Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-10-07AGENDA - CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING, MONDAY EVENING, OCTOBER 7, 1996, AT 6:00 P.M. COURT ROOM/COUNCIL CHAMBERS, #205 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD GRAPEVINE, TEXAS I. CALL TO ORDER II. OATH OF TRUTH III. NEW BUSINESS A. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-32, SUBMITTED BY MARVIN BALVIN AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-33, SUBMITTED BY ROBERT CASSTEVENS AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. IV. MINUTES BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 9, 1996, MEETING. V. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION VI. ADJOURNMENT IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILITY THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT (817) 481-0377 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS WILL BE MADE TO ASSIST YOUR NEEDS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551.001 et seq. ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1996 AT 5:00 P.M. SERVICES MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT 'E: MONDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1996 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Mr. Marvin Balvin submitted a'Conditional Use 'Permit CU96-24 for his truck leasing business which involves the retail sale and repair of new and used heavy trucks, miscellaneous outside land uses and outsidestorage. Mr. Balvin requested the variance in conjunction with the Conditional Use Permit. 'City Council approved the first reading of the Ordinance on September' 17, 1996. The second reading is scheduled for October 15, 1996. MR/pa 2 2. El CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT A PL„ 1, 51/wxll APPLICANT12 ;o5l, NAME- 10 I ADDRESS: . ...................... CITY/STATE:/ �-- 7; r ZIP: 7oWlf WORK4&74'//'/f//t7 PROPERTY OWNER(S) ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: I P: 't/mftc f ' 7y( Z HOME: - y/v -If l' / W 0 R 4��!Plel- - FAX - M/Wfj- STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) �0f 1,A 4�z ZZ94/rz I 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. ax/' 4e A /* 1z"i 4p '007V \lj L5- DETAI D IONS 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JjSTI S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. 99, A19,Z/ .3 A/1�/" 171111F . .. ....... 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PER APPLICANT (PRINT ORTvpr-) APPLICANT SIGNATURE - OWNER (PRINT) T OWNER SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS 66DAY OF .10&AI 61 oc"xoc occc XCOX'Scoc'01, - --NG - D �clic StIt, 3f Texas Q DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION sq( SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 1 State of Texas Expires -'."lsslon Expires 04-25-00 Di -',,?6.-6 b ILI] DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (8.17) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 ' GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 �ae AqA C8 kA I o��T9 5 �©3TR 50 AcD ��a2 E EST: -ITR 5z �..: 3 a 5 6 ` 1;dTaa + 30 ACUl Ni�8 20 R. 58 © 7 b T TR S2A .30 AC N 7i ' 3 7 t 6I v'I 1 4 TEXAS SI 5 6 v °` 9 f+a g R 61 TR 628 TP TR TR S i 2-0 TR o 041 60 W 3 AC 28 AC �25 638 03 634 O C E TEkAc 0 L 2 ¢ .398 23 •45 R Gla T8R 624 A0 .2AC5 .ASvv PT23 c3 I AC a c AC 7 AC cow O ^�U11o se 7�1 N P7 l w E w E98 4 7 PT PT • 3 !T PT T1tIZ1A V 33 a a �'1�0 i t' 2 3 a 5 k7;, i �I 2 3 a ag 9A CJJ WORTH ST 4 H 1 6Q' NPT 7f I+ � �� 6A �Tr w 9 1 ij , 5 N F T c�'1Iu`12 �. 06 7 aTI SF -1P 3 aTPT a 5 GU USS- I V N SPT 5 Pt� I 6� I ( GL 5 I _� , I < J I 10 4 Al 7D E E PT 7 c7 '�c' j� { 3 �< 5 6 7! c -I I Z7�-2 ' B PT 12 P7 0 I 9A _ 81 L F9Anr.�ir1 S, U 3 w P E PT wP E v HID E vfT ` h w L 1t 1 OF wP P G fT PT PT 1 i a Ell dii Es ' PT Ilii 5 I O 1 12 3 '14. 5 r r J �� U89 02 7o I 1 l 1 1 I W 3 W �I a 5 j 1 1 W FR Kl IN ST 15 d V A I D V TR 2N 5U Q L� HILi i4 I 280-1 �� 9 PT i .701 c I a5 i 5 P a 3 I 2A ,81 �L� I 5 a C a n o �A a6 3 •c I i� CBD Z86 I ( I I I (I aD TR `- 1 4 lz CO � iI w E BO 2 07 $P R QN \ i 3 50 56 sc I 1RZ91.4-t IR2 , ..2s A. I '02 `r_ %I'I �HtD PT : q CU93-08 ( CU1 9 ' -R 2J2 v Z8Z-39 > 7 5PT I I 1 PT"3 82-40 o Z90-09 C 2 23i+:<-. I 7a 1 N PT 6 2:3 J\� I– %M I ORD. 87-1 I s PT M e ,qua 90-64 P ✓ I 6 2_25 U95-12 I v { F',3— < 5 BZA96-32 IZ92-0 MARVIN BALVIN61: L 2 11 Ida 8 7 54-j' 5T �C.U1_ TA 654 L: ; C _ �- fT( i`�l•- TR =_ rF 21 1 TR t�b� 66 TO --2- 5 T ZP , I 5A EIA c TP ' aC B I,� °-Dallas Road — u°.A R TR f TR ;a,W- ,3A a-3-� 1T. T TP 264 1ba 1R ry Ta 2 483 AC 7R 26A .. - Y n fp o 23 .7a AC TP oa lj < Ic 722 Af i K a I� TP 2642 Z9 R A_ _ -PCS a3: At I �� TP 429 �,+- �cr _ a 3P C I.. ra 21- i.- Ta 28C to -yc — HRS Ppb, FEu`"p1Z I .'.1f4.'