HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-11-23 Joint Meeting CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
AGENDA
JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 1976 AT 7: 30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ed' II. INVOCATION - Councilman Dalton
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. The City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
to hold a public hearing for the purpose of con-
sidering the rezoning of 204 North Dooley Street
from "C-2" Community Business District to "L-I"
Light Industrial District. The applicant is Mr.
Frank Lang of American Klegecell Corporation.
Application Number Z76-18
B. The City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
to hold a public hearing for the purpose of con-
sidering the rezoning of the following two tracts
of land:
1. A 2. 36 acre tract out of the H. Decker
Survey from "R-3" Multi-family Dwelling
to "C-2" Community Business District.
2. A 3.42 acre tract out of the W. D.
Shepherd and H. Decker Surveys from
"R-2" Two-family Dwelling District to
"R-3" Multi-family dwelling district.
The applicant is Larry F. Lightner. Application
Number Z76-19
IV. END OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Planning & Zoning Commission to recess to the
Conference Room to consider further business.
B. City Council to remain in session to consider
further agenda items.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED
BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION,
THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEET-
ING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 19TH DAY OF
NOVEMBER, 1976 AT 2 :00 P.M.
CITY ECREtVARCY
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
AGENDA
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 1976 AT 8:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN
V. PUBLIC HEARING
City Council to hold a Public Hearing for the
purpose of the analyzation of rates, service, and
other related matters of Tri-County Electric Cor-
poration.
VI. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES (November 16, 1976)
VII. CITIZENS REQUEST AND/OR MISC. REPORTS & DISCUSSIONS
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A. City Council to consider authorizing the City
Staff to negotiate for additional lease from
the Corp of Engineers in the Oak Grove Park
area (included in the Master Plan) and to ne-
gotiate with Mr. Jodi Williams for the purpose
of establishing a cable water skiing system.
* Note to the Council - see blue attachment
B. City Council to consider the recommendation of
the Planning & Zoning Commission regarding appli-
cation Number Z76-18 (Klegecell Corp. ) . City
Council to also consider an ordinance if zoning
is approved.
C. City Council to consider the recommendation of
the Planning & Zoning Commission regarding appli-
cation Number Z76-19 (Larry Lightner) . City
Council to also consider an ordinance if zoning
is approved.
D. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission regarding the final
plat of LaGuna Vista Addition.
E. City Council to consider the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission regarding the pre-
liminary plat of Park Place Addition.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C. S. , AS AMENDED
BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION,
THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED '"
ON THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1976 AT 2 :00 P.M.
CIT SEC AR
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
EMERGENCY AGENDA ITEM
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 1976 AT 8:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
F. City Council to authorize a bid date on the
installation of the waste water return and
sludge clarifier for the water treatment plant.
This emergency item has been placed on the City Council
agenda as immediate action is necessary to insure the
health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of
Grapevine, Texas.
I
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED
BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION,
THE EMERGENCY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON
THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, AT 2:00 P.M.
All
E
CITY SEC A
m
t
�II
y
I
.y I
-f
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
AGENDA
REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING if
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 1976 AT 8:00 P.M.
CONFERENCE ROOM - 413 MAIN STREET
V. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING
i
VI. NEW BUSINESS
6
A. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning
Application Z76-18 (Klegecell Corporation) and
make a recommendation to the City Council.
B. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider Zoning
Application Z76-19 (Lightner) and make a recom-
mendation to the City Council.
i
s
C. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the final
plat of Lacuna Vista Addition and make a recommen-
dation to the City Council.
(
�.: D. Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the pre-
liminary plat of Park Place Addition and make a
recommendation to the Council.
VII. OLD BUSINESS
Planning & Zoning Commission to consider the
final plat of LaGuna Vista Addition and make
a recommendation to the City Council.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED
BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION,
THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WAS
PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1976
AT 2:00 P.M.
