Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-07-15The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Regular Session in a joint public hearing with the City Council in Council Chambers, 413 Main Street, on Tuesday, July 15, 1986, at approximately 7:30 P.M. and later at 311 Main Street, with the following members present, to wit: Richard Atkins Ron Cook Peggy Engholm Catherine Martin Larry Atchley Ervin Meyer Gil Traverse Chairman Vice-Chairman Member Member Member Member Member constituting a quorm, with no absences, and the following City Staff, H.T. (Tommy) Hardy Joy Carroll Marcy Ratcliff Doug Eberhart Adrienne Leonard Mary Peddycoart Director of Community Development Administrative Assistant Planning Technician Engineer Attorney, City Attorney's Office Secretary Chairman Atkins called the meeting to order at approximately 9:00 P.M. and explained the purposes thereof. I 'I Q 10i 2AM ti first item for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Ccnrdssion was a zoning change frcm. R-20 to 8-12.5 on 5.4790± acres to be called High Country II located on the West side of Parr Road. Present at the meting to represent this request was Fred Joyce. There was much discussion between the commission members with regard to this area of the City being the last remaining "country". The discussion centered around the possibility that if this request was approved for R-12.5 zoning more would follow, and that perhaps there would no longer be any R-20 zoning on the South side. After this period of discussion, a motion was offer by Peggy Engholm to recommend that Council deny this request to change to R-12.5 zoning. This motion was seconded by Catherine Martin and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Engholm, Martin, Atkins and Meyer Nays: Atchley, Cook and Traverse 06 P.141 51 W Allcllff��ffi *11 This zoning change request is for 1.985 acres of land located at the Northeast corner of the S.H. 26 and Ball Street intersection. The request is to change the present zoning of "LI", Light Industrial to "CC", Community Commercial. Representing the request was Gordy Henry. Mr. Henry was questioned extensively during the public hearing portion of the meeting, and during this portion of the meeting there was much deliberation between the Planning and Zoning Members as to the use of this particular tract. There was comment that the members would rather see a concept plan for the entire tract and not just a mall portion of same. At this time a motion was made by Catherine Martin to recommend that Council deny this zoning request. This motion was seconded by Peggy Engholm and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Martin, Engholm, Atkins, Cook, Atchley, Meyer and Traverse Nays: None Planning and Zoning July 15, 1986 Page 2. This zoning change request is for 10.188 acres located at the Northwest intersection of S.H. 114 and Wm. D. Tate, West of Wal-Mart and North of the Fina Station. The request is to change from "PCD", Planned Coin-nercial to "CC" Commmity Ccmuercial. Mr. Tommy Hardy advised that the developers are trying to resolve some problems • this tract, and that he would therefore reccumend that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend denial without prejudice. After a short period of discussion, a motion was made by Larry Atchley to recommend that Council deny, but in a cooperative spirit. To this motion a second was offered by Catherine Martin, and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Atchley, Martin, Atkins, Cook, Engholm Traverse and Meyer Nays: None Ni •�Wwogvuej kTA I &I This zoning request is for 3-4 acres • land located East • W.T. Parr Road, West of Woodland Hills in Woodland Estates. Current zoning is R-7.5 and the requested zoning is for R-20. Following a brief period of discussion, a motion was made by Peggy Engholm to recommend that Council approve this request for rezoning. This motion was seconded by Larry Atchley, and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Engholm, Atchley, Atkins, Cook, Martin Meyer and Traverse Nays: None The next item for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission is an amendment to section 25, "CC", Community Commercial District; to allow car washes under this section as a conditional use. There was much discussion between the members with regard to the possible addition of special wording to the design requirements section under the conditional use section as shown in the Con7mmity Commercial District Requirements. Further, the Staff advised that so far they had been unable to obtain car wash data from other cities, and that they would like more time to be able to get this information together. At this time a motion was made by Peggy Engholm to table to let Staff have more time to obtain additional information and to set up a workshop to discuss this within the next 45 days. This motion was seconded by Ervin Meyer and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Engholm, Meyer, Atkins, Cook, Martin, Atchley and Traverse Nays: None 112 111011 1 fl I The next item for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission is an amendment to Section 26 regarding driveway placement on other than a State Highway. A motion was made by Gil Traverse to recd mend that Council approve the amended wording. The motion was seconded by Ervin Meyer, and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Traverse, Meyer, Atkins, Cook, Engholm, Martin and Atchley Nays: None Planning and Zoning July 15, 1986 Page 3. The next item for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Con-mission was an amendment to Section 51.D, Open Space Committee. In order to prevent a tie vote, and in order to furnish the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council a true recommendation, it is felt that an additional member to this Committee is necessary. At this time, a motion was made by Peggy Engholm to recommend that Council approve the amendment to the Open Space, section 51.D to include that the additional member be named from the Zoning Cam-assion. The motion was seconded by Catherine Martin and the vote was as follows: Ayes: Engholm, Martin, Atkins, Cook, Atchley, Meyer and Traverse Nays: None M,R "F., "no-9 amaelpsaw The purpose of this replat is to divide the lot into two (2) lots in order to sell one of the lots. As this plat was reviewed during the public hearing portion of the meeting, and as there were no further ccoments by the Planning and Zoning Commission; a motion was made by Ervin Meyer to recommend that Council approve this replat. This motion was seconded by Larry Atchley and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Meyer, Atchley, Atkins, Cook, Engholm, Martin and Traverse Nays: None REPEAT OF LOTS 0-2 & 0-3, O"DELL SUBDIVISION The purpose of this replat is to combine two (2) lots into one (1) lot. This property had at one time been split from one lot into three (3) lots. At this time, a motion was made by Catherine Martin to recommend that Council approve this replat. A second to this motion was made by Peggy Engholm, and the vote was as follows: Ayes: Martin, Engholm, Atkins, Cook, Atchley, Traverse and Meyer Nays: None 11 111 TIFFIN The purpose of this replat is to relocate a lot line to save some large trees. The staff recommends approval. As little deliberation was necessary, a motion was made by Catherine Martin to recommend that Council approve this replat. This motion was seconded by Larry Atchley, and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Martin, Atchley, Atkins, Cook, Engholm, Meyer and Traverse Nays: None The next item for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission was the final plat for the Winding Creek II subdivision. At this time in the proceedings, Doug Eberhart asked if this item could be moved on down the list as everyone was waiting for Kevin Conklin, Director of Parks and Recreation to return from Council deliberations regarding the park land dedication or cash-in-lieu of for this same subdivision, and their decision may have some bearing on this final plat. Planning and Zoning July 15, 1986 Page 4. Chairman Atkins indicated that he had no objection to this suggestion, and then moved • to the next item. The next item for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission was the preliminary plat of High Country, Phase III. Prior to any discussion, it was pointed out by Tommy Hardy that this was the platting for the zoning case by the same name which was considered earlier on this agenda. As the reccmendation from the Planning and Zoning Cormission was denial for the requested zoning change, then the recommendation for the preliminary plat should also be denial. At this time, Chairman Atkins asked for a motion. Catherine Martin made a motion recaimending that Council deny this preliminary plat. This motion was seconded by Peggy Engholm and the motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Martin, Engholm, Atkins, Cook and Meyer Nays: Traverse and Atchley ly-aw"2014 - - * 411516110414 The next item for consideration was the preliminary plat for Heritage Industrial Park. There was much discussion with regard to both the signalization of the railroad crossing and of the signalization at the proposed intersection of Heritage and S.H. 26, and whether or not these would be paid by developer contribution. A motion to recomend that Council approve this preliminary plat and that Council further negotiate for participation for the cost of the signalization of Heritage and S.H. 26 was made by Ron Cook and seconded by Catherine Martin. At this time Doug Eberhart requested that as a part of the above motion the following wording be added, "with the staff's requested changes". Ron Cook at this time amended his motion to also read "with the staff's requested changes". Catherine Martin then amended her second to this same motion. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Cook, Martin, Atkins, Engholm, Atchley, Traverse and Meyer Nays: None Next for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Ccm-nission was the preliminary plat for Dove Duplexes located at the NW corner of the intersection of Dove and Dove Loop Roads. Following a short period of discussion a motion was made by Ron Cook to recommend that Council approve this preliminary plat subject to changes shown on the plat check list. To this motion a second was offered by Larry Atchley. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Cook, Atchley, and Traverse Nays: None Atkins, Engholm, Martin, Meyer The definition of "Denial" will be found in Section 67 A.3. Definitions of "Density" and "Commercial Laundry" are found in Section 12. After a review of all the definitions, a motion was made by Ron Cook to recommend that Council approve all definitions as submitted. Peggy Engholm seconded this motion, which prevailed as follows: Planning and Zoning July 15, 1986 Page 5. Ayes: Nays: Cook, Engholm, Atkins, Martin, Atchley, Traverse and Meyer None XGUR"K21VAN W to , The first set of minutes for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission was from the Special Session of April 24, 1986. As there were no comments or corrections, Catherine Martin made a motion to approve these minutes as submitted. This motion was seconded by Larry Atchley, and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Martin, Atchley, Atkins, Cook and Engholm Nays: None Abstain: Meyer and Traverse The next set of minutes for consideration were those from a Special Workshop Session of June 12, 1986. Ervin Meyer made a motion to approve these minutes with the following change. Insert Larry Atchley as having made the second to adjourn the meeting, and remove Richard Atkins' name from that same second. This motion was seconded by Larry Atchley and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Meyer, Atchley, Atkins, Cook, Martin and Engholm Nays: None Abstain: Traverse The final set of minutes for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission was from the Regular Session of June 17, 1986. As there were no comments or corrections, a motion was made by Ron Cook to approve the minutes as submitted. Catherine Martin seconded this motion, which prevailed as follows: Ayes: Cook, Martin, Atkins, Engholm, Atchley, Meyer and Traverse Nays: None At this point in the meeting, Chairman Atkins began deliberations for the above captioned final plat. Doug Eberhart returned from City Hall and advised that City Council was just at this moment voting on the Winding Creek II Plat with regard to cash-in-lieu of park land. The Council's decision was at this time unknown. At this time, it was determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission that this plat was not acceptable as the preliminary plat for Winding Creek II had actually expired. After much discussion as to the legality of this plat and as it was determined to be expired, Chairman Atkins asked if there was a motion. It was further mentioned that two (2) of the street names would be changed prior to being filed at the Court House. Chairman Atkins reminded the Staff that the Commission would like these street names to be changed prior to the final platting consideration. This would apply to all final plats to come before this board. After more deliberation with regard to this plat, a motion was rendered by Catherine Martin to deny this final plat because of expiring preliminary plat, and the other reasons stated and that it doesn't meet the requirements. This motion was seconded by Peggy Engholm and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Martin, Engholm, Atkins, Cook, Atchley, Meyer and Traverse Nays: None Planning and Zonint July 15, 1986 Page •. As there was nothing further for discussion by the Planning and Zoning Commission, a motion to adjourn was made by Peggy Engholm and seconded by Gil Traverse. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Engholm, Traverse, Atkins, Cook, Atchley, Martin and Meyer Nays: None PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PIANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF TBE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE �' DAY OF 1986. APPROVED: FWAy 09-W Secreta* /p