Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-11-04 AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETINU MONDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 4, 1996, AT 6:00 P.M. COURT ROOM/COUNCIL CHAMBERS, #205 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD GRAPEVINE, TEXAS I. CALL TO ORDER II. OATH OF TRUTH III. NEW BUSINESS A. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-41, SUBMITTED BY JAMES AND TERESA BRODRICK AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-34, SUBMITTED BY GRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. C. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-35, SUBMITTED BY SHIRLEY ARMSTRONG AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. D. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-36, SUBMITTED BY RICHARD CARTER COMPANIES AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. E. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-37, SUBMITTED BY TERRY BOUTON AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. F. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-38, SUBMITTED BY LINDA LAER AND CONSIDERATION OF'SAME. G. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-39, SUBMITTED BY JUNE STEVENSON AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. IV. MINUTES BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 7, 1996, MEETING. V. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION VI. ADJOURNMENT IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILITY THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT (817) 481-0377 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS WILL BE MADE TO ASSIST YOUR NEEDS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551 .001 et seq. ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1996 AT 5:00 P.M. ` jv DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMt) 3ANt3UNt : [ E1EL ?P1EIT MEMO?Tfl. 8�;ARP 3F }1t1 1 l I TI E 1T FROM ` SCfJTT ILIA IS _©ING F ICIAL MARC RAMTF, PL 1' NER 1JB lE T; BO AR Q Z�11 �#t)'JU ENT C�+ F [3Z11 �Al ©ATE # ,;NOV W B 4,.: 996 f rec©mrnends the 3c��,.1�rd cif Zc rAn �d'us dhl "th�i' pOc�al ��c�ipt�c�n �e utirt7�` : r ,� t+a .GrapeYlne C©rnprehen5iue: Zoning Ordinance ,Z-73 :#+fir the proposed Lnt' "0 BJI hwecre'st Acres Addition`ac tressed: } 8il erside flrl a #c ue s Sectic r� 15 A ,R- � i ngl m 1y a#r+ t e at�+r n , slid a sp c fi err #te i '- uses but dc�es riot include any crmmer�ial usall es.; l SPE�IAt. +Cfl!#1��T1C�N; Staff finds a special c©nclit©n does not exist:for'the prop©secl special �xOe ion; The; Zeryin flrdicance clean dfri ro corcerl uses :aid: erctted �n t +eFi-7.5 ' g . 'Sing e:F"idly Ditt�rict, The. 3oat l:p# Z n n g Adjustment t h4ve:the u�thcrity c�a ri+end#fie ern irdic a:tq:a'iiouw u e Va'dences: ty t nci i tt�e enly body V11 h egis ative t #i)r1 T 0. men', � f.' �i3t'��t�9 Ofdit3anc-'; a@`the.,6ttatihed m-e`m6 #rbrr tin Boy�e7. it Afitcne ` ll ACK�aROUNQ �NF�RMATIflIV; Mr; and Mrs. Srodr ck filed a special exception request part 0cteber 3, ;1 after:they received notice of the zoning v olati©n fe :np i i u lne s c ut bt a resiclenc6 s�: '1806,SHVersideDrive, The Bro, ri0 s were first notified o the Viola lb—-n Apr#;8 : 139 a# r a compjiar�t nras f lets v,v, c r1 :;Enfv c ereeht tf cer, a tier: r, Bu 77 r�ass9 # ut catrcep ' ctlewAced el-wit cr ©peratiori from their home: :See=the attached-mere©to Jcfira cy:le, fty Aftcrn+�y frcrr� Tommy Hardy, Director of[ e�elopment Services for codd enforcement history, I L&I ki"K I r1U—ZJ—JU s O-JUAM r UUIIIAYL VitK1 1011qzlujlo-'F Z/ Z Boyle & Lowry Attqrr� s ,A gamiacra 4201 Witten, 91fite 108 Irving, Texas 75062-2763 (972)050-7100 PAX(972)650-7105 AMMO DATE: October 26, 1996 TO: Board of Zoning Adjustment Marcy Ratdff,Platmer Ibminy Hardy, Development Services Director FROM: John F. Boyle, Jr.,City,Attorney RE: Case ff BZA 96-4 1; James,D. and Teresa Brodrick The applicants have filed a request that the Board grant a variance to the principal use requirements of the 4]1 75" single family district to -permit and allow a commercial use within subject property. A variance is not authorized or permitted merely to accommodate what the applicant believes is the highest and beat use nor is a variance authorized or allowed because of purely economic, based roaacmB. A variance is only permitted in the event an enforeernent of the zoning ordinance as written would preclude Wy reasonable use of the property. The Board Hof Zoning Adjustment does not have the authority to in essence amend the principal or accessory use sections of the zoning ordinance to permit and allow a use that is otherwise not allowed. Only the City Council, after receipt of a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, may arnend the basic ordinance in this manner. Board of Adjustment v. Willie 511 SW2nd 591; Chapter 211 Texas Local Government Code. cc Trent Petty, City Manager MEMO TO: JOHN BOYLE, CITY ATTORNEY FROM: TOMMY HARDY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR DATE: OCTOBER 1, 1996 SUBJECT: DARRELL AND TERESA BRODRICK, RESIDENT LOCATED AT 1806 SILVERSIDE DRIVE The code enforcement officer received correspondence dated March 30, 1996 concerning a complaint from Richard Grant in regard to someone operating a business out of a residence at 1806 Silverside Drive. In investigating the complaint, Mike Butler found that Darrell and Teresa Brodrick were operating a business known as Lobster Harvest from their residence located on property known as Lot 69 and 70 of Shorecrest Acres, 1806 Silverside Drive. The business is a distributor of live lobsters to the Dallas area. They operate several trucks out of this address. On April 8, 1996 Mike Butler sent notice of the violation to the Brodricks. Mike received no response as a result of the April 8 letter. On April 22, 1996 he sent another letter giving them 10 days to stop the business operation from their home. As a result of that letter, Mike met with the Brodricks on May 10, 1996 to discuss the problem. The Brodricks indicated to Mike that they hoped to able to have the operation moved from their home within 60 to 90 days. I also met with the Brodricks and we mutually agreed that they would. move the operation within 90 days because they described to us hardships in moving the tanks in which the lobsters were stored. Attached you will find written correspondence from Mike Butler verifying the 90 day extension. The 90 day extension ended August 30, 1996. At the end of the 90 day extension we had received no feedback from the Brodricks concerning their plans. Mike contracted the Brodricks again on June 12, 1996 to get an update on their move. The Brodricks expressed at that time that they thought they had a location in an industrial area to move their operation. At the end of the 90 day period, Mike renotified the Brodricks concerning their status. As a result of that notification, on August 22, 1996, Mike and I met with both Darrell and Teresa Brodrick to discuss the issue to hopefully resolve the matter. At the August 22 meeting, the Brodricks made it clear that they have not found another location to move their business. They asked us to give them until after January 1 , 1997. 1 made it clear to both Darrell and Teresa that waiting until January 1 was totally out of the question. I felt they had been given ample time to relocate the business. Since our August meeting, the Brodricks have had discussions with Marcy on filing a Board of Zoning Adjustment case on their business. Marcy advised them that it 0Ath\brodrickJb was outside the scope of the Board's discretion to authorize an amendment to the zoning ordinance, which in effect would be what the board would be .doing in granting the variance to operate a business from a home. The Brodricks have filed a Board of Adjustment request to be heard on November 5,1996. 1 would like for us to be prepared to file the temporary restraining order if the Board does not approve their request at that hearing. Attached is all the documentation we have on file for this issue. Attachments cc: Trent Petty, City Manager Roger Nelson, Assistant City Manager O:\th\brodrick Jb JV .LL r 7"�c�'16/ M2 K •� Ib�. BZA96-41 •� `° Wa — � JAMES & TERESA GU � � • n a • p ' , BRODRICK — — at"CT t • o \ v r w w I C b 1 23 \ I ♦ N O 1 « r • rr a » Q F 36 »� A•V P i tO,K n \ \ 1w C ]aa K v L aau K a u '� • . yNEDSLn u/ GUI I POD t n • t. n a >r c c Z7 06 N: c ' tss K p a G b a � ]• w u « — - c • a n v g : r 4 a — _ I :. i f ay v l • ri � w Ta is R-7.5 r t LN a � n H a a a b n ro v a N g to vc, ( �». g :a K T•tr a I I �N UkI 1 = .] s 2}58�s . s s • t o -t It Q 1, S • a 7. u a a b n r v r r ]+ F R`4fi 7. ] UN(� Z78 cN I N tarot. c' ' _ n•K.uN a a - / t wIs : j - - � ,a 1 S5 , \� - 57 ] BUSHONG RD. TR, Z94-10 ' - '" R[t'eMME NORTH RIVER= OR a ') , R-7.5 I t K b a 1 iR], • t • � r 71 S7 .z,•K • Q Tt _ N Is q K N a Q tl b /EVE KT n ] • T p ` • r N r N n • i = ]y tl V a s • R j 'tI tl 1 a at Q ) ] G � • 7 V 7 r tr � "V N • 1 {r,_ K ♦� / 1 ,c c pppp ) a 4y�7,5 O MQ tl t m GU J \ it • Q !� Q R • � IBC r • 0 sm •_Qi ' tt.+ RN � K = • W ] V �• O ' 1 = • r , s t • r r 1 �' v �O 7 11 M 1 N t ��1 • / / ` (gyp 1! IN K R-7. 5 ) _,R 5 Ki K *� R K q 3 t] WILDWOOD DR. R-MF_ t, -, 1• �('� I R-MF-1' o / 1),0. cq,_A,.113 PRD-12 id-d2-1336 11:22qM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 19174240545 P-02 Ul? (;Z, �� c o � CITY OF GRAPEVINE OU - 31996 BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT A 1. APPLICANT NAME' JAMES D - RRODRICK AND WIFE, TEIZZSA 4R9PR!G9 ADDRESS: - 1806 Silverside CITY/STATE: Grapevine , Texas ZIP: 76051 HOME: WORK:817--424-4298 FAX: 817-481-4678 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME- James D . Brodrick and wife , Teresa Brodrick ADDRESS: 1806 .SILVERSIDE , CITY/STATE: GRAPEVINE . TEXAS ZIP: 76nsi () .817-424-4298 817-481-4678 HOME: wn FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 1806 SILVERSIDE , GRAPEVINE, TX . LOT 70 , SHORECREST ACRES ADDITION , an Addition to the City of Grapevine , -Tarrant -County , Texas . 