Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-01-28j ]p P nly milli - The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in a workshop session Monday, January 28, 1985, at 7:00 P.M. in the Conference Room, Room 204, of the Police-Library Building, 307 West Dallas Road, with the following members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Ordinance Mop-Up Committee present, to wit: Sharron Spencer Chairman Ron Cook Vice Chairman Gerald Norman Men-ber Harlen Joyce Member with the following City Staff, to wit: H.T. (Tommy) Hardy Director of Community Development Joy Carroll Planning Aide Sue Martinez Secretary Al Dugger Asst. Director of Public Works 0015 &*1 •, Chairman Spencer declared that the meeting was in session and stated the procedures and purposes of the meting. The Committee reviewed and made recommendations for amendments to the following draft copy sections of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. There was discussion relative to Conditional Uses. The item changes in this section were suggested as follows: Item A, Permitted Uses, Number 4, It was suggested to eliminate the words, governmental and administrative use.. It was also suggested to eliminate Numbers 5 and 6 from this item. Item B, Accessory Uses, Number 2, the words advertising uses on the premises are to be inserted following the word Signs. Item C, Conditional Uses, It was suggested to eliminate Number 4d. Item F, Density Requirements, Number 5, Maximum Impervious Surface, it was recommended to change (4 0) percent to (70) percent. Item K, Off-Street Parking, It was suggested to change (10) feet to (50) feet and (5) feet to (10) feet. SECTION 53 - LANDSCAPING REGULATIONS Item A, Purpose, It was suggested to eliminate the words the functional and to change the word landscape to landscaping. It was also suggested to change the last sentence to read as follows: These regulations provide standards and criteria for new landscaping which are intended to enhance the value of property, promote the welfare, and improve the physical appearance of the City. Item B, Scope, The zoning codes R-20, R-7.5 and R-12.5 are to be inserted before the words siLi2le family. Item C, Enforcement, It was suggested to change the words Director of Public Works or his designee to Director of Community Development. Item E, Landscape Plans, It was suggested fifteen (15) days after submission from the suggested to eliminate the words landscape knowledgeable in plants, materials and lane to eliminate the words within first paragraph. It was also P&Z Minutes January 28, 1985 Page 2 Item. H, Minimum Requirements for Off - Street Parking and Vehicular Use Areas, Number 2 a., It was suggested to change (50) feet to (40) feet. Number 2 b., It was suggested to change (3) feet to (6) feet. Itern I, Landscaping Requirements for Non-Vehicular Open Space, Number 1, It was suggested to insert the word LLying before the word landscape. Number 3 b., It was suggested to change (10) percent to (15) percent. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION Following discussion and suggested amendments to the sections of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, it was mentioned that in the next "CMUC" CamLittee meting, discussion will be relative to the Sign Ordinance, more specifically (Off-premise and Portable) signs. There being no further review or recommended amendments to the sections of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, the meeting was considered adjourned at approximately 9:20 P.M. P,APSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING CCMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 2 5- V-4, DAY OF 1985. i'i Cha i rman F-AVVVF;w cretary • 0- V NEI W *'A' The Planning and Zoning Cam-Lission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in a Workshop session Tuesday, January 29, 1985 at 7:00 P.M. in the Conference Roam at 307 West Dallas Road, Grapevine, Texas; with the following members of the Planning and Zoning Commission present, to wit: Sharron Spencer Pon Cook Harlen Joyce Gerald Norman Shane Wilbanks Peggy Engholm Richard Atkins with the following City Staff, to wit: H. T. (Tommy) Hardy Joy Carroll A. L. Dugger, P. E. Mary Peddycoart. Director of Community Development Planning Aide Assistant Director of Public Works Secretary Chairman Spencer declared the meting was in session and stated