Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1996-05-06
AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING MONDAY EVENING, 'MAY 6, 1996, AT 6:00 P.M. COURT ROOM/COUNCIL CHAMBERS, #205 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD GRAPEVINE, TEXAS I. CALL TO ORDER II. OATH OF TRUTH III. OLD BUSINESS A. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-09, SUBMITTED BY CITY OF GRAPEVINE AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. IV. NEW BUSINESS A. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-1 1, SUBMITTED BY GREG WRIGHT AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-12, SUBMITTED BY GEORGE BOEDECKER AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. C. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-15, SUBMITTED BY PAUL DENNEHY AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. D. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-16, SUBMITTED BY JOHN MCGEE AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. V. MINUTES BOARD OF ZONi� ADJUSTMENT TO CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 1, 19 MEETING Vi. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION VII. ADJOURNMENT IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILITY THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT (817) 481-0377 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS WILL BE MADE TO ASSIST YOUR NEEDS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551.001 et seq. ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MAY, 1996 AT 5:00 P.M. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER7q%� SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: BZA96-09 - HERITAGE PARK MEETING FACILITY DATE: APRIL 25, 1996 The City of Grapevine has requested to withdraw the above referenced request (BZA96-09) requesting to allow parking in the front yard setback. It has been determined that parking will not be required in the front yard setback. O:\BZA196-09.41 MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFICIAL e/y•c.J MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER WT SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-11 GREG WRIGHT MEETING DATE: MONDAY, MAY 6, 1996 l t Qti Q n RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the request to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for Lot 25, Shorecrest Acres Addition and addressed as 1859 Chris Craft Drive as follows: 1. Section 15.6.2., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a twenty- five (25) foot rear yard setback. . The proposed variance would allow an eight (8) foot encroachment into the required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback If approved it would allow a seventeen (17) foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan SPECT CONDITION: Staff finds a special condition exists for the request being the platted lot depth is too shallow to met the current zoning ordinance requirements . � cisI to Ir BACKGROUND INFORMATION: An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Mr. Greg Wright, representing GA Wright and Associates, Inc. SW/kp 0:\BZA\96-11,4 M i Y BZA 96-11 GREG WRIGHT i to R In R ar x \ \ 7 •O \ \ � c • u u 2:47 \ DUNN CT I ,e u 2s e , 2 X27 51 2 T7 Q 21 K sa Cs `\ C 3 tl K a• ' u ' TR 8�8 10 L3 AC ` 111-7 C722 / 1 S K O ' ♦® 33 94 63 / • � s u � s n TR Jz sJ cz l 7 r2. 7 CA • TR 8L► �� I t• K .' a60S 20 a • t7 JJ s2 » / 9 10 5 is TR elc 2 SPHORE f .74 IAC t x 34 ,1A S3 68 \ • TR 8+ Tit IM 35 ar 54 r n \ • .J1 • a LO/ AC x „ %J ` rpt is 30 ` TR R tR vm `lz LOt AC 74 \ me r�eK a I -,K 37 J• SC 57 75 T t82 u L—L—i WOBW LN REDBUD LN 3a4 ' 10 • 7R s S o J GU I 1 ' 151624 32 33I 23 25 34 sl `? 47 ' TR TR u n .- us ' II IAS K U 22 29 x o n N v 44 r Z cZ 27 i 27 Vz x ?l e3 O —� ZO 21 Q 37 30 u,. K n cc � \ � t OWIEW LN MI V v a ® 1 I 3 C T t 1 if 11 [lZ 1J .. tC CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1. APPLICANT 4 NAME: ADDRESS: TX�zip: -76 092- CITY/STATE: 3 HOME: 5770 WORK: 2/7- 5�3/1-5d FAX: 9/7 V3/-07,6/ 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: 0-rCA-li 9�=7754 CITY/STATE: d2g�_ '05- � ZIP: HOME: LS'l- WORK: FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 11 1 Al io N'.0iI iii, llll Ali 50 MAb lll�j 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. 94 7--, rx) lAr'- Pax_ 2 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. t 4 11! 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. HIMPAPOMi I M-4 3 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT OWNER SIGNATU SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS /k--ZAY OF JIYAjetlk , 19 All A V �A 1% Notary is 7E X A DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS /& DAY OF -Z� '1926 G,^RRIE A AWERSONi STATE Public ' TATT E OF TEXAS My Comm. Exp, 08/19/98 g1l --I /fig DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERYADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DE VEL OPMEN T SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76051 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76099 0 9 MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OF IAL MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER 7 SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-12 GEORGE BOEDECKER MEETING DATE: MONDAY, MAY 6, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the request to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for Lot 4, Block, 2, Shoreview Estates Addition and addressed as 3104 Lakeview Drive as follows: 1. Section 14.6.1., "R-12.5" Single Family District Regulations require a thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a seven (7) foot encroachment into the required thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback If approved it would allow a twenty-eight (28) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot plan 2. Section 14.G.3., "R-12.5" Single Family District Regulations require an eight (8) foot side setback. The proposed variance would allow a two (2) foot encroachment into the required eight (8) foot side yard setback. If approved it would allow a six (6) foot side yard setback as shown on the plot plan. SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds a special condition exists for the request because the encroachment is not the fault of the owner. The house was built prior to front building line inspection requirements. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Mr. George Boedecker. SW/kp OAKAM-1 z.a ` tl a r J \I2 i 11 Il( 94 HIGH 04 .c t7 /a a• lea 2ta ata 2xy a— IS 2aa � t 3 14 �---- c CA 24% i < s c T a •� � R" LN ze IERCURY / 2 CA 711 OR /F 13 is R .3 PENINSULA C)R t :• s t 2 7 ac TT-pl 6 I --!, -1 T 6 9 I :c It 12 I M Z7 26 25 2+ 19 ii 21 ZQ !� 15 17 IfA 2) 26 25 2• 7 e Q to :IR IS FOFEST HU 5q0 c la A (] �+ 23 16 15 14 113 L BZA 96-12 ea i S EvINRUC`E CP. la T GEORGE BOEDECKER 16 Y E T = , f Is J9z � t � , CSO uaa t ae 'a a 1 5 S i I 3agla Ta a•3 1s [ 12 a �5� .SS i2° R® 2.5 _ONE STAtc 'J.R .. 7a ea •a 12a 22 05 1 25 I 26 t 7 • ' 27 1 v 16 / I ? 1.55 °C OR 234 12 1. ' 1 ua t 2 le a7'' a1 5/_ 154 TR 221 ' 24 0- 1-77 1-77 K ISR 6� to 1 20 21 y� 155 .L rO KMALL M E le � e 30 ( 2= 2e <'7 26 2t 1 24 23 21 n 2E j 1e 22 1716 GU acv\ t ! 3 , 2 _ s 5 5 `�l t-< ; 1< j ©, 3 ! 1 2 { 5 8� 13 !' r i2 A 12 10 R i � ! i 32 a 26 CITY OF GRAPEVINE lw',OARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION APPLICANT ADDRESS: -5/ L Aknal6 w -DelyE CITY/STATE: �z&e4eeyf NE %EX ZIP: 76051 HOME: -Z4;Z 4'a* -4 m2- ;VZ WORK: FAX: NAME: e,-rfARj-r A,1L, Pa YN ADDRESS: 31C Z.4A- V/6W .17-'rvEr CITY/STATE: �'C'EV�^iE ° 725A ZIP: 76 o S/ HOME: g�7° 4,461' 24942! WORK: 119"L -5-g!• Z2-7--5 FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 3104Z Ly4lc-ev1EW .DZ,, vE ° Lor �Z 2 a5W0R,6 V/E y,1 -5-06 ,>ry/.51.0 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. '7 /�4 <:F/ a n/ G ,c1C.•'Q-ta.�t t� 7-0 79-4s ,EGr otirG.e oAC�r 1 2-- 9 C. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. � NG�2.o.4C-�fNi�T,S �CioT'r�-dam oit! GGos��r�__ :5vR-4/6v Q Ivor 7710 &v4,T Qf-- AMA. 3 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR APPLICANT SIGNATUR OWNER (PRINT) e �® t506J=)gC&g,�- OWNER SIGNATURE TERESA E. WALLACE Notary Public p STATE OF TEXAS My Comm. Exp. 11/08196 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DEL/VERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 0 R 0 n� `�t G l `) V ^1 V b ;� O O � � ` J h X\ q� �J N O V ani 0 m ' ..+ Q 0 n� `�t G l `) V ^1 V b ;� O O � � ` J h X\ q� �J N O V ani 03Z - Zn tt� Q r WL 4 �0M1�r C4 r, 1ivC4in ao <,t lmxdfo Sdf ILO 0 z m ' ..+ Q Q � c O z N N O 4 x° UJ M C l9 au QUO ►-• e, > w m 4 O C qu .4 O Cn O oc ! •S.r- N ct C C ++ A C W .r.. {�'"' a.14 w U A 4 f flr • Cid 1 C " W o xNo v 3 N w m ui %4 (1 t 4 O as 4 4 10 0. \ O >r `v Ll 'O O 4 ^ C 0-4 m -.t Z v w Cl- ct .. m 0 ®.a cx ^ J O > N Z O O ^ O M N U w CD N U Z d C) Z O m " " \ m m m O r- o + -+ •••+ w. Aoa w .0 o o U C.7 dC Z M "O a > t�u.+004Am O 00m01x u ." HPOA 3 ^00 CU Mr a--+7«Lcp 041., Lt CAOYt O F-WOC J mm CD - .C-40.7Da4r.A) O."CCaC a 0 :m O q U 4 .t+m. CD Z:m Z m 4$4>, 4O OCm O.:b N J• - O 11M V006"10U�ML ei CCACOy0a O a- "av 4 h- Z W i ^ G) r� Q .0 C) 4 G � ¢( OaO O rn E L ._j $4 A.) :3 tQi V .�4t.c a -a,= - ta> C) J Q J U -'r a Ci At O>.Ona }.4, U43u p .0 C1 OLYC Mr C'6-4' NU4 O ti-OQC.4 >.n Wt3> r O " OG Ct0' upo-yAj QV a +.rsU F- >Oo a:,:'t :3 C. Q li Z CU O✓ G 400.A -fi a. ..O c�+v v + 4O' m.0,..t u +move L-) C) E ^v tt O• V + Ct r 4 -U ^. u O ti O NM r (� :r G Y:a+ O r� O .C.�O b J >- Oct r N 4 d O -•O" - =A+ «.c « U w F wX ON CJ 4-3' a•• Xoev a+wn.J�UnCB N .--• O W > E O .0 4 O •j3- r m 00 4 ++ S. W-) C(X O Or aCQ� CC..C70 CCLLmr.U4 N O C CT r 4 04 •u:soa-+U-4mc e u 0 O 'O f" V 4 4 b ..wU ^ ..- to O to ww. ovou W F-0-�F-- N C « a0aV-•-iUy + 4mmm Llw 9=tjC.Q0C0«40va)4,CN LY Z i-) --0 i-> y U Uw L1OF-C Cl0 c C� m °v 6 m~ F3 v- O +i m 4 40.04„ m mO�4a^.'$O H -a: C C) ct CC •i-' - m :0 7 ++ O >',C q .4 .i'm A %4 m m l.L J U E •V' U D U O C. i .c .+ C_ m 0 CZC1 CONN a 4 >.0 b• O mOmu aoaU a >•. m m C.4 C, m Cc 4- Uro U O F- to C 3A > t0 -4a? +xw>> a, >- .-+ W Z to N N 4- m 4 >.-4.4O >, w 0+ WF- _ �t CU E t0 4 7 •••� m .0 4 0 0 O C o m C� U'OOC 4 m nCG O M4-) 4 f, mm m>.v+.0 aC0 'O CC�O -:cs 0 tp O m4 44C F1r40 COP4>,o as0 C4000A. I Mr4Mg4ma3 N ct F- F- !- > d C .•: ->. +..0 4 " >0 m 'O m 4 > U. a 00 a i, •O -m v .= 4 4 0%) O O 3> — —A!! f!-CUOm4L. 0. 03Z - Zn tt� Q r WL 4 �0M1�r C4 r, 1ivC4in ao <,t lmxdfo Sdf ILO 0 42 m ' ..+ Q r c O r N N O 4 x° •e o C l9 au > k. > w m 4 O C qu .4 O Cn m N F 4 C ++ A C a.14 ►: A 4 C xv o xNo v o ° m %4 (1 t 4 O as 4 4 10 0. \ O >r `v Ll 'O O 4 ^ C 0-4 m -.t Z v C 01 .. m 0 ®.a MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OF ICIAL MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER� SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-15 PAUL DENNEHY MEETING DATE: MONDAY, MAY 6, 1996 4-fa.i RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the request to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Delaney Vineyards Addition and addressed as 1900 Champagne Boulevard as follows: 1. Section 23A., "GV" Grapevine Vintage District prohibits parking lots as a principal use. Off-street parking is allowed as an accessory use to a principal use. The variance request is to allow development of an accessory off-street parking lot without development of a principal use as shown on the plan SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds a special condition exists for the request because the applicant is proposing to develop an off-street parking lot to serve the overflow needs of the wine production building across the street. Currently the overflow traffic is parking in the grass where the parking lot is proposed to be located. The variance if approved will go away with development of a principal use on the property. Future development or expansion will be required to provide the necessary off-street parking. ••11LURE I ki 1110• • An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Paul Dennehy representing Dennehy Architects. The subject property was rezoned April 16, 1996 from "R -MF -2" Multifamily to "GV" Grapevine Vintage District. The concept plan in your packet was approved by City Council with the rezoning. • 0:\BZA\96-15.4 Z86-01 11 1 16-29 AC UC K Z94-01 TF 3� =J T1, ',s T R -Mf BZA 96-15 PAUL DENNEHY !PCD uN���� ! + i �c GU Hughes Road Z94-05 13 138 Z92-08 S2 CC I -'11E: C11- I -TS CC u 12 65 Z91 -12 i f 2t 5.78 AC. A so i 16C k 20\ 21 HCO L Z94-11 QV i' CU95-05 Ma 26 2. 2' S 23 25 o3 GV Z94-1 1cl3 22 CU94-16 . 2' isT,ID CU95-05 3. 0 21 c Mwp.� 22 TW 6. -Champagne Blv& FF,TW 9C 995•.[ ��� �� \,V � \ T �, 2 2 2� cc2 2t 2S 22 1 rZt GV '0 2 EVI 2 CU 4-2 cu -o1 I'll TIYi 4--J 1 30A M A 22 .2�' 2. pt, Co Glade Road ff�- U) < < T� �—P i -7, cw CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLI 1. APPLICANT NAME: Paul M. Dennehy Dennehy Architects ADDRESS: 3124 College Ave. Ft. Worth, Texas 76110 CITY/STATE: Ft, worth, Texas ZIP: 76110 HOME: 817-926-5484 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) /6 WORK: 817-923-2008 FAX: 817-923-1925 NAME:_ Grapevine Holdings Inc. Jerry R Delaney ADDRESS:- 2000 Champaqne Blvd. CITY/STATE:. Grapevine, Texas ZIP: 76051 HOME: WORK: 817-481-9989 FAX 817-251-0472 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) Delaney Vineyards Addition Lots 1 and 2 Block 2� 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. Sec 23A Grapevine Vintage District. Variance requested is for remote off-street parking for Delaney Vineyards. Variance is requested for a lot across the street from the Winery. 2 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL C ONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY TH OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPL Nt��,'I NS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVA RREGULAR L, OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUST T bETER A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKI MVION TO 0 E A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDI E , THE N MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. Special conditions that make this request nessesary are that there is a need for additional off street parking during special events at the Winery. With the current Vineyard location and development of a landscaped park area to the south of the present parking lots the added parking lot and landscaping acroes the street would eliminate any on street parking or potential congestion. This parking lot will eventually tie into the retail development planned for this site 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE;. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FORA BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. By providing this remote parking lot and the accompanyin landscaping the overall aesthetics of this development are maintained. Many Wineries in the Napa Valley region of California use a similar planning technique 3 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD, SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD IFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENT ti t APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) m- T) ppR chi ect APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) Grapevine Holdings Inc. Jerry R. Delaney Prtsident OWNER SIGNATURE—� SUBSCRIBE RN TO THIS 1 st DAY OF April �' Q��ZHA Gg9,9',� to-iF-'O , 19 96 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OFr _ 6:p 0,e--tDS RE r/t-- 4 oo*.*Oo 4f 4L OT4 VC %AS Ir. 4t DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DE VEL OPMEN T SER VICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 0 ■ .., .-- ���� • . 