HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-03-04AGENDA
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING
MONDAY EVENING, MARCH 4, 1996, AT 6:00 P.M.
COURT ROOM/COUNCIL CHAMBERS, #205
307 WEST DALLAS ROAD
GRAPEVINE, TEXAS
I. CALL TO ORDER
ii. OATH OF TRUTH
III. NEW BUSINESS
A. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC
HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE
BZA96-01, SUBMITTED BY PHIL SALYER AND CONSIDERATION
OF SAME.
B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC
HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE
BZA96-02, SUBMITTED BY HAMMOCK AND RICHARDS AND
CONSIDERATION OF SAME.
C. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC
HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE
BZA96-03, SUBMITTED BY JAMES LEHNERT AND
CONSIDERATION OF SAME.
D. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC
HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE
BZA96-04, SUBMITTED BY RICHARD PEMBERTON AND
CONSIDERATION OF SAME.
IV. MINUTES
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF
THE JANUARY 8, 1996 MEETING.
V. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION
VI. ADJOURNMENT
IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILITY
THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT
THE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT (817) 481-0377 AT LEAST 24 HOURS
IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS WILL BE MADE TO ASSIST YOUR
NEEDS.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551.001 et seq.
ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT
MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 1ST DAY OF
MARCH, 1996 AT 5:00 P.M.
T SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT
FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING_MIA
IA
MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER
SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-01
PHIL SALYER
MEETING DATE: MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the request to Grapevine
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for Lot 1, Block 1, Wildwood Crossing
Addition and addressed as 1102 Skyline Court as follows:
1. Section 42.117.5., Supplementary District Regulations state that the face (door)
of a private garage, either attached or detached shall not be located closer than
twenty (20) feet to any side or rear lot line in any residential district.
The proposed variance would allow a garage to be placed so that the face
(door) encroaches five (5) feet into the required twenty (20) foot side setback.
If approved it would allow the garage to be placed so that the face (door) is
fifteen (15) feet from the side lot line.
SPECIAL CONDITION:
Staff finds a special condition exists for the request in that it would be difficult to
construct a rear entry garage, due to the location of an existing storm inlet. A twenty
(20) foot side setback would be possible, but would restrict the habitable area of
house.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Phil
Salyer representing Salyer and Associates.
SW/kd
0:1BZA196-01.4
7 2 t l2it 12 U p 1< 2
LTR 02E
' Z94-10 aa7 • < RIVSERSIOE NORTH RIVERSIDE OR
�
R-7.5 Is Is 17 1e Ze --
2 3.3 6
21
TR 24 7 5 l3 14
t1 21 \ 24 2 J 20 (9 IR 17 if i, 1
jt2 3 C
\
/ m�•z a t 2 gT�Rk it a• � 1+
7e A BEVERIT
�-
1
5 � 6
TR 246 13 6 5 /4 2
28.78 0 / t R! t2 u 7 �ti 7 22 • s .\
t 1 h 71
2 2 S!� I i 2 z0 E i
' 1 � � 3 hp - / 1a �
1 '13 4 `+Y U V QTheA 79217
TR 25 4 \
� o 16 /
(Y12 18 6 i T //.
4.475 AC a 6 2 3
` 6
\1Y W u s 7 g1�15 13 4 4 11 n /lo / S 6
7�
BZA 96-01 S 7
PHIL SALYER
4 1
R—TH 6 a 1 1 4i R—TH
A Is H 14 1<R2 a
� 1 42A
PEAL'ti $T
R-5.0 R--MF-2
�11MF-4-2
TR 28A
6.8 p \ l�� N I i 3
eo
3,210 6.202 Ac I i
Z82-50 i Z82-50 PRD -1
z II 10 1 TR 30J 30 0
N Z5 AC 3TSR TR }6282 AC
9
15 TR 38F 3 TR 304 N
:;Aw 13 2 TR 300 tom. /v t
78 2 8 AC , S0 p ' S LZ O � 11
� JI _.
AC
n m 14 7 3 38 u 1� Z89�7 lass c
TR TR 89-07 i
K 1 3 ' 30 TR 38-0 3K Z89-07
30 30
16 302 13 11 - pa�
a m TURNER RO T11 �jeH
iR � I
30R }
TA 308 2 TR Tfl TR iR TR �
TRTR 30H TR 38A i
2' at ac Ac z( p Jaz p .806 • 36 C i
322R
_ 7 p 2Rt
_ E CU88-08 6
E p K , C 91-21 1 3��0
7 c w S
L
Q V J
e 36 X08 3 z R� HW ANG cc �G
2 C C
2 Z flROeWVAO Z82-01 I j
7R 9 a22 � '��
IA 2A 3A .A 5 6 7 e 6 3030 CU91 –16 i
\ e/
7 9 10
11A
2
21
20 "1
Ie
7 T{t� ®It
' \\
3
J
119 \
3 1
2: 1
4 S
2•L3y3
' /l
R u1
T 2
7.95•�.
