HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-09-17 Regular Meeting . �
E
CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
�:
F
AGENDA
REGUI,AR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 17� 197�+ AT 7:3� P.M. �
COtJNCII, CF�TAMBERS - �+13 MAIN STREET
�
,
T. CALL TO ORDER =
�
: II. INVOCATION to be given by Council Pittard
III. PUBLIC HEARTNGS '
A. Public Hearing for John W. McNary who is requesting to move a Lindal �
Cedar Home to Lot �+1, Shorecrest Acres. �
�
B. Public Hearing for the proposed gun ordinance.
i
� END OF PUBLIC HEARIlVGS � ;
�
, IV. CITIZENS REQUESTS AND�OR MISC. REPORTS & DISCUSSIONS �
�
A. Gary Kirkland to appear before the Council to ta11i about Surtran taxi y
service. �
�
�
V. CONSIDERATION OF THE 1�NUPES (August 20 & 27, September 3 & 12) �
VI. OLD BUSIlYESS
A. Council to consider Zoning Application Z-73-32, Ann Carlson requesting �
C-2 on a �+ acre tract of land in the A.F. Leonard Survey, Abstract No. a
9�6• �
,
; B. Council to consider Ordinance No. 7�+-32 granting a zoning change on a =
tract of land in the A. Foster Survey� Abstract No. 518 from "R-2" to 4
rrPD" Planned Development District on an emergency basis. Dr. �. L.
Lancaster is the applicant. "
�
rantin a zonin chan e on a �
C. Council to consider Ordinance No. 74-33, g � � 8 �
tract of land in the A. F. Leonard Survey, Tract 35, Abstract No, g�+6 �
from "R-2" to "C-2" Community Business District on an emergency basis. ;
The applicants are Ray Ward and Lloyd Graves. �
D. Council to consid.er the second reading on Ordinance No. 74-31, an ?
� ord.inance establi�hing '�he 197�+�75 budget. �
VII. NEW BUSINESS �
E
A. Council to consider Resolution No. 71+-12, a resolution appointing a :
director to CONET. �
€
B. Council to review and consider tabulation of bids received on Schribner
Street and Shady Brook extentions.
£.
C. Council to consider Ordinance No. 7�+-3�+, an ordinance amending monthly s �
�
sewer service charges.
D. Council to go into a closed meeting for a eonsultation with the City
Attorney. This closed meeting will be on this topic only persuant to
Article 6252-17, Section (e), Texas Civil Statutes. �
VIII. ADJOUfiNMENT
�
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S.� AS AMEIVDED BY CFiAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE �:
61ST LEGISLATURE� REGULAR SESSION� lg6g, THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND �
POSTED ON THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER� 197�+, AT 4:30 P.M. �
�
�, . �
CI SECRETARY �
9
�
�
�
�
�
s
�
f
f
�
�
STATE OF TEXAS �
COUNTY OF TARRANT �
CITY OF GRAPEVINE �
The City Council of the City of Grap evine, Texas� convened in regular meeting at
7;�+0 P,M. on this the 17th day of September, 197�+, with the following members
present, to-wit; �
William Tate Mayor � '
Thelma Conine Councilwoman �
Doil Dalton Councilman
Millard Dilg Councilman �
Bob MurpY�y Councilman �
Tomrr�y Eidson Councilman
• �
constituting a quorum, with
Jim Hancock Assistant City Manager �
Kennetii P,ritt:;Ci'�y ��areta�y �-
John Boyle City Attorney
Mayor Tate called the meeting to order.
The Invocation was given by CounciLnan Dalton.
Mayor Tate declared open the Public Hearing on an application by John W. McNary
to move a Lindal Cedar Home to Lot �+1, Shorecrest Acres. The location of the
lot was determined on the map and overhead projector. Mr. McNary came forward
and gave a brief history of the home while pictures of the home were distributed
to the members of the Council. The City Attorney explained what the proceedure
was for the Council to take as described under the newly enactEd Ordinance No.
7�+-27. The Mayor then asked for any members in the audience that wished to
speak for or against the application to be recognized:
A.Carol Rumsey was recognized and questioned the exact location of the lot.
