HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-06-15 Regular Meeting 3
i
�
CITY OF GRAPEVTNE, TEXAS
AGENDA
REGUI,AR CITY C4UNCIL MEET3NG F
�
TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 1976 AT 7: 30 P. M. �
CQUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET ;
�
F
�
�
I. CALL TO ORDER r
}
II. INVOCATION: Councilman Dunn
TII. CITIZENS REQUEST &�OR MI�aC. REPC7RTS & DISCUSSIONS Y
IV. CONSIDER.ATION OF THE MINUTES (May 1$, & 25)
V. OLD BUSINESS
�
;
A. City Council to discuss a new proposal submitted `
by Mr. M. D. Smi�h concerning canstruction of
the golf course.
z
B. Ca.ty Council to consider a locati.on for the �
Seniar Ci�izen' s Hame.
;
�
C. City Council to C4I1S1CI@�' twa ardinances �
contralling speed zones at certain school �
erassings. �
�
�
�
VI. NEW BUSINESS £
�
A. City Council ta consider the development af
� Oak Grove Park from 1977 to 1982 . �
}
B. City Council to cansider revisions to the #
swimming paal manual. t
;'.
�
C« City Cauncil ta appaint an Assistant City �.
Judge.
D. Ca.ty Council to appoint a member to each of
the fallawing boards:
Tourist & Canvention Bureau
Board of Zoning Adju�tments
Park & Recreation Baard
E. City Cauncil to consider a date for the
Equalization Board Meeting. City Staff
recammends July 27, 2.976.
VII. ADJOURN
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C,S. , AS AMENDED �
BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS 4F THE 61ST LEGZSLA'TURE, REGULAR SESSION,
THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND
POSTED QN '3.'I-i�S T�IE 11TH I}AY OF JUNE, 1976 AT 10:15 A.M.
__�=����� �¢�.��s�. � -
CITY SEC ARY
STATE OF TEXAS X
COUNTY OF TARRANT X
CITY OF GRAPEVINE X
The City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas convened
in regular session at 7:40 P. M. on this the 15th day of
June, 1976 with the following members present to-wit:
�
William D. Tate Mayor
Doil Dalton Mayor Pro-tem
Charles Gideon Councilman
David Florence Councilman
Larry Oliver Councilman
Charles Dunn Councilman
constituting a quorum with Willis Pirkle absent, with
Floy T. Ezell City Manager
Jim Hancock Assistant City Manager
Shirley Armstrong City Secretary
John Boyle City Attorney
Mayor Tate called the meeting to order.
The Invocation was given by Councilman Dunn.
The first order of business was consideration of the
minutes of May 18 and 25, 1976. Councilman Dalton
made a motion to approve the minutes as published. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Florence and prevailed
by the following vote:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays . None
Absen�: Pirkle
The next order of business was for the City Council to
discuss a new proposal submitted by Mr. M. D. Smith
concerning construction of the golf course. Mayor Tate
explained the major points of the proposal commenting
that, with the exception of items 10, 11, 12, & 13, the
new prop+�sal is similar to the previous ones submitted
by Southwest Golf & Development Corporation. A copy of
the proposal, (Exhibit "A" ) is attached heret�o and made
a part hereof to the minutes of the City Council meeting
of June 15, 1976. In regard to item 13, (construction at
cost plus 10 percent overhead and 10 percent profit) Mayor
Tate commented that City Attorney John Boyle had issued
a ruling that the City could not build the propased golf
course on a cost plus basis. The City Attorney stated that
the problem with the cost plus aspect is that there is no
limitation on construction of the facility. He further
.� commented that a contract for cost with a guaranteed maximum
or a negotiated fee would be more in line with the City' s
needs.
Mayor Tate stated that Southwest Galf & Development has '
asked, (in the event the City wishes to pursue the proposal) ,
that their expenses be paid until the City enters into a
contract with them. The Mayor commented that if the Council
is agreeable to reimburse expenses, a maximum amount would
need to be designated.
Councilman Dunn asked Mayor Tate to explain Item Fifteen.
The Mayor stated that this item pointed out that the
architects would work for the City and not for Southwest
Golf and Development Corporation.
Councilman Dunn then asked if the Mayor, for the benefit
of the audience, would explain the advantages Southwest
Golf and Development Corporation would gain from entering �
into a contract of this type. Mayor Tate answered that the
company would get the contract to build the course and would
make a profit off of that, otherwise they would have to bid
competitively. He further explained that the company felt
like the course would be a profitable venture for them since
they are getting involved in the management of golf courses.
He acknowledged that they felt like since they are experienced
in this line, that they could operate the course more efficiently {
and more profitably than the City. `
The Mayor then stated that the advantage of the City would ;
be that we would have independent financing rather than
actual bonds. He further commented that another possible
route would be for the City to build the course by Certificates ;
of Obligation and pay those off over a short term period of =
4
time. ;
The City Manager explained that the Certificates of Obligation
would be a very expensive route. He further commented that
the City would have to issue bonds later on to take up the
Certificates of Obligation. He stated that if the City }
could sell Certificates of Obligation there would be an
additional interest rate in excess of four (4) percent over ,
what bonds could be issued for.
