic Preservation Activities �'
I �
The process to be followed in drawing up and �`
; approving the fifth application will involve �
these steps :
f
; l. Needs and Priorities will be assessed
i , through a survey conducted by the Tarrant r
� County Planning Department and through :
public hearings held by the participating �
cities . ;
2. Development of projects proposals will be �
made by the City Staffs with citizen input �
provided at public hearings held by the �
participating cities . �
� 3 . Projects proposals will be ranked by the �
� Housing and Community Development Sub- �
i
committees . �
4. Approval of the proposed projects will be
voted on by the Mayors ' Council of Tarrant �'
County following the advice, comments and �'
alternative proposals submitted by citizens �
at a public hearing. �
5 . The Tarrant County Commissioners ' Court
will approve the work program and appli- �
cation after following the advice, comments
and alternative proposals submitted by �'
citizens at two public hearings . �
�
�
�
x
�
;:
�
�
�
�
:
/
.
10/17/78
6. The application will be submitted to North
Central Texas Council of Governments for A-95
Review and comment
7 . The application will be submitted to the Area �
HUD Office for approval , revision or rejection �
Mr. Hart then pointed out the four areas within the City of Grapevine �
which qualified for the Community Development Fund Projects . It �
was then noted that suggested needs included a project that related
to the senior citizens , the proposed HUD Housing Project , the E
extension of Scribner Street, improvements to Heritage Park that �
would make it more attractive to senior citizens , and the rehabilitatio''
of houses in the Scribner Street area. �
Mayor Tate asked if there were guests present in the audience who � �
wished to speak in relation to the Community Development Funds .
There were none.
Following a short Council discussion, Councilman Dalton made a
motion to close the public hearing. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Gideon and prevailed by the following vote :
Ayes : Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Dunn, and Shafer
Nays : None
AMENDMENT - GOLF COURSE FEE SCHEDULE
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider an
amendment to the ordinance providing golf course fee schedules . �
The City Manager explained that word had been received from the �
office of the U. S . Corps of Engineers that the provision relating �
to the purchase of punch cards could not be limited to Grapevine
residents only. He advised that the previously approved ordinance �
in regard to golf course fees would have to be amended to omit the � �
Grapevine residency benefit. He also advised that a fee schedule
for golf cart rental, range balls , and golf lessons needed to be �
added to the previously approved ordinance.
The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance .
Councilman Florence made a motion that the ordinance be adopted.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Gideon and prevailed by the
following vote :
Ayes : Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Shafer , and Dunn
Nays : None
ORDINANCE N0. 78-66
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS AMENDING
ORDINANCE N0. 78-58 , SECTION 1, SUBSECTION A (5) RELATIVE
TO PUNCH CARDS AND BY ADDING SECTION 1 , SUBSECTION C
RELATIVE TO GOLF CART FEES AND GOLF LESSONS FEES ; PRO-
VIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
BID - PURCHASE OF EARTH MOVING MACHINE
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider �
and award the bid for the purchase of an earth moving machine.
The City Council was advised that one bid had been received from
Hi-Way Machinery in the amount of $35 , 000.
A lengthy discussion followed relative to the benefits that such �
a machine would provide, waranty, and the fact that the machine �
in question was six (6) years old.