CITY SEC T RY
1
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
r
The City Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission met in
joint and regular session at 7:30 P.M. on this the 23rd day
of November, 1976 with the following members present, to-wit:
William D. Tate Mayor
Doil Dalton Mayor Pro Tem
David Florence Councilman
Larry Oliver Councilman
Charles Dunn Councilman
Willis Pirkle Councilman
k
constituting a quorum with Councilman Gideon absent, with
Ted Ware Chairman
Mike Davis Member
Harlen Joyce Member
Joe Kennedy Member s
Cato Jones Member
t:
constituting a quorum with Bill Crabtree absent, with
Floy T. Ezell City Manager
Jim Hancock Ass ' t. City Manager
Shirley Armstrong City Secretary
John Boyle City Attorney ,
f.
Mayor Tate called the meeting to order.
The invocation was delivered by Councilman Dalton.
The first order of business was for the City Council and
Planning & Zoning Commission to hold a public hearing for F
the purpose of considering the rezoning of 204 North Dooley
Street from 11C-2" Community Business District to "L-I"
Light Industrial District. The applicant was Mr. Frank Lang
of American Klegecell Corporation. Application Number Z76-18. ;
Mayor Tate declared open the public hearing and introduced
Mr. Richard Lang, General Manager of Klegecell Corporation. -
is
Mr. Lang explained that the material his firm manufactured
was Klegecell foam, a wholesale vinyl core material. He added
that future plans included building a structure similar to a
woodworking facility for the purpose of making sandwich panels,
a more finished product. Mr. Lang explained that the product
is being exported to numerous foreign countries as well as
being sold in the United States . He added that the proximity
to the airport would be an important convenience to Klegecell
Corp
The City Manager then pointed out the location of the property
in question.
j Councilman Dunn asked how many employees the firm anticipated }
hiring within the next year. Mr. Lang answered approximately r
one hundred.
t
Planning & Zoning Member, Harlen Joyce asked if there would be y
any dust, fumes or other elements that could cause injury. Mr.
Lang answered that there would be dust, but that it would
enter a dust collection system, be sacked in plastic bags, and
sold as insulation. He added that there were no toxic elements
'1 involved that would be detremental to health.
j k
t
Member Joe Kennedy asked what plans were expected for the second
building to be constructed. Mr. Lang answered that the foam
would be made into a sandwich panel, with wood, aluminum, steel
or metal on each side which would produce a very lightweight
structural panel. He added that such panels are presently
being sold for use in airplanes .
Councilman Florence asked if any excess noise was expected.
} Mr. Lang answered that the only noise would be from a wood
I saw but noted that it would be enclosed in a sound proof room.
Councilman Dalton asked if the foam was flamable. Mr. Lang
answered no, that the foam was filled with CO 2 and would only
vaporize.
Mayor Tate asked if there were any guests present who wished
to speak for or against the application. There were none.
The City Secretary reported that she had not received any
correspondence either for or against the application.
Member Joe Kennedy made a motion to close the Planning &
Zoning portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded
i
by Member Harlen Joyce and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Ware, Joyce, Kennedy, Jones and Davis
Nays: None
Absent: Crabtree
There being no further questions from the Council, Councilman
Pirkle made a motion to close the Council 's portion of the Public
Hearing. His motion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and pre-
vailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle and Dunn :
Nays: None
Absent: Gideon
The next order of business was for the City Council and Planning
& Zoning Commission to hold a public hearing for the purpose
of considering the rezoning of the following two tracts of land:
1. A 2.36 acre tract out of the H. Decker Survey from
"R-3" Multi-family Dwelling to "C-2" Community
Business District.
2. A 3.42 acre tract out of the W. D. Shepherd and H.
Decker Surveys from "R-2" Two-family Dwelling District
to "R-3" Multi-family Dwelling District.
The applicant was Larry F. Lightner.
Mayor Tate declared open the Public Hearing on Zoning Applica-
tion Z76-19.
The City Manager then described the location of the property
in question.