3>.Haaa: aa.Hror4 ""'nom-i_� .. . . ■a._ MONO ■■■ "■■■■■■ ,IMAson- ■Hills •■�■�,�/,,iil�i � �/�111111��/Illilllf ® � J • 10 Ml •_ • METAL 11 ( ;TRE DATA LEGEND - EXISTING SITE -nNDIII!2NS MYL LOT 517E 10.000 S.F. - SITE NOTES ACTUAL LOT SIZE 92XB8 AC. ENISTINOYAEES I. ALL PROPERTY �FORE]NWGCfAN0E REQUEST aCIR�ITLY zONED Y. MAX DENSITY AD FAR (`l EXIBTNOTREES TO SE REMOVED 2. PRESENT LAND USE DE&GHATION 18%CAN41T9iRYCOMMERCIAL '. ACTUAL DENSITY .14 FAR 3. ZONNWO CHANGE IS SEND REQUESTS) FOR THE tIMA04E TRACT LF THE MK OPEN SPACE 25% o NEW TREES V4 -FL DOW INTAOE08URV T. AB81T1ALT IAD. 440, TRACT BE TO EBV•-(IRAPEL8IE 141200 SF. 0 Zs sD r00 W5p ACTUAL OPEN SPACE SSD, -----W` E%IBTBGCONTOI,S B. NO PORTION FEDOD NAZAIED�AAEAA80ETHE ANE)YS SHCAVN p;p00%IE WITypBOUIaWYyAPB 149.45 B.F. GMPEVBE OOWNTY 10/00681 4exe w /SET PNEPAEiEDPORTNE_OF MAX. BAPEIt AREA 4MSOO S.F. EXSTB00TIAB4AOEPATTERN DE AQUEW NOTES im MAP ACTUAL IAPBi AREA 005E 1. THE PROPOSED113E FOR THIS SITE ISA•OV••GRAPEVINE VINTAGE DISTRICT - 567.120 S.F. A CONDITIONAL UBEPERNT WILL BE REQUESTED FORA PLANED -&L 35* CENTER PRIOR To DEVHAPMENT. MANED CO►BEEF9LYAL CE1jfERs 8t1ALi MAX BLDG NGT. 95• NOT O(CEeD 100.000 SF. ALL BDMOIJAL UBERB SHALL HAVE SANE ODOR AREA UM(TAT=A8 F0TT0 N RECTION JI844 ACTIYLL. BLDG FKiT. E• EItItE C NAC BLDG2. THESE PLN4SAlE SLBILfTED TO RA-RU-THEREWREMElTS FORA MNNG Am.00X/ ENMR 100.000 S.F. CHANGE ACTUAL SLOG. AREA. 100.001) &F. 1 PARKING FORTHE DSABLEDSHAugEDEBGNATEDA000L10 AUTO TNECITYOF AND. Cort Co.,"GRAPEVINE CODE OFORONAIICM. ASK PAAKYO d. PARKING LAT LIGHTING SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH S$ IO SSPACES OFTHE GRAPEVINEG ZONI ORDINANCE TgNfiE ACTLALL PAF00NG 016 SPACES S. LANDSCAPING AND SLFFER RfnLiREMEHTS SHALL BE INAOOORD NCE WITH BECTIOIN WC 13483, SECTION 60-8C AND SECTION U- LANDAIy1G, .. OF TIE (1RAPEVBBE 3kW G OROB4ANCE S. ALL STORAGE SHALL BE ON A CONCRETE PAD AND 8HALL8E 8CREHNEDONTF9REE81DE88Y A SOLD FENCE OR WALL ONE R30T ABOVE THE DWP$TEFi Mol TO t7CCE®e (El(iM) FEET w HE3GFLT. ALL DLRW8TERA3ARBAE STOP LOCATIONS BHALLCOMLY WITH SECTION 28482 4WIIEp ARCHREC74 BL7pYEYOFi 2DOO .. HOLDW(H$. BIC, oEMNE/i1'AALyifTECTa LO YD BRANSOM SURVEYORS, INC 7. libQ PROPOSED GRADING ISroCONFOR41roTHECTTYOFC1EiAPEVBIE'BORABLAGE 1000 CHAMPAGNE BLVD. 3124 COLLEGE AVE. TOM NORTH SYLVANIA AVE GRAPEVINI 51L � R'"T"7810 WORTK TX PH 417 -SU -3M"' .DEiANEY VINEYARDS FH:, 2143511-0457 PH: en -US -2006 PH: .417.654 -stn FX 2744511{J52O FX ef7-X25.1025 FX, e17$21.8e1e MASTER CONClPPT PT AAT w1diffil *40 is 0 - j . 33 30 1 Jl LEGAL DE onrT10N POW OF ( I BEING A TRACT OF LAND OUT of IE AJL DOSS SUIT ABSTRACT Na 440. TARRANT COUiTT. TEXAS AND BEING THE SANE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED E 0® RECORDED N 1IR78E Wast ►A!Y 1068, DEED AECOADS TMRANT CDINTY, 1048 AW BEING DESttAED AS FOUMM REGAIN" AT A t/Y IDON M FOUR NAE SWIM UNE OF HUGHES NOW FOR AA NORAEAST CODER OF BRACT KING DESCRIBED SAID PONT DOW LOCATED 2Ln FEET MOM 05 DECREES U (MUTES N SECONDS EAST FROM TIE NOIIAIrtST CDIDEl1 OF LOT 33 BLOCK a, 94Ap0+ Lull-FIMg TIN) -R. AN ADDITION TO INE On OF GRAPEVINE TAMMCOUNTY. TEXAS ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED N VOLUME 384-19X PAGE 31 PLAT RECORDS. TMRANT COUNTY. 1IDENCE SWIM 00 DEGREES II /MBEs N ECOIDS LRTT (DEED CMJ, SOUTH oS DEGREES 32 wu1ES 42 SEOOIDS IR51) 117212 FEET ALONG TIE BEST UE OF SAID SA= l fMADO�N PHASE TWO -AL TO A t/Y Rd M FOOD FDR comam HENCE SOUTH 06 DEGREES 23 boaM 52 SECONDS EAST (DEED CALL SOUTH 06 DECREES 00 NMJTES 11 SECONDS EAST) 54"1 FEET AND CONDNILNG AL(RIG 1E ZEST LIME OF SAID BUDOt 4. SHADOW CE71-PHASE T111D••B Al A 1J7' NON M FOUND i'OR AE SGJAEAST COI0E7t Of IAKI BEINGOEStleBED, SND PONS 4O" IOCAIED N TLE NORIN R0.E LINE OF OIAAVAGE BOULEVARD. AND ALSO BEING LOCATED N A CURIE TO VE LEST WITH A RADIUS OF 444.17 FEET. I SNCL NORM 4F AMY ALONG SAID R-0.+. AW CURIE TO ALE LEFT 31&47 FEET To A 1/Y (IDM M FOOD FOR TIE ETD Of ,40 0AW. NITRE CHORD BEARS NORTH ITS DEBATE, 37 loam e0 SECONDS HEST 344.,4 FELT: I EMCE SLUM e7 DEGREES 31 NARfES 19 SECONDS REST 6347 FEET AW COHNUNG ALONG SAID R.O.E TO A GIPPED GtON M FORD NAE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION O' CHAMPAGNE SOUL V01 7 y4) MERLOT AVENE FOR 1E SOU7/HIEST CORIA Of TRACT OEM DESCRIBED, THENCE HOLM 01 OEpELS b NINNIES N ECOOS HEST (D® CALL NORM ox DEISTS 13 NWWAJES 43 SECONDS WEST) 224.21 FEET ALONG 4 UST VL UE OF MEIEOT AVORJE FOTO FOR SHE BEGINNING OF A BRIE TO 1C NIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 2 W A 1/7. SDN M N0.00 TWIT: T11El10E NORIHIEISE7ILY ALONG THE EAST RND 0.a UNE OF MOR( AVENUE AORAE TO THE RIGHT 371.52 FEET TO A //2• NON M ET FOR tLE END OF SAM) ORAE TO THE aGNL NDE OVOID EMS MORIN 01 DEGREES 14 MINUS 53 SECONDS EAST 371.26 FEET: AENLE NORM 04 DECREES 54 MI 10 SECONDS EAST (OEED CALL MORIN 05 DECREES 12 NN.JWS 51 ST) 704.77 FEET AND C" IMRIIG ALONG SAID EAST RO.M. UE OF MCI AVENUE. 10 A /2- NUOM M ET FOR 1E B OM" OF A BRIE TO INE LEFT WIN A RADIUS OF 1174AS FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG AE EAST EO.+ LRE Of MEN -01 AIENLJE AND CURIE TO INE LETT 14645 FEET TO A 112• BOM M SET FOR AE END OF SAM) OJRW . WNW ORSTO BEARS WAIN 01 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST 14635 FEET: AE7HCE MORN 02 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 30 SECONDS (ESI (DEED CALL NORM 02 DEGREES M NWIES 4R ECOIDS AES T) 3643 FEET AND COMIRANG ALONG DIE EAST E0.+ LSE O HOW. T AVENUE TO A PN MK FOUND N SHE SUUIN UE Of IRJOIES ROAD FOR AE NORTHWEST COINER OF MALT BONG DESCRIED; MITI NORTH BD 7 DECADES 17 MINUTES 33 SECO$EAST (D® CALL NORTH 87 OEGE M 32 LNUS tE ECOIDS EAST) 3&LAIS FEET ALONG 1E SOUTH LNC OF SAID HUGHES ROAD TO THE Pawr or EF#0aD AID CONEMITNG U.wt ACRES OF LAND. MOTE 04 LESL A PLANNED GRAPEVINE VINTAGE DISTRICT m00'«EMWAOPW DOIN.EVAM I= jNEEI CONCEPT K" 1 OF I MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDINGF IAL MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER W SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-16 JOHN MCGEE MEETING DATE: MONDAY, MAY 6, 1996 #A A ) 1-1 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the request to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for Lot 1OR, Block 2, Woodland Estates and addressed as 3809 Kelsey Court as follows: "'V1. Section 42.0.3., Supplementary District Regulations requires a detached accessory building in the R-20 zoning district be located at least fifteen (15) feet from the side property line. The variance request is to allow a covered, unenclosed carport attachment to an accessory building to encroach nine (9) feet into the required fifteen (15) foot side yard setback. If approved, it would allow a six (6)foot side yard setback as shown on the plot pian SPECIAL CONDITION: Staff finds a special condition exists for the request. The major portion of this accessory structure does not violate the Zoning Ordinance. The building has an unenclosed covered attachment that projects into the required side yard setback. This structure would comply with the zoning ordinance as a patio cover used exclusively for recreational purposes. The applicant has indicated that this structure will be used to shelter a travel trailer for a very short time each year when relatives visit. A complying unenclosed covered attachment could be placed alongside the main building towards the center of the yard with no encroachments, however, it would require the removal of trees. Lastly, Staff feels the variance request should be approved, as the applicant built the structure in accordance with plans approved by the Building Inspection Department. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by the homeowner, John McGee. Staff issued the building permit in error and became aware of the setback problem as a result of complaint from a neighbor. O:kBZA196-16.4 27x2 2t 4 25 1 24 21 !� t ti fSTL I e( BZA - AC . 