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. SPECIAL PERMISSION TO OPERATE TOB-,TFg TANK-, TN A COMMF ' iAL BUILDING 2 10-02-1996 11:22Arl DEVELOPMENT 9EPVICE6 16 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL S�CIAL CO S WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUS LANCE R SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLE OF NDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATI IS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) iF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. SEE ATTACHMENT 3 1a-02-1336 11:23AM DE,)FE-3RIENT SERJICES OGT - 3W6 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF: THE SITE DRAWN CALE, AND AN HER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAI E 60 RD, SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LI S, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCES) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) 1AMES Z_ BRODRTCX AND TERESA BRODRICK APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) TAm-pq D RpnngTcK AND TERESA BRODE CK OWNER SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS 2nd -DAY OF OCTOBER 1996 -7 yp TERESA E. WALLACE NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXKST- Notary Pubiic STATE OF TEXAS, MY COMM. Exp. I DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES D E VEL 0 PMEN T SERVICE'S PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 4 LobJ���`�`�� ��ry OCT - 3 1996 1 806 SUNERSME DRIVE!'QRAPEVINE.'IF.XAS 76051 «�<.ZW9,74 4- METRO 8Ifi=424-4298 v ATTACHMENT TO NO. 7 The electricity is constantly going off in Grapevine. The four years we have been here the electricity went off an average of 8 to 10 times a year, excluding electrical storms or acts of God. We live next door to the building. This circumstance requires us to live close to the lobster tanks as the lobsters would all die inside of one (1) hour if the electricity is off. No matter what part of any city we are in we must live next door to our business. This is merely a shipping and receiving business that requires no retail or wholesale customer drive up, no commercial traffic;- no trailers, no large trucks, no signs, no public advertisement, no out front activity, no trash dumped out front, no outside storage, and no indication of any business being conducted on the outside. Our business is conducted entirely over the phone: Vehicle maintenance is taken to a certified mechanic. No oil changes, tune-ups, tire rotation, etc. is performed on or around this property. No boxes, commercial equipment or supplies are stored outside, or visible to any neighbors around Lot. 70. This property is maintained by a professional landscaper. In addition, the one garage door that we use is only open a total of 30-45 minutes sporadically during an 11 hour work day. The work days and hours are Monday-Friday from 7 AM to 6 PM. When the garage door is open the only itesmswhich are visible are our own personal belonging's. For example: lawn equipment, mobile-basketball hoop, and childrens toys. Lobster Harvest uses the back side of the commercial building which equivalates to 507. of this building. During the short time we have owned this property we have spent $60,000 upgrading the outer appearance of Lot 69 and Lot 70. Some of the upgrading that was necessary was: a new roof, painting the entire building, tearing down rotten fencing and replacing with a new fence and landscaping, replacing rotten wood with brick, cutting down dead or dying trees, etc. Many neighbors have complimented our efforts in beautifying our lots thus increasing the value of our neighborhood. Shorecrest Acres consists of many different types of living. Some of the examples are: Mobile Home Park, nightime auto repair shop, low income rooms for rent, Wagon Wheel Ranch, commercial Elk's Lodge tavern, and subdivison homes ranging from 50K to 250K. Since moving to this home we have increased the appraisal value by 30K. D ATTACHMENT — PAGE 2 OCT - 3 1996 7. (continued) Moving our business will put us out of business. Lobster Harvest has seven (7) employees, one of which is from the Brookwood Home for the mentally handicapped. They are established employees of Lobster Harvest and require an income to live. (1) This is a commercial building as axe the two other commercial buildings within 1/3 a mile . All three are in this residential area. We have a unique, low profile operation and need special permission to continue to operate all the responsibilities of the business we have. (2) We chose Grapevine to live in and raise our two boys over and above any other city in the Metroplex. Our plans are to live here for the rest of our lives. We are active in the community and support it 100%. We feel we are an asset to this community, consider ourselves law abiding citizens, and we do not want to leave. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 69, SHORECREST ACRE;, an Addition to the Town of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas, according to Plat xGcorded in Volurnca 388-L, 'Page 61, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Survc , is subject to Airport Zoning Ordinance No_ 71-100 recorded In 73 !/1106,. DRTCT. Easel at to TPSL recorded in 2556/129, DRTCT, provides electric sere= z to Subdivision. loci 3 @96 3/10' OUTSO 162.7' s FEN GOR �GRA °a POS DRIVE � •' ,�l 'fit �� UJ c d~ COVERED © AREAS W ' ;`` sR1CK s ws Y d FRAME '� ';= LET 69/ 40 a Q RES100ENCE (p LIJ CD 0 Y F GRAP VINE �4. T A 1 HORIIE N , DOE OT y ORK IN CONE . .Q �T r CeMf+�' 4 $ r � iZ � Lot �o fi y; 7 ♦ 1 u y2 J,SW RANDU pEVEI_Ci~PMENT SERi/10ES MEMO T(3» 50AR© OF ZONING ADJtI�Tl�I1��IT' FRC?NI SCOTT W1LL:lAMIS`BU1L 1 ' F i o ' NlARCY`RATCi.1FF, 't. INNER SUBJECT: bAR15 c z - r c z s� GI�APEu�wE RE���F" AN© con�n�u�l�-nr ExcHaN�E nc r a taf recommends the e r6OuOst to ,GMp n n Ctrs pr t�e�s ue oing Ordlhanc 82=73#�r t1�e ���#pQrt+��:�4 66c 3, Grapev n : Service=C@nter:Additic nand addressed as 604 shay Brook t)rive as follows:; 1: Section 54., Ulasonry Requirements require all structures in tree Gouernrnent L1se district to:hate # least,seventy, °per sect ®f the total exterior wails. constructed p,# rnas©tart':. Thy: speciail euetonr dOs i :isti t a110 "ne n 1- .r carat rp nca uxter�or mas©n II' to" atf ' indsa " cialccnctcn eisfor the re aa This eatr lt , � as.t urgnaly ciesigned;withcaut masonry veneer, and the energy and expense of adding x masonry would preclude lts utilizati©r resulting ira �ts`,demoiition, and the less u# � resource This:garage was originally>built adjacent to the residential structure thaf was recently moved tu; he proPerty:, The Board'of oning.A,justment approved 700, 4:redu�tinn irj,maso tn,tl e main stiruc ore at # 1lla '� , 1 9 � neeting. MOOil� �?�t�1HAT� � An application was submitted 1 -the ©epartrnent # Development Services by Tr�cia Wtod Executive :Director:Qf' GRACE, The:building will- e placed' on City Service !Center propey behind the.existing.GRAE #acility to the;east of the new retail thrift: sFhep and it=usrill;be used as storage for the thrift shop, e. 'MI AlI t4 `�: riEesflfititB QOK `c z«e at GO It to r:- �� use e ;culak A t}' 2 `.� V, :'" '4R At tit Sell.'' r�ftr. . " .. 4si�s � Ft s •� ss. s stsrssss � "�, sli 1f}Y >i2=." C, <.25' s; t'ss r s r�r?�r�rt i f • ;'"".:. "' ". .yy ssfsi ��,• it-+t�♦'•�s.• s s �2 s s s • � . " '" lss�,f s�ssil • f i.s ik'f's i"'♦'s • .� � ,. �332°4C"• s�r�r .'�a •w+ «�•`«spar .: 'rs�srs�"rrsr's��r rrr,es{�'r'• i�r,'r K'r f:' ,. � .. "'. .. l ,. a YBR 4 `" . tAF * . a �trz �n ei I AC 1 A 5 C r .'z65 TH, $T ", .57` c%% tR,Efi sft � � .. "� "� F��� ya= ( t ;r7 EaYintE55. 41 R.; t 3. . 3,1 3"S'�� "' "�'.��� "3"" ""5 .G4 q.'. .:€R ti+ku ,."t[{."�� ��'I""'�.��'" ,"" �f.��3�•;`� '':..��"�`" t"�- -Y .". .M G 2 T CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1. t PLICANT I, ME: GRACE (Grapevine Relief and Community Exchange) T• DRESS: 602 Shady Brook Drive C Y/STATE: Grapevine , Texas ZIP: 76051 H ME: (817) 488-6219 WORK: (817) 488-7009 (817) 488-2181 FAX: 2. F. )PERTY OWNER(S) I ` `JIE: Same as above (ATTN : Tricia Wood) A )RESS: C, 0STATE: ZIP: H AE: WORK: FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT W C PERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 04 Shady Brook Drive West portion of Block 3 , Brapevine Service Center Addition 5. LIF THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE Sr- -1IFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SI-- ET. ® 5ection 54 , City of Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance #82-73 equires all structures in the Government Use Zoning District to }ave at least 70% of the total exterior walls constructed of nasonry . The proposed variance would allow a 100% reduction of the xterior masonry requirement , allowing a inAtching structure to be -coved to the back of the site to one that was already approved oy the Board of Zoning Approval . 2 6. STA E THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHI. H CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPEC. 'AL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRA{..T SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPEC SAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A RE IUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUE �- BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. e subject structure , a two-car garage , is currently located at 5 E . Franklin S-t. It is part of a donation to QRACE from *. Johnny Esparza. The matching house has already been proved and moved behind the existing GRACE building for a profit use . The structure will hardly be visible from e street (if at all) , just as the house is hardly visible . 7. EXPL. 'JN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONI- IG ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS %MENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHEC< PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROC SS. T e addition of masonry would not be compatible with the period c construction of the matching house . It would also be c st-prohibitive . With a frame exterior , the garage will be ti, sually harmonious with the house , and both pieces will be h storically conserved as they stood on Franklin Street . The m tching house , with a 100% reduction of the exterior masonry r quirement , has already been approved for the site and s .ccessfully moved . 3 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) Tricia Wood Trent Petty for APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) City of Grapevine APPLICANT SIGNATURE------ Tiia Wood for GRACE Tre t Petty for rc OWNER (PRINT) City of Grapevine OWNER SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS 18 DAY OF October 1996 NERA -SOT RY4-BLC-FOR THE STATE OFTEXAA��— 110TA-�Y -L3LIC - TEXAS '01 30MM SSION EXPIRES x �AAA6,- 7AUXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx DATE OF CENSE EXRR-ATi-oN- SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 4C0`2e, jqq� P" GERRIE A. ANDERSON A", a, J-0— Notary Public NOTAX-Y—PUBLIC-FOR TR—E TAT E OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS OF My Comm.Exp.08/19/98 DATE OF L CENSE EXPIRATION — DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DEL/VERY DDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 4 New PENce ._.