the procedures and purposed thereof. The Committee was to review the amendments made by the Ordinance Mop-Up Committee of the Planning and Zoning Commission with regard to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. N_ F-0-JOWC911 IM = The OMUC Ccra-aittee has really not made any changes in this whatsoever. There's really not a whole lot that can be done. Marlin Smith has drafted this very closely in line with the College Station Ordinance; which, .. has stood up in court. We do expect a change in paragraph E, as relates to the payment of cash in lieu of open space. The College Station Ordinance has a provision giving their City Council the right to veto any offer of cash in lieu of land. In other words, they had the right to determine which of the two it would be. The OMC Committee does not read the Grapevine Ordinance in that way, therefore, Marlin is going to clarify it and give the Council the absolute clear cut right. You will note that the Parks and Recreation Board has met and they have had a change of heart, and decided this is a good idea and they will support it after all. Parks is mainly concerned with Item 3, which deals with maintenance over the years for open space which would be kept as a private area onto a specific subdivision without dedicating it to the City. Apparently two (2) of their members lived in other states, and were involved in a situation like this, and after ten (10) to twelve (12) the private open space land had the appearance of a ghetto. It appears that as the homes are resold, after a number of years, the new homeowners really do not want anything to do with this open space area and its upkeep. Parks and recreation is extremely concerned about this. This needs to be worked out in a workshop or something! Item 4, is something that we will probably also get into in a workshop. They are wanting the nuxdmum size tract to be 2/3 acre rather than 15,000 square feet. This is a size that is workable; it is a developable size which will provide more amenities. It is not so small that they have difficulty getting things in there and still have room enough. Kevin has pretty well dug his heels in on Item 4, and that is that. Parks and Recreation further feels that the 1/2 mile radius distance from subdivision should be extended. Section 21, B delete the following wording: "except for customary home occupations" Section 21, B, 1. add, it has to be 60 feet from residential area with an eight foot fence. Section 21, B, • delete this section Planning and Zoning Workshop Minutes January 29, 1985 Page 3 Section 21, C, 4. delete this section Section 21, C, 5. delete the following wording: "provided the number of beds do not exceed twelve per gross acre". Section 21, E, 1. change the word required to "approved" Section 21, E, 2. change the word required to "approved" Section 21, F, 3. change 20% to "25V In the second para. under F,3. change 250 square feet to "300 square feet" Section 21, F, 6. change minimum floor area in efficiency to 750 sq. ft. Section 21, 1, 1. change to two (2) stories/ thirty (30) feet. Section 21, 1, 3. delete this section. Section 21, M, 3. delete this section after the word degrees. Section 21, M, 4. change 80 to "60" Section 21, M, 7. change from six (6) to eight (8) foot fence. delete "or other landscape material" SECTION 22 - R-MF-2 - MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT REGULATIONS Section 22, (Purpose) change the word should to "shall" Section 22, B, delete the following words: "except for customary hom occupations" Section 22, B, 1. add: If within 60 feet of residential district, then must have an eight (8) foot screening fence. Section 22, B, 6. delete this section Section 22, C, 4. delete this section Section 22, C, 5. should read as follows: Nursing homes. Section 22, E, 1. change from required to "approved" Section 22, E, 2. change from required to "approved" Section 22, F, 1, e. need definition of "non-vehicular open space" Section 22, F, 3. second para. change to 300 Section 22, F, 6, a. efficiency changed to 750 sq. ft. Section 22, 1, 1. change to two (2) stories not to exceed 30 feet Section 22, 1, 3. delete this section. Section 22, M, 3. delete sentence after degree. Add: when adjoining residential district - one (1) story not to exceed 25 feet. Section 22, M, 4. change to 60 ft. Section 22, M, 7. eight (8) foot fence SECTION 23 - LB - LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT Section 23. (Purpose) key words are "daily necessity" Section 23, A, 1. eliminate the following: art, appliances, antiques, garden supply, hardware, variety and "similar uses" Planning and Zon' Workshop Minutes January 29, 1985 Page 4. 