The City Manager commented that the City could purchase
some property and b uild the club house themselves. Council-
man Dunn asked what would be the advantage of building the
club house on City property rather than on Corps property. f
The City Manager explained that the Corps had restrictions ;
on elevations in regard to a permanent structure. He ;
commented that there was an area to the North that was
above the flood plain area. He also stated that the club �
house needed to be on a location that was easily excessable
from major roads in the area.
�
Mayor Tate commented that if the City does agree to enter
into a contract with Southwest Golf & Development Corpora- "'
tion that any of the items discussed would be negotiable.
The Mayor stated that he felt the Park & Recreation Board
as well as the citizens committee should have an opportunity
to review the proposal and make a recommendation to the ='
Council. F
There was na action taken.
The next order of business was for the City Council to
consider a location for the Senior Citizen' s Home. The
City Manager explained that the City has been negotiating
with the First Methodist Churce to lease some land for the
home. He stated that the Parks & Recreation Director, Bob
Hart, had attended several meetings with officials of the
i
church and asked that Mr. Hart give a report to the Council.
Mr. Hart explained that First Methodist Church preferred to
lease the City half of their land and sell the City the
other half. The purchase cost would be approximately $1.00
per square foot or a total of $10,000.
Mr. R. G. Lyford, a representative of the church stated that
<:E, officials of the church felt that a forty year term lease
was too long. He stated that if given an alternative, some
agreement could possibly be reached.
Mr. Hart commented that in order to receive funding from
Housing '& Urban Development for the buiiding, the City must
have the land for a minimutn of forty years.
Councilman Florence asked Mr. Lyford if, disregarding the
details, was the administrative board of the church in
favor of having the senior citizens home on their property.
Mr. Lyford answered that they were.
�
Mayor Tate stated that he would prefer to buy the land
rather than enter into a lease agreement with the exception
of a parking area.
Councilmah Dunn stated that it might behove the Council to
consider purchasing land from sources other than the First
Methodist Church. He commented that the City might be able
to get more land for their money in some other location.
�, After little discussion, it was decided to postpone a
decision concerning a location for the senior' citizen' s
home pending further information in regard to land
availability. The City Manager was instructed to make
a report to the Council the following week.
No action was taken.
The next order of business was for the City Council to
consider two ordinances controlling speed zones at certain
i school crossings.
The City.Manager explained that the State=Departm�nt of
Highways & Public Transpartation had asked the City to
consider the ordinances in question. He stated that one
ordinance concerned the redesignation of Highway l21 to
Loop 382 . The other concerned changing the speed li.mits
in regard to the new school signal lights that the Council
had previously approved for state installation. There was
little discussion. The City Secretary read the caption of
the ordinance pertaining to Control 363-1 and 364-1. Council-
man Dunn made a motion to adopt the proposed ordinance. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by
the following vote:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays . None
Absent: Pirkle
ORDINANCE 76-14
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 3
,
i
OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS '
BY REGULATING THE SPEED OF VEHICLES ON
CONTROL 363-1 AND 364-1, STATE HIGHWAY
121 BUSINESS, TARRANT COUNTY; PROVID-
ING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING
ORDINANCE PROVISIONS AND FOR THE RE-
PEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS OF
THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS;
PROVIDING FOR SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR F..;
A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The City Secretary then read the caption of the proposed
ordinance in regard to Control 353-7. Councilman Dalton
made a motion to adopt the ordinance. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Gideon and prevailed by the follow-
ing vote:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays : . None
Absent: Pirkle
ORDINANCE 76-15
;
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 3 e
OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS,
�
BY REGULATING THE SPEED OF VEHICLES ON
CONTROL 353-7, LOOP 382, TARRANT COUNTY;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING
ORDINANCE PROVISIONS AND FOR THE REPEAL
OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS OF THE CITY
CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS; PROVIDING
FOR SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY;
PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. �
Mayor Tate then called a recess at 8: 50 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 9:20 P.M. with all members
present except Councilman Pirkle.
The next order of business was for the City Council
to consider the development of Oak Grove Park from 1977 �
thru 1979. Mr. Norman Hatfield of Hatfield-Halcomb, Inc. �
was in attendance to present the schematic design and �
probable development costs for the proposed group pavilion ''
and visitor' s center in Oak Grove Park. Mr. Hatfield �'
explained in detail the design of the proposed facility
and used large site plans and floor plans as exhibits
during his presentation.
x
Councilman Dunn complimented Mr. Hatfield for his excellent a
resentation and stated that he �
P personally appreciated the
work that had been done in regard to this project. Council-
man Dunn then made a motion to approve the preliminary plans
to be submitted to the Corps with the City' s application
for funds. The motion was seconded by Councilman Dalton fi
and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays . None
Absent: Pirkle
{
E
�
See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof to
the minutes of the June 15, 1976 City Council Meeting.