3
�!� 1
`
1
12
••�tR�i ••
2.57 0
14
u R 3 5
R-3.75
is
111777�1TI�(♦'•
WIE0v000 OR
16
1 v
A
ze
w� a
t
LN
IJ
a.56 AC
R --MF—
2
2 2 R1R s
1
11
C�
7R
L' -'
4 A
35111
R—MF-1
ie AC
2GE
i 13
31 AC
22
19
17
17
7 t
v
to `
I ! 1 =
!Z
71 5
SRI
TR 5d0
�
4 1
R—TH 6 a 1 1 4i R—TH
A Is H 14 1<R2 a
� 1 42A
PEAL'ti $T
R-5.0 R--MF-2
�11MF-4-2
TR 28A
6.8 p \ l�� N I i 3
eo
3,210 6.202 Ac I i
Z82-50 i Z82-50 PRD -1
z II 10 1 TR 30J 30 0
N Z5 AC 3TSR TR }6282 AC
9
15 TR 38F 3 TR 304 N
:;Aw 13 2 TR 300 tom. /v t
78 2 8 AC , S0 p ' S LZ O � 11
� JI _.
AC
n m 14 7 3 38 u 1� Z89�7 lass c
TR TR 89-07 i
K 1 3 ' 30 TR 38-0 3K Z89-07
30 30
16 302 13 11 - pa�
a m TURNER RO T11 �jeH
iR � I
30R }
TA 308 2 TR Tfl TR iR TR �
TRTR 30H TR 38A i
2' at ac Ac z( p Jaz p .806 • 36 C i
322R
_ 7 p 2Rt
_ E CU88-08 6
E p K , C 91-21 1 3��0
7 c w S
L
Q V J
e 36 X08 3 z R� HW ANG cc �G
2 C C
2 Z flROeWVAO Z82-01 I j
7R 9 a22 � '��
IA 2A 3A .A 5 6 7 e 6 3030 CU91 –16 i
BZA 96-1
PHIL SAL`
N DOOLEY ST
56 65
-37 i865
rER
co
r\ /-'N 1
uu
-1 007'-----=t
=:�� 101 7
65
65
C'A�E3LE CF�EEK-:;::
Ii1J
......... .
1 C) --7
14-
11 '31
CS
157
m
0
m
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION
1. APPLICANT
NAM
CITY/STATE: "MOiA9& ZIP:
HOME- :2 � ..qqt- LIS,.M WORK:I AX:
w
2. PROPERTY OWNER(S)
NAME: 51INa
ADDRESS: m
CITY/STATE: ZIP:
HOME- WORK: FAX:
4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY)
Lp-r I G(,I, LJtdw=� C&�4 i L04
1
Comgo-r�. TX -zosq
5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE
SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE
SHEET.
T o4c"
qd - A'vlf- r -c -Q
2
6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS
WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR
SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS
ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR
TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A
SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE
A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION
MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST.
a. � r G
144v
& UIC so ' h Lt
^ki'tmv 724 is 7),16sS'llrz- A!, P lAP-liiL Xlc j z A'101
7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE
ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A
PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE
WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS
CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT
PROCESS.
3
8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER
DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD.
SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND
THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED
BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.)
APPLICANT (PRINT 01
APPLICANT SIGNATU
lelvivJ041:4 009W Sol 10111 �.=Aas
OWNER SIGNATUR
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 19
r,•" KELLY DOUGHTY
a NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF TEXAS
t. or Is My Comm. Exp. 4-4-99
q -y-9
OF LICENSE I
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS .:2, 0 DAY OFDa,,xaaiu-, 19 qt,
KELLY DOUGHTY
o o NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF TEXAS
of %'
•* My Comm. Exp- 4-4-99
q- y--�1�
ATE OF LICENSE EXPIRA
DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377
FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545
DELIVERY ADDRESS
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION
307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104
GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099
s
1102 SKYLINE CT
6 4o'
/c�Gvoo� Gl2a�<�/✓G7 �iT�o�i/ � ® !
c/Ty o f `1�/� T
1
�PR-n U c
o PICS
i
co
/c -0l cloo� CRa--<1JAC7 /S�17-10 ,,V
(f-74'Al T
LSI
MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT
FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING O IICIAL
MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER r \ VV
SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-02
HAMMOCK & RICHARDS
MEETING DATE: MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the requests to Grapevine
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for Track 913031-1, Abstract 518, A. Foster
Survey and addressed as 901 West Texas Street as follows:
1. Section 15.G.1., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a thirty (30)
foot front yard setback.
The proposed variance would allow a five (5) foot encroachment for the
proposed house into the thirty (30) foot front yard setback. If approved, it
would allow a twenty five (25) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot
plan.
2. Section 15.G.2., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a twenty
five (25) foot rear yard setback.
The proposed variance would allow an eleven (1 1) foot encroachment into the
required twenty five (25) foot rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow
a fourteen (14) foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan.