1 Section 23, A, 2. delete all wording after mailing. Section 23, A, 3. delete this section Section 23, A, 6. delete this section Section 23, A, 7. delete from this section and move to Conditional Uses Section 23, B, 1. change to 8 foot fence Section 23, B, 4. change to 50 feet Section 23, C, 4. this section moved from permitted uses. "Food and Convenience Stores" Section 23, D, 2. change to 2,500 square feet Section 23, F. Marlin Smith would like to change the nave of this section to "Bulk & Intensity of Use Requirements" Ordinance Mop-Up Committee could not live with "Bulk". It is the decision of the Planning & Zoning Cc nuLssion at this workshop session to keep the term "Density" as it is throughout the ordinances. Section 23, 1, 1. change to read one (1) story or twenty-five (25) feet Section 24, A, 7. Section 24, A, 11. Section 24, A, 13. Section 24, A, 14. Section 24 A. 15. Section 24, A, 17. Section 24, A, 18. Section 24, B, 3. move this section to Community Commercial District move this section to Ccmunity Commercial District move this section to Highway Coftmrcial District move this section to Cammnity Conmrcial District move this section to Community Commercial District delete this section delete this section change 30 feet to "50" feet Section 24, B, 4. change to "8" foot fence Section 24, C, 5. move this section to Conditional Uses under Ccnm=ity Commercial District. Section 24, C, 6. Section 24, D, 1. Section 24, D, 2. Section 24, E, 1. Section 24, E, 2. Section 24, F, 1. Section 24, F, 2. move this section to Ccmmmity Commercial District change to 100,000 square feet (10,000 each) change to five (5) acres change require to "be approved" change require to "be approved" need to verify o.25. change to five (5) acres Planning and Zoning Workshop Minutes January 29, 1985 Page 5. Section 24, M, 1. add ® at least 30 feet from residential area on a concrete pad Section 24, M, 4. no alleyways will be allowed to satisfy this regulation 8 foot fence should be included, berm to be removed. The above mentioned changes, deletions, etc, were gone over with the Planning and Zoning Commissions in this Workshop Session by Chairman, Spencer. The changes (except keeping the term "Density") were made by the Ordinance Mop-Up Committee and read to the Planning and Zoning Commission Members. At this point in this workshop the numbers or acres of land necessary to build a shopping area in the CN District was discussed. At present the acreage is set at (5) acre parcels. The members took an informal vote and arrived at (8) acre parcels for this district, which would only take effect if the LB District was not made a part of the current commercial zoning in the City. If the TB District is made a part of the zoning ordinances, they would recommend that the acreage for CN be only (5) acres. M11 w"MOLIlLwallwasweill Section 25, A, 4. move this section to Highway Commercial District Section 25, A, 6. move this section to Highway Commercial District Section 25, A, 10, 11, 12 & 13 move these sections to Highway Qrmrcial District Section 25, A, 14. move this section to Conditional Uses in CC District Section 25, B, 4. change to "5011 feet Section 25, B, 5. change to "8" foot fence SECTION 26 - HC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS Section 26, A, 1. move this section to Conditional Uses Section 26, A, 8. change to "8" foot fence Section 26, A, 12. combine this entire section with section 26,A,13 Section 26, A, 20. delete "business services and" Section 26, A, 23. add - "in an enclosed building" Section 26, A, 24. move this section to Conditional Uses Section 26, A, 27. delete this section Section 26, A, 30. move to either CC or LI Section 26, A, 33. move to either CC or LI Section 26, A, 34. delete this section Section 26, B, 3. change to "50" feet Section 26, B, 5. change to "8" foot fence Section 26, C, 4. need to be checked as to what is meant by emergency services or deleted entirely. Section 26, 1, 1. change to 30 feet, and if adjacent to residential district then one (1) story not to exceed 25 feet Planning and Zon' Workshop Minutes January 29, 1•85 Page 6. 