Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-07-01AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING MONDAY EVENING, JULY 1, 1996, AT 6:00 P.M. COURT ROOM/COUNCIL CHAMBERS, #205 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD GRAPEVINE, TEXAS II. OATH OF TRUTH 111. OATH OF OFFICE IV. ELECTION OF OFFICERS V. OLD BUSINESS A. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-20, SUBMITTED BY PHIL MORLEY AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-24, SUBMITTED BY PHIL MORLEY AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-25, SUBMITTED BY VALERIE HEAD AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. C. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-26, SUBMITTED BY LLOYD AND DRUSILLA GALBREATH AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. D. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE BZA96-27, SUBMITTED BY GATEWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES AND CONSIDERATION OF SAME. VII. MINUTES BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT TO CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 13, 1996 AND JUNE 3, 1996 MEETING. VIII. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION IX. ADJOURNMENT IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU HAVE A DISABILITY THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AT (817) 481-0377 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS WILL BE MADE TO ASSIST YOUR NEEDS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551.001 et seq. ACTS OF THE 1993 TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 1996 AT 5:00 P.M. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FRO11 : Pana son i c FRX SYSTEII PHONE NO. : Jun. 19 19196 02:28FIl P1 I 1OF 11VIORLEY ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE - INTERIORS - PLANNING June 19, 1996 Mrs. Marcy Ratcliff City Planner City of Grapevine P.O. Box 729 Grapevine, Texas 76051 RE: Azalea Court Subdivision Dew Marcy, In view Qf the fact that the fina.1 plot of our revised 14 -lot subdivision known as Azalea Court was approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission and the 0N Council on June 18-, we respectfully request fhat You permanently remove our recently tabled variance request (BZA Case No. 96-20) from the BZA agenda. Thank you. Sincerely, A4P G. Philip Morley, NCARB Architect 817 - 329 - 4289 210 Park Blvd., Suite 100 - Grapevine, Texas 76051 A Division of The Morley Group Irv,. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING F ICIAQ MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-24 PHIL MORLEY MEETING DATE: MONDAY, JULY 1, 1996 Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the request to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for Lots 2134, 2113, and 2132, Block 2, J.J. Daniel Addition and addressed as 212, 218, 224 West Daniel Street as follows: 1. Section 15.H., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require developments adjacent to a non-residential district, without any division such as a dedicated public street, park or permanent open space to have all principal buildings or structures set back a minimum of forty (40) feet from the adjoining property line. The setback shall contain appropriate landscape improvements, fencing, berm, or trees to adequately buffer adjoining uses. The proposed variance would allow the reduction of fifteen (15) feet for Lot 2134, thirteen (13) feet for Lot 2133, and fourteen (14) feet for Lot 2132 in the required rear yard setback. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow Lot 2114 a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback, Lot 2133 a twenty-seven (27) foot rear yard setback, and Lot 2132 a twenty-six (26) foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Staff feels that there is a special condition for the request, due to the fact that the applicant cannot acquire additional land to increase the depth of his lots. An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Mr. Phil Morley. Mr. Morley is replatting the property and intends to develop the lots to R-7.5 standards. oAazAM-24.4 oil � � � it � ,Y r• to ..f .0 K r BZA96-24 PHIL MORLEY L•1 - •c I n • -. � • e� p; M i1• WP T • j, :• 8 1A s ',780 -08 6 to ar1 T �6it 7 2 s 6 7 3 m !r 7 t .?QSa 0 t u le u 11 t SR TQ Ir If 6 , x Ac t TR 1G, .7 •c z co >G S S W 2 -32 h. Z S 12 -1 S CL % 6 C lI Q CL e El�d e HAf<-kR LN ! •a 1K2A -I ACV 2 TFC I q 3 <c C 5 UR pi 6 :.,t oC Y 7:- 483 A: Tc 28+ 722 K ' • AC Hc TQ c Z9[ Tc i � i o ci r 1 �_ CU88-07 Z81— 1 1 v� � Pfl GU Tft 1J jfv, �GU �c X72 16 Pcy 101 C 2.7 .� U88-02 TR 2'4.212 < ! •a 1K2A -I ACV 2 TFC I q 3 <c C 5 UR pi 6 :.,t oC Y 7:- 483 A: Tc 28+ 722 K ' • AC Hc TQ c Z9[ Tc i � i o ci r 1 �_ CU88-07 Z81— 1 1 v� � Pfl GU Tft 1J jfv, �GU �c X72 16 Pcy 101 C 2.7 .� U88-02 TR 2'4.212 < CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 1. APPLICANT NAME: ADDRESS: noe- r 21Z -.1 S- L CITY/STATE: 7X zip: HOME: WORK: 9P21 7-23 Zf— 1f4M FAX: S/7--488-;5'-?_ j-7 3 vyt- 9 2. PROPERTY 6W {`3) NAME: 5q Lye, ADDRESS: 7o9 7 S' -%G/ -I 1;ew -5 7- - CITY/STATE: 6-I'dRe-ohe X ZIP: -7 HOME: WORK: FAX: 4. STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) /-,g Ac/J 1-0 1 * Qq 14 1 eo_ & 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING SHEET. 5(-, r- +-i 'r n 19- OY f4 THE ZONING REQUESTED. 4--Pj ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE F\et lies � Q,e l S t Varja4ce a -o Z-o� 0, v Itetri'gPice- oki q PL c/ 'r m 04- 2 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. o4dy /vs-, 'q, re!T e..' e-=� `oQcAC qvi d er- aa7 047 . ( N is a / Ps I If If i r-- AklaP,ee.7�4 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. Hd i's 0-04.1 e_t� Pro D''F;e- C oft 7 -5 o Q ,5;D G2 Ore.est`,le e4 VSA 14' Q Z4 Al sem,Ord, v«h c -'p- r`e yr res ex - 1 0-r a re -t oF- 7S�oD s ,F. '*'m d a. to 2L 4-:FvL aA ,'rte:.. yr Q /off 4V:4 M ©F e0 -'+f 3 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT 01 APPLICANT SIGNATU OWNER SIGNATURE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS ',' DAY OF , 19�� N \ 1 p WWWWWA i t SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF , 19_ NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 ' GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 0 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE. MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT APPLICANT OWNER (PRI OWNER SIGP SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 19q� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES April 30, 2000 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 19� C A . N"�- \-fir IMMIGIE J. HART MY COMMISSION WIRES April 30, 2000 M1 DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DELIVERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 ' GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 7£6099 I MAY -10-98 16:04 FROM: WESTERN PIEDMONT CC --- ID; 70443860I5 PAGE 2 B. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD, SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT APPLICANT SIGNA • 5 p p RCTI I V. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OFMt-L�- , 19 jp U WMIE J. KART MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ApdI 30, 2000 15XTE 6P EIMSE EXPIRATION SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF 19 1�10 .................... oo CYNTHIA L. DAY Notary Public, State of Tan My Ommission Expires 1146.9 I-- &-9�' DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481.0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DC VEL 0 P M C / V T S C R V1 C r- S PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 4 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76051 GRAPEVINE, 7X 76099 4 12-29-15 00:04 +I PATI 1420 n 20'6 40`��u 4' NG. ALK 16' Gc7NG PRY 17 j a 1.00 t�ANM STRMT LOTx 2122 SLKi 2 .'J. J. DANM-S AVOITON 6R APIZV I Tx. PLOT PLAN Sc u I° *;zoo,, 25` OL 55 5 PANEL STREET LOTIt 2R5 5LK, 2 J. J. ZPANELS APPITION ORAPEVKn, TX. PLOT PLAN SO w I' a* 20'011 359 P03 2S' 5L. ev HOUSE 14'M 50 eve L4'7,01NO, AAI -K- J-- I6' GONG. PRIVEViAY--1 PANEL STREET LOTIt 2R5 5LK, 2 J. J. ZPANELS APPITION ORAPEVKn, TX. PLOT PLAN SO w I' a* 20'011 359 P03 2S' 5L. tt t 12-29-15 00:04 PANEL 5TPr;E LOTe 2124 15LK: 2 J. J. PANELS ADDITION GIRAPEV(Ne, TX. PLOT PLAN 5C, a 1" 0 20100 3s"i P02 --7 / 21' 40' 25'BL 0 0. tKIVEWAY 82 51' PANEL 5TPr;E LOTe 2124 15LK: 2 J. J. PANELS ADDITION GIRAPEV(Ne, TX. PLOT PLAN 5C, a 1" 0 20100 3s"i P02 i' � MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFECA MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER - SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTE #BZA96-25 VALERIE HEAD MEETING DATE: MONDAY, JULY 1, 1996 Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the request to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for Lot 5R, Block 31, City of Grapevine Addition and addressed as 205 East College Street as follows: 1, Section 58.B., Parking and Loading Area Standards require all off street parking areas and driveways to be paved to a minimum standard equivalent to four (4) inches concrete slab with six (6) inches by six (6) inches by six (6) gauge mesh or two (2) inch hot mix asphaltic concrete over six (6) inch crushed rock base. Staff feels that a special condition exists for this request. The applicant is attempting to replicate a historically correct architectural environment. The use of gravel for the driveway, therefore, would be appropriate in this situation. An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Mrs. Valerie Head. The plans for the house were reviewed and approved by the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission. 