3. Section 15.G.4., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a sixty five
(65) foot lot width.
The proposed variance would allow a five (5) foot reduction of the required
sixty five (65) foot lot width. If approved, it would allow a lot width of sixty
(60) feet.
4. Section 15.G.5., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a one
hundred (100) foot lot depth.
The proposed variance would allow an eleven (1 1) foot reduction of the
required one hundred (100) foot lot depth. If approved it would allow a lot
width of eighty (89) feet.
5. Section 15.F.6., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a minimum
floor area not less than twelve hundred (1,200) square feet of floor area.
The proposed variance would allow a two (2) foot reduction in the required
floor area. If approved, it would allow a floor area of 1,198 square feet.
SPECIAL CONDITION:
Staff finds a special condition exists for the request in that the size of lot can not be
increased because of existing adjacent development. The proposed house size is not
excessive. The variances proposed are generally conforming to the existing
development in the neighborhood.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Bobbie
Hammock and Pam Richards.
MR/kd
0:\BZA\96-02.4
0o 4 .4vn I rin
>. MA v T •Uen
t19,t 3 P co6 CU 1-OL2
�A �R TR
.32 iA .3 QC .SIS `Y �S � �< HC
TR aG
TR 4046 z a P
.99 Ac R TR ^ 2 e4 AC 14
<�A 20g6a <Ff5 2 Z0 14A1
_ Z7 3-03
W WALL ST
'1 TR TF 4E TR 9F T r TR I TP TR TR 46
32 43 Ar .648 AC aJAC 9J
' BZA 96-02
�!A to TR TR
HAMMOCK & RICHARDSI"Tfi Tk
.331 AC ' 9R 9R qF 9RTR TR
t 3R 3T -Al`TR 9k
13 134 13
3U 25.1 a 81 t `< 43
IFi `jR16 � tR 3v
x .25 . 'S .'5
AC 4C AC Ta act
t—
L
W TEXAS ST 10
EZ ® R a rp 9R3N 6 1 2 12
m
TR 44C 12 3-' u j
643 aC �' x x 13c•I s "C I
SUNSET ST TA IZJla i 51NG
9� TR L0 AC
3 AL 923E TR RR 3A T4.239
4r- Ar 3c �63
_ T$1 4R 3E ^U
! TR act 1 / :.772 AC 60 1 c
I
1..0132 4C 8 4
ST I J WORTH
P�n 113
J4 8 Tp R-7* 5
21 4 5TR -4L coo U91-275 A- j -331 AC Z25—
OR
r--- -111 ac m v E
10 zja® T W PD PT 6
14 12 12 T31 I Ac ' TR
113!1
REY q6A0 l.Ar�lE 9.; TR Ie� 1J � i-rAttr,�IN � t
rp :8J R teI: I� j � ` 7
TR aM
TR i 54 1.
�
3 5 5 3 4c < I F4 3 2 I u
JZ" 18
R50
i? 9tr7 nC
,��
TR iN t t 36 f
fZ 3 �jzE
I 1 S_ 5C
Tc TF- B1
1C IAo
i f ES A 7 I COM
5 k;:�hftl� SPR � v ION ;Ic
g HIS GRIL Ar M
ST
Do
—� Z 8 -0 ""
T� J20 PT
4 C ''= 1 C{ i
X51 Q 7 nt
_>� 5 2. 84 AC. j o KE
_03R 1 T-
?T
89 AC e (�O
2.
5.
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION
APPLICA T
NAME: (' �ZLrC�
ADDRESS: 1-50,q e- <
CITY/STATE: ZIP: 7t'0-5 i
HOME: 42l - Oo7a WORK: s FAX:
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
NAME:
ADDRESS: 1. C) -B D x go- 7 F I
CITY/STATE: �50ut t t4 J -6t -e C; I�ZIP: i foci 92
HOME: */%" V31 ".31V WORK: FAX: L2 -413J -J `J `i' '
STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY)
�0 l W e -L5 Ayertue
ry-a=�-4 A Eos -as, S c -le v E Y 51?
LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING
SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED.
SHEET.
f:4 I * 0, �#'4
-�CCLION ItD --v,v
+ Approve'_ fhe
G 1 ivi rt f -h o -f (oo
o v; ,5 /0f -f'ro m
771P S%Ant'j�,rc( (05�
ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE
IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE
Sk i (oN
rnCNVE The- hou-Sz-
S+Anda-, d
-rorlf �ard
5Ec' t tor4-15-Gy
want -rhe- rc&r
�f rd+0be- Q+1
iAStC -d 0+ 4 -he.