B.Joe Kennedy was then recognized and he questioned the ownership of the
property involved and also questioned Mr. McNary about the possibilities
of this home becoming a rental. ' 1
C.Linda Blackwell was then recognized and she questioned the -possibilities
of this becoming a rental and also questioned if the two-s�tory house �
could be violating•;ce.rtain deed restrictions.
D.Tommy Alexander was then recognized`�and he stated that he felt that strict
enforcement of our present ordinances would eliminate the objections of
persons moving into the area. His main concern was enforcement of our
grass�.�nd weed ordinance. Mr. McNary stated that he would indeed maintain
the property.
There being no f'urther statements for or against the application, Councilinan
Eidson made a motion to close the public hearing. Councilwoman Conine seconded �
the motion and the motion prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Conine� Dalton, Dilg, D'lu.rphy� Eidson
Noes; None
Absent: Pittard -
Mayor Tate declared the Public Hearing on the house moving application closed.
�
The Mayor then called for a discussion of the application by the members of the
Council. Councilman Murphy stated that he lives in the area where the lot in
question_ is located and that he would lean toward approving the application
`�r =because he felt the house would be better than nothing on the lot. Councilman
Dilg felt the value of the house would not degrade the area and felt that it
should be approved because we are encouraging new residents for the City.
Councilman Eidson felt that a more permanent type of residence would enhance
the area. Mayor Tate felt the same as Councilman Eidson. Councilman Dalton
felt that something on the lot was better than nothing but that he was rather
neutral. Councilman Eidson then made a motion to d�sapprove the application.
Councilman MusPhy seconded the motion and the motion prevailed by the following
vote:
Ayes; Tate, Dalton, Eidson, Conine, MurpY�y
Noes: D3.lg
Absent: Pittard
Mayor Tate declared open the Public Hearin� on the proposed gun ordinance.
The City Attorney gave a brief history and explained wha,t the present laws
are that the City of Grapevine enforce. He then explained what the new proposed
gun ordinance contained and what it restricted or made an exception to the
ordinance. The Mayor called for any persons that desired to speak for or
against the proposed ordinance to be reco�nizedt
A.Mx. Jay Stockstill was recognized and he felt that the new ordinance
was too complieated and that a simpler ordinance be put into effect.
B.Mrs. Jess Stockstill was then reco�nized and shE also felt that the
ordinance was too restrictive and she urged that the ordinance not
be approved in its present form.
C.Mx. A. J. Harper was then reco�nized and he felt tha� each hunter
' should be responsible for himself and his actions, that a man should
be able to zero in his own r�fle at a shouting range� and that an
ordinance could be written to regula.te the size of sho� to be used in
shotguns in order to m�,ke them less lethal or dama,gin�.
D.Mrs. Ruth Supthen was then recognized and she felt that the shooting
range should be ab?�: to operate during the daylight hours only but that
an ordinance be passed as soon as possible.
E.(3erald Thompson was then recogniz�d and Yii� fel� that the ordinance
should only prohibit the discharges of a gun within certain distances
of a buildin� as long as the �un is�'�°discharged toward the building.
F.Mr. Larry Supthen was then reco�nized and� he felt that the shooting
range was the "hang up" in getting an enforceable ordinance and �hat -an
ordinance should be made now, acting on the shooting ran�e at 'a later
date.
The Mayor then :made a shor'E summary of the consensus of the majority of the
people involved. Councilman Dilg made a motion to close the Public Hearing
on the praposed gun ordinance. Councilman Dalton seconded the motion and
the motion prevai led by the following vote;
Ayest Tate� Dalton, Eidson, Conine, Murphy, Dil�
Noes: None
Absent: Pittard
Mayor Tate then declared the Public Hearing on the proposed gun ordinance
closed.