—._.—.—.—._._._. eX.TG SLOG P.1 FEMCe RESALE HOUSE GARAGE -4 VIA EXIST.TREES TO REMAIN aWA.ri WOOD ■OGE OF ASPHALT PAVING EXifT.GATSf TO RSMAM SUT SS .— -----_ _ _ _ _ _ — — _ _ _ _ — — — _ _ _ _ j \—RELOCATE PENCE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXIST. 1 FEl1� PARKING ASPHALT� /ENCE 1 I 1 i 1 I 1 1 1 ' I 1 I 1 i 1 1 ------- ------------ LINE OP PUTURE EXPANSION 1 1 TAINNG HALL. EXMI SLIP OYES PARK G CLOTH 40 1 PI. CLOTMG FOOD STORAGE D CUSTOMER Pb=W IT Iq HC PARKING EMPLOYEE/CUSTOMER PARKING SHADYBROOK DRIVE PROPOSED G.R.A.C.E. SITE PLAN I' - 30'-0' --t; _. f, ;._. ., 1 ... , a .. • ,,,,, � , ,��y �` �. � �. ,_ � � ---_ -_ -a.. _ _> _,- -=�: �:... �` £ MEMtJRAN©UM;; �EYELQPMENT SERMCES MEMO'TO'-, 90ARP OF ZQNING DJUSTMENT FRC?(111 : : CQTT 1ILLIAMS, BU166ING: FF IAL - - SUBJECT: B A} 1 4F t}f'+11i 1 C "UST 1�lE lT GASH #BZ 4Sfi 35 SH-LEY #RI MS 'f3ii iYlirE;IiY17.QATi:. ��DA i Vi�1Y1iDiEiI .. Staffi redornrheh ds=the I%% cif Zor irk Ad�ustrnent. � t� . 9 1 �lJ.�t--za a request to Gra euine R C pre%ensiv onin dir ce 82`-7 for % . i %B pck' ,'' i :tit v� 1 SObdNisjoh, Phase 11 aryci +ddeSpe a .# 3 Riuprsid flue Scud as ows ;1, 5ectia►n 'IG ,1 r, "R7 5" Sirf ie F rn'1 9 y tistrict:Ftegulations riequire a thirty: {30a. foot front %aril setback: The°:pr©posed Variance se teau Olaf pla al, AL CJ s Staff finds, pedal conditionOxist � fp�r hei requ tt � tt�+e stru��kure �s xistlr� 9 the encroachment Is-,not the- ablt c►f the%current owner. r XT% ? Are, application ; r s s ib itteii ao the,, a artment�of %Ue R % eiopm6n# Ser ices by Ms, Shirley Armstrong; 'Th,s , structure was` + r stcucte i : ri i:982; ricer to th+e impleml ntatJon cif setback his%%%% ons� s SW/9 14 k • .4 k� MVK ILW LK8 At GU k � - !HI °` : R E ai . "r�",ti ri:. ►` ' � � guc �u _tj -- EEEEE- RtVaEftkrvotswE: EIEt. ou p 7e L:. ." r m VC Q .% Y 41 h. cs. 4v f' .F*2 Y� �Y z RD7-1 SEP 23 '3o 01 55PM CARROLLTON t q-ri COURT 2 3 3 9-23-1996 1 : 17PM FROM CENTURY21ME=TROPORT 817 481 9053 P 2 A' ,C L N 7 CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1. APPLICANT �11 NAME* ADDRESS: o CITY/STATE:__lJi�it'E- ZIPS yD�'/ HUML ' f-�`�s 11 WOHK: -P/417 fay—r14-4�6 fAX: .�,,s/ g/,(� J-709 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME- -o4Aa7s7jP0A4QLO /YF.1ll r(aG/ .? to ADDRESS: tGY CITYISTATE: � /CN V,(2pp---fX ZIPIV - HOME:--_4/�'P''S8�/ WORK: /Vz- 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTYI 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. SEP 23 '96 01:55PM CARROLLTON MUN CST P.3 9-23-19% 1 : 17PM FROM CENTURY21METROPORT 817 481 90S3 P. 3 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRA '- SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. f 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES:, I7) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. 3EP 23 '96 03:13PM CARROLLTON t" COURT P.1 9-23-1996 i : i8PM FROM CENTURY2 I ME7ROP0PT 8t? 18I 9053 P. d 8- ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE-TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, 6UILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S)REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE)— S&77 6- APPLICANT SIGNATURE- OWNER (PRINT) .p C. OWNER SIGNATURE— SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS � t- DAY OF , 19_j� $00000000000000000000 // x :'• ",� DONNA L.STARAZ? ►rotary Puonc.state of Texas NOTARY PUBLIC FO HE TATE F EXA •«� tay Cwwisstn Ex v Wres 01-24-1997 �:xna:�r00000000eoc�oa0000000s�ooc ?` •,Z�- I DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 19 NO ARY PUSLfC FOR HE STATE F T A DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (8 1 7) 424-054S DEL/VERY ADDRESSORRESPONtnENCE QppRFSS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES KANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76051 GRAPEVINE, 7-X 76099 A Future With A Past September 24, 1996 GRAPEVINE American Title Group 1340 South Main Street Suite 150 Grapevine, TX 76051 Attn- Linda Hamlin RE: FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR LOT 1, BLOCK A, THE WOODS, PHASE TWO ADDITION Ms. Hamlin: I have reviewed the attached closing survey of the residence located at 1041 South Riverside, legally described as Lot 1 , Block A, The Woods, Phase Two Addition. The existing house on the survey shows a two and one half (2 '/2) foot encroachment into the required 30 foot front yard setback. The house as shown on the plot plan has a twenty seven and one half (27 '/2) foot front yard setback. Section 15.G.1., R-7.5 Single Family District, Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 requires a thirty (30) foot front yard setback. An application has been received by this office from Shirley Armstrong requesting a variance from the Board of Zoning Adjustment to allow a two and one-half ( 2 '/2) foot encroachment to the thirty (30) foot front yard setback. The Board of Zoning Adjustment has historically approved requests on existing homes that encroach building lines that were not created by the home owner. If there are any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 817-481-0376. Sincerely yours, Teresa Wallace Planning Secretary Development Services /tw Attachment THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES P O Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Phone Metro 817%481-0377 FAX 9817/424-0545 SURVEY PLAT OF I() \1,1 I'mi I IvS IINI FREST ED IN PREMISES SURVFYFI): I'AV I I) P)I,!A!ZD A Rq,11-1 I-t S"-p. M I-1,''M'f'0.1, -6d--y-..3,M'h'r-M lb,d"',-dr, ,,y..,err, M tI,Will-,ll---r 1, [UkCK 110F 11iE V&UL)S SUBDIVISION, AL)DI'I-'I0N.-'1U TIIE CITY OF,,--- (MAPE ',JNF, TARRAW C)L)UWI'Y, TEXAS, ACY-Y)RDlNG 11) 111E PLAT TILER00F REWORDED IN VOLUME 038-1-18, PAGE 36,- RLAZ ROO DS TARR1iNT CQQ-N—I'Y� -- ---- f-rI.aljrvniM prrVoy nr the mri-, d-O'd k­ ar - RIVERSIDE DRIVE (2,-T- �,Ti 2r--" ZT.BU 0 30 ep. L J., N -T-,r L- .. ......... 20 Ir 0- 1111111�tr mot-Ixt'n, !r5 &;,'r* -set' Z=CIF-= -74-10 v--1 110G. R)RJ:C-41.R: HANLEY (',F#- c)6 (T., 410078-U OF SWO STA IF,OF rFX," 1 01 N rN (IF TARRANT T,�the Licoholdc,, 31d'of the 0\voers of the Premises surveyed and to 1:1,001)NOIF: I befel"Y ratify 111-11 tl"!ptnperly""""'C""c""' A111EJU CAN T-T==ANY---- --- 1115 /V407 1-ilhol .'pr'ial 11"'d hi'a"I area As identified by Ill, Ihr under siRnrd(bleg hereby critify that this survey was this day made Federal lost me Adll,ilwfl ntinn, Itrparhnrrq of 11111"ing and t4h;rn thr 9--d of the llrnfTrly legally dekcrihed hereon and is correct,and that hevehgv lc,,(.lite fi--d —a hol,g Orolifird as Z ON E the itc-dlsclrpnrcirs.cnnnict,,shortages in area•boundary line conflicts, X_ of the F,dctal J-otancr Adinkft.,lim, I lood 11,17111,1 -- #, 1--t- nprino of intrtoverocro,t, iittihle It",or road,in place, Ilq,3 11:�' Wy �lpl' "Itv'fi- "'t )t h""'o and that -id property has to and from:,,,,I-.,e-ny ,c,rt a,shown Meson f, the 11-0 At)GIJS*I' 19, 1996 Ily nAS IS I OR R i A R INO ;-P-SunvFyipK1 CO. 09-109/96 na,iirl Pol�a,d 11fIN1518 I. 100.1 Cemrp I,)rl,o Suile 309 r:nI I OR NtTcjlf I ION fledlo,d, 7 Y 790?t MrlHo(91 7)267 12454 07 LEGAL DESCRIPTION IT^ LOT 1 , BLOCK h. THE WOODS SUBDIVISION, PHASE TWO, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 338-133, PAGES 36 AND 37, OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. / � n 74.10 M 3 v LOT 1 _4 © /ort /2 4 3 Z /7 lY �0 /t 7 .8. 6 4 27. 37 1041 RIVERSIDE .DRIVE SOUTH SCALE w , aF i. i�rnc� r. w+•�.. A REGISTERED ENGINEER HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE PLAT WAS COMPILED FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY MADE ON / •� L•F••)Cc} THE GROUND UNDER MY PERSONAL SUPERVISION, AND THERE ARE NO JA"60 H• OOWOY yip'•••. 'aP•• ;� ENCROACHMENTS, CONFLICTS OR PROTRUSIONS EXCEPT AS NOTED.THE �ND ARI�OCIATBE� � mil( ONLY EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE THE ONES THE SURVEYOR HAS PERSONAL '• •" •• ' J r.'•:.� H E'G aNOWIEDGE'OF AND THE ONES SHOWN ON THE RECORDEp PLAT. ......• ••..•. •• •• •-• P.O. BOX 507 ARL-INGTON, TEXAS 76010 S OAT' �/��g L MEM()RANpUM` ` - 1 , I., , 11 t?E1lEL©PMENT SERVICES .-,, lVIEMU T{): E" A 13=fly "C3 11 'I:{'a AAL ,IU'S IfNT FR{?11lI11 Ile, ::�: SC?TT 1NlLi.iAle ,IS, BleeIJICIN IA :,,, MARCY RATCL FF, Pl. #1 1ERell" '111 �: :; SUBJECT: I elBC/ R",11,F=ZONING ADJUSTMENT CAe' eSE=#BZA96=36 # 11ARt:CA►RTit11'AN1ES ; MEETING t, ATE'` MUN�AY, #IC)VE ISE 4 'O `' , ; o (+n �► c % L ATI % .. % % .,_ .. _ % % Staff redbrT117 £hds t $1 d L3 , -en Nd,%e' ��'1�tl t1 � . .. ,. Cues# #1? Graprjne I?t #e11 ile (J 1►7 ft� lance':; - ; <fC? fL? (3 �; ` e Ine C� �A 8e r Rur + tin aciiresed-as 19. 2 Ncrft 1' rtCour 10 ws :% , ;, : '1 Secet is :gulatonsPq ,r ` ` forty 40,ee fit:buf er yar: �a t�ng�� t e w rr i ert fin ; lien p p ;Y evef a%�i-7. gle Fare y de e is 1ci etetl�ad'scent to a nc ie redential distrIt, t,ttoi any �els such as%a de i c t # + r e it er e P ,, p „ p marle�% Ppen space, ail; pricipal builclr�gs: rstri +ctdres� F11be set bcc am�:riii+aa�c #art 4�p1 feet: rcirn. theiinn %prppet hide, . '; T%ae P%%r%op©sed v %a% a ee%,e �' . % staff icie% s:;n fin !`e s eciei ccnc ti r tc�r%t e r is % �. % %% %%% P %% P P e1 a%%r�ance, Tt�e�purpose ci%f t%o % b%i %%fi%%er a rd s % v pr 1e: ep r %a%t en b�fwee%n�re i�l+a%n%ti%e;I"I% r%e le( co%rn % er\e�al %%a .�% '1"he`applicanf h %,%`b tteci:%�tF e`;ere�que t%Or% e;�ac��s+e~t�et �s �� �Ir a .eac r been;t;%po n+ o b Circltrs.�"t" e Bc�art ttri�nAlias#mere:ten ed 'arnilarre i t q en >`tamelot e+�ri�ti R , e I,.`: ,e% ppl a nt at `t et:t ► e r i �r c t;-e ei =fi�auc a ho e' 1 Pan, anc , : %,%% u ��tetl a 24 f+ +�t cr ance to the t f . rard . T + Bc ar f:Zbnin Ad' ` I-',%e�� J t Bien the're�ucst:beceu e there,, w s no peciael%cevneit c ;::�Sta f% ridieated;to�#be,c��;�re��:�er a� :, p, tt e"time cf platting aI % -%tt n nit to create a:10 tha vuc ulci r�eecl variances. �n , �� 6.-eq se-3e.4 At At— :., P . ." tu CC GU ' zee-sx � G i,77 Ja . '.. {` � ar+�.r ibe 'w rd We � �!''i. '� i s ♦ r' ' �,' ', . Pb..'.,: "r i , , tit. +X. 'C .3. ` ` '"� , " T77 "rs"K . ' a "ZBT-04A es RE ;..nS t. 2614 AC °. t 44 cue= ,` & pA '_ PC 0 . v �. 