S4r nd zu-cl 0-5
.SEei OM
he-
debth
{ hLS lof -from �
-�T v, r.l ?e r rl l oc)
7fu's om--
pRl is - Fla -- o a -l1 o c� -��t � � Q �oo�ag � o 5--
Y
I ! q .-C4 / .l s7�ca a% C74
2
6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS
WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR
SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS
ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR
TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A
SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE
A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION
MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST.
awi
�,o rr►et4 -rhe, s--&nd&v-d lof S12-e--f7t-on+ ane ren--ryur«r�ees nv� �15
79,
'_ We- b e -h e t1 e., ;o l t✓t r
-Yom-the, 64ree- w d 1 6n4tzny -the. look of 4 -he, house- c y he- /of &nct uea4c-
tz aI'`ba uzLrd /�y�� o he- ofher homes or +=his 5+yf-r--'
reef- sore. are. 15;
7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE
ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A
PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE
WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION O'F THE PLANS
CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT
PROCESS.
. (o
0 o i 1 f� n x f�,c c1,�. a_� f,�yu.,���it� -t�.e C� ��U .G CJ �a✓.� 9 -�''�
Ll^ n i; n X 4- )7 i A / 4 , /I 7"i n/Y e , T n i] o ' "" .Lf P A / / h A [ :J
'`U'.� x'11 �l/.C�d'.�c,di f.(J ���`a-� a t -at �✓� �� �1 � D"?�J �iZLt,G, ��7`
3
8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER
DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD.
SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND
THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED., THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED
BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.)
APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) BALL OaM m a e Iz � �� m �c C' k&rd 5
APPLICANT SIGNATURE,
OWNER (PRINT
OWNER SIGNATURE
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF Q-�4 N
,C3tI /3t3i � �/.�iKM.4G K/f Qivt jZ [ G-H/�/z {7S d N z -Y
JEFF COSAND
MY COMMISSION DtP&'S
November 18 1998 N j U B I C
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF
19 -�' 0;�'
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION
DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377
FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545
DELIVERY ADDRESS
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION
307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104
GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099
111
8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER
DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD.
SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND
THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED
BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.)
Y
APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE)
APPLICANT SIGNATURE
OWNER (PRINT) /4.+R -y w iNR p L A —r T—.4
OWNER SIGNATUR
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF , 19
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS � ZJ__DAY OF J �L��/Ly 19 /
amommom000000
B. J. COUCH
o rte; Notary Public, State of Texas
r
M Commission Expires 7-31-96
-1-31-
DIRECT
131.
DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377
FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545
DELIVERY ADDRESS
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION
307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104
GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099
n
W
S�m
n=
�o
G
'S L
�
(� O
O O
z
I
>
,j
W
U
ll�
O(\Q
Q
m
V QN�
g}k
3yp
d' gk
1D
(%
Q N Xa
uj J
0oi
a �I
}$�b'�,
Ali
s a
_
a
m�z �Po
��$�
Y�
u
o O
`o Y`oy
bF �S
o� $
8
5NAB
S
4 -.•.. -.
S
L s
m$ xo
Luo§
oh€T^
kd�
I
MA
V9z$c
I
JTTr o
m�
=ao
I
I
g r6 IK
II
W
w
if..
N
(r
�Rm$.
I
W
$�°s
W
S�m
a
a i
Y Syv1
1332J1S SMA318
n=
�o
G
'S L
�
(� O
O O
z
I
>
,j
W
U
ll�
O(\Q
Q
m
V QN�
g}k
3yp
d' gk
1D
(%
Q N Xa
uj J
0oi
a �I
}$�b'�,
Ali
a°
s°O
m�z �Po
Y�
u
o O
a
a i
Y Syv1
1332J1S SMA318
�o
I
,j
YY6'
rro
s°O
m�z �Po
1Dt�HADH
4 -.•.. -.
kd�
I
JTTr o
m�
=ao
I
II
a
a i
Y Syv1
1332J1S SMA318
�'R% N VON
13obb'tcllommAck �-Tary, - ei6
_
A -5L --i
3
D
7—
P--,C-H-
In Orr
IDE LOT S17 -E----
9 Blix ql KIT YARD "x 0,
PROPERTY IO 4 xll-41 Ly
HOME --DEN ]=J--------FROAJT YARD
5QuinoRe FOOTAP-C WSTCK II
Mpl?\l -Rooms-13.-T2000n) 13- 111
sq,P. -br-T qStCL0SCTS W -8"AW', q P, YAR
RE
o
TA
T SQ F T,
HQM17- DIMENSIO
0
rn
4— 'D
480
f ME WAY m �Jew per�l C,
goo
PROPERTY
\— L
MEMORANDUM
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT
FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFF CIA
MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER 7
SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-03
JAMES LEHNERT
MEETING DATE: MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the requests to Grapevine
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for Lot 11 BR, Shorecrest Acres Addition and
addressed as 1704 Dunn Street as follows:
1. Section 15.G.2., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a twenty
five (25) foot rear yard setback.
The proposed variance would allow a ten (10) foot encroachment into the
required twenty five (25) foot rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow
a fifteen (15) foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan.
2. Section 15.G.5., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a one
hundred (100) foot lot depth.
The proposed variance would allow a twenty (20) foot reduction of the required
one hundred (100) foot lot depth. If approved, it would allow a lot depth of
eighty (80) feet.
SPECIAL CONDITION:
Staff finds a special condition exists for the requests because the lot was platted in
1951 with a twenty five (25) foot front yard set back which met the zoning ordinance
requirements at that time. The lot was platted to accommodate a "ranch" style
structure, but Grapevine's Ordinance encourages deep lots with a narrow width.
Similar variances have been approved by the Board.
An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Viola
Lehnert.
< 3 Z27 5 T7 T2 ?v « 4a 65
23
2 tt 36 < 64
TR 838 ;b
u ^C vfca
2z ,Q
S K z 9 33 « a 54 63
O OC J W
s u a 21 o
F— Q 32 43 cc62 W
T2
7
7 W
TR 8U► 78'{ z 6�3 20 U a J
1 is K _503 z co z (n
a TI a cr
= 33 .2 a
U
/ ' 9 i° S 10 SPHME
TR SSC 53 b8
-74 A-C BZA 96-03 }' $qq�
JAMES LEHNERT 3
<s s• ��
TR 81 rn sv n
79 0 i t01 IAC
16
TR TR I"
1L 0-4 AC
\ 37 38 56 57
K
na 12 u
T *2 REDBUD LN
< T
3 I i
33
42
24 � 32 34 a 1
23
_
TR 3l2 n r.- . 31 V 35 +-
22 v O v
f f 1-65 AC 13 � 9 LA-
18
18 21 ' 27 3; 36 34
J
O V
n a 1
HK;HV 1E W L N
9
2 ,
, 6 7 1 t It 12
' TR S-%A 8 21 20 19 m 17 16 15
"5 ^C 23 2 • 23 72
I � � {'
-1.
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION
APPLICANT
NAMF-
>
ADDRESS:
CITY/STATE: ZIP:-
HOME:- -WORK:
2. PROPERTY OWNER(S)
---I k_l&z' \
FAX:
C -
NAME: 4Z_1
ADDRESS:
CITY/STATE: ZIP:
HOME: WORK:- FAX:
4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY)
5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE
SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE
SHEET.
75- -
6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS
WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR
SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS
ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR
TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A
SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE
A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION
MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST.
7
f `
�c.�o�C� ��C..'c �-� SQA `oc'c_x � O � o o` �o
EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE
ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A
PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENTZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE
WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS
CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR.OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT
PROCESS.
�C_-c' 0- cf
p j
s
err-e��`
\( p\ S '�j, -)\cmc c! �' \' � C) -.c eco \-\'C"-� pec-e�'y-e(k— Uc-. \4'c'\c-eS
q
8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER
DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD.
SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND
THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED
BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.)
APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE)
APPLICANT SIGNATURE
OWNER (PRINT)c m
<o
OWNER SIGNATUR
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS '��\` DAY OF
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS
DAY OF
19_
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION
DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377
FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545
DEL/VERY ADDRESS
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION
307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104
GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099
C!
DECEMBER 7, 1995
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
RE: COVERING THE EXISTING 10' x 15' PATIO AT THE REAR WITH A ROOM
ADDITION TO THE HOUSE LOCATED AT 509 DUNN STREET, GRAPEVINE,
TEXAS
i
I HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, SHOWN BOVE.
NAME I V r1 !�/ti M ► , �C// A
ADDRESS`
5
MUiTYLm
ADDRES
NAME
ADDRESS_ v)
NAMEcf
_i
ADDRESS D
5 84 Cl:53
Jo0 G•';�. 9q.o
y., w
A74 jr
4 .!2. �.Y 'gip �i 1�1 � �. : : i ":, i.♦ �'.-
�J 4
90 3 G� J 8� A:
j� R K� �Jra R.o.W♦�
PLAT OF
LOT t 1--A-R AND LOT, 11 �-B-R,
SHORECREST ACRES ADDITION'.; TO
THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, ,;.TARRANT
COUNTY, TEXAS] BEING A'.,REVISION 1
OF ,LOT Ile SHORECRES\T ACRES
ADDZ1TION TO- THE CITY`'OF r GRAPEVINE
TARRANT COUNTyor, TEXAS'# _ ACCORDING
TO PLAT RE;CORDED._IN- VOLUME -_.388—L, I.
PAGE 81P Pi.AT `RECORDS' TARRANT
COUNTY, TEXAS
4
. L
4 '
ii
APPROVED BY
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
PLANNING & ZONING
2(
191NIM _W
r�
APPROVED BY
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
PLANNING & ZONING
2(
191NIM _W
� a Z __--
� ��.�<<�
U�
O
r � �-.
^'1
�.,%
tavc
J
\CI
MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT
FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFICIAL'(f
MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER -M-k V
SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-04
RICHARD PEMBERTON
MEETING DATE: MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the requests to Grapevine
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for Lot 30, Shorecrest Acres Addition and
addressed as 1936 Chris Craft Drive as follows:
1. Section 15.G.1., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a thirty (30)
front yard setback.
The proposed variance would allow a ten (10) foot encroachment into the
required thirty (30) foot front yard setback If approved it would allow a
twenty (20) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot plan
2. Section 15.G.2., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a twenty
five (25) foot rear yard setback.
The proposed variance would allow a nine (9) foot encroachment into the
required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback If approved it would allow
a sixteen (16) foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan
SPECIAL CONDITION:
Staff finds a special condition exists for the requests. The lot was platted in 1951
with a twenty five (25) foot front yard setback which met the zoning ordinance
requirements at that time.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Richard
Pemberton. Mr. Pemberton is proposing to construct a new house on the vacant lot.
Shorecrest Acres subdivision was platted in 1951 with smaller lot dimensions than the
current zoning ordinance requirements. Most of the homes in the subdivision are built
with a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback.
SW/kd
fR 1�
2titt
BZA 96-04
RICHARD PEMBERTON
n'R
27
6 12
TR 153CZ
S DUW CT 28 t 7 r
m
24
3 Z32-75 = n 12
u zv tc se \� e
• ;id 6-t
TR 6J8 10
u AC a
1 22 c7
S K 9
37 56 63 /
4 ZZ 8 21� � ca /
TR to 32 43 co 62
TR 1gU1 tate 7 7 Q 7 51 G9 r
t8 K 54 -3 20
® d 6 Q 33 Q y
n 2 7t
J10
5 '.
TR 1W 2 I
74 AC t >s 34 1 cS3 68 \ i
T 3 3$Ag0 71 \ s
3S \
.79 rw Im 72
8t a8 \ /
t t01Ac3*6 156 \ `�
73 \
TR\14 • 7R tgS
31A LO4 K 74
11AR riSRu 37 36 56 57 75
15
REDEW W
f
7R6 5 4 �7 t. 3
z ,
15 tb 2< 32 33 42 4 3
yt 23 25 a t
TR cc '
TR 3A,2 T7 2.25
t_d.S AC 22 v 26 3i v 33 ►-
13 44
ir Zpp U
z? 71 27 3R 3 36 -m • 3
O J \n24 Q 3 7 38 } as
3
Hie lvIE1- LN tij 11
GU' ` s
9 1 2
CITY OF GRAPEVINE '
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT AP
1.APPLI NAME:�T41,20
/'\ /�4
47? �-3 ff 4? w/- - -e �
J.
0 kl
CITY/STATE:LS ZIP:
HOME• 1!Lff0 _ Z -?J WORK:2/'9 -j5?/_ '�� J'9 FAX:2/,v— ;W — X-5-3
2. PROPERTY OWNER(S)
NAME: / C
A�v�.
ADDRESS: ��t`
CITY/STATE: r��n ) ZIP: -76 04 /
HOME:/i Z� 3 WORK: SG �— FAX:
4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY)
o,
C C S
5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE
SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE
SHEET.
Z:�
2- ZZL
2
Q
7
STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS
WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR
SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS
ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR
TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A
SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE
A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION
MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST.
EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE
ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A
PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE
WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS
CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT
PROCESS.
3
8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER
DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOAR
SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMEN
THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD
BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE,
9140,
APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) r Aj
APPLICANT SIGNATURE
OWNER (PRINT
OWNER SIGNA-
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS-57�� DAY OF , 19 �G
Notary Public
STATE OF TEXAS
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS 4� DAY OFA 19��
rI
U
TERESA E. kA LLKCc.
My Comm, Exp. I!
DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377
FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545
DEL/VERY ADDRESS
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION
307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104
GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099
11
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday
evening, March 4, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307
West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit:
Chris Coy
Chairman
Ery Meyer
Secretary
Randy Howell
Vice -Chairman
Carl Hecht
Member
Jill Davis
Member
Dennis Luers
1 st Alternate
constituting a quorum. Also present was Councilman Gil Traverse and the following
City Staff:
Scott Williams
Marcy Ratcliff
Teresa Wallace
CALL TO ORDER
Building Official
City Planner
Planning Secretary
Chairman Chris Coy called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M.
NEW BUSINESS
The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-01
submitted by Phil Salyer who requested a variance for Lot 1, Block 1, Wildwood
Crossing Addition, specifically addressed as 1102 Skyline Court. The request was to
the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows:
Section 42.F.5., Supplementary District Regulations state that the face (door) of a
private garage, either attached or detached shall not be located closer than twenty
(20) feet to any side or rear lot line in any residential district.
The proposed variance would allow a garage to be placed so that the face (door)
encroaches five (5) feet into the required twenty (20) foot side setback. If approved,
it would allow the garage to be placed so that the face (door) is fifteen (15) feet from
the side lot line.
An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Phil
Salyer representing Salyer and Associates.
BZA Minutes
3/04/96
Scott Williams, Building Official, explained Staff found a special condition for the
request in that it would be difficult to construct a rear entry garage, due to the
location of an existing storm inlet. A twenty (20) foot side setback would be
possible, but would restrict the habitable area of house.