The next order of business was for the City Council to
consider revisions to the swimming pool manual. The City
Manager explained that the Parks &�Recreation Department ,
recommended the following three revisions to the swimming
pool manual:
1. . Al1 full time city emplo�rees and their
imtnedia�e family, and all councilmen and
their immediate family to be admitted to
� the pool free of charge.
2. All parents of children under the age of
seven (who do not wish to enter the pool)
will be admitted free of charge to watch
their children.
3. Flotation devioes may be used at the
descretion. of the pool manager. (Intended
to help those children who cannot swim
because of a physical or mental handicap
and will be used only when the pool is
not crowded and parents are present.
After a lengthy discussion, Councilman Oliver made a
motion to approve item two; all parents of children under
the age of seven (v�rho do not wish to enter the pool) will
be admitted free of charge to watch their children; effective
imrnediately. �. The motion was seconded by Councilman Florence
and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays . None
Absent: Pirkle
Councilman Elorence then made a motion to table items
one and three in regard to the swimming pool revisions
until the next . Council meeting. The n�otion was seconded
by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays . None
Absent: Pirkle
The next order of business was for thE City Council to
appoint an Assistant City �udge. The City Manager ex-
plained that an Assistant City Judge needs to be appointed
in order to help our City Judge to arraign prisoners at
night and on the weekends.
Mayor Tate asked �the City .Attorney if the City could
� appoint an .As:sistant City Judge and limit his purpose
to arraignment. The City Attorney answered yes and ex-
plained that the City' s present municipal court ordinance
would need to be amended to set up the duties of the night
magistrate.
The City Manager acknowledged that he had talked with Mr.
Floyd Gray and he indicated that he would serve as assis-
tant City Judge if the Council so desired. Councilman
Oliver asked if under this arrangement, would Judge Austin' s
E
t
duties be limited only to day time activities plus the
municipal court duties. Mayor Tate stated that Judge
Austin' s activities would not be limited at all. The
Mayor explained that the Assistant City Judge would act
in the absence of the City Judge.
Councilman Dunn made a motion to accept the recommendation
of the City Manager and appoint Mr. Floyd Gray as Assistant
City Judge until ,Tanuary l, 1977. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Florence and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays . None '
Absent: Pirkle '
The next order of business was for the City Council to '
appoint a member to the Tourist and Convention Bureau, ,
the Board of Zoning Adjustments, and the Park & Recreation '
Board. Mayor Tate asked the City Manager if there were any
recommendations. The City Manager explained, in regard to '
the Tourist & Convention Bureau, that according to City '
Ordinance, two members of that board must be connected
with a hotel or motel within the City. He then commented
that Mr. Norris Graham of Silverlake Marina had indicated
that he would serve in that capacity if appointed by the
Council.
Councilman Dunn made a motion that Nor�is Graham be appointed
to the Tourist & Convention Bureau by acclamation. The
motion was seo�nded by Councilman Daltan and prevailed by
the following vote:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays . None
Absent: Pirkle
Mayor Tate asked the City Manager if he had any recommenda-
tions concerning an appointment to the Board of Zoning Ad-
justments. Mr. Ezell answered that no names had been sub-
mitted for consideration. Mr�. Gail Gerschick, citizen in
attendance, stated that possibly Mr. Jerry Spencer would
serve on that board. Councilman Oliver stated that he would
contact Mr. Spencer and see if he would be willing to serve.
Councilman Oliver then made a motion to table the appaint-
ment of a member to the Board of Zoning Adjustments until
the next meeting. The moti on was seconded by Councilman
Gideon and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays . None
Absent: Pirkle
The City Manager stated that the members of the Parks &
Recreation Board had recommended Robert Hinson, Buddy Hall,
or William Shaffer be appointed to that Board. Councilman
Florence made a motion to appoint William Shaffer to the
Parks & Recreation Board by acclamation. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the following
vo te:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays . None
Absent: Pirkle
The next order of business was for the City Council to
�
consider a date for the Equalization Board Meeting. The
City Staff recommended July 27, 1976. Councilman Florence
made a motion to accept the recommendation of the City Staff
and set the date for the Equalization Board Meeting on July
27, 1976. The motion was seconded by Councilman Oliver and
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays . None
r�
Absent: P ir]s„le
There being no further business to come before the Council,
Councilman Gideon made a motion to adjourn the meeting. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the
follawing vote:
Ayes . Tate, Gideon, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, & Dunn
Nays . None
l�bs�nt: Pirkle
The meeting was adjourned at 10 :40 P.M.
PASSED AND APPROVED on this the �_ day of , -1976.
-�i`� 4.�f�r''�> l�
MAYOR �
Attest:
,�,
City Secr ry
i
�
���
" (�"'' �....r..--- EXHIBIT "A°
PRUPOSIIL # 1
1 . Terrn of the lease to be concurxent �vith the City�s lease
cvith the Carps of Engineer� with aptiona1 extensions tox
2 ten year t�rrns C4I1�li�f�'E.,'ri"� also an the City�s abi.lity ta
Qbtain extensions af its 2ease with the Corps . At the end
of each twa years , lessee will. have the right to teraninate
the lease contract .