The Mayor then called for a discussion by the members of the Council. Council-
man Eidson stated that he felt that a place should be provided to shoot� that
certain areas of the City shoul�d not be restrictive to hunters, and that .22
, caliber rifles and air guns were his ,biggest concern. He also felt that the
subject needs more study and he recognized that we aorely �teed an enforceable
gun ordinance. Councilman Dilg stated tha,t a gun ordinance is needed and he
expressed to the Stockstills that none of this discussion is a reflection on
the type of business that they operate. He further stated that he felt young,
unsupervised persons should not be allowed to carry a gun. Councilman Murpk�y
stated that he was in concurrence with Councilman Dilg. He then made a motion
to have the Ci�y Attorney draft an ordinance prohibiting the discharging of
rifles or air guns within the City of Grapevine except in the desi�nated area
of a shooting range� and that ar�y person dischargin� a gun in certa�n "huntable"
areas of the City must have written permission from any property owners on which
ar�y projectile would fa]1 on or over their property; and that only shot�uns could
be used for hunting� restricting '�he size of shot that can be used to shot no
larger than size �6; and wous.d include any ,State Statutes. Councilwoman Conine
seconded the motion and the motion prevailed by �he following vote:
Ayess Tate, Dalton, Eidson, Conine, Murphy� Dilg
Noess None .
Absentt Pittard
Mayor Tate then declared a recess.
The Council reconvened at 9:35 P.M. and the Mayor called the meeting to order.
The first order of business on the published agenda was for the Council to
consider the minutes of August 20, 27, September 3, and 12. Councilman Dilg
made a motion to waive the reading qf the minutes and approve them as written.
Cotkncilwoman Conine seconded the motion and the motion prevailed by the
following votet
Ayes: Tate, Dalton, Eidson, Conine, Murphy, Dilg
Noee: None
Absent; Pittard
�
The next order of business was to consider Zoning Application No. Z-73-32� Ann
Carlson requesting C-2 on a four acre tract of' land in the A. F. Leonard Survey�
Abstract No. 9�+6. The City Secretary gave a brief history of the application. The
City Attorney stated that six members of the Council have to vote aye in order to
over-ride the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission. There was a short
discussion and Couneilman Dalton stated that he felt that the entire property should
be zoned C-2. Councilwoman Conine also felt that the entire property should be zoned
C-2. Councilman Murphy felt that part of the property should be zoned G-2, the rest
remaining R-1 and that Mrs. Carlson can ask for a new zoning on the R-1 at a later ,�..
date. Counci]�ra n Dilg felt that the entire property should be zoned C-2. The
Mayor stated that he would like to have some specific plans before he would grant s
C-2 for the entire property but that he wasn't violentl�y� against granting C-2 for j
all the property. Councilman Murphy stated that he would vote against zoning C-2 �
for the entire property. There was a short discussion and Councilman MurpY�y' made
a motion to grant C-2 zoning on the area of the property that was 250 feet from the
most southeasterly corner and then a line directly north. The site plan is �attached
to the application in the office of the City Secretary showing the area of the �+.235
acres des�gnated as C-2. The motion also included that the balance of the property �
retain its present zoning. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion and the motion
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Tate, Dalton� Eidson, Dilg� Nha.rphy, Conine
Noes; None
Absent; Pittard
The next order of business was to consider Ordinance No. 74-32, granting a zoning i
change on a tract of land in the A. Foster Survey� Abstract No. 518 fr�m "R-2" to
"PD" on an emer�ency basis. Dr. E. L. Lancaster is the applicant. The City Secretary
read the caption of the ordinance� there was little discussion and Councilman Eidson
made a motion to approve the ordinance ,No. 7�+-32 on an emergency basis. Councilman
Dilg seconded the motion and the motion prevailed by the following vote;
Ayes; Tate� Da].ton, Dilg, Eidson� MurpY�y� Conine
Noes: None
Absent: Pittard
��
ORDINANCE N0. 7�+-32 }
AN ORDIlVANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 70-10, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONIN'G i
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE� TEXAS� SAME BEING ALSO KNOWN AS
TITLE 10 OF THE CITY CODE OF GRAPEVINE� TEXAS� GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS: BEING A TRACT OF LAND IN
THE A. FOSTER SURVEY� ABSTRACT N0. 518, IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, �
TARRANT COUN'1.'Y, TEXAS� MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE
BODY Ok' THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY '
FROM "R-2" TWO-FAMCLY RESIDIIVTIAL DISTRICT TO "PD" PI�ANNED DEVELOP- �
MENT DISTRICT; ALL ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLADT ATTACHED HERETO AND
MADE PART HEREOF; CORRECTING THE OFFICT.AL ZONIl�TG MAP; PRESERVII�TG ALL
OTHER PORTIONS QF THE ZONIIVG ORDIPIANCE� PROVIlg NG A SEVERABILITY
CI,I�IISE DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND QENERAL
WELFARE DEMAI�ID A ZONING CHANGE AND AN�VDNIf�N T HEREIlV MADE; PROVID-
ING A PENAI�TY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The next order of business was to consider Ordinance No. 7�+-33, granting a zoning
change on a tract of land in the A. F. Leonard Survey, Tract 35, Abstract Ido. 9�+6
from R-2 to C-2 on an emergen cy basis. The applicants are Ray Ward and Lloyd
Graves. The City Secretary read the caption, there was little discussion and
Councilman Dalton made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 7�+-31 on an emergency
basis. He then amended his motion to approve Ordinance No. 7�+-33 not 7�+-31.