1 Section 26, M. 4. change to "8" foot fence Section 26, M, 6. this section to be added - All sales and/or display areas and storage areas should be fenced with a 7 ft. fence During this workshop session it was discussed that members may wish to specify that driveways will only be on major highway side of lot, ie, State Highway. SECTION 27 - P-0 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT RELATIONS Section 27, A, 3. delete this section Section 27, A, 7. delete "real estate agent" fran this section Section 27, A. 7. move "funeral home" to Conditional Uses Section 27, C. add "funeral home to this section Section 27, D. Could possibly add "real estate agent" in this section Section 27, E, 1. & 2. add the wording "to be approved" to each of these sections Section 27, H. change from one and one half height of structure to read two times height of structure or 25 feet, whichever is greater. In no case shall it be less than 25 feet. Section 27, 1, 3. this section to be added. Next to residential district - one (1) story, not to exceed 25 feet Section 27, M, 1. add on concrete pad for garbage Section 27, M, 4. add screen from residential area with an "8" foot fence PPY'vPTM1 ?Q - TT(°`Ci PCYPVr. ANT) MPPMATP OP'PTrP T)Tqq'PTrT PM7-Tr.AFPT(Wq Section 29, A, 4. should read - Offices for business or professional uses. Section 29, A. 5. delete this section Section 29, A. 6. delete this section Section 29, A, 15. add this section - Restaurants Section 29, B, 2 change to read - uses on premise - Sect. 60 Section 29, C, 1. delete this section Section 29, C, 4. d. delete this section Section 29, D. 20 percent retail Section 29, H. (need to check with Marlin for rewriting) Section 29, K. change 10 feet to "50" and change 5 feet to "10" SECTION 53 - LANDSCAPING REGULATIONS Section 53, A. delete the word functional and add "ing" to landscape change pramte to "enhance" and change enhance to "promote" It was determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission Men hers that in Section 53, each time Director of Public Works is listed change same to "Director of Community Develor-ment". Planning and Zoning Workshop Minutes January 29, 1985 Page 7. Section 53, E. sentence should end after the word architect. Section 53, G, 8. this section to be added to read: "There shall be no clear cutting at any time". Section 53, H, 2, a. change to "40" feet (as per current ordinance) Section 53, H, 2. b. change to not less than "6" feet in height Section 53, 1, 1. change to read: "other living landscape materials Section 53, 1, 3. this section needs to be defined Section 53, 1, 3. b. change from ten percent to fifteen (15) percent At this time Mr. Tommy Hardy, suggested that developers/builders be required to install sprinkler systems in the required landscaping Section 53, J. More -information and explanation is needed on this entire section. Information and explanation will be obtained from Tony Wiles. As this completes sections gone over by the Planning and Zoning Commission at this workshop session, Chairman Spencer asked for a motion to have Tony Wiles incorporate into his word processor all changes and suggestions, and request a workshop with the Council, Planning and Zoning, Tony Wiles and Marlin Smith at the first possible date so that the previously mentioned questions can be ironed out. Mr. Ron Cook requested that Tony Wiles meet with the Planning and Zoning Commission first, before any workshop with the Council. Mr. Harlen Joyce made a motion to the effect that the Planning and Zoning Commission meet with Tony Wiles at the first possible date to go over questions and suggestions from the Planning and Zoning Can-nission. This being prior to any meeting with the Council. This motion was seconded by Mr. Ron Cook, and prevailed by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Norman, Wilbanks, Atkins and Engholm Nays: None After a short period of discussion, Chairman Spencer asked for a motion to adjourn this workshop meeting. A motion to adjourn was made by Mr. Ron Cook, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Norman, Wilbanks, Atkins and Ehgholm Nays: None The workshop meting adjourned at approximately 9:35 P.M. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONINIM-, I • • THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS • THIS THE _L" DAY • 1985. Secret 'r I