=1' —t 'a Ij i s..t6- K ra 7a ! '8 Ta 280 112 ' 1! I ` ma �I I K- �w1 73 Do P U�PPZ aL LOMP G U G U i If 1,Y�•° _.i_. ��N�o ,l /P, i Lam! Z87 -2e, Ai z .., E c�� On Monday, August 5, 1996, at approximately 10:30 a.m., Officers Margie Salame and Matt Petrie met with Mr. Marvin Balvin, owner of Grapevine Truck Leasing at 141 Central Avenue in Grapevine, Texas. The purpose of this meeting was to review plans for the new building to be located at 305 E. Nash Street. Construction start dat on the building is tentatively scheduled for December 1, 1996. Phase One is one large building that includes space for several offices, a repair shop, a tire shop, a body shop, a spray booth as well as 14 bays. It will also include a wash bay and an outdoor storage area. The approximate square footage is to be 18,000 square feet. Phase Two will add additional office space as well as a showroom. Construction will be determined at a future date. The approximate square footage for phase two is to be 5,146 square feet. Mr. Balvin has given careful consideration to his crime prevention measures at the new site. There are a few areas in which we have made suggestions. These changes have been added to the plans and will be easy to locate as they have been highlighted with green ink. LIGHTING Lighting is one of the most cost-effective deterrents to crime prevention. Along with the areas on the plans designated for security lights we suggest the following; Add exterior lights on all four corners of the building and above bay doors 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13 and 14. Exterior lights should also be placed over the body shop bay door and the painting booth bay door.'(All exterior lights should be high pressure sodium with building mount cut-off type fixtures) 2. Lights over the main entry door on the north side of the building. Add Pole lights for Phase II area. 4. Add additional security light on the south end of property (Nash Street). 0 DOORS AND LOCKS �\JB� The concern with regard to securing a facility is the building exterior. The principal entry are windows, doors, skylights and roofs. The following will discuss steps to c building exteriors and suggest steps that can be taken to secure such entry points. Ensure that track door (overhang or bay doors) are tight and secure. Heavy duty screws should be used to insure that the tracks remain secure. All doors should be secured with case hardened hasps and padlocks on both sides of the doors. 2. Do not place locking devices on the exterior of the building. Bay doors should not have windows. 4. Exterior door placed on the east and west sides of the building should be as follows: A. Use only solid metal door except for the entry doors. Further definition of door is described in Sec.3304. (A) 1991 Uniform Building Code - City of Grapevine. It is recommended that the sheet metal used in the construction of a metal door be no thinner than 18 gauge. The doors should be reinforced at the lock and door knob assembly. B. Type of locks or latches to be used must meet the Uniform Building Code Sec. 3304 (C.), (D), and any other applicable sections. Doors should have a peeper or viewer with a wide angle of 180 degree view. C. No exterior locking devices. D. Interior doors should use solid wood doors with V throw deadbolt locks. 5. All windows should be constructed of burglary resistant glass. Burglary resistant glass is bonded with a polyvinyl butyral plastic interlayer (PVB) with a .60" thickness. SKYLIGHTS Skylights that provide ventilation and light to some buildings are a favorite point of entry for burglars. Recommendations to strengthen the skylights are as follow: S I . Place a grading on the inside, or outside, of the skylightjantry Pi9o roof 2. Equip skylight with security alarm contact. FENCING i Perimeter barriers are regarded as the first line of defense in crime prevention. Perimeter barriers fir (fencing, gates, etc.) are designed to represent a physical and psychological deterrent. It is most s important that the overall visibility of a building not be reduced. Fencing should be either the metal picket fence type or the traditional chain link fence type. It is recommended the fence completely surround the property and have an electronic gate at the entrance. The code to be provided to the Police Department Communication Center to provide access to emergency vehicles. 2. If a chain link fence is used, it should be 8 feet tall and should be free of slats which tend to obstruct visibility from the officers on routine patrol. If chain link fence is used, the woven wire should produce no more than a two inch square and should be made of number nine grade or heavier wire. LANDSCAPING Careful consideration must be given to landscaping to prevent foliage from becoming concealment to a burglar. Basic guidelines governing landscaping are as follows: Visibility of all possible entrance and exit points. 2. Shrubs should be 18 to 24 inches away from all entry points. Hedges should be cut at least 6 inches below window level or no higher than 18 inches. 4. Tall shrubs or trees can be trimmed from the bottom up to assure visibility. Hedges can be separated to prevent hiding. KEY CONTROL Key control represents another effective procedural technique to improve security. 1. Limit the number of keys that are issued to employees. 2. Have locks re -keyed or codes changed when an employee quits or is fired. 3. Keep a record of keys. 4. Provide a secured place to store keys. 5. Make entry door accessible from outside. All other exterior doors should be opened from the inside of the building. CAMERAS The placement of cameras and alarms deal with placing obstacles that will make it more difficult and riskier for a crime to be committed. The camera tapes can be used as evidence in the event a critne is committed. The blueprints call for the exterior of the building to have cameras mounted at each of the 4 corners. 1. Recommend a camera be installed in the foyer/leasing center area to record activity at the front counter. 2. Recommend cameras be monitored at all times. ALARMS l . Burglar and fire alarms should provide contacts on all exterior doors, exterior overhead doors and all windows. 2. Motion detectors be used in conjunction with the system. 