Councilman Eidson seconded the motion and the motion prevailed by the following �
v�ote;
Ayes; Tate, Eidson Dalton� Dilg, Conine� MurpY�y'
Noes; None '
Absent; Pittard �
ORDIlVANCE N0. 7�+-33 �
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING O�INANCE N0. 70-10� THE COMPREF�NSIVE a
ZONIlVG ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE� TEXAS� SAME BEING `
ALSO KNOWN AS TITLE 10 OF THE CI'I'Y CODE OF GRAPEVIlVE� TEXAS,
GRANTING A ZONII�TG CHANGE ON A TRACT OF I�AND DESCRIBED AS:
BEING TRACT 35 OF TIiE A. F. LEONARD SURVEY� ABSTRACT N0. 9�+6; `
IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE� TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS� MORE FULLY
DESCIrLBED IlV THE BODY OF THIS ORDIlVANCE� ORDERING A CHANGE IN
THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "R-2" TWO-F�IILY RESIDENTIAL
OFFICIAL 7ANING I� � PRESERV'ING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF TI� +
September g, 197�
Re: Street Improvements
Shac�y Brook Drive &
Scribner Street
Mayor and City Council
City of Grapevine`
Grapevi.ne, Texas
Dear Ma.yor and Members of the Council.: �
�;: �
Submitted herewith is the tabulation of bids reca:eved this date on the �
above mentioned project. ;
Of the three Contracting firms submitting bids on the work, Austin Road
Company is the low bidder on both Alternates.
Alternate 1 was a surface treatment using 2 course penetration paving and alter-
nate 2 was a pavement of 12" Type "C" hot mix asphaltic concrete. As can be
seen by the bid tabulation, Alternate 2 is only ��+0.00 higher than Alter-
n,ate l. A higher quality pavement can be obtained from HMAC than penetration
and from an En�ineering and main�enance stan dpoint, I fe�l that the City
should e�nsider the use of HMAC as the surfacing material.
I hereby recommend that the City of Grapevine award the construction contract
on the above mentioned project to Austin Road Compaz�y using Alternate 2 and.
in the amount of $58,158•3�+•
If any questions should arise, please feel free to call on me.
Sincerely,
�s� R. V. Trammell
R. V. Trammell, P.E.
The next order of business was to consider Ordinance No. 7�--3�+, amending monthly sewer
service charges. The City Secretary read the caption and the City Attorney briefed the
Council on the rates and their changes. There was little discussion and Councilman �
Dalton made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 74-3�+ on an emergency laasis. Councilman
Murpl�y seconded the motion and the motion prevailed by the following vote;
l�yes: Tate, Dalton9 Dilg, MurpY�y Eidson, Conine
Noes: None
Absent: Pittard
oRDINANCE lvo. 7�+-3�+ �
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVI1�fE� BY
AMENDING SECTION 7-2-2 RELATIlVG TO SEWER RATES BY ESTABLISKLNG j
A NEW RANGE OF RATES FOR RESIDIIVTIAL AND COI�A'IERCIAL SERVICES; i
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
,
�I
i
�
The next order of business Vras the Council to go into a closed meeting for a
consultation with the City Attorney. This closed meeting �ri11 be on this topic only
persuant to Article 6252-17, Section �e'�, Texas Civil Statutes.
The Council re-convened and there being no further business, Councilman Eidson made �
a motion to ad,journ. Councilman Dilg seconded the motion and all present voted aye�
adjourning the meeting at 11:15 P.M.
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the l d r day of �C i D,a 2 � 197�+.
MAYOR
ATTEST;
CITY SE RETARY �
