The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986-02-25WIN% min #1 L"MMAKIN '0211 k The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine met in Regular Session at approximately 7:30 P.M. February 25, 1986 in a Joint Public Hearing with the City Council in the Council Chambers at 413 Main Street. At the end of the Public Hearing portion, the Planning and Zoning Commission remained in Council Chambers, and the Council Members retired to the conference room of the same building. This meting had been rescheduled from February 18, 1986 at which time the Planning and Zoning Commission did not have a quorum present to hear any of the agenda items. At this rescheduled meting the following Planning and Zoning Commission Members were present to wit: Richard Atkins Ron Cook Harlen Joyce Peggy Engholm Don Florence Catherine Martin Larry Atchley Chairman Vice-Chairman Member Member Member Member Member constituting a quorum., with no absences, and with the following City Staff present to wit: J. R. Baddaker, P.E. H. T. (Tommy) Hardy Albert L. Dugger, P.E. John S. (Stan) Laster John Boyle Joy Carroll Mary Peddycoart Director of Public Works Director of Community Development Assistant Director of Public works Assistant Director of Public Works City Attorney Administrative Assistant Secretary Chairman Atkins called the Planning and Zoning portion of the meeting to order at approximately 8:05 P. M. Grapevine Zoning Ordinance 82-73 Section 26,D. 2.B (Proposed Amendment to �h�a Commercial District Regulations) Following discussion and review regarding the proposed amended wording to Section 26, D,2.; John Boyle, City Attorney, suggested that Staff get all facts before Grandfathering certain businesses that do not front on a State Highway, but are zoned as HC. (example - business fronting on Wall Street, and parallel to Northwest Highway) Tommy Hardy, Director of Ccmunity Developiwnt then indicated that the Staff was making an inventory of existing businesses fronting only on a street that is other than a State Highway. It was further suggested by John Boyle that the City set a Moratorium for these business, with this Moratorium only applying to new permits. John Boyle's office has rewritten Section 26,D.2.a and 26,D.2.b. to read as follows: D: LIMITATION OF USES: 2. (a) All property zoned HC, Highway Commercial, shall have driveway access and frontage in accordance with Section 26, paragraph G.l, only from a State Highway. (b) Additional driveway access on a corner lot from other that a State Highway, for the intersecting street only, may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council with the filing of a concept plan in accordance with Section 45. For purposes of this Section 26,D., corner lot shall man a lot located at the juncture of a State Highway and a street which intersects such State Highway. As the Members had no further questions or comments regarding this rewording, a motion was made by Catherine Martin to recommend that Council approve this amended wording of Section 26,D.2.a. & b. A second to this motion was made by Harlen Joyce. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Planning and Zoning February 25, 1986 Page 2. Ayes: Martin, Joyce, Atkins, Cook, Florence, Engholm and Atchley Nays: None NEW BUSINESS CU-86-01 - North Seafood p, •ba, Silverhook Seafood Restaurant This conditional use permit is for the requested on premise sale, consumption and storage of alcoholic beverages. Joy Wells was present to represent this application for conditional use permit. After a brief period • discussion between the Planning • and • Zoning • Members and John Boyle regarding the 50%/50% alcoholic beverage/ food ordinance, and the fact that this is a monthly tabulation, there was no further discussion. At this time a motion was made by Peggy Engholm to recommend that Council approve this Conditional Use Application. This motion was seconded by Don Florence, and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Engholm, Florence, Atkins, Cook, Joyce, Martin and Atchley Nays: None Amendment to Section 47, Site Plan Review and Section 53,H.l.a., Landscap gulation The amendments to both of the above sections were discussed together. With regard to Section 47, after a short period of discussion it was brought up that these changes would make things easier • the builders. It was also mentioned that these changes would not change the final item. With regard to Section 53, H.1.a., after a period of questions from the Board to the Staff concerning size of island being directly relative to the size of the tree, to be saved, it was recommended by Mr. Tommy Hardy that this item be tabled for further study. As there was no further discussion on either • the previously mentioned sections, a motion was made by Catherine Martin to recommend that Council accept the revisions to Section 47, Site Plan Review and reconmnd that the amending of Section 53, H.1.a. be tabled. This motion was seconded by Peggy Engholm, which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Martin, Engholm, Atkins, Cook, Joyce, Florence and Atchley Nays: None Replat - Lot 32-R, Block 4 - Placid Penninsula The owner of this property, Mr. Phillip Barnwell, was present representing this replat. There followed a brief discussion regarding the location of the proposed hcme on this plat, followed by a motion by Harlen Joyce to reccmend that Council approve this replat. This motion was seconded by Larry Atchley, and prevailed • the following vote: Ayes: Joyce, Atchley, Atkins, Cook, Engholm, Florence and Martin Nays: None Planning and Zoning February 25, 1986 Page 3. Final Plat - Timberline South With regard to this final plat, there was much discussion pertaining to Heritage Drive between the Planning and zoning Commission, Joe Wright and John Powell, representing Starnes and Associates. After this period of discussion, a motion was made by Harlen Joyce to recommend that Council approve this final plat, which was seconded by Catherine Martin. The ration prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Joyce, Martin, Atkins, Cook, Florence, Engholn and Atchley Nays: None Parking of Recreational Vehicles in Required Front Yard The purpose of this discussion is to determine whether a public hearing should be scheduled with regard to amending the City Ordinance prohibiting the parking of recreational vehicles in the required front yard of all residential districts. Chairman Atkins asked the Members, as a body, how they felt about this ordinance and how they felt about advertising for a public hearing for same. The consensus seem to be from the Members that the ordinance should be upheld. There was no recommendation for a Public Hearing. Minutes for meeting dates of January 13, & 21, and February 4, 1986 The next item for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission was the Minutes of January 21, 1986. There were questions regarding Z86-02 and Z85-26, and it was requested that these two items be checked by the secretary. At this point, a motion to table these minutes was made by Catherine, Martin, which was seconded by Peggy Engholm. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Martin, Engholm, Atkins, Cook, Atchley and Florence Nays: None The next set of minutes for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission were from January 13, 1986. As there were no additions or changes noted, a motion was made by Harlen Joyce to approve these minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Ron Cook, and prevailed as follows: Ayes: Joyce, Cook, Atkins, Florence, Atchley, Engholm and Martin Nays: None The last set of minutes for consideration by the Planning and zoning Commission were minutes from February 4, 1986. There were no additions or changes noted, and a motion was made by Peggy Engholm to approve these minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Harlen Joyce, and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Engholm, Joyce, Atkins, Cook, Martin and Atchley Nays: None Abstain: Florence Planning and Zon February 25, 198 Page 4. 1 W"161=2111-11 . •+1' W Z11 As there was no further business to discuss, a mtion to adjourn was n-ade by Larry Atchley and seconded by Ron Cook. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Atchley, Cook, Atkins, Joyce, Enghoh-n, Martin and Florence Nays: None A PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND 0 j7G Ca'O'ISSION OF THE CITY OF DAY " GRAPEVINE, TEXAS ON THIS THE 42� F 1986. PR�ED -. CliaErman Wwig Sed—retary /p