3. Glass breakage sensors may also be a benefit if the building includes windows. SATES � 8 j99 There are basically two types of business safes. The fire safes are commonly used to store business records. Money safes are constructed to resist burglary and robbery but provide minimal fire protection. If money is left overnight, a floor safe should be installed. This survey does not provide all the answers, but should serve as a guide for asking challenging questions and offering practical answers to the people who make the decisions which affect the physical environment and the human functions in the community. If there are any further questions regarding this survey, please feel free to contact the Grapevine Police Department - Crime Prevention Office at 424-0575 during regular business hours. This survey was prepared by Officer Margie Salame. mIcttinw, 1C." S.%. LJ 17,F- rl e H7-� DC r6l I W, 5" IIATeit 07- AciAceNT zoNiw� -t, %31 Zr (Az4og. K66*4 S -r.) POLE L;6 -HT &u- c�aivmmnsT us -p- AruAGC,4T ZONIW-- 1,10tWALZ AS, REWO Ib*T cePT. LT. - LVHr INVUbTlKLAL. 6Xr-`nWl CHWI4 LlHt FC'kA;' r.' HM (f)-,TOH 4 IzepAwK 0,5 146a'(7) FOLC L&HT L4 FOLZ LI*mT lo, L.I.06CAP-H& :!XIT Ift V I 9 -0 A 0 W W fx tvria r"', Doz,,, W -70 be At"POMW FZEU4 ExIbT"5- CHAIN L.IHr- go"Iw, 6A.Te 7�T F, lt�e I LAN I L-� 7 M PAILQW, STVPft 11PICA I_ L b� W TO ele AlEmweo 1444 1 MT12. VTF91OIZ WdNTIlor PVpZ SIOTF 2- 9 0 LIT VOOOZ A. HAf. -5fOJ 0MIletiTS0 4 F15QLUIAeMrI4'T OP THIS, ,QaA A' -'H IT C�I!A 21" CAJDNEL7A90C. a,*%e , FLI&HT FLEVATIOA C.Q. J0144-SoN '530 a a T. rl.T`� Ij, VOL. It, Uo T� L.L '16 1 77 . . ... . ... J.s , 1�cl� I I I " TZ.T. AcjAcasT LAI40 VICtW7T 1-lAl- p"A5F- = LJ 17,F- rl e H7-� coo Sp 07- 175 ZF -t, %31 Zr owe '51A.4. POLE L;6 -HT 0 'LlY. 7 07, .001/. u7T 1=17�E (rilk.) Sp 4,4a, IF 1-7 BUIL01146, SIZE (MAA 4c, =1 r�F ".o Sr I surFAc-0- C -l" 567.) 5157. r. 7 V, etwIT, (rtH. F"f� t4oiz'r-i, 7X '%.itn Wumselzb- (s) 1000 G.L. -7 A A SIO,14, G HT MILX J,60,41E C-AOUMP JOB -5 S'MAAC,f -.AN I:r GAtIOLIIE DIMEL,; SP�WF- P'ZX 2000sf- LOT �IZ6A Sub,isr�T TO ALL OF - -I-CCA.t. 4 Sr�Tm FIME C.00E-I, I A "A"d, I p"A5F- = rIFTAk- A�=,� coo Sp 07- 175 ZF -t, %31 Zr p"A5F- = W - qe,4 ".-Ce ZCHIIA(l - L7 lcu!arfzl�L GAT I s'.0, Pac�'Veo coo Sp -2 &,.t W " 175 ZF -t, %31 Zr owe '51A.4. rb7. 0 'LlY. 7 07, .001/. I ; 22- W - qe,4 ".-Ce ZCHIIA(l - L7 lcu!arfzl�L GAT I s'.0, r7 r 7, /A- I laws llmmmfr7, �:;;Al N I tit. -- IT z zZ:- Z 6 cc RM It I elk Lor. U 12 9 r HA&A� rtT. ANNING 91 M -A "'T 7 -L 6 H—T 40. It 7-1 A FXtITiWcl C -W L:kr FC,445 - MT. DrAINA&e 5,�e CC": S2,1- -I' PHAbr- i 'HAk4 :r FxT-fi 4 FLeP^,K �e� A=9) (LANveckrt buFFeg OmLl) exlb,rG STOPM -W"T C�iM44 IT IMP"VeMEW11.) ST.ft, TTP. A,0j^czNr !f. LIL&NT KOUITIR.I� 7. 6' UTIUT7 eAt.ErIENT "it W pt"zl 641-L IL-lm.&e ilao I'MUCT L= M 14 Oc so I C, (,7' !O'LA�Csc.,PINO, ics, 7115 5r ml �:=p =Z4. SF owe '51A.4. -, I 7� 0 'LlY. H4. -7/� .3.5 4. FVLf LIUMT I.Fbl�.11A�nOlwi. C-AWevime (s 1-1 ) -q&I - Z38" rIW- HYDA-WT 0 W 44 121504, Rimme"Ttl OF T1,1m fic. < 4L W cr uj cc PAOFOSCO 5U,. NESS, A r7 r 7, /A- I laws llmmmfr7, �:;;Al N I tit. -- IT z zZ:- Z 6 cc RM It I elk Lor. U 12 9 r HA&A� rtT. ANNING 91 M -A "'T 7 -L 6 H—T 40. It 7-1 A FXtITiWcl C -W L:kr FC,445 - MT. DrAINA&e 5,�e CC": S2,1- -I' PHAbr- i 'HAk4 :r FxT-fi 4 FLeP^,K �e� A=9) (LANveckrt buFFeg OmLl) exlb,rG STOPM -W"T C�iM44 IT IMP"VeMEW11.) ST.ft, TTP. A,0j^czNr !f. LIL&NT KOUITIR.I� 7. 6' UTIUT7 eAt.ErIENT "it W pt"zl 641-L IL-lm.&e ilao I'MUCT L= M Co. � �&e 5.ALED 114 WW-. '-C F�.k SIT& "WA�c ics, 7115 5r ml �:=p =Z4. SF Millel'164T -SHjLLI dF� -, I 7� ISV. 'LlY. 7c'/, -7/� .3.5 4. r7 r 7, /A- I laws llmmmfr7, �:;;Al N I tit. -- IT z zZ:- Z 6 cc RM It I elk Lor. U 12 9 r HA&A� rtT. ANNING 91 M -A "'T 7 -L 6 H—T 40. It 7-1 A FXtITiWcl C -W L:kr FC,445 - MT. DrAINA&e 5,�e CC": S2,1- -I' PHAbr- i 'HAk4 :r FxT-fi 4 FLeP^,K �e� A=9) (LANveckrt buFFeg OmLl) exlb,rG STOPM -W"T C�iM44 IT IMP"VeMEW11.) ST.ft, TTP. A,0j^czNr !f. LIL&NT KOUITIR.I� 7. 6' UTIUT7 eAt.ErIENT "it W pt"zl 641-L IL-lm.&e ilao I'MUCT L= M Co. � �&e 5.ALED 114 WW-. '-C F�.k SIT& "WA�c MT P-wE La SITE PLAN mui-Leg. HoLLaATE Millel'164T -SHjLLI dF� SVIT. 0 z 0 01"11101A Or ClfZA.wA6r- I, FcFeK TO SHFFT A-2 4. crrl rIA--OWIZT 6- FVLf LIUMT I.Fbl�.11A�nOlwi. C-AWevime (s 1-1 ) -q&I - Z38" rIW- HYDA-WT 0 W 44 121504, Rimme"Ttl OF T1,1m P. 0. i5ox Is 5 ac:o < 4L W cr uj cc PAOFOSCO 5U,. NESS, A F"f� t4oiz'r-i, 7X '%.itn Wumselzb- NAlveg Pb ILCAueireo -7 A A SIO,14, G HT MILX < r7 r 7, /A- I laws llmmmfr7, �:;;Al N I tit. -- IT z zZ:- Z 6 cc RM It I elk Lor. U 12 9 r HA&A� rtT. ANNING 91 M -A "'T 7 -L 6 H—T 40. It 7-1 A FXtITiWcl C -W L:kr FC,445 - MT. DrAINA&e 5,�e CC": S2,1- -I' PHAbr- i 'HAk4 :r FxT-fi 4 FLeP^,K �e� A=9) (LANveckrt buFFeg OmLl) exlb,rG STOPM -W"T C�iM44 IT IMP"VeMEW11.) ST.ft, TTP. A,0j^czNr !f. LIL&NT KOUITIR.I� 7. 6' UTIUT7 eAt.ErIENT "it W pt"zl 641-L IL-lm.&e ilao I'MUCT L= 6fIxOt.* -0715- T�IC P90ftM it, lifaTUALLT FLAT --v coe%) Nor MAVC ANr 16,c- I Fl,^ -4T 7cPO&"e-ICA6 09 r"v6wm- reArulke6. THe O"'NA&E AFOW#. ON TMLI r -L,4.4 eSec L.�ewv ) I NOIC'Are Tmt Fixoroboo WATCOZ k04 - OFF 'zo U94.010 A." Olbautero Ni/ put" wopjv%. ^ acriPxTe 01RAINAI(le 4. �,FZAV,WC- �PLA� JiLL BC SjbMMe0 141 F,HAL LXAWIRIu FO$L EUIL044CY f'gF'rlll- SMOH.4 OWLIT"t SITE. ,4 Frtovictf ILL MILATOW wr -to excreo awE fi!>OT 5� C-440II4 AT !Aalr4M�y OKOUND ANO �or ciarsLuTe molLe imA-4 -/ to tk� oi- owe fboTcA."pLr_ umw Aiy A-)`lA(-eWT Pr--pr4TY tameo Pft-DCWTAL. 3. A" THC *PAPfVIHE SOIL efZO-JCjCOWTFO-- C40C, SMALL EIC Mr -T DURIM& T"t F6:100 Op e.O.&Mdr-roj. M Co. � �&e 5.ALED 114 WW-. '-C F�.k SIT& "WA�c A,LL EXTEA10K mauj44k�.i_ SITE PLAN mui-Leg. HoLLaATE Millel'164T -SHjLLI dF� sefto - ;=Ae - e- Iz ere. 0 z 0 01"11101A Or ClfZA.wA6r- I, FcFeK TO SHFFT A-2 4. crrl rIA--OWIZT 6- FVLf LIUMT I.Fbl�.11A�nOlwi. C-AWevime (s 1-1 ) -q&I - Z38" rIW- HYDA-WT 2. fXTMi0K LI&HTIW, TO be 6fIxOt.* -0715- T�IC P90ftM it, lifaTUALLT FLAT --v coe%) Nor MAVC ANr 16,c- I Fl,^ -4T 7cPO&"e-ICA6 09 r"v6wm- reArulke6. THe O"'NA&E AFOW#. ON TMLI r -L,4.4 eSec L.�ewv ) I NOIC'Are Tmt Fixoroboo WATCOZ k04 - OFF 'zo U94.010 A." Olbautero Ni/ put" wopjv%. ^ acriPxTe 01RAINAI(le 4. �,FZAV,WC- �PLA� JiLL BC SjbMMe0 141 F,HAL LXAWIRIu FO$L EUIL044CY f'gF'rlll- SMOH.4 OWLIT"t SITE. ,4 Frtovictf ILL MILATOW wr -to excreo awE fi!>OT 5� C-440II4 AT !Aalr4M�y OKOUND ANO �or ciarsLuTe molLe imA-4 -/ to tk� oi- owe fboTcA."pLr_ umw Aiy A-)`lA(-eWT Pr--pr4TY tameo Pft-DCWTAL. 3. A" THC *PAPfVIHE SOIL efZO-JCjCOWTFO-- C40C, SMALL EIC Mr -T DURIM& T"t F6:100 Op e.O.&Mdr-roj. IHTFAHAL PFLO-itbiow. C--DITIMJ-kl Ube fellf IT ft=&Tep mli. OUT -40C SIOKA&t to cowWupLjOt4 izcQTAI- 4 AeUlk- s -r OIL HeA41( Trl�".. M A,LL EXTEA10K mauj44k�.i_ F -OW �,-Mrj mui-Leg. HoLLaATE Millel'164T -SHjLLI dF� sefto - ;=Ae - e- Iz ere. pAso �Msm,p EWA�0%,:P 4 flEe7 THe, �,,6NT POR 540 czmmegcr- crrl rIA--OWIZT MAJWlW 5ALV,,4 GOLITHLAw-e Ty. -%,-n:. ReaulizemesT,- C-AWevime (s 1-1 ) -q&I - Z38" cur- it THe 69ciRiTy + LF -^51W, FA -K -4 M - 8 1-15 121504, Rimme"Ttl OF T1,1m P. 0. i5ox Is 5 ac:o < 4L W cr uj cc PAOFOSCO 5U,. NESS, A F"f� t4oiz'r-i, 7X '%.itn Wumselzb- NAlveg Pb ILCAueireo (&1-[) 419. libi A A TO EUMIWA-Tf- TMe ILAIK ;(.I - 2S44 IHTFAHAL PFLO-itbiow. C--DITIMJ-kl Ube fellf IT ft=&Tep mli. OUT -40C SIOKA&t to cowWupLjOt4 izcQTAI- 4 AeUlk- s -r OIL HeA41( Trl�".. M x Y. L er-,,,L .OT I E -On f X 1`14 H A.001-110�4 r,177 Or &"eeVI�4E COUNT'T OF 7A"^NT W W CABINE7 A , Sooe IVA 5 z > Z 3o'S CAbl �*--H U. 0 W > CL W < 4L W cr uj cc 91-C-beNT Lr�,.E ,^CA,4T Wumselzb- SHEETNO '1� - Z4- .45 A A 52. JOB -5 -=/-&\ PLANTING PLAN V 2 CALCULATIONS: 1099!0K :GAov+rt.: ror•,..re.o. rwc. —9`5 a"s 0 -y , K Ed1yFGD. Gr -lo s.F, '°'`t'3o ii-oo .+ 13 fitGG9 KQ1rRCo, 13 7,ww. ew'-rcmv. PER�NE2R. ;..a So ArG', IS 17 (14M) L.F. go' c 31 rKEe,.. ftQj,Kr=- 3t rR E&t rRe.n.c �. CAnar]Htl 10'' PeGA4 exit,nma- lo" PECAA PLANT MATFRIAI c nEadC = KK- LOMHON NeH� BO•{p..rGd� ��„�� ___ Hew M{EN tii� � Qyp N. AP deK USQi '=dk +"!a Ytr u `e+c �L+14 ew.sTOGpaT T ra 8 GG GFx.rseiC GLN j�H u�i Gad.an Po..i1 �� GM �6Wv ,-�erf..,C dcerc s. �c:[aprt � q 'O �i�es ope 4E�K �iw�di6dd F'77 WOCT'H) `X 70.107 3 E[l3 QCl74r�t7 (A QGn"' G6+�GL.yisi i 3 RO RW o6 K, ,�udu15 uJrtae,,p� ,� 2 (y GEK HJdb („iCd55 -• ..amo .. =- ?--grWv ryi•m :. NOTES: . F-�� G�+wi'ttll/t",w o �� �il� 2aG vxwiveO d29+. �I. OLL (fLOtINOlo.itR .i.RL..r Da (..c.:.r�. ywiLG.�.s .v2*� '� r«e,.a. Z e+•cTr..: re-n•es-,.�a.� ,mss , �rs..rm aw.a OF fjW � /rR r.�6 irG Oh 4, d.jRRib✓r.o., s�'sra.n sr.c�. iam yuoczyicoymv Aj,m N6TtG , aoT T »G6G`7, L.)�7'pV Gl/+�p •w�. 5,�ara+.w�,a. a.ow6G"i+�rra.�cc•�r: /.�r+�pyE-,,E, N TlY G�f� ♦i i�Ae'li✓•+4 ,..,��a'sLaIE >r�e. G, . , fxees yiu..- .iNe a TOT• car.�re.. •e. u s.yrr ow 7' .yAGX "eA a$c6o 0✓ AM"N.fm lwtoumv .B" PEUiJ SEPLANN I ''f G O Z ZCR zmZz. s s - d5 5~6P£�\Cti •CL 2 U ^.. 2 pFF F. W W . T w- oo"yti'l+- i U. � Z Z F'77 WOCT'H) `X 70.107 U. O W y W 2(>J O SHEET NO. J inn Vn !9g PHASE I 4 REAR ELEVATION f— r. ETAL Rao F, � --1 iI FF'rc' c,OUGKEIE ,. WALL PA'4EL N/ FKft: Et; fU:YRW—ATL Tp. 10'14, 14'H 1&, D t O.H. Doo a rirTAi. AW4kiNZ, Thps, bAT ONLY W 1,4cow- A.ND Auui N.r ' FIGHT Sior eLevAT1oN ON61 Ili MA54NRi : 0 7, t1PEONR ( *_ 1007, PHASE I FRONT ELEVATION II I I II 4T PHASE I LEFT SIDE VIEW ( OPPOSITE HAND) J PHASE I 0RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 1,9 ,� i • O'r r-ouNa s,c� � PAE.trgC �R aPP�TEi: Lao < l.Virl up. s E PA NTEv '�0 $Trgfe GROUND SIGN (D ELEVATION 19'-fo" AFP 16� ✓ AFc y, 'S'•D" AFF a DDE: —, 1 ED= PA.4,1!c L0.•o nti AerIL:ED SI&J — PAINT!C p:.ATUFE t FTD. r+E:AL, GCPI Kj `A'NTw LWO s�F=. "v" 6rccve lcc- T SEP ExP�eO K-CsF�shTE 7 '�I' Oi1 APG PLANNINGK TYPICAL !7 c PT F•+t FAINcO ':+.TURN) a II1 PF&AST caNu:•ETE WAI.I PANEL, TYYKat. 0 Z < Z < n ;4 s I � bR NOTEfo � V j L== x � o .-^ yf r r 0 wtow 1 � I 0 n y O U x17 °f /= PPo_c.Af.T cor•- -r SHEET 40. 11, ELIE--- �mF zxa. 20 -o EAVG yT. METAU COH4SPOUT STEEL MAI4 FRMh cuPO, coNT, ARaUuJ I ( ��iva BHT.: Ii � � � . PHASE I 4 REAR ELEVATION f— r. ETAL Rao F, � --1 iI FF'rc' c,OUGKEIE ,. WALL PA'4EL N/ FKft: Et; fU:YRW—ATL Tp. 10'14, 14'H 1&, D t O.H. Doo a rirTAi. AW4kiNZ, Thps, bAT ONLY W 1,4cow- A.ND Auui N.r ' FIGHT Sior eLevAT1oN ON61 Ili MA54NRi : 0 7, t1PEONR ( *_ 1007, PHASE I FRONT ELEVATION II I I II 4T PHASE I LEFT SIDE VIEW ( OPPOSITE HAND) J PHASE I 0RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 1,9 ,� i • O'r r-ouNa s,c� � PAE.trgC �R aPP�TEi: Lao < l.Virl up. s E PA NTEv '�0 $Trgfe GROUND SIGN (D ELEVATION 19'-fo" AFP 16� ✓ AFc y, 'S'•D" AFF a DDE: —, 1 ED= PA.4,1!c L0.•o nti AerIL:ED SI&J — PAINT!C p:.ATUFE t FTD. r+E:AL, GCPI Kj `A'NTw LWO s�F=. 1 WATJRAa_ ox GAST sTCNE SILL. 14' La , 14' H o. H, 000K TTP Ica L, %A6a14R'C = 100y— PHASE IL FRONT ELEVATION ra oee�4 -,AT "v" 6rccve lcc- T SEP ExP�eO K-CsF�shTE I X7ERIo!'z FIR" PLANNINGK TYPICAL !7 c PT F•+t FAINcO ':+.TURN) a II1 PF&AST caNu:•ETE WAI.I PANEL, TYYKat. 0 Z < 1 WATJRAa_ ox GAST sTCNE SILL. 14' La , 14' H o. H, 000K TTP Ica L, %A6a14R'C = 100y— PHASE IL FRONT ELEVATION ra oee�4 -,AT RECEIVED% c SEP =nh` :• PLANNINGK Til 4i X - c=<Q 0 Z < Z < n ;4 s rFF>` TO -L rgATICH A&WE_ IT -1 bR NOTEfo � V L== x � o .-^ yf r r 0 wtow 1 � I 0 n y O U x17 °f /= ia SHEET 40. zZC= �mF zxa. RECEIVED% SEP T PLANNINGK a. (Zw 0 x Y rFF>` TO -L rgATICH A&WE_ v V Q bR NOTEfo � V Z �. w w .-^ yf U Z ` w U. > Z r 0 wtow CL UJ °f /= w X Is z C? J SHEET 40. rlA--,OWP.-T- 100-1. PHASE M REAR ELEVATION M A,,o w F --r -. 100 7. PHASE 71 - LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 11 F] Ioo%. PHASE IZ RIGHT S I.0 ELEVATION LtVA I 10N �-lll - �Fllll W--uT fQ=A&.Z A -LL rr IV E Dj Z. SEP 11996 NINE r" PLAN C: C- co z w 41 W W 2 z C.D W U- > z w a. . . . . . . < CL cr ui CD —1 SHEET NO. A "n, 4 MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT A BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT ROBERT CASSTEVENS uv -u .v vvvv vL..v11.IIVU /" %AJWQL111G11L. OWWI%JVC. -Lit G '.i/VICIIuIAYVC11 UI1110 request to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 1812-1814 Evergreen Court, legally described as Lot 8, Block 5, 'Ridgecrest Addition as follows: 1. Section 20.G.2., Townhouse District Regulations, which requires the rear yard to have a depth of twenty-five (25) feet specifically on Lot 8R-1. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of ten (10) feet from the required twenty-five (25) foot lot depth requirement, If approved' it would allow a minimum fifteen (15) foot lot depth on Lot 813-1 as shown on the ply Inns CDCf 1AI Pn1Un1 r1nA1- m mance request in conjunction with his proposed replat dition. Mr. Casstevens is proposing to subdivide the :) unit townhouse. The proposed townhouses are imodate the physical limitations of the new owners. also requesting a variance to the maximum building is able to revise the plan to not 'exceed the building )plicant has now revised his plan to meet the Zoning le, paper, Robert Casstevens — modus designs l5 855 E Ash Ln #1704 Euless Tx 76039 817-354-1268 Development Services Department Planning Division 307 West DallasRoad, Room 290 Grapevine, Tx 76051 Dear BZA`Board Members: Due to changing' conditions,1, Robert Casstevens (the applicant), am requesting a withdrawal' of application for variances concerning Lot 8 Block 5 Lots 8R-1 & 8R-2 of the Ridgecrest Addl scheduled for the BZA'Hearing on October 7, 1996. Sincerely Yours, Robert Casstevens APPLICANT NAME: RoC3E2i (,'4SS ADDRESS: 8 E. ZASH I, Sti'l-DIF 1704 CITY/STATE: Fz-jl F_ ' - -1 —x ZIP: 0 _`� 2 HOME: WORK: 214 65-6 ?qlq FAX: 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: a-%� "f F ADDRESS: Ldl 10 _BL'v L-) - -tk 24101 CITY/STATE: ZIP: HOME: _A?4'_,f5_,f179 —WORK: FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 1812 /8 /4 t-- Cir 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. /- (:�7e7 R-TH3 6. Fo JZ IXT 1 /4 VIQ Rl 11 �,QC6 Z)F 16 115 ��LAE57_6b - 114E DL57-nMa 4�vm z -he WE5T DEW 6E Rif TZ)U)Aj t46CL5E is 4j-qE.F_-r b 6)F 7H6 U t k E b T. R-TIH2 f___ q Folz 4o r3 t'9p_/'PNC6, oF j OV6, i PKIML0,k ALUUJA81-E q07Q J&t[Lcwjcx &v6RA6'c_ LS gggLkE o� 61 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL I ONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JU TIFY ) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. 6. The grounds for this request are two -fold. First, the lot is at the back of a cul-de-sac and, thus, has an irregular shape which makes it very difficult to fit a townhouse/duplex on the lot. There are no other duplexes or townhouses behind the subject lot. The lot backs up to an extremely low area which is owned by Baylor Hospital. There is no rear access to the proposed second lot from a platted alley. Secondly, the owner of the property and the lady who will occupy the subject townhouse are 53 and 55, respectively. Both of them have health problems which prompted them to decide to build a single story home. The owner has a degenerative back problem, and the other lady has had a heart attack and has had surgery and chemotherapy/radiation for cancer. In addition, both ladies have elderly parents who, in all probability, will need to move in with them in the near future. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, E NTfi-AN r---3 THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) IFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAG C.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) rivoi je 4 rey-11 0111 &wl ut "i Mel 0 OWNER (PRINT) OWNER SIGNAl SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS D Y OF 19 LAVON A. IROU J' i Notary PubPc 4L STATE OF TE F TARP PUBLIC FOR' OF My Comm. Exp. 01/27/98 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS Z,2*, Y OF 19 F Y 0 LAVON A. ROUE Notary Publ;c '4:OTARY PUBLIC OTARY PUBLIC FOR THE-STATI TEXAS AS STATE OF T E X AS 4 OF My Comm. Exp. 01/27/98 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 SEE SNT 2120-464 �+ 3 I i .••2 ' 1i K CC Z95-01 ,iw -c Tian` -HC 1 ti CU92-150-15 H C M 'R �NEP\� f o IK ca. �"", >(�v�Q , CU94-1 �PN4'� 1 .'0" (R1P 7e •� \� G DEED Z` �.. ( �E KIA Z89-09 �'CNUR STR1C �" PLP O UR050 is=le LSM AC AC 9 AM J6 ZA�7 2a m 1� Z37`'S — 85 01 u��19 -195 ' KZ80-3 m BZA96-33K ` R-3 NPLPZP Ac TN K3 .7t K ,J 7 24 Ac ROBERT Tfl 6� TR n2 g CU89-19 3.96 K 1.729 / a ,p CASSTEVENS J) .46 1 3 A3 & K mss] .0 a r- 2]za CU94-3 TA yU CU95-09 2.837 K 1 15. I 28 2 90-14 .5`` I t p�0-17 ' (T pS� I 20 19 2 7 P• I11 ] 4 x 2E 2 382 AC i le 3 Om l 3 39 ' 3 �W7 ]D 1 ••� t S 2 S.,]3 K 19 ,A 17 y , / Z94-06 i m �E S ` 17 ' 17 m 17 S SSR 0 P PO / u n u u w G 0 i 16 5 w sR a6g0 �. ie > Is 3A26 0 -- is a n 6 s I7 D fl • 1 5 6 IS 8 Q 15 ¢ 74 fl U m 1, I� 7 FERN CT 14 6 14 7 14 7 7 \ e efl 6 I9 J3. 