2. A1.1 fixed strtYCtures and irnproveme�nts ivilZ be surrei�c3�red
� = ta the City on the expiration date af the l.ease and ex-
tensions thPreof.
, 3. The City shali be responsible for a].l utilities and water
tu' t h d
'n conn�ction i h t e facilities an the cour�e.
used a�
4. The 2ess�e shall be subject to ad vaiorem taxation an all
,�,. personai pzope�rty oti�°ned by the 2essee and used an or in
` cannect�on with the Ieased premises.
5. The lessee shall obtain and maintain all apprapriate zn-
surance coverage deerned necessary far the aperatian of the
les�ee. The lessar sha.11 obtain and mainta.in a1Z appropriate
insurance coverage c3eemed necessa.ry to protect the liability
of the lessor. �
b. The l�ssee sha11 have sole responsibility for the mair,tenance
of the Ieased premi�es and be free to enc�age in the business
of operatirig the golf recreation camplex within the parar�eters �
af govern�ng legislation.
'7, The lessee wzll maintain adequate recards and wi13 make them
available for audit by the City or the Corps at anytime
duri.ng regular business hours.
4
8. The les�ee shall abtain financing far the construction of the
course and its facilities. This praposal is specifically ;
cantingent upon such financing being obtained. zi,�',��...�,�,, _ j�!..G��---�:t
9. The Iessee sl-iall collect a11 reventies and pay ail apexating
expen�es and debt service obligatians facom such revenues.
The City agrees a�d abliaates itself that shauld reuenues not
provide sufficient revenue for the operations of the course
� and retirement af the debt service obl.igatior�s , the City
shall provide funds f rom its General Funds to cover such
deficits in any year in ��hich these deficits shce.�ld occur.
Tha.s will constitute compensation in consideration for .
lease of the facili�ies by the City of Grapevine ,
10. A31 revenues in excess of operating expenses and debt �ecure
shall be earned by the Ie�see as management fees , except foac a
continoency reserve of l0i'o af such net revenues to be set aside
for investment in future d�,ve�apment c+f the faci],ities .
11. City will advance 25,000 a.n mar�age:.lent fees during periocis of
deficits far the first 3 y�ars. The advance �vill be paid b�.ck
starti.ng at year 7 for three years if the original deficits is
>- � far that durat�on.
12. City of Grapevine will reinbur�e S:•.� for all expenses incurred
fron tha.s time until the conformation or failure af ccantract �
not ta exceed� manths . �- L� %+� ,f�,/�•�-.G . .�'1
13. Constr�ction contract will be c4ith So�zth�:est Golf & Development
at cost pZus 10 a aver}�ead and 1Q o profit. Aia.nagement contract
1qj.��, be tV3�Y2 Southti:est Galf A'fanac�em�nt on the basis =tated in
preceed:ing parag Yaphs .
�
t Sc.,• lC�e_ C--�%..1'---�1 .� .c-C..L, ('`��'•%='-�....C.,. .�.���'-c_ _ •—
•- -- r , .��:.-'> > c.._ /-_.. fl�.�,K!-�?!,s _ :, f
� - �1��. • � • � � .
-..._ c'�t��.
/
_�. �..j1�����-.1�_.L C=.�-7 /'�., / '~- .
,
,
� ' EXHIBIT "B" -
�,
HATFIELD•HALCOMB, INC.•ARCHITECTS•PLANNING CONSULTANTS
810 CARILLON TOWER WEST 13801 PRESTON ROAD DALLAS, TEXAS 75240 214/233-9151
15 June 1976
The Honorable Wi 11 i am D. Tate
Ma�yor ,
City of Grapevine
P. 0. Drawer 307
Grapevine, Texas
Re: Proposed Group Pavilion and Visitor's Center
Oak Grove Park
Grapevine, Texas
HH 7603
Dear Mayor Tate:
Per the terms of our agreement with the City of Grapevine for the above
project, we are pleased to present the following for your review and use.
A. The site plan, building plan and building elevations and section
� (dated 6-14-76) prepared at full drawing size, colored, and mounted
on boards for the City's presentation uses.
B. Ten (10) packages of the above drawings reduced on 8Z x 11 paper to
be used by the Ci ty i n p repari ng the s ubmi tti ng the funds appl i cati on :
to the Corps of Engineers.
C. An analysis of the areas , facilities and probable development costs
for the project (buildings and grounds).
We feel that the plan is very functional , practical and aesthetically pleasing.
We also feel that the facility will provide a significant contribution to the
Corps and City Recreation Programs and to the environment of Oak Grove Park.
The Corps of Engineers and the City of Grapevine will have a facility which
will be an area landmark and a facility of which the City and Corps can be
proud.
We have, therefore, satisfied the terms of our initial agreement. We will
hold at this point until we receive written authorization from the Cith that
funding has been approved and that we are to continue toward the final
development of the project. We, as does the City, look forward to that
announcemen t.
Very truly yours ,
FI - HALCOMB, INC, cc: Ci ty Counci 1 Members
- Floy Ezell
Bob Hart
. at i e , J r. , A. . .