The presentation was then made by Mr. George Christian on behalf
of the applicant. Mr. Christian explained that he felt the
zoning should be granted because the change would not increase
the overall density of the community that is developing in that
section of the city. He added that the zoning would be logical
for the area and would help to meet the needs of the people.
He explained that the 3.42 acre tract is presently zoned for
duplex construction but is only 150 feet wide and 1050 feet deep.
He added that it joined a piece of property to the north that is
already zoned multi-family. He explained that this would then
make a multi-family tract of approximately ten acres.
He then stated that the 2.36 acre tract is similarly in an
isolated position. He explained that it is currently zoned
Multi-family in an area surrounded by a church, school, and
single family dwelling. He added that the lot was small
trianular shaped, and would be best suited for commercial
property.
Member Harlen Joyce asked if there were any specific plans
for the commercial property. Mr. Christian answered that no
definite plans had been made. Ir
Mayor Tate asked if there were any guests present who wished
to speak for or against the application. Mr. Joe Box asked
permission to speak on behalf of the D.E. Box Estate. Mr.
Box explained that the 2.36 acre tract being considered joined
approximately 137 acres to the south and west that was owned w
by the Box Estate. He then stated that because of the con-
figuration of the lot in question and its proximity to his
property, he felt that a commercial business on that site
would decrease the value of the estate property. He also 6
expressed concern that there were no definite plans for a
specific commercial business at the present time.
Mr. Joe Wright, citizen, commented that he would like to
speak in favor of the "R-3" zoning for the 3.42 acre tract.
He added that he felt a zoning of "C-211 was too heavy for the
2.36 acre tract and commented that "C-1" might be a more
suitable zoning for that property. t;
r
The City Secretary stated that she had not received any k
opposition to the zoning request concerning either piece of
property.
AIM
Mr. Christian commented in regard to Mr. Box's statement, that
he felt even though a piece of property was zoned commercial,
the City still had control over the type business, building
construction, and fencing.
Member Harlen Joyce commented that it would be more practical
to ask for commercial zoning after a decision had been made as
to what type business would be constructed on the site. Mr.
Christian answered that that would be best for the surrounding k
property owners of today, but might not necessarily meet the
F
needs of the many homes in the area that will need to be served
by commercial property. Mr. Christian then pointed out that
t
the piece of property in question needed to be pictured as a
potential major intersection. He acknowledged that according F
F
to the City's Master Plan, a road would pass through that area r
connecting Hwy. 157 to Hwy. 121.
C
Councilman Dunn stated that it needed to be taken into considera-
tion that there would soon be approximately 400 homes in that
area, with virtually no commercial conveniences.
There was little other discussion. Member Mike Davis made a p
motion to close the Planning & Zoning 's portion of the Public
Hearing. The motion was seconded by Member Harlen Joyce and
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Ware, Kennedy, Joyce, Jones and Davis
Nays: None
Absent: Crabtree
Councilman Oliver then made a motion to close the Council's
portion of the Public Hearing. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Dalton and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Florence , Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn
Nays: None
Absent: Gideon
3
Y
F
e
S
Mayor Tate then announced that the Council would take a short
recess and reconvene in the Council Chambers. He added that the
Planning & Zoning Commission would reconvene in the Conference
Room to discuss further agenda business.
The next order of business was for the City Council to hold a
Public Hearing for the purpose of the analyzation of rates,
service, and other related matters of Tri-County Electric Corp.
Mayor Tate explained that several months prior to this meeting,
the Council heard complaints from numerous customers of Tri-County
Electric. He stated that during that time, Tri-County was
negotiating with TP&L for the sale of their assets within the City.
He added that it was his understanding that those negotiations
had ceased. He stated that there were various matters in which
the council felt it has prerogative to establish in its relation-
ship with Tri-County. He added that complaints have been re-
ceived from several Tri-County customers and that was the purpose
of the Pulbic Hearing.