�
�
£ ;
�
10/17/78
Councilman Dunn then made a motion to accept the recommendation of
the City Staff and award the bid for the purchase of a grade-all
machine to Hi-Way Machinery in the amount of $35, 000. The motion �
was seconded by Councilman Florence and prevailed by the following �
vote: �
�
Ayes : Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Shafer, & Dunn
Nays : None �
�
�
RESOLUTION - CLOSED CIRCUIT MONITORING SYSTEM �
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a
- resolution authorizing the City Staff to apply for a grant from the
Criminal Justice Division providing 75% funding toward the purchase �:
of a closed circuit monitoring system. :
� The Chief of Police, Bill McLain, gave a brief history and outlined }
� the specific equipment to be purchased. �
IThe City Manager advised that the total cost of the project would be �
; approximately $11, 000 with the City' s portion being approximately �
' $2 , 750 . He advised the Council that the proposed expenditure was
' outside the scope of the current budget and that an amendment would �
, have to be made to the budget later in the year. �
�� ,
( Councilman Gideon then made a motion to authorize the Police Department �
� to apply for the grant providing 75% funding for the purchase of the �
i monitoring system and to authorize the City Manager to approve the
� city' s portion of the necessary funds in the amount of $2, 750. The
� motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following
vote :
� �'
; �
� Ayes : Tate, Florence, Gideon, Oliver, Dalton, Dunn, & Shafer
Nays : None �;
� �
RESOLUTION N0. 78-25 �
�
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE TO �
APPLY FOR A GRANT FROM THE TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE �
DIVISION. �
RESOLUTION - CRIME PREVENTION SPECIALIST
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider a �:
resolution authorizing the City Staff to apply for a grant from the
Criminal Justice Division providing 100% funding for a crime prevention �'
specialist project. �'
I`
Police Chief Bill McLain advised the Council of the details of the �
project and noted that the 100% funding would be for a period of one �
year. �'
�
�
Following a short discussion, Councilman Dunn made a motion to �
authorize the Police Department to apply for a grant for a crime i
prevention specialist, 100% funding. The motion was seconded by �:
Councilman Florence and prevailed by the following vote : �
Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Dunn, Shafer, and Gideon �
Nays : None �'
�
RESOLUTION N0. 78-26 �°
�
? ' �
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE TO �
APPLY FOR A GRANT FROM THE TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE �
DIVISION. �
�
a:
GARBAGE CONTRACT RENEWAL k'
�
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the
� renewal of the Estes Service Company contract.
10/17/78
; The City Manager then pointed out the contract provisions of Section 8
I (page 20) entitled Disposal of Refuse. He noted that because of
i numerous new laws , it would not be possible for Estes to comply with
� that portion of the contract. Mr, Hancock then advised the City
;
Council that it was the recommendation of the City Staff that the
I'4 contract be renewed in accordance with the five year option with the
� exception that Estes would not be expected to abide by Section 8 of
� the contract.
�
j Following a lengthy discussion, Councilman Dalton made a motion that
ithe contract with Estes Service Compnay be extended for a five year
i period in accordance with the five year option.
' The City Secretary asked if the motion needed to include reference
� to the deletion of Section 8 of the contract. The City Attorney
recommended that the contract be left as is since it had been brought �
to everyone' s attention that Section 8 was no longer a legally en-
forceable aspect of the contract.
Councilman Gideon then seconded Councilman Dalton' s motion and it
prevailed by the following vote :
Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Shafer, Dunn, and Gideon
;
Nays : None '
; RESOLUTION - GRAPEVINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NAME CHANGE
The next order of business was for the City Concil to consider a
j resolution requesting that the name of the Grapevine Independent
f School District not be changed.
I
! Several Council Members expressed concern that it would not be
� proper for the Council to take action on an item of this nature.
� Councilman Florence made a motion to table consideration of the
! item. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by
! the following vote :
i
; Ayes : Tate, Florence, Gideon, Oliver, Dalton, Shafer, and Dunn
� Nays : None
i
� ZONING ORDINANCE - APPLICATION N0. Z78-20
�
�
iThe next order of business was for the City Council to consider the
� recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission relative to Zoning �
� Application No. Z78-20 submitted by Mr. Bob Taylor, and an ordinance
� pertaining thereto. �
�
; Administrative Assistant Bob Hart advised that the Planning & Zoning �
; Commission unanimously recommended approval of the application.
The City Secretary read the caption of the proposed ordinance.
Councilman Gideon made a motion to accept the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commisison and adopt the ordinance granting the
zoning request. The motion was seconded by Councilman Shafer and
prevailed by the following vote :
Ayes : Tate, Florence, Gideon, Oliver, Dalton, Shafer , and Dunn
Nays : None
ORDINANCE N0. 78-67 �
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10, THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS TITLE
10 OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , GRANTING �
A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS
BEING A LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS , BEING
A PART OF THE A. F. LEONARD SURVEY, ABSTRACT
N0. 946 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS , MORE
FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF
THIS ORDINANCE, ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF I�/I7/7$
SAID PR(}PERTY FRQM "R-1" SINGLE FAMILY DWELLZNG
DISTRICT TO "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT;
CORRECTZNG THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAF; PRESERVING
ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING (3RDINAN�E ;
PROVIDTNG A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS
AND GENERAL WALFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE
AND p�1ENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROt�IDING A PENALTY;
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. '
ZONING ORDINANCE - APPLICATION N0. Z7$-22
� The next order of business was for the City Council to consider the
recommendatian of the Planning & Zoning Cornmission relative to
Zoning Application No. Z7$-22 submitted by Thereon S. Bradfc�rd,
Trustee, and an ordinance pertaining there�o.