54 13 7 13 e ' 13 8 13 fl 1 K u 9 u 5 98 9 ------'—--���\ 23 !! • U \ 1722 �a 9 , 11 19 ll 78 11 I 19 79 5'6 7P ,AC 53. 54 `° 2.36 K 24 COLLEGE ST. t P� P . 0. IS IE 17 t SU)95-02 VAN CLEVE o ' ADDITION o ����i 9 13 YJ E \665 I B L K 12 ZEA �.,� W 2 P 5P¢5�8 1G(aL u 2 11 \a5� 2 ,97 L I� Z 23 o p to OXFORD G °" TR 9R Z87 9 PP�v R ] 7 9 ,8 K Z870 P 9 8 Z74�,R G�NpCD \601 12-0 A j s Y o CU89-07 7 w z. 23 2. m Z SU89-02 A 9 6 s CU95-14 CU94-30EATON U CU95-04 SU95-01 � s PQ� ,A Z 3 3 s CU92-06 G�� C�gA. Sa z 2 2• LI CC ' 2 7C Z87-0 IB TR 8 8 AC 4- i, L 3 17 • L1 9 20.968 • 2 ` A < 17 96E W0005 AvE --� ZRA TA S,CU93-05 ,3s c / A7 • CU92-23 21 Z9za g9 425 4' ' CC TR 8C 97 ��//� , s.39i x 89 I �!m�i ! i i � Imi j iYY I iuN ryi I i I X • p E I E E I i II � p I i , I j CS I m s �im � ICS i I I � I I I I I I I I �.I. I iw � ��1IY I• I� �,� � LU Q ( I� I N STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, September 9, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Chairman Carl Hecht Vice -Chairman Ery Meyer Secretary Jill Davis Member Russell Anderson 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum with Member Dennis Luers absent. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Marcy Ratcliff City Planner Scott Williams Building Official Teresa Wallace Planning Secretary Ron Stombaugh City Planner Gerrie Anderson Administrative Secretary Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:05 P.M. Teresa Wallace administered the Oath of Office to Russell Anderson to serve as 1 st Alternate of the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Former Chairman of the Board of Zoning Adjustment, Chris Coy, was presented a plaque from Chairman Randy Howell for his years of service to the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Mr. Coy is now a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-29 submitted by Eric Hansen who requested a variance and special exception for proposed Lot 9R, Block 2, Original Town of Grapevine Addition and addressed as 334 South Barton Street. The variance and special exception from the Grapevine BZA Minutes 09/09/96 Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 are as follows: Section 28.G.2., Central Business District requires a minimum lot depth of seventy- five (75) feet. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of fourteen (14) feet from the required seventy-five (75) foot lot depth requirement. If approved, it would allow a minimum sixty-one (61) foot lot depth as shown on the site plan and proposed plat. Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the Board of Zoning Adjustment to approve the remodeling or enlargement of an existing nonconforming use. The proposed special exception would allow the applicant to remodel the exterior of the existing nonconforming 100% metal building. If approved, it would allow the existing metal building and any proposed remodeling to remain as developed. Marcy Ratcliff, City Planner, explained that Staff found a special condition existed for the proposed variance to the lot depth. The special condition was that the lot cannot be expanded to meet the depth requirement because of the development of the DFW Church of Christ at the rear of the property and the rear property line is the zoning line separating the Townhouse and Central Business District. Mrs. Ratcliff explained that Staff also found that a special condition existed for the proposed special exception to allow the existing building to remain as developed. The existing metal building was built around 1930 or earlier by Foust Funeral Home to be used for storage purposes and therefore, because of its age, had historical significance. Also, the property is located across the street from the Main Street Historic Landmark District. Mrs. Ratcliff indicated that Staff and the Historic Preservation Commission were interested in helping the owner/applicant maintain the building's historical appearance as much as possible. Mrs. Ratcliff noted that the first reading of Mr. Hansen's Conditional Use Request CU96-18 was approved August 20, 1996 by the City Council pending the outcome of the Board of Zoning Adjustment's decision. The second reading of the Ordinance will be heard on September 17, 1996. Mr. Hansen was present to answer any questions. There being no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: K BZA Minutes 09/09/96 Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers Carl Hecht then made a motion that a special condition existed for the minimum lot depth of seventy-five (75) feet and the special condition being that the lot depth could not be increased because of existing development. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers A motion was made by Carl Hecht to approve the variance to Section 28.G.2., Central Business District to allow a reduction of fourteen (14) feet from the required seventy-five (75) foot lot depth requirement, allowing a minimum sixty-one (61) foot lot depth as shown on the site plan and proposed plat. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers A motion was made by Carl Hecht that a special condition existed for the special exception to Nonconforming Uses and Structures and the special condition being the building was built around 1930 and that the Historical Preservation Commission was interested in preserving the outside appearance as much as possible. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers Carl Hecht then made a motion to approve the special exception to Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures to allow the applicant to remodel the exterior of the existing nonconforming 100% metal building, allowing the existing metal building to remain as developed. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 3 BZA Minutes 09/09/96 Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-31 submitted by Julian Head who requested a variance for Lot 5R, Block 31, City of Grapevine Addition and specifically addressed as 205 East College Street. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 58.B., Parking and Loading Area Standards require all off-street parking areas and driveways to be paved to a minimum standard equivalent to four (4) inches concrete slab with six (6) inches by six (6) inches by six (6) gauge mesh or two (2) inch hot mix asphaltic concrete over six (6) inch crushed rock base. The .proposed variance would allow the deletion of paving for a driveway approximately 169 feet long. If approved, it would allow a gravel drive to be installed to serve as vehicular access from College Street as shown on the plot plan. Scott Williams, Building Official, explained to the Board that Staff found a special condition for the request in that the applicant was attempting to replicate a historically correct architectural environment. The use of gravel for the driveway, therefore, would be appropriate in this situation. Mr. Williams added the plans for the house were reviewed and approved by the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission. Also a letter from P.W. McCallum, Acting Historic Preservation Officer, was included in their packet concerning the Preservation Commission's recommendation of approval for the request. Mr. Williams, stated that Staff had received one letter for and one letter against the request. Julian Head, applicant, 3845 Misty Glen Court, Bedford, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that a gravel driveway look was much more representative of the time period that they were trying to capture. Mr. Head explained that there were several old trees along the driveway that would probably die if they had to put in forms for the driveway. Also there were two driveway runners that went with the house that was there years ago. If a concrete drive was put in, the concrete pads would have to be removed which would be a detriment to the historic value. He explained that the runners would contain the gravel, as well as the driveway approach 4 BZA Minutes 09/09/96 which is concrete. The gravel drive would be at least 10 feet from the neighbors property line and would not be encroaching upon their property. Councilman Roy Stewart of 309 Drexel Drive, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that he owned the building across the street from the property and said he was in favor of the request. Member Ery Meyer asked if the Historic Preservation Commission would have to approve on the type of gravel that could be used. Mr. Williams explained that the Board could grant the request with the stipulation that the Acting Historic Preservation Officer approve the gravel to be used. Mrs. Ratcliff noted that she had spoken with Mr. Ron Tilllery, a property owner within 200 feet, that had sent in a response of opposition to the request. Mrs. Ratcliff indicated that Mr. Tillery was no longer in opposition after learning about what type and size of gravel the Historic Preservation Commission recommended. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers Ery Meyer made a motion that a special condition existed, specifically that the applicant is attempting to keep correct the historical appearance in the area. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers Ery Meyer then made a motion to approve the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 58.B., Parking and Loading Area Standards which would allow the deletion of paving for a driveway approximately 169 feet long, allowing a gravel drive to be installed to serve as vehicular access from College Street as shown on the plot plan, and that the Acting Historic Preservation Officer specifically approve the size and type of gravel to be used. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 5 BZA Minutes 09/09/96 Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider were the minutes of the July 1, 1996, meeting. Ery Meyer moved to approve the minutes of the July 1, 1996, meeting. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers Mrs. Ratcliff noted there would be two cases for the October meeting. Mrs. Ratcliff updated the Board on current development. Mrs. Ratcliff also introduced Ron Stombaugh, the new City Planner for Development Services, who was formally with the City of Carrollton. With no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: Luers The meeting was adjourned at 6:35 P.M. R BZA Minutes 09/09/96 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1996. APPROVED: CHAIRMAN ATTEST: SECRETARY STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OFTARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, October 7, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Chairman Carl Hecht Vice -Chairman Ery Meyer Secretary Dennis Luers Member Jill Davis Member Russell Anderson 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Marcy