The City Manager introduced Mr. Johnny Ammons, the General
Manager of Tri-County Electric. Mr. Ammons commented that the
negotiations with TP&L had not been completed. He added that
there were a number of items that would have to be considered
in the event Tri-County sold to TP&L. He explained that Tri-County
borrowed money from the Rural Electric Administration, a govern-
ment agency, and Consumers Finance Corporation. He added that
Tri-County had mortgages with those two firms and that there were
certain conditions written into those contracts. He stated that
his attorney was preparing papers in regard to that matter which
would be presented to the Board of Directors of Tri-County
Electric during a meeting on December 7, 1976. He added that at
that time the Board of Directors would determine whether or not
to continue negotiations with TP&L.
Mr. Ammons explained that the major complaint from Grapevine
customers had been in regard to the fuel clause which was a
result of the present energy crisis.
Mayor Tate asked if Tri-County manufactured any fuel, or if it
was purchased. Mr. Ammons answered that all of their power was
purchased.
The Mayor then stated that in talking with some Tri-County custo-
mers , there had apparently been a substantial increase in the
fuel adjustment. He asked Mr. Ammons if there was any reason for
a recent increase. Mr. Ammons answered that there had not been
an increase in the last several months , but that there had been
during the past two or three years.
Mayor Tate then asked if Tri-County had made any comparison of
the rates, including the fuel adjustments, with the average home-
owner in the Grapevine area that might compare to a similar bill
for service rendered by TP&L. Mr. Ammons answered that they had
not.
Mayor Tate asked if there was a pass through on the fuel clause
or if there was a markup on it. Mr. Ammons answered that it was
a complete pass through that was controlled by the Texas Utility
Commission. f .
Mayor Tate asked if Mr. Ammons was in a position to state what
Tri-County's future would be in Grapevine in the event they did
not decide to sell their assets to TP&L. Mr. Ammons answered
that because of the State Utility Commission, he did not know
what the future of Tri-County might be.
Mayor Tate asked how many customers Tri-County was serving in
the City of Grapevine. Mr. Ammons answered approximately 40.
The Mayor asked if Tri-County planned to expand its operation
in Grapevine in the future. Mr. Ammons answered that they would
not be able to because of lack of a franchise.
Councilman Florence asked where the power came from that served
Grapevine customers. Mr. Ammons stated that they were a member
of the Brazos Power System and bought their power from them
through various sub stations.
Councilman Florence then asked where the nearest service '
representative was located for Grapevine customers. Mr. Ammons C
answered that there was a sub-office in Keller.
i
Councilman Florence asked if Tri-County Electric was a profit
making organization with dividends. Mr. Ammons answered that r
there were no dividends of any kind. He added that Tri-County
has a Capital Credit System which was initiated by Internal
Revenue Service whereby when there was no longer a direct
need for profit funds, that it was returned to customers in the
form of capital credit refunds .
Mayor Tate asked if Tri-County Electric would object to un-
satisfied customers being served by TP&L. Mr. Ammons commented
that he felt the people Tri-County Electric had borrowed money
from would object. Mayor Tate commented that it appeared that
it was not a voluntary cooperative, but that the Tri-County
customers are in essence a captive group. 4.
Councilman Dunn asked Mr. Ammons if he would make some statement
regarding the failure of his firm to pay the 2% utility rental
charge required by the City of Grapevine. Mr. Ammons explained
that this occurred when Tri-County Electric was brought into
the city as an annexed territory. He added that a franchise was
MWA requested, and not granted. He acknowledged that it was his k
understanding that if a company did not have a franchise, it
owed the city nothing. He explained that if that was in error,
the Tri-County Electric attorney would be instructed to in- 4!
vestigate the matter.
Mayor Tate then introduced Mr. P. R. Yoes , resident of Indian
Hills Mobil Home Park and Tri-County Electric customer. Mr.
Yoes explained in detail the constant increase in his electric
statement over the past several months. He expressed a lack
of cooperation from Tri-County in regard to consideration of the r
large increase.
1
Mr. Jack Kemp, resident of Indian Hills Mobil Home Park and Tri-
County customer stated he had made a comparison which showed the
Tri-County rates were higher than neighboring utility companies.