NP :dmc :
Nom�en P.Hattield,Jr.,A.I.A. Jerry L.Halcomb,A.I.A. James H.S1ewaA,Jr.,A.I.A.
, :.
HATFIELD•HALCOMB, INC.•ARCHITECTS•PLANNING CONSULTANTS
810 CARILLON TOWER WEST 13801 PRESTON ROAD DALLAS. TEXAS 75240 214/233-9151
�f
15 June 1976 '4
HH 7603 �
PROPOSED GROUP PAVILION AND VISITOR'S CENTER
Oak Grove Park; Grapevine, Texas
A Cooperative Project Sponsored by the
City of Grapevine and the Corps of Engineers
NET AREAS AND FACILITIES
+
(The areas indicated are per the plan dated 6/14/76 as a part of the Schematic
Design Presentation as presented to the Grapevine City Council in the public
meeting held Tuesda�y evening, June 15, 1976) .
1 . ENTRY VESTIBULE AND DISPLAY CENTER:
A public arrival space to feature Corps of Engineers information and
� Di spl a�y features, Lake Grapevi ne maps and the Ci ty of Grapevi ne's publ i c
announcements and s chedules of events and activities.
Entry Vestibule (18 x 28) . 558 sq. ft. x
2. VISITOR'S INFORMATION CENTER AND CONTROL (394 sq. ft. ) :
. A central space for receiving visitors and providing information
concerning Lake an d Facility q ues tions. This space is also designed to
allow maximum direct visual super�ision of the Group Pavilion activities,
entry circulation to and from the restrooms , the activities in the Games
and Activities Area, and the corridor to the Multi-Purpose Meeting Rooms.
Storage is provided to ajlow locked control of checkout equipment and
supplies. The office is a private, administrative office for the
supervisor of the facility and allows locked control of the facilities
business records and schedules.
Visitor's Information Center and Control (12 x 22) 264 sq. ft.
Storage (5 x 10) 50 sq. ft.
Office (8 x 10) 80 sq. ft.
3. GROUP PAVILION (Multi-Purpose Activities) (7719 sq. ft. ) :
One multi-purpose room for Activities and Group Meetings. Ceiling height
provides adequate clearance for various activities and gatherings. `
Storage is provi ded for game apparatus and table and chai r storage. �,
�
Group Pavilion (76 x 96) 7415 sq. ft. �
Equiprr�nt Storage (16 x 19) 304 sq, ft.
Nom�an P.Hattield,Jr..A.I.A. Jerry L.Halcomb,A.I.A. Jemes H.Stewart.Jr.,A.I.A.
. �
HATFIELD•HALCOMB, INC.•ARCHITECTS•PLANNING CONSULTANTS
810 CARILLON TOWER WEST 13801 PRESTON ROAD DALLAS, TEXAS 75240 214/233-9151
p age 2 .
Net Areas and Faci 1 i ties
Group Pavilion and Visitor's Center
4. PUBLIC RESTROOMS (1008 sq. ft.) :
A. Separate public restrooms in the passive area are provided for
men and women.
Men 60 sq. ft.
Women 70 sq. ft.
B. Restroom, shower and dressing facilities are provided for men and
women. These restmoms are accessi ble by the publi c from the entry
vestibule, allowing access during partial operation of the total
facility. (Group Pavilion only or the Games and Meeting Areas only).
Men's Restroom and Dressing (18 x 26) 454 sq. ft.
Women's Restroom and Dressing (18 x 24) 424 sq. ft.
5. MULTI-PURPOSE MEETING ROOMS (1687 sq. ft. ) :
,
A flexible area is provi ded to accorr�nodate a number of acti vi ties and
si zes of groups si mul taneously or separately by the use of fol ding
divider walls with access from the corridor to each area. A small
children's toilet is provided for scheduled preschool activities.
Adequate miscellansous storage areas are provided for each area. Glass
openings provide a view of the courtyard and the lake and err�hasize the
relationship of the facility to the lake. �
� Multi-purpose meeting room (27 x 58) 1566 sq. ft.
Sub-Room "A" (27 x 18) 456 sq. ft.
Sub-Room "B" (27 x 20) 540 sq. ft.
Sub-Room "C" (27 x 20) 540 sq. ft.
Storage Area 94 sq. ft.
Toilet Area 27 sq. ft.
6. GAMES AND ACTIVITIES (926 sq. ft. ) :
Space is provided for table games and lounge activities. A vending area is
provided for drink and snack service to the game area. Glass openings also
provi de an overview of the exteri or courtyard space and a vi ew of the 1 ake.
Games and Activities (28 x 36) 896 sq. ft.
,
Vending Area (3 x 10) 30 sq. ft.
:
Normen P.Hatlield,Jr.,A.I.A. Jerry L.Haloomb,A.I.A. Jamea H.Stewart,Jr.,A.I.A.
i ,9'
' "'
♦ �
HATFIELD•HALCOMB, INC.•ARCHITECTS•PLANNING CONSULTANTS
810 CARILLON TOWER WEST 13801 PRESTON ROAD DALLAS, TEXAS 75240 214/233-91b1
page 3
Net Areas and Facilities
Group Pavilion �and Visitor's Center
7. FOOD PREPARATION AND SERVICE:
A ki tchen space i s provi ded wi th di rect counter servi ce to the corri dor
to the meeting rooms and to the Group Pavilion. This provides either
buffet service or concession sales to visitor's to the Group Pavilion
activities or meeting rooms.