266-t7f , (r( r .: � ;FE C*t1. IA ". }{ F ( c 4.. tt f 136 ZJZ` B: ',cikCEYVa,CE�,6rT".'CYT,S�'�� /� �"ZII MS K,"�' �1; �}•;I SE%S`�"�k"�{}{[ j [( 'SS ' "tJu z .bRu2Gtl.i+XLC.r tse. .r� t1 IL{`„." ." R--MF cx' '= Y t .�. i 27 i CITY OF GRAPEVINE � �=- BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT AP AT10N 1 . APPLICANT NAME: Richard Carter Companies ADDRESS: 915 Two Turtle Creek Village CITY/STATE: Dallas, Texas ZIP: 75219 HOME: WORK: 214/521-8170 FAX: 214/521-8171 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Richard Carter Companies ADDRESS: (Same As Above) CITY/STATE: ZIP: HOME: WORK: FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 1972 North Port Court - Lot 16R, Block A, Bear Run Addition 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. Section 15H - Buffer Area Regulations 27 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAkL` Aff'? CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION i6efliz-Y-TH5--VARIANCES) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. The builder who has built all the houses in Bear Run Addition has requested we investigate the possibility of varying from the standard 40 ' buffer to 39 ' 2" buffer in order for them to construct a house that has already been designed. (see attached) 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1 ) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. None 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALF,--.ANf1--ANv4THER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) R d Carter APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) Rjnhard Carter OWNER SIGNATURE /4 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS.,)*-) /DAY OF attar T.G. HUSSEY Notary Public NOT-AW PUBLIC FORT TATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS N my Cann.Exp-06/10/96 / A,19 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS ,,?/7 D A Y 0 F 19 OWA Y T.G. HUSSY Notary Public NOTARY PUBLIC FOPL/Y'P�STATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS ''OF MY Cam. Exp.06/10/98 Z/" DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES D E VEL OPMEN T SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 \ 130-004 \ LDT16R2.OWC a — 27 I u III lu i'1 In III In III lu III I11 I'i 111 III lu III In i'i III 1'I lu III In II1 I11 III 111 III nl III In I'I 111 III III III 111 ilt 111 Iit 111 III 1II IIi III III I t I' � I JillBEDROOM #4 BEDROOM #3 II !ill t IN i I 0 WALK-IN 0 CLOSET 0 HIGH OIBATH #2 ' 0CEILIN HIGH I0IIglIIIq ' C E I L INC u l�I I I I .I IIiiL;1' i BATH #1 i 0 � Z WALK-IN H A L L CLOSET p 0 I O WALK-IN I __ CLOSET MASTER SUITE DN HIGH CEILING I it I i I � I BEDROOM #2 I I BALCONY HICH CEILING 4I 1 . Cl 1 Second Level NOTE:Because we are constantly improving our prod reserve the right to change product features,brand nar dimensions,architectural details and design. This brcx for illustration purposes. This is not part of a legal cor 2401 East Randol Mill Rd. Suite 454 Arlington,.Texas 76011 ° Metro (817)640-6143 The FARMINGTON,V_____ NO �' _ air � •{ •C .m, Get WwV so 1":. ••.°Si -1« - � _..:�rrm4 w•l y.1/ .F.�.!•h►l�J^ ..•w r.'....a...'"J�,riK..�►:.r vL.�......mow•. .,.a. ._ . Elevation "E" The Farmington V "F" an elegant entry with transom and sidelights, an attractive bay window, windows accented with brick detailing and keystones, and interest-adding brick quoins. Dii iv.;CS H 0 M E S "The Go'.--' Neighbor BuilderT". . . Since 1928" "... MEMQRANflUM C1E'�/E1�tC}P#IIE IT SERVICts , , ,, E C,ITI { t. ,, , BOARD 0 7QNIN At��tJ ��E TII , ,} I - . ` `°FRAM,::: , GCTT 1li :LiS,,83ffi(1a lA ' ` 4RA ' I.1f F ;f'LR ,� � � `� �� �� � 'I, 11 ,. 3 lE T: BO ARO'�F }I A,"A I T C # E B A9 i-37 TER ;'1(:S R CfJTCI MEBTIC:QAT :: i111iC4f NQEM3ER`4� 1R BB: , . , R %EC % 111%Ei11[% ? ► fl l %% % %% %% % , % Staff r ornm6hd, the l3oartl a%%ih�,% t n o% �% %r� t e ry%e°: t%% tt Gra= ; ire% `; % -- %q % ,, e % C� i reF ena ,ee— c:�Qr% it ar a 82 7 for he rc �, % -cat% �e 1tVind i%1%,%=%,% % % % %% % % P: % ,_ tet%es; % % � %+dsei�a3ik% TrLane as% # %l1or :: %% %% %% %% %% % % %%% % , % 1: etin4 ,C: Suaeenta% %% i %� eel ,� %:% : % % % % P % 'y :str t Re %I e%%Jb%ns �requjr%os�% %r,%%%a cass'pry %. tr a%% re + . % as t%ter � �" I%% %T%,%er% %% ; cl %% I%,e %% . % % Tl% %r, pr%p+' %+�% ! - %"'—e% . ,. y.� % r f %% % # . % a d%%t ais ait % %% %% % %I % fi el fi �, , %to , ohs a pec ai%cpnt +ar cues% eI % % fo the pr ap%o ed;�arlagCa ti a�tta t is ex%stirs11 %% % % % %% % % 9 % op69rap%hy%"% i"t% tie% i % ant,t e % %i ir►% % #ot%r%%foot% ratoi sir% %uu ii arac a cistir� tr % %% % %%% f %%% .. %% % q ee % add t%4 $ th%e:availel eeabl%e rre%a% r yard%is'very%iim teci % 8 iJ ':' `: , . A 1GRflU11fl 1R ►T1111 % % .> _ �% % e , �. Mr. rr %,,e %,- ©e t %% submitted%a%;requast% % I f the;u%riance to`al%io %w %t%h%e%%ci%eye%lopr %ne%nt o a%prQp4%sed° 11° x%2%1%, f©ot car%p+or%t% at the rear%% %f tt ; ex st n: h©b%%6 % % %el % �. % ,% 9 % �%ro�. :; ,as . i po Gu, ; . how 14Q: t48 . '}SST`•' u at s :* .i'a. . • ,", Aim art ,, G tto.ts .' VV a+ft Z44-Q .. , CIL `, � ..,i �:."..�' 1r" ,, :N'.,y, '�. Tk. ,11 ',if„', tea;` fflG'i iil'C.. ��16�.. .'",�,"•�..,;. Am— law :. erica`' "14T. mrcr':.' .10 AC w taa A �`�.i cy" :meµ. tcamux. NV ` E 643 �� itbTFl(. xri, m NO CITY OF GRAPEVINE -71 BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APIP-064TION' 1 . APPLICANT 27 NAME- Terry Bouton ADDRESS: 3257 Oak Tree Lane CITY/STATE: Grapevine, TX ZIP: 76051 HOME: ( 817 ) 481-4124 -WORK- (817 ) 329-3636 FAX: (817 ) 481-5230 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME:_ Terry and Debra Bouton ADDRESS: 3257 Oak Tree Lane CITY/STATE: Grapevine, TX ZIP: 76051 HOME: ( 817 ,, 481-4124 -WORK- (817 ) 329-3636 FAX: (817 ) 481-5230 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 3257 -aak Tree Lane, Grapevine, TX Lot 6, Windmill Estates Addition to City of Grapevine, Volume 388-167 , Page 49, Plat Records/ Tarrant County, TX 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. 1 ) Sec 42 - Requires a 101 separation between existing structure and detached carport. My proposed carport if 6 ' 6" from existing structure. 2 ) Sec 58 (d ) Proposed carport is not an enclosed structure . 2 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DE ECI\1-' C'\' TIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION TIFYj IA ) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES O'F-S CIA I ONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVXTO OT OR S��1ENS TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJU 4 ETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MA N OTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL COND TION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. Elevation of my lot required retaining walls to be built to preserve the trees and soil . Existing retaining wall ( Exhibit A) prevents the movement of the carport toward the back line of my lot . To accomplish this I would have to tear down the wall , cut down the tree, (which is my only shield against the west sun) , have my underground utilities moved ( they are presently in the wall which would need to be moved) and destroy the topography of my lot as it presently exists . 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. Unaware of any. 3 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) Terr Bouton APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) t✓r -�✓�- ��u�c►� OWNER SIGNATURE t SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS. 'j DAY OF'Jepiya-v\ (tc, 191(o KRlSHU81K NOTARY UBLI R F THE STATE OF TEXAS I f" MY COMMISSION EXPIRES July 12, 1997 1 DATE OF ICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS --�.)t1-DAY Off;c.,�,,.�o,e - 19 1 b KRIS HU81K NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS _�.....; My COMMISSION EXPIRES July 12, 1997 DATE 019 LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 4 3 0 fl { ce- 15fIR Pr�tce -.4-�14.WALt- Go u G. P }c I V N r a� 1'�'/�t'oS61� FPoRT litce/V OPT Proposed Carport for ,�n Term Bouton ny N 3257 Oak Tree Lane Grapevine, Texas r4r ,> V it N ,PC <0" AL- A p C: .SCALE V 20' 7 T TS zF-4w,4&- N r� 1,(X AT t.1) )N' i 0 NT)M I.J. TATFS AN ADD IT 10 TO rHF rly 0-� . % I TA RR.A N1' "N Fl- T NG TO PLAT RFC0RDFD TN )IJ"� F ;,,\GF 49 . 1 .A.N J' 1)1",T Y , r F X A S CO3MY0\11,\,' N-4,:, V' IAK 1 tF1' ','INK This iS L t) Cl-r' i (%' that I h,ivr, :;urveyo,4, the ahove di ,c ribed property ami find bui 1 r'in,,r, wltol ly w i chin L b c, hounds <a p ro 1, r and tit, t�i,cvoacnnwy�ts thereon , except: 41L// ���� ���tK-Ci�._„Ce!�E F Y;Rl��F 1l�� 114a j 4 Re�jsterod Public Surveyor N,), 4166 Da L e WARDSURVEYING COMPANY P. 0. BOX 18253 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 761 18 "Wr%Wff A r 1*1 1% MOO I -t A I I i I _ r 1 IEMORANt3UM ©EV ,,,ME SERVICES MENt4>TQ: '90AR© OF ZONjNG AC}JUSTMENT + � scoTT wiLL Ianns gui©ING F. , :i= PLA tNEW sug. Ec=r: of zoNn� ►o, us` trs€ ► s= R C�1UInnFN9dTioN: Staff recornrnends the Bcaardf Zoning Aciiustrrtentrove the request tc� Grapevine: Comprehensive Zoning Qrdinance 82=73 Jo the prt�posecl i_t t 1; Block 2, Tra�� lake Addition`addressed a3 25 " ail" . ke ©iiue asfoll©ws; Secfoni-7.&`Single :Farn 1 C�istriet Re blati©ns re wire a< w q s t ent � f'vet,l rearyard,setbac,c; The, <pri�p6ed vafiande Legal Sec on�' 5-1— ., -7r5� 1 ' le am l p strict# egulat c ns, re t fires a h rt {3 � Y foot front yard setb' T�ha proposed variance it mac , hit cn the !�t can .1 :LY. . St f f i ds a pedal �ndi#ic n does,exist� fur It%e!prc� i e variance tc�:th rear ac+d' Y % setback due tQ the inaccessibility t© the exist+ng:two ear garage arid: the %current dra nage.problemt of the lbt: Staff also f©und" % special condition d©es ex%ist for the Oro variance to the front hard;setback beeause the %house is existing and is n+ot t ,a fa it of the,c�Wner. 1. Ms�;t nda Laer submitted a variance rec uest'lln conjunction with`�: ro q dd t o car garage, 2 feet x 22 feet-'a incf es to be developed irt:the rear por oh of the.property. In addition; Staiff noticed the front of tfe existing hvue encroached into:the required frcirFt yard. setback artd lneludeo the i arianee within th s,request.: Please see tl e tta b6d-letter:relative td ralne e: .,- M wln id1 a,n C its 22 M 2K 21Y.0 SSi C '• LN K JL Y M j it f°C N h\V f•S..Ci V ! �I P', BA9 6 3 8 o w n s c _ 2 K M n = N ^R M/ Z L I■ A LA ` ■ ` r s Rl CREST ,Y1 G s 5� �O. � uc K I• w 1• a a a a sr o' a s ° z �W h40,9 TRALL LAKE BfL c c Y 2 Y M Ian L�K M i .1,• z a s c I e WI .ai K 0 2. a 22 a ze n Y I> Y N U 11 ❑ Y Y S 2J S n F� Z • M Y° M IF SWEET BRIM " SCEfac OR. 21 F Y u a n Mm A >r N > A Iv S K f J2i o a G2. • Z} K C AL•6K �. � M► � M 2n � t r K n c S '\\ 50.76 AC. rlra .n.