He also expressed concern that his meter was not being read.
Mr. Ralph Anderson, citizen, asked Mr. Ammons what part of their
electric service was fuel cost. Mr. Ammons answered that the
fuel adjustment was the total cost of fuel, plus some of the
total cost of the increase from the power company when power
was purchased.
jThere was little other discussion. Mayor Tate commented that
Mr. Yoes bill was grossly too high. He added that there was too
large a difference in TP&L rates and Tri-County rates consider-
ing the difference in service, cooperation, and facilities . He
commented that the same problem had been reoccuring for several
years. and that it was his hope that the matter could be solved
in the near future. He added that it was his desire that when
the Board of Directors of Tri-County met on December 7th, that
they would reach a decision to begin negotiations with TP&L to
sell their facilities so that the forty customers served by Tri-
County could buy their electric service on the same basis as other
Grapevine citizens. He then stated that the Utility Committee
would meet in the near future to discuss the matter further.
F
a
Councilman Dunn then made a motion to close the Public Hearing.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Pirkle and prevailed by
the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn
Nays: None
Absent: Gideon
The next order of business was consideration of the minutes of
November 16, 1976. Councilman Oliver made a motion to waive
the reading of the minutes and approve them as published. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the
following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Florence , Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn
Nays: None
Absent: Gideon
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider
authorizing the City Staff to negotiate for additional lease from
the Corps of Engineers in the Oak Grove Park area (included in
the Master Plan) and to negotiate with Mr. Jodi Williams for the
purpose of establishing a cable water skiing system.
The City Manager explained that Mr. Jodi Williams was in attend-
ance to show the Council a film of the cable water skiing system
being considered for installation on a portion of Lake Grapevine
corps lease. Mr. Ezell explained that an additional 20 acres
would need to be leased from the Corps of Engineers . Mr. Williams
showed the film and briefly explained the operations of the ski-
ff system.
The City Manager explained that there would be some fees from the
operation that woould go to the City and assist in the maintenance
of Oak Grove Park.
Councilman Oliver made a motion to authorize the City Staff to
negotiate with the Corps of Engineers for additional lease and to
negotiate with Mr. Williams regarding the installation of the
cable water skiing system. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Dalton and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Florence , Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn
Nays: None
Absent: Gideon
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider
the recommendation the Planning & Zoning Commission regarding
application Number Z76-18 (Klegecell Corp. ) . City Council to
also consider an ordinance if zoning is approved. The Assistant
City Manager reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission
unanimously recommended approval of the application. The City
Secretary then read the caption of the proposed ordinance.
Councilman Dalton made a motion to accept the recommendation of
the Planning & Zoning Commission and adopt the ordinance pertain-
ing to Zoning Application Z76-18. The motion was seconded by
Councilman Dunn and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn
Nays: None
Absent: Gideon
i
1
{
ORDINANCE NO. 76-34
y
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10,THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS TITLE
10 OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS GRANTING
A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS
BEING A LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A
PART OF THE A. F. LEONARD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.
946 IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS MORE FULLY
AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS
ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID
PROPERTY FROM "C-2" COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT
TO "L-I" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT; CORRECTING w
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER
PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A
CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL
WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT
THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND DECLAR-
ING AN EMERGENCY. _
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider F'
the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission regarding
application Number Z76-19 (Larry Lightner) . City Council to also
consider an ordinance if zoning is approved. The Assistant City
Manager reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously
recommended approval of the request concerning the rezoning of a
3.42 acre tract from "R-2" to 11R-311 . He also stated that the F
Planning & Zoning Commission recommended denial of the request to r
change the 2.36 acre tract from "R-3" to "C-2" by a vote of four in
favor of denial, and one abstention.
' The City Secretary read the caption of the ordinance pertaining to
the 3.42 acre tract. Councilman Oliver made a motion to accept the
recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission and adopt the x
ordinance pertaining to Zoning Application Z76-19. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Pirkle and prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle, And Dunn.