Food Preparation and Services (12 x 16) 192 sq. ft.
8. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SERVICE AND HOUSEKEEPING AREAS (380 sq. ft.)
Custodial 36 sq, ft.
Storage 36 sq. ft.
Mechanical and Equipment 152 sq. ft.
Trash and Se rvice (12 x 13) 156 sq, ft.
TOTAL NET USAGLE AREA 12,864 sq, ft.
(assignable A/C space)
Note: Corri dor and ci rcul ation spaces are not i ncl uded i n the Net Area Total)
TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA:
A/C Space (Inside) 15,322 sq. ft.
Non A/C Space (Outside Covered) 764 s ft.
6,i� os� S�.
Ratio of Net/Gross (A/C Space) 83.96%
.
:
Nom►er►P.Hatlield.Jr..A.I.A. Jerry L.Hak�rnb,A.IA. James H.StewaA.Jr..A.I.A.
. �
HATFIELD•HALCOMB, INC.•ARCHITECTS•PLANNING CONSULTANTS
810 CARILION TOWER WEST 13801 PRESTON ROAD DALLAS, TEXAS 75240 214/233-9151
PROPOSED GROUP PAVILION AND VISITOR'S CENTER
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE DEVELOPMENT COSTS: �
Building Costs:
A. Building Area (A/C Space) :
15,322 sq. ft. @ $27.00/sq. ft. $413,694.00
B. Covered Area (non-A/C Space)
764 sq. ft. @ $13.50/sq. ft. 10,314.00
Sub-Total Building Costs $424,008.00
Site Work:
A. Paved Asphalt Driveways and Parking with
Concrete Curbs and Gutters
60 spaces @ $325.00/space $ 19,500.00
;
B. Landsapced Courtyard Allowance 10,000.00
C. Asphalt Service Drive
500 sq. yd. @ $7.00/sq. yd. 3,500.00
Sub-Total Site Work $ 33,000.00
TOTAL PROBABLE DEVELOPMENT COSTS �
(Building and Grounds) $457,008.00 �'
,
Furnishings and Equipment (Allowance) 20,000.00
Planning Fees (@ 6.5% of Construction) 29,706.00 I'
i;,
TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE $506,714.00
. i
u� .
;
Nortnsn P.Hattfeld,Jr.,A.I.A. Jerty L.Fla�omb,A.I,A. James H.Stewart,Jr.,A.I.A.
__�_'_-- � '.
• li
'—1 �
� � \
' nciwe �wrw "\ �\'\
� cwc�awT�av \\_.\ . `\ �. � _
� • �Y � ` \
___ ___"__ __ __� -\ \•,\ `.\�.
. __ ,r� �,� � G VINE\
\ �J oAKGROVE � �� \�
ARK
�.�� � �Q � --`\�� . �
a -- � �� � !
�.�.,a. �. I
� ��_
� _ -- _ .� ,�. �' 7,� EJ
� _ �
__ --_.._� � ' �,
�TWG UTTL� �� Q
/ �I Fl � � �
/' a.,�,.r.�,R..,�,. -- � LJ
� � 1 ,� �.��� .�.,
� Q
E LI ; � �°� �� ,�,,�/�/ �� ,�.,,�.
E FI � C' J,;.('_',.�-� � �
� ,y__
c.�i � �,�,,,�«
-MINM�LM OIILpI.q
[ CON10U11
--�_-" Ex� NCi UTTLE ` OI.�IPLEx — Q �
� �
0
nawe wnu
���
', �
i I �
i� �/� /
� �lJ �
-' — �\ �
//
s1-rE �a� ' _-- -%' �.�, " � ` ;
y�y,. e '� G P PAVILION D; ITORS C AT L • HALCOMB, INC.
�,.Np� � o,uc ww1c onw�cv�uc, Tcw�s A EC •PLANNING CONSULTANTS
A RATNC MOJCCT BPONOOj1CD OY CMIILI TOWEII WlIT 1MM Ml�TON IqM
� T CITY OF GRAP��IIS+JE'�AND TFiE CORPS o�uu,re�s �eaw xH us�nn
I
p!o' ._ w2b' ��o� ao'-o� . .
CMCI�OCNCY
CKIT
I
OROU/I MVILJON
� nain�iaww icrrvrriro
M X W
� �
�
�� rMKINO
AI�EA
. CMCROCNCY
� [%T
* -.
� TI�ABM 6 . � I.<CM • N .
aCMICE �' KRJ�CC I CLLGT �
n x�s t ro [GUIrACMr
' .� I H�II�m1
CGUIMCNT � CCM[A �
e�ae�oe omcc • ,
MX Y •XC @%4II . .