�C d U 75y .KPgfAf 7A L.a K Z 1 C cc C r Z87-13 s;c //Q R-7.5 A YUF 2Y 2 , r zs Z. ZI Y 7 zi K• CR ,K n 87-13 x zz jI r•I YS t s049 AK I �, TM: 2 n Iz G' sa K ,,� Y 2• � 2 f K i•K f-N��.� Sl �� 2! )i ' SJ�68L' Z89-18 `�reF TM It P' S STONCf LY K A Ii1 i K to 1.2 � ! Y t t F t l ' Y t/ • .••K 1 1 I I Y Cy A t CM(5 lA - '}I ICe 1 `�g Est K , z za 21yPQ" y5 ! z i u •. PC G e>K h z �,• 0� zx K 6 242 11 A X M � U n u Y S f }2°K M!•I • S Y • u �\ �i a fP " ME VCASTLE OR 21SF K = ) u O I! Mt Y CM.K A Z S.zK• � AL ACE zn K A ze+ a RRC]C� c , �Rdp s.c s K P NpP u u Y I � p 2! A am 3�9 CU91-10 z-nz A zsi i1— � -2K86 I..YZ nc Z \ O TM we A � rK�N'JIEST ES LN ° a ',,. CN + Off, , t• � i z K to• u • ��P. �s.c N � 2 Y +w • a a•Z I \Y >� l T. w2° b M f Y ,�•� \ '/ it /\ \� �21 R-1,2 � L-,&L,+EEO ra /� �� GL CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT A�PFU-C 1. APPLICANT NAME: L IN DA l L AL 3 Q ADDRESS: 3125 Traii Lake Drive CITY/STATE:_ CrapPvine* Ty ZIP: 76051 HOME: 817 4`�,I - 59 -2- WORK: 817-292-9�48 FAX: 817-481-5922 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME* M V. Cannon and Linda Laer ADDRESS: 3125 Trail Lake Drive CITY/STD :Grapevine, Tx. ZIP: 76051 HOME: same VV0RK:___ FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 3t2 5 mra ; l rakA El rot 11131nck 2 TRAIL LAKE an addition to tl City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas. Home purchased was a non-qualifying assumable loan, no survey re ' gc 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. SPc _ 15 G; 2 Addition will come within six feet of the rear property line. Addition will not encroach on five foot easement. 2 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITION WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) of SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OF TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDIT�9� ST-S,—,TH'E-,M-6TION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. Location of a separate detached two car garage in another area of the backyard which would satisfy code restrictions, would destroydraina e scheme and french drainage system. 3 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHEI DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AN[ THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIEC BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) L 'INOA LAC p- APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT). L i N O A L- Ac-L OWNER SIGNATURE� LZ SUBSCRIBED AND P" OF, 19 %7 . F A3 Exp. t -0 0 T A P U B L C- F 0 R i riE S A T E OF T E 7T /4-( ' q�z DATE OF LICENSE ]EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 4 When our house was being constructed the builder declared bankruptcy. The house sat unfinished for approximately b months. A bank took possession and finished the construction. Initially, the garage was a side entry garage, but due to code violations (too close to the property line) the entrance was changed to the rear entry making the garage more narrow. Because of the restrictive opening it is impossible for us to park our two cars in the garage during hail or inclement weather. The lot our house was built on has a 9"- 12"slope from the garage to the rear property line. During heavy rains we have had our garage flood. We have a system of french drains throughout our back yard which were installed by the original owner after 75%of the house flooded during heavy rains. We have installed additional drains throughout our back yard to compensate for the drainage from the wail (code violation) our rear neighbor was allowed to construct. The purpose of the attached garage will be two fold: To be able to park 2 cars in the garage and to further help direct water flow into the street and away from the house. �-1 63 79' - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - to I � m Q o DRAINAGE NEW TWO' u �Q z > � � 1 I \ X Q I w 3 ti- o ; Lu � m m v 1 � EXI5TIOG HOUSE � 1 +n i X � ` - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t - 30 B L a (55.02 w 3 J i9 1 T TF ALL L2T n. TN I ?N5 7E71340105 AM Y ,E' 'E"Tq T& PF � LL LL Q QQa - �- W F- Q W � W a Q) E-- 7- a T- QQ � Q Way oa — a �- Wz a z U-) (Y - Q UW � Q - Xa W - � 1W � - - - - - - - - - - - - I- d W CO i- X L/I EX I '55T I rl N0U5E i I n t ^ ~ `~ ^ ^^ ~ ' ^^ ` LU CL LU Eli if UJ -LL LL Lij ' , ' - ~-- ------ � �L -r _ __ BREEN & ASSOCIA TES, INC. /J CONSULTING ENGINEERS l� August 19 , 1992 Ms . Linda Laer 2509 Weatherby Drive, #217 Arlington, TX 76006 Re: Drainage Investigation Conducted at 3125 Trail Lake, Grapevine, Texas Site Investigation : A condition survey at the above-referenced property was conducted on August 17 , 1992 by Jim Breen of Breen & Associates , Inc. Present during the inspection was Linda Laer (prospective homeowner) . Property Description: Dwelling constructed circa 1986 as a single-story superstructure, placed on a concrete slab-on-ground type foundation system. The general drainage pattern is from back to front ( home faces North) and West to East. Observations : 1 . Garage interior veneer material along both East and West walls shows evidence of water stains from floor level up approximately 1 - 2 feet . 2 . Garage doorway has a 2 X 8 wood plank laid across the entry (water block ) . 3 . Driveway surface to South of garage doorway has a slope which flows surface moisture toward garage entry. 4 . Shallow concrete swale has been installed in front of garage doorway, post-construction. 5 . Finish grade along East wall of garage at front corner is lower than driveway, and will pond water next to foundation. 1615 W. Abram, Suite 200 e Arlington, Texas 76013 • 817-275-4711 11's ampres Sty ag'ee0 and untlerStoOd Oy the acceptance of thug report that no prom%ees certjfICair(jhf%W ua re ntees as to the Condition of the structure which is desCnbed are made in this report All Page Two - Letter to Ms . Laer - August 19 , 1992 6 . Garage East roof eve has no guttering and roof shed of rain will splash back into weep holes and into construction gap between driveway and perimeter beam. 7 . Trench or French-drain system (pipe only found at several locations ) has been installed along the West garage, back wall of dwelling, and out under the fence at the West property line with pipe exit at street curb . No visual evidence found to indicate to this inspector that drain is not adequately performing its intended function. Scope of inspection does not include certification of drainage system operation. Discussion : As we discussed during the on-site inspection , it appears to me that the original design of the driveway caused negative drainage into the garage with the resulting water damage around the base of the walls . I cannot categorically say that the wood board and driveway swale with French-drain system have corrected the problem, but it didn ' t worsen the structure; And except during extremely heavy downpours , the corrections probably keep water out of the garage. However, as we discussed, additional measures can be taken to help insure a better drainage condition. I would recommend: a ) Seal the weep holes and construction gap along the garage East wall with elastomeric type exterior sealant ; b ) Lower the finish grade to provide a positive slope at the East side front garage corner ; c ) Remove the wood plank and replace with a concrete curb approximately 2 inches in height, the full length of the door opening. Feather each side of curb width to help avoid excessive auto jarring ; d) Gutters along the roof edge would help divert roof runoff . If these actions do not satisfactorily prevent water penetration, I would suggest the more expensive repair we talked about ( ie: cutting a trench through the driveway in front of the door and placing grate over channel to catch and channel below grade the surface runoff ) . This type drainage system is common in commercial construction. Page Three - Letter to Ms. Laer - August 19 , 1992 Hoping this has been of required service, and please don ' t hesitate to contact this office if you have other questions . Very( tru�y your James 47. Breen Reg Ste��ed Professional Engineer n s _----} t JOB 3 12 S T,2 A l t, L.A ic c G,Z n "'z y Breen Engineering SHEET NO OF 1615 W. Abram Street Suite 200 CALCULATED BY _- _ DATE ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76013 — (817) 275-4711 CHECKED BY DATE - SCALE i I WAII- C � 2 14 YY a.A.r �iiw�� • * Slope r_ G'. G-- " �, L � D I � \ r; pvc .. I� rl --- I I J 4/ L BREEN ENGINEERING Construction Consultants James E. Breen, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer 1615 W. Abram, Suite 200 817.275-4711 Arlington, TX 76013 Fax 817.860-6263 f MEMORANDUM i)EVEfJ� PMENT SEFT1/ICE.+' MEM(J T OF 26NING ADJUSTMENT FROM ` C{} '1 1J�/ l;L1A , SU 1.:?iIUG O MARCY`RA"f PL FF, PLANNER,,,' " S 8 ► 7- JUKE STEVENSt N MEETING,DA►"T'E ` °`11�IE�111t3A'll :l�1�}�tEMBEt� 4 6: St aff rerrmerdstbe 8orl ofion Ad�ostrnont the+ ! a-�- special exception request tc `Cr pe i e C+�mpr l ens a ctn c 3rd r a =7 fio tfie p ope e l i.Ot 1; Slocic 1 Sattre.Addtion addressed as:4{ V1/estUTI: treet, as,fllvs. 1 Set on Masons Ae ulations re uires 7fl°� f t Y + / be=exterior walls; excluding, d©ors ancl;uuino w , to be:"constructed of: b`rlcl ; st©ne or ether masorir ,car v rnatecial.= # equal cteraete #ics iracccrdane with the It , Buitli Cc�d .`an d�' Ir re rentic r dude. `h � irpce ectin r f I , � .. r i n I II MIS r=- ir�E,, IAL, ' . Q Staff find$: a s ecial',gondition: does exist: for- the P proposed:variance because:the aPp:licant;rs trying to recreate b historic structure which is close to the,,on anal site BAGK�RONQI#IF(3A' 'IOI11 ; Stevenst�n submitta i a ria +ce �:ragi est�"ir con' oc#c r nr th a it J e pan reVjew to cnn trust:a i ever str cture that""is,a,replica,Of hlstvr�c resilience that as once located 1 a r� Stroa# ann w s meowed, o 409 W,e8t VlWall at a latex date;. The historic: structure: was eice y 4ostro�red b- :fire, 'be Historic !'r servatiora e CQrnrnission nfc� all r re ie ++r+ rf the prc�pc seu. cteriot building efeyatlQr s at be. October 23, 199fi meeting.- he,CQrninission reibbmme 6 approval j'the c©riceptual renderings of the ecterior and sou orts usiri #1` 7 ' pp U ea drrap wnridng rnaier�al:and� up a ttio; fl °l cieletaen f the ,requi ed'ma inr r e #erior;: :: -99. 