3 R a� 5g5 96 16 Q JOHN MCGEE 25 e ' s TR 2A 17 u 12 u t1 >i . c n n TP- f" TR_tB>8 ®2 0 c k 1 2.94 k Q ,t 1= 9 _ 3 TR,taJ O 0 S_S K a 17 a TR.1 S ' 18 7 is dos er O F N p:R ��( r, V 6 12 6 TR L&M t k S 20 S Ac ®2 O • 2t d Q_' R K 3 � TRtl1 — } 22 3 L33 Ac 1 el n Z^ 2 23 2 >,, o 0 r, 6 1 2.4 1 R-20 HALL -JOHNSON RD - 2 D w <o � 2 35 7 w <o � Llw sm 2 � 31a 7 3 -- 41-- tJ 0 Zm 1 —37 J r 9 1 � 2 1 4 213 TR.2e s h1 4 13 2 a5 S H d.e3 k 3 30 9 tj� IR -381 .46 k T7t_3ct s 5 2 t3 0 Q 7 7 30 a E n 5 Sp 21 27 33 2a v, zz 7 26 o u I 1®�`� X34 , 7R.2 d 23 W > 27 L 14 26 - 9 24 3t 2,16 TP -2A Llw sm CITY OF GRAPEVIN-2 BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT 1. APPLICANT NAME: 1? ADDRESS: ---D 0 HIM U &A- CITY/STATE:GAa'o n e----, n ZIP: HOME 13: UQWORK-�/Lt -42Y-6395 FAX:- LIOAl e--.1 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: ADDRESS; CITY/STATE Z I P: HOME -- 489 -ice- WORK F A i 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) Cr - L o7- OCT 2 - woo c(lei '� cl (�s -� f -e 5 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. 'aao"E-C-4 6-, rx-'jr-. L) 4.0 cfc� I- 0) 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF S IONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEV IRU T OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJU ST DET NE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MATO OVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CO 0 IS)TS, THE TION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. :2 pro 1n'f'-teA^ 2s- s - '717 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. a S C-Oc)e't-' s '5i C-1 3 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE; PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) —JOA,-, 1 r APR APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) OWNER SIGNATURE r .--�— SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS .hN�t.M1hnnM1f M1hh...M1,.hM1 °SPRY P& GERRIE A. ANDERSON * Notary Public s� p, STATE OF TEXAS 9l'F �4 My Comm. Exp. 08/19/98 f• -57 DAY OF =/ 19 gll':� Iq g SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS S -M DAY OF 'i , 1 • PRY PG y, a, GEi•,RiE A. ANDERSON Nett Public IV V STATE Or `_X My Comm, t,p. G8;18/q8 fZ DA S1M K DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 �(,�2 M0 IS APR - 5 1996 e /-r t � —s cl&12� - 4 GJ, [DRA�u�G� ,:.) �,A� 's� N< STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, April 1, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Chris Coy Ery Meyer Randy Howell Carl Hecht Jill Davis Dennis Luers Chairman Secretary Vice -Chairman Member Member 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum. Also present were the following City Staff: Scott Williams Marcy Ratcliff Teresa Wallace CALL TO ORDER Building Official City Planner Planning Secretary Chairman Chris Coy called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. OLD BUSINESS BZA96-01 - PHIL SALYER The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-01 submitted by Phil Salyer who requested a variance for Lot 1, Block 1, Wildwood Crossing Addition, specifically addressed as 1102 Skyline Court. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 42.F.5., Supplementary District Regulations which states that the face (door) of a private garage, either attached or detached shall not be located closer than twenty (20) feet to any side or rear lot line in any residential district. The proposed variance would allow a garage to be placed so that the face (door) encroaches five (5) feet into the required twenty (20) foot side setback. If approved, BZA Minutes 4/01/96 it would allow the garage to be placed so that the face (door) is fifteen (15) feet from the side lot line. An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Phil Salyer representing Salyer and Associates. Scott Williams, Building Official, explained Staff found a special condition for the request in that it would be difficult to construct a rear entry garage, due to the location of an existing storm inlet. A twenty (20) foot side setback would be possible, but would restrict the habitable area of house. Mr. Phil Salyer was present to address questions relative to the request. With no other guests to speak, Ery Meyer moved to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Jill Davis asked the Building Official, Mr. Williams, if there was a requirement for driveway setbacks from street intersections. Mr. Williams stated the City Design Standards require twenty-five (25) feet. After a brief discussion, Ery Meyer moved that a special condition did exist and that being it would be difficult to construct a rear entry garage due to the location of an existing storm inlet. Further, he stated a twenty (20) foot side yard setback would be possible but would restrict the habitable area of the house. Jill Davis seconded the motion, with the amendment the original intended driveway placement would have violated the city design standards. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Ery Meyer moved, with a second by Jill Davis, to grant the variance to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 42.F.5., Supplementary District Regulations for Lot 1, Block 1, Wildwood Crossing Addition, specifically addressed as 1102 Skyline Court, to allow a garage to be placed so that the face (door) encroaches five (5) feet into the required twenty (20) foot side yard setback allowing the garage to be placed so that the face (door) is fifteen (15) feet from the side lot line as shown on the plot plan. The motion prevailed by the following vote: 6 BZA Minutes 4/01/96 Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None BZA96-06 - BENNETT & MARLA LOONEY Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-06 submitted by Bennett and Marla Looney requesting a variance for Lot 24, Block 5, Parra Linda Estates Section Two, specifically addressed as 2901 Tumbleweed Trail. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 42.F.5., Supplementary District Regulations which requires the face (door) of a private garage, either attached or detached to be located not closer than twenty (20) feet to any side or rear lot line in any residential district. The proposed variance would allow a five (5) foot encroachment into the required twenty (20) foot side yard setback. If approved, it would allow the face (door) of the proposed garage to be built fifteen (15) feet from the side lot line as shown on the plot plan. An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Bennett and Marla Looney. Mr. Williams, Building Official, stated Staff became aware of the potential setback problem after reviewing the permit application submitted to construct a new garage on the property. Mr. Williams, Building Official, explained Staff found a special condition for the request in that the existing garage is setback fifteen (15) feet from the side property line. When the neighborhood was originally developed the twenty (20) foot setback requirement was not in place. A rear entry garage would also require a twenty (20) foot setback which is not possible without elimination of the existing patio. Marla Looney, applicant, showed the Board photographs of their property and other surrounding property illustrating other garages and placement of their driveways which are also setback from the side property lines fifteen (15) to sixteen (16) feet. Also included was a photograph of the existing garage and driveway which will be removed when the new garage is built. Four (4) letters of approval were received. Randy Howell moved to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 3 BZA Minutes 4/01/96 Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None After a brief discussion, Carl Hecht moved that a special condition did exist and that being the new garage will be setback a distance equal to and replacing the existing garage, and if not so placed the garage would interfere with the existing patio. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Carl Hecht moved, with a second by Randy Howell, to grant the variance request to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 42.F.5., Supplementary District Regulations for Lot 24, Block 5, Parra Linda Estates Section Two, specifically addressed as 2901 Tumbleweed Trail, to allow a five (5) foot encroachment into the required twenty (20) foot side yard setback allowing the face (door) of the proposed garage to be built fifteen (15) feet from the side lot line as shown on the site plan. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None BZA96-07 - KFS INC Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-07 submitted by James F. Keller who requested a variance for the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, James Keller Addition and to be addressed as 900 Port America Place. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 53.H.2.b., Landscaping Requirements which require a ten (10) foot wide perimeter landscape area whenever off-street parking or a vehicular use area abuts an adjacent property line. The proposed variance would allow a deletion of the required ten (10) foot perimeter landscaped area along the western property line approximately 255 lineal feet as shown on the plot plan. Marcy Ratcliff, Planner, explained Staff found a special condition for the request in that the property is a corner lot located in an Industrial District and no additional land can be added. Further, she explained the truck loading area needs a minimum lot depth of 120 feet so trucks can maneuver in and out of the property. The plot plan shows the applicant has separated the loading area from the required off-street parking which provides safe ingress and egress for both types of traffic. 4 BZA Minutes 4/01/96 Using a large colored exhibit of the concept plan, Mrs. Ratcliff explained the location of the off-street parking. She noted the applicant had done a good job in separating large truck traffic from off-street parking instead of allowing mixed parking with unloading areas. One letter of protest was received. Mr. Jim Keller, KFS, Inc. was introduced to respond the questions relative to the request. He noted there will be a combination of tractor trailers, bobtails and street trucks that will be required to utilize specific dock doors. The smaller trucks will use the doors closer in so maneuvering on the property will be easier to negotiate for the larger trucks. With no other guests to speak to the request, Randy Howell moved to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis and Luers Nays: None Ery Meyer moved that a special condition did exist for the request and that being the property is a corner lot in an Industrial District and no additional land can be added to the development, and the truck loading area needs a minimum of 120 feet to maneuver in and out of the property, and by separating the loading area from the required off-street parking provides safe ingress and egress for both forms of traffic. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Ery Meyer moved, with a second by Carl Hecht, to grant the variance to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 53.H.2.b., Landscaping Requirements for the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, James Keller Addition, to be addressed as 900 Port America Place, to allow a deletion of the required ten (10) foot perimeter landscaped area along the western property line only approximately 255 lineal feet as shown on the plot plan. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None BZA96-08- PAYTON WRIGHT FORD Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-08 submitted by Mike Ware, Kaker and Ware representing Payton Wright Ford requesting a special exception for Lot 1R-1, Block 1R, Payton -Wright Addition, addressed as 440 West State 5 BZA Minutes 4/01/96 Highway 114. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the Board of Zoning Adjustment to approve the remodeling or enlargement of a nonconforming use. The proposed special exception would allow an expansion to the existing nonconforming metal auto maintenance shop. If the expansion is approved, the existing nonconforming building will expand 1,230 square feet as shown on the site plan. Marcy Ratcliff, Planner explained Staff found a special condition for the request in that the enlargement would not tend to prolong the life of the existing nonconforming structure. The expansion area is to the right rear side of the property and will not be highly visible from the front or rear of the property. Mike Ware, Kaker and Ware, was present to respond to questions relative to the property owner response requesting the six (6) foot fence required by a previous zone change request be completed before starting the next project. Mrs. Ratcliff explained the First National Bank of Grapevine allowed Payton -Wright Ford to apply for a conditional use permit to allow truck parking on the bank property. The western part of the First National Bank of Grapevine property is developed as a vehicle sales area. A requirement of the zoning request was to provide a six (6) foot wooden fence and landscaping. Mrs. Ratcliff noted the applicant has not installed either to date, but have indicated they will begin in the next week or so. Mike Ware stated the posts have been set but the fence has not been completed at this time. One negative response was received. Mrs. Ratcliff added a conditional use request from Payton Wright will be going before City Council on April 15, 1996. She explained the Zoning Ordinance allowed car sales as a permitted use, but the ordinance was amended and car sales now require conditional use permits. The approval of the special condition to allow the expansion of a nonconforming use is required before the conditional use request can be heard by Council. Carl Hecht moved to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None After a brief discussion, Carl Hecht moved that a special condition exist and that being the expansion area is to the right rear side of the property and will not be highly visible from the front or rear of the property; and the enlargement would not tend to 2 BZA Minutes 4/01/96 prolong the life of the existing nonconforming structure. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Carl Hecht moved, with a second by Jill Davis, to grant the variance to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures for Lot 1 R-1, Block 1 R, Payton -Wright Addition, specifically addressed as 440 West State Highway 114, to allow an expansion to the existing nonconforming metal auto maintenance shop allowing the existing nonconforming building to expand 1,230 square feet as shown on the site plan. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None BZA96-09 - CITY OF GRAPEVINE - HERITAGE PARK MEETING FACILITY Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-09 submitted by Doug Evans, Parks and Recreation Director of the City of Grapevine who submitted a variance request for Tract 10,11, A. Foster Survey, Abstract 518, and addressed as 411 Ball Street. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 20.J. "R-TH" Townhouse District to allow parking in the front yard setback. Marcy Ratcliff, Planner, explained the request had been incorrectly advertised and would need to be advertised again before the Board could hear the request. Ery Meyer moved to table the public hearing to May 6, 1996. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis and Luers Nays: None Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-10 submitted by Halden Tally, James Langford Architects, representing Memorial Baptist Church requesting variances for Lot 1, Block 1, Memorial Baptist Church Addition and addressed as 3000 William D. Tate Avenue. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 as follows: 0 BZA Minutes 4/01/96 Section 15.1.1., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations which allows a maximum building height of thirty-five (35) feet above average grade. The proposed variance would allow the building to exceed the maximum height by nineteen (19) feet, and if approved would allow a building height of fifty-four (54) feet above average grade as shown on the site plan. Section 56.A.2., Off -Street Parking Requirements which requires each parking space have to be a minimum size of nine (9) feet by eighteen (18) feet for angular or head -in parking. The proposed variance would allow the a reduction of two (2) feet to the minimum eighteen (18) foot parking space length, and if approved, would allow all parking spaces to be sixteen (16) feet in length as shown on the site plan. Scott Williams, Building Official, explained Staff finds no special condition for the first request. However, Staff thinks the Board should consider the substantial setback for the church sanctuary from all adjacent property lines. Also, Staff finds no special condition for the second request and feels that a reduction in parking space size would have a negative impact on site circulation and could result in damage to the landscaping due to the proposed vehicular overhang. Mr. Halden Tally was introduced to speak to the request. Using exhibits of the proposed development, Mr. Tally explained the church is requesting variances to allow the campus style church to be developed on a tract in excess of fifty (50) acres as shown on the site plan. Further, he stated the property is heavily wooded and the sanctuary building is shown to be centrally located which is approximately 450 feet from the adjacent residential property. Mr. Tally explained the church was requesting to develop the sanctuary building with a slope roof design that would increase from thirty five (35) feet to fifty four (54) feet at its highest point. The increase in height is designed to accommodate balcony seating and stage lighting for the church. Also, the church was requesting a modification of parking space requirements to allow a reduction of the required eighteen (18) foot length allowing an eight (8) foot green space area between rows of head in parking. The green space area would act as wheel stops for the vehicles allowing the vehicles to overhang into the green space area. Mr. Tally further explained a Tree Removal Permit TR96-01 was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 20, 1996 which requires trees to be replaced on the property to compensate for the number of trees proposed to be removed for development. They are proposing to plant trees in the eight (8) foot green space area to meet this requirement. The church also feels the design would increase the permeable ground area which would reduce storm water runoff. He also BZA Minutes 4/01/96 explained ponds were to be developed to contain storm water runoff from Big Bear Creek. Mr. David Cunningham, representing Memorial Baptist Church, addressed the Board regarding the size of the required parking space length in the City of Grapevine. He stated they had researched other cities requirements and learned many have a compact car size parking space. He stated that with the decrease in size of automobiles today these nine (9) foot by eighteen (18) foot spaces were not always necessary and would reduced the number of parking spaces the church could develop. The church requests the Board consider reducing the parking space length requirement which would increase the maximum parking capacity for Sunday services. Mr. Martin Anderson, 3803 Shady Hill, Western Oaks Subdivision, spoke against the request addressing erosion problems he was experiencing with increased area development. After a lengthy discussion, Randy Howell moved that a special condition exists for the first request and that being there is no specific zoning district for churches which can not typically meet the single family district height regulations of two (2) stories or thirty five (35) feet; and, the buildings have been designed to be placed in the central area of the property which is in excess of fifty (50) acres and would be setback at least 450 feet from the nearest adjacent single family property. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis and Luers Nays: None Randy Howell moved to approve the request to Section 15.1.1. of the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for Lot 1, Block 1, Memorial Baptist Church addressed as 3000 William D. Tate Avenue to allow the sanctuary building to exceed the maximum thirty five (35) feet height requirement by nineteen (19) feet to allow a maximum building height of fifty four (54) feet above average grade as shown on the site plan. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis and Luers Nays: None After further discussion regarding the length of the required parking space, Ery Meyer moved no special condition could be found for the second request and moved to deny the request to modify the size of a parking space. Jill Davis seconded the motion which failed by the following vote: Ayes: Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis and Luers Nays: Coy 0i BZA Minutes 4/01/96 Chairman Chris Coy stated that changing the parking space requirement was an issue that would need to be addressed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Coy asked Staff to forward the Memorial Baptist Church request to modify the parking space length to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their consideration. MINUTES - DECEMBER 4 1995 Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider were the minutes of the December 4, 1995 meeting. Ery Meyer moved to approve the minutes of the December 4, 1996 meeting as amended. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None MINUTES - MARCH 4, 1996 Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider were the minutes of the March 4, 1996 meeting. Ery Meyer moved to approved the minutes of the March 4, 1996 meeting. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION Staff gave a brief summary of new development beginning in Grapevine. Mr. Williams noted that the Mills Project ground breaking is still set for the first week of June 1996. ADJOURNMENT With no further discussion, Randy Howell made a motion to adjourn. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 P.M. 10 BZA Minutes 4/01/96 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY Ar OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MAY, 1996. ATTEST: SECRETARY APPROVED: 11 Lei I WAR91MCMISIERVAN, I ON I The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, May 6, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Chris Coy Ery Meyer Randy Howell Carl Hecht Jill Davis Dennis Luers Chairman Secretary Vice -Chairman Member Member 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum. Also present were the following City Staff. Scott Williams Building Official Marcy Ratcliff City Planner Kelly Prater Building Inspection Secretary Chairman Chris Coy called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-09 submitted by the City of Grapevine who requested the variance request for Track 10J1, A. Foster Survey, Abstract 518, specifically addressed as 411 Ball Street be withdrawn. The City requested to withdraw the application as variances were not needed. Ery Meyer moved to withdraw the request for BZA96-09. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None BZA Minutes 5/06/96 - - GREG WRIGHT Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-1 1 submitted by Greg Wright requesting a variance for Lot 25, Shorecrest Acres Addition, specifically addressed as 1859 Chris Craft Drive. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 15.G.2., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations which require a twenty- five (25) foot rear yard setback. The proposed variance would allow an eight (8) foot encroachment into the required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow a seventeen (17) foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Marcy Ratcliff, City Planner, explained Staff found a special condition for the request being the platted lot depth is too shallow to met the current zoning ordinance requirements. Ms. Ratcliff further noted many variances have been granted in this area for lot depth. Greg Wright (2805 Johnson Road, Southlake, Texas) introduced Rick Smith, future tenant of the proposed house. The lot is simply to small to build a house of any caliber by today's standard. Rick Smith (1723 Anglers Plaza, Grapevine, Texas) noted to the Board that a number of variances have been granted in this area. The purpose of the request is to maintain the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback and move the house back since the lot to the rear is vacant. One letter of protest was received regarding the case. Ery Meyer moved to close the public hearing. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None After a brief discussion, Carl Hecht moved that a special condition did exist and that being the lot depth is too shallow to meet the current zoning ordinance requirements. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: PA Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Carl Hecht moved, with a second by Ery Meyer, to grant the variance request to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 15.6.2., Single Family District Regulations for Lot 25, Shorecrest Acres Addition, specifically addressed as 1859 Chris Craft Drive, to allow an eight (8) foot encroachment into the required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback allowing a seventeen (17) foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-12 submitted by George Boedecker who requested a variance for the Lot 4, Block 2, Shoreview Estates Addition and to be addressed as 3104 Lakeview Drive. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 14.G.1., 'R-12.5" Single Family District Regulations require a thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a seven (7) foot encroachment into the required thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty-eight (28) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Section 14.G.3., "R-12.5" Single Family District Regulations require an eight (8) foot side yard back. The proposed variance would allow a two (2) foot encroachment into the required eight (8) foot side yard setback. If approved, it would allow a six (6) foot side yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Mr. Williams explained Staff found a special condition for the request in that the encroachment is not the fault of the owner. The house was built prior to front building line inspection requirements. No written correspondence was received. With no other guests to speak to the request, Randy Howell moved to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 3 BZA Minutes 5/06/96 Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis and Luers Nays: None Randy Howell moved that a special condition did exist for the request and that being the encroachment is not the fault of the owner. The house was built prior to front building line inspection requirements. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Randy Howell moved, with a second by Jill Davis, to grant the variance to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 14.G.1. and Section 14.G.3., Single Family District Regulations for Lot 4, Block 2, Shoreview Estates Addition, addressed as 3104 Lakeview Drive, to allow a seven (7) foot encroachment allowing a twenty-eight (28) foot front yard and a two (2) foot encroachment allowing a six (6) foot side yard setback as shown on the plot plan. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None A9 Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-15 submitted by Paul Dennehy representing Dennehy Architects requesting a variance for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Delaney Vineyards Addition, addressed as 1900 Champagne Boulevard. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 23A., "GV" Grapevine Vintage District prohibits parking lots as a principal use. Off-street parking is allowed as an accessory use to a principal use. The variance request is to allow development of an accessory off-street parking lot without development of a principal use as shown on the plan. Ms. Ratcliff explained Staff found a special condition for the request being the applicant is proposing to develop an off-street parking lot to serve the overflow needs of the wine production building across the street. Currently the overflow traffic is parking in the grass where the parking lot is proposed to be located. The variance if approved will go away with development of a principal use on the property. Future development or expansion will be required to provide the necessary off-street parking. Paul Dennehy (3124 College Avenue, Fort Worth, Texas) illustrated to the Board 4 ffm exhibits for the request. Within the last month the property has been rezoned from Multi -family to Grapevine Vintage District. Delaney's desire is to develop the area around the recently completed building into a Vintage District. The trees in the southwest corner will be saved to provide landscaping for that lot. The photographs submitted explain how the parking is handled at many of the vineyards in different areas. The 189 spaces requested are due to retail, restaurant area, and the recent opening of Delaney Vineyards. The Grapevine Vintage District Requirements require a fifteen (15) foot side yard, which has been maintained with the credit received for the existing trees and the additional landscaping that will by far exceed the City's landscape requirements. No building in the future development would be closer than ninety (90) feet to the eastern property line. When we eventually developed the retail and restuarant area we are requesting on our concept plan 78 parking spaces over the City's minimum requirement for use development. Chris Coy mentioned that when buildings area actually built on this lot, the variance will go away. Bryan Blackwell (5110 Caverdale Drive,- Grapevine, Texas) noted he had protested the first change from Multifamily to Grapevine Vintage. Retail and restuarants do not belong in a residential district. Heat, noise, pollution, and reduction in residential property Values will be a result- from this development. Chris Coy added this area has already been rezoned. They can go ahead and build the entire complex tomorrow with the restaurants and parking. The City Council has already approved the development, Ms. Ratcliff noted the zoning is already in place. According to the concept plan approved by Council, which the submitted drawing is a replica of. In order to develop this they would have to go for the conditional use because the proposed development contains 100,000 square feet. Bill Rodgers (407 East 2nd Street, Irving, *Texas) explained he is concerned the effect the development will have on the residential lots. He is in protest of the variance. Ms. Davis noted that the Board of Zoning Adjustment does not have the authority to change zoning. Cynthia Strain (5114 -Heatherdale, Grapevine, Texas) noted that retail will add to trash, noise, pollution, decrease in property value to the neighborhood. Eight letters of protest were received. Sherri Blackwell (5110 Heatherdale, Grapevine, Texas) stated there needs to be more awareness in the neighborhood. She is in protest of the request. R BZA Minutes 5/06/96 Paul Dennehy showed the homeowners in the audience drawings of their proposed plans. Chris Coy stated there would be a fifteen 0 5) foot landscape buffer behind the fence. Ms. Ratcliff noted dumpsters are required to be fifty (50) feet away from residential districts. Virginia Flores (5206 Heatherdale