The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-11-16CALL TO ORDER The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Grapevine, Texas, met in Regular Session, Tuesday, November 16, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. in the Civic Center, 311 Main Street, following a joint Public Hearing with the City Council in the Council Chambers, 413 Main Street, with the following members of the Planning and Zoning Commission present, to wit: Sharron Spencer Chairman Ron Cook Vice Chairman Hanle Joyce Member Ann Glynn Member Klee Hawkins Member Tom Powers Member Gerald Norman Member Constituting a quorum, with no absences and the following City Staff, to wit: J.R. Baddaker Public Works Director Ttmmy Hardy Building Official Joy Welch Secretary CALL TO ORDER The meting was then called to order by Chairman Spencer who then informed those present of the procedures and purposes of the meting. ZONING APPLICATION Z82-49-KEENAN YATES-ADVERTISING, INC. The first item for consideration by the Commission was Zoning Applica- tion Z82-49 submitted by Keenan-Yates Advertising, Inc. for the purpose of making a recommendation to the City Council. In the earlier public hearing session, Mr. Baddaker introduced Steven Hennigan who explained that a zoning change from "R-1" to "I-1" on 18.436 acres located at the NE corner of Minters Chapel Road and State Highway 114 had been requested. He further advised that an automatic zoning of "R-1" was placed on the property when it was annexed into the City. There were no other persons to speak and no letters or petitions were received. The Commission discussed the types of signs to be used, traffic flow and proposed usage of the property. Mr. Hardy answered questions from the Commission, and advised that applicant had met requirements of the City and did comply with the Master Plan. There being no further discussion, Chairman Spencer called for a motion. Harlan Joyce so moved to recommend approval of the the zoning change as requested. Tom Powers seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Joyce, Cook, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman Nays: None ZONING APPLICATION Z82-50-CAPCON PROPERTIES The second item for consideration by the Commission was Zoning Application Z82-50, submitted by Capcon properties for the purpose of making a recommendation to the City Council. P & Z Minutes 11-16-82 Page 2 Mr. Baddaker introduced Mr. Donald Plunk of Capcon properties who outlined the development plans for the (the southwest corner of Peach Street and Boyd Drive and the southeast corner of Wildwood Drive and Boyd Drive). He further advised that he was requesting to change the zoning from "C-2" Community Buiness to "PD" Planned Development for multi-family dwellings. Mr. Plunk reported that a traffic study had been conducted indicating a reduced flow from Community Business if the area is approved for multi-family dwelling, that the plat was in compliance with the master plan, and that late January or early February was the projected date for submittal of a site plan. Mr. Rex Scott, 1166 Butterfield, spoke on behalf of some of the property owners advising that those he represented were in favor of the zoning change, one of the main reasons being reduced traffic flow. Further discussion from the Commission centered on parking requirements and density. Ron Cook then made a motion to recommend approval of the zoning change as requested with the provision for minimal 2 2 parking spaces per unit for Tract I and the portion of Tract II not specified for twelve (12) dwelling units per acre. The density requirements for the portion of Tract II, north of the center line of Peach Street should require a denisty of twelve (12) units per acre and be required to provide two and one half (22) parking spaces per dwelling unit; also that the construction standards submitted with the application becom a part of the approved zoning ordinance. Harlen Joyce seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Norman and Hawkins Nays: None The next item for consideration by the Planning and zoning Commission was the replat of the First Baptist Church. During the public hearing portion of the meeting, Mr. Baddaker explained that Tract 51, 53, and 54-55 of the G.E. Hurst Addition and Block 38, Lot I and Block 41, Lot 1 of the Original Town of Grapevine would be combined into one tract and renamed the First Baptist Church Addition if the request was granted. It was noted that the plat conformed to the present zoning ordinance requirements and that a conditional building permit was issued for the construction of the new church building on the property currently zoned C-2. It was also noted that no letters or petitions were received. Following a short discussion, Harlen Joyce made the ration to grant the application as requested, and Ann Glynn seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman Nays: None The next item for consideration by the Commission was the replat of Grapevine Lake Estates submitted by Mr. Matheson. At the earlier public hearing, Mr. Baddaker explained that the request was to combine Lots 1, 2, 4, 5 & 6, Block 2 of Grapevine Lake Estates into two lots, Lot 1-R and 2-R. There were several property owners representing the area in question, and Jimmie Mundell, 3507 Oakwood, Lot 8, stated that he spoke on behalf of the residents in that area, explaining that he was not opposed to to the replat but recommended that the City maintain Lot 1-R for future street expansion purposes. Mr. Baddaker discussed three possible solutions. One being the provision for a through street at Redbird Lane in Placid Penninsula to align with Redbird Lane in Grapevine Lake Estates, the second to provide a turn-a-round, and the third to approve the plat as submitted. P & Z Minutes 11-16-82 Page 3 Mrs. Armstrong