0ABZA196 5lWE:��+x..it25�a$E:. $`F -.' .. �,i^4��� [ EST,h Y.,ust t H " 2Tt 0'3 Jt T t4k1`'' p< • ��+«. as d.__ � E 't�tt tti"Sx` �� ! ' xt EF �'iR" x,E4c'sC',� ,xa�nt.�" "i]t': •EEE. ,t .0yc(i '�yg'tl �. pp tt. j/jj v,At(fk.•Gf' ,�K#:z L&"GR Ii'" E p "h!', ,U`.its �� ' p £ AC t i il�l tow ` Z1 -. i-� — aY . U . GrCat:, Y ''�, '" ,E. • t `s.,," .s. ., P«; `e4*,"` Ce twfp� c� t7F" rP Y t it>;kT v;! t c ' € w 13:. .', k: i' ttt ?RiG"Pryk,: F:. � t<F .,f: s y,, k iit�ex.' "'t ::F JR j p ;e 4r i}.. 'i� a. At e :. L:#":.,hf.EEfsz, c+r xi .<. .I '"{'$ �ct kr .iG:'�' -Yv .r ,#1'�. 7YSi:4: '.' ,i.,'` .^"""`.rim.'._..' .— ✓"u O 41 iiddt ,Z ZZ#' 'vaE! ,6 ..(},'i4 A f} ,{ ;4� '4E tia•, f�f tt '2<;4 f 'c'« ZR CC 'AC 4L 7t .:442: ai CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1. APPLICANT NAME: J c> yt e CJ tom--ye vt ADDRESS: (�' f-7-yvte r-e I CITY/STATE: �O � �g fie ZIP: HOME: 01 7- WORK: FAX: 2. PROPERTY OWNER(S) c NAME: J cI vte ✓/ �' Vim'yc o�i ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: 5Oy l (ti TA-' ZIP: HOME: 0/7 WORK: FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) Liza ZZ 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. —7 0 � ) JJ // O W �d`o pose To rro 2 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR A LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT_MU-ST-DETERMI)NE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MA���A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONbftiON EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. -3y T�e E1"wRf-5'ec1 574-tt1c-7 ,v1'-e 15 je51'-j ":2 ve r c 1e'5c -fo 4 X-1 e-l)rll-z 1--e ell 4- r cl-lz Ilia 74; a tez) Lt bly F/r� l� l� Te � � `� S ��� /s prop�se� 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1 ) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. 7-� 7' f/jriS YJ�C GJ C��/!/!�1�Q// ! :S C�f�1'j'1//1�c� lGO/! 1'e v 3 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENT"'ND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCErT 0U D BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) I/ jun !c, D, 9i-e61en-5-,qrr7 4-zo- -j APPLICANT SIGNATURE OWNER (PRINT) 12 -StrOe,?S ef7 OWNER SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS -50 DAY OF 19 sl�p"''.A MARGIE J.HART My COMMISSION EXPIRES NqTAR)/ PU�YIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS -Rll April 30,2000 DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481 -0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P. O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 4 SVX31 3AA3dvb9 I-NM M 60P UJCp CD Al il CC a. asp b bG.OG bq N .00 GZ:1 Wi UP WW4 !:nA fl H '4L z LI Li 01 03 Iz co 77 LL 41 —,rQ-3s�,o, 7 1-3 G co Gz: L T w a CC 0 QI- ,u > LU �./.� ,N� ' f / � ♦ � f+' fir � . ii�** ,ail - j bra•f' �7; IVA it //i +�YI'J [' •- ..`�, .SO m W—, '1.A Emil����� rnei+�.J 7/777,777, 77 / �/' %� I l % /,EM/ER ��%�% Ma ' MR- %% % lk- ��littt�E 13361S H:)8 nHS t r►t s ���yyyw,,�JJJJJJJ vzr ! " '!y h t V i OL Z R=� N=909 F Dd 'LYvs -tUA l nos E m a � � I •- b i 3 a� d c OJ w m- zo z J 9O'ICZ N1MON F E 3 ` 1°la0 r LOt 'Od 'OYt9 "t°A ! t Z v tz Z F-Z 2� 0- a YNNCS O � Q� t i I 133a1S 63N9Qd3S -C*-ZZ-a v § s ��oo rlfl4�rrtl'iv.'trp.�n4 MwF/frMWCO N f�y� b rpe•ap.frr tw v1w( wllln pMM•p� tiyfM w ..eo.ar `u�wa�ir°1° rr. wf►a'lw�..lr /aM.ILie ®wr .�.�.i ecwia�w. IC10r faMow a my.w soffafarnww IO gi , IL"'o o faMaY br+w or a- fon 4crPonan �wwvr \ W5 LEI f ' .-•i•-.i •i• lopw m►or rawa ' •n.ifLTfNYtd FO►Gr rlfwfaf. Wr.OP f/RNNi ...... i 7.0 OrRW Or P^aA \ \ f7wlftOCR f IL ww op SPA" IL 4ow w.w skm A3 2 OF 8 R•�MI 1h IL u►«yr pro M� ambd aa. lw dp PWiH oaft MR,w. w ap O i.swims.®`.iIIL a" .r a�• mr ®.i L ""40 1 aWW t avnwr C►,MO,.an L ow ,mop omp— ow lial ecmwrc Vr waw .L Ugh TOPwrpt"qft `C*12 ------------------ Aw%�smomm �.op#"A~ op .w I� �... .,. aw •i.—. ..ate.—. lu aor.a►�s rR�nw.. avna•o►r ► O w wnwa'nwai► � �'1�, V *AM Maw A 3 va STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, October 7, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Chairman Carl Hecht Vice-Chairman Ery Meyer Secretary Dennis Luers Member Jill Davis Member Russell Anderson 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Marcy Ratcliff City Planner Ron Stombaugh City Planner Gerrie Anderson Secretary CALL TO ORDER Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:02 P.M. BZA96-32 - MARVIN BA VIN The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-32 submitted by Marvin Balvin who requested a variance for Lot 1, Block 1, M & H Addition and addressed as 305 East Nash Street. The variance was from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 31.C.4., Light Industrial District, requires outside storage in conjunction with permitted uses in Section 31 .A. and conditional uses in Section 31 .C., provided that such storage shall be screened in accordance with Section 50, Alternates A or E (6 foot masonry or wooden fence). The requested variance would allow outside storage without any required screening in conjunction with a truck leasing business which includes the retail sale and repair of new and used heavy trucks and miscellaneous outside land uses as shown on the site plan. Marcy Ratcliff, City Planner, explained that Staff found a special condition existed for the proposed variance to the screening requirement for outside storage due to BZA Minutes 09/09/96 security reasons. Mrs. Ratcliff explained that in the Board's packet was a report from the Grapevine Police Department indicating their security preference for outside storage. Mrs. Ratcliff also explained that Mr. Balvin submitted a Conditional Use Permit CU96-24 for his truck leasing business which involves the retail sale and repair of new and used heavy trucks, miscellaneous outside land uses and outside storage. The City Council approved the first reading of the Ordinance on September 17, 1996, and the second reading is scheduled for October 15, 1996. Mr. Marvin Balvin, applicant, took the Oath of Truth and explained to the Board the three main concerns for requesting the variance to the screening requirements, crime prevention, wanting the required landscaping to be seen, and to have marketing ability by having the display of equipment be visible. There being no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Member Carl Hecht asked how many crime prevention measures, that were suggested from the Police Department, Mr. Balvin would be using. Mr. Balvin explained that a security alarm with cameras and microphones would be installed, as well as perimeter lighting. There was concern from Member Dennis Luers whether someone would be able to see wrecked trucks parked outside. Mr. Balvin explained there would be wrecked trucks out in the yard but mostly they would be parked inside the garage area. With no letters for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None 2 BZA Minutes 09/09/96 After further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion that a special condition existed to the screening requirements for outside storage for security reasons, and in addition, he has provided a six foot chainlink fence along with perimeter landscaping which will provide some screening. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer then made a motion to approve the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-72, Section 31 .C.4., Light Industrial District, eliminating the requirement for the required screening of outside storage in accordance with Section 50, Alternates A or E (six foot masonry or wooden fence), allowing outside storage without any required screening in conjunction with a truck leasing business which includes the retail sale and repair of new and used heavy trucks and miscellaneous outside land uses as shown on the site plan. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None BZA96-33, ROBE.R.T CASSTEVENS The last item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-33, submitted by Mr. Robert Casstevens who was requesting the Board to approve the withdrawal of the variance request from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 20.G.2., Townhouse District Regulations which requires the rear yard to have a depth of twenty-five (25) feet. This request was for 1812-1814 Evergreen Court, legally described as Lot 8, Block 5, Ridgecrest Addition. The proposed variance would allow a reduction of ten (10) feet from the required twenty-five (25) foot lot depth requirement. If approved, it would have allowed a fifteen (15) foot lot depth on Lot 811-1 as shown on the plot plan. Mrs. Ratcliff explained that the request for withdrawal was submitted after the public hearing notice was sent to the newspaper. 3 BZA Minutes 09/09/96 Carl Hecht moved to approve the withdrawal of BZA96-33 in accordance with the letter received from Mr. Casstevens on September 26, 1996. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None (MINUTES Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider were the minutes of the September 9, 1996, meeting. Ery Meyer made a motion to accept the minutes of the September 9, 1996, meeting as written. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION Mrs. Ratcliff noted that for the November meeting, there will be eight cases. Member Jill Davis mentioned that she had received a call from one of the applicants for the November meeting and asked Mrs. Ratcliff details about the case. Mrs. Ratcliff explained that staff was still gathering information, but basically the applicant appealed the process by applying for a variance which gives them 30 more days without being issued tickets. ADJOURNMENT There being no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 P.M. 4 BZA Minutes 09/09/96 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1996. APPROVED: CHAIRMAN ATTEST: SECRETARY 5 4 i i t STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, November 4, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Chairman Carl Hecht Vice-Chairman Ery Meyer Secretary Dennis Luers Member Jill Davis Member Russell Anderson 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: H. T. (Tommy) Hardy Director of Development Services John Boyle City Attorney Scott Williams Building Official Ron Stombaugh City Planner Tim Fleming Plans Checker/Field Coordinator Gerrie Anderson Secretary CALL TO ORDER Chairman Randy Howell called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. BZA96-41 - JAMES D. AND TERESA BRODRICK The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-41 submitted by James D. and Teresa Brodrick who requested a variance for Lot 70, Shorecrest Acres Addition and addressed as 1806 Silverside Drive. The variance was from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.A., R-7.5 Single Family District Regulations which allows specific permitted uses but does not include any commercial uses. The proposed special exception, if approved, would authorize a commercial use to operate in a R-7.5, Single Family District. Mr. Williams explained the case and that Staff found no special condition existed. James Daryl Brodrick, applicant of 1806 Silverside, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that when he and his wife purchased Lots 69 and 70, it was i BZA Minutes 11/04/96 obvious the out building had been used as a commercial building. Mr. Brodrick noted they had renovated the house and out building, put in landscaping and cleaned the property. Mr. Brodrick explained that his business hours were 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M., there were no signs on the property and all his trucks were new and in good working condition. Mr. Brodrick did have available a petition from approximately 20 neighbors in favor of their request. Teresa Brodrick, applicant of 1806 Silverside, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the business does not cause any problems to the neighbors. Art Brown of 1822 Silverside Drive, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that he had lived in the neighborhood since 1981 . Mr. Brown noted that the Brodricks had improved the deteriorated building and that he was in favor of the request. Richard Grant of 1846 Anglers Plaza, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth. Mr. Grant explained that he was concerned with safety of children playing in the streets and elderly people that walk in the neighborhood with the increased truck traffic from the Brodrick's business and from another business being run in the neighborhood. Mr. Grant noted that the streets are narrow and there are no sidewalks. Bob Lowry of 1710 Silverside Drive, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained he was against the request. Mr. Lowry explained that he had built a new home in the neighborhood and did not want to see a continuation of commercial businesses in residential areas. Bob Fahey of 1730 Silverside Drive, 'Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that he had no complaints concerning the business. Mr. Fahey noted how the Brodricks have cleaned up the property. Kenneth Tucker of 1805 Silverside Drive, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained he had built a new home in the neighborhood two years ago and does not have a problem with the Brodrick's business. Geraldine Lowry of 1710 Silverside Drive, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that she and her husband were the newest residents in the neighborhood and was not in favor of the request. Ms. Lowry noted that where she lives, she sees 20 trucks a day going to and from the business. 2 t 4 t k 2 G BZA Minutes 11/04/96 i Kathy Owens of 1734 Chris Craft Drive, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that she lives two streets from the Brodricks, feels the streets are safe and does not see many commercial vehicles in the neighborhood. Mrs. Brodrick also noted that their business only has four commercial vehicles. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Mr. John Boyle, City Attorney spoke and explained that the property was residentially zoned and being utilized for a commercial purpose with employees and there is no ability to grant a variance for a principal use. Mr. Boyle noted that the Brodricks could seek to change the zoning and go before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Ery Meyer made a motion that no special condition exists. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None BZA96-34 - GRACE The next item of business for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-34 submitted by Grapevine Relief and Community Exchange who requested a variance for the west portion of Block 3, Grapevine Service Center Addition and addressed as 604 Shady Brook Drive. The variance was from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 54, Masonry Requirements, which requires all structures in the Government Use District to have at least seventy (70) per cent of the total exterior walls constructed of masonry. The requested variance would allow a one hundred (100) per cent reduction of the exterior masonry requirement on an existing building. If the Board of Zoning 3 3 G' BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Adjustment approves the request, it would allow an existing structure to be moved onto the site with no exterior masonry. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found a special condition existed for the request being that the existing building was originally designed without masonry veneer, and the energy and expense of adding masonry would preclude its utilization, resulting in its demolition, and the loss of a resource. Mr. Williams explained that the garage was originally built adjacent to the residential structure that was recently moved to the property. The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a 100% reduction in masonry to the main structure at its May 13, 1996, meeting. Ms. Tricia Wood, representing GRACE, was present to answer any questions. There being one letter in opposition of the request and no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht then made a motion that a special condition existed, being the garage was originally built to match the structure that was moved to the property in May and that the garage and house do not have masonry. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht moved to approve the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 54., Masonry Requirements, to allow a one hundred (100) percent reduction of the exterior masonry requirement on an existing building, allowing an existing structure to be moved onto the site with no exterior masonry. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None 4 BZA Minutes 11/04/9 6 BZA96-35 - SHIRLEY ARMSTRONG The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-35, submitted by Ms. Shirley Armstrong who requested a variance for 1041 Riverside Drive South, legally described as Lot 1, Block H, The Woods Subdivision, Phase II. The variance was from Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.1 ., Single Family District Regulations which requires a thirty (30) foot front yard setback. The requested variance would allow a three (3) foot encroachment of the existing house into the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback. If approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustment, it would allow the existing house a twenty-seven (27) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found a special condition existed and the special condition being that the encroachment is not the fault of the current owner. Shirley Armstrong, applicant, of 2934 Oak Forest, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that she had purchased the property in 1986 and resided there for 10 years. Ms. Armstrong explained that during the sale of this property, it was again surveyed and she was advised of the three (3) foot encroachment. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Jill Davis made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Jill Davis made a motion that a special condition existed, that being the structure is existing and the encroachment is no fault of the owner. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Jill Davis then made a motion to approve the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 15.G.1., Single Family District Regulations, allowing 5 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 a three (3) foot encroachment of the existing house into the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback, allowing the existing house a twenty-seven (27) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None BZA96-36 RICHARD CARTER COMPANIES The next item of business for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-36, submitted by Richard Carter Companies who requested a variance for Lot 16R, Block A, Bear Run Addition, addressed as 1972 North Port Court. The variance was from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.H., R-7.5 Single Family District, Buffer Area Regulations, which requires a forty (40) foot buffer yard along the western property line whenever a R-7.5, Single Family development is located adjacent to a non-residential district, without any division such as a dedicated public street, park or permanent open space, and all principal buildings or structures shall be set back a minimum of forty (40) feet from the adjoining property line. The requested variance would allow a reduction of one (1 ) foot to the forty (40) foot buffer yard required between residentially and commercially zoned property. If approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustment, it would allow a thirty-nine (39) foot buffer yard along the western property line. Mr. Williams explained the case and noted that Staff found no special condition for the proposed variance; therefore, recommended denial of the request. Mr. Williams explained that the purpose of the buffer yard was to provide separation between residential and commercial uses. Mr. Jackie Fluitt, with Washington and Associates, representing Mr. Carter, took the Oath of Truth and explained that early in the process of developing this property, there were negotiations with the City of Grapevine concerning park land. He explained the subdivision was designed to accommodate the park land to the north and east property lines. Mr. Fluitt went on to explain that Drees Homes currently has 38 homes constructed, the remaining lots are under contract and because the buildable area on this lot is only forty (40) feet wide, this is the last lot to be built on in the subdivision. 