Mr. Phil Salyer was not present at the hearing to represent his request. Mr. Williams,
Building Official, stated he personally informed Mr. Salyer of the meeting, date and
time. He also stated that he told Mr. Salyer he needed to be there to explain the
reasoning behind his decision to change the location of the garage after the building
permit had been issued.
No letters of correspondence were received.
With no other guests to speak, Carl Hecht moved to close the public hearing. Randy
Howell seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None
Board Members questioned why a building permit was issued when the house was not
in accordance with the zoning ordinance.
Mr. Williams replied that when the plans were submitted and permit was issued, the
house showed a rear entry garage with a driveway that complied. At the time of the
foundation inspection, nothing indicated the plans had changed. The change of plans
was found during subsequent inspections. The inspector noted that changes had
been made without City approval. After submitting the application for Board of
Zoning Adjustment, Mr. Salyer was allowed to continue with the understanding that
he would have to comply with the outcome of the hearing. Mr. Salyer was informed
that he would have to alter the structure to comply.
Scott Williams recommended that the Board of Zoning Adjustment table the request.
Board members discussed that it was necessary for the applicant or someone
representing the case be present to answer questions relative to the request.
Following the discussion, Ery Meyer moved to table the hearing to April 1, 1996. Jill
Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None
V,
BZA Minutes
3/04196
BZA96-02 - HAMMACK & RICHARDS
Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-02 submitted by Bobbie
Hammack and Pam Richards who requested variances for Tract 913031_1, Abstract
518, A. Foster Survey, and addressed as 901 Vilest Texas Street. The request was
to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows:
Section 15.G.1., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a thirty (30) foot
front yard setback.
The proposed variance would allow -a five (5) foot encroachment for the proposed
house into the thirty (30) foot front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a
twenty five (25) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot plan.
Section 15:G.2., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a twenty five (25)
foot rear yard setback.
The proposed variance would allow an eleven (11) foot encroachment into the
required twenty five (25) foot rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow a
fourteen (14) foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan.
Section 15.G.4., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a sixty five (65)
foot lot width.
The proposed variance would allow a five (5) foot reduction of the required sixty five
(65) foot lot width. If approved, it would allow a lot width of sixty (60) feet.
Section 15.G.5., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a 'one hundred
(100) foot lot depth.
The proposed variance would allow an eleven (11) foot reduction of the required one
hundred (100) foot lot depth. If approved, it would allow a lot width of eighty (89)
feet.
Section 15.F.6., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a minimum floor
area not less than twelve hundred (1,200) square feet of floor area.
The proposed variance would allow a two (2) foot reduction in the required floor area.
If approved, it would allow a floor area of 1,198 square feet.
�3
BZA Minutes
3/04/96
An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Bobbie
Hammack and Pam Richards.
Marcy Ratcliff, City Planner, explained Staff found a special condition for the request
in that the size of lot can not be increased because of existing adjacent development.
The proposed house size is not excessive. The variances proposed are generally
conforming to the existing development in the neighborhood. Pam Richards,
applicant, was present to answer any questions relative to the case.
Lorene Davis, 304 Ball Street, Grapevine, Texas, spoke regarding the lot adjoining the
property on the west side. She questioned what was proposed for that lot. She had
no objection to the request.
Jeff Davis, 304 Ball Street, Grapevine, Texas, spoke regarding an unrelated drainage
problem in the area. He recommended. curbs and gutters be installed.
Mr. Williams, Building Official, explained the Public Works Department will conduct
a drainage inspection during the construction phase of the house. He also told Mr.
Davis he would forward his comments to the Public Works Department.
Randy Howell moved to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion
which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None
After a brief discussion, Carl Hecht moved that a special condition exists in that the
size of the lot can not be increased because of existing development and the variances
proposed are generally conforming to the existing development in the neighborhood.
Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None
Carl Hecht moved, with a second by Ery Meyer, to grant the variance requests to the
Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 15.G.1., Section 15.G.2.,
Section 15.G.4., and Section 15.G.5. and Section 15.F.2. "R-7.5" Single Family
District Regulations for Tract 913031-1, Abstract 51.8, A. Foster Survey, specifically
addressed as 901 West Texas Street, to allow a five (5) foot encroachment for the
proposed house into the thirty (30) foot front yard setback allowing a twenty-five (25)
foot front yard setback; to allow an eleven (11) foot encroachment for the proposed
house into the required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback allowing a fourteen
(14) foot rear yard setback; to allow a five,(5) foot reduction to the required sixty-five
(65) foot lot width allowing a lot width of sixty (60) feet; to allow an eleven (11) foot
4
BZA Minutes
3/04/96
reduction of the required one hundred- (100) foot depth of lot allowing a lot width of
eighty-nine (89) feet; and to allow a two (2) foot reduction in the required floor area
allowing a floor area of 1,198 square feet. The motion prevailed by the following
vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None.