advised that a petition had been received, signed by eight residents of Redbird Lane requesting that a cul-de-sac arrangement be considered. The Commission further discussed the best solution to a possible problem which might later evolve from no through street, taking into consideration the suggestions of residents of the area and recommendations of the City Staff. Commission Member Harlen Joyce then made the motion to recommend approval of the plat with the provision that roadway right-of-way be maintained to provide for Redbird Lane in the Placid Peninsula Addition to align with Redbird Lane in Grapevine Lake Estates. The motion was seconded by Tom Powers and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman Nays: None The next item was for the Commission to consider the replat of Rolling Hills Lane Addition for the purpose of making a recommendation to the City Council. Following a brief discussion and review of the replat of Lot 1, Block 2 of this S.E. corner of Rolling Hills Lane and Poole Road which would divide the area into three lots, the general concensus of the Commission was that they saw no conflicts in areas of provision for utilities, easements for roads or zoning ordinance regulations. Gerald Norman made the motion to recommend approval of the replat as submitted. The motion was seconded by Ann Glynn and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Norman, Powers, and Hawkins Nays: None WNISAM • WO - The next item for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission was the final plat of the Lutheran Church Addition for the purpose of making a recommendation to the City Council. Following a short discussion, Member Ann Glynn moved to recommend approval of the plat as submitted. Harlen Joyce seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman Nays: None The next item for consideration by the Commission was the final plat of the Harwell Addition for the purpose of making a recommendation to the City Council. There was a short discussion relating to the temporary cul-de-sac at the north end of the proposed street which was explained by Mr. Baddaker as providing future extension to property to the north. There being no further discussion, Member Harlen Joyce made the motion to recommend approval of the plat as submitted. The motion was seconded by Ann Glynn and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman Nays: None P & Z Minutes 11-4-82 Page 4 INV 0 The purpose of the next item for consideration by the Commission was the Preliminary plat of the Inter -Paint Business Park. The Commission discussed the plat and the possible alignment problem which might be created by Ball Street becoming a collector type street in the future after which Member Gerald Norman then made the motion that the plat be approved contingent upon right-of-way alignment problems being resolved with the City Staff prior to submittal of the final plat. The motion was seconded by Ann Glynn and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Norman and Hawkins Nays: None The next order of business was for the Planning and Zoning Commission to make a reccmendation to the City Council for the purpose of instructing the City Staff on what procedure to use in determining a schedule and case order for rezoning. Having been discussed at the special Planning & zoning Meeting the Previous evening, there was only a short "recap" discussion prior to th e motion. Ann Glynn made the motion to recommend that the Council consider those tracts that were presently zoned 11R-3"Multi-Family and "PD" Planned Development, which were Shown On the Master Plan as low density. It was then discussed that this would be just the first phase, would be reviewed again at the end of a ninty (90) day period. Gerald Norman seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Glynn, Hawkins, and Norman Nays: Joyce and Powers CITIZEN'S REQUEST, MR. TROY FULLER The next item was to enable the Commission to hear Mr. Troy Fuller's Proposals for Property development in Grapevine. Chairman Spencer advised that from time to time developers met with the Commission for the purpose of determining what type of reception might be given particular proposals. Mr. Fuller told the Commission that he had at one time lived in Grapevine and planned to do so again upon completion of a project which he asked Mr. Clyde Hueppelsheuser to describe. Of forty-seven (47) acres fifty-five(55) per cent would be utilized for condominiums in the price range of from $110 to $160 thousand, leaving the remaining forty-five(45) per cent of the property for riding trails, hiking trails, jogging trails, etc. The density per unit would be 42 on the developed property. Mr. Fuller asked for input from the Commission before the actual steps were taken to begin the project. There was much discussion and many questions from the Cam-tission. Mr. Fuller asked that the Commission tour other developments of this type at some future date whereby all or some of the members could participate. The name of the proposed development would be "Bear Run." There was no formal action taken on this matter. P & Z Minutes 11-16-82 Page 5 CONSIDERATION OF THE MI=S OF MEETINGS OF OCTOBER 18 AND 19, 1982 The next item for the Commission's consideration was the minutes of the meetings of October 18 and 19, 1982. This item was tabled until the December 21 meeting from a motion made by Ann Glynn, seconded by Tom Powers and prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Norman and Hawkins Nays: None At approximately 10:20 P.M. Klee Hawkins made the ration to adjourn the meeting. Gerald Norman seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote: Ayes: Spencer, Cook, Joyce, Glynn, Powers, Hawkins and Norman Nays: None PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE ��'_ DAY OF 198/-9, LA'I CHAIRMAN SECT�E-