Ratcliff City Planner Ron Stombaugh City Planner Gerrie Anderson Secretary • • •' Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:02 P.M. The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-32 submitted by Marvin Balvin who requested a variance for Lot 1, Block 1, M & H Addition and addressed as 305 East Nash Street. The variance was from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 31.C.4., Light Industrial District, requires outside storage in conjunction with permitted uses in Section 31.A. and conditional uses in Section 31.C., provided that such storage shall be screened in accordance with Section 50, Alternates A or E (6 foot masonry or wooden fence). The requested variance would allow outside storage without any required screening in conjunction with a truck leasing business which includes the retail sale and repair of new and used heavy trucks and miscellaneous outside land uses as shown on the site plan. Marcy Ratcliff, City Planner, explained that Staff found a special condition existed for the proposed variance to the screening requirement for outside storage due to BZA Minutes 10/07/96 security reasons. Mrs. Ratcliff explained that in the Board's packet was a report from the Grapevine Police Department indicating their security preference for outside storage. Mrs. Ratcliff also explained that Mr. Balvin submitted a Conditional Use Permit CU96-24 for his truck leasing business which involves the retail sale and repair of new and used heavy trucks, miscellaneous outside land uses and outside storage. The City Council approved the first reading of the Ordinance on September 17, 1996, and the second reading is scheduled for October 15, 1996. Mr. Marvin Balvin, applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained to the Board the three main concerns for requesting the variance to the screening requirements, crime prevention, wanting the required landscaping to be seen, and to have marketing ability by having the display of equipment be visible. There being no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Member Carl Hecht asked how many crime prevention measures, that were suggested from the Police Department, Mr. Balvin would be using. Mr. Balvin explained that a security alarm with cameras and microphones would be installed, as well as perimeter lighting. There was concern from Member Dennis Luers whether someone would be able to see wrecked trucks parked outside. Mr. Balvin explained there would be wrecked trucks out in the yard but mostly they would be parked inside the garage area. With no letters for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None 2 BZA Minutes 10/07/96 After further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion that a special condition existed to the screening requirements for outside storage for security reasons, and in addition, he has provided a six foot chainlinl< fence along with perimeter landscaping which will provide some screening. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer then made a motion to approve the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-72, Section 31.C.4., Light Industrial District, eliminating the requirement for the required screening of outside storage in accordance with Section 50, Alternates A or E (six foot masonry or wooden fence), allowing outside storage without any required screening in conjunction with a truck leasing business which includes the retail sale and repair of new and used heavy trucks and miscellaneous outside land uses as shown on the site plan. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None The last item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-33, submitted by Mr. Robert Casstevens who was requesting the Board to approve the withdrawal of the variance request from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 20.G.2., Townhouse District Regulations which requires the rear yard to have a depth of twenty-five (25) feet. This request was for 1812-1814 Evergreen Court, legally described as Lot 8, Block 5, Ridgecrest Addition. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of ten (10) feet from the required twenty-five (25) foot lot depth requirement. If approved, it would have allowed a fifteen (15) foot lot depth on Lot 8R-1 as shown on the plot plan. Mrs. Ratcliff explained that the request for withdrawal was submitted after the public hearing notice was sent to the newspaper. 3 BZA Minutes 10/07/96 Carl Hecht moved to approve the withdrawal of BZA96-33 in accordance with the letter received from Mr. Casstevens on September 26, 1996. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider were the minutes of the September 9, 1996, meeting. Ery Meyer made a motion to accept the minutes of the September 9, 1996, meeting as written. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Mrs. Ratcliff noted that for the November meeting, there will be eight cases. Member Jill Davis mentioned that she had received a call from one of the applicants for the November meeting and asked Mrs. Ratcliff details about the case. Mrs. Ratcliff explained that staff was still gathering information, but basically the applicant appealed the process by applying for a variance which gives them 30 more days without being issued tickets. There being no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 P.M. 4 BZA Minutes 10/07/96 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1996. ATTEST: ECRETAR'V 2L CH <1 R M AV---:-" ' E