Nays: None
Absent: Gideon
ORDINANCE NO. 76-35
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 70-10, THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
x
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS TITLE
10 OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS GRANTING
A ZONING CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS
BEING A LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A
PART OF THE W. D. SHEPHERD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.
1394 AND THE H. DECKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 438
IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE;
;j ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM
"R-2" TWO FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO "R-3" MULTI-
FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE t'
ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO
SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,
MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE
AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY;
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
{{ f
I
}I
{ k'
P
gi
3
q�
S
Councilman Dunn then asked if the Planning & Zoning Commission
considered granting "C-1" rather than the requested "C-2" on
the 2.36 acre tract. The Assistant City Manager answered that
there was a lengthy discussion, but that the application had
been advertised as a request for IIC-2" without an alternative;
therefore, the Planning & Zoning Commission could not recommend
a "C-1" zoning. Mr. Christian commented that if he and Mr.
Lightner had more clearly understood the 'Zoning Ordinance, they
would have requested "C-2" or "C-111 , at the option of the
Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council.
Councilman Pirkle made a motion to accept the recommendation of
the Planning & Zoning Commission and deny the request of zoning
application Z76-19 pertaining to the 2.36 acre tract. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Florence and prevailed by the follow-
ing vote:
Ayes: Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn
Nays: None
Absent: Gideon
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider
the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission regarding
the final plat of LaGuna Vista Addition. The Assistant City
Manager presented the Council with copies of the plat and stated
that the City Staff and Planning & Zoning Commission recommended
approval. There was little discussion.
Councilman Dunn made a motion to accept the recommendation of
the Planning & Zoning Commission and approve the final plat of
LaGuna Vista Addition. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Pirkle and prevailed by the following vote:
Wan
Ayes: Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn
Nays: None
s
Absent: Gideon
The next order of business was for the City Council to consider
the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission regarding
the preliminary plat of Park Place Addition. Mayor Tate commented
that the developer of Park Place Addition was a relative and that
he wished to disqualify himself regarding this agenda item. Mayor
Pro-tem Dalton then presided over the meeting.
The City Secretary reported that the Planning & Zoning Commission
recommended approval of the preliminary plat of Park Place
Addition contingent upon approval by the City Engineers.
i
3
t
Mr. Buddy Shepherd, of Starnes and Associates, explained certain
`s portions of the plat. There was some discussion regarding sewage
i in the proposed subdivision. The City Manager explained that the
city had previously participated in some offsite sewage and that
it would be in order for the city to take part in the cost of the
off site sewer. He further stated that there were some drainage
problems that would have to be worked out with the engineers
involved.
Councilman Dunn made a motion to accept the recommendation of the
Planning & Zoning Commission and approve the preliminary plat of
Park Place Addition contingent upon approval by the City Engineers .
The motion was seconded by Councilman Pirkle and prevailed by the
following vote:
Ayes: Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn
Nays: None
Absent: Gideon
Abstain: Mayor Tate
The next order of business was for the City Council to authorize
a bid date on the installation of the waste water return and
sludge clarifier for the water treatment plant.
There was little discussion. Councilman Pirkle made a motion to
authorize a bid date of December 30th. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Oliver and prevailed by the following vote: 4
Ayes: Tate, Florence, Oliver, Dalton, Pirkle & Dunn
Nays: None
Absent: Gideon
Mayor Tate asked if there was further business to come before the
Council. The City Manager commented that the Council members
had been provided a schedule of proposed bond issuance and asked f
that any recommendations by the Council be reported to him.
Councilman Dalton then commented that he would like to express
his appreciation to the Members of the Planning & Zoning
Commission for their faithfulness and willingness to serve.
There being no further business to come before the council,
Councilman Pirkle made a motion to adjourn. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Oliver and all present voted aye.
r
r
f
C
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 19 c
a
Mayor
ATTEST: k
r
City Se ret y
rkr'
l
t
1.
4
E
fi
F
h
F
1
Y
f
P
fi
4
E
i