0 AMAM-25.4 — TN 40A TR TR Ti+ tit ''apllca`a N`' Q10 t 1111 K bI a 48A1 41 42 4 a( 12C 12$ Z 7 9 ZY ,• `� e : e 12E o -Z$ 7 6t TR 4-A 68 le lJj- ( o 3Q 4 T 49 \ 5 1 43 t•T rt t — Tr. 50 AC i 13 "2 " R' ' 9 r\ 3o tC I Pp �5 I Cj • 2Q36A© I E E C 'URI TR 52 ' :opwn f 30 AC : ` il<I 1 6 N m _ TR tj4 j4 TR MICI TR 17J1 �AC 1.28 AC S8 X32 , !1 TEXAS ;T M3Q J Et gg 2—� tR a TF TP � T4 TR 61 p.T-'.rj E 6 i 14 TRS 21 L 2 QAI) 6� bP2 ) AC pC le ^3 ; 3c t C i E I_W V PT 23 0 t ¢ .J99 13 4• c 1 .25 .?5E 1 4 t t 6i.0 , 4C Ar 5 ' 3 r E 11 — �„14 4 1 T 7 BZA96-25 3' 2c i3 4C 'Aa �� a VALERIE HEAD 4G I f< s T 3 WORTH ST � K S S 1 Cj v w FT c Qi 1 Tt;� 1 r �1 E v E �. j �. E; •ats ! 1 1 GU 0.06 7 �b - PT s 2 FT 1 of rt PI ;T�o, U88—� I UN SST SIPtl2 2I 551 _cl Io 4 _ 1 Z7;_Z At ,B •' PT 92 PT P-. PT I�c7 I 7 ( 2 13 4 5 c 7(+ FRAWLJN ST N r s:.t.k.! 1"1 -t U8 1 3--T , SU89 0 17 " P OFF °E FT ci)1 D: I I ~! <r v E I f 1 11/ F.. I ,li ._ k o7 cTi 5 (1 2 3 f4 t < 0 1 1 1 I ,� W `T I S r<.I tll j w FR Ll ST t5 1 •j V 1 J a ,• I I ,� 1 1 Z80-1 =' S(a�4�$ O ,.� MID I4 iR h1, J + � 1 2 •rip E P� , - �'y .7Ci c � , 'g ' s 51 D 3 c T 1 ''' t COLLEGE ST0 ! Y 2,02 0T` i SP j 1, -R 21 sr+10 t: 1 q CU93-08 j �i s. ; .Z9,4 -12i R2 2 Z8Z-39.27 I C1 9� 9_ -R a�< i of E 82-401 Z90-09 1 L I ORO:- 8 ?C- 1 90 64 j CU67 _ T ' ' 2-25 U95-12 —06 _ ; — P. GUe 792-05 E - F S7l�rw - `j c.c c ___.S4\�•t 'l 4C ' <� =� 73E c ra MIA —7 I m i � 21' Tc,c _ - � < r ;R I s• is a '• ir• T TF. 26a 32c Y z ' .+e3 AC T. 264 U 23 l�.!: f 1 "a r. v aC .722 uC 1 TQ 2Ea2 Zg _Og�1 N. AC 1 3F IES AC Tc x C `� ;� i I 7; ar <: t�x tt � t•1- S� ' <-C � ' CITY OF GRAPEVINE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT AP 1. APPLICANT NAME: ADDRESS: - 4 a m CITY/STATE: zip: HOME:361A- K) WORK: FAX: PROPERTY OWNER(S) i ON FTI kyj I ADDRESS: �i>L6 -ul CITY/STATE: —ZIP: ---lc-ooal HOME: 3Q4- WORK: Q" QqD-DQQQ- FAX: STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDITION EXISTS, THE MOTION MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. �D QCA c 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: '(1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. q 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) SHOULD BE QUANTIFIED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, ETC.) APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) APPLICANT SIGNAT OWNER (PRI OWNER SIGNATU ie- L ' JA. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS J0 DAY OF SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS DAY OF C, J , 19 qu /� / A �) /9� IF LICENSE EXPIRATION , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS DATE OF LICENSE EXPIRATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DEL/VERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 0 O `w -:,r,r-, MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMO TO: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING O IAL MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER t— SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-26 LLOYD & DRUSILLA GALBREATH MEETING DATE: MONDAY, JULY 1, 1996 Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the request to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for the proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Galbreath Addition and addressed as 1618 North Gravel Circle as follows: 1. Section 13.G.1., "R-20" Single Family District Regulations require a forty (40) foot front yard setback. • . ••• •• . ,. • ♦. -• . • I UNI $1111 1zle n Lela PAVAIC 101M 01*10 RelI • - •. .•� • •• ♦• • . • 1' "I •• •s • -me . 1 I•.1 •I I' • •• .I 2. Section 13.G.2., "R-20" Single Family District Regulations require a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. • ••• -• . • •. . 1 -' •• -• •I . - -.. -• ♦ •I ••i - - •. .�• • -• • • • -I 3. Section 13.G.5., "R-20" Single Family District Regulations require a lot depth of one -hundred (100) feet. 4. Section 13.G.7., "R-20" Single Family District Regulations require only one single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted on each lot. i ••• • i' • • • • •1 J.• j• • • • /• • •/ ----------- Staff 1-• . Staff finds a special condition being the house was built prior to annexation into Grapevine city limits, No inspections are required in the county. The depth of the lot cannot be increased due to existing development. An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Mr. and Mrs. Galbreath. The applicant is proposing to purchase a tract of land adjacent to the east side of their current property. The tract of land has an existing principal structure the applicant has promised to remove. The applicant cannot remove the additional principal structure until they close on the property. The property cannot be closed upon until it is platted. It cannot be platted until variances are approved. 0ABZX96-26.4 SJA e No TR 3F I 5.83 A[ / I I -8 34 2.86 K TR 3A2 1.43 AC � I ►I II i 6 T I I I 1 AC i II � I II II a>JRNE Y LN R-20 BZA96-26 I 2TR a LMLLOYD & DRUSILLA GALBREATH TR IA]A 22.62 AC Z TR IeGRAPEY NE CITY t TS I TR 18 a l aC O 1.04 AC ( 0 d cD I cr N {yT TR IF ,Q >Q C TR IC TR X2 TR ICI L7'5 I I a Taa naC 7K U8K LJO41 AC U TR 19 o •fj /ii1 ((b R.) y O TR 10 TR IE U \l!(/) r�i'}Y� aR 71� Ao _ tR I88 TR !Q4 TR 387 Fie,-i—F18TR 7A 28b TR -- -- F �N • 186A O GRAVEL RD N TR TR TR TR TR TR HSf t85 IBStI le lais 5F x X Q TR 18X, ` TR TR TR TR Vlow )9 tot I� tR TR BZA T83J N ti.• SVR Ei ` TR TR TR TR 183M P�gB s >srasc les )e3 >� Tit 1e5A s a c N AI Az IR MIA TR TR i8+f TR It1i) TR TA Tit R a4B It T 4 At lBafl � b K 48 R-20 TRIQI -- -- — 4 AC Tll 194E TR )6404 TR is" TR la3 I I LAH AC ttl2 2.82 AC TR 1 SCALE* T'-500' TILS MAP WAS COWLED BY 4 9 MAY 2 81996 CITY OF GRAPEVINI-4 BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTIVIENA APPLICANT NAME: ADDRESS:- CITY/STATE: I m FOU 191m I i'Vilmil)"Al sm 1618 N. GRAVEL CIRCLE HOME: 817-481-4467 NA I WORK: 214-696-6901 FAX: 214-361-5491 NAME: LLOYD R. AND DRUSILLA F. GALBREATH ADDRESS: 1618 N. GRAVEL CIRCLE CITY/STATE: GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ZIP: 76092 817-481-4467 WORK: 214-696-6901 FAX: 214-361-5491 STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (PLEASE ATTACH SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY) 1618 N. GRAVEL CIRCLE GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76092 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. IF NECESSARY USE A SEPARATE SHEET. SECTION 13 R-20 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT REGULATIONS (G. AREA REGULATIONS) 1. DEPTH OF FRONT YARD, FEET 40. VARIANCE REQUEST -26-9 FT. ZI-0 2. DEPTH OF REAR YARD, FEET 25. VARIANCE REQUEST 21�- 3 X --N 5. DEPTH OF LOT, FT. 100 FT. VARIANCE REQUEST 22.00 FT. DETACH ACCESSORY/GARAGE - n "T7 I 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO ABP.RWE A REQUEST. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT NO SPECIAL CONDIT _ N MUST BE TO DENY THE REQUEST. r� SEE ATTACH® T,FTT*rRi . 2 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. 2 A m A alai M4 Q 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHMENTS, AND THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCE(Srj�Llt �ED BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTOM APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) APPLICANT SIGNATOR OWNER (PRINT OWNER SIGNA' ��l L SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS o DAY OF 199 I�F SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS c� g DAY OF Q 1991 «fiffm DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DEL/VERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 w Lloyd and Drusilla Galbreath 1618 North Gravel Circle MAY 2 819 Grapevine, Texas 76092 (817) 481-4467 City Of Grapevine Board of Zoning Adjustment P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Attn: Mr. Edward T. Kellie Re: First Review of the Final: Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Galbreath Addition Dear Sir, Enclosed is a BZA application that my wife and I are filing for consideration of approval. We purchased our home at 1618 North Gravel Circle on October 30, 1990. We have also purchased the adjoining lot next to our property March 8, 1996. We are in the process of refinancing both properties that was scheduled to close on May 31, 1996. In order for our loan to be approved, both properties need to be replated as one. In trying to do so we have been informed as per your letter dated May 23, 1996, that our properties do not meet requirements of the Section 13. R-20 Single -Family District Regulation (G. Area Regulations) due to the location of our existing house on the lot. We feel we have a hardship case since this property was annexed after the purchase and structure of our home. We would like to be considered for approval for variances' changes listed in the enclosed BZA application. We would like for this application to be turned in on May 28, 1996 deadline for your July 1, 1996 Monday board meeting. Thank you for your attention in this matter as our mortgage company and the seller of the adjoining lot are wanting to finalize this deal. Regards, Lloyd R. and Drusilla Galbreath Lloyd and Drusilla Galbreath 1618 North Gravel Circle Grapevine, Texas 76092 (817) 481-4467 City Of Grapevine Board of Zoning Adjustment P.O. Box 95104 Grapevine, Texas 76099 Attn: Marcy Ratcliff/ Mr. Edward T. Kellie c Fac ,D �f JUN - U Ilj Re: First Review of the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Galbreath Addition Dear Sir, This letter is to advise the Building and Zoning committee for the City of Grapevine of our intentions of the house located at 1600 N. Gravel Circle. It does not have any utilities connected at present time and we have no intentions of ever hooking any up. We also want to advise the City of Grapevine that our intentions with this house is to demolish it within 6 months. Our sole purpose of this purchase was for the land not the house. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. I (Drusilla) can be reached in the daytime at 214-696-6901. Thanking you in advance for your consideration in this matter. Regards, Lloyd R. and Drusilla Galbreath 06/05/96 08:19 FAX 2143615491 BRADLEY SALES 1000L City Of Grapevine Board of Zoning Adjustm( P.O. BOX 95 104 Grapevine, Texas 76()99 Attn: Marcy Ratcl iffl Mr. I Re: First Review of the Dear Sir, This letter is to ad Grapevine of our intentiol have any utilities connect any Lip. We also want to is to demolish it within 6 r the house. If you have any qt reached in the daytime at Thanking you in ai oyd and Drusilla Calbreat I 1618 North Gravel Circle Grapevine., Texas 76092 (817) 481-4467 T. Kellie Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Galbreath Addition ;e the Building and Zoning committee for the City of Of the house located at 1600 N. Gravel Circle. It does not at Present time and we have no intentions of ever hooking vise the City of Grapevine that our intentions with this house .1ths. Our Sole purpose of this purchase was for the land not bons, please do not hesitate to call- I (Drusilla) can be 4 -696 -6901 - ince for your consideration in this matter. Regards, 17 4W* --X 1 41t�'C Lloyd R. and Drusilla Galbreath 06/04/96 08:09 FAX 2143615491 BRADLEY SALES MARCY RATCLIFF * i . GRAPEVINE Phone: 817-481-0377 • s 17-424-0545 From: DRUSILLA GALBREATH Company: BRADLEY SALES Phone: 214/696-6901 Fax: 214/361-5491 Dae: 6[4196 Pages including this cover page: 10 Comments: • • GALBREATH ADDITION DEAR MARCY, AS PER OUR CONVERSATION REGARDING THE CONDITIONS OF OUR CLOSING, DOCUMENTS ARE TO F04W. I HAVE MARKED WITH * ON PAGE FOUR ABOUT WHERE WE CAN NOT DEMOLISH S�RUCTVRE ON PROPERTY UNTIL FULL AND FINAL PAYMENT IS MADE FROM REFINANCIVG BOTH PROPERTIES. I HAVE MARKED WITH'"' ON PAGE NINE WHERE IT STATES THAT THERE ARE BACK TAXES FROM THE PREVIOUS OWNER AND THEY (PREVIOUS OWf1ER OR SELLER) WILL PAY UPON RECEIPT OF FULL AND FINAL PAYMENT MADE FROM REFINANCING BOTH PROPERTIES. I HOPE THIS HELPS YOU TO PRESENT OUR DI MA IF YOU WILL ADVISE ME AS WHAT MY HUSBAND AND I NEED TO DO ABOUT THE DEMOLITION PERMIT, AND IF THEY WILL ALLOW US B MONTHS AFTER REPLATING TO DO SO. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO THANKYQU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE AS THIS IS ALL NEW TO US. AFTER REVIEWING WHAT I HAVE ALREADY SUBMITTED BZA APPLICATION AND LETTER EXPLAINING OUR HARDSHIP CASE, IF THERE IS ANYTHING ELSE THAT WE NEED TO DO, PLEASE ADVISE_ REGARDS, DRUSILLA GALBREATH vioul UO/ U4r ars u4: ur rad G14 3U15 1l1 b.NADLEY 5Al �a ana W Four Eunay Rssidexadg Firncet Moony C i ct Cowexuing 16M AL GC (Addrns: of .Rvpny) WIVUS 10.25-Q3 If Sailer does not notify Buyer,Royer shat.! notify Seller of Buyer's choice from tho three alternatives provided above within 12 days after Seller receives all inspact+n reports and repair designations from $oyes and any leader_ If B'uyTT does nor norif Seller of Buyer's choice wirhin the sp i cylted time, BuYer shall accept the Properly with rhe Costs of rreattnent repairs lilaited to the amo wnis stated in TC. If the total cost of required treatmcut and repairs exceeds 5'% of the Sales Price and Seller agrees to pay the fatal cost, Buyer may (1) accept the property with all required treatment and repairs, or (2) terminate this contract and the I .erne Money shall all refcosts of to Buyer. Buyer shall rattly Seller of Buyer's Cho" within 5 clays after Seller notifies Buyer that Seller will pay all Costs of treatment Anel repair- If EJ dose not nor Seller of Buyer's choice within the specified Ame.Buyer shall accept doe Propeny with alt required treatment Iand repairs. E. COMPLETION OF TREATiv1EXT OR REPAIRS. Seller shalt complete required or agreed tre� the Closing Date. If Seller fails to com lite as and repairs prior to P y required or agreed treatment or repairs, Buyer may do so; Seller shalt be liable for the cost up to the maximum 4reed amount which shall be deducted from the sales cIosinR � proceeds or collected from Seller' ac if necessary- Buyer may also exercise applicable remedies provided in Paragraph 15. S. BROKERS' REPRESENrATYON AND S: Cet�cTURY 21 Panasetters (Listing Broker) represents ❑ Seller only ® Seller and Buyer. Any other broker represents: Seller as Listing Broker's subagent-, ❑ Buyer only as Buyer's agent- Brokers' gentBrokers' fees sttall be paid as specified by separate written agreements. 9. CLOSING: The closing of the sale shall bJI on or before March B , j9 96 al`er objections to title and survey have been erred, whichever date is later (the Closing Date); however, r an in r p � 7 clays apps val has been obtained pursuant- to f 8 assumption p f�'iu-ggraph 4, the Closing Data shall be extended up to 15 days only if necessary to comply with lender's closing requiremen (for example, survey, insurance pole, prpp�y reps, closing documents). If either party fails to close this sale by tIho Closing Daft:,, the non-defanl cantsincxl in para Pte' shall be entitled to exercise the remedies mph 15. AL Closing Seller shall furnish tax statements or certificates showing no delinquent taxes, and a General Warranty Deed conveying good and indefe+r able tide showing no additional exceptions to those permitted in Paragraph la. POSSESSION: S�Ller shall deliverb. posse�saon of theFroperty to $oyer on olodito and fundis in its present or required repaired condition, subject to the dollar limitations of Paragraph 7, ordinary wear and tear excepted. An possession by Buyer prior to closing or by Seller after closing that is not authorized by a temporary Iease form promujgatod by TREC or required by the parties shall est�lish a landlord -tenant at sufferance relationship between the parties. Consult your insurance ugeru priorm c.*ange ofpgxressio� Its insurance coveragentay be!united orterminared. 11. SPECL L ]PROVISIONS: [Insert only facer>a1 statomentss and business details applicable to this sale- A licensee shall not add to a promulgated carnest money contract farrij facittal statements or business deWis for which a contract addendum, lease or other form has been promulgated by TREC for madatory use. 22 TAC §537.11 (d)_] BUMS admawlodaoa dakant taxis an propapyi Century 21 ftw tiers *W io delay rept of peal Estate ccmmWion unt,, sinal payment ae outlined in attached Owner Finamin0 Addendurn. Owner may caaaidat ofbw attars an property until oioac USUAQ a96M to scale addilionai bonus o/ .- k. . Buyers may not dement structure on oroparty tat I full and final paiytMard as Outlined in dexter 1 Man ng Addendum, 12_ SALES EXPENSES: The following exile las shall be paid at or prior to closing: A- Appru ,-al fees shall be paid by B. The Intal of loan discount and buydown fees (including any Texas Veterans' Housing Assistance program participation Fec) shall not exo-cd 0.000% of the loan of which Seller shall pay the first 0,1100%r�zinder. of the loan and Buyer shall pay the C. Seller's Expenses: lZeleascs of existing liras, including prepayment penalties and recording fees; release of Sdjer's loan Liability; tax stsitcments or certificates; preparation of det,-dr one-half of escrow fee; and other expenses stipulated to be paid by Seller under otherprovisions of this contracts D. Buyer's Expenses_ Loan application, o taction and cormnitment fees; loan assumption costs r test of flus[ [o secure , preparation and recording of assumption; hide. required expenses incident to new loarn(s): (for example, PMI premiu.m,pr�paration of loan documcuts, survey, recording fens, tax Survice and rc�arch fees, warehouse or underwriting fees, copies of restrictions and easements, amorti2lation schedule, ptatniums for ma bvagee title policies and eadorsemcmts required by lender, credit reorts, photos; required premiurns fvr,Hoo and hazard insurance; required reserve deposit for i A //I�nct,ran premirw]fi and ad Initiated for identification by Buy P"4 and SellerW1W7.t:&7fi TREC Na: 2a-2 Rfrttetl with +5uiat:antraa software. wrotiaally Products, r>C low West t�tretlne, smot3 (8001322-1x78 File Name: TAYLOR FRAME RESIDENCE N.89*40'00"E. 171.25' —I. DRAINAGE t UNRY EASWOn -40' BUILDING LINE EASEMEN N.89'53'55" W. 173.34' N. GRAVEL CIRCLE (50' R.O.W.) 58.8° ;-o 6 FRAME RESIDENCE 00 ul I � Vll b EXHIBIT SHOWING EXISTING STRUCTURES & SETBACKS GALBREATH ADDITION LOT 1, BLOCK 1 MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FROM: SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING MARCY RATCLIFF, PLANNER SUBJECT: BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CASE #BZA96-27 GATEWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES MEETING DATE: MONDAY, JULY 1, 1996 Staff recommends the Board of Zoning Adjustment approve the request to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for 3300 Grapevine Mills Parkway legally described by metes and bounds as follows: 1 > Section 53.H.2.A., Landscaping Requirements require that whenever an off- street parking or vehicular use area abuts a public right-of-way, except a public alley, a perimeter landscape area of at least fifteen (15) feet in depth shall be maintained between the abutting right-of-way and the off-street parking or vehicular use area. The proposed variance is to allow a five (5) foot reduction in the required fifteen (15) foot perimeter landscape area.. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a ten (10) feet perimeter landscape area as shown on the site plan. 2. Section 53.H.2.C., Landscaping Requirements require the perimeter landscape areas to contain at least one (1) tree for each fifty (50) lineal feet or fraction thereof of perimeter area. The proposed variance is to allow the elimination of required trees in the required landscape areas of the fuel line easement. If approved, it would allow only grass to be placed in the fuel line easement as shown on the site plan. 3. Section 60., Sign Standards require any functional type sign a minimum ten (10) foot setback. The proposed special exception is to allow any functional type sign a five (5) foot encroachment into the required ten (10) foot setback. If approved, it would allow any functional type signs to have a minimum five (5) foot setback as shown on the site plan. Staff finds special conditions exist for the proposed variances and special exception because of the relocation of the fuel line easement. The fifty (50) foot width of the fuel line easement creates a physical hardship for the signage and for planting landscaping other than grass because no structures, trees or shrubs are allowed in the easement. Signs set back from fifty (50) to sixty (60) feet of the property line would not be visible. The relocation of the fuel line along the major thoroughfare creates visibility problems for signage and a reduced amount of landscaping materials but creates a lot that is developable. The fuel line easement was formerly down the middle of the lot. An application was submitted to the Department of Development Services by Fred Brodsky for Gateway Center Associates. Mr. Brodsky is concerned with the physical constraints on his property as a result of the fuel line easement relocation. O:1BZA196-27.4 E CITY OF GRAPEVINE _ BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATI -� SUBMITTED BY D �/ GATEWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES, LTD. MAY 2 8 APPLICANT Z NAME: GATEWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES, LTD. 2. ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 3. 4. 5223 Royal Lane Dallas, Texas 75229-5526 214/692-9090 FAX: 214/692-9094 PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: GATEWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES, LTD. 5223 Royal Lane Dallas, Texas 75229-5526 214/692-9090 FAX: 214/692-9094 STREET ADDRESS AND LOT, BLOCK AND SUBDIVISION NAME OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (SURVEY ATTACHED) Tract of land containing 33.398 acres situated in the heirs of James Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 586 and the Henry Suggs Survey, Abstract No. 1415, in the City of Grapevine, Tarrant County, Texas. 5. LIST THE PERTINENT SECTION(S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND INDICATE THE SPECIFIC VARIANCE AMOUNTS BEING REQUESTED. Section 53H -2a: Request 15' requirement between street and parking be reduced to 10'. Section 53H -2c: Request requirement for landscaping of parking areas with trees and shrubs be reduced to only grass. Section 601-5a: Request on -premise sign setback be reduced from 10' to 5'. CITY OF GRAPEVINE FMAY BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION 6 GATEWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES, LTD. 6. STATE THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST AND DETAIL ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH CAUSE HARDSHIPS THAT IN YOUR OPINION JUSTIFY THE VARIANCE(S) OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S) YOU ARE REQUESTING. EXAMPLES OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE: HILLS, VALLEYS, CREEKS, POWER POLES, ELEVATIONS, IRREGULAR LOT OR TRACT SHAPES, ETC. THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT MUST DETERMINE A SPECIAL CONDITION OR CONDITIONS EXIST(S) BEFORE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST, A. REDUCE 15' REQUIREMENT BETWEEN STREET AND PARKING TO 10': In order to accommodate the planning of the Grapevine Mills Mall, Gateway Center Associates has agreed to relocate the existing 50' Citgo gas easement. The new location of the pipeline conflicts with the setback requirements of the City of Grapevine; consequently, it becomes economically onerous to accommodate an exclusive 50' right of way in addition to the City's statutory set -back requirements. B. LANDSCAPING EXCEPTION FOR TREE PLANTING ON PARKING AREAS: A hardship exists because of the easement created by the Citgo gas line which requires that no trees be planted in the easement, thus creating a physical constraint which makes planning the site impossible. Should Gateway Center Associates be required by the City of Grapevine to include trees in the landscaping of the parking areas, and the only logical place within the site for parking is the Citgo easement which precludes the planting of trees. Consequently, a substantial portion of the site becomes unusable. C. REDUCE 10' SIGNAGE SETBACK TO 5': The 50' exclusive Citgo gas line easement precludes any signage or landscaping. The only logical location for the Citgo easement parallels Anderson Gibson Road and International Parkway (FM 2499). Maintaining the 10' setback imposes a substantial economic hardship on the landowner. We request, therefore, that the 10' signage setback be reduced to 5'. D. ALLOW UTILITIES AND SIGNAGE TO COEXIST: The 50' exclusive Citgo gas line easement does not allow any other utilities to coexist in that easement except to cross the easement in which case a minimum of 18" separation is required by Citgo. The signage and landscape area therefore is critical to allow for utility laterals and access to utility mains. CITY OF GRAPEVINE L81 DBOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION MAY 2 GATEWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES, LTD. 7. EXPLAIN ANY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, IF APPLICABLE, NOT CONSIDERED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE. EXAMPLES: (1) IF THE GRAPEVINE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PLAT PRIOR TO PRESENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS; OR (2) THE ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED OR A POLICY CHANGE WAS ADOPTED AFTER INITIATION OF THE PLANS CHECK PROCESS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT OR OTHER PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. The relocation of the Citgo gas pipeline and easement necessitated by the development of the Grapevine Mills Mall has caused the above conflicts to occur, thus prompting this request. Although this request is for an adjustment to the current zoning requirements, it is our intention to meet the spirit of the ordinance in all ways possible regarding the setback and landscaping requirements. 8. ATTACH A DETAILED DIAGRAM OF THE SITE DRAWN TO SCALE, AND ANY OTHER DRAWINGS OR PICTURES NECESSARY TO HELP EXPLAIN THE CASE TO THE BOARD. SHOW ON THE DIAGRAM ALL EASEMENTS, BUILDING LINES, ENCROACHME THE VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED. THE REQUESTED VARIANCES) SH BY AN APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT (DISTANCE, PERCENTAGE, n M �� 2 81996 APPLICANT (PRINT OR TYPE) S REIMISSAN�E 41, INC., ITS GENEkAt-15ARTNER APPLICANT SIGNATUR DARLA C. BRODSKY, PRESIDE OWNER (PRINT) GATEWAY CENTER ASSOCIATES, LTD. h �Y: DALLAS $,ENAISSANC;; #1, INC., ITS GENERAL PARTNER OWNER SIGNATUR SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS 20 DAY OF 19�& t i��Far ►��r 10 ANNE HARK Notary Public. state of Texan uy eorermsion Expires to O(VARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS 10/2�'�9� SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO THIS ,Z�'DAY OF Pat - 19% f =�tAaY'Gb (^ JO RNNU HARN aoa+ry oaf , stue of Taxa )b1n DIRECT QUESTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT (817) 481-0377 FAX NUMBER (817) 424-0545 DEL/VERY ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD, ROOM 209 P.O. BOX 95104 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 GRAPEVINE, TX 76099 9 Concept Plan of Signage Easement Areas Gateway Center Associates, Ltd. Parcel at Grapevine Mills 7�WP7 0 50' 100° 200' March 26, 1996 Signage Ise Area Architectural C k Hunt0 ign euro tateraational Parkwa..s Signage Use Area Architectural International M Gateway Property Sign curb /Signage B Use Area Cinema Architectural S°gn 20.i Feature '� .I Gateway y Property ,�5•z Sign � R rooms --�, s 76.4' COt10111101 ti�2d8XT curb of Ramo asci \temauoua P•rkwy I• o a z Ii■ml ■ ■ tir•� ■ ■ tttttttl■ ®■ ■ ■ trrrrr■L ■,i■ n■■■ Perimeter Easement Area B-1 33.398 Ac. 50' Exclusive Fuel Line Easement A _Project Entry Landscape Easement International Parkway FM - 2499 60 s.f. 6 maximum Grade Gateway Property Sign (as Allowed by Current Code) 10' Landscape/ Utility Easement Proposed Gateway Property Sign Subject to Approval by the City of Grapevine Da Project Entry Landscape Easement E"'CE� ,V E � mv- '264�, Landscape/ ; . ■ Utility Easement t.. t; ;`r::i1 � ■ 10' Landscape/ Utility Easement Proposed Gateway Property Sign Subject to Approval by the City of Grapevine Da Project Entry Landscape Easement E"'CE� ,V E � mv- Project Entry W Landscape r F:> '� • Easement .N 10' Landscape/ Utility Easement Proposed Gateway Property Sign Subject to Approval by the City of Grapevine Da Project Entry Landscape Easement E"'CE� ,V E � mv- STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, May 13, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Chris Coy Chairman Ery Meyer Secretary Randy Howell Vice -Chairman Carl Hecht Member Jill Davis Member constituting a quorum with 1st Alternate Dennis Luers absent. Also present was Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Scott Williams Building Official Marcy Ratcliff City Planner Gerrie Anderson Administrative Secretary Chairman Chris Coy called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-18 submitted by Trisha Wood, representing GRACE, who requested a variance for the west portion of Block 3, Grapevine Service Center Addition, addressed as 604 Shady Brook Drive. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82- 73, as follows: Section 54 Masonry Requirements which requires all structures in the Governmental Use District to have at least seventy (70) percent of the total exterior walls constructed of masonry. The special exception request is to allow a one hundred (100) percent reduction of the exterior masonry requirement. If approved, it would allow a structure to be moved onto the site with no exterior masonry. Scott Williams stated that Staff recommends approval and finds that a special condition does exist for the request. He explained the structure has historic value BZA Minutes 5/13/96 that Staff feels would be compromised by the addition of a masonry exterior. As this building was originally designed without masonry veneer, the energy and expense of adding masonry would preclude its utilization, resulting in its demolition, and the loss of a resource. Three responses were received, one for the request and two against. Mr. Williams noted that City Council approved the Move -In Building Permit on May 7, 1996, pending the variance. With no other guests to speak, Carl Hecht moved to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis Nays: None Absent: Luers Scott Williams noted that this building will be used as a retail thrift shop. A building permit will be obtained and it will be inspected and issued a Certificate of Occupancy. Carl Hecht made a motion that a special condition did exist and being the structure is of historic value and is being moved to the GRACE facility. The existing structure would be compromised by the addition of a masonry exterior. The location of the structure will not be visible from the street and barely visible from adjacent properties. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyers, Howell, Hecht, Davis Nays: None Absent: Luers A motion was made by Carl Hecht to approve the variance to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 54, Masonry Requirements to allow a one hundred (100) per cent reduction of the exterior masonry requirement to allow a structure to be moved onto the site with no exterior masonry at 604 Shady Brook Drive. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyers, Howell, Hecht, Davis Nays: None Absent: Luers 2 BZA Minutes 5/13/96 The next item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-13, submitted by MasterPlan who is requesting the following variances and special exceptions to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Bear Creek Park Addition, 3230 South State Highway 360: Section 15.17.2., "R-7.5", Single Family District Regulations which requires a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. The proposed variance would allow a 5,000 square foot reduction of the minimum lot size. Section 15.G.1., "R-7.5", Single Family District Regulations which requires a minimum front yard setback of 30 feet. The proposed variance would allow a 14 foot encroachment into the required front yard setback. Section 15.G.2., "R-7.5", Single Family District Regulations which requires a minimum rear yard setback of 25 feet. The proposed variance would allow a 2 foot encroachment into the required rear yard setback. Section 15.G.4., "R-7.5", Single Family District Regulations which requires a minimum lot width of 65 feet. The proposed variance would allow a 15 foot reduction of the minimum lot width Section 15.G.5., "R-7.5", Single Family District Regulations which requires a minimum lot depth of 100 feet. The proposed variance would allow a 50 foot reduction of the minimum lot depth. Section 38.J., Governmental Use requires landscaping in accordance with Section 53, Landscaping Regulations. The proposed special exception would exempt the lot from landscaping requirements of Section 53, Landscaping Regulations. Marcy Ratcliff stated Staff found a special condition for the request because the proposed location of the antenna is on top of an existing TU Electric tower in a TU Electric easement within a City of Grapevine Public Park. Park land is considered open space. Only the tower area is being platted and needs variances because it does not meet the minimum lot requirements. This is scheduled to go before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council on Tuesday, May 21, 1996 to consider a Special Use Permit to allow an antenna on top of an existing structure. 3 BZA Minutes 5/13/96 William Cothrum (500 South Ervay Building, Dallas, Texas), representing Primeco Communication Service, explained his case to the Board. There was no one else to speak for or against the request and there was no written correspondence. Randy Howell questioned Mr. Cothrum on the height of the extension. Mr. Cothrum replied that the height of the extension will be 6 % feet and 10 to 12 feet in a triangular area. Mr. Cothrum further explained that an 8'x 8' prewired cabinet would be located at the base of the tower and would locked at all times. With no further discussion, Carl Hecht made a motion to close the public hearing. Randy Howell seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis Nays: None Absent: Luers Carl Hecht then made a motion that a special condition did exist for Board of Zoning Adjustment Case BZA96-13, being the applicant is only platting an area covered by an existing TU Electric tower and is located in an easement within the City of Grapevine's Bear Creek Park and the reason for platting is so the applicant can submit an application for a Special Use Permit to the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Randy Howell seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis Nays: None Absent: Luers A motion was made by Carl Hecht to grant the variances to Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, for 3230 South State Highway 360, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Bear Creek Addition as follows: Section 15.17.2., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations granting a 5,000 square foot reduction of the minimum lot size, allowing a minimum lot size of 2,500 square feet. 4 BZA Minutes 5/13/96 Scott Williams explained Staff found no special condition for the request and that the proposed residence has adequate off-street parking and garage space without the addition of the second garage. Mr. Williams also explained that a second garage could be placed on the property in compliance with the deed restrictions, however, staff feels that the unusual shape of the cul-de-sac lot warrants consideration. Darrell Bruce (2605 Pinon Court, Grapevine, Texas) representing Riviera Residential Properties, Inc. explained the garage must be placed at a lesser angle in order to get the boat in the garage. He explained he could get a 90 degree angle on this garage, keeping the house with the same garage visibility to the street if the house was pushed back 75 feet. If the house is pushed back, it would improve the angle but would give the same visibility from the street. Mr. Bruce noted in order to help reduce the visibility, he would be willing to build a six (6) foot privacy fence across the front of the garage. The garage would only be used for boat storage and would not be open all the time. Mr. Bruce showed pictures of other houses in the subdivision that has the California swing type of garage entry at a 90 degree angle. Scott Williams explained the deed restrictions require the garage to be perpendicular (90 degrees) to the front building line. On a regular rectangular lot, it faces the side property line. On a cul-de-sac lot, it tends to be more visible from the front building line. Kim Gill (3131 Turtle Creek Boulevard, Suite 950, Dallas, Texas 75201) representing Mockingbird Development explained this section is more restrictive than Section II of Western Oaks and feels that this particular case because of the shape of this lot, does not believe it violates the spirit of the restrictions. Ms. Gill does felt that with the shape and depth of the lot the garage will not be visible . This is a small cul-de- sac street with only 7 lots, so the proposed garage would not be as visible. Schelling (601 West Wall Street, Grapevine, Texas) explained he was on the �terrinCommittee for the Builder's Association of Tarrant County. He noted that e was going to be in the Kaleidoscope of Homes. Mr. Schelling explained when they were at the point to rezone the property, Mayor Tate said that he wanted it to be equal dignity to the neighbors to the west, an average minimum lot size of 12,000 sq. ft, and there were no front entry garages. He feels it meets the spirit of the restrictions being equal dignity to what is existing to Western Oaks. G BZA Minutes 5/13/96 With no one else to speak either for or against the request and no written correspondence, Randy Howell made a motion to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis Nays: None Absent: Luers MISCELLANEOUS <REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION Board Members discussed the progress of the proposed Mills Mall project. Councilman Traverse explained Tax Abatement measures relating to the Mills Project. With no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Howell, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 1996. ATTEST: SECRETARY CHAIRMAN 6 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, June 3, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Chris Coy Ery Meyer Carl Hecht Jill Davis Dennis Luers Chairman Secretary Member Member 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum. Also present were the following City Staff: Scott Williams Building Official Marcy Ratcliff City Planner Kelly Prater Building Inspection Secretary Chairman Chris Coy called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-15 submitted by Paul Dennehy of Dennehy Architects representing Delaney Vineyards who requested a variance for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Delaney Vineyards Addition, specifically addressed as 1900 Champagne Boulevard. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 23A., "GV" Grapevine Vintage District prohibits parking lots as a principal use. Off-street parking is allowed as an accessory use to a principal use. The variance request is to allow development of an accessory off-street parking lot without the development of a principal use as shown on the site plan. The subject property was rezoned April 16, 1996 from "R -MF -2" Multifamily District to "GV" Grapevine Vintage District. This variance request was tabled at the May 6, 1996 Board of Zoning Adjustment meeting until tonight's meeting. BZA Minutes 6/03/96 Marcy Ratcliff, Planner, explained Staff found a special condition for the request because the applicant is proposing to develop an off-street parking lot to serve the overflow needs of the wine production building across the street. Currently, the overflow traffic is parking in the grass where the parking lot is proposed to be located. The variance, if approved, will go away with the development of a principal use on the property. Future development or expansion will be required to provide the necessary off-street parking. Paul and Sandra Dennehy, 3124 College Avenue, Fort Worth, Texas, Dennehy Architects spoke to the request. Mr. Dennehy related he had met with the neighborhood after the last meeting and had been able to reconcile some of the misunderstandings about the request. Chris Hall, 5118 Heatherdale, Grapevine, Texas, spoke in favor of the case. He told the Board that his house backs up to the proposed parking lot and he has no objections to granting the request. Vivian Douglas, 1811 Branch Hollow, Grapevine, Texas, former President of the Homeowners Association also spoke in favor of the request. She also commented she believes the Grapevine Vintage District will be an asset to the area. Ery Meyer moved to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None After a brief discussion, Ery Meyer moved that a special condition did exist and that being the applicant is proposing to develop an off-street parking lot to serve the overflow needs of the wine production building across the street. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Ery Meyer moved, with a second by Carl Hecht, to grant the variance request to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 23A., "GV" Grapevine Vintage District for Lots 1 and 2 , Block 2, Delaney Vineyards Addition, specifically addressed as 1900 Champagne Boulevard, to allow the development of an accessory off-street parking lot without the development of a principal use as shown on the site 2 BZA Minutes 6/03/96 plan. The motion prevailed as follows:: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-17 submitted by Bryan Burton requesting variances for Tract 9133K, Abstract 518, A. Foster Survey, specifically addressed as 907 West Texas Street. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 15.G.1., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a thirty (30) foot front yard setback. The variance request is to allow an eight (8) foot encroachment into the required thirty (30) foot front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty-two (22) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Section 15.G.4., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a lot width of sixty- five (65) feet. The variance request is to allow a five (5) foot reduction from the required sixty-five (65) foot lot width. If approved, it would allow a lot width of sixty (60) feet as shown on the plot plan. Section 15.G.5., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a one hundred (100) foot lot depth. The variance request is to allow a twelve (12) foot reduction to the required one hundred (100) foot lot depth. If approved, it would allow a lot depth of eighty-eight (88) feet as shown on the plot plan. Section 15.F.6., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a minimum floor area not less than twelve hundred (1,200) square feet of floor area. The proposed variance would allow a one hundred -fifty (150) square foot reduction of the required floor area. If approved, it would allow a floor area of 1,050 square feet. 3 BZA Minutes 6/03/96 Section 15.F.1., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a lot size of seventy-five hundred (7,500) square feet. The proposed variance would allow a 2,124 square foot reduction from the required seventy-five hundred (7,500) square feet. If approved, it would allow a 5,376 square foot lot size. Ms. Ratcliff explained Staff found a special condition exists for the request in that the size of the lot can not be increased because of existing adjacent development. The proposed house size is not excessive. The variances proposed are generally conforming to the existing development in the neighborhood. Mr. Bryan Burton was present to answer questions relative to the case. One letter was received in favor of the request. Another letter was received to inform us he no longer owns the property. Carl Hecht moved to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None After a brief discussion, Carl Hecht moved that a special condition exists and that being the size of the lot can not be increased because of existing adjacent development; and the proposed house size is not excessive. These proposed variances are generally conforming to the existing development in the neighborhood. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Carl Hecht moved, with a second by Jill Davis, to grant the variance requests to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 15.G.2., 15.G.4., 15.G.5., 15.F.6., 15.F.1., Single Family District Regulations for Tract 9133K, Abstract 518, A. Foster Survey, specifically addressed as 907 West Texas Street, to allow a seventeen (17) foot rear yard setback; a lot width of sixty (60) feet; a lot depth of eighty-eight (88) feet; a floor area of 1,050 square feet; and a 5,376 square foot lot size. The motion prevailed by the following vote: 4 BZA Minutes 6/03/96 Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-20 submitted by Phil Morley who requested variances for the Lots 1-16, Block 1, Azalea Court Addition. The requests were to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 15.G.1., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require reverse frontage lots to have two thirty (30) foot front yard setbacks. Reverse frontage lots are lots whose rear is adjacent to another lot's side yard. Lots 1 and 16 are considered reverse frontage lots because their rear yards are adjacent to the side yard of the Abundant Life Church and the Grant Pittard Addition. The variance request is to allow Lots 1 and 16 a fifteen (15) foot reduction of the required front yard setback along Wall Street. If approved, it would allow a fifteen (15) foot front yard setback along Wall Street. Section 15.6.2., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. The variance request is to allow Lot 16 a five (5) foot reduction of the twenty-five (25) foot required rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow Lot 16 a twenty (20) foot rear yard setback. Section 15.G.4., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a ninety-five (95) foot lot width for a reverse frontage lot. The variance request is to allow Lot 1 to have a seventeen (17) foot reduction and Lot 16 to have a four (4) foot reduction from the required reverse frontage lot width. If approved, it would allow Lot 1 to have a minimum lot width of seventy-eight (78) feet and Lot 16 to have a minimum lot width of ninety-one (91) feet. Section 15.G.5., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a one hundred (100) foot lot depth. The variance request is to allow Lot 16 an eleven (11) foot reduction of the one hundred (100) foot lot depth. If approved, it would allow Lot 16 an eighty-nine (89) foot lot depth. 5 BZA Minutes 6/03/96 Section 15.H., "R-7.5" Single Family District Regulations require a forty (40) foot buffer yard adjacent to a non-residential district. The variance request is to allow Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 a fifteen (15) foot reduction of the forty (40) foot buffer yard. If approved, it would allow Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 a twenty-five (25) buffer yard adjacent to a non-residential district. Ms. Ratclif explained Staff found a special condition for variance requests #2 and #4 for the rear yard setback and lot depth of Lot 16. City Staff worked diligently with the applicant to align Azalea Court with Azalea Drive. The alignment requirement creates the physical hardships for this lot. Ms. Ratcliff further explained Staff did not find any special conditions for variance requests #1, #3, and #5. The applicant would be able to meet the requirements if he were not developing so may lots. The buffer yard requirement is in place to separate residential uses from commercial uses. Lots 5, 6 and 7 especially need a buffer yard because of the Northwest Plaza Development. Lots 8 and 9 will be impacted with future development. The applicant has submitted a final plat application for Azalea Court Addition for the June 18, 1996 City Council Meeting. Philip Morley (210 South Park Boulevard Suite 100, Grapevine, Texas) explained his case to the Board. Mr. Morley noted that he had been working with the Engineering Department to align Azalea Court with Azalea Drive. Grant Pittard (1364 West Wall Street, Grapevine, Texas) spoke in opposition of the case. Mr. Pittard stated the development is inappropriate and does not conform to the surroundings. Tim Lancaster (2010 Forest Hills Road, Grapevine, Texas) stated to the Board that he supports Staff's recommendation. Carl Hecht questioned Mr. Morley on how many house could be built if no variances were granted. Mr. Morley replied a minimum of three (3) lots would be lost if variances were not granted. Three letters of objection were received. With no other guests to speak to the request, Carl Hecht moved to close the public hearing. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis and Luers R BZA Minutes 6/03/96 Nays: None Carl Hecht moved no special condition exists for the request. Ery Meyer seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Meyer, Hecht, and Davis Nays: Coy, Luers Mr. Morley noted to the Board that Lot 16 is losing thirty-eight (38) feet because the Engineering Department has requested him to. align Azalea Court with Azalea Drive. The average lot size in this Azalea Court Addition is 8,500 square feet. Mr. Morley proposed an alternative of approval on the buffer and he would do away with the Lot 16. Ery Meyer moved, with a second by Jill Davis, to table the variance requests to the next Board of Zoning Adjustment meeting on July 1, 1996. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-23 submitted by John Daloise representing Standard Building Systems requesting a special exception for Lot 1, Block 6, W.R. Boyd Center, addressed as 204 North Dooley Street. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures allows the Board of Zoning Adjustment the ability to approve the remodeling or enlargement of a nonconforming use when such an enlargement would not tend to prolong the life of the nonconforming use. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the special exception request, it would allow a 4,800 square foot metal building expansion of an existing non -conforming use in a Community Commercial District as shown on the site plan. Marcy Ratcliff explained Staff found a special condition for the request in that this is an existing industrial use and development. The applicant is using an existing slab that is in place. This will give the Board an opportunity to require screening that is not currently there. The development occurred before the 1984 City Rezoning. 7 BZA Minutes 6/03/96 John Daloise (7538 Malabar Lane, Dallas, Texas) explained his case to the Board. No written correspondence was received. Ms. Ratcliff noted to the Board that the front parking lot recently was landscaped. Ms. Ratcliff recommended that the Board specify an exact fence height of six (6) to eight (8) feet. City staff recommends that a solid screening around the entire perimeter of the storage area be provided. Mr. Daloise added the :large tanks will- be moved, within the building or behind the screening. Only the buildings, cars, and landscaping will be visible. Ery Meyer moved to close the public hearing. Dennis Luers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None After a brief discussion, Ery Meyer moved a special condition does exists for the request being that this is an existing industrial use and development. The applicant is using an existing slab that is in place. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Ery Meyer moved, with a second by Carl Hecht, to grant the special exception to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, Section 43.E.3., Nonconforming Uses and Structures for Lot 1, Block 6, W.R. Boyd Survey, specifically addressed as 204 North Dooley Street, to allow 4,800 square foot metal building expansion of an existing nonconforming use as shown on the site plan with the stipulation that the storage area be screened with a six (6) foot solid fence. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider were the minutes of the May 6, 1996 meeting. N BZA Minutes 6/03/96 Ery Meyer moved to approve the minutes of the May 6, 1996 meeting as amended. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Scott Williams discussed submitted plans for the CMPA office building located at, 1450 Hughes Road. Children's Courtyard second addition located at 5200 Champagne Boulevard is underway. The ground breaking for the Mills Mall is set for June 26, 1996 at 10:00 a.m. With no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Coy, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 1 ST DAY OF JULY, 1996. ATTEST: SECRETARY V1 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE The Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Grapevine, Texas met on Monday evening, July 1, 1996, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit: Randy Howell Vice -Chairman Ery Meyer Secretary Carl Hecht Member Jill Davis Member Dennis Luers 1 st Alternate constituting a quorum with Member Randy Howell arriving at 6:20 p.m.. Also present was City Councilman Roy Stewart and the following City Staff: Marcy Ratcliff City Planner Kelly Prater Building Inspection Secretary Acting -Chairman Ery Meyer called the meeting to order at 6:10 P.M. Kelly Prater administered the Oath of Office to Ery Meyer, Carl Hecht, Jill Davis, and Dennis Luers to serve as regular Board of Zoning Adjustment Members. The first item for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider was BZA96-20 submitted by Phil Morley representing Morley Architects who requested to withdraw the variance requests for Lots 1-16, Block 1, Azalea Court Addition. Carl Hecht moved, with a second by Jill Davis, to withdraw the variance requests from the agenda for Lots 1-16, Block 1, Azalea Court Addition. The motion prevailed as follows: Ayes: Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Absent: Howell BZA Minutes 7/01/96 Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-24 submitted by Phil Morley representing Morley Architects who requested to withdraw the variance request for 2112, 2133, and 2134, Block 2, J.J. Daniel Addition, specifically addressed as 224, 218, and 212, West Daniel Street. Carl Hecht moved, with a second by Jill Davis, to withdraw the variance requests from the agenda. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Absent: Howell Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-25 submitted by Valerie Head who requested a variance for the Lot 5R, Block 31, City of Grapevine Addition and specifically addressed as 205 East College Street. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 58.B., Parking and Loading Area Standards require all off-street parking areas and driveways to be paved to a minimum standard equivalent to four (4) inches concrete slab with six (6) inches by six (6) inches by six (6) gauge mesh or two (2) inch hot mix asphaltic concrete over six (6) inch crushed rock base. The proposed variance would allow the deletion of paving for a driveway approximately 169 feet long. If approved, it would allow a gravel drive to be installed to serve as vehicular access from College Street as shown on the plot plan. Marcy Ratcliff, Planner, explained to the Board Staff found a special condition for the request and that being the applicant is attempting to replicate a historically correct architectural environment. The use of gravel for the driveway, therefore, would be appropriate in this situation. Ms. Ratcliff added the plans for the house were reviewed and approved by the Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission. Board Members expressed concerned about the outcome of the Historic Preservation Commission's review of the house plan showing the gravel drive. 2 BZA Minutes 7/01/96 Mrs. Ratcliff told the Board there was no one present to address the request. She also noted the applicant suggested the property could possibly be a Bed and Breakfast in the future. With no other guests to speak to the request, Carl Hecht moved to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Meyer, Hecht, Davis and Luers Nays: None Absent: Howell Carl Hecht noted that in this particular area the driveways are paved. Board members expressed disappointment that the applicants were not present at the public hearing to answer their questions relative to the request. Carl Hecht moved no special condition could be found for the request. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Absent: Howell Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-26 submitted by Lloyd and Drusilla Galbreath who requested a special exception and variances for proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Galbreath Addition, addressed as 1618 North Gravel Circle. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 13.G.1., "R-20" Single Family District Regulations require a forty (40) foot front yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a twenty-one (21) foot reduction from the required forty (40) foot front yard setback. If approved, it would allow a nineteen (19) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Section 13.G.2., "R-20" Single Family District Regulations require a twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. The proposed variance would allow a three (3) foot reduction from the required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback. If approved, it would allow a twenty-two 3 BZA Minutes 7/01/96 (22) rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Section 13.G.5., "R-20" Single Family District Regulations require a lot depth of one - hundred (100) feet. The proposed variance would allow a twenty-two (22) foot reduction from the required one -hundred (100) foot lot depth. If approved, it would allow a lot depth of seventy -eighty (78) feet as shown on the plot plan. Section 13.G.7., "R-20" Single Family District require only one single-family detached dwelling shall be permitted on each lot. The proposed special exception would allow two (2) existing dwellings to remain on the lot. If approved, it would allow two (2) structures to remain on the lot on a temporary basis. Mrs. Ratcliff explained Staff found a special condition for the request being the house was built prior to annexation into Grapevine City Limits. No inspections are required in the county. The depth of the lot cannot be increased due to existing development. Mrs. Ratcliff added the applicant is proposing to purchase a tract of land adjacent to the east side of their current property. The tract of land has an existing principal structure the applicant has promised to remove. The applicant cannot remove the additional principal structure until they close on the property. The property cannot be closed upon until it is platted. It cannot be platted until variances are approved. Druisilla Galbreath (1618 North Gravel Circle, Grapevine, Texas) was present to speak on behalf of the request. She reassured the Board that the structure to the West would be demolished. One letter of approved was received. Randy Howell moved to close the public hearing. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None After a brief discussion, Carl Hecht moved a special condition does exists for the request being the house was built prior to annexation into Grapevine City Limits, no inspections are required in the county, and the depth of the lot cannot be increased due to existing development. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: U1 BZA Minutes 7/01/96 Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Carl Hecht moved, with a second by Jill Davis, to grant the variances and special exception to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Galbreath Addition, specifically addressed as 1618 North Gravel Circle. Section 13.G.1., "R-20" Single Family District Regulations to allow a twenty-one (21) foot reduction from the required forty (40) foot front yard allowing a nineteen (19) foot front yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Section 13.G.2., "R-20" Single Family District Regulations to allow a three (3) foot reduction from the required twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback allowing a twenty-two (22) foot rear yard setback as shown on the plot plan. Section 13.G.5., "R-20" Single Family District Regulations require a lot depth of one -hundred (100) foot lot depth allowing a lot depth of seventy-eight (78) feet as shown on the plot plan. Section 13.G.7., "R-20" Single Family District Regulations to allow two (2) existing dwellings to remain on the lot allowing two (2) structures to remain on the lot on a temporary basis. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Next for the Board of Adjustment to consider was BZA96-27 submitted by Fred Brodsky representing Gateway Center Associates who requested a special exception and variances for 3300 Grapevine Mills Parkway, legally described by metes and bounds. The request was to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73, as follows: Section 53.H.2.A., Landscaping Requirements require that whenever an off-street parking or vehicular use area abuts a public right-of-way, except a public alley, a perimeter landscape area of at least fifteen (15) feet in depth shall be maintained between the abutting right-of-way and the off-street parking or vehicular use area. The proposed variance is to allow a five (5) foot reduction in the required fifteen (15) foot perimeter landscape area. If the Board of Zoning Adjustment approves the request, it would allow a ten (10) foot perimeter landscape area as shown on the site plan. Section 53.H.2.C., Landscaping Requirements require the perimeter landscape areas to contain at least one (1) tree for each fifty (50) lineal feet or fraction thereof of perimeter area. 5 BZA Minutes 7/01/96 The proposed variance is to allow the elimination of required trees in the required landscape areas of the fuel line easement. If approved, it would allow only grass to be placed in the fuel line easement as shown on the site plan. Section 60., Sign Standards require any functional type sign a minimum ten (10) foot setback. The proposed special exception is to allow any functional type sign a five (5) foot encroachment into the required ten (10) foot setback. If approved, it would allow any functional type signs to have a minimum five (5) foot setback as shown on the site plan. Mrs. Ratcliff explained Staff found a special condition for the request because of the relocation of the fuel line easement. The fifty (50) foot width of the fuel line easement creates physical hardship for the signage and for the planting landscaping other than grass because no structures, trees or shrubs are allowed in the easement. Signs setback from fifty (50) to sixty (60) feet of the property line would not be visible. The relocation of the fuel line along the major thoroughfare creates visibility problems for signage and a reduced amount of landscaping materials but creates a lot that is developable. The fuel line easement was formerly down the middle of the lot. The fuel line is being realigned with the Grapevine Mills Mall Development. She also noted a proposed amendment will be going before City Council regarding sign height. The applicant was present to answer question relative to the request. Fred Brodsky (5223 Royal Lane, Dallas, Texas) explained due the Mill's restrictions, they will not compete with the Mall for two years after the grand -opening. They currently have agreements with the Mills to put signs on their land. Randy Howell noted that the signs would have to be placed sixty (60) feet off the property line if the variance was not granted. Jill Davis moved to close the public hearing. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None After a brief discussion, Jill Davis moved that a special condition does exists for the request due to the relocation of the fuel line easement. Randy Howell seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None P BZA Minutes 7/01/96 Jill Davis moved, with a second by Randy Howell, to grant the variances and special exception to the Grapevine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 82-73 for proposed 3300 Grapevine Mills Parkway, legally described by metes and bounds. Section 53.H.2.A., Landscaping Requirements to allow a five (5) foot reduction in the required fifteen (15) foot perimeter landscape area allowing a ten (10) foot perimeter landscape area as shown on the site plan. Section 53.H.2.C., Landscaping Requirements to allow the elimination of required trees in the required landscape areas of the fuel line easement allowing only grass to be placed in the fuel line easement as shown on the site plan. Section 60., Sign Standards to allow any functional type sign a five (5) foot encroachment into the required ten (10) foot setback allowing any functional type signs to have a minimum five (5) foot setback as shown on the site plan. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Randy Howell opened the floor for nomination of officers for the 1996-97 term for the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Dennis Luers nominated Randy Howell as Chairman for the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Ery Meyer seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Randy Howell nominated Ery Meyer as Secretary for the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Carl Hecht seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Jill Davis nominated Carl Hecht as Vice -Chairman for the Board of Zoning Adjustment. Ery Meyer seconded the motion, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider were the minutes of the May 13, 1996 meeting. W BZA Minutes 7/01/96 Ery Meyer moved to approve the minutes of the May 13, 1996 meeting as amended. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None Next for the Board of Zoning Adjustment to consider were the minutes of the June 3, 1996 meeting. Ery Meyer moved to approve the minutes of the June 3, 1996 meeting. Jill Davis seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None kTA 6-14: U 4"al 111118601401&1 Me Mrs. Ratcliff explained that at the June 13, 1996 Board of Zoning Adjustment meeting the Board requested changing the sign height because it is a zoning issue not a variance issue. The Planning and Zoning Commission will be meeting on July 16, 1996 to discuss the sign ordinance which could eliminate the twenty (20) foot pole sign encouraging monument signs. Mrs. Ratcliff updated the Board on current development. Mrs. Ratcliff announced Ex -Chairman Chris Coy has been appointed to serve as a regular member of the Planning and Zoning Commission. With no further discussion, Ery Meyer made a motion to adjourn. Carl Hecht seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Howell, Meyer, Hecht, Davis, and Luers Nays: None The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1996. W BZA Minutes 7/01/96 AI AN ATTEST: SECRETARY