I
COI[1tD
T i �
,� tTOAAOC -..:
� _ _. - l�V. � �
i� �
MULTI�rUI� MfLTINO rM � :
'1�XN
'�J"!��N 'J7 X�� I !'I X��' � M 1�
_ , �� y�� � t �
�.���'�\.��- ��
V �
��
•t'r Q t
���}� -m d.
b
�L��� �� �n� '7� OUP PAVILION AND VISIT NTER ALCOMB, INC.
��~�„ � � �� e MRK Ol4.PEVINE, T[XAB RCHITECTS•PLANNING CONSULTANTS
KM�1'�Oi �- � 7
� C , RATIVE PROJECT 6PONBORED BY 10 CARIILOX TOWEP WEBT 1]WI p1E8TON R011D
� TH TY OF GRAPEVINE AND THE CORPS GINEERS LLAB,TE%�Y rsxa m� xoa-m�
,. ��IIII1 IIIIIN ������ii��n��� � � �
,�,,. _ ;,�,, ,��,,,,���„;����N� _ ., HIIINI IIIlllllllllli „�, :, !H�I������iI�N���l��l���l���l�llll���llI�III _;�,,�;;.
, � r,;:: ,�1,,. , �1,. ,,,�q, ��:�� �is;�� I� ti ��'-
r;,,- , ���% ��;�; �i��i��il�il�� liill;: _, /,;�:,,�IlIIIIIIIIIIIIII��,,,;�,,�.,,��I���IqI����UpN�I�IINI�IIIIIIInIIIINIIIn�ullullllllllililllll�llllal�l�alillll�lll�i 'i
t11��1��1..ruirrW�Ird=III�I�IIIIIlIII�I�I�iIIIIIIIIIIII� I 1�' I„� IIIIIIIIII�fI'lllllllllll�IIIIII��II'I�IIII�I�II���IIIIIIIItlI111RI1111111�I111�I���IIiItlIIR�lllll'�IIII�!'ittt!!�iI��ILf.'�w:. . -
'
•- �
.���.
���. ��. .����
������) �I�I�I�IIlilllll�� �OpIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUII�IINNIIIIiIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIII� (I����!!"1°°��ii�ll
I , I .i.wJ�imEii:i;am ���,i li.I!�:.i.... ( .u. ..i���l
: : , ....:..:.:....:.::..�,,�,,.�....:��I1::.I:E,,:�I:•::,. .•...
4` � �, w",-• �d!��� ` �l� ������� \U!I�i.f+
. ��.��' �I� �'' ���.. �- � ���� ', ,y y' ,\ ,'�;°
�.��_; �Ilill�IIIiI'�����'iill�. � ' ' � � j�- �. II��� ' ��'ii� ��I� li�'''1�,;;,.�� I ,,, � �''i��
� ��� �� . ��� �� � ����� � ���� IIIIIIII, �� .,��.���,,i������������11� IIIIII 11�I I I����1�� ��:..�� '��li lilllllllliu����III��,,����,�� �I�,����II�:!�u�����o�ii�llllllllll� � � ��, ��=-, ;� N � � � ,. � �,� , , 1.
p ..
�� , � � ,... .,... � � �.,.r.._ �,�, , ,.� ,;.�
� 1�'I �I�� +/Ii7i1���'YI��I�H�I��Ii1�E— -- __—_
— �
Contract No. DACW63-
EXHIBIT A
Lake Grapevine - Oak Grove Park
City of Grapevine, Texas - Cost Sharing Program
Estimated Recreation Cost
Construction
Park Cost
Oak Grove Park $815,300
Fees and Continqencies
Contingencies (Included in Construction Cost)
# Engineering and Design 82,000
' ;
i
- ' Supervision and Administration 37,700
Total Estimated Recreation Cost $935,000
u
i
OAK GRQVE PARK
PROPOSED FACILITY DEVELOPMENT & COST ES�'IMATE
FY 1977
FACILITY UNITS UNIi COST TOTAL COST
Visitor's Center 16,086 Sq ft. $29.00/Sq ft $466,500.
Utilities (lift station� 1 �ob $30,000.
{�arce main 2400' 7 1 Jab 18,500.
(water service) 1 Job 2,000.
�electrical service) 1 Job 4,000 54,500.
Parking 55 Spaces 35Q. 19,500.
.
Picnic Units 50 Ea 350. 17,500.
Playgraund Apparatus A� Areas 6,250. 25,000.
Landscaping 1 Job 26,000. 26,000.
Trash Containers 50 Ea 20. 1,000.
Con�ral Signs 20 Ea I00. 2,OQ0.
Traffic Gontral Barriers 1000 Lin. Ft. 60. Lin Ft. 6,000.
TOTAL $61$,000. `
g
Engineering and Design $ 62,000.
Supervisian and Administration 30,000.
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COST $710,000.
FY 1977
�
OAK GROVE PARK
PROPOSED FACI�ITY DEVE�OPME�T & COST ESTIMATE
FY 1978
FACILITY UNiTS UNIT CQST TOTAL COST
Group Picnic Shelters 2 $ 3,000.00 $ 6,Q00.