Mr. Har� advised that the Planning & Zaning Casrunission vo�ed �o
approve the applica�ion by a vote af four �o one, with the declining
member stating �hat a zoning of "C-1" would be more appropriate.
A lengthy discussion followed with the general concensus being that
"C-2" would not be apprapriate for tha�C area and in e�'fec� would be
spot zoning. Several Council members noted that they would nat be
appased to apartmen�s or a planned developmen�G zoning.
� Councilman 0liver then rnade a motion to den.y the application. The
T114t1.OT1 was secanded by Gauncilman �hafer and prevailed by the
' fO1�..OWlrig VOte:
Ayes : Flarence, Oliver, Dal�on, Gideon, Shafer, and Dunn
Nays : Ta�e
ZONING ORDINANCE - APPLICATION N0. Z78-23
The nex� order of business was for the Ci�y Cauncil to consider the
reco�nendatian of the Planning & Zoning Corarnission relative to
� 2oning Application No. Z7$-23 submitted by Billy Lane and Phi1
4liver.
Administrative Assistan� Bob Hart advised �hat the Planning & Zoning
Commission had unanimously voted to grant the applicatian. The City
Secretary read �he cap�ion of �Ghe proposed ordinance.
Councilman Dunn made a motion �.o adopt the ordinance. The maGion
was seconded by Councilrnan Dal�on and prevailed by the fallowing
vote:
Ayes : Tate, Florence, Oliver, Daltan, Dunn, Gidean, and Shafer
Nays : None
ORDINANCE N0. 78-6$
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 70-10, THE
COMPREHENSTVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVTNE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSt� KNOWN AS TITLE
10 OF THE CITY CODE OF GRA.PEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING
A ZONING GHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS
BEING A LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN TARR:ANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING
A PART OF THE BBB & CRR COUNTY SURVEY, ABSTRACT
� N0. 205 IN THE CiTY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE
FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF
THIS ORDINANCE, ORDERING A GHANGE IN THE USE OF
� SAID PROPERTY FROM "M-H" MOBILE H�ME DWELLING
DISTRICT TO "I-1" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT;
C�R.REGTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING
ALL OTHER PORTIONS •OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE;
PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TQ SE�TERABILZTY;
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS
AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND
AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
,
�
I
I
10/17/78
REPLAT - CREEKW40D ESTATES
The next order of business was far the Gity Gouncil ta consider the
I recommendatian of the Planning & Zaning Cornmission relative ta the
'� replat of Creekwood Estates.
�� Mr. Hart advised the Council that �he Planning & Zonning Commissian
i had unanimous2y voted in favor of �he replat. Ci�y Engineer Jim
Baddaker noted �hat the basic change was to reduce the drainage
easemen� in the rear yards from 30' to 25' .
Ccauncilman Daltan made a motion to accegt �he recammendatian. of the
Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Staf� and approve the
replat of Creekwood Estates. The motion was seconded by Councilman
aliver and prevailed by the fallawing vote;
Ayes : Ta�e, Florence, Olz.ver, Dalton, Dunn, Shafer, and Gideon
Nays : None
ZONING APPLICATION N0. Z78-21
The n.ext order of bu.siness was for the City Council ta consider the
recomrnendation of the Planning & Zaning Commission relative to
Zoning Application No. Z78-2I and an ardinance pertaining thereta. �,�}
l`4'',A
City Engzneer Jim Baddaker advised thaC the Planning & Zoning
Commission had postponed any action unGil November 7 , 1978 . The
City Cauncil taak na formal actian.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The next order of business was for the City Council ta recess to �he
Conference Room to discuss pending I.itigation pursv.ant to Article
6252-17 , V.A.T. C. S. , Section 2 , Subsection (f) , Te�as Civi1 Statutes .
The City Council la�er reconvened in the Council Chambers . No
action was taken relative to pending li.tigatian. �`
�':.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no £urther business to come be£ore the Council, Counca.l-
man Oliver made a motian to adjourn. The matian was seconded by
Councilman Florence and all present voted aye.
� _:_�,
PASSED AND APPROVED on �his ,� �'�'day o£ �LY� 1978 . d
.,,....—>
�� .�w�
Mayor
ATTEST:
�
( �ty S cre
�
i �