Drive, Grapevine, Texas) requested to see the location of the parking lot in relation to her lot. Greg Cooper (5112 Heatherdale Drive, Grapevine, Texas) stated he did not want the restaurants and retail in this area as well. The vineyard is very enjoyful. There are other areas the parking lot can go. Marcy Ratcliff noted in order for Delaney to develop they would have to go before City Council due to the size and square footage of the building. If they size down they would only have to go back and change their concept plan which would also be another public hearing. Randy Howell added that regardless, they will have another public hearing whether it is scaled down or remains the same. Dondee Blanton (5100 Heatherdale Drive, Grapevine, Texas) stated she supports the proposal. It is not a low scale project and will do good for the community. Bryan Blackwell added there is understanding the zoning has already changed. The plans can be built as is. All that is being asked today is that this variance not be approved. Paul Dennehy explained their entent is to enhance the entire area. Carl Hecht questioned Mr. Dennehy requarding how many special events does he plan on having per year. Mr. Dennehy replied special events occur frequently on weekends such as Weddings, Christmas parties, Blessing of the Vines, etc. Randy Howell moved to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers 0 Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays. None After a brief discussion, Carl Hecht moved that no special condition exists for the request. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Hecht and Davis Nays. Coy, Meyer, and Howell Chris Coy explained the option for the applicant to request the Board to table the request. Mr. Dennehy requested to table the request to the next meeting. He will speak with the neighbors to work things out. Chris Coy moved, with a second by Ery Meyer, to table the variance request to the next Board Zoning Adjustment June 3, 1996 meeting. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-16 submitted by Mr. John McGee who submitted a variance request for Lot 10R, Block 2, Woodland Estates and as 3809 Kelsey Court. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 42.0.3., Supplementary District Regulations require a detached accessory building in the R-20 zoning district be located a least fifteen (15) feet from the side property line. The variance request is to allow a covered, unenclosed carport attachment to an accessory building to encroach nine (9) feet into the required fifteen (15) foot side yard setback. If approved, it would allow a six (6) foot side yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Mr. Williams explained Staff found a special condition for the request. The major portion of this accessory structure does not violate the Zoning Ordinance. The building has an unenclosed covered attachment that projects into the required side yard setback. This structure would comply with the zoning ordinance as a patio cover used exclusively for recreational purposes. The applicant has indicated that this 0 BZA Minutes 5/06/96 structure will be used to shelter a travel trailer for a very short time each year when relatives visit. A complying unenclosed covered attachment could be placed alongside the main building towards the center of the yard with no encroachments, however, it would require the removal of trees. Lastly, Staff feels the variance request should be approved, as the applicant built the structure in accordance with plans approved by the Building Inspection Department. Staff became aware of the encroachment problem well after the structure was underway and almost complete. Staff became aware of the encroachment as a result from a complaint from an adjacent property owner. Mr. John McGee, applicant, is present to represent the case. John McGee (3809 Kelsey Court, Grapevine, Texas) stated he prepared a brochure on the structure and distributed to the Board. Page one is the plat submitted to the City with the carport highlighted. This was designated as a carport from the beginning. The carport was placed adjacent to the workshop with storage above it. This building is legal as it sets as we speak. Page two shows the orginial plans submitted to the City. Again, the word carport is highlighted on the plans from the beginning. Photographs of the structure were included in the packet showing the overhang and during rain. These plans were approved by the City Staff. He went to the bank and borrowed the money. To date there is about $30,000 put into it. This pad is two feet deep in some places. The pad is poured to City approval in 1993. If the he has to move the pad it going to produce hardships for them financially, trees are going to be affected, underground telephone cables will have to be moved. The structure, barn, has already been green tagged. It was never his intent to be out of compliance With any zoning ordinance. At the back of your book, is a petition signed by the neighbors on Kelsey Court asking the Board to grant the variance to finish the carport as he applied for the permit. The second petition there in good faith if you don't feel that you can request that they permit me to continue would you have any objections. Note that all the neighbors have signed both petitions. Kathy McGee (3809 Kelsey Court, Grapevine, Texas) noted that a video was made of the property and the trees for the City's record. Over the weekend a letter was received by a neighbor about our continuing and would also like to submitt to the file. Tom Ryan (3815 Kelsey Court, Grapevine, Texas) explained he is located on the south side of Mr. McGee. Mr. Ryan submitted three photographs to the Board illustrating closeness to property. He requested the variance not be granted. Jill Davis questioned Mr. Ryan how much lower his property sits than the adjacent property. Mr. Ryan answered Mr. McGee's lot is 150 feet wide as is mine. I am probably two or two and a half foot lower at that property line on that side. Art Moore (3719 Kelsey Court, Grapevine, Texas) explained he is recommends approval for the request. He noted to the Board that the area he is in was once R-20 and City Council rezoned to R-7.5. Four (4) written corresponse for approval were received. Randy Howell moved to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Board members discussed there concern regarding the protesters. After a brief discussion, Carl Hecht moved that a special condition exist and that the applicant has built a structure in accordance with plans approved by the Building Inspection Department. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Carl Hecht moved, with a second by Jill Davis, to grant the variance to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 42.C.3., Supplementary District Regulations for Lot 10R, Block 2, Woodland Estates, specifically addressed as 3809 Kelsey Court, to allow a covered, unenclosed carport attachment to an accessory building to encroach nine (9) feet into the required fifteen fteen (15) foot side yard setback allowing a six (6) foot side yard setback as shown on the plot plan. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes- Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider were the minutes of the April 1, 1996 meeting. Ery Meyer moved to approve as amended the minutes -of the December 4, 1996 meeting as amended. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 0 BZA Minutes 5/06/96 Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None With no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Randy Howell seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays- None The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 P.14 �*ASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY *F GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 1996. ATTEST: � SE& E -TA R Y � �9" im