Picnic Area Road including 3,700 ft. 11.26 41,700.
Culdesac Parking
Walkways 90Q ft. 6.00 5,400.
Archery Range 1 15,OOO.Qp 15,QQ0.
.
Picnic llnits 25 350.00 8,$00
Park Lighting 1 Job 4,0OO.Op 4,000,
i
Landscaping 1 Job 1,80Q.OQ 1,804.
Cantrol Signs 20 Ea. 100.00 2,000.
Traffic Control Barriers 50p Lin ft. 60.Op Lin ft. 3,000. �
TOTAL 87,700.
Engineering and Design 8,700.
Supervision and Administration 3,600
TOTAL DEVELqPMENT CO5T $100,000.
FY 1978
_ �
OAK GROVE PARK
PROPOSED FACILITY DEVELOPMENT & COST ESTIMATE
FY 1979
FACILITY UNITS UNIT GOST TOTAL COST
Restroom 600 sq. ft. $44.95 sq ft. $ 27,OOQ.
Utilities (lift station) 1 $35,000.
(force main) 1Q,QQ0 ft. 10,000.
(water service & 10,000. 55,OQ0
fountains�
Picnic Units 25 350. 8,8Q0.
.
Security fencing 500 Lin ft. 10. 5,000.
Park Lighting 1 Jab 5,OOQ. 5,QQ0.
�
Landscaping 1 Jab 5,04Q, 5,000.
TOTAL $105,800.
Engineering and Design $ 12,QOQ. .
Supervision and Administration 7,200.
TQTAL DEVELOPMENT COST $125,OOQ.
FY 1979
� ��� �
Justification Statement For
a Proposed Visitor Center and Pavilion
to be Constructed as a Cooperative Project
Between The City of Grapevine and The Corps of Engineers
Oak Grove Park - Grapevine Lake �
City of Grapevine:
The statistical area encompassing the proposed park development site is
rapidly changing from a rural agricultural environment to a developing
urban-industrial environment due to the effect of surrounding urban
expansion and industrialization. The park site lies within Grapevine, a
fast growing community of almost 11,000 residents. The major reason for
this fast growth is that Grapevine is experiencing the effects and influ-
ence of the Dallas/Fort Worth Metropolitan area, principally the new
Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport.
The Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport encompasses almost 8,000 acres
within the City Limits of Grapevine. This represents about forty-five
percent of the City's land area (based on excluding the U. S. Government
land area). The Airport is the most significant factor affecting Grapevine.
Its vastness, high aircraft traffic volume, patrons numbering in the tens
of thousands, thoroughly equipped cargo and freight facilities and its z
� large number of employees (18,000) all add up to a very significant impact
on the cities immediately surrounding the Airport. This impact is even
more pronounced in smaller cities like Grapevine.
Grapevine Reservoir, or Lake Grapevine as it is popularly called has been
a contributing factor to residential growth in the northern limits of the
City. Scenic landscape, plus the recreational facilities and activities
associated with the Lake, offer desirable characteristics for future
residential growth.
The lake surface and surrounding public land contains 12,740 acres of
which approximately 4,369 acres are within the Grapevine City Limits. �
• Eventually, Lake Grapevine could have a very dynamic effect on influencing
the character of the City. The potential in the possible pleasure and
recreational activities associated with the lake indicate the possibility
of Grapevine developing into a significant pleasure-recreational center
in the Metroplex.
The development of a portion of Oak Grove Park is designed to attract
visitors to the lake, and provide a clean wholesome environment for the
user. The Group Pavilion and Visitors Center is a revolving focal point
in the development of the park. A building of this nature will provide a
unique setting for potential visitors not only from the Dallas/Fort Worth
Metroplex but from the entire Southwest.
i
�
Design of the building is attractive to large group gatherings to ;
approximately 500 persons, and yet small enough for a comfortable setting
for a group of 15 or less. A visitors information center will provide
information to the user on lake activities and locations. Shower facili-
ties are convenient to the entrance for use by the camper.
An aesthetically pleasing landscaped design will add to the park area.
Multi-purpose meeting rooms will have a view overlooking the lake and
the developed park area.
It is the City of Grapevine's desire to construct the building in
conjunction with the Corps of Engineers to enhance the water related recre-
ational opportunities on Grapevine Reservoir. {
, ,
�
Corps of Engineers:
It is envisioned that the Fort Worth District will utilize the proposed
structure as a visitors ' information center but will not have Corps of
� Engineers ' personnel regularily assigned to work in the building. An
audio-visual display will be placed in the lobby of the building. The
�
display will explain the Corps of Engineers' role in water resource �
development and related environmental development concerns through an :
interpretation of project purposes and/or functions, and a history of
the area. This display will be placed in accordance with guidance
contained in ER-1130-2-401. The building will also serve as a lake vista
point with restroom facilities for visitors to the park.
The Corps of Engineers will also utilize the building for public workshops,
meetings and hearings for projects within the Trinity River Basin. The
- range of facilities provided follow, in part, those shown in Appendix C j
of ER-1130-2-401.
;
�
� ;
2