BZA96-03 - JAMES LEHNERT
Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-03 submitted by James
Lehnert who requested variances for Lot 1.1 BR, Shorecrest Acres and addressed as
1704 Dunn Street. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance 82=73, as follows:
Section 15.G.2., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a twenty five (25)
foot rear yard setback.
The proposed variance would allow a ten (10) foot encroachment into the required
twenty five (25) foot rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow a fifteen (15) foot
rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan.
Section 15.G.5.., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a one hundred
(100) foot lot depth.
The proposed variance would allow a twenty (20) foot reduction of the required one
hundred (100) foot lot depth. If approved, it would allow a lot depth of eighty (80)
feet.
An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Viola
Lehnert.
Marcy Ratcliff explained- Staff finds a special condition exists for the requests because
the lot was platted in 1951 with a twenty five (25) foot front yard set back which
met the zoning ordinance requirements at that time. The lot was platted to
accommodate a "ranch" style structure, but Grapevine's Ordinance encourages deep
lots with a narrow width. Similar variances have been approved by the Board. Rusty
Anderson was present to answer any question relative to the case.
With no other guests to speak to the request, Carl Hecht moved to close the public
hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis and Luers
Nays: None
5
BZA Minutes
3/04/96
Carl Hecht moved that a special condition did exist for the request because the lot
was platted in 1951 with a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback which met the
zoning ordinance requirements at that time. The lot was platted to accommodate a
"ranch" style structure, but Grapevine's Ordinance encourages deep lots with a
narrow width. Similar variances have been approved by the Board. Ery Meyer
seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None
Carl Hecht moved, with a second by Ery Meyer, to grant the variances to the
Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 15.G.2. and Section
15.G.5., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations for Lot 11 BR, Shorecrest Acres
Addition, specifically addressed as 1704 Dunn Street, to allow a ten (10) foot
encroachment into the required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback allowing a
fifteen (15) foot rear yard setback; and to allow a twenty (20) foot reduction of the
required one hundred (100) foot lot depth allowing a lot depth of eighty (80)� feet as
shown on the plot plan. The motion prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None
Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-04 submitted by Richard
Pemberton who requested variances for Lot 30, Shorecrest Acres, and addressed as
1836 Chris Craft Drive. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance 82-73, as follows:
Section 15.G.1., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a thirty (30) front
yard setback.
The proposed variance would allow a ten (10) foot .encroachment into the required
thirty (30) foot front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty (20) foot
front yard setback as shown on the plot plan.
Section 15.G.2., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a twenty five (25)
foot rear yard setback.
The proposed variance would allow a nine (9) foot encroachment into the required
twenty five (25) foot rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow a sixteen (16)
foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan.
G
BZA Minutes
3/04/96
Mr. Williams explained Staff found a special condition for the requests. The lot was
platted in 1951 with a twenty five (25) foot front yard setback which met the zoning
ordinance requirements at that time.
Richard Pemberton, 15710 EI Estacado #120-3, Dallas, Texas, stated he was present
to answer questions relative to the request.
Mr. Pemberton explained that due to the location of the house, he would save trees
on the lot, however, Jill Davis noted those trees are not located in the buildable area.
The trees were in the required front and rear yards.
Mrs. Davis also indicated that she did not feel that tree preservation was a priority for
Mr. Pemberton, as his previous projects had the structures placed in close proximity
to existing stands of trees.
Several Board Members and Councilman Traverse disagreed, stating that their
experience had been that trees were not always adversely affected by the nearby
placement of structures.
Ery Meyer moved to close the public hearing. Randy Howell seconded the motion
which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None
Mrs. Ratcliff explained that Staff recommended approval because he meets the spirit
of the ordinance.
After a brief discussion, Ery Meyer moved that a special condition exists in that the
lot was platted in 1951 with a twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback which met the
zoning ordinance requirements at that time. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None
Ery Meyer moved, with a second by Carl Hecht, to grant the variances to the
Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 15.G.1. and Section
15.G.2., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations for Lot 30, Shorecrest Acres
Addition, specifically addressed as 1836 Chris Craft Drive, to allow a ten (10) foot
encroachment into the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback allowing a twenty
(20) foot front yard setback; and to allow a nine (9) foot encroachment into the
required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback allowing a sixteen (16) foot rear yard
setback as shown on the plot plan. The motion prevailed by the following vote:
7
BZA Minutes
3/04/96
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None
-MINUTES
Next the Board of Zoning Adjustment considered the minutes of the January 8, 1996,
meeting.
Ery Meyer moved to approve the minutes of the January 8, 1996 meeting. Carl Hecht
seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None
MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUIrn-t-Ifl%K1
Board Members discussed the progress of the proposed Mills Mail project.
Councilman Traverse explained Tax Abatement measures relating to the Mills Project.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Jill Davis seconded
the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers
Nays: None
The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 P.M.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY
OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 1 ST DAY OF APRIL, 1996.
F-ITMOM111
CH MAN
ATTEST*
SECRETARY