6 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Tim Denihan with Drees Homes, took the Oath of Truth and explained that a variance was needed in order to build a home compatible with what is marketable in the area. Mr. Denihan also explained that if a variance was not granted, Drees Homes would not buy the lot. Richard Carter, applicant of 3838 Oak Lawn, Suite 915, Dallas, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that because of negotiations with the City of Grapevine about the 45 acre park, the whole subdivision was pushed south and four (4) lots were lost. Mr. Carter noted that this lot has not sold within two years because a forty (40) foot wide house is not marketable. Mr. Carter noted that the deed restrictions for the subdivision requires 1650 square feet. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Jill Davis made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Chairman Randy Howell, remarked that there was usually a reason for a lot to be sold last and he hated to see lots sitting vacant. After discussion among the members about not being able to find a hardship, Jill Davis made a motion that no special condition existed. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None BZA96-37,_TERRY BOUTON The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-37, submitted by Terry Bouton who requested a variance for Lot 6, Windmill Estates, addressed as 3257 Oak Tree Lane. The variance was from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 42.C.3., Supplementary District Regulations which requires an accessory structure to be at least ten (10) feet from any dwelling. 7 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 The requested variance would allow a carport to encroach a minimum of four (4) feet into the required ten (10) foot building separation. If approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustment, it would allow a minimum separation of six (6) feet between the carport structure and the existing house. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found a special condition existed for the proposed variance due to the existing topography of the lot, and the existing four foot retaining wall and existing tree, and in addition, the available rear yard was very limited. Mr. Williams also explained that the applicant submitted a request for the variance to allow the development of a proposed 11 x 21 foot carport at the rear of the existing house. Mr. Terry Bouton, applicant, of 3257 Oak Tree Lane, Grapevine, Texas, took the Oath of Truth and explained that he had lived in the house for 11 years and with a teenager and a third car, a covered carport was needed. Mr. Bouton noted that the existing garage would still be used as a garage. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht then made a motion that a special condition existed due to the topography of the lot and the existing four foot retaining wall and existing tree, and in addition, the available rear yard was very limited. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Carl Hecht made a motion to approve the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 42.C.3., Supplementary District Regulations to allow a carport to encroach a minimum of four (4) feet into the required ten (10) foot building separation, allowing a minimum separation of six (6) feet between the carport structure and the existing house. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 8 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None BZA96-38. LINDA L. LAER The next item of business was for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider BZA96-38, submitted by Linda L. Laer who requested variances for 3125 Trail Lake Drive, legally described as Lot 1, Block 2, Trail Lake Addition. The following variances were from the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 15.G.2., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations which requires a twenty- five (25) foot rear yard setback. The requested variance would allow the proposed garage to encroach a maximum of nineteen (19) feet into the required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. If approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustment, it would allow a principal structure with a minimum six (6) foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Section 15.G.1., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, requires a thirty (30) foot front yard setback. The requested variance would allow the existing house an encroachment of two (2) feet into the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback. If approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustment, it would allow the existing house a minimum twenty-eight (28) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Mr. Williams explained that Staff found a special condition existed for the proposed variance to the rear yard setback due to the inaccessibility to the existing two car garage and the current drainage problems of the lot. Staff also found a special condition existed for the proposed variance to the front yard setback because the house was existing and was not the fault of the owner. Linda Laer, applicant, of 3125 Trail Lake Drive, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the house was built in 1985 and was left unfinished for six to eight months due to the builder declaring bankruptcy. Ms. Laer also explained that two cars could not fit in the garage because of the way it was oriented. With no one to speak either for or against the request, Ery Meyer made a motion to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 9 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer made a motion that a special condition existed for the rear yard setback due to the inaccessibility to the existing two car garage and the current drainage problems of the lot, and that a special condition also existed for the proposed variance to the front yard setback because the house is existing and is not the fault of the owner. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None Ery Meyer made a motion to approve the variances requested to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 15.G.2., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, to allow the proposed garage to encroach a maximum of nineteen (19) feet into the required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback, allowing a principal structure with a minimum six (6) foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan and to Section 15.G.1 ., R-7.5, Single Family District Regulations, to allow the existing house an encroachment of two (2) feet into the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback allowing the existing house a minimum twenty-eight (28) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot plan. -Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None BZA96-39, JUNE STEVENSON The next item of business for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider as BZA96- 39, submitted by Ms. June Stevenson who requested a special exception for 409 West Wall Street, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Sathre Addition. The special exception was to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73: Section 54 Masonry Regulations which requires 70% of the exterior walls, excluding doors and windows, to be constructed of brick, stone or other masonry or material of equal characteristics in accordance with the City's Building Code and Fire Prevention Code. 10 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 The proposed special exception would allow construction of a new structure with a 100% reduction to the masonry requirements. Mr. Williams explained the case and that Staff found that a special condition existed for the proposed special exception because the applicant was trying to recreate a historic structure which was close to the original site location. Mr. Williams also noted that the Historic Preservation Commission informally reviewed the proposed exterior building elevations at their October 23, 1996, meeting and recommended approval of the conceptual renderings of the exterior. Phil Morley, representing Ms. Stevenson, took the Oath of Truth and explained that the original building was built in 1912 at the corner of Wall Street and Main Street, until Ms. Stevenson bought it and moved it to 409 West Wall Street. Mr. Morley explained that the building burned to the ground late last year and Ms. Stevenson retained his firm to attempt to recreate it exactly as it was before. Mr. Morley also explained that he had met with the Historic Preservation Commission and that P.W. MCCallum, Acting Foundation Director, pointed out the exact type of siding that was almost certainly used on the original structure. With no one else to speak either for or against the request, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Luers, Davis Nays: None Absent: None After further discussion, Carl Hecht made a motion that a special condition existed because the original house burned and that the applicant was trying to recreate a historic structure which is close to the original site location. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: Luers Carl Hecht then made a motion to approve the special exception to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 54 Masonry Regulations, to allow construction of a new structure with a 100% reduction to the masonry requirements. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: 11 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: Luers MINUTES Last for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider were the minutes of the October 7, 1996, meeting. Ery Meyer made a motion to accept the minutes of the October 7, 1996, meeting as corrected. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None MISCELLANEOUS ANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION There were questions asked about a dent repair shop being run from Mr. Daniel's building at the corner of Dallas Road and Main Street. Mr. Hardy explained to the Board that the dent repair business in Mr. Daniel's building was for estimates only, they would have to go before City Council as a Conditional Use Request to do repairs. Mr. Williams explained to the Board that Certificate of Occupancies are required for all change of businesses. ADJOURNMENT There being no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed ,by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Hecht, Meyer, Luers, Davis, Anderson Nays: None Absent: None The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 P.M. 12 BZA Minutes 11/04/96 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 1996. APPROVED: C AIR ATTEST: c' SECRETARY F 13